Bell's Theorem

download Bell's Theorem

of 7

Transcript of Bell's Theorem

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    1/7

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    2/7

    http788&&&.uanti+i.org8&i+i8inde).php8Bell(s9theorem:Statement9of9Bell.;?;.

    Bell(s theorem decisively re6ects *instein(s vie& of reality. Nature has non-local aspects.

    !he ramifications are astounding. *ven though the &orld appears to be based on locality, it is infact based on an unmediated, unseen reality that permits faster than light /and probablyinstantaneous0 communication. 1ny credible theory of reality must be able to satisfy Bell(stheorem.

    @avid Bohm, a supporter of *instein(s vie&s, proposed that the universe is actually somethinga+in to a giant hologram. 1 true hologram /rather than the type that gets placed on credit cards0has the property of non-locality7 every part of a piece of holographic film contains all of theinformation possessed by the &hole film. Aarl Pribram has suggested that human memory isbased on holographic principles. n fact, his theory involves the &hole human brain operating

    according to holographic rules. !his theory could potentially e)plain &hy people can recover ahuge amount of normal brain function even after suffering ma6or brain damage or even thesurgical removal of large portions of the brain.

    !he hologram theory is e)tremely controversial and has been dismissed by most scientists. *venmore controversial is upert Sheldra+e(s theory of Morphic esonance. 1ccording to Sheldra+e,information can be transmitted instantaneously &ithout loss of energy through any amount of timeand space via "morphogenetic fields."

    Some people have speculated that particles called tachyons e)ist. !hese are superluminalparticles7 they travel faster than light. Such particles are consistent &ith *instein(s theory ofrelativity /no particle can be accelerated from belo& the speed of light to faster than the speed oflight but since tachyons can never travel more slo&ly than the speed of light, this rule does not

    apply to them0. f tachyons e)ist, then they travel bac+&ards in time. 1lthough tachyons aretheoretically interesting, no evidence for their e)istence has ever been found.

    llumination has no difficulty in conforming to the reuirements of Bell(s theorem. lluminationteaches that mind and matter are t&o aspects of the same substance. !his single substancee)ists in both a dimensional and non-dimensional space. !he matter aspect is confined to thedimensional space &hile the mind aspect is confined to the non-dimensional space. !he non-dimensional space can be considered along the lines of the "singularity" that is said to e)ist at thecentre of a blac+ hole, or the singularity associated &ith the Big Bang.

    http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/index.php/Bell's_theorem#Statement_of_Bell.27s_theoremhttp://www.quantiki.org/wiki/index.php/Bell's_theorem#Statement_of_Bell.27s_theorem
  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    3/7

    n blac+ hole theory, the singularity of a non-spinning blac+ hole is a dimensionless point ofinfinite density /&hich distorts time and space so much that nothing, including light, can escapefrom its gravitational field0. t has ero radius, ero volume, and the la&s of physics brea+ do&ncompletely at this point.

    !he dimensionless singularity of llumination also has ero radius and ero volume, but ratherthan being associated &ith infinite density, it is associated &ith infinite mental events. t has noconnection &ith space and time /&hich are part of the dimensional universe0.

    *verything in the universe can be e)plained by the co-e)istence of the mental and materialaspects in an all-pervasive single substance, and by the co-e)istence of a dimensional universeand a non-dimensional universe.

    llumination provides a straightfor&ard ans&er to the *P parado). !he pair of entangledparticles start off together in the dimensional material universe, and also in the ero-dimensionalmental universe. 5hile they can be separated in the physical universe, they cannot be separatedin the dimensionless mental universe. o matter ho& far apart they travel in physical space, theyare permanently connected via the mental universe. So, as soon as a measurement is carried outon one, the outcome is immediately reflected in the mental universe, and that result is in turnimmediately reflected in the paired particle, again in the mental universe. But as soon as the

    results of the measurement are "+no&n" in the mental universe they are instantaneously reflectedin the physical universe. Hence, the behaviour reuired by Bell(s theorem is comprehensivelye)plained.

    !he fundamental point is that by uniting the material and the mental, by uniting a universe &ithdimensions &ith one &ithout dimensions, all of the problems of @escartes( dualistic universe aresolved, all the parado)es of uantum mechanics are solved, the appearance of mind from non-mind and of life from non-life no longer have to be e)plained since every material ob6ect is"minded" and to that e)tent alive. nstantaneous communications are no longer baffling. 1llinstantaneous lin+s are mediated by the mental singularity that lies at the core of physicale)istence.

    !he la&s of science relate, over&helmingly, to the physical universe. !he *P parado) and Bell(s

    theorem give the first scientific glimpse of the interface bet&een mind and matter. n the future, ane& science of this e)traordinary interface &ill emerge. n the far future, physics /the science ofthe dimensional universe0 and metaphysics /the science of the dimensionless universe0 &ill cometo be seen as one. /llumination prefers the term "transcendental physics" rather than"metaphysics".0

    n one mind - that of Cod - physics and transcendental physics are already one.

    !he implications of the mind-matter, dimensional-dimensionless universe are e)traordinary. !hedoor is opened to psychic po&ers and &hat is commonly referred to as the "paranormal." Suchpo&ers are mediated by the dimensionless mental singularity &here time and space do not e)istand everything is, in a sense, connected and one.

    !he lluminati refer to the dimensional universe of matter as the Hylocosmos /hyle D matter0 andthe dimensionless universe of mind - the mental singularity - as the Psychocosmos /psyche Dmind0. Enly a reality &ith these t&o aspects can account for the nature of our +no&ledge ande)periences. eality is a superposition of the mental and physical, of the dimensional anddimensionless.

    !ime, space and causation arise in the Hylocosmos, and from there are reflected in thePsychocosmos, but time, space and causation are not inherent in the Psychocosmos. !ime andspace support theprincipium individuationis- the principle of individuation. 5hat distinguishes

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    4/7

    one individual thing from another is that they are differently located in time and space. 1nythingthat e)isted in e)actly the same time and space, and &ith the same properties, as another thing&ould not be different from that thing. Because things e)ist individually in the Hylocosmos, this isreflected in the Psychocosmos, but individual things are not inherent in the Psychocosmos./4uantum physicists &ill rightly point out that, as a conseuence of Heisenberg(s uncertaintyprinciple, it is impossible to tell &hether t&o uantum particles of the same type are located in thesame space. !his could be interpreted as evidence that the Psychocosmos shapes theHylocosmos at the elementary level, blurring the principle of individuation. 5e &ill turn in a laterarticle to one of the most significant aspects of the uantum &orld7 the difference bet&een"bosons" and "fermions". !his difference is critical to the nature of reality.0

    !he lac+ of intrinsic ualities of time, space and individuation in the Psychocosmos is &hatunderlies, in religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism, notions of an underlying universaloneness, &holeness and togetherness. !hese religions treat the Hylocosmos as a +ind of illusionor place &here &e misapprehend the real nature of things /the veil of Maya in Hinduism0 and seethe Psychocosmos as the true reality. !hese religions regard ego, separation, difference,individuation as entities that need to be overcome on the 6ourney to&ards universal union. Humansuffering arises, they claim, from our inability to perceive the true interconnectedness of all things."*nlightenment" in these religions amounts to escaping the Hylocosmos and fully entering thePsychocosmos.

    llumination, &hile it has certain elements in common &ith Hinduism and Buddhism, is ultimatelyfundamentally different and teaches radically different truths. For one thing, the Hylocosmos andPsychocosmos are ine)tricably lin+ed and neither is more "true" than the other. !hey e)ist only inrelation to each other. !he Psychocosmos - as the arena of thought and moral action - is rightlythe focus of all religions, but it cannot do &ithout the Hylocosmos.

    5hereas Hinduism and Buddhism both see+, ultimately, the abolition of the self, lluminationcentres on the transition of the self from its most primitive form to the ma)imum e)pression ofitself, the fullest realisation of its potential - the Self &ith a capital "S". t see+s, in short, not toabsorb the individual into some universal oneness, but to ma+e the individual as perfect aspossible7 Codli+e. !he Psychocosmos is the arena &here individuals can become everything theyhave it &ithin themselves to be. t is not the place &here individuality is e)tinguished.

    !here is a higher truth that Hindus and Buddhists completely miss. t derives from the &ell-+no&nconcept that the &hole is greater than the sum of its parts /a concept +no&n as holism0. Humanbodies are made up of many individual cells, but the &hole - humans themselves - are vastlymore than mere collections of cells. 1 &hole that contains no parts is intrinsically inferior to a&hole that is greater than the sum of its parts. !he latter contains an entire e)tra element missingin the former. ndividuation is critical to the creation of the greatest conceivable &hole. Far frombeing e)tinguished in "nirvana", individuation has to be ma)imised so that the &hole, comprisedof all the optimised individual things, &ill itself be optimised. !he destruction of the individual inHinduism and Buddhism is anathema to llumination.

    1rthur Aoestler introduced the term "holon" /from the Cree+ &ord "holos" meaning &hole0 todescribe an entity functioning as both a &hole and as a part of a &hole, to be independent in one

    function, and dependent in the other. Aoestler referred to the "Ganus principle" to describe thedual nature of holons. Holons strive to be both &hole and to belong to a &hole. !his is very closeto the ancient teaching of llumination. Enly individuals &ho are &hole can be part of a divine&hole. !he 6ourney of each individual, over a number of incarnations, is to allo& him to learn thelessons that &ill permit him to become &hole, and thence be part of a greater &hole.

    !he lluminati teach the message of the @ouble Holos - a perfect, &hole individual &ithin aperfect, &hole community. !hose &ho cannot learn that lesson are re6ected from the divine&hole. !hey are the damned. Hell is that place &here the &hole is less than the sum of its parts,&here the damned are loc+ed in selfishness, egotism, refusal to cooperate, cruelty, vanity, greed

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    5/7

    and division. t does not ta+e much to see that hell closely resembles this earth of ours, ruled bythe Eld 5orld Erder. !his hell can be transformed into the first step to heaven, but the Eld 5orldErder must be destroyed before &e can begin to climb the ladder.

    Philosophically, the concepts of sub6ect and ob6ect are of fundamental importance. !he sub6ect isthat &hich +no&s or e)periences &hile the ob6ect is that &hich is +no&n or e)perienced. 1ll thingsare ob6ects in the Hylocosmos and sub6ects in the Psychocosmos. !here is no such thing as asub6ect &ithout an ob6ect or an ob6ect &ithout a sub6ect. t is one of the most remar+able featuresof e)istence that everything is both ob6ect and sub6ect. Most things do not have sufficientlydeveloped minds to ta+e advantage of that, but humans do. 5e can see our bodies as physicalob6ects in the Hylocosmos, yet our primary &ay of relating to reality is as sub6ects.

    et even &ith humans, there is a vast grey area and it relates to &hat is commonly +no&n as the"unconscious". llumination uses a different terminology for this concept. llumination asserts thatall animals are sentient beings and to that e)tent are conscious. Humans are the only animals onearth that have the higher level of consciousness labelled "self-consciousness", the ability toreflect upon their o&n e)istence. f a human could remove his self-consciousness, he &ould e)istat the same level of consciousness as animals. 5hat Freud refers to as unconsciousness is &hatis, really, the consciousness of non-human animals.

    1 sleep&al+ing human is not self-conscious, but can nevertheless carry out complicated tas+s.He is not unconsciousI he is using animal consciousness rather than human self-consciousness.

    1t this level of consciousness, humans are more li+e ob6ects than sub6ects. @espite &hat humansthin+, much of their activity actually ta+es place at this level, hence the success of Freud(s theoryof the unconscious. Freud revealed that a huge amount of &hat &e do derives from our ob6ectiverather than our sub6ective nature. Eur sub6ective nature then has to rationalise &hy &e behavedin that &ay. Some people are far better at that tas+ than others. Many humans e)ist as little morethan higher-functioning animals, &hile a fe& have the capacity to successfully operate as lo&er-functioning gods. 5hich &ould you prefer to be2

    !he &ord "theatre" derives from the Cree+ &ord theatron meaning "seeing place". !heHylocosmos is the theatre for the mind, &here sub6ects sit and &atch both themselves and othersub6ects as ob6ects. et the sub6ects can also step onto the stage and change the performance.

    !here is no pre-&ritten script. *veryone has the chance to shape their destiny.

    !he Paranormal

    Ene e)periment that has been used to probe the paranormal is upert Sheldra+e(s "telephonetelepathy" &hich involves a receiver guessing &hich of four close friends is phoning them. !hee)periment is carried out roughly forty times, &ith the roll of a dice being used to select &hichfriend should ma+e each call. Sheldra+e claims that the receiver typically achieves a J;Ksuccess rate &here a ;LK success rate &ould be e)pected by chance. nfortunately, the samplesie is far too small to be meaningful, and the e)periment could be vastly improved by includingfour automated voices, and four people &ho only vaguely +no& the receiver. !he number of trialscould be e)tended from forty to one hundred. t is li+ely that if these conditions &ere applied,Sheldra+e(s results &ould revert to the e)pected average.

    llumination ma+es the follo&ing prediction regarding the strength of psychic connections/bet&een those &ho do not claim to have psychic po&ers07

    =0 dentical t&ins /Monoygotic t&insI t&o separate embryos come from a single fertilised egg0;0 Fraternal t&ins /@iygotic t&insI separate embryos from separate fertilised eggs0N0 Parents and their childrenJ0 SiblingsL0 Oovers

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    6/7

    0 Friends

  • 7/22/2019 Bell's Theorem

    7/7

    !here is no recorded case of a people blind from birth having an out-of-body e)perience or near-death e)perience in &hich they e)perienced vision. n fact, even if they could see, they &ouldn(t+no& &hat they &ere seeing. Seeing is something that is learned. People &ho recover sight afterlosing it for decades have to relearn ho& to see.

    et if a single case of an out-of-body e)perience or near-death-e)perience could be cited thatdemonstrated that someone had seen &ithout the use of physical eyes it &ould instantly be thestrongest possible evidence for the e)istence of souls. !here are no& operating theatres in the&orld &here coded messages have been placed on top of theatre euipment so that they arevisible to anyone "hovering" above an operating table as part of a near-death-e)perience. ocoded message has ever been reported by anyone claiming to have a near-death-e)perience.et &hat if that proof e)isted, but hadn(t been placed in the public arena2 5hat if a secret societyhad already performed out-of-body e)periments &here coded information &as successfullyretrieved2

    Oast pdated /Sunday, =N February ;Q== =J7NQ0