Background to study Gemba findings Lilly · PDF fileBackground to study Gemba findings...

11
Background to study Gemba findings Details of study DMAIC Results analysed One year on …. Lilly Walsh Lean Sigma Black B

Transcript of Background to study Gemba findings Lilly · PDF fileBackground to study Gemba findings...

Background to study

Gemba findings

Details of study – DMAIC

Results analysed

One year on ….

Lilly Walsh

Lean Sigma Black Belt

• CUH is routinely experiencing overcrowded conditions resulting in long waits, ambulance delays, patients boarding in hallway and patients leaving without treatment.

• Exceeding both 6hr and 9 hr PET targets

• Staff Frustration

• Poor Patient Satisfaction

Background to ED study 2014

Gemba – walk the patient pathway E

ffo

rt &

Tim

e

ROE

ROE Effort

& T

ime

Effort

& T

ime

ROI

Effort

& T

ime

Act on the IMPORTANT not react to the URGENT

Study details (Feb 2014)

“Tell me and I will forget,

Show me and I may remember,

Involve me and I’ll understand.”

– Chinese Proverb

Resus Paeds Minors Majors

• Map the patient path from attendance to discharge

• Design data collection sheets

• Agree start date for the study

• Communication to all hospital staff

• Medical students

• Information sessions

• Posters in E.D.

• Assign ‘Lead’ person for each day

• Collected data – VSM with timeline

• Analyse the ‘overall’ picture

“A bad system will defeat a good person every time.” – Deming

•Collaboration with E.D staff

•Other hospital staff

•UCC medical students 1 week in February 2014

Monday 24/7 thereafter

08:00 – 17:00

Value stream mapping with time line Review of steps the patient takes to get treated

NOT the steps the clinician takes to treat the patient

Time saved by improving a process

that is not a bottleneck will not

improve the overall performance

National Emergency Care Programme 2012

the patient journey – significant steps

relating directly to diagnosis

the processes supporting these

activities

the delays providing the service

the information flows that report and co-

ordinate these activities

the management / coordination that

‘ties’ them all together – manage the

flow

47

336 13%

Value

added

Patient Journey

P.E.Time

Registration Triage 1 Triage 2 ED Dr

Ambulance

Duration

Ambulance Triage Paeds Nursing

Speciality

Radiology

Ultrasound

CT

Bloods

Cultures

ED Dr Review Bed Allocated Transfer to ward Plan admit/

discharge or

3 107 13

13 14

Patient Discharged

from department

Either

iPM updated &

&

Results available

10 20 60 328

Average waits by speciality

Medical : 4 hours ( 30 – 1105 mins)

Neuro : 2 hours (24 – 280 mins*)

Ortho: 3 hours (2- 1040 mins)

Surgical : 10 hours (11 – 2280 mins)

300 270

40

420

660

60

189

11

3

Patient Journey

Delays

14% Value

Added

Registration Triage 1 Triage 2 ED Dr

Ambulance

Duration

Ambulance Triage Paeds Nursing

Speciality

Radiology

Ultrasound

CT

Bloods

Cultures

ED Dr Review Bed Allocated Transfer to ward Plan admit/

discharge or

3 107 13

13 14

Patient Discharged

from department

Either

iPM updated &

&

Results available

10 20 60 328

Average waits by speciality

Medical : 4 hours ( 30 – 1105 mins)

Neuro : 2 hours (24 – 280 mins*)

Ortho: 3 hours (2- 1040 mins)

Surgical : 10 hours (11 – 2280 mins)

300 270

40

420

660

60

189

11

3

Supporting processes

Information flows

Manage and

co-ordinate patient flow

in Emergency dept

One year on ……..

Thank you for your attention

CONCLUSION

Background to study

Gemba

Details of the study

Results analysed

Where we are today …..