Average: 77; SD: 14.4

60
Average: 77; SD: 14.4 Exam 1 Grade Distribu 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 <29 30-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-89 90+ Score

description

Average: 77; SD: 14.4. Power Functions (vs. Weber) (r) a = (s) b. Magnitude Estimation Steven’s Law: Power Function Cross Modality Match. Visual system characteristics. Retina: 120 million rods & 6 mill. Cones Retinal distribution meaningful. System operating characteristics. Color - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Page 1: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Exam 1 Grade Distribution

0102030405060

<29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90+Score

Number of Students

Page 2: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Power Functions (vs. Weber)(r)a = (s)b

• Magnitude Estimation• Steven’s Law: Power Function • Cross Modality Match

Page 3: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 4: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 5: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 6: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 7: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 8: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 9: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 10: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Visual system characteristics

• Retina: 120 million rods & 6 mill. Cones• Retinal distribution meaningful

Page 11: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 12: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

System operating characteristics

• Color• Sharpness or acuity: 1 sec. line (1 inch

at 3.5 miles)• Sensitivity (range (candle at 10 mi. to

noon sun 10,000,000,000,000:1)• Differential course of adaptation

Page 13: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Duplex Theory of Vision

• Two systems: – Rod based

• Sensitive• Low acuity• Monochromatic

– Cone based• High threshold• High acuity• Color

Page 14: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Adaptation

• Overall range of light 1013 : 1• Adaptation range of eye 105 : 1

Page 15: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 16: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 17: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

We’re not from Missouri!

• Color Vision ( Perceptual constancies/neural interactions)

• Feature Detection--the analysis of visual input– Limulus– Cats– Humans

• Top-down perceptual processes and their interactions with bottom-up

Page 18: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Active processing

• Sentence• Necker Cube• Gestalt principles

Page 19: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

• The large black dog was chasing the the pretty little groundhog who was very much afraid of him across the carpet.

Page 20: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 21: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 22: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 23: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 24: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 25: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 26: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 27: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 28: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 29: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 30: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Feature Detection: the analysis of visual input

Bottom-up perceptual processes (lateral inhibition)– Limulus (Hartline & Ratliff)– Frogs (Matarana, Lettvin, McCullough & Pitts)– Cats (Kuffler, Hubel & Weisal)– Humans

• Top-down perceptual processes and their interactions with bottom-up

Page 31: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 32: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 33: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 34: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 35: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 36: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 37: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 38: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 39: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 40: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 41: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 42: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 43: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 44: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 45: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 46: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 47: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 48: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Top-down processes:Some examples and a

mechanism

Page 49: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 50: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 51: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 52: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Word Superiority Effect & its Mechanism

Page 53: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 54: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 55: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Conclusion• Perception is an active process that

tries to extract a more or less coherent iinterpretation of the world from the barrage of stimuli impacting us.

• It focuses on change (temporal or spatial).

• In order to quickly extract info from the deluge, it must distort the world to attempt to see it for what it is!!

Page 56: Average: 77; SD: 14.4

Attention• System interrupt attracted by alternative

stimuli (dog in street)• Conscious reallocation device• Attention as limited resource• Attention as bottleneck

– Cocktail party effect : Colin Cherry– Filter theory: Donald Broadbent– Attenuation theory: Anne Triesman– Late selection theory: Donald MacKay (pennies)– Spotlight model: Michael Posner

Page 57: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 58: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 59: Average: 77; SD: 14.4
Page 60: Average: 77; SD: 14.4