AVAS Sound Specification - UNECE Homepage 10 20 30 40 50 60 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k A-weighted...
Transcript of AVAS Sound Specification - UNECE Homepage 10 20 30 40 50 60 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k A-weighted...
Three vehicle manufacturers provide their AVAS for EV and HEV in Japanese market. This report shows sound characteristics according to QRTV informal group discussion.
2
Specifications (discussed in QRTV)
1 Over all sound level(a) Stopped condition
(b) 10 km/h cruise
2 Frequency component
3 Frequency shift
4 Modulation
Test vehicles
EV/HEV with AVAS Vehicle-A, -B, -C
ICE vehicle Vehicle-D
Summary of Sound Characteristics
EV/HEV with AVAS ICE vehicle
A B C D
1
Over all
sound level
[dB(A)]
(a) stopped
conditionNot generated 45.9
(b)
10 km/h
cruise
Avg. 54.0 54.3 54.6 55.8
Max. 54.1 55.0 54.8 56.4
Min. 53.8 53.4 54.4 55.4
2Frequency
component
Band [Hz] 250 2k 630 2.5k 500 2.5k - -
Level
[dB(A)]
Avg. 44.5 48.7 49.0 44.1 47.5 47.8 - -
Max. 46.3 49.1 51.0 45.3 50.4 50.7 - -
Min. 41.1 48.2 47.4 43.3 44.6 44.1 - -
3Frequency shift [%]
(from 10 to 20 km/h)21 14 8
4 Modulation With With Without
3
“Avg.”, “Max.” and “Min.” levels correspond to the averaged, maximum and minimum values in 4 measurement results, respectively.
1. Over all sound level measurement
according to SAE J2889-1: 2011
(a) Stopped condition
(b) 10 km/h cruise
4
(a) Stopped condition @semi-anechoic room (defined by SAE J2889-1:2011)
1.2 m
2.0 m
2.0 m
Microphone
D-range, Brake on
40
45
50
55
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
40
45
50
55
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
Min.
Right
Min.
Left
Lstop = Min(left, right)
5
Semi-anechoic room
(b) 10 km/h cruise @ISO test track (defined by SAE J2889-1:2011)
ISO test track
2 m
2 m
Microphone (h = 1.2 m)
AA'PP'
6
V = 10 km/h (constant speed)
45
50
55
60
-4 -2 0 2 4
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
45
50
55
60
-4 -2 0 2 4
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
Max. (AA'-PP')
Max. (AA'-PP')
Right
Left
Lcrs = Min(left, right)
Measurement results
Minimum sound level [dB]
EV/HEV with AVAS ICE vehicle
A B C D
Lstop Avg. Not generated 45.9
Lcrs
Max. 54.1 55.0 54.8 56.4
Min. 53.8 53.4 54.4 55.4
Avg. 54.0 54.3 54.6 55.8
7
similar level to ICE vehicleLcrs(Avg.) is
“Avg.”, “Max.” and “Min.” levels correspond to the averaged, maximum and
minimum values in 4 measurement results, respectively.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
The example of frequency component:10 km/h cruise @ISO test track
9
1/3 octave band spectrum
of minimum sound level @10 km/h cruise
Tonal component band
from 160 Hz to 3.15 kHz
(1)(2)
(1) (2)
Frequency
band [Hz]630 2.5k
Level [dB] 49.0 44.1
(Vehicle-B with AVAS)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
without AVAS
with AVAS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
without AVAS
with AVAS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
without AVAS
with AVAS
Measurement results:10 km/h cruise @ISO test track
10
Vehicle-A Vehicle-B
Vehicle-C Vehicle-D
(2)(1) (1)
(2)
(2) (1)
(1), (2): Tonal component band from 160 Hz to 3.15 kHz
Measurement results:10 km/h cruise @ISO test track
Frequency componentEV/HEV with AVAS ICE vehicle
A B C D
Tonal
component
(1), (2)
Frequency
band [Hz]250 2k 630 2.5k 500 2.5k - -
Level
[dB]
Avg. 44.5 48.7 49.0 44.1 47.5 47.8 - -
Max. 46.3 49.1 51.0 45.3 50.4 50.7 - -
Min. 41.1 48.2 47.4 43.3 44.6 44.1 - -
Max. - Min.
5.2 0.9 3.6 2.0 5.8 6.6 - -
11
In case where the levels of frequency components are specified, it is necessary
to consider the following items:
• Dispersion of each measurement
• Errors which are made in 1/3 octave band frequency analysis
• Variation of frequency characteristics in loudspeakers
“Avg.”, “Max.” and “Min.” levels correspond to the averaged, maximum and
minimum values in 4 measurement results, respectively.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k OA
Le
vel
de
ffe
rence
[dB
]
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k OA
Le
vel
de
ffe
rence
[dB
]
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k OA
Le
vel
de
ffe
rence
[dB
]
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz]
The figures indicate the maximum,
minimum and averaged levels, and the
differences between the maximum and
the minimum levels for 4 measurements
in 1/3 octave band.
Dispersions of sound level in 1/3 octave
band (0.3~7.2 dB) are larger than those
in overall levels (0.3~1.6 dB).
Example of dispersion in each measurement:10 km/h cruise @ISO test
track
12
Vehicle-A with AVAS (n=4) Vehicle-B with AVAS (n=4)
Vehicle-C with AVAS (n=4)
Max. Min. Avg. Difference
So
und
pre
ssure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
Case-1
Case-2
Case-3
The errors occurred in 1/3 octave band frequency analysis
13
1/3 octave band frequency [Hz]
Sound p
ressure
level [d
B]
An example of AVAS sound
:1/3 octave band filter (1)
1/3 octave band
A B
Case-1 X dB
Case-2 X-3 dB X-3 dB
Case-3 X dB
Band A Band B
On the process of 1/3 octave band
frequency analysis, the AVAS sound
level at specific frequency may result
in 3 dB lower than the level where
the frequency is at center of
frequency band.
X dB X-3 dB X dB
(1): defined by IEC 61260, ANSI S1.11
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
1 dB
Frequency shift measurement @ chassis dynamometer in semi-anechoic room
0.5 m
1.0 m
Microphone
15
Chassis dynamometer in semi-anechoic room
FFT analysis
(next slide)
1.0 m
(Vehicle-B with AVAS)
It is difficult to drive stably at less than 10 km/h.
--> The measurements were conducted from 10 km/h to 20 km/h (every 2 km/h).
V = 10 to 20 km/h (every 2 km/h)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
1 dB
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
1 dB
0 2 4 6 8 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
1 dB
Examples of frequency shift measurements:10 km/h
16
Vehicle-B with AVAS
Vehicle-A with AVAS
Vehicle-C with AVAS
FFT analysis
Sample rate 48 kHz
Number of
data points
32768
(215)
Frequency
resolution1.46 Hz
Frequency
range18.75 kHz
Window Hanning
Overlap 75 %
Average10 s
(55 times)
Vehicle-B
Vehicle-A
Vehicle-C
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ound
p
ressure
leve
l [d
B]
Frequency [Hz]
with AVAS without AVAS
10 dB
R² = 0.9996
2400
2600
2800
3000
5 10 15 20 25
Fre
que
ncy
[Hz]
Speed [km/h]
Examples of frequency shift measurements:From 10 to 20 km/h (every 2 km/h)
17
10 km/h
12 km/h
20 km/h
� Identify the predominant
frequency of AVAS sound
�Read the shifting frequencies
�Calculate the frequency shift (fs)
from 10 to 20 km/h
fs = (f20 - f10) / f10 x 100 [%]
Vehicle-B
Measurement results of frequency shift
EV/HEV with AVAS
A B C
Frequency shift
from 10 to 20 km/h21 % 14 % 8 %
e.g.)
Frequency of
AVAS sound
@10 km/h 1086 Hz 2531 Hz 2247 Hz
@20 km/h 1313 Hz 2879 Hz 2435 Hz
18
• It is difficult to drive stably at less than 10 km/h.
• Frequency shifts from 10 to 20 km/h are in the range of 8 - 21 %.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A-w
eig
hte
d s
ou
nd
p
ressu
re le
ve
l [d
B]
Time [s]
1 dB
Study of modulation for AVAS sound
0.5 m
1.0 m
Microphone
20
Chassis dynamometer in semi-anechoic room
1.0 m
V = 10 km/h
(Vehicle-B with AVAS)
(A microphone was set at the same position as the frequency shift measurement)
Sound pressure waveform and
A-weighted sound pressure
level were measured.
Time variation of sound pressure waveform
22
Vehicle-A with AVAS
(display time <--> 2 sec)
with modulation
Vehicle-B with AVAS
with modulation
Vehicle-C with AVAS
without modulation
Vehicle-D (ICE vehicle)
Time variation of sound pressure waveform
23
Vehicle-A with AVAS
(display time <--> 0.5 sec)
with modulation
Vehicle-B with AVAS
with modulation
Vehicle-C with AVAS
without modulation
Vehicle-D (ICE vehicle)
Investigation into modulation of AVAS sound
24
• With or without modulation, clear distinction is not found in the time domain of sound pressure waveform and A-weighted sound pressure level.
• It is difficult to define and to evaluate the modulation.
EV/HEV with AVAS
A B C
Modulation(Intention of
sound design)with with without
Summary (1)
25
The sound characteristics of AVAS that are introduced in Japan and our experiences of measurements are as follows;
1. Minimum A-weighted sound pressure level
• AVAS sound is not generated in stopped condition.
• Sound level of cruising EV/HEV with AVAS is equivalent to that of ICE vehicle.
2. Frequency componentWe observe a lot of uncertainties in sound level on frequency base. In case where the levels of frequency components are specified, it is necessary to consider the following uncertainties:
- Dispersion of each measurement- Errors which are made in 1/3 octave band frequency analysis
- Variation of frequency characteristics in loudspeakers
Summary (2)
26
3. Frequency shift
• It is difficult to drive stably at less than 10 km/h.
• Frequency shifts between 10 and 20 km/h are from 8 to 21 %.
4. Modulation
• With or without modulation, clear distinction is not found in the time domain of sound pressure waveform and A-weighted sound pressure level.
• It is difficult to define and to evaluate the modulation.
5. Others
• From the viewpoint of authorities who grant approval or inspectors, practical method should be considered.