Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

8/8/2019 Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/austin-isd-community-meeting-3-options-handout 1/21

G

G G

G

G G

G

G

G

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂ _̂

_̂

_̂

_̂ _̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂ _̂

_̂

_̂

_̂ _̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

M O - P A

C E X P Y

1 S T S T

L A M A R B L V D

U S H W Y 1 8 3

US H W Y 2

90

F M 1 3 2 7

B R O D I E

L A

F M 9 6

7

S T A T E H W Y 7 1

SL AU GH T ER L A

6 2 0 R D

F M 2 2 4 4

R D

C O N G R E S S

A V

F M 9 6 9

M A N C H A C A R D

7 T H S T

B U R

N E T

R D

W I L L I A M C A N N O N D R

5 1 S T S T

C A P I T A L O F T E X A S H W Y

B R A K E R L A

S H 4 5

A I R P O R T B L V D

I H - 3 5

F M 2 2 2 2 R D

S T A S S N E Y L A

B E N W H I T E B LV D

12 TH S T

C A M E R O N R D

F M

1 8 2 6

R D

M ANOR RD

M E T R I C B L V D

O L T O R F S T

4 5 T H S T

S O U T H W E S T P K W

Y

F M

2 7 6 9 R D

5 T H S T

F M

1 6 2 6

D E S S A U

R D

B U R L E S O N R D

6 T H S T

S P R I N G D A L E R D

Q U I N L A

N P A R

K R D

E D

B L U E S T E I N B

L V D

C E S A R C H A V E Z S T

P A R M E R L A

M C N E

I L D R

D E C

B E E C A V E S R D

R U N D B E R G L A

Y A G E R L A

K O E N I G L A

J O L L Y

V I L L

E R D

D U V A L R D

M AR TIN L

U THER KIN

G BL VD

N U T T Y B R O W N R D

M O N T O P O L I S D R

D E S S A U R O A D

B A L C O N E S D R

1 5 T H S T

E N F I E L

D R D

N O R T H L A N D D R

G U A D A L U P E S T

2 6T H S T

T O D D L A

A N D E R S O N L A

H O W A R D L A

SCENIC

LOOP

R E D

R I V E R

S T

B U L L I C K H O L L O W R D

P A R M E R

B A S T R O P H W Y

R I V E R S I D E D R

F E R G U S O N L A

E X P O S I T I O N

B L V D

W E S

T G A T E

B L V D

Z H U G H R D

ANDE R SON M ILL RD

1 1 T H S T B A R T O N S P R I N G S R D

2 4 T H S T

F M

9 7 3

L O Y O L A L A

T H E R M A

L D R


5 1 S T S T

U S H W Y 1 8 3

1 S T S T

B U R N E T

R D

B U R N E T

R D


F M 1 8 2 6

R D

M A N O R

R D

U S H W Y 1 8 3

F M 1626

P A R M E R L A

F M 6 2 0

R D

H O W A R D L A

S T A T E H W

Y 7 1

F

M 9 7 3 R D

F M

9 7 3

R D

US HW Y 290

P A R M E R L A

4.4B

Barton Hills ES &Zilker ES

3.9 C

Sanchez ES

3.9 A

Brooke ES

3.9 B1

Ortega

3.9 B2

Oak Spring

3.6

Pease ES

AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force

Options for Community Meetings - January 12 & 13, 2011

3.4

12.4

Assign the remaining 2008

undesignated ES to north

central (in addition to 2004

Bond Program ES)

0.17

Three new undesignated

elementary schools in

future bond program

8.2 B

Pearce M

0.19

New High School

(land funded in previou

bond program)

16.2

2.2 C

Joslin ES

0.18

New Middle School(land funded in previous

bond program)



FACILITY MASTER PLAN O PTIONS – COMMUNITY MEETINGS JANUARY 12 & 13, 2011

1

OPTION 2.2 C :

Close Joslin ES and reassign stud ent pop ulation into Sunset Va lley ES. Rea ssign a portion o f the Sunset Va lleystud ent p op ulation into Boone ES and Cunn ingha m ES to b a lanc e utilizat ion.

Background

• Tota l population for Joslin, Sunset Va lley, Boo ne and Cunningha m a ttendanc e zones is 1,936 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 2,314 elem enta ry stud ents, lea ving an exce ss of 378 sea ts.•

Current b ound a ries result in a projec ted pe rc ent of p op ulation for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 95% - Joslin ESo 67% - Boone ESo 104% - Cunningha m ESo 97% - Sunset Va lley ES

Rationale

• Joslin ES has a perma nen t c apac ity of 374 stud ent s, the low est o f the four sc hoo ls.• Joslin ES ha s a Fac ility Co nd ition Index (FCI) of 44.1%, similar to Cunning ha m and Sunset Va lley ES. Boone

ES has a low FCI of 17.4%

Impact

• An estimate d 475 students wo uld be a ffec ted by this prop osal.• An estimated annual savings of $1,266,595 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $8,466,116

c ould be rea lized .• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a projec ted pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:

o 88% - Boone ESo 117% - Cunningha m ESo 118% - Sunset Va lley ES

Existing Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries

Advantages

• Annual cost savings and capital costavoidance

Disadvantages

• Affects a large number of students andfamilies due to the need to also moveSunset Va lley stud ents to Boo ne andCunningham

• Sunset Valley and Cunningha m ove rc apa c ity by 2014-15 sc hoo l year




2

OPTION 2.2 C :

School Nam e

Boo ne ES

Cunningha m ES

Joslin ES

Sunset Valley ES

Current

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

17.4% Boone ES 752 0.0121 502 67% 496 66% 510 68% 504 67%

39.4% Cunningham ES 627 (0.1250) 553 88% 632 101% 568 91% 649 104%

44.1% Joslin ES 374 0.0382 326 87% 314 84% 371 99% 357 95%

41.1% Sunset Va lley ES 561 (0.0628) 463 83% 494 88% 508 91% 542 97%

2,314 1,844 1,936 1,957 2,052

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

17.4% Boone ES 752 0.0121 654 87% 646 86% 667 89% 659 88% 0

39.4% Cunnigham ES 627 (0.1250) 615 98% 703 112% 640 102% 731 117% 0

0.0% Joslin ES 0 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 314

41.1% Sunset Va lley ES 561 (0.0628) 550 98% 587 105% 620 111% 662 118% 161

1,940 1,819 1,936 1,927 2,052 475

Yrs

10

101

10

Total

Total

Total

Action

Rec eive stud ents from Sunset Va lley

Rec eive stud ents from Sunset Va lley

Close Joslin a nd reassign stud ent pop ulat ion to Sunset Va lley

Rec eive stud ents from Joslin and reassign a portion of stud ent p op ulat ion to Boo ne ESand Cunningha m ES

Cost or Savings Categories Amount Extended Inc ludes

Op era tiona l Sa ving s $519,359 $5,193,590 M &O, Food Servic e, Eq uip ., etc .

Salaries and Benef its Savings $761,432 $7,614,320 Admin., Clerica l , Custodia l, e tc .Mo ving Costs ($14,196) ($14,196) Associated with closureTransporta tion $0 $0 No new routes required

$1,266,595 $12,793,714

Capital Cost Avoidance Amount

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Joslin 8,466,116$

8,466,116$

Future Bond Impac t Amount

-$

$0




3

OPTION 3.6:

Close Pea se ES and rea ssign stud ent p op ulation to hom e e leme nta ry sc hool.

Background

• Pea se ES ha s no a ttendanc e zone ; it is an a ll transfer school.• Tota l c apac ity of Pea se is 293 elementa ry stud ents; it is not c ost effec tive to o perate.

Rationale• Pea se ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Index (FCI) of 71.9%, the highest in the District.

Impact

• An estimate d 252 students wo uld be a ffec ted by this proposal.• An estimat ed annual sav ings of $712,296 and an estimat ed c ap ita l co st a voida nc e o f $7,668,770 could

be rea lized .


Advantages

• Not a neighborhood school, students couldreturn to home school or request a transferto a nother sc hool

• A relatively small number of students andfam ilies affec ted

• Highest FCI in the Distric t• Not co st effective to op erate

Disadvantages

• Historic building.

• Diverse enrollment




4

OPTION 3.6:

School Nam e

Pease ES

Current

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

71.9% Pease ES 293 1.0000 252 86% 0 0% 300 103% 0 0%

293 252 0 300 0

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

71.9% Pease ES 0 1.0000 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 252

Yrs

1010

110

Total

Total

Total

ActionClose


Op era tiona l Sa ving s $296,520 $2,965,200 M &O, Food Servic e, Eq uip ., etc .Salaries and Benef its Savings $435,725 $4,357,250 Admin., Clerica l , Custodia l, e tc .

Associated with closure

Transporta tion $0 $0 No new routes required

$712,296 $7,302,501


Mo ving Costs ($19,949) ($19,949)

-$

$0

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Pease 7,668,770$

7,668,770$





5

OPTION 3.9 A :

Close Brooke ES and reassign stud ent pop ulation into Zava la ES and Allan ES. Rea ssign a portion o f the Allan ESstude nt p op ulat ion into Norman ES to ba lanc e utilization.

Background

• Tota l population for Broo ke, Zava la, Allan a nd Norma n ES a ttend anc e zones is 1,524 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 2,169 elem enta ry stud ent s, lea ving an exce ss of 645 sea ts.

• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 110% - Brooke ESo 56% - Zava la ESo 56% - Alla n ESo 74% - Norma n ES

Rationale

• Brooke ES has a perma nent c apac ity of 430 stud ents, the low est o f the four sc hools.

• Brooke ES has a Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 32.6%, whic h is c om parab le to the other three sc hoo ls.

Impact

• An estima ted 469 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.•

An estimated annual savings of $1,301,382 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $5,477,387could be realized.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a project ed pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:

o 104% - Zava la ESo 82% - Alla n ESo 79% - Norma n ES


Advantages

• Annual savings and cost avoidance fromc losing Brooke ES

• Improves percent of capacity at Allan ESand Zava la ES within ta rge t range

• Slightly imp rove s Norma n ES percent ofcapaci ty

Disadvantages

• Brooke ES students south o f Town Lake stilbused long distances. (could be resolved i3.9 C were ap proved)

• Affect s a relatively large numb er of studentsand families




6

OPTION 3.9 A :

Sc hool Nam e

Brooke ES

Zava la ES

Allan ES

Norman ES

Current 3.9a

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

32.6% Brooke ES 430 (0.0579) 423 98% 449 104% 445 103% 472 110%

31.2% Zava la ES 580 0.1062 375 65% 339 58% 361 62% 326 56%

32.1% Allan ES 673 0.1011 392 58% 356 53% 416 62% 378 56%

32.2% Norman ES 486 (0.1421) 326 67% 380 78% 310 64% 361 74%

2,169 1,516 1,524 1,531 1,537

Proposed 3.9a

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

0.0% Brooke ES 0 (0.0579) - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 469

31.2% Zava la ES 580 0.1062 632 109% 571 98% 665 115% 601 104% 0

32.1% Allan ES 673 0.1011 631 94% 573 85% 606 90% 550 82% 0

32.2% Norman ES 486 (0.1421) 326 67% 380 78% 331 68% 386 79% 0

1,253 1,263 1,144 1,270 1,151 469

Yrs

10

10110

Total

5,477,387$

Capita l Cost Avoidanc e Amount

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Brooke 5,477,387$

Transporta t ion $0 $0 TBD

$1,301,382 $13,312,674

Salaries and Benefits Savings $871,559 $8,715,590 Admin., Clerical , Custodia l, etc.Moving Costs ($33,206) ($33,206) Assoc iate d with c losure


Op era tiona l Sa ving s $463,029 $4,630,290 M&O, Food Servic e, Eq uip ., etc .

Receive students from Allan ES

Action

Close a nd rea ssign stude nt p op ulat ion t o Zava la a nd Allan

Receive students from Brooke ES

Receive students from Brooke ES




7

OPTION 3.9 B 1:

Close O rteg a ES and rea ssign stud ent pop ulation into G ova lle ES.

Background

• Tota l pop ulation fo r Orteg a a nd Go va lle ES a ttendanc e zone s is 713 stud ents.• Tota l ca pac ity of the sc hoo ls is 972 elementa ry stud ent s, lea ving a n excess of 259 sea ts.• Current bound a ries result in a projec ted pe rc ent of p op ulation for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:

o 74% - Ortega ESo 80% - Gova lle ES

Rationale

• Ortega ES has a p ermane nt c ap ac ity of 374 students, the lower of the two sc hools.• Ortega ES ha s a Fac ility Co nd ition Ind ex (FCI) of 40.2%, whic h is slight ly highe r than Gova lle ES.

Impact

• An estimat ed 263 stude nts wo uld be a ffect ed by this p rop osal.

• An estimated annual savings of $1,153,873 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $6,082,090c ould be rea lized .

• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:o

126% - Gova lle ESExisting Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries

Advantages

• Sma ll number of stud ents and fa miliesaffected

• Ortega ES ha s a high FCI• Moves Ortega intac t to Gova lle• Ortega and Govalle are within 2 miles of

one another• Annua l savings and c ost avo idanc e

Disadvantages

• Go va lle ES rea c hes 126% of p erma nentc apa c ity b y 2014-15 sc hoo l year.




8

OPTION 3.9 B 1:

Sc hool Nam e

Ortega ES

Gova lle ES

Current 3.9b

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

40.2% Ortega ES 374 0.0875 286 76% 263 70% 300 80% 276 74%

36.1% Gova lle ES 598 (0.1244) 394 66% 450 75% 419 70% 478 80%

972 680 713 719 754

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

0.0% Ortega ES 374 0.0875 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 263

36.1% Gova lle ES 598 (0.1244) 624 104% 713 119% 660 110% 754 126% 0

972 624 713 660 754 263

Yrs

10

10

110

Total

Tota l

Tota l $0

6,082,090$


-$

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Ortega 6,082,090$


Transporta t ion $0 $0

$1,153,873 $11,777,131


No new routes required

Admin., Clerical, Custodial, etc.

Assoc iate d with c losure

Sa la ries and Bene fit s Sav ings $824,362 $8,243,620

Moving Costs ($26,489) ($26,489)

Rec eive stud ent s from Ortega ES

Action

Close a nd rea ssign stud ent p op ulation to Gova lle ES





9

OPTION 3.9 B 2:

Close O ak Springs ES and reassign stud ent p op ulation into Blac kshea r ES.

Background

• Tota l pop ulation for Oa k Sp rings and Blac kshea r ES a ttendanc e zone s is 591stud ent s.• Tota l capac ity of the sc hoo ls is 1,010 elem entary stud ent s, lea ving an excess of 419 sea ts.• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:

o 88% - Oak Sp rings ESo 44% - Blackshe ar ES

Rationale

• Oa k Springs ES ha s a perma nent c apac ity of 411 stud ent s, the lower of the t wo sc hoo ls.• Oak Spring s ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Index (FCI) of 26.5%, which is low er than Blac kshea r ES a t 34.7%.

Impact

• An estimat ed 336 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.

• An estimated annual savings of $1,146,969 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $4,225,932could be realized.

• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:o

105% - Blac kshe a r ESExisting Bound aries Proposed Bound a ries

Advantages

• Blac kshea r ES percent o f ca pac ity w ithintarget rang e

• Annual cost savings and ca pital avoida nce• Mo ves Oa k Springs intac t to Blac kshea r

Disadvantages

• Parent involvement c ould be mo re d iffic ult

• Long er wa lk to sc hoo l




10

OPTION 3.9 B 2:

Sc hool Nam e

Oa k Sp rings ES

Blac kshe ar ES

Current 3.9b

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

26.5% Oak Sp rings ES 411 (0.0744) 311 76% 336 82% 337 82% 364 88%

34.7% Blac kshear ES 598 (0.0627) 239 40% 255 43% 248 42% 265 44%

1,010 550 591 585 629

FCI Sc hool Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

0.0% Oak Sp rings ES 411 (0.0744) - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 336

34.7% Blac kshear ES 598 (0.0627) 554 93% 591 99% 590 99% 629 105% 0

1,010 554 591 590 629 336

Yrs

10

10

110

Total

Tota l

Tota l $0

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Oak Springs 4,225,932$

4,225,932$


-$

$1,146,969 $11,707,965


Moving Costs ($26,475) ($26,475) Assoc iate d with c losure

Transporta t ion $0 $0 TBD


Salaries and Benefits Savings $792,897 $7,928,970 Admin., Clerical , Custodia l, etc.

Action

Close a nd reassign stud ent pop ulation t o Blac kshea r ES

Rec eive stud ents from Oa k Spring s ES and Go va lle ES





11

OPTION 3.9 C :

Close Sanc hez ES and rea ssign stud ents north o f Tow n Lake to Zava la a nd Me tz ES. Ad just b ound aries betwe enLinde r and Zava la ES (or Broo ke ES if 3.9 A we re not app rove d ), and between Ma thew s and Zava la ES. Build anew 800-stud ent elem enta ry sc hoo l south of Tow n Lake to rec eive stud ents from Sanc hez, Me tz and TravisHeights ES

Background

• Tota l po pulation for Sanc hez, Me tz, Zava la, Linde r, Travis Heights, and Ma thews a ttend anc e zones is3,377 students.

• Tota l ca pac ity of the sc hoo ls is 3,559 elementa ry stud ents, lea ving a n excess of 187 sea ts. ClosingSanc hez and c onstruct ing a new eleme nta ry sc hool would increase the c apa c ity to 3,780 sea ts.

• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 100% - Sanc he z ESo 89% - Metz ESo 104% - Zava la ES

o 125% - Lind er ESo 126% - Travis Heig ht s ESo 81% - Ma thews ES

Rationale

• Sanc hez ES has a perma nent c apac ity of 580 stud ents.• Sanc hez ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Inde x (FCI) o f 26.8%.

Impact• An estimat ed 1,080 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by t his proposa l.


• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:o 100% - New Elementa ryo 55% - Metz ESo 71% - Zavala ESo 97% - Linder ES

o 98% - Linder Early Childhoodo 109% - Travis Heig ht s ESo 71% - Ma thews ES


Advantages

• Stud ents south of Tow n Lake would a ttend asc hoo l in their immed iate neighb orhood .

• Provides som e relief for Linder and TravisHeights ES

Disadvantages

• Requires construction of new elementaryschoo l in future b ond prog ram

• Results in Metz, Zavala and Mathews undecapacity in 2014-15 school year.




12

OPTION 3.9 C :

Scho ol Nam e

New Elemen ta ry

Travis Heights ES

Sanc hez ES

Metz ES

Zavala ES

Mathews ES

Linder Early Child.

Linder ES

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

0.0% New Elementa ry 0 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

36.4% Travis Heights ES 486 (0.0504) 528 109% 556 114% 584 120% 615 126%

26.8% Sanc hez ES 580 0.0833 611 105% 564 97% 627 108% 579 100%

29.5% Metz ES 542 0.0229 492 91% 481 89% 495 91% 484 89%31.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 632 109% 571 98% 665 115% 601 104%

31.8% Mathews ES 397 0.2007 359 90% 299 75% 385 97% 321 81%

0.0% Linder Early Child . 432 0.0000 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

19.7% Linder ES 542 (0.0706) 842 155% 906 167% 628 116% 676 125%

3,559 3,464 3,377 3,385 3,276

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

0.0% New Elementary 800 0.0000 722 90% 722 90% 800 100% 800 100% 0

36.4% Travis Heights ES 486 (0.0504) 464 96% 489 101% 505 104% 532 109% 67

26.8% Sanc hez ES 0 0.0833 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 564

29.5% Metz ES 542 0.0229 330 61% 323 60% 307 57% 300 55% 15831.2% Zavala ES 580 0.1062 503 87% 455 78% 457 79% 413 71% 116

31.8% Mathews ES 397 0.2007 300 76% 250 63% 336 85% 280 71% 49

0.0% Linder Early Child . 432 0.0000 358 83% 358 83% 425 98% 425 98% 0

19.7% Linder ES 542 (0.0706) 725 134% 780 144% 489 90% 526 97% 126

3,780 3,403 3,377 3,319 3,276 1,080

Yrs

10

10

110

Tota l

Tota l

Tota l

*land costs not included

$28,100,000

9,424,688$

Future Bond Impac t AmountNew Elemen ta ry 2 28,100,000$

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Sanc hez 9,424,688$


Transporta tion $0 Savings TBD

$1,556,924 $15,728,945

Salaries and Benefits Savings $988,174 $9,881,740 Admin., Clerical , Custodial, etc .

Moving Costs ($17,745) ($17,745) Associated with closure



Build a new 800 stud ent eleme nta ry sc hool to rec eive stud ents from Linde r, Travis Heights,

Sanc hez and Me tz ES (South o f river)

Reassign a portion of student population (East of I-35) to New ES

Rea ssign a po rtion o f stud ent pop ulation (South of river) to New ES

Rec eive stud ents from Zava la ES (along Pleasant Va lley Rd.)

Action

Close a nd reassign stud ent p op ulat ion to New ES (South o f river), Metz ES (be tw ee n river

and Cesar Chave z) and Zava la ES (be tween Ce sar Chave z and East 11th St.)

Rec eive stud ents from Sanc hez and Met z (South of river) and Ma thews ES

(East of I-35)

Con tinue to rec eive Linder PK and K stud ents

Rea ssign a portion of stud ents (East o f I-35) to Zava la ES




13

OPTION 4.4 B:

Close Barton Hills and Zilker ES and reassign stud ent p op ulation into Bec ker and Dawson ES.

Background

• Tota l population fo r Barton Hills, Zilker, Bec ker and Dawson a tte nd anc e zones is 1,006 stud ents.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 1,739 elem enta ry stud ents, lea ving an e xcess of 733 sea ts.• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:

o 77% - Barto n Hills ESo 79% - Zilker ESo 44% - Bec ker ESo 52% - Dawson ES

Rationale

• Barton Hills ES has a permanent capacity of 251 students, the lowest of the four schools. It is not costeffec tive to o perate. Zilker ES ha s a p erma nent capac ity of 460 stud ent s.

• Barton Hills ES ha s a Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 33.5%, simila r to Bec ker and Dawson. Zilker ES ha san FCI of 55.0%, the third h ighe st in the District.

Impact

• An estima ted 513 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.


• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a project ed pe rc ent o f po pulat ion for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:o 107% - Bec ker ESo 96% - Dawson ES


Advantages

• Improves percent of capacity for Beckerand Dawson

• Not c ost effec tive to op erat e Barton Hills ES• Zilker ES ha s high FCI• High in-migration at both schools, area

po pulat ion does not supp ort either sc hoo ls

Disadvantages

• Stud ents from Ba rton Hills and Zilker w ill needto cross Lamar Blvd. to attend Becker oDawson.




14

OPTION 4.4 B:

School Nam e

Bec ker ES

Dawson ES

Barton Hills ES

Zilker ESCurrent

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

37.1% Bec ker ES 524 (0.0935) 194 37% 214 41% 207 39% 228 44%

27.0% Dawson ES 505 0.2007 335 66% 279 55% 313 62% 261 52%

33.5% Barton Hills ES 251 0.8859 347 138% 184 73% 366 146% 194 77%

55.0% Zilker ES 460 0.5927 524 114% 329 72% 580 126% 364 79%

1,739 1,400 1,006 1,466 1,047

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net. Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected37.1% Bec ker ES 524 (0.0935) 467 89% 515 98% 509 97% 561 107% 0%

27.0% Dawson ES 505 0.2007 590 117% 491 97% 584 116% 486 96% 0%

0.0% Barton Hills ES 0 0.0000 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 184

0.0% Zilker ES 0 0.5927 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 329

1,029 1,056 1,006 1,092 1,047 513

Yrs

10

10

1

10Total

Total

Total

Action

Rec eive stud ents from Barton Hills and a portion o f stud ent from Zilker (82B)

Rec eive stud ents from Zilker (82A and 82C)

Close Barton Hills and reassign stud ent pop ulation to Bec ker

Close Zilker and rea ssign stud ent po pulat ion to Daw son and Bec ker



Adm in., Clerica l, Custod ial, etc .

Mo ving Costs ($32,624) ($32,624) Associated with closure

Def ic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Barton Hills 4,894,150$

Salaries and Benefits Savings $1,524,470 $15,244,700

Transporta tion $0 $0 No new routes required$2,266,637 $22,959,986


-$

$0

Defic ienc ies 1 - 5 for Zilker 12,649,785$

$17,543,935





15

OPTION 8.2 B:

Close Pea rc e M S and rea ssign stude nt p op ula tion into G a rc ia a nd Webb MS. Rea ssign a portion o f the Web bMS stude nt p op ulation into Dob ie MS to b alanc e utilization.

Background

• Tota l popula tion for Pea rc e, Ga rc ia, Webb and Dob ie MS a ttend ance zones is 2,885 stude nts.• Tota l capac ity of four sc hoo ls is 3,998 midd le sc hoo l stud ents, lea ving a n excess of 1,113 sea ts.

• Current bound a ries result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f pop ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 71% - Pea rce MSo 73% - Ga rc ia MSo 104% - Webb MSo 90% - Dob ie MS

Rationale

• Pea rce MS has a pe rma nent c ap ac ity of 1,078 student, Webb and Dobie b oth ha ve c ap ac ities unde1,000.

• Pea rce MS has a low Fac ility Cond ition Ind ex (FCI) of 15.2%, all midd le sc hoo ls in the a rea have low FCIsthe h ighest being Webb a t 25.1%.

Impact

• An estimat ed 683 stude nts wo uld be a ffect ed by this proposa l.• An estimated annual savings of $1,881,140 and an estimated capital cost avoidance of $7,443,511

c ould be rea lized .• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted percent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 schoo l year of:

o 88% - Ga rc ia MSo 121% - Webb MSo 140% - Dob ie MS


Advantages

• Annual cost savings and ca pital avoida nce• Because Pearce 6th grade students are

currently attending home elementaryschool, this option would only affect thecurrent 7th grade class attending Pearce,app roxima tely 159 students

Disadvantages

• Long er travel d ista nc es for som e stud ent s• Pea rc e M S c om munity investme nt in an

Ea rly College Prep School.




16

OPTION 8.2 B:

School Nam e

Pea rc e MS

Garcia MS

Webb MS

Dobie MS

Current

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

15.2% Pearc e MS 1,078 (0.3382) 452 42% 683 63% 505 47% 763 71%

4.7% Garc ia MS 1,215 (0.1398) 689 57% 801 66% 761 63% 885 73%

25.1% Webb MS 804 (0.1720) 573 71% 692 86% 693 86% 837 104%

15.7% Dobie MS 902 (0.1495) 603 67% 709 79% 689 76% 810 90%

3,998 2,317 2,885 2,648 3,295

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

0.0% Pearc e MS 1,078 0.0000 - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 683

4.7% Garc ia MS 1,215 (0.1398) 839 69% 975 80% 919 76% 1,068 88% 0

25.1% Webb MS 804 (0.1720) 691 86% 835 104% 803 100% 970 121% 0

15.7% Dobie MS 902 (0.1495) 914 101% 1,075 119% 1,072 119% 1,260 140% 0

3,998 2,444 2,885 2,793 3,298 683

Yrs

10

10

1

10Total

Total

Total

Action

Close a nd rea ssign stude nt p op ulat ion to Ga rc ia, and Web b

Rec eive stud ents from Pea rc e

Rec eive stude nts from Pea rc e and rea ssign a po rtion of stude nt p op ulat ion to Dob ie

Op era tiona l Sa ving s $715,238 $7,152,380 M&O, Food Se rvic e, Eq uip ., etc .

Rec eive stud ents from Webb

IncludesCost or Savings Categories Amount Extended

Salaries and Benefits Savings $1,477,480 $14,774,800 Admin., Cleric al, Custodial, etc .

Moving Costs ($67,518) ($67,518) Assoc iated with c losure

Transporta tion ($244,060) ($2,440,600) Add itiona l route s req uired$1,881,140 $19,419,062

Capita l Cost Avoidance Amount

Defic ienc ies for Pearc e MS $7,443,511

$7,443,511

-$

$0





17

OPTION 3.4:

Rea ssign a po rtion of the Ma plew ood ES student pop ulat ion into Ca mp bell ES to ba lanc e utiliza tion.

Background

• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 72% - Ca mpbell ESo 130% - Ma p lewoo d ES

Impact

• An estimat ed 89 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this prop osal.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:

o 90% - Ca mpbell ESo 103% - Ma p lewoo d ES


Advantages

• Balances percent of capacity at bothschools

Disadvantages




18

OPTION 3.4:

School Nam e

Cam pb ell ESMap lewoo d ES

Current

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

20.8% Campbell ES 524 0.0504 396 76% 377 72% 395 75% 376 72%

36.5% Maplewood ES 355 0.2848 388 109% 302 85% 592 167% 461 130%

879 784 679 987 837

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

20.8% Campbell ES 524 0.0504 489 93% 466 89% 496 95% 472 90% 0

36.5% Maplewood ES 355 0.2848 274 77% 213 60% 469 132% 365 103% 0

879 763 679 965 837 0

Yrs

10

10

110

Total

Total

Total

Action


Receive students from Maplewood ESRea ssign stude nts from PA 41B and the sout hern po rtion of PA 41E to Ca mp bell ES

Opera tiona l Savings $0 $0 M&O, Food Servic e, Equip ., etc .

Sa la rie s a nd Be ne fits Sa ving s $0 $0 Ad min., Cle ric a l, Custo dia l, e tc .

Moving Costs $0 $0 Assoc ia ted with c losureTransporta tion $0 $0 Additional routes required

$0

$0 $0


-$

$0


-$




19

OPTION 16.2:

Rea ssign a portion of the Akins HS stud ent pop ulation into Croc kett HS to ba lanc e ut ilizat ion.

Background

• Current b ound a ries result in a project ed pe rc ent of p op ula tion for the 2014-15 sc hoo l year of:o 134% - Akins HSo 91% - Croc ket t HS

Impact

• An estimat ed 220 stude nts wo uld be affec ted by this proposa l.• The p rop osed op tion wo uld result in a p rojec ted pe rc ent o f po pulation for the 2014-15 sc hool yea r of:

o 125% - Akins HSo 102% - Croc ket t HS


Advantages

• Improves percent of capacity at bothschools

• Imp roves vertica l alignment

Disadvantages




20

OPTION 16.2:

School Nam e

Akins HSCrockett HS

Current

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

6.5% Akins HS 2,394 (0.1190) 2,710 113% 3,076 128% 2,835 118% 3,218 134%

30.5% Croc kett HS 2,163 (0.0851) 1,763 82% 1,927 89% 1,810 84% 1,978 91%

4,557 4,473 5,003 4,645 5,196

Proposed

FCI School Name

Perm.

Cap.

Net.

Migr.

Fact.

2009

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2009

Pop.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Enroll.

%

Cap.

2014

Proj.

Pop.

%

Cap.

Students

Affected

6.5% Akins HS 2,394 (0.1190) 2,516 105% 2,856 119% 2,640 110% 3,314 138% 220

30.5% Croc kett HS 2,163 (0.0851) 1,964 91% 2,147 99% 2,013 93% 1,882 87% 0

4,557 4,480 5,003 4,653 5,196 220

Yrs

10

10

110

Total

Total

Total

Action

Rea ssign a po rtion of the stude nt p op ulation t o C roc kett HSRec eive stud ents from Akins HS


Opera tiona l Savings $0 $0 M&O, Food Servic e, Equip ., etc .

Sa la rie s a nd Be ne fits Sa ving s $0 $0 Ad min., Cle ric a l, Custo dia l, e tc .

Moving Costs $0 $0 Assoc ia ted with c losureTransporta tion $0 $0 Additional routes required

$0

$0 $0


-$

$0


-$

Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout

Documents

Transcript of Austin ISD Community Meeting # 3 Options Handout