Sluttrapport: Nutrition in larvae and juveniles of the Atlantic halibut
Atlantic Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus
Transcript of Atlantic Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus
Atlantic Halibut (Atlantic Halibut (HippoglossusHippoglossus hippoglossushippoglossus))
Laurel ColLaurel ColNortheast Fisheries Science CenterNortheast Fisheries Science Center
Figure S1. Atlantic halibut landings from the Gulf of Maine- Georges Bank region during 1893-2006.
Year
1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Land
ings
(liv
e-w
eigh
t, m
t)
0
200
400
600
800
10004000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
70006,639 mt in 1879
Fall Survey Time Series
Spring Survey Time Series
Figure S2. Atlantic halibut US landings (mt) and discards (mt with 95% CI) from combined ratio estimation.
Year
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
US
Lan
ding
s an
d D
isca
rds
(mt)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Discards (mt) US Landings (mt)
Figure S3. Atlantic halibut biomass indices (stratified mean weight per tow and 5-year average) from NEFSC spring and autumn surveys.
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght (
kg) p
er T
ow
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Spring IndexAutumn Index
Total numbers of Atlantic halibut caught in NEFSC springand autumn surveys per year
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Tota
l Num
ber o
f Hal
ibut
per
Yea
r
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Spring SurveyAutumn Survey
Spring survey n=161# 0s in spring = 4
Autumn survey n=152#0s in autumn = 3
•• No age data availableNo age data available•• No door, vessel or gear conversions availableNo door, vessel or gear conversions available
Atlantic Halibut Current Status and ManagementAtlantic Halibut Current Status and Management
Current StatusCurrent Status• NEFSC: NEFSC: Overfished, Overfishing can not be determinedOverfished, Overfishing can not be determined
•• NOAA: NOAA: Species of ConcernSpecies of Concern
•• American Fisheries Society: American Fisheries Society: ThreatenedThreatened
•• IUCN: IUCN: EndangeredEndangered (due to overfishing)(due to overfishing)
ManagementManagement•• Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (Amendment 9) 1Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (Amendment 9) 1999999
•• 1 fish halibut possession limit1 fish halibut possession limit per trip for commercial and per trip for commercial and recreational vesselsrecreational vessels
•• Minimum size of 36 inchesMinimum size of 36 inches (91 cm)(91 cm)
Figure S2. Trends in swept-area biomass indices (mt) of Atlantic halibut from NEFSC autumn bottom trawl surveys.
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Bio
mas
s (m
t)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
5-Year Average Swept-Area Biomass
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
BMSY = 5400 mt
Year1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Swep
t-Are
a Bi
omas
s (m
t)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Expl
oita
tion
Inde
x
0
1
2
3
4
5
Figure S4. Trends in Atlantic halibut commercial landings, fall stratified swept-area biomass, and exploitation index calculated as annual landings divided by the 5-year moving average of the swept-area biomass index.
Exploitation Index5-Year Average Swept-Area Biomass
Landings
20002000--2004 Experimental Halibut Fishery2004 Experimental Halibut Fishery
Maine DMR and Maine Sea GrantMaine DMR and Maine Sea Grant• Tagged 825 halibut in coastal Maine watersTagged 825 halibut in coastal Maine waters
•• 1,611 fish retained, 1,611 fish retained, otolithsotoliths and gonad samples takenand gonad samples taken
•• 92 recaptured as of Dec. 31, 2005 (11% return rate)92 recaptured as of Dec. 31, 2005 (11% return rate)
•• 28% of recaptures in Canadian waters28% of recaptures in Canadian waters
•• Mean days at large = 431Mean days at large = 431
•• Mean distance traveled = 151 km (1,758 km max)Mean distance traveled = 151 km (1,758 km max)
•• Mean length of tagged halibut = 79 cm (all immature)Mean length of tagged halibut = 79 cm (all immature)
Experimental Halibut FisheryExperimental Halibut Fishery
• Release area in greenRelease area in green•• Black dots represent recapture locationsBlack dots represent recapture locations
Basic Life History Characteristics for Atlantic HalibutBasic Life History Characteristics for Atlantic Halibut
Sigourney et. al. 2006Sigourney et. al. 2006•• Aged 530 Aged 530 otolithsotoliths from NMFS surveys and Experimental Halibut fisheryfrom NMFS surveys and Experimental Halibut fishery
•• Halibut up to ~40+ years oldHalibut up to ~40+ years old
•• LonglineLongline gear selected fish with faster growth compared to bottom trawlgear selected fish with faster growth compared to bottom trawl
•• A50 = 6.0 years for males, 7.3 years for femalesA50 = 6.0 years for males, 7.3 years for females
•• L50 = 80.2 cm for males, 103.0 cm for femalesL50 = 80.2 cm for males, 103.0 cm for females
Stock Reduction AnalysisStock Reduction Analysis
Kimura and Kimura and TagartTagart, 1982, 1982•• Uses available time series of catch data: Uses available time series of catch data: CCii (catch in year (catch in year ii))
•• For For ii = 1, = 1, ……, , nn catch equations:catch equations:CCii = = BBiiFFii(1 (1 -- exp(exp(-- FFii -- MM))/())/(FFii + + MM))BBii = = BBii--1 1 exp(exp(-- FFii--1 1 -- MM) + ) + RR for for ii>1>1
•• Provide starting estimates for: Provide starting estimates for: BB11 and and MM, solve for , solve for RR
•• Find best estimates of Find best estimates of FFii , , BBii
•• Two equations used for SRA plots:Two equations used for SRA plots:PP = = BBnn+1+1//BB11describes the decline in population biomass caused by describes the decline in population biomass caused by nn years of catchesyears of catches
•• Expected recruitment line (for varying values of Expected recruitment line (for varying values of RR and and BB11):):RR = = BB11(1 (1 –– exp(exp(-- MM))))
Stock Reduction AnalysisStock Reduction Analysis
• MM = 0.006 (= 0.006 (--log(0.5)/max age 50)log(0.5)/max age 50)•• BBii = 11,000 = 11,000 mtmt (sum of 1893(sum of 1893--1897 landings)1897 landings)•• BBnn+1+1 = 252 = 252 mtmt (2007 swept(2007 swept--area biomass)area biomass)•• Gives Gives RR = 66 = 66 mtmt
Gulf of Maine Atlantic Halibutn=114 (1893-2006)
Initial Biomass (mt) 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000
Rec
ruitm
ent B
iom
ass
(mt)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Expected Recruitment Line
P=0.018P=0.019
P=0.020
P=0.021
P=0.022
P=0.023
P=0.017
Stock Reduction AnalysisStock Reduction Analysis
StrengthsStrengths•• Uses entire catch time seriesUses entire catch time series
•• Does not rely on surveys (little relation to catches and high uDoes not rely on surveys (little relation to catches and high uncertainty)ncertainty)
•• Very simplistic, no age data requiredVery simplistic, no age data required
•• Provide annual estimates of F (possibly use to determine overfiProvide annual estimates of F (possibly use to determine overfishing status)shing status)
•• Immigration or emigration do not violate assumptions of modelImmigration or emigration do not violate assumptions of model•• included in apparent recruitmentincluded in apparent recruitment
•• Plots can be used to verify results in relation to other indicePlots can be used to verify results in relation to other indices/known valuess/known values•• Compare to NMFS survey indices, future inshore Maine halibutCompare to NMFS survey indices, future inshore Maine halibutlonglinelongline surveys etc.surveys etc.
Stock Reduction AnalysisStock Reduction Analysis
WeaknessesWeaknesses•• Not widely used for stock assessmentsNot widely used for stock assessments
•• Current regulations could skew catch in recent yearsCurrent regulations could skew catch in recent years•• Incorporate discards?Incorporate discards?
•• Starting estimates very rough for Starting estimates very rough for BBii, F, F11, , ……, F, Fnn, M, P, M, P
•• MM and and RR are fixed through timeare fixed through time•• RR can be variable in more complex versions of the modelcan be variable in more complex versions of the model
•• Current model assumes virgin biomass for Current model assumes virgin biomass for BBii•• might be possible include might be possible include FF in in initial biomassinitial biomass
•• Are assumptions/problems with this approach worse than the fallAre assumptions/problems with this approach worse than the fall--back?back?•• Any better alternatives?Any better alternatives?
Atlantic Halibut Biomass from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 7000 mt
Years
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Biom
ass
or L
andi
ngs
(mt)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
SRA Biomass
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
BMSY = 5400 mt
Landings (mt)
Atlantic Halibut Biomass from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 15000 mt
Years
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Biom
ass
or L
andi
ngs
(mt)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Biomass (SRA, Bi=15000mt)
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
BMSY = 5400 mt
Landings (mt)
Atlantic Halibut Biomass from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 7000 mt
Years
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Biom
ass
or L
andi
ngs
(mt)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
SRA Biomass
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
Landings (mt)
Fall 5-year Swept-Area Biomass
Atlantic Halibut Biomass from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 11000 mt
Years
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Biom
ass
or L
andi
ngs
(mt)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
SRA Biomass
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
Landings (mt)Fall 5-year Swept-Area Biomass
Atlantic Halibut Biomass from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 15000 mt
Years
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Biom
ass
or L
andi
ngs
(mt)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
SRA Biomass
1/2 BMSY = 2700 mt
Landings (mt)
Fall 5-year Swept-Area Biomass
Atlantic Halibut Fishing Mortality from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 7000 mt
Year
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Land
ings
(liv
e-w
eigh
t, m
t)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Stoc
k R
educ
tion
Anal
ysis
F
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Atlantic Halibut Fishing Mortality from Stock Reduction AnalysisBi = 15000 mt
Year
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Land
ings
(liv
e-w
eigh
t, m
t)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Stoc
k R
educ
tion
Anal
ysis
F
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Atlantic Halibut Landings
Year
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Hal
ibut
Lan
ding
s (m
t)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
CanadaUSOther
Atlantic halibut NEFSC autumn biomass indices (stratified mean weight per tow) with 1 standard error
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght (
kg) p
er T
ow
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Atlantic halibut NEFSC spring biomass indices (stratified mean weight per tow) with 1 standard error
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght (
kg) p
er T
ow
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Figure S3. Atlantic halibut biomass indices (stratified mean weight per tow) from NEFSC spring and autumn surveys.
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Spring IndexAutumn Index
Use of Spring v. Autumn Survey IndexUse of Spring v. Autumn Survey Index
Time SeriesTime Series• Autumn survey has longer time seriesAutumn survey has longer time series•• Autumn survey includes relatively high landings during 1963Autumn survey includes relatively high landings during 1963--1967 1967 (highest landings since 1930s)(highest landings since 1930s)
VariabilityVariability•• CVs/SE similar between surveysCVs/SE similar between surveys•• Similar number of years with 0 halibutSimilar number of years with 0 halibut•• Similar number of total halibut caughtSimilar number of total halibut caught
Temperature Correlation in Spring SurveyTemperature Correlation in Spring Survey•• Spring sweptSpring swept--area biomass neg. corr. with spring bottom waterarea biomass neg. corr. with spring bottom watertemperature anomaliestemperature anomalies
•• Water temp. influences spring distributionWater temp. influences spring distribution--Not seen in autumn surveyNot seen in autumn survey
Atlantic Halibut NEFSC Spring and Autumn Survey Indices and Swept-Area Biomass
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
5-Ye
ar A
vera
ge S
wep
t-Are
a B
iom
ass
(mt)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Spring IndexAutumn Index
Discarded Halibut Kept HalibutYear Mean Length (cm) Std Err N Year Mean Length (cm) Std Err N1990 . . . 1990 46.6 2.0012 61991 . . . 1991 92.0 . 11992 33.0 . 1 1992 67.1 5.2457 111993 31.3 13.3458 3 1993 62.8 5.5333 101994 42.4 5.1049 5 1994 73.3 5.0781 161995 27.2 5.4858 6 1995 79.6 4.6356 291996 . . . 1996 69.2 10.027 51997 36.3 2.1858 3 1997 67.5 11.3893 61998 . . . 1998 . . . 1999 62.0 . 1 1999* . . . 2000 57.0 4.0778 13 2000 . . . 2001 67.5 2.9518 13 2001 118.0 6 22002 70.2 4.7648 13 2002 88.0 9.0738 62003 64.0 1.6363 91 2003 81.0 5.349 292004 57.1 1.3502 87 2004 83.9 3.9709 332005 60.4 1.3042 160 2005 76.4 2.5691 802006 63.0 1.495 107 2006 84.9 3.5611 372007 64.0 2.0581 70 2007 89.4 4.7544 29
*Minimum size of 91cm implemented in 1999
NMFS Fall Survey Halibut in Massachusetts Inshore Strata
Year
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow (k
g)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Sw
ept A
rea
Bio
mas
s (m
t)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
5-Year Average Swept Area Biomass
NMFS Spring Survey Halibut in Massachusetts Inshore Strata
Year
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow (k
g)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
Sw
ept A
rea
Bio
mas
s (m
t)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
5-Year Average Swept Area Biomass
NMFS Fall Survey Scotian Shelf Halibut
Year
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow (k
g)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Sw
ept A
rea
Bio
mas
s (m
t)
0
200
400
600
800
10005-Year Average Swept Area Biomass
NMFS Spring Survey Scotian Shelf Halibut
Year
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Stra
tifie
d M
ean
Wei
ght p
er T
ow (k
g)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sw
ept A
rea
Bio
mas
s (m
t)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
5-Year Average Swept Area Biomass
Halibut von Bertalanffy Growth CurvePooled Data Females
Age
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Leng
th (c
m)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Halibut von Bertalanffy Growth CurvePooled Data Males
Age
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Leng
th (c
m)
0
50
100
150
200
Halibut Yield per RecruitFemale Pooled
F
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
YPR
0
2e+4
4e+4
6e+4
8e+4
1e+5
FMAX = 0.0354
F0.1 = 0.0227
Halibut Spawning Stock Biomass per RecruitFemale Pooled
F
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
SS
B/R
ecru
it
0
2e+6
4e+6
6e+6
8e+6
1e+7
F40 = 0.0238