Asset Management Strategy - Rockingham Forest … Executive Summary Effective asset management is...
Transcript of Asset Management Strategy - Rockingham Forest … Executive Summary Effective asset management is...
0
\
Asset Management Strategy
Author I Jekyll
Job Title Operations Director
Approved by / Date 18 July 2012
Approved by Challenge Group / Date June 2012
Review Date July 2017
Cross Reference with Business Plan, Risk Management Strategy, VFM
Strategy, Tenant Involvement Strategy, Added
Value Strategy, Sustainable Energy & Affordable
Warmth Policy
All Staff email sent 23/07/12
Timetable updated 23/07/12
www.rfha.org.uk
1
Contents
Section Page
Executive Summary 3
1 Introduction 5
Key Aims and Objectives
2 Our Housing Assets 6
Stock Profile
Stock Condition
Supply & Demand
3 Managing the Assets 10
Key Components & Tools
Asset Optimisation
4 Investment Programmes 12
Five Year Asset Management Plan
Transforming Homes Programme
Aids & Adaptations
5 Funding the Strategy 15
Availability of Resources
Long Term Future Investment Plans
6 Service Delivery 16
Contractors
Staffing
Categorisation of Maintenance Activities
Responsive Repairs
Voids
Cyclical Maintenance Work
Planned & Major Improvement Work
7 Health & Safety 21
Gas Servicing
Electrical Testing
Fire Safety
Asbestos Management
Legionella
Control of Contractors
8 Affordable Warmth & Improving Energy Efficiency 24
9 Tenant Engagement & Partnerships 25
Working with Tenants
Training Opportunities
10 Strategy Delivery & Monitoring 26
Budgetary Control
Procurement
Risk Management
Performance Management
11 Equality & Diversity 28
2
12 Review 28
13 Action Plan & KPIs 28
Appendices
Appendix 1: Asset Management Framework
Appendix 2: Decent Homes Standard
Appendix 3: Option Appraisal Process
Appendix 4: 5 Year Asset Management Plan
Appendix 5: 30 year Asset Management Plan
Appendix 6: Staffing Structure
3
Executive Summary
Effective asset management is fundamental to the successful delivery of organisational objectives
and business plan priorities.
This Asset Management Strategy (AMS) is a key tool in delivering our overall strategic aims. It will
highlight relevant asset management risks, including increasing investment costs, changing
government policy, tenancy turnover and voids, housing need/demand and wider economic and
demographic change.
The 2012/13-2017/18 Business Plan includes 8 strategic priorities, one of which relates directly to
the AMS:-
“To ensure that we continue to meet & if possible exceed the Decent Homes Standard by facilitating
a range of tailored services.
To identify major repairs programmes that will reduce our reactive repairs costs and improve tenant
satisfaction levels. Stock investment used efficiently for maximum impact and best value is
achieved."
The AMS is pivotal in supporting our Value for Money Strategy, as repairs and maintenance is one of
the biggest areas of expenditure in the overall budget.
This AMS has been developed from a review of the previous strategy, the introduction of new Asset
Management software system (Keystone) and a rolling stock condition survey programme.
The specific aims of this strategy are:
• Any asset management activity should preserve or increase the value of our assets.
• Best value for money is achieved.
• Funds committed to stock investment are used efficiently for maximum impact Tenants
aspirations are met, high levels of customer satisfaction are maintained and tenant
involvement in decision making is meaningful.
• To ensure the right tools are used to identify risks, liabilities and costs, to reduce exposure to
acceptable levels.
• To provide a continuous improvement framework based on monitoring, performance
reporting, and accountability to tenants.
• To provide a framework for decision making which uses financial, stock condition and
housing management data in a rational and consistent way.
• Investment programmes are delivered in a cost-effective manner in accordance with sound
procurement principles and in line with statutory requirements.
• We help to improve the communities we work in and provide local employment
opportunities wherever possible.
In February 2012 we entered into a key partnership with Futures Housing Group (FHG). This will
help to ensure that our stock reinvestment programmes are managed as efficiently and effectively
4
as possible, maximum value for money is achieved and high levels of customer satisfaction are
maintained.
As a result of this significant benefits have been achieved:-
• Projected 24% savings on major improvement programme costs
• Improved specification and quality of work and benefitting from a range of added value
initiatives e.g. apprenticeship scheme
• Access to specialist asset management software. Enhanced our management and
manipulation of stock condition data, assisting annual and long term budgeting.
• A cost effective stock condition survey programme, fully integrated with asset management
software.
• Access to an EU procured responsive repairs service at nil cost
• FHG expertise and knowledge of procurement and contract management, a skills gap in our
current Maintenance Team.
Tenants have a role in shaping the delivery of this strategy. From RFH’s perspective our housing
stock represents a financial asset but to tenants it is their homes and it is therefore imperative that
tenants’ views are at the heart of our investment decisions. The Tenant Involvement Strategy details
the ways in which tenants can become involved in asset management and all other areas of
operation.
The strategy has been enhanced by the inclusion of:
• A specific 5 year Asset Management Plan
• A 30 year Financial Plan
• Plans to consult with tenants, leaseholders and stakeholders on strategy detail in line with
regulatory guidance
• A suite of performance targets, and a delivery action plan, to help measure the success of
the strategy.
The AMS sets out the 5 year medium term investment plans and looks forward 30 years to 2042,
assessing the stock investment needs and resources required to ensure the future life of existing
stock and replacement of obsolete housing.
A holistic approach to housing asset management is essential alongside the effective planning of its
repairs and maintenance, voids and planned works programmes that represent value for money.
The Decent Homes Standard alone cannot deliver the change necessary to improve neighbourhoods
and meet our tenants’ aspirations. It is vital therefore that we make the best use of internal and
external resources that may be available for investment.
5
1. Introduction
1.1 Key Aims & Objectives
This strategy is deigned to act as the framework within which RFH makes strategic decisions on
stock investment and, where necessary, disposal. It has been drawn up to complement the business
plan, assist in meeting the requirements of the regulator and to set out priorities for the ongoing
maintenance and improvement of RFH’s housing stock.
RFH has a number of long term strategic aims. They are:-
• To provide quality homes
• To deliver excellent services
• To demonstrate our community values in everything we do
• To exceed expectations
In common with every other housing organisation, RFH has finite resources to spend on asset
management. It must make the best use of these to obtain maximum benefit for tenants.
Appendix 1 shows the framework for delivery of asset management at RFH. The Asset Management
Strategy is central to this framework. It is intended to assist RFH’s staff and Board of Management in
meeting our strategic objectives and balancing competing needs for investment.
The key objectives of this strategy are to:-
1. Meet statutory and regulatory requirements including 100% Decent Homes compliance
2. Provide safe affordable quality homes that meet current local housing need and that take
account of future demographic changes tenant profile and aspirations.
3. Deliver a quality repairs and maintenance service which achieves high levels of customer
satisfaction
4. Achieve a quantifiable reduction in repair and void expenditure without sacrificing quality
5. Maintain a robust procurement strategy for achieving value for money and maximise
operational efficiencies.
6. Improve service whilst reducing costs by taking a planned elemental approach to repairs
wherever possible, achieving an effective balance of expenditure on responsive, cyclical and
capital works.
7. Tackle fuel poverty and the environmental impact of climate change on the housing stock,
ensuring tenants have every opportunity to reduce energy consumption and the associated
cost of heating their homes
8. Ensure capital and revenue resources are targeted to properties that have a long-term future
and represent value for money by using Keystone and financial analysis costing techniques to
determine future investment plans.
9. Ensure consultation with our tenants on medium term investment plans and priorities is
effective and plans are clearly communicated to tenants.
10. Provide employment opportunities for the local community wherever possible.
This strategy aims to help achieve the RFH’s mission and guide investment decisions to enable us to
deliver quality homes which achieve, and in some areas, exceed the Decent Homes Standard.
6
2. Our Housing Assets
2.1. Stock Profile
RFH's stock is located in six local authority districts:-
East Northamptonshire Wellingborough Kettering
Corby Daventry Northampton
The majority (92%) is located in East Northamptonshire. Our stock profile is as follows:
499 properties trickle transferred from East Northamptonshire Council; 63 new build properties
constructed since 1995;
74 Existing Satisfactory/Purchase & Repair properties; 21 properties for market renting;
6 shared ownership properties;
150 properties managed for Circle Group.
We also manage a small portfolio of up to 10 properties within a Private Sector Leasing Scheme,
‘Key Solutions’, in partnership with East Northamptonshire Council (ENC).
RFH’s property profile is as follows:-
Property Type
No.
1 bed flat 36
2 bed flat 2
2 bed bungalow 3
3 bed bungalow 2
2 bed house 186
3 bed house 412
4 bed house 19
5 bed house 1
Total 663
RFH's stock is currently valued 'at cost' in our balance sheet at £18,277,202 as at January 2012.
During 2008 a re-valuation exercise of stock in charge to the Nationwide Building Society was
carried out. Following this exercise RFH's stock is valued as follows:
Basis of valuation 446 general needs units
EUV-SH
Existing Use Value for Social Housing
£17,031,000
MV-ST
Market Value subject to tenancies
£31,158,000
MV-VP
Market Value with vacant possession
£47,000,000
Insurance reinstatement guidance £60,572,243
RFH has 132 unencumbered properties with an estimated EUV-SH of just over £5 million.
7
2.2 Stock Condition
2.2.1 Stock Condition Surveys
The RFH engaged external surveyors, Property Techtonics, to undertake a 100% stock condition
survey (SCS) in 2009/10. This data has recently been transferred onto the new Keystone asset
management software and used to produce the financial forecasts included within this strategy.
Following the last stock condition survey we agreed to adopt an alternative approach, surveying our
stock on a rolling programme over 5 years, rather than the whole stock every five years. This would
provide more accurate and up to date information, enabling us to monitor our position in relation to
the Decent Homes Standard more effectively.
Futures Housing Group monitors their stock like this, and offers this service at a very competitive
price to partner organisations. RFH has therefore chosen to employ FHG to carry out ongoing stock
condition surveys, effective 1st April 2012.
The new stock condition survey programme has commenced. The original plan to do 20% each year
has increased to a 25% year on year rolling survey of all properties. This was partly due to concerns
about the quality of the previous stock condition data but also to enable us to capture the condition
of all homes in a 4 year plan that feeds into the 4 year major improvement programme.
Surveys are completed by FHG’s in-house surveyors using palmtop computers which are
synchronised with the Keystone Asset Management system. The stocks’ needs in terms of
investment for short, medium and long term plans will be derived from data held in Keystone.
The management of stock condition data will be validated by an independent specialist Chartered
Surveying organisation every five years.
2.2.2 Stock Condition Information
Ensuring that investment needs and funding required is accurate requires staff time and use of stock
condition information systems to manage, check, challenge and make adjustments as both the
number and condition of housing changes.
RFH, supported by the Futures Housing Group (FHG) Asset Management Team, manages an Asset
Management database for strategic planning, including Decent Homes, capitalised repairs and
planned maintenance programmes.
Responsive repairs are managed through the Omniledger housing management system.
Asbestos data is currently managed using the Omniledger system, but following surveys carried out
prior to major improvement works, we intend to start a new asbestos database. This data will be
stored on specialist Property Compliance Manager (PCM) software, accessible to contractors as well
as members of staff.
8
The Asset Management Plan is based on stock condition information recorded in Keystone which is
used for scenario planning of improvements and priorities of work. The plan identifies the key
replacement elements and the timescale in which replacement is required. This data forms the basis
of annual major improvements required to maintain Decent Homes Standard. Details of the Decent
Homes Standard can be found at Appendix 2.
The projected serviceable life of elements forms the basis of modelled stock investment needs and
medium and long term financial cost projections. Profile reports are generated and projects the
capital costs for the replacement of key elements over a 30 year period.
Investment decisions are informed by the Asset Management database but the final decisions are
informed by other factors which include:
• Life Expectancy of the stock
• Ensuring programmes are planned for cost effective delivery by contractors
• The possibility of extending the life expectancy of the component by cost effective repairs
• Tenant demand, aspirations and priorities
• Spreading elemental renewal programmes to optimise the use of financial resources.
All of the RFH’s properties had met the Decent Homes Standard by 2010.
Age is the most significant factor affecting RFH’s stock. It is fundamental to this Asset Management
Strategy. The table below shows the numbers and percentages of the stock in 10 year ranges.
Age Range Number %
0-9 years 20 3.02%
10-19 years 76 11.46%
20-29 years 18 2.71%
30-39 years 15 2.26%
40-49 years 40 6.03%
50-59 years 76 11.46%
60-69 years 96 14.48%
70-79 years 204 30.77%
80+ years 118 17.80%
The expected life of the main structures of a property i.e. walls and foundations, is 80 years. The
above table shows that nearly a fifth of the stock has exceeded this life expectancy and a further
30% will do so in the next 10 years.
Although the quality of construction of older properties generally results in this 80 year life cycle
being exceeded, the effects of an aging stock on future investment decisions need to be considered.
It is anticipated, for example, that increased budget provision may have to be made for roofing and
roofline works, repointing, re- rendering and replastering from 2012 onwards, partly because some
of these costs have been increasing in recent years in relation to both void costs and reactive repairs
expenditure but also because stock condition data indicates a high number of potential Decent
Homes failures due to the age and condition of property structure.
9
2.2.3 Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)
We have built HHSRS methodology into our stock condition survey programme and tackle any
Category 1 (severe) failures immediately. Any works related to less urgent failures are built into our
forward plans.
2.3 Supply & Demand
Over the next 30 years stock numbers will change as some properties are lost through disposal or
‘Right to Buy’ sales. However, we expect at least the equivalent stock numbers to be gained.
The present Government’s proposals to reinvigorate Right to Buy include the intention to double
the discounts available. The Government wants to see a significant increase in sales to fund new
social housing on a ‘one for one’ replacement. The proposals are targeted at local authority stock at
present so RFH is currently unaffected but it is unclear how Registered Providers (RP) will be
affected in the future. It should be noted that almost all of our stock is currently excluded from the
Right to Buy/Right to Acquire.
In terms of stock expansion, RFH is a member of the Quantum Consortium, led by East Midlands
Housing RFH, but is not currently developing properties. Our position in relation to property
development will be reviewed as part of our decision making process regarding the use of
affordable rent and flexible tenancies. The views of our local authority partners will be taken into
account on these issues as well as advice in relation to RFH’s charitable status.
RFH is seeking additional borrowing of around £2m, as outlined in the Business Plan. Recent
negotiations with our funders in relation to additional borrowing have not been successful, due to
the short term nature of the funding available. During 2012 we will be investigating alternative
sources of funding to enable us to maximise our borrowing to support future growth.
Due regard will be given to the local Strategic Housing Market Need Assessment when considering
future growth.
RFH introduced customer profiling in 2010 and we now have profile data on 92% of our customers.
Our main client group are predominantly young families, headed by a woman of working age.
Despite this, a surprisingly high percentage has a disability (15%).
The Welfare Reform Act, which came into force in March 2012, introduced new property size
criteria for housing benefit claimants in the social housing sector, also known as the ‘bedroom tax’
or “under occupation penalty”.
This new criteria means that any working age household deemed to be under occupying their home
will lose part of their housing benefit from April 2013. Housing benefit will be reduced by 14% for
claimants with one extra bedroom and 25% for two or more extra rooms.
We estimate this is likely to affect around 17% of the RFH’s tenants, including disabled people living
in an adapted property. Many of these tenants may be forced to move to smaller properties either
within the RFH’s stock or with another RP.
10
The new rules are expected to lead to higher void and relet costs as tenants downsize. We also
expect unmet demand for smaller properties and a corresponding impact on demand for 3 bedroom
properties, which make up over 60% of the RFH’s stock. The table below shows the numbers of
properties under occupied by size and the likely corresponding increased demand. Some of the
demand for 2 bedroomed properties will be offset by the tenants moving out of these under
occupied properties into one bedroomed properties.
Bedrooms Under Occupied Potential Additional Demand
1 0 65
2 18 48
3 91 0
4 4 0
Total 113 113
3. Managing the Assets
3.1 Key Components & Tools
Reducing costs, whilst maintaining excellent service delivery, is a key business priority. To this end,
in February 2012 we formed a partnership with Futures Housing Group for the delivery of our major
repairs service, stock condition surveys, asset management software.
As a result, RFH now has new tools to deliver this strategy. These include:
• Stock condition data, updated regularly, collected using statistically reliable and verifiable
stock survey techniques
• A comprehensive and dynamic stock condition database
• A formal Option Appraisal Process to assess major capital Investment proposals
• An informed experienced workforce, internally (and externally via FHG), to deliver quality
projects on time within budget.
These are the basic tools required to enable RFH to take informed decisions. Once strategic
decisions are taken, RFH may use the various strategic components to deliver results including:-
• Refurbishment of dwellings so that they continue to meet modern requirements and
tenant expectations
• A planned maintenance programme, achieving economies by replacing components just
as they reach the end of their lifecycle, anticipating changes in minimum acceptable
standards, and reducing future requirements for demand driven maintenance
• Cyclical maintenance to prevent deterioration in the physical condition of the stock and
annual servicing to comply with legislation
• A responsive maintenance service to address unforeseen sporadic repairs
• An efficient and effective voids repair service, helping to protect RFH’s revenue and
minimise the number of rejected offers on the grounds of poor condition
• An effective option appraisal process that considers different forms of intervention
including disposal.
11
3.2 Asset Optimisation
The AMS has to optimise the use of funds available to enhance the stock and benefits that tenants
should enjoy. Long term planning and continuous annual monitoring is therefore essential.
Where investment does not reflect service priorities or value for money then alternative solutions
such as disposal or other routes will be explored.
We expect a significant number of properties will continue to remain structurally sound, despite the
age profile of our stock. However, we must plan for a proportion to fail structurally, with resulting
high repair costs in relation to the value of affected properties.
However, non-financial factors such as the continuing high demand for social housing in our area of
operation means that is unlikely that we would consider disposal or demolition, except in very
extreme cases.
The full range of options must be considered and evaluated when deciding on the future of a
property. The intention will be to find long term solutions to any issues. Escalating actions include
the following:-
• Minor works to improve lettability
• Major works to resolve fundamental issues Tenure change to address demand issues
• Disposal by transfer to another organisation or sale
Reasons to consider disposal include high management costs, demand issues, long term viability,
customer aspirations (linked to demand), condition/cost of repairs and sustainability of worthwhile
investment (damp, sound insulation, access issues, health and safety issues etc.).
The benefits of disposal are that it can address problems that are beyond the scope of reasonable
investment, meet customer aspirations, improve services and reduce overhead costs. Some
properties are disproportionately time consuming and expensive to manage and will never achieve
high levels of customer satisfaction. It should be noted that the consent of the Homes and
Communities Agency is required should RFH wish to consider disposal or demolition of any
properties that have been grant funded.
The indicators that will be taken into account when considering disposal include high marginal costs
of management, for example arising from distance or low stock numbers in a location, high
comparative costs of maintenance or refurbishment and housing management based indicators
such as voids, tenancy turnover, abandonment and tenant complaints.
The appraisal process and the key data that is used to inform the assessment are set out in
Appendix 3.
Appraisals take into account both the current and future value of assets, ongoing maintenance,
repairs and investment to maintain the assets to arrive at a Net Present Value (NPV). The NPV
informs us whether it is sensible to continue to invest in certain types of properties. A negative
12
score for example may indicate that despite investment the value of the asset will never offset the
costs.
The model allows for an objective and consistent way of assessing properties and we plan to use
this approach as part of our continuing work to carry out option appraisals on all the stock. As part
of this process we may also consider the disposal of high value larger properties that do not require
significant investment in the future. Funds released from these sales would be recycled to purchase
properties that would assist us to meet future demand for smaller homes.
4. Investment Programmes
In the appendices, the 30 year plan and the 5 year plan set out the amounts required to maintain
and improve RFH’s housing stock over time, based on stock condition survey information which is
regularly updated with works undertaken. These plans also identify risks to RFH posed by any part
of its property portfolio, and will assist in the management of these risks.
Objectives for the investment and maintenance of RFH’s stock are set out below:
• Effective and responsive maintenance of the property portfolio
• Investment in properties with a long term future
• Ensuring that properties meet a defined lettable standard
• To maintain the Decent Homes Standard, and meet revised Standards
• Engagement with tenants in making decisions
When taking decisions on our portfolio, we will have regard to:
• Costs of management and maintenance and rents that can be achieved
• Future investment required for properties to meet Decent Homes Standard
• Lettability of property types or in specific locations
• Other regeneration initiatives in the area and how the property contributes to this
4.1 Five Year Asset Management Plan
The AMS uses as a starting point the current known stock condition at 2012.
Our current resources mean that our main focus will be to continue to maintain 100% compliance
with the Decent Homes Standard. This will be achieved through the Major Improvement
Programme, also known as Transforming Homes Programme, and a series of planned
programmes, all of which will consider potentially non-decent issues.
Appendix 4 attached to this report shows the 5 year Asset Management Plan for the period 2012/13
to 2017/18.
The Major Improvement Programme budgets assume total resources in the region of
£2.75M over the period, most of which is capitalised. In addition to this, Revenue Repairs, Cyclical
Maintenance and Voids costs are estimated to be £2.9M over the 5 years.
13
This is more than the current 5 year budget, which accompanied the business plan approved in
March 2012. This is largely due to a new workstream being identified (re-pointing and re-rendering),
and other increasing costs due to the age of the stock, as detailed at 2.2.2.
However, it should be noted that the component replacement dates and associated costs included
in the 5 Year Asset Management Plan are only an indication of work that may need to be carried
out, not work that necessarily will be carried out. The majority of the replacement dates are based
on the 2009 stock condition survey carried out by Property Techtonics, which needs to be verified.
In addition to this, costs are based on 2011 figures and are therefore due to be updated on
Keystone in the near future with the new schedule of rates following recent tenders.
Because of these two factors it is prudent to wait until we have more accurate information later this
year before making any significant changes to the budget. Nevertheless, it is apparent that it will be
necessary to start making some budgetry provision from 2013 for a new work stream to undertake
re-pointing and re- rendering. This will need to be addressed by examining ways to reduce these
costs to bring them closer into line with the overall budget, securing additional funding, reprofiling
the major repairs budget or increasing the overall major repairs budget allocation. It is likely to be a
combination of all these approaches.
The budgets are of course subject to annual review and challenge.
4.2 “Transforming Homes” Programme
The current 4 year Major Improvement programme, also known as the Transforming Homes
Programme, was tendered in partnership with Futures Housing Group. RFH and tenants were
involved at all stages of the process and maintained control over timings and work specifications.
The procurement process followed an EU Restricted Procedure and resulted in Lovell Partnership
Limited being appointed as the contractor by both organisations.
The programme was launched in April 2012. The total budget for RFH’s 4 year programme is
approximately £1.2m.
Without this improvement programme pockets of stock will progressively become non-decent. The
main programme will therefore continue to be:
• New windows and external doors where required
• New kitchens and bathrooms
• Upgrades or rewires to the electrical system
• New roof coverings.
The programme will be completed by 31st March 2016. It will be subject to ongoing re-profiling in
response to information obtained from the rolling stock condition survey and any identified non-
decent properties that will be in the programme.
Properties earmarked for Major Improvement works occupied by Tenants that have refused the
works for various reasons, are monitored and included in the database. They will either be improved
when void or revisited at the end of the programme.
14
The contract with Lovell is managed by FHG with ongoing involvement from RFH’s Property Services
Manager.
Various regular meetings across the partnership will occur to audit progress/stalls, etc. These will
include:
- Operational/Progress : weekly
- Steering Group Meeting : monthly
- Partnering Board Meeting : bi-monthly
- Commercial and Supply Chain Meetings : monthly
- Tenant Liaison Group (Repairs & Improvement Group)- bi annually
Health and Safety and Construction Design & Management will be monitored by FHG in conjunction
with ARC Consultants.
A suite of KPIs monitor handovers, completed works, waste management (environmental issues),
time in properties, property storyboards, activities on site, health and safety, etc. The individual
household storyboard is also part of the handover pack highlighting the customer journey and is
measured according to a scoring system.
4.3 Aids & Adaptations Work
The Aids and Adaptation Policy outlines RFH’s approach to providing a range of property
adaptations that give elderly, disabled tenants and people with special needs housing that suits
their physical needs, improves their quality of life, and enables them to be independent.
RFH adopts a customer focused approach to all aspects of our service delivery and we will consult,
inform and involve tenants at all stages of the adaptations process. We will offer tenants a degree of
flexibility and choice in the style of aids and adaptations where possible and where funding
arrangements will allow.
While providing tenants with suitable housing for their individual health needs is the key priority,
the suitability and future use of the housing stock must be considered and look at ways in which the
stock use can be maximised and households provided with alternative suitable adapted homes.
We are committed to working in partnership with the relevant agencies and professional services to
ensure that the work is co-ordinated to deliver the most appropriate solutions for people in need of
Aids and Adaptations.
Adaptations are split into two categories – minor and major. These distinctions are based on the
nature of the work required in order to implement the adaptation and do not correspond to the
impact the adaptation will have on the individual requiring such work. It is understood that both
minor and major adaptation work can impact significantly on an individual’s quality of life.
Below are examples of the types of work categorised as either minor or major:
• Minor adaptations; (typically under £1250) include the provision of ramps, handrails, grab
rails, hoists, bath-boards, seating in shower area and lever taps.
15
• Major adaptations; (Over £1250) require more extensive and complex work and include the
installation of stair lifts and level access showers; over bath showers; bathroom and kitchen
conversions; access alterations.
The starting point will again be an Occupational Therapist assessment to ensure the work is
appropriate and the best way forward. Works will normally be being funded through the Local
Authority Disabled Facilities Grant. This is a means tested grant where tenants may be required to
make a contribution to the cost of the works irrespective of value and may take up to 12 months to
be sanctioned from the date of the formal OT recommendation.
OT recommendations for more significant work may be incorporated into other planned works.
In view of budget limitations the wait for such adaptations could be considerable and in view of this
and with the tenant in focus RFH will consider a range of measures to help improve the situation in
the short term.
This could include;
• Temporary (or permanent) provision of a `Lifeline` alarm call system
• Minor adaptation work as an interim measure
• Liaison with any other support agencies
Welfare Reform is likely to impact on how we deliver disabled adaptations in certain cases. Any
changes will be reflected in the Aids and Adaptations Policy.
5. Funding the Strategy
5.1 Availability of Resources
RFH should have sufficient funds available for the lifetime of the business plan to undertake all
works necessary to maintain the current 100% compliance with the Decent Homes Standard,
dependant upon the impact of welfare reform and other factors. However, as mentioned at 4.1, the
costs indicated in the 5 year Asset Management Plan, which takes into account potential non
decency as well as renewal of some additional components, are higher than those allowed for in the
five year Business Plan budget.
Availability of resources and updated stock condition data will be reviewed on an annual basis and
the AMP revised accordingly.
In addition to the Business Plan funding we will work closely with the funders to find ways to secure
the required resources when they are needed for the purchase of new properties.
5.2 Long Term Future Investment Plans
The AMS 30 year plan is currently based on there being sufficient funding to meet RFH’s future
investment needs and this level of resources will be made available through normal funding routes.
16
Appendix 5 provides detail on the level of investment needed over the next 30 years to carry out
general maintenance and elemental improvements as they are needed. The total investment
required is estimated to be £26m.
All costs are exclusive of professional fees, management and administration costs and are based on
current prices because it is not possible to predict inflationary increases, or changes to market
prices of labour and materials over 30 years. Costs, however, are inclusive of preliminaries and VAT
at the current rate.
Taking into account forecast resources set out above we will develop our future plans around the
investment needs and resources available. There will be a core of investment to maintain the
retained stock at a reasonable standard and to ensure we continue to meet the current Decent
Homes Standard. Any changes to the Decent Homes Standard will trigger a review of this strategy
and associated financial forecasts.
Further consideration will need to be given to improving the energy efficiency and environmental
sustainability of our properties. There is a need to work with other agencies and our tenants to
develop plans and associated resources required to achieve this.
6. Service Delivery
6.1 Contractors
Our community values are evidenced by our long standing commitment to use local contractors
wherever possible; approx. 75% of our total repairs expenditure is delivered by this means.
RFH has an approved contractor list, reviewed annually.
Following a recent tender exercise run in partnership with FHG the RFH’s responsive repairs are now
carried out by an approved list of around 9 Framework contractors under Term Partnering Contracts
(TPC2005). Joining arrangements have been agreed with individual contractors and they are all
required to comply with our Contractor Code. These are mostly small and medium-sized local
businesses.
Both organisations have benefited from current market competitiveness. RFH, in particular will
share the benefits of extended material warranties and lower unit costs on materials that
Framework Contractors will be able to purchase through Futures’ procurement agreements. Three
contractors carry out RFH’s cyclical programmes, under Measured Term Contracts. One of these
contractors is also a Framework contractor. These five year contracts run until 31st March 2016.
Contractors are subject to performance monitoring of customer satisfaction, complaints, value of
orders etc., to ensure that the service they provide meets the standards set. This monitoring
enables any performance issues to be identified and addressed at an early stage.
Regular contractor meetings take place, to exchange information, provide good practice and
legislative updates and deliver refresher training.
6.2 Staffing
17
The current staffing structure is set out at Appendix 6. We have adequate staff resources to deliver
this strategy and manage the asset management process but will procure suitable external
assistance as and when required.
RFH works closely with FHG Asset Management Team. We will take every opportunity to benefit
from their expertise.
6.3 Categorisation of Maintenance Activities
RFH subdivides stock maintenance into a number of different types of work, each of which is used
to fulfil a particular purpose during the life of a dwelling. The five principal types are:
• Responsive repairs
• Void repairs
• Cyclical maintenance
• Planned maintenance
• Refurbishment and improvement.
A key component of this strategy is to provide a responsive repairs service for irregular unexpected
failures, for example, burst pipes or broken locks. Our tenants consider an efficient and cost
effective responsive repairs service as one of their top priorities (Jan 2012 Business Plan Survey), as
well nationally being recognised by the regulator as a high priority for tenants. Projected resources
for this work over the next five years are set out in Appendix 4.
A key aim of this strategy is to reduce long term responsive repair costs through targeted
investment and a pro-active planned repair programme. We propose to increase the proportion of
pre-planned work and to improve on our current performance.
The budget for responsive repairs is based on developing a long term reduction in costs due to the
effective management of the stock and investment in major improvements. The benchmark ratio of
planned repairs to responsive is 60 : 40 of which the responsive repairs should be aimed at the
benchmark priority ratio of 10:20:70, (Emergency:Urgent:Routine) wherever possible. We are
currently achieving a 63:37 planned to responsive repairs and responsive repairs priority ratio of
5:27:68.
6.4 Responsive Repairs
The majority of the 2500 repairs carried out each year are reported directly by tenants to the
Tenant Services Team. RFH spends approximately £300K a year on responsive repair work.
To achieve responsive repairs within the funding limits, repair requests from tenants are
standardised against a responsive performance service level agreement, which is included in the
updated Repairs Handbook following consultation with the RFH’s tenant forum, the Challenge
Group.
18
Each repair request will be given one of the following priorities based on RFH’s statutory and
regulatory obligations:-
Emergency (make safe within 12 hours). Repairs needed to avoid an immediate danger to personal
health or safety or serious damage to property
Urgent (to be completed within 5 working days). Repairs needed to avoid substantial inconvenience
to the tenant or continued damage to the property
Routine (to be completed within 21 working days).
During the life of this strategy we will aim to introduce a further category; Programmed, which is
non urgent work that could be completed as part of a programme in order to provide greater
flexibility and achieve potential efficiency savings. Works such as external groundworks and
rainwater goods could be included in this category.
An emergency out of hours service is provided via one of the Framework Contractors, MAW
Services, with support provided from officers as required.
In 2012/13 only one KPI was not achieved or exceeded. During annual review, targets are
renegotiated to improve and challenge service delivery.
Lean Systems Thinking was implemented at RFH in 2011 and repairs and maintenance was the first
review. As a result of this review, there have been a number of efficiencies in the repairs service.
In addition, there are a variety of other mechanisms to review and monitor the success of the
repairs service, some involving Tenants.
Recent improvements include :
• Tendering work under Framework Agreements on 60/40 price/quality basis. resulting in
better prices whilst maintaining quality and a reduced Approved Contractor List who get a
greater share of work
• Better prices on materials via FHG’s procurement agreement with Travis Perkins – on
average achieving savings of around 16%
• Delivering 99.5% of all repairs within agreed timescales Achieving 96% tenant satisfaction
• Consolidating the invoice process to reduce officer time
• Using Customer Feedback to systematically improve the service such as offering reduced
timescales for responsive repairs
• Redefined Out of Hours emergency repairs arrangements with 23% reduction in works
undertaken out of hours through improved controls and enhanced telephone advice
• Reducing Out Of Hours emergency cover costs by 33%
• Implementing a new text messaging service which aims to reduce call times and missed
appointments and provide a more seamless service.
Also, the use of tenant profiling information will help further tailor the service to our tenant’s needs,
as detailed in the Customer Insight Strategy.
19
6.4.1 Property MOTs
During the life of this strategy we will explore ways of reducing our responsive repairs expenditure
including the introduction of Property MOTs, an annual scheduled visit by a contractor, often
combined with the annual gas check, to identify and carry out any minor repairs. Pilots have shown
significant reductions in unplanned maintenance costs as a result of property MOTs.
6.4.2 Tenant Cashback
RFH is required, as part of the revised statutory standards for the provision of social housing, to
implement some form of repair and maintenance cash back scheme with effect from April 2012.
Whilst the standard set by the Social Housing Regulator is not particularly prescriptive, all social
housing landlords must provide tenants with the opportunity to be involved in the:-
‘Management of repair and maintenance services, such as commissioning and undertaking a range
of repair tasks, as agreed with landlords and the sharing in savings made’.
No guidance (other than a letter outlining the scheme) has been issued by the Department for
Communities and Local Government (DCLG).
The scheme aims to encourage tenants to take control of their own minor repairs or commission
them locally, and benefit from any savings made. RFH has concerns over the costs of such a scheme,
how we would keep control of the works carried out and potential health and safety problems
created by poor standard repair work. In addition to this, we are not sure our tenants are actually in
favour of such a scheme. RFH has opened discussions with tenants and will use this feedback to
develop a scheme which fulfils our obligations, meets our tenants’ needs and RFH’s business
objectives.
6.4.3 Repairs Charter
The Chartered Institute of Housing launched its’ Repairs Charter in June 2012. It is a framework that
aims to drive improvements in the delivery of responsive repairs.
Sign up is voluntary and based on self assessment.
The Charter includes a set of commitments, underpinned by a range of outcomes, against which
organisations can assess where they are now and where they aspire to be. Once we have carried out
our self assessment in consultation with the RIG or Challenge Group, we aim to sign up to the
charter as a public commitment to delivering a high quality repairs service.
6.5 Voids
Void properties are unoccupied dwellings that arise when there is a change of tenancy. Repairs are
carried out in line with an agreed lettable standard. The lettable standard was initially agreed with
tenants in 2011 to ensure compliance with relevant legislation and to bring void properties up to a
common standard.
20
Currently between 30 – 40 voids are dealt with per year, on average. RFH’s void turnaround time
has reduced from 16.9 days to 12.6 days over the last 12 months (excluding major voids). This level
of performance not only puts us in upper quartile but makes us one of the best performers. It is
important that we continue to deliver voids quickly to reduce rent loss, make properties available to
let sooner and prevent them being left empty for long periods of time.
Properties generally fall into 2 categories, either a minor void or a major void.
The majority of voids are Minor (24 during 2011/12). Works to bring these up to the agreed lettable
standard cost less than £3000 and are undertaken by our Repairs Team, taking on average 7 days
from the surveyor’s inspection to the keys being handed back to Housing Team.
Major voids (8 during 2011/12) exceed £3000 and generally include elemental replacement works,
such as new kitchen, bathroom, heating system due to the age and poor condition due to tenant
neglect/damage. These works are only carried out at void if considered necessary to ensure the
property is re-lettable and/or the works are so extensive that it would not be reasonable to carry
them out whilst the new tenant was in situ . The average time to inspect, undertake the major
works and hand back to Housing Team for 2012/13 was 26 days.
Consideration of the extent of the works to be carried out takes into account future elemental
programmed works to be undertaken within the following 12 months.
RFH has a cash reward scheme which was implemented in 2008 with the objective of reducing some
of the costs incurred in re-letting general needs voids.
Under the scheme, a cash reward of £200 is offered to an outgoing tenant where the property
meets the following qualifying criteria:-
• Property and garden are clean and clear
• Property is in good decorative condition
• Repairs have been carried out where it is the tenant’s responsibility
• There are no outstanding rent arrears or sundry debt.
The scheme does not appear to be meeting its objective in its current form; take up is very low with
only 15% of outgoing tenants qualifying for payment and there has been no tangible impact on relet
costs since the scheme has been in operation.
The current average cost of a void available for letting is £3130, including any major works carried
out and VAT. During the course of this strategy we will review alternative ways of working, and the
tenant incentive scheme will be revised with the aim of reducing rechargeable repairs costs.
The Lettable Standard will also be reviewed with tenants again within the life of this strategy. We
will also consider introducing a full refurbishment programme for a percentage of void properties,
bringing forward improvement programme works and carrying out additional works such as re-
plastering work etc. whilst the property is void rather than whilst it is tenanted to minimise
disruption to the new tenant. However, this will need to be balanced with minimising rental losses.
6.5.1 Void Appraisal
21
This strategy introduces a structured options appraisal for void properties which require major
works above £10,000. Full property history, projected costs, available funding, and demand for the
accommodation will be considered before work is carried out to such properties. This will ensure
that resources are effectively spent only on properties that are sustainable and cost effective to
maintain. Properties with major works above £10,000 are subject to approval at a senior level. It’s
important that the appraisal process is completed quickly, however, in order to prevent delaying
relet with resulting higher void losses.
6.6 Cyclical Maintenance Work
These are works of a preventative nature which RFH plans in advance and repeats on a “cyclical”
basis. This is done in order to avert the premature decline of time sensitive components and meet
regulatory and legal duties.
Presently this part of the service spends approximately £165K a year, predominately from revenue
budgets. Cyclical programmes exist for:
• Gas heating servicing
• Electrical testing
• Fire fighting equipment
• External decoration
The organisation will continue to reduce the scale of its external painting programme by the
sensitive replacement of existing ‘maintenance hungry’ external components with low-maintenance
alternatives, i.e. external doors and soffits and fascias.
6.7 Planned & Major Improvement works
As discussed elsewhere in this strategy document, the core asset management issue for the
organisation in the medium to long term is how to cope with the need to maintain, replace or
revitalise an ageing stock.
Elemental replacement programmes will be identified from the Keystone database together with
input from Surveyors and repair trends.
RFH will seek to maximise the works undertaken within planned maintenance programmes and will
be exploring opportunities to achieve efficiencies through modern procurement methods, including
framework agreements with percentage reductions for volume of work.
7. Health & Safety
7.1 Gas Servicing
With respect to gas safety our objectives are to:-
• Ensure we meet our legal obligations under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations
1998
22
• Ensure all reasonable steps are taken to issue a Landlord’s Gas safety Certificate to all
tenanted dwellings on or before the expiry date of the previous certificate. The legal
requirement is 100% compliance.
We have a programme in place to ensure that all gas installations and equipment are tested,
inspected and maintained by competent persons in accordance with the relevant legislation and
other relevant standards. Our contractor also tests smoke alarms during the gas safety check.
We are 100% compliant with the gas safety regulations and our monitoring of the gas contractor is
externally audited to achieve quality assurance. We achieve 100% compliance by offering flexible
appointments followed up with a text reminder, cold calling and involvement of the Housing
Management Team in dealing with “hard to reach” tenants.
Only after all these processes have been exhausted would we enforce access by court injunction. To
date, this has never been necessary.
During 2012/12 we intend to introduce a programme to install CO detectors in our properties as an
additional measure to ensure the safety of our tenants.
7.2 Electrical Testing
We are delivering a programme of periodic testing and remedial works on fixed electrical
installations using our voids, Decent Homes and electrical maintenance programmes.
7.3 Fire Safety
RFH ensures that Fire Risk Assessments are carried out in accordance with the Regulatory Reform
(Fire Safety) Order 1995 at all applicable premises occupied or managed by RFH, and that all
necessary alterations, equipment and installations are implemented to reduce fire risks as low as
reasonably practicable.
There are 6 housing schemes, which require a Fire Risk Assessment; all bar one belong to Circle. We
risk assessed all these buildings in 2011, which resulted in the following action:-
• Works to carry out remedial repairs
• Smoke detectors replaced
• Fire safety information communicated to tenants and displayed in communal areas
• Programme of monthly Fire Safety checks with records of findings and any action taken
Fire Risk Assessments are reviewed annually.
During 2012/13 we intend to introduce a programme to replace battery powered smoke detectors
with hard wired detectors in void properties, although this is not a legislative requirement.
7.4 Asbestos Management
RFH has a duty of care to ensure that all Asbestos Containing Materials are in a safe condition.
Legislation relating to the management of asbestos came into force on 21 May 2004. The legislation
requires the ‘Duty Holder’ to have a detailed register of non domestic locations with the asbestos
23
materials that exist at each location, together with effective management arrangements for dealing
with those materials.
Further legislation under The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 came into force in April 2012. In
practice the changes are fairly limited. They mean that some types of non-licensed work with
asbestos now have additional requirements, i.e. notification of work, medical surveillance and
record keeping. All other requirements remain unchanged.
RFH will seek information regarding any Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM’s) within premises
occupied by, or under the control of, RFH or in which RFH employees are working, and take
appropriate measures to protect employees, tenants, visitors, clients, contractors, and other
persons who may be affected by RFH’s activities from unsafe exposure to ACM’s within those
premises.
Employees and contractors will be provided with adequate training to ensure that they are aware of
the properties of asbestos and its effects on health; the types, uses and likely occurrence of
asbestos and ACMs in buildings and plant; the general procedures to be followed to deal with an
emergency; and how to avoid the risks from asbestos.
RFH has developed an Asbestos Management Policy and Procedures, which contains detailed
arrangements for the management of ACM’s in premises occupied by, or under the control of, RFH.
7.5 Legionella
RFH adopts, as far as reasonably practicable, the principles of control and management identified in
the current edition of the H.S.E Approved Code of practice and Guidance Document L8 “The Control
of Legionella Bacteria in Water Systems” (ACOP L8).
To comply with its legal duties RFH will:
• Identify and assess sources of risk
• Prepare a scheme for preventing or controlling the risk
• Implement, manage and monitor all precautionary control measures identified
• Keep records of precautionary measures
• Identify responsibilities of employees and contractors within RFH.
We have developed a Legionella Management Policy, which contains detailed arrangements for the
management of Legionella Bacteria in premises occupied by, or under the control of, RFH.
7.6 Control of Contractors
Approved Contractors are responsible for complying with the relevant statutory duties placed upon
them by the Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974, the Management of Health and Safety at
Work Regulations 1999 and other applicable Regulations.
This responsibility includes ensuring that all employees & sub-contractors are competent to carry
out their work safely, and in accordance with the relevant standards & statutory requirements.
24
Contractors are also responsible for complying with RFH’s Contractor Code and instructions
regarding healthy & safety from duly authorised representatives of RFH.
Contractors are responsible for assessing the risks associated with their work on behalf of RFH, and
the methods to be used to eliminate those risks or reduce them so far as reasonably practicable.
Contractors should provide adequate information to RFH regarding these risks and the methods
used to control them.
We will seek to identify suitable contractors through competence checks and selection procedures
and ensure that any health and safety hazards within the area of work are communicated to
contractors.
RFH will issue RFH safety rules to contractors and will check to ensure that these are being adhered
to; control the contractors on site and will check that they have left the site clean and tidy.
All contractors selected to carry out any work on behalf of RFH should be made aware of the
standard of health and safety management that is expected of them.
The contractor will also be required to supply RFH with a copy of their Health and Safety Policy or
sign to adhere to RFH’s Health & Safety Statement of Intent. Areas of incompatibility with RFHs own
policy and or expected standards should be identified as soon as possible and appropriate action
taken. A copy of professional indemnity insurance must also be provided.
8. Affordable Warmth and Improving Energy Efficiency
RFH believes all tenants have a right to affordable warmth and that the environmental impact
should be reduced by the use of energy efficient materials. In recent years the increase in fuel costs
will have increased the number of families and individuals that are unable to heat their homes
properly. This can also have a detrimental effect on our stock as a result of poor ventilation as
tenants try to preserve as much heat in their homes as possible.
The aim of RFH’s Sustainable Energy and Affordable Warmth Policy is to ensure that we meet
Government targets in relation to carbon emissions and improve the SAP (standard assessment
procedure) ratings of our housing stock. By adopting this approach to energy efficiency, we can help
our tenants to keep warm at home, save energy, reduce fuel debt and maintain good health.
Asset Management programmes mean that the energy efficiency of our housing stock will continue
to improve year on year. We have a commitment to reduce carbon emission and improve the SAP
rating of our housing stock which is currently an average of 65.2, which is quite low but largely due
to the age of our stock, mentioned in 2.2.2 of the strategy.
When major items are due for renewal, e.g. boilers, they are replaced with more energy efficient
systems to reflect our commitment to improve the energy efficiency of housing stock.
The following major repairs have been undertaken on a substantial number of our trickle transfer
properties since the properties were acquired:
25
• Rated Energy Efficient Boilers
• Replacement Roofs
• Installation of double glazed windows
• Loft and Cavity Wall Insulation
RFH produces Energy Performance Certificates for all vacant properties relet, as required.
Properties with a low SAP will be targeted for further assessment and interventions. Our longer
term target is to have no properties with a SAP rating of below 65. Our records indicate that there
are 234 properties with a SAP rating below 65. There are a further 58 properties for which we have
no energy rating. This figure is not accurate, however, because it does not take into account any
insulation, and some roofs and new boilers fitted since the 2009 Stock Condition Survey. This is
because Keystone’s ability to recalculate SAP ratings following completed works is reliant on the
format of the EPC.
During the life of the strategy we will commission a report that explores options that enable us to
address the issue of poor performing/hard to treat properties, and available funding to develop an
investment plan to address any deficiencies in our stock. We would expect this to include a
programme of external wall insulation to solid wall properties, which typically have low SAP ratings,
and are due for external rendering/repointing.
Research shows that where people understand their homes they are able to save considerable
amounts on fuel bills. In line with Ofgem regulations and FSA guidelines, we will promote
organisations that give our tenants choice and competitive tariff regardless of payment method,
usage or circumstance.
We will investigate ways to enable our tenants to access opportunities for improved energy
efficiency and cost savings that may emanate from the government’s Green Deal initiative.
This theme is also covered in the Added Value Strategy 2012/13-2017/18 with interlinking
objectives and targets being set.
9. Tenant Engagement and Partnerships
9.1 Working with Tenants
RFH’s mission is to provide quality homes. It is therefore crucial to the success of this strategy that
tenants’ views are taken into account and they are empowered to assist in management decisions,
where feasible.
Specifications and works are discussed with tenants to ensure we try and meet as many priorities,
individual needs and aspirations as possible within the resources available.
Tenant representatives were involved extensively during the recent procurement processes to assist
in the selection of contractors and preferred partners to undertake improvement works and the
choice and quality of products we use.
26
Tenants from RFH’s Repairs Improvement Group (RIG) went to Daventry & District Housing during
the recent joint procurement process with Futures HG to see examples of Lovell’s work on the
Futures part of the contract. The group was able to see for themselves the difference in quality over
price, with the specification providing attractive homes whilst retaining value for money. A tenant
representative will be involved in the ongoing monitoring of the contract and the RIG will be
updated on a twice yearly basis.
Going forward, tenants will continue to be invited to participate in any procurement, specification
and materials and service delivery projects.
9.2 Training Opportunities
We have one apprenticeship position in place. This is a two year placement, running on from a
Future Jobs Fund placement, which completes in summer 2013.
Our Major Improvement Programme partnerships are also delivering training and employment
opportunities. The contract includes a requirement for Lovell to appoint one new apprenticeship for
every £1m generated in turnover. This is likely to be delivered through a county wide training
academy. Progress in delivering the scheme will be monitored via regular FHG Partnering Board
meetings.
10. Strategy Delivery & Monitoring
10.1 Budgetary Control
There is a comprehensive system of budgetary control incorporating:-
• The timely production of management accounts
• Identification of adverse variances with reference to the budget holder for explanation and
corrective action
• Regular meetings with budget holders throughout the year to assess performance
• Regular reporting of the headline figures to the Board, key variances and a commentary on
the causes and action being taken
In addition all senior managers have budgetary control as one of their targets within the annual
appraisal system.
10.2 Procurement
RFH works closely with the FHG Procurement Team to challenge how work is procured and ensure
value for money is achieved.
Future procurement decisions will reflect lessons learnt, in particular the value of partnership
working and creating a balance between price and quality to achieve value for money. We will work
with partners, framework contractors and the supply chain to use our collective experience to
identify the right procurement strategies for the future.
27
The Value for Money Strategy and Added Value Strategy provide information about our approach to
procurement including how we incorporate social value into the process, a new requirement
introduced by The Public Services (Social Value Act), which was passed at the end of February 2012.
10.3 Risk Management
RFH is acutely aware that evaluation of risk is an essential part of an effective asset management
strategy. Major decisions taken about the future and utilisation of the asset base in the absence of a
risk assessment may have a long-term detrimental effect on the sustainability of communities and
financial viability of the RFH.
In drawing up this strategy we have undertaken a risk analysis which feeds into RFH’s Risk
Management Plan.
The key risk to this strategy being achieved relates to the availability of ongoing funding, especially
in light of forthcoming Welfare Reform which could threaten RFH’s income.
Further risks in relation to asset management have been identified as:
• Risk in not undertaking stock improvements or ineffective targeting of our
programmes. May lead to wasted resources.
• Failure to continue to meet the Decent Homes Standard. May lead to non- decent homes,
regulatory action, high tenancy turnover and associated costs.
• Inadequate Stock Condition Information. This will result in the inability to make informed
decisions on investment requirements and priorities
• Inadequate information on life cycle costs. The estimation of a product’s life expectancy is
essential in order to programme effective planned maintenance programmes.
• Poor procurement. This may result in the loss of efficiencies and the potential misdirection
of finite resources
• Restrictions re stock disposal under the ENC Trickle Transfer Agreement. Failure to
successfully re-negotiate this agreement will mean that we cannot dispose of properties
acquired under the agreement which do not meet demand
• Failure of the FHG Partnership. This may result in the loss of efficiencies and the need to
retender services.
RFH has a systematic approach to managing risks. This involves the regular review of impact and
probability of specific risks materialising and an evaluation of the control arrangements that are in
place for managing and minimising current and emerging risks. These are updated in light of
changing circumstances.
The Risk Management Plan is reviewed on an annual basis with the support of Hargreaves Risk
Services (HRS), we also subscribe to Hargreaves’ risk management service for small RFHs.
In drawing up this strategy we have reviewed best practice guidance provided by Hargreaves Risk
Services and included new risks identified in the risk register.
10.4 Performance Management
28
We will carry out periodic reviews and update our Asset Management Strategy and ensure it
remains fully aligned to our Business Plan and other related strategies. The review process will
enable us to assess how well we have delivered against the priorities, budgets and targets set,
identify further improvements and respond to the changing external environment we operate in.
The Action Plan included with this strategy details the activities that we will be undertaking to
achieve our objectives. It will feed into our team plans and from March 2013 into individual
performance targets and be the subject of regular monitoring, evaluation and review. Regular
reports will be provided to the Board of Management on progress with developing the Asset
Management Strategy objectives.
In addition Decent Homes and repairs have been identified as key areas which are linked to our local
offers and subject to close scrutiny by RFH’s Tenant Review Panel. This is because they deliver
important outcomes for tenants and contribute to achieving our primary objectives.
11. Equality & Diversity
This Asset Management Strategy sets the framework within which RFH will work to uphold the
condition of its property portfolio, deliver enhancements beyond the government’s basic decent
homes standard and ensure that our homes provide a safe place for our tenants to live in. Asset
management encompasses a broad range of activities, which ensures that our housing stock meets
needs and standards both now and in the future.
In setting out the Strategy we have been mindful of ensuring we have given due consideration to
best practice in the delivery of quality services. In this way we aim to engage our tenants in
everything we do. Equality and diversity considerations are also a mainstream factor in our
approach.
We recognise that the community we serve is made up of different backgrounds, disabilities,
religions and traditions with a variety of individual needs and expectations. We will ensure that we
reflect this in the way we present and deliver the repairs and maintenance service in line with RFH’s
Single Equality Scheme.
12. Review
This strategy will be reviewed every 5 years or earlier in the event of relevant legislative changes or
changes in standards for tenantial buildings i.e. building regulations, Decent Homes Standard.
The Five Year Plan and annual action plan are subject to annual review.
13. Action Plan & KPIs
This section of the strategy lists the range of targets the organisation has set itself for improving the
management of its assets and directing its investment in the most cost-effective manner. The action
plan is designed to cover the five year period of the strategy, and to be reviewed annually and
updated where necessary.