ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 1

The ASAS-SN Bright Supernova Catalog – IV. 2017

T. W.-S. Holoien1?, J. S. Brown2,3, P. J. Vallely2, K. Z. Stanek2,4,C. S. Kochanek2,4, B. J. Shappee5, J. L. Prieto6,7, Subo Dong8, J. Brimacombe9,D. W. Bishop10, S. Bose8, J. F. Beacom2,4,11, D. Bersier12, Ping Chen8,L. Chomiuk13, E. Falco14, S. Holmbo15, T. Jayasinghe2, N. Morrell16,G. Pojmanski17, J. V. Shields2, J. Strader13, M. D. Stritzinger15,Todd A. Thompson2,4, P. R. Wozniak18, G. Bock19, P. Cacella20, J. G. Carballo21,I. Cruz23, E. Conseil22, R. G. Farfan24, J. M. Fernandez25, S. Kiyota26,R. A. Koff27, G. Krannich28, P. Marples29, G. Masi30, L. A. G. Monard31,J. A. Munoz32,33, B. Nicholls34, R. S. Post35, G. Stone36,D. L. Trappett37, and W. S. Wiethoff38

1 The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA2 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA3 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 92064, USA4 Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics (CCAPP), The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave.,

Columbus, OH 43210, USA5 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai’i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA6 Nucleo de Astronomıa de la Facultad de Ingenierıa y Ciencias, Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejercito 441, Santiago, Chile7 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Santiago, Chile8 Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road 5, Hai Dian District,

Beijing 100871, China9 Coral Towers Observatory, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia10 Rochester Academy of Science, 1194 West Avenue, Hilton, NY 14468, USA11 Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA12 Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK13 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA14 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA15 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark16 Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Observatories, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile17 Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland18 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop B244, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA19 Runaway Bay Observatory, 1 Lee Road, Runaway Bay, Queensland 4216, Australia20 DogsHeaven Observatory, SMPW Q25 CJ1 LT10B, Brasilia, DF 71745-501, Brazil21 Observatorio Cerro del Viento-MPC I84, Paseo Condes de Barcelona, 6-4D, 06010 Badajoz, Spain22 Association Francaise des Observateurs d’Etoiles Variables (AFOEV), Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 Rue de l’Universite,

67000 Strasbourg, France23 Cruz Observatory, 1971 Haverton Drive, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068, USA24 Uraniborg Observatory, cija, Sevilla, Spain25 Observatory Inmaculada del Molino, Hernando de Esturmio 46, Osuna, 41640 Sevilla, Spain26 Variable Star Observers League in Japan, 7-1 Kitahatsutomi, Kamagaya, Chiba 273-0126, Japan27 Antelope Hills Observatory, 980 Antelope Drive West, Bennett, CO 80102, USA28 Roof Observatory Kaufering, Lessingstr. 16, D-86916 Kaufering, Germany29 Leyburn & Loganholme Observatories, 45 Kiewa Drive, Loganholme, Queensland 4129, Australia30 Virtual Telescope Project, Via Madonna de Loco, 47-03023 Ceccano (FR), Italy31 Kleinkaroo Observatory, Calitzdorp, St. Helena 1B, P.O. Box 281, 6660 Calitzdorp, Western Cape, South Africa32 Departamento de Astronomıa y Astrofısica, Universidad de Valencia, E-46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain33 Observatorio Astronomico, Universidad de Valencia, E-46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain 34 Mount Vernon Observatory, 6 Mount Vernon Place, Nelson, New Zealand35 Post Observatory, Lexington, MA 02421, USA36 Sierra Remote Observatories, 44325 Alder Heights Road, Auberry, CA 93602, USA37 Brisbane Girls Grammar School - Dorothy Hill Observatory, Gregory Terrace, Spring Hill, Queensland 4000, Australia38 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, 230 Heller Hall, 1114 Kirby Drive,

Duluth, MN. 55812, USA

14 October 2019

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

arX

iv:1

811.

0890

4v2

[as

tro-

ph.H

E]

10

Oct

201

9

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019) Preprint 14 October 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0

ABSTRACTIn this catalog we compile information for all supernovae discovered by the All-SkyAutomated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN) as well as all other bright (mpeak 6 17),spectroscopically confirmed supernovae found in 2017, totaling 308 supernovae. Wealso present UV through near-IR magnitudes gathered from public databases of allhost galaxies for the supernovae in the sample. We perform statistical analyses of ourfull bright supernova sample, which now contains 949 supernovae discovered since 2014May 1, including supernovae from our previous catalogs. This is the fourth of a seriesof yearly papers on bright supernovae and their hosts from the ASAS-SN team, andthis work presents updated data and measurements, including light curves, redshifts,classifications, and host galaxy identifications, that supersede information containedin any previous publications.

Key words: supernovae, general — catalogues — surveys

1 INTRODUCTION

In recent years, large-scale, systematic surveys for super-novae (SNe) and other transient phenomena have becomea cornerstone of modern astronomy. (Significant examplesof such surveys are summarized in Paper III; Holoien et al.2017c). Despite the large number of transient surveys, how-ever, prior to 2013 there was no high-cadence optical sur-vey designed to scan the full observable sky for the bright,nearby transients that are easiest to observe in great detail.While fewer in number, such events provide the opportu-nity to obtain the high-quality observational data needed tohave the largest impact on our understanding of the physicsbehind transient phenomena.

The All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN1; Shappee et al. 2014) was created for this purpose.ASAS-SN is designed to survey the entire visible sky at arapid cadence to find the brightest transients. ASAS-SN hasfound many nearby and interesting SNe (e.g., Dong et al.2016; Holoien et al. 2016a; Shappee et al. 2016; Godoy-Rivera et al. 2017; Bose et al. 2018b,a; Vallely et al. 2019),tidal disruption events (TDEs; e.g., Holoien et al. 2014a;Brown et al. 2016, 2017a; Holoien et al. 2016c,b; Prieto et al.2016; Romero-Canizales et al. 2016; Holoien et al. 2018),stellar outbursts (Holoien et al. 2014b; Schmidt et al. 2014;Herczeg et al. 2016; Schmidt et al. 2016), flares from activegalactic nuclei (Shappee et al. 2014), black hole binaries(Tucker et al. 2018), and cataclysmic variable stars (Katoet al. 2014a,b, 2015, 2016).

Each ASAS-SN unit is hosted by the Las CumbresObservatory (Brown et al. 2013) network and consists offour 14-cm telescopes, each with a 4.5× 4.5 degree field-of-view. Until 2017, ASAS-SN comprised two units, each us-ing V -band filters with a limiting magnitude of mV ∼ 17:Brutus, located on Haleakala in Hawaii, and Cassius, lo-cated at Cerro Tololo, Chile (further technical details canbe found in Shappee et al. (2014)). In late 2017, ASAS-SNexpanded with three new units: Paczynski, also located atCerro Tololo, Leavitt, located at McDonald Observatory inTexas, and Payne-Gaposchkin, located in Sutherland, SouthAfrica. Between the five units, ASAS-SN now surveys the

? tholoien@carnegiescience.edu1 http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~assassin/

entire visible sky (roughly 30000 square degrees) in lessthan a single night, with weather losses. Further, ASAS-SNswitched to g-band for our new units, increasing our imit-ing magnitude to mg ∼ 18.5. Due to the increased depth,we will be switching our initial 8 telescopes to g-band aswell by the end of 2018. For a more detailed history of theASAS-SN project, see Holoien et al. (2017a) and Shappeeet al. (2014).

All ASAS-SN data are automatically processed and aresearched in real-time. New discoveries are announced pub-licly either upon first detection if the source is judged likelyto be real based on ASAS-SN data alone, or once confirmedthrough follow-up imaging in cases where the first detec-tion is ambiguous. This allows for both rapid discovery andresponse by the ASAS-SN team, as well as by others. ASAS-SN uses an untargeted survey approach and 97% of an-nounced ASAS-SN discoveries have been confirmed spectro-scopically, either by the ASAS-SN team or by public clas-sification efforts via channels such as the Transient NameServer (TNS2) and Astronomer’s Telegrams (ATels). Thismakes the ASAS-SN sample much less biased than manyother SN searches, and it is thus ideal for population stud-ies of nearby SNe and their hosts (e.g., Brown et al. 2018).

This manuscript is the fourth of a series of yearly cat-alogs provided by the ASAS-SN team. We present collectedinformation on all SNe discovered by ASAS-SN in 2017 andtheir host galaxies. We also provide the same informationfor all bright SNe (those with mpeak 6 17) discovered byother professional and amateur astronomers in the sameyear, as we have done with our previous catalogs (Holoienet al. 2017a,b,c). We also include whether ASAS-SN inde-pendently recovered these SNe after their initial discovery,to better quantify the completeness of our survey.

This paper contains updated measurements and analy-sis that are intended to supersede publicly available infor-mation from ASAS-SN webpages, TNS, and discovery andclassification ATels. ASAS-SN continues to participate inthe TNS system to avoid potential confusion over discover-ies, but strongly object to a naming scheme that does notcredit the discoverer, even though this would be trivial toimplement. Throughout this catalog we use the internal sur-vey discovery names for each SN as our primary nomencla-

2 https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/

c© 2019 The Authors

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 3

ture, and we encourage others to do the same to preservethe origins of new transients in future literature.

The catalog is organized as follows: in Section 2 wedescribe the sources of the information presented in thismanuscript and list SNe with updated classifications andredshift measurements. In Section 3, we give statistics onthe SN and host galaxy populations in our full cumu-lative sample, including the discoveries listed in Holoienet al. (2017a,b,c), and discuss overall trends in the sam-ple. Throughout our analyses, we assume a standard ΛCDMcosmology with H0 = 69.3 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩM = 0.29, andΩΛ = 0.71 for converting host redshifts into distances. InSection 4, we summarize our overall findings and discuss fu-ture directions for the ASAS-SN survey and how they willimpact future discoveries.

2 DATA SAMPLES

The sources of the data collected in our supernova andgalaxy samples are summarized below. All data are pre-sented in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4.

2.1 The ASAS-SN Supernova Sample

All information for supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN be-tween 2017 January 1 and 2017 December 31 is given inTable 1. As in Holoien et al. (2017a,b,c), we obtained allsupernova names, discovery dates, and host names from ourdiscovery ATels, which are cited in Table 1. Also includedin the table are the IAU names given to each supernovaby TNS, which is the official mechanism for reporting newastronomical transients to the IAU.

We measured all ASAS-SN supernova redshifts fromclassification spectra. For cases where the nominal super-nova host galaxy had a previously measured redshift thatis consistent with the transient redshift, we list the red-shift of the host taken from the NASA/IPAC ExtragalacticDatabase (NED)3. For other cases, we report the redshiftsgiven in the classification telegrams or posted on TNS, withthe exception of those that are updated in this work (seebelow).

Classifications for ASAS-SN supernova discoveries wereretrieved from classification telegrams, which are cited inTable 1 when available, or from TNS, when a classifcationwas not reported in an ATel. We list “TNS” in the “Classifi-cation Telegram” column of the table for such cases. Whenmeasurable from the classification spectra, we also give theapproximate age of the supernova at discovery in days rel-ative to peak. Classifications were typically obtained usingeither the Supernova Identification code (SNID; Blondin &Tonry 2007) or the Generic Classification Tool (GELATO4;Harutyunyan et al. 2008), which both compare observed in-put spectra to template spectra in order to estimate thesupernova age and type.

We present updated redshifts and classifications for a

3 https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/4 gelato.tng.iac.es

number of ASAS-SN discoveries whose redshifts and clas-sifications differ from previous reports based on an ex-amination of archival classification spectra obtained fromTNS and the Weizmann Interactive Supernova data REPos-itory (WISEREP; Yaron & Gal-Yam 2012). ASASSN-17bb,ASASSN-17ol, and ASASSN-17om have updated redshifts,and ASASSN-17io has an updated type based on archivalspectra. We also report the classifications (and in some cases,redshifts) for a number of supernovae that were not previ-ously publicly classified based on spectra obtained with theWide Field Reimaging CCD Camera (WFCCD) mountedon the Las Campanas Observatory du Pont 2.5-m telescopeand the Fast Spectrograph (FAST; Fabricant et al. 1998)mounted on the Fred L. Whipple Observatory Tillinghast1.5-m telescope. ASAS-SN discoveries with new classifica-tions include ASASSN-17ip, ASASSN-17mf, ASASSN-17oh,and ASASSN-17ot. All updated redshifts and classificationsare available in Table 1.

We used the astrometry.net package (Barron et al. 2008;Lang et al. 2010) to solve astrometry in follow-up images ofASAS-SN supernovae and used Iraf to measure centroidpositions for each SN. This generally gives position errors of<1.′′0 and is substantially more accurate than using ASAS-SN images, which have a 7.′′0 pixel scale, to measure SNpositions. Follow-up imaging used to measure positions wereobtained using the Las Cumbres Observatory 1-m telescopesor by amateur collaborators who work with the ASAS-SNteam. Coordinates measured from follow-up imaging wereannounced in discovery ATels, and we report these coor-dinates in Table 1. The offsets between the SNe and thecenters of their host galaxies are also reported in the Table,and these offsets were calculated using galaxy coordinatesavailable in NED, or measured from archival images in caseswhere a host center was not previously catalogued.

We re-processed ASAS-SN data and measured V -band,host-subtracted light curves for all ASAS-SN supernova dis-coveries spanning 90 days prior to discovery through 250days after discovery. From these light curves we measuredV -band peak magnitudes for each ASAS-SN supernova. Inaddition, as the three new units deployed in 2017 use g-bandfilters, we measured g-band peak magnitudes for each ASAS-SN supernova that was discovered after the new units weredeployed. Both magnitudes are reported in Table 1. In somecases, due to the way ASAS-SN fields were divided betweencameras and because the new units were still building refer-ence images in late 2017, supernovae were only detected in asingle filter. We also report discovery magnitudes in the dis-covery filter measured from the re-subtracted light curves.In some cases, these magnitudes differ from the magnitudesreported in the original discovery ATels or on TNS, as re-processing the data can result in improvements in the pho-tometry. As we did in the previous ASAS-SN catalogs, wedefine the “discovery magnitude” as the supernova’s magni-tude on the date of discovery. For supernovae with enoughdetections in their light curves (for either or both filters),we also performed parabolic fits to the full light curves andestimate peak magnitudes based on the fits. We report thebrighter value between the brightest magnitude measuredfrom the light curve and the peak of the parabolic fit foreach filter as the “peak magnitudes” in Table 1This is doneto provide more accurate peak magnitudes for the few caseswhere the peak of the light curve was not well-covered by

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

4 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

ASAS-SN data, as was done in the previous ASAS-SN cat-alogs.

As in Holoien et al. (2017a,b,c), all supernovae discov-ered by ASAS-SN in 2017 are included in this catalog, in-cluding those fainter than mV = 17 or mg = 17. When per-forming comparison analyses that are presented in Section 3,we only include those ASAS-SN discoveries with mpeak 6 17so that our sample is consistent with the non-ASAS-SN sam-ple.

2.2 The Non-ASAS-SN Supernova Sample

Table 2 contains information for all SNe discovered by otherprofessional and amateur SN searches between 2017 January1 and 2017 December 31 that are both spectroscopicallyconfirmed and have peak magnitudes of mpeak 6 17.

As in our previous catalogs, the list of non-ASAS-SNdiscoveries was gathered from the “latest supernovae” web-site5 created by D. W. Bishop (Gal-Yam et al. 2013). Thiswebsite compiles discoveries reported via a multitude ofchannels, including TNS and ATels, and links objects re-ported by different searches at different times. It is thus anideal source for information on discoveries from various SNsearches. Some supernova searches are not participating inthe TNS system, so we only use TNS for verifying data onthe latest supernovae website, and not as a primary infor-mation source.

We obtained supernova names, IAU names, discoverydates, coordinates, host offsets, peak reported magnitudes,spectral types, and discovery sources for each supernovae inthe non-ASAS-SN sample from the latest supernovae web-site, when possible. NED was used to gather host galaxynames and redshifts when available, with the SN redshiftson the latest supernovae website being used in other cases.For supernovae without a host offset listed on the website,we took the offset from NED, defining the offset as the angu-lar separation between the coordinates of the host in NEDand the reported SN coordinates.

Some SNe has no host galaxy listed near their posi-tions in NED, but had hosts clearly visible in archival Pan-STARRS data (Chambers et al. 2016). For such cases weused Iraf to measure a centroid position of the host touse to calculate the offset. The host galaxy names given inthis manuscript are the primary names of the galaxies takenfrom NED. These differ in some cases from what is listed onASAS-SN websites or the latest supernovae website.

The magnitudes from the latest supernovae website arereported in different filters from various telescopes, and inmany cases the reported photometry does not necessarilycover the actual peak of the supernova light curve. Forthe purposes of having a more consistent sample of su-pernova peak magnitudes between the ASAS-SN sample,which uses peak magnitudes measured from ASAS-SN data,and the non-ASAS-SN sample, we also produced new, host-subtracted V - and g-band ASAS-SN light curves for everynon-ASAS-SN supernova in the 2017 sample. As we did withthe ASAS-SN sample, we also performed parabolic fits to thelight curves with enough detections, and used the brighterof the brightest measured magnitude and the peak of the fit

5 http://www.rochesterastronomy.org/snimages/

as the “peak magnitude” for each filter, when a supernovawas detected. These peak ASAS-SN V - and g-band magni-tudes are also listed in Table 2 for each supernova that wasdetected. We find that only 9 supernovae from the 2017 non-ASAS-SN sample are not detected in this re-examinationdespite 48 of these supernovae not being recovered duringnormal survey operations. This is likely due to better-qualitylight curves being produced in this new reduction, and thefact that our processing ensures no supernova light is con-tained in the reference image, and thus subtracted from thelight curve.

We performed a similar reduction and peak magnitudemeasurement for supernovae in the 2014-2016 non-ASAS-SN samples, and use only ASAS-SN V -band magnitudeswhen looking at the peak magnitude distribution and sam-ple completeness in Section 3. The ASAS-SN light curves forall supernovae in these samples will be released in a futuremanuscript (Ping et al., in prep.)

As we did with the ASAS-SN sample, we also checkedthe redshifts and classifications of the non-ASAS-SN super-novae using publicly available spectra on TNS and WIS-EREP. Based on our re-examination of these spectra, weupdate the classifications of ATLAS17cpj and ATLAS17evmand the redshift of ATLAS17cpj. In addition, the supernovaSN 2017gfj has a measured redshift of z ∼ 0.072, but hasbeen publicly announced as being hosted in the galaxy UGC11950, which has a redshift of z = 0.020541. This was likelydone because UGC 11950 is the nearest catalogued galaxyto the SN, but based on the redshift discrepancy we believeit likely that SN 2017gfj was actually located in an uncat-alogued background galaxy, and we update the host namein our sample accordingly. We assume the SN redshift ofz ∼ 0.072 for SN 2017gfj in our analyses presented in Sec-tion 3. We report updated types and redshifts in Table 2.

We give the name of the discovery group for all SNediscovered by other professional surveys in Table 2. We use“Amateurs” as the discovery source for supernovae discov-ered by non-professional astronomers, as this allows us todifferentiate this sample of SNe from the ASAS-SN andother professional samples. We include the names of the am-ateurs responsible for these discoveries in the full machine-readable version of Table 2 that is available in the onlineversion of this manuscript so as to properly credit themfor their discoveries. Unlike in previous years, amateurs nolonger account for the second largest number of bright su-pernova discoveries after ASAS-SN, with the ATLAS survey(Tonry 2011; Tonry et al. 2018) now holding that distinc-tion. Amateurs still account for the third largest number ofbright supernova discoveries in 2017, however, showing theyare still a significant source of bright discoveries.

Finally, we also note in Table 2 whether or not non-ASAS-SN supernovae were independently recovered by theASAS-SN team during normal survey operations. This al-lows us to better quantify the impact of ASAS-SN on thediscovery of bright SNe independent of other SN searches.

2.3 The Host Galaxy Samples

For both the ASAS-SN and non-ASAS-SN samples, we col-lected Galactic extinction estimates in the directions of thehost galaxies and near-ultraviolet (NUV) through infrared(IR) host galaxy magnitudes, which we presentin Tables 3

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 5

Ia79% (415)

II18% (96)

Ib/Ic3% (15)

ASAS-SN Discoveries (526)

Ia

57% (240)

II

33% (137)

Ib/Ic10% (43)

Non-ASAS-SN Discoveries (420)

Ia

69% (655)

II

25% (233)

Ib/Ic6% (58)

Full Sample (946)

Figure 1. Left Panel : Breakdown by type of ASAS-SN supernova discoveries between 2014 May 01 and 2017 December 31. The

proportion of each type continues to closely match that of the ideal magnitude-limited sample from Li et al. (2011). Center Panel :

The same breakdown for the non-ASAS-SN sample over the the same time period. Right Panel : The type breakdown for our entire SNsample, now totaling 946 supernovae.

This analysis excludes the 3 superluminous SNe in the sample, and includes Type IIb SNe in the “Type II” sample.

and 4. We obtained the values of Galactic AV from Schlafly& Finkbeiner (2011) in the directions of the supernovae fromNED. NUV host magnitudes from the Galaxy Evolution Ex-plorer (GALEX; Morrissey et al. 2007) All Sky Imaging Sur-vey (AIS), optical ugriz magnitudes from the Sloan DigitalSky Survey Data Release 14 (SDSS DR14; SDSS Collabo-ration et al. 2016), NIR JHKS magnitudes from the Two-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006), andIR W1 and W2 from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Ex-plorer (WISE; Wright et al. 2010) AllWISE source catalogswere obtained from publicly available online databases.

We adopt J and H filter upper limits correspondingto ther faintest detected host in our combined 2014 − 2017sample (mJ > 17.0, mH > 16.4) for hosts that are not de-tected in 2MASS data. If a host not detected in 2MASS wasdetected in WISE W1 data, we added the mean KS −W1offset from the total sample to the WISE W1 magnitudeto estimate a KS magnitude. This average offset is equalto −0.51 magnitudes with a scatter of 0.04 magnitudes anda standard error of 0.002 magnitudes, matching what wefound when doing the same calculation for the 2014− 2016sample in Holoien et al. (2017c). We adopted an upper limitof mKS > 15.6, equal to the faintest detected KS-band hostmagnitude from our sample, for galaxies not detected in ei-ther 2MASS or WISE data.

3 ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLE

The total sample of bright SNe discovered by all sourcesbetween 2014 May 01, when ASAS-SN began operationsin the Southern hemisphere, and 2017 December 31 nowincludes 949 SNe, after excluding ASAS-SN discoverieswith mpeak,V > 17.0 and mpeak,g > 17.0 (Holoien et al.2017a,b,c). 56% (528) of these SNe were ASAS-SN discov-eries, 19% (176) were discovered by amateur astronomers,and 26% (245) were discovered by other professional sur-veys. Breaking the sample down by type, 655 were Type IaSNe, 233 were Type II SNe, 58 were type Ib/Ic SNe, and

3 were superluminous SNe. For the purpose of these analy-ses, we include Type IIb SNe in the Type II sample so thatwe can more directly compare with the results of Li et al.(2011), as we have done in our previous catalogs. The objectASASSN-15lh, either an extremely luminous Type I SLSN(Dong et al. 2016; Godoy-Rivera et al. 2017) or a tidal dis-ruption event (Leloudas et al. 2016), is excluded from thefollowing analysis.

The breakdown by type of the ASAS-SN, non-ASAS-SN, and total samples are shown in Figure 1. As (e.g.,Li et al. 2011) predicted for a magnitude-limited sample,Type Ia SNe account for the largest fraction in each of thethree samples. As we have seen in our previous catalogs, theASAS-SN sample continues to match the “ideal magnitude-limited sample” from Li et al. (2011), where there are 79%Type Ia, 17% Type II, and 4% Type Ib/Ic SNe, almost ex-actly. Due to the observing strategies of the various discov-ery sources in the non-ASAS-SN sample not necessarily be-ing magnitude-limited in all cases (e.g., because the surveytargets certain types of galaxies or takes a volume-limitedapproach), the other two samples have higher fractions ofcore-collapse SNe than the ASAS-SN sample.

ASAS-SN accounts for 56% of the bright supernovaein our total sample, and thus remains the dominant sourceof bright supernova discoveries despite new surveys like AT-LAS coming online in 2017. A large fraction of the ASAS-SNsample continues to be discovered shortly after explosion be-cause of our high cadence. Out of 459 ASAS-SN SNe withestimated ages at discovery, 70% (322) were discovered priorto reaching their peak brightness. As we found in Holoienet al. (2017b) and Holoien et al. (2017c), the ASAS-SN sam-ple remains less affected by host galaxy selection effects thanother samples: 24% (127) of ASAS-SN supernovae occurredin catalogued hosts without previously measured redshiftsand an additional 4% (19) occurred in uncatalogued hostsor were hostless. In contrast, 18% (74) of non-ASAS-SN su-pernovae were discovered in known hosts without reportedredshifts, and only 2% (9) were discovered in uncataloguedhosts or were hostless.

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

6 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

-15 -16 -17 -18 -19 -20 -21 -22 -23 -24 -25 -26

Host Galaxy MKs

0.1

1

10

100O

ffse

t(a

rcse

c)

ASAS-SNOther Prof.Amateurs

-3 -2 -1 0 1

Host Galaxy logL/L?

-15 -16 -17 -18 -19 -20 -21 -22 -23 -24 -25 -26

Host Galaxy MKs

0.1

1

10

100

Off

set

(kpc

)

ASAS-SNOther Prof.Amateurs

-3 -2 -1 0 1

Host Galaxy logL/L?

Figure 2. Upper Panel : The absolute KS host magnitudes for all supernovae in our 2014 − 2017 combined sample compared to the

offsets of the SNe in arcseconds from their host nuclei. The top scale shows a luminosity scale corresponding to the magnitude range onthe bottom scale, assuming M?,KS

= −24.2 (Kochanek et al. 2001). Red stars, black circles, and blue squares denote discoveries from

ASAS-SN, amateurs, and other professional searches, respectively. Triangles in corresponding colors indicate upper limits on the host

galaxy magnitudes for hosts that are not detected in 2MASS or WISE data. Filled points indicate supernovae that were discovered orindependently recovered by ASAS-SN. The median host magnitudes and offsets are indicated with dashed, dotted, and dash-dotted lines

for the ASAS-SN sample, amateur sample, and other professional sample, respectively, in colors that correspond to those of the matching

data points. Lower Panel : The same plot, but with the offset measured in kiloparsecs.

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 7

−26−25−24−23−22−21−20−19−18−17−16

Host Galaxy MKS

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

f SN

AmateursOther Prof.ASAS-SN

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

Offset (arcsec)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

f SN

AmateursOther Prof.ASAS-SN

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

Offset (kpc)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

f SN

AmateursOther Prof.ASAS-SN

Figure 3. Normalized cumulative distributions of host galaxy absolute magnitudes (upper panel), SN offsets from host nuclei in arcsec-

onds (center panel), and SN offsets from host nuclei in kpc (bottom panel) for ASAS-SN discoveries (red), other professional discoveries(blue), and amateur discoveries (black). As is seen in Figure 2, amateur discoveries are biased towards more luminous hosts than profes-sional surveys, and ASAS-SN continues to find supernovae at smaller offsets than either comparison group, regardless of how the offset

is measured.

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

8 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

2012

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

2013

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

2014

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

2015

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

2016

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

2017

Jan.

Mar

.M

ayJu

l.Se

p.N

ov.

Month

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40NSN

/Mon

th

Real-timeAnalysisBegins

BrutusUpgraded

CassiusDeployed

Machine LearningImplemented

Cassius UpgradedPaczynski &

LeavittDeployed

Payne-Gaposchkin

DeployedASAS-SN DiscoveriesRecoveredNot Recovered

Figure 4. Histogram of bright supernovae discovered in each month from 2012 through 2017. ASAS-SN discoveries are shown in red,supernovae found by other sources and recovered in ASAS-SN data are shown in yellow, and supernovae not recovered by ASAS-SN (or

discovered prior to ASAS-SN coming online) are shown in blue. Significant milestones in the ASAS-SN timeline are indicated. The dashed

pink line indicates the median number of bright supernovae discovered in each month from 2010 through 2012, while the dashed cyanline indicates the median number of bright supernovae discovered in each month since 2014 May. Since ASAS-SN became operational in

both hemispheres in 2014 May, the number of bright supernova discoveries has exceeded the previous median and supernovae discovered

or recovered by ASAS-SN account for more than half of all bright supernova discoveries in every month.

Figure 2 shows the KS-band absolute magnitudes of SNhost galaxies in our sample compared to the SN offsets fromtheir host nuclei. The Figure shows the ASAS-SN, amateur,and other professional samples as different colors, and alsoshows the median offsets and magnitudes for each source.To put the magnitude scale in perspective, we also give acorresponding luminosity scale that assumes an L? galaxyhas M?,KS = −24.2 (Kochanek et al. 2001).

Amateur discoveries continue to be biased towards moreluminous host galaxies and larger SN offsets (Holoien et al.2017a,b,c). Supernovae found by other professional surveyscontinue to exhibit a smaller median angular separationthan amateur discoveries (median value of 10.′′4 comparedto 17.′′3), and now show a smaller median offset in physicalseparation as well (4.5 kpc vs. 5.7 kpc). This is in contrast toprevious years, when the median physical offset was similarbetween the two groups (e.g., Holoien et al. 2017c). ASAS-SN remains less biased against discoveries close to the hostnucleus than either group, with the ASAS-SN discoveriesshowing median offsets of 4.′′5 and 2.4 kpc.

The median host galaxy magnitude for ASAS-SN dis-coveries is MKS ' −22.7, compared to MKS ' −22.9, andMKS ' −23.9 for other professional surveys and amateurs,respectively. This is similar to the trend seen in our previous

years’ catalogs, where there is a clear distinction in host lu-minosity between professional surveys (including ASAS-SN)and amateurs (Holoien et al. 2017a,b,c).

Cumulative host galaxy magnitude and SN offset distri-butions are shown in Figure 3. The Figure shows clearly thatthe amateur supernova sample stands out from the ASAS-SN and other professional samples in host galaxy luminosity.It also shows that supernovae discovered by ASAS-SN aremore concentrated towards the centers of their hosts, andthat those discovered by other professionals fall between theASAS-SN sample and the amateur sample in offset. A largerfraction of the other professional sample was discovered bysurveys that use difference imaging in 2017 compared to pre-vious years, largely due to the ATLAS survey. (See resultsfor previous years in Holoien et al. 2017a, Holoien et al.2017b, and Holoien et al. 2017c.) While ASAS-SN remainsthe dominant source of bright supernova discoveries, AT-LAS has now surpassed amateur astronomers to becomethe second largest contributor of bright supernova discov-eries. Despite the contribution of ATLAS, ASAS-SN contin-ues to find SNe with smaller median offsets than competingSN searches, and still has a smaller median offset than otherprofessionals (3.′′2 vs. 8.′′6) when looking only at 2017 discov-

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 9

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11

Redshift

102030405060708090

100110120

NSN

Type IaType IIType Ib/Ic

Figure 5. Histograms of redshifts of the supernovae in our full

sample with a bin width of z = 0.005. We show the distributionsfor Type Ia (red line), Type II (blue line), and Type Ib/Ic (green

line) separately. Type Ia supernovae are largely found at higher

redshifts than the core-collapse supernovae, as they are typicallymore luminous.

eries. This implies that other SN surveys continue to avoidcentral regions of galaxies in their searches.

In Figure 4 we show the number of bright supernovaediscovered in each month from 2012 through 2017 in orderto show the impact ASAS-SN has on the discovery of brightsupernovae. Various milestones in the history of ASAS-SN,such as the deployment of additional units and software im-provements, are also shown in the figure to show the impactof these changes.

In the months since 2014 May, the average number ofbright supernovae found per month is 21 with a scatter of5 SNe per month. This is an increase compared to an av-erage of 13 with a scatter of 4 SNe per month from 2012January through 2013 May (the months prior to ASAS-SNbeginning operations), and an average of 15 with a scatterof 5 supernovae per month from 2013 June through 2014May (the months prior to the deployment of our southernunit Cassius), indicating ASAS-SN has increased the rate ofbright supernovae found per month since expanding to thesouthern hemisphere. The addition of the 2017 sample hasonly improved the trend from Holoien et al. (2017c), as theaverage rate is now ∼ 21 ± 2, rather than ∼ 20 ± 2 as wasseen in the 2016 catalog. While the addition of new surveyslike ATLAS has cut into the number of ASAS-SN discoveriessomewhat, ASAS-SN still discovered or recovered well overhalf of all bright supernovae every month in 2017. ASAS-SNcontinues to find supernovae that would not be found if itdid not exist, and this is allowing us to construct a morecomplete sample of bright supernovae.

The addition of the new ASAS-SN telescopes did nothave a major impact on ASAS-SN discovery numbers in2017, as all three new units were deployed late in 2017 andwere accumulating images with which to build reference im-ages for much of the remainder of the year. We expect anincrease in the average number of discoveries in future yearsbecause of our increased cadence and coverage, however. Fora breakdown of the impact of previous improvements to theASAS-SN network and pipeline, see Paper III (Holoien et al.2017c).

The distribution of redshifts of the supernovae in ourtotal sample, shown in Figure 5, has not changed signifi-

13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17

Peak Magnitude

1

10

100

1000

NSN

AllASAS-SN Discovered + RecoveredASAS-SN Discovered

Figure 6. Cumulative histogram of peak supernovae V -bandmagnitudes. ASAS-SN discoveries are shown with a red line, SNe

discovered or recovered by ASAS-SN are shown with a blue line,and editthe total sample is shown with a black line. The green

dashed line shows a broken power-law fit

that is normalized to the full sample, and has a Euclidean slope

below the break magnitude and a variable slope above it. The

magenta dashed line shows the Euclidean slope extrapolated tom = 17, and the sample is approximately 70% complete for

mpeak < 17. Only supernovae with ASAS-SN V -band light

curves are included in this Figure.

cantly from Holoien et al. (2017c). The Type Ia distributionpeaks between z = 0.03 and z = 0.035, the Type II distri-bution peaks between z = 0.01 and z = 0.015, and the TypeIb/Ic distribution peaks between z = 0.015 and z = 0.02.As we noted in our previous catalogs, this distribution is notunexpected given that we have a mostly magnitude-limitedsample since Type Ia supernovae are more luminous on av-erage than core-collapse supernovae.

Finally, Figure 6 shows a cumulative histogram of su-pernova peak magnitudes for ASAS-SN discoveries, SNe dis-covered or recovered by ASAS-SN, and all SNe in the totalsample. Because the magnitudes from the Bright Supernovawebsite are from different sources and in different filters, forthe purposes of this figure we use only supernovae for whichwe were able to obtain an ASAS-SN V -band light curve.This allows us to look at our completeness with a consistentset of peak magnitudes that come from the same telescopesand same filters. This also allows this sample to be moreeasily applied to supernova rate studies.

The majority of very bright (mpeak . 14.5; Holoienet al. 2017b) supernovae are discovered by amateurs orthe Distance Less Than 40 Mpc (DLT40) survey6, both ofwhich typically survey the brightest and nearest galaxiesrather than taking an unbiased, all-sky approach. However,ASAS-SN recovers the vast majority of these supernovae,and in 2017 ASAS-SN discovered or recovered all SNe withmpeak < 15.3, a significant improvement from 2016, when weonly discovered or recovered everything with mpeak < 14.3(Holoien et al. 2017c).

Figure 6 also illustrates the estimated completeness ofour sample. We used a broken power-law fit, indicated in theFigure with a green dashed line, to model the distributionof the observable SNe brighter than mpeak = 17.01. This fit

6 http://dark.physics.ucdavis.edu/dlt40/DLT40

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

10 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

assumes a Euclidean slope below the break magnitude and avariable slope above it. We used Markov Chain Monte Carlomethods to derive the parameters of the fit. Similar to whatwe found in the 2016 catalog, we find that the best-fit breakmagnitude is m = 16.24±0.11 for the total sample, meaningthat the number counts are consistent with a Euclidean slopefor magnitudes brighter than 16.24.

The integral completeness of our total sample relativeto Euclidean predictions is 0.95 ± 0.03 at m = 16.5 and0.73 ± 0.03 at m = 17.0. The differential completeness rel-ative to Euclidean predictions is 0.71 ± 0.07 at m = 16.5and 0.36 ± 0.04 at m = 17.0. These results are very sim-ilar to what we found in Holoien et al. (2017c) and implythat roughly 70% of the SNe brighter than mpeak = 17 androughly 30% of the mpeak = 17 SNe are being found. Wenote that the Euclidean approximation we use for this anal-ysis does not account for deviations from Euclidean geome-try, K-corrections, or the effects of time dilation on SN rates,so it likely underestimates the true completeness for faintsupernovae slightly. We will include these higher order cor-rections when carrying out an analysis of nearby supernovarates in future work.

4 CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript presents a catalog of bright, spectroscop-ically confirmed SNe and their hosts, totaling 308 new su-pernovae discovered in 2017. Our full combined bright SNsample now includes 949 SNe, with 528 of these discoveredby ASAS-SN and an additional 216 independently recoveredby ASAS-SN after discovery. The ASAS-SN sample contin-ues to closely resemble an ideal magnitude-limited sampledefined by Li et al. (2011), while the combined sample hasa similar distribution but with a larger proportion of core-collapse SNe relative to Type Ia SNe than expected.

ASAS-SN remains the only professional survey to pro-vide a rapid-cadence, all-sky survey of bright transients, andwith the expansion of our telescope network in 2017, it willhave an even greater impact on the discovery of bright SNegoing forward. The ATLAS survey is now the primary com-petitor to ASAS-SN for new bright SN discoveries, thoughamateur astronomers still discover a significant fraction ofthe brightest SNe and discover the third most SNe in our2017 sample overall. Despite the advent of recent profes-sional surveys like ATLAS, ASAS-SN continues to find SNecloser to galactic nuclei than its competitors (Figure 2), andfinds SNe that would not be found otherwise (Figure 4). Asin 2015 and 2016, ASAS-SN recovered the majority of non-ASAS-SN discoveries in 2017, and it recovered or discoveredall supernovae with mpeak 6 15.3 in 2017.

Similar to what we found in Holoien et al. (2017c),our total sample is roughly complete to a peak magni-tude of mpeak = 16.2, and is roughly 70% complete formpeak 6 17.0. This analysis served as the precursor to ourfirst supernova rates paper, where we found that the specificType Ia supernova rate rises as host galaxy mass decreases(Brown et al. 2018). Manuscripts with further rate calcula-tions with respect to other host properties (e.g., star forma-tion rate and metallicity) and an overall nearby supernovarate paper are in preparation, and will have a significant im-pact on a number of fields of astronomy, including the nearby

core-collapse rate (e.g., Horiuchi et al. 2011, 2013) and multi-messenger studies ranging from gravitational waves (e.g.,Ando et al. 2013; Nakamura et al. 2016), to MeV gammarays from Type Ia supernovae (e.g., Horiuchi & Beacom2010; Diehl et al. 2014; Churazov et al. 2015) to GeV–TeVgamma rays and neutrinos from rare types of core-collapsesupernovae (e.g., Ando & Beacom 2005; Murase et al. 2011;Abbasi et al. 2012). Joint measurements such as these willgreatly increase the scientific reach of ASAS-SN.

This is the fourth of a yearly series of catalogs of brightSNe and their hosts provided by the ASAS-SN team. Thesecatalogs are intended to provide useful data repositories forbright SN and host galaxy properties that can be used fornew and interesting population studies. As ASAS-SN con-tinues to dominate the discovery of the best and brightesttransients in the sky, this is just one way in which we canleverage our unbiased sample to improve supernova research.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Las Cumbres Observatory and its stafffor their continued support of ASAS-SN.

ASAS-SN is supported by the Gordon and Betty MooreFoundation through grant GBMF5490 to the Ohio StateUniversity and NSF grant AST-1814440. Development ofASAS-SN has been supported by NSF grant AST-0908816,the Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at theOhio State University, the Mt. Cuba Astronomical Founda-tion, the Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Cen-ter for Astronomy (CASSACA), and by George Skestos.

This material is based upon work supported by theNational Science Foundation Graduate Research FellowshipProgram Under Grant No. DGE-1343012. JSB, KZS, andCSK are supported by NSF grant AST-181440. KZS andCSK are also supported by NSF grant AST-1515876. Sup-port for JLP is provided in part by FONDECYT throughthe grant 1151445 and by the Ministry of Economy, Develop-ment, and Tourism’s Millennium Science Initiative throughgrant IC120009, awarded to The Millennium Institute ofAstrophysics, MAS. SD, SB, and PC acknowledge Project11573003 supported by NSFC. JFB is supported by NSFgrant PHY-1714479. MDS is supported by generous grantsfrom the Villum foundation (grant 13261) and the Indepen-dent Research Fund Denmark. TAT is supported in partby Scialog Scholar grant 24215 from the Research Corpora-tion. PRW acknowledges support from the US Departmentof Energy as part of the Laboratory Directed Research andDevelopment program at LANL.

This research uses data obtained through the TelescopeAccess Program (TAP), which has been funded by “theStrategic Priority Research Program-The Emergence of Cos-mological Structures” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No.11 XDB09000000) and the Special Fund for As-tronomy from the Ministry of Finance.

This research has made use of the XRT Data AnalysisSoftware (XRTDAS) developed under the responsibility ofthe ASI Science Data Center (ASDC), Italy. At Penn Statethe NASA Swift program is support through contract NAS5-00136.

This research was made possible through the use of the

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 11

AAVSO Photometric All-Sky Survey (APASS), funded bythe Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund.

This research has made use of data provided by Astrom-etry.net (Barron et al. 2008; Lang et al. 2010).

This paper uses data products produced by the OIRTelescope Data Center, supported by the Smithsonian As-trophysical Observatory.

Observations made with the NASA Galaxy EvolutionExplorer (GALEX) were used in the analyses presented inthis manuscript. Some of the data presented in this paperwere obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Tele-scopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association ofUniversities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASAcontract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST datais provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grantNNX13AC07G and by other grants and contracts.

Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Al-fred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Depart-ment of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III web siteis http://www.sdss3.org/.

This publication makes use of data products from theTwo Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of theUniversity of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing andAnalysis Center/California Institute of Technology, fundedby NASA and the National Science Foundation.

This publication makes use of data products from theWide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint projectof the University of California, Los Angeles, and the JetPropulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology,funded by NASA.

This research is based in part on observations obtainedat the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) telescope,which is a joint project of the Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnolo-gia, e Inovacao (MCTI) da Republica Federativa do Brasil,the U.S. National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO),the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), andMichigan State University (MSU).

The Liverpool Telescope is operated on the island of LaPalma by Liverpool John Moores University in the SpanishObservatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Institutode Astrofisica de Canarias with financial support from theUK Science and Technology Facilities Council.

This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Ex-tragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the JetPropulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,under contract with NASA.

REFERENCES

Abbasi R., et al., 2012, A&A, 539, A60

Ando S., Beacom J. F., 2005, Physical Review Letters, 95, 061103Ando S., et al., 2013, Reviews of Modern Physics, 85, 1401

Barron J. T., Stumm C., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Roweis S., 2008,AJ, 135, 414

Blondin S., Tonry J. L., 2007, ApJ, 666, 1024

Bose S., Dong S., Klusmeyer J., Prieto J. L., Shields J., Stanek

K. Z., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10047Bose S., et al., 2018a, preprint, (arXiv:1810.12304)

Bose S., et al., 2018b, ApJ, 862, 107Brimacombe J., et al., 2017a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9939Brimacombe J., et al., 2017b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9951

Brimacombe J., et al., 2017c, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9965

Brimacombe J., et al., 2017d, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9998Brimacombe J., et al., 2017e, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9999

Brimacombe J., et al., 2017f, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10000

Brown T. M., et al., 2013, PASP, 125, 1031Brown J. S., Shappee B. J., Holoien T. W.-S., Stanek K. Z.,

Kochanek C. S., Prieto J. L., 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3993

Brown J. S., Holoien T. W.-S., Auchettl K., Stanek K. Z.,Kochanek C. S., Shappee B. J., Prieto J. L., Grupe D., 2017a,

MNRAS, 466, 4904

Brown J. S., et al., 2017b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9952Brown J. S., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1810.00011)

Chambers K. C., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1612.05560)Churazov E., et al., 2015, ApJ, 812, 62

Cikota A., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9945

Diehl R., et al., 2014, Science, 345, 1162Dong S., et al., 2016, Science, 351, 257

Drout M. R., Holoien T. W.-S., Shappee B. J., 2017, The As-

tronomer’s Telegram, 10014Fabricant D., Cheimets P., Caldwell N., Geary J., 1998, PASP,

110, 79

Gal-Yam A., Mazzali P. A., Manulis I., Bishop D., 2013, PASP,125, 749

Godoy-Rivera D., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1428

Harutyunyan A. H., et al., 2008, A&A, 488, 383Herczeg G. J., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1607.06368)

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2014a, MNRAS, 445, 3263Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2014b, ApJ, 785, L35

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016a, Acta Astron., 66, 219

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016b, MNRAS, 455, 2918Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016c, MNRAS, 463, 3813

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2017a, MNRAS, 464, 2672

Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2017b, MNRAS, 467, 1098Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2017c, MNRAS, 471, 4966

Holoien T. W.-S., Brown J. S., Auchettl K., Kochanek C. S.,

Prieto J. L., Shappee B. J., Van Saders J., 2018, MNRAS,480, 5689

Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., 2010, ApJ, 723, 329

Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., Kochanek C. S., Prieto J. L., StanekK. Z., Thompson T. A., 2011, ApJ, 738, 154

Horiuchi S., Beacom J. F., Bothwell M. S., Thompson T. A., 2013,ApJ, 769, 113

Kato T., et al., 2014a, PASJ, 66, 30

Kato T., et al., 2014b, PASJ, 66, 90Kato T., et al., 2015, PASJ, 67, 105

Kato T., et al., 2016, PASJ, 68, 65

Kilpatrick C. D., Pan Y.-C., Foley R. J., Jha S. W., Rest A.,Scolnic D., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10032

Kochanek C. S., et al., 2001, ApJ, 560, 566

Krannich G., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10022Lang D., Hogg D. W., Mierle K., Blanton M., Roweis S., 2010,

AJ, 139, 1782

Leloudas G., et al., 2016, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0002Li W., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1441

Masi G., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9989Morrissey P., et al., 2007, ApJS, 173, 682

Murase K., Thompson T. A., Lacki B. C., Beacom J. F., 2011,Physical Review D, 84, 043003

Nakamura K., Horiuchi S., Tanaka M., Hayama K., Takiwaki T.,Kotake K., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3296

Nyholm A., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9980Post R. S., et al., 2017a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9944

Post R. S., et al., 2017b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9948Post R. S., et al., 2017c, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9957Prieto J. L., et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1609.00013)Romero-Canizales C., Prieto J. L., Chen X., Kochanek C. S.,

Dong S., Holoien T. W.-S., Stanek K. Z., Liu F., 2016,preprint, (arXiv:1609.00010)

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

12 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

Rui L., Wang X., Xiang D., Wu H., Jia J., Zhai M., Zhang T.,

Zhang J., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9997SDSS Collaboration et al., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1608.02013)

Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

Schmidt S. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 781, L24Schmidt S. J., et al., 2016, ApJ, 828, L22

Shappee B. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

Shappee B. J., et al., 2016, ApJ, 826, 144Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

Taddia F., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9968

Tonry J. L., 2011, PASP, 123, 58Tonry J. L., et al., 2018, PASP, 130, 064505

Tucker M. A., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1808.07875)Vallely P. J., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints,

Wright E. L., et al., 2010, AJ, 140, 1868

Yaron O., Gal-Yam A., 2012, PASP, 124, 668

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

ASAS-SN Bright SN Catalog 2017 13

Table

1.

AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

novae

IAU

Dis

covery

Off

set

Age

SN

Nam

eN

am

eD

ate

RA

aD

ec.a

Redsh

ift

mb disc

Vc peak

gc peak

(arc

sec)d

Typ

eat

Dis

c.e

Host

Nam

ef

Dis

covery

AT

el

Cla

ssifi

cati

on

AT

el

ASA

SSN

-17ac

2017ad

2017-0

1-0

4.3

614:3

4:2

6.0

1−

38:2

8:0

9.7

00.0

3332

16.6

16.3

—6.0

9Ia

−6

2M

ASX

J14342552

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017a)

Cik

ota

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17ad

2017ah

2017-0

1-0

4.5

511:1

0:0

1.9

5+

63:3

8:3

4.1

60.0

3286

17.3

15.9

—3.8

2Ia

−11

CG

CG

314-0

11

Post

et

al.

(2017a)

TN

SA

SA

SSN

-17ae

2017ai

2017-0

1-0

4.6

616:1

7:0

2.6

2+

10:4

1:3

6.1

70.0

5027

17.5

17.6

—11.5

0Ia

−3

2M

ASX

J16170338

Post

et

al.

(2017b)

TN

SA

SA

SSN

-17af

2017b

c2017-0

1-0

5.5

112:1

9:5

0.9

0−

06:5

1:2

0.4

50.0

2687

17.0

16.4

—4.4

7Ia

−4

MC

G-0

1-3

2-0

01

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017b)

Cik

ota

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17ai

2017hl

2017-0

1-0

9.6

312:0

7:1

8.8

3+

16:5

0:2

6.0

20.0

2307

17.3

16.7

—4.7

4Ib

−7

KU

G1204+

171

Bro

wn

et

al.

(2017b)

Taddia

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17aj

2017hm

2017-0

1-0

9.6

211:3

3:1

0.5

0−

10:1

3:1

8.3

70.0

2128

16.9

15.8

—25.5

0Ia

−13

MC

G-0

2-3

0-0

03

Bro

wn

et

al.

(2017b)

Taddia

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17am

2017hq

2017-0

1-1

0.6

613:4

9:2

3.8

1+

08:3

0:2

7.6

20.0

3798

17.6

16.5

—2.2

1Ia

18

CG

CG

073-0

79

Post

et

al.

(2017c)

TN

SA

SA

SSN

-17ap

2017je

2017-0

1-0

3.1

100:3

7:3

7.5

9−

34:2

9:4

9.2

40.0

4500

17.4

16.8

—8.9

4Ia

−10

GA

LE

XA

SC

J003737

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017c)

Dro

ut

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17at

2017ln

2017-0

1-1

9.5

411:3

8:3

3.6

6+

25:2

3:5

0.1

70.0

2536

16.7

16.4

—3.0

8Ia

−9

2M

ASX

J11383367

Masi

et

al.

(2017)

Nyholm

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17bb

2017ng

2017-0

1-2

3.6

515:2

0:4

0.7

5+

04:3

9:3

4.4

20.0

3700

16.9

16.7

—1.8

6Ia

−3

2M

ASX

J15204087

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017d)

Dro

ut

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17b

c2017nh

2017-0

1-2

3.3

607:1

0:1

3.5

2+

27:1

2:0

9.9

70.0

6100

17.6

16.8

—6.1

8Ia

12M

ASX

J07101346

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017e)

Rui

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17b

d2017nk

2017-0

1-2

3.6

115:5

9:1

8.4

3+

13:3

6:5

0.8

90.0

3455

17.3

17.1

—3.0

0Ia

32M

ASX

J15591858

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017f)

Dro

ut

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17b

e2017pa

2017-0

1-1

7.0

702:0

3:1

0.5

3−

61:4

1:1

0.6

10.0

4000

17.5

17.0

—0.5

1Ia

−1

2M

ASX

J02031063

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017f)

Bri

macom

be

et

al.

(2017f)

ASA

SSN

-17bh

2017p

o2017-0

1-2

6.6

116:0

3:5

1.7

0+

39:5

9:2

4.1

70.0

3186

16.6

15.8

—14.5

2Ia

−3

CG

CG

223-0

33

Dro

ut

et

al.

(2017)

Kilpatr

ick

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17bn

2017vu

2017-0

1-2

1.4

308:5

9:2

3.9

2−

09:5

2:2

9.3

20.0

4451

17.6

17.0

—0.6

1Ia

−2

2M

ASX

J08592386

Kilpatr

ick

et

al.

(2017)

Kilpatr

ick

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17b

o2017w

b2017-0

1-2

8.5

911:0

1:1

9.5

3+

70:3

9:5

4.7

60.0

3000

16.9

16.3

—1.9

1Ia

−9

2M

ASX

J11011991

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17bp

2017w

i2017-0

1-2

9.0

502:0

2:0

8.6

3−

17:5

9:5

6.3

60.0

5100

17.2

17.0

—3.4

5Ia

7G

AL

EX

ASC

J020208

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

Bose

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17b

q2017xx

2017-0

1-2

7.5

107:2

5:3

8.2

1+

59:0

0:0

9.6

30.0

4000

17.6

16.4

—1.5

1Ia

19

GA

LE

XA

SC

J072538

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17br

2017xy

2017-0

1-2

9.6

315:5

2:0

0.3

1+

66:1

8:5

5.2

70.0

2600

17.1

18.1

—3.7

1II

P10

GA

LE

XA

SC

J155200

Kra

nnic

het

al.

(2017)

Kilpatr

ick

et

al.

(2017)

ASA

SSN

-17bs

2017yh

2017-0

1-3

0.6

617:5

2:0

6.1

3+

21:3

3:5

7.8

20.0

2040

16.5

15.9

—13.0

2Ia

−8

IC1269

Kilpatr

ick

et

al.

(2017)

Bose

et

al.

(2017)

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

aR

ight

asc

ensi

on

and

declinati

on

are

giv

en

inth

eJ2000

ep

och.

bD

iscovery

magnit

udes

are

V-

org-b

and

magnit

udes

from

ASA

S-S

N,

dep

endin

gon

the

cam

era

use

dfo

rdis

covery

.c

Peak

V-

and

g-b

and

magnit

udes

are

measu

red

from

ASA

S-S

Ndata

.d

Off

set

indic

ate

sth

eoff

set

of

the

sup

ern

ova

inarc

seconds

from

the

coord

inate

sof

the

host

nucle

us,

taken

from

NE

D.

eD

iscovery

ages

are

giv

en

indays

rela

tive

top

eak.

All

ages

are

appro

xim

ate

and

are

only

list

ed

ifa

cle

ar

age

was

giv

en

inth

ecla

ssifi

cati

on

tele

gra

m.

e“2M

ASSX

”and

“G

AL

EX

ASC

”host

nam

es

have

been

abbre

via

ted

due

tosp

ace

const

rtain

ts.

Table

2.

Non

-AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

novae

IAU

Dis

covery

Off

set

SN

Nam

eN

am

eD

ate

RA

aD

ec.a

Redsh

ift

mb peak

Vc peak

gc peak

(arc

sec)d

Typ

eH

ost

Nam

eD

iscovere

dB

ye

Recovere

d?f

AT

LA

S17abh

2017ae

2017-0

1-0

4.2

902:0

5:5

0.6

2+

18:2

2:3

0.2

30.0

22000

16.4

16.2

—4.7

4Ia

GA

LE

XA

SC

J020550

AT

LA

SY

es

2017hr

2017hr

2017-0

1-0

6.6

912:0

6:2

7.3

9+

28:0

8:1

9.7

00.0

29300

16.6

17.0

—1.3

8Ia

SD

SS

J120627.4

6A

mate

urs

Yes

PS17hj

2017jd

2017-0

1-0

9.2

123:3

4:3

6.4

7−

04:3

2:0

4.3

20.0

07368

14.6

——

1.2

6Ia

IC5334

Pan-S

TA

RR

SN

o2017hn

2017hn

2017-0

1-0

9.4

113:0

7:3

9.4

6+

06:2

0:1

4.6

00.0

23853

16.1

15.8

—4.6

6Ia

UG

C08204

Am

ate

urs

Yes

AT

LA

S17ajn

2017lv

2017-0

1-1

4.6

311:4

4:2

6.5

4−

28:2

7:2

7.2

20.0

28717

17.0

16.7

—18.4

8Ia

ESO

440-G

001

AT

LA

SY

es

MA

ST

ER

OT

J081506.1

3+

381123.3

—2017-0

1-1

6.0

208:1

5:6

.13

+38:1

1:2

3.3

00.0

54000

16.9

16.6

—11.3

5Ia

2M

ASX

J08150520

MA

ST

ER

No

AT

LA

S17air

2017jl

2017-0

1-1

6.2

200:5

7:3

1.9

0+

30:1

1:0

6.8

30.0

16331

14.6

15.3

—5.8

8Ia

2M

ASX

J00573150

AT

LA

SY

es

2017m

f2017m

f2017-0

1-2

1.0

914:1

6:3

1.0

+39:3

5:1

2.0

20.0

25678

16.0

15.9

—12.6

IaN

GC

5541

Am

ate

urs

Yes

PT

SS-1

7dfc

2017m

s2017-0

1-2

1.7

110:2

6:4

2.3

7+

36:4

0:5

0.6

20.0

24639

15.6

15.7

—5.2

2Ia

SD

SS

J102641.9

9P

TSS

Yes

AT

LA

S17akw

2017nt

2017-0

1-2

3.2

123:5

3:3

1.1

3+

03:4

4:0

8.1

80.0

38800

16.8

——

34.3

8Ia

-91T

SST

SL

2J235328.8

9A

TL

AS

No

AT

LA

S17alb

2017ns

2017-0

1-2

3.3

102:4

9:1

0.3

6+

14:3

6:0

2.4

80.0

27900

16.7

——

2.8

8Ia

2M

ASX

J02491020

AT

LA

SN

oA

TL

AS17am

z2017pn

2017-0

1-2

6.3

104:4

6:2

4.5

9−

11:5

9:1

8.2

50.0

14000

16.5

15.8

—0

IIP

Uncata

logued

AT

LA

SN

oA

TL

AS17auc

2017zd

2017-0

1-2

6.6

413:3

2:4

2.0

9−

21:4

8:0

4.3

50.0

2947

15.9

15.9

—1.3

8Ia

2M

ASX

J13324217

AT

LA

SY

es

AT

LA

S17axb

2017adj

2017-0

1-3

0.6

513:4

3:2

3.2

5−

19:5

6:3

7.1

30.0

30000

16.9

16.1

—3.8

4Ia

GA

LE

XA

SC

J134322

AT

LA

SY

es

Gaia

17aiq

2017ati

2017-0

2-0

6.4

309:4

9:5

6.7

0+

67:1

0:5

9.5

60.0

1305

16.0

16.2

—38.6

IIb

KU

G0945+

674

Gaia

Yes

DLT

17h

2017ahn

2017-0

2-0

8.3

610:3

7:1

7.4

5−

41:3

7:0

5.2

70.0

09255

15.8

15.3

—40.3

2II

NG

C3318

DLT

40

Yes

MA

ST

ER

OT

J083256.9

2-0

35128.1

2017cgr

2017-0

2-1

1.9

308:3

2:5

6.9

2−

03:5

1:2

8.1

00.0

30584

16.5

16.5

—5.8

2Ia

2M

ASX

J08325728

MA

ST

ER

Yes

PS17bbn

2017avj

2017-0

2-1

4.5

813:0

5:3

.01

+53:3

9:3

3.2

10.0

29037

17.0

16.7

—19.4

4Ia

-91bg

CG

CG

270-0

47

Pan-S

TA

RR

SY

es

iPT

F17aub

2017aub

2017-0

2-1

5.3

06:4

0:2

4.7

0+

64:3

3:0

2.7

50.0

16000

17.0

16.9

—10.0

2II

CG

CG

308-0

36

PT

FN

oA

TL

AS17bam

2017avl

2017-0

2-1

6.3

205:2

0:4

7.0

8+

03:1

5:2

4.5

50.0

27426

16.4

16.4

—23.4

6Ia

CG

CG

421-0

34

AT

LA

SY

es

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

bR

ight

asc

ensi

on

and

declinati

on

are

giv

en

inth

eJ2000

ep

och.

cM

agnit

udes

are

taken

from

D.

W.

Bis

hop’s

Bri

ght

Sup

ern

ova

websi

te,

as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt,

and

may

be

from

diff

ere

nt

filt

ers

.d

All

V−

and

g−

band

peak

magnit

udes

are

measu

red

from

ASA

S-S

Ndata

for

case

sw

here

the

sup

ern

ova

was

dete

cte

d.

eO

ffse

tin

dic

ate

sth

eoff

set

of

the

sup

ern

ovae

inarc

seconds

from

the

coord

inate

sof

the

host

nucle

us,

taken

from

NE

D.

f“A

mate

urs

”in

dic

ate

sdis

covery

by

any

num

ber

of

non-p

rofe

ssio

nal

ast

ronom

ers

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

gIn

dic

ate

sw

heth

er

the

sup

ern

ova

was

indep

endentl

yre

covere

din

ASA

S-S

Ndata

or

not.

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)

14 T. W.-S. Holoien et al.

Table

3.

AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

nova

Host

Gala

xie

s SN

SN

SN

Off

set

Gala

xy

Nam

eR

edsh

ift

Nam

eT

yp

e(a

rcse

c)

AV

am

NU

Vb

muc

mgc

mrc

mic

mzc

mJd

mH

dm

KS

d,e

mW

1m

W2

2M

ASX

J14342552-3

828081

0.0

3332

ASA

SSN

-17ac

Ia6.0

90.2

80

——

——

——

13.5

60.0

712.7

40.0

712.4

10.1

112.8

30.0

212.8

70.0

3C

GC

G314-0

11

0.0

3286

ASA

SSN

-17ad

Ia3.8

20.0

32

19.7

00.1

216.0

50.0

114.2

90.0

013.5

10.0

013.1

20.0

012.8

60.0

011.8

90.0

211.1

80.0

410.8

70.0

511.3

10.0

211.3

60.0

22M

ASX

J16170338+

1041359

0.0

5027

ASA

SSN

-17ae

Ia11.5

00.1

66

19.0

20.0

717.8

10.0

416.4

10.0

015.7

60.0

015.4

00.0

015.1

70.0

214.4

60.1

213.7

00.1

213.2

50.1

814.1

00.0

713.9

80.0

4M

CG

-01-3

2-0

01

0.0

2687

ASA

SSN

-17af

Ia4.4

70.1

02

16.9

20.0

2—

——

——

11.8

80.0

311.1

30.0

410.8

50.0

611.3

80.0

211.3

70.0

2K

UG

1204+

171

0.0

2307

ASA

SSN

-17ai

Ib4.7

40.1

29

17.5

00.0

416.6

00.0

115.5

50.0

015.0

90.0

014.8

80.0

014.6

60.0

113.8

10.0

513.0

90.0

712.9

70.0

913.0

90.0

312.9

50.0

3M

CG

-02-3

0-0

03

0.0

2128

ASA

SSN

-17aj

Ia25.5

00.1

14

17.8

00.0

3—

——

——

12.3

70.0

411.6

70.0

511.2

70.0

811.8

00.0

211.7

70.0

2C

GC

G073-0

79

0.0

3798

ASA

SSN

-17am

Ia2.2

10.0

77

17.1

70.0

416.2

20.0

114.5

30.0

013.7

10.0

013.3

30.0

012.9

80.0

012.1

80.0

411.4

40.0

511.1

80.0

812.0

50.0

212.1

30.0

3G

AL

EX

ASC

J003737.2

0-3

42957.7

0.0

4500

ASA

SSN

-17ap

Ia8.9

40.0

37

19.4

30.0

5—

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

15.4

40.0

6*

15.9

50.0

515.9

40.1

42M

ASX

J11383367+

2523532

0.0

2536

ASA

SSN

-17at

Ia3.0

80.0

75

—16.8

30.0

115.3

80.0

014.6

60.0

014.2

70.0

014.0

10.0

012.8

50.0

312.1

80.0

511.8

00.0

612.1

50.0

211.5

70.0

22M

ASX

J15204087+

0439331

0.0

3000

ASA

SSN

-17bb

Ia1.8

60.1

21

19.0

70.0

818.4

90.0

617.1

70.0

116.6

10.0

116.2

70.0

116.0

60.0

114.9

00.0

814.3

00.1

013.9

70.1

513.9

40.0

313.8

40.0

42M

ASX

J07101346+

2712041

0.0

6100

ASA

SSN

-17b

cIa

6.1

80.1

69

——

——

——

13.2

60.0

312.6

20.0

512.2

80.0

612.7

10.0

412.7

20.0

52M

ASX

J15591858+

1336487

0.0

3455

ASA

SSN

-17b

dIa

3.0

00.1

29

17.4

20.0

216.4

60.0

115.6

50.0

015.2

40.0

015.0

00.0

014.8

10.0

113.6

10.0

612.9

30.0

712.4

60.1

012.5

50.0

412.2

70.0

32M

ASX

J02031063-6

141105

0.0

4000

ASA

SSN

-17b

eIa

0.5

10.0

96

21.3

20.2

8—

——

——

12.9

80.0

412.2

60.0

511.9

00.0

812.1

20.0

212.1

70.0

2C

GC

G223-0

33

0.0

3186

ASA

SSN

-17bh

Ia14.5

20.0

38

18.9

90.0

6—

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

>15.6

——

2M

ASX

J08592386-0

952291

0.0

4451

ASA

SSN

-17bn

Ia0.6

10.1

01

21.0

80.2

1—

——

——

12.7

00.0

312.0

30.0

311.6

90.0

511.8

40.0

211.8

00.0

22M

ASX

J11011991+

7039548

0.0

3000

ASA

SSN

-17b

oIa

1.9

10.0

68

18.1

40.0

5—

——

——

14.8

10.0

814.2

20.1

113.8

70.1

313.8

00.0

313.6

90.0

3G

AL

EX

ASC

J020208.7

3-1

75958.3

0.0

5100

ASA

SSN

-17bp

Ia3.4

50.0

75

18.6

80.0

417.8

60.0

216.9

20.0

116.6

30.0

116.4

10.0

116.3

00.0

2>

17.0

>16.4

14.2

70.0

5*

14.7

80.0

314.5

30.0

5G

AL

EX

ASC

J072538.1

4+

590010.5

0.0

4000

ASA

SSN

-17b

qIa

1.5

10.1

36

21.5

90.3

6—

——

——

14.2

40.0

513.5

50.0

713.2

00.0

813.8

30.0

313.8

10.0

4G

AL

EX

ASC

J155200.1

6+

661851.6

0.0

2600

ASA

SSN

-17br

IIP

3.7

10.0

75

——

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

15.0

70.0

5*

15.5

80.0

315.7

30.0

7IC

1269

0.0

2040

ASA

SSN

-17bs

Ia13.0

20.2

43

16.1

10.0

1—

——

——

11.8

30.0

311.1

90.0

510.8

90.0

611.9

50.0

211.8

20.0

2

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

Uncert

ain

tyis

giv

en

for

all

magnit

udes,

and

inso

me

case

sis

equal

tozero

.a

Gala

cti

cexti

ncti

on

taken

from

Schla

fly

&F

inkb

ein

er

(2011).

bN

om

agnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

GA

LE

Xsu

rvey

data

.c

No

magnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

SD

SS

data

or

those

locate

douts

ide

of

the

SD

SS

footp

rint.

dFor

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

2M

ASS

data

,w

eass

um

ean

upp

er

lim

itof

the

fain

test

gala

xy

dete

cte

din

each

band

from

our

sam

ple

.e

KS

-band

magnit

udes

mark

ed

wit

ha

“*”

indic

ate

those

est

imate

dfr

om

the

WIS

EW

1-b

and

data

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

Table

4.

Non

-AS

AS

-SN

Su

per

nova

Host

Gala

xie

s

SN

SN

SN

Off

set

Gala

xy

Nam

eR

edsh

ift

Nam

eT

yp

e(a

rcse

c)

Aa V

mb N

UV

mc u

mc g

mc r

mc i

mc z

md J

md H

md,e

KS

mW

1m

W2

GA

LE

XA

SC

J020550.5

30.0

22000

AT

LA

S17abh

Ia4.7

40.2

03

21.2

60.2

720.2

50.2

218.3

60.0

217.7

10.0

217.3

50.0

117.1

30.0

4>

17.0

>16.4

15.1

70.0

6*

15.6

80.0

415.7

90.1

3SD

SS

J120627.4

6+

280820.6

0.0

29300

2017hr

Ia1.3

80.0

61

—21.4

90.1

320.4

80.0

319.5

80.0

219.1

40.0

218.8

10.0

5>

17.0

>16.4

15.6

90.0

7*

16.2

00.0

616.0

40.1

7IC

5334

0.0

07368

PS17hj

Ia1.2

60.1

14

16.9

60.0

415.2

20.0

113.4

70.0

012.7

00.0

012.2

80.0

011.9

60.0

011.0

20.0

210.3

40.0

210.1

10.0

410.5

10.0

210.5

80.0

2U

GC

08204

0.0

23853

2017hn

Ia4.6

60.0

91

17.3

50.0

416.0

30.0

114.5

40.0

013.7

90.0

013.3

80.0

013.0

60.0

011.9

00.0

411.1

70.0

510.8

60.0

811.2

60.0

311.1

50.0

2E

SO

440-G

001

0.0

28717

AT

LA

S17ajn

Ia18.4

80.2

06

17.4

00.0

5—

——

——

13.2

90.0

612.5

70.0

712.3

60.1

112.7

90.0

312.8

50.0

32M

ASX

J08150520+

3811205

0.0

54000

MA

ST

ER

OT

J081506

Ia11.3

50.1

01

18.9

40.0

616.9

50.0

315.4

60.0

114.7

70.0

014.2

80.0

013.9

90.0

113.8

00.0

613.1

60.0

912.6

60.0

913.3

20.0

413.1

00.0

42M

ASX

J00573150+

3011098

0.0

16331

AT

LA

S17air

Ia5.8

80.2

01

19.2

10.0

818.2

00.0

416.7

20.0

016.0

30.0

015.7

10.0

015.4

70.0

114.7

40.0

914.1

90.1

413.8

80.1

414.0

60.0

314.0

40.0

4N

GC

5541

0.0

25678

2017m

fIa

12.6

0.0

30

15.8

40.0

2—

——

——

11.1

70.0

110.4

30.0

210.0

70.0

211.0

00.0

310.8

20.0

2SD

SS

J102641.9

9+

364053.2

0.0

24639

PT

SS-1

7dfc

Ia5.2

20.0

27

19.0

10.0

618.2

30.0

317.0

90.0

116.6

70.0

116.4

40.0

116.3

40.0

3>

17.0

>16.4

14.5

90.0

6*

15.1

00.0

415.1

30.0

8SST

SL

2J235328.8

9+

034400

0.0

38800

AT

LA

S17akw

Ia-9

1T

34.3

80.1

36

—21.9

60.2

720.4

20.0

319.2

40.0

218.6

90.0

218.3

20.0

4>

17.0

>16.4

14.4

80.0

6*

14.9

90.0

414.3

00.0

52M

ASX

J02491020+

1436036

0.0

27900

AT

LA

S17alb

Ia2.8

80.2

99

19.5

10.1

1—

——

——

13.3

10.0

412.5

70.0

412.2

30.0

712.2

90.0

312.2

40.0

3U

ncata

logued

0.0

14000

AT

LA

S17am

zII

P0

0.3

84

——

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

14.8

40.0

5*

15.3

50.0

315.1

90.0

72M

ASX

J13324217-2

148034

0.0

2947

AT

LA

S17auc

Ia1.3

80.2

32

19.3

40.1

0—

——

——

13.6

60.0

512.9

00.0

512.5

60.0

913.0

60.0

413.0

50.0

4G

AL

EX

ASC

J134322.9

70.0

30000

AT

LA

S17axb

Ia3.8

40.3

00

20.9

60.3

3—

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

13.6

10.0

5*

14.1

20.0

313.9

80.0

4K

UG

0945+

674

0.0

1305

Gaia

17aiq

IIb

38.6

0.3

27

——

——

——

>17.0

>16.4

14.6

70.0

5*

15.1

80.0

314.9

10.0

6N

GC

3318

0.0

09255

DLT

17h

II40.3

20.2

12

——

——

——

10.0

70.0

29.4

10.0

39.1

00.0

310.3

50.0

210.2

30.0

22M

ASX

J08325728-0

351295

0.0

30584

MA

ST

ER

OT

J083256

Ia5.8

20.1

00

20.4

10.1

417.3

20.0

215.4

70.0

014.6

40.0

014.2

50.0

013.9

60.0

012.7

00.0

412.1

20.0

511.8

20.0

912.1

10.0

212.1

70.0

2C

GC

G270-0

47

0.0

29037

PS17bbn

Ia-9

1bg

19.4

40.0

52

18.5

00.0

616.4

10.0

114.6

00.0

013.8

30.0

013.4

10.0

013.1

10.0

012.3

40.0

311.6

40.0

411.3

40.0

611.6

70.0

211.6

70.0

2C

GC

G308-0

36

0.0

16000

iPT

F17aub

II10.0

20.2

29

17.5

90.0

316.4

40.0

215.1

10.0

014.4

90.0

014.1

80.0

013.9

80.0

113.3

30.0

512.7

30.0

812.4

80.1

013.2

10.0

313.1

30.0

3C

GC

G421-0

34

0.0

27426

AT

LA

S17bam

Ia23.4

60.3

19

—16.6

10.0

114.6

90.0

013.7

60.0

013.3

20.0

012.9

90.0

011.8

60.0

311.1

80.0

310.8

40.0

611.1

70.0

211.1

90.0

2

This

table

isavailable

init

senti

rety

ina

machin

e-r

eadable

form

inth

eonline

journ

al.

Ap

ort

ion

issh

ow

nhere

for

guid

ance

regard

ing

its

form

and

conte

nt.

Uncert

ain

tyis

giv

en

for

all

magnit

udes,

and

inso

me

case

sis

zero

.“M

AST

ER

”su

pern

ova

nam

es

and

“G

AL

EX

ASC

”gala

xy

nam

es

have

been

abbre

via

ted.

aG

ala

cti

cexti

ncti

on

taken

from

Schla

fly

&F

inkb

ein

er

(2011).

bN

om

agnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

GA

LE

Xsu

rvey

data

.c

No

magnit

ude

islist

ed

for

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

SD

SS

data

or

those

locate

douts

ide

of

the

SD

SS

footp

rint.

dFor

those

gala

xie

snot

dete

cte

din

2M

ASS

data

,w

eass

um

ean

upp

er

lim

itof

the

fain

test

gala

xy

dete

cte

din

each

band

from

our

sam

ple

.e

KS

-band

magnit

udes

mark

ed

wit

ha

“*”

indic

ate

those

est

imate

dfr

om

the

WIS

EW

1-b

and

data

,as

desc

rib

ed

inth

ete

xt.

MNRAS 484, 1899–1911 (2019)