Arun
2
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Divn.), MALOUT Suman Rani V/. Ra!"a# $%&. Sui% ' r " $i n * +a* ' "ar%i%i n AFFIDAVIT I, Ja Ra! S/ Siri Ram R/ Ga#i Man ar Na-"a#, E . M.C. a#i, Ma# u%, T$ i# Di%%. Sri Mu0%ar Sa i , 1 $r$ * #$mn#* a''irm an1 1$&#ar$ a un1$r 23 4. T a% I a# n- +i% % $r 1$'$n1an% an1 "#ain%i'' ar$ ui% u$ % % $ %un$ ' 5/46 S ar$ $a& . T $ 1$'$n1an% n . 4 Ra!"a# i in % ' ui% u$ %i## % 1a*. 5. T a% "r$vi u#* Dar "%i D$vi m% $r ' % $ 1$'$n1an% a 7ri an u an1 ' % $ "#ain%i'' +$r$ +n$r in " $i n ' % $ ui% u$. T Dar "a%i D$vi 1i$1 n 8439:35998. T $r$a'%$r % $ ai1 7$+a# 7ri an a# 1i$1. % $ "#ain%i'' an1 1$'$n1an% $&am$ % $ +n$r ' ui% u$ % % $ %un$ ' 5/4 $a& . 8. T a% % $ ui% u$ a $& m$ a ur&$ ' 1i"u%$ ar$r. I am a# n % -ainin- an*% in- u% ' i%. I &ann % u$1 % $ u$ un#$ 1ivi1$1 * m$$% an1 un1. I a# n- +i% 1$'$n1an% Sa%"a# +an% ur $"ara%$ % $ ui% u$ 'r m % $ "#ain%i'' an1 % $r & 31$'$n1an%. T $ "r "$r%* / ui% $ 1ivi1$1 * u& a +a* % a% % $ I a# n- +i% Sa%"a# &an -$% "$&i'i& " r%i $"ara%$ " $i n 'r m "#ain%i'' an1 % $r & 31$'$n1an%. I a# n- +i% a%"a# +an% % -$% % $ "$&i'i& " r%i n ' % $ ui% u$ * "ar%i%i n. S % $ ui% "ar%i%i n$1 * m$$% an1 un1. D$" n$n% Ja Ra! V$ri'i&a%i n 23 V$ri'i$1 % a% % $ & n%$n% ' "ara n . 4 % 8 ' m* a v$ ai1 a''i1avi% ar$ %ru % % $ $% ' m* 0n +#$1-$ an1 $#i$' an1 n % in- a $$n & n&$a#$1 % $r$in. D$" n$n% Ja Ra!
-
Upload
rajiv-kalra -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Arun
Transcript of Arun
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (Jr
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Divn.), MALOUT
Suman Rani
V/s.
Rajpal etc.
Suit for possession by way of partition
AFFIDAVIT
I, Jas Raj S/o Siri Ram R/o Gali Manohar Nagpal, Ex. M.C. Wali, Malout, Tehsil Malout, Distt. Sri Muktsar Sahib, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :-1.
That I along with other defendants and plaintiff are owners of the suit house to the tune of 2/16 Share each. The defendant no. 1 Rajpal is in the possession of suit house till today.
2.
That previously Daropti Devi mother of the defendants and Kewal Krishan husband of the plaintiff were owner in possession of the suit house. The said Daropati Devi died on 31-05-2003. Thereafter the said Kewal Krishan also died. Hence the plaintiff and defendants became the owner of suit house to the tune of 2/16 Share each. 3.
That the suit house has become a source of dispute between all co-sharers. I am also not gaining anything out of it. I cannot used the house unless it is divided by meets and bounds. I along with defendant Satpal wants our separate share in the suit house from the plaintiff and other co-defendants. The property / suit house shall be divided by such a way that the I along with Satpal can get specific portion and separate possession from plaintiff and other co-defendants. I along with satpal defendant wants to get the specific portion of the suit house by partition. So the suit house must be partitioned by meets and bounds. Deponent
Jas Raj
Verification :-
Verified that the contents of para no. 1 to 3 of my above said affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therein.
Deponent
Jas Raj
