Art Gallery of New South Wales Sydney Modern Masterplan … · 2017. 12. 7. · 3D Volumes -...
Transcript of Art Gallery of New South Wales Sydney Modern Masterplan … · 2017. 12. 7. · 3D Volumes -...
44ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
Summary
The Art Gallery of New South Wales has developed a building with unique heritage values.
Many of the difficulties the Gallery currently faces are a legacy of staged, incremental development. In most instances each phase has been initiated in order to accommodate the expanding needs of the Gallery’s audiences.
The existing heritage fabric of the Gallery limits direct access for people with a disability and families with prams, and maintains a singular small and closed, yet attractive, facade to the entrance.
5 Heritage
45JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
5 Heritage
46ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
5 Heritage
History
Brief history of the Art Gallery of New South Wales
The Art Gallery of New South Wales traces its origins to a public meeting on April 24, 1871, which established an “Academy of Art” for ‘the purpose of promoting the fine arts through lecture, art classed and regular exhibitions.’
The physical realisation of this ambition however, first begins with the assembly of a collection in the Art Annex at the International Exhibition of 1879. Since 1885, the collection has been housed and displayed at its current location in the Domain, adjacent to the eastern entrance to the Royal Botanic Gardens.
Over its life-time there have been a number of radical changes in the form and development of the Gallery with each stage being over seen by eminent architects of their respective eras.
Since its inception the Gallery has been know under an number of names. The ‘Fine Art Annex’ which served as a part of the International Exhibition was opened as ‘The Art Gallery of New South Wales’ in 1880. This was changed to ‘The National Art Gallery of New South Wales’ in 1883. It was not until the establishment of the Art Gallery of New South Wales Act 1958, that the name reverted to the 1880 version.
Today, various display galleries have been named in honour of major benefactors. These include:
> Rudy Komon Gallery, Upper Level;
> The James Agapitos Analysis Room, Conservation Studio – Microscope Room, Upper Level;
> Dorothy Street Twentieth Century Australian Galleries, Ground Floor;
> The Nelson Meers Foundation Sidney Nolan Room, Ground Floor;
> The Lowy Gonski Gallery, Ground Floor;
> The James Fairfax Galleries, Ground Floor;
> The John Schaeffar Galleries, Ground Floor;
> The Margaret Olley Function Space, Ground Floor;
> The Margaret Olley Twentieth Century European Galleries, Lower Level 2;
> Franco & Amina Belgiorno-Nettis & Family Contemporary Galleries, Lower Level 2; and the
> John Kaldor Family Collection Gallery, Lower Level 2.
The
Cad
igal
peo
ple
of t
he E
ora
natio
n ar
e cu
stod
ians
of
the
land
on
whi
ch t
he G
alle
ry is
cur
rent
ly s
ited
1871
Mee
ting
esta
blis
hes
an ‘A
cade
my
of A
rt’
John Hornbury Hunt, ArchitectPhoto: Freeman Brothers (1899)From original glass plateMitchell Library, SLNSW
Walter Liberty Vernon, ArchitectUnknown photographerwww.wikipedia
Edmund Capon, Director1978 to presentPhoto: The Australian (2007)www.theaustralian.news.com.au
Hal Missingham, DirectorPhoto: Max Dupain OBE (1947)Gelatin silver photograph NPG Collection: 2003.69
Portrait of Sir William Ashton, DirectorUnknown photographer (1940s)Gelatin silver photograph; 15.4 x 8.9 cmPictures Collection nla.pic-an11852731
1875
The
Gal
lery
’s c
olle
ctio
n is
firs
t ho
used
at
Cla
rke’
s A
ssem
bly
Hal
l in
Eliz
abet
h S
tree
t
1879
A t
imbe
r ‘F
ine
Art
s A
nnex
’ is
built
for
Sydn
ey’s
In
tern
atio
nal E
xhib
ition
.
1885
The
colle
ctio
n of
‘The
Nat
iona
l Art
Gal
lery
of
New
Sou
th
Wal
es’ i
s m
oved
to
a bu
ildin
g de
sign
ed b
y Jo
hn H
ornb
ury
Hun
t at
the
pre
sent
site
in t
he D
omai
n
John Hornbury Hunt’s vision for the Gallery
Walter Liberty Vernon’s design
Hunt’s Annex interior
1892
Elie
zer
Mon
tiefo
re is
app
oint
ed t
he G
alle
ry’s
firs
t D
irect
or
1896-1909
Gov
ernm
ent A
rchi
tect
Wal
ter
Libe
rty
Vern
on d
esig
ns a
nd
build
s th
e co
urts
and
gal
lerie
s as
an
exte
nsio
n to
the
an
nex
and
whi
ch r
emai
ns e
ssen
tially
unc
hang
ed u
ntil
1969
Vernon’s completed galleries and vestibule
1905
Got
her V
icto
r Fy
ers
Man
n is
app
oint
ed ‘D
irect
or a
nd
Sec
reta
ry’
1929
Jam
es S
tuar
t M
acD
onal
d is
app
oint
ed D
irect
or a
nd
Sec
reta
ry
1937
John
Will
iam
Ash
ton
is a
ppoi
nted
Dire
ctor
and
Sec
reta
ry
1945
Hal
Mis
sing
ham
is a
ppoi
nted
Dire
ctor
and
Sec
reta
ry
The
Cap
tain
Coo
k W
ing
(by
Gov
ernm
ent A
rchi
tect
s D
epar
tmen
t an
d A
ndre
w A
nder
sons
) is
built
and
ope
ned
to t
he p
ublic
North elevation of Cook wing
1978
Edm
und
Cap
on is
app
oint
ed D
irect
or
Brit
ish
colo
ny is
est
ablis
hed
in S
ydne
y C
ove
1788 1971
Pete
r P
hilli
p La
vert
y is
app
oint
ed D
irect
or
1980
Art
Gal
lery
of
New
Sou
th W
ales
Act
198
0 is
pas
sed
1988
The
Bic
ente
nnia
l ext
ensi
on (b
y A
ndre
w A
nder
sons
of
PTW
) ar
e co
mpl
eted
- th
is d
oubl
es t
he s
ize
of t
he G
alle
ry
2003 2011
The
Asi
an g
alle
ries
exte
nsio
n (b
y R
icha
rd J
ohns
on a
nd
JPW
) are
com
plet
ed
The
new
con
tem
pora
ry g
alle
ries
feat
urin
g th
e Jo
hn K
aldo
r Fa
mily
Gal
lery
(by
PTW
) are
com
plet
ed
1969-1970
Bicentennial sculpture court
The Asian Wing
The Belgiorno-Nettis FamilyImage: AGNSW
Dorothy and Fred StreetImage: AGNSW
David Gonski and Frank LowyImage: AGNSW
Margaret OlleyImage: AGNSW
John KaldorImage: AGNSW
James FairfaxImage: AGNSW
John SchaefferImage: AGNSW
Major Benefactors
Major Milestones
47JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
5 Heritage
Significance & Potential
Lower Level 3 Lower Level 2 Lower Level 1 Ground Level Upper Level Roof Level
Fabric of High Heritage Significance
Fabric of Heritage Significance
3D Volumes - Heritage Significance - View from NortheastNot to scale @ A3
3D Volumes - Heritage Significance - View from SouthWestNot to scale @ A3
Introduction
The building and site of the Gallery have significant heritage opportunities. Many of these are recognised by heritage listings and some are maintained by virtue of their inclusion in the AGNSW Conservation Management Plan (CMP), completed in 2008.
Heritage Significance - Current Listings
The Gallery is currently listed on the following registers due its deemed heritage significance:
Register of the National Estate> Listed on 21 March 1978 with place ID 2349;
NSW State Heritage Register> The building is listed (Local Government listing,
Database number 2423945);
> The site is listed as an Archaeological item (Local Government listing, Database number 2424840);
City of Sydney Council> Listed in Sydney City Heritage Study (2002), Item 3012;
National Trust Register> Listed as Classified;
RAIA, NSW Register of Significant Buildings> Listed for Walter Liberty Vernon works 1897-1909;
> Listed for NSW Government Architect Work 1972 and 1988.
Conservation Management Plan, 2008
While the CMP has been activated primarily to assist the management of exhibitions while conserving the significant fabric of the building, it is also serves to facilitate the growth of the Gallery.
The CMP acknowledges that the Gallery will have to expand in line with increasing audience and collection demands.
Note: The constraints and opportunities in line with heritage listings identified above are outlined in CMP Section 6, while the conservation policies are dealt with in Section 7.
48ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
1909 - End of Phase 2The north-western courts 5 & 6 and the board room are completed.
All elements of Vernon’s Gallery are in place.
1901 - Phase 2The south elevation of the Gallery is completed with galleries 11, 12 & 13 adjacent to the completed courts.
1905-1906 - Phase 2Central Court floor and roof is raised to meet the level of the Vernon galleries.
The new entrance and entry court is opened to the public in 1906.
1904 - Phase 2The vestibule and portico are completed in the anticipation that they are to be established as the main entrance to the Gallery.
5 Heritage
Evolution of the AGNSW Site
The Art Gallery of New South Wales has occupied its site in the outer domain since 1885.
Over this period, the Gallery has grown through the six significant phases (each with their own staging). There has also been significant modifications to its surrounds during this period.
The building is the major service delivery asset owned by the Gallery and it contains a number of built elements and architectural stages unified into a single purpose built structure:
1 Subterranean remnants of John Horbury Hunt circa 1885 - foundations/footing for original National Art Gallery building on the site;
2 1896 Art Gallery designed by the NSW government Architect Walter Liberty Vernon and subsequent additions in the classical revival style;
3 1972 Captain Cook wing designed by the NSW government Architect’s office, Andrew Andersons’ chief designer, in a style described as late 20th century international;
4 1988 Bicentennial additions designed by the NSW government Architect, Andrew Andersons in the late 20th century international style;
5 2003 Asian galleries extension and associated works designed by Richard Johnson of Johnson Pilton Walker adding a white glass and steel pavilion that has been likened, when lit a night, to a softly glowing paper lantern; and
6 2011 Contemporary art galleries designed by PTW to house the John Kaldor Family collection.
The stages of growth are shown in the diagrams to the right, and are grouped into the 6 principal phases of development.
Many of the difficulties the Gallery is currently faced with are a legacy of the staged, incremental development.
In most instances each phase has been initiated in order to accommodate the expanding needs of the Gallery’s audiences.
Evolution
1885 - Phase 1The National Art Gallery of New South Wales, consisting of six galleries, is built on a site in the ‘Outer Domain’ to John Hornbury Hunt’s plans.
An ancillary structure is located to the east.
1897 - Beginning of Phase 2Courts 7 & 8 are added to the Hornbury Hunt galleries as the first phase of plans by Government Architect Walter Liberty Vernon.
The eastern ancillary structure is removed.
1899 - Phase 2Vernon’s Courts 9 & 10 are completed.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
49JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
5 Heritage
Evolution
1920sPlacement of equestrian groups to the west of the entrance is decided upon by Sir John Sulman.
A care-takers residence is constructed on the east facade of the Gallery.
1930sConservation Department is built to east of the care-takers residence and a garage is built for the director on the north-east most corner.
Fig Tree Avenue is widened to a dual carriage way.
1960sThe Cahill expressway Outer Domain cutting and Art Gallery Road Bridge are completed to the north of the Gallery.
1972 - Phase 3The Captain Cook Wing designed by the Government Architect’s Office is completed.
Hunt’s original galleries are largely demolished and the ancillary buildings to the east are removed.
1988 - Phase 4The Bicentennial Wing is completed.
1999The Eastern Distributor replaces the Cahill Expressway cutting.
The Land-bridge is built to the north of the Gallery connecting the north and south edges of the Cahill Expressway cutting.
2003 - Phase 5The Asian Wing and associated works are completed.
2011 - Phase 6Contemporary art galleries and associated works are completed.
PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6
50ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
5 Heritage
Existing Fabric
The heritage significance of the building, and particularly the Vernon Wing, presents the Gallery with a range of assets that unique, but which also present a range of operational and curatorial challenges.
The significance of the fabric is a legacy of the contextual and cultural circumstances which lead to the Gallery’s construction, but also extends to the use of materials, methods and architecture styles.
Classical vaulted ceiling and lead-light sky-light, Vestibule, GFImage: AGNSW
Classical vaulted ceiling, The Lowy Gonski Gallery, Vernon Wing, GFImage: AGNSW
The interface between the vestibule sandstone entrance arches and the Rudy Komon Gallery, Upper LevelImage: AGNSW
The Classical vaulting in Maroubra sandstone with Kempsey Marble used for the columns, Vestibule, Ground FloorImage: AGNSW
The south-west stairs from Gallery 13 to the Library in ornamental stone work with Borenore Marble treads, Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: JPW
Mosaic floor, Vestibule, GFImage: AGNSW
The James Fairfax Galleries, Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: JPW
The south-west stairs from Gallery 13 to the Library, Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: AGNSW
Mosaic floor detail, Vestibule, GFImage: AGNSW
The entry doors limit the size of the only public entrance, Vestibule, GFImage: AGNSW
Clerestory windows of lead-light sky-lights, Vestibule, Roof LevelImage: JPW
51JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
5 Heritage
Existing Fabric
The Bicentennial Wing received the RAIA Sulman Award for Architectural Merit in 1989 - Commemorative Plaque, Grand Court, GFImage: JPW
The parquetry flooring (Silky Oak and Queensland Maple), Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: AGNSW
The Design and Multi-media offices, Vernon Wing, Upper Level. This space was once occupied by the library, but is now overcrowded and cluttered with servicesImage: JPW
Workshops, Vernon Wing, LL1. The cast-iron columns are remains from the Walter Liberty Vernon design.Composite Image: JPW
Court 9, Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: JPW
The approach via Art Gallery Road to the Vernon Wing PorticoImage: JPW
Sculptures, Court 11, Vernon Wing, Ground FloorImage: AGNSW
The interface of three stages of the Gallery’s historical development: the sandstone of the Vernon Wing (left); the transparent glazing of the Captain Cook Wing (middle); and the reflective glazing of the Asian galleries (right). Image: JPW
Vernon Gallery Lanterns, Vernon Wing, Roof Level. These lanterns originally provided natural light to the gallery space, but this has ceased due to conservation considerations. The lantern now house the artificial lighting necessary for the Vernon Galleries.Composite Image: JPW
52ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
Over the past 10 years, other major Australian galleries and museums have undergone significant projects to either establish or revitalise their services, facilities and culture.
If the AGNSW desires to excel on a global stage while increasing visitor numbers, an increase in the amenity of public facilities as well more exhibition and gallery display space is necessary to bring it into line with the best institutions of the world.
The current relationships between functional spaces are fragmented, complex and inefficient.
The scale of galleries is comparable to a ‘suite of rooms’ which limits the Gallery’s ability to manage large crowds, exhibit large works or present large exhibitions.
There are a number of planning instruments which will affect, but not necessarily restrict, the Gallery’s development.
There are a number of projects and Masterplanning Strategies being implemented by the Gallery’s neighbours. Each of these will need to be given careful consideration by the Gallery.
The ratio of gallery and exhibition space to GFA within the Gallery appears to be in line with other galleries of a similar type, but what must be highlighted is that the majority of collection and exhibition galleries serve as multipurpose areas and circulation zones.
In its present state, the Gallery’s public area constitutes less than 25% of the total GFA. Ideally, this figure needs to be doubled.
The serviceability and flexibility of the existing galleries and exhibition space is limited as more than two thirds of this space has a ceiling height of only 3.6 to 4.4 metres.
Summary
6 Analysis
53JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
6 Analysis
When compared to all other international galleries and museums, the AGNSW placed 28th in terms total museum attendance for 2007, fell to 34th in 2009, and has continued to decline in 2010 to 48th in total attendances, 6 places behind Queensland’s GoMA and 13 places behind the Melbourne Museum.The Art Newspaper,No. 189, March 2008; No. 212, April 2010; No. 223, April 2010
54ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
6 Analysis
Precinct Planning
Development Controls
Any development of the Gallery is affected by state and local legislation concerning the land use planning and heritage management. This is primarily through the Environment Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.
Local Government
The Gallery is geographically situated in the City of Sydney Local Government Area (LGA), making the City of Sydney Council or the Central Sydney Planning Committee the consent authority under the EP&A Act.
The LGA planning instrument that affects the Gallery is the Sydney LEP 2012.
Not only do the current planning instruments recognise the significance of the site and building, but they also offer some clues as to how the Gallery might approach any future expansion.
Sydney LEP 2012 Heritage Map (Sheet 14)
The AGNSW is identified as Item I1665 in the LEP’s Heritage Map.
The significance of the building and site need to be maintained. Any proposed development would also need to consider the potential for archaeology.
(i)
Central Sydney
Sydney Cove
Darling Harbour
Darling Harbour
FarmCove
(i)
CITY
CIR
CLE
RAILW
AY
EASTERN SUBURBS RAILWAY
NO
RTH
SHO
RE
RAI
LWAY
METRO MONORAIL
CITY
CIRC
LE RA
ILW
AY
High S
treet
Kent Street
Har
ringt
on St
reet
Sydney Harbour Tunnel
Philli
p S
treet
Cahill Expressway
Tank
Stre
am W
ay
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Macqu
arie Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Bent Street
Grosvenor Street
Council Place
Cum
berla
nd S
treet
Custom House Lane
Argyle Street
Lance Lance
Barrack Street
Prince Albert Road
Longs Lane
Mac
quar
ie S
treet
Wynyard Street
Curtin Place
Margaret Street
Littl
e H
unte
r Stre
et
Loftu
s La
ne
Dalley Street
High Lane
Sk it tle Lane
Sussex Street
Mar
gare
t Lan
e
Ham
ilton
Stre
et
Wes
tern
Dis
tribu
tor
Angel Place
Gas Lane
Youn
g S
treet
Palm
er S
treet
Farrer Place
Essex Street
Crown
Street
King Street
Eliz
abet
h S
treet
Hunter Street
Bridge Street
Cuthbert Street
Lees
Cou
rt
Jamison Street
Clarence
Street
Hosking Place
Ash
Stre
et
Rugby Place (Private)
Cross
City
Tunn
el
Glo
uces
ter S
treet
Bulletin PlaceG
resham S
treet
Circular Quay West
Albert Street
King Street
Spring S
treet
Jenk
ins
Stre
et
Abercrombie Lane
York
Stre
et
Sir Joh
n You
ng C
resc
ent
Market Street
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Alfred Street
Bond Street
Napole on
Street
Lang
Stre
et
Reiby Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Erskine Street
St James Road
Clarence S
treet
York Lane
St Marys Road
Philli
p La
ne
Bligh
Stre
et
Cas
tlere
agh
Stre
et
Car
ringt
on S
treet
Wyn
yard
Lan
e
O'conn
ell S
treet
Day
Str ee t
Kent Street
Brad
field
Hig
hway
Shelley Street
Art Gallery Roa
d
Hickson R
oad
Lance Lane
Rowe Street
Conservatorium Road
Cahi
ll Ex
pres
sway
Western D
istributor
De Mestre Place
Cahill Expressway
Loftu
s S
treet
Underwood Street
Argyle Lane
Shakespeare Place
Col
lege
Stre
et
Slip
St reet
Lime S
treet
Upp
er Fo
rt St
reet
Hos
pita
l Roa
d
Bridge Lane
Map identification number: 7200_COM_CL1_
Locality and Site Identification Map
Central Sydney
Green Square
Ultimo-Pyrmont
Land Affected by Cross City Tunnel Ventilation Stack
Refer to Schedule 1
SydneyLocal EnvironmentalPlan 2012
014_005_20120814
011
006 013 020
007 014 021
001 008 015 022
002 009 016 023
003 010 017 024
004 018
005 012 019
Locality and Site Identification MapForeshore Building Line Map- Sheet CL1_014
Foreshore Building Line MapForeshore Area
Foreshore Building Line
CadastreCadastre 14/08/2012 © City of Sydney
Projection: GDA 1994Zone 56
Ü Scale: 1:5,000 @ A3
0 200 m I2195I2194
I2193
I1953
I1932
I1863
I1813
I1775
I1764
I1740
I1697
I940
I887I886
I935
I934
I1711
I1711I1862
I1861
I1861
I934
I935
I876
I880
I1856
I1912I1911
I1913
I1729
I1952
I1884
I1971
I1762
I1761 I1679I1682
I1759
I1674I1915
I1901I1900
I1665
I1653
I1652
I1862
I1946
I1947
I1951
I1888I1789 I1887
I1789
I1887
I1774
I1928
I1929
I1888
I1951
I1653
I2138
I1972
I1924
I1695I1696
I1983 I1970I1776
I1982
I1979
I1816
I167
8I1
680
I1681
I1969
I191
6I1
917
I1657
I1677
I1763
I1683I1684
I2000 I1685
I1907
I1910I1909I1908
I1872
I1873I1872
I190
5
I920
I868I922 I921
I884 I885
I924I923
I925
I1716
I1993 I1992
I1991
I1990
I197
8
I1841
I1962
I1826I1825
I1827
I1959
I1960
I1957
I1958
I1956
I1817I1818
I1814 I1838I1839I1989I1988
I1714I1987
I1840 I1773
I1977
I1976
I1973
I1974I1669
I1985I1667I1717
I1955
I1668 I1984I1770
I1769
I1768
I1754
I1755
I1756I1757
I1758
I1715 I1713
I1981
I1980
I1767
I1692
I1975
I1691
I1765 I1766
I1808 I1806
I1809
I1656
I890
I890
I1954
I1709 I1709 I1709 I1709I1660
I1807
I1858
I1857
I1898
I1926I1926I1927
I886
I919
I907
I908
I909I910
I889
I888
I938
I937I936
I186
1I1
860
I1868
I1869
I1906
I1870
I1871
I1662I1661
I1731I1999I1688
I1689I1690
I1687
I1914
I1859
I1855
I1686
I1874
I1875
I1876
I1861
I1904
I1903
I1902
I1676
I1877
I187
8
I1918I1737
I166
6
I1771I1921
I1663I1772
I1893
I1889
I1919
I1920I1948
I1892 I1894 I1895
I1889I1889
I1896
I1738I1897
I1891 I1889
I1880
I1922
I1842
I1843
I1923
I1693
I1844 I1694
I1845
I1846
I1664
I882
I912I898
I881
I900I899
I913I914
I901
I903I904
I906I905
I883
I881
I1654
I1847
I1739
I1882I1867
I1866
I1881
I1865
I1879
I1864
I1673I1675 I1811
I1708
I1810I1950
I1949
I1730
I1653
I1665
I1653
C71
I902
I2196
I1848
I1781
I1986
I1777
I1780
I1779
I1778
I1925
I1784
I1782
I2138
I915
I917
I918
I916I916
C35
I1710
I1710
I1652
I1969
I1657
I176
4
I1806
I1663
I189
2
I1889 I1889
I1890I1890
I882
I1718
I1719
I1886
I1824
I1823
I1822
I1821
I1820I1819 I1720
I1721
I1815
Sydney Cove
Darling Harbour
Darling Harbour
FarmCove
CITY
CIR
CLE
RAILW
AY
EASTERN SUBURBS RAILWAY
NO
RTH
SHO
RE
RAI
LWAY
METRO MONORAIL
CITY
CIRC
LE RA
ILW
AY
High Street
Mac
quar
ie St
reet
Sussex Street
Har
ringt
on St
reet
Sydney
Harbour Tunnel
P hil l
ip St
reet
Tank
Stre
am W
ay
Bridge Street
Gloucester Street
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Car
aher
s La
ne
Macqu
arie Place
Pitt
Str e
et
Mrs Macqua
ries R
oad
Bent Street
Grosvenor Street
Que
ens
Cou
rt
Domain Terrace
Council Place
Cum
berla
nd St
reet
Argyle Street
King Street
Barrack Street
Prince Albert Road
Longs Lane
Wynyard Street
Curtin Place
Margaret Street
Dalley Street
Sussex
Street
Mar
gare
t Lan
e
Ham
ilton
Stre
et
Angel Place
Blue Anchor Lane (Private)
East
ern
Dis
tribu
tor
Gas Lane
Conservatorium Road
Pal
mer
Stre
et
Whe
at R
oa
d (Priv
ate)
Cahill Expressway
Crow
n Street
Hunter Street
De Mestre Place
Cuthbert Street
Essex Street
Lees
Cou
rt
Clarence Street
Youn
g S
treet
L oftu
s La
ne
Hosking Place
Ash
Stre
et
Rugby Place (Private)
Cross City
Tunn
el
Loftu
s S t
r eet
Bulletin Place
Gresham
Street
Circular Quay West
Albert Street
Underwood Street
Bridge Lane
Argyle
Lane
Spring Street
Jenk
ins
S tre
et
Abercrombie Lane
York S
treet
Shakespeare Place
Sir Joh
n Youn
g Cresc
en
t
Market Street
College
Street
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Alfred Street
Bond Street
Lance Lane
Jamison Street
Napoleon Street
Slip Street
Lang Stre
et
Reiby Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Erskine Street
Kent Street
Lime Street
St James Road
Clarence
St reet
York Lane
Cahill Expressway
St Marys Road
Phillip Lane
High
Lane
Bligh
Stre
et
Cas
tler e
agh
Str e
et
Car
ringt
on S
treet
Wyn
yard
Lane
O'conn
ell Stre
et
Day
Street
Kent Street
Upper Fort Street
Phi
llip
Stre
etEliz
abet
h St
reet
Brad
field
Hig
hway
She lle y
Str eet
Art Gallery Road
Hospital Road
Wes
tern
Distr
ibutor
Wes
tern
Dist
ribut
or
Hickson
Road
Cah il l E
xpressway
Map identification number: 7200_COM_HER_
HeritageConservation Area - General
Item - General
CadastreCadastre 26/09/2012 © City of Sydney
SydneyLocal EnvironmentalPlan 2012
_005_20120926014
011
006 013 020
007 014 021
001 008 015 022
002 009 016 023
003 010 017 024
004 018
005 012 019
Heritage Map - Sheet HER_014
Projection: GDA 1994Zone 56
Ü Scale: 1:5,000 @ A3
0 200 m
Sydney Cove
Darling Harbour
Darling Harbour
FarmCove
RE1
B8
RE1
RE1
RE1
B4
B4
B4
RE1
B8
B8
B8
B8
B8
SP2Boating Facilities
SP2Boating Facilities SP2
Boating Facilities
SP2Boating Facilities
SP2Boating Facilities
SP2Railways
RE1
RE1RE1
RE1
RE1
RE1
RE1
RE1 RE1
B8 B8
RE1
SP2Railways
RE1
RE1
RE1
RE1
R1
MD
MD
DH
SCRA
RE1
RE1RE1
SHC
SP2Classified Road
B8
B8
SP2Classified Road
RE1
RE1
RE1
RE1
SP2Railways
B4
B8
SP2Classified Road
SP2Classified Road
SP2Classified Road
SHC
SP2Classified Road
CITY
CIR
CLE
RAILW
AY
EASTERN SUBURBS RAILWAY
EAST
ERN
SUBU
RBS
RAI
LWAY
CIT
Y C
IRC
LE R
AILW
AY
NO
RTH
SHO
RE
RAI
LWAY
METRO MONORAIL
CITY
CIR
CLE
RA
ILWAY
High Street
Mac
quar
ie S
treet
Kent Street
Har
ringt
on S
treet
Sydney Harbour Tunnel
Phi
llip S
treet
Tank
Stre
am W
ay
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Macqu
arie Place
Bent Street
Grosvenor Street
Council Place
Lance Lane
Cum
berla
nd S
treet
Custom House Lane
Argyle Street
Barrack Street
Prince Albert Road
Longs Lane
Mac
quar
ie S
treet
Wynyard Street
Curtin Place
Margaret Street
Littl
e H
unte
r Stre
et
Loftus Lane
Dalley Street
High Lane
Skittle Lane
Sussex Street
Mar
gare
t Lan
e
Ham
ilton
Stre
et
Wes
tern
Dis
tribu
tor
Angel Place
Gas Lane
Youn
g S
treet
Palm
er S
treet
Farrer Place
Essex Street
Cro
wn
Stre
et
King Street
Eliz
abet
h St
reet
Hunter Street
Bridge Street
Cuthbert Street
George S
treet
Lees
Cou
rt
Jamison Street
Hosking Place
Ash
Stre
et
Rugby Place (Private)
Cross
City
Tunn
el
Glo
uces
ter S
treet
Bulletin PlaceG
resham S
treet
Circular Quay West
Albert Street
Spring
Street
Jenk
ins
Stre
et
Abercrombie Lane
York Street
Shakespeare Place
Sir Joh
n You
ng C
resc
ent
Market Street
Alfred Street
Bond Street
Napoleon Stre et
Lang
Stre
et
Reiby Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Erskine Street
St James Road
Clarence S
treet
York Lane
St Marys Road
Phillip Lane
Cas
tlere
agh
Stre
et
Blig
h S
treet
Car
ringt
on S
treet
Wyn
yard
Lan
e
O'conn
ell S
treet
Day
Stre
et
Kent Street
Bra
dfie
ld H
ighw
ay
Shelley Street
Art G
alle
ry Ro
ad
Hickson R
oad
Cahi ll Expressway
Rowe Street
Conservat ori um Road
Western D
istributor
De Mestre Place
Cahill Expressway
Loftu
s St
reet
Underwood Street
Argyle Lane
Col
lege
Stre
et
Slip StreetLime Street
Upp
er Fo
rt St
reet
Hos
pita
l Roa
d
Bridge Lane
011
006 013 020
007 014 021
001 008 015 022
002 009 016 023
003 010 017 024
004 018
005 012 019
Projection: GDA 1994Zone 56
Map identification number: 7200_COM_LZN_
Ü
SydneyLocal EnvironmentalPlan 2012
_005_20120926014
ZoneNeighbourhood Centre
Local Centre
Commercial Core
Mixed Use
Business Development
Enterprise Corridor
Business Park
Metropolitan Centre
General Industrial
Light Industrial
General Residential
Low Density Residential
Public Recreation
Special Activities
Infrastructure
SREP 26 City West
Darling Harbour Development Plan No.1
Sydney LEP (Glebe Affordable Housing Project) 2011
South Sydney LEP 1998 and City of Sydney Planning Scheme OrdinanceSouth Sydney LEP 1998 and South Sydney LEP 114
Sydney LEP (Harold Park) 2011
SEPP Major Development 2005
SEPP 47 Moore Park Showground
Sydney Cove Redevelopment Authority Scheme
SREP Sydney Harbour Catchment 2005
Sydney LEP 2005
South Sydney LEP 1998
SREP 16 Walsh Bay
Unzoned Land
CadastreCadastre 26/09/2012 © City of Sydney
Land Zoning Map - Sheet LZN_014
Scale: 1:5,000 @ A3
0 200 m
B2
B3
B4
B5
B1
B6
IN1
B7
IN2
R1
R2
RE1
SP1
SP2
DH
CW
GS1
MD
MPS
GS2
SCRA
SHC
SLEP
UL
WB
B8
SS
GAHP
HP
Sydney LEP 2012 Coverage Map (Sheet 14)
The Gallery is located within the City of Sydney Council, Sydney LEP zone.
Sydney LEP 2012 Zoning Map (Sheet 14)
The AGNSW is identified as B8 Zoning - Metropolitan Centre.
Development of the Gallery would need to be based on a premise of cultural and community benefit.
Sydney Cove
Darling Harbour
Darling Harbour
FarmCove
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 2
Area 2
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
Area 3
J
JJ
X
AB1
Z
AH
O
O
O
V
AC
AC
M
ADAD
O
O
R
AHAHAH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AHAH
U1
Y
Y Y
Z
ZZ
Z
Z
Z
ZZ
Z
ZZ
E
AA1
AA1
AA1
AA1 AA1 AA1
AB1
AB1 AB1
AB1
AB1
AB1
O
O
JJ J
JJ
AB1 AB1
AB1
AB1
U1
Area 1
Area 1
Area 1
S
T2
AD
AD
AD
AD
J
AH
AD
AA1
AB1
AB1
J
AC
AC
U1
X
Z
Z
ZZ Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
U1
Z
Z
Z
AC
AC
Z
AC
Area 1Area 1
R
Area 1 Area 1 Area 1
Area 1 Area 1
Area 1
Area 1Area 1
Area 1
Area 4
98 RL
J
J
46.7 RL
Area 1
Area 1
Area 3
P
AD
AD
AA1
28.6 RL
Y
X
AD
28.6 RL
J
J
J
AH
AH
AH
AA1
CITY
CIR
CL E
RAIL W
AY
EASTERN SUBURBS RAILWAY
EAST
ERN
SUBU
RBS
RAI
LWAY
NO
RTH
SHO
RE
RAI
LWAY
METRO MONORAIL
CITY
CIRC
LE RA
ILW
AY
High S
treet
Kent Street
Napoleon
Street
Har
ringt
on St
reet
Sydney Harbour Tunnel
Phill
ip S
treet
Tank
Stre
am W
ay
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Macqu
arie Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Bent Street
Grosvenor Street
Council Place
Cum
berla
nd S
treet
Custom House Lane
Argyle Street
Lance Lane
Barrack Street
Prince Albert Road
Longs LaneM
acqu
arie
Stre
et
Wynyard Street
Curtin Place
Margaret Street
Littl
e H
unte
r Stre
et
Loftus Lane
Dalley Street
High Lane
Skit tle
Lane
Sussex Street
Mar
gare
t Lan
e
Ham
ilton
Stre
et
Wes
tern
Dis
tribu
tor
Angel Place
Eas
tern
Dis
tribu
tor
Gas Lane
Youn
g S
treet
Palm
er S
treet
Farrer Place
Essex Street
Crow
n Street
King Street
Eliz
abet
h St
reet
Hunter Street
Bridge Street
Cuthbert Street
Lees
Cou
rt
Jamison Street
Clarence
Street
Hosking Place
Ash
Stre
et
Rugby Place (Private)
Cross
City
Tunn
el
Cas
tlere
agh
Stre
et
Glo
uces
ter S
treet
Bulletin PlaceG
resham S
treet
Circular Quay West
Albert Street
King Street
Spring
Street
Jenk
ins
Stre
et
Abercrombie Lane
York
Stre
et
Sir Joh
n You
ng C
resc
ent
Market Street
Geo
rge
Stre
et
Alfred Street
Bond Street
Lang
Stre
et
Reiby Place
Pitt
Stre
et
Erskine Street
St James Road
Clarence S
treet
York Lane
St Marys Road
Phill
ip L
ane
Bligh
Stre
et
Car
ringt
on S
treet
Wyn
yard
Lan
e
O'conn
ell S
treet
Day
St re et
Kent Street
Brad
field
Hig
hway
Shelley Street
Art Gallery Roa
d
Hickson R
oad
Cahill Expressway
Cahill Expressway
Rowe Street
Conservatorium Road
Western D
istributor
De Mestre Place
Cahill Expressway
Loftu
s St
reet
Underwood Street
Argyle Lane
Shakespeare Place
Col
lege
Stre
et
Slip S
treet
Lime S
treet
Upp
er Fo
rt St
reet
Hos
pita
l Roa
d
Bridge Lane
Map identification number: 7200_COM_HOB_
SydneyLocal EnvironmentalPlan 2012
_005_20120926014
011
006 013 020
007 014 021
001 008 015 022
002 009 016 023
003 010 017 024
004 018
005 012 019
Height of Buildings Map- Sheet HOB_014
Maximum Building Height (m)3
6
7.5
8
9
11
12
15
18
22
24
25
27
28
29
30
33
35
40
42
45
50
55
60
65
70
80
85
110
130
150
235
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
CadastreCadastre 26/09/2012 © City of Sydney
Projection: GDA 1994Zone 56
Ü 0 200 m
Scale: 1:5,000 @ A3
Heights shown on map in RL (m)
10
28.6
42
46
46.7
60
71
98
Maximum Building Height (m)
W 1
W 2
Y
A H
X
Z
A A 1
A A 3
A A 2
A B 2
A C
A D
A E
A B 1
A
E
I
J
L
M
R
O
P
S
T 1
T 2
T 3
T 4
U 1
V
U 2
H
Sydney LEP 2012 Height of Buildings Map (Sheet 14)
There may be the opportunity to increase the height of the Gallery as the LEP does not refer to a specific height limit. Careful consideration would need to be given though to the protection of sun access to the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain though.
55JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
A New CBD Rail Station
Currently, the access routes to the Gallery via the rail transport are the Martin Place and St. James stations.
The eastern edge of the city contains a significant proportion of the CBD work force while the residential population of the CBD and Woolloomooloo areas are growing.
While no specific project refers to a new station adjacent to the Gallery on the eastern rail line, if one were created it would link directly to the domain while providing major transport, safety and environmental benefits for large public events.
An alternative would be a new rail station on the city circle line adjacent to the State Library of NSW.
6 Analysis
Royal Botanic Gardens
General Map of LawnsMasterplan
An initiative of the RBG, 2001
Precinct Planning
Existing Masterplans, New Project and Possibilities
There are a number of Masterplanning documents and long term strategies outlining the future of the precinct around the Gallery.
Included in this report are four of these items.
Future Domain
Future Domain builds on the Domain Masterplan, and proposes a series of projects (two of which are included overleaf) to improve the amenity for users of the Domain and to complement broader Sydney and metropolitan planning objectives.
In October 2006, the RGB&D Trust undertook a broad public consultation process to assess the community’s views on the proposals. (Further information can be found on the RBG’s web-site).
Of note however was comment in relation to Domain Parking Station ‘refurbishment’ project, using the Domain Parking Station as a bus lay-over depot (instead of Mrs. Macquarie’s Road) and the creation of a formal entry to the Domain at the junction of St. Mary’s Road and Art Gallery Road.
Sydney 2030 Strategy - JPW
In 2008 as part of the CoS’s Sydney 2030 initiative, JPW was engaged to review the Eastern Cultural Precinct.
The finalised strategy intends to:
> Provide a focus and improved connectivity to all cultural institutions in the eastern precinct as well as the green open space from the Opera House to the ANZAC war memorial;
> Re-establish Fig Tree Avenue in the Domain;
> Remake Shakespeare Place as an major entry to the Eastern Cultural Precinct;
> Define the precinct as a main entrance to the Mitchell Library, Botanic Gardens and the Domain;
> Create a public event space for the State Library;
> Anticipate a future new train station on the City Circle line for Domain events; and
Create an Gallery Forecourt:
> As an entry and public event space for the AGNSW;
> With Basement support space for Domain events; and
> As a node connecting pedestrian and bicycle paths with the new Woolloomooloo train station.
DA
Y
ST
BATHURST
STREET
STR
EET
KEN
T
STREETDRUITT
STR
EET
SUSSEX
WILLIAM
STREET
ELIZ
AB
ETH
CA
STLE
REA
GH
STR
EET
BATHURST
STR
EET
STR
EET
PARK
STREET
BANK
STREET
BAN
K SAUNDERS
MILLER
STREET
STREET
JON
ES
HA
RR
IS
PYR
MO
NT
POIN
T
HIGH ST
HA
RR
IS
STREET
STR
EET
PYRMONT BRIDGE
MU
RR
AY
STREET
ALLEN
PYRM
ON
T
STR
EET
JON
ES GIPPS
STREET
STREET
BRID
GE
STR
EET
BUNN STREET
ROAD
STR
EET
EDW
AR
D STREET
UNION
CIR
CU
LAR
CU
MBE
RLA
ND
STREET
CAHILL
ALFRED
CR
ESC
ENT
WY
LDE
ROA
DW
AY
GEO
RG
E
STR
EET
STR
EET
EAST
QU
AY
WES
TQ
UA
Y
STR
EETK
ENT
ARGYLE
PLACE
STREET
STR
EET
BRA
DFI
ELD
GEO
RGE
CIRC
ULA
R
ROA
D
HIC
KSON
HIG
HW
AY
TR
INIT
YA
V
STRE
ET
FORT
LOW
ER
STREET
STREE
T
POTTINGER
ROAD
WINDMILL
HICKSON
HIC
KSO
N
ARGYLE
DA
LGET
Y
TOWNS PLACE
STREET
STR
EET
ST SIR
JO
HN
YOUN
G C
RESCEN
T
LIN
CO
LN COWPER
WH
AR
F
STREET
HA
RR
IS
JON
ES
STR
EET
STR
EET
WA
TT
LE
STR
EET
STREETPIER
ULTIMO
THOMAS
QU
AY
ROAD
ULTIMO
WILLIAM
HENRY
STREET
QUARRY
STREET
MARY
ANN
STREET
MACARTHUR
STR
EET
STREET
PYRMO
NT
JON
ES
FIG
WAT
TLE
PIT
T
STR
EET ST
REE
TEL
IZA
BET
H
ST
GOULBURN
STREET
STR
EET
STR
EET
STREET
LIVERPOOL
EDDYAVENUE
ELIZ
AB
ETH
MA
RY
STREET
ALBION
CAMPBELL
STR
EET
STREE
T
PELI
CA
N
STREET
OXFO
RD
HU
NT
STR
EET
BRISBANE
STREET
STREET
STREET
STR
EET
PAR
KER
BARLOW STREET
PITT
RAWSON PL
ROAD
GEO
RG
E
STREET
STREET
HAY
STREET
STRE
ET
HAY
STR
EET
CAMPBELL
CA
STLE
REA
GH
WEN
TWO
RTH
AVEN
UE
STR
EET
STANLEY
CO
LLEG
E
STR
EET
STR
EET
PIT
T
GEO
RG
ESTR
EET
LIVERPOOL
GOULBURN
CLEVELAND
LEE
REG
ENT ST
REET
REG
ENT
STR
EET
STR
EETA
BER
CR
OM
BIE
BROADWAY
STR
EET
STR
EET
STR
EET
STREET
THOMAS
CH
ALM
ERS
STREET
DEVONSHIRE
ST
RANDLE
HO
LT
STREET
COOPER
STR
EET
STR
EET
STRE
ET KIPPAX
STRE
ET
MA
RY
SQUARERAILWAY
STRE
ET
CLEVELAND
FOVEAUX
STREET
SUSSEX
CLA
REN
CE
STR
EET
STREETSTREETMARKET
STR
EET
STR
EET
ELIZ
AB
ETH
CA
STLE
REA
GH
KING
STREET
GEO
RG
E
STR
EETMARKET
(TH
E
M
ALL
)YOR
K
ROAD
ST. JAMES
ST.
STREET
PHIL
LIP
PIT
T
MA
CQ
UA
RIE
KING
WES
TER
N
SUSSEX
RO
AD
STR
EET
STR
EET
STR
EET
PIT
T
GEO
RG
E
STR
EET
STR
EET
KEN
T
PLACE
STR
EET
STR
EET
STR
EET
STREET
HUNTERSTREET
STREET
PHIL
LIP
BLIG
H
STR
EET
STREE
T
O'C
ON
NEL
L
SPRIN
G STBENT
STR
EET
YOU
NG
LOFT
US
MA
CQ
UA
RIE
STREET
EXPRESSWAY
STR
EET
STR
EET
STR
EET
ERSKINE
ST
NA
POLEO
N
BARRACK ST
MARTIN
HUNTER
STR
EET
STREET CA
RR
ING
TON
ST
REE
T
YOR
K
CLA
REN
CE STREETMARGARET
JAMISON STREET
BRIDGE
STR
EET
STRE
ET
STREET
ESSEX
LAN
G STREE
TSTREETGROSVENOR
HA
RR
ING
TON
GLO
UC
ESTE
R
DIS
TR
IBU
TOR
CAHILL EXPRESSWAY
RO
AD
CONSERVATORIUM
ROAD
VIC
TOR
IA
ST
PIR
RA
MA
ROA
D
ST
EDRALCATH
CR
OW
N S
TR
EET
MARY'S
RO
AD
JOHN
STREET
BAYVIEW
ST
JON
ES ST
CR
ESC
ENT
WA
TT
LE
STR
EET
HA
RW
OO
D
CIRCULAR QUAY
EXPR
ESSW
AY
CRESC
ENT
COVE
FARM
PIER
O
NE
STR
EET
C A H I L L
STREET
PLA
YFA
IR
STR
EET
HIG
H
MER
RIM
AN
ST
REE
T
SQUARE
SYLVIA CHASE
CATHEDRAL ST
ST
STR
EET
FOST
ER
STRE
ET
STREET
POPLAR
ST
VALENTINE
FRANCIS
SQUARE
WHITLAMDIX
ON
HAY STLITTLE
BA
LFOU
RST
REET
UPPER FIG S
T
SQUARE
QUEEN'S
ROAD
ALBERT
PRINCE
SQUARE
CHIFLEY
PLACE
SHAKESPEARE
STR
EET
GR
ESHA
M
ALBERT ST
WYNYARD ST
STBOND
ROAD
GALLERY
ART
NEOT AVE
MO
UN
T
BOWMAN
S
TREET
BOWMAN
HER
BERT ST
REET
STR
EET
STR
EET
EXPER
IMEN
T
ROA
D
STR
EET
BULW
AR
A
STR
EET
MO
UN
T
LITT
LE
ROW
PATER
NO
STER
SquareHerald
MRS
RO
AD
RO
AD
MACQUARIE'S
MAC
QU
ARI
E'S
MRS
WAY
TAR
PEIA
N
GLOBE STREET
ROAD
WATSON
THOMAS
BULW
AR
A
ROA
D
STR
EET
McKEE
STRE
ET
BRIS
BAN
E
LANE
STR
EET
NIT
HSD
ALE
ST
HA
RG
RA
VE
STREET
CLARKE
FACTORY ST
LITT
LE REG
ENT
ST
STREETO'CONNOR
JAM
ES
LANE
DRUITT
STREET
SAN
DS
MULLINS STREET
DRUITT PLACE
LAWSON ST
LAN
E
JON
ES
BUNN
LANE
AD
A
LANE
GIPPS
LANE
MILLER
LANEUNION
HA
RW
OO
DLA
NE
LIT
TLE
EDW
AR
DST
EDWARD LANE
GRANTHAM STREET
WA
LK
NU
RSE
S
STR
EET
CA
MB
RID
GE
LAN
E
KEN
DA
LL
MILL LANE
ATHERDEN ST
DO
WN
SHIR
E
STR
EET
PARBURY L.
ST
BETTINGTON
WIN
DM
ILL
ST
LAN
E
RO
DEN
'S
HA
CKET
T
PLAC
ELANE
QUARRY
AV
ENU
E
HEN
RY
LANE
FIG
LAN
E
OM
NIBU
S
STR
EET
LAN
E
WAT
TLE
HENSON
LANE
PAR
BURY
LAN
E
LAN
E
BULLEC
OU
RT
STR
EET
KIRK
CO
LLEG
E
LANE
WRIGHT
LAN
EH
AN
DS
STREET
BLACKBURN
STREET
WAINE
LANE
GOULBURN
LAN
E
PAR
KER
RAWSO
NLANE
LANE
EAGAR
STR
EET
EAG
AR
LANE
DOUGLASS
STR
EET
DO
UG
LASS
STREET
HAM
CU
NN
ING
ST
CUNNINGHAM
LANE
FOY
STR
EET
ALB
ERTA
LANE
NITHSDALE
LAN
E
CHARLOTTE
HARGRAVE
LYONS LANE
STREET
JAMES
LAN
E
STREET
CENTRAL
STREET
WILMOT
BIJOU
STREET
WELLINGTON
STREET
OUTRAM
STR
EET
GO
OLD
STREET
DWYER
STR
EET
KEN
SING
TON
LANEBISHOP
STR
EET
HA
RT
STREET
GLADSTONE
LANE
BEATTIE
STREET
O'LO
UG
HLIN
LAN
E
RA
ND
LE
ST
TER
RY
LAN
E
SOPHIA
STREET
HER
CU
LES
STR
EET
UTHER
STREET
ROWE ST
HO
SPIT
AL
LAN
E
PLACE
HOSKING
RO
AD
TERRACE
DOMAIN
LANE
PHIL
LIP
LOFT
US
LA
NE
CUSTOM HOUSE LN
PLACE
BULLETIN
PLACE
REIBY
PLACE
CRANE
LANE
BLUE ANCHOR
LAN
E
SUSSEX
GAS LANE
STR
EET
JEN
KIN
S
PLACE
ANGEL
STR
EET
ASH
PLA
CEDE MESTRE
PLACE
CURTIN
STR
EET
HA
MIL
TON
YOR
K
LAN
E
WY
NYA
RD
LAN
EM
AR
GA
RET
TAN
KST
REA
MW
AY
BRIDGE LANE
STREET
UN
DER
WO
OD
MACQ
UARIE
P
LACE
UN
DER
WO
OD
LANE
SLIP STR
EET
LEES
C
OU
RT
GR
AN
TH
AM
LAN
E
McELHONESTAIRS
BLACKWATTLEBAY
JOHNSTONSBAY
DARLINGHARBOUR
COCKLEBAY
WALSHBAY
SYDNEYCOVE
FARMCOVE
WO
OLL
OO
MO
OLO
OBA
Y
ELIZABETHBAY
CA
DIG
AL
AV
E
Copyright 2005 City of Sydney & Land and Property Information
Drawn by: D.H.RobinsonPlanning officer: K.CusackCouncil File No: SO 16796Department File No:
Certified in accordance withthe Environmental Planningand Assessment Act 1979and Regulations as amended.
General Manager / /
Approved
Minister
0 Metres400 500 NORTH
SydneyLocal Environmental Plan2005Environmental Planning andAssessmentAct 1979
100 200 300
Rai
l Cor
rido
r M
ap
LegendCity of Sydney LGA boundary
Sydney LEP 2005 boundary
Railway Corridor Referral Area
Rail Corridor Map
Note:Areas identified outside the SydneyLEP 2005 boundary area are forinformation purposes only. Referral ofdevelopment in these areas isrecommended, however not requiredunder this plan.
(See Clause 81)
Martin Place
Town Hall
Circular Quay
Wynyard
Extract from Sydney LEP 2005, Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979
Rail Corridor Map, Sydney LEP 2005 boundaryNot to scale @ A3
© 2005 City of Sydney & Land and Property Information
Royal Botanic Gardens, Domain Masterplan
In 2001, the Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust released the Domain Masterplan to address short to medium term management and planning issues confronting the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain, specifically focusing on opportunities to substantially improve the quality and significance of the Sydney Domain.
The document suggests improving the amenity through the implementation of projects such as:
> A bus and coach lay-over space provided within the Domain Parking Station
> The development of a major out-door performance space above the existing Domain Parking Station; and
> The Sydney Sculpture Walk initiative.
St. James
Royal Botanic Gardens
General Map of LawnsFuture Domain
An initiative of the RBG, 2006
Summary
There are potential synergies that can benefit both the Royal Botanic Gardens and the Gallery.
Eastern Cultural Precinct
Linking the InstitutionsSydney 2030 Strategies - JPW
An initiative of the City of Sydney 2008
Summary
The recreation of Fig Tree Avenue has potential to provide a corridor to the Gallery’s forecourt even when events are held in the Domain.
Summary
There are two projects outlined in Future Domain which will affect/provide opportunities for the Gallery - these are outlined in detail overleaf.
Summary
The Gallery would benefit from a new ‘metro’ station on the Eastern Suburbs rail line.
PotentialNew station
PotentialNew station
Shakespeare Place
Fig Tree Avenue
56ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
Domain Parking StationArtists ImpressionDA Number D/2008/1118, City of Sydney
© 2008 HASSELL
Domain Parking StationPlan (Extract)DA Number D/2008/1118, City of Sydney
© 2008 HASSELL, Not to Scale @ A3
6 Analysis
Precinct Projects
Domain Parking Station Project
In 2008, a 25 year lease for the management of the Domain Parking Station was awarded to Challenger on the basis that over the next four years, only cosmetic changes were made, but with the opportunity to add two extra floors to the top of the carpark in the following 21 years.A DA was lodged in July 2008 which captures the proposed cosmetic changes and an extract of the application is included below:
Integrated Development ProposalReference Number D/2008/1118Site: 2 Prince Albert Road , Sydney, NSW 2000Applicant: Challenger Diversified P/LDetailed Description:Refurbishment of the Domain Car Park. Internal works include the installation of 2 lifts; new ramps and associated car park re-configuration; and new toilet facilities. External works include replacement of existing pedestrian entrance building, construction of new pedestrian entrance at northern corner and new balustrade at roof level; refurbishment of travelator; signage; landscape works and new pathways.
SummaryConsideration needs to be given to how the Gallery might benefit from or key into the refurbished Domain Parking Station in terms of parking for their patrons, signage and access.The Gallery needs to be mindful of, and place itself to be actively engaged with, the inclusion to two extra floors on top of the existing carpark (which is likely to occur in the next 25 years).
Sir John Young Crescent frontage for the Domain CarparkComposite Image: JPW
Domain Carpark travelatorImage: JPW
57JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
6 Analysis
Precinct Projects
Disused Royal Australian Navy Fuel Tanks
RBG’s Future Domain identifies the disused fuel tanks as an item within the Domain which needs to be rejuvenated.
The following is an extract from Future Domain:
The top of the disused naval oil tanks in the Woolloomooloo Precinct could be made more aesthetically appealing as well as better utilised. Suggested developments include providing new or enhanced sports facilities or developing the area into a venue for small events. These suggestions would take pressure off the Phillip Precinct. Any such project would consider the impact on local residents.
The tanks themselves could be used to store recycled or reclaimed water. This would help the Trust to meet its 2016 objective of using no Sydney drinking water for irrigation purposes across the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain estates. Such a development would also include appropriate landscaping to reduce impact on green space.
SummaryConsideration needs to be given to how the Gallery might use the land occupied by the fuel tanks in any future expansion.Key factors will be land ownership, site restrictions, site re-mediation and conversion of the space for the Gallery’s use.
Interior View of the Disused Fuel TanksImage: Source Unknown
Interior View of the Disused Fuel TanksImage: http://www.uer.ca/locations/show.asp?locid=21910
Aerial Photo of AGNSW and Fuel Tanks, circa 2006Not to Scale @ A3
Aerial Photo of AGNSW and Fuel Tanks, circa 1943Not to Scale @ A3
58ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
6 Analysis
Siting Strategies
New Building, Prominent LocationMaintain AGNSW Domain Location (no work) and new gallery building
Maintain AGNSW Domain Location (no work) New Building, Prominent Location & Re-plan ExistingRe-plan AGNSW Domain Location (new works) and new gallery building
Option A1.1Existing Option A1.2 Option B1
New South West WingAGNSW Domain Location new gallery wing to the south west
NEW BUILDING IN REMOTE LOCATIONEXISTING: NO LIFE AND SLOW DEATH NEW WING
Advantages> Landmark location in the city> Green-field site
Disadvantages> Access to public transport and parking is difficult> Likely to diminish the role and status of existing AGNSW> Difficult to maintain identity of single institution
operating across 2 major sites> Will do little to address current pressing issues inherent
on the AGNSW’s Domain site> Increased security operations> Duplication of services, operational systems and public
programming costs> Significant capital cost in new facility> Difficult to maintain sense of staff cohesion and
collaborative effort across 2 major sites> Major operational and curatorial challenges in existing
AGNSW not addressed
Advantages> Landmark location in the city> Green-field site
Disadvantages> Access to public transport and parking is difficult
> Likely to diminish the role and status of existing AGNSW> Difficult to maintain identity of single institution
operating across 2 major sites> Increased security operations> Duplication of services, operational systems and public
programming costs> Significant capital cost in new facility and replanning of
existing Domain site> Difficult to maintain sense of staff cohesion and
collaborative effort across 2 major sites
Summary of Maintaining Operations without ChangeNo growth = No life and slow death
Advantages > A new wing will provide an opportunity to resolve current
problems and provide space and facilities for the future> Close to the Domain Carpark
Disadvantages > Limited opportunities for a landmark building
> Location remote and not prominent> Heritage issues associated with building on parkland> Conflict with public activities> Very difficult to connect to existing AGNSW at more than
one level and only at one location between the Vernon and Asian wings
> Confused public circulation> Duplicates costs and operations across two sites> Complex construction over existing railway corridor> May impact existing Police Memorial Wall> Vehicle access to existing dock limits connectivity
between buildings
59JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
Option B2 Option B3 OPTION C1 (A1 + B3)
New North West WingAGNSW Domain Location new gallery wing to the north west
New North East WingAGNSW Domain Location new gallery wing to the north east
New North East Wing and Presence in the CityReorganise existing AGNSW Domain Location and link to new gallery wing to the north east
NEW WING COMBINED OPTION
RECOMMENDED OPTION
Advantages> Prominent location> Visible from the city
> A new wing will provide an opportunity to resolve current problems and provide space and facilities for the future
Disadvantages> Difficult construction> Heritage tree issues> Complex siting close to existing RBG buildings and
major entry to Gardens may limit opportunities> Difficult connection to new wing> Loss of parkland> Duplicated entry> Art Gallery Road will always divide the two buildings
Advantages > A new wing will provide an opportunity to resolve current
problems and provide space and facilities for the future > Ability to create iconic building
> Strengthens identity of AGNSW within the city> Strong connections to city and harbour, which can be
unique Sydney experience and reinforce Gallery identity> Opportunity to create international quality contemporary
exhibition spaces and visitor services which complement spaces and services in existing building
> Significantly improves accommodation standards, security and workplace amenity
> Activation of site improves pedestrian connectivity and activation
> Utilises relatively under-utilised open space
Disadvantages> More complex construction approach> More prominent when viewed from eastern approaches
Advantages> Landmark location in the city> Green-field site> A new wing will provide an opportunity to resolve
current problems
Disadvantages> Access to public transport and parking is difficult> Likely to diminish the role and status of existing AGNSW> Increased operating costs> Significantly larger capital investment required> Duplication of services, operational systems and public
programming> More complex construction approach than other options> Complex security arrangements between buildings
The siting options identified in the previous section have been tested against a range of key criteria to determine the most appropriate option for further development:
1 Cultural Asset Value
2 Precinct Value
3 Masterplan
4 Consultation
5 Operations
6 Implementation
The options have been evaluated in two ways:
> Weighting the benefits and negative impacts on a sub-category (more detailed or specific) level. Options with the highest beneficial score and lowest negative impact score represent the preferred option; and
> On the primary category levels each option is ranked against the others, with the option with the lowest score here representing the preferred option.
Evaluation Criteria
60ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA EXISTING OPTION A1.1 OPTION A1.2 OPTION B1 OPTION B2 OPTION B3 OPTION C1
CULTURAL ASSET VALUE
Image / Identity / Landmark Quality
Connection to City / Harbour
Synergy with other Sydney Cultural Institutions
Contemporary Relevance
Ability to meet vision, purpose and mission of AGNSW
Ability to maintain and improve local and international comparisons
PRECINCT
Access from city
Public transport / Parking
Relationship with landscape
Impact of Domain events
Forecourt - Identity and Function
Vistas to and from the Institution
Heritage considerations
MASTERPLAN
Quality and flexibility of galleries
Range of temporary exhibition spaces
Clarity of public circulation
Flexibility of spaces for public programs
Public amenities
Group arrival / entry
Universal access
Security
BOH Circulation
Loading docks compared to international standards
Adequate storage
BCA compliance
Heritage considerations
Staff workspaces and amenities
Functional relationships
SUB TOTAL
MINOR BENEFIT MEDIUM BENEFIT SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT NEGATIVE IMPACT MEDIUM NEGATIVE IMPACT SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT
47 5 27 16 11 26 16 34 2 46 2 50 7 41
6 Analysis
Siting Evaluation
RECOMMENDED OPTION
61JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA EXISTING OPTION A1.1 OPTION A1.2 OPTION B1 OPTION B2 OPTION B3 OPTION C1
CONSULTATION
Heritage
Urban Design
Adjoining uses
Key Stakeholders
OPERATIONS
Ability to increase visitor numbers
Ability to increase public programs
Efficiency of operations
Ability to attract sponsorship and benefaction
Ability to attract significant international exhibitions and loans
Ability to grow revenue from events. Shop, catering, etc.
IMPLEMENTATION
Buildability NA
Maintain operations NA
SUB TOTAL
TOTAL
CRITERIA RANKING
CULTURAL ASSET VALUE NA 3 3 6 2 1 3
PRECINCT NA 4 4 6 1 1 3
MASTERPLAN NA 6 5 4 2 1 3
CONSULTATION NA 1 2 3 6 4 3
OPERATIONS NA 5 1 1 1 1 6
IMPLEMENTATION NA 1 5 2 3 3 6
OVERALL POINTS NA 20 20 22 15 11 24
OVERALL RANK 3 4 5 2 1 6
MINOR BENEFIT MEDIUM BENEFIT SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT NEGATIVE IMPACT MEDIUM NEGATIVE IMPACT SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT
12 3 5 10 6 7 8 7 7 8 7 8 13 7
59 8 32 26 17 33 23 42 9 54 9 58 20 48
RECOMMENDED OPTION
62ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
Museum of SydneySydney, Australia
Walsall Art GalleryWalsall, UK
Rosenthal Centre forContemporary Arts
Cincinnati, USA
Wallace CollectionLondon, UK
Crawford Art GalleryCork, Ireland
Morgan LibraryNew York, USA
Yale Centre for British ArtConnecticut, USA
Dulwich Picture GalleryLondon, UK
BeyelerBasel, Switzerland
NGV, Ian Potter GalleryMelbourne, Australia
Ashmolean MuseumOxford, UK
Kimbell Art MuseumFort Worth, USA
National Portrait Gallery Canberra, Australia
Museum of Contemporary ArtSydney, Australia
Natural History MuseumParis, France
Naturalis MuseumLeiden, Netherlands
Gallery of Modern ArtBrisbane, Australia
National Gallery of AustraliaCanberra, Australia
Musee du Quai BranlyParis, France
Tasmanian Museum and Art GalleryHobart, Australia
Art Gallery of New South WalesSydney, Australia
National Maritime MuseumSydney, Australia
Australian MuseumSydney, Australia
De Young MuseumSan Francisco, USA
21 st Century MuseumKanazawa, Japan
PowerhouseSydney, Australia
Tjibaou Cultural CentreNoumea, New Caledonia
Louisiana Museum of Modern ArtHumlebæk, Denmark
City Arts MuseumManchester, UK
6 Analysis
The following diagrams at right indicate the relative size of the Art Gallery of New South Wales to other Australian and International Art Galleries and Museums.
The Gallery, when compared to other prominent Australian and International institutions on the basis of scale, can be considered to be of a small to medium size.
If the Gallery intends to compete with both Australian and International landmark institutions, there is a necessity for growth.
Precendent Comparisons
Numbers of Visitors per m2 of Gallery Space
INSTITUTION Visitors 2010* GFA Annual Visitors / m2
Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), New York, USA 5,216,488 58,500 89.17
British Museum, London, UK 5,842,138 75,000 77.90
De Young Museum, San Francisco, USA 2,043,854 27,221 75.08
Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK 2,629,065 45,000 58.42
NGV Ian Potter Gallery, Federation Square, Melbourne 717,676 16,000 44.85
Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney 1,004,404 23,227 43.24
GoMA and QAG, Brisbane (Combined figures) 1,379,583 43,635 31.62
Museo National Centro De Art Reina Sofia, Madrid, Spain 2,313,532 84,000 27.54
National Gallery of Australia, Canberra 973,348 41,248 23.60
NGV International, Melbourne 820,632 35,500 23.12
Louvre, Paris, France 8,500,000 400,000 21.25
Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences (Powerhouse), Sydney 673,913 35,000 19.25
Melbourne Museum, Melbourne 1,164,139 90,000 12.93* 2010, or latest available figures - approximate only
This table illustrates that the AGNSW has more than twice the number of visitors, per square metre of GFA, than the Louvre.
It also shows that the AGNSW is one of the most intensively used cultural institutions in Australia, with most others having a “density of visitors” only about half that of the Gallery.
63JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
Field MuseumChicago, USA
Museo National Centro De Art Reina SofiaMadrid, Spain
Natural History MuseumLondon, UK
NGV, InternationalMelbourne, Australia
American Natural History MuseumNew York, USA
Melbourne Museum, MOVMelbourne, Australia
British MuseumLondon, UK
National Museum of AustraliaCanberra, Australia
Royal Ontario MuseumToronto, Canada
Centre PompidouParis, France
Siza Expo 98Lisbon, Portugal
Smithsonian National Portrait GalleryWashington, USA
Museum of Modern ArtNew York, USA
Louvre MuseumParis, France
Victoria & Albert MuseumLondon, UK
Getty CentreLos Angeles, USA
64ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
There are three general options open to the Gallery which might be adopted to deal with the issues identified in Strategic Options Volume 1: Status Quo 2008-2011.
These are:
> Redevelopment within the existing footprint;
> Building a New Wing; or
> Building a New Gallery
Which strategy is adopted is dependant upon which one is seen as being most appropriate for the Gallery.
The examples shown here are instances where other large international museums and cultural institutions have responded to similar issues to those presently faced by the Art Gallery of NSW.
6 Analysis
British MuseumLondon, UK
The British Museum clarified and simplified its public space and circulation system by limiting the number of floors that were publicly accessible and creating a central orientation space within the existing footprint of the Museum.
The Great Court, within the historically significant confines of the Museum, thus became a powerful orientation device and the central space that connects all circulation paths, both physically and visually.
Victoria & Albert MuseumLondon, UK
Faced with circulation issues and a need to respond to the contemporary demands of a internationally regarded and historically significant cultural institution, the V&A initiated ‘Future Plan’ to rejuvenate the Museum:
FuturePlan developments will provide enhanced welcome and orientation facilities as well as a significantly extended education programme. It will also revamp the collections with a clearer layout and more imaginative and informative displays. The British Galleries have already shown how the V&A’s rich collections can be displayed. Under V&A FuturePlan, displays of the collections will be radically recast to evoke the cultures from which the objects come. State-of-the-art information technology and labelling will engage visitors with the works on many levels.
The qualities of the original building will be emphasised to reveal the Museum’s remarkable architecture, and previously hidden spaces will be opened up. The scheme will result in a truly 21st-century museum of art and design that will be an invaluable resource for students, educators, the creative industries and general visitors alike.
EXTRACTS SOURCED FROM: V&A Museum websitehttp://www.vam.ac.uk/futureplan/index.html
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and MuseumGlasgow, UK
CONSTRUCTION COST > (GBP) £28M
This project was initiated and completed with the intention of modernising:
...the most popular museum in the UK outside London which involved sensitive reinstatement and extension of a Grade A-listed [heritage] building.
[The] lower-ground stores and staff accommodation [were relocated], creating space for a new restaurant, education suite and environmentally controlled exhibition space, while a new north entrance provided Kelvingrove’s first barrier-free access and...rationalised parking area freed up space for recreation.
Vertical circulation for visitors was enhanced by relocating lifts and two new public staircases which link the new exhibition space to an impressive central hall.
EXTRACTS SOURCED FROM: BDP websitehttp://www.bdp.com/Projects/By-Name/F-L/Kelvingrove-Art-Gallery-and-Museum/
Redevelopment Models
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum interior galleryImage: David Babour, BDP web-site, http://www.bdp.com/
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum central hallImage: David Babour, BDP web-site, http://www.bdp.com/
V&A Museum, Cromwell Road FacadeImage: http://www.vandaimages.com
Sculpture Gallery, V&A MuseumImage: http://www.vandaimages.com
Great Court, British MuseumImage: wikimedia web-site, http://www.wikimedia.org
Section through entrance axis and Great Court, British MuseumNTS @ A3
Morris Room, V&A MuseumImage: http://www.vandaimages.com
65JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
National Gallery of Art, East WingWashington, USA
The new wing of the NGA, Washington sits adjacent to the original Neoclassical wing and is connected above ground via a piazza and also below ground via passageways for visitors and artefacts.
A larger section of the new wing accommodates new exhibition space located off a large atrium space which serves as an entrance and orientation space for the wing. Within a smaller eight-storey building adjacent to the atrium the administrative functions and a study centre for the visual arts are housed.
Royal Ontario Museum, Michael Lee-Chin CrystalToronto, Canada
CONSTRUCTION COST (CAD) $270M
The new wing of the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) stitches a contemporary building into the heritage fabric of the existing galleries and provides new public facilities, new gallery and a new contemporary presence on a busy Toronto street.
Museum of Fine ArtsBoston, USA
CONSTRUCTION COST > (USD) $500M
The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston is internationally recognised for the scope and quality of its collections. It stages an increasingly dynamic programme of exhibitions, lectures, films and educational events and is visited by more than one million people every year. However, in common with many such institutions that have grown incrementally over the years, the sheer scale of this audience places a great strain on the Museum’s facilities. This masterplan presents a clear strategic framework within which the Museum’s current accommodation will eventually be doubled to provide new galleries, a study centre, and temporary exhibition and education spaces. In the process, the visitor experience will be transformed.
..the rejunvination project establishes a creative dialogue between the old and the new, and strengthening links with the local community by making the building more open and accessible. At the core of the scheme is the restoration of the symmetry and logic of the Museum’s original Beaux-Arts plan, devised in 1907 by the American architect Guy Lowell. Following Lowell’s intentions, the central axis of the main building on Huntington Avenue is reasserted with the reintroduction of the main entrance to the south and the reopening of the north entrance, which is currently closed to visitors. At the heart of this axis is a new information centre, from where all visitors will begin their tour of the galleries. A glazed structure – ‘a crystal spine’ – provides new accommodation and partly encloses the two grand courtyards at the centre of the Museum in a glass ‘jewel box’, creating valuable new space for visitor orientation, cafés, sculpture and special events.
EXTRACT SOURCED FROM: Foster and Partners web-sitehttp://www.fosterandpartners.com/Projects/1049/Default.aspx
De Young MuseumSan Francisco, USA
The purpose built Museum for the collection of the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco was designed by Herzog & de Meuron, opening in 2005.
The new landmark museum which integrates art, architecture and the cultivated landscape of an urban park, replaces the old facility which formally occupied the same site but was severely damaged by an earthquake in 1989.
New Wing New Gallery
MFA Masterplan (new works outlined in red)Image: Foster + Partners web-site, http://www.fosterandpartners.com
MFA interior galleryImage: Foster + Partners web-site, http://www.fosterandpartners.com
ROM interface between old and new workImage: ROM web-site, http://www.rom.on.ca/crystal/index.php
ROM, street frontageImage: ROM web-site, http://www.rom.on.ca/crystal/index.php
NGA East Wing atriumImage: Richard Johnson, JPW
NGA West Wing entranceImage: Richard Johnson, JPW
Plan of ROM with new wing highlightedNTS @ A3
Plan of NGA with new wing and connecting forecourt highlightedNTS @ A3
NGA West Wing entranceImage: Richard Johnson, JPW
Plan of De Young Museum - the whole of the Museum was newly built in 2005NTS @ A3
RECOMMENDED STRATEGY
ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND CONNECTIONS
66ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
6 Analysis
Redevelopment Options
Total GFA = 25,000 m²
Total GFA = 25,000 m²
Total GFA = 25,000 m²
50% PUBLIC SPACE50% NON-PUBLIC SPACE
OPTION B3.1 This option involves a new institution of similar size, which would be constructed adjacent to the current Art Gallery of New South Wales. The new building would not be physically connected to the original building and would have a separate function, however the two buildings would run in coordination with each other. The existing heritage fronted building would keep its current entrance and foyer, and the new building would have a fully accessible main entrance and foyer space.
OPTION B3.2 This option involves a new wing of similar size, which would be constructed adjacent to the current Art Gallery of New South Wales. A corridor of public space would connect the new building with the current building. A new entrance a foyer would be included within the new building. The existing building would retain its current entrance and foyer.
OPTION B3.3 This option involves a new wing of similar size, which would be constructed adjacent to the current Art Gallery of New South Wales. A corridor of public space would connect the new building with the current building. A new Main Entrance would be located along this corridor between the two buildings, serving access to both institutions. The entrance to the existing building would become a ceremonial entrance.
LAND BRIDGE
LAND BRIDGE
LAND BRIDGE
SUBSTATION
SUBSTATION
SUBSTATION
67JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
Schematic Perspective of Option B3Not to scale @ A3
Gallery Typology
Gallery Typology and Functional Relationships
The Gallery, in its current configuration, has a complex arrangement of functional relationships between galleries, public spaces and back of house.
The ideal arrangement of functional relationships would lead to greater efficiencies in the functioning of the Gallery, a better visitor experience and better security for BOH areas
The relationships of functional space within the existing building are fragmented, complex and confusing.
IDEAL FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
BACK OF HOUSE
PUBLIC / FRONT OF HOUSE
LOA
DIN
G D
OCK
STO
RAG
E
CURA
TORI
AL
&
INST
ALL
ATI
ON
WO
RKSH
OPS
CON
SERV
ATI
ON
STA
FF F
ACI
LITI
ES
SECU
RITY
AD
MIN
ISTR
ATI
ON
EXHIBIT ZONE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
GA
LLER
Y SP
ACE
EXH
IBIT
ION
S G
ALL
ERY
THEA
TRE
CAFE
FUN
CTIO
NS
SPA
CE
RETA
IL
EDU
CATI
ON
&
CHIL
DRE
N’S
ACT
IVIT
Y
GRO
UP
RECE
PTIO
N
INFO
RMA
TIO
N &
RE
SOU
RCE
CEN
TRE
MEM
BER
S FA
CILI
TIES
AGNSW FORECOURT
REST
AU
RAN
T
SECURITY LINE
(CLOAKING/VISITOR SERVICE/TICKETING)
MA
IN E
NTR
AN
CE
> A legible and flexible circulation system that connects all zones effectively is crucial to any art gallery;
> Any circulation system must establish connections that naturally lead visitors through the foyer to the exhibition spaces and other facilities, and provide opportunities for physical and conceptual orientation, and appropriate positions for rest and group assembly across the site;
> Back of House circulation routes for staff and collections need to be efficient, and some functional spaces must be co-located to meet operational objectives; and
> A clear security hierarchy for each section is very desirable.
GALLERIES
EXISTING RELATIONSHIPS
GALLERIES
VESTIBULE
GRAND COURT&
CENTRALCIRCULATION
CAFE
SHOP
GALLERIES
TICKETING
GALLERIES
EDUCATION&
RESOURCECENTRE
TEMPORARYEXHIBITIONS
GROUPS
TEMP. EX. SHOP
GOODS & ARTEFACTLOADING
BACK OF HOUSE
FORECOURT
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
RESTAURANT &FUNCTIONS
STAFFENTRY
LOADING DOCK
THEATRE
CLOAKS
BACK OF HOUSE
THEATRE
CLOAKS
GALLERIES
TEMPORARYEXHIBITIONS
AGS
BOH
TEMPORARYEXHIBITIONS
BOH
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
INFORMATION DESK
> The scale of the entrance, including external spaces, is inadequate to deal with visitor numbers and particularly school groups;
> The entrance is not accessible for those with mobility disabilities;
> The existing relationships within the building is unclear with disparate functional relationships;
> The same circulation system is used by public patrons, staff and also for goods and artefacts which complicates security and general day to day operations;
> There is no clear physical or conceptual orientation system in place for exhibitions, collections and other public spaces;
> Key public spaces are scattered through the building;
> Functions and events often occupy exhibition and circulation spaces which presents a number of operational and security challenges; and
> Back of house areas are separated from each other which presents problems for staff.
TEMPORARYEXHIBITIONS
IDEAL TYPOLOGY
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
THEATRE
INITIALORIENTATION
EXHIBITIONGALLERY
ORIENTATION&
CENTRALCIRCULATION
CAFE
SHOP
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
TICKETING
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
EDUCATION&
RESOURCECENTRE
TEMPORARYEXHIBITIONS
GROUPS TEMP. EX. SHOPCLOAKS
ARTEFACT LOADING
GOODSLOADING
BACK OF HOUSE
FORECOURT
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
EXHIBITIONGALLERIES
RESTAURANT & FUNCTIONS
EXHIBITIONCOURTYARD
STAFFENTRY
LOADING DOCK
MEMBERS SERVICES
SECURITY LINE
Rationalising the functional relationships would:
> Give greater legibility to physical and conceptual orientation for the Gallery;
> Give greater prominence to public and group spaces such as an educational and research centre; and
> Allow for greater efficiencies in the day-to-day functioning of the Gallery.
68ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK
Indicative Planning Schematic - Option B3Not to scale @ A3
Domain Parking Station
3
ENABLE THE GALLERY TO BE A 21st CENTURY CULTURAL INSTITUTION WORTHY OF A GLOBAL CITYFaced with space and operational restrictions for exhibitions, collections, staff, storage, public facilities and public programs the Gallery must expand and improve its facilities which are the cause of many problems.
WELCOMING AND CLEAR IDENTITYThe Gallery should maintain a singular identity rather than splitting and compromising its status as the State’s preeminent cultural institution. While the frontage to Art Gallery Road is impressive, it does not project a contemporary image, and the existing entrance does not provide an accessible entry for all.A contemporary image should define the entry and showcase the relevance, accessibility and diverse appeal of the Gallery’s facilities and services.This expression must also complement the Gallery’s important heritage assets and unique setting.
CLARIFY ENTRY & IMPROVE EXTERIOR PUBLIC SPACE ForecourtRationalise the forecourt road system and provide coach pick-up/drop-off points and accessible parking.Enable forecourt to accommodate large scale art installations and use as a performance space.Provide seamless connection between new and old assets.
Main EntryCreate a suitably sized new main entry for regular patrons and groups that is accessible for all.Provide a strong visual connection into the Gallery’s pubic facilities from the forecourt.Maintain the historic, ceremonial entry to the Vernon Wing.
Group EntryProvide group entry from the forecourt with suitable group entry services and multiple coach drop-off/pick-up areas.
Sculpture CourtCreate a major new sculpture court on the land bridge to the east of the new wing.
Pedestrian Through AccessCreate a secure pedestrian route through/under the new foyer to improve pedestrian permeability and create a unique interaction between the gallery and the city.
Signage and AccessImprove precinct signage and connections to the Gallery from the Domain Parking Station, The Domain, Botanic Gardens and Woolloomooloo.
1
2
3
4 GALLERY CIRCULATION Foyer
Strengthen connections to a revitalised forecourt and with a new foyer serving both general entry and group entry. Provide appropriate cloaking and visitor sevices at the entry.
CirculationImprove circulation and orientation to existing gallery display spaces while stitching the new wing’s circulation into an integrated holistic system.
Connect the circulation system to the harbour and parklands to create a unique gallery and Sydney experience.
PUBLIC SPACESLearning Centre, Research Library & Archive
Decant existing Research Library and Archive from current location in the Vernon Wing and provide a Learning Centre with state-of-the-art IT capabilities and access to all Gallery archival and resource material within the new wing.Locate this important public facility in an easy to access, prominent location.
Gallery & Exhibition SpaceCreate major new gallery spaces that complement the existing display spaces in the current buildings.Create major new exhibition spaces that are suitable for major travelling exhibitions and blockbusters.Support major new display spaces with 21st century technology hubs.
Groups Entry, Cloak, Shop & Information DeskNew groups entry, shop and information desk located adjacent to new entry and foyer.
Visitor Services Create major new functions and restaurant spaces that
capitalise on the unique setting and harbour views.
STAFF SPACEThe majority of staff spaces are to be decanted from the existing building and consolidated within the new wing.
SERVICES & LOADING DOCKArtefacts Loading DockAt a minimum, the following should be considered for a new loading dock:
> A new dedicated loading and handling area for art, that can be separated from other loading dock and back of house areas, and including vehicle docks, unpacking and preparation areas, and associated management spaces;
> The loading dock should be large enough to accommodate a variety of service vehicles, including articulated container lorries (up to 19 m in length, including cabin), and have adequate height for unloading large or irregularly shaped objects;
> Direct access to primary vertical circulation system from all loading dock areas;
> Security control point to the loading and service areas at the entrance, with additional security zones/points within the loading dock to be control access to circulation systems; and
> Anticipate spaces and functions that require direct access and relate to exhibition preparation.
Goods Loading DockThe existing loading dock should be converted into a dedicated general goods and maintenance loading bays independent from the artefact loading area.
TRANSPORT Carparking
On-site carparking under the new wing of the Gallery.
Bus and CoachCoach drop-off and pick-up points for groups and separate bus stop for state transit routes.
6
7
8
5
Indicative Site Planning
7 Recommendations
69JOHNSON PILTON WALKER
GALLERY
GALLERY
GR
AN
D C
OU
RT
GALLERY
GALLERY
KITCHEN
GO
OD
S L
OA
DIN
G
DO
CK
COLLECTIONGALLERIES
CEREMONIAL ENTRANCE
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
TERRACE &SCULPTURE
COURT
BOH (under)>Admin.>AGS>Workshops>Stores
VE
RT
ICA
L C
IRC
ULA
TIO
N
GALLERY
GALLERY PIAZZABOH (under)
> Catering > Security > Stores
3EXHIBITION
RESTAURANT & FUNCTIONS ROOM
VE
RT
ICA
L C
IRC
ULA
TIO
N
CLO
AK
S
CLO
AK
S
INFO
24 HOUR THROUGH ACCESS
SHOP CAFE
FOYER ENTRY AND
ORIENTATION
GALLERY
GALLERY
GALLERY EXHIBITION
ART GALLERY ROAD
LINCOLN CRESCENT
23 3
4
4
5
7
7
6
1
8
8
8
COACHES
BUS-STOPS
RESEARCH LIBRARY AND ARCHIVE
ARTEFACTS
LOADIN
G DOCK
& BOH
© This document is the copyright of Johnson Pilton Walker Pty Ltd Pty Ltd.It is not to be copied in any form without the written permission of the AGNSW or JPW.
Art Gallery of NSW in city context
Image: AGNSW
Johnson Pilton Walker Pty LtdACN 095 778 886Level 10 Plaza Building, Australia Square95 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 AustraliaRichard Johnson, DirectorGraeme Dix, Director
T +61 2 9259 5900F +61 2 9259 5999E [email protected] www.jpw.com.au
Art Gallery of New South WalesArt Gallery Road, The DomainSydney NSW 2000 Australia
Anne Flanagan, Deputy Director
T +61 2 9225 1799F +61 2 9225 1701E [email protected] www.ag.nsw.gov.au