Ariel Frisancho National Directorate...
Transcript of Ariel Frisancho National Directorate...
Ariel Frisancho
National Directorate
ForoSalud
WB Civil Society Policy Forum
Washington DC, April 19th, 2017
Citizen-led
Accountability
to improve UHC
Actor- Oriented Approach to Promote Accountability
Since 2008, citizen surveillance mechanisms are spearheaded by women monitors, working on a voluntary basis within local areas (i.e. Puno Region: 40 vigilantes for two provinces, 3 health posts, 3 health centers and one local hospital in each)
After attending a series of capacity-building workshops, each vigilante receives accreditation and they plan their visits to health facilities
They visit health centers’ officers and explain the mechanism to health providers
Women surveillance for accountable health services
The citizen monitors visit the health facilities 2-3 / week, stay 6 hours. They make direct observations and conversations with female patients in their native language
On the basis of their findings, they produce regular reports and analyze them monthly with the regional Ombudsman's office, ForoSalud and CARE Peru members
They prioritize the findings, both the good and the bad, and construct a “dialogue agenda” which is presented to the health care networks / hospital directors and health team, to agree commitments of improvement
Stages (“Moments”) and Processes of
Citizen Monitoring
ORGANIZATION
& COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING
SELECTION / CAPACITY
BUILDING / PLANNING
IMPLEMENTATION OF FIELD
ACTIVITIES MONITORING &
EVALUATION
Process I Process II Process III Process IV Process V Process VI
Process of
Organization /
Planning –
Constituting of the
technical supporting
and facilitating team
of the citizen
monitoring of health
services
Public
announce-
ment &
selection
process of the
citizen
monitors of
health
services’
quality
Capacity
building,
planning of the
visits to health
facilities and
introduction to
health
authorities
Implementationof
monitoring visits
to health facilities
and meetings for
the participatory
analysis of the
findings
Dialogue and
negotiation to
agree commit-
ments to
improve health
services’
quality
Monitoring of the
Commit-ments
made and
planning of the
next steps for
monitoring
health services’
quality
(transversal) SOCIAL COMUNICATION / INFORMATION TO THE PEOPLE / COMMUNITY
Results
• Identification of practices that were deterring women
from utilizing services
• Space for a systematic dialogue on what women
expect and achievements / pitfalls of health care
• Commitments to improve health care (opportunity,
treat, information, language, culture appropriateness)
• Medical practitioners and health authorities more
accountable to people’s needs
• Improvement in obstetric care, child care•
• Increased demand of maternal health services and
institutional birth deliver
Context and Health System Challenges
• Same words, different meanings (Universal Health
Coverage = Universal Health Insurance?)
• Big inequality gaps
• Lack of an Accountability Culture (Acctability to whom?)
• In-equal Power relations
• Most donors are focused on value for money and
performance metrics ( pressure to our M&E and
Advocacy work, defining impact and results of complex,
long run processes)
• Costs of citizen participation & Volunteers’ crisis
• Co-option and partisans political interests
How does an accountability enabling environment looks like?
a) Political will translated on context and people-based norms
b) “appropriateness” and support to the transforming initiatives
by authorities: institutional arrangements for implementation,
analysis and allocation of resources
c) Informed citizens on their rights and responsibilities , with
inter-acting capacities (attention to gender approaches)
d) Policy-dialogue & Accountability spaces:
- Clear, participatory rules of the game (“learn to listen”)
- Capacity Building on both sides
- responsiveness
- Binding decisions
e) Voice with Strategic Amplifiers:
- Vertical integration towards the construction of a “Sandwich
strategy” (Local action, Bottom – up “voice” articulated to
sub-national and national “teeth”)
g) Civil society organizational “maturity”:
- Share leadership
- downplay own power relations
- leadership of women and young people
- Articulation amongst diverse civil society organizations
- social mobilization and advocacy skills
Ariel Frisancho A.