Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

24
Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia Simon Bush Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University

Transcript of Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Page 1: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Simon Bush Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University

Page 2: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Seafood production

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Pro

du

ctio

n p

er c

apit

a (k

g)

Fish

erie

s an

d A

qu

acu

ltu

re P

rod

uct

ion

(m

illio

n t

)

Capture fisheries Aquaculture Production/capita

8.1% per annum since 1970

60% stocks fully exploited

~8% growth p.a.

Page 3: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Challenges in coastal Southeast Asia

IUU fishing beyond control of coastal communities Insecure or non-existent

rights based management systems Overcapacity in fishing and

rapid expansion in aquaculture Global market volatility Overall ... risky business

Page 4: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Shifts in governance

Perceived over regulation in North, under-regulation in South Growing demand for

sustainable fish in high value seafood markets Global sustainable

seafood movement Industry co-management

and global sustainability partnerships

Page 5: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Private certification

Limited (!) market demand Narrow take on sustainability Self-selection of good

performers in need of small improvements Exclusion of poor performers

in need of large improvements Dependence on public and

private intermediaries for ‘improvement’

Bush et al. 2013; Gulbrandsen 2010

Page 6: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Demonstrating improvement

Cambridge et al. 2011; Bush and Oosterveer 2015, Sustainability

Certification ‘pull’ below certification threshold?

Page 7: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Credibility

Accessibility Continual improvement

‘Devil’s triangle’

Key governance challenge

Developing world

producers?

Best performing producers?

New approaches

needed?

Bush et al. 2013, Marine Policy

Page 8: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Clustering

Cooperative production to enhance farm level production and trade function.

Time for area-based governance?

Ecosystem based approach

Ecological function central, but little attention on organisation, trade and risk transfer.

Zonal management

Disease, regulation and certification. Less focus on ecological function.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What is a meaningful scale for producers? �What incentives can foster collaboration?
Page 9: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

www.blueyou.ch

Case 1: Coastal Aquaculture

Page 10: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Vo et al. 2013, Remote Sensing

Page 11: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Farms in landscapes

Ha et al. 2012 Journal of Rural Studies

Mangrove-shrimp integrated systems, Ca Mau, Vietnam ● Timber: US$596 ha/yr; vs.

Shrimp US$ 1539 ha/year

● But ... farmers see mangroves as income and disease (risk) reduction

● Government forest-pond ratios tiered by farm scale

● Naturland set ≥50%

Page 12: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Joffre et al. 2014

CONTINUE INTEGRATED MANGROVE SYSTEMS

MOVE FROM EXTENSIVE TO INTEGRATED MANGROVE SYSTEMS

INTE

RNAL

DRI

VERS

DRIVER WEIGHT (100 total)

Page 13: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Joffre et al. 2014

MOVE FROM EXTENSIVE TO INTEGRATED MANGROVE SYSTEMS

EXTERNAL DRIVERS

CONTINUE INTEGRATED MANGROVE SYSTEMS

DRIVER WEIGHT

Page 14: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Overcoming regulatory fragmentation?

Landscape level coordination to reduce farm level risk

Benefit sharing models incentivise coordination

State oversight on ecological and production functions

Page 15: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Claiming value and reducing risk

Possibility for claims to be made and rewarded in the market Support from buyers and

the state – although benefit sharing remains an issue Possibilities for

certification to provide assurance for insurance and finance?

Page 16: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Case 2: Indonesian coastal tuna

Information poor

Transboundary Small-scale

Page 17: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

FAD distribution based on logbooks handline, P&L fishers, Bitung Indonesia. Nugroho et al. In Prep

Page 18: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Inclusive, transparent, traceable

Middlemen Processor Exporter Buyer

RFMO Licence Register

POINT 2: Catch and vessel enumeration

POINT 1: On the water

POINT 3: Traceability data

Presenter
Presentation Notes
POINT 2: Catch and vessel enumeration Info on harvester/producer, evidence of authorization; UVI; Gear Fish info: Spp; Product Description; Name of product (Kg) Where harvesting: where; when; landed; date of landing; name of processor/dealers ETP interactions POINT 3: Traceability data Catch volumes verified through catch landings Vessel level data to assessment on effort, not only catch Supplier codes and volumes – to assess leakage/mass balance
Page 19: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Risk profile of tuna fishery

Page 21: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Timely and legible information

iFISH

Sub-national National Regional

Producer Consumer

Mar

ket

Sta

te

?

Page 22: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Inclusive, risk assessed area-based approach?

Co-management data-management areas?

Market recognition for not IUU, but LRR fisheries?

Page 23: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

New possibilities for area-based approaches?

Inclusive business models

Risk transfer (Finance and

insurance)

Secure market supply and

claims

Reinforcing government regulation

Continuous improvement

Page 24: Area-based Governance for Fisheries and Aquaculture Sustainability in Southeast Asia

Conclusions

Need to move beyond technical interventions at producer level to govern shared social and ecological factors

Area based as a new kind of governance – bring together different forms of market and state authority

New informational technologies making area based management possible to address production and market risks