Architect (K.U.) ADAM GUMOWSKI V p A c i e w Engineer (S.U.) JASON STONE C.M. (S.U.) BOB FARMAN...

Architect (K.U.)ADAM GUMOWSKI

VVp p AA cc ii

eeww

2200

0022

Engineer (S.U.)JASON STONE

C.M. (S.U.)BOB FARMAN

Winter Quarter Presentation

03.15.2002

acific niversity

Architect

Adam Gumowski

Construction Mngr.

Bob Farman

Engineer

Jason Stone

Owner

Joel Villamil

windwaterfunctionsustainabilitycollaborationcontextefficiencygatewayaxisintegrationcirculationexpression

ASite Location

EC

Presidio National Park

Of

San

Francisco


ASite Evaluation

EC

Surrounding Architecture Historical Context The Bay as a gateway Sustainable DesignSoil Characteristics Foundation Studies Water Table Concerns

Dewatering Methods Water Protection Sustainable Materials Site Accessibility


AEC

by esign ustainability

Arch. Design #1


AEC

NS Section through West Wing

by esign ustainability

• “green architecture”

•based on the functionality and awareness to efficiency and sustainability

• air circulation and natural ventilation

•natural lighting and light modulation throughout the building

•natural humidification from the water

EW Section Through South Wing Roof Plan


AEC

Basement Floor Plan Ground Floor PlanFloor Plans

Auditorium

Chair’s Office

Computer Room

Faculty Lounge

Faculty Offices

Instructional Labs

Lg Classrooms

Mech. Room

Restrooms

Secretaries

Seminar Rooms

Senior Admin.

Sm.Classrooms

Storage/Utility

Student Offices

Tech. Support


Floor Plans2nd Floor Plan

AEC

3rd Floor Plan

Auditorium

Chair’s Office

Computer Room

Faculty Lounge

Faculty Offices

Instructional Labs

Lg Classrooms

Mech. Room

Restrooms

Secretaries

Seminar Rooms

Senior Admin.

Sm.Classrooms

Storage/Utility

Student Offices

Tech. Support


AEC

Design Development


Structural Design Parameters• Seismic Zone 4, 10 km from San Andreas

• Soil Qb = 40 ft. of sand, Soil Type SE

• Flood Resistance and Green Building Considerations• Dead loads:

– Slab, partitions, beams, columns, shear core, roofing system, cladding

• Live loads per UBC 97

AEC


Structural Solution #1 – Dual System

SMRF beams: 14x16”

SMRF columns: 14”x14”

Gravity columns: 12”x12”

Second Floor

Third Floor

Roof

12” Shear Walls

8” Flat Slab

First Floor

Base Shear = 268kOverturning moment = 4700 k*ftA

EC


Architechural Overlay #1

Second Floor

Third Floor

Basement

Ground Floor

AEC


Structural Solution #2 – Dual System

SMRF beams: W18x35

SMRF columns: W12x120

Gravity columns: W12x65

Second Floor

Third Floor

Roof

Gravity Beams: W10x33

12” Shear Walls

Concentrically braced frame: HS 12x12x5/8

5.25” Composite Lightweight Concrete Slab

First Floor

AEC


Architectural Overlay#2

Second Floor

Third Floor

Ground Floor

First Floor

AEC


Load Path - Lateral Loads

AEC


Load Path - Skyways

I NSTRUCTI ONALLAB

I NSTRUCTI ONALLAB

COMPUTERMACHI NE ROOM

TECH.SUPPORT

STORAGESTORAGESTUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

ST

UD

EN

TO

FFIC

E

STORAGE

MEN'SR.R.

WOMEN'SR.R.

STORAGE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

SECRETARY

STORAGE

FACULTYOFFI CE

FACULTYOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

SENI ORADMI N.OFFI CE

SECRET

ARYFACULTY

OFFI CEFACULTYOFFI CE

FACULTYOFFI CE

FACULTYOFFI CE

FACULTYOFFI CE

STOR.

STUDENTOFFI CE

STUDENTOFFI CE

SECOND LEVEL

ST

OR

SENI ORADMI N.OFFI CE

DNDN

DN

AEC


Load Path - Skyways

Steel solution with 5.25” lightweight slab on beam

Concrete solution with 7” slab and 12” x 12” beamA

EC


Load Path - Gravity

W30x235

AEC


Load Path - Roof

Shear keys and chord member create a monolithic behavior of the precast roof panels instead of individual behavior

Chord member

Shear Keys

Connection to Beams with anchor bolts

AEC


Steel Connections

Steel Beam-Shearwall Connection Moment Connection

Steel Bracing Connection Girder-Column Connection

PL1/4 - 9in

Shop weld

AEC


Foundation – Site Characteristics

• Soil underneath structure is 40 ft. of sand• Assumed soil properties:

- F’ = 30o, c’ = 0, g = 125 pcf• Bearing Capacity = 4500 psf• 8 x 8 ft2 spread footings, strip footings• Mat Foundation – estimated 18” depth

and 24” under columns

First FloorBasement

AEC


Foundation Connections

AEC


Site Layout

AEC

Concept 1 SchedulePrecast Concrete Option

Structural Steel Option


AEC

Concept 1 BudgetAlt 1-1 Alt 1-2

L-shaped building; P/C structure; 14ft below grade

L-shaped building; Steel structure; 14ft below grade

02000 Sitework 422,238$ 422,238$ 03000 Concrete 1,062,533$ 816,855$ 04000 Masonry 24,482$ 24,482$ 05000 Metals 73,645$ 446,845$ 06000 Carpentry 186,600$ 186,600$ 07000 Thermal & Moisture Protection 97,614$ 97,614$ 08000 Doors & Windows 520,160$ 520,160$ 09000 Finishes 461,325$ 558,730$ 10000 Specialties -$ -$ 11000 Equipment -$ -$ 12000 Furnishings -$ -$ 13000 Special Construction -$ -$ 14000 Conveying Systems 69,664$ 69,664$ 15000 Mechanical 298,560$ 298,560$ 16000 Electrical 261,240$ 261,240$

Subtotal 3,478,061$ 3,702,989$ Engineering (6%) 208,684$ 222,179$ General Conditions (10%) 347,806$ 370,299$ Contingency (15%) 521,709$ 555,448$ Fee (4%) 139,122$ 148,120$

Grand Total 4,695,382$ 4,999,035$ COST/SF 157$ 167$

Structural System Cost 354,801$ 373,200$

CSI Division Desciption


AEC


AEC

an xis efining

Arch. Design #2


AEC

an xis efining


AEC

Design Process

Massing


AEC

Ocean View

View from Tidal Marsh


Floor PlansGround Floor Plan

AEC

Auditorium

Chair’s Office

Computer Room

Faculty Lounge

Faculty Offices

Instructional Labs

Lg Classrooms

Mech. Room

Restrooms

Secretaries

Seminar Rooms

Senior Admin.

Sm.Classrooms

Storage/Utility

Student Offices

Tech. Support


Floor Plans2nd Floor Plan

AEC

3rd Floor Plan

Auditorium

Chair’s Office

Computer Room

Faculty Lounge

Faculty Offices

Instructional Labs

Lg Classrooms

Mech. Room

Restrooms

Secretaries

Seminar Rooms

Senior Admin.

Sm.Classrooms

Storage/Utility

Student Offices

Tech. Support


3D Floor Plans

2nd Floor Plan

AEC

Ground Floor Plan

3rd Floor Plan


Structural Solution #1

SMRF beams: 16”x18”

SMRF columns: 16”x16”

Gravity columns: 12”x12”

Gravity Beams: 12”x18”

Second Floor

Third Floor

Roof

8” Flat Slab

Note: Due to seismic conditions, this design might require capitals or beams.

First Floor

Base Shear = 4000k

Overturning Moment = 10000 kft

AEC


Architechural Overlay #1

Second Floor

Third Floor

First Floor

AEC



SMRF beams: W18x36

SMRF columns: W14x120

Gravity columns: W12x72

Second Floor

Third Floor

Roof

Gravity Beams: W10x19

Gravity Girders: W12x40

5.25” Composite Lightweight Concrete Slab

First Floor

AEC



Second Floor

Third Floor

First Floor

AEC


Load Path - Lateral Loads

AEC


AEC

Steel Connections

Coped Connection Moment Connection

Angled Beam Connection Girder-Column Connection


AEC

Foundation – Site Characteristics

• 8 x 8 ft2 spread footings, 24” deep

• Mat Foundation – estimated 18” depth and 24” under columns


AEC

Concept 2 SchedulePrecast Concrete Option

Structural Steel Option


AEC

Concept 2 BudgetAlt 2-1 Alt 2-2

Dbl. Diamond shaped bldg; P/C Structure; 14ft below grade

Dbl. Diamond shaped bldg; Steel Structure; 14ft below grade

02000 Sitework 159,506$ 159,506$ 03000 Concrete 1,014,718$ 595,354$ 04000 Masonry 39,808$ 39,808$ 05000 Metals 73,645$ 540,145$ 06000 Carpentry 186,600$ 186,600$ 07000 Thermal & Moisture Protection 96,723$ 96,723$ 08000 Doors & Windows 334,754$ 334,754$ 09000 Finishes 461,151$ 607,856$ 10000 Specialties -$ -$ 11000 Equipment -$ -$ 12000 Furnishings -$ -$ 13000 Special Construction -$ -$ 14000 Conveying Systems 69,664$ 69,664$ 15000 Mechanical 298,560$ 298,560$ 16000 Electrical 261,240$ 261,240$

Subtotal 2,996,369$ 3,190,209$ Engineering (6%) 179,782$ 191,413$ General Conditions (10%) 299,637$ 319,021$ Contingency (15%) 449,455$ 478,531$ Fee (4%) 119,855$ 127,608$

Grand Total 4,045,099$ 4,306,783$ COST/SF 135$ 144$

Structural System Cost 362,937$ 466,500$

DesciptionCSI Division


Decision Matrix

EC

•Many pleasing Many pleasing aesthetic elementsaesthetic elements•Exposed steel and Exposed steel and connections to be connections to be aesthetically designedaesthetically designed•Steel will react w/ salt Steel will react w/ salt water over timewater over time

•Sustainability and Sustainability and usage of ventilation are usage of ventilation are strongstrong•Use of glass curtain Use of glass curtain wallswalls•Limited advancement Limited advancement for designfor design

•Many options in Many options in looking to sustainable looking to sustainable materialsmaterials•Increased area of Increased area of ocean-view windowsocean-view windows•Interesting non-Interesting non-uniform connectionsuniform connections

•Unique and interesting Unique and interesting spaces. Excellent axis spaces. Excellent axis consideration.consideration.•Non-celebrated Non-celebrated connectionsconnections

•Flexible structural Flexible structural systemsystem•Symmetrical solutionSymmetrical solution•Good possibilities for Good possibilities for spring quarterspring quarter

•Flexible structural Flexible structural systemsystem•Symmetrical solutionSymmetrical solution•Will probably need a Will probably need a height variance to height variance to accommodate MEPaccommodate MEP

•ChallengingChallenging•Structural system Structural system inflexibleinflexible•Very little repetition so Very little repetition so design will be design will be expensive and expensive and consumingconsuming

•ChallengingChallenging•Structural system Structural system inflexibleinflexible•Very little repetition so Very little repetition so design will be design will be expensive and expensive and consumingconsuming

•Short Duration Short Duration ScheduleSchedule•Cheapest Structural Cheapest Structural SystemSystem•Difficult and Expensive Difficult and Expensive Foundation Foundation CosntructionCosntruction

•Easy Erection Easy Erection SequenceSequence

•Need for fireproofing Need for fireproofing of steel.of steel.•Highest Cost/SFHighest Cost/SF

•Shortest Construction Shortest Construction Schedule (187 days)Schedule (187 days)•Simple Foundation Simple Foundation ConstructionConstruction•Complicated Structural Complicated Structural System ConstructionSystem Construction

•Simple Foundation Simple Foundation ConstructionConstruction•Most Expensive Most Expensive Structural SystemStructural System•Complicated Complicated ConstructionConstruction

A Steel Concrete Steel Concrete


AEC Interaction Discussion

EC

A

Architect (K.U.)ADAM GUMOWSKI

VVp p AA cc ii

eeww

2200

0022

Engineer (S.U.)JASON STONE

C.M. (S.U.)BOB FARMAN

Winter Quarter Presentation

03.15.2002

acific niversityQUESTIONS?

Architect (K.U.) ADAM GUMOWSKI V p A c i e w Engineer (S.U.) JASON STONE C.M. (S.U.) BOB FARMAN...

Documents

Transcript of Architect (K.U.) ADAM GUMOWSKI V p A c i e w Engineer (S.U.) JASON STONE C.M. (S.U.) BOB FARMAN...