Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

download Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

of 113

Transcript of Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    1/113

    Roads BranchPublic Works Department Malaysia

    Jalan Sultan Salahuddin50582 Kuala Lumpur

    Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8/86

    5.0m0m

    7.0m0m

    A Guide on

    Geometric Design of Roads

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    2/113

    Page 2ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    3/113

    Page 3ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    ADDENDUM NO. 1

    This Addendum to the 'ArahanTeknik Galan) 8/86 - A Guide on

    Geometric Design of Roads' shall bemade part of this Arahan Teknik and

    users shall incorporate thisAddendum into the Arahan Teknik(jalan) 8/86.

    1.0 TABLE 3-2A DESIGN SPEED

    (RURAL) and

    TABLE 3-2B : DESIGNSPEED (URBAN), page 25

    Tables 3-2A and 3-?~B shouldread as table 3-2A : DESIGN

    SPEED (RURAL) (AMENDEDSEPT. 1989) and table 3-2B :DESIGN SPEED (URBAN)(AMENDED SEPT. 1989)respectively, herewith asattached to this Addendum.

    2.0 GENERAL SUMMARY -GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITE-RIA FOR ROADS INRURAL AREAS (METRIC),page 103

    The above mentioned table issuperceeded by table 'GEN-ERAL SUMMARY - GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA FORROADS IN RURAL AREAS

    (METRIC) (AMENDED SEPT.1989)' herewith attached tothis Addendum.

    3.0 GENERAL SUMMARY -

    GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITE-RIA FOR ROADS IN URBANAREAS (METRIC),t4Age 104

    The above mentioned table is

    superceeded by table 'GEN-ERAL SUMMARY - GEOMET-RIC DESIGNED CRITERIAFOR ROADS IN URBANAREAS (METRIC) (AMENDED SEPT. 1989)' herewithattached to this Addendum.

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    4/113

    Page 4ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    TABLE 3-2A : DESIGN SPEED (RURAL) (AMENDED SEPT. 1989)

    TABLE 3-213:DESIGN SPEED (URBAN) (AMENDED SEPT. 1989)

    DesignStandard

    Design Speed ( km / hr )

    Terrain

    Flat Rolling Mountainous

    R6

    R5

    R4

    R3

    R2

    R1

    R1a

    120

    100

    90

    70

    60

    40

    40

    100

    80

    70

    60

    50

    30

    30

    80

    60

    60

    50

    40

    20

    20

    DesignStandard

    Design Speed ( km / hr )

    Area Type

    I II III

    U6

    U5

    U4

    U3

    U2

    U1

    U1a

    100

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    40

    80

    60

    60

    50

    40

    30

    30

    60

    50

    50

    40

    30

    30

    20

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    5/113

    Page 5ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    Note :

    Type I - Relatively free iri road location with verylittle problems ns regards land acquisition, affected buildings or

    other socially sensitive areas.Type II - Intermediate between I and II.

    Type III - Very restrictive in road location with problems as regards landacquisition, affected buildings and other sonsiltive areas.

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    6/113

    Page 6ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    GENERAL SUMMARY - GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ROADS IN RURAL AREAS ( METRIC) x 4

    0 1 DESIGN STANDARD - R 6 R 5 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 1 R 1A

    2 ACCESS CONTROL - FULL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL NIL NIL NIL

    3 TERRAIN - F R M F R M F R M F R M F R M F R M F R M

    0 4 DESIGN SPEED Km/hr 120 100 80 100 80 60 90 70 60 70 60 50 60 50 40 40 30 20 40 30 20

    5 I LANE WIDTH m 3.50 ! 3.50 ( 3.15 3.00 I 2.75 I (5.00)0 (4.50)0I 6 1 SHOULDER WIDTH I m 13.00 3.00 2.50 13.00 3.00 1.50 13.00 3.00 2.00 12.50 2.50 2.00 12.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 ; 1.Y 1.50 I N I

    1;HOULOrE~R~ allRI~trIVRLJ m 1:00 1.00 1: 00 0.50 0.50 0_50 0.50

    z 8 I MEDIAN WIDTH (MINIMUM) m'

    6.0 5.0 4.0 1 4.0 3.5 3.0 ! 3.0 2.5 2.0 1 N/A N/A N/A j N/A

    N 9 MEDIAN WIDTH (DESIRABLE) m 18.0 12.5 8.0 12.0 9.0 6.0 9.0 6.5 4.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

    N 10 MARGINAL STRIP (WIDTH) m 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00

    11 MINIMUM RESERVE WIDTH m 60 60(50)b

    40(30)b

    20 20 12 12

    12 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE m 185 205 140 205 140 85 180 120 85 120 85 65 85 65 45 45 30 20 45 30 20

    13 PASSING SIGHT DISTANCE m N/A 700 550 450 625 500 450 500 450 350 450 350 300 300 250 200 300 250 200

    z 14 MINIMUM RADIUS m 570 375 230 375 230 125 300 175 125 175 125 85 125 85 50 50 30 15 50 30 15

    15 MINIMUM LENGTH OF SPIRAL m SEE TABLE 4 - 4A N/A N/A

    0 16 MAXIMUM SUPERELEVATION RATIO 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

    17 MAXIMUM GRADE (DESIRABLE) % 2 3 4 3 4 5 4 5 6 5 6 7 6 7 8 7 8 9 10

    W

    W18 MAXIMUM GRADE % 5 6 7 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 9 10 9 10 12 10 12 15 25

    19 CREST VERTICAL CURVE (K) - 120 60 30 60 30 15 45 22 15 22 15 10 15 10 10 10 5 5 10 5 5

    20 SAG. VERTICAL CURVE (K) - 60 40 28 40 28 15 35 20 15 20 15 12 -15 --12- 10 -I- 8 8 10 8 8 I

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    7/113

    Page 7ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    GENERAL SUMMARY - GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ROADS IN URBAN AREAS ( METRIC )

    s I DESIGN STANDARD - U 6 U 5 U 4 U 3 U 2 U i U la

    o ~ 2 ACCESS CONTROL - FULL PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL/NIL NIL NIL NIL

    uN 3 AREA TYPE - I II III i II Itl I II III i il III I II III I II III I 11 III

    0 4 DESIGN SPEED Km/hr 100 80 60 80 60 50 70 60 50 60 50 40 50 40 30 40 30 20 40 30 10

    1~~, ;

    6 1;

    1 A\1

    uvE 1 zI 1Z

    J.5u J.uu IJ . L J I a.uu I L.ia irn i

    -

    (4.50;n I

    -

    6 !7

    SHOULDER WIDTH !?SHOULDER WIDTH

    STRUCTURES >1Wm

    mm

    3.003.001.00

    2.50 3.003.001.00

    2.503.00 2.501.00

    2.00 2.502.000.50

    1.501

    2.001.500.50

    1.501

    1.501.500.50

    0.50~

    1.501.500.50

    1.501

    8 MEDIAN WIDTH (MINIMUM!) m 14.0 3.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 N/A N/A N/A

    9 MEDIAN WIDTH (DESIRABLE) m 112-009- 6.00 9.00 6.50 4.00 7.50 5.00 3.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 N/A N/A N/A

    v 10 MARGINAL STRIP (WIDTH) m 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00

    11 MINIMUM RESERVE WIDTH m 60 50 40(30) b 30(20) b 20 11 12

    12 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE m 205 140 85 140 85 65 115 85 65 85 65 45 65 45 30 45 30 20 45~ 30 20

    13 PASSING SIGHT DISTANCE m N/A 550 450 350 500 450 350 450 350 300 350 300 250 300 250 200 300 250 200Z 14 MINIMUM RADIUS m 465 280 150 280 150 100 210 150 100 150 100 60 100 60 35 60 35 15 60 35 15

    15 MINIMUM LENGTH OF SPIRAL m SEE TABLE 4 - 4B N/A N/A N/A0

    0 16 MAXIMUM SUPERELEVATION RATIO 0.060.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

    17 MAXIMUM GRADE (DESIRABLE) % 3 4 5 4 5 6 5 6 7 6 7 8 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9

    W 18 MAXIMUM GRADE % 6 7 8 7 8 9 8 9 10 9 10 12 10 12 15 10 12 15 10 12 15

    W 19 CREST VERTICAL CURVE (K) - 60 30 15 30 15 10 22 15 10 15 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 10 5 5

    20 SAG. VERTICAL CURVE (K) 1 - 40 28 15 28 15 12 120 15 12 15 12 10 12 10 8 10 8 8 10 8 8

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    8/113

    Page 8ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    ERRATA

    Replace section 5.14.2(c) (i) on pages 92 and 94 with the following :

    Section 5.14.2 (c) Horizontal Alignment

    (i) Minimum Radius

    The following formula is used in determining the required. minimumradius for the curves.

    R = V2.............127(e+f)

    Where R = Minimum radius of curve in meters V = Designspeed, in km/hr

    e = Maximum rate of superelevationJ- = Maximum allowable side friction factor.

    Table 5-11 gives the minimum radius that are to be used in design. Flatter-curves should always be used wherever possible. There is no necessity toprovide any transition (spiral) curves.

    Table 5-11: MINIMUM RADIUS FOR DESIGN

    Design Speed (km/hr)Minimum Radius

    e = 0.06 e = 0.10

    203040506080100

    120

    153560100150280465

    710

    15305085

    125230375

    570

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    9/113

    Page 9ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CONTENTS

    CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

    1.1 Introduction

    CHAPTER 2 - DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROAD CLASSIFICATION

    2.1. Road Standards

    2.1.1 Standardisation2.1.2 Rural and Urban Areas2.1.3 Application of Standards

    2.2 Road Classification

    2.2.1 Function of Road

    2.3 Road Administration

    2.4 Access Control

    2.4.1 Degree of Control2.4.2 Application

    2.5 Design Standards

    2.5.1 Selection of Design Standard

    CHAPTER 3 - DESIGN CONTROLS AND CRITERIA

    3.1 Topography

    3.2 Traffic

    3.2.1 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)3.2.2 Design Hourly Volume (DHV)3.2.3 Design Hourly Volume Ratio (K)3.2.4 Directional Distribution Ratio (D)3.2.5 Traffic Composition

    3.2.6 Projection of Traffic

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    10/113

    Page 10ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    3.3 Design Vehicles and Characteristics

    3.3.1 Design Vehicles3.3.2 Summary of Dimension of Design

    Vehicle

    3.4 Speed

    3.4.1 Operating Speed3.4.2 Design Speed3.4.3 Design Section

    3.5 Capacity

    3.5.1 Capacity Under Ideal Conditions

    3.5.2 Design Volume3.5.3 Service Volume3.5.4 Design level of service and

    Volume/Capacity Ratio

    CHAPTER 4 - ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    4.1 Sight Distance

    4.1.1 General4.1.2. Stopping Sight Distance4.1.3 Passing Sight Distance4.1.4 Criteria For Measuring Sight

    Distance

    4.2 Horizontal Alignment

    4.2.1 General4.2.2 Superelevation Rates4.2.3 Minimum Radius

    4.2.4 Transition (Spiral) Curves

    4.2.5 Methods of Attaining Superelevation4.2.6 Superelevation Runoff with Medians4.2.7 Pavement Widening on Curves4.2.8 Sight Distance on Horizontal Curves4.2.9 General Controls For Horizontal

    Alignment

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    11/113

    Page 11ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    4.3 Vertical Alignment

    4.3.1 Maximum Grades4.3.2 Minimum Grades4.3.3 Critical Grade Length

    4.3.4 Climbing Lanes for Two Lane Roads4.3.5 Passsing Lane Section on Two Lane

    Road4.3.6 Climbing Lanes on Multi lane Roads4.3.7 Vertical Curves4.3.8 General Controls for Vertical

    Alignment

    4.4 Combination of Horizontal and Vertical Alignment

    CHAPTER 5 - CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    5.1 Pavement

    5.1.1 Surface Types5.1.2 Normal Cross Slope

    5.2 Lane Widths and Marginal Strip

    5.3 Shoulders

    5.3.1 General Characteristics5.3.2 Width of Shoulders5.3.3 Shoulder Cross Slope5.3.4 Shoulder Structure

    5.4 Kerbs

    5.4.1 General Considerations5.4.2 Types of Kerbs

    5.5 Sidewalks

    5.6 Traffic Barriers

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    12/113

    Page 12ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.7 Medians

    5.7.1 General5.7.2 Median Types and Width

    5.8 Service Roads

    5.8.1 General

    5.8.2 Design Requirements

    5.9 Pedestrian Crossings

    5.9.1 General Considerations5.9.2 School Level Crossings

    5.10 U-Turns

    5.10.1 General Considerations5.10.2 Design Considerations

    5.11 Bridge and Structure Cross Sections

    5.11.1 Width of Shoulders5.11.2 Required Clearances

    5.12 Bias Laybyes

    5.13 Minimum Reserve Width

    5.14 Exclusive Cycle Lanes

    5.14.1 General Considerations .5.14.2 Elements of Design5.14.3 Cross-Section Elements5.14.4 Intersection Treatment

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    13/113

    Page 13ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 6 - OTHER ELEMENTS AFFECTING. GEOMETRICDESIGN

    6.1 Road Safety

    6.2 Drainage

    6.3 Lighting

    6.4 Utilities

    6.5 Signing and markings

    6.6 Traffic Signals

    6.7 Erosion Control, Landscape Development andEnvironmental Impacts

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    14/113

    Page 14ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

    1.1 INTRODUCTION

    This Arahan Teknik. is limitedto the geometric features of roaddesign as distinguished from struc-

    tural design. It is intended as a com-prehensive manual on the geometricdesign of road, inclusive both in ruralas well as in urban conditions. Thegeometric design of road isonly applicable to Rural or Urban

    areas as specifically indicated in thisArahan Teknik.

    This Arahan Teknik is to beapplied to all new construction andimprovements of roads for vehiculartraffic undertaken by JKR.

    Modifications and updating will becarried out from time to time. In thisrespect, comments from users will bemost welcomed.

    This Arahan Teknik is to beused in conjunction with other

    Arahan Tekniks that have been orwill be produced by CawanganJalan.

    The design of at-grade inter-sections and interchanges are pre-

    sented individually in separate

    Companion Arahan Tekniks.

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    15/113

    Page 15ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 2.

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSIFICATIONS

    2.1 ROAD STANDARDS

    2.1.1 Standardisation

    The geometric design of allroads need to be standardisedfor the following; reasons:

    (a) to provide a uniformitythe design of roadsaccording to their per

    formance requirements.(b) to provide a consistent,

    safe and reliable roadfacilities for movementof traffic.

    (c) to provide. a guide forless subjective deci

    sions on road design.

    2.1.2 Rural and Urban Areas

    Urban areas are defined asareas having a population ofat least 1,000 where buildings

    and houses are gathered andbusiness activity is prevalent.It covers all areas within thegazetted Municipality limitsand also includes areasexpected to becomeurbanised within the design

    period. Rural areas can beregarded as areas other thanurban areas.

    There is no fundamental difference in the principles ofdesign for rural and urban

    roads. Roads in urban areas,however,are characterised bybusy pedestrian activities and

    frequent stopping of vehicles

    owing to short intersectionspacings and congested built-up areas. Lower designspeeds are usually adopted

    for urban roads and differentcross-sectional elements are

    applied to take into accountthe nature of traffic andadjoining land use. It is forthese reasons that variationsin certain aspects of geometric design are incorporated forthese two broad groups of

    roads.

    2.1.3 Application of Standards

    The design standard is classi-fied into seven groups(R6,R5, R4,R3,R2,:R1 & R1a)

    for rural areas and into sevengroups(U6,U5,U4,it3,U'2,U1,& Uta)for urban areas. These are indescending order of hierarchy.

    Roads which function to provide long distance travel, willrequire higher, design speedswhilst road which serve localtraffic, where the effect ofspeed is less significant canhave a lower design speed.

    Also roads with heavier trafficwill be provided with a higher

    standard.

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    16/113

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    17/113

    Page 17

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    (h) Srandard U1a :

    Applied to local accessto low cost housingareas.

    2.2 ROAD CLASSIFICATION

    2.2.1 Function of Road

    Each road has its functionaccording to its role either in

    the National Network,Regional Network, StateNetwork or City/TownNetwork. The most basic function of a road is transportation. This can be further divid-

    ed into two sub-functions;namely mobility and accessibility. However, these two sub-functions are in trade-off. Toenhance one, the other mustbe limited. In rural areas,roadsare divided into five cate

    gories, namely, EXPRESSWAY, HIGHWAY, PRIMARYROAD, SECONDARY ROADand MINOR ROAD and inurban areas, roads are divid-ed into four categories, name-ly, EXPRESSWAY, ARTERI-

    AL, COLLECTOR AND

    LOCAL STREET. They are inascending order of accessibili-ty and thus in descendingorder of mobility.

    2.2.2 Categories of Road

    Roads are divided into twogroups by area, i.e. rural andurban. Roads in rural areas

    are further classified into fivecategories by function namely

    Expressway, Highway,Primary Road, SecondaryRoad and Minor Road andinto four categories in urbanarea, namely, Expressway,Arterial, Collector and LocalStreet. Their general. appli-

    cations are as follows.

    CHAPTER 2

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    18/113

    Page 18

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    (a) Expressway

    An Expressway is adivided highway forthrough traffic with full

    control of access andalways with grade sep

    arations at all intersections.

    In rural, areas, theyapply to the interstatehighways for through

    traffic and make the

    basic framework ofNational road transportation for fast travelling. They serve longtrips and provide higherspeed of travelling and

    comfort. To maintainthis, they are fullyaccess-controlled andare designed to thehighest standards.

    In urban areas, theyform the basic framework of road trans portation system inurbanised area forthrough traffic. Theyalso serve relatively

    long trips and smoothtraffic flow and with full

    access control andcomplements the RuralExpressway.

    (b) Highways

    They constitute theinterstate national network and complementsthe expressway net

    work. They usually link

    up directly or indirectlythe Federal Capitals,State capitals andpoints of entry/exit to

    the country. They serveong to intermediate trip

    lengths. Speed serviceis not so important asin an Expressway butrelatively high to medium speed is necessary.Smooth traffic is provid-ed with partial access

    control.

    (c) Primary Roads

    They constitute themajor roads formingthe basic network of

    the road transportationsystem within a state.They serve intermedi-ate trip lengths andmedium travellingspeeds. Smooth traffic

    is provided with partialaccess control Theyusually link up theState! Capitals andDistrict Capitals orother Major Towns.

    (d) Secondary Roads

    They constitute themajor roads formingthe basic network ofthe road transportationsystem within a District

    or RegionalDevelopment Areas.They serve intermedi-ate trip lengths withpartial access control.

    CHAPTER 2

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    19/113

    Page 19

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    They usually link up the

    raajor towns within theDistrict or RegionalDevelopment Areas.

    (e) Minor Roads

    They apply to all roadsother than thosedescribed above in therural areas. They formthe basic road networkwithin a Land Schemeor other inhabited

    areas in a rural area.

    They also includeroads with special func-tions such as holidayresort roads, securityroads or access roadsto microwave stations.

    They serve mainly localtraffic with short triplengths and are usuallywith partial or noaccess control.

    (f) Arterials

    An arterial is a conti-nous road with partialaccess control forthrough traffic withinurban areas. Basically

    it conveys traffic fromresidential areas to the

    vicinity of the centralbusiness district orfrom one part of a cityto another which doesnot intend to penetrate

    the city centre .Arterials do not pene-trate identifiable neighbourhoods. Smoothtraffic flow is essential

    since it carries large

    traffic volume.

    (g) Collectors

    A collector road is aroad with partial access

    control designed toserve on a collector ordistributor of trafficbetween the arterialand the local road sys-tems. Collectors arethe major roads which

    penetrate and serve

    identifiable neighbourhoods, commercialareas and industrialareas.

    (h) Local Streets

    The local street systemis the basic road net-work within a neighbourhood and servesprimarily to offer directaccess to abutting land.

    They are links to thecollector road and thusserve short trip lengths.Through traffic shouldbe discouraged.

    CHAPTER 2

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    20/113

    Page 20

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    2.3 ROAD ADMINISTRATION

    For the purposes of roadadministration, roads are clas-sified as Federal, State, Local

    Authority (City Hall, Municipalor Local Council) or Kampong(District Office) Roads

    depending upon their jurisdic-tion.

    (a) Federal Roads areroads that are gazettedunder the FederalRoad ordinance and

    are usually roads link-ing the State Capitals,Airports, RailwayStations and Ports.Roads within theFELDA Land Schemes

    and those in otherRegional LandSchemes constructedwith Federal Fundsalso fall under this cat-egory. The maintnanceof these roads are the

    responsibility of theFederal Governmentand is done through theState JKR with fundsfrom the FederalGovernment.

    (b) State Roads are all the

    other roads within theState outside the jurisdiction of the LocalAuthority or DistrictOffice, built to JKR

    standards. They arenormally constructedwith State Funds. Themaintenance of theseroads are the responsi-

    bility of the State

    Government and isdone through the StateJKR.

    (c) Local Authority Roadsare all those roads

    within the limits of theLocal Authority and arenormally maintained bythe responsible localauthority.

    (d) Kampong (District

    Office) Roads are all

    those roads directlyunder the jurisdiction ofthe District Office. Theyare usually earth roadswith no right of way.The maintenance of

    these roads are theresponsibility of theDistrict Office.

    2.4 ACCESS CONTROL

    2.4.1 Degree of Control

    Access control is the conditionwhere the right of owners oroccupants of abutting land orother persons to access, in

    connection with a road is fully

    or partially controlled by thepublic authority.

    Control of access is usuallyclassified into three types forits degree of control, namely

    full control, partial control andnon-control of access

    CHAPTER 2

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    21/113

    Page 21

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    Full Control of Access mean

    that preference is given tothrough traffic by providingaccess connecting with selected public roads only and by

    prohibiting crossings at gradeor direct private driveway con

    nections.

    Partial Control of Accessmeans that preference isgiven to through traffic to adegree that in addition toaccess connection with select-

    ed public roads, there may be

    some crossings traffickedroads, at grade intersectionsshould be limited and onlyallowed at selected locations.To compensate for the limitedaccess to fully or partially

    access controlled roads,frontage or service roads aresometimes attached to thesides of the main roads.

    In Non Control Access, thereis basically no limitations of

    access.

    2.4.2 Application

    The selection of the degree ofcontrol required is important

    so as to preserve the as builtcapacity of the road as well as

    improved safety to all roadusers. Two aspects pertainingto the degree of control is tobe noted.

    (a) during the time ofdesign in the consider-ation of accesses toexisting developments.

    (b) after the completion of

    the road in the controlof accesses to futuredevelopments.

    The selection of degree ofaccess control depends on

    traffic volumes, function of theroad and the road networkaround the areas. Table 2-2Aand 2-2B is general guide forthe selection of degree ofaccess control.

    CHAPTER 2

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    22/113

    Page 22

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 2

    TABLE 2--2A: ACCESS CONTROL (RURAL)

    TABLE 2-2B: ACCESS CONTROL (URBAN)

    NOTE :

    F = Full Control of AccessP = Partial Control of AccessN = No Control of Access

    Road CatagoryDesign Standard

    R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 / R1a

    Expressway

    HighwayPrimary RoadSecondry RoadMinor Road

    F

    ----

    -

    PP--

    -

    -PP-

    -

    --P-

    -

    ---N

    -

    ---N

    Road CatagoryDesign Standard

    U6 U5 U4 U3 U2 U1 / U1a

    ExpresswayArterial

    CollectorLocal Street

    F-

    --

    -P

    --

    -P

    P-

    --

    PN

    --

    -N

    --

    -N

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    23/113

    Page 23

    DESIGN STANDARDS AND ROADCLASSFICATIONS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 2

    2.5 DESIGN STANDARDS

    The design standards used for various categories of roads are asshown in Table 2-3

    TABLE 2-3: DESIGN STANDARDS

    2.5.1 Selection of :Design Standard

    The selection of the required design standard should begin with the assessment ofthe function of the proposed road and the area it traverses. This should generally bedone in conjunction with the Highway Planning Unit of the Ministry of Works. If there

    is an overlapping of function, the ultimate function of the road shall be used for theselection criteria. The projected ADT at the end of the design life should then be calculated and from Table 2-3, the required design standard can be obtained. From thecapacity analysis (as in Chapter 3) the required number of lanes can then be calculat-ed.Figure 2--1 gives a flow chart indicating the processes for the selection of the,requireddesign standard.

    Area Road Catagory

    Projected ADT

    AllTraffic

    Volume

    >100,00

    10,000to

    3,000

    3,000to

    1,000

    1,000to

    150

    180 R-1- 230 R'-' 1100 R 2 880 Rar 680 R2510 R R'100 R' 68 R> 52 M39 39 MORE

    M- 340- 20- 2309 1100>n 880- 670} 520;*- 68~ 52=- 39>

    ~-8U R-Ir

    11-- R 1 30 R=340 R - 2 8 0 0 R ~ Z% R ICU I t - 4u R al.iI f -

    a

    180~' 150s- 130- 340- 280- 230y 190- J7~'

    R~t150 R~-100 8286 R ~180 R~150 R'130 R'110 R'`24 1

    86' 180' 150- 130=- 110=- 24 , . y

    R264 R;!'150 R y100 R286 8274 4'-16

    Note:64~8260

    86aR265

    74~R251

    16~R' 15

    1.25

    is

    65'R260

    578245

    154

    45:

    R238

    1.75

    35>

    R2-- 35 2, 4

    e

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    57/113

    Page 57

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    attained owner the

    superelavation runofflength with most of all,of' the wideningattained at the start of

    circular curve point.

    4.2.8 Sight Distance on HorizontalCurves

    Another element of horizontallignment is the sight distanceacross the inside of curves.Where there are sight oba-

    tructions (such as walls, cut

    slopes, buildings andguardrails),a design to provideadequate sight distance mayrequire adjustment in the nor-mal road cross-section orchange) in alignment if the

    obstruction cannot beremoved. Using the designspeed and a selected sightdistance as a control, thedesigner should check theactual condition and make the

    necessary adjustments in themanner most fitting to provideadequate sight distance

    4.2.9 General Controls forHorizontal Alignment

    In addition to the specificdesign elements for horicontal

    alignment, a number of gener-al controls are recognised andshould be used. These con-trols are not subject to empiri-cal or formula derivation but

    are important for the attain-ment of safe and smooth-flow-ing roads. These are:

    (a) The horizontal align-

    ment should,be consis-tent with the topogra-phy and with preserv-ing developed proper

    ties and community val-ues. Winding alignment

    composed of shortcurves should beavoided. On the otherhand too long a straightshould also be avoided.

    (b) The use of the mini-

    mum radius for the par-

    ticular design speedshould be avoidedwherever possible.Generally flat curvesshould be used, retain-ing the maximum for

    the most critical condi-tions.

    (c) Consistent alignmentshould always besought. Sharp curves

    should not be intro-duced at the end oflong tangent. Wheresharp curves must beintroduced, it should beapproached, wherepossaible, by succes-

    sively sharper curvesfrom the generally flat

    curvature.

    (d) For small deflectionangles, curves shouldbe sufficiently long to

    avoid the appearanceof a kink. Curvesshould be at least150m long for a centralangle of` 50 and the

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    58/113

    Page 58

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    length should be

    increased 30 m foreach 10 decrease inthe central angle

    (e) Any abrupt. reversal inalignment should be

    avoided. The distancebetween reversecurves should be thesum of the supreleva-tion runoff lengths andthe tangent runoutlengths.

    (f) The 'broken back'arrangement of curvesshould be avoided. Ilseof spiral transitions or acompound curve align-ment is preferable for

    such conditions if it. isunavoidable.

    4.3 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT

    4.3.1 Maximum Grades

    The vertical profile of roadaffect the performance of

    vehicles. The effect of gradeson trucks which have weight

    power ratio of about 300lb/hp, is considered. Themaximum grade controls interms of design speed is sum-marised in Table 4-6

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    59/113

    Page 59

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    4.3.2 Minimum grades

    A desirable minimum grade or0.5 percent should be used. Agrade of 0.35 percent may beallowable where a high typepavement. accurately crownedis used. On straight stretchestraversing across wide areas

    of low lying swamp use ofeven flatter grades may beallowable with prior approval.

    4.3.3 Critical Grade Length

    The term " critical grade

    length" indicate the maximumlength of a designated

    upgrade upon which a loadedtruck can operate without an

    unreasonable reduction inspeed.

    To establish the design vlauesfor critical grade lengths" forwhich gradeability of trucks is

    the determining factor, the following assumptions are made:

    (i) The weight-power ratioof a loaded truck is about 300 lb /hp .

    (ii) The average runningspeed as related todesign speed is used to

    CHAPTER 4

    TABLE 4-6 : MAXIMUM GRADES

    The desirable maximum should be aimed at in most cases. The maximumgrades should be used infrequently. The total upgrade for any section of roadshould not exceed 3000m, unless the grade is less than 4%.

    Design Speed( km/hr )

    Desirable MaximumGrade ( % )

    Maximum Grade( % )

    120100806050

    4030

    20

    23456

    78

    9

    56789

    1012

    15

    Road StandardR1a

    10 25

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    60/113

    Page 60

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    approximate the speed

    of vehicles beginningand uphill climb.

    (iii) A maximum reduction

    in speed to half thedesign speed is

    allowed for designspeeds of 80km/hr orabove except fordesign speeds of 50and 40km/hr where theallowable minimumspeeds are 30 and

    25km/hr respectively.

    The critical gradelengths for the variousspeeds are as shodmin Table 4-7.

    Where a particular section ismade up of a combination ofupgrades, the length of criticalgrade should take into consid-eration, the entire section ofthe combination. A speed

    reduction/recovery curveshould be plotted to determinethe critical grade length baseon the assumptions usedabove. Figure 4-2 gives theacceleration and decelerationcurves that can be used for

    this purpose.

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    61/113

    Page 61

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 4

    Design Speed Gradient ( % ) Critical Grade

    Length ( m )

    120 345

    500400300

    100 456

    500400300

    80 567

    500400300

    60 678

    300250200

    50 789

    250200170

    40 8

    910

    200

    170150

    30 - Not defined - decisionleft to designer

    20 - Not defined - decisionleft to designer

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    62/113

    Page 62

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    63/113

    Page 63

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    Where the length of critical

    grade is exceeded and espe-cially where grades exceed5%, consideration should begiven to providing an added

    uphill lane, that is, the climb-ing lane, for slow moving vehi-

    cles, particularly where thevolume is at or near capacityand the truck volume is high.

    4.3.4 Climbing Lanes for Two LanedRoads

    Climbing lanes are desirable

    and should be consideredwhere the critical gradelengths are exceeded andprovided the volume of trafficand percentage of trucks justi-fy the additional cost. An

    exception to the above wouldbe where overidding safetyconsiderations dictate theaddition of the climbing laneregardless of grade or trafficvolume. Where climbing lanes

    are provided, the followingrequirements are to be fol-lowed.

    (a) the climbing laneshould begin rear thefoot of the grade and

    should be preceded bya tapered section of at

    least. 50m long.

    (b) the width of the -lirn-bing lane should be thesame as the main car-

    riageway lane widthand in any case shouldnot be less than 3.25m.

    (c) the section of the road

    must be separated by aNew Jersey TypeConcrete Median withadequate signing and

    markings and theopposing lane widened

    also to 2 lanes to makeit a four-lane dividedcarriageway.

    (d) the climbing laneshould end at least60m beyond the crest

    and in particular should

    be at a point where thesight- distance is suffi-cient to permit passingwith safety. In addition,a corresponding taperlength as in (a) of

    100m should be provid-ed.

    (e) the shoulder on theouter edge of the climb-ing lane should N a5

    wide as the shoulderon the normal twolaved section, Whereconditions dictate oth-erwise, a usable stsulder widtn of 1.25m isacceptable.

    4.3.5 Passing Lane Sections andLaybyes on Two-Lane Roads

    Where a sufficient numberand length of safe passing

    section cannot be obtained inthe design of horizontal andvertical alignment alone, anoccasional section of fourlanes may be introduced to

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    64/113

    Page 64

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    provide more sections and

    length safe for passing. Suchsection are particularly advan-tageous in rolling terrain,especially where the align-

    ment is winding or where thevertical profile includes critical

    lengths of grade. Four lanesections should be sufficientlylong to permit its effectiveusage.

    The sections of four lanesintroduced need not be divid-

    ed. The use of a median,

    however is advantageous andshoed be considered on roadscarrying 500 vehicles per houror more.

    The transitions between the

    two lane and four lane pave-ments should be locatedwhere the change in width isin full view of the driver.Sections of four-lane road,particularly divided sections

    should not be longer than 3km so as to ensure that triedriver, does not lose hisawareness that the road isbasically a two lane facility.

    Where four lane sections are

    riot practical, passing laybyesmay be introduced at regular

    intervals. This passing laybyemust be at least 1'000rri longand of full lane width and pre-ceded by a taper of 50m atthe beginning and 100m at

    the end.

    4.3.6 Climbing Lanes on Multilane

    Roads

    Multilane roats more frequent-ly have sufficient capacity to

    handle their traffic load,including the normal percent-

    age of slow-moving vehicleswithout becoming congested.However where the volume isat or neat, capacity and thetruck volume is high so as tointerfere with the normal flowof traffic, climbing lanes

    should be considered.

    4.3.1 Vertical Curves

    Vertical curves are used toeffect a gradual charge

    between tangent grades. Theyshould be simple in applica-tion and should result in adesign that is safe, comfort-able in operation, pleasing inappearance and adequate for

    drainage. For simplicity, theparabolic curve with an equiv-alen-G vertical axis centeredon the vertical point of inter-section is used.

    The rate of change of grade to

    successive points on thecurve is a constant amount for

    equal increments of horizontaldistance, and equals the alge-braic difference between theintersecting tangent gradesdivided by the length of curve

    or A/L in percent per metere.The reciprocal L/A is the hori-zontal distance in metrerequired to ef:fec;t a 1 percentchange in gradient and is

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    65/113

    Page 65

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    a measure of curvature. This

    quantity (L/A), termed k, isused in determining the hori-zontal distance from thebegining of the vertical curve

    to the apex or low point of thecurve. The k value is also

    useful in determining the mini-mum lengths of vertical curvesfor the various des isanspeeds.

    The lengths of vertical curvesused should be as long as

    possible and above the mini-

    mum values for the designspeeds where economicallyfeasible.

    (a) Crest vertical curves

    Minimum lengths ofcrest vertical curvesare determined by thesight distance require-ments. The Stoppingsight distance is the

    major control for thesafe operation at thedesign speed chosen.Passing sight distancesare not used as it pro-vides for an. uneco-nomical design. An

    exception may be atdecision. areas such as

    sight distance to rampexit gores where longerlengths are necessary.

    The basic formulas for length

    of a parabclic vertical curve interms of algebraic differencein grade and sight distance(using an eye height of 0.92m

    and object height of 0.15m)are as follows:

    Where S is less than L,

    L = AS2....................

    405

    Where S is greater than L,

    L = 2S - 405........

    A

    Where :

    L = length of verticalcurve(m)

    S = sight distance (m)

    A = algebraic difference ingrades (percent)

    Table 4-8 indicates the mini-mum k values that are to beused design for the variousdesign speeds.

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    66/113

    Page 66

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    (b) Sag Vertical curves

    At least four different criteria forestablishing lengths of snagvertical curves are recognised.These are (1) headlight sightdistance, (2) rider comfort, (3)

    drainage control and (4) a ruleof thumb for general appear-ance. However, the headlightsight distance basis appears tobe the most logical for generaluse and this criterion is used to

    establish the design values fora range of lengths of sag verti-cal curves. It is again conven-ient to express the design con-trol in terms of the k value.

    Table 4-9 indicates the minimutr, kvalues that are to be used.

    Longer curves are desired whereverfeasible and should be used butwhere k values in excess of 55 art-USF:d, special attention to drainage

    must be exercised. Shorter sag verti-cal curves may be justified for eco-nomic reasons, in cases where anexisting element, such as a. structurewhich is not ready for rei)lace:mentcontrols the vertical profile.

    Drainage of curbed pavements areespecially important on sag verticalcurves where a grade line of not lessthan 0.3 percent ;within 15m of thelevel point must be maintained.

    CHAPTER 4

    TABLE 4-8 CREST VERTICAL CURVE (k values)

    Design Speed

    ( km/hr )

    120 100 80 60 50 40 30 20

    Minimum k value 120 60 30 15 10 10 5 5

    TABLE 4-9 SAG VERTICAL CURVE (k values)

    Design Speed( km/hr )

    120 100 80 60 50 40 30 20

    Minimum k value 60 40 28 15 12 10 8 8

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    67/113

    Page 67

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    4.3. 8 General Controls For Vertical

    Alignment

    In addition to the specific con-trols, there are several gener-

    al. controls that should beconsidered.

    (a) A smooth gradelinewith gradual changesshould be strived for inpreference to a linewith numerous breaksand short lengths of

    grade. While the maxi-

    mum grade and thecritcal length are con-trols, the manner inwhich they are appliedand fitted to the terrainon a. continous line

    determines the suitabili-ty and appearance ofthe finished product.

    (b) The 'roller coaster' orthe 'hidden-dip' type of

    profile should be avoid-ed. They are avoidedby use of horizontalcurves or by moregradual grades.

    (c) A broken back grade-

    line should be avoiled,particularly in sags

    where the full view, ofboth vertical curves isnot pleasing. This effectis very notice able endivided roadways with

    open median sections

    (d) On long grades, it is

    preferable to place thesteepest grade at thebottom and lighten thegrades near the top of

    the ascent or to breakthe sustained grade

    by short intervals oflighter grade instead ofa uniformed sustainedgrade that might beonly slightly below theallowable minimum.

    (e) Where intersections at

    grad occur on sectionswith moderate to steepgrades, it is desirableto reduce the gradientthrough the intersec-tion.

    4.4 COMBINATION OF HORIZON-TAL AND VERTICAL ALIGN-MENT

    Horizontal and vertical align-ment should not be designedindepeni-Jilently. They com-plement each other.Excellence in their design and

    in the design of their combina-tion increase utility and safety,

    encourage uniform speed,and improve appeararce,almost always without addi-tional cost.

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    68/113

    Page 68

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    Proper combination of hori-

    zontal alignment and profile isobtained by engineering studyand consideration of the fol-lowing general controls.

    (a) Curvature and grades

    should be in proper bal-ance. Tangent align-ment or flat curvatureat the expense of steepor long grades, andexcessive curvaturewith flat grades, are

    both poor design. A log-

    ical design is a compro-mise between the two,which offers the most insafety, capacity, easeand uniformity of oper-ation, and pleasing

    appearance within thepractical limits of terrainand area traversed.

    (b) Vertical curvaturesuperimposed upon

    horizontal curvature, orvice versa, generallyresults in a more pleas-ing facility but it shouldbe analyzed for effectupon traffic. Successivechanges in profile rot in

    combination with hori-zontal curvature may,

    result in a series ofhumps visible to thedriver for some dis-tance, a hazardouscondition.

    (c) Sharp horizontal curva-ture should not beintroduced at or nearthe top of a pro-

    nounced crest vertical

    curve. This condition ishazardous in that thedriver carinot perceivethe horizontal change

    in alignment, especiallyat night when the head-

    light beams go straightahead into space. Thehazard of this arrange-merit is avoided if thehorizontal curvatureleads the vertical cur-vature, i.e. the horizon-

    tal curve is made

    longer than the verticalcurve. Also, suitabledesign can be made byusing design valueswell above the mini-mums for the design

    speed.

    (d) Somewhat allied to theabove, sharp horizontalcurvature should not beintroduced at or near

    the low point of a pro-nounced sag verticalcurve. Because theroad ahead is fore-shortened any but flathorizontal curvatureassumes an undesir-

    able distorted appear-ance. Further, vehicular

    speeds, particularly oftrucks, often are high atthe bottom of gradesand erratic operationmay result, especially

    at night.

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    69/113

    Page 69

    ELEMENTS OF DESIGN

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    (e) On 2-lane roads the

    need for safe passingsections at frequentintervals and for, anappreciable percentage

    of the length of theroad often supersedes

    the general desirabilityfor combination of hori-zontal and verticalalignment. In thesecases it is necessary towork toward long tan-gent sections to secure

    sufficient passing sight

    distance in design.

    (f) Horizontal curvatureand profile should bemade as Qat as feasi-

    ble at intersectionswhere sight distancea1mg both roads isimportant and vehiclesmay have to slowdown or stop.

    (g) On divided roads, vari-ation in the width ofmedian, and the use ofseparate profiles andhorizontal alignmentsshould be considered

    to derive design andoperational advantages

    of one-way roadways.Where traffic justifiesprovision of 4 lanes, asuperior design withoutadditional cost general-

    ly results from the con-cept and logical designbasis of oneway road-ways

    CHAPTER 4

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    70/113

    Page 70ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    5.1. PAVEMENT

    5.1.1 Surface Type

    The selection of the pavement

    type is determined by the vol-

    ume and composition of traf-fic, soil characteristics, weath-er, availability of materials, theinitial cost and the overallannual maintenance and serv-ice life cost.

    Pavements may be consid-ered as three general types -high, intermediate and low.High type pavements are justi-fied for high volume traffic for

    which it is fitting that the sur-face have smooth riding quali-ties and good nonskid proper-ties in all weather.Intermediate type pavementvary from those only slightlyless costly and with somewhat

    less strength than high typepavements to surface treat-

    ments. Low type pavementsrange from surface treatedearth roads and stabilized,materials to loose surfacesuch as earth and gravel.

    The important characteristics

    of surface type in relation togeometric design are the abili-ty of a surface to retain theshape and dimensions, the

    ability to drain, and the effecton driver's behavior. Table 5-1

    gives the general selection ofthe pavement surface typesfor the various road stan-dards. For minor roads ofgrades exceeding 8%, thesurface and shoulder shouldbe sealed to prevent erosion.

    The structural design of thepavement should be in accor-dance to Arahan Teknik(Jalan) - 5/85 "Manual OnPavement Design''.

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    71/113

    Page 71

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-1 : PAVEMENT SURFACE TYPE

    Where : H : High Type Pavement

    I : Intermediate Type Pavemant

    L : Low Type Pavement

    Design Standard PavementType

    Description

    R6 / U6 H / H Asphaltic Concrete / Concrete

    R5 / U5 H / H Asphaltic Concrete / Concrete

    R4 / U4 I / H Dense Bituminous Macadam / Asphaltic Concrete / Concrete

    R3 / U3 I / I Bitumenous Macadam / Concrete

    R2 / U2 I / I Surface Treatment / Semigrout

    R1 / U1 L / I Earth Gravel / Semigrout

    R1a / U1a L Surface Treatment / Semigrout

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    72/113

    Page 72

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.2 LANE WIDTHS AND MARGINALSTRIPS

    Lane widtlis and the conditionof the pavement surface arethe most important features ofa road pertaining to the safetyand comfort of driving, The

    capacity of a highway ismarkedly affected by the 'lane

    width and in a capacity sense,the effective width of a trav-elled way, is further reducedwhen adjacent obstructions

    such as retaining walls, bridgepiers and parked cars restrictthe lateral clearance.

    Marginal strip is a narrowpavement strip attached to

    both edges of a carriageway.It is paved to the same stan-dard as the pavement struc-tures. For divided roads, themarginal strips are providedon both sides of the carriage-

    way in both directions. Themarginal strip is included aspart of the shoulder width andis demarcated from the

    through lane by lane edgemarkings on the marginalstrip.

    Table 5-3 indicates the laneand marginal strip widths thatare to be used for the variousroad standards.

    CHAPTER 5

    5.1.2 Normal Cross Slope

    Cross slopes are an important element in the cross-section designand a reasonably steep lateral slope is desirable to minimise waterponding on flat sections of uncurbed pavements due to pavement

    imperfections or unequal settlements and to control the flow of wateradjacent to the curb on curbed pavements. Table 5-2 indicates the

    range of cross slopes for various pavement types.

    TABLE 5-2: NORMAL PAVEMENTS CROSS SLOPE

    Surface Type Cross Slope Rate ( percent )

    High

    Intermediate

    Low

    2.5

    2.5 - 3.5

    2.5 - 6.0

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    73/113

    Page 73

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    On 6-lane: divided highways,

    the middle lane of the threelanes on each direction shouldhave a wider lane of 3.75m

    when the commercial vehiclevolume exceeds 20% of thetotal traffic.

    Figure 5-10A and 15-10Bshows examples of the usageof the above wider lama of3.75m and the usage of themarginal strips.

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-3 : LANE AND MARGINAL STRIP WIDTH

    NOTE : ( ) denotes the total two-way lane width

    Design Standard Lane Width ( m ) Marginal StripWidth ( m )

    R6 / U6

    R5 / U5

    R4 / U4

    R3 / U3

    R2 / U2

    R1 / U1

    R1a / U1a

    3.50

    3.50

    3.25

    3.00

    2.75

    ( 5.00 )

    ( 5.40 )

    0.50

    0.50

    0.25

    0.25

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    74/113

    Page 74

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.3 SHOULDERS

    5.3.1 General Characteristics

    A shoulder is the portion ofthe roadway continuous with

    the travelled way for accomo-dation of stopped vehicle, foremergency use and forLateral support of the pave-ment.

    Their main functions are :

    (a) space is provided foremergency stoppingfree of the traffic lane.

    (b) space is provided forthe occasional motorist

    who desires 'to stop forvarious reasons.

    (c) space is provided toescape potential acci-dents or reduce their

    severity.

    (d) the sense of opennesscreated by shoulders ofadequate width con-tributes to driving easeand comfort.

    (e) sight distances is

    improved in cut sec-tions, thereby improv-ing safety.

    (f) highway capacity is

    improved and uniformspeed is encouraged.

    (g) lateral clearance is pro-

    vided for signs andguardrails.

    (h) structural support is

    given to the pavement.

    5.3.2 Width of Shoulders

    The normal. usable shoulderwidth that should be providedalong high type facilities is3m. However, in difficult ter-

    rain and on lout volume roads,

    usable shoulders of this widthmay not be feasible. A mini-mum usable shoulder width of0.6m should be considered insuch cases.Table 5--4A and 5--4B gives

    the widths of shoulders for thevarious road standards in ruraland urban areas.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    75/113

    Page 75

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-4 : SHOULDER WIDTH ( RURAL )

    TABLE 5-4Ba SHOULDER WIDTH (URBAN)

    ( * ) For Area Type see Table 3-2B

    DesignStandard Usable Shoulder Width ( M )

    Terrain

    Flat Rolling Mountainous

    R6R5R4

    R3R2R1R1a

    3.003.003.00

    2.502.001.501.50

    3.003.003.00

    2.502.001.501.50

    2.502.502.00

    2.001.501.501.50

    DesignStandard

    Usable Shoulder Width ( M )

    Area Type *

    I II III

    U6U5

    U4U3U2U1

    U1a

    3.003.00

    3.002.502.001.50

    1.50

    3.003.00

    2.502.001.501.50

    1.50

    2.502.50

    2.001.501.501.50

    1.50

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    76/113

    Page 76

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.3.3 Shoulder Cross Slope

    All shoulders should, besloped sufficiently to rapidlydrain surface water but not to

    the extend that vehicular usewould be hazardous. Because

    the type of shoulder construc-tion has a bearing on thecross-slope, the two should bedetermined jointly.

    Bituminous and concrete sur-faced shoulders should be

    sloped from 2, to 6 percent,

    gravel or crushed rock shoulders from 4 to 6 percent andturf shoulders 6 percent.Where kerbs are used on theoutside of the shoulders, theminimum cross-slope shoud

    not be less char 4 percent toprevent ponding on the road-way.

    At supereleiated areas, theshoulder cross-slopes should

    be adjusted to ensure that themaximum "roll over" does notexceed 8 percent.

    5,3.4 Shoulder Structure

    For shoulders to functioneffectively, they must be suffi-

    ciently stable to support occa-sional vehicle loads , in allkinds of weather without rut-ting. Paved or stabilisedshoulders offers many advan-

    tages in this aspect, Pavedshoulders of the samestrength and standard as thepavement should be consid-ered for road standards R6,

    R5 and U6, U5 while sta-

    bilised shoulders designed tocater for 50% of the designtraffic should be consideredfor road standards R4, R3 and

    U4, U3. For road standardsR2, R1, U7,, U1 and R1a, the

    normal earth type shouldercan be used. However, wheregradients exceed 8% theshoulders should also bepaved to prevent erosion.

    5.4 KERBS

    5.4.1 General Consideration

    The type and location of kerbs

    appreciably affect driver'sbehaviour and in turn thesafety and usage of a road.Kerbs are used for drainagecontrol, pavement edge delin-eation, aesthetics, delineationof pedestrian walkways and to

    assist in the orderly develop-ment of the roadside.

    Kerbs are needed mostly onroads in urban areas. In ruralareas, the use of kerbs shouldbe avoided as far as possible

    except in localised areas

    which has predominantaspects of an urban condition.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    77/113

    Page 77

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.4.2 Types of Kerbs

    The two general classes ofkerbs are BARRIER KERBSand MOUNTABLE KERBS

    and each has numerous typesand detail design. Each may

    be designed as a separateunit or integrally with thepavement. They may also bedesigned with a gutter te, forma combination kerb and guttersection.

    Barrier kerb are relatively high

    and steep faced and aredesigned to inhibit or discour-age vehicles from leaving theroadway. They should not beused on expressways. Theyshould alsc not be used

    where the design speedsexceed 70 km/hr. or in combi-nation with traffic barriers.They are recommended foruse in built-up areas adjacentto footpaths with considerable

    pedestrian traffic, wherepedestrian traffic is light, asemibarrier type may be used.

    Mountable kerbs are used todefine pavement edges ofthrough carriageways. For

    channelisation islands, medi-ans, outer separators or any

    other required delineationwithin the roadway, a ,semi-mountable type may be used.

    Figure 5-1 shows the various

    standard types of kerbs thatare to be used.

    The width of kerbs are con

    sidered as cross section elements entirely outside the traf-fic lane width. However, fordrainage kerbs, the gutter

    section may be considered aspart of the marginal strip.

    Where roadways do not haveany marginal strip, an offset of0.3 to 01.6m is desirable.

    5.5 SIDEWALKS

    Sidewalks are accepted asintegral parts of urban roadsand should be providedexcept on Urban Expresswaysor Major Arterials where the

    presence of pedestrians areminimal. However, the needfor sidewalks in many ruralareas is great because of thehigh speed and general lackof adequate lighting and due

    consideration must be givenfor it especially at points ofcommunity development suchas schools, local business andindustrial plants that results inhigh pedestrian concentra-tions. While there are no

    numerical warrants, the justifi-cation for a sidewalk depends

    on the vehicle-pedestrian haz-ard which is

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    78/113

    Page 78

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    79/113

    Page 79

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    governed by the volumes of

    padestrian and vehicular. traf-fic, their relative timiag andthe speed of the vehiculartraffic.

    In urban areas, sidewalks can

    be placed adjacent to the curband raised above the pave-ment. In the absence of curbs,a strip of a minimum width of1.0m must be providedbetween the sidewalk and thetravelled way to allow for

    planting of trees or safety bar-

    riers.

    In rural areas, sidewalks mustbe placed well away from thetravelled way and separatedfrom the shoulder by at least

    1.0m.

    A desriable minimum width of2.Om is to be provided for allsidewalks. Where there arerestrictions on right of way, a

    minimum of 1.25m can beconsidered. When provided,sidewalks must have allweather surfaces.

    5.6 TRAFFIC BARRIERS

    Traffic barriers are used tominimise the severity ofpotential accidents involvingvehicles leaving the travelledway. Because barriers are a

    hazard in themselves, empha-sis should be on minimisingthe number of such installa-tions. Arahan Teknik (Jalan)1/8.5 "A2anual On Design

    Guidelines of Longitudinal

    Traffic Barrier" (May, 1984)should be used for the designof longitudinal traffic barriers.

    5.7 MEDIANS

    5.7.1 General

    A median is a highly desirableelement on all roads carryingfour or more lanes and should

    be provided wherever possi-

    ble. The principal functions ofa median are to provide thedesired freedom front theinterference of opposing traf-fic, to provide a recovery areafor out-of-control vehicles, to

    provide for speed changesand storage of right-turningand U-turning vehicles and toprovide for future lanes.

    For maximum efficiency, a

    medium should be highly visi-ble both night and day and indefinite contrast to the throughtraffic lanes.

    5.7.2 Median Types and Width

    Medians may be depressed

    raised or flush with the pave-ment surface. They should beas wide as feasible but of adimension in balanced withother components of the

    cross-section. The generalrange of median width variesfrom a minimum of 1.0 m in aType III urban situation to adesirable width of 18m on

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    80/113

    Page 80

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    a rural expressway. On wide medi-

    ans, it is essential to have adepressed centre or swale to providefor drainage.

    Figure 5-2 gives examples of kerbedand unkerbed medians while Table 5-

    5A and 5-5B gives the minimum anddesirable widths and types of medi-ans that are to be applied to the vari-ous road standards. The medianwidths as expressed are the dimen-sions between the through laneedges and includes the right shoul-

    ders if any.

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE5-5A : MEDIAN WIDTH AND TYPES (RURAL)

    Note : Min. - MinimumDes. - Desirable (for consideration of landscaping)

    DesignStandard

    Median Width ( M )

    MedianTypeTerrain

    Flat Rolling Mountainous

    Min. Des. Min. Des. Min. Des.

    R6

    R5

    R4

    6.0

    4.0

    3.0

    18.0

    12.0

    9.0

    5.0

    3.5

    2.5

    12.5

    9.0

    6.5

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    8.0

    6.0

    4.0

    B, C, E, F

    E, F

    E, F

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    81/113

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    82/113

    Page 82

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    83/113

    Page 83

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.8 SERVICE ROADS

    5.8.1 General

    Service roads are generallyfound in urban areas and theycan have numerous functions,depending on the type of road

    they serve and the characterof the surrounding area. Theymay be used to controlaccess or function'as a streetfacility serving adjoining prop-erty. They segregate local traf-

    fic from the higher speedthrough traffic and interceptdriveways of residences andcommercial establishmentsalong the road. Service roadsalso not only provide morefavourable access for com-

    mercial and residential devel-ovment than the faster movingarterials but also helps to pre-serve the safety and capacity

    of the latter.

    5.8.2 Design Requirements

    From an operational. andsafety standpoint, one wayservice roads are nuch prei-ferred to two-way and should

    be considered. One-way oper-

    ation inconveniences localtraffic to some degree, but theadvantages in reduction invehicular and pedestrian con-flicts at intersecting streetsoften fully compensate for this

    inconvenience.

    Two-way service roads may

    be considered for partiallydeveloped urban areas wherethe adjoining road system isso irregular and disconnected

    that. one-way operation wouldintroduce considerable added

    travel distance and causeundue inconvenience. Two-way service roads may alsobe necessary for suburban orrural areas where points ofaccess to the through facilityare infrequent; where only one

    service road is provided,

    where roads connecting withthe service roads are widelyspaced or where there is noparallel street within reason-able distance of the serviceroads in urban areas that are

    developed or likely to b edeveloped.

    The design of a service roadis affected by the type of serv-ice it is intended to provide.

    When provided, they shouldalways cater or at least oneside on-street parking. Theyshould be at least: 7.25mwide for one-way operationand 9.25m for two-way opera-tion. Figure 5-3 gives the rec-

    ommended layout for a tw-o-way operation service road

    fronting an urban arterialwhere the distance betweenjunctions is greater than 0.5km. The minimum reservewidth for a service road is

    12m.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    84/113

    Page 84

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5. 9 PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

    5. 9.1 General Considerations

    Pedestrian crossings (whetherlevel, overpass or underpass)

    should be provided wherepedestrian volumes, traffic vol-umes, intersection capacityand other conditions favourtheir use. They may be war-ranted in areas of heavy peakpedestrian movements such

    as factories, schools, athletic

    fields or control business dis-tricts or where abnormal haz-ards or inconveniences topedestrians would otherwiseresult.

    Table 5-6 gives the general

    guidelines for determining thetype of crossing that isrequired. Where the pedestri-an and vehicle volumes does

    not fit into any of the categoryshown, judgement is needed

    in the assessment of the typeof crossing required.

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-6 : GUIDELINE FOR TYPE OF CROSSING REQUIRED

    Pedestrian Volume atpeak hour

    Traffic Volume ( 1 way )at peak hour

    Type of Crossing

    < 50

    50 - 100

    > 100

    < 1000

    100 - 2000

    > 2000

    Ordinary level crossing

    Signalised level srossing

    Overhead crossing /underpass

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    85/113

    Page 85

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    86/113

    Page 86

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    For roads with dual 3-lanes or

    more, an overhead crossingor underpass hcali aI.wz!ys heconsidered if a pedestriancrossing is justified so as not

    to impede the smooth flow oftraffic unduly.

    Where justified, the locationand design of the pedestriancrossing would require anindividual study. Where over-head pedestrian crossings areprovided, side barriers must

    be installed. to prevent jay-

    walking. Such barriers shallbe installed for a distance of75m on both sides of the loca-tion of the crossing. The mini-mum spacing between cross-ings is 400m.

    For overhead pedestriancrossings, standard JKRdesigns shall be used as faras possible. These are avail-able from the Road Design

    Unit.

    5.9.2 School Level Crossing

    The installation of a full trafficsignal school level crossing

    should be considered whenthe following warrants are

    met:

    Either (a) 500 vehicles /hour on the roadand 100 school

    children/hourcrossing duringthe peak hours.

    Or (b) 500 vehicles /

    hour on the roadduring the peakhour and a mini-mum of 500

    school childrenduring the entire

    day.

    Where the above warrant fora full traffic signal school levelcrossing is not met, anunsignalised crossing mustalways be provided.

    5.10 U-TURNS

    5.10.1 General Considerations

    Divided highways requiremedian openings to accomo-date vehicles making U turnsin addition to right turning andcross traffic. Separate U-turnmedian openings may be

    required at the following loca-tions :

    a. Locations beyond inter-sections to accomodate

    minor turuing move-nente not otherwise

    provided in the inter-section or interchangearea. The major inter-section area is keptfree for the important

    turning movements, insome cases obviatingexpensive ramps oradditional structures.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    87/113

    Page 87

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    b. Locations just ahead of

    an intersection to acco-modate U-turn move-ments that would inter-fere with through and

    other turning movements at the intersec-

    tion. Where a fairlywide median on theapproach roadway hasfew openings, 1U-turn-ing is necessary toreach roadside areas.Advance separate

    openings to accomo-

    date them outside theintersection proper willreduce interference.

    c. Locations occurring inconjunction with minor

    crossroads where traf-fic is not permitted tocross the major roadbut instead is requiredto turn left, enter thethrough traffic stream,

    weave to the right, U-turn, then return. Onhigh-speed or high-vol-ume roads,the difficultyand long lengthsrequired for weavingwith safety usually

    make this design pat-tern undesirable unless

    the volumes intercept-ed are light and themedian is of adequatewidth. This conditionmay occur where a

    crossroad with highvolurne traffic, a shop-ping area, or other traf-fic generator thatrequires a median

    opening nearby and

    additional medianopenings would not bepractical.

    d Locations occurringwhere regularly spaced

    openings facilitatemaintenance opera-tions, policing, repairservice of stalled vehi-cles, or other highway-related activities.Openings for this pur-

    pose may be needed

    on controlled-accessroads and on dividedroads through undevel-oped areas.

    e. Locations occurring on

    roads without control ofaccess where medianopenings at optimumspacing are provided toserve existing frontagedevelopments and at

    the same time minimizepressure for futuremedian openings.

    5.10.2 Design Considerations

    U-turning vehicles interferewith through traffic by

    encroaching on part or all ofthe through traffic lanes. Theyare made at low speeds andthe required speed change isnormally made on the through

    traffic lanes with weaving toand from the outer lanes. Assuch U-turn facilities arepotential hazard areas.Careful consideration should.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    88/113

    Page 88

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    be made not only on the need

    for it but also on the type andlocation of the U-turns.

    (a) Minimum Design four

    Direct U-Turns

    For direct U-Turns, thewidth of the highway,including the medianshould be sufficient topermit the turn to bemade withoutencroachment beyond

    the outer edges of the

    pavements. Figure 5-4gives the minimumwidth of the mediumrequired for the varioustypes of maneuvers fordirect U-turns.

    For direct U-Turns, thelayout in Figure 5-5Aand B is suggestedWhere direct U-Turnswill not be feasiblebecause of median

    restrictions, indirect U-Turns can be used.

    (b) Indirect U-Turns

    Indirect U--Turns can

    take many forms, thesimpliest being to allow

    traffic to use existinglocal streets or to goaround the block fortheir turning move-ments. Where medians

    are narrow, the specialindirect U-turn asshown in Figure 5-6can be used. IndirectU-Turns are only to be

    used for Road

    Standards R4, U4 andU3 only.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    89/113

    Page 89

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 4-s P ~t Widening On Open Road Curves

    PKNW Win (m ) 7 5.5 5-5 REU8iE0

    DESM SPEED (Km/h) 80 50 50 l0 60 50 40 30 50 40 30 70 (M)

    P--470 8-340 R> 180 R-1- 230 R'-' 1100 R 2 880 Rar 680 R2510 R R'100 R' 68 R> 52 M39 39 MORE

    M- 340- 20- 2309 1100>n 880- 670} 520;*- 68~ 52=- 39>

    ~-8U R-Ir 11-- R 1 3 0 R=340 R - 2 8 0 0 R ~ Z% R ICU I t - 4u R al.i

    I f - a

    180~' 150s- 130- 340 - 280- 230y 1 90- J7~'

    R~t150 R~-100 8286 R ~180 R~150 R'130 R'110 R'`24 1

    86' 180' 150- 130=- 110=- 24 , . y

    R264 R;!'150 R y100 R286 8274 4'-16

    Note:64~8260

    86aR265

    74~R251

    16~R' 15

    1.25

    s

    65'R260

    578245

    154

    45:

    R238

    1.75

    35>

    R2-- 35 2, 4

    e

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    90/113

    Page 90

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    91/113

    Page 91

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    DIMENSION MINIMUMDISTANCE ( m )

    DIMENSION MINIMUMDISTANCE ( m )

    m

    1

    a

    4

    8

    20

    R1

    R2

    b

    50

    100

    60

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    92/113

    Page 92

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    (c) Locations for U-Turns

    The locations of U-Turns are very important and proper consid-eration should be given to it. As a general guide, Table 5-8 canbe used to determine the minimum distances between U-turns.

    TABLE 5-8 : DISTANCES BETWEEN U-TURNS

    5.11 BRIDGE AND STRUCTURE CROSS-SECTIONS

    5.11.1 Width of Shoulders

    For bridges that are less than 100m long, the width of the usableshoulders should follow that as indicated in Table 5-4A and 5-4B.Where bridges are longer than 100m, the values as shown inTable 5-9 should be used. Figure 5-7 shows the typical bridge cross-

    section to be used.

    Design

    Standard

    Distance between

    U-turns

    Design

    Standard

    Distance between

    U-turns

    R6

    R5

    R4

    No. U-Turns allowed

    3 km

    2 km

    U6

    U5

    U4

    U3

    No. U-Turns allowed

    2 km

    1 km

    0.5 km

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    93/113

    Page 93

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-9 : USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH FOR BRIDGES > 100m

    Design Standard Usable Shoulder Width ( m )

    R6 / U6

    R5 / U5

    R4 / U4

    R3 / U3

    R2 / U2

    R1 / R1a

    R1a / U1a

    1.5

    1.5

    1.0

    1.0

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    94/113

    Page 94

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    NOTE:1) ALL DIMENSIONS ARE. IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS STATED

    OTHERWISE.

    2) DESIRABLE WIDTH Of SIDEWALK I'' is 2- 0 m. A MINIMUM WIDTH TOBE USED IS 1.25 m.

    3 ) WIDTH OF CYCLE LANE "C" 15 AS INDICATED IN TABLE 5 - 12.

    4) MINIMUM WIDTH Of 'K' TO HE USED IS 300mm. FOR PROVISION OFSERVICE DUCTS THIS VALUE IS TO BE INCREASED.

    5) KERBS FOR BRIDGES ARE LEFT TO DISCRETION.

    DESIGNSTANDARD

    CARRIAGEWAY( L )

    SHOULDER ( S ) MARGINALSTRIP( M )

    SPAN < 100m SAPN > 100m

    R5 / U5

    R4 / U4

    R3 / U3

    R2 / U2

    R1 / U1

    R1a / U1a

    7000

    6500

    6000

    6000

    6000

    6000

    3000

    3000

    2500

    2000

    1500

    1500

    1500

    1000

    1000

    500

    500

    500

    500

    250

    250

    0

    0

    0

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    95/113

    Page 95

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.11.2 Required Warance

    (a) The clear verticalheight of all structuresshould be at least 5.0m

    over the entire width oftraffic lanes, auxiliamy

    lanes and lateral clear-ance areas to kerbs,walls on piers includingshoulders. However, forstructures over railwaylines, the minimum ver-tical clearance above

    the rail level should be

    at least 6.5m to meetthe requirements ofKeretapi Tanah Melayu.For underpasses, anadditional clearance of300mm should be pro-

    vided initially to allowfor one to two cycles offuture resurfacings.

    (b) For minor roads andlocal streets or where

    alternative routes withclearances above 5.Omwithin a reasonable dis-tance are available, theclear vertical clearancemay be reduced to aminimum of 4.6m.

    (c) Figure 5-8 indicates the

    clearance required atunderpasses for vari-ous types of cross-sec-tions.

    5.12 BUS LAYBYES

    Bus laybyes serve to removethe bus from the through traf-fic lanes. Its location and

    design should therefore pro-vide ready access in the

    safest and most efficient man-ner possible. The basicrequirenent is that the decel-eration, standing and acceler-ation of the buses be effectedon pavement areas clear ofand separated from the

    through traffic lanes.

    The locations of bus laybyesare important so as not toimpede the normal flow oftraffic. In this respect, bus lay-byes must not be located on

    any interchange ramps orstructures, slip roads or within60m of any junction or inter-section. The distance betweenlaybyes too should not be lessthan 150m. Liason will need

    to be made also with the rele-vant bus companies and therespective Local Authority.

    For school areas, provision ofbus laybyes and parkingareas should be specifically

    studied so as to ensure theunimpeded flow of traffic.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    96/113

    Page 96

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    97/113

    Page 97

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    F1gure 5-9 show the typical

    layout and dimensions of buslaybyes that are to be use inboth rural and urban areas. Ifpossible dividing area

    between the outer edge of theroadway shoulder rind the

    edge of the bus laybye laneshould be provided. Thisdividing area should be aswide as possible but not lessthan 0.6m.

    The pavement areas of the

    laybyes Should be of concrete

    for contrast in ce)lour and tex-ture with the through trafficlanes to discourage throughtraffic from encroaching on orentering the bus stop.

    5.13 MINIMUM RESERVE WIDTH

    An adequate road reservewidth is important to cater notonly for the present demandsof traffic but more so for the

    future requirements as bythen,it may not be possible toacquire any more additionalland. Figure 5-2 OA and 5-108 show examples of thetypical cross-sections for vari-

    ous road standard in rural andurban areas together with the

    minimum reserve required,while Table 5-10 lists the mini-mum reserve widths for thevarious road standards. Thevalues as shown in Table 5-10

    are for road standards in flatareas and will need to beincreased accordingly forareas involving deep cuts orfills.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    98/113

    Page 98

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    99/113

    Page 99

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-10 : MINIMUM RESERVE WIDTH

    Area Road Category Design Standard Minimum Reservewidth ( m )

    RURAL

    Expressway R6 60

    Highway R5 60

    Primary Road R5R4

    5040

    Secondary Road R4R3

    3020

    Minor Road R2R1R1a

    201212

    URBAN

    Expressway U6 60

    Arterials U5U4

    5040

    Collector U4U3

    4030

    Local Street U3U2U1U1a

    20201212

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    100/113

    Page 100

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    101/113

    Page 101

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    102/113

    Page 102

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    103/113

    Page 103

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.14 EXCLUSIVE CYCLE LANES

    5.14.1 General Considerations

    In areas where there is usual-ly a high proportion of motor

    cyclists, the volume may beso substantial as to affect thesmooth flow of traffic. In suchinstances, the provision ofseparate and exclusive cyclelanes should be considered.Figure 5-11 shows the various

    types of cycle tracks used.

    The general warrant for deter-mining the need for an exclu-sive cycle lane are:

    (i) the total volume of traffic exceeds the provid-

    ed lane cspacity

    and

    (ii) the volume of motorcy-cles exceeds 20% of

    the total volume of traf-fic.

    5.14.2 Elements of Design

    (a) Design Speed

    The design speed to beused is 60 km/hr.However, where thereare physical constraints, this may be

    lowered.

    (b) Sight Distance

    The priciples as estab-lished in Section 4.1also applies.

    (c) Horizontal Aligriment

    (i) Minimum Radius

    The followingformula is usedin determining

    the required min-

    imum radius forthe curves.

    R = 0.24V + 0.43

    where R = radius ofcurve in(m)

    V = speed inkm/hr

    Table 5-11 gives theminimum radius thatare to be used indesign. Flatter curvesshould always be used

    wherever possible.There is no necessity

    to provide any transi-tion ( spiral ) curves.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    104/113

    Page 104

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    105/113

    Page 105

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    TABLE 5-11 : MINIMUM RADIUS FOR DESIGN

    (ii) Curve Treatment

    To allow for the motorcyclist to lean on curves, there is aneed to increase the width through the curve. A maxi-mum widening of 1.2m is to be allowed. Figure 5-12shows the curve treatment that is to be used.

    (iii) Superelevation

    The maximum superele-vation to be used is 0.06.Superelevation should be applied from the tangent pointto its required value at the point of maximum widening.This is as shown in Figure 5-13.

    (d) Vertical Alignment

    (i) Grades

    The maximuin grade allot,7ed is 10% with a minimumgrade Df 0.5%. At very flat areas, the minimum gradecan be reduced further but with prior approval.

    Design Speed ( km / hr ) Minimum Radius ( m )

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    8

    10

    13

    15

    18

    20

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    106/113

    Page 106

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    R - RADIUS OF CURVEW - WIDTHA - CENTRAL ANGLE OF IHE CURVE OF THE DEFLECrION BETWEEN TAN-

    GENTS,

    MAXIMUM WIDEWING SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1.2M.

    WHEN WKNK WANES I- 2M. (A 2' 95 - 4.) THAI WITH SHALL BE CAN G ON A MIS OF R-4 THROUGH THE CENTRAL PORITION OF THE CURVE (A>96.4) ASSHOWN

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    107/113

    Page 107

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

    (ii) Vertical Curves

    The minimum vertical curve length to be used is15m. On sag vert.ical curves, the design shouldbe such as to avoid any ponding of surface water.

    5.14.3 Cross-Section Elements

    (a) Lane Width

    The required widths of the cycle lane is as shown inTable 5-12, The cycle lane must be separated from anypedestrian sidewalk and the width of separation must be

    at Least 10-in.

    TABLE 5-12 : WIDTH OF CYCLE LANE

    (b) Pavement

    The pavement structure will vary according to groundand sub-surface conditions, volume of motorcycles andand type of use. Two types of standard design havebeen selected and are to be used. They are as indicated

    in Figure 5-14. The normal crossfall of the pavement is2 %.

    Volume ofmotorcycle / hr

    Width of Cycle Lane ( m )

    Minimum Desirable

    1000 - 1500

    1500 - 2000

    > 2000

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    108/113

    Page 108

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    109/113

    Page 109

    CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS

    ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    5.14.4 Intersection Treatment

    At intersection or interchangex, some form of chan-nelisation with specific roaces

    for rhe motor should be pro-vided to minimise conflicts

    that will arise. Possible inter-section treatment typesinclude (i) at-grade or(ii) gzade-separated. The typeof intersection treatment willdepend on the volume of thetraffic and the volume of

    motorcycles.

    (a) An-Grade IntersectionTreatment

    An at-grade intersec-tion treatment is suffi-

    cient where the volumeof motorcycles dces notexceed 30 percent ofthe total volume of traf-fic at the particularintersection at. the

    peak hour.An at-grade intersec-tion treatment is suffi-cient with propeyAgning, speed limitsand lane markings.

    (b) Grade SeparatedIntersection Treatment

    When the volume ofmotorcycles exceeds30 percent of the totalvolume of traffic at the

    particular intersectionat the peak hour orwhen an at-grade inter-secricn treatment doesnot provide a smooth

    flow or adequate safety

    to the motorcyclistsgrace separated inter-section treatmentshould be considered.

    These can be easily

    incorporated at round-about and other inter-sections with the provi-sion of underpasses(box culvert type).

    The type of the under-

    pass must have a 2.5m

    clearance with a maxi-mum slope of 10 per-cent. They should belighted to give bettervisibility and safety dur-ing the night Lime.

    CHAPTER 5

  • 8/3/2019 Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 8-86 - A Guide on Geometric Design of Roads

    110/113

    Page 110ARAHAN TEKNIK ( JALAN ) 8/86

    CHAPTER 6

    OTHER ELEMENTS AFFECTING

    6.1 Road Safety

    Road safety have been amuch neglected area in thedesign of roads. With anincreasing number, of acci-dents each year, attention to

    road safety should be empha-

    sised. While the road elementis only one of the three groupsof influences causing acci-dents, it is nonetheless theresponsibility of the designerto provide as safe a road envi-

    ronment as possible.

    In this aspect, the road designshould be one with uniformlyhigh standards applied consis-tently over a section. It should

    avoid discontinuities such asabrupt maljior changes indesign speeds, trarisitions inroadway crass-section, theintroduction of a short-radiuscurve in a series of longerradius curves, a change from

    full to partial control of access,constrictions in roadway width

    by narrow bridges or otherstructures, intersections with-out adequate sight distances,or other fail