Application of enhanced communication techniques (Telemedicine) to the development of the Paediatric...
-
Upload
jocelyn-booth -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Application of enhanced communication techniques (Telemedicine) to the development of the Paediatric...
Application of enhanced communication techniques (Telemedicine) to the
development of the Paediatric Intensive Care advice line in the North West of
England.
Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital
Background
• PETS & Advice line since Nov 96 – (full service April 97)
• Audit data • Compatible with ICNARC• Response times (mean to bedside 90
mins)
How do we spend £19,000?
• Investigation of possible systems• Memo of understanding• Installation of lines• Coordination of billing• Installation of equipment• Identification of stakeholders and their
objectives for the project• Steering group
Progress• Sites chosen• Partnership• Equipment enhancements• MSc student(s)• First consultation!
Project – what do you measure?
• Outcome measures
• Feasibility (how to identify levels of infrastructure needed)
• Training issues
• Medicolegal issues
• Comparative audit (response times, referrals, severity of illness)
• Acceptability to users
How did it work?• Initial telephone call /Computers on line
• Video & telemetric link and initial data
• Contact with Consultant
• Advice/ retrieval offered
• PETS team set off
• Ongoing advice (SpR, Senior Nursing staff)
• Collection/ fax questionnaire and retrieval form
Time scale• Funding Nov 98
• MSc research Nurse Feb 99
• ISDN 2 positive April 99
• All equipment functional May 99
• Training/ operational policy May 99
• Live June 99
• Study ended June 2000
Computer Hardware £ 8060.78P/ T Research Nurse £ 8468Line rental £ 1000Telephone calls £ 1000Travel & sundries £ 384
£18912.78
Additional value of project f rom collaboration
Hewlett Packard Medilink system £ 17000Cable & Wireless f ree installation £ 1200C & W Subsidised line rental £ 240University of Salf ord MSc tuition andfees
£ 2500
GEMI SI S Telemedicine conference £ 320£21260.00
Total project value £40,172.78
Ref er r ed Ret r ieved A dmit t ed
Bolt on 26 (6 ) 19 (5 ) 25 (5 )
Bar r ow 11 (8 ) 10 (6 ) 10 (7 )
Telemedicine usage in brackets
Question 1. “Was the equipment easy to use?”
1 2 3 4 5 6
Easy Hard
Question 2. “Did the Telemedicine link assist youin f ulfi lling your role?”
Yes/ Made no difference/ Made things worse
Why wasn’t the link-up used? Equipment f ailure 1 Staff training 2 Wrong area 21 Barrow SCBU 2 Ward 1 Bolton A & E / CT 9 Ward 5 Theatres 2 SCBU 2
Phase 2 - a wireless solution? • NHS Exec Northwest -- IM & T Collaborative project
• £80 000
• New equipment (Kerridge)
• Aims
– Review of referral/ retrieval rates
– Ease of use
– Remote role assistance
– Establishment of remote scenario training
Remote Consultant
ISDNTransmitter/ receiver
•Image capture•Self view monitor•Visual presenter•Specialist Camera
Wireless transmission
Future & funding • Echocardiography/ other tertiary
specialists• Next step?
• wider cover within each site • more sites• mobile communications• integrate with NHS net / web based
Phase 3
IP based solution
Monitor streaming across Hospital Network
NHS Net
Videoconferencing
£30 000 (Regional Support and Review Group)
100 MB triangulated LAN between RMCH, Central and BHCH
Link between Regional Burns Centre, Remote HDU and PICU
Remote End•Motion Media 745 units •Eyesite 6 input box•PTZ camera•Handheld digital camcorder•Plantronic wireless headsets•Sony digital visual presenter•Connections from HP monitors to the LAN
Equipment
Medical student project
1) Attitudes before and after by questionnaire• 16 questions
2) Quality of referral between TM and Telephone • Each doctor referred two similar cases• Each case had a story, CXR, ECG, ventilation settings, biochemistry
Results Telephone Telemedicine
Mean Score (46 total)
35.0
45.9
95% Confidence
Intervals
31.2 - 38.8
45.6 - 46.0
Correlation between scores
0.2
(Low)
0.8
(High)
Mean difference between scores
10.4
(95% CI 12.5-8.4)
Conclusions
TM improves information flow
Healthcare opinions shifted in favour of TM after using the equipment
In the real world ..
• Impossible to use clinically without
major IT & Network commitment
• If it works to their advantage people will
use it
• Keep it simple!