Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors...

40
Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework 83 Anchor Advantages Disadvantages Monetary targeting Some monetary aggregates can be quickly and easily controlled by the central bank. Depends on a well-defined and stable relationship between monetary aggregates and nominal income. With financial innovations, this stability often breaks down. Monetary aggregates can be accurately measured (with short lags). Greater stress on making policy transparent (clear, simple and understandable) and on regular communication with the public may undermine credibility in the face deviations. Increases the transparency of monetary policy, thereby avoiding the time- inconsistency trap. Nominal income targeting It could be superior to monetary targeting, since it avoids the problem of velocity shocks and time inconsistency. Compels a central bank to announce a potential GDP growth number, over which it has limited control. Allows a country to maintain independent monetary policy. Concept of nominal GDP is not clearly understood by the public, lowering transparency. Could engender time inconsistency if the central bank announces too low or too high a number, which subsequently is found to be different from the announced one. Exchange rate targeting The nominal anchor of the exchange rate fixes the inflation rate for internationally traded goods and thus, contributes directly to keeping inflation in check. The central bank has limited control over its monetary policy. If the exchange rate target is credible, it anchors inflation expectations to the inflation rate in the anchor country to whose currency it is pegged. The country becomes vulnerable to shocks emanating from the country to which its currency is pegged. Has the advantage of simplicity and clarity; well understood by the public. Speculative attacks on the exchange rate might force the central bank to substantially raise its interest rates, with significant economic costs. Inflation targeting Preserves independence of monetary policy. Too much focus on inflation often at the cost of output stabilisation. Provides a nominal anchor for the path of price level. Long and variable lags in monetary transmission means that a substantial amount of time must elapse before the success of monetary policy can be ascertained. (Contd...) Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons

Transcript of Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors...

Page 1: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

83

Anchor Advantages Disadvantages

Monetary targeting

Some monetary aggregates can be quickly and easily controlled by the central bank.

Depends on a well-defi ned and stable relationship between monetary aggregates and nominal income. With fi nancial innovations, this stability often breaks down.

Monetary aggregates can be accurately measured (with short lags).

Greater stress on making policy transparent (clear, simple and understandable) and on regular communication with the public may undermine credibility in the face deviations.

Increases the transparency of monetary policy, thereby avoiding the t ime-inconsistency trap.

Nominal income targeting

It could be superior to monetary targeting, since it avoids the problem of velocity shocks and time inconsistency.

Compels a central bank to announce a potential GDP growth number, over which it has limited control.

Allows a country to maintain independent monetary policy.

Concept of nominal GDP is not clearly understood by the public, lowering transparency.

Could engender time inconsistency if the central bank announces too low or too high a number, which subsequently is found to be different from the announced one.

Exchange rate targeting

The nominal anchor of the exchange rate fi xes the infl ation rate for internationally traded goods and thus, contributes directly to keeping infl ation in check.

The central bank has limited control over its monetary policy.

If the exchange rate target is credible, it anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency it is pegged.

The country becomes vulnerable to shocks emanating from the country to which its currency is pegged.

Has the advantage of simplicity and clarity; well understood by the public.

Speculative attacks on the exchange rate might force the central bank to substantially raise its interest rates, with signifi cant economic costs.

Infl ation targeting

Preserves independence of monetary policy. Too much focus on infl ation often at the cost of output stabilisation.

Provides a nominal anchor for the path of price level.

Long and variable lags in monetary transmission means that a substantial amount of time must elapse before the success of monetary policy can be ascertained.

(Contd...)

Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons

Page 2: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

84

Appendix Tables

Anchor Advantages Disadvantages

Clear and simple; hence, well-understood by the public.

Effi cacy could be compromised if interest rates hit a zero lower bound.

Transparency increases the potential for promoting low infl ation expectations, which helps to produce a desirable inflation outcome.

A rigid rule does not allow enough headroom (discretion) to respond fl exibly to unforeseen contingencies.

Price level targeting

Lowers uncertainty about prices that would prevail in the near future.

Poses communication challenges. Under this approach, the central bank, at a minimum, needs to specify both an intercept (level of target in the base period) and a slope (rate of increase in target price path over time), over and above a time period.

Allows economic agents to form forward-looking expectations, based on current price levels.

Not practical experience on the success or failure of its implementation across countries in modern times1.

Can prove effective when nominal interest rates hit the zero lower bound.

The transition costs of moving to this practice (for countries already on infl ation targeting) could be large and uncertain.

Just-do-it strategy

Constructive ambiguity in policy making often helps central bank achieve its long-term goal (price stability).

Non transparent; not clear to the public what the central bank intends to do (or, is doing).

Demonstrated success. Strongly dependent on skills and preferences of individuals in charge of the central bank.

1 In 1931, Sweden went off the gold standard and adopted a price-level target in order to counter defl ationary pressures associated with the Great Depression (C. Berg and L. Jonung, 1999. Pioneering Price Level Targeting: The Swedish Experience 1931-1937, Journal of Monetary Economics 43, 525-51).

Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons (Concld.)

Page 3: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

85

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/goa

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r, t

ime

fram

e an

d st

yle

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ in

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er c

omm

ents

Aust

ralia

1993

Non

e/Pr

ovid

e a

new

mon

etar

y an

chor

Rese

rve

Bank

Bo

ard

in

agre

emen

t w

ith

Gov

erno

r an

d th

e M

inis

ter

of

Fina

nce

(Tre

asur

er)

Targ

et r

ange

of

2-3

per

cent

in

fl ati

on o

n av

erag

e ov

er

the

econ

omic

cy

cle.

Med

ium

ter

m

Nor

mal

ly m

eets

11

tim

es e

ach

year

, on

the

fi rst

Tue

sday

of

each

mon

th (n

o m

eeti

ng in

Ja

nuar

y)

Targ

et c

ash

rate

/I

nter

bank

cas

h ra

te

In d

eter

min

ing

mon

etar

y po

licy,

the

Ban

k ha

s a

duty

to

mai

ntai

n pr

ice

stab

ility

, ful

l em

ploy

men

t, a

nd t

he

econ

omic

pro

sper

ity

and

wel

fare

of

the

Aust

ralia

n pe

ople

.

Can

ada

1990

- 19

91N

one/

Prov

ide

a ne

w m

onet

ary

anch

or a

nd

brin

g do

wn

infl a

tion

The

infl a

tion

ta

rget

s ar

e ag

reed

join

tly

by t

he

Gov

ernm

ent

of

Can

ada

and

the

Bank

of

Can

ada

A t

arge

t ra

te f

or

tota

l CPI

of

2 pe

r ce

nt o

n a

12-m

onth

bas

is,

wit

h a

1-3

per

cent

con

trol

ra

nge.

The

cu

rren

t ta

rget

ra

nge

exte

nds

to D

ecem

ber

2016

In la

te 2

000,

th

e Ba

nk o

f C

anad

a ad

opte

d a

syst

em o

f ei

ght

pre-

set

date

s pe

r ye

ar

on w

hich

it

anno

unce

s it

s ke

y po

licy

rate

.

The

Bank

ca

rrie

s ou

t m

onet

ary

polic

y by

in

fl uen

cing

sh

ort-t

erm

in

tere

st r

ates

. It

does

thi

s by

ra

isin

g an

d lo

wer

ing

the

targ

et f

or t

he

over

nigh

t ra

te.

The

Ban

k al

so m

onit

ors

a se

t of

“co

re”

infl a

tion

m

easu

res,

incl

udin

g th

e C

PIX

, whi

ch s

trip

s ou

t ei

ght

of t

he m

ost

vola

tile

C

PI c

ompo

nent

s. T

hese

“c

ore”

mea

sure

s al

low

th

e Ba

nk t

o “l

ook

thro

ugh”

tem

pora

ry

chan

ges

in t

otal

CPI

in

fl ati

on a

nd t

o fo

cus

on

the

unde

rlyi

ng t

rend

of

infl a

tion

, whi

ch is

a g

ood

indi

cato

r of

whe

re t

otal

C

PI in

fl ati

on is

hea

ded

in

the

abse

nce

of p

olic

y ac

tion

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

A: I

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s

(Con

td...

)

Page 4: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

86

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/goa

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r, t

ime

fram

e an

d st

yle

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ in

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er c

omm

ents

Japa

nJa

nuar

y 20

13Th

e A

ct s

tate

s,

"The

Ban

k of

Ja

pan'

s au

tono

my

rega

rdin

g cu

rren

cy a

nd

mon

etar

y co

ntro

l sha

ll be

re

spec

ted.

" su

ffi c

ient

ly."

Pric

e st

abili

ty

targ

et o

f 2

per

cent

in t

erm

s of

th

e ye

ar-o

n-ye

ar r

ate

of

chan

ge in

the

C

PI a

t th

e ea

rlie

st

poss

ible

tim

e,

wit

h a

tim

e ho

rizo

n of

ab

out

two

year

s.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Mee

ting

s (M

PMs)

are

he

ld o

nce

or

twic

e a

mon

th,

for

one

or t

wo

days

. D

iscl

osur

e vi

a pr

ess

rele

ases

, m

inut

es o

f th

e m

eeti

ngs,

pre

ss

conf

eren

ce.

The

Bank

co

ntro

ls t

he

amou

nt o

f fu

nds

in t

he

mon

ey m

arke

t,

mai

nly

thro

ugh

mon

ey m

arke

t op

erat

ions

.

The

Bank

sup

plie

s fu

nds

to fi

nanc

ial i

nsti

tuti

ons

by, f

or e

xam

ple,

ex

tend

ing

loan

s to

the

m,

whi

ch a

re b

acke

d by

co

llate

ral s

ubm

itte

d to

th

e Ba

nk b

y th

ese

inst

itut

ions

. Suc

h an

op

erat

ion

is c

alle

d a

fund

s-su

pply

ing

oper

atio

n.

New

Ze

alan

d19

89-9

0N

one/

Part

of

exte

nsiv

e re

form

s,

diss

atis

fact

ion

wit

h ea

rlie

r ou

tcom

es;

prov

ide

a ne

w

nom

inal

anc

hor

The

Min

iste

r of

Fi

nanc

e an

d th

e G

over

nor

of

the

Rese

rve

Bank

sha

ll to

geth

er h

ave

a se

para

te

agre

emen

t se

ttin

g ou

t sp

ecifi

c ta

rget

s fo

r ac

hiev

ing

and

The

curr

ent

agre

emen

t,

sign

ed in

Se

ptem

ber

2012

, cal

ls f

or

infl a

tion

to

be

kept

wit

hin

1 to

3 p

erce

nt a

ye

ar, o

n av

erag

e ov

er

the

med

ium

te

rm, w

ith

a

Eigh

t sch

edul

ed

deci

sion

m

akin

g m

eeti

ngs

in a

ye

ar.

Offi

cia

l cas

h ra

te (O

CR)

- the

w

hole

sale

pri

ce

of b

orro

wed

m

oney

.

The

Rese

rve

Bank

pu

blis

hes

its

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Stat

emen

t (M

PS)

quar

terl

y. E

ach

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Stat

emen

t m

ust

set

out:

1) h

ow t

he R

eser

ve

Bank

pro

pose

s to

ach

ieve

it

s ta

rget

s; 2

) how

it

prop

oses

to

form

ulat

e an

d im

plem

ent

mon

etar

y po

licy

duri

ng t

he n

ext

fi ve

year

s; a

nd 3

) how

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

A: I

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

ontd

.)

Page 5: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

87

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/goa

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r, t

ime

fram

e an

d st

yle

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ in

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er c

omm

ents

mai

ntai

ning

pr

ice

stab

ility

. Th

is is

kno

wn

as t

he P

olic

y Ta

rget

s A

gree

men

t (P

TA).

focu

s on

ke

epin

g fu

ture

av

erag

e in

fl ati

on n

ear

the

2 pe

rcen

t ta

rget

m

idpo

int.

The

Re

serv

e Ba

nk

has

publ

ishe

d an

inte

ract

ive

infl a

tion

ca

lcul

ator

on

its

web

site

,

mon

etar

y po

licy

has

been

im

plem

ente

d si

nce

the

last

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Stat

emen

t.

Nor

way

2001

Exch

ange

rat

e /

grad

ual

mov

emen

t to

war

ds fl

exib

le

exch

ange

rat

e an

d st

rong

er

emph

asis

on

pric

e st

abili

ty

The

Gov

ernm

ent

has

set

an

infl a

tion

tar

get

for

mon

etar

y po

licy.

The

op

erat

iona

l ta

rget

of

mon

etar

y po

licy

shal

l be

annu

al

cons

umer

pri

ce

infl a

tion

of

clos

e to

2.5

per

ce

nt o

ver

tim

e.

The

Exe

cuti

ve

Boar

d se

ts t

he

key

rate

at

pre-

anno

unce

d ti

mes

, nor

mal

ly

six

tim

es a

ye

ar.

Key

pol

icy

rate

, w

hich

is t

he

inte

rest

rat

e on

ba

nks'

dep

osit

s in

Nor

ges

Bank

.

The

Nor

ges

Bank

’s f

ocus

is

on

pric

e st

abili

ty,

fi nan

cial

sta

bilit

y an

d ge

nera

ting

add

ed v

alue

th

roug

h in

vest

men

t m

anag

emen

t.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

A: I

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

ontd

.)

Page 6: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

88

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/goa

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r, t

ime

fram

e an

d st

yle

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ in

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er c

omm

ents

Swed

enAn

noun

ced

in

Janu

ary

1993

, ad

opte

d in

199

5

Exch

ange

rat

e /

Forc

ed o

ff a

fi x

ed e

xcha

nge

rate

reg

ime

The

Exec

utiv

e Bo

ard

of t

he

Riks

bank

m

akes

the

m

onet

ary

polic

y de

cisi

ons

wit

hout

in

stru

ctio

n fr

om a

ny o

ther

pa

rtie

s.

2 pe

r ce

nt

targ

et in

ann

ual

chan

ge in

he

adlin

e C

PI

The

Exec

utiv

e Bo

ard

hold

s si

x sc

hedu

led

mon

etar

y po

licy

mee

ting

s a

year

.

Ove

rnig

ht r

epo

rate

/

Ove

rnig

ht r

epo

rate

tar

get

The

Riks

bank

’s f

unct

ion

is t

o ke

ep in

fl ati

on c

lose

to

the

goa

l of

2 pe

r ce

nt.

If t

he c

redi

bilit

y of

thi

s in

fl ati

on t

arge

t is

not

th

reat

ened

, the

Rik

sban

k ca

n m

ake

furt

her

cont

ribu

tion

s to

red

ucin

g va

riat

ions

in a

reas

suc

h as

pro

duct

ion

and

empl

oym

ent

- the

'rea

l ec

onom

y’.

Sout

h K

orea

Apr

il 19

98Ba

sed

on B

ank

of K

orea

Act

, it

sets

the

mid

-te

rm in

fl ati

on

targ

et t

o be

ap

plie

d fo

r th

ree

year

s in

co

nsul

tati

on

wit

h th

e go

vern

men

t.

The

infl a

tion

ta

rget

mea

sure

du

ring

the

pe

riod

fro

m

2013

to

2015

is

set

at

2.5~

3.5%

, ba

sed

on c

onsu

mer

pr

ice

infl a

tion

(yea

r-on

-yea

r).

The

Base

Rat

e,

the

BOK

's

polic

y ra

te, i

s se

t du

ring

the

'm

ain

mee

ting

' of

the

M

onet

ary

Polic

y C

omm

itte

e th

at

take

s pl

ace

once

eve

ry

mon

th.

The

Bank

of

Kor

ea B

ase

Rat

e is

the

ref

eren

ce

polic

y ra

te.

In a

ddit

ion,

the

Ban

k of

K

orea

als

o gi

ves

expl

anat

ion

to t

he

gene

ral p

ublic

as

to t

he

stat

us o

f th

e m

ediu

m

term

infl a

tion

tar

get

by

mon

itor

ing

it o

n an

an

nual

bas

is.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

A: I

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

ontd

.)

Page 7: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

89

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/goa

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r, t

ime

fram

e an

d st

yle

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ in

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er c

omm

ents

UK

Oct

ober

19

92Ex

chan

ge r

ate

Infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

Forc

ed o

ff a

fi x

ed e

xcha

nge

rate

reg

ime

to

mai

ntai

n pr

ice

stab

ility

/

Pri

ce s

tabi

lity

is d

efi n

ed b

y th

e G

over

nmen

t’s

infl a

tion

tar

get

of 2

%.

The

infl a

tion

ta

rget

of

2 pe

r ce

nt is

ex

pres

sed

in

term

s of

an

annu

al r

ate

of

infl a

tion

bas

ed

on t

he

Con

sum

er

Pric

es In

dex

(CPI

).

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Com

mit

tee

mee

ts m

onth

ly

for

a tw

o-da

y m

eeti

ng.

Dec

isio

ns a

re

mad

e by

a v

ote

of t

he

Com

mit

tee

on

a on

e-pe

rson

on

e-vo

te b

asis

.

The

1998

Ban

k of

Eng

land

Act

m

ade

the

Bank

in

depe

nden

t to

se

t in

tere

st

rate

s. B

ank

rate

is

bei

ng u

sed

sinc

e 20

09;

asse

t pu

rcha

se

as a

n ad

diti

onal

in

stru

men

t.

In A

ugus

t 20

13 t

he M

PC

prov

ided

som

e ex

plic

it

guid

ance

reg

ardi

ng t

he

futu

re c

ondu

ct o

f m

onet

ary

polic

y. T

he

MPC

inte

nds

at a

m

inim

um t

o m

aint

ain

the

pres

ent

high

ly

stim

ulat

ive

stan

ce o

f m

onet

ary

polic

y un

til

econ

omic

sla

ck h

as b

een

subs

tant

ially

red

uced

, pr

ovid

ed t

his

does

not

en

tail

mat

eria

l ris

ks t

o pr

ice

stab

ility

or

fi nan

cial

st

abili

ty.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

A: I

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

oncl

d.)

Page 8: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

90

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ an

y ta

rget

oth

er

than

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/ G

oal

inde

pend

ence

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ In

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er

com

men

ts

Euro

are

aTo

mai

ntai

n pr

ice

stab

ility

is

the

pri

mar

y ob

ject

ive

of t

he

Euro

syst

em a

nd

of t

he s

ingl

e m

onet

ary

polic

y fo

r w

hich

it is

re

spon

sibl

e.

This

is la

id

dow

n in

the

Tr

eaty

on

the

Func

tion

ing

of

the

Euro

pean

U

nion

, Art

icle

12

7 (1

).

the

Gov

erni

ngC

ounc

il.

pric

e st

abili

ty

is d

efi n

ed a

s "a

yea

r-on

-yea

r in

crea

se in

the

H

arm

onis

ed

Inde

x of

C

onsu

mer

Pr

ices

(HIC

P)

for

the

euro

ar

ea o

f be

low

2

per

cent

. Pri

ce

stab

ility

is t

o be

m

aint

aine

d ov

er

the

med

ium

te

rm".

Twic

e a

mon

th,

wit

h fi r

st d

ay

disc

ussi

ng

over

all

asse

ssm

ent

of

the

econ

omic

si

tuat

ion

and

the

risk

s to

pr

ice

stab

ility

ba

sed

on a

com

preh

ensi

ve

econ

omic

and

m

onet

ary

anal

ysis

in t

he

cont

ext

of t

he

ECB’

s (t

wo-

pilla

r) m

onet

ary

polic

y st

rate

gy.

Min

imum

ra

te in

mai

n re

fi nan

cing

op

erat

ion

(MRO

) and

the

in

tere

st r

ates

on

the

mar

gina

l le

ndin

g fa

cilit

y an

d th

e de

posi

t fa

cilit

y.

The

Euro

sy

stem

cur

rent

ly

acce

pts

a ve

ry b

road

ra

nge

of d

ebt

inst

rum

ents

, is

sued

both

by

publ

ic

and

priv

ate

issu

ers.

Swit

zerl

and

The

Swis

s N

atio

nal

Bank

(SN

B)

impl

emen

ts it

s m

onet

ary

polic

y by

fi xi

ng a

tar

get

rang

e fo

r th

e th

ree-

mon

th

Art

icle

99

of

the

Fede

ral

Con

stit

utio

n en

trus

ts t

he

SNB,

as

an

inde

pend

ent

cent

ral b

ank,

w

ith

the

SNB

equa

tes

pric

e st

abili

ty

wit

h a

rise

in

the

nati

onal

co

nsum

er p

rice

in

dex

of le

ss

than

2 p

er c

ent

per

annu

m in

Qua

rter

ly

mee

ting

s (M

arch

, Jun

e,

Sept

embe

r an

d D

ecem

ber)

wit

h pr

ess

rele

ase

and

bulle

tin

publ

icat

ion.

CH

F 3-

mon

th

Libo

r.M

ediu

m-

term

infl a

tion

fo

reca

sts.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

B: N

on-i

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s

(Con

td...

)

Page 9: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

91

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ an

y ta

rget

oth

er

than

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/ G

oal

inde

pend

ence

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ In

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er

com

men

ts

Swis

s fr

anc

Libo

r.co

nduc

t of

m

onet

ary

polic

y in

the

inte

rest

s of

the

cou

ntry

as

a w

hole

.

term

s of

tot

al

CPI

.

Sing

apor

eEa

rly

1980

sC

entr

ed o

n th

e m

anag

emen

t of

th

e ex

chan

ge

rate

.

The

exch

ange

ra

te p

olic

y ba

nd

is p

erio

dica

lly

revi

ewed

to

ensu

re t

hat

it r

emai

ns

cons

iste

nt w

ith

the

unde

rlyi

ng

fund

amen

tals

of

the

econ

omy.

The

obje

ctiv

e of

Sin

gapo

re's

ex

chan

ge r

ate

polic

y ha

s al

way

s be

en

to p

rom

ote

sust

aine

d an

d no

n-in

fl ati

onar

y gr

owth

for

th

e Si

ngap

ore

econ

omy.

Regu

lar

mon

etar

y po

licy

anno

unce

men

ts

are

sche

dule

d in

Apr

il an

d O

ctob

er.

The

trad

e-w

eigh

ted

exch

ange

rat

e is

allo

wed

to

fl uct

uate

wit

hin

a po

licy

band

, an

d w

here

ne

cess

ary,

M

onet

ary

Auth

orit

y of

Si

ngap

ore

(MA

S)

cond

ucts

dir

ect

inte

rven

tion

s in

the

for

eign

ex

chan

ge

mar

ket

to

mai

ntai

n th

e ex

chan

ge r

ate

wit

hin

this

ba

nd.

MA

S' m

onet

ary

polic

y is

ce

ntre

d on

the

m

anag

emen

t of

th

e ex

chan

ge

rate

rat

her

than

tar

geti

ng

inte

rest

rat

e le

vels

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

B: N

on-i

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

ontd

.)

Page 10: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

92

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ an

y ta

rget

oth

er

than

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/ G

oal

inde

pend

ence

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

M

eeti

ngK

ey p

olic

y ra

te

/ Ope

rati

onal

ta

rget

/ In

stru

men

tal

inde

pend

ence

Any

oth

er

com

men

ts

Uni

ted

Stat

esN

o fo

rmal

ta

rget

/Th

e C

omm

itte

e ju

dges

tha

t in

fl ati

on a

t th

e ra

te o

f 2

per

cent

, as

mea

sure

d by

th

e an

nual

ch

ange

in t

he

pric

e in

dex

for

pers

onal

co

nsum

ptio

n ex

pend

itur

es, i

s m

ost

cons

iste

nt

over

the

long

er

run.

Stat

utor

y M

anda

te f

rom

th

e C

ongr

ess.

Max

imum

em

ploy

men

t,

stab

le p

rice

s,

and

mod

erat

e lo

ng-te

rm

inte

rest

rat

es.

FOM

C m

eeti

ngs

and

pres

s co

nfer

ence

.

Dec

isio

n by

co

nsen

sus/

Eig

ht s

ched

uled

pe

r ye

ar, w

ith

othe

rs a

s ne

eded

/M

eeti

ngs

may

la

st o

ne o

r tw

o da

ys.

In t

he m

ost

rece

nt

proj

ecti

ons,

FO

MC

pa

rtic

ipan

ts’

esti

mat

es o

f th

e lo

nger

-run

no

rmal

rat

e of

un

empl

oym

ent

had

a ce

ntra

l te

nden

cy o

f 5.

2-

6.0

per

cent

.

Sour

ce: B

IS M

C C

ompe

ndiu

m, P

etur

sson

(200

4), m

onth

ly b

ulle

tin,

Han

dboo

k of

Cen

tral

Ban

king

, 29,

Ban

k of

Eng

land

, dif

fere

nt c

entr

al b

ank

web

site

s ti

ll Ja

nuar

y 10

, 201

4

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.2

B: N

on-i

nfl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng C

ount

ries

– A

dvan

ced

Econ

omie

s (C

oncl

d.)

Page 11: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

93

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/op

erat

iona

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

Mee

ting

Key

pol

icy

rate

Any

oth

er

com

men

tsPe

rfor

man

ce

on in

fl at

ion

Chi

leSe

ptem

ber

1999

Hig

h in

fl ati

on d

ue t

o ex

pans

iona

ry p

olic

ies,

oi

l pri

ce h

ike

duri

ng

Gul

f w

ar, f

ailu

re

wit

h ex

chan

ge r

ate

base

d st

abili

sati

on

prog

ram

me,

inst

abili

ty

of m

oney

dem

and

and

diffi

cul

ty in

mon

etar

y ta

rget

ing,

pro

vide

a

new

mon

etar

y an

chor

and

gra

dual

di

sinfl

ati

on.

Cen

tral

ban

k/Ye

sA

nnua

l CPI

(h

eadl

ine)

Poin

t ta

rget

: 3

per

cent

/+

/- 1

perc

enta

ge

poin

t/A

roun

d 2

year

s.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Repo

rt/

4 ti

mes

a

year

.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Inte

rest

Rat

e (O

vern

ight

in

terb

ank

rate

).

Braz

ilJu

ne 1

999

Due

to

conc

erns

on

fi sca

l fro

nt, c

olla

pse

of c

urre

ncy

unde

r sp

ecul

ativ

e at

tack

and

se

arch

for

a n

omin

al

anch

or w

ithi

n IM

F pr

ogra

mm

e.

Nat

iona

l M

onet

ary

Cou

ncil

(bot

h G

ovt

and

cent

ral b

ank

Gov

erno

r)/

Yes

Hea

dlin

e Br

oad

Nat

iona

l CPI

/ 4.

5 pe

r ce

nt

+/-

2 pe

rcen

tage

po

int

Year

ly t

arge

t.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar

An

over

nigh

t in

tere

st r

ate

(SEL

IC )

Hun

gary

June

200

1In

crea

sing

in

com

pati

bilit

y of

fi xe

d ex

chan

ge

rate

reg

ime

and

disi

nfl a

tion

; nee

d to

br

ing

dow

n in

fl ati

on

wit

h fu

ture

EU

m

embe

rshi

p in

min

d

Cen

tral

ban

k/Ye

sC

PI/

3 pe

r ce

nt

per

annu

m/

Med

ium

-te

rm.

Qua

rter

ly

Repo

rt o

n In

fl ati

on/

4 ti

mes

a

year

.

Inte

rest

rat

e on

2-w

eek

cent

ral b

ank

bond

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.3

: Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

Cou

ntri

es –

Em

ergi

ng M

arke

t Ec

onom

ies

(Con

td...

)

Page 12: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

94

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/op

erat

iona

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

Mee

ting

Key

pol

icy

rate

Any

oth

er

com

men

tsPe

rfor

man

ce

on in

fl at

ion

Indo

nesi

aJu

ly 2

005

The

rela

tion

ship

be

twee

n m

onet

ary

aggr

egat

es a

nd

nom

inal

inco

me

beco

min

g te

nuou

s du

e to

inst

abili

ty

in in

com

e ve

loci

ty

of m

oney

fol

low

ing

fi nan

cial

der

egul

atio

n an

d le

ss s

ucce

ss w

ith

exch

ange

rat

e as

no

min

al a

ncho

r.

Gov

ernm

ent

in c

onsu

ltat

ion

wit

h ce

ntra

l ba

nk/

Yes.

CPI

/ 4.

5 pe

r ce

nt +

/- 1

perc

enta

ge

poin

t/M

ediu

m-

term

.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Repo

rt/

4 ti

mes

a

year

.

BI r

ate.

Isra

elIn

form

ally

in

199

2;fu

ll-fl e

dged

fr

om Ju

ne

1997

Lock

in d

isin

fl ati

on

and

defi n

e th

e sl

ope

of t

he e

xcha

nge

rate

cr

awlin

g pe

g.

Gov

ernm

ent.

in

con

sult

atio

n w

ith

cent

ral

bank

Gov

erno

r/Ye

s.

CPI

/ Ta

rget

R

ange

of

1- 3

pe

r ce

nt/

Wit

hin

2 ye

ars.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/Tw

ice

a ye

ar.

Shor

t-ter

m

inte

rest

rat

e (o

vern

ight

tr

ansa

ctio

ns

betw

een

cent

ral b

ank

and

bank

s).

Mex

ico

2001

Dif

fi cul

ty w

ith

mon

etar

y ta

rget

ing,

un

relia

bilit

y of

re

lati

onsh

ip b

etw

een

mon

etar

y ba

se a

nd

infl a

tion

, and

lack

of

nom

inal

anc

hor

to g

uide

infl a

tion

ex

pect

atio

ns.

The

Boar

d of

G

over

nors

/Ye

s.

CPI

/ M

ulti

-an

nual

in

fl ati

on

targ

et3

per

cent

+/-1

per

ce

nt/

Med

ium

-te

rm.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar.

Ove

rnig

ht

inte

r-ba

nk

rate

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.3

: Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

Cou

ntri

es –

Em

ergi

ng M

arke

t Ec

onom

ies

(Con

td.)

Page 13: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

95

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/op

erat

iona

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

Mee

ting

Key

pol

icy

rate

Any

oth

er

com

men

tsPe

rfor

man

ce

on in

fl at

ion

Sout

h A

fric

aFe

brua

ry

2000

Follo

win

g lib

eral

isat

ion

and

stru

ctur

al

deve

lopm

ents

, ch

angi

ng r

elat

ions

hip

betw

een

outp

ut, p

rice

s an

d m

oney

gro

wth

, m

akin

g m

onet

ary

targ

etin

g le

ss u

sefu

l; ne

ed f

or g

reat

er

tran

spar

ency

in p

olic

y.

Gov

ernm

ent

in c

onsu

ltat

ion

wit

h ce

ntra

l ba

nk/

Yes.

CPI

/ A

Tar

get

rang

e of

3-6

pe

r ce

nt/

On

a co

ntin

uous

ba

sis.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Revi

ew/

Twic

e a

year

.

Repo

rat

e.

Peru

Janu

ary

2002

Form

alis

atio

n of

ea

rlie

r re

gim

e; g

reat

er

tran

spar

ency

of

polic

y.

Targ

et is

ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Bo

ard

of

Dir

ecto

rs.

CPI

/ 2

per

cent

+/-1

pe

rcen

tage

po

int/

At

all t

imes

.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar.

Refe

renc

e in

tere

st r

ate.

Phili

ppin

esJa

nuar

y 20

02Fo

rmal

isat

ion

and

sim

plifi

cati

on o

f ea

rlie

r re

gim

e;

grea

ter

tran

spar

ency

an

d fo

cus

on p

rice

st

abili

ty.

Gov

ernm

ent

in c

onsu

ltat

ion

wit

h ce

ntra

l ba

nk/Y

es.

CPI

/ 4

per

cent

+/-

1 pe

rcen

tage

po

int

for

2012

, 201

3 an

d 20

14/

Med

ium

-te

rm.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar

Key

Pol

icy

inte

rest

ra

tes

for

over

nigh

t re

po/ r

ever

se

repo

and

te

rm r

epo/

re

vers

e re

po

and

spec

ial

depo

sit

acco

unts

.

Targ

et is

an

noun

ced

2 ye

ars

in

adva

nce.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.3

: Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

Cou

ntri

es –

Em

ergi

ng M

arke

t Ec

onom

ies

(Con

td.)

Page 14: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

96

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/op

erat

iona

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

Mee

ting

Key

pol

icy

rate

Any

oth

er

com

men

tsPe

rfor

man

ce

on in

fl at

ion

Pola

nd19

98C

onsi

dere

d th

e m

ost

effe

ctiv

e w

ay t

o br

ing

dow

n in

fl ati

on

as a

pre

cond

itio

n fo

r su

bseq

uent

EU

m

embe

rshi

p.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Cou

ncil/

Yes.

CPI

/ 2.

5 pe

r ce

nt +

/- 1

perc

enta

ge

poin

ts/

Med

ium

-te

rm.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/3

tim

es a

ye

ar

Refe

renc

e ra

te (t

he

rate

tha

t de

term

ines

th

e yi

eld

on

the

mai

n O

MO

s).

Sout

h K

orea

Apr

il 19

98U

nsta

ble

mon

ey

dem

and

follo

win

g st

ruct

ural

cha

nges

in

fi nan

cial

mar

kets

, and

w

ith

1997

fi na

ncia

l cr

isis

; dis

cont

inua

tion

of

exc

hang

e ra

te.

Cen

tral

Ban

k in

con

sult

atio

n w

ith

the

Gov

t./

Yes.

CPI

/ 3

per

cent

+/-

1 pe

rcen

tage

po

int/

3 ye

ars.

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Repo

rt/

Twic

e a

year

.

Bank

of

Kor

ea B

ase

rate

.

Thai

land

May

200

0In

fl ati

on t

arge

ting

co

nsid

ered

mor

e ap

prop

riat

e w

ith

fl oat

ing

exch

ange

rat

e th

an m

oney

sup

ply

targ

etin

g af

ter

the

fi nan

cial

cri

sis

of 1

997.

MPC

in

cons

ulta

tion

w

ith

the

Gov

t./

Yes.

3.0

per

cent

+

/- 1.

5 pe

rcen

tage

po

ints

/8

quar

ters

.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar.

One

day

re

po r

ate.

Targ

et is

se

t by

MPC

an

nual

ly.

The

targ

et

deci

ded

in

agre

emen

t w

ith

the

Min

iste

r of

Fin

ance

, w

hich

th

en

requ

ires

ap

prov

al

by th

e Ca

bine

t.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.3

: Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

Cou

ntri

es –

Em

ergi

ng M

arke

t Ec

onom

ies

(Con

td.)

Page 15: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

97

Cou

ntry

Sinc

e w

hen

Prev

ious

/ w

hy

infl

atio

n ta

rget

ing

Who

set

s th

e Ta

rget

/op

erat

iona

l in

depe

nden

ce

Targ

et

indi

cato

r,

tim

efra

me

and

styl

e

Freq

uenc

y of

Mee

ting

Key

pol

icy

rate

Any

oth

er

com

men

tsPe

rfor

man

ce

on in

fl at

ion

Turk

eyJa

nuar

y 20

06M

PC in

co

nsul

tati

on

wit

h th

e G

over

nmen

t.

Ann

ual C

PI/

5 pe

r ce

nt +

/-2

perc

enta

ge

poin

ts f

or

2012

, 201

3 an

d 20

14/

Mul

ti-y

ear

hori

zon

3 ye

ars.

Infl a

tion

Re

port

/4

tim

es a

ye

ar.

One

wee

k re

po a

ucti

on

rate

.

Inte

rest

ra

te

corr

idor

an

d re

quir

ed

rese

rve

rati

os a

lso

used

as

polic

y in

stru

-m

ents

.

Sour

ce:

1. P

etur

sson

T.

G.

(200

5):

“Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

and

its

Eff

ects

on

Mac

roec

onom

ic P

erfo

rman

ce”,

SU

ERF

stud

ies:

200

5/5

- Th

e Eu

rope

an M

oney

and

Fin

ance

For

um, V

ienn

a.

2. H

amm

ond

G. (

2012

): “S

tate

of

the

Art

of

Infl a

tion

Tar

geti

ng”,

CC

BS, H

andb

ook

No.

29, B

ank

of E

ngla

nd.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.3

: Infl

ati

on T

arge

ting

Cou

ntri

es –

Em

ergi

ng M

arke

t Ec

onom

ies

(Con

cld.

)

Page 16: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

98

Appendix Tables

Appendix Table II.4A: Individual Countries Infl ation Targets

Country Target Measure Target 2013 Target Type

Armenia H CPI 4% ± 1.5 pp P + TAustralia H CPI 2% - 3% RangeBrazil H CPI 4.5% ± 2 pp P + TCanada H CPI 2% (mid-point of 1%-3%) P + TChile H CPI 3% ± 1 pp P + TColombia H CPI 2% - 4% RangeCzech Republic H CPI 2% ± 1 pp P + TGhana H CPI 9% ± 2 pp P + TGuatemala H CPI 4% ± 1 pp P + THungary H CPI 3% PointIceland H CPI 2.5% PointIndonesia H CPI 4.5% ± 1 pp P + TIsrael H CPI 1% - 3% RangeMexico H CPI 3% ± 1 pp P + TNew Zealand H CPI 1% - 3% RangeNorway H CPI 2.5% PointPeru H CPI 2% ± 1 pp P + TPhillippines H CPI 4.0% ± 1 pp P + TPoland H CPI 2.5% ± 1 pp P + TRomania H CPI 2.5% ± 1 pp P + TSerbia H CPI 4.0% ± 1.5 pp P + TSouth Africa H CPI 3% - 6% RangeSouth Korea H CPI 2.5% - 3.5% RangeSweden H CPI 2% PointThailand Core Infl ation 0.5% - 3.0% RangeTurkey H CPI 5.0% ± 2 pp P + TUnited Kingdom H CPI 2% Point

H CPI - Headline CPI; P+ T - Point with tolerance; PP – Percentage pointSource: Hammond G. (2012);”State of the art of infl ation targeting”, CCBS, Handbook - No.29, Bank of England

and Website of Central Banks

Appendix Table II.4B: Non-Infl ation Targeting Countries

Country Target Measure Desired level of Infl ation

US PCE 2 %ECB H CPI Below but close to 2%Malaysia H CPI 2% - 3%Singapore H CPI 3% - 4%Russia H CPI 5% - 6%China H CPI 3.50%

PCE: Personal Consumption ExpenditureSource: Website of Central Banks

Page 17: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

99

Appendix Table II.5: Time Horizon for attending Price Stability

Infl ation Targeting Non-infl ation Targeting

Country Time horizon Country Time horizon

Armenia Medium term US Long-termAustralia Medium term ECB Medium-termBrazil Yearly Target Malaysia Short-termCanada Six-eight quarters; current target extends to Dec.2016 Singapore Short-termChile Around two years Russia Medium-termColombia Medium term China Short-termCzech Republic Medium term,12-18 months Ghana 18-24 months Guatemala End of year Hungary Medium term Iceland On average Indonesia Medium term Israel Within two years Mexico Medium term New Zealand Medium term Norway Medium term Peru At all times Philippines Medium term(from 2012-14) Poland Medium term Romania Medium term target from 2013 Serbia Medium term South Africa On a continuous basis South Korea Three years Sweden Normally two years Thailand Eight quarters Turkey Multi year(Three years) United Kingdom At all times

Source: Hammond G. (2012);”State of the art of infl ation targeting”, CCBS, Handbook - No.29, Bank of England and Website of Central Banks

Page 18: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

100

Appendix Tables

App

endi

x Ta

ble

II.6

A: C

omm

unic

atio

n an

d Tr

ansp

aren

cy P

ract

ices

in In

fl at

ion

Targ

etin

g C

ount

ries

Coun

try

Ope

n le

tter

Parl

iam

enta

ry h

eari

ngs?

Pres

s N

otic

e/

Conf

eren

ceM

inut

esVo

tes

Infl a

tion

Freq

uenc

y

Arm

enia

No

Yes,

ann

ual

PRYe

s, w

ithi

n te

n da

ysN

oYe

s4

Aust

ralia

No

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyN

otic

eYe

s, a

fter

tw

o w

eeks

n/a

Yes

4Br

azil

Yes

Yes,

six

per

yea

rPR

+ P

C f

or IR

Yes,

aft

er e

ight

day

sBa

lanc

e of

vot

esYe

s4

Can

ada

No

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyPR

+ P

C f

or IR

No

n/a

Yes

4C

hile

Ye

s, f

our

tim

es p

er y

ear

PR

Yes,

aft

er t

wo

wee

ksye

sYe

s4

Col

ombi

aN

oYe

s, t

wic

e ye

arly

PR +

PC

for

IRYe

s, a

fter

tw

o w

eeks

Maj

orit

y/un

anim

ous

Yes

4C

zech

Rep

ublic

No

No

(Rep

ort)

PR +

PC

for

IRYe

s, a

fter

eig

ht d

ays

Yes

Yes

4G

hana

No

No

PR +

PC

N

on/

aYe

s4

to 6

Gua

tem

ala

No

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyPR

+ P

C

Yes,

aft

er f

our

wee

ksno

Yes

3H

unga

ry

No

Yes,

onc

e a

year

PCYe

sye

sYe

s4

Icel

and

Yes

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyPR

+ P

C

Yes

Bala

nce

of v

otes

Yes

2 pl

us 2

Indo

nesi

aN

oN

oPR

No

n/a

Yes

4Is

rael

No

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyPR

Yes,

aft

er t

wo

wee

ksBa

lanc

e of

vot

esYe

s2

Mex

ico

No

Yes,

not

reg

ular

PRYe

s, a

fter

tw

o w

eeks

n/a

Yes

4N

ew Z

eala

ndO

ther

Yes,

fou

r ti

mes

a y

ear

PR +

PC

for

IRN

on/

aYe

s4

Nor

way

No

Yes

PR +

PC

N

on/

aYe

s3

Peru

No

Yes,

onc

e a

year

Tele

conf

eren

ceN

oN

oYe

s4

Phill

ippi

nes

Yes

No

PR +

PC

Ye

s, a

fter

fou

r w

eeks

No

Yes

4Po

land

No

No(a

)PR

+ P

C

Yes,

aft

er t

hree

wee

ksYe

s in

IRYe

s4

Rom

ania

No

No

PR +

PC

for

IRN

oN

o Ye

s4

Serb

iaYe

sN

o(b)

PR +

PC

N

oN

oYe

s4

Sout

h A

fric

aN

oYe

s, a

t lea

st th

ree

per

year

PR +

PC

N

on/

aYe

s2

Sout

h K

orea

No

Yes

PR +

PC

Ye

s, a

fter

six

wee

ksN

oYe

s2

Swed

enN

oYe

s, t

wic

e ye

arly

PRYe

s, a

fter

tw

o w

eeks

Yes

Yes

3 pl

us 3

Thai

land

Yes

No

PR +

PC

Ye

s, a

fter

tw

o w

eeks

Bala

nce

of v

otes

Yes

4Tu

rkey

Yes

Yes,

tw

ice

year

lyPR

Yes

No

Yes

4U

nite

d K

ingd

omYe

sYe

s, t

hree

per

yea

rPR

+ P

C f

or IR

Yes,

aft

er t

wo

wee

ksYe

sYe

s4

IR: I

nfl a

tion

Rep

ort.

P

C: P

ress

Con

fere

nce

PR

: Pre

ss R

elea

se.

(a) G

over

nor

repo

rts

to L

ower

Hou

se o

nce

a ye

ar o

n M

onet

ary

Polic

y in

pre

cedi

ng y

ear.

(b) G

over

nor

expl

ains

rep

orts

to

Nat

iona

l Ass

embl

y.So

urce

: Ham

mon

d G

. (20

12);”

Stat

e of

the

art o

f infl

ati

on ta

rget

ing”

, CC

BS, H

andb

ook

- No.

29, B

ank

of E

ngla

nd a

nd W

ebsi

te o

f Cen

tral

Ban

ks

Page 19: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

101

Appendix Table II.6B: Communication and Transparency Practices in Non-infl ation Targeting Countries

Country Press Notice/ Conference

Minutes of Monetary Policy

Meeting

Infl ation Projection

Other Publications

US PR + PC Yes, within twenty days

2 years ahead

ECB PR + PC No N.A.

Malaysia PR No One Year Outlook and Policy (annual)

Singapore PR No One year Macroeconomic Review (twice a year)

Russia PR No N.A. Guidelines for Single State Monetary Policy, Monetary Policy Report

China PR No One year Quarterly Monetary Policy Report

PR: Press Release; PC: Press Conference. Source: Website of Central Banks.

Page 20: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

102

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

/C

entr

al B

ank

Dec

isio

n m

akin

g by

Poli

cy

obje

ctiv

eM

onet

ary

poli

cy t

arge

tK

ey p

olic

y ra

teSt

andi

ng

Faci

lity

Rese

rve

requ

irem

ents

Mar

ket

oper

atio

ns

Uni

ted

Stat

es(F

eder

al

Rese

rve

Syst

em)

Fede

ral

Ope

n M

arke

t C

omm

itte

e

Prom

ote

pric

e st

abili

ty a

nd

max

imum

su

stai

nabl

e em

ploy

men

t

Max

imum

em

ploy

men

t an

d 2

per

cent

in

fl ati

on*

Unc

olla

tera

lised

in

terb

ank

rate

Prim

ary

Cre

dit

Faci

lity.

N

o D

epos

it

faci

lity*

*

Yes

Yes

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

(Ban

k of

En

glan

d)

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Com

mit

tee

To m

aint

ain

pric

e st

abili

ty

and

to s

uppo

rt

the

obje

ctiv

es

for

grow

th a

nd

empl

oym

ent

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

The

offi c

ial B

ank

Rat

e pa

id o

n co

mm

erci

al b

ank

rese

rves

Yes

No

Yes

Braz

il(C

entr

al B

ank

of B

razi

l)

Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Com

mit

tee

Ach

ieve

men

t of

in

fl ati

on t

arge

ts

set

by t

he

Gov

ernm

ent

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

Inte

rest

rat

e on

ove

rnig

ht

inte

rban

k lo

ans

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can

ada

(Ban

k of

C

anad

a)

Gov

erni

ng

Cou

ncil

Con

trib

utin

g to

sus

tain

ed

econ

omic

gr

owth

, ris

ing

leve

ls o

f em

ploy

men

t an

d im

prov

ed

livin

g st

anda

rds

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

Inte

rest

rat

e on

co

llate

raliz

ed

mar

ket-b

ased

ov

erni

ght

tran

sact

ions

Yes

No

Yes

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.1

: Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Fra

mew

ork

- Int

erna

tion

al E

xper

ienc

e

*: I

n it

s re

cent

pol

icy

anno

unce

men

ts,

the

Fed

has

indi

cate

d th

at t

heir

ass

essm

ent

sugg

ests

tha

t it

will

be

appr

opri

ate

to m

aint

ain

the

curr

ent

targ

et r

ange

for

the

Fed

eral

Fun

ds r

ate

wel

l pa

st t

he t

ime

that

the

une

mpl

oym

ent

rate

dec

lines

bel

ow 6

.5 p

er c

ent,

esp

ecia

lly i

f pr

ojec

ted

infl a

tion

con

tinu

es t

o ru

n be

low

the

com

mit

tee’

s 2

per

cent

long

er-r

un g

oal.

** In

200

8, t

he F

ed s

tart

ed p

ayin

g in

tere

st o

n re

quir

ed a

nd e

xces

s re

serv

es, t

o av

oid

dow

nwar

d pr

essu

res

on t

he F

ed F

unds

rat

e.

(Con

td...

)

Page 21: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

103

Cou

ntry

/C

entr

al B

ank

Dec

isio

n m

akin

g by

Poli

cy

obje

ctiv

eM

onet

ary

poli

cy t

arge

tK

ey p

olic

y ra

teSt

andi

ng

Faci

lity

Rese

rve

requ

irem

ents

Mar

ket

oper

atio

ns

Euro

are

a(E

urop

ean

Syst

em o

f C

entr

al B

anks

)

Gov

erni

ng

Cou

ncil

To m

aint

ain

pric

e st

abili

tyIn

fl ati

on b

elow

bu

t cl

ose

to

2 pe

r ce

nt o

ver

med

ium

-term

Min

imum

bid

ra

te in

mai

n re

fi nan

cing

op

erat

ions

Yes

Yes

Yes

Aust

ralia

(Res

erve

Ban

k of

Aus

tral

ia)

Rese

rve

Bank

Bo

ard

Ach

ieve

men

t of

in

fl ati

on t

arge

tA

n in

fl ati

on

targ

etin

g fr

amew

ork

Targ

et c

ash

rate

Yes

No

Yes

Japa

n(B

ank

of Ja

pan)

The

Polic

y Bo

ard

Mul

tipl

e ob

ject

ives

2 pe

r ce

nt

infl a

tion

Unc

olla

tera

lized

ov

erni

ght

call

rate

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sing

apor

e (M

onet

ary

Auth

orit

y of

Si

ngap

ore)

Mon

etar

y an

d In

vest

men

t Po

licy

Pric

e st

abili

ty

for

sust

aina

ble

econ

omic

gr

owth

Pric

e st

abili

ty

for

sust

aina

ble

econ

omic

gr

owth

Exch

ange

rat

eYe

sYe

sEx

chan

ge

inte

rven

tion

Mex

ico

(Ban

k of

M

exic

o)

Boar

d of

G

over

nors

Ach

ieve

men

t of

pr

ice

stab

ility

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

Targ

et f

or t

he

inte

rban

k ov

erni

ght

fund

ing

rate

Yes

No

Yes

Swit

zerl

and

(Sw

iss

Nat

iona

l Ba

nk)

Gov

erni

ng

Boar

dPr

ice

stab

ility

Pric

e st

abili

tyC

HF

3-m

onth

Li

bor

Yes

Yes

Yes

Swed

en(R

iksb

ank)

Exec

utiv

e Bo

ard

Mai

ntai

n pr

ice

stab

ility

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

Repo

rat

eYe

sN

oYe

s

Kor

ea(B

ank

of K

orea

)M

onet

ary

Polic

y C

omm

itte

ePr

ice

stab

ility

An

infl a

tion

ta

rget

ing

fram

ewor

k

The

Bank

of

Kor

ea B

ase

Rat

eYe

sYe

sYe

s

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.1

: Mon

etar

y Po

licy

Fra

mew

ork

- Int

erna

tion

al E

xper

ienc

e (C

oncl

d.)

Page 22: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

104

Appendix Tables

Coun

try

Bank

Res

erve

Stan

ding

Fac

ility

Mai

n Li

quid

ity

Ope

rati

onO

ther

dis

cret

iona

ryCo

unte

r par

ty

Req.

Avg.

Loan

Dep

osit

Teno

rIn

stru

men

t(s)

Teno

rFr

eq.

Inst

rum

ent

Teno

rCo

llate

ral

Lend

ing

Ope

rati

ons

Aust

ralia

N–

YY

Ove

rnig

htRe

po/

Rev.

repo

1 da

y to

12

m

onth

s

daily

Out

right

/ Fx

-Sw

ap /

term

dep

osit

1 da

y to

3

mon

thdi

scre

tion

Wid

e

Braz

ilY

YY

YTw

o D

ays

Repo

/Re

v. re

po1-

30 d

ays

daily

Out

right

ope

ratio

n;

non-

stan

dard

ized

, no

n-re

gula

r

no d

iscr

etio

n

Cana

daN

–Y

YO

vern

ight

OM

O /

Intr

aday

thro

ugh

spec

ial p

urch

ase

and

Resa

le

daily

colla

tera

l inc

lude

s U

S tr

easu

ry b

ills,

no

tes

and

bond

s,

list o

f tre

asur

e w

ere

expa

nded

dur

ing

the

cris

is

OM

O fo

r PD

s, S

F fo

r Pay

men

t and

se

ttle

men

t sys

tem

pa

rtic

ipan

ts

Euro

Are

aY

YY

YO

vern

ight

Colla

tera

lized

cr

edit

varia

ble

wee

kly/

mon

thly

OM

O a

nd In

trad

ay

cred

itth

e Go

vern

ing

coun

cil h

as th

e di

scre

tion

to e

xpan

d

Wid

e in

term

s of

bot

h ty

pe a

nd

part

icip

ants

Hon

g Ko

ng

SAR

N–

YO

vern

ight

Two

way

con

vert

ibili

ty u

nder

taki

ngal

l exc

hang

e fu

nd

bill

and

note

s,

exte

nded

to u

se U

S Tr

easu

ries

und

er

disc

ount

win

dow

Japa

nY

YY

YFi

xed

Term

Repo

(s

hort

run)

over

nigh

t to

1 y

ear

2-3

times

a

day

OM

OJa

pan

Gove

rnm

ent

Bond

s / C

Ps; L

aw

gene

rally

lim

its

expa

ndin

g co

llate

ral

Wid

e bu

t var

ies

with

fa

cilit

ies

Kore

aY

YY

YO

vern

ight

Repo

/Rev

. re

po (i

ssue

r / r

edem

ptio

n of

mon

ey

stab

ilisa

tion

bond

s)

7 da

ysw

eekl

yAd

ditio

nal

repo

s1-

3 da

ysBa

nk o

f Kor

ea a

ct

give

s th

e ba

nk

disc

retio

n to

ext

end

loan

aga

inst

the

colla

tera

l of a

ny

asse

t.

Nar

row

for O

MO

, w

ide

for S

F

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.2

: Sta

ndin

g Fa

cili

ties

, Mai

n Li

quid

ity

Ope

rati

ons

and

Oth

er D

iscr

etio

nary

Ope

rati

ons

of S

ome

Maj

or C

entr

al B

anks

– : N

ot a

pplic

able

.(C

ontd

...)

Page 23: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

105

Coun

try

Bank

Res

erve

Stan

ding

Fac

ility

Mai

n Li

quid

ity

Ope

rati

onO

ther

dis

cret

iona

ryCo

unte

r par

ty

Req.

Avg.

Loan

Dep

osit

Teno

rIn

stru

men

t(s)

Teno

rFr

eq.

Inst

rum

ent

Teno

rCo

llate

ral

Lend

ing

Ope

rati

ons

Mex

ico

NY

YO

vern

ight

Ope

n m

arke

t op

erat

ion

1-25

day

sda

ilyLo

ng te

rm s

teril

isat

ion

of e

xces

s liq

uidi

ty/

spor

adic

use

of

com

puls

ory

depo

sit

cent

ral b

ank

has

the

disc

retio

n to

ex

pand

oth

er ty

pe o

f co

llate

rals

OM

O fo

r all

loca

l ba

nks,

SF

for p

riva

te

sect

or b

anks

onl

y

Sing

apor

eY

YY

YO

vern

ight

Exch

ange

rate

in

terv

entio

nFS

- spo

tdi

scre

-tio

nary

Repo

/ Fx

-sw

ap

dire

ct le

ndin

g / b

orro

win

g

Up

to 1

ye

arM

AS h

as th

e di

scre

tion

to e

xpan

d co

llate

ral

PD o

nly

for O

MO

, al

l RTG

S pa

rtic

ipan

ts fo

r SF

Swed

enN

YY

Ove

rnig

htRe

po /

Riks

bank

cert

ifi ca

te

1 w

eek

loan

/ de

posi

tO

ver-

nigh

tAc

t allo

ws

expa

nsio

n of

col

late

ral

Wid

e

Switz

erla

ndY

YY

Ove

rnig

htO

pen

mar

ket

oper

atio

n /r

epo

/SN

B Bi

lls

Mos

tly

one

wee

kda

ilyIn

ject

ion

/ab

sorp

tion

thro

ugh

auct

ions

Mos

tly

over

-ni

ght

SNB

has

disc

retio

n on

col

late

ral

Wid

e in

term

s of

type

UK

Volu

ntar

yY

YO

vern

ight

Shor

t ter

m (fi

xed

rate

) lon

g te

rm (v

aria

ble

rate

repo

op

erat

ion)

wee

kly

/ m

onth

lySt

erlin

g Fi

nanc

ing

thro

ugh

OM

Obr

oad

base

d se

curi

ty

for d

isco

unt w

indo

wVa

ries

with

faci

lity-

bank

s fo

r liq

uidi

ty

USA

YY

Prim

ary

Cred

itGe

nera

lly

Ove

rnig

htre

poup

to 6

5 da

ysda

ily /

wee

kly

OM

Ova

riabl

eU

nder

exc

eptio

nal

situ

atio

nPD

s on

ly O

MO

s;

wid

e fo

r SF

Sour

ce:

BIS

Mar

kets

Com

mitt

ee s

ever

al p

ublic

atio

ns,

web

-site

s of

cen

tral

ban

ks,

Nar

row

=re

stric

ted

for

sele

ct f

ew i

nstit

utio

ns (

wid

e ot

herw

ise)

; Y=

yes,

N=

No,

PD

=pr

imar

y de

aler

s, S

F =

Stan

ding

liqu

idity

faci

lity.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.2

: Cro

ss C

ount

ry S

tand

ing

Faci

liti

es, M

ain

Liqu

idit

y O

pera

tion

s an

d O

ther

Dis

cret

iona

ry O

pera

tion

s (C

oncl

d.)

Page 24: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

106

Appendix Tables

Dep

osit

Rat

es*

Lend

ing

Rate

Savi

ng D

epos

itTe

rm D

epos

it

Effe

ctiv

e fr

omRe

stri

ctio

ns a

nd

Regu

lati

ons

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

ed

July

1,

1977

3 pe

r ce

nt (c

hequ

eble

de

posi

ts) a

nd 5

per

ce

nt (n

on- c

hequ

eabl

e)

Apr

. 198

5Ba

nks

wer

e al

low

ed t

o se

t in

tere

st

rate

s fo

r mat

urit

ies

betw

een

15 d

ays

and

up to

1 y

ear,

sub

ject

to a

cei

ling

of 8

per

cen

t.

Mar

ch

1981

A b

road

fra

mew

ork

of in

tere

st r

ates

w

as p

rovi

ded

wit

h fi

xed

rat

es o

n ce

rtai

n ty

pes

of a

dvan

ces

and

ceili

ng

rate

on

othe

r ty

pes

of a

dvan

ces.

Mar

ch 2

, 19

784.

5 pe

r ce

nt, u

nifo

rmly

May

198

5Fr

eed

om

to

set

in

tere

st r

ates

ac

cord

ed

in

A

pri

l 1

96

5

was

w

ithd

raw

n.

Oct

ober

19

88Fi

xed

rate

sti

pula

tion

s co

nve

rted

in

to fl

oor r

ates

wit

h op

tion

to b

anks

to

rai

se t

he r

ates

.

Apr

il 24

,199

26.

0 pe

r ce

ntO

ct. 1

989

Dom

esti

c sh

ort

term

dep

osit

s of

m

atur

ity

46 d

ays

to 9

0 da

ys a

nd 9

0 da

ys t

o on

e ye

ar m

erge

d to

geth

er

wit

h un

ifor

m i

nter

est

rate

pay

able

, ef

fect

ive

Oct

ober

11,

198

9.

Sept

embe

r 19

90D

isco

nti

nua

tion

of

sect

or-s

peci

fic

and

prog

ram

me-

spec

ifi c

inte

rest

rate

st

ipul

atio

ns, b

arri

ng a

few

are

as li

ke

agri

cult

ure

, sm

all

ind

ust

ries

, di

ffer

enti

al r

ate

of i

nte

rest

(D

RI)

sche

me

and

expo

rt c

redi

t. L

inki

ng

inte

rest

rat

e to

the

siz

e of

the

loa

n (o

ver `2

lakh

) was

intr

oduc

ed.

July

1,1

993

5.0

per

cent

Apr

. 199

2Re

plac

emen

t of m

atur

ity-

wis

e ce

iling

ra

tes

by a

sin

gle

ceili

ng ra

te o

f 13

per

cent

on

all d

epos

its

abov

e 46

day

s.

Apr

il 19

92Th

e in

tere

st r

ates

of

SCBs

(ex

cept

D

RI a

dvan

ces a

nd e

xpor

t cre

dit)

wer

e ra

tion

aliz

ed b

y br

ingi

ng th

e si

x sl

abs

of a

dvan

ces

to f

our

slab

s ac

cord

ing

to s

ize

of c

redi

t.

Nov

embe

r 1,

199

44.

5 pe

r ce

ntN

ov. 1

994

Cei

ling

rate

was

bro

ught

dow

n to

10

per

cent

.A

pril

1993

Le

nd

ing

rate

s w

ere

fu

rth

er

rati

onal

ized

as

the

num

ber

of s

labs

w

as b

rou

ght

do

wn

fro

m f

ou

r ca

tego

ries

to

thre

e ca

tego

ries

by

mer

ging

the

fi rs

t tw

o sl

abs.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.3

: Der

egul

atio

n of

Inte

rest

Rat

es in

Indi

a

(Con

td...

)

Page 25: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

107

Dep

osit

Rat

es*

Lend

ing

Rate

Savi

ng D

epos

itTe

rm D

epos

it

Effe

ctiv

e fr

omRe

stri

ctio

ns a

nd

Regu

lati

ons

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

ed

Apr

il 1,

20

004.

0 pe

r ce

ntA

pr. 1

995

Cei

ling

rate

rai

sed

to 1

2 pe

r ce

nt.

Oct

ober

19

94Le

ndin

g ra

tes

for c

redi

t lim

it o

f ove

r `2

lak

h w

ere

dere

gula

ted.

Ban

ks

wer

e re

quir

ed to

dec

lare

thei

r Pri

me

Lend

ing

Rat

es (P

LRs)

.

Mar

ch 1

, 20

03 3

.5 p

er c

ent

Oct

. 199

5In

tere

st r

ates

on

dep

osit

s w

ith

mat

uri

ty o

f ov

er t

wo

year

s w

ere

free

d.

Oct

ober

19

95In

tere

st r

ate

on a

dvan

ces

agai

nst

te

rm d

epos

its

of `

2 la

kh a

nd a

bove

fo

r bot

h do

mes

tic

and

NRE

dep

osit

s w

ere

dere

gula

ted.

May

3,

2011

4.0

per

cent

Jul.

1996

Free

dom

to s

et ra

tes

for t

erm

dep

osit

ab

ove

one

year

mat

urit

y. M

inim

um

peri

od o

f ter

m d

epos

it b

roug

ht d

own

from

46

days

to

30 d

ays.

For

th

e m

atur

ity

buck

et o

f 30

days

to 1

yea

r,

bank

s co

uld

fi x in

tere

st ra

tes

subj

ect

to a

cei

ling.

Febr

uary

19

97Ba

nks

allo

wed

to p

resc

ribe

PLR

s an

d sp

read

s se

para

tely

for l

oan

and

cash

cr

edit

com

pone

nts

of lo

ans.

Oct

25,

20

11D

ereg

ulat

ion

subj

ect

to

cond

itio

ns.

Apr

. 199

7C

eili

ng

inte

rest

rat

e on

dom

esti

c te

rm d

epos

its

of m

atur

ity

of 3

0 da

ys

and

up to

1 y

ear

was

link

ed to

Ban

k R

ate

Oct

ober

19

97Fo

r te

rm lo

ans

of 3

yea

rs a

nd a

bove

, se

para

te P

rim

e Te

rm L

endi

ng R

ates

(P

TL

Rs)

wer

e re

qu

ired

to

be

anno

unce

d by

ban

ks.

Oct

.199

7Te

rm d

epo

sit

rate

s w

ere

full

y de

regu

late

d.A

pril

1998

PLR

conv

erte

d as

a c

eilin

g ra

te o

n lo

ans

up t

o `2

lakh

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.3

: Der

egul

atio

n of

Inte

rest

Rat

es in

Indi

a (C

ontd

.)

Page 26: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

108

Appendix Tables

Dep

osit

Rat

es*

Lend

ing

Rate

Savi

ng D

epos

itTe

rm D

epos

it

Effe

ctiv

e fr

omRe

stri

ctio

ns a

nd

Regu

lati

ons

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

edM

onth

&

Year

Res

tric

tio

ns

and

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Pres

crib

ed

Apr

.199

8Fr

eedo

m to

off

er d

iffe

rent

ial i

nter

est

rate

for b

ulk

depo

sits

of ̀

15 la

kh a

nd

abov

e. F

reed

om t

o se

t ow

n p

enal

in

tere

st r

ates

on

pre

mat

ure

w

ith

dra

wal

of

do

mes

tic

term

d

epo

sits

. M

inim

um

per

iod

of

mat

urit

y of

ter

m d

epos

its

redu

ced

from

30

days

to

15 d

ays.

Apr

il 19

99Ba

nks

wer

e pr

ovid

ed f

reed

om t

o op

erat

e te

nor

linke

d PL

R.

Apr

. 200

1M

inim

um m

atur

ity

peri

od o

f 15

days

re

duce

d to

7 d

ays

for

wh

oles

ale

depo

sits

of `1

5 la

kh a

nd a

bove

.

Oct

ober

19

99Fl

exib

ility

to

char

ge i

nte

rest

rat

es

wit

hou

t re

fere

nce

to

the

PLR

on

cert

ain

cate

gori

es o

f lo

ans/

cred

it.

Nov

. 200

4M

inim

um m

atur

ity

peri

od o

f 15

days

re

duce

d to

7 d

ays

for

all d

epos

its.

Apr

il 20

00B

anks

all

owed

to

char

ge f

ixed

/fl

oati

ng

rate

on

th

eir

len

din

g fo

r cr

edit

lim

it o

f ov

er `

2 la

kh.

Jan.

2013

Ban

ks w

ere

per

mit

ted

to

offe

r di

ffer

enti

al d

epos

it r

ates

for

bul

k de

posi

ts o

f `1

cro

re a

nd a

bove

.

Apr

il 20

01C

omm

erci

al b

anks

allo

wed

to

lend

at

sub

-PLR

rat

e fo

r lo

ans

abov

e `2

la

kh.

Apr

il 20

03Te

nor l

inke

d PL

R sy

stem

repl

aced

by

Ben

chm

ark

Prim

e Le

nd

ing

Rat

e (B

PLR)

.

July

201

0In

trod

ucti

on o

f Ba

se R

ate

Syst

em,

wh

ich

ser

ves

as t

he

fl oor

rat

e fo

r al

mos

t al

l typ

es o

f ad

vanc

es.

*: T

he r

egul

atio

n th

at n

o in

tere

st m

ay b

e pa

id o

n cu

rren

t de

posi

ts c

onti

nues

till

dat

e.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

III.3

: Der

egul

atio

n of

Inte

rest

Rat

es in

Indi

a (C

oncl

d.)

Page 27: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

109

Appendix Table III.4: Money Demand Estimates

M3 defl ated by GDP defl atorRolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), call rate (i) with 15-year window

start end lrgdp t-stat Call Rate t-stat Constant t-stat

1 1991 2005 1.57 18.5 0.00 0.3 -10.75 -12.32 1992 2006 1.58 21.7 0.00 0.3 -10.85 -14.43 1993 2007 1.57 28.1 0.00 -0.4 -10.79 -18.54 1994 2008 1.58 35.4 -0.01 -1.2 -10.80 -23.15 1995 2009 1.59 35.7 0.00 -0.9 -10.94 -23.16 1996 2010 1.60 35.1 0.00 -0.6 -11.05 -22.77 1997 2011 1.52 29.3 -0.01 -1.2 -10.23 -17.88 1998 2012 1.44 34.6 -0.02 -2.6 -9.34 -20.59 1999 2013 1.40 37.2 -0.02 -3.1 -8.89 -21.9

M3 defl ated by WPI IndexRolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), call rate (i) with 15-year window

start end lrgdp t-stat Call Rate t-stat Constant t-stat

1 1991 2005 1.59 23.1 0.00 0.1 -10.94 -15.42 1992 2006 1.58 26.6 0.00 0.0 -10.83 -17.63 1993 2007 1.56 36.1 0.00 -1.2 -10.61 -23.54 1994 2008 1.56 44.9 -0.01 -2.0 -10.59 -29.05 1995 2009 1.56 44.0 -0.01 -1.8 -10.61 -28.16 1996 2010 1.55 40.4 -0.01 -1.6 -10.55 -25.67 1997 2011 1.51 34.4 -0.01 -1.0 -10.05 -20.78 1998 2012 1.42 45.3 -0.02 -2.9 -9.13 -26.69 1999 2013 1.39 49.7 -0.02 -3.5 -8.73 -29.1

M3 defl ated by GDP defl atorRolling Reg Output: Log(real money) , log(rgdp), WALR with 15-year window

start end lrgdp t-stat WALR t-stat Constant t-stat

1 1991 2005 1.54 31.5 0.00 -1.0 -10.44 -21.62 1992 2006 1.15 16.1 -0.07 -6.1 -5.60 -6.53 1993 2007 1.18 14.6 -0.06 -5.3 -5.89 -6.04 1994 2008 1.30 16.8 -0.05 -4.2 -7.28 -7.75 1995 2009 1.32 17.1 -0.05 -4.0 -7.54 -8.06 1996 2010 1.33 13.5 -0.04 -3.0 -7.74 -6.47 1997 2011 1.23 14.9 -0.06 -4.4 -6.45 -6.38 1998 2012 1.24 22.7 -0.06 -5.2 -6.63 -9.59 1999 2013 1.22 26.4 -0.06 -5.5 -6.34 -10.5

WALR: Weighted Avereage Lending Rate.

Page 28: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

110

Appendix Tables

Appendix Table III.5: Access to Liquidity Under Refi nance Facilities

15-Apr-1997 A general refi nance facility was introduced effective from April 26, 1997 under which all SCBs (expect RRBs) were provided General Refi nance equivalent to 1 per cent of each bank's forthightly average outstanding aggregate deposits in 1996-97 in two blocks of 4 weeks each at Bank rate for the fi rst block of 4 weeks and Bank rate plus one percentage point for second block of 4 weeks.

15-Apr-1997 From April 26, 1997 the base level ECR limit at 20 per cent of export credit as on Feb. 16, 1996 was withdrawn and SCBs were provided ECR only to the extent of 100 per cent of the increase in outstanding export credit eligible for refi nance over the level of such credit as on Feb. 16, 1996. Interest rate was retained at 11 per cent (i.e., the Bank Rate).

16-Jan-1998 Effective from Jan 17, 1998 the ECR limit was lowered to 50 per cent of the increase in outstanding export credit eligible for refi nance over the level of such credit as on Feb. 16, 1996, in order to reduce the access to liquidity in the context of measures announced relating to foreign exchange market.

16-Jan-1998 Access to General Refi nance Facility was reduced to equivalent to 0.25 per cent of forthightly average outstanding aggregate deposits in 1996-97.

15-Apr-1998 General Refi nance Facility was closed (effective from April 20, 1998).

29-Apr-1998 Export Credit Refi nance Limit was raised to 100 per cent (effective from May 9, 1998).

19-Apr-2001 With effect from May 5, 2001 SCBs were provided ECR to the extent of 15 per cent of the outstanding export credit eligible for refi nance as at the second preceding fortnight.

3-Nov-2008 A special refi nance facility was introduced under which all SCBs (excluding RRBs) were provided refi nance (which could be fl exibly drawn and repaid) from the Reserve Bank equivalent to up to 1.0 per cent of each bank’s NDTL as on October 24, 2008 at the LAF repo rate up to a maximum period of 90 days.

18-May-2004 ECR made available at the Reverse Repo Rate.

15-Nov-2008 Eligible limit for ECR facility increased from 15 per cent to 50 per cent of outstanding export credit eligible for refi nance.

6-Dec-2008 Refi nance facility of `7,000 crore was provided to SIDBI at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2010

11-Dec-2008 Refi nance facility of `4,000 crore was provided to the National Housing Bank at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2010

11-Dec-2008 Refi nance facility of `5,000 crore was provided to the EXIM Bank at the Repo Rate. This facility was available up to March 31, 2013.

27-Oct-2009 The special refi nance facility introduced on November 03, 2008 was closed.

27-Oct-2009 Eligible limit of ECR facility reduced from 50 per cent of the outstanding rupee export credit eligible for refi nance to 15 per cent.

18-Jun-2012 Export Credit Refi nance limit increased to 50 per cent from 15 per cent of eligible outstanding export credit.

14-Jan-2013 INR-USD swap facility with the Reserve Bank was provided to SCBs (except RRBs) to support incremental Pre-shipment export credit in foreign currency, with the option to access rupee refi nance to the extent of swap with the RBI under Special Export Credit Refi nance Facility (SECRF). The scheme was closed on June 28, 2013.

18-Nov-2013 Refi nance facility of `5,000 crore was provided to SIDBI . This refi nance facility is be available up to November 13, 2014.

Page 29: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

111

Appendix Table III.6: CPI-Combined (back-casted series*)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 55.5 55.4 55.7 56.1 56.5 57.1 57.8 58.2 58.0 58.6 59.0 58.8

2002 58.6 58.5 58.9 59.2 59.6 60.2 60.8 61.1 61.2 61.5 61.7 61.3

2003 61.2 61.4 61.8 62.7 62.8 63.0 63.5 63.1 63.2 63.7 63.8 63.7

2004 63.8 63.8 63.9 64.1 64.6 65.1 65.6 66.2 66.3 66.8 66.6 66.1

2005 66.6 66.6 66.6 67.1 66.7 66.8 67.9 68.1 68.2 68.8 69.5 69.2

2006 69.3 69.3 69.3 70.0 70.9 71.9 72.3 72.8 73.3 74.2 74.2 73.9

2007 73.9 74.1 74.1 74.8 75.2 75.8 76.9 77.2 77.3 77.9 78.0 78.0

2008 78.1 78.6 79.7 80.7 80.8 81.9 83.3 84.3 85.1 86.7 86.7 85.5

2009 85.9 85.8 86.1 87.0 87.9 88.9 92.0 92.9 93.6 94.6 96.5 96.7

2010 97.4 96.5 96.3 97.0 97.8 99.0 101.3 101.4 102.3 102.9 103.5 104.7

2011 105.9 105.3 105.6 106.2 107.1 108.8 110.5 111.7 113.0 113.8 114.1 113.6

2012 114.0 114.6 115.5 117.1 118.2 119.6 121.4 122.9 124.0 124.9 125.4 125.6

2013 126.3 127.1 127.5 128.1 129.2 131.4 133.1 134.6 136.2 137.5 139.5 138.0

*The new series of Consumer Price Index-Combined (CPI-C) (Base: 2010=100) is available on a monthly basis from January-2011. For the purpose of empirical analysis in this Report, back-casted data had to be generated, and the data presented here should not be seen as an offi cial price index. The back-casted series of CPI-C was generated by using the price indices of Consumer Price Index-Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) (Base: 2001=100) and applying the corresponding weighting diagram of CPI-C at sub-group level, with some minor adjustments.

Page 30: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

112

Appendix Tables

Cou

ntry

Key

Pol

icy

Rate

H

ikes

Key

Pol

icy

Rate

C

uts

Liqu

idit

yM

easu

res

FX

inte

rven

tion

FX s

wap

sC

apit

al

acco

unt

man

agem

ent

Mac

ro-

prud

enti

al

mea

sure

s

Indo

nesi

aR

ates

wer

e hi

ked

in s

ever

al

stag

es b

y 17

5 bp

s.

Ass

uran

ce t

o pr

ovid

e do

mes

tic

liqui

dity

.A

ssur

ance

to

pro

vide

do

mes

tic

liqui

dity

.

Yes

Als

o a

spec

ial

swap

line

wit

h Ba

nk o

f K

orea

.

Allo

wed

m

ore

min

eral

ex

port

s;

easi

ng o

f ho

ldin

g pe

riod

re

stri

ctio

ns

to a

ttra

ct

infl o

ws.

Bank

In

done

sia

Dep

osit

C

erti

fi cat

es

adde

d as

a

com

pone

nt

of S

econ

dary

St

atut

ory

Rese

rves

; LTV

on

pro

pert

y lo

ans

rais

ed.

Thai

land

Cut

ove

rnig

ht

repo

rat

e by

25

bps

to 2

.5%

on

May

29,

201

3.

Sout

h K

orea

Yes

Swap

line

w

ith

Bank

In

done

sia.

Turk

eyC

ut r

equi

red

rese

rve

rati

os o

n fo

rex

depo

sits

to

boos

t m

arke

t liq

uidi

ty.

Trie

d us

ing

fore

x in

terv

enti

on

for

mon

etar

y po

licy

goal

s,

but

this

cou

ld

not

cont

ain

infl a

tion

.

Dou

bled

th

e am

ount

of

res

erve

s th

at b

anks

ar

e al

low

ed

to k

eep

in f

orei

gn

curr

ency

.

Fore

x re

serv

e ra

tio

requ

irem

ent

was

in

crea

sed.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.1

: Mea

sure

s A

imed

at

Man

agin

g th

e Im

pact

of

Tape

r Ta

lk

(Con

td...

)

Page 31: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

113

Cou

ntry

Key

Pol

icy

Rate

H

ikes

Key

Pol

icy

Rate

C

uts

Liqu

idit

yM

easu

res

FX

inte

rven

tion

FX s

wap

sC

apit

al

acco

unt

man

agem

ent

Mac

ro-

prud

enti

al

mea

sure

s

Russ

iaU

nder

took

liqu

idit

y m

anag

emen

t re

form

s.

Intr

oduc

ed 1

-wee

k te

rm r

epos

as

the

mai

n in

stru

men

t. 1

-day

rep

o to

be

disc

onti

nued

fr

om F

eb.1

, 201

4. W

ill

star

t us

ing

1-6

day

repo

as

fi ne-

tuni

ng

oper

atio

ns. I

ntro

duce

d st

andi

ng f

acili

ty.

Braz

ilH

iked

Sel

ic r

ate

150

bps

from

8.

0% t

o 9.

5%

duri

ng M

ay-O

ct.

2013

. Ear

lier

it h

ad r

aise

d Se

lic r

ate

75 b

ps

duri

ng Ja

n-A

pril

2013

.

On

Aug.

24

US$

54 b

n In

terv

enti

on

Plan

an

noun

ced

afte

r 15

%

depr

ecia

tion

of

rea

l in

thre

e m

onth

s.

Incl

uded

w

eekl

y au

ctio

n of

U

S$1

bn d

olla

r lo

ans.

US$

0.5

bn o

f fo

rex

swap

s fo

ur d

ays

a w

eek.

Rea

l ap

prec

iate

d 7.

7% d

urin

g Se

pt-O

ct.

2013

aid

ed b

y in

terv

enti

on

plan

but

ra

ised

the

co

st o

f it

s co

ntin

uati

on.

How

ever

, on

Nov

. 8, t

he

cent

ral b

ank

anno

unce

d ro

llove

r of

sw

aps

thus

in

crea

sing

its

inte

rven

tion

.

Rela

xed

capi

tal

infl o

ws.

Sc

rapp

ed

the

6% IO

F on

for

eign

po

rtfo

lio

infl o

ws

into

fi x

ed in

com

e in

vest

men

ts.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.1

: Mea

sure

s A

imed

at

Man

agin

g th

e Im

pact

of

Tape

r Ta

lk (C

oncl

d.)

Page 32: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

114

Appendix Tables

Asi

an c

risi

s of

199

7-98

Rat

e M

easu

res

Incr

ease

in B

ank

Rat

e (t

o 11

per

cen

t) a

nd r

ever

se r

epo

rate

(to

9 pe

r ce

nt) b

y tw

o pe

rcen

tage

poi

nts

each

on

Janu

ary

16, 1

998.

Incr

ease

in in

tere

st r

ate

surc

harg

e on

ban

k cr

edit

for

impo

rts

to 3

0 pe

r ce

nt o

n Ja

nuar

y 16

, 199

8.

Hik

e in

the

inte

rest

rat

e on

pos

t-sh

ipm

ent

rupe

e ex

port

cre

dit

beyo

nd 9

0 da

ys a

nd u

p to

6 m

onth

s fr

om 1

3 pe

r ce

nt t

o 15

per

cen

t on

Nov

embe

r 26

, 199

7 (a

bri

ef p

erio

d of

sta

bilit

y in

end

-Dec

embe

r le

d to

wit

hdra

wal

of

the

hike

fro

m Ja

nuar

y 1,

199

8).

On

Dec

embe

r 17

, 199

7 it

was

sti

pula

ted

that

the

min

imum

inte

rest

rat

e of

20

per

cent

per

ann

um to

be

char

ged

on o

verd

ue e

xpor

t bi

lls. A

n in

tere

st r

ate

surc

harg

e of

15

per

cent

on

impo

rt c

redi

t w

as a

lso

anno

unce

d.

Qua

ntit

y M

easu

res

CRR

was

rai

sed

twic

e in

Dec

embe

r 19

97 (b

y 50

bps

to

10 p

er c

ent

and

the

incr

emen

tal 1

0 pe

r ce

nt C

RR o

n N

RE a

nd N

RNR

depo

sit

sche

mes

was

wit

hdra

wn)

and

Jan

uary

199

8 (b

y 50

bps

to

10.5

per

cen

t). T

his

was

inte

nded

to

abso

rb e

xces

s liq

uidi

ty a

nd r

emov

e th

e ar

bitr

age

on a

ccou

nt o

f lo

w r

ates

in t

he c

all m

oney

mar

ket

and

the

pote

ntia

l gai

ns in

the

for

eign

exc

hang

e m

arke

t.

Redu

ctio

n in

acc

ess

to r

efi n

ance

fac

iliti

es (g

ener

al r

efi n

ance

lim

it r

educ

ed f

rom

1.0

per

cen

t to

0.2

5 pe

r ce

nt o

f fo

rtni

ghtl

y av

erag

e ou

tsta

ndin

g ag

greg

ate

depo

sits

in

1996

-97

and

expo

rt r

efi n

ance

lim

it r

educ

ed f

rom

100

per

cen

t to

50

per

cent

of

the

incr

ease

in

outs

tand

ing

expo

rt c

redi

t ov

er F

ebru

ary

16, 1

996)

.

Glo

bal fi

nan

cial

cri

sis

of 2

008-

09

Rat

e M

easu

res

Cut

in t

he r

epo

rate

und

er t

he L

AF

by a

cum

ulat

ive

425

bps

from

9.0

per

cen

t to

4.7

5 pe

r ce

nt.

Cut

in t

he r

ever

se r

epo

rate

by

a cu

mul

ativ

e 27

5 bp

s fr

om 6

.0 p

er c

ent

to 3

.25

per

cent

.

The

ceili

ng r

ate

on e

xpor

t cr

edit

in f

orei

gn c

urre

ncy

incr

ease

d to

LIB

OR

plus

350

bps

.

Cum

ulat

ive

incr

ease

in th

e in

tere

st r

ate

ceili

ngs

on F

CN

R(B)

and

NR(

E)RA

term

dep

osit

s by

175

bps

eac

h si

nce

Sept

embe

r 16

, 200

8.

Qua

ntit

y M

easu

res

Cut

in t

he C

RR b

y a

cum

ulat

ive

400

bps

of N

DTL

fro

m 9

.0 p

er c

ent

to 5

.0 p

er c

ent.

Intr

oduc

tion

of a

spe

cial

refi

nan

ce fa

cilit

y up

to M

arch

31,

201

0 un

der

whi

ch a

ll SC

Bs (e

xclu

ding

RRB

s) p

rovi

ded

refi n

ance

from

the

Rese

rve

Bank

equ

ival

ent

to 1

.0 p

er c

ent

of e

ach

bank

’s N

DTL

as

on O

ctob

er 2

4, 2

008.

Term

rep

o fa

cilit

y un

der

the

LAF

to e

nabl

e ba

nks

to e

ase

liqui

dity

str

ess

face

d by

mut

ual

fund

s, N

BFC

s an

d ho

usin

g fi n

ance

co

mpa

nies

(HFC

s) w

ith

asso

ciat

ed S

LR e

xem

ptio

n of

1.5

per

cen

t of

ND

TL. T

his

faci

lity

is a

vaila

ble

up t

o M

arch

31,

201

0.

Redu

ctio

n in

sta

tuto

ry l

iqui

dity

rat

io (

SLR)

fro

m 2

5 pe

r ce

nt t

o 24

per

cen

t of

ND

TL w

ith

effe

ct f

rom

the

for

tnig

ht b

egin

ning

N

ovem

ber

8, 2

008.

Intr

oduc

tion

of

a m

echa

nism

to

buyb

ack

date

d se

curi

ties

issu

ed u

nder

the

MSS

.

Exte

nsio

n of

the

peri

od o

f ent

itle

men

t by

90 d

ays

of th

e fi r

st s

lab

of p

re-s

hipm

ent a

nd p

ost-

ship

men

t rup

ee e

xpor

t cre

dit w

ith

effe

ct

from

Nov

embe

r 15

, 200

8 an

d N

ovem

ber

28, 2

008,

res

pect

ivel

y.

Incr

ease

in

the

elig

ible

lim

it o

f th

e EC

R fa

cilit

y fo

r sc

hedu

led

bank

s (e

xclu

ding

RRB

s) f

rom

15

per

cent

to

50 p

er c

ent

of t

he

outs

tand

ing

expo

rt c

redi

t el

igib

le f

or r

efi n

ance

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.2

: Mon

etar

y M

easu

res

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Pres

sure

s

(Con

td...

)

Page 33: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

115

In o

rder

to

prov

ide

liqui

dity

sup

port

to

hous

ing,

exp

ort

and

MSE

sec

tors

, RBI

pro

vide

d a

refi n

ance

fac

ility

to

NH

B, E

XIM

Ban

k an

d SI

DBI

up

to M

arch

201

0.

Scop

e of

OM

O w

iden

ed b

y in

clud

ing

purc

hase

s of

gov

ernm

ent

secu

riti

es t

hrou

gh a

n au

ctio

n-ba

sed

mec

hani

sm.

Spec

ial m

arke

t op

erat

ions

to

mee

t th

e fo

reig

n ex

chan

ge r

equi

rem

ents

of

publ

ic s

ecto

r oi

l mar

keti

ng c

ompa

nies

aga

inst

oil

bond

s.

HFC

s re

gist

ered

wit

h th

e N

HB

wer

e al

low

ed t

o ra

ise

shor

t-ter

m f

orei

gn c

urre

ncy

borr

owin

gs u

nder

the

app

rova

l rou

te, s

ubje

ct t

o co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

prud

enti

al n

orm

s la

id d

own

by t

he N

HB.

AD

s al

low

ed to

bor

row

fund

s fr

om th

eir

head

offi

ce,

ove

rsea

s br

anch

es a

nd c

orre

spon

dent

s an

d ov

erdr

afts

in n

ostr

o ac

coun

ts u

p to

a

limit

of

50 p

er c

ent

of t

heir

uni

mpa

ired

Tie

r 1

capi

tal o

r U

S$ 1

0 m

illio

n, w

hich

ever

was

hig

her.

A fo

reig

n ex

chan

ge s

wap

faci

lity

wit

h te

nure

up

to th

ree

mon

ths

to In

dian

pub

lic a

nd p

riva

te s

ecto

r ban

ks h

avin

g ov

erse

as o

pera

tion

s in

ord

er t

o pr

ovid

e th

em fl

exib

ility

in m

anag

ing

thei

r sh

ort-t

erm

fun

ding

req

uire

men

ts a

t th

eir

over

seas

offi

ces

.

Syst

emic

ally

im

port

ant

non-

depo

sit

taki

ng N

BFC

s w

ere

perm

itte

d to

rai

se s

hort

-ter

m f

orei

gn c

urre

ncy

borr

owin

gs u

nder

the

ap

prov

al r

oute

, sub

ject

to

com

plia

nce

wit

h th

e pr

uden

tial

req

uire

men

ts o

f ca

pita

l ade

quac

y an

d ex

posu

re n

orm

s.

Exch

ange

mar

ket p

ress

ures

sin

ce M

ay 2

2 in

res

pons

e to

talk

of t

aper

ing

Rat

e M

easu

res

MSF

was

rai

sed

by 2

00 b

ps t

o 10

.25

per

cent

(rev

erse

d by

Oct

ober

29,

201

3).

Inte

rest

rat

e ce

iling

on

NRI

dep

osit

s of

3-5

yea

rs m

atur

ity

was

incr

ease

d by

100

bps

to

LIBO

R/SW

AP

plus

400

bps

.

The

ceili

ng o

n in

tere

st r

ate

on N

RE d

epos

its

rem

oved

.

Qua

ntit

y M

easu

res

Rest

rict

ion

on t

he o

vera

ll ac

cess

to

LAF

to 0

.5 p

er c

ent

of e

ach

bank

’s N

DTL

.

OM

O s

ales

of `2

5 bi

llion

.

CRR

, w

hich

ban

ks h

ad t

o m

aint

ain

on a

for

tnig

htly

ave

rage

bas

is s

ubje

ct t

o a

daily

min

imum

req

uire

men

t of

70

per

cent

, w

as

mod

ifi ed

req

uiri

ng b

anks

to

mai

ntai

n a

daily

min

imum

of

99 p

er c

ent

of t

he r

equi

rem

ent

(red

uced

late

r to

95

per

cent

).

Auct

ion

of C

MBs

on

a w

eekl

y ba

sis

of a

not

ifi ed

am

ount

of `2

20 b

illio

n fo

r a

few

wee

ks.

Wit

h ef

fect

fro

m f

ortn

ight

beg

inni

ng A

ugus

t 24

, 201

3, in

crem

enta

l FC

NR

(B)

and

NRE

dep

osit

s, o

f th

ree

year

and

abo

ve m

atur

ity,

w

ere

exem

pted

fro

m m

aint

enan

ce o

f C

RR a

nd S

LR. T

his

mea

sure

was

ann

ounc

ed to

giv

e im

petu

s to

ban

ks to

mop

up

NRI

dep

osit

s of

long

-term

mat

urit

y.

On

Augu

st 2

8, 2

013,

a f

orex

sw

ap w

indo

w w

as o

pene

d to

mee

t th

e en

tire

dai

ly d

olla

r re

quir

emen

ts o

f th

ree

publ

ic s

ecto

r oi

l m

arke

ting

com

pani

es.

On

Sept

embe

r 4

2013

, RB

I op

ened

a s

peci

al c

once

ssio

nal

win

dow

for

sw

appi

ng f

resh

FC

NR(

B) d

olla

r de

posi

ts,

mob

ilise

d fo

r a

min

imum

teno

r of

thre

e ye

ars

and

abov

e at

a fi

xed

rate

of

3.5

per

cent

per

ann

um f

or th

e te

nor

of th

e de

posi

t (up

to N

ovem

ber

30,

2013

).

The

exis

ting

ove

rsea

s bo

rrow

ing

limit

of

50 p

er c

ent

of t

he u

nim

pair

ed T

ier

I ca

pita

l w

as a

lso

rais

ed t

o 10

0 pe

r ce

nt a

nd t

he

borr

owin

gs m

obili

sed

coul

d be

sw

appe

d w

ith

RBI

at a

con

cess

iona

l rat

e of

100

bps

bel

ow t

he o

ngoi

ng s

wap

rat

e pr

evai

ling

in t

he

mar

ket

(up

to N

ovem

ber

30, 2

013)

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.2

: Mon

etar

y M

easu

res

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Pres

sure

s (C

oncl

d.)

Page 34: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

116

Appendix Tables

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.3

: Cou

nter

-Cyc

lica

l Pru

dent

ial R

egul

atio

n: V

aria

tion

s in

Ris

k W

eigh

ts a

nd P

rovi

sion

ing

Requ

irem

ents

Dat

eC

apit

al M

arke

tH

ousi

ngO

ther

Ret

ails

Com

mer

cial

Re

al E

stat

eN

on-D

epos

it t

akin

g Sy

stem

ical

ly

Impo

rtan

t N

on-B

anki

ng

Fina

ncia

l Com

pani

es

Risk

W

eigh

tPr

ovis

ions

(%

)Ri

sk

Wei

ght

Prov

isio

ns

(%)

Risk

W

eigh

tPr

ovis

ions

(%

)Ri

sk

Wei

ght

Prov

isio

ns

(%)

Risk

W

eigh

tPr

ovis

ions

(%

)

Dec

-200

410

00.

2575

0.25

125

0.25

100

0.25

100

0.25

Jul-2

005

125

0.25

750.

2512

50.

2512

50.

2510

00.

25N

ov-2

005

125

0.40

750.

4012

50.

4012

50.

4010

00.

40M

ay-2

006

125

1.00

751.

0012

51.

0015

01.

0010

00.

40Ja

n-20

0712

52.

0075

1.00

125

2.00

150

2.00

125

2.00

May

-200

712

52.

0050

-75

1.00

125

2.00

150

2.00

125

2.00

May

-200

812

52.

0050

-100

1.00

125

2.00

150

2.00

125

2.00

Nov

-200

812

50.

4050

-100

0.40

125

0.40

100

0.40

100

0.40

Nov

-200

912

50.

4050

-100

0.40

125

0.40

100

1.00

100

0.40

Dec

-201

012

50.

4050

-125

0.4-

2.0#

125

0.40

100

1.00

100

0.40

Jul-2

011

125

0.40

50-1

250.

4-2.

012

50.

4010

01.

0010

00.

40Ju

l-201

212

50.

4050

-125

0.4-

2.0

125

0.40

100

1.00

100

0.40

Jul-2

013

125

0.40

50-7

5*0.

4-2.

012

50.

4010

0@1.

0010

00.

40

* Th

e ri

sk w

eigh

ts f

or h

ousi

ng lo

ans

vary

acc

ordi

ng t

o am

ount

of

the

loan

and

the

loan

-to-v

alue

rat

io a

s be

low

.

# P

rovi

sion

ing

requ

irem

ent

for

hous

ing

loan

s w

ith

teas

er in

tere

st r

ates

was

incr

ease

d to

2.0

per

cen

t in

Dec

embe

r 20

10. I

t re

mai

ned

at t

wo

per

cent

till

on

e ye

ar a

fter

res

et o

f in

tere

st r

ate

to h

ighe

r ra

te a

nd t

here

afte

r it

was

0.4

per

cen

t. F

or o

ther

hou

sing

loan

s, t

he p

rovi

sion

ing

rem

aine

d at

0.4

per

cen

t.

@: A

s pe

r th

e D

BOD

Cir

cula

r N

o.D

BOD

.BP.

BC.N

o. 1

04 d

ated

June

21,

201

3, a

new

sub

sect

or c

alle

d 'C

omm

erci

al R

eal E

stat

e-Re

side

ntia

l Hou

sing

(CRE

-RH

)' ha

s be

en c

arve

d ou

t of

CRE

and

thi

s se

gmen

t at

trac

ts a

low

er r

isk

wei

ght

of 7

5 pe

r ce

nt a

nd lo

wer

sta

ndar

d as

set

prov

isio

ning

of

0.75

per

cen

t.

Page 35: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

117

Item

Aug

ust

1995

to

Mar

ch 1

996

(Mex

ican

Cri

sis)

Aug

ust

1997

- A

ugus

t 19

98 (E

ast

Asi

an C

risi

s)

Hig

h C

apit

al fl

ow

duri

ng 2

003-

04 t

o 20

07-0

8

Glo

bal C

risi

s:

2008

-09

Sinc

e M

ay 2

013

FCN

R (B

) &

NRE

Fore

ign

curr

ency

de

posi

ts li

ke

FCN

R(B)

and

N

R(N

R) R

D w

ere

exem

pted

fro

m

CRR

req

uire

men

ts.

Incr

ease

in in

tere

st

rate

s on

NRE

de

posi

ts.

Rem

oval

of

incr

emen

tal C

RR o

f 10

per

cen

t on

N

RERA

and

NR(

NR)

de

posi

ts.

Redu

ctio

n in

in

tere

st r

ate

ceili

ng

on F

CN

R(B)

and

N

R(E)

RA d

epos

its.

Incr

ease

in in

tere

st

rate

cei

ling

on

FRN

R (B

) and

NRE

de

posi

ts.

Sepa

rate

con

cess

iona

l sw

ap

win

dow

to

attr

act

FCN

R(B)

do

llar

fund

s.

Exem

ptio

n fr

om m

aint

enan

ce o

f C

RR

an

d SL

R o

n i

ncr

emen

tal

FCN

R (B

) de

posi

ts a

s al

so N

RE

depo

sits

wit

h re

fere

nce

to b

ase

date

of J

uly

26, 2

013,

and

hav

ing

mat

urit

y of

thre

e ye

ars a

nd a

bove

.

Der

egul

atio

n of

int

eres

t ra

te o

n N

RE d

epos

its.

Incr

ease

in

inte

rest

rat

e ce

iling

by

100

bps

to

LIBO

R/ S

WA

P pl

us

400

bps

on F

CN

R(B)

dep

osit

s of

m

atur

ity

3 to

5 y

ears

.

ECB

and

trad

e cr

edit

Rela

xati

on in

the

EC

B no

rms.

Incr

easi

ng t

he

exis

ting

lim

it f

or

prep

aym

ent

of

exte

rnal

co

mm

erci

al

borr

owin

gs (E

CBs

) w

itho

ut t

he R

BI’s

ap

prov

al f

rom

U

S$ 4

00 m

illio

n to

U

S$ 5

00 m

illio

n,

subj

ect

to

com

plia

nce

wit

h th

e m

inim

um

Rela

xati

on in

EC

B po

licy

in t

erm

s of

up

war

d re

visi

on in

al

l-in-

cost

cei

ling,

el

igib

le b

orro

wer

s an

d en

d us

e.

ECB

allo

wed

for

re

paym

ent

of

outs

tand

ing

rupe

e

loan

tow

ards

ca

pita

l ex

pend

itur

e, u

nder

ap

prov

al r

oute

.

Expa

nsio

n of

elig

ible

end

use

of

ECB

to in

clud

e im

port

of

serv

ices

, tec

hnic

al k

now

-how

an

d pa

ymen

t of

lice

nse

fees

as

part

of

impo

rt o

f ca

pita

l goo

ds,

subj

ect

to c

erta

in c

ondi

tion

s.

Avai

lmen

t of

EC

B fo

r w

orki

ng

capi

tal f

or c

ivil

avia

tion

sec

tor.

Exte

nsio

n of

sch

eme

for

Buyb

ack

/ Pre

paym

ent

of F

CC

Bs

unde

r th

e ap

prov

al r

oute

, up

to

Dec

embe

r 31

,201

3.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.4

: Cap

ital

Con

trol

Mea

sure

s Ta

ken

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Vol

atil

ity

(Con

td...

)

Page 36: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

118

Appendix Tables

Item

Aug

ust

1995

to

Mar

ch 1

996

(Mex

ican

Cri

sis)

Aug

ust

1997

- A

ugus

t 19

98 (E

ast

Asi

an C

risi

s)

Hig

h C

apit

al fl

ow

duri

ng 2

003-

04 t

o 20

07-0

8

Glo

bal C

risi

s:

2008

-09

Sinc

e M

ay 2

013

aver

age

mat

urit

y pe

riod

.In

trod

ucti

on o

f Fo

reig

n C

urre

ncy

Exch

ange

able

bo

nds.

All-

in-c

ost

ceili

ng

for

trad

e cr

edit

s w

ith

mat

urit

y up

to

one

yea

r an

d be

twee

n on

e an

d th

ree

year

s ha

s be

en r

evis

ed t

o 35

0 bp

s ab

ove

6-m

onth

LIB

OR

.

Avai

lmen

t of

EC

B fo

r fi n

anci

ng

3G s

pect

rum

out

stan

ding

rup

ee

loan

.

Avai

lam

ent

of E

CB

by N

BFC

- A

sses

Fin

ance

com

pani

es.

ECB

rais

ed u

nder

the

app

rova

l ro

ute

from

for

eign

equ

ity

hold

er c

ompa

ny w

ith

min

imum

av

erag

e m

atur

ity

of s

even

yea

rs

allo

wed

to

use

for

gene

ral

corp

orat

e pu

rpos

es, s

ubje

ct t

o th

e ce

rtai

n co

ndit

ions

.

FII

Ban

on u

se o

f Pr

omis

sory

Not

es.

Lock

-in p

erio

d of

lo

ng t

erm

in

fras

truc

ture

bo

nds

for

FIIs

was

re

duce

d to

one

ye

ar.

Cei

ling

for

FIIs

in

vest

men

t in

G

-sec

and

co

rpor

ate

bond

s ra

ised

by

US$

5

billi

on e

ach

to U

S$

20 b

illio

n an

d U

S$

45 b

illio

n re

spec

tive

ly.

Enha

nce

the

limit

for

for

eign

in

vest

men

t in

Gov

ernm

ent

date

d se

curi

ties

by

US$

5 b

illio

n to

US$

30

billi

on. E

nhan

ced

limit

is a

vaila

ble

only

for

long

te

rm in

vest

ors

regi

ster

ed w

ith

SEBI

(Sov

erei

gn W

ealt

h Fu

nds

(SW

Fs),

Mul

tila

tera

l Age

ncie

s,

Pens

ion/

Insu

ranc

e/

Endo

wm

ent

Fund

s, F

orei

gn

Cen

tral

Ban

ks).

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.4

: Cap

ital

Con

trol

Mea

sure

s Ta

ken

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Vol

atil

ity

(Con

td.)

Page 37: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

119

Item

Aug

ust

1995

to

Mar

ch 1

996

(Mex

ican

Cri

sis)

Aug

ust

1997

- A

ugus

t 19

98 (E

ast

Asi

an C

risi

s)

Hig

h C

apit

al fl

ow

duri

ng 2

003-

04 t

o 20

07-0

8

Glo

bal C

risi

s:

2008

-09

Sinc

e M

ay 2

013

Oth

ers

Floa

ting

of

Resu

rgen

t In

dia

Bond

s.

Ban

on u

se o

f of

fsho

re d

eriv

ativ

e pr

oduc

ts.

Ban

on o

vers

eas

indi

vidu

al t

o pa

rtic

ipat

e in

In

dian

sto

ck

mar

ket.

Rupe

e D

olla

r Sw

ap

Faci

lity.

To c

onve

rt 1

0 pe

r ce

nt o

f th

e ba

lanc

es in

the

EE

FC a

ccou

nts.

Qua

lifi e

d Fo

reig

n In

vest

ors

(QFI

s)

allo

wed

to

inve

st

in m

utua

l fun

ds.

Broa

deni

ng o

f in

vest

or b

ase

for

G-s

ec t

o in

clud

e So

vere

ign

Wea

lth

Fund

s, in

sura

nce

fund

s an

d pe

nsio

n fu

nds.

Incr

ease

d in

ov

erse

as b

orro

win

g lim

its

for

bank

s fr

om 2

5 pe

r ce

nt t

o 50

per

cen

t of

Ti

er-I

capi

tal o

r U

S$ 1

0 m

illio

n,

whi

chev

er is

hi

gher

.

Incr

ease

in o

vers

eas

borr

owin

g lim

its

for

bank

s fr

om 5

0 pe

r ce

nt t

o 10

0 pe

r ce

nt o

f Ti

er-I

capi

tal.

Incr

ease

in o

vers

eas

borr

owin

g lim

its

for

bank

s fr

om 5

0 pe

r ce

nt t

o 10

0 pe

r ce

nt o

f Ti

er-I

capi

tal o

r U

S$ 1

0 m

illio

n,

whi

chev

er is

hig

her.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.4

: Cap

ital

Con

trol

Mea

sure

s Ta

ken

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Vol

atil

ity

(Con

td.)

Page 38: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

120

Appendix Tables

Item

Aug

ust

1995

to

Mar

ch 1

996

(Mex

ican

Cri

sis)

Aug

ust

1997

- A

ugus

t 19

98 (E

ast

Asi

an C

risi

s)

Hig

h C

apit

al fl

ow

duri

ng 2

003-

04 t

o 20

07-0

8

Glo

bal C

risi

s:

2008

-09

Sinc

e M

ay 2

013

Out

fl ow

sLi

mit

on

ou

twar

d F

DI

incr

ea

se

d gr

adua

lly to

400

per

ce

nt o

f the

thei

r net

w

orth

un

der

th

e au

tom

atic

rou

te.

Gra

dual

incr

ease

in

limit

of

outw

ard

port

folio

in

vest

men

ts b

y lis

ted

com

pani

es

to 5

0 pe

r ce

nt o

f th

e ne

t w

orth

and

di

spen

sing

wit

h th

e re

quir

emen

t of

10

per

cen

t re

cipr

ocal

sha

re

hold

ing

in t

he

liste

d In

dian

co

mpa

nies

by

over

seas

co

mpa

nies

.

Enha

ncem

ent

in

limit

on

over

seas

in

vest

men

t by

m

utua

l fun

ds

regi

ster

ed w

ith

the

SEBI

to

US$

7

billi

on.

Redu

ctio

n in

the

lim

it o

f ou

twar

d FD

I fro

m 4

00 p

er c

ent

to 1

00 p

er c

ent

of n

et w

orth

of

Indi

an c

ompa

ny, u

nder

Au

tom

atic

Rou

te.

Redu

ctio

n in

lim

it o

f U

S$ 2

00,0

00 p

er fi

nanc

ial y

ear

to U

S$ 7

5,00

0 pe

r fi n

anci

al y

ear

unde

r Li

bera

lized

Rem

itta

nce

Sche

mes

.

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.4

: Cap

ital

Con

trol

Mea

sure

s Ta

ken

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Vol

atil

ity

(Con

td.)

Page 39: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency

Report of The Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework

121

App

endi

x Ta

ble

V.4

: Cap

ital

Con

trol

Mea

sure

s Ta

ken

to A

ddre

ss E

xcha

nge

Mar

ket

Vol

atil

ity

(Con

cld.

)

Item

Aug

ust

1995

to

Mar

ch 1

996

(Mex

ican

Cri

sis)

Aug

ust

1997

- A

ugus

t 19

98 (E

ast

Asi

an C

risi

s)

Hig

h C

apit

al fl

ow

duri

ng 2

003-

04 t

o 20

07-0

8

Glo

bal C

risi

s:

2008

-09

Sinc

e M

ay 2

013

Enha

ncem

ent

of

limit

on

over

seas

in

vest

men

t un

der

the

Libe

ralis

ed

Rem

itta

nce

Sche

me

(LRS

) for

re

side

nt

indi

vidu

als.

Inte

rest

pay

men

t of

EEF

C a

ccou

nts

to t

he e

xten

t of

ou

tsta

ndin

g ba

lanc

es o

f U

S$ 1

m

illio

n pe

r ex

port

ers

(tem

pora

ry

mea

sure

, val

id u

p to

Oct

31,

201

8.

Faci

lity

clos

ed o

n N

ov 1

, 201

8.

Page 40: Appendix Table II.1: Nominal Anchors – Pros and Cons Anchor … · 2014. 1. 27. · anchors inflation expectations to the infl ation rate in the anchor country to whose currency