Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD...

311
Appendix A Group Consensus Values for Michigan English Language Art Extended Grade Level Content Expectations and Benchmarks

Transcript of Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD...

Page 1: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Appendix A

Group Consensus Values for Michigan English Language Art Extended

Grade Level Content Expectations and Benchmarks

Page 2: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 3: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 2, Language Arts, Grade 2

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 3R.WS.EG04

Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial letters/sounds (phonics)—picture clues (semantic)—patterns of language (syntactic).

3

R.WS.EG05

Begin to recognize automatically a small number of frequently encountered, personally meaningful words in print.

3

R.WS.EG06

Begin to recognize words in the environment, such as—exit signs—names on buses—the schooland begin to recognize automatically a few of the 220 Dolch basic sight vocabulary.

3

R.WS.EG07

Begin to recognize a few of the 1000 Dolch first words. 3

R.WS.EG08

Using context clues (including pictures), strategies, and resources, begin to understand the meaning of a few words and familiar and repeated phrases, such as —objects—actions—concepts

4

R.WS.EG11

Know the meanings of a few words encountered frequently in grades K-1 reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG12

Begin to use strategies to identify unknown words and construct meaning—letter-sound cues—semantic context cues (including pictures)—syntactic cues.

4

R.WS.EG13

Use picture clues, prediction, and help from other people to recognize words. 3

R.FL FLUENCY 3R.FL.EG04

Begin to recognize identified grades K-1 high frequency words and sight words. 3

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 4R.NT.EG01

Begin to become familiar with classic and contemporary literature —recognized for quality and literary merit—reflecting our common heritage as well as cultures from around the world.

1

R.NT.EG02

Begin to become familiar with a variety of narrative genre including—stories—nursery rhymes—poetry—songs.

1

R.NT.EG03

Begin to identify simple story elements in narrative text, such as- problem — setting (time and place)- events—characters—sense of story events (beginning, middle, and end).

4

R.NT.EG04

Begin to identify why authors write and how authors/illustrators use pictures and illustrations to support the understanding of settings and characters

5

R.NT.E Begin to respond to multiple texts by discussing, drawing, and/or writing to reflect, make 5

A-1

Page 4: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 2, Language Arts, Grade 2

Level Description DOKG05 meaning, and make connectionsR.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 5R.IT.EG01

Begin to identify a variety of informational genre—environmental text—concept books—picture books.

3

R.IT.EG02

Begin to identify informational text patterns—descriptive—sequential (directions, steps). 4

R.IT.EG03

Begin to understand why authors write and how authors/illustrators use text features such as pictures and drawings to enhance the understanding of key ideas presented in—descriptive and—sequential organizational patterns.

5

R.IT.EG04

Begin to respond to multiple texts by discussing, drawing, and/or writing to reflect, make meaning, and make connections.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG02

Begin to connect personal knowledge, experience, and understanding of others to ideas in text in order to make predictions and draw conclusions.

5

R.CM.EG03

Begin to identify and/or retell events, main ideas, and important details from text. 4

R.CM.EG04

Begin to make text-to-self and text-to-text connections and comparisons, such as—personal experience to problem or characters in narrative text;—comparison of two narrative texts (e.g., “Cinderella” stories); and—comparison of narrative to informational t

5

R.CM.EG05

Begin to identify relationships among characters, events, and key ideas within text to create a deeper understanding.

5

R.CM.EG06

Begin to map story elements within a text. 4

R.CM.EG09

Begin to apply what has been read to them from grade level appropriate science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

W Writing 4W.GN WRITING GENRES 4W.GN.EG01

Begin to write brief personal narratives using—pictures—words, word-like clusters, and/or sentences as support.

4

W.GN.EG03

Begin to write brief informational pieces (a page for a class book) using—pictures —words, word-like clusters, and/or sentences.

4

W.PR WRITING PROCESS 4W.PR.EG01

With assistance as needed, consider audience and purpose for writing. 4

W.PR.EG03

Begin to understand that writing requires a plan that may include graphic organizers that represent a specific organizational pattern—sequence—description.

4

W.PR.EG04

Begin to write complete sentences that express a main idea and some details. 4

W.PR.EG05

Begin to write in first person. 4

W.PR.EG06

Begin to focus on one story idea. 4

A-2

Page 5: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 2, Language Arts, Grade 2

Level Description DOKW.PR.EG07

Begin to use a sequenced organizational pattern with—some grade level appropriate grammar—temporary spellings that reflect a close approximation of the sequence of sounds in the word.

4

W.PR.EG09

Begin to identify sections of their own text that need to be revised using—additions—deletions

5

W.PR.EG10

Begin to become familiar with revision strategies to make changes in content and form to suit intended purpose and audience.

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

Begin to form complete simple sentences beginning with a capital letter and ending with a period.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

Begin to spell a small number (about 18) of frequently encountered and personally meaningful words correctly

3

A-3

Page 6: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 3, Language Arts, Grade 3

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EG01

Use a variety of clues to recognize words, including —pictures—phonics—syntax—context—prediction—other peopleto recognize frequently encountered words in the environment and in text.

4

R.WS.EG03

Know the meanings of words encountered frequently in grades K-1 reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG04

Recognize words in the environment, such as—exit signs—names on buses—the schooland begin to recognize a few of the 220 Dolch basic sight vocabulary automatically.

3

R.WS.EG05

Recognize automatically a few of the 1000 Dolch first words, as well as frequently encountered, personally meaningful words.

3

R.WS.EG06

Use strategies to identify unknown words and construct meaning—letter-sound cues—semantic context cues (including pictures)—syntactic cues.

4

R.WS.EG08

Using context clues (including pictures), strategies, and resources, understand the meaning of a few words and familiar and repeated phrases, such as —objects—actions—concepts.

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 5R.NT.EG01

Become familiar with and respond thoughtfully to quality and culturally diverse literature.

4

R.NT.EG02

Identify simple story elements, such as- problem — setting (time and place)- events— characters—sense of story events (beginning, middle, and end)- theme/lesson

4

R.NT.EG03

Respond to multiple texts read by discussing, drawing, and/or writing to reflect, make meaning, and make connections.

5

R.NT.EG04

Understand the roles and purposes of authors and illustrators, and begin to identify how authors/ illustrators use pictures and illustration to support the understanding of settings, characters, and story events.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EG01

Identify a variety of informational/functional genre, such as—environmental text—concept books—picture books.

3

R.IT.EG02

Identify informational text patterns—sequential—descriptive. 4

R.IT.EG03

Understand authors’ purposes, and begin to identify how authors/illustrators use text features, such as pictures and drawings, to enhance the understanding of key ideas presented in—descriptive (definitions, enumeration) and—sequential (directions, step

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG01

Connect personal knowledge and experience to ideas in texts in order to make predictions and draw conclusions.

5

R.CM.EG02

Identify and/or retell events, main ideas, and important details from text. 4

R.CM.EG03

Make text-to-self and text-to-text connections and comparisons, such as—personal experience to problem or characters in narrative text;—comparison of two narrative texts (e.g., “Cinderella” stories); and—comparison of narrative to informational text.

5

A-4

Page 7: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 3, Language Arts, Grade 3

Level Description DOKR.CM.EG04

Apply what has been read to them in grade level appropriate science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

W Writing 4W.GN WRITING GENRES 4W.GN.EG01

Write a brief personal narrative using—pictures—words, word-like clusters, and/or sentences as support.

4

W.GN.EG03

Write a brief informational piece using—drawings—words, word-like clusters, and/or sentences.

4

W.PR WRITING PROCESS 4W.PR.EG01

With assistance as needed, consider the audience reaction as they plan their writing. 4

W.PR.EG03

Use semi-phonetic spelling to represent narrative, informational, and functional text when writing, and incorporate pictures and drawings.

3

W.PR.EG04

Use lists and chronological organizational patterns in informational writing. 4

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EG01

Show originality in oral, written, and visual messages including—narrative (natural language, expressed sentiment, original ideas)—informational/functional (listing, naming, describing).

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

Begin to use complete simple sentences beginning with a capital letter and ending with a period, question mark, or exclamation point.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

Spell a small number of frequently encountered and personally meaningful words correctly; for other words, rely on —structural cues (beginning and simpler ending sounds)—environmental sources (word wall, word lists).

3

A-5

Page 8: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 4, Language Arts, Grade 4

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EG01

Use structural cues to recognize one-syllable words, blends, and consonant diagraphs—letter/sound—onset and rimes—whole word chunks—word families—diagraphs th, ch, sh.

3

R.WS.EG02

Use syntactic and semantic cues to determine the meaning of words in grade level appropriate texts.

4

R.WS.EG03

Recognize automatically grades K-2 high frequency words whether encountered in or out of context.

3

R.WS.EG04

Know the meaning of words encountered frequently in grade K-2 reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG05

Use strategies to identify unknown words and construct meaning—letter- and word-level cues (i.e., prefixes, suffixes, rimes) to recognize word—semantic context cues (including pictures) and syntactic cues to check word recognition and select best meaning.

4

R.WS.EG07

In context using strategies and resources, understand the meaning of words and phrases (objects, actions, concepts, content, and English language arts vocabulary).

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 4R.NT.EG01

Become familiar with and respond thoughtfully to quality and culturally diverse literature.

4

R.NT.EG02

Begin to identify and describe a variety of genre including—realistic fiction—fantasy —folktales.

4

R.NT.EG03

Identify simple story elements, such as- problem — setting (time and place)- events— characters—sense of story events (beginning, middle, and end)- theme/lesson

4

R.NT.EG04

Identify authors’ purposes, and explain how authors/ illustrators use—illustrations to support story elements—transitional words (e.g., before, after, now, finally) to indicate a sequence of events and a sense of story.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EG01

Begin to identify and describe a variety of informational/functional genre including—simple how-to books—personal correspondence—science and social studies magazines.

4

R.IT.EG02

Identify informational text patterns—sequential- descriptive—enumerative. 4

R.IT.EG03

Identify authors’ purposes, and explain how authors/illustrators use text features to enhance the understanding of key and supporting ideas—headings—titles—labeled photographs—illustrations—boldface type—charts.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG01

Connect personal knowledge, experience, and understanding of others to ideas in texts in order to make predictions and draw conclusions..

5

R.CM.EG02

Identify and retell the main idea(s) and relevant details of grade level appropriate narrative, informational, and functional texts.

4

R.CM.EG03

Begin to compare and contrast relationships among characters, events, and key ideas within and across texts to create a deeper understanding.

5

R.CM.E Apply what has been read to them in grade level appropriate science, social studies, and 5

A-6

Page 9: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 4, Language Arts, Grade 4

Level Description DOKG04 mathematics texts.W Writing 4W.GN WRITING GENRES 5W.GN.EG01

Write a personal narrative using illustrations and transitional words (before, after, now, finally) to indicate—sequence of events—sense of story (beginning, middle, end)—physical features of characters.

5

W.GN.EG03

Write an informational piece that addresses a focus question (e.g., What is a family?) using —descriptive—enumerative—sequence patterns that may include headings, titles, labels, photographs, or illustrations to enhance the understanding of central ideas.

5

W.PR WRITING PROCESS 4W.PR.EG01

With assistance as needed, consider their audience and purpose for their writing as they begin to use specific strategies including graphic organizers when planning narrative and informational text

4

W.PR.EG03

Write three or four connected sentences with grade level appropriate grammar, usage, mechanics, and temporary spellings that reflect a close approximation of the sequence of sounds in the word.

4

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EG01

Begin to show originality in oral, written, and visual messages including—narrative (natural language, specific action, emotion)—informational/functional (sequence, specific vocabulary, visual representation).

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

Use complete simple sentences beginning with a capital letter and ending with a period, question mark, or exclamation point.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

In the context of writing, spell frequently encountered one-syllable words from common word families correctly; for other words, use—structural cues (letter/sound, rimes)—environmental sources (word walls, word lists).

3

A-7

Page 10: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 5, Language Arts, Grade 5

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EG01

In context, determine the meaning of a few words and familiar and repeated phrases (objects, actions, concepts, content, and English language arts vocabulary) using strategies and resources.

4

R.WS.EG03

Recognize automatically grades K-2 frequently encountered words in connected text and in isolation.

3

R.WS.EG04

Know the meaning of words encountered frequently in grades K-2 reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG05

Use strategies to identify unknown words and construct meaning—reread a sentence or paragraph when meaning is unclear—use context as a basis for predicting meaning of unfamiliar words—increase bank of known sight words—use subvocalization to sound out unknown words.

4

R.WS.EG07

Determine the meaning of words and phrases (objects, actions, concepts, and English language arts vocabulary) in context using strategies and resources.

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 5R.NT.EG01

Become familiar with and respond thoughtfully to quality and culturally diverse literature.

4

R.NT.EG02

Begin to identify and describe a variety of genre including—poetry—fantasy—legends—drama.

4

R.NT.EG03

Identify story elements, such as—characters’ actions and motivations—setting (time and place)—problem/solution—sequence of events- theme/lesson.

5

R.NT.EG04

Identify authors’ purposes, and explain how authors/illustrators use literary devices—illustrations to depict major story events—title—comparisons (metaphor/simile) to reveal characters’ thoughts and actions.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EG01

Identify and describe a variety of informational/functional genre including—simple how-to books—personal correspondence—science and social studies magazines.

4

R.IT.EG02

Identify informational text patterns—sequential- descriptive—enumerative. 4

R.IT.EG03

Identify authors’ purposes and how authors/illustrators use text features to enhance the understanding of key and supporting ideas—boldface type—graphs—maps—diagrams—charts.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG01

Connect personal knowledge, experience, and understanding of others to ideas in texts in order to make predictions and draw conclusions.

5

R.CM.EG02

Identify and retell the main idea(s) and relevant details of grade level appropriate narrative, informational, and functional text.

4

R.CM.EG03

Begin to compare and contrast relationships among characters, events, and key ideas within and across texts to create a deeper understanding.

5

R.CM.EG04

Apply what has been read in grade level appropriate science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

W Writing 5

A-8

Page 11: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 5, Language Arts, Grade 5

Level Description DOKW.GN WRITING GENRES 5W.GN.EG01

Write a personal narrative using illustrations and transitional words (before, after, now, finally) to indicate—sequence of events—sense of story (beginning, middle, end)—physical features of characters.

5

W.GN.EG02

With assistance as needed, attempt to write simple poems patterned after grade level appropriate published poetry.

5

W.GN.EG03

Write an informational piece that addresses a focus question (e.g., What are three things you do every morning?) using —descriptive—enumerative—sequential patterns that may include headings, titles, labels, photographs, or illustrations to enhance the understanding of central ideas.

5

W.WP WRITING PROCESS 4W.PR.EG01

Begin to consider audience and purpose for writing. 4

W.PR.EG03

Write four or five connected sentences with grade level appropriate grammar, usage, mechanics, and temporary spellings that reflect a close approximation of the sequence of sounds in the word.

4

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EG01

Develop personal style in oral, written, and visual messages including—narrative - descriptive language, use of imagination, varying sentence beginnings—informational/functional - facts, effective conclusions.

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

In the context of writing, begin to use complete sentences, nouns and verbs, commas, contractions, colons to denote time, capitalization.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

In the context of writing, spell frequently encountered one-syllable words from common word families correctly; for other words, use—structural cues (letter/sound, rimes)—environmental sources (word walls, word lists).

3

A-9

Page 12: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 6, Language Arts, Grade 6

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EG01

Utilize letter and word level clues, semantic, and syntactic cues to recognize words and recognize frequently encountered words in text even when those words are encountered out of context.

4

R.WS.EG02

Use structural, semantic, and syntactic cues to automatically read frequently encountered words, decode unknown words, and decide meaning including multiple meaning words (e.g., letter/sound, rimes, base words, affixes).

4

R.WS.EG03

Progress to automatically read by sight the 1000 Dolch first words and other frequently encountered vocabulary.

3

R.WS.EG04

Know the meanings of words encountered frequently in grade level appropriate reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG05

Apply strategies to construct meaning, self-monitor, and identify unknown words or word parts using—knowledge of language—sound/symbol/structural relationships—context.

4

R.WS.EG07

Determine the meaning of words and phrases in context, such as —synonyms, homonyms, multiple meaning wordsand using strategies and resources, such as —context clues, concept mapping, dictionary.

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 5R.NT.EG01

Begin to identify how characters in literature and other texts express attitudes about one another in familiar classic and contemporary literature recognized for quality and literary merit.

5

R.NT.EG02

Identify and describe a variety of narrative genre (e.g., folktales, fables, realistic fiction).

4

R.NT.EG03

Identify and describe characters’ thoughts and motivations, story level themes, main idea, and lesson/moral (e.g., fable) in narrative text.

5

R.NT.EG04

Identify authors’ purposes, and begin to explain how authors use literary devices (e.g., prediction, personification, point of view) to develop a story level theme, depict the setting, and reveal character traits.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EG01

Identify and describe a variety of informational/functional genre, such as—textbooks—encyclopedias—magazines.

4

R.IT.EG02

Identify informational text patterns, such as —problem/solution—sequential—compare/contrast—descriptive.

4

R.IT.EG03

Identify authors’ purposes and explain how authors use text features, (e.g., titles, headings and subheadings, time lines, prefaces, indices, and table of content) to enhance understanding of informational and functional text.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG01

Connect personal knowledge, experience and understanding of the world to themes and perspectives in text in order to make predictions and draw inferences and conclusions.

5

R.CM.EG02

Retell and summarize the main ideas and relevant details of grade level appropriate narrative, informational, and functional texts.

4

R.CM.E Begin to compare and contrast (oral and written) relationships among characters, 5

A-10

Page 13: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 6, Language Arts, Grade 6

Level Description DOKG03 events, and key ideas within and across texts to create a deeper understanding, such as —

a narrative to an informational text—a literature selection to a subject area text—R.CM.EG04

Apply knowledge from what has been read in grade level appropriate science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

W Writing 5W.WG WRITING GENRES 5W.GN.EG01

Write a personal narrative that—depicts major story events—uses illustrations to match mood—contains setting, problem/solution, and sequenced events.

5

W.GN.EG02

Write an informational piece that focuses on a functional activity using —descriptive—enumerative—sequential patterns that may include headings, titles, labels, photographs, or illustrations to enhance the understanding of central ideas.

5

W.WP WRITING PROCESS 5W.PR.EG01

Set a purpose, consider audience, and replicate authors' styles and patterns when writing narrative or informational text.

5

W.PR.EG04

Write several connected sentences with grade level appropriate grammar, usage, mechanics, and temporary spellings that reflect a close approximation of the sequence of sounds in the word.

4

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EG01

Exhibit individual style and voice to enhance the written message (e.g., in narrative text: varied word choice and sentence structure, character description; in informational text: examples, transitions, grammar usage).

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

Identify and use subjects and verbs that are in agreement; past, verb tenses; nouns and possessives; commas in a series; and begin use of quotations marks and capitalization in dialogue.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

Spell frequently encountered words (e.g., multi-syllabic, r-controlled, most consonant blends, contractions, compound, common homophones) correctly. For less frequently encountered words, students will use structural cues (e.g., letter/sound, rimes, morphemic) and environmental sources (e.g., word walls, word lists, dicitonaries, spell checkers)

3

A-11

Page 14: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 7, Language Arts, Grade 7

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EG01

Utilize letter and word level clues, semantic, and syntactic cues to recognize words and recognize frequently encountered words in text even when those words are encountered out of context.

4

R.WS.EG02

Use structural, semantic, and syntactic cues to automatically read frequently encountered words, decode unknown words, and decide meaning including multiple meaning words (e.g., letter/sound, rimes, base words, affixes).

4

R.WS.EG03

Progress to automatically read by sight the 1000 Dolch first words and other frequently encountered vocabulary.

3

R.WS.EG04

Know the meanings of words encountered frequently in grade level reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EG05

Apply strategies to construct meaning, self-monitor, and identify unknown words or word parts using—knowledge of language—sound/symbol/structural relationships—context.

4

R.WS.EG07

Determine the meaning of words and phrases in context, (e.g., synonyms, homonyms, multiple meaning words) using strategies and resources (e.g., context clues, concept mapping, dictionary).

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 5R.NT.EG01

Identify how characters in literature and other texts express attitudes about one another in familiar classic and contemporary literature recognized for quality and literary merit.

5

R.NT.EG02

Identify and describe a variety of narrative genre (e.g., folktales, fables, realistic fiction).

4

R.NT.EG03

Identify and describe characters’ thoughts and motivations, story level themes, main idea, and lesson/moral (e.g., fable) in narrative text.

5

R.NT.EG04

Identify authors’ purposes, and explain how authors use literary devices (e.g., prediction, personification, point of view) to develop a story level theme, depict the setting, and reveal important character traits.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EG01

Identify and describe a variety of informational/functional genre (e.g., textbooks, encyclopedia, magazines).

4

R.IT.EG02

Identify informational text patterns (e.g., problem/solution, sequential, compare/contrast, descriptive).

4

R.IT.EG03

Identify authors’ purposes, and explain how authors use text features (e.g., titles, headings and subheadings, time lines, prefaces, indices, and table of contents) to enhance understanding of informational and functional text.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EG01

Connect personal knowledge, experience, and understanding of the world to themes and perspectives in text in order to make predictions and draw inferences and conclusions.

5

R.CM.EG02

Retell and summarize the main ideas and relevant details of grade level appropriate narrative, informational, and functional text.

4

R.CM.EG03

Begin to compare and contrast (oral and written) relationships among characters, events, and key ideas within and across texts to create a deeper understanding (e.g., a

5

A-12

Page 15: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 7, Language Arts, Grade 7

Level Description DOKnarrative to an informational text, a literature selection to a subject area text, a

R.CM.EG04

Apply knowledge from what has been read in grade level appropriate science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

W Writing 5W.GN WRITING GENRES 5W.GN.EG01

Write a personal narrative that—depicts major story events—uses illustrations to match mood—contains setting, problem/solution, and sequenced events.

5

W.GN.EG02

Write an informational piece that focuses on a functional activity using —descriptive—enumerative—sequential patterns that may include headings, titles, labels, photographs, or illustrations to enhance the understanding of central ideas.

5

W.WP WRITING PROCESS 5W.PR.EG01

Set a purpose, consider audience, and replicate authors' styles and patterns when writing narrative or informational text.

5

W.PR.EG03

Use revision strategies to make stylistic changes in content and form to suit intended purpose and audience.

5

W.PR.EG04

Write several connected sentences with grade level appropriate grammar, usage, mechanics, and temporary spellings that reflect a close approximation of the sequence of sounds in the word.

4

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EG01

Exhibit individual style and voice to enhance the written message (e.g., in narrative text: varied word choice and sentence structure, character description; in informational text: examples, transitions, grammar usage).

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 3W.GR.EG01

Identify and use subjects and verbs that are in agreement; past, verb tenses; nouns and possessives; commas in a series; and begin use of quotations marks and capitalization in dialogue.

3

W.SP SPELLING 3W.SP.EG01

Spell frequently encountered words (e.g., multi-syllabic, r-controlled, most consonant blends, contractions, compound, common homophones) correctly. For less frequently encountered words, students will use structural cues (e.g., letter/sound, rimes, m

3

A-13

Page 16: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 11, Language Arts, Grade 11

Level Description DOKR Reading 4R.WS WORD STUDY 4R.WS.EB02

Use structural, semantic, and syntactic cues to automatically read frequently encountered words, decode unknown words, and decide meaning, including multiple meaning words (e.g., letter/sound, rimes, base words, affixes, syllabication).

4

R.WS.EB03

Recognize automatically frequently encountered words in print, with the number of words that can be read fluently increasing steadily across the school year.

3

R.WS.EB04

Know the meanings of words encountered frequently in grade level appropriate reading and oral language contexts.

3

R.WS.EB05

Apply strategies to construct meaning, self-monitor, and identify unknown words or word parts, such as—engage actively in reading a variety of genre—self-monitor and correct in narrative, informational, and functional text—use a thesaurus.

4

R.WS.EB07

Determine the meaning of words and phrases in context (e.g., similes, metaphors, content vocabulary), using strategies and resources (e.g., context clues, semantic feature analysis, thesaurus).

4

R.NT NARRATIVE TEXT 5R.NT.EB01

Describe and discuss the shared human experience depicted in classic and contemporary literature from around the world recognized for quality and literary merit.

5

R.NT.EB02

Identify and describe a variety of narrative genre, such as —poetry—myths/ legends—fantasy—adventure.

4

R.NT.EB03

Analyze characters’ thoughts and motivation through dialogue, various character roles and functions (e.g., hero, villain, narrator), point of view, and conflict/resolution.

5

R.NT.EB04

Identify authors’ purposes, and begin to explain how authors use literary devices (i.e., flash forward, flashback, simile) to depict time, setting, conflicts, and resolutions that enhance the plot and create suspense across a variety of texts.

5

R.IT INFORMATIONAL TEXT 4R.IT.EB01

Identify and explain the defining characteristics of informational genre, such as—autobiography/biography—personal essay—almanac—newspaper.

4

R.IT.EB02

Identify and describe informational text patterns, such as —compare/contrast—position/support—problem/solution.

4

R.IT.EB03

Identify authors’ purposes, and begin to explain how authors use appendices, headings, subheadings, marginal notes, keys and legends, figures, and bibliographies to enhance understanding of supporting and key ideas.

5

R.CM COMPREHENSION 5R.CM.EB01

Connect personal knowledge, experience, and understanding of the world to themes and perspectives in text in order to make predictions and draw inferences and conclusions.

5

R.CM.EB02

Retell and summarize the main ideas and relevant details of grade level appropriate narrative, informational, and functional text.

4

R.CM.EB03

Explain oral and written relationships among themes, ideas, and characters within and across texts to create a deeper understanding, such as—categorize and classify—compare and contrast—draw parallels across time and culture.

6

R.CM.EB04

Apply significant knowledge from what is read in grade level science, social studies, and mathematics texts.

5

A-14

Page 17: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.14Group ConsensusMI ELA EGLCE Grade 11, Language Arts, Grade 11

Level Description DOKW Writing 5W.GN WRITING GENRES 5W.GN.EB01

Write a narrative piece (e.g., personal, realistic, or adventure story) creating relationships among setting, characters, theme, and plot.

5

W.GN.EB02

Write an informational piece that focuses on a functional activity (e.g., a report, letter, opinion/reason) using —descriptive--compare/contrast--cause/effect—enumerative—sequential patterns that may include headings, titles, labels, photographs, or illustrations to enhance the understnading of central ideas.

5

W.PR WRITING PROCESS 5W.PR.EB01

Set a purpose, consider audience, and replicate authors’ styles and patterns when writing narrative or informational text.

5

W.PS PERSONAL STYLE 5W.PS.EB01

Exhibit individual style and voice to enhance the written message (e.g., in narrative text: strong verbs, figurative language, sensory images; in informational text: precision, established importance, transitions).

5

W.GR GRAMMAR AND USAGE 4W.GR.EB01

With assistance as needed, use simple and compound sentences, direct and indirect objects, prepositional phrases, adjectives, common and proper nouns as subjects and objects, pronouns as antecedents, regular and irregular verbs; use hyphens between syllables, apostrophes in contractions, and commas in salutations to set off words, phrases, and dialogue; and use quotation marks or italics to identify titles or names.

4

A-15

Page 18: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 19: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Appendix B

Data Analysis Tables

Michigan Grades 3-8 and 11 Functional Independence English

Language Arts Grade Level Content Expectations/Benchmarks and Michigan-Access Assessments

Page 20: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 21: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Brief Explanation of Data in the Alignment Tables by Column

Tables grade.1Standards # Number of standards plus one for a generic standard for each

standard.Standards # Average number of standards for reviewers. If the number is

greater than the actual number in the standard, then at least one reviewer coded an item for the standard/standard but did not find any standard in the standard that corresponded to the item.

Level The Depth-of-Knowledge level coded by the reviewers for the standards for each standard.

# of standards byLevel The number of standards coded at each level% w/in stdby Level The percent of standards coded at each levelHits Mean & SD Mean and standard deviation number of items reviewers coded as

corresponding to standard. The total is the total number of coded hits.

Cat. Conc.Accept. “Yes” indicates that the standard met the acceptable level for

criterion. “Yes” if mean is six or more. “Weak” if mean is five to six. “No” if mean is less than five.

Tables grade.2First five columns repeat columns from Table 1.

Level of Itemw.r.t. Stand Mean percent and standard deviation of items coded as “under” the

Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standard, as “at” (the same) the Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standard, and as “above” the Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standard.

Depth-of-Know.ConsistencyAccept. “Yes” indicates that 50% or more of the items were rated as “at” or

“above” the Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standards. “Weak” indicates that 40% to 50% of the items were rated as “at” or “above” the Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standards. “No” indicates that less than 40% items were rated as “at” or “above” the Depth-of-Knowledge level of the corresponding standards.

B-1

Page 22: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Tables grade.3First five columns repeat columns from Table 1 and 2.Range ofStandards# Standards Hit Average number and standard deviation of the standards hit

coded by reviewers.% of Total Average percent and standard deviation of the total standards that

had at least one item coded.Range ofKnow.Accept. “Yes” indicates that 50% or more of the standards had at least one

coded standard.“Weak” indicates that 40% to 50% of the standards had at least one coded standard.“No” indicates that 40% or less of the standards had at least one coded standard.

BalanceIndex% Hits inStd/Ttl Hits Average and standard deviation of the percent of the items hit for a

standard of total number of hits (see total under the Hits column).Index Average and standard deviation of the Balance Index.

Note: BALANCE INDEX 1 – (∑ │1/(O) – I (k) /(H )│)/2

k=1

Where O = Total number of standards hit for the standard I (k)

= Number of items hit corresponding to standard (k)

H = Total number of items hit for the standard

Bal. of RepAccept. “Yes” indicates that the Balance Index was .7 or above (items

evenly distributed among standards).“Weak” indicates that the Balance Index was .6 to .7 (a high percentage of items coded as corresponding to two or three standards).“No” indicates that the Balance Index was .6 or less (a high percentage of items coded as corresponding to one standard.)

Tables grade.4Summary if standard met the acceptable level for the four criteria by each standard.

B-2

Page 23: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Tables grade.6The DOK value for each assessment item given by each reviewer. The intraclass correlation for the group of reviewers is given on the last row.

Tables grade.8The DOK level and standard code assigned by each reviewer for each item.

Tables grade.9This list for each item all of the standards coded by the group of reviewers as corresponding to the item. Repeat of a standard indicates the number of reviewers who coded that standard as corresponding to the item.

Tables grade.10This lists for each standard all of the items coded by the group of reviewers as corresponding to the standard. Repeat of an item indicates the number of reviewers who coded the item as corresponding to the standard.

Tables grade.12This table summarizes the number of reviewers who coded an item as corresponding to a standard. It contains the same information as in Table 10.

Tables grade.13This table can be used to compare the DOK level of a standard to the average DOK level of the items reviewers assigned to the standard. This table is helpful to identify items with a lower DOK level that should be replaced by an item with a higher DOK level to improve the Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency.

B-3

Page 24: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 5 24

1345

2868

8332533

74.33 9.66 YES

W - Writing 4 12

345

282

166616 8 4 YES

Total 9 36

1345

2101410

5273827

82.33 10.32

B-4

Page 25: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 5 24 74.33 9.66 31 41 66 42 4 18 YESW - Writing 4 12 8 4 0 0 42 49 58 49 YES

Total 9 36 82.3310.32 26 39 62 44 13 33

Page 26: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 5 24 74.33 9.66 10.17 1.67 42 7 WEAK 90 5 0.57 0.03 NOW - Writing 4 12 8 4 2 1 17 8 NO 10 5 1 0 YES

Total 9 36 82.33 10.32 6.08 4.31 30 15 50 41 0.79 0.21

B-6

Page 27: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES WEAK NO

W - Writing YES YES NO YES

B-7

Page 28: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 61 3 3 3 3 3 32 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 34 3 3 3 3 3 35 3 3 3 3 3 36 3 3 3 3 3 37 3 3 3 3 3 389 3 3 3 3 3 31011 3 3 3 3 3 31213 3 3 3 4 3 31415 3 3 3 4 3 316 3 3 3 3 3 317 3 3 3 4 3 318 3 3 3 3 3 319 3 3 3 3 3 320 3 3 3 3 3 321 3 3 3 3 3 322 3 3 3 3 3 323 3 3 3 3 3 324 3 3 3 3 3 325 4 4 4 4 4 326 5 3 4 4 5 327 3 3 3 3 3 328 3 3 3 3 3 329 3 3 3 3 3 330 3 3 3 4 3 331 3 3 4 5 4 33233343536373839 4 4 3 4 4 340 3 3 3 4 3 3

B-8

Page 29: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 3 3 3 3 3 342 5 3 4 4 3 443 5 5 5 5 5 444 5 4 4 4 4 445 4 3 4 4 4 446 4 4 4 4 4 447 3 3 3 3 3 348 3 4 4 4 4 449 3 3 3 3 3 350 5 3 3 5 5 451 4 5 4 5 3 352 4 3 3 3 3 353 4 5 4 4 5 5

Intraclass Correlation: 0.908Pairwise Comparison: 0.7952

B-9

Page 30: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item DOK0 PObj0 S1Obj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 S2Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2 S2Obj2 S2Obj41 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG042 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG113 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG124 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG115 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG126 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG077 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 R.FL.EG04 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG0789 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG131011 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG071213 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG11 3 R.WS.EG071415 3 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 R.FL.EG04 3 R.WS.EG06 R.WS.EG0716 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG0717 3 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG1218 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0719 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG0720 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG0721 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG0722 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG0723 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG0724 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG1125 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG02 R.NT.EG0226 5 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 R.NT.EG0227 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0228 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0229 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.CM.EG02 R.NT.EG0230 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0231 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG02 R.NT.EG02 R.CM.EG053233343536373839 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0240 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0241 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0242 5 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0243 5 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG04

B-10

Page 31: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item DOK0 PObj0 S1Obj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 S2Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2 S2Obj2 S2Obj444 5 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0345 4 R.WS.EG08 3 R.WS.EG08 R.WS.EG12 4 R.WS.EG08 R.WS.EG1246 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0347 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0348 3 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0249 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0350 5 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0251 4 R.CM.EG03 5 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG0352 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0353 4 W.GN.EG03 5 W.GN.EG03 W.PR.EG04 W.PR.EG06 4 W.GN.EG03 W.PR.EG07 W.PR.EG06 W.PR.EG05

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.472Standard Pairwise Comparison: 1

Item DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3 S2Obj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj5 S2Obj51 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG052 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG073 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG06 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG074 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG13 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG075 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG116 3 R.WS.EG04 R.NT.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG11 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG057 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG11 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG1189 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG071011 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG111213 4 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG11 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG051415 4 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 3 R.FL.EG04 R.WS.EG11 3 R.WS.EG1216 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0717 4 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG06 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0718 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0719 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG1120 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG1121 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG1122 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0723 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG11 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG1124 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG06 R.WS.EG12 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 R.WS.EG0725 4 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG05 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03

B-11

Page 32: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3 S2Obj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj5 S2Obj526 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG05 3 R.CM.EG0227 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0328 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0329 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0330 4 R.IT.EG02 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0331 5 R.CM.EG04 4 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG033233343536373839 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG0340 4 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 R.NT.EG0341 3 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG0342 4 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0343 5 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG04 4 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG04 R.CM.EG0344 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG05 4 R.CM.EG0345 4 R.WS.EG12 4 R.WS.EG12 4 R.WS.EG12 R.WS.EG1346 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG03 R.CM.EG05 4 R.CM.EG0347 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0348 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG05 R.CM.EG03 4 R.CM.EG02 R.CM.EG0349 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0350 5 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG03 R.CM.EG0551 5 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0352 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG03 3 R.CM.EG0353 4 W.GN.EG03 5 W.PR.EG04 W.PR.EG03 5 W.GN.EG03

B-12

Page 33: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Low Medium High0 9.320755 48

1 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

2 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

3 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

4 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG13

5 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

6 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.NT.EG05

7 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.W R.W R.W R.W R.F

B-13

Page 34: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

S.EG11

S.EG11

S.EG12

S.EG12

L.EG04

8 9 R.W

S.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG13

10 11 R.W

S.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

12 13 R.W

S.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

14 15 R.W

S.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.FL.EG04

R.FL.EG04

16 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

17 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

18 R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

R.WS.E

B-14

Page 35: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

G04 G04 G04 G04 G05 G05 G05 G07 G07 G07R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

19 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

20 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

21 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

22 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

23 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

24 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG11

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

25 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG05

26 R.N R.C R.C R.C R.C R.C R.C R.C

B-15

Page 36: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

T.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG02

M.EG05

27 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

28 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

29 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

30 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.IT.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

31 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG04

R.CM.EG05

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

40 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

41 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

42 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

43 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG04

R.CM.EG04

R.CM.EG04

44 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG05

B-16

Page 37: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

45 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG12

R.WS.EG13

46 R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG05

47 R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

48 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG05

49 R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG05

51 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

52 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

R.CM.EG03

53 W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG05

W.PR.EG05

W.PR.EG05

W.PR.EG05

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG06

W.PR.EG07

W.PR.EG07

W.PR.EG07

W.PR.EG07

B-17

Page 38: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Low Medium High0 10.29167 99

RR.W

SR.WS.EG04

1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5

5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 9 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 1111 13 13 13 15 16 16 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 1920 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 24 2424

R.WS.EG05

1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 9 9 9 11 11 13

15 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 2323 24 24 24

R.WS.EG06

3 15 17 24

R.WS.EG07

1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4

4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 99 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 13 15 15 16 16 16 1616 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 2020 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 24 2424 24 24

R.WS.EG08

45 45 45

R.WS.EG11

2 4 5 6 7 7 11 13 13 15 19 20 21 23 23 24

R.WS.EG12

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 9 11 11 13 13 15 15

15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 2445 45 45 45 45

R.WS.E

4 9 45

B-18

Page 39: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

G13R.FL

R.FL.EG04

7 15 15

R.NT

R.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 39 40 41 42

R.NT.EG03

29 30 31 39 39 39 40 41 41 41 41

R.NT.EG04R.NT.EG05

6

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

30

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG04

R.CM

R.CM.EG02

25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 29 31 43 43 43 43 43 44 48 48 50 50

50 50 51 51 51 52 52R.CM.E

25 25 25 25 25 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 29

B-19

Page 40: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

G0329 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 31 39 39 39 39 40 40 4040 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44 44 4446 46 46 46 46 46 47 47 47 47 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 49 4949 49 49 49 50 50 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52

R.CM.EG04

31 43 43 43

R.CM.EG05

25 26 31 44 46 48 50

R.CM.EG06R.CM.EG09W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01W.GN.EG03

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PR

W.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03

53 53 53 53

W.PR.EG04

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PR.EG05

53 53 53 53

W.PR.EG06

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

B-20

Page 41: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

W.PR.EG07

53 53 53 53

W.PR.EG09W.PR.EG10W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-21

Page 42: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG04

1:5 2:4 3:5 4:4 5:5 6:4 7:3 9:5 11:5 13:3 15:1 16:2 17:4

18:4 19:4 20:4 21:5 22:4 23:4 24:3R.WS.EG05

1:2 2:1 3:4 4:1 5:2 6:2 7:2 9:3 11:2 13:1 15:1 16:2 17:3

18:3 19:3 20:2 21:2 22:2 23:2 24:3R.WS.EG06

3:1 15:1 17:1 24:1

R.WS.EG07

1:6 2:6 3:4 4:6 5:5 6:6 7:5 9:6 11:4 13:4 15:2 16:6 17:3

18:6 19:5 20:5 21:5 22:6 23:4 24:5R.WS.EG08

45:3

R.WS.EG11

2:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:2 11:1 13:2 15:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 23:2 24:1

R.WS.EG12

1:2 2:2 3:2 4:1 5:2 6:2 7:2 9:1 11:2 13:2 15:4 16:2 17:2

18:2 19:1 20:2 21:2 22:2 23:2 24:2 45:5R.WS.EG13

4:1 9:1 45:1

R.FL

R.FL.EG04

7:1 15:2

R.NT

R.N

B-22

Page 43: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

T.EG01R.NT.EG02

25:1 26:1 27:1 28:1 29:1 30:1 31:1 39:1 40:1 41:1 42:1

R.NT.EG03

29:1 30:1 31:1 39:3 40:1 41:4

R.NT.EG04R.NT.EG05

6:1

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

30:1

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG04

R.CM

R.CM.EG02

25:2 26:6 29:1 31:1 43:5 44:1 48:2 50:4 51:3 52:2

R.CM.EG03

25:5 27:6 28:6 29:6 30:5 31:4 39:4 40:6 41:5 42:6 43:1 44:4 46:6

47:6 48:5 49:6 50:2 51:4 52:4R.CM.EG04

31:1 43:3

R.CM.EG05

25:1 26:1 31:1 44:1 46:1 48:1 50:1

R.CM.E

B-23

Page 44: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

G06R.CM.EG09W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01W.GN.EG03

53:5

W.PR

W.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03

53:1

W.PR.EG04

53:2

W.PR.EG05

53:1

W.PR.EG06

53:2

W.PR.EG07

53:1

W.PR.EG09W.PR.EG10W.G

RW.GR.EG01

B-24

Page 45: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

W.SP

W.SP.EG01

B-25

Page 46: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 R.WS.E

G04:5

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G12:2

2 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:1

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

3 R.WS.E

G04:5

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G07:4

R.WS.E

G12:2

4 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:1

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:1

R.WS.E

G13:1

5 R.WS.E

G04:5

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

6 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

R.NT.E

G05:1

7 R.WS.E

G04:3

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:2

R.WS.E

G12:2

R.FL.E

G04:1

8 9 R.W

S.EG04:

5

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G12:1

R.WS.E

G13:1

10 11 R.W

S.EG04:

5

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:4

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

12 13 R.W R.W R.W R.W R.W

B-26

Page 47: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

S.EG04:

3

S.EG05:

1

S.EG07:

4

S.EG11:

2

S.EG12:

214 15 R.W

S.EG04:

1

R.WS.E

G05:1

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G07:2

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:4

R.FL.E

G04:2

16 R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G12:2

17 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G07:3

R.WS.E

G12:2

18 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G12:2

19 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:1

20 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

21 R.WS.E

G04:5

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

22 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:6

R.WS.E

G12:2

23 R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:4

R.WS.E

G11:2

R.WS.E

G12:2

24 R.WS.E

G04:3

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G07:5

R.WS.E

G11:1

R.WS.E

G12:2

B-27

Page 48: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

25 R.NT.E

G02:1

R.CM.EG02:

2

R.CM.EG03:

5

R.CM.EG05:

126 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG02:

6

R.CM.EG05:

127 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

628 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

629 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:1

R.CM.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

630 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:1

R.IT.EG02:1

R.CM.EG03:

531 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:1

R.CM.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

4

R.CM.EG04:

1

R.CM.EG05:

132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:3

R.CM.EG03:

440 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:1

R.CM.EG03:

641 R.N R.N R.C

B-28

Page 49: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

T.EG02:

1

T.EG03:

4

M.EG03:

542 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

643 R.C

M.EG02:

5

R.CM.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG04:

344 R.C

M.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

4

R.CM.EG05:

145 R.W

S.EG08:

3

R.WS.E

G12:5

R.WS.E

G13:1

46 R.CM.EG03:

6

R.CM.EG05:

147 R.C

M.EG03:

648 R.C

M.EG02:

2

R.CM.EG03:

5

R.CM.EG05:

149 R.C

M.EG03:

650 R.C

M.EG02:

4

R.CM.EG03:

2

R.CM.EG05:

151 R.C

M.EG02:

3

R.CM.EG03:

452 R.C R.C

B-29

Page 50: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

M.EG02:

2

M.EG03:

453 W.G

N.EG03:

5

W.PR.EG03:

1

W.PR.EG04:

2

W.PR.EG05:

1

W.PR.EG06:

2

W.PR.EG07:

1

B-30

Page 51: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [3]:R.WS.EG04 [3]:

1:5[3]

2:4[3]

3:5[3]

4:4[3]

5:5[3]

6:4[3]

7:3[3]

9:5[3]

11:5[3]

13:3[3]

15:1[4]

16:2[3]

17:4[3.25]

18:4[3]

19:4[3]

20:4[3]

21:5[3]

22:4[3]

23:4[3]

24:3[3]

R.WS.EG05 [3]:

1:2[3]

2:1[3]

3:4[3]

4:1[3]

5:2[3]

6:2[3]

7:2[3]

9:3[3]

11:2[3]

13:1[3]

15:1[4]

16:2[3]

17:3[3]

18:3[3]

19:3[3]

20:2[3]

21:2[3]

22:2[3]

23:2[3]

24:3[3]

R.WS.EG06 [3]:

3:1[3]

15:1[3]

17:1[3]

24:1[3]

R.WS.EG07 [3]:

1:6[3]

2:6[3]

3:4[3]

4:6[3]

5:5[3]

6:6[3]

7:5[3]

9:6[3]

11:4[3]

13:4[3.25]

15:2[3]

16:6[3]

17:3[3]

18:6[3]

19:5[3]

20:5[3]

21:5[3]

22:6[3]

23:4[3]

24:5[3]

R.WS.EG08 [4]:

45:3[3.67]

R.WS.EG11 [3]:

2:1[3]

4:1[3]

5:1[3]

6:1[3]

7:2[3]

11:1[3]

13:2[3]

15:1[3]

19:1[3]

20:1[3]

21:1[3]

23:2[3]

24:1[3]

R.WS.EG12

1:2[3]

2:2[3]

3:2[3]

4:1[3]

5:2[3]

6:2[3]

7:2[3]

9:1[3]

11:2[3]

13:2[3.5]

15:4[3.25]

16:2[3]

17:2[3]

B-31

Page 52: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

[4]:18:2[3]

19:1[3]

20:2[3]

21:2[3]

22:2[3]

23:2[3]

24:2[3]

45:5[3.8]

R.WS.EG13 [3]:

4:1[3]

9:1[3]

45:1[4]

R.FL

[3]:R.FL.EG04 [3]:

7:1[3]

15:2[3]

R.NT

[4]:R.NT.EG01 [1]:R.NT.EG02 [1]:

25:1[4]

26:1[4]

27:1[3]

28:1[3]

29:1[3]

30:1[3]

31:1[4]

39:1[3]

40:1[3]

41:1[3]

42:1[4]

R.NT.EG03 [4]:

29:1[3]

30:1[3]

31:1[4]

39:3[3.67]

40:1[3]

41:4[3]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:R.NT.EG05 [5]:

6:1[3]

R.IT [5]:R.IT.EG01 [3]:

B-32

Page 53: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

R.IT.EG02 [4]:

30:1[4]

R.IT.EG03 [5]:R.IT.EG04 [5]:R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG02 [5]:

25:2[4]

26:6[4]

29:1[3]

31:1[4]

43:5[4.8]

44:1[5]

48:2[4]

50:4[4.5]

51:3[4.67]

52:2[3.5]

R.CM.EG03 [4]:

25:5[3.8]

27:6[3]

28:6[3]

29:6[3]

30:5[3]

31:4[3.25]

39:4[3.5]

40:6[3.17]

41:5[3]

42:6[3.83]

43:1[4]

44:4[4]

46:6[4]

47:6[3]

48:5[3.8]

49:6[3]

50:2[3.5]

51:4[3.5]

52:4[3]

R.CM.EG04 [5]:

31:1[5]

43:3[4.67]

R.CM.EG05 [5]:

25:1[4]

26:1[5]

31:1[4]

44:1[4]

46:1[4]

48:1[4]

50:1[4]

R.CM.EG06 [4]:R.CM.EG09 [5]:W [4]:

B-33

Page 54: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

W.GN

[4]:W.GN.EG01 [4]:W.GN.EG03 [4]:

53:5[4.4]

W.PR

[4]:W.PR.EG01 [4]:W.PR.EG03 [4]:

53:1[5]

W.PR.EG04 [4]:

53:2[5]

W.PR.EG05 [4]:

53:1[5]

W.PR.EG06 [4]:

53:2[4.5]

W.PR.EG07 [4]:

53:1[4]

W.PR.EG09 [5]:W.P

B-34

Page 55: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

R.EG10 [5]:W.G

R [3]:W.GR.EG01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

B-35

Page 56: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-36

Page 57: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 17

345

476

234135 46.67 10.47 YES

W - Writing 5 8

345

341

375012 5.33 1.89 NO

Total 9 25

345

7117

284428 52 11.69

B-37

Page 58: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 17 46.6710.47 26 39 67 43 7 25 YESW - Writing 5 8 5.33 1.89 0 0 62 48 38 48 YES

Total 9 25 52 11.69 22 38 66 43 12 31

B-38

Page 59: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 17 46.67 10.47 7.83 1.34 46 8 WEAK 90 3 0.53 0.08 NOW - Writing 5 8 5.33 1.89 1.33 0.47 17 6 NO 10 3 1 0 YES

Total 9 25 52 11.69 4.58 3.40 31 16 50 40 0.76 0.24

B-39

Page 60: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES WEAK NO

W - Writing NO YES NO YES

B-40

Page 61: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 612345 4 3 4 4 4 46 4 3 4 4 4 47 4 3 4 4 4 48 4 3 4 4 4 49 4 3 4 4 4 410 4 3 4 4 4 411 4 3 4 4 4 412 4 3 4 4 4 413 4 3 4 4 4 414 4 3 4 4 4 415 4 3 4 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 4 417 4 3 4 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 419 4 3 4 4 4 420 4 3 4 4 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 3 4 4 4 424 4 3 4 4 4 425 4 3 4 4 3 326 4 4 4 4 4 327 4 3 4 3 3 328 4 3 4 3 4 329 3 3 4 3 3 330 4 3 4 4 4 431 4 3 4 3 3 33233343536373839 5 3 4 4 4 440 5 4 5 4 4 5

B-41

Page 62: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 5 3 5 3 4 442 3 3 4 4 4 443 4 3 4 4 4 344 4 3 4 4 4 345 4 4 4 4 4 446 5 4 4 4 4 447 5 5 5 4 5 548 3 3 4 4 4 449 4 3 4 3 4 350 4 3 4 3 4 351 5 4 5 5 5 452 5 4 5 5 5 553 4 5 4 4 4 4

Intraclass Correlation: 0.8419Pairwise Comparison: 0.5921

B-42

Page 63: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj5

12345 4 R.WS.

EG083 R.WS.

EG08R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

6 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

7 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

8 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

9 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

10 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

11 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

12 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

13 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

14 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

15 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

16 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

17 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

18 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

19 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

20 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

21 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

22 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

23 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

24 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

B-43

Page 64: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj5

25 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG04

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

26 4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

27 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

28 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

29 3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

30 4 R.WS.EG08

3 R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.WS.EG06

4 R.WS.EG08

31 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

3233343536373839 5 R.NT.

EG023 R.NT.

EG02R.CM.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

40 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG02

5 R.NT.EG04

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG04

5 R.NT.EG04

41 5 R.CM.EG01

3 R.NT.EG02

5 R.NT.EG03

3 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

42 3 R.WS.EG03

3 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG06

4 R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG03

4 R.NT.EG01

4 R.WS.EG03

43 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

44 4 R.NT.EG02

3 R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

45 4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.NT.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

46 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

47 5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG03

5 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG01

48 3 R.WS.EG03

3 R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG08

4 R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG06

4 R.WS.EG03

49 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

B-44

Page 65: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj5

50 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

51 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

52 5 R.IT.EG03

4 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

53 4 W.GN.EG01

5 W.GN.EG01

W.PR.EG04

4 W.GN.EG01

W.PR.EG03

4 W.GN.EG01

4 W.GN.EG01

4 W.GN.EG01

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.6625Standard Pairwise Comparison: 1

B-45

Page 66: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Low Medium High0 5.886793 32

1 2 3 4 5 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

6 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

7 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

8 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

9 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

10 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

11 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

12 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

13 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

14 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

15 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

16 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

B-46

Page 67: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

17 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

18 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

19 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

20 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

21 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

22 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

23 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

24 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.CM.EG02

25 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG04

26 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

27 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

28 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

29 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

30 R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.WS.EG08

R.CM.EG01

31 R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

B-47

Page 68: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

G02 G02 G02 G02 G02 G0232 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

40 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

41 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

42 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG06

R.NT.EG01

43 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

44 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

45 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG02

R.CM.EG02

46 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

47 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG03

48 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG06

R.WS.EG08

49 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

B-48

Page 69: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

51 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

52 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

53 W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

B-49

Page 70: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Low Medium High0 8.432432 123

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

5 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24R.WS.EG03

42 42 42 42 42 48 48 48 48

R.WS.EG04R.WS.EG05R.WS.EG06

14 22 23 24 30 30 42 48

R.WS.EG08

5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8

8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 1111 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 1414 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 1718 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 2121 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 24 2424 24 24 30 30 30 30 48

R.NT

R.NT.EG01

42

R.NT.EG02

39 39 39 39 39 40 41 41 41 43 43 44 44 45 45 45 45 45

R.NT.EG03

41

B-50

Page 71: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

R.NT.EG04

40 40 40 40

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

52 52 52 52 52 52

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26 30 39 40 40 41 43 46 47 47 47 47 47 51 51 51 51 51

R.CM.EG02

24 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28

28 28 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 39 39 41 4143 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 45 46 46 46 46 46 47 49 49 4949 49 49 50 50 50 50 50 50 51

R.CM.EG03

47

R.CM.EG04

25

WW.G

NW.GN.EG01

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

53 53 53 53W.GN.EG03W.P

RW.PR.E

B-51

Page 72: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

G01W.PR.EG03

53 53 53 53

W.PR.EG04

53 53 53 53

W.PS

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-52

Page 73: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

5:3 6:1 7:1 8:1 9:1 10:1 11:1 12:1 13:1 14:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 24:1R.WS.EG03

42:5 48:4

R.WS.EG04R.WS.EG05R.WS.EG06

14:1 22:1 23:1 24:1 30:2 42:1 48:1

R.WS.EG08

5:6 6:6 7:6 8:6 9:6 10:6 11:6 12:6 13:6 14:5 15:6 16:6 17:6

18:6 19:6 20:6 21:6 22:6 23:6 24:5 30:4 48:1R.N

TR.NT.EG01

42:1

R.NT.EG02

39:5 40:1 41:3 43:2 44:2 45:5

R.NT.EG03

41:1

R.NT.EG04

40:4

R.ITR.IT.EG

B-53

Page 74: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

01R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

52:6

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26:1 30:1 39:1 40:2 41:1 43:1 46:1 47:5 51:5

R.CM.EG02

24:1 25:5 26:5 27:6 28:6 29:6 31:6 39:2 41:2 43:4 44:5 45:1 46:5

47:1 49:6 50:6 51:1R.CM.EG03

47:1

R.CM.EG04

25:1

WW.G

NW.GN.EG01

53:6

W.GN.EG03W.P

RW.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03

53:1

W.PR.EG04

53:1

W.PS

B-54

Page 75: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-55

Page 76: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 2 3 4 5 R.W

S.EG01:

3

R.WS.E

G08:6

6 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

7 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

8 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

9 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

10 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

11 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

12 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

13 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

B-56

Page 77: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

14 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G08:5

15 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

16 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

17 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

18 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

19 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

20 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

21 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

22 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

23 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G08:6

24 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G08:5

R.CM.EG02:

1

B-57

Page 78: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

25 R.CM.EG02:

5

R.CM.EG04:

126 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

527 R.C

M.EG02:

628 R.C

M.EG02:

629 R.C

M.EG02:

630 R.W

S.EG06:

2

R.WS.E

G08:4

R.CM.EG01:

131 R.C

M.EG02:

632 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02:

5

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

240 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G04:4

R.CM.EG01:

241 R.N R.N R.C R.C

B-58

Page 79: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

T.EG02:

3

T.EG03:

1

M.EG01:

1

M.EG02:

242 R.W

S.EG03:

5

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.NT.E

G01:1

43 R.NT.E

G02:2

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

444 R.N

T.EG02:

2

R.CM.EG02:

545 R.N

T.EG02:

5

R.CM.EG02:

146 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

547 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG02:

1

R.CM.EG03:

148 R.W

S.EG03:

4

R.WS.E

G06:1

R.WS.E

G08:1

49 R.CM.EG02:

650 R.C

M.EG02:

651 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG02:

152 R.IT

B-59

Page 80: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

.EG03:6

53 W.GN.EG01:

6

W.PR.EG03:

1

W.PR.EG04:

1

B-60

Page 81: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EG01 [4]:

5:3[3.67

]

6:1[3]

7:1[3]

8:1[3]

9:1[3]

10:1[3]

11:1[3]

12:1[3]

13:1[3]

14:1[3]

15:1[3]

16:1[3]

17:1[3]

18:1[3]

19:1[3]

20:1[3]

21:1[3]

22:1[3]

23:1[3]

24:1[3]

R.WS.EG03 [3]:

42:5[3.6]

48:4[3.5]

R.WS.EG04 [3]:R.WS.EG05 [3]:R.WS.EG06 [4]:

14:1[3]

22:1[3]

23:1[3]

24:1[3]

30:2[3.5]

42:1[3]

48:1[4]

R.WS.EG08 [4]:

5:6[3.83

]

6:6[3.83

]

7:6[3.83

]

8:6[3.83

]

9:6[3.83

]

10:6[3.83]

11:6[3.83]

12:6[3.83]

13:6[3.83]

14:5[4]

15:6[3.83]

16:6[3.83]

17:6[3.83]

18:6[3.83]

19:6[3.83]

20:6[3.83]

21:6[3.83]

22:6[3.83]

23:6[3.83]

24:5[3.8]

30:4[3.75]

48:1[4]

R.NT

[5]:R.N 42:1

B-61

Page 82: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

T.EG01 [4]:

[4]

R.NT.EG02 [4]:

39:5[4]

40:1[4]

41:3[3.33]

43:2[3.5]

44:2[3.5]

45:5[4]

R.NT.EG03 [5]:

41:1[5]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:

40:4[4.5]

R.IT [4]:R.IT.EG01 [3]:R.IT.EG02 [4]:R.IT.EG03 [5]:

52:6[4.83]

R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG01 [5]:

26:1[4]

30:1[4]

39:1[4]

40:2[4.5]

41:1[5]

43:1[4]

46:1[5]

47:5[4.8]

51:5[4.8]

R.CM.EG02 [4]:

24:1[4]

25:5[3.4]

26:5[3.8]

27:6[3.33]

28:6[3.5]

29:6[3.17]

31:6[3.33]

39:2[3.5]

41:2[3.5]

43:4[3.5]

44:5[3.6]

45:1[4]

46:5[4]

47:1[5]

49:6[3.5]

50:6[3.5]

51:1[4]

R.C 47:1

B-62

Page 83: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

M.EG03 [5]:

[5]

R.CM.EG04 [5]:

25:1[4]

W [4]:W.G

N [4]:W.GN.EG01 [4]:

53:6[4.17]

W.GN.EG03 [4]:W.P

R [4]:W.PR.EG01 [4]:W.PR.EG03 [3]:

53:1[4]

W.PR.EG04 [4]:

53:1[5]

W.PS

[5]:W.PS.EG01 [5]:W.G

B-63

Page 84: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

R [3]:W.GR.EG01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

B-64

Page 85: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

B-65

Page 86: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-66

Page 87: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 17

345

395

175229 46 8.60 YES

W - Writing 5 7

345

223

282842 4 1.79 NO

Total 9 24

345

5118

204533 50 8.60

B-67

Page 88: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 17 46 8.60 28 40 64 43 8 27 YESW - Writing 5 7 4 1.79 50 50 33 47 17 37 YES

Total 9 24 50 8.60 30 42 60 44 9 28

B-68

Page 89: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 17 46 8.60 8.5 1.61 50 9 YES 92 5 0.53 0.03 NOW - Writing 5 7 4 1.79 1 0.45 14 6 NO 8 4 0.83 0.17 YES

Total 9 24 50 8.60 4.75 3.83 32 18 50 41 0.68 0.24

B-69

Page 90: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES YES NO

W - Writing NO YES NO YES

B-70

Page 91: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 612345 4 3 4 4 4 46 4 3 4 4 4 47 4 3 4 4 4 48 4 3 4 4 4 49 4 3 4 4 4 410 4 3 4 4 4 411 4 3 4 4 4 412 4 3 4 4 4 413 4 3 4 4 4 414 4 3 4 4 4 415 4 3 4 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 4 417 4 3 4 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 419 4 3 4 4 4 420 4 3 4 5 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 3 4 4 4 424 4 3 4 4 4 425 4 3 4 3 3 326 4 4 4 4 4 327 4 3 4 3 3 328 4 3 4 3 4 329 4 3 4 3 3 330 4 3 4 4 4 431 4 3 4 3 3 33233343536373839 4 3 4 4 4 440 5 4 5 4 4 5

B-71

Page 92: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 5 3 5 3 4 442 3 3 4 4 4 443 4 3 4 4 4 344 4 3 4 4 4 345 4 4 4 4 5 446 5 4 4 4 4 447 5 5 5 4 5 548 4 3 4 4 4 449 4 3 4 3 4 350 4 3 4 3 4 351 5 4 5 5 5 452 5 4 5 5 5 553 5 4 5 4 4 4

Intraclass Correlation: 0.8581Pairwise Comparison: 0.581

B-72

Page 93: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3 DOK4 PObj4 DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj512345 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG056 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG057 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG058 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.NT.EG04 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG059 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0510 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0511 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0512 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG0513 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0514 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0515 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0516 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0517 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0518 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0519 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0520 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 5 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0521 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0522 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0523 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0524 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0525 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0226 4 R.IT.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0227 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0228 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0229 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0230 4 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG0731 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG023233343536373839 4 R.NT.EG03 3 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG02 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0240 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.NT.EG04 R.NT.EG02 5 R.NT.EG04 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.NT.EG04 5 R.NT.EG0441 5 R.NT.EG03 3 R.NT.EG03 5 R.CM.EG01 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 4 R.NT.EG01 4 R.NT.EG0342 3 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG02 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0443 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.NT.EG03 3 R.CM.EG02

B-73

Page 94: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3 DOK4 PObj4 DOK5 PObj5 S1Obj544 4 R.NT.EG03 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.WS.EG04 3 R.CM.EG0245 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 5 R.WS.EG03 4 R.NT.EG0346 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.WS.EG02 4 R.CM.EG0247 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG0148 4 R.NT.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 4 R.NT.EG04 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.WS.EG0449 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0250 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0251 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG0252 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 R.CM.EG0153 5 W.GN.EG01 4 W.GN.EG01 5 W.GN.EG01 4 W.GN.EG01 4 R.IT.EG03 4 W.GN.EG03

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.5576Standard Pairwise Comparison: 0.9921

B-74

Page 95: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Low Medium High0 5.660378 28

1 2 3 4 5 R.W

S.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

6 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

7 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

8 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.NT.EG04

9 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

10 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

11 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

12 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

13 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

14 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

15 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

16 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

B-75

Page 96: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

17 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

18 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

19 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

20 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

21 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

22 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

23 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

24 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

25 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

26 R.IT.EG02

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

27 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

28 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

29 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

30 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

31 R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

B-76

Page 97: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

G02 G02 G02 G02 G02 G0232 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

40 R.NT.EG02

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

41 R.NT.EG01

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

42 R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

43 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

44 R.WS.EG04

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

45 R.WS.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

46 R.WS.EG02

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

47 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

48 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.NT.EG04

R.CM.EG01

49 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

B-77

Page 98: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

51 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

52 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

53 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

B-78

Page 99: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Low Medium High0 8.333333 100

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01R.WS.EG02

42 46

R.WS.EG03

45

R.WS.EG04

12 42 42 42 42 44 48 48 48

R.WS.EG05

5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8

9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 1213 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 1616 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 2020 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 24 2424 24 24 42

R.WS.EG07

5 5 6 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15

15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 2430 30 30 30 30 30 42

R.NT

R.NT.EG01

41

R.NT.EG02

39 40

R.NT.EG03

39 39 39 39 41 41 41 41 43 43 44 44 45 45 45 45 45

B-79

Page 100: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

R.NT.EG04

8 40 40 40 40 48 48

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

26

R.IT.EG03

52 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26 40 40 41 43 46 47 47 47 47 47 47 48 51 51 51 51 51 52 52

R.CM.EG02

25 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 28

28 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 39 41 43 43 4343 44 44 44 44 46 46 46 46 49 49 49 49 49 49 50 50 50 5050 50 51

R.CM.EG03R.CM.EG04W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.GN.EG03

53 53 53 53

W.PR

W.PR.E

B-80

Page 101: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

G01W.PR.EG03

53 53 53 53

W.PS

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-81

Page 102: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01R.WS.EG02

42:1 46:1

R.WS.EG03

45:1

R.WS.EG04

12:1 42:4 44:1 48:3

R.WS.EG05

5:5 6:5 7:5 8:5 9:5 10:5 11:5 12:4 13:5 14:5 15:5 16:5 17:5

18:5 19:5 20:5 21:5 22:5 23:5 24:5 42:1R.WS.EG07

5:2 6:2 7:2 8:1 9:2 10:2 11:2 12:2 13:2 14:2 15:2 16:2 17:2

18:2 19:2 20:2 21:2 22:2 23:2 24:2 30:6 42:1R.N

TR.NT.EG01

41:1

R.NT.EG02

39:1 40:1

R.NT.EG03

39:4 41:4 43:2 44:2 45:5

R.NT.EG04

8:1 40:4 48:2

R.ITR.IT.EG

B-82

Page 103: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

01R.IT.EG02

26:1

R.IT.EG03

52:5 53:1

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26:1 40:2 41:1 43:1 46:1 47:6 48:1 51:5 52:2

R.CM.EG02

25:6 26:4 27:6 28:6 29:6 31:6 39:1 41:1 43:4 44:4 46:4 49:6 50:6

51:1R.CM.EG03R.CM.EG04W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01

53:4

W.GN.EG03

53:1

W.PR

W.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03

53:1

W.PS

W.PS.EG01

B-83

Page 104: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

W.GR

W.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-84

Page 105: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 2 3 4 5 R.W

S.EG05:

5

R.WS.E

G07:2

6 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

7 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

8 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:1

R.NT.E

G04:1

9 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

10 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

11 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

12 R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:2

13 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

B-85

Page 106: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

14 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

15 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

16 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

17 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

18 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

19 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

20 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

21 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

22 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

23 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

24 R.WS.E

G05:5

R.WS.E

G07:2

B-86

Page 107: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

25 R.CM.EG02:

626 R.IT

.EG02:1

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

427 R.C

M.EG02:

628 R.C

M.EG02:

629 R.C

M.EG02:

630 R.W

S.EG07:

631 R.C

M.EG02:

632 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G03:4

R.CM.EG02:

140 R.N

T.EG02:

1

R.NT.E

G04:4

R.CM.EG01:

241 R.N R.N R.C R.C

B-87

Page 108: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

T.EG01:

1

T.EG03:

4

M.EG01:

1

M.EG02:

142 R.W

S.EG02:

1

R.WS.E

G04:4

R.WS.E

G05:1

R.WS.E

G07:1

43 R.NT.E

G03:2

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

444 R.W

S.EG04:

1

R.NT.E

G03:2

R.CM.EG02:

445 R.W

S.EG03:

1

R.NT.E

G03:5

46 R.WS.E

G02:1

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

447 R.C

M.EG01:

648 R.W

S.EG04:

3

R.NT.E

G04:2

R.CM.EG01:

149 R.C

M.EG02:

650 R.C

M.EG02:

651 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG02:

152 R.IT R.C

B-88

Page 109: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

.EG03:5

M.EG01:

253 R.IT

.EG03:1

W.GN.EG01:

4

W.GN.EG03:

1

W.PR.EG03:

1

B-89

Page 110: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EG01 [3]:R.WS.EG02 [4]:

42:1[3]

46:1[4]

R.WS.EG03 [3]:

45:1[5]

R.WS.EG04 [3]:

12:1[4]

42:4[3.5]

44:1[4]

48:3[3.67]

R.WS.EG05 [4]:

5:5[3.8]

6:5[3.8]

7:5[3.8]

8:5[3.8]

9:5[3.8]

10:5[3.8]

11:5[3.8]

12:4[3.75]

13:5[3.8]

14:5[3.8]

15:5[3.8]

16:5[3.8]

17:5[3.8]

18:5[3.8]

19:5[3.8]

20:5[4]

21:5[3.8]

22:5[3.8]

23:5[3.8]

24:5[3.8]

42:1[4]

R.WS.EG07 [4]:

5:2[3.5]

6:2[3.5]

7:2[3.5]

8:1[3]

9:2[3.5]

10:2[3.5]

11:2[3.5]

12:2[3.5]

13:2[3.5]

14:2[3.5]

15:2[3.5]

16:2[3.5]

17:2[3.5]

18:2[3.5]

19:2[3.5]

20:2[3.5]

21:2[3.5]

22:2[3.5]

23:2[3.5]

24:2[3.5]

30:6[3.83]

42:1[4]

R.NT

[4]:R.N 41:1

B-90

Page 111: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

T.EG01 [4]:

[4]

R.NT.EG02 [4]:

39:1[4]

40:1[4]

R.NT.EG03 [4]:

39:4[3.75]

41:4[3.75]

43:2[3.5]

44:2[3.5]

45:5[4]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:

8:1[4]

40:4[4.5]

48:2[4]

R.IT [4]:R.IT.EG01 [4]:R.IT.EG02 [4]:

26:1[4]

R.IT.EG03 [5]:

52:5[4.8]

53:1[4]

R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG01 [5]:

26:1[4]

40:2[4.5]

41:1[5]

43:1[4]

46:1[5]

47:6[4.83]

48:1[4]

51:5[4.8]

52:2[5]

R.CM.EG02 [4]:

25:6[3.33]

26:4[3.75]

27:6[3.33]

28:6[3.5]

29:6[3.33]

31:6[3.33]

39:1[4]

41:1[3]

43:4[3.5]

44:4[3.5]

46:4[4]

49:6[3.5]

50:6[3.5]

51:1[4]

R.C

B-91

Page 112: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

M.EG03 [5]:R.CM.EG04 [5]:W [4]:W.G

N [5]:W.GN.EG01 [5]:

53:4[4.5]

W.GN.EG03 [5]:

53:1[4]

W.PR

[4]:W.PR.EG01 [4]:W.PR.EG03 [4]:

53:1[5]

W.PS

[5]:W.PS.EG01 [5]:W.G

R [3]:W.GR.E

B-92

Page 113: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

G01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

B-93

Page 114: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-94

Page 115: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 16

345

286

125037 45 8.94 YES

W - Writing 5 8

345

224

252550 6.67 2.98 YES

Total 9 24

345

41010

164141 51.67 8.22

B-95

Page 116: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 16 45 8.94 26 41 66 44 8 26 YESW - Writing 5 8 6.67 2.98 0 0 70 46 30 46 YES

Total 9 24 51.67 8.22 21 38 67 44 12 32

B-96

Page 117: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 16 45 8.94 7.17 1.07 45 7 WEAK 87 6 0.53 0.03 NOW - Writing 5 8 6.67 2.98 1.67 0.75 21 9 NO 13 6 1 0 YES

Total 9 24 51.67 8.22 4.42 2.90 33 14 50 37 0.77 0.23

B-97

Page 118: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES WEAK NO

W - Writing YES YES NO YES

B-98

Page 119: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 61 4 3 4 4 4 42 4 3 4 4 4 43 4 3 4 4 4 44 4 3 4 4 4 45 4 3 4 4 4 46 4 3 4 4 4 47 4 3 4 4 4 489 4 3 4 4 4 41011 4 3 4 4 4 41213 4 3 4 4 4 41415 4 3 4 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 4 417 4 3 4 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 419 4 3 4 4 4 420 4 3 4 4 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 3 4 4 4 424 4 3 4 4 4 425 5 3 5 4 5 426 4 3 4 4 4 527 4 3 4 3 4 328 4 3 4 4 5 429 4 3 4 4 4 330 4 3 5 4 4 331 5 4 5 5 5 53233343536373839 4 4 4 4 4 440 4 3 5 3 4 3

B-99

Page 120: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 4 3 4 4 4 342 4 3 4 3 4 343 5 3 5 5 4 444 4 3 4 3 4 345 4 3 4 3 4 346 5 4 5 5 5 547 4 4 4 4 4 548 4 3 4 4 4 449 4 3 4 3 4 450 4 3 4 3 4 351 5 4 5 5 5 552 5 4 4 5 4 553 5 5 5 5 5 5

Intraclass Correlation: 0.8806Pairwise Comparison: 0.5794

B-100

Page 121: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

1 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

2 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

3 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

5 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

6 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

7 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

89 4 R.WS.

EG073 R.WS.

EG05R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

1011 4 R.WS.

EG073 R.WS.

EG05R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

1213 4 R.WS.

EG073 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG014 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG051415 4 R.WS.

EG073 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG014 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG054 R.WS.

EG0516 4 R.WS.

EG073 R.WS.

EG05R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

17 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

18 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.NT.EG03

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

19 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

20 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

21 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

22 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

23 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

24 4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG03

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG05

B-101

Page 122: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

25 5 R.IT.EG03

3 R.NT.EG03

5 R.NT.EG03

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.NT.EG03

4 R.CM.EG02

26 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

27 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

28 4 R.WS.EG04

3 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG05

5 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG04

29 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

30 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

R.NT.EG03

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG04

3 R.CM.EG02

31 5 R.IT.EG03

4 R.IT.EG03

5 R.NT.EG04

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.NT.EG04

3233343536373839 4 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.NT.

EG044 R.CM.

EG0240 4 R.WS.

EG013 R.CM.

EG025 R.CM.

EG013 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG0241 4 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG0242 4 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG0243 5 R.CM.

EG013 R.CM.

EG025 R.CM.

EG015 R.CM.

EG014 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG0144 4 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG0245 4 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG023 R.CM.

EG0246 5 R.IT.E

G034 R.CM.

EG015 R.IT.E

G035 R.IT.E

G035 R.IT.E

G035 R.IT.E

G0347 4 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG024 R.CM.

EG025 R.CM.

EG0148 4 R.WS.

EG043 R.WS.

EG05R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.CM.EG03

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG05

49 4 R.WS.EG04

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG07

B-102

Page 123: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

S2Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 S1Obj3

DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

50 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

51 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG03

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

52 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

53 5 W.GN.EG03

5 W.GN.EG03

5 W.GN.EG03

W.PR.EG03

5 W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG02

5 W.GN.EG01

W.PR.EG01

W.PR.EG03

5 W.GN.EG03

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.4264Standard Pairwise Comparison: 1

B-103

Page 124: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Low Medium High0 5.849057 40

1 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

2 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

5 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

6 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

7 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

8 9 R.W

S.EG03

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

10 11 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

12 13 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

14 15 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

16 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

B-104

Page 125: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

17 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

18 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.NT.EG03

19 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

20 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

21 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

22 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

23 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

24 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

25 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

26 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

27 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

28 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

29 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

30 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG04

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

31 R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.IT.EG

R.IT.EG

R.IT.EG

R.IT.EG

B-105

Page 126: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

G04 G04 03 03 03 0332 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG04

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

40 R.WS.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

41 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

42 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

43 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

44 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

45 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

46 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

47 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

48 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.CM.EG03

49 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

B-106

Page 127: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

51 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG03

52 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

53 W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.GN.EG03

W.PR.EG01

W.PR.EG01

W.PR.EG01

W.PR.EG01

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

W.PR.EG03

B-107

Page 128: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Low Medium High0 8.611111 83

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

2 3 4 5 6 7 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 28 40 48

49 49R.WS.EG03

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 28

R.WS.EG04

1 9 23 28 28 48 49 49

R.WS.EG05

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5

6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 11 13 13 1313 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 1919 19 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 2424 24 24 28 48 48

R.WS.EG07

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

28 28 48 48 48 49 49 49 49R.N

TR.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.EG03

18 25 25 25 29 30

R.NT.EG04

30 31 31 39

R.IT

B-108

Page 129: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

R.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25 31 31 31 31 46 46 46 46 46

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26 30 30 40 43 43 43 43 46 47 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52

R.CM.EG02

25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 29 29 29 29 29 29 30

30 30 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 41 42 4242 42 42 42 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 45 4747 47 47 47 50 50 50 50 50 50 52 52

R.CM.EG03

48 51

R.CM.EG04W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01

53 53 53 53

W.GN.EG02

53 53 53 53

W.GN.EG03

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.WPW.PR.EG01

53 53 53 53

B-109

Page 130: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

W.PR.EG03

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PS

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-110

Page 131: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1 18:1 19:1

20:1 21:1 22:1 24:1 28:1 40:1 48:1 49:2R.WS.EG03

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:1 11:1 16:1 19:1 20:1 21:1

22:1 23:1 24:1 28:1R.WS.EG04

1:1 9:1 23:1 28:2 48:1 49:2

R.WS.EG05

1:4 2:4 3:4 4:4 5:4 6:4 7:4 9:4 11:4 13:4 15:4 16:4 17:4

18:4 19:4 20:4 21:4 22:4 23:4 24:4 28:1 48:2R.WS.EG07

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:1 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 24:1 28:2 48:3 49:4R.N

TR.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.EG03

18:1 25:3 29:1 30:1

R.NT.EG04

30:1 31:2 39:1

R.ITR.IT.EG

B-111

Page 132: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

01R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25:1 31:4 46:5

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26:1 30:2 40:1 43:4 46:1 47:1 51:5 52:4

R.CM.EG02

25:2 26:5 27:6 29:6 30:3 39:5 40:4 41:6 42:6 43:2 44:6 45:6 47:5

50:6 52:2R.CM.EG03

48:1 51:1

R.CM.EG04W

W.GN

W.GN.EG01

53:1

W.GN.EG02

53:1

W.GN.EG03

53:5

W.WPW.PR.EG01

53:1

W.PR.EG03

53:2

W.PS

B-112

Page 133: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-113

Page 134: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

2 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

3 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

4 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

5 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

6 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

7 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

8 9 R.W

S.EG03:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

10 11 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

12 13 R.W R.W R.W

B-114

Page 135: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

S.EG01:

1

S.EG05:

4

S.EG07:

114 15 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

16 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

17 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

18 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

R.NT.E

G03:1

19 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

20 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

21 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

22 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

23 R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

24 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G05:4

R.WS.E

G07:1

B-115

Page 136: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

25 R.NT.E

G03:3

R.IT.EG03:1

R.CM.EG02:

226 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

527 R.C

M.EG02:

628 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G03:1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:1

R.WS.E

G07:2

29 R.NT.E

G03:1

R.CM.EG02:

630 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.NT.E

G04:1

R.CM.EG01:

2

R.CM.EG02:

331 R.N

T.EG04:

2

R.IT.EG03:4

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG04:

1

R.CM.EG02:

540 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

441 R.C

B-116

Page 137: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

M.EG02:

642 R.C

M.EG02:

643 R.C

M.EG01:

4

R.CM.EG02:

244 R.C

M.EG02:

645 R.C

M.EG02:

646 R.IT

.EG03:5

R.CM.EG01:

147 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

548 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

R.CM.EG03:

149 R.W

S.EG01:

2

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G07:4

50 R.CM.EG02:

651 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG03:

152 R.C R.C

B-117

Page 138: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

M.EG01:

4

M.EG02:

253 W.G

N.EG01:

1

W.GN.EG02:

1

W.GN.EG03:

5

W.PR.EG01:

1

W.PR.EG03:

2

B-118

Page 139: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EG01 [4]:

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

24:1[4]

28:1[4]

40:1[4]

48:1[3]

49:2[3]

R.WS.EG03 [3]:

1:1[3]

2:1[3]

3:1[3]

4:1[3]

5:1[3]

6:1[3]

7:1[3]

9:1[3]

11:1[3]

16:1[3]

19:1[3]

20:1[3]

21:1[3]

22:1[3]

23:1[3]

24:1[3]

28:1[3]

R.WS.EG04 [3]:

1:1[4]

9:1[4]

23:1[4]

28:2[4]

48:1[4]

49:2[3.5]

R.WS.EG05 [4]:

1:4[3.75

]

2:4[3.75

]

3:4[3.75

]

4:4[3.75

]

5:4[3.75

]

6:4[3.75

]

7:4[3.75

]

9:4[3.75

]

11:4[3.75]

13:4[3.75]

15:4[3.75]

16:4[3.75]

17:4[3.75]

18:4[3.75]

19:4[3.75]

20:4[3.75]

21:4[3.75]

22:4[3.75]

23:4[3.75]

24:4[3.75]

28:1[4]

48:2[3.5]

R.WS.EG07 [4]:

1:1[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:1[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:1[4]

24:1[4]

28:2[4]

48:3[3.67]

49:4[3.75]

R.NT

[5]:

B-119

Page 140: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

R.NT.EG01 [4]:R.NT.EG02 [4]:R.NT.EG03 [5]:

18:1[3]

25:3[4.33]

29:1[3]

30:1[3]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:

30:1[4]

31:2[5]

39:1[4]

R.IT [4]:R.IT.EG01 [4]:R.IT.EG02 [4]:R.IT.EG03 [5]:

25:1[5]

31:4[4.75]

46:5[5]

R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG01 [5]:

26:1[5]

30:2[4.5]

40:1[5]

43:4[4.75]

46:1[4]

47:1[5]

51:5[4.8]

52:4[4.75]

R.CM.EG02 [4]:

25:2[4]

26:5[3.8]

27:6[3.5]

29:6[3.67]

30:3[3.33]

39:5[4]

40:4[3.25]

41:6[3.67]

42:6[3.5]

43:2[3.5]

44:6[3.5]

45:6[3.5]

47:5[4]

50:6[3.5]

52:2[4]

B-120

Page 141: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

R.CM.EG03 [5]:

48:1[4]

51:1[5]

R.CM.EG04 [5]:W [5]:W.G

N [5]:W.GN.EG01 [5]:

53:1[5]

W.GN.EG02 [5]:

53:1[5]

W.GN.EG03 [5]:

53:5[5]

W.WP [4]:W.PR.EG01 [4]:

53:1[5]

W.PR.EG03 [4]:

53:2[5]

W.PS

[5]:W.PS.EG01 [5]:

B-121

Page 142: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

W.GR

[3]:W.GR.EG01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

B-122

Page 143: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-123

Page 144: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 17

345

287

114741 45.5 10.06 YES

W - Writing 5 7

345

214

281457 6 3.06 YES

Total 9 24

345

4911

163745 51.5 9.62

B-124

Page 145: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 17 45.510.06 27 40 59 44 13 33 YESW - Writing 5 7 6 3.06 0 0 67 47 33 47 YES

Total 9 24 51.5 9.62 23 38 60 45 17 37

B-125

Page 146: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 17 45.5 10.06 6.83 1.07 40 6 WEAK 88 6 0.55 0.04 NOW - Writing 5 7 6 3.06 1.5 0.76 21 11 NO 12 6 1 0 YES

Total 9 24 51.5 9.62 4.17 2.82 31 13 50 39 0.78 0.22

B-126

Page 147: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES WEAK NO

W - Writing YES YES NO YES

B-127

Page 148: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 61 4 3 4 4 4 42 4 3 4 4 4 43 4 3 4 4 4 44 4 3 4 4 4 45 4 3 4 4 4 46 4 3 4 4 4 47 4 3 4 4 4 489 4 3 4 4 4 41011 4 3 4 4 4 41213 4 3 4 4 4 41415 4 3 4 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 4 417 4 3 4 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 419 4 3 4 4 4 420 4 3 4 4 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 3 4 4 4 424 4 3 4 4 4 425 5 4 5 4 5 426 4 4 4 4 4 527 4 3 4 3 4 328 4 3 4 4 5 429 4 3 4 4 4 330 4 3 5 4 4 431 5 4 5 5 5 53233343536373839 4 4 4 4 4 440 4 3 5 3 4 3

B-128

Page 149: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 4 3 4 4 4 342 4 3 4 3 4 343 5 3 5 5 4 444 4 3 4 3 4 345 4 3 4 3 4 346 5 4 5 5 5 547 4 4 4 4 4 548 4 3 4 4 4 449 4 3 4 3 4 450 4 3 4 3 4 351 5 4 5 5 5 552 4 4 4 5 4 553 5 5 5 5 5 5

Intraclass Correlation: 0.8855Pairwise Comparison: 0.5937

B-129

Page 150: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

1 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

2 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

3 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

4 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

5 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

6 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

7 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

89 4 R.WS.

EG053 R.WS.

EG05R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

1011 4 R.WS.

EG053 R.WS.

EG07R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

1213 4 R.WS.

EG053 R.WS.

EG07R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

1415 4 R.WS.

EG053 R.WS.

EG07R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

16 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

17 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

18 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

19 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

20 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

21 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

22 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

23 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

24 4 R.WS.EG05

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG05

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

4 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG04

B-130

Page 151: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

25 5 R.IT.EG03

4 R.NT.EG03

5 R.NT.EG03

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.NT.EG03

4 R.CM.EG02

26 4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

27 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

28 4 R.WS.EG04

3 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG04

5 R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG07

29 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

30 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.NT.EG03

4 R.NT.EG03

31 5 R.IT.EG03

4 R.NT.EG04

5 R.NT.EG04

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.NT.EG04

5 R.NT.EG04

3233343536373839 4 R.CM.

EG024 R.NT.

EG03R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.NT.EG03

4 R.CM.EG02

40 4 R.CM.EG01

3 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

41 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

42 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

43 5 R.CM.EG01

3 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG01

44 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

45 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

46 5 R.IT.EG03

4 R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

5 R.IT.EG03

47 4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

48 4 R.WS.EG04

3 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG07

4 R.CM.EG03

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

49 4 R.WS.EG04

3 R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG04

4 R.WS.EG02

4 R.WS.EG07

B-131

Page 152: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1

DOK2 PObj2 S1Obj2

DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4

S2Obj4

DOK5 PObj5

50 4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

4 R.CM.EG02

3 R.CM.EG02

51 5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG03

5 R.CM.EG01

5 R.CM.EG01

52 4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

4 R.CM.EG02

5 R.CM.EG01

53 5 W.GN.EG02

5 W.GN.EG02

5 W.GN.EG02

W.PR.EG04

5 W.GN.EG02

5 W.GN.EG01

W.PR.EG04

W.SP.EG01

5 W.GN.EG02

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.3834Standard Pairwise Comparison: 1

B-132

Page 153: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Low Medium High0 5.830189 36

1 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

2 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

5 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

6 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

7 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

8 9 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

10 11 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

12 13 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

14 15 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

16 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

B-133

Page 154: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

17 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

18 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

19 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

20 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

21 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

22 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

23 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

24 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

25 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

26 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

27 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

28 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

29 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

30 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

31 R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.IT.EG

R.IT.EG

B-134

Page 155: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

G04 G04 G04 G04 03 0332 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

40 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

41 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

42 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

43 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

44 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

45 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

46 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

47 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

48 R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.CM.EG03

49 R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

B-135

Page 156: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

51 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG03

52 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

53 W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.SP.EG01

W.SP.EG01

W.SP.EG01

W.SP.EG01

B-136

Page 157: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Low Medium High0 8.583333 69

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

R.WS.EG02

16 21 22 23 48 49

R.WS.EG03R.WS.EG04

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 11 13 15 17 18 19 20 23 24 24

28 28 48 48 49 49 49R.WS.EG05

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 9 9 11 11 13 13

15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 2424

R.WS.EG07

1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7

9 9 11 11 11 13 13 13 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 1818 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 23 23 24 24 28 2828 28 48 48 48 49 49 49

R.NT

R.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.EG03

25 25 25 26 30 30 39 39 40 43

B-137

Page 158: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

R.NT.EG04

31 31 31 31

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25 31 31 46 46 46 46 46 46

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26 30 30 40 40 43 43 43 43 46 47 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52

R.CM.EG02

25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 29 29 29 29 29 29 30

30 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 41 42 42 4242 42 42 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 4747 47 47 50 50 50 50 50 50 52 52

R.CM.EG03

48 51

R.CM.EG04WW.WGW.GN.EG01

53 53 53 53

W.GN.EG02

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.WP

B-138

Page 159: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

W.PR.EG01W.PR.EG04

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PS

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

53 53 53 53

B-139

Page 160: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:1 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 24:1R.WS.EG02

16:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 48:1 49:1

R.WS.EG03R.WS.EG04

1:2 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:2 11:1 13:1 15:1 17:1 18:1

19:1 20:1 23:1 24:2 28:2 48:2 49:3R.WS.EG05

1:2 2:2 3:2 4:2 5:2 6:2 7:2 9:2 11:2 13:2 15:2 16:2 17:2

18:2 19:2 20:2 21:2 22:2 23:2 24:2R.WS.EG07

1:2 2:3 3:3 4:3 5:3 6:3 7:3 9:2 11:3 13:3 15:3 16:3 17:3

18:3 19:3 20:3 21:3 22:3 23:2 24:2 28:4 48:3 49:3R.N

TR.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.EG03

25:3 26:1 30:2 39:2 40:1 43:1

R.NT.EG04

31:4

B-140

Page 161: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25:1 31:2 46:6

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26:1 30:2 40:2 43:4 46:1 47:1 51:5 52:4

R.CM.EG02

25:2 26:5 27:6 29:6 30:2 39:5 40:4 41:6 42:6 43:2 44:6 45:6 47:5

50:6 52:2R.CM.EG03

48:1 51:1

R.CM.EG04WW.WGW.GN.EG01

53:1

W.GN.EG02

53:5

W.WPW.PR.EG01W.PR.EG04

53:2

W.PS

B-141

Page 162: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

53:1

B-142

Page 163: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:2

2 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

3 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

4 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

5 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

6 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

7 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

8 9 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:2

10 11 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

12 13 R.W R.W R.W R.W

B-143

Page 164: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

S.EG01:

1

S.EG04:

1

S.EG05:

2

S.EG07:

314 15 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

16 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G02:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

17 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

18 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

19 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

20 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

21 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G02:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

22 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G02:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

23 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G02:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:2

24 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:2

R.WS.E

G07:2

B-144

Page 165: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

25 R.NT.E

G03:3

R.IT.EG03:1

R.CM.EG02:

226 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

527 R.C

M.EG02:

628 R.W

S.EG04:

2

R.WS.E

G07:4

29 R.CM.EG02:

630 R.N

T.EG03:

2

R.CM.EG01:

2

R.CM.EG02:

231 R.N

T.EG04:

4

R.IT.EG03:2

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG03:

2

R.CM.EG02:

540 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

2

R.CM.EG02:

441 R.C

B-145

Page 166: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

M.EG02:

642 R.C

M.EG02:

643 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

4

R.CM.EG02:

244 R.C

M.EG02:

645 R.C

M.EG02:

646 R.IT

.EG03:6

R.CM.EG01:

147 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

548 R.W

S.EG02:

1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

R.CM.EG03:

149 R.W

S.EG02:

1

R.WS.E

G04:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

50 R.CM.EG02:

651 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG03:

152 R.C R.C

B-146

Page 167: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

M.EG01:

4

M.EG02:

253 W.G

N.EG01:

1

W.GN.EG02:

5

W.PR.EG04:

2

W.SP.E

G01:1

B-147

Page 168: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EG01 [4]:

1:1[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:1[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:1[4]

24:1[4]

R.WS.EG02 [4]:

16:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:1[4]

48:1[4]

49:1[4]

R.WS.EG03 [3]:R.WS.EG04 [3]:

1:2[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:2[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

23:1[4]

24:2[4]

28:2[4]

48:2[3.5]

49:3[3.33]

R.WS.EG05 [4]:

1:2[3.5]

2:2[3.5]

3:2[3.5]

4:2[3.5]

5:2[3.5]

6:2[3.5]

7:2[3.5]

9:2[3.5]

11:2[3.5]

13:2[3.5]

15:2[3.5]

16:2[3.5]

17:2[3.5]

18:2[3.5]

19:2[3.5]

20:2[3.5]

21:2[3.5]

22:2[3.5]

23:2[3.5]

24:2[3.5]

R.WS.EG07 [4]:

1:2[3.5]

2:3[3.67

]

3:3[3.67

]

4:3[3.67

]

5:3[3.67

]

6:3[3.67

]

7:3[3.67

]

9:2[3.5]

11:3[3.67]

13:3[3.67]

15:3[3.67]

16:3[3.67]

17:3[3.67]

18:3[3.6

19:3[3.6

20:3[3.6

21:3[3.6

22:3[3.6

23:2[3.5]

24:2[3.5]

28:4[4]

48:3[3.6

49:3[3.6

B-148

Page 169: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

7] 7] 7] 7] 7] 7] 7]R.N

T [5]:R.NT.EG01 [5]:R.NT.EG02 [4]:R.NT.EG03 [5]:

25:3[4.67]

26:1[4]

30:2[4]

39:2[4]

40:1[3]

43:1[3]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:

31:4[4.75]

R.IT [4]:R.IT.EG01 [4]:R.IT.EG02 [4]:R.IT.EG03 [5]:

25:1[5]

31:2[5]

46:6[4.83]

R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG01 [5]:

26:1[5]

30:2[4.5]

40:2[4.5]

43:4[4.75]

46:1[4]

47:1[5]

51:5[4.8]

52:4[4.5]

R.CM.E

25:2[4]

26:5[4]

27:6[3.5]

29:6[3.6

30:2[3.5]

39:5[4]

40:4[3.2

41:6[3.6

42:6[3.5]

43:2[3.5]

44:6[3.5]

45:6[3.5]

47:5[4]

B-149

Page 170: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

G02 [4]:

7] 5] 7]

50:6[3.5]

52:2[4]

R.CM.EG03 [5]:

48:1[4]

51:1[5]

R.CM.EG04 [5]:W [5]:W.WG [5]:W.GN.EG01 [5]:

53:1[5]

W.GN.EG02 [5]:

53:5[5]

W.WP [5]:W.PR.EG01 [5]:W.PR.EG04 [4]:

53:2[5]

W.PS

[5]:W.PS.EG01 [5]:

B-150

Page 171: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

W.GR

[3]:W.GR.EG01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

53:1[5]

B-151

Page 172: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-152

Page 173: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 17

345

287

114741 49.5 12.05 YES

W - Writing 5 8

345

215

251262 5.33 1.89 NO

Total 9 25

345

4912

163648 54.83 12.58

B-153

Page 174: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 17 49.5 12.05 30 40 57 44 13 32 YESW - Writing 5 8 5.33 1.89 0 0 75 43 25 43 YES

Total 9 25 54.8312.58 25 39 60 44 15 35

B-154

Page 175: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 17 49.5 12.05 7.17 1.95 42 11 WEAK 90 3 0.55 0.04 NOW - Writing 5 8 5.33 1.89 1.33 0.47 17 6 NO 10 3 1 0 YES

Total 9 25 54.83 12.58 4.25 3.24 29 16 50 40 0.78 0.23

B-155

Page 176: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES WEAK NO

W - Writing NO YES NO YES

B-156

Page 177: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 61 4 3 4 4 4 42 4 3 4 4 4 43 4 3 4 4 4 44 4 3 4 4 4 45 4 3 4 4 4 46 4 3 4 4 4 47 4 3 4 4 4 489 4 3 4 4 4 41011 4 3 4 4 4 41213 4 3 4 4 4 41415 4 3 4 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 4 417 4 3 4 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 419 4 3 4 4 4 420 4 3 4 4 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 3 4 4 4 424 4 3 4 4 4 425 5 4 5 4 5 426 4 4 4 4 5 527 4 3 4 3 4 328 4 3 4 4 5 429 4 3 4 4 4 330 4 3 5 4 4 431 5 4 5 5 5 53233343536373839 4 4 4 4 4 440 4 3 5 3 4 3

B-157

Page 178: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 4 3 4 4 4 342 4 3 4 3 4 343 5 3 5 5 4 444 4 3 4 3 4 345 4 3 4 3 4 346 5 4 5 5 5 547 4 4 4 4 4 548 4 3 4 4 4 449 4 3 4 3 4 450 4 3 4 3 4 351 5 4 5 5 5 552 4 4 4 5 4 553 5 5 5 5 5 5

Intraclass Correlation: 0.887Pairwise Comparison: 0.5889

B-158

Page 179: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 S2Obj4 DOK5 PObj51 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.NT.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG072 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG073 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG074 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG075 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG076 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG077 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0789 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG071011 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG071213 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG071415 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0716 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0717 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0718 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0719 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0720 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0721 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0722 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0723 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0724 4 R.WS.EG05 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG01 4 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG05 4 R.WS.EG0725 5 R.IT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG03 5 R.NT.EG03 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.NT.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0226 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG0127 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0228 4 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG04 5 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG0729 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0230 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG0331 5 R.IT.EG03 4 R.NT.EG04 5 R.NT.EG04 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.NT.EG04 5 R.NT.EG043233343536373839 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.NT.EG03 4 R.CM.EG0240 4 R.CM.EG01 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG01 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0241 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG04 3 R.CM.EG0242 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0243 5 R.CM.EG01 3 R.NT.EG03 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG01

B-159

Page 180: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 S2Obj4 DOK5 PObj544 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0245 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0246 5 R.IT.EG03 4 R.IT.EG03 R.CM.EG01 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG03 5 R.IT.EG0347 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG0148 4 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG04 R.WS.EG07 4 R.WS.EG07 4 R.CM.EG03 4 R.WS.EG02 4 R.WS.EG0749 4 R.WS.EG04 3 R.WS.EG07 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG07 3 R.WS.EG04 4 R.WS.EG02 4 R.WS.EG0750 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG02 4 R.CM.EG02 3 R.CM.EG0251 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG03 5 R.CM.EG01 5 R.CM.EG0152 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG01 4 R.CM.EG02 5 R.CM.EG0153 5 W.GN.EG02 5 W.GN.EG02 5 W.GN.EG02 5 W.GN.EG02 5 W.GN.EG01 W.PR.EG04 R.WS.EG03 5 W.GN.EG02

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.389Standard Pairwise Comparison: 0.9921

B-160

Page 181: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Low Medium High0 6.207547 36

1 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.NT.EG04

2 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

3 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

4 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

5 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

6 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

7 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

8 9 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

10 11 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

12 13 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

14 15 R.W

S.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

16 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

B-161

Page 182: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

17 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

18 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

19 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

20 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

21 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

22 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

23 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

24 R.WS.EG01

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG05

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

25 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

26 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

27 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

28 R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

29 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

30 R.NT.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

31 R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.NT.E

R.IT.EG

R.IT.EG

B-162

Page 183: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

G04 G04 G04 G04 03 0332 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG03

R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

40 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

41 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG04

42 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

43 R.NT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

44 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

45 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

46 R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.IT.EG03

R.CM.EG01

47 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

48 R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.CM.EG03

49 R.WS.EG02

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG04

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

R.WS.EG07

50 R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

B-163

Page 184: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

51 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG03

52 R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG01

R.CM.EG02

R.CM.EG02

53 R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

R.WS.EG03

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG01

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.GN.EG02

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

W.PR.EG04

B-164

Page 185: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Low Medium High0 8.891891 68

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

R.WS.EG02

48 49

R.WS.EG03

53 53 53 53

R.WS.EG04

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

23 24 28 28 48 48 49 49 49R.WS.EG05

1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7

7 9 9 9 11 11 11 13 13 13 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 1718 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 23 23 23 2424 24

R.WS.EG07

1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7

9 9 11 11 11 13 13 13 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 1818 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 22 22 23 23 24 24 24 2828 28 28 48 48 48 49 49 49

R.NT

R.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.E

25 25 25 26 30 30 39 39 40 43

B-165

Page 186: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

G03R.NT.EG04

1 31 31 31 31

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25 31 31 46 46 46 46 46 46

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26 30 30 40 40 43 43 43 43 46 47 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 52

R.CM.EG02

25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 29 29 29 29 29 29 30

30 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 42 42 42 4242 42 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 47 4747 47 50 50 50 50 50 50 52 52

R.CM.EG03

48 51

R.CM.EG04

41

WW.G

NW.GN.EG01

53 53 53 53

W.GN.EG02

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.

B-166

Page 187: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

WPW.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03W.PR.EG04

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PS

W.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-167

Page 188: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EG01

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:1 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 24:1R.WS.EG02

48:1 49:1

R.WS.EG03

53:1

R.WS.EG04

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:2 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:2 24:1 28:2 48:2 49:3R.WS.EG05

1:3 2:3 3:3 4:3 5:3 6:3 7:3 9:3 11:3 13:3 15:3 16:3 17:3

18:3 19:3 20:3 21:3 22:3 23:3 24:3R.WS.EG07

1:2 2:3 3:3 4:3 5:3 6:3 7:3 9:2 11:3 13:3 15:3 16:3 17:3

18:3 19:3 20:3 21:3 22:3 23:2 24:3 28:4 48:3 49:3R.N

TR.NT.EG01R.NT.EG02R.NT.EG03

25:3 26:1 30:2 39:2 40:1 43:1

R.NT.EG04

1:1 31:4

B-168

Page 189: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

R.ITR.IT.EG01

R.IT.EG02

R.IT.EG03

25:1 31:2 46:6

R.CM

R.CM.EG01

26:1 30:2 40:2 43:4 46:1 47:1 51:5 52:4

R.CM.EG02

25:2 26:5 27:6 29:6 30:2 39:5 40:4 41:5 42:6 43:2 44:6 45:6 47:5

50:6 52:2R.CM.EG03

48:1 51:1

R.CM.EG04

41:1

WW.G

NW.GN.EG01

53:1

W.GN.EG02

53:5

W.WPW.PR.EG01W.PR.EG03W.PR.E

53:2

B-169

Page 190: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

G04W.P

SW.PS.EG01W.G

RW.GR.EG01W.S

PW.SP.EG01

B-170

Page 191: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:2

R.NT.E

G04:1

2 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

3 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

4 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

5 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

6 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

7 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

8 9 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:2

10 11 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

12 13 R.W R.W R.W R.W

B-171

Page 192: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

S.EG01:

1

S.EG04:

1

S.EG05:

3

S.EG07:

314 15 R.W

S.EG01:

1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

16 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

17 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

18 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

19 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

20 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

21 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

22 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

23 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:2

24 R.WS.E

G01:1

R.WS.E

G04:1

R.WS.E

G05:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

B-172

Page 193: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

25 R.NT.E

G03:3

R.IT.EG03:1

R.CM.EG02:

226 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

527 R.C

M.EG02:

628 R.W

S.EG04:

2

R.WS.E

G07:4

29 R.CM.EG02:

630 R.N

T.EG03:

2

R.CM.EG01:

2

R.CM.EG02:

231 R.N

T.EG04:

4

R.IT.EG03:2

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.N

T.EG03:

2

R.CM.EG02:

540 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

2

R.CM.EG02:

441 R.C R.C

B-173

Page 194: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

M.EG02:

5

M.EG04:

142 R.C

M.EG02:

643 R.N

T.EG03:

1

R.CM.EG01:

4

R.CM.EG02:

244 R.C

M.EG02:

645 R.C

M.EG02:

646 R.IT

.EG03:6

R.CM.EG01:

147 R.C

M.EG01:

1

R.CM.EG02:

548 R.W

S.EG02:

1

R.WS.E

G04:2

R.WS.E

G07:3

R.CM.EG03:

149 R.W

S.EG02:

1

R.WS.E

G04:3

R.WS.E

G07:3

50 R.CM.EG02:

651 R.C

M.EG01:

5

R.CM.EG03:

152 R.C R.C

B-174

Page 195: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

M.EG01:

4

M.EG02:

253 R.W

S.EG03:

1

W.GN.EG01:

1

W.GN.EG02:

5

W.PR.EG04:

2

B-175

Page 196: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EG01 [4]:

1:1[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:1[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:1[4]

24:1[4]

R.WS.EG02 [4]:

48:1[4]

49:1[4]

R.WS.EG03 [3]:

53:1[5]

R.WS.EG04 [3]:

1:1[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:2[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:2[4]

24:1[4]

28:2[4]

48:2[3.5]

49:3[3.33]

R.WS.EG05 [4]:

1:3[3.67

]

2:3[3.67

]

3:3[3.67

]

4:3[3.67

]

5:3[3.67

]

6:3[3.67

]

7:3[3.67

]

9:3[3.67

]

11:3[3.67]

13:3[3.67]

15:3[3.67]

16:3[3.67]

17:3[3.67]

18:3[3.67]

19:3[3.67]

20:3[3.67]

21:3[3.67]

22:3[3.67]

23:3[3.67]

24:3[3.67]

R.WS.EG07 [4]:

1:2[3.5]

2:3[3.67

]

3:3[3.67

]

4:3[3.67

]

5:3[3.67

]

6:3[3.67

]

7:3[3.67

]

9:2[3.5]

11:3[3.67]

13:3[3.67]

15:3[3.67]

16:3[3.67]

17:3[3.67]

18:3 19:3 20:3 21:3 22:3 23:2 24:3 28:4 48:3 49:3

B-176

Page 197: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

[3.67]

[3.67]

[3.67]

[3.67]

[3.67]

[3.5] [3.67]

[4] [3.67]

[3.67]

R.NT

[5]:R.NT.EG01 [5]:R.NT.EG02 [4]:R.NT.EG03 [5]:

25:3[4.67]

26:1[4]

30:2[4]

39:2[4]

40:1[3]

43:1[3]

R.NT.EG04 [5]:

1:1[4]

31:4[4.75]

R.IT [4]:R.IT.EG01 [4]:R.IT.EG02 [4]:R.IT.EG03 [5]:

25:1[5]

31:2[5]

46:6[4.83]

R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EG01 [5]:

26:1[5]

30:2[4.5]

40:2[4.5]

43:4[4.75]

46:1[4]

47:1[5]

51:5[4.8]

52:4[4.5]

R.C 25:2 26:5 27:6 29:6 30:2 39:5 40:4 41:5 42:6 43:2 44:6 45:6 47:5

B-177

Page 198: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

M.EG02 [4]:

[4] [4.2] [3.5] [3.67]

[3.5] [4] [3.25]

[3.6] [3.5] [3.5] [3.5] [3.5] [4]

50:6[3.5]

52:2[4]

R.CM.EG03 [5]:

48:1[4]

51:1[5]

R.CM.EG04 [5]:

41:1[4]

W [5]:W.G

N [5]:W.GN.EG01 [5]:

53:1[5]

W.GN.EG02 [5]:

53:5[5]

W.WP [5]:W.PR.EG01 [5]:W.PR.EG03 [5]:W.PR.EG04 [4]:

53:2[5]

W.PS

B-178

Page 199: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

[5]:W.PS.EG01 [5]:W.G

R [3]:W.GR.EG01 [3]:W.S

P [3]:W.SP.EG01 [3]:

B-179

Page 200: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11Number of Assessment Items - 42

B-180

Page 201: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.1Categorical Concurrence Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Level by Objective HitsCat.

Concurr. Title Goals #

Objs # Level # of objs by

Level% w/in std by

Level Mean S.D.

R - Reading 4 16

3456

2761

1243376

44.83 7.71 YES

W - Writing 4 5

45

14

2080 3.33 0.67 NO

Total 8 21

3456

28101

938474

48.17 8.17

B-181

Page 202: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.2Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsLevel of Item w.r.t. Standard

DOK Consistency % Under % At % Above

Title Goals # Objs # M S.D. M S.D. M S.D. M S.D.R - Reading 4 16 44.83 7.71 24 35 69 38 7 23 YESW - Writing 4 5 3.33 0.67 20 40 80 40 0 0 YES

Total 8 21 48.17 8.17 23 36 71 38 6 21

B-182

Page 203: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.3Range-of-Knowledge Correspondence and Balance of Representation Between Standards and Assessment as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards HitsRange of Objectives

Rng. of Know. Balance Index

Bal. of Represent. # Objs Hit % of Total % Hits in Std/Ttl Hits Index

Title Goals # Objs # Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.R - Reading 4 16 44.83 7.71 3.83 0.69 24 4 NO 93 3 0.72 0.11 YESW - Writing 4 5 3.33 0.67 0.83 0.17 17 3 NO 7 2 0.83 0.17 YES

Total 8 21 48.17 8.17 2.33 1.50 20 4 50 42 0.78 0.16

B-183

Page 204: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.4Summary of Attainment of Acceptable Alignment Level on Four Content Focus Criteria as Rated by Six ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11Number of Assessment Items - 42

Standards Alignment CriteriaCategorical Concurrence

Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency

Range of Knowledge

Balance of Representation

R - Reading YES YES NO YES

W - Writing NO YES NO YES

B-184

Page 205: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 61 4 3 4 4 4 42 4 3 4 4 4 43 4 3 4 4 4 44 4 3 4 4 4 45 4 4 4 4 4 46 4 4 4 4 4 47 4 4 4 4 4 489 4 4 4 4 4 41011 4 3 4 4 4 41213 4 3 4 4 4 41415 4 4 4 4 4 416 4 4 4 4 4 417 4 4 4 4 4 418 4 4 4 4 4 419 4 4 4 4 4 420 4 4 4 4 4 421 4 3 4 4 4 422 4 3 4 4 4 423 4 4 4 4 4 424 4 4 4 4 4 425 4 4 4 4 4 426 4 3 4 4 4 427 3 3 4 3 3 328 4 3 4 4 4 429 4 3 4 4 4 330 4 3 4 4 4 331 5 4 5 4 5 53233343536373839 4 4 4 4 4 440 4 3 4 4 4 3

B-185

Page 206: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.6Depth-of-Knowledge Levels by Item and ReviewersIntraclass CorrelationMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 641 5 4 5 4 4 542 4 3 4 4 4 343 4 4 4 4 4 444 4 3 4 4 5 445 5 5 4 4 5 546 4 3 4 4 4 347 4 3 4 4 4 348 4 3 4 4 4 349 4 3 4 4 3 450 4 4 4 4 4 351 5 4 5 4 5 552 5 4 5 4 4 553 5 5 5 4 4 5

Intraclass Correlation: 0.8199Pairwise Comparison: 0.7095

B-186

Page 207: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 DOK5 PObj5

1 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB072 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB073 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB074 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB075 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB076 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB077 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0789 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB071011 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB071213 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB071415 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0716 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0717 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0718 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0719 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0720 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0721 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0722 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0723 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0724 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 4 R.WS.EB04 4 R.WS.EB0725 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB0226 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0727 3 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0228 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0729 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0230 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0231 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB03 5 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB01323334353637

B-187

Page 208: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.8DOK Levels and Objectives Coded by Each ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item

DOK0 PObj0 DOK1 PObj1 S1Obj1 DOK2 PObj2 DOK3 PObj3 DOK4 PObj4 S1Obj4 DOK5 PObj5

3839 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB0240 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0241 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.NT.EB03 4 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB0142 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0243 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 R.WS.EB07 4 R.CM.EB0244 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB04 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 5 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0745 5 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.IT.EB01 4 R.WS.EB02 5 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB0146 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0247 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0248 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0249 4 R.WS.EB07 3 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB02 3 R.WS.EB07 4 R.WS.EB0750 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 4 R.CM.EB02 3 R.CM.EB0251 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.NT.EB03 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB0152 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 5 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB01 4 R.CM.EB02 5 R.CM.EB0153 5 W.GN.EB02 5 W.GN.EB01 5 W.GN.EB02 4 4 W.GN.EB02 5 W.GN.EB02

Objective Pairwise Comparison: 0.561Standard Pairwise Comparison: 1

B-188

Page 209: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Low Medium High0 5.45283 20

1 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

2 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

3 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

4 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

5 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

6 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

7 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

8 9 R.W

S.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

10 11 R.W

S.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

12 13 R.W

S.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

14 15 R.W

S.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

16 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

B-189

Page 210: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

17 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

18 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

19 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

20 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

21 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

22 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

23 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

24 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

25 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

26 R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.CM.EB02

27 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

28 R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.CM.EB02

29 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

30 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

31 R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

R.CM.E

B-190

Page 211: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

B01 B01 B01 B01 B01 B0332 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.C

M.EB01

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

40 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

41 R.NT.EB03

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

42 R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

43 R.WS.EB07

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

44 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB04

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

45 R.WS.EB02

R.IT.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

46 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

47 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

48 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

49 R.WS.EB02

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

R.WS.EB07

50 R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

R.CM.EB02

B-191

Page 212: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.9Objectives Coded to Each Item by ReviewersMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

51 R.NT.EB03

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

52 R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB01

R.CM.EB02

53 W.GN.EB01

W.GN.EB01

W.GN.EB01

W.GN.EB01

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

W.GN.EB02

B-192

Page 213: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Low Medium High0 9.03125 106

RR.W

SR.WS.EB02

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

44 45 49R.WS.EB03R.WS.EB04

1 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 9 9 11 11 13 13 15 15

16 16 17 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 22 22 23 24 24 44R.WS.EB05R.WS.EB07

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5

5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 11 1313 13 13 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 1819 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 2323 23 23 23 24 24 24 24 26 26 26 26 26 28 28 28 28 28 4344 44 44 44 44 49 49 49 49 49

R.NT

R.NT.EB01R.NT.EB02R.NT.EB03

41 51

R.NT.EB04

B-193

Page 214: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

R.ITR.IT.EB01

45

R.IT.EB02

R.IT.EB03

R.CM

R.CM.EB01

31 31 31 31 31 39 41 41 41 41 41 42 43 43 45 45 45 45 51 51

51 51 51 52 52 52 52 52R.CM.EB02

25 25 25 25 25 25 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 29 29 29 29 29 29

30 30 30 30 30 30 39 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 4242 42 42 42 43 43 43 43 46 46 46 46 46 46 47 47 47 47 4747 48 48 48 48 48 48 50 50 50 50 50 50 52

R.CM.EB03

31

R.CM.EB04W

W.GN

W.GN.EB01

53 53 53 53

W.GN.EB02

53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

W.PR

W.PR.EB01W.P

S

B-194

Page 215: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.10Items Coded by Reviewers to Each ObjectiveMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

W.PS.EB01W.G

RW.GR.EB01

B-195

Page 216: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Low Medium High1 3 6

RR.W

SR.WS.EB02

1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:1 9:1 11:1 13:1 15:1 16:1 17:1

18:1 19:1 20:1 21:1 22:1 23:1 24:1 44:1 45:1 49:1R.WS.EB03R.WS.EB04

1:2 2:2 3:1 4:2 5:2 6:2 7:1 9:2 11:2 13:2 15:2 16:2 17:2

18:2 19:1 20:2 21:1 22:2 23:1 24:2 44:1R.WS.EB05R.WS.EB07

1:4 2:4 3:5 4:4 5:4 6:4 7:5 9:4 11:4 13:4 15:4 16:4 17:4

18:4 19:5 20:4 21:5 22:4 23:5 24:4 26:5 28:5 43:1 44:5 49:5R.N

TR.NT.EB01R.NT.EB02R.NT.EB03

41:1 51:1

R.NT.EB04 R.ITR.IT.EB01

45:1

B-196

Page 217: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

R.IT.EB02

R.IT.EB03

R.CM

R.CM.EB01

31:5 39:1 41:5 42:1 43:2 45:4 51:5 52:5

R.CM.EB02

25:6 26:1 27:6 28:1 29:6 30:6 39:6 40:6 42:5 43:4 46:6 47:6 48:6

50:6 52:1R.CM.EB03

31:1

R.CM.EB04W

W.GN

W.GN.EB01

53:1

W.GN.EB02

53:4

W.PR

W.PR.EB01W.P

SW.PS.EB01W.G

RW.GR.E

B-197

Page 218: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.11Number of Reviewers Coding an Item by Objective (Item Number: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

B01

B-198

Page 219: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Low Medium High1 3 6

1 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

2 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

3 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

4 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

5 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

6 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

7 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

8 9 R.W

S.EB02:

1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

10 11 R.W

S.EB02:

1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

12 13 R.W R.W R.W

B-199

Page 220: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

S.EB02:

1

S.EB04:

2

S.EB07:

414 15 R.W

S.EB02:

1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

16 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

17 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

18 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

19 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

20 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

21 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

22 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

23 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

24 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.WS.E

B04:2

R.WS.E

B07:4

B-200

Page 221: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

25 R.CM.EB02:

626 R.W

S.EB07:

5

R.CM.EB02:

127 R.C

M.EB02:

628 R.W

S.EB07:

5

R.CM.EB02:

129 R.C

M.EB02:

630 R.C

M.EB02:

631 R.C

M.EB01:

5

R.CM.EB03:

132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 R.C

M.EB01:

1

R.CM.EB02:

640 R.C

M.EB02:

641 R.N R.C

B-201

Page 222: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

T.EB03:

1

M.EB01:

542 R.C

M.EB01:

1

R.CM.EB02:

543 R.W

S.EB07:

1

R.CM.EB01:

2

R.CM.EB02:

444 R.W

S.EB02:

1

R.WS.E

B04:1

R.WS.E

B07:5

45 R.WS.E

B02:1

R.IT.EB01:1

R.CM.EB01:

446 R.C

M.EB02:

647 R.C

M.EB02:

648 R.C

M.EB02:

649 R.W

S.EB02:

1

R.WS.E

B07:5

50 R.CM.EB02:

651 R.N

T.EB03:

1

R.CM.EB01:

552 R.C R.C

B-202

Page 223: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.12Number of Reviewers Coding an Objective by Item (Objective: Number of Reviewers)MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

M.EB01:

5

M.EB02:

153 W.G

N.EB01:

1

W.GN.EB02:

4

B-203

Page 224: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Low DOK

Matched DOK

High DOK

1 3 6

R [4]:R.W

S [4]:R.WS.EB02 [4]:

1:1[4]

2:1[4]

3:1[4]

4:1[4]

5:1[4]

6:1[4]

7:1[4]

9:1[4]

11:1[4]

13:1[4]

15:1[4]

16:1[4]

17:1[4]

18:1[4]

19:1[4]

20:1[4]

21:1[4]

22:1[4]

23:1[4]

24:1[4]

44:1[4]

45:1[4]

49:1[4]

R.WS.EB03 [3]:R.WS.EB04 [3]:

1:2[3.5]

2:2[3.5]

3:1[3]

4:2[3.5]

5:2[4]

6:2[4]

7:1[4]

9:2[4]

11:2[3.5]

13:2[3.5]

15:2[4]

16:2[4]

17:2[4]

18:2[4]

19:1[4]

20:2[4]

21:1[3]

22:2[3.5]

23:1[4]

24:2[4]

44:1[3]

R.WS.EB05 [4]:R.WS.EB07 [4]:

1:4[3.75

]

2:4[3.75

]

3:5[3.8]

4:4[3.75

]

5:4[4]

6:4[4]

7:5[4]

9:4[4]

11:4[3.75]

13:4[3.75]

15:4[4]

16:4[4]

17:4[4]

18:4[4]

19:5[4]

20:4[4]

21:5[3.8]

22:4[3.75]

23:5[4]

24:4[4]

26:5[3.8]

28:5[3.8]

43:1[4]

44:5[4]

49:5[3.6]

R.NT

[5]:R.NT.EB01

B-204

Page 225: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

[5]:R.NT.EB02 [4]:R.NT.EB03 [5]:

41:1[5]

51:1[5]

R.NT.EB04 [5]:R.IT [4]:R.IT.EB01 [4]:

45:1[4]

R.IT.EB02 [4]:R.IT.EB03 [5]:R.CM

[5]:R.CM.EB01 [5]:

31:5[4.8]

39:1[4]

41:5[4.4]

42:1[4]

43:2[4]

45:4[5]

51:5[4.6]

52:5[4.6]

R.CM.EB02 [4]:

25:6[4]

26:1[4]

27:6[3.17]

28:1[4]

29:6[3.67]

30:6[3.67]

39:6[4]

40:6[3.67]

42:5[3.6]

43:4[4]

46:6[3.67]

47:6[3.67]

48:6[3.67]

50:6[3.83]

52:1[4]

R.CM.E

31:1[4]

B-205

Page 226: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.13Assessment Item DOK vs Consensus DOK (Item Number: Number of Reviewers [Average DOK])MI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

B03 [6]:R.CM.EB04 [5]:W [5]:W.G

N [5]:W.GN.EB01 [5]:

53:1[5]

W.GN.EB02 [5]:

53:4[4.75]

W.PR

[5]:W.PR.EB01 [5]:W.P

S [5]:W.PS.EB01 [5]:W.G

R [4]:W.GR.EB01 [4]:

B-206

Page 227: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 228: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Appendix C

Reviewers Notes and Source of Challenge Comments

Michigan Funtional Independence Asessments English Language Arts

Grades 3-8 and 11

Page 229: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 230: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Brief Explanation of Data in the Alignment Tables by Column

Tables grade.5Comments made by reviewers on items identified as having a Source-of-Challenge issue by item number.

Tables grade.7All notes made by reviewers on items by item number.

C-1

Page 231: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item Number Comments by Reviewer15 Students would have to recognize or read the word "soup." Otherwise,

basket could be consider correct also.22 The student may know the "n" sound and letter cue but not know the t

sound and eliminate the two "n" choices to get the correct answer.23 The student may know this picture as a "bunny" and get the correct

answer rabbit because it is the only answer that has the letter-sound "b" in it even though the b is in the middle of the word.

C-2

Page 232: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item Number Comments by Reviewer1 The student may only need to know the initial letter-sound of the picture

cue to answer this item but they may also only recognize a sight word and not know the initial letter-sound. This could also be aligned to WS.02.EG12 because the student could use letter-sound cues and semantic cues to identify an unknown word that completes the sentence.

1 FL04, WS11,WS12 Standards could match.However, fluency & use of strategies would be difficult to assess in a group setting administration.

1 Without the Dolch Sight Word list to reference it is very difficult to ascertain whether this word occurs on the list.

2 This could also be aligned to WS.02.EG12 because the student could use letter-sound cues and semantic cues to identify an unknown word that completes the sentence. The student may only need to know the initial letter-sound of the picture cue to answer this item but they may also only recognize a sight word and not know the initial letter-sound

2 See Item 1 comments3 See Item 1 comments3 unsure of Dolch list without having it in front of me4 See comment 15 This answer is typically a high frequency word in K-1 so it could be

aligned to the fluency standard as well as knowning the initial sound-letter to answer correctly

5 See comment 16 This answer may also be a frequently, encountered word which is

WS.02.EG.056 Distractors water and candy require students to use picture cue to gain

meaning6 The student may not know that the picture represents food, an abstract

concept. They may focus on an element of the picture, for example, the grapes.

7 Requires more than initial sounds to select word.9 The answer is a frequently used word in K-1 so it may also align with WS

EG 07 and 139 Same comment as Item 111 Similar to Item 6 Distractors bear and goat require student to use picture

cue for meaning.13 I am not sure a student would know what this picture is so they would

need to know how to decode the word choices and then know the meaning of the choices.

13 Requires comprehenison that item is a note by understanding a message. 15 Requires more than initial sounds16 the student could know the beginning and ending sounds of the picture to

identify the word or they could just know the meaning of the sight words in the choices without using the letter sound cues.

18 Same comment as item 1

C-3

Page 233: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

Item Number Comments by Reviewer19 Same comment as item 625 Needs to connect personal knowledge of sharing experiences. Requires

main idea.25 This story is mainly about an abstract idea-sharing. Not as easy to grasp

as a story about fishing or going to the zoo.26 Infers relationship where students can use personal experience to

determine answers26 It is never directly stated that Mrs. Stone is Tom's teacher. The reader

must infer that relationship from her actions and the setting. 27 CM03 Asking a question led into the focus of sharing.

NT0329 EG02 is a bit of a stretch, but the text does not actually say that he wanted

brown paint--only that he is looking for it. Hence, the reader does draw a mini conclusion.

42 The reader would need to draw a small conclusion about why Bill is happy.

43 The reader would need to bring an understanding of list making to the text to make the inference.

48 The question requires a very mild inference, but the rest of the EGLCE EG02 doesn't seem applicable.

51 Again, a very mild inference. The rest of the EGLCE EG02 does not seem to apply especially well.

53 The prompt by itself is at Stage 4 which requires the student to construct sentences around one idea with supporting details. However, in order to respond to the checklist, the student is asked a couple of questions that requires the student to review and possibly edit the content of their composition so there are several expectations in the one item.

53 It is difficult to say which objectives are more significant for secondary positions, but I think the genre one is definitely primary.

C-4

Page 234: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item Number Comments by Reviewer43 /boys pulled weeds-does not necessarily mean cleaned yard/ So choice B

seems inaccurate, 46 Unsure if water creatures is accurate/

C-5

Page 235: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

Item Number Comments by Reviewer21 could be 2 correct answers. John could find the dirty dishes and he could

wash them. Context suggests that washed is the correct answer.25 The item could, I think, also be viewed as very mildly inferential, as the

text paragraphs do not state the date. However, a careful reading of the chart provides the date, so it's a detail.

28 This item was interesting. The student had two different ways to access the requested information. The task was more difficult if they used the chart. They had to recognize the function of the chart, locate Omar and then note the column heading that identified his job. The other option was to locate the information in the note at the bottom.

41 The student must draw a conclusion as to where the story takes place.41 State doing things around house42 this item does not refer the student directly back to a sentence in the text,

just "the story."42 drawing conclusions44 no correct answer; what he does last is read a book. Item 43 and 44 cue

each other.47 The inference is very, very mild in this case. It comes close to being a

"right there" question.48 does not refer students to sentence in story; just "the passage"51 This item requires a stronger ability to draw conclusions.

C-6

Page 236: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item Number Comments by Reviewer43 See 3rd Grade comment

C-7

Page 237: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

Item Number Comments by Reviewer25 The item could, I think, also be viewed as very mildly inferential, as the

text paragraphs do not state the date. However, a careful reading of the chart provides the date, so it's a detail.

30 does not take student directly back to a sentence in the text; just refers to "the chart"

47 This is very mildly inferential--almost "right there."51 This requires a stronger inference than I have seen before in the test items.

C-8

Page 238: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item Number Comments by Reviewer

C-9

Page 239: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

Item Number Comments by Reviewer29 This assessment item asks the student to attend to the sequence of events.

There is not a standard that clearly addresses the issue of sequencing. The one selected has to do with maid idea and details.

30 The student must draw a conclusion to answer this correctly.31 I believe that this is considered a functional passage. As such, it combines

elements of narrative text and informational text and the standards that were aligned were from those two different domains.

40 Another inferential question--not clearly stated in the text.43 This is a very mild inferential question.49 could also be a comprehension detail as item does not ask for definition of

energy, but rather for someone who has energy, so may not be using context; same for item 48.

51 not exactly a correct answer; should have something about "being fun" or "friend" etc. in it.

51 This one threw me. I kept looking for a direct reference to reading a book.52 I like this item format.

C-10

Page 240: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item Number Comments by Reviewer

C-11

Page 241: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

Item Number Comments by Reviewer48 comparing key ideas -activity level with exercise

C-12

Page 242: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item Number Comments by Reviewer

C-13

Page 243: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

Item Number Comments by Reviewer51 comparing the 3 choices52 Expresses Opinion53 Three things not a BME

C-14

Page 244: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.5Source-of-Challenge Issues by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item Number Comments by Reviewer1 Depending on the perspective of the student, both A and C might be

possible answers. For example, going late to the movie might mean they get someone to assist them with their wheelchair to get a good seat.

6 The office could be located on sixth street as well as the sixth floor. Even though the sentence flows better with "the sixth floor," one could argue that street can be correct.

22 Lots of supermarkets now have books that a person can buy. So if the student is not familiar with a library but often goes to the store to buy a book, the student would get this item wrong for the wrong reason.

C-15

Page 245: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.7Notes by ReviewerMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

Item Number Comments by Reviewer23 May be more than 1 correct answer. Messages could also be written in a

book. (i. e. log book to check back)28 There is a slight amount of inference in this item as the words "special

things" are not in the text; the words in the text are "such as a stereo or power windows." As inference this would be coded as a stage 5 and CM...01. The underlined word suggests it was intended to be a word study item, so it is coded WS.

29 Although items like this one say to refer back to the passage, the word itself seems too easy and may be more at a DOK level of 3. Perhaps the vocabulary selected for referring back to the text should be more content specific vocabulary in science, social studies, etc

31 Very little difficulty in item compared to EGLC DOK so I'm not sure this measures the EGLC.

40 A little bit of inference there, but coded as a detail.42 Although I coded this item 01 because the answer is not explicitly stated

in the text, the corresponding DOK of 5 (our group coding) seems in conflict since the inferential answer is very elementary in nature.

43 Item 43 may cue item 4443 This might be considered very mildly inferential.44 Do item 43 and 44 cue each other in some way?45 Is this a text comprehension item? There is no mention of any of the foils

in the text. Clearly based on connecting personal experience as the statement suggests, but is the item resding comprehension?

45 I'm not sure what this goes under. It has to do with identification of the appropriate reference material.

53 Seems to be a weak prompt for this grade level if student chooses to respond in writing. Seems as if a list might emerge and it would be hard to write with great detail. Drawing might be the better way to respond as it could incorporate great detail. (which may be ok)May be appropriate for a younger age. If prompt were, however, tied to a reading selection, i. e. about Peter's making pizza, it might strengthen the response. "You read earlier about Peter making dinner for his friends. Tell about

53 This item doesn't appear to match any of the Narrative or Informational Text. It lacks any type of complexity expected in EGLC.

53 This writing prompt was more simplistic than the previous 8th grade writing prompt where the student was asked to "imagine" and then support what they wanted to know about their new school with rationale. I feel that this writing prompt is so simplistic and concrete that it is better suited to elementary students. It was very loosely aligned with the GNO2 (opinion/reason).

C-16

Page 246: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Appendix D

Debrief Summary Notes

Michigan Functional Independence Assessments English Language Arts,

Grades 3-8 and 11

Page 247: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial
Page 248: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes, but first 20 items were very repetitious; questions from reading selections included main idea, details, predictions, conclusions, context. Some on setting. Balance of narrative and informational passages. No separate language or editing items. · The items did not cover all the expected alternate performance indicators. The word identification did not focus on the meaning of words.The stem of the items were the same throughout so there was only the recognition or decoding of single words so pictures cues were used predominantly. The informational and narrative text expectations were not covered. The writing genre for informational writing was the only standard that was represented in the one item. · It is very difficult in group-administered assessment to determine whether students are reading strategically. Although the student may identify the word correctly, he/she may not necessarily have used a strategy to do so. A few more questions about vocabulary words in context might be helpful in this respect.· I felt the different narrative and informational text were not sufficiently assessed.· It was difficult to discern how the EGLCE's for narrative and information text were being measured other than the fact that those two types of text were represented in the assessment. In the Word Recognition section there weren't many items that assessed words related to enviornment or words that were frequently encountered, personally meaningful. · I felt that not all the standards were addressed in the assessment. In the word study there could have been more on strategies. In Narrative Text more could have been addressed with authors and reflective questioning. There was also not much on Informational Text and deeper comprehension. I didn't think there was really anything on grammar and spelling.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· Stages ranged from 3 to 5.· Most of the items were at stage 3 and 4 which were the same for the standards. However, the higher level items were typically not assessed. · I thought the standards were covered in a range of DOK levels. It's very difficult to assess extended thinking in a statewide assessment.· I felt there was a lot of inconsistency between the DOK of the item and the standards which made it difficult to select an eglc· In the comprehensin section there could have been more items that required students to discern the relationships of characters within the story. Additionally, students could have responded to questions about author's purpose. It is not possible to measure WS.02.EG12 in a group administered format. You need to be able to ascertain the strategy that the student is using. · For the most part I seemed to rate most at the level 3 with a few 4s. There could have been more 1 and 2.

D-1

Page 249: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 3.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 3

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Most EGLCEs are specific in word study, comprehension, writing process, etc; The verb "begins to" seems to cause some confusion as it seems to emphasize development rather than the specific verb intended, i. e. identify, recognize, use, apply, etc. · Some standards were vague and not measurable such as "begins to become familiar".· I believe the standards are appropriate.· Standards need to be revised for more clarity in assessment· There were some problems with the verbs. Some were not action verbs ( begin to narrow, become familiar)or not measureable. · Yes I believe so however some of the wording such as begin to becomme familiar with can be somewhat subjective.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (1) : 17%iii. Needs slight improvement (4) : 67%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

E. Comments

· Are 20 items of such similariity really necessary? Could other EGLCEs be assessed? I thought the range of SPED stages in the reading section had a fairly wide range with 3, 4, and 5. Appreciated seeing a fairly large number of stage 4 and 5 items. Same ECGCE was used for both main idea and detail; the same goes for prediction and conclusions, so variation may not be evident. Writing prompt seems appropriate for this grade level.· Only two out of five categories in reading were really represented in the assessment so the range was limited. The balance also seemed to be weighted on literal comprehension and word identification.· As with every project, additional work after sessions such as this usually results in improvement, but I thought the assessment was sound.· The Writing portion would be enhanced if the students proveded the organized that they utilized. · I felt that the assessment only focused in on a few of the standards. There needs to be more standards in the assessment.

D-2

Page 250: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes. Many repetitive items on word meaning in context; many questions in passages were details; in some passages there were some inferential questions.· For the most part, the important topics were assessed. The ones that were not assessed were typically written in a way that cannot be measured by a multiple choice test such as "become familiar with quality and culturally diverse literature."· I thought the items represented the standards fairly well. The word study items, due to the format, seemed all to fit under context clues to me. They could possibly also be from the first 1000 Dolch list words, but it seems to me that the sentence-with-blank format calls for context clues.· The items did not adequately cover the various EGLC'S. · The standards were divided by narrative and informational text. The standards that were written under those domains did not address the kinds of subtle comprehension differences that might occur when reading different text. Additionally, the passage that was more functional (incorporated a narrative portion and a chart) was difficult to score. The comprehension standards seem somewhat incomplete. · In word study they could have had more on word structure and strategies. It seemed to focus only on using context.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· Used stages 3, 4, and 5· Even though many word study items required students to read in context and determine the missing word, the items were very simplistic and seemed to be requiring basic recall of a sight word.· I thought the items required performances that were all at a solid DOK level. · I would like to see more 5 DOK levels across the standards.· Yes, I did feel that each standard covered the most important DOK levels.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Standards are specific enough to code most test items approrpiately.· Standards appear to be written appropriate for the grade and would only recommend revision to standards that using language such as "begin to" or "become familiar"· The standards are specific enough, I think, and the expectations are challenging--as they should be.· The standards need to be revised to be more specific. Begins to and Become make it difficult to determine what is expected.

D-3

Page 251: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 4

· Many standards were poorly written. They appeared to include too many aspects. For example, NT..03. EG02 involves simple story elements such as character, setting, etc. but it extends the item tol include the theme or lesson which is far more difficult. · Yes, I believe so.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (1) : 17%iii. Needs slight improvement (4) : 67%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

E. Comments

· Text comprehension items seem to be more literal and direct at previous grade level.· This grade seems smoother, partly because we gained in our understanding through the processing we did yesterday and today, but also because the EGLCE's dropped the "begin to" qualifier.

D-4

Page 252: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes· For the most part, the important topics were assessed. The ones that were not assessed were typically written in a way that cannot be measured by a multiple choice test such as "become familiar with quality and culturally diverse literature."· The items seemed to bridge the standards fairly well, although the format for the word study questions seemed to call for the context EGLCE. · See comments made for grade 3· For the word study again it only focused in on using context strategies.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· 3, 4, and 5· Even though many word study items required students to read in context and determine the missing word, the items were very simplistic and seemed to be requiring basic recall of a sight word.· The required performances edge into the higher compentencies. It will be interesting to see if we move all the way to any level six performances.· For most standards they were at a performance of 3 or 4.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Yes· Standards appear to be written appropriate for the grade and would only recommend revision to standards that using language such as "begin to" or "become familiar"· Yes, the standards seem appropriate for fifth grade.· I believe for Special Education they are appropriate.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (2) : 33%iii. Needs slight improvement (3) : 50%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

E. Comments

D-5

Page 253: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 4.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 5

· some literal items could be made inferential

D-6

Page 254: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes. vocab in context, main idea, author's purpose, details, inference; little on predicting. · Each standard in reading was covered but many items often only covered a few indicators such as determining and recognizing words in context. The writing prompt requires students to use the writing process, personal style, grammar, and spelling but is not explicitly a stated expectation. The student checklist after they complete the composition does not have any grammar or spelling questions.· The items seemed to cover most of the standards. Word study seems to concentrate on one EGLCE.· There was limited coverage of the standards in the items. I would like to see more of a range in DOK and use of more EGLC's.· The word study standards were fairly redundant. They need to be simplified and synthesized. This issue of sequencing was not addressed.· I felt that the topics were representing several of the standards.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· stages 3, 4, and 5· Most word study items appeared to be at the basic recall level even when determining a missing word in context. There were often more recall items with the reading passages and comprehension as well but the DOK level for inferences and conclusions were present.· The DOK levels were sufficiently deep--actually quite good.· I felt that the standards covered the appropriate DOK for the grade level taking the assessment.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Yes· Yes, the standards were written appropriately for the grade. The only challenge was that several indicators within the Word Study strand seemed to be asking the student to demonstrate the same knowledge and skill. Also, it is difficult to measure a statement that starts with "Begin to" or "become familiar"· I thought the standards were sound as presented.· Standards need to be written more specifically and not include DOK at varing levels in the same EGLC. Often the DOK score on the standard was more difficult than the test item DOK for that standard. Certainly, revisiting the EGLC's with Alignment Study will make some significant improvements.· Yes

D-7

Page 255: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 6

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (2) : 33%iii. Needs slight improvement (3) : 50%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

E. Comments

· Still several voc in context to choose from as as previous grade levels; some items in test meant to be vocab in context (underlined words) but refer to the passage rather than the word meaning. Some detail items could be made inferential. Like alternate title item. More of these. One passage had a chart but there were no items that student had to answer based on the chart. If so, why include the chart?

D-8

Page 256: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes; see previous comments· In Word Study, the expectation to read in context was thoroughly cover but items did not necessarily require the student to used sound/symbol/structural relationships to identify the unknown words. In the comprehension section, only a few topics were covered, eg themes/lessons, main ideas, details, meaning of vocabulary, inference, and conclusions. In writing, I would recommend that the checklist questions incorporate some grammar and spelling checks.· The items covered most of the important topics. The reading strategies, other than context, did not appear in any clear form. · Please see 6th Grade Comments· For the most part it seems to cover the same standards for the primary. Even though I used the same standard for my primary I did feel that the items addressed more than one standard.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· Yes. 3, 4, and 5· Most items seemed to be at a basic recall or identification level. Only the items related to inference, conclusion, and main ideas were up to basic reasoning. · Yes, the DOK levels were as I expected.· Most of my DOK's were 3 through 4. Could have possibly had a few 2s.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Yes· The standards appear to be written appropriately for the grade and level of cognitive ability for the students. · The standards were acceptable.· The standards between grades 5-7 were very similiar but appropriate.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (1) : 17%iii. Needs slight improvement (4) : 67%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

D-9

Page 257: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 7

E. Comments

· see earlier comments

D-10

Page 258: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Topics are similar to previous grade levels: vocab in context, (too many items that are similar)(still difficult to determine which statement to use.) main idea and detail are still one standard; author's purpose is used as are some inference. Wrtg appears to be the same in each grade level as well. Would also like to see prediction, questions on character and setting. · In Word Study, the expectation to read in context was thoroughly cover but items did not necessarily require the student to used sound/symbol/structural relationships to identify the unknown words. In the comprehension section, only a few topics were covered, eg themes/lessons, main ideas, details, meaning of vocabulary, inference, and conclusions. In writing, I would recommend that the checklist questions incorporate some grammar and spelling checks.· The topics were basically covered, with the exception of reading strategies focusing on context. This format does not lend itself to assessing other strategy application.· Word Study--Many of the EGLCE's in the Word Study Domain would be difficult to measure in a group administered format because they require students to utilize strategies to identify meaning or decode unfamiliar words. The use of those strategies would not be readily observable in a group administered format. · I feel that several of the items covered several of the standards even though I felt the primary was one standard for many.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· Yes. Stages 3, 4, and 5 were used.· Most items seemed to be at a basic recall or identification level. Only the items related to inference, conclusion, and main ideas were up to basic reasoning. · The DOK levels seem quite strong, and I think that's good.· Text Comprehension--The mix of narrative and expository text was appropriate. The functional passages appeared to incorporate both narrative and expository which was interesting from a teaching perspective but a little difficult ot code accurately. · The DOK levels that I used mostly on the alignment were 3-5. I didn't use any 1 or 2 but at this grade level maybe that is not needed.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Standards do not vary a lot from grade level to grrade level so they remain fairly specific.· The standards appear to be written appropriately for the grade and level of cognitive ability for the students. · The EGLCE seem to be appropriate, although I would think that there could and should

D-11

Page 259: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 7.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 8

have been more changes between sixth and seventh grade.· Revisit the verbs used to be more specific. ie. recall, reproduce, identify and avoid Begin to and Become aware of. Consider breaking Eglc's that can be consider two different DOK's based on what part is tested or write EGLC so that item is written at higher level. Revisit the WS EGLC's to determine if some could be eliminated or combined because they are very similar. If not consider making clear disctinctions between them. It is suggested that there be more of a progression in difficulty of word recognition across the grades. Students could progress in early elementary with one syllable word recognition to multisyllabic words in 11th grade. Comprehension questions seemed to be more literal. Need questions that require more complex reasoning. For example: provide two short texts for students to read and determine theme. At each Grade level specific genre should be introduced as it is in general education and then the complexity of test items to increase through all grade levels.· Word Study--The term "grade level reading and oral language contexts" is somewhat ambiguous. Does it mean chronological grade level or does it mean the instructional grade level for the student since those can be dramatically different as you consider the higher grades. · The standards for grade 6 and 7 were very similiar. There was very little change. Taking into consideration this population taking the test that may be the case. I do feel they were appropriate for grade level.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (1) : 17%iii. Needs slight improvement (4) : 67%iv. Needs major improvement (1) : 17%

E. Comments

· since standards varied very very little from previous grade level, analysis should be almost identical.· It is difficult to select level of improvement on all grade levels. In general, the EGLC's are well developed, but there is definitely a need for improvement. Due to the number of EGLC's it seems impossible to test them all. However, the test should cover the various levels of DOK.

D-12

Page 260: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

A. For each standard, did the items cover the most important topics you expected by the standard? If not, what topics were not assessed that should have been?

· Yes. Same kind of items present in earlier grade levels and same item missing. Items focused heavily on vocabulary in context; also covered detail and main idea in informational and narrative selections with some inference, which is very good. No interpretation of charts, graphic organizers, prediction or writing process (same is true in other grade levels.)spelling is missing from grade 11. Seems that most informational pieces are restructed to literal questions, except one in one passgae at this grade level that may not be text (redaing comprehension) just personal experience.· Not all the standards were covered by the assessment items. the narrative text and informational text objectives were not assessed with the passages for grade 11.· The coverage is fairly sound, although strategies for constructing meaning are difficult to assess in this format. Some of the EGLCE are not covered.· There were very few standards covered by the items presented. · Word STudy--No, at this age you would expect to see the assessemnt covering more content area vocabulary, interpretation of phrases, etc. Text Comprehension--No, the problems may be due to the level of text that doesn't allow for an in-depth analysis as specified in the EGLCE's. Many of the EGLCE's also require cross text comparisions, which were not included. Expressing Ideas--See notes after item.· Again I felt that the majority of the topics primary aligned to one standard but several could fall under it. Not a lot to do with grammar, spelling and genre identification. I do realize the writing portion addresses the spelling and grammar but that is just one item.

B. For each standard, did the items cover the most important performance (DOK levels) you expected by the standard? If not, what performance was not assessed?

· stages 3, 4, and 5 were used throughout.· Most items were at a level lower than the DOK's expected by the standard. There were very few items that represented complex reasoning. · I thought the DOK levels came out to be quite strong.· Overall, the items clearly lacked the complexity to meet the EGLC and DOK. This was especially true in the writing prompts. The level of expection just did not show a progression in level of difficulty throughout the grades. This becames especially apparent when using the 11th grade Writing Genres Standards. · My DOK levels were again between 3-5.

C. Were the standards written at an appropriate level of specificity and directed towards expectations appropriate for the grade level?

· Yes. Standards are similar from grade level to grade level and are specific except with duplication of context clues.· The standards were all written relatively high which would be expected for grade 11.

D-13

Page 261: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial

Table 11.15Debriefing SummaryMI Functional Independence ELA Grade 11

However, given the population taking this assessment, some of the standards could have been written at a lower complexity level.· Yes, I thought the standards were appropriate as written in most cases.· The standards appeared to be written at a more difficult level then previous grades while items seem to be even more simplistic. Expectations jump significantly from MS to HS without prepartion at early grades for the expectiations at high school. Perhaps looking at the 11th Grade EGLC's and working backwards through the grades would fill in the gaps (ie. grammar & usage,Writing Genres and Word Study). Across grade level the Word Study EGLC's are unclear and somewhat similar so it is difficult to determine what is expected with each one and how they are different. There also appears to be a discrepancy across grade levels with the expectation of reading the 1000 Dolch word while also expecting students to be able to read grade level science, social studies, and science vocab. The sight word expectations should grow with each grade level and not stay stagnate with the Dolch 1000 Word List. · Word Study--Generally, the vocabulary selected appeared to be the same difficulty or easier than Grades 6-8. Additionally, the stem of many items contained only one sentence and the sentences were very short, all contributing to a lesser difficulty level. · I do feel the assessment and standards were written at an appropriate level.

D. What is your general opinion of the alignment between the standards and assessment:

ii. Acceptable Alignment (1) : 17%iii. Needs slight improvement (3) : 50%iv. Needs major improvement (2) : 33%

E. Comments

· On the whole assessments are well-done but exceptions are noted. Too many of the same type in the first 20 questions at each grade level; could write items that address affixes, synonyms, antonyms, etc. Nice range of stages 3, 4, and 5; writing prompts generally ok but related more to genre than wrtg process. other "headings, i. e. personal style, grammar and usage, genres, literary devices, etc. not assessed either.· Overall, the reading items appeared to be simpler tasks but automaticity was probably expected. · Things I'd like to see: Two short texts for students to analyze and determine theme. Comprehension questions that match the EGLC'S DOK. Sentences or Paragraphs where students need to do some editing or revising.

D-14

Page 262: Appendix A - SOM - State of Michigan€¦  · Web viewLevel Description DOK R Reading 4 R.WS WORD STUDY 3 R.WS.EG04 Begin to narrow possibilities in predicting words using—initial