AOPA EUROCAE · 2017-09-30 · EUROCAE activities of interest Potential GA activites GA...
39
Madrid, 30 September 2017 AOPA – EUROCAE Christian Schleifer-Heingärtner Secretary General
Transcript of AOPA EUROCAE · 2017-09-30 · EUROCAE activities of interest Potential GA activites GA...
Madrid, 30 September 2017
AOPA – EUROCAE
Christian Schleifer-Heingärtner Secretary General
EUROCAE Governing Bodies
✈President and General Assembly
✈Strategic decisions through “Full Members” votes
✈Council
✈Final decision-making body
✈Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
✈Technical and operational advisor to the Council and the General Secretariat
✈General Secretariat
✈Day to day management and further development of the Association
Inputs for StandardisationMembership
R&D
SESAR JU
Manufacturers
International
Bodies
ICAO
Other SDO
RTCA, SAE
Regulators
(national, EASA)
Organisations
(ECTL, ECA,
IFATCA, CANSO)
Service
Providers
ESO
✈220+ Members (+10% p.a.)
✈115 in 2010
✈36 active working groups
✈26 in 2010
✈1400 experts
EUROCAE facts and figures
EUROCAE Role
✈strong reliable partner for
✈ Industry
✈ R & D
✈ user and
✈ regulator
✈to reach the destination
EUROPEAN Coordination
MoC
✈harmonised implementation in support of the
regulatory frame
✈timely availability
✈streamline relevant standardisation activities in
Europe
✈new standards arising from the deployment and
implementation process
✈performance-based regulation
EASCG/EUSCG goals
✈develop, monitor and maintain an overarching
European standardisation and regulatory RDP
✈facilitate the sharing of work among the SDOs,
avoiding the risk of overlaps and gaps
✈monitor all relevant processes, resource availability
and other related risks and issues
✈provide a forum to manage specific issues and
resolution of conflicts
✈advise the EC and EASA ad other regulators on
standardisation matters and standardisation issues
EA/USCG Tasks & Deliverables
Internal Standard Development Process SDO
EASCG*
EC
ATM Master Plan
SESAR
SDOInternal task
approvalDevelopment
process
Feedback loop
Monitoring SDP
Approvalprocess
Standard
Advisory loop
International activities
Coordination
SDO
SDO
EASA
EASCG model to support
✈Interfaces with a number of organisation
necessary to obtain relevant information
✈ICAO
✈RTCA
✈SESAR Deployment Manager
✈…
✈Complementary to existing coordination
arrangements and efforts
✈Coordination ensured through chair/secretariat
EA/USCG Link with other
Organisations
Global Coordination
10% joined WGs
50% joined WGs
EUROCAE domains of activities
✈Security
✈AIS / MET
✈RPAS & General
Aviation
✈Miscellaneous
✈Fuel Cells
✈Possible future
activities: space
✈Avionics
✈Communication
✈Navigation
✈Surveillance
✈ATM Systems
✈Airports
✈SWIM
Specific topics of interest
✈WG-49 Mode S
✈WG-51 ADS-B
✈WG-75 TCAS
✈WG-105 UAS
✈WG-28/62
Galileo, EGNOS, GNSS
✈WG-14/31
Environment, Lightning
✈WG-72 Cyber security
✈WG-106 EFB
✈WG-79 EVS/SVS
✈WG-82 DLS
✈WG-98 ELT
✈WG-100 Remote tower
✈WG-101 ROAAS
✈WG-104 SWIM
✈WG-107 DME/DME
✈WG……
✈Current GA-relevant activities and EDs
✈Current deliverables:✈Status of Single Constellation GALILEO OS receiver
MOPS, and way forward – Guidance Document
✈MOPS on GPS/GALILEO L1/L5 E1/E5a Antenna
✈Receiver using Dual Frequency GPS/GALILEO, with
multi constellation SBAS
GALILEO – WG-62*
*Joint with RTCA SC-159
✈ WG-14 is tasked to review ED-14 “Environmental Conditions and test
procedures for airborne equipment” current version G and maintain
ED-234 “User Guides Supplement to ED-14G” as necessary
✈ Deliverables will be used by equipment manufacturers, aircraft
manufacturers, airlines, aircraft operators, aircraft modifiers, test
laboratories, and aviation authorities for the design, approval and
installation of aircraft equipment.
✈ WG-14 works in coordination with RTCA SC-135.
Environment – WG-14
✈ The primary task of WG-31 is to prepare technical standards,
specifications, guides and any other material required to support the
development of regulation and the certification of aircraft in relation to
the hazard of lightning and Electrostatics (P-Static and In-tank ESD)
✈ Deliverables:
✈ User's guide for lightning protection of fuel tank structure and systems
✈ Report about improvements necessary to ED-14 Section 22/23 and possible new
sections (In tank ESD qualification)
✈ ED-91A Lightning Zoning
Lightning – WG-31
Deliverables (continued)
✈ Report about necessary evolutions and complement to ED-105 about test methods
✈ ER-006 Intermediate Guidance Material for Compliance Demonstration Related to
Lightning Protection of Fuel Tank Structure 25.981 Requirements
✈ ED-158 User’s Manual for certification of aircraft Electrical/Electronic systems for the
indirect effects of lightning
✈ ED-248 Guide to Civil Aircraft Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) to be published
by the end of the year.
✈ WG-31 works in coordination with SAE AE2.
Lightning – WG-31
✈Two documents published:✈ED-73E: MOPS for Secondary Surveillance Radar
Mode S Transponders (DO-181)
✈ED-115: MOPS for Light Aviation Secondary
Surveillance Radar Transponders
✈Currently under revision (December 2019)✈CSC(Combined Surveillance Committee) with WG-
51and RTCA SC209/SC-186
✈Cooperation with WG-75 and WG-105
Mode S Transponders – WG-49
✈SG-1:✈1090 MHz Extended Squitter MOPS ED-102A
✈Under review with RTCA SC-186 (Dec. 2019)
✈SG-4:✈TS for WAM System with Composite Functionalities
ED-142A (June 2018)
✈SG-2 & SG-3 currently dormant
ADS-B – WG-51
✈All work in cooperation with RTCA SC-147
✈ACAS-X:✈Multiple variants
✈ACAS Xa: successor of TCAS II
✈ACAS Xo (operational): closely spaced operations
✈ACAS Xu: for UAS (close cooperation with WG-105/SC-228)
✈Interoperability MASPS✈Specifying requirements for the interoperability of CA
systems of differing designs
Collision Avoidance – WG-75
✈WG-79 is tasked to develop MASPS-level guidance for
SVS, EFVS, EVS and combined architectures to identify
intended operations and systems architectures and enable
the development of MOPS
✈ Deliverables:✈ to review existing ED-179B and evaluate the changes that could benefit to rotorcraft
operations
✈ to develop MASPS for CGVS;
✈ to develop MASPS for an Enhanced Flight Vision System for take-off credit.
✈ to develop MASPS for SVS for aircraft state awareness (ED-249 expected to be
published end September 2017).
✈ WG-79 works joint with RTCA SC-213
EVS/SVS – WG-79
✈Current activities and publications✈ED-201 AISS Framework Specification (2015)
✈ED-202A Airworthiness Security Process Specification
(2014)
✈ED-203A Airworthiness Security Methods and
Considerations (expected 2018)
✈ED-204 Continued Airworthiness Security (2014)
✈ED-205 Security certification of CNS/ATM systems
(expected 2018)
✈ER-013 Aeronautical System Security Glossary
Cybersecurity – WG-72Join
t w
ith R
TC
A
✈Potential future activities
✈Cybersecurity workshop 31 May 2017
✈Technical Work Programme 2018
✈under development
Cybersecurity – WG-72
✈Disappearance of AF447 & MH370✈Difficulties to locate flight recorders
✈Difficulties to locate an aeroplane in distress
✈ICAO Global Aviation Distress and Safety
System (GADSS) ✈Aircraft Tracking Task Force
✈Tracking aircraft under
normal conditions
✈Distress Tracking
ELT / Flight Tracking – WG-98
✈Joint EUROCAE / RTCA activity for ELT triggered
in-flight
✈Initiated by French BEA
✈EUROCAE WG-98 & RTCA SC-229
established in 2013/2014
✈Deliverables
✈ED-237 MASPS for in-flight event detection and
triggering criteria (2016)
✈ED-62B/DO-204B MOPS for new generations of ELTs
(joint with RTCA; expected 2018)
ELT / Flight Tracking – WG-98
✈ICAO Annex 6 amendment
with reference to ED-237✈Annex 6 Part I to be amended in
Nov 2016 following ICAO Council on 2 March 2016
✈A distress alert can be triggered using criteria that may
vary as a function of aircraft position and phase of flight.
Further guidance regarding in-flight event detection and
triggering criteria may be found in the EUROCAE
ED-237, Minimum Aviation System Performance
Specification (MASPS) for In-Flight Event Detection and
Triggering Criteria.
ELT / Flight Tracking – WG-98
✈WG-100 created 2014✈Over 30 organisations actively contributing
✈Close coordination with EASA, ICAO, SESAR, SESAR2020 PJ05
and EUROCAE WG41 A-SMGCS
✈Work programme✈ED-240 (published) MASPS for Visual Surveillance for use in
Remote and Virtual Towers
✈ED-240 rev A (draft - mid 2018) to include remote tower target
tracking technologies;
this should include an assessment of the applicability of MASPS
already produced for SMGCS
Remote and Virtual
Towers – WG-100
✈Benefits of RVTs:✈ more cost efficient provision of air traffic services at small airports which serve mostly
GA traffic
✈ increased safety and better services
✈ greater operational opportunities for airport users (extended times of operation,
frequency etc.)
✈Since 2009 introduced at Heathrow Airport as remote
contingency tower
✈Operating since 2015 at Örnsköldsvik Airport (Sweden) from
Sundsvall
✈Remote Towers technology undergoing pilot projects in US
at 2 GA airports (e.g. Leesburg Executive Airport (Virginia) and Northern Colorado
Regional Airport in Loveland)
Remote and Virtual
Towers – WG-100
✈Created 2016
✈Merging previous WG-73 and WG-93
✈All classes of UAS in all types of airspace
under all conditions for all operations
✈Matrix structure
✈Operations centric, risk based
✈Ambitious work programme
✈Over 30 deliverable in ambitious timescale
UAS – WG-105
✈ Develop the necessary standards to enable safe integration of all classes of UAS into all classes of airspace
✈ Consider emerging European regulatory proportionate risk based approach and related UAS Categories
✈ Due consideration of the industry requirements
✈Maintain coordination with ✈EASA
✈JARUS
✈Other involved bodies (SJU, EDA , RTCA, ASTM…)
WG-105 UAS
Scope and Objective
Planned for next phase
WG-105 UAS
Structure
Steering Committee(Co-chairmen, Secretary, FT leaders)
FTC3&S
FTDAA
FTERA
FTUTM
FT D&AW / SORA
SGDAAA-C
SGA&ER
SGATOL
SGAuto Taxi
SGDAAD-G
SGDAAVLL
SGIDN SG
GEO
SGC2
MOPS/MASPS
SGC2
Spectrum
SGC2
Security
TBD
SGRPS SG
xxx
Risk-based approach & Three pillar concept (Open, Specific, Certified)
WG-105 to essentially deal with Specific & Certified
WG-105 UAS
… in a New Regulatory Environment
Support from WG-105… … to Regulators
Open Specific Certified
UTM 1st step PoW then Supporting standards
1st step PoW then Supporting standards
Recommended Standards
C3&S MASPS/MOPS MASPS/MOPS ETSO & AMCRecommended Standards
DAA (MASPS, MOPS) MASPS/MOPS MASPS/MOPS ETSO & AMCRecommended Standards
ERA MASPS/MOPS ETSO
D&AW 1st step PoW then Supporting Standards
AMC 1309 AMC to CS/SCRecommended Standards
SORA 1st step PoW then Supporting Standards
Recommended Standards
✈WG-106 should:
✈identify the minimum requirements that any EFB
application must meet and;
✈develop corresponding test criteria;
✈monitor and consider the progress of the current EFB
rulemaking activity at EASA
✈Current deliverable:
✈MOPS for Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Software
Applications (expected Q4/2018)
EFB – WG-106
Publication of EUROCAE Document
EUROCAE Council approval
Comment resolution & Finalisation of draft
EUROCAE Open Consultation
Drafting of document by WG
Document development approved Transparent and open process
Consensus driven development approach
Standards validation
Open consultation
Worldwide recognition
Worldwide application
Open for worldwide participation
By the industry – for the industry
EUROCAE process
Regulation – Standard
✈PB regulations by EASA and ICAO
✈Reference to industry standards
✈standardisation reaction to regulation
✈forward looking
✈in anticipation of regulatory requirements
✈referenced by the regulator
✈EASA, EU Leg, FAA, ICAO
✈ETSO – MOPS, SW, Environment
R&D-standardisation-deployment
R&D Standardisation Deployment
and Regulation
EUROCAE Standards EDs
Best industry practice
Soft law
Acceptable means of compliance
How to do and to comply
Internationally recognised
✈EUROCAE activities of interest
✈Potential GA activites
✈GA participation in EUROCAE activities
✈Difference between US and EU
✈Resources
✈Active - passive
✈Foster AOPA – EUROCAE cooperation
✈MoU to more detailed definition
✈Part 23 new, by ASTM
✈AOPA priorities, vision and targets
Discussion
