“Re-plumbing” Roadside Ditch Networks · in-stream erosion and habitat degradation...
Transcript of “Re-plumbing” Roadside Ditch Networks · in-stream erosion and habitat degradation...
Rebecca Schneider Dept. Natural Resources Cornell University, NY
Ditches – Improving management to reduce flooding,
water pollution, and in-stream erosion
and habitat degradation
“Re-plumbing” Roadside Ditch Networks
PA Dirt and Gravel Roads Conference April 2017
Precipitation = Runoff + Groundwater + Evaporation/transpiration
Watersheds determine the quantity and quality of water available
rain
Groundwater contribution –
base flow
Groundwater - Low flow Runoff - High flow
Naturally dynamic
stream flow patterns
Runoff
PRE-development
POST-development
Center for Watershed Protection 1995
time (hrs/days/weeks)
stream height
POST-development
PRE-development
• increase in frequency and magnitude of floods
• increase in stream dry out, water table decline
Human activities have shifted the balance
Roadside Drainage Networks
What role do they play in:
Floods? Droughts? Water pollution? Stream ecosystem health?
Faculty: D. Orr, Cornell Local Roads Program T. Walter, Dept. Biological and Environmental Engineering D. Buckley, P. Bergholz, Dept. Crops and Soils R. Marino, R. Howarth, K. Sparks, Dept. Ecology S. Allred (Dept. Natural Resources) Graduate Students: K. Falbo, B. Buchanan, J. Diaz-Robles, J. Archibald, L. McPhillips, S. Davis, W. Pluer, T. Johnson, J. Kimchi
Roadside Ditch Team
Study Sites
NY
PA
Approaches
(2) MONITORING Total water flow Suspended sediment Dissolved chemicals Bedload Fecal coliforms
(1) GPS and ARC-GIS MAPPING Ditch lengths Connections to streams Management types
vegetated exposed, scraped
Ditch Study Sites
Watershed area Road length Roadside ditch length* Total ditch length connected to strms Total # of direct connections to strms % road surface area of wtshd Area of basins draining to ditches % of watershed draining to ditches Stream channel length (no ditches) Stream channel density w/o ditches Stream channel density with ditches
42.3 km2 (16.3 sq. mi) 54.3 km 81.4 km 51.0 km (31.7 miles) 94 0.69 % 8.1 km2 (3.1 sq. mi) 22.0 % 66.0 km 1.55 (km/km2) 2.73 (km/km2)
Characteristic Average value
Results - Drainage Mapping
* 23% is exposed – scraped or eroded
Ditch drainage basins potentially intercept ~22 % of the surface runoff and
shallow groundwater from each watershed and
rapidly shunt it to the nearest stream.
Ditch drainage basins Stream Road ditches Ditch outflows
Results – Drainage Mapping
Results – Hydrology
Doolittle Creek Watershed 8 ditch monitoring stations and Doolittle Crk 10 storms 2005-2006; 1.3 – 12.9 cm total rain/event Each ditch captured avg of 51% of rainfall in the ditch’s basin
Diaz-Robles 2007
Methods
Runoff
INPUTS:
Slope Soils Land use
Routing
Methods – Hydrologic Model
Buchanan et al. 2012
Results – Hydrologic Model
Entire Modeled Ditch Drainage Networks: Doolittle: transported 45,400 m3 water / storm =
3.6% (+/- 1.4%) of incoming precipitation and 19.5% (+/- 9.7%) of total stream flow measured in each storm
Paine’s Creek: 22% of total stream flow in spring storm event and 29% of total stream flow in a summer storm event.
Results - Hydrology
Buchanan et al. 2012
7 ditches 34 storms 2.5 – 40 mm rain April – Dec. 2009
Paine’s Creek Watershed
Results – Hydrology
Ditch discharges contribute to increased peak flows (avg 78%) and total flows (avg 57%) in streams. Buchanan et al. 2012
spring summer
time (hrs/days/weeks)
stream height
Ditches
No ditches
Results: Ditches alter the Natural Flow Regime, Aka Environmental Flows
Ditches are a source of sediment and
associated contaminants to
downstream waters, especially
when scraped.
Photo Bill Hecht
Results – Sediment
0.00E+00
1.00E-03
2.00E-03
3.00E-03
4.00E-03
5.00E-03
6.00E-03
0.00
2.27
4.27
7.95
21.67
22.17
22.67
24.67
45.95
47.95
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
Dis
char
ge (m
^3/s
ec)
Disc
harg
e ( TSS concentrationDischarge
Diaz-Robles, 2007 Duration of storm (hrs)
TSS
conc
entr
atio
n
Dis
char
ge (m
3/se
c)
Nutrients
Element Total load (kg)
Ortho-Phosphates 1.43
Total P 83.43
NO3- + NO2
- 21.43
Trace Metals
Al 22.64
Mn 1.48
Fe 52.27
Ni 6.39
Cu 1.28
Pb 0.25
Cr 3.79
Zn 2.90
Cations
Na+ 11,100.58
Mg2+ 737.39
K+ 75.78
Ca2+ 3,205.36
Anions As3- 0.16
Dissolved Chemical
Loads over 10 storms
A diversity of chemicals
dissolved in the
water and adsorbed on the sediment particles are
transported by ditches
downstream. De-icers
Results – Nutrients, Cations
Diaz-Robles 2007
Positive for Total Coliforms
Positive for E. coli
Idexx’s Colilert/Quantitray Method ™
Methods - Microbes E. coli quantification
Manure spread on farm fields
Falbo et al. 2012
Manure spreading, livestock pasturing … microbes move via tile drains to roadside ditches
Results - Microbes
7/08 8/08 9/08 10/08 11/08 12/08 1/09 2/09 3/09 4/09 5/09 6/09 7/09
E. c
oli c
once
ntra
tions
(MPN
/100
mL)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Manure spreading
Manure spreading
EPA STD
Large quantities of gravel, rocks and other bedload move out of ditches and form deltas in the streams.
Results – Bedload
Moose River, Adirondacks
Results – Bedload + Discharge Stream Geomorphology
High velocity discharges, bedload deltas
impact stream at ~94 locations in each watershed.
Upstream
Ditch
Downstream
Flow direction
30 m
30 m
Average Bankfull Width (m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6
Stream Number
Wid
th (m
)
UpstreamDownstream
Average Grain Size Distribution
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
<2 2--4 4--8 8--16 16--32 32--64 64--128 128--256 256--512
Grain Size (mm)
%To
tal UpstreamDownstream
Results – Hydraulic Radius and Substrate
Kimchi 2010
upstream
downstream
Streams are in chronic disequilibrium with a storm-driven geomorphology
N2O ~50 ug/m2-hr
NO3 ~20 mg/l
Groundwater Exchange
On-going Research: Conduits/ filters of Nitrogen from manure ?
NO3 900 kg/ 6 mo Marino 2017 in prep
Summary – Roadside Ditch Impacts
Intercept, capture and shunt ~20% of watershed runoff to streams
Contribute to flooding in streams Contribute to headwater stream dry-outs and probably lowering of water table Rapid conduit, and source, of sediments, pathogens, de-icers and nutrients Contribute to in-stream erosion and stream ecosystem degradation
Extension Program on Re-plumbing Ditches
Presentations to ~2,800 town highway staff – Cornell Local Roads Highway School, Town govts Chesapeake Bay Watershed Conference and Report 2016
Strategies to Reduce Flooding /Droughts Disconnect ditches from streams. Use infiltration basins, constructed wetlands, or
detention ponds that allow for groundwater recharge.
“Re-plumb” our watersheds to reduce floods, droughts and pollution
Catch and save the rain to buffer the impacts of
climate change!
Mow ditches, instead of scraping.
Strategies to Reduce Pollution
Hydroseed immediately after ditching.
Ditches as opportunity for a watershed-wide filtration system.
Questions?
www.SustainbleWaterResourceManagement.info