Ann - Riin Ridbeck Petra Nilsson Maksym Sytnyk Þórdís Björnsdóttir Group 4 – ÞAMP.
-
Upload
janel-george -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
2
Transcript of Ann - Riin Ridbeck Petra Nilsson Maksym Sytnyk Þórdís Björnsdóttir Group 4 – ÞAMP.
Main energy sources in the next decades
Ann - Riin RidbeckPetra NilssonMaksym SytnykÞórdís Björnsdóttir
Group 4 – ÞAMP
Population in regions
Nordic Baltic0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20002011
Mill
ion
citize
ns
Wav
e power
Solar
elect
ricity
and so
lar hea
t
Air and ge
othermal
Wind power
Hydro
power (in
cl small
scale
)
Biomass to
tal (in
cl pea
t and w
aste)
0
50
100
150
200
20XX20502030
TWh
Future energy sourses, in SwedenÞAMP
Future energy sourses, in DenmarkÞAMP
Finland – Electricity generation
Nuclear Coal power Gas and oil Imports CHP Hydro Wind0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
201120202050TW
h
Goals: 38 % of consumption from renewable sources by 2020Carbon neutral economy
Load 2020: 117 TWh Load 2050: 168 TWhLoad 2011: 70,4 TWh2012: 85,4 TWh
ÞAMP
Finland – Renewable energy
Forest chips Hydro Heat pumps Wind Biofuel Pellets Recovered fuel Biogas0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20102020TW
h
ÞAMP
Norway – Electricity generation
2007 2009 2011 2020110
115
120
125
130
135
140
Fossil fuels
Biomass
Wind
Hydro
13,2 TWh boost with electricity certificates by 2020 (+SWE)
Goals: 67,5 % of energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020 (60 % in 2012)Wind: 2012 – 440 MW; 20XX – 21,000 MW.
ÞAMP
IcelandÞAMP
IcelandPlace Type GWh/year MWh
Start of construction
Búðarháls Hydropower 600 68.49 2010Bjarnarflag I Geothermal 370 42.24 2012Reykjanes II Geothermal 400 45.66 2012Eldvörp Geothermal 370 42.24 2013Hvammsvirkjun Hydropower 665 75.91 2013Hverahlíð Geothermal 570 65.07 2013Krísuvík I Geothermal 470 53.65 2013Reykjanes III Geothermal 370 42.24 2013Bjarnarflag II Geothermal 370 42.24 2014Holtavirkjun Hydropower 415 47.37 2014Krísuvík II Geothermal 470 53.65 2015Krísuvík III Geothermal 470 53.65 2015Urriðafossvirkjun Hydropower 980 111.87 2015Þeistareikir I&II Geothermal 740 84.47 2015
ÞAMP
Nordic electricity generationin the Carbon-Neutral Scenario
Up to a 10-fold increase in wind generationfrom 3% of total generation in 2010 to 25% in 2050
LithuaniaÞAMP
LithuaniaÞAMP
EstoniaÞAMP
LatviaÞAMP
ComparisonSweden 2020
Wave
Solar
Geo
Wind
Hydro
Biomass
Denmark 2020
WaveSolarGeoWindBiomass
Norway 2020
Fossil fuels
Biomass
Wind
Hydro
Iceland 2020
HydroGeo
NuclearCoal powerGas and oilImportsCHPHydroWind
Finland 2020
ComparisonLithuania 2020
NuclearFossilSolarWindBiomassHydro
Estonia 2020
Coal/ShaleOilNatural Gaswind, solar, hydroBiomass
Latvia 2020
CoalOilNatural gasWind,solar, wavesBiomass
ComparisonSweden 2050
WaveSolarGeoWindHydroBiomass
Denmark 2050
WaveSolarGeoWindBiomass
Iceland 2050
HydroGeo
NuclearCoal powerGas and oilImportsCHPHydroWind
Finland 2050
ComparisonLithuania 2050
NuclearFossilSolarWindBiomassHydro
Estonia 2050
Coal/ShaleOilNatural Gaswind, solar, hydroBiomass
Latvia 2050
CoalOilNatural gasWind,solar, wavesBiomass
Cooperation
• Flexible energy networks
• Trade with excess of electricity
• Electricity certificates; foreign investments
• Share of expertise and technology
Thank you !