Analysing and Understanding Seed R&D Policy Processes in Africa
-
Upload
futureagricultures -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
133 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Analysing and Understanding Seed R&D Policy Processes in Africa
Analysing and Understanding Seed R&D Pathways andPolicy Processes in Africa
Dr John Thompson ([email protected]) Future Agricultures Consortium (www.future-agricultures.org)
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Future Agricultures-Tegemeo Institute Regional Dialogue on Strengthening African Seed Systems
14-15 July 2014
Presentation• Future Agricultures Consortium – a
focus on agricultural policy processes in Africa
• Innovation pathways – opening up and broadening out
• Changing views on policy & policy processes
• Lessons from the FAC Policy Processes approach
• Case study: Political Economy of Cereal Seed Systems
• Reflections on Seed R&D Pathways and Policy Processes Analysis
Future Agricultures ConsortiumEstablished in 2005… to encourage dialogue and the sharing of good practice by policy makers and opinion formers in Africa on the role of agriculture in broad based growth
Why FAC?... the lack of attention to the political economy of policy processes is leading to inappropriate policy formulation and implementation failures in African agriculture
10 Themes, 1 Common Focus1. Policy processes2. Social protection3. Commercialisations4. Science, technology &
innovation5. Young people & agri-food6. Pastoralism7. Land8. Climate change9. Brazil and China in Africa10. Gender & social difference
Assuming that effectiveness of policy is a major determinant of agricultural performance in Africa… • Which policies get
implemented in different contexts – and who decides?
• What political interests are driving or constraining the implementation of a pro-poor policy?
• Why might a particular policy prescription lead to different outcomes for different people in different contexts?
Pathways Definition• Pathway a self-reinforcing trajectory of change
(social, technological, environmental)
• Some pathways are ‘dominant’ supported by powerful incumbent interests and investments, and reinforced by policy and practice
• These are the ‘motorways’ they channel current mainstream R&D efforts in particular directions
• Others are ‘alternative’ or ‘suppressed’ these define and respond to different goals, values and forms of knowledge
• These are the ‘bush paths’ they may be important to poor and vulnerable people, but neglected by authority
Linear view of agriculture science and technology
Past
Future
‘Progress’
• Notions of ‘progress’ pervade debates about food and agricultural futures
• Policy makers speak of ‘the way forward’ often without saying which way
• Agricultural development is viewed as a ‘race to advance science and technology’ – without stating the particular direction
But innovation is a social choice…
Seed innovation as branching evolutionary process
open source sharing
industrial hybrids
cisgenics
marker assisted
participatory breeding
apomixis
e.g. innovation for seed R&D
transgenicssynthetic biology
And social choice gets socially ‘closed down’
TINA –
“There is no alternative …”
‘Path dependence’ or technological ‘lock in’
industrial hybrids transgenicssynthetic biology
open source sharing
cisgenics
marker assisted
participatory breeding
apomixis
‘Opening Up’ Pathways
Questions about future pathways are often restricted to:
• ‘yes or no?’• ‘how much?’• ‘how fast?’• ‘who leads?’
More searching questions are neglected:
• ‘which way?’• ‘what alternatives?’• ‘who says?’• ‘who benefits?’ • ‘why?’
‘Opening Up’ Pathways: the ‘3-Ds’• Directionality – of pathways towards specific pro-poor
and pro-sustainability objectives
• Distribution – more equitable distribution of benefits, costs and risks associated with innovation
• Diversity – in seed systems, in order to build robust and resilient systems, mitigate ‘lock-in’ and cater for seemingly irreconcilable perspectives on value and sustainability
narrow inputs
e.g.: Sophisticated cost-benefit analysis focuses on ranking monetary ‘externalities’ or: Selective participatory process delivers prescriptive recommendations
1: NARROW - CLOSED
POSSIBLE PATHWAYS
SOCIAL APPRAISAL
‘closed down’ outputs
Opening Up, Closing Down
POLICY ANDGOVERNANCE COMMITMENTS
narrow inputs
e.g.: Risk assessment results expressed to policy making using sensitivity analysis
2: NARROW - OPEN
POSSIBLE PATHWAYS
POLICY ANDGOVERNANCE COMMITMENTS
SOCIAL APPRAISAL
‘opened up’ outputs
Opening Up, Closing Down
‘closed down’ outputsbroad inputs
3: BROAD - CLOSED
POSSIBLE PATHWAYS
SOCIAL APPRAISAL
e.g.: broadly constituted participatory appraisal, multiple contending expert and stakeholder witnesses, aimed at consensus statement
POLICY ANDGOVERNANCE COMMITMENTS
Opening Up, Closing Down
‘opened up’ outputsbroad inputs
e.g.: Inclusive participatory appraisal, expert and stakeholder engagement, focus on uncertainties, full transparency on dissenting views
4: BROAD - OPEN
POSSIBLE PATHWAYS
SOCIAL APPRAISAL
POLICY ANDGOVERNANCE COMMITMENTS
Opening Up, Closing Down
Policy and PathwaysPolicy and pathways to sustainable seed R&D systems are intimately intertwined in two ways:
1. Seed policy challenges are open to a variety of competing ‘framings’ or ‘narratives’ about problems and potential solutions each suggesting a particular pathway to a particular future
2. Seed policy processes are often key factors implicated in these framings and in which pathways are opened up or closed down
Policy: Clearly central to development,
but difficult to pin down...‘Policy is rather like the elephant - you know it
when you see it, but you cannot easily define it’ (G. Cunningham, 1963: 229; cited in M. Hill, 1997: 6)
Policy: A Textbook Definition
• Policy comes from the Middle English word ‘policie’, meaning ‘art of government’, ‘civil organisation’
• Standard definition of policy is: ‘a plan or course of action, as of a government, political party, or business, intended to influence and determine decisions, actions, and other matters’ – West’s Dictionary of American Law
Conventional View of Policy• Series of well-defined steps:
Determining the policy issue or problem Exploring possible options for resolving the problem
Weighing up the costs and benefits of each option Making a rational choice about ‘best option’
Implementing the policy Evaluating the outcome
• Bureaucratic approach separation of ‘value’ and ‘fact’• The political nature of the policy is hidden by the use of
technical language ‘Evidence-based policy-making’
An Alternative View of Policy
• “...policies appear to be mere instruments for promoting efficiency and effectiveness. This masking of the political under the cloak of neutrality is a feature of modern power.” Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1997): Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge; p. 8
• Policies = Political phenomena/processes
Value of a Policy Process Approach
• What is a political economist?
‘Someone who comes and explains why your programme hasn’t worked’ – Alex Duncan
• But a policy process approach can also identify what can work in particular contexts i.e. what is both technically viable and politically feasible
Politics/Interests
Actors/ Networks/Practices
Discourses/Narratives
A Simplified Framework
Keeley, J. and Scoones, I. (2003) Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa. London: Earthscan.
Understanding policy processes comes as a result of looking at the intersection of
these 3 overlapping elements.
Policy Narratives
• Policy narratives ‘frame’ a problem; explain how it comes about; and show what needs to be done to put it right
• These narratives – storylines – frequently simplify complex issues– Many are ‘crisis narratives’, demanding
urgent policy action– Others are ‘success stories’, suggesting a clear
way forward
Discourses/Narratives
Actors, Networks, Practices• Actors and networks define and perpetuate
certain policy narratives
• These are coalitions and alliances of people with shared beliefs, visions and patterns of behaviour
• They often link state institutions with private sector, donors and civil society interests, spanning local-global levels
• Diverse stakeholders engage in practices that can reinforce – or sometimes challenge – the prevailing narratives
Actors/Networks/Practices
Politics and Interests
• Competition exists between groups in society, based on their differing interests (e.g. over allocation of resources; economic vs. social priorities)
• The political context is moulded by the interests of particular authorities who seek to remain in power
• It is a country’s political system that generates the incentives (strong or weak) for the state to take action to invest in agricultural R&D policy
• The political system also influences the type of agricultural R&D promoted (i.e. the pathways pursued)
Politics/Interests
Technical Expertise and Patronage Politics
1. Good technocratic policies with no ‘appeal’ to patronage politics simply don't make it
2. Policies driven by patronage politics, but which make no plausible contribution to stated public policy goals, may lead to anti-poor outcomes
3. Partial alignment: patronage politics distort well-intentioned technocratic policies, undermining impact
4. ‘Success stories’: some alignment between technocratic policies and the exigencies of patronage politics leads to effective implementation
Technocratic Support
No Yes
Political Backing
No X 1. Inertia
Yes 2. Anti-poor policy
3. Distorted policy
4. Success stories
Policy Spaces
• ‘Policy spaces’ define the policy-maker's scope of action ‘room to manoeuvre’
• Strong pressures to adopt a particular policy position can limit this space ‘closing down’
• Reduction of such pressure may provide opportunities to develop consensus among stakeholders involves negotiating trade-offs
• But consensus needs to be negotiated genuinely; otherwise, the policy process may fall apart during implementation ‘implementation failure’
Politics/Interests
Political Economy of Cereal Seed Systems in Africa
• Focus: Particular configurations of powerful public and private actor-networks are shaping the way cereal seed systems operate in Africa, which is influencing the way the ‘new Green Revolution’ agenda is playing out in different countries
• Framing: ‘market-led technology adoption’
Thompson, J. and Scoones, I. (2012) ‘The Political Economy of Cereal Seed Systems in Africa’s Green Revolution’, FAC Policy Brief 44,.
L. Sperling et al 2008. JDS
Planting breeding, PBR, priority setting
Seed aid and relief
Regulation and certification
Governance of seed/
innovation systems
Economics of seed production and distribution
Political economy of policy processes
Politics of national and
global agri-food systems
Seed systems
Seeds and livelihoods:
social-cultural dimensions
Research Questions• How do seed policies get created, and by
whom? • How do narratives about what makes a
‘good seed policy’ change over time?• How are seed problems and solutions
‘framed’ – and how does this affect policy processes?
• Whose voices are taken into account in the seed policy process – and whose are excluded?
• What spaces exist for new ideas, actors and networks? How can these be opened up?
Country Studies1. Ethiopia (Dawit Alemu)– liberalisation under state control:
the politics of the emergent private sector seed industry
2. Ghana (Kojo Amanor) – Green Revolution narratives and local-level realities: how a technocratic approach overwhelms alternative perspectives on breeds and seeds
3. Kenya (Hannington Odame and Elijah Muange) – agro-dealers and the market solution: politics, interests and who wins and loses from the new Green Revolution?
4. Malawi (Blessings Chinsinga) – the politics of maize and input subsidy programmes: how diverse interests converge around a particular technical-economic trajectory
5. Zimbabwe (Charity Mutonodzo and Douglas Magunda) – rebuilding the seed system post ‘collapse’: why top-down government/aid programmes may make things worse
Opening Up Seed R&D Pathways
• There are many possible seed R&D pathways each looks preferable to different actors and interests
• We can avoid generalised policy responses to complex seed system challenges by nurturing diverse seed innovation pathways
• To do this, it is essential to:- question the dominant narratives that lead to
technological ‘lock in’- highlight the ‘3-Ds’ – Direction, Distribution and
Diversity to spark debate on priorities
Engaging with Seed Policy Processes• Seed R&D policy must be understood as a political
process, as much as an analytical or technical one• They are a complex interplay of narratives +
actor-networks + political interests• Seed policy change requires understanding these
interactions in order to identify: – ‘policy spaces’ to increase room to
manoeuvre, negotiate trade-offs and create synergies
– incentives for getting political commitment to deliver public goods
Technocratic Support
No Yes
Political Backing
No X1. Inertia
Yes2. Anti-poor policy
3. Distorted policy
4. Success stories
Thank You
John ThompsonFuture Agricultures Consortium
www.future-agricultures.org