An RDM Service for Health Researchers: LSHTM Case Study
-
Upload
lshtm -
Category
Technology
-
view
97 -
download
1
Transcript of An RDM Service for Health Researchers: LSHTM Case Study
AN RDM SERVICE FOR HEALTH RESEARCHERS
A case study of work performed at LSHTM
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 2.0
UK: England & Wales License
Gareth KnightLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research Data Services workshop30 June 2015
Overview
1. Institutional context
2. Motivation for establishing an RDM Service
3. Determining needs and building support structure
4. Enhancing RDM Practice
5. Next steps and conclusion
London School ofHygiene & Tropical Medicine
• Postgraduate institute for research and education in public health & tropical medicine
• Research funding exceeds £60 million a year
• Recognised as one of world’s highest rated universities for collaborative research
• 4000 students & 1,300 staff workingin 100+ countries
Research Data Initiative 2009-11
Researcher as initial champion:• Personal pride: High-quality data should be produced & made available• Support requirement: Huge time commitment to support end user
Research Data Working Group• Established in Feb 2010 to:
– advise institution on RDM/Open Data development– Produce recommendations for next steps
• Membership comprised of research staff,librarians, archivists, and other staff
• ‘Raising Standards’ Study Recommendationsfully accepted by SMT in mid 2011
Report available: http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/rdmss/outputs/
RDM Support ServiceBroad remit to enhance data management practice
and improve infrastructure within institution
• Located in Library & Archives Service
• Funded by:– Wellcome Trust ISSF: 2012 – 15– Central funding: 2015 onwards
• RDM Steering Group provides direction on a Management by Exception (MbE) basis
Project Blog: http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/rdmss/outputs/ RDM Website: http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/researchdataman/
RDM Service Challenges
Reaching audience• Many researchers work overseas
for 50% / 100% of time• Too busy to respond to emails /
telephone
Establishing buy-in• What are the benefits?• Many researchers are supported
by funding with no data management requirements
• Uncertainty on how it applies to their field
Providing domain expertise• Scientific discipline requires
years of study & have specific language
• Specialised tools & resources – limited conversion options and few recognised preservation formats
Dealing with conflicting requirements
• What do you do when funders & governments disagree?
Supporting collaborative research
• What support should/can you provide to collaborators at other institutions?
Managing withlimited resources
• Staff must support large no. of researchers
• Time commitment for one-to-one support
Establishing buy-inTailoring message to key stakeholders
Researchers &Data Creators
Improve likelihood of research funding
Potential to use data in further research
Fulfil publisher obligations & achieve higher rate of citation
Save time & effort
Principal Investigators
& Head of Dept
Contribution to “reproducible research”
agenda
Enhanced data handling practice & less
duplication of effort
Greater take-up of research outputs in research & teaching
Senior Management
Better able to achieve strategic goals to maximise
research impact
Build capacity within institution & collaborators
Remain competitive with other institutions
Ensure compliance with regulatory and
contractual obligations
Requirements Gathering
Survey/interviews with researchersResearch Data WG report
Funder & Regulators
http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/rdmss/outputs/ http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/researchdataman/
Advisory bodies
Resource developmentProviding RDM support using limited resources
Plan proposal
Project Start
Project End
Possible deletion
Identify RDM
resources
Develop funder DMP
Create & store data
Journal data needs
Data sharing
agreementPrepare data for deposit
Data description
Preservation & sharing Qs
RDM Website Training sessions RDM videos
Responding to evolving needs
Support requests:• Monitor demand over time
– 88 (2013)– 120 (2014)– 69 (Jan-May 2015)
• Produce/Update guidance to reflectcommon questions
Data Management Plans• Tailored feedback on request• Produce sample DMPs for common funders
http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/researchdataman/plan/
Top 10 RDM topics raised in 2014http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/rdmss/support-planning/
Enhancing RDM Practice
Mandate that projects without a funder DMP obligation should produce a institutional DMP
Strategy for minimising resource allocation:
1. Prioritise key projects: LSHTM-led projects are mandated, consultancies & others encouraged
2. Avoid duplication: Allow projects to submit a Research Protocol or other DMP if they have produced one
3. Acquire DMPs for funded projects only: Analysis of 2013 funding bids found that:– 247 met eligibility criteria at pre-award– 97 met eligibility criteria at post-award
Ensure Data Management is considered from outset
End of project support
Guidance on ‘data archiving’ process:
• (re)familiarisation with funder/publisher requirements
• Prepare data for transfer– Redaction, – Formats & documentation– Access controls & licences
• Locating appropriate repository– Domain repository preferred– LSHTM data repository for non-
sensitive ‘homeless data’
Liaise with projects in final 3 months of funding
http://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/
Next Steps
Operate ‘business as usual’ service:• RDM ‘Help desk’
• Promote & populate research data repository
• Development of tutorials, guides & other resources
Consult with key stakeholders to identify additional topics:• Integration of repository with infrastructure (such as CRIS)
• Case studies on ‘Cradle to grave’ data management in specific depts/environments
• Case studies on working with sensitive data
Concluding thoughts
• Institutional size simplifies process of introducing new policy– Remains a need to present at various groups & obtain broad acceptance
• Health researchers recognise importance of data to their work, but still need to be convinced to apply specific practices
• Effective use of staff resources is essential to support varied research needs
• Data Manager/researcher collaboration is necessary to tailor resources to specific fields
Thank You for your attention!
Gareth Knight.Project Manager, LSHTM Research Data Management ServiceEmail: [email protected]
Questions