America’s Friend to the South(and drug supplier)

MexicoMexico

I. Legitimacy

•Revolution of 1910-1921 – Mexicans have admired revolutionary leaders throughout their history. Revolutions in general are seen quite positively, and charisma is highly valued as a leadership characteristic

▫ Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) – helped legitimize the revolution, served as an important source of government legitimacy until the late 20th century

▫ Constitution of 1917 – created a democratic, three-branch government, but allowed the PRI to stabilize and consolidate power within the hands of its leaders.

II. Historical Traditions•Authoritarianism – from Spanish colonial

structure and strong-armed tactics of military-political leaders (caudillos) such as Porfirio Diaz, Mexico has long tradition of authoritarian rule. President currently still holds a great deal of power.

•Populism – revolutions of 19th and 20th century had significant peasant bases led by charismatic leaders that called for more rights for ordinary Mexicans, particularly indigenous citizens. Zapatista movement is reflection of this tradition.

Historical Traditions continued•Power Plays/Divisions within Elite – elites

who led dissenters during 1810 & 1910 revolutions; warlords & caudillos of the early 20th century; and the politicos & tecnicos of the late 20th century

•Instability and Legitimacy Issues – Mexico’s political history full of chaos, conflict, bloodshed, and violent resolution to political differences. Even though most Mexicans believe the government is legitimate, they express a lot of criticism and cynicism about how it is run and who the government serves.

III. Political Culture• National Identity – Mexicans share a

strong sense of national identification based on common history, dominant religion and language

▫ Importance of religion (Catholicism)▫ Patron-clientelism (“You scratch my back,

I’ll scratch yours”); even the poorest of people can get access to its government officials (an example of informal politics)

▫ Economic dependency

IV. Geographic Influence•Mountains & Deserts – make

communication and transportation difficult; promotes regionalism; limits areas where productive agriculture is possible

•Varied Climates – cold, dry mountains to tropical rain forests because of Mexico’s varying terrain and long expanse from North to South

•Natural Resources – petroleum, silver, copper, gold, lead, zinc, natural gas, timber

•U.S.-Mexican Border – 2,000 mile long border means relationships are inevitable (migration, dependency, conflict)

V. Population• Over 100 million people in Mexico

60% Mestizo 30% Amerindian (Indigenous) 10% other (European, Asian, etc.)

• Most populated Spanish-speaking country in the world

• 75% of Mexico’s population live in urban areas (Mexico City’s population is 18 million)

• Population in northern part of Mexico more prosperous than central & southern Mexico. Farther south you go the greater the poverty of the people.

Population continued

•Rural farmers: Indians, poorest and most exploited

•Poor urban: unskilled workers•Growing working class•Middle class that has grown since WWII•Upper-middle class that wields a lot of

political power•Tiny rural, landowning class holds rest of

political power

VI. Colonial Era (colonialism)•Cultural Heterogeneity – Spanish took control

over numerous indigenous populations dominated by the Aztecs once they conquered Tenochtitlan

Mestizo – ethnic mixture of two peoples (European & indigenous)

•Catholicism – most Spaniards settled in or near Mexico city, but Spanish priests settled throughout Mexico’s hinterland converting the population to Christianity. Priests developed strong relationships with the people of Mexico

•Economic Dependency – all trade done with Spain

•Spanish Hierarchy – elaborate political & social status hierarchy structure

VII. Independence: “MEXICO”• Instability & Legitimacy Issues – Spanish left

and took hierarchy structure with them, reorganizing government was difficult task, Mexico had 36 presidents from 1833-1855

•Rise of Military – Instability led to military control, ex. Santa Anna

•U.S. Domination – US challenges Mexican land claims, Mexican-American War (1846-1848), Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo (US gets TX, NM, CA, AZ, UT, part of CO)

•Liberals vs. Conservatives – Constitution of 1857 based on democratic principles. Liberal president Benito Juarez “liberalizes” Mexico. Conservatism reflected in joint French, Spanish, and English takeover of Mexico under Maximilian (1864-1867). After Maximilian’s execution Juarez brought back to power but liberal/conservative struggle would continue

“The Porfiriato”

•Porfirio Diaz Military general under Benito Juarez Staged military coup in 1876 Instituted himself as president of Mexico,

promised he would serve no more than one term

Ruled Mexico for 34 years with an iron hand Cientificos – young, educated advisors of Diaz

that believed in bringing scientific and economic progress to Mexico

Influences of Porfiriato•Stability – Diaz dictatorship ended years of

conflict and chaos•Authoritarianism – no sharing of political power

beyond small, closed elite group (who also got really rich)

•Foreign Investment/Economic Growth – cientificos encouraged entrepreneurship and foreign investment, primarily from the U.S., resulted in growth of business and industry

•Growing Gap between Rich & Poor – as a result of development and industrialization

VIII. 20th Century • Porfirio Diaz ousted in coup by other elites

dissatisfied with Diaz’ rule and sensitive to the greed of the Porfirians

• Diaz abdicates to General Francisco Madero, a landowner from Coahuila

• Revolution of 1910 begins and warlordism (Zapata and peasants; Pancho Villa and unemployed workers and small farms) chaos would persist in Mexico until 1934

• Caudillos or regional strongmen sought to increase their personal wealth and social status

Influences of the Mexican Revolution• Patron-client System

• Constitution of 1917-established principle of state control over all natural resources, subordination of church to state, government redistrbutes land and labor rights

• Establishment of the PRI▫1929 Plutarco Calles brings the many caudillos

together and offers a plan: contenders would accommodate each other’s interests without political violence, allowing country to stabilize and prosper, especially for warlords

Mexican Revolution continued

•Patron-Client System – in an effort to unseat Diaz, caudillos rose to challenge each other for power. Popular leaders Pancho Villa & Emiliano Zapata emerged leading peasant armies. Around each leader a patron-client system emerged that involved large numbers of citizens

Many caudillos were ultimately assassinated (including Villa and Zapata)

Large numbers of followers were also killed in the competing world of the caudillos

Patron-Client system• Camarillas: everyone knows the system even

the peasants

• This is clientelism which works with corporatism▫Starts with an assumption of community, not

individual▫People are members of a group that make up

society▫ If led wisely, the system works▫Led wrongly, and corruption sets in

Patrons maintain loyalty by offering rewards, and clients repay that debt at the voting booth

Constitution of 1917•Ended the Revolution

Violence & Political Assassinations continued

•Mexican constitution very long and easily amended

•Set up structure for Democratic Government (Political Institutions resemble those of the U.S.)

Three branches of Government Competitive Elections Most public officials directly elected by the people

Conflict with Church after Revolution•Cristeros Rebellion (1920)

Hundreds of Thousands Killed (Priests murdered)

•Liberals legally separate Church & State, viewed church as a bastion of conservatism

Forbid priests from voting Placed federal restrictions on church-affiliated

schools (parochial schools) Suspended religious services

•Priests continue to lead rebellions after Liberal changes, contributes to chaos of 20th century

Establishment of PRI• After years of conflict, President Calles brings

caudillos together for agreement in 1929• Attempts to bring all caudillos under one big,

umbrella political party Bring stability through the idea of “passing

around” power from one leader to the next as presidency changed hands

Sexenios – president could only serve one 6-year term

Other leaders would be given major positions in government to establish their influence

PRI- “institutionalized” the revolution by stabilizing conflict between leaders

Results of Revolution

•1. traditional landowners power is undercut and reduced

•2. Catholic church influence reduced•3. power of foreign investors limited and

nationalism would guide economic policymaking

•4. new political elite created•5. new constitution and new party created

a strong central government and could assert its power

IX. Cardenas Upheaval (1934-1940)

•Succeeded Calles’ as president•Stabilized and Radicalized Mexican

politics•Gave voice to peasant demands from

the Revolution of 1910•Charismatic leader•“the Roosevelt of Mexico” as labeled by

American scholars

Cardenas’ Changes• Redistribution of Land – land taken away from big

landlords, foreigners and redistributed as ejidos – collective land grants – to be worked by peasants

• Nationalization of Industry – foreign business owners kicked out of country, most industry put under control of the state. Ex: PEMEX – giant, government controlled oil company

• Investment in Public Works – government builds roads, provides electricity, creates public services to modernize Mexico

• Encouragement of Peasant & Union Organizations – Cardenas welcomes their input in government, they form their own camarillas with leaders that represent their interests on presidents’ cabinet

• Concentration of Power in Presidency – Cardenas stabilizes presidency, when his sexenio was up he peacefully let go of power

Cardenas and ISI

•Cardenas’ strategy of state-led development known as Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)

•ISI Employs high tariffs to protect locally produced

goods from foreign competition Government ownership of key industries Government subsidies to domestic industries Government takes lead in promoting

industrialization (very little capital in private hands during this era)

X. Tecnicos & the Pendulum Theory• Miguel Aleman becomes president in 1946

Encouraged entrepreneurship Foreign investment Free-market strategies on exports

• Followed by president who returned to Cardenas-style reform

•Pendulum Theory – back-and-forth effect in Mexican politics from socialist reform to free-market economic development and back again.

• By the 1970s the pendulum appeared to stop with the emergence of the tecnicos

Tecnicos continued•Tecnicos – educated, business-oriented

leaders usually with degrees in economics, political science, business, etc.

•Tecnicos in the PRI espouse the free-market approach to politics

•By the 1980s Mexico had settled into an economic approach based upon Neoliberalism

Free markets Balanced budgets Privatization Free trade Limited government intervention in the economy

“Tecnicos & Politicos”• By 1950s Mexico welcomed foreign investment• GNP experienced spectacular growth until the

1980s• This “Mexican Miracle” based largely on huge

supplies of natural gas & oil• Mexico became a model for LDC’s everywhere• “Oil Bust” of the early 1980s, plummeting price of

oil sunk the Mexican economy and inflated the value of the peso

• This caused added political tension within the PRI• Division between the “politicos” – old style

caciques who headed camarillas – and the “tecnicos” began to grow wider

XI. Citizens, Society, & the State• Traditionally Mexican citizens have interacted with

government through patron-client system

• Because camarillas are so interwoven in Mexican politics, most people have had some contact with government during their lives

• Clientelism has generally meant that the government had the upper hand through its ability to determine which interests to respond to and which to ignore

• Role of citizens in Mexico is changing as political parties have become competitive and democracy becomes more firmly entrenched

XII. Cleavages•Urban vs. Rural – Mexico’s political structure put into

place in early 20th century when most of population was rural. PRI and patron-client system were intended to control large numbers of illiterate peasants in exchange for small favors from politicos. Today Mexico is 75% urban, with a literacy rate of about 90%. Urban voters less likely to support PRI, more receptive to political and economic reform

•Mestizo vs. Amerindian – only about 10% of Mexicans speak indigenous languages, but about 30% consider themselves Amerindians. Amerindians marginalized, predominantly rural, and poor. This cleavage tends to define social class, with most of Mexico’s wealth in the hands of the mestizo population.

•North vs. South – north almost like a different country then the area south of Mexico City. Majority of educated citizens and Mexico’s wealth lies in the north. Southern Mexico primarily populated by Amerindians, characterized and led by Zapatista Movement in Chiapas.

“Ya Basta” Zapatista Movement Lives On (EZLN)

• EZLN – began in 1994 in Chiapas in protest of the signing of the NAFTA treaty

• Viewed agreement as a continued exploitation of landowners and PRI bosses

• EZLN captured four towns demanding jobs, land, housing, food, health, education, independence, freedom, democracy, justice and peace

• Rebellion originally based on ethnicity – Amerindian – but spread to other factions of society

• Zapatista supporters wear black ski masks to hide their identity from the government

• Although a moderate truce was announced with the government, the Fox administration was unable to negotiate a settlement to the dispute with the Zapatistas despite numerous efforts to do so

Other challenges• Urbanization and a new middle class

• Economic crises: heavy deficit spending

• Globalization: requires more transparency to Mexican politics and limits how it responds because of how may be perceived in the world

• Privitization: could create more independent elites

• Communications technology: allows Mexicans to see world standards and how to achieve those goals

• Narco politics

Vicente Fox’s Legacy•First non-PRI president in 70 years

•Pluralism

•Decentralization

•Electoral Reform

•Rule of Law

•Anti-Narcotics Policy

XIII. Political Participation•Historically characterized by revolution &

protest

•Mexican citizens have generally been subjects under authoritarian rule of the political elite

•Citizens sometimes benefited from patronage, but legitimate channels to policy-makers were few

•Today citizens participate through increasingly legitimate and regular elections

XIV. Patron-Client System (Mexico)• Roots in warlordism and loyalty to caudillos during 19th century• Each caudillo had supporters – in return for their loyalty – he

granted favors to them• Establishment of Camarillas that still exist today• Mexican citizens participate in government through formal &

informal mechanisms• Emphasizes compromise among contending elites• “Behind the Scenes” conflict resolution• Distribution of political rewards to those willing to play by

formal/informal “rules of the game”• Keeps control in the hands of the elite• Elite has upper hand in deciding who gets favors and who doesn’t• Patron-client system still very important in determining the

nature of political participation• Modernization and legitimate democracy tend to break up the

patron-client system as networks get blurred in large population centers, and more formal forms of participation are instituted

Camarillas• Hierarchical network

• Exchange of offices and other benefits

• Within the PRI, up until the election of 2000, most positions within the president’s cabinet were filled by supporters or heads of camarillas that the president wanted to appease

• Peasants in camarillas received jobs, financial assistance, family advice, and even food & shelter in return for votes for the PRI in the past

Protests• When citizens demands have gotten out of hand,

the government generally responded by not only accommodating their demands, but by including them in the political process through cooptation

Tlatelolco (1968) – student protest led to a massacre by government troops. Next president recruited large numbers of students into government, increased spending on social services

Zapatista Uprising (1994) – Chiapas rebellion reminded Mexicans that some people still lived in appalling conditions, and poverty and lack of education were still serious problems

Voter Behavior•PRI era

PRI controlled local, state, & national elections Voting rates high because of patron-client system Election day festive, accompanied by free food, music,

and celebratrions Corruption extensive Challengers easily defeated with “tacos” – stuffed

ballot boxes•Post-PRI era

Presence of competing parties, have existed since 1930s, but no real legitimacy until 1994 78% of eligible citizens voted in 1994 64% voted in 2000 Both much better than 49% of 1988 when PRI corruption

was at its height

Factors influencing Voters•Age

Younger voters were more likely than older voters to support Vincente Fox’s PAN, and older voters more likely to support the PRI

59% of all student voters chose PAN 19% voted for the PRI

•Education The more educated voted for Fox and the PAN 60% of those with a college education voted for Fox 22% of college educated voted for Labastida, the PRI

candidate•Region

PRI evenly supported throughout the regions of the country

PAN received majority of its support from the north and center-west