Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per dose and single sire...
description
Transcript of Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per dose and single sire...
Commercial application of reducing dose concentration
and single sire matings
Amanda Williams Minton1, Alicia Johnson2, Darran Miller2, Troy Werner2, Nick Holden2, Jennifer Patterson3, Michael Dyck3, and George
Foxcroft3
1PIC North America, Hendersonville, TN; 2Holden Farms, Northfield, MN; 3Swine Reproduction-Development Program, Swine Research & Technology
Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Goal of a commercial production system:
lbs pork produced
Cost produce pork
Improve the bottom line
Create more value and
How improve a pig’s value?
Strategically use genetically superior animals
A high indexing terminal boar is superior to his counterparts (i.e. lower indexing boars).
3. Decreased mortality
1. Better feed conversion
2. Fewer days to market
How improve a pig’s value?
A high indexing terminal boar passes these traits on to his progeny.
3. Decreased mortality
1. Better feed conversion
2. Fewer days to market
Increase $$ per pig produced
Improvements in the last 10 years?
Sow Farm
1. Gilt development and management
3. Managing sow body condition
2. Lactation and gestation feeding strategies
4. Length of lactation
5. Putting the right people in place
Improvements in the last 10 years?
Boar Stud
1. Accuracy of semen concentration?
2. Assessment of sperm?
3. Confidence in boar studs?
Not much change in semen concentration and utilization of boars…
Time to focus on the boar
Primary driver is Genetics
Countries routinely use 2 billion total
Use fewer, higher indexing boars
Increase value of the progeny
Reduce genetic lag
Take advantage of genomics
Trial
• Objective: Decrease semen concentration and use single sire matings to improve the use of genetically superior sire line boars
Materials & Methods
• Boars started on trial as enter the stud
– Ejaculates processed 2 billion viable
– Fifty single sire matings
– Pooled after 50 matings
• Sows from two farms
– WEI d 3 to 6
– Multiparous sows
– Conventional AI
• Data collected for
– Pregnancy rate, farrowing rate and litter size
Trial
• Phases of the trial:
1) SSM with 2B viable cells and multiple doses
2) SSM with 1.5B viable IUI and multiple doses
3) Single fixed-time AI with 1.5B viable IUI
• Results presented from 5 groups
Pregnancy and farrowing rates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
% o
f so
ws
BoarPR FR
PR 93.8%FR 92.2%
Total born and born alive per litter
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
161 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Nu
mb
er
of
pig
s
BoarTB BA
TB 13.08BA 11.90
Data combined
RT
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91
01
11
21
31
41
51
61
71
81
92
02
12
22
32
42
52
62
72
82
93
03
13
23
33
43
53
63
73
83
94
04
14
24
34
44
54
64
74
84
95
05
1
% o
f so
ws
Nu
mb
er
of
pig
s
BoarTB BA PR FR
EBV and Fertility
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
43
45 2 9
38
40
44
30
39
11
46
26
34
12
17
18
28
23
27
29
31
33
19 3 5 8
41
16 1
42
35
47
10
22 6 7
50
21
36
14
20
25
51
24
49
37
32
13
48
15 4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Bo
ar
EB
V
Boar
Fe
cun
dit
y i
nd
ex
(1
00
*FR
*BA
)
EBV Fecundity index
Value of progeny
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
7 12
63
53
22
2 92
5 61
12
32
12
91
82
42
02
7 43
33
11
53
7 51
73
05
01
43
83
61
94
41
05
1 81
24
63
44
91
3 3 21
63
94
24
84
04
72
84
54
34
1
Va
lue
fo
r p
igs
pro
du
ced
Fe
cun
dit
y i
nd
ex
(1
00
*FR
*BA
)
BoarFecundity index $$
Implications
• Identified boars with poor fertility
• Performance no different from prior 6 mos
• Boars should be removed considering index and fertility
• Successfully use boars at 2 billion cells
• Use fewer boars to disseminate superior genetics
• Applicable to sire and maternal lines
GENETIC VALUE: SIRE LINE MODEL
Boar Categories
• Top 50% boars = AI boars
• Top 25% boars = CBVPlus
• Value difference between AI sired progeny and CBVPlus = $1.30 to 1.70 more per pig
• Value additive to the model
Sire Line Model
100 115
Ave. Index = 107
Ave. Index = 126
Diff = 18.8
50% 50%Cull
How does this change?
• Reducing semen concentration from 3 to 2 billion reduces boars needed by 33%
• AI boars needed = 34% (50% x 67%) of boars available
50% AI and 50% CBVPlus
Sire Line Model: 2 billion
108 119
Ave. Index = 113
Ave. Index = 129
Diff = 16
50% 50%Cull
Impact on average index?
• Average AI boar improves from 107 to 113 or 6 index points
• Average CBVPlus boar improves from 126 to 129 or 3 index points
Change in traits
AI CBVplus
FCR -0.0067 -0.0033
Days -0.256 -0.128
Backfat (mm) -0.150 -0.075
Loin Depth (mm) 0.107 0.054
Pre wean Mort (%) -0.141 -0.070
Nurs Mort (%) -0.062 -0.031
Fin Mort (%) -0.064 -0.032
$ value/pig $0.54 $0.27
Reduction to 1 billion per dose
• IUI with 1 billion brings effective reduction of boars by 67%
• AI boars needed = 17% (50% x 33%) of boars available
– 50% AI and 50% CBVPlus
Sire Line Model: 1 billion
128119
Avg. Index = 122
Avg. Index = 136
Diff = 14
50% 50%
Cull
• Average AI boar improves from 113 to 122 or 9 index points
• Average CBVPlus boar improves from 129 to 136 or 7 index points
Reduction to 1 billion per dose
AI CBVplus
FCR -0.0100 -0.0078
Days -0.385 -0.300
Backfat (mm) -0.225 -0.175
Loin Depth (mm) 0.161 0.125
Pre wean Mort (%) -0.212 -0.165
Nurs Mort (%) -0.093 -0.072
Fin Mort (%) -0.096 -0.075
$ value $0.78 $0.61
Reduction to 1 billion per dose
AI CBVPlus
FCR -0.0168 -0.0112
Days -0.642 -0.428
Backfat (mm) -0.365 -0.250
Loin Depth (mm) 0.269 0.179
Pre wean Mort (%) -0.354 -0.236
Nurs Mort (%) -0.155 -0.104
Fin Mort (%) -0.161 -0.107
$ value $1.31 $0.87
TOTAL Reduction from 3 to 1 billion
Genetic Value
• In order for genetic value to be realized long term all customers need to reduce semen concentration
Future Implications
1. Fewer boars sold by suppliers because demand is less
2. Improvement index short-term unlessstrategy adopted by all producers
3. Selection intensity improves significantly for large index improvements to occur
Key Message
Strategically use genetically superior boars
Semen concentration
Number boars needed
Genetic index
$0.87 to $1.31 per pig
Acknowledgements