All DOC is not the same : DOC classified by functional properties and their environmental...
-
Upload
aiden-rench -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of All DOC is not the same : DOC classified by functional properties and their environmental...
All DOC is not the same: DOC classified by functional properties and their environmental significance
Andy BakerUniversity of [email protected]
The microbial loop. Fenchel, doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.013
Battin et al. doi:10.1038/ngeo618
(In predominantly natural systems)
Evidence of DOC processing within rivers. DOC becomes increasingly ‘young’ in 14C age and hydrophilic with distance from source. Rivers evade CO2. Photodegradation and biodegradation occurs, arguably of all DOM fractions.
Seasonal variations in riverine DOM character, typically a hydrophobic / aromatic ‘flush’. Differences in DOM character between catchments, depending on soil type, land cover and human impact.
Evidence of greater variability in DOC characteristics in headwaters and low order streams with ‘fresh’ DOM. Downstream DOC might be 14C ‘young’, but it is more homogenous and biogeochemically ‘aged’.
Anthropogenic inputs typically introduce hydrophilic, relatively colourless, DOC.
Clear links between DOC character and function. Aromatic DOC has greater chemical and ecological function (metal binding, contaminant binding, UV screening), and is easy to treat. Hydrophilic DOC difficult to remove during drinking water treatment.
Variable and high fluorescence / g C in bog waters
Less variable and less fluorescent / g C river waters
IHSS standards have atypically low fluorescence
Time /Processing
Peak
C fl
uore
scen
ce
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
FE
FC
MC
ME
PGweir
Pweir
CBweir
Pea
k C
int/a
340
Mean and standard deviation colour/DOC
CBweir 10.7 (1.4)
Pweir 10.0 (1.2)
PGweir 8.4 (2.5)
ME 10.8 (3.7)
MC 9.5 (0.8)
FE 12.4 (3.7)
FC 11.5 (2.0)
‘fresh’ DOC is more coloured
Different DOC character between sub-catchments
‘fresh’ DOC is more fluorescentper unit absorbance
Photodegradation of lignin over two months
Sampling Period
8 (µ
g L-1
)
40
60
80
100
120
140
Sampling Period
8
(mg
(100
mg
OC
)-1)
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Sampling Period
V (
mg
(100
mg
OC
)-1)
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9Lignin phenol concentration and relationship with optical characteristics through the ‘wet’
Sampling Period
SR
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
Sampling Period
SU
VA
254
(L m
g C
-1 m
-1)
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Sampling Period
Flu
ores
cenc
e In
dex
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Summary
River microbial ecosystem processes DOC. Aromatic bonds in DOC relatively easier to break. DOC therefore less aromatic with residence /travel time. Easily measured ‘in-situ’ using UV absorbance or fluorescence.
River experience seasonal variations in riverine DOC character. Typically with ‘flush’ of relatively fresh (therefore aromatic) DOC. Groundwater rivers will have a groundwater hydrophilic DOC source.
Catchment mean DOC character depending on soil type, land cover and human impact.
Evidence of greater variability in DOC characteristics in headwaters and low order streams with ‘fresh’ DOM; variability decreases downstream as this is processed.
Anthropogenic inputs typically introduce relatively hydrophilic, colourless, DOC.
Aromatic DOC has greater chemical and ecological function (metal binding, contaminant binding, UV screening), and is easy to treat. Hydrophilic DOC difficult to remove during drinking water treatment.
0.01 0.1
1
10
1
1
1
1
22
2
2
23
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
1011
1111
11
1112
1212
12
12
1313
13
13
13 1414
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
1717
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
2121
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
22
2323
23
23
23
24
24
25
25
25
25
2526
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
30
30
31 31
31
32
32
32
32
32
33
33
33
33
33
34 34
34
34
34
35
35
35
35
36
3636
36
36
37
37
37
3737
38
38
38
3838
39
3939
39
40 40
4040
40
41
41
41
4141
42
42
42
42
43 43
43
43
43
4444
444444
45
45
45
45
46 46
4646
46
47
4747
47
484848
48
48
49
49
49
49
49
50
50
50
50
50
51
51
51
51
52
52
53
54
54
54
55
55
55
55
56
56
56
57
57
58
58
60
60
60
60
61
61
61
61
62
62
62
62
63
63
63
63
64
64
64
DO
C (m
g/l)
UV Absorbance (410 nm) /cm