Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences
-
Upload
bert-davis -
Category
Documents
-
view
30 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental Sciences
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock
Climate Dynamics11:670:461
Lecture 10, 10/6/14
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
Predictability: How can we predict the climate decades into the future when we can’t even predict the weather for next week?
Predictability of the first kind: Predict the future based on initial conditions, with boundary conditions constant. This is limited by the chaotic nature of the atmosphere, which is a physical system with built-in instabilities, in vertical convection (e.g., thunderstorms) and horizontal motion (e.g., baroclinic instability - development of low pressure systems, such as hurricanes and Nor’Easters).
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
Consider a prediction using the above equation of the future state of the variable X, say the surface air temperature. The subscript n indicates the time, say the day, and a is a constant representing the physics of the climate system. X for any day is a times its value on the previous day minus X squared on the previous day.
With such a simple equation, it should be possible to predict X indefinitely into the future. Right?
X0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.20a 3.930 3.940 3.930 3.93
Precision (decimal places)
3 3 3 2
n (Time Step) Control PhysicsInitial
ConditionsRounding
0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.201 3.806 3.828 3.801 3.812 0.472 0.429 0.490 0.463 1.632 1.506 1.686 1.604 3.750 3.666 3.783 3.735 0.675 1.004 0.556 0.756 2.197 2.948 1.876 2.397 3.807 2.924 3.853 3.688 0.468 2.971 0.297 0.929 1.620 2.879 1.079 2.7710 3.742 3.055 3.076 3.2111 0.703 2.704 2.627 2.3112 2.269 3.342 3.423 3.7413 3.769 1.999 1.735 0.7114 0.607 3.880 3.808 2.2915 2.017 0.233 0.465 3.7616 3.859 0.864 1.611 0.6417 0.274 2.658 3.736 2.1118 1.002 3.408 0.725 3.8419 2.934 1.813 2.324 0.3520 2.922 3.856 3.732 1.25
Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn2
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
X0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.20
a 3.930 3.940 3.930 3.93Precision
(decimal places)3 3 3 2
n (Time Step) Control PhysicsInitial
ConditionsRounding
0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.201 3.806 3.828 3.801 3.812 0.472 0.429 0.490 0.463 1.632 1.506 1.686 1.604 3.750 3.666 3.783 3.735 0.675 1.004 0.556 0.756 2.197 2.948 1.876 2.397 3.807 2.924 3.853 3.688 0.468 2.971 0.297 0.929 1.620 2.879 1.079 2.7710 3.742 3.055 3.076 3.2111 0.703 2.704 2.627 2.3112 2.269 3.342 3.423 3.7413 3.769 1.999 1.735 0.7114 0.607 3.880 3.808 2.2915 2.017 0.233 0.465 3.7616 3.859 0.864 1.611 0.6417 0.274 2.658 3.736 2.1118 1.002 3.408 0.725 3.8419 2.934 1.813 2.324 0.3520 2.922 3.856 3.732 1.25
Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn2
Let’s assume that a is exactly 3.930 and that a prediction with three decimal places is the exact solution.
Then let’s consider three types of errors: imprecise knowledge of the physics of the climate system, imprecise initial conditions, and rounding due to limited computer resources.
This example is from Edward Lorenz.
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
X0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.20
a 3.930 3.940 3.930 3.93Precision
(decimal places)3 3 3 2
n (Time Step) Control PhysicsInitial
ConditionsRounding
0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.201 3.806 3.828 3.801 3.812 0.472 0.429 0.490 0.463 1.632 1.506 1.686 1.604 3.750 3.666 3.783 3.735 0.675 1.004 0.556 0.756 2.197 2.948 1.876 2.397 3.807 2.924 3.853 3.688 0.468 2.971 0.297 0.929 1.620 2.879 1.079 2.7710 3.742 3.055 3.076 3.2111 0.703 2.704 2.627 2.3112 2.269 3.342 3.423 3.7413 3.769 1.999 1.735 0.7114 0.607 3.880 3.808 2.2915 2.017 0.233 0.465 3.7616 3.859 0.864 1.611 0.6417 0.274 2.658 3.736 2.1118 1.002 3.408 0.725 3.8419 2.934 1.813 2.324 0.3520 2.922 3.856 3.732 1.25
Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn2
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
X0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.20
a 3.930 3.940 3.930 3.93Precision
(decimal places)3 3 3 2
n (Time Step) Control PhysicsInitial
ConditionsRounding
0 2.200 2.200 2.210 2.201 3.806 3.828 3.801 3.812 0.472 0.429 0.490 0.463 1.632 1.506 1.686 1.604 3.750 3.666 3.783 3.735 0.675 1.004 0.556 0.756 2.197 2.948 1.876 2.397 3.807 2.924 3.853 3.688 0.468 2.971 0.297 0.929 1.620 2.879 1.079 2.7710 3.742 3.055 3.076 3.2111 0.703 2.704 2.627 2.3112 2.269 3.342 3.423 3.7413 3.769 1.999 1.735 0.7114 0.607 3.880 3.808 2.2915 2.017 0.233 0.465 3.7616 3.859 0.864 1.611 0.6417 0.274 2.658 3.736 2.1118 1.002 3.408 0.725 3.8419 2.934 1.813 2.324 0.3520 2.922 3.856 3.732 1.25
Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn2
Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn2
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
n
Xn
Control Physics Initial Conditions Rounding
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
Predictability: How can we predict the climate decades into the future when we can’t even predict the weather for next week?Predictability of the second kind: Predict the future based on boundary conditions, independent of initial conditions. If there are slowly-varying (with respect to the atmospheric predictability limit of 2-3 weeks) boundary conditions (e.g., greenhouse gases, stratospheric aerosols, sea surface temperatures, soil moisture, snow cover) that can be predicted, then the envelope of the weather can be predicted. [The first two examples are external to the climate system, and the last three are internal.]
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
NOAA Medium Range Forecasts
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/medr.shtml
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/era-interim
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/medium/verification/timeseries/ccafadrian/
ECMWF forecast skill
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
MJO forecast from Dee et al.
(2011).
Correlation of> 0.6 has skill.
Dee, D. P., et al., 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597. DOI:10.1002/qj.828
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
NOAA MJO forecasts
(1) Reanalysis 2 (R2) is used since CFS operational forecast utilizes the R2 as initialization data.
(2) The indices for the latest 4 days are calculated using NCEP GDAS (Global Data Analysis System).
(3) The MJO definition used here is identical to the Matt Wheeler's (Wheeler and Hendon 2004), i.e., to represent the MJO, the first two EOFs of combined fields of OLR, u850 and u200 are used. The followings are some details of the forecast models.
(4) CFS operational: this is a 2003 version and two member ensemble mean is used.
(5) GFS offline: this runs exactly the same as CFS operational model (e.g. the same R2 initial data) except that air-sea interactionis not allowed. Four member ensemble mean is used.
(6) GFS operational: the model keeps being updated. Model climatology from the GFS offline model is used. The 11-member ensemble mean is used.
(7) AR: Autoregressive time series model.(8) PCRLAG: Lagged multiple linear regression.
For details please contact to Kyong-Hwan Seo ([email protected]).
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wd52qz/mjoindex/description_methods_forecasts.html
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
NOAA MJO forecast
from GEFS model
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wd52qz/mjoindex/index/diagram_40days_forecast_GEFS_membera.gif
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
NOAA MJO forecast
from statistical models
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wd52qz/mjoindex/index/diagram_40days_forecast.gif
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
Dee, D. P., et al., 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597. DOI:10.1002/qj.828
Persistence
ERA-Interim
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
CONSTRUCTED ANALOG METHOD, Huug van den Dool, http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wd51hd/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/seasonal_range_forecast/nino_plumes_public_s4!3.4!plumes!201310/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/seasonal_range_forecast/nino_plumes_public_s4!3.4!plumes!201301/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/seasonal_range_forecast/nino_plumes_public_s4!3.4!plumes!201208/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/seasonal_range_forecast/nino_plumes_public_s4!3.4!plumes!201203/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/eurosip/nino_plumes_euro_public!3.4!201309!/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/eurosip/nino_plumes_euro_public!3.4!201301!/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/eurosip/nino_plumes_euro_public!3.4!201208!/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/seasonal_range_forecast/nino_plumes_public_s4!3.4!plumes!201208/
Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental
Sciences
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/seasonal/forecast/eurosip/nino_plumes_euro_public!3.4!201203!/