Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

42
Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion Presented by: Los Angeles World Airports Greater Toronto Airport Authority Salt Lake City International Airport Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sacramento International Airport

Transcript of Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Page 1: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Presented by: Los Angeles World Airports

Greater Toronto Airport Authority Salt Lake City International Airport

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sacramento International Airport

Page 2: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Agenda: β€’ Presentation format and ground rules: Joshua Amos β€’ General Introduction: Stuart Mathews β€’ Presentation from LAWA Phu Tong, Rick Connelly β€’ Presentation from GTAA Vivek Kaushish β€’ Presentation from SLC David Jacks β€’ Presentation from SEA Erik Knowles, Mike Tasker β€’ Presentation from SMF Greg Nowakowski β€’ General Q&A – Next Steps

Page 3: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

LAWA Conveyance Information

Page 4: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Standard Data

β€’ 84.56 - Million Annual Passengers (MAP) 2017 CY (71% Domestic) β€’ 141 - Total number of Escalators β€’ 199 - Total number of Elevators β€’ 19 - Total number of Moving Walks β€’ $14.9M - Total annual budget for Conveyance Maintenance β€’ 31 FTE for maintenance budgeted – 23 filled β€’ 24x7 - Hours of service coverage β€’ 388 Total number of personal injuries in 2017 β€’ 667 - Total number of elevator entrapments in 2017 β€’ 12,137 - Total service requests (SR) or problem tickets (PB) in 2017 β€’ How you share equipment status with outside customers

– Not currently sharing info outside of LAWA departments

Page 5: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Data Cont’d - Normalization

β€’ Cost per device: (# devices/total annual cost) – $41,504

β€’ Entrapments per enplanement – For every 126,773 there is 1 entrapment

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per enplanement – For every 234,883 passengers there is 1 injury

β€’ Entrapments per elevator – 3.35

β€’ Service Requests per device – Average 34 SR per asset for 2017

Page 6: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions for all to answer

β€’ How is your airport measuring equipment availability? – Availability = 1 – Downtime / Operational Terminal Hours

β€’ Labors (SRs, WO) = Downtime β€’ Operational Hours = Calculate based on hours that the terminal is open (6,935 hours per year)

β€’ How are you collecting the data necessary to measure equipment availability? – Recording hours against WO and SR in Maximo – Moving toward using mobile asset up/down feature

β€’ How are you holding your service provider accountable to the requirements of your contract?

– Currently revising the process – can discuss on call should time allow

β€’ How are you notified if a piece of equipment is not operating? – Call to Airport Response Coordination Center (ARCC) to create SR/ticket

β€’ How do various airports measure proactive to reactive ratio for conveyance & what are goals for

this KPI? – Use work order hours recorded in Maximo

β€’ PM and % CM work orders proactive β€’ Service Request and Field Corrective reactive

– Have not established goals

Page 7: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions?

Page 8: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Greater Toronto Airport Authority

Page 9: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Airport Stats

2015 2016 2017

41 M

44 M

47 M

Consistently adding 3 Million passengers every year from 2015-2017.

On track to achieve 50 Million passengers in 2018

Page 10: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Equipment Stats

People moving devices (PMD’s) service the Airport grounds 387

213 Servicing Terminal 1

133 Servicing Terminal 3

Escalators 132

Elevators 181

Power Walks 65

Baggage Lifts 5

High-Speed Walks 2

Automated people mover (APM) trains servicing 3 stations. Moves

16,000 people per day on a 1.46km (0.91mi) track. Each train is

comprised of 7 cars that can hold 25 passengers

2

Page 11: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Labor Stats

β€’ PMD Maintenance outsourced to Thyssen Krupp.

β€’ Inspection & Auditing

Elevating Devices Inspection Services (EDIS) Inc.

18 Mechanics (O&M Contract)

2 Mechanics (Capital Projects)

4 Management/Administrative

β€’ APM Maintenance and Operations outsourced to Doppel Mayr Cable Car

6.5M/yr Thyssen Krupp Contract

47M 47 million passengers / year with

a 7% average growth

Page 12: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Service Coverage 18 Mechanics Crew Size: 2 Mechanics

2 crews for Terminal 3 One crew on radio response and one crew on planned maintenance

3 crews for Terminal 1 Two crews on radio response and one crew on planned maintenance

1 Crew for Major Maintenance (CAT 5) For both Terminals

2 Crews for Annual Inspections (CAT 1) For both terminals

1 Crew for repairs/upgrades For both Terminals

Page 13: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Equipment Stats

$16,883 Cost per Device including Escalators, Moving Walkways and Elevators

1 in

600,000

Passengers reported an entrapment incident 1 in

250,000

Passengers reported an elevator/moving walk incident

1.04 Entrapments per Elevator

0.39 Incidents reported per Escalator and Moving Walkway

34 Service Requests per device (elevators, escalators and moving walkways)

Page 14: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Monitoring

β€’ Monitoring and Reporting is completed Through application called:

Lift-Net β€’ Vendor of application:

Integrated Display Systems

Page 15: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Reporting & Metrics

Page 16: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Minimum Equipment Level

Page 17: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Reporting & Metrics

Page 18: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Reporting & Metrics

Page 19: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Reporting & Metrics

Page 20: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Metrics Definitions/Calculations

π‘†π΄π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘£π‘Žπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘  =# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’

# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ =

(115 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ (β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘ )

115 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž

π‘†π΄π‘’π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘™π‘Žπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘  =# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’

# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ =

(92 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ (β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘ )

92 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž

π‘†π΄π‘šπ‘œπ‘£π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘€π‘Žπ‘™π‘˜π‘  =# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’

# π‘œπ‘“ π‘ˆπ‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘  π‘₯ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ =

(41 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ (β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘ )

41 π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘€π‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž

π‘†π΄π»π‘–π‘”β„Ž 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑠 =π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’

π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ π‘‚π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ =

(18 β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘  π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘¦π‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘šπ‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž βˆ’ π‘‡π‘œπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑂𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑓 π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ π‘‡π‘–π‘šπ‘’ π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘” 0500βˆ’2300 (β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘ )

18 β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘  π‘₯ # π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘¦π‘  𝑖𝑛 π‘šπ‘œπ‘›π‘‘β„Ž

β€’ PMD’s Operating Time = 24hrs/day 7 days/week β€’ Planned maintenance not included in out of service time β€’ New metric being used to capture PMD availability as per passenger experience.

Therefore would include planned maintenance outage.

Page 21: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Reliability

Technical Performance Review Room

(War Room)

β€’ Meet daily with terminal operations, PMD maintenance staff and GTAA management

β€’ Discuss previous day

performance (restarts, failures, shutdowns)

β€’ Track all performance issues on tracker board and terminal map

β€’ Look for trends, patterns, high impact/critical areas

Page 22: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions?

Page 23: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Salt Lake City International Airport

Page 24: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Standard Data

β€’ Million Annual Passengers (MAP) 24,691,217 β€’ Total number of Escalators 25 β€’ Total number of Elevators 26 β€’ Total number of Moving Walks 10 β€’ Total annual budget for Conveyance Maintenance. $380,000.00 β€’ FTE for maintenance (if in-house) N/A β€’ Hours of service coverage 0800-1700, Mon-Fri β€’ Total number of treated passenger injuries in 2017 Not Tracked β€’ Total number of elevator entrapments in 2017 Not Tracked β€’ Total service requests (SR) or problem tickets (PB) in 2017 178 β€’ How you share equipment status with outside customers

PASSUR/OPS

Page 25: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Data Cont’d - Normalization

β€’ Cost per device: (# devices/total annual cost) $6,229.50

β€’ Entrapments per enplanement Not Tracked

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per enplanement Not Tracked

β€’ Entrapments per elevator Not Tracked

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per device Not Tracked

β€’ Service Requests per device 2.91/Average

Page 26: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions for all to answer

β€’ How is your airport measuring equipment availability? Not currently measured

β€’ How are you collecting the data necessary to measure equipment availability? N/A

β€’ How are you holding your service provider accountable to the requirements of your contract? Current contract does not include measurable, only response time.

β€’ How are you notified if a piece of equipment is not operating? BAS system sends signal to Control Center. They notify maintenance tech.

Page 27: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions?

Page 28: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Seattle Tacoma International Airport

Page 29: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Standard Data

β€’ Million Annual Passengers (MAP)

– 46.9 million in 2017

β€’ Total number of Escalators – 86

β€’ Total number of Elevators – 81

β€’ Total number of Moving Walks – 6

β€’ Total annual budget for Conveyance Maintenance. – 2018 Approved estimate 5 million a year/ Previous contract spend approx, 16 million over 4 years

β€’ FTE for maintenance (if in-house) – 1 Manager/ Split responsibilities 33%

β€’ Hours of service coverage – M-F 0400-2400/ Weekend 1.75 Hours opening shifts

β€’ Total number of treated passenger injuries in 2015* (most recent data) – 39

β€’ Total number of elevator entrapments in 2017 – Not Tracked. Very dependent on track cleaning.

β€’ Total service requests (SR) or problem tickets (PB) in 2017 – 5,103

β€’ How you share equipment status with outside customers – Weekly report sent to stakeholders by Manager

Page 30: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Basic Data Cont’d - Normalization

β€’ Cost per device: (# devices/total annual cost) – $10,240 elevators/ $20,840 for escalators and walkways average X2

β€’ Entrapments per enplanement – Not tracked

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per enplanement – 188/45MM*

β€’ Entrapments per elevator – Not Tracked.

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per device – 188/81 (2.3 per device)*

β€’ Service Requests per device – 29.6 for 2017

Page 31: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions for all to answer

β€’ How is your airport measuring equipment availability? – Weekly report and contractor meeting

β€’ How are you collecting the data necessary to measure equipment availability? – Weekly reporting makes this relatively easy

β€’ How are you holding your service provider accountable to the requirements of your contract? – Most repairs fall under customer damage* but regular maintenance work is

determined in concert with operations on a weekly basis. The longest downtime would be a long handrail replacement (vulcanizing) and step replacement.

β€’ How are you notified if a piece of equipment is not operating? – Liftnet is monitored in our ACC center but most common is customer calls.

β€’ How do various airports measure proactive to reactive ratio for conveyance & what are goals for this KPI? – Not measured.

Page 32: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions?

Page 33: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Sacramento International Airport

Page 34: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Sacramento International Airport

β€’ Quick Facts β€’ 2017 Annual Passenger Traffic: 10.9 Million β€’ Traffic growing by 7% over previous year β€’ 2 Terminal, 2 Concourse System β€’ 31 Gates β€’ 2 Active Runways

Page 35: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Conveyance

β€’ Elevators 34 β€’ Escalators 18 β€’ People Movers 2

Page 36: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Contractual Information

β€’ Elevator/Escalator Contract with KONE β€’ $600,000 Annual cost β€’ All inclusive performance contract β€’ Provides for 1 full time tech on site 8 hours/day β€’ Outside normal working hours response 60min; 30min for entrapment β€’ Callback penalty: frequency of callback determined by formula

β€’ No penalty under .333 β€’ 5% penalty for .333 to .399 β€’ 10% for greater than .400

β€’ Availability Penalty: Average of 98.7% of property hours of operation over each 3 month period β€’ This includes allowance for equipment service time β€’ 98% and below: 20% penalty

Page 37: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Contractual Information

β€’ Automatic People Mover Contract with Bombardier β€’ $2,954,757 annual cost; includes insurance costs β€’ All inclusive performance contract β€’ 24/7 365 maintenance coverage β€’ Normal business hours staffed with maintenance personnel β€’ Performance determined by formula based on equipment availability

Page 38: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Conveyance Injuries

β€’ Total number of treated passenger injuries in 2017: 7 β€’ Total number of elevator entrapments in 2017: 7 β€’ Total service requests or problem tickets in 2017: 155 β€’ Equipment status shared by e-mail, operation center

announcements or direct contact

Page 39: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Data Normalization

β€’ Cost per device: β€’ Escalators/Elevators $11,538 β€’ APM $1,477,378

β€’ Entrapments per enplanement β€’ .0000006

β€’ Escalator Passenger Injuries per device β€’ .38

β€’ Service request per device β€’ 2.98

Page 40: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Additional Questions

β€’ How is your airport measuring equipment availability?

β€’ Equipment availability is measured by formula β€’ How are you collecting the data necessary to measure equipment

availability?

β€’ Data is collected by vendor, verified by Airport staff, cross checked with Operations

β€’ How are you holding your service provider accountable to the requirements of your contract?

β€’ Monthly status meetings between Management. Formula based penalties applied as appropriate

β€’ How are you notified if a piece of equipment is not operating?

Operations, maintenance, vendor, CMMS system aggregate status and notifications

Page 41: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

Questions?

Page 42: Airport Passenger Conveyance Benchmarking Discussion

General Feedback Next Steps