AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD AGENDA

The Agricultural Service Board will hold a meeting on Monday, July 6, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., live streamed via Zoom Cloud Meetings.

1. Call to Order

2. AGENDA2.1 Adoption of Agenda

3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES3.1 Agricultural Service Board Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2020

4. BUSINESS ARISING

5. DELEGATIONS5.1 Milena McWatt, Green Acreages Program Coordinator, Land Stewardship Centre

(10:30 a.m.)

6. OLD BUSINESS6.1 Alternative Land Use Services Program 6.2 Riparian & Ecological Enhancement Program Projects

7. NEW BUSINESS7.1 Alberta Open Farm Days – Re-Connect Tour 2020

8. REPORTS8.1 a. Seed Plant Updates (verbal report)

9. CORRESPONDENCEa. Fusarium Graminearum (media release)b. Alberta Crop Report – as of June 9, 2020c. CAP Agriculture Training Supportd. Alberta Beef Producers Nominationse. Southern Alberta Grazing School for Women & Alberta Range Stewardship

Virtual Courses

10. CONFIDENTIAL ITEMSNil

11. ADJOURNMENTNEXT MEETING DATE – August 17, 2020

1

UNADOPTED

1 April 20, 2020

MINUTES

AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD MEETING

Mountain View County Minutes of the Agricultural Service Board Meeting held on

Monday, April 20, 2020, live streamed via Zoom Cloud Meetings.

PRESENT: B. Rodger; Chairman Councillor P. Johnson Councillor D. Milne Councillor D. Fulton B. Buschert, Vice Chairman S. LaBrie T. Jackson ABSENT: Nil. IN ATTENDANCE: J. Fulton, Assistant Director of Legislative, Community and Agricultural Services C. Chrenek, Assistant Agricultural Fieldman C. Verpy, Agricultural Coordinator L. Grattidge, Sustainable Agricultural Specialist D. Archer, Administrative Support CALL TO ORDER: B. Rodger, Chair, called the meeting to order at 8:59 a.m. AGENDA Moved by Milne ASB20-001 That the Agricultural Service Board adopt the agenda of the

Agricultural Service Board Meeting of April 20th, 2020. Carried. MINUTES Moved by Brent ASB20-002 That the Agricultural Service Board adopt the Minutes of the

Agricultural Service Board Meeting of December 16th, 2019. Carried. BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF THE MINUTES Nil. OLD BUSINESS 2020 Provincial ASB Conference Discussion Item - Autonomous Equipment J. Fulton briefly introduced the discussion from the 2020

Provincial ASB Conference on Autonomous Equipment.

2

UNADOPTED

2 April 20, 2020

Moved by B. Buschert ASB20-003 That the Agricultural Service Board forward to Council the

importance of ensuring traffic regulations be developed to support the use of autonomous farm equipment.

Carried. NEW BUSINESS Procedure #6307 Northern Pocket Gopher Control – Incentive Program J. Fulton summarized the procedure and opened the floor for

discussion. Board discussion resulted in the following motion: Moved by Councillor P. Johnson ASB20-004 That the Agricultural Service Board continue the Northern

Pocket Gopher Incentive program to include participants of all ages to a maximum of 50 participants with 100 tails at $1 per tail with a maximum budget of $5,000.00 for the program and to be reviewed in 2021.

Carried. Procedure #6309 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program Funding L. Grattidge summarized that in 2019, seven (7) projects were

approved for a total of $10,303.58. A total of $14,696.42 of Alberta Conservation Association grant funds were allocated to ALUS projects.

Thirteen (13) follow-up Riparian Health Assessments have been completed for 2014 Riparian & Ecological Enhancement Projects, six (6) sites scored healthy and seven (7) score healthy with problems. All sites improved in health except for two (2); one was the result of a mechanical issue with the waterer at the time of assessment, the other was due to a dugout needing to have its holding capacity increased, which resulted in disturbance to the riparian area.

CORRESPONDENCE Cows and Fish Spring 2019 Newsletter L. Grattidge highlighted the 1996-2018 Provincial Riparian

Health Summary chart in comparison to Mountain View County’s riparian areas.

Moved by Councillor D. Fulton ASB20-005 That the Agricultural Service Board recommend the Chief

Administrative Officer approves the changes to the Procedure #6309-01 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program Funding.

Carried.

3

UNADOPTED

3 April 20, 2020

ALUS Program Guidelines Review L. Grattidge updated the Board on the ALUS projects within

Mountain View County approved since the year 2015. In 2019, nine (9) producers were approved funding for projects

totaling $37,248 in funding; $11,600.00 was allocated towards the 2019 ALUS Canada Administration fee, third party project verification and program coordination. An additional $5,311 was used to fund MVC administration and promotion of the program, ALUS 5-year celebration, national conference expenses, PAC per diem and project signage. It is estimated that MVC producers contributed approximately $43,909 to project establishment (including cash, equipment and labour). Six (6) producers had their ALUS contracts come up for renewal and they renewed for an additional five (5) years.

L. Grattidge Highlighted the national ALUS Canada numbers

where in total, ALUS Canada has disbursed more than $10M in funding to 27 ALUS communities in six provinces where more than 900 participants have enrolled more than 27,000 acres in the ALUS program.

Moved by S. LaBrie ASB20-006 That the Agricultural Service Board approves the changes to

the ALUS PAC Project Decision Considerations Guidelines. Carried.

DELEGATION Edward Richards B. Rodger, Chair, welcomed Edward Richards, Meadow Lea

Farm, to the Agricultural Service Board meeting of April 20, 2020.

Edward Richards gave a presentation where he covered the

following points:

• Sessions attended at FarmTech • Takeaways from his attendance

Recess and Reconvene B. Rodger, Chair, recessed the meeting at 9:58 a.m. and

reconvened at 10:06 a.m. 2020-24 ASB Grant Program J. Fulton reviewed the report for the Board’s information. Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-007 That the Agricultural Service Board receive for information the

2020-2024 Agricultural Service Board Grant update. Carried.

4

UNADOPTED

4 April 20, 2020

2020 Agricultural Related Project Grant J. Fulton introduced the applications and they were reviewed

by the Board. The Board had some discussion on the applications received prior to approval.

Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-008 That the Agricultural Service Board approve funding Carstairs

& District 4H Show & Sale for $500.00 for the Agricultural Grant Funding for 2020.

Carried. Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-009 That the Agricultural Service Board approve funding the

Didsbury Agricultural Society for $5,000.00 for the Agricultural Grant Funding for 2020.

Defeated. Due to the tardiness of the application, the Didsbury

Agricultural Society was denied funding. Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-010 That the Agricultural Service Board approve funding the Olds

Regional Exhibition for $10,000.00 for the Agricultural Grant Funding for 2020.

Carried. Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-011 That the Agricultural Service Board approve funding Ag for Life

Inc. for $12,500.00 for the Agricultural Grant Funding for 2020.

Carried. Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-012 That the Agricultural Service Board use the remaining funds for

additional applications submitted in 2020. Carried.

Procedure #6303-01 Clubroot Management Review J. Fulton introduced the procedure for the Board’s information. Moved by Councillor P. Johnson ASB20-013 That the Agricultural Service Board receive for information

Procedure #6303-01 Clubroot Management. Carried.

REPORTS Seed Plant Updates B. Rodger reported that as of March the Mountain View Seed

Cleaning Plant has cleaned 315,392 bushels which is 37,294 bushels more than the same time of year last year.

5

UNADOPTED

5 April 20, 2020

S. LaBrie reported that the Olds Seed Cleaning Co-op were down in processed bushels from last year and are concerned about 2020 as they have lost potential contracts to a new seed cleaning plant.

2019 Annual Agricultural Service Board Report J. Fulton went over the report with the Board highlighting the

New Twine Collection program that took in 163 bags that went to recycling.

Mountain View County has the second largest number of containers brought in at their jug site than any other site in Alberta.

Insect Survey Reports 2019 J. Fulton provided information to the Board from the Alberta

Insect Pest Monitoring Network. Report – Evaluation of Strychnine Baiting on Richardson’s Ground Squirrel J. Fulton informed the Board that the last year Mountain View

County’s Agricultural Services will be able to sell Strychnine to producers will be March 4, 2021. Producers will have until March 4, 2022 to use any Strychnine purchased from MVC.

PMRA – Strychnine and Its Associated End-use Products Final Decision J. Fulton summarized the information provided for the Board’s

consideration. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Weed Control Act Appeal Review Process Fact Sheet 2020 J. Fulton gave a short overview on the updates to the Alberta

Agriculture and Forestry Weed Control Act Appeal Review Process.

CORRESPONDENCE Weed Notice Appeal Process - RMA Letter J. Fulton provided a summary for the Board’s information. Letter from the Minister of Agriculture and Forestry regarding Fusarium J. Fulton briefly summarized the letter to the Board highlighting

changes we may see on how Fusarium is currently regulated. Advisory 2020-2 Farmer’s Advocate Office Presented for the Board’s information. Advisory 2020-3 Farmer’s Advocate Office Presented for the Board’s information.

6

UNADOPTED

6 April 20, 2020

NEXT MEETING DATE June 15th, 2020. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Councillor D. Milne ASB20-014 That the Agricultural Service Board Meeting of April 20, 2020

be adjourned at 11:23 a.m. Carried. Chair I hereby certify these minutes are correct. Assistant Director of Legislative, Community and Agricultural Services

7

Page 1 of 2

Agricultural Service Board Meeting

Request for Decision

Date: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: ALUS Program Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for 100% of the materials for the riparian fencing project to a maximum of $3,200 on the NW-19-31-04-W5 and additionally $20 to annual payments for the maintenance of this project from the 2020 ALUS budget. That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for 50% of the materials for the riparian fencing project to a maximum of $2,125 on the N-18-32-05-W5, S-19-32-05-W5 and additionally $8,657.50 to annual payments for the maintenance of this project from the 2020 ALUS budget. That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for 50% of the materials for the riparian fencing project to a maximum of $6,555 on the NE-16-33-03-W5; 25% for the solar winter watering system to a maximum of $2,500 and additionally, $509 to annual payments for the maintenance of this project from the 2020 ALUS budget. That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for 100% of the riparian fencing project to a maximum of $3,000 on the NW-34-31-05-W5; 25% for the watering system to a maximum of $1,187.50 and 100% for the crossing to a maximum of $250 and additionally $2,055 to annual payments for the maintenance of this project from the 2020 ALUS budget. That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for 50% of the materials for the riparian fencing project to a maximum of $1,350 on the SE-18-31-04-W5; 25% for the watering system to a maximum of $125 and additionally $230 to annual payments for the maintenance of this project from the 2020 ALUS budget. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS: That the Agricultural Service Board receives for information the ALUS project applications as presented. BACKGROUND: Projects will be presented for approval consideration. Project Decision Consideration Guidelines are attached for reference purposes. Applications have been scored using the project rating form and funding recommendations are based on the rating. Agricultural Services has developed a funding spreadsheet based on these evaluations for review. ALUS Canada has provided an update on national numbers to April 1, 2020. RELEVANT POLICY: Policy/Procedure #6309 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program Funding BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: 2020 ALUS W. Garfield Weston Foundation: $2,225

8

Page 2 of 2

2020 Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk: $20,050 2020 ALUS Canada Special Funding: $7,725 2020 RBC: $1,700 2020 Anonymous Donor: $20,000 Attachments Nil

1. ALUS PAC Project Decision Considerations Guidelines 2. 2020 ALUS Projects – July 3. 2020 ALUS Project Spreadsheet 4. ALUS Canada Stats Infographic April 2020

PREPARED BY: LG REVIEWED BY: JF

9

Alternative Land Use Services (ALUS)/ Partnership Advisory Committee (PAC) Project Decision Considerations Guidelines

1408 Twp. Rd. 320 / Postal Bag 100, Didsbury, AB Canada T0M 0W0 T 403.335.3311 F 403.335.9207 Toll Free 1.877.264.9754

www.mountainviewcounty.com

Mountain View County Agricultural Service Board and Partnership Advisory Committee The Mountain View Agricultural Service Board (ASB) is acting as the Partnership Advisory Committee (PAC), under the Policy #6301 Agricultural Service Board. All members of the ASB/PAC are encouraged to promote and participate in ALUS projects. Goals Mountain View County Agricultural Service Board (ASB) / Partnership Advisory Committee (PAC) values, protects and promotes a thriving agricultural community and the preservation of the Region’s unique and precious natural environment. The administration and delivery of the ALUS program encourages and supports agriculture into the future, promoting beneficial management practices that are environmentally sustainable. Mountain View County’s agricultural community implements projects on working landscapes to create, restore and enhance natural areas such as wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas and treed areas; resulting in cleaner air and water, healthy soils, sustainable food production and habitat for: fish and wildlife, species at risk and native pollinator insects. Mountain View County identified areas of focus for ALUS program

• Preserving and establishing trees in areas of low concentration • Reclaiming Alkali or Marginal Soils to Native stands • Increasing and promoting pollinator establishment • Reclaiming marginal cropland for buffering around streams; preserving potholes or wetlands

ALUS Applicants • Farmers or ranchers with a registered or legally defined farming operation are eligible recipients of ALUS annual

payments. • Land zoned Agriculture in MVC is eligible for ALUS projects. • Land renters with a registered or legally defined farming operation are eligible recipients of ALUS payments (a letter

of authorization from the landowner is required) or the owner of rented farm land may qualify if they are receiving less rent due to the establishment of a project.

• Rural non-farm landowners are ineligible for payments under ALUS.

To compare the Canadian Agricultural Partnership definition to be eligible for funding is: Active producer: An individual or a registered corporation responsible for the day-to-day management and work on the farm, including responsibility for input costs for agricultural crops or livestock producing at least $10,000 worth of farm commodities annually, but does not include a landlord whose only interest in the crop or livestock is that of ownership of the land.

Non Farm Lands As stated above generally non-farmers are ineligible to participate in ALUS. ALUS projects have been implemented on a couple of commercial properties to showcase the concept and the project, but no annual payments are made. ALUS priority targets include: • Improvements to environmentally-sensitive, marginal or inefficient farm land. • Enhancing natural features contained within the farmed portion of the land. • Complexes of wetlands, riparian zones and grassed uplands on and adjacent to selected parcels of farmland. • Working lands and adjacent areas with special biodiversity features or ecological assets/opportunities. ALUS does not want to retire productive farm land but there are exceptions. Rental rates for productive farm land are generally higher than the ALUS annual payments and thus there is increased risk of reversal of ALUS projects when commodity prices are high. However, there are a couple of examples where productive land might be retired to conservation – i.e. on productive but environmentally sensitive lands such as a floodplain beside a water body or where

10

Page 2 of 4 the productive lands are inefficient to farm. Additionally, this could include odd areas, narrow corridors along shelterbelts, corners of fields, or where farm equipment is too large to efficiently work the ground. Project Selection Guidelines Things to consider when approving a New Project proposal

Is the project on marginal or environmentally sensitive lands that are currently under agricultural production? Does the project meet current local environmental priorities? Does the project provide new or complement existing “ecosystem services”? Does the project improve diversity? Does the project complement existing programs ie: EFP, Growing Forward? Has the Participant shown interest in contributing to project establishment? Are their opportunities for delivery partnerships, cost savings, non-duplication etc..? Will this project likely remain if annual payments cease to continue? Can this project be used as a Demonstration Site? Does the Landowner plan to retain the property for at least 10 years? Does the project link existing natural features? Is the project on less than 20% of the farmed portion of the land?

ALUS projects for review by the PAC’s should make note of the local environmental priorities identified by locally driven environmental report cards, studies or environmental assessments. Initial Project Establishment costs Funding amount allocated will be prorated based on other funding received for the project. The maximum amount an applicant can receive per voluntary project will be evaluated case by case. Material costs for project establishment are eligible for funding. Additional expenses may be eligible for funding in Wetland restoration projects due to expertise required to ensure success ie: consultation, planting, monitoring and reporting costs. In the event of poor initial vegetation establishment, reseeding will not be considered for funding. Project Annual Payments (November or December) PAC’s should consider: Land rental rate base Cropland vs pasture vs marginal land – link to opportunity costs Extent of continued agricultural use/benefits Existing vs new services; recognition for existing services ALUS Alberta payment schedule - updated June 2015, should be reviewed regularly Maximum amount Quality adjustment Use adjustment Cropland $50/acre Case by Case If grazed or Hay / 50% approved practice Pasture $30/acre Case by Case If grazed or Hay / 50% approved practice Existing native upland (sm)* $10/acre n/a If grazed or Hay / 50% approved practice Existing native upland (med)* $5/acre n/a If grazed or Hay / 50% approved practice Existing native upland (lg)* $2/acre n/a If grazed or Hay / 50% approved practice Permanent wetland (sm)* $5/acre n/a n/a Permanent wetland (lg)* $2/acre n/a n/a Ephemeral wetland* $5/acre n/a n/a Restored/created wetland $50/acre n/a n/a Cropland - this is based on the average rental rate for the county. Restoration, enhancement or creation of habitats in these areas receive the cropland payment. This could include the establishment of new shelterbelts or eco-buffers. ALUS is not meant to compete for good cropland areas, rather it focuses on marginal and odd areas that will complement adjacent natural areas. Cropland rates will also be paid for pasture/hayland areas if the soils are good.

11

Page 3 of 4 Pasture - this is areas that are marginally productive that are in either pasture or hayland. Should the pasture be hayed or grazed later season (after Aug 1) or during dormant season (Oct 15-Mar 15), the payment will be reduced accordingly (typically by 50%) unless this is deemed necessary for maintenance. Restoration, enhancement or creation of habitats in these areas receive the pasture payment. This could include the establishment of new shelterbelts or eco-buffers. Existing Native uplands - these are areas that have often been left unused/untouched on a farm. These include areas surrounding a wetland or riparian area, bush, forested area, grasslands, etc. Small native patches are areas up to 10 acres in size. Medium native upland are areas between 10 and 25 acres. Large native upland are areas over 25 acres in size. Existing shelterbelts or eco-buffers will be considered at similar payment rates. Permanent Wetlands - this includes any waterbody, focuses on sloughs (potholes) but also includes creeks. Different sizes of wetlands are generally more or less vulnerable to being drained so payments are greater for smaller (up to 2 acres) versus larger wetlands. A payment may be considered for shallow, temporary, ephemeral wetlands (potholes) in annual cropland if they are not ditched or drained, farming through is acceptable if feasible; payments will continue in dry years. * These areas will only be consolidated if new creation, enhancement or restoration has taken place on the property. Use Adjustment - In some cases the PAC might allow the farmer/rancher to use the ALUS project for part of their farm operation. For instance, the farmer may want to let their cows pasture on the prairie project, or even bale those acres for winter feed. To encourage management practices that ensure the project still offer’s the ecosystem services, the PAC may agree to a partial payment to the farmer. An example of this might be allowing a farmer/rancher to hay the prairie acres only once in August so the prairie can provide nesting habitat for grassland birds. By your own hand This refers to projects that have been completed in the past by a farmer now applying to ALUS. In some communities the PAC has recognized existing projects if they were done since 1990 by the farmer’s own hand AND that acreage is matched by a new project. ie: If the participant had 8 acres of hedgerow already on the farm and they put in a new project of 8 acres of new prairie, the participant could receive annual payments for 16 acres. Another example in Western Canada includes existing wetlands and bush that have not been drained or cleared whereby we can enroll such existing habitats into ALUS assuming some improvements are made on the same parcel of land. Annual payment agreement terms ALUS payment agreement terms are for 5 years. Consideration should be given to allowing term renewals. Project Monitoring All projects will be monitored on an annual basis and the farmer will be responsible for maintenance, 10% of past projects will be verified by a third party annually. ALUS Funding National Wetland Conservation Fund / National Conservation Plan (NCP) of Environment Canada (wetland associated projects only, up to 15% for administration) Year 1 (2014): $36,812.50, Year 2 (2015): $30,000 W. Garfield Weston Foundation (new acres, renewals, annual payments, program delivery) Year 1 (2015): $2,000, Year 2 (2016): $10,000, Year 3 (2017): $10,000, Year 4 (2018): $52,000, Year 5 (2019): $28,381.29, Year 6 (2020): $2,225 Bissett Action Fund (new acres establishment costs and annual payments) Year 1 (2017): $40,000 ACA Conservation, Community and Education Grant (establishment costs) Year 1 (2017): $11,800 Year 2 (2018): $14,083.50 Year 3 (2019): $14,697.04

12

Page 4 of 4 Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk (new acres, establishment costs, year one of annual payments, program delivery) Year 1 (2019): $2,429.26 Year 2 (2020): $20,050 ALUS Canada – Special Funding (new acres, one-year renewals, annual payments) Year 1 (2020): $7,725 RBC – (administration, outreach activities, establishment costs, annual payments) Year 1 (2020): $1,700 Anonymous Donor – (50 new acres, establishment costs, year one of annual payments, program delivery) Year 1 (2020): $20,000 ALUS Projections 2020: 6 new ALUS participants with projects covering a total of 180 acres

13

Class 4 Wetland, Dugouts

25 cow/calf pairs

Little Red Deer River Watershed

51 ALUS wetland acres from 2019

2 additional acres of large wetlands

835m of new fence (east side)

Cost for fencing materials: $3,200

Rating: 100%, 38/50

Existing Fence

New Fence

Watering System

14

Existing Fence

New Fence

Watering System

Crossing

Wetlands

Red Deer River & Tributary

Community Creek Tributary

40 cow/calf, 20 yearlings

Red Deer River Watershed

1 acre of small wetlands

102.3 acres of river/floodplain

50.73 acres of riparian pasture

1445m of new fence

Cost for fencing materials: $4250

Rating: 100%, 45/50

Riparian

Pasture

Riparian

Pasture

Riparian

Pasture

River &

Floodplain

15

Existing Fence

New Fence

Existing Watering System

New Watering System

Crossing

Little Red Deer River

40 bison pairs

Little Red Deer River Watershed

23.4 acres of large wetlands/floodplain

5.5 acres of small native upland

1981m of new fence

Cost for fencing materials: $13,110

Cost for solar watering system (west): $10,000

Rating: 100%, 45/50

Native

Upland

16

Well

Subdivision

ERE

New Fence

New Watering System

New Crossing

Fallentimber Creek

30 horses

Red Deer River Watershed

13.7 acres of riparian pasture

575m of new fence

Cost for fencing materials: $3000

Cost for new watering system: $4750

Cost for gravel for crossing: $250

Rating: 100%, 38/50

Riparian

Pasture

Riparian

Pasture ERE

17

New Fence

New Watering System

New Well

Elkton Creek, Class 4 Wetlands

25 cow/calf

Little Red Deer River Watershed

23 acres of large wetlands

735m of new fence

Cost for fencing materials: $2700

Cost for new watering system: $500

Rating: 100%, 39/50

18

ALUS 2020 Projects

ALUS Project - NW-19-31-04-W5

Project Expenses

Estimated

Costs CAP% MVC% Acres $/acre

5 year Contract

Annual Payment

$ CAP

Estimated $ MVC Allocated

Fencing Materials $3,200.00 100.00% $0.00 $3,200.00

Fencing Labour & Equipment $3,200.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Annual Payments

Large Wetlands 2 $2.00 $4.00 $20.00

Total Annual Payment $4.00 $20.00

Totals $6,400.00 2 $4.00 $3,220.00

Total ALUS Funds $51,700.00

Total ALUS Funds Remaining $48,480.00

ALUS Project - N-18-32-05-W5, S-19-32-05-W5

Project Expenses

Estimated

Costs CAP% MVC% Acres $/acre

5 year Contract

Annual Payment

$ CAP

Estimated $ MVC Allocated

Fencing Materials $4,250.00 50.00% 50.00% $2,125.00 $2,125.00

Fencing Labour & Equipment $4,250.00 50.00% 0.00% $2,125.00 $0.00

Annual Payments

Small Wetlands 1 $5.00 $5.00 $25.00

Large Wetlands 102.3 $2.00 $204.60 $1,023.00

Riparian Pasture 50.73 $30.00 $1,521.90 $7,609.50

Total Annual Payment $1,726.50 $8,657.50

Totals $8,500.00 154.03 $1,731.50 $10,782.50

Total ALUS Project Funds $48,480.00

Total ALUS Funds Remaining $37,697.50

ALUS Project - NE-16-33-03-W5

Project Expenses

Estimated

Costs CAP% MVC% Acres $/acre

5 year Contract

Annual Payment

$ CAP

Estimated $ MVC Allocated

Fencing Materials $13,110.00 50.00% 50.00% $6,555.00 $6,555.00

Fencing Labour & Equipment $7,350.00 50.00% 0.00% $3,675.00 $0.00

Solar Winter Watering System $10,000.00 50.00% 25.00% $5,000.00 $2,500.00

Annual Payments

Large Wetlands 23.4 $2.00 $46.80 $234.00

Small Native Uplands 5.5 $10.00 $55.00 $275.00

Total Annual Payment $101.80 $509.00

Totals $30,460.00 28.9 $101.80 $9,564.00

Total ALUS Project Funds $37,697.50

Total ALUS Funds Remaining $28,133.50

ALUS Project - NW-34-31-05-W5

Project Expenses

Estimated

Costs CAP% MVC% Acres $/acre

5 year Contract

Annual Payment

$ CAP

Estimated $ MVC Allocated

Fencing Materials $3,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $3,000.00

Fencing Labour & Equipment $3,000.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Watering System $4,750.00 25.00% $0.00 $1,187.50

Crossing $250.00 100.00% $0.00 $250.00

Annual Payments

Riparian Pasture 13.7 $30.00 $411.00 $2,055.00

Total Annual Payment $411.00 $2,055.00

Totals $11,000.00 13.7 $411.00 $6,492.50

Total ALUS Project Funds $28,133.50

Total ALUS Funds Remaining $21,641.00

19

ALUS Project - SE-18-31-04-W5

Project Expenses

Estimated

Costs CAP% MVC% Acres $/acre

5 year Contract

Annual Payment

$ CAP

Estimated $ MVC Allocated

Fencing Materials $2,700.00 50.00% 50.00% $1,350.00 $1,350.00

Fencing Labour & Equipment $2,700.00 50.00% 0.00% $1,350.00 $0.00

Watering System $500.00 33.33% 25.00% $166.65 $125.00

Annual Payments

Large Wetlands 23 $2.00 $46.00 $230.00

Total Annual Payment $46.00 $230.00

Totals $18,750.00 23 $46.00 $1,705.00

Total ALUS Project Funds $21,641.00

Total ALUS Funds Remaining $19,936.00

20

ALUS.ca

ALUS active in 6 provinces

22,197 acres of wetlandrelated ecosystems

+3,354 since last year17.5% growth

27,134 acres of land enrolled in ALUS

+4,048 since last year17% growth

27 ALUS communities

+2 since last year

More than $10 M invested by ALUS Canada

+nearly 2M since last year

20,089 acres of pollinator habitat

+2,700 since last year15% growth

903 farmers & ranchersparticipate in ALUS

+241 since last year32.4% growth

Farmers, ranchers and communities multiply our investment on the ground

5,178 acres reforestedwith native trees & shrubs

+796 since last year19% growth

ALUS Canada by the NumbersThank you for making a di� erence on the ground

[as at April 1, 2020]

ALUS Canada by the NumbersThank you for making a di� erence on the ground

[as at April 1, 2020]

21

Page 1 of 1

Agricultural Service Board Meeting

Request for Decision

Date: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program (REEP) Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Agricultural Service Board approves funding for the off-site watering system project on the SW-20-31-04-W5 for 25% of the material costs to a maximum of $1850 from the 2020 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program budget. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS: That the Agricultural Service Board receives for information the REEP project application as presented. BACKGROUND: One project will be presented for approval consideration. The application has been scored using the project rating form and funding recommendations are based on the rating. This project was previously approved in 2018 but was not completed. Agricultural Services has developed a funding spreadsheet based on these evaluations for review. RELEVANT POLICY: Policy/Procedure #6309 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program Funding BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: 2020-21 ACA Conservation, Community and Education Grant: $25,000 2020 Mountain View County Project Funding: $25,000 Attachments Nil

1. 2020 REEP Projects - July 2. 2020 REEP Project Spreadsheet

PREPARED BY: LG REVIEWED BY: JF

22

Existing Fence

Well

New Watering System

Tributary to Elkton Creek

Dugout, Class 3 & 4 wetlands

35 cow/calf

Little Red Deer River Watershed

$ Requested for Watering System: $7,400

25% Funding: $1,850

Rating: 75%, 32/50

23

LSD CAP% MVC%

Total Material

Cost CAP Estimated $ MVC Allocated Waterbody/Wetland Watershed Project

SW-20-31-04-W5 33% 25% 7,400.00$ 2,442.00$ 1,850.00$ Tributary to Elkton Creek, Dugout, Wetlands Little Red Deer River Watershed Watering System

1,850.00$

Total allocated to ALUS projects -$

Total MVC REEP Funds 50,000.00$

Total MVC REEP Funds Remaining 48,150.00$

2020 MVC REEP Projects

Total for approval

24

Page 1 of 1

Agricultural Service Board

Request for Direction

Date: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Alberta Open Farm Days - Re-Connect Tour RECOMMENDATION: That the Agricultural Service Board provide direction on the Re-Connect With the Farm Tour event. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS: That the Agricultural Service Board receive the information the update on Open Farm Days 2020. BACKGROUND: As Alberta is within Phase 2 of Relaunch, the organizers of the Provincial Open Farm Days Program have determined a safe and responsible way, while following the government’s latest public health guidelines to be able to hold this year’s Open Farm Days on August 15-16. Participating hosts of the event would allow visitors to their farm, however, there is support from the organizers in a few ways:

• There will continue to be a reimbursement up to $200 for Porta Potty and handwashing stations. • Travel Alberta is working on an online booking service for hosts to use to manage the number of

guests that visit their farm. The number of guests can be adjusted according to provincial regulations and their comfort level as a host.

• There will continue to be insurance provided during Open Farm Days. • Host farms will be provided hand sanitizer for free. • They will also provide other resources to hosts to make hosting easier. This includes directional

signs, posters, postcards, etc. • Connection to a culinary coordinator who can help hosts navigate the Alberta Health Services

processes and regulations will be provided. The organizers are aiming to have as many farms registered as possible by June 30. Inquiries have been made for a list of participating host farms within the County. Mountain View County has hosted a Re-Connect With the Farm Tour in conjunction with Open Farm Days. The event buses approximately 60 participants to the various host farms within the County and provides lunch. Due to the logistics and demographics of the participants it is advised the event is not organized for this year. Alternatively, should the Agricultural Service Board wish to proceed with the Tour, discussion will be held on the number of participants, transportation and activities. RELEVANT POLICY: Attachments Nil PREPARED BY: JF REVIEWED BY: JF

25

Page 1 of 1

Agricultural Service Board

Request for Direction

Date: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Reports RECOMMENDATION: That the Agricultural Service Board receive the following as information:

a. Seed Plant Updates (verbal report) BACKGROUND: Nil. RELEVANT POLICY: Nil. BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: Nil. Attachments Nil PREPARED BY: DA REVIEWED BY: CV

26

Page 1 of 1

Agricultural Service Board

Request for Direction

Date: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Correspondence RECOMMENDATION: That the Agricultural Service Board receive the following correspondence for information:

a. Fusarium Graminearum (media release) b. Alberta Crop Report – as of June 9, 2020 c. CAP Agriculture Training Support d. Alberta Beef Producers Nominations e. Southern Alberta Grazing School for Women & Alberta Range Stewardship Virtual Courses

BACKGROUND: Nil RELEVANT POLICY: Nil Attachments Nil

1. Alberta Crop Report – June 2020 2. CAP Agriculture Training Support 3. Alberta Beef Producers Nominations 4. Southern Alberta Grazing School for Women & Alberta Range Stewardship Virtual Courses

PREPARED BY: DA, LG REVIEWED BY: CV

27

Alberta Crop Report

Our thanks to Alberta Agricultural Fieldmen and staff of AFSC for their partnership and contribution to the Alberta Crop Reporting Program. The climate map is compiled by Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Environmental Stewardship Branch, Engineering and Climate Services Section.

Crop Conditions as of June 9, 2020 (Abbreviated Report) With over 98 per cent of 2020 spring plantings in the ground, attention now shifts to crop development. Provincially, 75 per cent of the crops have emerged (see Table 1), 12 per cent behind the previous five-year average (2015-2019). Regionally, South, Central and North East regions are close to the five-year average. Challenges continue for the northern parts of the province. The cool wet weather that caused seeding delays for much of the spring is now affecting crop development. Forty-one per cent of the spring-seeded crops in the North West have emerged, 41 per cent behind the five-year average. Similarly, in the Peace region, 40 per cent of the spring-seeded crops have emerged, 39 per cent behind the five-year average. An extended period of warm, rain-free days would be welcomed to dry out the ground. Table 1: Alberta Crop Emergence as of June 9, 2020

Source: AF/AFSC Crop Reporting Survey Soil moisture is near field capacity across a wide area of the province running from the US border, all along the foothills up to Red Deer. North of this, the area of wet soils extends eastward towards Lac La Biche, and occupies most of the growing areas with the exception of the central and northern Peace Region (see map). This has resulted in very good soil moisture conditions throughout the province with 82 per cent rating good or excellent. Regionally, the Central and Peace areas both rate soil moisture as 90 per cent good or excellent; South and North East areas both rate soil moisture being better than 80 per cent good or excellent. The North West rate only 38 per cent good or excellent. Excessive moisture is an issue in a large part of the North West and in parts of the North East and the Peace. In areas north of Lacombe, the soil moisture levels are nearing 50-year highs. In the North West 62 per cent of the soil moisture was rated as excessive, a 42 per cent increase over the previous week. The North East rates 13 per cent as excessive and the Peace rate almost 10 per cent as being excessive.

% Emerged South Central N East N West Peace Alberta

Spring Wheat 94.6% 88.8% 91.4% 50.2% 40.4% 80.5% Barley 92.2% 83.1% 72.0% 38.3% 26.4% 75.2% Oats 91.3% 77.1% 64.4% 29.1% 30.7% 53.0% Canola 84.8% 84.3% 76.5% 34.6% 36.9% 66.6% Dry Peas 98.4% 93.7% 97.7% 50.6% 58.4% 85.7% Average 91.9% 86.3% 82.9% 41.2% 39.9% 74.5% Last Week 77.7% 66.5% 59.4% 20.6% 13.6% 54.0% Last Year 96.4% 95.7% 93.2% 98.3% 96.8% 95.7% 5-year Average 92.8% 89.5% 83.8% 81.7% 79.2% 86.4%

28

The 2020 Alberta crop reporting series is available on the Internet at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2830245 2

Table 2: Surface Moisture Rating as of June 9, 2020

Source: AF/AFSC Crop Reporting Survey Perennial forages are being reported as being in “really good shape” and “looking stronger than they have in some years,” due in large part to the spring rains. Provincially, tame hay growth rated as good or excellent is at 93 per cent compared to the five-year average of 56 per cent. Pasture growth is rated at 90 per cent good or excellent compared to the provincial five-year average of 56 per cent.

Table 3: Tame Hay (Pasture) Growth Rating as of June 9, 2020

Source: AF/AFSC Crop Reporting Survey

Regional Assessments: Region One: Southern (Strathmore, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat, Foremost)

• Most areas received precipitation this week ranging from light showers to general rains dropping up to one inch of rain. Cooler nighttime temperatures are the only thing preventing a “perfect start” to the year.

• Reports of reseeding of some crops in the southern part of the region due to flooding, crusting and wind damage. • Spring-seeded cereals are midway through the tillering stage of the Zadocs growth scale, with most crops having four

or five tillers. • Tame Hay conditions (pasture shown in brackets) are rated as nine (12) per cent fair, 70 (73) per cent good, and 21

(15) per cent excellent.

Region Two: Central (Rimbey, Airdrie, Coronation, Oyen)

• Precipitation received in most of the region this last week has provided good growing conditions, but cooler temperatures continues to slow growth.

Poor Fair Good Excellent Excessive South 1.0% 15.3% 58.3% 24.7% 0.7% Central --- 7.0% 52.6% 38.7% 1.7% North East --- --- 26.4% 60.5% 13.1% North West --- --- 5.2% 32.5% 62.3% Peace --- 0.7% 20.2% 69.5% 9.6% Average 0.3% 6.9% 40.6% 41.2% 11.0% Last Year 13.7% 27.2% 49.7% 9.1% 0.3% 5-year Average 14.2% 22.7% 41.4% 18.8% 2.9%

Poor Fair Good Excellent South 0.1% (0.1%) 8.6% (11.6%) 70.0% (73.3%) 21.3% (15.0%) Central --- (---) 7.4% (11.1%) 84.0% (78.2%) 8.6% (10.7%) North East --- (---) 6.9% (10.4%) 74.9% (74.7%) 18.2% (14.9%) North West --- (---) --- (---) 14.9% (18.4%) 85.1% (81.6%) Peace 3.4% (3.2%) 11.1% (11.5%) 71.7% (70.7%) 13.8% (14.6%) Average 0.6% (0.3%) 6.8% (10.2%) 64.4% (69.9%) 28.2% (19.6%) Last Year 15.4% (24.7%) 35.9% (31.8%) 45.6% (39.9%) 3.1% (3.6%) 5-year Average 17.0% (19.6%) 27.1% (24.4%) 45.9% (44.9%) 10.0% (11.1%)

29

The 2020 Alberta crop reporting series is available on the Internet at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2830245 3

• Spring-seeded cereals are midway through the seedling stage of the Zadocs growth scale, with most crops being at the five-leaf stage.

• Tame hay conditions (pasture shown in brackets) are rated as seven (11) per cent fair, 84 (78) per cent good, and nine (11) per cent excellent.

• Less than one per cent of 2019 unharvested spring wheat acres remain in the field.

Region Three: North East (Smoky Lake, Vermilion, Camrose, Provost)

• Significant precipitation received this week resulting in “wet and soggy” conditions with some areas receiving up to five inches of rain. Cooler temperatures are slowing plant growth.

• Reports of saturated fields in the western part of the region that may end up as unseeded this year. • Spring-seeded cereals are in the early seedling stage of the Zadocs growth scale, with most crops being at the two-

leaf stage. • Tame hay conditions (pasture shown in brackets) are rated as seven (10) per cent fair, 75 (75) per cent good, and 18

(15) per cent excellent. • Less than one per cent of 2019 unharvested spring wheat, barley, oats and canola acres remain in the field.

Region Four: North West (Barrhead, Edmonton, Leduc, Drayton Valley, Athabasca) • Heavy rains continued in the region with accumulations of up to seven inches over the last two weeks. Cool weather

has slowed germination and crop progression. • Unseeded acres reported throughout the region because of the excess moisture and many fields are too saturated to

support the equipment. Some producers are looking at unconventional means such as floating on the crop to get it seeded.

• Spring-seeded cereals are midway through the seedling stage of the Zadocs growth scale, with most plants being at the four-leaf stage.

• Tame hay conditions (pasture shown in brackets) are rated as 15 (18) per cent good, and 85 (82) excellent. • Two per cent of 2019 unharvested spring wheat, barley, oats and less than one per cent of the unharvested canola

acres in the region remain in the field.

Region Five: Peace River (Fairview, Falher, Grande Prairie, Valleyview) • Precipitation received throughout the region, with accumulations of up to two-and-a-quarter inches were reported in

some places. • Spring-seeded cereals are in the late germination stage of the Zadocs growth scale. • Tame hay conditions (pasture shown in brackets) are rated as three (three) per cent poor, 11 (12) per cent fair, 72

(71) per cent good, and 14 (15) excellent. • One per cent of 2019 unharvested spring wheat, barley, oats and canola acres in the region remain in the field.

Contacts Agriculture Financial Services Corporation Jackie Sanden – Product Coordinator Business Risk Management Products Unit Ken Handford – Product Development Analyst Lacombe, Alberta Email: MediaInquiry@afsc.ca June 12, 2020

Note to Users: The contents of this document may not be used or reproduced without properly accrediting AFSC and Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Economics and Competitiveness Branch, Statistics and Data Development Section

30

Classification: Protected A

AGRICULTURE TRAINING SUPPORT

The Canadian Agricultural Partnership Agriculture Training Support Program will provide a grant to eligible

employers to offset the costs of training and ensuring safety protocols are in place for new employees

hired from the available domestic labour pool.

Eligible Applicants

Individuals, corporations, registered partnerships and other organizations, including Hutterite colonies,

members of Indians Bands, and members of Metis Settlements that operate Essential Services

(Agricultural and Horticultural); and produce at least $10,000 worth of agricultural or horticultural farm

commodity, or processed food and beverage product, annually.

Cost Share

The maximum government contribution under this Program is $2,000 per new employee with a maximum

of $50,000 per applicant.

Requirement

A New Hire Employee must be a Canadian citizen or permanent resident residing in Alberta, including

students, that is newly employed, or will be newly employed, by an Eligible Applicant for a minimum of 25

hours per week for a minimum employment term of 12 continuous weeks. Students are eligible new

employees. Each New Hire Employee must complete COVID-19 safety procedures training, and must

also complete at least one of occupational health and safety training or work-related duties and activities

training.

Examples of Eligible Expenses

Occupational health and safety certifications;

Training of work-related duties and activities;

Implementation of COVID-19 protocols, such as physical distancing;

The purchase of Personal Protective Equipment;

Incremental Applicant costs for new measures directly related to the New Hire Employees as a direct result

of COVID-19 restrictions;

Incremental Applicant costs for the New Hire Employee to ensure awareness of any existing and revised

federal or provincial legal requirements as it relates to COVID-19;

Costs of activities and supplies to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks among workers and/or expenses to

develop, deliver, adapt, implement, promote and communicate COVID-19 training and education; and

Incremental and reasonable travel/accommodation;

31

Classification: Protected A

Additional Information

This is one program out of many under the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a five-year federal-provincial-

territorial investment in the agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector.

For More Information

Phone: 310-FARM (3276)

Web: cap.alberta.ca

Email: cap.riskmanagement@gov.ab.ca

If there is any discrepancy between this document and the most current program Terms and Conditions,

the program Terms and Conditions shall prevail.

32

Call For Nominations The Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) is seeking nominations for the 2021 Environmental Stewardship Award (ESA). The ESA recognizes cattle producers whose natural resource stewardship practices contribute to the environment and enhance productivity and profitability. Take this opportunity to share your environmental practices with other producers and to present the positive story about cattle producers' contribution to the environment. Nomination forms are available from the Alberta Beef Producers office or from ABP delegates. All cattle producers are encouraged to either enter or nominate another producer who they think may qualify. The winner will receive a commemorative gate sign and an all-expenses paid trip for two from anywhere in Alberta to the 2021 ABP Annual General Meeting in Red Deer. The competition is open to all cattle producers. Deadline for nominations is July 15, 2020 and the winner will be announced at the ABP Annual General Meeting, March 2021. Send nominations to: Alberta Beef Producers Environmental Stewardship Award 165, 6815 - 8th Street N.E. Calgary, Alberta T2E 7H7 Email: Katelynl@albertabeef.org Phone: (403) 451-1183 Fax: (403) 274-0007

33

ESA Nomination Form June 29, 2020 Page 2

Rules For Competition: • Stewardship is defined as the environmentally beneficial management of natural

resources. • All applications must be typed and submitted on letter sized paper (8.5x11) or

submitted electronically. • Color photographs, maps, etc., are encouraged. Please provide a brief description of

each item. • Two independent letters of recommendation are required with one coming from an

agricultural professional. • Deadline for nominations is July 15, 2020 (extensions may be granted under special

circumstances by the ESA chairman) • Judging teams will tour each applicant's operation by the end of August 2020. • The winner will be officially announced in March at the 2021 ABP Annual General

Meeting in Red Deer. • All applicants will be informed of the decision in September 2020. Section I - Description of Operation 1. Please supply the following information:

a. Name of Operation Name of individual(s) to be recognized Address Town, Postal Code Phone Email

b. Does the cattle business provide your primary source of income? Yes/No 2. What is the nature of your current operation: (i.e. cow/calf, feedlot, backgrounder,

other livestock, farming, etc. relative to production agriculture) 3. Discuss the history of your operation: (i.e. length of ownership, major changes in

structure or business plan, number of acres, leased acres, crown lease acres, and other pertinent data, (information on acreage, stocking rate, herd numbers, etc. is encouraged but voluntary))

34

ESA Nomination Form June 29, 2020 Page 3

4. Give a brief ecological description of your land: (list cover types, terrain, water systems, average annual rainfall; if more than one property, list them separately by business name)

5. List all other uses of natural resources that provide income on your land: (examples

include farming, timber, hunting, oil and gas production, mining, etc.) 6. List all organizations that your operation has utilized in environmental efforts:

(government and non-government agencies i.e. PFRA, Ducks Unlimited, forage associations, etc.)

Section II - Discuss the Stewardship Goals of Your Operation Please describe the resource management goals of your operation in terms of stewardship and conservation. Supporting information and benchmark data is encouraged. (use additional pages if necessary) Section III - Stewardship Accomplishments Describe specific, innovative stewardship practice(s) in detail pertaining, but not limited to, the following resources: • energy • water systems • air • vegetation • wildlife • soil • manure Include pertinent supporting information such as maps and photos. Before and after photos are encouraged. No videos will be accepted. (use additional pages if necessary)

35

ESA Nomination Form June 29, 2020 Page 4

Section IV - Productivity and Leadership Please answer the following questions. (use additional pages if necessary) 1. How have your stewardship practices affected your cattle business, including

productivity and profitability? (direct or indirect effects) 2. Discuss any of the following that are appropriate to your business.

a. Leadership activities or involvement in local, regional, and national efforts to improve stewardship among cattle businesses and/or the public's perception of the cattle industry. (i.e. public speaking and presentations, tours, etc.)

b. Involvement in cooperative research, demonstration, education, or government programs that promote environmental stewardship.

3. What reasons would you give to other producers for implementing these or similar

conservation/stewardship programs in their business? 4. How does your cattle operation contribute to a positive public perception of cattle's

impact on the environment?

36

HAVE GONE VIRTUAL

SOUTHERN ALBERTA GRAZING SCHOOL FOR WOMEN &

ALBERTA RANGE STEWARDSHIP COURSE

Grazing Principles & Practices - July 16

Riparian 101 & Riparian Health Assessments - July 21

Range Health Assessments - July 23

YOU CAN REGISTER FOR THESE COURSES ATHTTPS://ZOOM.US/WEBINAR/REGISTER/WN_JVGFIKL4RFA69BI9TEVTZW

Ranching Women - July 28

Mental Health in Agriculture Feat. Do More Ag Foundation - July 30 (Live Only)

SAME GREAT COURSES, NEW EXCITING FORMAT!Shared Courses & Dates

SAGSW Courses & Dates

Webinars will be free!

For more information contact:

Kristi Stebanuk 

kstebanuk@cowsandfish.org

(403) 382-0927

Please note, webinars will be recorded with the exception of the Mental Health in Agriculture presentation

from Do More Ag Foundation.

**All presentations will begin at 9:00am**

37