Agenda 30 SCM Vol 2
Transcript of Agenda 30 SCM Vol 2
i
AGENDA
for
30th STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
of
MICRO & SMALL ENTERPRISES -
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (MSE-CDP)
(Vol.-I)
DATE : 21 March 2012
TIME : 11:00 a.m.
VENUE : Room No. 701, Nirman Bhawan
New Delhi
MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES,
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (MSME)
NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI
ii
INDEX
Agenda Description Page
Gujarat
30.1 CFC for Ceramic Industry Cluster, Trajpar, Tal. Morbi, Rajkot 1
30.2 CFC for Brass and Copper Utensils Cluster, Dabhoi, Vadodara 6
30.3 CFC for Embroidery, Garmenting & Zari Cluster, Kareli, Tal. Olpad, Surat 8
West Bengal
30.4 Setting up of CFC for Cashew Processing Cluster, Contai, Purba Medinipur 10
30.5 Setting up of CFC for Clay Pottery Cluster, Siliguri 15
30.6 Setting up of CFC for Wood Carving Cluster, Burdwan 20
30.7 Setting up of CFC for Foundry (Metal Casting) Cluster, Howrah 22
30.8 Setting up of CFC for Metal Spare Parts Cluster, Howrah 24
30.9 Setting up of CFC for Plastic Products Cluster, Umarpur, Murshidabad 26
30.10 Setting up of CFC for Balarampur Shellac Manufacturing Cluster, Purulia 28
30.11 Setting up of CFC for Brass & Bell Metal, Nadia 30
30.12 Setting up of CFC for Gold & Silver Jewellery Cluster, Nadia 32
30.13 Setting up of CFC for Rice Mill Cluster, Burdwan, 34
30.14 Setting up of CFC for Hosiery Cluster, Sovabazar, Kolkata 36
30.15 Soft Interventions in Agarbati Works Cluster of Baruipur, South 24 Parganas 38
30.16 Soft Interventions in Brass Metal Cluster in Bali, Goghat , Hooghly 41
30.17 Soft Interventions in Clay Doll and Terracotta Cluster of Ghurni, Nadia 45
30.18 Soft Interventions in Earthen Pottery Cluster of Chaltaberia, North 24
Parganas
47
30.19 Soft Interventions in Fireworks Cluster, Baruipur 50
30.20 Soft Interventions in Gems and Jewellery cluster of Domjur, Howrah 53
30.21 Soft Interventions in Beekeeping, Honey Extracting and Processing Cluster of
Darjeeling
55
30.22 Soft Interventions in Imitation Ornaments Cluster of Domjur, Howrah 58
30.23 Soft Interventions in Shoe and Chappal Making Cluster of Digha-Daspara-
Chotojagulia
62
30.24 Soft Interventions in Shoe making Cluster of Janbazar, Kolkata 65
30.25 Soft Interventions in Optical Lens Grinding Cluster of Munsirhat 68
30.26 Soft Interventions in Refractory Brick Cluster of Kulti, Salanpur, Burdwan 70
30.27 Soft Interventions in Rubber Moulding Cluster of Raghudevpur, Howrah 72
30.28 Soft Interventions in Silk Printing Cluster of Serampore 75
30.29 Soft Interventions in Woolen Product Manufacturing Cluster of
Darjeeling
78
30.30 Soft Interventions in Artificial Ornaments and Gift Items Cluster,
Paschim Medinipur North 24 Parganas, West Bengal.
81
30.31 Soft Interventions in Zari Embroidary Cluster of Sankrail, Howrah 83
30.32 Soft Interventions in Bamboo Craft Cluster, Baduria, North 24
Parganas
86
Rajasthan
30.33 Upgradation of Infrastructure at Industrial Area Phase-I & II, Balotra 88
30.34 Infrastructure Development (ID) centre at Industrial Area, Sri Ganganagar 90
iii
30.35 Other proposals 93
Haryana
30.36 Setting up of CFC for Home Furnishing Cluster, Panipat 94
30.37 DSR in 4 Clusters
i) Auto Components Cluster, Faridabad
ii) Printing & Packaging Cluster, Karnal
iii) Printing & Packaging Cluster, Rai, Sonepat iv) Stainless steel utensils cluster, Kundli
101
30.38 Soft Interventions in Paint & Chemical Industry Cluster, Karnal 107
30.39 Soft Interventions in Pharmaceutical Cluster, Karnal 109
Himachal Pradesh
30.40 Soft Interventions in Furniture and Fabrication Cluster, Rampur 111
30.41 DSR for Iron & Steel Product Cluster, Damtal, Kangra 113
30.42 DSR for Wooden Furniture Cluster, Hamirpur 115
Punjab
30.43 Soft Interventions in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana 117
30.44 Soft Interventions in Steel Re-rolling Cluster, Mandi Govindgarh 120
30.45 DSR in Agriculture Implements Cluster, Malout, Distt. Mukatsar 123
30.46 DSR in Agriculture Implements Cluster, Talwanti Bhai, – Ferozepur 124
30.47 DSR in Hand Tools Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana 125
30.48 DSR in Tractors Parts Manufacturers Cluster, Hoshiarpur 126
30.49 DSR in Tractor Parts Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana 127
30.50 DSR in Wire Drawing Cluster, Ludhiana 128
30.51 DSR in Foundry & General Engg. Cluster, Phagwara Kapurthala 129
30.52 Soft Interventions in Printing & Packaging Cluster, Ludhiana 130
30.53 Up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities at Focal Point, Ludhiana 132
Kerala
30.54 Setting up of CFC (Tool Room and Training Centre) in Agricultural Implements Cluster, Shornur
134
30.55 Setting up of CFC for Soft Toy Cluster, Kottayam 140
30.56 Setting up of CFC for Printers Cluster, Kannur 142
Andhra Pradesh
30.57 Extension of time limit for submission of DPRs for setting up of 7 Infrastructure Development (ID) centres
147
30.58 Other proposals 148
Bihar
30.59 DSR in Agarbati Manufacturing Cluster at District Gaya 149
iv
Agenda No. 30.1: Setting up of CFC for Ceramic Industry Cluster, Trajpar, Tal. Morbi,
Distt. Rajkot
Industries Commissionrate, Govt. of Gujarat has submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in
Ceramic Industry Cluster, Trajpar, Tal. Morbi, Distt. Rajkot, Gujarat. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Trajpar, Tal. Morbi, Distt.
Rajkot, Gujarat.
SIDBI appraisal mentions that SPV has already identified
land and building which is
Name of the cluster Ceramic Industry Cluster
Location of Cluster Trajpar, Tal. Morbi, Distt. Rajkot, Gujarat.
Products of the cluster
Sanitary ware, Glazed Tiles, Floor Tiles, Vitrified Tiles,
Refractories, Frit, Ceramic Stain, Grinding Media, Wall Tiles Body Making (spray drier), Third Firing decoration, Roofing
tiles.
No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium)
(P-278/c)
597 Nos.
(Micro – 150, Small – 297 and Medium – 150)
Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (P-279/c)
2006-07 – Rs. 3200
2007-08 – Rs. 3550 2008-09 – Rs. 4000
2009-10 – Rs. 4500 2010-11 – Rs. 5500
Exports (Rs in crore) for the last five years (P-279/c)
2006-07 – Rs. 1120 2007-08 – Rs. 1243
2008-09 – Rs. 1400 2009-10 – Rs. 1575
2010-11 – Rs. 1925
Employment in Cluster 2000 Nos.
Technological Details Units are engaged in manufacturing of wall tiles, sanitary wares
etc. with low level of technology. There is no standardization of
raw material.
Whether DS conducted and
validated.
Yes, the DSR was validated in the meeting of SPV M/s Shri
Morbi Cera-lab co-operative society Ltd held on dt. 2.6.2011. The
validation workshop was conducted by Assistant Director,
MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Main findings of DSR No proper testing facility which results in poor quality of inputs
raw material as well as finished goods.
Main Problems of cluster • Low level of modernization and technology up gradation.
• Inadequate of training for workers.
• Non availability of standard raw material.
• Difficulties in testing at local level and low demand in
local market.
• High rejection rate.
v
centrally located at Trajpar
Char Rasta, NH8A, Morbi.
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather land acquired
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
. Whether lease is legally
tenable
SPV have made deed of
bargain.
Not applicable.
Rs.28.8+1.2 lakh proposed.
No.
Information not available
N.A.
N.A.
SPV has made deed of
bargain for 07 shops (G & F
floor). Total area-139.04
sq.mts. which seems to be
inadequate area for a CFC.
c. Total Building area (sq ft) 139.04 Sq. mtrs
d. Rate of construction of
building
Not applicable.
e. Main facilities proposed Testing lab, Training
f. Prod. capacity of CFC 23160 samples per year
g. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of
production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.)
Proper testing facility for
raw materials and finished
goods, the industry can
serve customers with better products and it can easily
compete with other players in the domestic as well as
international market.
Projected outcomes should
be quantified in terms of
turnover, production,
employment, export etc. with
time limits.
h. Pollution clearance required
or not
---- Consent of pollution control
department required as per
local by-laws.
i. Man power in CFC (p-
290/c)
20 nos.
j. Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability
of assets (service/user
charges to be levied, any
other-to be specified)
Revenue is proposed from
service charges towards
testing.
---
k. Estimated net profit for 1st
& 2nd
year.
1st year – Rs. 70.26 lakh
2nd
year- Rs. 67.25 lakh
---
3. Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address
(P-25/c)
M/s. Shree Morbi Cera Lab Co-
operative Society Ltd., C-10/12,
Hari Chamber, Trajpar Char Rasta, N.H. No. 8-A, Tal. Morbi, Dist.-
Rajkot, Gujarat
----
b. Nature of SPV
(company or Society or Trust) ( P– 25/c)
Co operative Society
c. Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in
Information not given. Provision in byelaws
should be made for
vi
SPV inclusion of one official
from State Govt. and
MSME.
d. Date of formation of
SPV (P– 25/c)
6th
October, 2010 --
e. Number of members (P-
274-276 /c)
59 nos. (details available of 55
members only)
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital
(P-274/c)
Rs. 15.00 lakh + Rs. 77.87 lakh
member deposit
h. Paid up capital as on
1.9.2011 (P-274/c)
Rs. 4.05 lakh
i. Shareholding Pattern (P-
274/c)
Given None of member has more
than 10% of in the equity capital of the SPV.
j. Commitment letter for
contribution (p-199/c)
State Govt. has confirmed
contribution to project vide letter
dated 26.08.11.
SPV commitment
required.
k. SPV specific A/c (P-246
of corr.)
SPV M/s Morbi Cera-lab co-
operative society Ltd has opened Account with HDFC Bank, Morbi
– Gujarat (A/c No. 03071450000086)
l. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV
members need to be highlighted with support
documentation (p-286/c)
SPV formed, SPV members have
not taken any co-operative
initiatives in the past.
m. Technical Institution Lukdhirji College of Engineer,
Morbi
--
n. CFC may be utilized by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
However, evidence
should be furnished with regard to SPV member
ability to utilize at least 60 per cent of installed
capacity.
Commitment furnished by the SPV.
o. (a) Power requirement
for commercial/ domestic purpose
(b) Water (c) Gas/Oil/ Other
utilities
Information not available.
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description As per prospasal Remarks, if any
vii
a. Implementation Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship
Development, Gandhinagar,
b. Implementation Period 6 months The CFC should be
operationslised within two
years from the date of final
approval.
c. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SIDBI recommended proposal. Conditions mentioned in
the appraisal should be
fulfilled by SPV at
different stages before
sanction and during project implementation.
d. Comments of Technical Division
Technical division recommended the proposal- Technical feasible
and viable subject to purchasing of machinery should be decided
by Purchase Committee.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC :
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP (Page– 47 of corrs.) 46.59% Ok
b. IRR, payback period (P-49 of corrs.) 13.51%, 7 years & 7.62
months
c. DSCR Not applicable
d. Return on Capital employed (ROCE) ---
e. NPV Positive IRR is 13.51, and
hence NPV will be
positive at 10%
discount rate.
f. DER ---
g. Sensitivity Analysis Positive
h. Working capital (In-principle
sanction of loan from a bank, if
applicable arrangement made)
Information not given.
6. Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No
Particulars Amount
1. Land including development and building 30.00
2. Machineries & Equipments
(i) Imported Machinery 290.68
(ii) Indigenous Machinery 106.96
3. Misc. fixed assets 20.92
4. Preliminary & Preoperative Exp. 15.00*
5. Margin for working capital 1.13
Total cost of project 464.69
* Should be 2% of the Project Cost.
viii
7. Means of Finance (Corr. Page– 95 of file): (Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 65.31 303.49
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 14.49 67.36
3. SPV contribution (Equity share capital +
Members fee)
20.20 93.84
Total 100.00 464.69
8. Plant and Machinery: Annexure - I
9 Shortcomings
• Land documents (CFC is proposed to be set up in Shops)
• Projected outcomes in quantified terms
• Commitment regarding contribution by SPV
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Ceramic Industry Cluster, Trajpar, Tal. Morbi, Distt. Rajkot, Gujarat to accord in-principle approval.
ix
Agenda No. 30.2: Setting up of CFC for Brass and Copper Utensils Cluster, Dabhoi,
Vadodara
Jt. Commissioner of Industries (Salt/Tex), Industries Commissionerate, Govt. of Gujarat has
submitted a proposal for interventions in Brass and Copper Utensils Cluster, Dabhoi, District
Vadodara, Gujarat. Salient features of the cluster/ proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Brass and Copper Utensils Cluster
2. Location Dabhoi, District Vadodara, Gujarat
3. Products Brass and Copper Utensils
4. Age of the cluster Information not available
5. No. of Units Information not available
6. Type of units Information not available
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Information not available
8. Formation of SPV Yes, M/s Shree Ram Vasan Industries Cluster Association,
Dabhoi
9. Employment Only employment generation of proposed project given i.e.
500 nos.
10. Turnover / Export Information not available
11. Implementing
Agency
Information not available
12. Problems of the units
in industrial estate
(p-6 of corrs.)
• To handle utensil for labour job or any addition or improvement in design or quality or shape members are
facing transportation problems due to narrow streets and
roads in the city for preparing vessels in its design and
changes in shape and quality.
• Problems for purchase of raw materials i.e. scarp and its
storage facility.
• Problems in making ingots out of scrap are difficult due
to purchase in little quantity due to individuality and
make ingots out of scarps is costlier.
• Difficulties facing like R&D laboratory or testing
laboratory therefore benefits of new technology are not
enjoyed.
• Difficulties are faced to create common branding and
market development activities for utensils of brass and
copper.
13. Recommendations in
the Diagnostic Study
Report
Diagnostic Study is not received.
14. Need for CFC Need of CFC is not supported by DS.
15. Cost of the project
S. No. Particulars Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land & its Development 65.00
2. Building 185.00
3. Plant & Machinery 165.00
4. Electrification (including
solar lights)
15.00
5. Working capital 107.72
x
Total 537.72
16 Means of finance Member’s contribution - Rs. 172.72 lakh
Loan from Co.-bank - Rs. 150.00 lakh
State Govt - Rs. 215.00 lakh
Total - Rs. 537.72 lakh
17 Facilities to be
created in the CFC
(p-10-11 of corrs.)
• Common Testing laboratory
• Storage facilities for raw materials (scrap)
• Common Processing Centre (Rolling Mill, Bending
machines, Power Press, Buffing machine, Cutting
machine, Welding machine etc.)
2. Shortcomings
• SIDBI appraisal
• Clarification regarding Govt. of Gujarat sanction,
• Clarification regarding working capital
3. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for in-principle approval for setting up of CFC in Brass and Copper Utensils Cluster,
Dabhoi, District Vadodara, Gujarat.
xi
Agenda Item No. 30.3 Setting up of CFC for Embroidery, Garmenting & Zari Cluster,
Kareli, Tal. Olpad, Surat
Industries Commissionrate, Govt. of Gujarat has submitted a proposal for in-principle approval
for setting up of CFC in Embroidery, Garmenting & Zari Cluster, Kareli, Tal. Olpad, District
Surat, Gujarat. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Embroidery, Garmenting & Zari Cluster
2. Location Village Kareli, Taluka Olpad, District Surat, Gujarat
3. Products Shirts, trousures, Jeans, Coat, etc. with Embroidery and Zari
Works
4. Age of the
cluster/Industrial
Estate
Information not available
5. No. of Units 815 units (50 units formed consortium for cluster development)
6. Type of units Information not available
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Surat Art silk Cloth Manufacturers Association
8. Formation of SPV Yes, M/s Sunrise Integrated Textile Park Ltd.,
9. Employment 3855 nos.
10. Turnover / Export Rs 9408 cr/ Information not available
11. Implementing
Agency
Information not available
12. Problems of the units
in industrial estate
Infrastructure problems, lack of supporting facilities, high
cost of energy, old and obsolete machinery, lack of
manpower training, lack of awareness on technology, lack of
funding by financial institute etc.
13. Recommendations in
the Diagnostic Study
Report
Diagnostic Study has been received from SPV. SIDBI
appraisal and State Govt recommendations are still awaited.
14. Need for CFC Need of CFC has been identified.
15. Cost of the project (Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1. Land & Site Development 29.33
2. Building 153.00
3. Plant & Machinery 1368.10
4. Preliminary & pre-operative
expenses
42.00
5. Operating capital 14.95
Total 1607.38
16 Means of finance Govt. of India - Rs. 1050.00 lakh
Govt. of Gujarat - Rs. 230.00 lakh SPV - Rs. 327.38 lakh
Total - Rs. 1607.38 lakh
17 Facilities to be
created in the CFC • Testing Centre
• Training Centre
xii
• Common Production Centre
• CETP
• Solid Waste Management
• Basic Amenities
2. Shortcomings:
• SIDBI appraisal and State Govt recommendations
3. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal
for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government
within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may
consider the proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC in Embroidery,
Garmenting & Zari Cluster, Kareli, Tal. Olpad, Surat, Gujarat.
xiii
Agenda No. 30.4 Setting up of CFC in Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Cashew Processing Cluster, Contai, Purba Medinipur
Directorate of MSSE, Govt. of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for setting up of
CFC in Cashew Processing Cluster, Contai, Purba Medinipur, West Bengal. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Cashew Processing Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster
Contai, Purba Medinipur
c. Products of the cluster Cashew kernel of different grades
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
250 units (Micro – 15, Medium – 35 and Small – 200)
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Rs. 137.00 crore.
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Not available
g. Employment in Cluster Not available
h. Technological Details Processing technology is primitive. Most of operations
are done manually with only a crude machine for
roasting. It results in lot of broken products. CNSL
remains unrecovered and in absence of scientific
packaging, shelf life of product is reduced. The net result is low margin.
Proposed CFC will minimize broken cashew, improve shelf life, and recover valuable CNSL as by product,
resulting in more profit. While steam cooking, drying, product packaging,
CNSL recovery will be done mechanically, shelling / cutting of raw cashew, peeling, sorting and grading will
be done manually.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes.
j. Main findings of DSR • Low yield of cashew kernels i.e. around 22% only.
• Improper gradation leads to loss of revenue.
• Lack of awareness and measure of quality
assurance.
• Infestation measures not up to the desired level by
a number of units.
• Packaging is not up to desired level.
• Requirement of huge working capital.
• Inadequate credit flow for working capital.
k. Main Problems of cluster 1. Absence of market intelligence for institutional and
new product sale.
2. Lack of marketing skill. 3. Lack of exposure of different market segments in
the national and international arena. 4. Lack of awareness of improved technology.
5. No increase in cashew cultivation during last few
xiv
years in the state.
6. High raw material cost due to procurement of
major quantities outside the state.
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Mouza,Ten gunia, VPO
Contai, Purba Medinipur.
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather land acquired Yes. Deed No. 6022/09 for Rs.
1423132 (74-9 decimal) and Deed
No. 6021/09 for Rs. 1190329 (60
decimal)
ii. Title is in name of ‘Contai Cashew Industries
Limited’.
iii. Valuation and its basis Market value.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use Not available.
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
Not applicable.
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
Not applicable.
c. Total Building area (sq ft) 3,000 sqm. Shed
Administrative Building 120 sqm. Other constructions – 95 sqm.
d. Rate of construction of building
3,000 sqm. Shed @ 7,000/- per sqm.
Administrative Building 120 sqm@ 9,000/- per sqm.
Other constructions – 95 sqm @
7,000/- per sqm.
e. Major Outputs of CFC,
Projected performance of
cluster after setting up of
CFC
Before setting
up of CFC
After (?)
years of CFC
Production (Rs in cr) 10-40 bags per
day for each
unit (1 bag =
80 kg)
Export (Rs in cr) Not available.
Employment (nos) Not available.
Others like no of ISO,
etc
f. Pollution clearance required or not
Yes.
xv
g. Main facilities proposed a) Centralized Mechanized
Processing facility for raw
cashew for production of
cashew kernels of different
grades as finished product and
Cashew Nut Shell Liquid
(CNSL) as by- product.
b) Semi mechanical process has
been proposed to be followed
for processing of raw cashew nut. While steam cooking,
drawing, product packaging, CNSL recovery will be done
mechanically, shelling/cutting of raw cashew, peeling, sorting
and grading of cashew kernels will be done manually.
h. Prod capacity of CFC 24 TPD (Raw Cashew Processing) 6 TPD (CSNL)
On two shift basis.
i. Man power in CFC 42 nos. of persons.
j. Revenue mechanism for
sustainability of CFC (by
user charges, etc)
Rs. 648.00 lakh – Processing of
raw cashewnut.
Packing in pouches
Packaging in tin containers
Sale of CSNL.
k. Estimated net profit for 1st
& 2nd
year.
1ST Year – Rs. 5.45 lakh
2nd
Year – Rs. 135.48 lakh
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address Contai Cashew Industries Limited.
Vill – Alipur, P.O. Tengunia, Dist
– Purba Medinipur, Contai –
721401 (WB)
b. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust)
Limited Company.
c. Name of the state Govt and
MSME officials in SPV Not available.
d. Date of formation of SPV 19th December 2008.
e. Number of MSE Member
Units
180 nos.
f. Bye laws or MoA and AoA
submitted
Yes.
g. Authorized share capital Authorized share capital of the
company is Rs. 1,00,00,000/-
divided into 10,00,000 equity
shares of Rs. 10/- each.
h. Shareholding Pattern 180 nos. of members contributed
@ of Rs. 20,000/- each.
i. Commitment letter for Received on stamp paper dated
xvi
contribution 28.06.11.
j. SPV specific A/c State Bank of Contai, A/c no.-
31448468786
k. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members with documentation
Soft interventions in this cluster
has been taken up by State Govt.
earlier under funding support of
MSE-CDP.
l. Technical Institution WEBCON, Kolkata
m. CFC may be utilised by SPV
members as also others in a
cluster. Evidence for SPV
members’ ability to utilise at least 60% of installed capacity
Not available.
n. Utilities requirement
Power 160 KVA
Water 22 Kl. Per day.
Gas/Oil/ Other
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Land 14.50
2 Site Development 33.01
3 Civil Cost 250.55
4 Plant & Machinery/equipment 420.37
4 Misc. fixed assets 67.75
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 23.65*
6 Contingency @ 2% on civil cost 5.01
7 Contingency @ 5% on P&M and MFAs 24.41
7 Margin money for Working Capital 16.44
Total 855.69
Say 856.00
* may be restricted to 2% of project cost.
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 10.04 86.00
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 62.15 532.00
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of WB. 27.81 238.00
Total 100.00 856.00
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 32.33%
b. IRR 17.46%
c. DSCR N/A
d. Return on Capital employed 35.89%
xvii
(ROCE)
e. NPV Rs. 506.74 lakh
f. DER N/A
g. Sensitivity Analysis Holds Good.
7. Plant and Machinery As per list enclosed
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a Implementation Agency West Bengal State Export Promotion
Society (WBSEPS), Kolkata.
b Commitment of SPV
contribution
Received.
c Commitment of State
Government contribution
Govt. of West Bengal confirmation
received.
d Commitment of Loans
(Working capital and/ or term loan)
Not available.
e Implementation Period 18 months
f Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SIDBI has appraised the DPR and has
informed that the setting up of proposed CFC is economically viable and support
worthy.
g Comments of Technical
Division
Food Division has informed that
proposed interventions is complete manufacturing activity and is not
complementary process, there is no activity of manufacturing left for cluster
units to perform in their premises. Some
more observations of Food Division
have been sent to state govt. for their
comments.
Technical
Division has not supported the
proposal. Cluster .
9 Shortcomings:
i. Food Division has not supported the proposal
ii. Major outputs of CFC not given
iii. Data like employment, export, utilization of at least 60% of installed capacity of facilities
by SPV members, name of stat official in SPV, in-principle approval of working loan, etc.
not given.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal to set
up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Cashew Processing Cluster, Contai, Purba Medinipur may be rejected.
xviii
Agenda No. 30.5 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Clay Pottery
Cluster, Siliguri
Department of MSSE, Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for setting up
of CFC in Clay Pottery Cluster, Siliguri, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Clay Pottery Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster
Matigara, Siliguri in Darjeeling of West Bengal.
c. Products of the cluster Clay pottery
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
130 units.
(All are micro enterprise)
e. Turnover for the last five
years
2005- 06 Rs. 3.00 crore (approx.).
2006-07 Rs. 3.75 crore (approx.)
2007-08 Rs. 4.00 crore (approx.)
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Negligible for the last 3 financial years.
g. Employment in Cluster 700 nos.
h. Technological Details The entire production process is labour intensive and
manual and productivity is very low.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes.
j. Main findings of DSR • Organizing meeting with the actors.
• Organizing cluster vision.
• Study in understanding the present manufacturing process & isolate the weak point.
• Workshop on modern technology.
• Network building.
• Training on diversification as a strategic opinion
(design development)
• Expose to national market through seminar &
workshop.
• Training on modern technology
• Value chain analysis.
• Establishing Common Facility Centre for marketing & Furnace.
k. Main Problems of cluster • The entire production process is labour intensive
and productivity is rather low. All these factors
affect adversely on the quality of products and accounts for the low rate of return on investment.
• In order to improve upon the productivity it is
necessary to introduce ceramic machinery which
will reduce the human drudgery and at the same
time will improve upon the quality of products.
• There is also an opportunity for diversification of
product range through introduction of different
ceramic fabrication procedure and development of glazed articles particularly glazed table wares and
xix
art wares utilizing locally available raw materials.
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Location of CFC Near Siliguri railway station.
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather land acquired SIDBI has informed in its appraisal
report that land has been identified
and transfer of land is in process.
Land
documents are
required.
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
vii. Whether lease is legally
tenable
c. Total Building area (sq ft) 9950 sqft..
d. Rate of construction of
building
@ of Rs.345 per sqft
e. Major Outputs of CFC,
Projected performance of cluster after setting up of CFC
Before setting up of
CFC
After …
years of CFC
Production (Rs in
cr)
130 MT. 175 MT
Export (Rs in cr) Nil 0.25
Employment (nos) 700 nos. 750 nos.
Others like no of
ISO, etc
- -
f. Pollution clearance required
or not
Yes.
g. Main facilities proposed • A full scale production unit in
semi-commercial scale to produce
normal un-glazed art wares and
planters.
• Design facility to enable the
artisans to get creative designs and preserving the same in the archive.
• Testing facility of the raw
materials as well as the products.
• R&D input for development of
new product or for modifying the
existing products.
• Training Centre for imparting
training on different aspects i.e.
fabrication procedure, designing
of articles, improving firing
practices, testing of products etc.
xx
h. Man power in CFC
37 nos.
i. Revenue mechanism for
sustainability of CFC (by user
charges, etc)
Revenue Generation at 70% Capacity
Utilization per annum. Rs. 84.00 lakh
to be generated by way of production
of engraved /glazed work, clay mix
preparation, firing /glazing charges,
testing, designing etc.
j. Estimated net profit for 1st &
2nd year. 1
st Year – 15,03, 948/-
2nd Year – 17,49,327/-
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address Matigara Paul para Industrial Cluster Co-operative Society
Ltd., Vill – Matigara, Siliguri in Darjeeling District, West
Bengal.
b. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust)
Society Limited.
c. Name of the state Govt and
MSME officials in SPV
Not available.
d. Date of formation of SPV 5th June 2009
e. Number of MSE Member
Units
50 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and AoA
submitted
Yes.
g. Authorized share capital Rs. 100,00,000/-
h. Shareholding Pattern Not available. Required
i. Commitment letter for
contribution
Received.
j. SPV specific A/c Not available. Required
k. Trust building of SPV, Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued by SPV members with
documentation
Earlier soft interventions in the cluster have been taken up
by State Govt. through DIC.
l. Technical Institution CGCRI, Kolkata.
m. CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a
cluster. Evidence FOR SPV members’ ability to utilise at
least 60% of installed capacity
Not available. Required
n. Utilities requirement
Power 3 H.P
Water NA
Gas/Oil/ Other 50000
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
xxi
Particulars Amount
1 Land and its development 0.00
2 Building 34.25
3 Plant & Machinery 106.83
4 Misc. fixed assets 3.50
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
4.50*
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 5.34
7 Margin money for Working Capital 7.17
Total 161.59
* to be restricted to 2% of project cost.
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1. SPV contribution 16.16
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 127.34
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of WB. 18.09
Total 161.59
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 37.58%
b. IRR 13.67%
c. DSCR -
d. Return on Capital employed
(ROCE)
56.65%
e. NPV 25.56%
f. DER -
g. Sensitivity Analysis ------
7. Plant and Machinery - Annexure
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency West Bengal Export
Promotion Society
(WBEPS), Kolkata.
b. Commitment of SPV contribution Received.
c. Commitment of State Government contribution
Received.
d. Commitment of Loans (Working capital and/ or term loan)
Not available.
e. Implementation Period 18 months.
f. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
DPR has been appraised
by SIDBI and has concluded that project for
setting up of CFC is economically viable and
xxii
technically feasible.
g. Comments of Technical Division • The total area is not adequate to install
five component of CFC as mentioned in
the DPR.
• Service user charges which are to be
paid by the potters are not indicated in
terms of MT/KG. Where as it is
reported in no of orders which is not
defined properly.
• The proposed shuttle kiln having
volume 5 m3 is also not sufficient to
fired/ baked the items of all the potters.
• A member of the SPV an amount of Rs.
78000/- would contribute against the
total share amounting Rs. 16.15 lakh of
the SPV. According to this statement
only 20-21 potters would be SPV
members.
9 Shortcoming:
i. Land documents
ii. Shareholding Pattern with list of member units, Name of State Govt official in SPV
iii. Project specific account
iv. Details of 60% capacity utilization of CFC facilities, by SPV members
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may approve In-
principle the setting up of CFC in Clay Pottery Cluster, Siliguri.
xxiii
Agenda No. 30.6 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
for Wood Carving Cluster, Burdwan
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Wood Carving Cluster, Burdwan, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Wood Carving Cluster
2. Location Natungram, Burdwan, West Bengal
3. Products Wood Carving products & Novelty Items & Furniture
4. Age of the cluster 200 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 82
6. Type of units Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
NGO & Self Help Group in the local area
8. Recommendation in the DSR Design Development, Product Diversification, linkage
with buyers, establishment of raw materials testing centre
& tools library & bank, creation of CFC with modern
machinery
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed Design Dev. Trg., Exposure visit, artisan
card, health insurance scheme, Janashree Bima Yojana,
Demonstration on Modern Machinery, Computer
Training
10. Formation of SPV SPV has been formed in the name of Swami Janaki Das
Nutangram Wood Carving Artisans Industrial Co-Operative Society Limited.
11. Employment 200
12. Turnover Rs. 0.97 Crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises, West Bengal
14. Problems of the cluster Use of traditional hand tools, low productivity, lack of design as per market requirement, inability to access
outer market etc.
15. Need for CFC Skill Upgradation, capacity building, design
development, etc.
16. Cost of the
project
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars
Land & Site development 0.75
Building & other civil construction 17.00
Plant & Machinery 15.73
Misc. Fixed Assets
(Office Machinery, furniture, fixture etc.)
13.90
Contingencies @5% on items under Sl. No. 3 0.79
Preliminary & Pre Operative Expenses 2.50
Margin Money for working capital 1.03
Total 51.70
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
xxiv
1. SPV contribution 10.04 5.19
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
65.66 33.95
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
WB
24.30 12.56
Total 51.70
Shortcomings
i. List of SPV members with their contribution is not available. ii. Project specification account is not opened up in scheduled A Bank.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee
may consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Wood Carving
Cluster, Natungram, Burdwan.
xxv
Agenda No. 30.7 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Foundry (Metal Casting) Cluster, Howrah, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Foundry (Metal Casting) Cluster, Howrah, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and
the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Metal Casting (Foundry) Cluster
2. Location Liluah, Ghusuri, Salkia, Santragachi, Bellilious Road,
Dasnagar, Baltikuri under Howrah Municipal Corpn.
area
3. Products a) Industrial Product: CI casting items such as Rly.
Components and spares, engg. & mechanical
components and spares (e.g. sluice valves, ball valves
components) (b) Domestic products: CI casting house
hold items such as sanitary fittings, hand pump, and
parts and CI pan.
4. Age of the cluster 70 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 320
6. Type of units 90% Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, Howrah Foundry Association
8. Recommendation in the DSR Develop capability of the cluster to perform as leader
actor in the domestic as well as global market adopting a realistic and flexible action plan with proper thrust on
technology upgradation, marketing, networking, improvement in infrastructure including CFC and
modernization – thus making a socially sustainable / environment sustainable development model of metal
casting (foundry) cluster.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed awareness prog., trust building, environment
and energy saving prog., exposure visit, trade fair participation etc.
10. Formation of SPV Howrah Foundry Development Cluster
11. Employment 8000
12. Turnover Rs. 3500 Crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises
14. Problems of the cluster i) Absence of up graded technology in Mfg. practices
(ii) Lack of quality consciousness in product. (iii) Lack
of innovative marketing strategy for existence in the
competitive market. (iv) Low end product range.
15. Need for CFC i) Quality metal and prototype development (ii)
Chemical, physical and mechanical analyses and testing
(iii) Casting / welding defect analyses including NDT
(iv) Quality assessment of moulding / core-sand (v)
Pollution Control Measures (vi) CAD / CAM
facilities(vii) Dev. Of human resources
xxvi
16. Cost of the
project
Particulars Total (Rs.
in lakh)
1. Land & Site development 5.00
2. Building & other civil construction 180.10
3. Plant & Machinery 262.45
4. Misc. Fixed Assets (Office
Machinery, furniture, fixture etc.)
20.00
5. Contingencies @5% on items under
Sl. No. 3
17.72
6. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
15.65
7. Margin Money for working capital 0.91
Total 501.83
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs.
in lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10% 50.18
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
59% 296.08
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of West Bengal
31% 155.57
Total 501.83
What are the shortcomings
i. List of SPV members with their contribution not available. ii. Cost of project has been changed from Rs.822.56 lacs to Rs.501.83 lacs requiring revised
appraisal from SIDBI.
iii. Cost of land has been taken on lease basis requiring clarification as earlier it was shown on purchase basis.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Foundry
(Metal Casting) Cluster, Howrah, West Bengal.
xxvii
Agenda No.30.8 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Metal Spare Parts Cluster, Howrah
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Metal Spare Parts Cluster, Howrah, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Metal Spare Parts Cluster
2. Location Mansinghapur, Hantal, Sadatpur, Bargachia, Patihal, in
and around Jagatballavpur in Howrah
3. Products Mechanical Sector- Automobiles, Steel Plant
machineries, Defence Factories, Locomotives & Engg.
Goods. Electrical Sector- Electrical / power
transmission, industries machinery, electrical component
etc.
4. Age of the cluster More than 50 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 900
6. Type of units Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, Jagatballavpur Gramin Khudra Kutir Shilpo Unnyan
Samity
8. Recommendation in the DSR Setting up of CFC to render services for business
development, skill & managerial power development,
R&D testing facilities, vendor development Etc.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Vendor development Programme, Trust Building
programmes, Programmes on Pollution Control
Measures, Exposure visits, Awareness Prog. On energy audit & environment Prog. Etc.
10. Formation of SPV Bargachia Cluster of Metal Products Manufacturers
11. Employment 5000
12. Turnover Rs. 60.00 Crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises, West Bengal
14. Problems of the cluster (i) Lack of age old designs and in accessibility to wider market and method of Mfg. practices & process not
compatible with present technology oriented Mfg. process. (ii) Product of this cluster is found to be
qualitatively low. (iii) Backdated in design not in tune
with the test of present consumers and thus loss the
competitive edge and expected market.
15. Need for CFC (i) This cluster is very much meant for the Mfg. of
various type of complicate shaped metallic component.
Such component can be produced with adequate
productivity only with the help of modernized machines
like automatic/semi automatic cap stain lathe machine,
CNC wire cutting machines for operating such machines,
the operators and machinists need to be specially trained.
Proposed CFC can provide such Trg. Facilities to the
interested S/H and the operators.
xxviii
16. Cost of the
project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land & Site development To be provided by
GoWB
2. Building & other civil
construction
23.00
3. Plant & Machinery 414.10
4. Support Equipment & Misc.
Fixed Assets (Office Machinery,
furniture, fixture etc.)
9.10
5. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
8.00
6. Margin Money for working
capital
8.15
Total 462.35
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10 46.23
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
90 416.12
Total 462.35
What are the shortcomings
i. Land documents not available.
ii. Complete specification of the machinery has been requested by the Technical Division and is yet to be received from State Government.
iii. List of SPV members with their contribution not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may
consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Metal Spare Parts Cluster,
Howrah, West Bengal.
xxix
Agenda No. 30.9 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Plastic Products Cluster, Umarpur, Murshidabad, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Plastic Products Cluster, Murshidabad, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Plastic Products Cluster
2. Location Vill.- Umarpur under Raghunathganj-I Block,
Murshidabad, West Bengal
3. Products Plastic Products
4. Age of the cluster 30Yrs.
5. No. of Units 56
6. Type of units Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, Association
8. Recommendation in the DSR Design as per their creativity and CAD facility, archive
facility for designs, accurate tooling as per designs, high
class polishing system, better product range with quality,
higher volume of product and quality control and benefits
of standardized products as envisaged by the CFC
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed Trg., awareness Prog., exposure visit, vendor
development etc.
10. Formation of SPV The Umarpur Plastic Shilpa Samabaya Samity Ltd.
11. Employment 500
12. Turnover Rs. 65.00 Crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises, West Bengal
14. Problems of the cluster Up gradation of technology, design development, Testing facility, quality awareness etc.
15. Need for CFC The CAD centre of the CFC will enable the S/H to create new and creative designs for the household plastic items
with the aid of 3D modeling services. The design finalize through the CAD technology can be transfer to the CNC
machines for suitable model making using modern CAM technology. A state of the art tool room in the CFC would
make moulds with the help of CNC machines. Hard Chrome plating would also be done, CFC would also
provide modern Trg. Services to the S/H to equip them
with the upgraded Mfg. Technology required for
production of modern value added plastic items.
xxx
16. Cost of the
project
Particulars (Rs. In
lakh)
1. Land & Site development 04.20
2. Building & other civil
construction
16.00
3. Plant & Machinery 254.87
4. Support Equipments & Misc.
Fixed Assets (Office Machinery,
furniture, fixture etc.)
77.76
5. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
09.10
6. Margin Money for working
capital
06.40
Total 368.33
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10 % 36.83
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
90 % 331.50
Total 368.33
What are the shortcomings
i. Land documents not available.
ii. List of SPV members with their contribution not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Plastic Products
Cluster, Murshidabad
xxxi
Agenda No. 30.10: Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Balarampur Shellac Manufacturing Cluster, Purulia, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Shellac Manufacturing Cluster, Purulia, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and
the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Balarampur Shellac Manufacturing Cluster
2. Location Balarampur, Purulia, West Bengal
3. Products Shellac, Bleached Lac, Aleuritic Acid products
4. Age of the cluster 100 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 123
6. Type of units Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, Association
8. Recommendation in the DSR CFC for machine made Shellac, Aleuritic Acid & de-
waxed Bleached Lac
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed Awareness Prog. Exposure visit, market
development Prog., TRg. Prog on value added product
10. Formation of SPV Balarampur Shellac Cluster Shilpa Samabaya Samity
Ltd.
11. Employment 1639
12. Turnover Rs.262.53 Crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises, West
Bengal
14. Problems of the cluster Low productivity & low value addition, inferior product
quality, high process loss & high production cost
15. Need for CFC Higher value addition, mechanism of production
process, economic viability for installation of machines
for common use, enhancing productivity and export of
product
16. Cost of the
project
Sl. Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land Govt. Land
2. Site development 5.00
3. Building & other civil
construction
334.53
4. Plant & Machinery 107.52
5. Misc. Fixed Assets (Office
Machinery, furniture, fixture etc.)
71.00
6. Contingencies @3% on Civil
cost, P&M & MFA
15.54
7. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
4.00
8. Margin Money for working
capital
88.12
Total 625.71
17. Proposed
Means of
xxxii
Finance Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10% 62.57
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
39.70 248.40
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
West Bengal
50.30 314.74
Total 625.71
Shortcomings
i. Land documents not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee: - Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may
consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Shellac Manufacturing
Cluster, Purulia
xxxiii
Agenda No. 30.11: Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Brass & Bell Metal, Nadia, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for approval for setting up of CFC in
Brass & Bell Metal, Nadia, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as
follows:
1. Name of the cluster Brass & Bell Metal
2. Location Nadia, West Bengal.
3. Products House hold Items, Decorative items, Idols, Hinges
etc.
4. Age of the cluster Age old.
5. No. of Units 150 units
6. Type of units Micro units.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Dharmada – Murogachha – Sadhanpara Brass and Bell Metal Artisans’ Cluster Co-operative Industrial
Society Ltd.
8. Recommendation in the
DSR
DSR recommends for setting up of CFC in the
cluster.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions have been taken up earlier by DIC,
Nadia.
10. Formation of SPV Dharmada – Murogachha – Sadhanpara Brass and
Bell Metal Artisans’ Cluster Co-operative Industrial
Society Ltd.,
11. Employment 640 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 5.00 crore.
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of MSSE, Govt. of West Bengal.
14. Problems of the cluster The artisans of the cluster suffer from lack of economies of scale, productivity, innovative, designs,
proper quality of conventional product and newer value added items.
15. Need for CFC The CFC will enhance the artisan’s productivity and competitiveness.
16. Cost of the
project
(Rs. in lakh)
Sl. Particulars Total Cost
1. Land & site development 32.29
2. Building / Civil construction 63.00
4. Plant & Machinery 145.40
5. Misc. Fixed Assets 2.50
6. Contingencies 7.92
7. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
9.74
8. Margin Money for working
capital (25% of working capital)
8.98
Total 269.83
xxxiv
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 26.98
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
157.08
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
West Bengal
85.77
Total 269.83
Shortcomings
(i) Land documents related to procurement of land by the SPV. (ii) Project Specific account of SPV.
(iii) Approved Building plan for CFC
(iii) List of SPV members with names of units as well as individual
contribution.
(iv) Technical Division has requested for complete specification of plant & machinery from State Govt.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division
recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall
be dropped. Steering Committee may consider ‘In-principle’ approval for the CFC.
xxxv
Agenda No. 30.12 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Gold & Silver Jewellery Cluster, Nadia, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of
CFC in Gold & Silver jewellery Cluster, Ranaghat, Nadia, West Bengal. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Gold & Silver Jewellery Cluster
2. Location Ranaghat, Hijuli, Jafarnagar Dist.-Nadia, West Bengal
3. Products Gold & Silver Jewellery ornaments
4. Age of the cluster 60 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 700
6. Type of units Micro Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, Association
8. Recommendation in the DSR Technological upgradation in the Mfg. Process as well as
introduction of quality assurance system as Hallmarking
System with modern computer based design facility
which suits the present customers need.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed awareness Prog., Trg. Prog., Exposure visit,
Participation in different Trade Fair at National level.
10. Formation of SPV Ranaghat Sub Division Gold & Silver Jewellery
Artisans’ Cluster Co-Operative Industrial Society Ltd.
11. Employment 2100
12. Turnover Rs. 343.00 Crores
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises,
Government of West Bengal
14. Problems of the cluster Absence of modern technology, no scope for design
development, non existence of quality assurance system, and collective marketing approach.
15. Need for CFC Installation of Hallmarking centre, Design development through CAD-CAM facility. Different Jewellery Mfg.
technology and Tool Room facilities.
16. Cost of the
project
Sl. Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land 0.00
2. Site development 0.00
3. Building & other civil
construction
02.00
4. Plant & Machinery 235.72
5. Misc. Fixed Assets (Office Machinery, furniture, fixture
etc.)
59.16
6. Contingencies @3% on
Civil cost, P&M & MFA
0.00
7. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
09.61
8. Margin Money for working
capital
0.00
xxxvi
Total 306.49
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 30.98
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
273.71
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
West Bengal
1.80
Total 306.49
What are the shortcomings
I. List of members of SPV and their contribution is not available. II. Lease Agreement of land not clear as it is in local language.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may
consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Gold & Silver
Jewellery Cluster, Nadia.
xxxvii
Agenda No. 30.13 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Rice Mill Cluster, Burdwan, West Bengal
Directorate of MSSE, Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for approval for
setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Burdwan, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Rice Mill Cluster
2. Location Burdwan, West Bengal.
3. Products Rice
4. Age of the cluster Age old.
5. No. of Units 133 units in the SSI Category ( Sadar block)
6. Type of units Medium – 5 and Small - 128
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Burdwan District Rice Mills Cluster Association
8. Recommendation in
the DSR
Creation of testing facility for Rice Bran and other by
products.
Creation of an organized paddy procurement system.
9. Soft Interventions in
the cluster
Soft interventions have been taken up earlier by DIC,
Burdwan.
10. Formation of SPV Burdwan District Rice Mills Cluster Association -
Section 25 company incorporated on 23.02.2009.
11. Employment Not available.
12. Turnover Rs. 800 crore.
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of MSSE, Govt. of West Bengal.
14. Problems of the cluster Poor linkage with R & D Institutions, High unit cost of power, High cost of raw materials, irregular availability
of consumables and stores.
15. Need for CFC The high content of silica to the extent of around 80-
90% in rice husk ash offers it as a potential raw material for production of various value added silica
based products such as Sodium Silicate, Silica gel, precipitated silica etc. As such the availability of
commercially viable technologies for conversion of rice husk ash into silica based value added products
have been explored.
Production of edible variety of Rice bran oil has
gained importance in Burdwan and its adjoining
districts in recent time in view of its health friendly
characteristics. The low level of SFA and high level of
PUFA in edible grade of rice bran oil are the typical
characteristics of rice bran oil. The accurate and fast
production of test results plays an important role in the
valuation of the products.
xxxviii
16. Cost of the
project
Sl. Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land 27.70
2 Site development 38.55
2. Building / Civil construction 115.49
4. Plant & Machinery 537.40
5. Misc. Fixed Assets 150.15
6. Contingencies 17.19
7. Preliminary & Pre Operative Expenses
59.80
8. Margin Money for working capital
1.70
Total 947.98
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10 94.80
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
54 536.37
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of West Bengal
36 316.81
Total 100 947.98
What are the shortcomings
(i) Land documents not available.
(ii) Contribution from SPV members not available.
(iii) Specification and quotation of the machinery is not available.
(iv) Confirmation from IISC – Bangalore to transfer technology for setting
up of commercial level plant not available.
(v) Name of the process licensor for the technology and chargers for the
licensor not available.
(vi) Project specific account of SPV
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division
recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall
be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC.
xxxix
Agenda No. 30.14 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre for Hosiery Cluster, Sovabazar, Kolkata, West Bengal
Government of West Bengal has submitted a proposal for In-Principle approval for setting
up of CFC in Hosiery Cluster, Kolkata, West Bengal. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Hosiery Cluster
2. Location Sovabazar, Ultadanga, B.T. Road, Kolkata
3. Products Hosiery Fabrics
4. Age of the cluster 119 Yrs.
5. No. of Units 375
6. Type of units Micro & Small & Medium Units
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Yes, The Bengal Hosiery Mfg. Association.
8. Recommendation in the
DSR
Technological Upgradation, quality upgradation,
market development, testing facility
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Completed Awareness Prog,. Exposure Visit,
Workshop on Machinery & Technology etc.
10. Formation of SPV Bengal Hosiery & Knitware Entrepreneurs Association
11. Employment 4185
12. Turnover Rs. 14000 Lakh
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Micro & Small Scale Enterprises,
Government of West Bengal.
14. Problems of the cluster Technology, raw materials, Trg., Marketing, capacity
building.
15. Need for CFC Power generation for emergency use of the CFC, Boiler
for steam generation, water treatment plant, Testing
Lab., Development and trade centre, raw materials and
consumable stores.
xl
What are the shortcomings
I. Land documents not available. II. Project Specific account is not available.
III. List of SPV members and their contribution is not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- The Committee may
consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Hosiery
Cluster, Sovabazar, Kolkata.
16. Cost of the
project
Sl. Particulars Total Cost (Rs. in lakh)
1. Land 152.58
2. Site development
3. Building & other civil
construction
168.83
4. Plant & Machinery 207.26
5. Misc. Fixed Assets (Office
furniture, fixture etc.)
10.00
6. Contingencies @3% on
Civil cost, P&M & MFA
17.45
7. Preliminary & Pre Operative
Expenses
25.00
8. Margin Money for working
capital
10.40
Total 591.52
17. Proposed
Means of
Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs.
in lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10 59.15
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
40 238.59
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
West Bengal
50 293.78
Total 100 591.52
xli
Agenda No.30.15: Soft Interventions in Agarbati Works Cluster of Baruipur, South
24 Parganas
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Agarbati Works Cluster of Baruipur
Location The cluster is predominant at Phooltala, Shakari, Pukur, Ramnagar, Kurali,
Chhayani, Kakgaru, Uttarbhag, Paruldha and Baruipur block of South 24
Parganas.
Products Raw Agarbati Stick (90 percent) and Perfumed Agarbati stick (10 percent)
Technological
details, pollution, etc.
The cluster mostly produces raw (non-perfumed) agarbatti sticks of
bamboo. Bamboos are cut by hand into small and fine sticks. Required bamboo is mostly available in Tirpura. Often, due to flooding supply of
sticks get choaked. The sticks are sorted and sometimes those are also coloured. One important issue is that often there will be need for drying of
sticks.
“Gola Masala” - combination of charcoal powder, powder of jiggat bark
and plywood dust is used for making agarbati. The stick is then sun dried.
At present there are only 2 pulverisers in the entire cluster. A high capacity
common pulveriser along with appropriate sieving machine will help
prepare appropriate quality of pastes.
There is no training organization in the cluster.
Preparation of perfumed sticks goes through three more steps, an area
which is almost absent from the cluster.
Age of cluster 70 years
No. of units a. MSEs: 112
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 112
ii. Small: Nil
(Note: there are 12,500 household units too who are doing job work for
these 112 principal firms)
iii. Women-owned: 11 iv. Owned by SC: 65
v. Owned by ST: 4 vi. Owned by minorities: 6
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers : Rs. 6000 to Rs. 7000 pa and unit owner : Rs. 3 lakh to Rs. 4 lakh pa.
Profiles of
units/category
Principal Firms in the Cluster
Type of Principal
Firms
No. of Micro
Units
Investment in Plant and
Machineries
Turnover (Rs crore)
Employment Generation
Micro A 15 8 to 9 lakhs (per
units)
60 22350
Micro B 20 Not Applicable 34 12925
Micro C 77 Not Applicable 40 14901
Total 112 135 50176
Turnover (per
annum)
Total turnover of the cluster including exports: Rs 135 crores approx.
Export
Employment 50,156
xlii
(direct/indirect)
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
“Baruipur Agarbatti Manufacturers’ Welfare Association”.
Mr. Ashutosh Das, Secretary Mobile no. 09339701415
Main problems
of cluster • Lack of availability of bamboo sticks during rainy seasons and
difficulty in getting two important raw materials – bark of garan and
jiggat
• There is no R&D to replace jiggat as a raw material
• The industry is operating only on 10 percent of the value chain
• Training of labour force is a costly and time consuming affair.
• No laboratory to prepare perfumes or stock perfumes. Impurities in raw
materials lead to less efficient and defective raw stick preparation
• Lack of training in science of perfuming
• Severely restricted to least value added raw sticks and missing out on
growing export, wholesale, retail market of perfumed stick
• No idea of the marketing strategy if they enter into the perfumed stick
business
• Lack of water and fragrance proof packaging
• Lack of pulverisation and appropriate technology for mechanical sieving.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, South 24 Paraganas
Project Cost Total: Rs. 12,20,000
Govt. of India: Rs. 10,00,000
State Govt.: Rs. 93,200
SPV/Stake holders: Rs. 1,26,800
Technical
Agency to
associated and its
expertise
• Cane and Bamboo Technology Centre (CBTC), Guwahati
• Foundation for MSME Clusters (FMC), Kolkata
• Fragrance and Flavor Development centre (FFDC),
Kannauj
• Indian Institute of Packaging (IIP), Kolkata
Outcomes Around 100 units to get benefitted through workshop on
packaging, perfuming, good manufacturing processes and exposure to MSE-CDP and schemes. 100 units to benefit
through training in fragrance preparation, raw material
handling and processing, water proof packaging, etc. Exposure
visit will do capacity building of around 40 firms directly and
the cluster indirectly through spread effect. It will also create
source for appropriate raw material procurement and improve
quality. Technology study and market study will support the
entire cluster.
Some of the expected qualified outcomes are listed as follows.
Sl.
No
.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefite
d
Before
Intervention
s
After
Intervention
s
xliii
i. Total Sales 15 Rs 9 crores Rs 11 crores
ii Increased
productivity
and reduced
cost
25
iii Employment 50,000 55,000
v New product 10
vi Worker
income
Rs 3,000 Rs 5,000 to
Rs 6,000
vii CFC and
waterproof
packaging
All
firms
None Initiated
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.20 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 10.00 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.93 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.27 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
xliv
Agenda No.30.16 Soft Interventions in Brass Metal Cluster in Bali, Goghat, Hooghly
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the Cluster Brass Metal Cluster in Bali, Goghat
Location Spread over four villages, namely, Bali, Kalagachia, Udhayrajpur and
Radhaballavpur on the banks of river ‘Dwarakeswar’ in Bali Gram
Panchayet under Goghat-I Development Block of Hooghly
Products Different sizes of Pitchers (known as Ghora and Ghoti in local
language)
Technological
details, pollution, etc.
Cluster artisans use recycled brass scraps. Pitcher are made with two
or three dies. All these are made of clay obtained from the river nearby. Scrap of brass metal is heated in a furnace. Required quantity
of zinc is added and is heated to a temperature of about 1,050°C. The molten metal is then poured into the die by inverting the crucible.
Pitcher is buffed and polished. The process wastage makes cost of production higher by an amount of
Rs. 4/- per piece. The technical feasibility of replacing clay die with
metal die may be examined. The feasibility of sand casting as in
vogue at Moradabad may also be studied.
Pollution is an issue. No units have chimneys and exhaust fans. The
workers are inhaling smoke and metal fumes. Face, hands, legs and
eyes of workers are exposed to a very high temperature because they
don’t use any protective covers. In the buffing and scraping operations
a lot of black dust and metal particles are spread and are inhaled by workers because they do not use mask for nose and mouth.
Age of cluster 200 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 130
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 130
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC:26
v. Owned by ST: Nil vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner : Workers: Rs 36,000 to Rs 48,000 per annum
Unit Owner: Rs 70,000 to Rs 1.5 lakh
Turnover (per annum)
Total turnover of the cluster including exports: Rs 30 crores
Export Yes
Employment
(direct/ indirect)
Around 600
Presence of
association/ NGO, contact
details
i) Bally-Anchalik Ghora Silpa Samity,
ii) Bally Anchalik Ghoti Silpa Samity iii) Bally Anchalik Mahajan Samity.
Name of the CDE : Mr. Nemai Garai, : 09332159320
Main problems
of cluster • No formally registered strong Association capable of leading the
cluster enterprises
• No networking of enterprises
xlv
• Enterprises are fully dependent upon traders
• Poor quality of raw materials used
• Artisans have no knowledge of making brass ingot from virgin metal.
• Limited market due limited products focused on rural markets,
outdated designs, heavy weight resulting in comparatively higher prices
• No product diversification made till date.
• Lack of brand image.
• No dealers network for marketing except local Mahajans
• No export
• Traditional & obsolete technology leads to high cost of production, low
productivity and low profitability
• Traditional furnace and die are used here having high depreciation
value
• No design development centre or R&D centre to support the cluster
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
, if any
IA, its experience
in cluster development
District Industries Centre, Hooghly
Project Cost Total Budget : Rs. 12,70,000
Government of India Rs. 10,04,000
State Government : Rs. 1,36,000 SPV/Stakeholders : Rs. 1,30,000
Some of the major Technical Agency
to be associated and its expertise
• Industry-Institute Partnership Cell (IIPC) - Jadavpur
University
• National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Kolkata
• West Bengal Consultancy Organisation Ltd. (WEBCON),
• Kolkata )
• National Metal Handicrafts Centre, Moradabad
• Research Testing & Calibration Laboratory (RTCL)
Outcomes 1. 10% of the existing principal firms by way of using 70%
capacity utilization started producing different
decorative items and other value added products.
2. At least 5 New product range of decorative and novelty
items introduced and around 20 firms started producing
those. Profit margin increased by 20 percent and
turnover by at least 10 percent of those 20 firms.
3. A Plan for Raw Material Bank of brass material
prepared
4. Plan for CFC with machinery for lacquering,
electroplating, powder coating and CAD facility for
higher value added product prepared. SPV formed and
registered.
5. A complete report on scope of technical intervention for
xlvi
enhanced productivity and quality is prepared with all
detailing of machines/ tools and methods
6. At least 40 entrepreneurs exposed to oil filed furnace
7. 20 entrepreneurs exposed to Moradabad cluster and
learnt better production techniques, management
practices. They also got ideas on different products that
can be produced in the cluster.
8. 50 young entrepreneurs and unemployed youths in the
cluster had undergone the training on enterprise
management. 10 new enterprises established by new
entrepreneurs and another 10 entrepreneurs went for
expansion generating employment for at least 50 people
9. At least 30 entrepreneurs learnt better scarping, welding,
polishing and buffing techniques. The product quality
improved and waste minimized significantly
10. In the backward linkage section net work of raw material
supplier, coal supplier formed and started supplying raw
material / coal directly to manufacturing units at
competitive price.
11. A network of machine supplier also set up within the
cluster. This network started working in such a fashion
that Mahajan’s control over the supply of raw material
and coal drastically reduced.
12. At least 5 new BDS providers linked with principal
firms for technology up gradation, design development,
productivity enhancement, and skill development.
13. One brochure of cluster products with all details and
profile of entrepreneurs prepared and circulated in
different markets. Cluster website launched and made
use by entrepreneurs
14. A complete study report prepared and potential markets
identified. A road map to target those markets with right
kind of products developed.
Some of the quantified outcomes are listed as follows.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefited
Before
Interventi
ons
After Interventions
Improved
capacity
utilization
10% of
the
existing
principal
firms
Quite
Low
Improved utilization
to 70% by producing
value added products.
i. Total Sales/
Turnover
20 firms Base 5 New product
introduced. Profit
xlvii
increased by 20%
and turnover by 10%
Quality 30 units Very low Better scarping,
welding, polishing
and buffing
techniques. Product
quality improved and
waste minimized
ii BDSP All units Very few At least 5 new BDS
providers linked with
principal firms for
technology up
gradation, etc.
iii New units/
Employment
generation
50 units
benefitte
d. 10
units
newly
establish
ed and
10
existing
one went
for
expansio
n.
Generated
employment to
50 people
- 50 young
entrepreneurs and
unemployed youths
in the cluster had
undergone the
training on enterprise
management. 10 new
enterprises
established by new
entrepreneurs and
another 10
entrepreneurs went
for expansion
generating
employment for at
least 50 people
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.70 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 10.04 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.36 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.30 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
xlviii
Agenda No. 30.17 Soft Interventions in Clay Doll and Terracotta Cluster of Ghurni,
Nadia
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Clay Doll and Terracotta Cluster, Ghurni
Location Spread over Sastitala, Natun Bazar, Palpara, Anandamayeetala, Halder
Para, Bagdipara, Sandhyapara, Nedeirpara, Bhatjagla, Gate Road of
Krishnanagar Municipality ward no. 1, 2, 3, & 4 and its adjacent villages of
Krishnanagar –1 Development Block of Nadia
Products Dolls, handmade human figure, portrait of Gods and Goddesses, fruits
vegetables, animals, flower pots, flower vases, pitchers, cut-work lamps,
water pots, musical instruments, terracotta jewelry, murals.
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
After breaking clay lumps manually and kneading, it is allowed to soak with water and then further kneaded. The process is repeated for a few days
and the mass is converted in to plastic form. The articles are then shaped by
throwing process on the potter’s wheel.
Once the green products are ready those go for firing. The current practice
is using of potter’s kiln – clamp firing. Articles are loaded in heaps which
arrests the entry of adequate air supply.
Various new forms of firing techniques are in practice. These include up-
draft kiln, down draft kiln, roller kiln, tunnel kiln, etc. Various fuels like
furnace oil, diesel, kerosene, gas, etc. However it is felt that shuttle kiln (a combination of up-draught and or down-draught kiln) along with
appropriate kiln furniture is an appropriate solution to various problems of
potters being faced at present.
Age of cluster 300 years old.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 675
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i) Micro: 675 ii) Small: Nil iii) Women-owned: These are all
household units. iv) Owned by SC: Nil v) Owned by ST: Nil vi) Owned by minorities:
Negligible c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Worker (Both men and women) Rs. 14,500-20,000 per annum Unit owner : Annual earnings is estimated at Rs 20,000, Rs 2.5 lakh and Rs 3
lakh for Micro-C, Micro-B and Micro-A respectively.
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs 20 crores
Export Yes, but negligible
Employment (direct/ indirect)
2800
Presence of association/
NGO, contact details
There is no empowered association in the cluster. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been trained in CDP.
Name of CDE : Mr. Paran Sakar Mobile no. : 09733758160
Main problems of cluster
Lack of appropriate packaging, technology (firing, colouring, raw material processing), skill of new artisan entrants, market identification and export
xlix
linkage, new product technique, process time, firing related pollution,
processing space, limited market outlet, lack of geographical identification,
high costing in processing, linkage with technical institutions, etc.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its experience in
cluster development
District Industries Centre, Nadia
Project Cost Total : Rs. 11,95,000 Government of India: Rs. 9,09,000
State Government: Rs. 1,39,000 SPV/ stakeholders :Rs. 1,47,000
Some of the Technical
Agencies to be associated
and its expertise
• Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CGCRI), Kolkata
• Indian Institute of Packaging (IIP), Kolkata
• Sutra Handicrafts Private Limited, Kolkata
• Visva Bharti University, Shantiniketan , Birbhum, West Bengal
Outcomes Around 100 units to get benefitted through introduction to modern techniques, packaging system, marketing channel, awareness of CDP
and schemes. Visit to clusters will enhance knowledge of 20 firms
directly and the cluster indirectly through sharing of experiences.
Training in design development and CAD, packaging, marketing,
firing, colouring, clay treatment and participation in international
fairs will do capacity building of around 200 firms. Technology study
will support the entire cluster.
Apart from these, some of the quantified expected outcomes are
mentioned as below.
Particulars MSEs
benefited
Before After Interventions
Total Sales Cluster Rs 20 cr Rs 24 crores
Export
linkage
10 to 20 None Export linkage created
Packaging system
675 Archaic Gift packaging introduced. Long distance packaging to
reduce breakage by 5%
GI
registration
675 None Established
SPV
formation
675 Nil 1
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.95 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.09 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.39 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.47 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
l
Agenda No.30.18 Soft Interventions in Earthen Pottery Cluster of Chaltaberia, North 24
Parganas
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Earthen Pottery Cluster of Chaltaberia
Location The cluster is situated at a distance of about 5-8 kms. from the Barasat-I
Development Block and 12-15 kms. from DIC North 24 Paraganas, Barasat (Dist.
H.Q.) and 30 kms. from Kolkata in the state of West Bengal.
Products Decorative Diyas, Idols of Gods & Goddess, Traditional Pottery Items like Pitcher,
Jar, Dish, Glass, Trays, Well Rings, Fancy Decorative Showpiece and Gift Items.
Technological details,
pollution, etc.
After breaking clay lumps manually and kneading, it is allowed to soak with water and then further kneaded. The process is repeated for a few days and the
mass is converted in to plastic form. The articles are then shaped by throwing process on the potter’s wheel.
Once the green products are ready those go for firing. The current practice is using of potter’s kiln – clamp firing. Articles are loaded in heaps which arrests
the entry of adequate air supply.
Various new forms of firing techniques are in practice. These include up-draft kiln,
down draft kiln, roller kiln, tunnel kiln, etc. Various fuels like furnace oil, diesel,
kerosene, gas, etc. However it is felt that shuttle kiln (a combination of up-draught
and or down-draught kiln) along with appropriate kiln furniture is an appropriate
solution to various problems of potters being faced at present.
Age of cluster The cluster is 40 years old.
No. of units Total no. units: 250
No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 250
ii. Small: 0
iii. Women-owned: All these units are household units.
iv. Owned by SC: 12
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: 12 Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner : Man worker : Rs.
14,400 to Rs. 18,000 per annum, Woman worker : Rs. 12,000 to 14,400 per annum Unit owner : Mostly Rs 40000; in few cases Rs 3 lakh to Rs 4 lakh and in 5 cases it
is Rs 8 lakh to Rs 10 lakh per annum
Turnover (per annum)
Rs 7.5 crores
Export No direct export
Employment 915 (Direct)
Presence of association/
NGO, contact details
There is no association in the cluster. However, there is plan for creation of requisite consortium/SPV. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been
trained in CDP. Name of the CDE : Mr. Arindam Biswas
Mobile no. : 09433376289
Main
problems of cluster
The major problem areas are with respect to lack of appropriate packaging,
technology (firing, colouring, raw material processing), market identification and linkage, product diversification, firing related pollution, availability of raw
material, high costing in processing, absence of professional business enterprise practices, linkage with technical institutions, etc.
li
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its
experience
DIC, North 24 Paraganas
Project
Cost
Total: Rs. 12,45,000
Government of India: Rs. 9,65,000
State Government: Rs. 1,43,000
SPV/Private Partners: Rs. 1,37,000
Some of
the Technical
Agency to associated
and its expertise
• Sutra Handicrafts Private Limited, Kolkata
• Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CGCRI),
Kolkata
• Indian Institute of Packaging (IIP), Kolkata
• Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business
Management (IISWBM) – Kolkata
• Visva Bharti University, Shantiniketan Birbhum,
Outcomes Around 75 to 100 units to get benefitted through introduction to modern techniques, packaging system, marketing channel,
awareness of CDP and schemes. Visit to clusters will enhance knowledge of 10 firms directly and the cluster indirectly through
sharing of experiences. Training in design development and CAD, packaging, marketing, finance and participation in national fairs
will do capacity building of around 80 to 100 firms. Training in
technology issues will also help around 40 to 80 firms.
Technology study and market study will support the entire cluster.
Some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of MSEs
benefited
Before
Interve
ntions
After
Interventions
i. Total Sales 20 Rs 7.5
crores
10 per cent for
at least 20
firms
ii Market
Channels
20 Limited 3 more
iii Packaging
system
250 Archaic Gift packaging
and Long
distance
packaging
iv Value added
products
100 Limited Some
v Employmen
t generation
50 to100 915 960
vi SPV
formation
250 Nil 1
vii CFC 250 None Initiated
viii Systematized business
units
30 5 35
lii
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.45 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.65 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.43 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.37 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
liii
Agenda No. 30.19: Soft Interventions in Fireworks Cluster of Baruipur
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Baruipur Fireworks Cluster
Location The cluster comprises of Champahati, Haral, Chinagram, Naridana etc under
Baruipur Development Block of South 24 Paraganas District, West Bengal
Products 1) Light Based products, like- Ground Chakkars, Flower Pots, Spearklers
Search light
etc. (70 percent of the total turnover of the cluster)
2) Sound Based products like- Rockets, Shell, Crackers etc.(30 percent of the
total turnover of the cluster)
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
Most of people artisans are making low cost sound emitting fire-works but due to serious stipulation of Govt. parameters it loses its market and more
than 70% of the supply to the demand of West Bengal is being catered presently by the manufacturer of Shivakashi, Tamilnadu. Though they
gradually shifted from sound emitting crackers to light crackers, but still the
quality and type is not in commensurate with the market demand.
The characteristic of the different raw-materials for Gun Powder is such that
individually these raw materials carry no hazards or risks, but after mixing, it
is inflammable and perilous in nature. As per ‘Explosive Act’, a magazine
house should be built by keeping certain barrier or gap with the other sections
of the unit.
Mechanization of different terminal process is necessary in a modern fireworks cluster.
Pollution is a major issue in the cluster.
Age of cluster More than 50 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 4000
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 4000
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 3200 v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: Nil c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Man worker : Rs 22,000 pa, Woman worker: Rs 16,000 pa Unit owner : Rs 45,000-Rs 60,000 pa
Turnover (per annum)
Rs. 42.50 crores
Export Yes
Employment
(direct/ indirect)
25,175
Presence of
association/ NGO, contact
details
There is one association but it is dormant. However, there is plan for
creation of requisite consortium/SPV. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been trained in CDP.
Name of the CDE : Mr. Kaushik Majumdar Mobile no. : 09330962152
Main problems of cluster
1. Backwardness in Technology: Traditional process of manufacturing is used which makes the unit less competitive in regional/ national and
liv
international market.
2. Old and limited product range: In spite of changing demand, they are
continuing the old product produced in traditional way.
3. Infrastructure: Lack of adequate environmental friendly infrastructural
and high uncertainties in government regulation.
4. Product Quality: Lack of product quality awareness.
5. Poor packaging: Poor packaging methods.
6. Literacy: Lack of business sense and financial literacy.
7. Technical Institutes and BDS: No. existence of technical training
institute and specialized services on technology, marketing, etc.
Health Hazards: Lack of awareness about health hazards.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its experience
District Industries Centre, South 24 Paraganas
Project Cost Total Budget : Rs. 11,40,000 Govt. of India : Rs. 9,01,000
State Government : Rs.1,09,000 SPV/Stakeholders :Rs.1,30,000
Technical Agency to be
associated
and its
expertise
• Foundation for MSME Clusters (FMC), Kolkata
• Indian Institute of Packaging (IIP), Kolkata
• Centre for Quality Management System, Jadavpur
University, Kolkata
• Industry-Institute Partnership Cell (IIPC) - Jadavpur
University
Outcomes • One SPV formed and registered for CFC. DPR for CFC
prepared and work initiated towards the end of 18 months.
• 100 entrepreneurs sensitized to pollution control and safety measures. At least 50 out of them started practicing those in
their units and therefore pollution and health problems
minimized and safety assured in work place.
• At least 5 new products identified and units started manufacturing those, leading to increasing returns and improved
market shares.
• Skill of 160 workers upgraded.
• Product catalogue and entrepreneurs brief profile prepared and shared with traders in national and international markets.
• 40 units benefitted through creation of new market linkages in
national market. Profitability increased by 2 percent and
turnover increased by 10 to 15 percent.
• At least 40 entrepreneurs adopted advanced production methods
and went for capacity expansion to the extent of 5 to 10 percent
and created employment opportunity for at least 100
unemployed youths.
• 20 new units established giving employment to around 100 people.
• A directory of BDSPs prepared and shared with units for sustainable market promotion.
Some of the expected quantified outcomes are listed below.
SN Particulars No. of MSEs Before After Interventions
lv
benefited Interventio
ns
i. Total Sales/
profitability
/ Turnover
40 units 10 market linkages
developed in national
market. Profitability
increased by 2 percent and
turnover increased by 10 to 15 percent.
Ii Packaging system
20 percent firms
Almost not in use
New packaging system
iii New range
of products
20 units
Limited
range
At least 5 new products
iv Skill 160 Low to
average
Better production
techniques adopted
v New units
and
Employment generation
40 units
through
expansion and 20 units
newly created
- 40 units adopted advanced
production methods and
went for capacity expansion to the extent of
5 to 10 percent and created employment opportunity
for at least 100 unemployed youths.
20 new units established giving employment to
around 100 people.
vi SPV
formation
All (Direct
and indirect)
- SPV formed or CFC
vii CFC All (Direct
and indirect)
- Plan for CFC prepared and
work initiated
viii Pollution
control and health
hazards
100
entrepreneurs
Highly
affected
100 entrepreneurs
sensitized to pollution control. At least 50 started
practicing & therefore
pollution problems
minimized.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.40 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.01 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.09 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.30 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lvi
Agenda No. 30.20: Soft Interventions in Gems and Jewellery cluster of Domjur, Howrah
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Domjur Gems and Jewellery cluster
Location The cluster is predominant within a radius of 15-20 kms. of Domjur in district
Howrah of West Bengal.
Products a) Gem studded gold ornaments b) Gold chain
c) Gold ball
Technological
details, pollution, etc.
For improving quality, productivity and marketing the product cost effectively
and more competitively, up-gradation of technology and quality control system (Hall Marking) is necessary for the cluster. Newer manufacturing techniques
like investment casting, holloware, chain making and stamping have developed to manufacture different shapes. Even traditional activities like wire drawing,
die making and cutting have become increasingly sophisticated and
mechanized.
Pollution angle: Some firing related pollution are prevalent in the cluster
Age of cluster 100 years old.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 3010
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 3010
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 150 to 300
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average income of men/women of workers/unit owner : Worker: Rs 54,000
to Rs 72,000 per annum
Unit owner : Rs. 2.4 lakh to Rs 6 lakh per annum
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs 1250 crores
Export -
Employment
(direct/
indirect)
Total employment: 24000
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
Name of the association is “Domjur Swarna Roupya Shilpi Samity”
Mr. Tarun Ghosh, Jt. Secretary (09830440900)
Sk. Nasir Uddin,Jt. Secretary (09836254859)
Mr. Sasthi Charan Dab, President (09830167584)
Mr. Biswanath Mukherjee, Vice President (09051720920)
Main problems
of cluster
The major problem areas are with respect to low productivity, low level of
entrepreneurial skills, limited market exposure and marketing channels, high requirement of working capital, age old technology in several operations
leading to lowered quality, health issues related to work environment, etc.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comment
s
lvii
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, Howrah Should be
WBEPS
Project
Cost
Total: Rs. 12,70,000
Government Of India: Rs. 9,96,000
State Government: Rs. 1,23,000
SPV/Stakeholders: Rs. 1,51,000
Technical Agency to
be associated
and its
expertise
• Centre for Quality Management System, Jadavpur University
• Enterprise Development Institute: Kolkata
• Institute of Gemological Research (IGR-Gem Testing Lab),
Kolkata
• National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Kolkata
• Sindhar Institute of Gemology (SINGEM), Kolkata
Outcomes Around 100 units to get benefitted through introduction to best manufacturing practices in various techniques including casting,
polishing, engraving, hall marking, etc., units to get benefitted through awareness of CDP and schemes. Visit to clusters and
participation in fairs will enhance knowledge and business linkage of
10 firms directly and the cluster indirectly through sharing of
experiences. Training in design development and CAD, IT,
marketing, exposure to new machinery, etc. will do capacity building of around 500 firms. Market and technology study will support the
entire cluster.
Some of the quantified outcomes are listed as follows.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefited
Before
Intervention
s
After
Intervention
s
i. Total Sales Cluster Rs 20 crores Rs 2 crores
Ii Market
Channel
15 2 to 3 15
Iii Improved
working condition
50
V Entrepreneurial skills
50 None Enhanced
Vi Productivity
enhanced
250 units None Cost
reduction
Vii Usage of gas
burner
50 Pollution
reduced
Vii
i
CFC and
productive
association
200 None Initiated
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.70 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.96 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.23 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.51 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lviii
Agenda No.30.21: Soft Interventions in Beekeeping, Honey Extracting and Processing
Cluster of Darjeeling
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of
Cluster
Beekeeping, Honey Extracting and Processing Cluster of Darjeeling
Location The cluster units are in villages of 10 Gram Panchayat under Phulbazar
Block in Darjeeling District of West Bengal
Products Raw honey
Technological details,
pollution, etc.
Traditional methods of tree trunk are still in practice in many household units in remote villages. Moreover, the units which are having modern bee
boxes are not using quality bee boxes with quality standard marks like ISI Moreover, these low quality boxes do not generate sufficient temperature
that can give optimum output. Local made bee box is heavy and its longevity is 5 years. Longevity of a
foundation sheet is on an average of 2 years.
Good quality bee boxes; advanced methods of beekeeping and honey
extraction and processing and use of good quality readily available hives
are the major pressure points for intervention in the cluster. Training can be
organized to aware the bee keepers about the present technology for
collecting pollen, royal jelly, propolish etc. Favourable climate of
Darjeeling Hill & presence of rich flora & fauna, there exist a huge
potential of growth through modern methods.
Stakeholders in the area use normal bottles for packaging honey.
Age of cluster More than 60 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 186
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 186
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: 10
iv. Owned by SC: 12
v. Owned by ST: 84 vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner : All are family based units, Unit owner’s income is Rs 1 lakh to Rs 2 lakh.
Profiles of units/category
There are around 186 household units in the cluster spread over 10 Gram Panchayat under Phulbazar Block having major concentration of
beekeepers. Around 80 units are owned by people from Other Backward Caste (OBC), 84 units by people from Scheduled Tribe (ST), 12 by
Scheduled Caste (SC) people. 10 units are owned by women. On an average per unit investment in plant and machineries is Rs 5000-10,000.
Turnover (per annum)
Total turnover of the cluster including exports: Rs. 2.37 crores
Export Nil
Employment
(direct/indirect)
Total employment: 250 (Direct employment)
Presence of
association/ NGO, contact
details
There are two associations in the cluster. There is plan for creation of
requisite consortium/SPV.
Main problems 1. Largely following traditional method of beekeeping and honey
lix
of cluster processing and thereby getting low yields.
2. Lack of skill and knowledge on advanced methods of Beekeeping and
honey processing. Moreover there is no training institution near by the
cluster who can impart such skills.
3. Lack of knowledge on proper health and nutritional requirement of
honeybee
4. Lack of testing and refining facility for raw honey
5. No value added product available/ experimented as yet.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster
Division
IA, its experience
District Industries Centre, Darjeeling
Project Cost Total: Rs Rs.11,70,000 Government of India: Rs. 9,35,000
State Government: Rs.1,13,000
SPV/Stakeholders: Rs. 1,22,000
Technical
Agency to
associated and
its expertise
• Central Bee Research and Training Institute (CBRTI), Khadi and Village Industries Commission, Pune
• Foundation for MSME Clusters (FMC): Kolkata
• Indian Institute of Packaging (IIP), Kolkata
Outcomes • One SPV formed and registered for CFC for testing,
refining, bottling and processing facilities. A detailed project report for the CFC is ready.
• 50 entrepreneurs learnt scientific Bee keeping methods to get better quality of honey and higher yield. They also
learnt bee health management practices.
• 120 Entrepreneurs learnt scientific and attractive bottling
and packaging methods. They also learn different attractive way of bottling for tourist market and out of
them at least 30 entrepreneurs started doing the same.
• 120 entrepreneurs acquired marketing skill.
• 20 entrepreneurs exposed to best beekeeping and honey
processing practices. They also got an idea on different
value added products.
• 20 entrepreneurs through the platform of association participated in 2 identified trade fairs in the country and
got a good return. They established direct linkages with the potentials buyers/ traders. Moreover they learnt the
market preferences and the type of fast moving value
added honey market in high end market.
• A thorough study is done with clear picture on potential markets and market preferences. Potential retail chains
are also identified. A strategy road map prepared to enter
into those potential markets and link the retail chain to the
cluster.
• At least 5 new linkages established with big retail chains
in national market benefitting to at least 20 units.
• At least 5 new value added products introduced and more
lx
than 10 units started preparing that.
• Beekeeping was promoted as a part of tourist attraction in the area. New products and packages that can give a
souvenir feeling of Darjeeling was introduced and
popularised.
• A detailed study report is prepared on advanced methods
of beekeeping and the technology and equipments
required for the same to improve the quality and
productivity of honey. Also a list of machines required for testing, grading, R&D on blending and processing
techniques is prepared with all detailing
• 10 new units started in the cluster.
Some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefite
d
Before
Intervention
s
After
Interventions
i Total
Sales
ii Market
Channels
20 units No retail
chain
linkage with
national
buyers
5 new linkages
developed
iii Value
added
products
10 units No value
added
products
5 new value
added products
introduced
iv Scientific
Bee
keeping
50 units Very Low Scientific
methods
adopted
v Employm
ent
generation
186 250 275
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.70 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 9.35 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.13 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.22 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxi
Agenda No.30.22 Soft Interventions in Imitation Ornaments Cluster of Domjur, Howrah
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Imitation Ornaments Cluster of Domjur
Location Parbatipur, Uttar Jhapordah, Daskhin Jhapardah, Makardah-II, Narna, Begri and
proper Domjur Village area in Domjur, Howrah. Area of cluster is around 10 sq
km.
Products Aluminium bangles and earrings of around 75 different colours.
Technological
details, pollution,
etc.
The technology adopted in the cluster is traditional, yielding low returns. Being
an unorganized sector no formal R&D is being done to upgrade the process of
production. The technology used involves usage of machinery like designing machine, anodising machine etc.
There are few units engaged in anodising. These units are highly polluting and do not follow the environmental rules.
The heat treatment process is done in heat treatment chambers that are obsolete and therefore, modern methodology needs to be introduced in the cluster.
Few units that are engaged in colouring. The technology used is the traditional method of using hand held devices for spray painting.
The aesthetic designs, colour combinations that are produced with etched, engraved and electroplated techniques are able to command higher price.
Pollution angle: Yes but minimal
Age of cluster Around 60 years.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 1100 b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 1100
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 220
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner:
Man worker: Rs 38,400 to Rs 48,000 per annum
Woman worker: Rs 28,800 to Rs 38,400 per annum
Unit owner’s income is around Rs 60,000 to Rs 1,00,000 per annum
Turnover (per
annum)
Total turnover of the cluster including exports: Rs 92.6 crores
Export Yes, but not very significant
Employment
(direct/ indirect)
8000
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
There is no association in the cluster. However, there is plan for creation of
requisite consortium/SPV. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been
trained in CDP.
Name of the CDE : Mr. Haripada Das, Mobile no. : 09830282904
Main problems
of cluster • Human Resource: The artisans are not aware of the modern designs that are
currently in demand.
• Raw Materials: All the units purchase raw materials from local market,
where the price is not very competitive. Moreover, there is no testing
lxii
laboratory in this area to test the quality of the raw material procured.
• Marketing: Market linkages are weak and the cluster cater to only local
market. Huge potential exist in tapping new markets both spatially as well
as age and sex wise through various retail outlets.
• Production process: Production process is not scientific. All the
machineries used are age old and the methodology of production adopted is
also traditional. There are separate welding and anodizing units in the
cluster that does not comply with the environmental rules as per guideline
of pollution control board.
• Salary and Wages: Most of the workers are contractual workers and the
wages are low, Rs 800-1000 per week. This leads to migration of workers from the cluster to other states like Hyderabad, Gujarat and Mumbai. Both
education and skill level of the workers are low. They also have limited knowledge on modern design
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its experience
District Industries Centre, Howrah
Project Cost Total Budget : Rs. 12,00,000 Government of India : Rs. 9,52,000
State Government: Rs 1,10,000 SPV/Private Partners: Rs 1,38,000
Some of the
Technical
Agencies to
be associated
and its expertise
• Centre for Quality Management System, Jadavpur University
• Enterprise Development Institute, Kolkata
• Institute of Gemological Research (IGR-Gem Testing Lab):
National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT):Kolkata
• Sindhar Institute of Gemology (SINGEM), Kolkata
Outcomes • Introduction of 10 new value-added costume ornaments.
• Profitability of 10 units manufacturing these products increased by 30 percent and turnover by at least 5 percent.
• 5 new designs of national and international standard developed and at least 5 new linkages established.
• 100 entrepreneurs learn techniques of better engraving, polishing
and cutting methods to produce better finished product and reduce
wastage.
• Value realization of their product increased by at least 10 percent and wastage reduced by 20 percent.
• 100 entrepreneurs exposed to advanced machines. 10 firms went for better technology and capacity expansion by at least 30 percent.
• 50 entrepreneurs acquired better managerial skills on managing business, better marketing practices, office management and record
keeping and handling clients in a more professional way. They also learnt creating brand for the products and positioning in right
markets.
• 60 units learn the right anodizing practice to reduce the
environment related risk. Posters, audio-visual tools developed and
lxiii
made available to continue the same training in other units in the
cluster.
• 50 entrepreneurs trained on better designs/ product by using CAD.
At least 20 of them started making new designs using CAD and
earned better margins for the products.
• 50 entrepreneurs learn basic skill of computer and online marketing
and at least 10 of them started advertising their products in different
portals
• One brochure of cluster products with all details and profile of
entrepreneurs prepared and circulated in different markets. Cluster website launched and made use by entrepreneurs
• A detailed study report is prepared on advanced machines for processing for improved quality and productivity. Also a list of
machines required for testing with all detailing for the CFC
prepared and submitted for funding.
• A mini raw material bank started functioning.
Some of the expected quantified outcomes are listed below.
Sl. No.
Particulars No. of MSEs
benefited
Before Interventions
After Interventions
i. Total
Sales
10 units-
profitability
Profitability increased by
30% and turnover by at least 5 %. Value
realization of the products
increased by at least 10
percent and wastage
reduced by 20%.
ii Market
Channels
20 units Limited 5 new designs of national
and international standard
developed and at least 5
new linkages established.
iii Better
production
technique/
skill
100
entrepreneur
s
Low quality
and high
wastage
Better engraving,
polishing and cutting
methods to produce better
finished product and
reduce wastage.
iv Value added
products
At least 20 units
Limited and traditional
10 new value added costume ornaments
v Design/
Skill and marketing
50 units Entrepreneurs trained on
better designs/ product by using CAD.
vi Technolog
y and capacity
expansion
100 units Obsolete
technology
Exposure to advanced
machines. 10 firms went for better technology and
capacity expansion by at
least 30 percent.
vii Pollution 60 units - units learn the right
lxiv
anodizing practice to
reduce the environment
related risk. Posters,
audio-visual tools
developed and made
available to continue the
same training in other
units in the cluster.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.00 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 9.52 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.10 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.38 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxv
Agenda No.30.23 Soft Interventions in Shoe and Chappal Making Cluster of Digha-
Daspara-Chotojagulia
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Shoe and Chappal Making Cluster of Digha-Daspara-Chotojagulia
Location The cluster is situated at 8 kms. from Barasat, the district head quarter of North
24 paraganas under Barasat-1 development block; 25 kms. from Kolkata and
20 kms. from Kolkata airport. It includes the village Digha Daspara partly
Chotojagulia and Sikdespukuria of West Bengal.
Products • Ladies chappals both leather and non leather
• Gents chappals both leather and non leather
• Baby shoe
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
A quality footwear manufacturing sector requires modern stitching machine (flat bed & cylinder bed), cutting, clicking, skiving and roughing machine
and compressor for sole pressing. On the contrary, local footwear manufactures in Digha Daspara use flat bed stitching machine only.
Roughing and many other operations, which could easily be done with
machines, are done by hand.
Pollution angle: There is no pollution related major problem in the cluster.
Age of cluster Near about 60 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 300 b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 300
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 120
v. Owned by ST: 60
vi. Owned by minorities: 120
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Man worker: Rs 42,000 per annum.
Unit owner’s income is around Rs 1,14,000- Rs 3,60,000 per annum
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs 28 crores
Export No direct export
Employment
(direct/ indirect)
2200 (Direct and indirect)
Presence of
association/ NGO, contact details
No association
Main problems of cluster
• The units generally use old and traditional method of production. No
modern machineries have been used in the cluster. Only stitching
machine and basic hand tools are used to make products here.
• Major raw materials are coming from Delhi through chain of middlemen. There is no direct link with the raw materials suppliers.
• Lack of education and entrepreneur skill of the unit owners.
• Lack of institutional /BDS linkages and no facilities of skill up gradation
2. Analysis of the Proposal
lxvi
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, North 24 Paraganas
Project Cost a) Total Budget- Rs. 11,55,000
b) Government of India-. Rs. 9,57,000
c) State Government – Rs. 75,000 d) SPV/ Stakeholders- Rs. 1,23,000
Technical
Agency to be associated
and its expertise
• Footwear Design & Development Institute (FDDI), Kolkata
• Government College of Engineering and Leather Technology
(GCELT) - Govt of West Bengal, Kolkata
Outcomes • One SPV formed and registered for CFC. DPR for CFC prepared
and work initiated
• At least 20 firms started using advanced tools and machineries for
better production.
• 5 new products/ designs developed with the help of design expert
and later on entrepreneurs develop another 5 new designs on their own. .
• At least 10 firms started producing diversified products and therefore their turnover increased by at least 5 percent.
• 5 new market linkages established and 20 firms got benefitted
through the direct linkage with high end traders/ retail chains.
• 50 entrepreneurs learnt advanced methods of product designing,
pattern making. Value realization of their products increased by 10
percent. Some of the quantified outcomes are listed as follows.
Sl. No.
Particulars No. of MSEs
benefited
Before Interventio
ns
After Interventions
i. Total Sales/
Turnover
10 firms Diversified products.
Turnover increased by at least 5 percent.
ii Market Channels
20 units got benefitted
Limited 5 new market linkages established
iii Advanced technology
20 firms started using
Very low Advanced tools and machineries for better
production introduced and units started using
those.
iv New
Products/ Designs
20 units Limitted
product/ design
range
5 new products/ designs
developed with the help of expert and firms also
developed another 5 designs/ products on
their own
Skill
development
50
entrepreneur
s
Learnt advanced
methods of product
designing, pattern
making. Value
lxvii
realization of their
products increased by
10%.
v Employment
generation
- 2200 2700
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.55 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.57 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.75 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.23 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxviii
Agenda No.30.24: Soft Interventions in Shoe making Cluster of Janbazar, Kolkata
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the Cluster Shoe making cluster of Janbazar
Location Janbazar, Central Kolkata in West Bengal
Products Close type shoes; formal and sports shoes popularly known as Jackson,
Doctors sam, Darbi shoes. etc.
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
Processes like cutting, stitching, forma setting, lining, sole pasting, polishing etc. all are done under one roof for shoe making. Most of the units are using
basic hand tools like hammer, ‘batali’ etc. Stitching machine is not available with majority of the units. The quality of stitching is also not appreciable.
Modern machines like skiving, roughening, sole press, clicking, pasting, folding, etc. are also not available in the cluster. Use of kerosene stove in lieu
of heat chamber for sole pasting typically delineates the status of technology absorption in the cluster.
Age of cluster This shoe making cluster has evolved over a period of 100 years.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 120
b. No. of enterprises of each category i. Micro: 120
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 120
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Man worker : Rs 18,000 to Rs 22,000 per annum
Unit owner’s income is around Rs 90,000 to Rs 1,20,000 per annum
Turnover (per
annum)
Around Rs 16 crore
Export No direct export
Employment
(direct/ indirect)
1200
Presence of
association/ NGO,
contact details
There is one association in the cluster called Janbazar Leather Artisans
Industrial Cooperative Society (JLAICS). Name and contact of the president
of this association is as follows.
Name of the CDE : Mr. Munnilal Prasad
Mobile no. : 09748413210
Main problems of
cluster
Technology: The units have adopted old and traditional methods of
production. The penetration of latest technology and machinery is bare minimal. There is no modern machinery employed in this cluster. Only a few,
about 6-7 in numbers, stitching machines and 2 skiving machines are available
in the cluster.
No Direct Market Linkage: The cluster units have no direct linkage with the
market or consumer. They only supply to the middleman or traders operating
in the market. Therefore, understanding of the customer’s requirements and
their changing tastes and preference is not percolated at the manufacturer’s
level.
Demand Pattern: Shoe is a necessary consumer product and the consumption
lxix
is primarily linked to population size. However, the cluster units experience
demand fluctuations due to (i) no direct linkage with the market and
dependency on middleman/traders, (ii) shortage of working capital and (iii)
products emanating from this cluster is mainly targeted towards low-income,
price-sensitive customers and this type of customers are found to postpone
their purchase decision till the festive seasons.
Support Institution / BDS: Though Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI),
Government College of Engineering & Leather Technology (GCELT) is
located within the same city but the cluster has no linkage with these
institutions/colleges. Similarly the expertise available with the Central
Footwear Training Centre (CFTC), Budge Budge is not being utilized by the
cluster members. Moreover, the CFC run by the former Leather Development Corporation of
the Govt. of WB and the marketing outfit called Chrmaja are no longer in existence.
Thus one can argue that that the linkage with support Institutions is limited. Application of Innovative raw material:
Different variety of raw materials and consumables are generally sourced from Agra. A little initiative from units and R&D institutions in Kolkata could help
in developing new varieties of raw materials and consumables locally.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
by Cluster
Division
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, Kolkata
Project Cost 1. Total Budget- Rs. 10,15,000
2. Government of India-. Rs. 8,13,000
3. State Government – Rs. 91,000
4. SPV/Stakeholders - Rs. 1,11,000
Technical
Agencies to
be associated
• Footwear Design & Development Institute (FDDI), Kolkata
• Government College of Engineering and Leather Technology (GCELT) - Govt of West Bengal
Outcomes Firm / Enterprise level : Introduction of Advance Machinery
• Stitching – 20 Nos
• Skiving – 5 Nos
• Sole Attaching – 2 Nos
• Heat setting conveyor – 2 Nos
• Improvement in turnover both unit and cluster level- it has
the potential to reach Rs. 20 crore.
• Bank finance – Credit linkages will be established and credit
facilities availed.
• Skill level of household entrepreneurs improved leading to
an increase in product profitability by at least 20 percent and
overall turnover by at least 10 percent.
• At least 5 new market linkages developed with the high end
buyers and linked with 25 units.
lxx
Cluster Level Out put
• Capacity building of the association leading to making them pro-
active.
• Improved competitiveness of the cluster actors.
• Skilled workforce utilizing their full capacity.
• CFC for advanced technology planned and work initiated
• Market potential explored in national and international market and
road map to target those prepared.
Some of the expected quantified outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs benefited
Before
Interventions
After Interventions
i. Turnover - Rs 16 crores Rs. 20 crore
ii Market
Channels
25 units Limited At least 5 new market
linkages with 25 units.
iii Technology 30 units Low
mechanizati
on/ inferior
technology
Introduction of Advance
Machinery.
Stitching – 20 Nos
Skiving – 5 Nos
Sole Attaching – 2 Nos
Heat setting conveyor – 2
Nos
iv Skill 40 units Low to
average skill
of many
entrepreneur
s
Skill level of household
entrepreneurs improved
leading to an increase in
product profitability by at
least 20 percent and
overall turnover by at least 10 percent.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 10.15 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 8.13 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.91 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.11 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxi
Agenda No. 30.25: Soft Interventions in Optical Lens Grinding Cluster of Munsirhat
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Optical Lens Grinding Cluster, Munsirhat
Location Villages of Shankarhati, Naikulli, Narendrapur, Dhasa, Kharda-Bramhanpara,
Chaksahadat and Bardhipa, spread over an area of 4 sq kms
Products Cylindrical and spherical optical lenses made up of glass
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
In optical lens, the lens material, which traditionally used to be glass, has gradually moved into high quality plastics. Apart from glass, the various types of
lens material used are high index glass, plastic lens (PMMA &CR39), poly carbonate and high index plastic.
Average productivity of a labour is around 15 pairs of lens per day. For this the machinery used are of archaic nature.
Age of cluster 40 years old.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 355
b. No. of enterprises of each category i. Micro: 355
ii. Small: 0
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: Nil
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities: 355
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner: Skilled workers
: Rs. 18,000 to Rs. 21,600 per annum, Semi Skilled workers : Rs. 12,000 to Rs.
14,400 per annum/Unit owners: Rs 35,000 per annum
Profiles of
units/category
The 355 odd micro units. The workers and unit owner are mostly Muslims.
Turnover (per
annum)
Total turnover of the cluster: Rs 8 crores
Export Nil
Employment
(direct/indirect)
2100
Presence of association/
NGO, contact details
There is an association in the cluster, but it is dormant. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been trained in CDP.
Name of CDE : Mr. Prodyut Das Mobile no. : 09051405496
Main problems of cluster
The major problem areas are with respect to age old first generation technology, poor productivity, difficult to get labour, laborious and long working hours,
ergonomic problems, poor finishing, extremely limited market channel, low level of education of workers, no technical institution, lack of finance, etc.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster
Division
IA, its experience District Industries Centre, Howrah
lxxii
in cluster
development
Project Cost Total: Rs.11,00,000
Government of India: Rs. 8,90,000
State Government: Rs. 98,500
SPV/ Stakeholders: Rs. 1,11,500
Some of the Technical Agency
to associated and its expertise
• Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CGCRI),
Kolkata
• Foundation for MSME Clusters (FMC), Kolkata
• Indian Society of Ergonomics (ISE), Department of Physiology, Presidency University, Calcutta
Outcomes Around 150 units to get benefitted through introduction to modern machinery, buyers, ergonomics, awareness of CDP and
schemes. Visit to clusters and Vision Optics will enhance knowledge of 20 firms directly and the cluster indirectly
through sharing of experiences. Training in usage of modern technology, accounting, market awareness and EDP practices
will do capacity building of around 80 to 100 firms. Workshop and demonstration of semi-automatic and automatic
machinery, technology study and market study will support the
entire cluster of 300 odd units.
Some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefited
Before
Interventio
ns
After
Interventions
i. Knowledge of
new technology
100 Nil Price and
sourcing
information
and benefits
ii Technology
introduced
20 to 30 Nil 20 to 30
iii Bank loan
organized
20 to 30 Very low 20 to 30
iv Turnover
increase
20 to 30 Rs 1 crore Rs 1.3 crore
v Employment
generation
50 to100 915 960
vi Enhanced wage 20 to 30 None 200 labourers
vii CFC 200 None Initiated
viii Quality
certification
(aware)
100 Nil 100
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.00 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 8.90 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.99 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.11 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxiii
Agenda No.30.26 Soft Interventions in Refractory Brick Cluster of Kulti, Salanpur area of
Burdwan
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Asansol Refractory Brick Cluster
Location Salanpur, Kulti, Baraboni, Jamuria, and Raniganj within a radius of 15-20
kms under Asansol Sub-division in Burdwan
Products Refractory Bricks, B.P.Sets & Shapes
Technological
details, pollution,
etc.
The refractory cluster is using traditional refractory manufacturing process.
Many of these units are shaping their products by hand moulding
methods. The raw materials which are available from natural mines are rarely
tested for their properties and are used on thumb rule basis. Most of the units do not have any calcinations plants for processing the raw materials.
Pollution angle: Coal based firing related pollution are visible in cluster.
Age of cluster The cluster is more than 60 years old.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 150 b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 130 ii. Small: 20
iii. Women-owned: Nil iv. Owned by SC: Nil
v. Owned by ST: Nil vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner : Man worker– Rs. 30,000, Woman 25,000 per annum; unit owner : Rs.
5,00,000 to Rs 15,00,000 per annum.
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs 135 crores approx.
Export Nil
Employment
(direct/indirect)
Total employment: 4600 (direct) and 2200 (indirect)
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
“Refractory Manufacturer’s Association, Kulti”. Contact person is
Mr. Ashok Chakraborty, General Secretary
Phone nos. 09832197099,0943463546, 09832187105
Main problems of
cluster • Unorganized market channels.
• Non-availability of quality standard in most units.
• Traditional/conventional method of production/primitive technology.
Uses of
• raw materials without testing. Low level of technological development.
• Poor managerial/entrepreneurship skill.
• Poor linkage with support institutions.
• Lack of awareness of energy efficient technology.
• Lack of product standardization.
• Absence of preventive pollution control measures.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
lxxiv
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comme
nts
IA, its
experience
Sub-District Industries Centre, Durgapur should
be
WBEPS
Project Cost Total : Rs. 12,40,000 Government of India: Rs. 9,81,000
State Government: Rs. 1,25,000 SPV/ Private Partners: Rs. 1,34,000
Some of the Technical
Agencies to be associated
and its expertise
• Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CGCRI),
Kolkata
• The Central Fuel Research Institute (CFRI), Dhanbad,
Jharkhand
• Indian Refractory Makers Association (IRMA), Kolkata
• Petroleum Conservation Research Association (PCRA), Dhakuria
Outcomes Walk through energy audit, ISO, health camps, knowledge of MSECDP and schemes, etc. will benefit around 100 firms. Study
tours to build capacity of 20 firms directly and the cluster indirectly
through dissemination. Training programmes and interaction with
industry leaders will benefit around 50 firms. Low cost pollution
control device will reduce pollution for 60 firms. Technology study
will benefit the entire cluster. SPV formation and promotion through
brochures and web will also support the cluster firms.
Some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefited
Before
Intervent
ions
After Interventions
i. Turnover 40 Increased by at
least 5 percent
ii Export linkage 20 Increased by at
least 2-3 percent
iii Investment/Exp
ansion
30 Increased
v Employment
genration
4600 5100
vi ISO
certification
10 Certified
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.40 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 9.81 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.25 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.34 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxv
Agenda No.30.27 Soft Interventions in Rubber Moulding Cluster of Raghudevpur,
Howrah
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Rubber Moulding Cluster, Raghudevpur
Location Raghudevpur Gram Panchyat, Uluberia – II Block, Uluberia, Howrah
Products Various rubber products like-‘O’- Ring, Bush, Chevron, Packing, Oil Seal,
Bonded Seal, Bucket, Washer, V- Ring, V- Seal, Diaphragms, Quad Ring,
Expansion Joints, Bellows, Pads & Sheet, Mats and Rubberised Cork Sheet
Technological
details, pollution, etc.
Machinery used in most of the small scale units are more than 45 years old. The
cluster suffers from lack of critical infrastructure like Central Mixing Unit, Tool Room Facility, Training facility for Labour.
Pollution: Not a major problem in the cluster
Age of cluster Almost 50 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 275
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 275 ii. Small: 0
iii. Women-owned: 25 iv. Owned by SC: 42
v. Owned by ST: 0 vi. Owned by minorities: 203
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner: Worker: Rs. 36,000 to Rs 60,000 per annum
Unit Owner: Rs. 6 lakh to Rs. 15 lakh per annum
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs.167.88 crores
Export No direct export
Employment (direct/ indirect)
3025 (Direct employment)
Presence of association/
NGO, contact details
There is no association in the cluster. There is plan for creation of requisite consortium/SPV. The current contact person is the CDE, who has been trained in
CDP. Name of CDE is Mr. Biswajit Modak
Mobile no: 098307-37242
Main problems
of cluster
1. Financial
a. Low institutional credit facility – due to unavailable collateral security.
b. Bulk purchase of inputs for cost benefit is absent.
c. Lack of financial discipline
2. Market a. Limited market access. Over dependence on regional marketing channels.
b. Lack of institutional linkage – for the development of market, technology and
production.
c. Unhealthy price competitions among the firms
3. Production/ Technology
a. Obsolete technology owing to low productivity.
b. No quality testing facility
c. Lack of raw material mixing facility and tool room
lxxvi
d. Low value added products
e. High wastage
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
by Cluster
Division
IA, its experience in
cluster development
District Industries Centre, Howrah should be WBEPS
Project Cost Total: Rs. 10,70,000 Government of India: Rs. 8,16,000
State Government: Rs. 96,000 SPV/Private Partners: Rs. 1,08,000
Technical Agency to be
associated and its
expertise
• Indian Rubber Institute (IRI), Kolkata
• Rubber Research Institute of India (RRII), Kottayam, Kerala
• Industry-Institute Partnership Cell (IIPC) - Jadavpur University,
Kolkata
Justification
for DSR
DSR is the result of the complete diagnostic study conducted in the
cluster to obtain a more in-depth picture to identify the following aspects of the cluster -
• Understand the socio-economic environment of the cluster
• Discuss the major issues in the cluster and also spell out the need
for common infrastructure
• Identify the most effective leverage points for intervention
• Provide a baseline for future monitoring and evaluation
• Build initial trust with and among the stakeholders
Outcomes • Value addition in the existing range of products by way of up-gradation of the technology and improved production process.
At least 3 new value added products introduced and 10 firms
started manufacturing those. Their turnover increased by at least
10 percent.
• Competitiveness in terms of productivity and quality of the
product significantly improved for at least 30 firms. These firms
started catering to high end national and international markets
and their overall market accessibility enhanced by 30 percent.
• At least 5 new product range introduced
• Employment increased by at least 20 percent
• Common Facility Centre for central mixing room, tool room
facility, quality testing, training facilities, etc initiated.
• Quality certification like ISO adopted by at least 10 firms
• Mechanism for uniform supply of quality raw materials
strengthened. At least 50 firms got direct benefits.
Some of the expected quantified outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of MSEs
benefited
Before
Interventions
After
Interventions
lxxvii
i. Total Sales 10 Increased by at
least 10 percent
ii Market
Channels
10 Limited 3 more
iii Value added
products
10 Limited 3 more
iv Employment
generation
50 to100
(Indirectly)
v SPV formation At least 100 Nil 1
vii Raw material 50 units
viii Systematized
business units
30 5 35
ISO certification 10 10
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 10.70 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 8.16 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.96 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.08 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxviii
Agenda No.30.28: Soft Interventions in Silk Printing Cluster of Serampore
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Silk Printing Cluster of Serampore
Location 26 km north of Kolkata (Serampore and Baidyabati Municipality area as well as
in some Gram Panchayets like Rajyadharpur and Piarapur
Products Hand printed silk sarees, scarves and stoles
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
Technology of printing is restricted to hand block and hand screen printing.
Prevailing practice to increase production capacity is by increasing the
number of printing tables which needs more space and labour. Methods used
for mixing of colors are also not very scientific. It is always done manually
based on previous experience/word of mouth and using locally made colors
resulting in inconsistency in colors. Repeating same colour is also not
possible. Automatic or semiautomatic screen printing system may be adopted
for increasing production. Demonstration of such technology is essential.
Awareness and training on scientific colour mixing method is required for
consistency in quality. Also there is lack of appropriate usage and sourcing of
vegetable dyes.
Infrastructure: Most of the units do not have water softening and effluent
treatment plant. The units are also operating from home resulting in smoke
pollution. This is scope for common washing.
Pollution: This is a highly polluting cluster.
Age of cluster The cluster is 150 years old.
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 210
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 199
ii. Small: 12
iii. Women-owned: Nil
iv. Owned by SC: 20
v. Owned by ST: Nil
vi. Owned by minorities :Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner: Skilled
workers – Rs. 48000 per annum
Unskilled workers : 24000 per annum
Unit owners: the earnings vary between Rs 6 lakh to Rs 7 lakh for micro, Rs 15
lakh to Rs 60 lakh per annum for medium and small unit owners.
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs 170 crores
Export Yes, around Rs 34 crores per annum
Employment
(direct/indirect)
12,000 persons
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
Serampore Silk Printing Owners Welfare Association is the concerned
association. The contact person is Mr. Pradip Banik, Secretary (Mobile no.
09831060482) and Mr. Mahananda Ghosh, President
(Mobile no. 09830820628) Contact no. of Association : 09433737871
lxxix
Main problems
of cluster
The major problem areas are with respect to pollution, lack of finance due to
no NOC from PCB, market identification and linkage, poor quality raw
material, lack of design inputs, loss of sericin, lack of good quality specialized
colour, usage of vegetable colour, absence of professional business enterprise
practices, high energy usage, lack of proper processing technique, working
condition of labour, limited marketing channel, etc.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, Hoogly
Should be
WBEPS
Project Cost Total: Rs. 12,60,000
Government Of India: Rs. 9,60,000
State Government: Rs. 1,50,000
SPV/Stakeholders: Rs. 1,50,000
Some of the
Technical
Agencies to
associated
and its
expertise
• Business Analyst Group (BAG), Kolkata
• Sutra Handicraft Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
• Government College of Engineering and Textile Technology,
Serampore (GCETTS), Hooghly
• The Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), Kolkata
• National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Kolkata
Outcomes Around 75 to 100 units to get benefitted through introduction to
modern techniques of sericin recovery, degumming, vegetable dyes,
ISO certification. Awareness of CDP and schemes will benefit around
100 units. Visit to clusters will enhance knowledge of 20 firms directly
and the cluster indirectly through sharing of experiences. Training in
design development and CAD, export procedures, marketing, safety,
etc. will do capacity building of around 100 firms. Technology study
and market study will support the entire cluster. Apart from these, some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed
as follows.
Sl. No.
Particulars No. of MSEs
benefited
Before Interventio
ns
After Interventions
I Employment 200 12000 14500
ii Enhanced Capacity (three
years)
50 170 crores Rs 205 crores
iii Energy audit 45 None Cost reduction
and profitability
iv Silk park 200 None Initiated
vi Market Channel 200 Local and
Export
Direct Market
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 12.60 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.60 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.50 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.50 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxx
Agenda No.30.29: Soft Interventions in Woolen Product Manufacturing Cluster of
Darjeeling
1. Brief information of Cluster
Name of the
Cluster
Darjeeling Woolen Product Manufacturing Cluster
Location Household enterprises are in four areas in and around the town of Darjeeling,
namely, Rajbari (10 units), Mangalpuri (23 units), main Town (15 units) and
Mul Danra (6 units) of West Bengal
Products The major products of the cluster, in the order of volume of production are:
Sweaters (mainly for women) Baby Suits, Jackets, Jumpers (Sweaters with
hoods) and Shawls
Technological details,
pollution, etc.
This is an all women cluster engaged in manual knitting of various knitwear items. The women entrepreneurs should be motivated to buy, install and
operate machines for substantially increasing production. These machines are
easy to operate and hence the entrepreneurs and workers can learn to operate
the machines with a few days training.
Pollution: There is no pollution related problem in the cluster
Age of cluster More than 70 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 54
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 54
ii. Small: Nil
iii. Women-All 54 units
iv. Owned by SC: 5
v. Owned by ST: 10-15
vi. Owned by minorities: Nil
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Woman worker : RS 18,000 to Rs 24,000 pa
Unit owner’s income is around Rs 40,000 to Rs 150,000 pa
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs.4.21 crores
Export Nil
Employment
(direct/indirect)
504
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact
details
There is no association in the cluster. However, there is plan for creation of
requisite consortium/SPV. The current contact person is the CDE, who has
been trained in CDP.
Name of the CDE : Mr. C.T. Bhutia
Mobile no. : 09434329831
Main problems
of cluster • Low volume of production due to hand knitting
• Lack of knowledge of fashion and designing trends
• No collective initiatives for purchase of raw materials, marketing, CFCs
• Lack of awareness of support schemes and services that can boost
investments for business development
• Low level of literacy
• Cascading of raw material prices due to intermediaries
• Absence of strategic BDS providers for designing, market promotion, etc.
2. Analysis of the Proposal
lxxxi
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Commen
ts
IA, its
experience
District Industries Centre, Darjeeling
Should be
WBEPS
Project Cost Total proposed budget: Rs 10,95,000
Government of India: Rs. 9,01,500 State Government: Rs. 80,750
SPV/ Stake holders: Rs. 1,12,750
Technical
Agency to associated
and its expertise
• Foundation for MSME Clusters (FMC),Kolkata
• National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Kolkata
• Sutra Handicrafts Private Limited, Kolkata
• Enterprise Development Institute (EDI), Kolkata
Outcomes • 4 networks formed and one Cluster Association formed and registered for identified common activities.
• 40 firms inspired to go for capacity expansion.
• At least 5 firms expand production capacities with latest machines.
• At least 3 new units started.
• In-principle approval for CFC obtained.
• Increase in turnover by 10 percent for 20 firms through creation
of new designs and capacity building.
• At least 10 firms linked to 2/3 exporters.
• Appropriate marketing strategy established.
Some of the quantified expected outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particular
s
No. of
MSEs
benefite
d
Before
Interventi
ons
After Interventions
i. Turnover 20 units Increase in turnover
by 10% for 20 firms
through creation of
new designs and
capacity building.
ii Market
Channels
10 units No direct
linkage
with
exporter
At least 10 firms
linked to 2/3
exporters.
iii Better technolog
y
40 units - 40 firms inspired to go for capacity
expansion.
Employm
ent
Employment
increased by 10 %
SPV
formation
All - One SPV formed for
CFC
New
units
57 At least 3 new units
started.
lxxxii
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 10.95 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 9.01 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 0.81 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.12 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxxiii
Agenda No.30.30 Soft Interventions in Artificial Ornaments and Gift Items
Cluster, Paschim Medinipur North 24 Parganas, West Bengal
Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Artificial Ornaments and Gift Items Cluster
Location Paschim Medinipur.
Products Copper made artificial Jewellery and Gold made Jewellery, Bangle, ring, chain etc.
Technological details, pollution
angle, etc.
The units in the cluster are micro level and use very low level of technology for producing artificial jewelry. It is mainly labour
oriented and most of the works are done manually.
Age of cluster About 25 years old.
No. of Units 545 no
Profiles of units/
Category
All are Micro units. 60% of them are women
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 12 crore
Export Not available.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
3895 nos. (Direct – 3395 and Indirect – 500)
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
West Bengal Scheduled Castes, Tribes & Minority Welfare
Association, Rabindra Nagar, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur.
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes. The DSR mentions following key areas that require strategic
interventions:
Technology up gradation Networking among cluster members
Export promotion Developing BDS
Creating new market through diversfication
Extent of Competition
for cluster
Not available.
Main Problems of
cluster • Lack of infrastructure facilities.
• Most of their units are unorganized sector.
• Poor financial support.
• Poor market linkage & marketing strategies as well as net work distribution.
• Poor technology & quality control.
• Lack of brand image.
• Poor lending and credit facility for cash flow
• Poor and unhygienic infrastructure
• Lower capacity utilization.
• Poor packing system.
• Lack of Government and institutional supports.
• Lack of storage facility.
• Lack of training and design development facilities.
• Inadequate flow of market information
Need for CFC, if any DSR recommends for CFC in the cluster containing following
facilities: Raw material bank, Design development, Training section,
Quality Control Section etc.
lxxxiv
2 Analysis of Proposal
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 14.82 lakh for duration of 18 months with
GoI contribution of Rs. 13.34 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.48 lakh to be contributed by
cluster units / association.
Agenda No 30.31 Soft Interventions in Zari Embroidary Cluster of Sankrail, Howrah
1. Brief information of Cluster
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its experience in
cluster development MSME-DI, Kolkata MSME-DI,
Kolkata has taken
up of Soft
Interventions in
other clusters also.
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
Trust Building, Awareness programme,
Training programme, Capacity Building,
Participation in local fare, Miscellaneous
Development Cost, Services of BDS
providers.
Whether DSR validated
by the stakeholders
Yes, validated on 2.12.11
Project Cost Project Cost : Rs. 14.82 lakh
GoI contribution : Rs. 13.34 lakh
Cluster beneficiaries: Rs. 1.48 lakh
Technical Agency to be
associated & its
expertise
Govt. College of Engineering & Fashion
Designing Technology, Management
Consultant, Industrial Safety Deptt. , Govt.
of WB
Justification for undertaking Soft
Interventions
Units have scope for export, but due to poor quality of machinery, quality of products is
not export worthy. Unit owners are mostly
uneducated and are unaware of marketing
channels, pricing, and technology.
Interventions will help improve technology, quality, and designing of the products for
growth of units.
Main outcomes (before
& after) in terms of
sales, Exports,
Investment, Profitability,
Employment, ISO &
other Certification,
others
S.
No
Items for
comparison
Before
Intervention
After
Interventions
(Approx.)
1. Employment 3395 nos. 4200 nos
2. Production
Capacity
88.46 lakh 135 lakh
3. Profit Margin on production cost
13% (up to Semi-finished
products)
30% (up to Gold
plated finished
Products)
4. Turnover 12.00 crore 18.00 crore.
5. Reduction in
wastage of
Materials
15% 05%
lxxxv
Name of the
Cluster
Sankrail Zari Embroidery Cluster
Location Units are located in 5-6 gram pachyets of Sankrail - mainly concentrated in 7
villages namely Kandua, Sandhipur, Nabghara, Sulaty, Bhagatipur, Mahisgoat,
Chaturbhujkati under Kundua Gram Panchayat.
Products Zari embroidery work is primarily done mainly on Sari, Salwar Kameez, Lahenga / Ghagra, Punjabi (Kurta), Churidar, Scarves, Rakh etc.
Technological details, pollution,
etc.
The cluster does not use any technology per se. The main tools and implements employed here are; Hadda (Wooden frames of different sizes);Needle; Scissors;
Iron; and Weighing Scale Artisans work 10-12 hours a day during peak season. Problems of working
posture in Hadda leads to occupational hazards like problems with eye-sight, backache, spinal cord etc. Technical assistance might be sought for
modernization of Hadda which can reduce occupational hazards. Some big traders use China made computerized embroidery machines. A blend of
machine and hand embroidery work may be initiated to improve competitiveness of this cluster. This cluster also requires establishment of a
Common Facility Centre (CFC) to facilitate technology up-gradation.
However, design is an aspect, improvement on which can change the fortune of
this cluster. Training on design development, skill development can be
organized.
Pollution: Not a major problem in the cluster.
Age of cluster Around 50 – 60 years
No. of units a. Total no. of micro and small enterprises: 250 units
b. No. of enterprises of each category
i. Micro: 250
ii. Small: 0
iii. Women-owned:-
iv. Owned by SC: 15
v. Owned by ST: 10
vi. Owned by minorities:
c. Average yearly income of men/women of workers/unit owner :
Man/woman worker : Rs.24,000 to Rs. 36,000 per annum,
Unit owner : per annum Rss24,000 to Rs 30,000 per annum for household units and Rs. 1,44,000 to Rs. 180,000 per annum for tiny units.
Turnover (per
annum)
Rs. 13.633 crores
Export No direct export
Employment (direct/ indirect)
800 persons (approximately)
Presence of
association/
NGO, contact details
There is no association in the cluster. However, there is plan for creation of
requisite consortium/SPV.
Main problems of cluster
• Traditional technology, low productivity
• Lack of awareness regarding modern technology
• Absence of Modern Machinery
• Absence of design development / introduction of new design
• No training on quality control
• Low standardization
lxxxvi
• Non diversification of product
• Limited production capacity
• Inadequate infrastructure
• Poor condition of working shed
• Lack of common work shed
• No linkage with technical institutions
• No linkage with BDS providers
• No direct purchase of raw material from manufactures
• Low investment capacity due to poor flow of credit from financial
institutions
• Occupational hazards like eye and spinal cod problems
• Artisans having limited exposure to market
• Poor knowledge of artisan regarding marketing
• Lean period of four months in a year
• No direct linkage with national/ global market
• Absence of market survey
2. Analysis of the Proposal
Propose by Implementing Agency (IA) Comments
IA, its
experience in
cluster
development
District Industries Centre, Howrah Should be
WBEPS
Project Cost a) Total: Rs. 11,80,000
b) Government of India: Rs. 9,55,000 c) State Government: Rs. 99,800
d) SPV/ Stakeholder: Rs. 1,25,200
Some of the
Technical Agencies to
be associated and its
expertise
• National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Kolkata
• Indian Society of Ergonomics (ISE), Department of
Physiology, Presidency University,Calcutta
• Sutra Handicrafts Private Limited, Kolkata
• West Bengal Consultancy Organisation Ltd. (WEBCON),
Kolkata
• Birla Institute of Liberal Arts and Management Sciences
,Calcutta
Outcomes • 50 artisans trained under Design Development programme
• 50 artisans acquired better skill on product development and better
designs
• 8 artisans exposed to Benchmark Cluster in Mumbai
• 20 artisans exposed to Zari Cluster at Budge Budge II, south 24 Pgs - 1 visit
• 50 artisans trained on Marketing skill and linkage facilitation.
• Marketing BDSP groomed and made available in the cluster
• Training and démonstration of CAD / CAM etcorganised for 50
artisans
• 2 artisns participated in the Exhibition Trade fair
• Training on Financial Management and hand holding for
maintaining books and accounts
• 3 to 4 new market channel created
• At least 10 new designs and 5 new products introduced
lxxxvii
• CFC for designing created
• Ergonomic condition of worker/artisan improved
Some of the expected quantified outcomes are listed below.
Sl.
No.
Particulars No. of
MSEs
benefited
Before Interventions After
Interventions
i. Turnover Cluster Rs.13.633 crores Rs16.4 crores
Wage of the
workers
400
artisans
Rs 2500-Rs 3500 Rs. 3750-Rs
5250
ii Market
Channels
Many Limited 3-4 new market
channels
iii Improved
ergonomic
condition
Many Poor ergonomic
condition limiting
their working hour
Significantly
improved
iv Designs/
Value added
products
20 units Limited 10 new designs
and 5 new value
added products
v SPV formation
- - One SPV formed foro CFC
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 11.80 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 9.55 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 1.00 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 1.25 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
lxxxviii
Agenda No.30.32: Soft Interventions in Bamboo Craft Cluster, Baduria, North 24
Parganas, West Bengal.
Brief information of Cluster: The proposal was earlier placed in the 27th
meeting of Steering
Committee held on 31.05.2011. The Steering Committee was of the view that hard interventions
directly would be more appropriate and therefore soft interventions were not approved.
The details of the cluster and proposed interventions are as follows:
Name of the Cluster Bamboo Craft Cluster
Location Baduria Block under the District of 24 North Parganas.
Products Basket, Chalani, Cross bows, Kula, Khorahi, Dukula or Tukuri, Dala or
Thali, Dun or Kathi, Bamboo mats, Fish catching devices etc.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Due to abundant availability of raw materials, this area is famous in a
particular artisanship.
Age of cluster 60 years old.
No. of Units 110 nos. micro bamboo crafts units.
Profiles of units/
Category
All units belong to SC category.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 1.81 crore approx.
Export Nil
Employment (direct /
indirect)
537 nos.-Directly & 230 nos.-Indirectly
The 40% of the total employment is men and rest 60% are women
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Basirhat Women Development Society, Basirhat
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes. Due to abundant availability of raw materials, the area is
famous in artisanship. The cluster needs various supportive activities
like waste minimization, quality control, creating awareness
regarding effective use of raw materials, new design development
and product diversification etc. Extent of Competition
for cluster
The entrepreneurs in Cluster are manufacturing different type of Mat and
diversified mat product through traditional method i.e. completely manual
type. The competition is within the cluster units.
Main Problems of
cluster � Lack of Infrastructure facilities.
� Problem in regular supply of quality raw materials.
� Lack of BDS providers.
� Lack of supporting Institution.
� No quality control method.
� Lack of CFC.
� Credit availability.
� Marketing problem. Need for CFC, if any Yes.
- Raw materials Banks.
- Design Development Section.
- Training section (Skill Development)
- Training Facility Centre
- Quality Control Section
- Different Types of machineries.
Any other information This office has received a letter dtd 5.3.12 from Director, MSME-DI,
Kolkata conveying that DC (Handicraft), Regional Office, Kolkata
has informed about interventions in this cluster which is also going on and therefore.
lxxxix
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposal for Steering Committee: Office of DC (Handicrafts) is already undertaking interventions
in the cluster; the cluster division recommends that the proposal may be rejected.
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster
Division
IA, its experience in cluster development
MSME-DI, Kolkata
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export / Quality/
Design, etc.)
Trust Building, Awareness programme,
Training programme, Capacity Building,
Participation in local fare, Miscellaneous
Development Cost, Services of BDS
providers, Local Travel, Local Purchase.
The proposal was earlier
placed in the 27th
meeting
of Steering Committee
held on 31.05.2011. The
Steering Committee was
of the view that hard
interventions directly
would be more
appropriate and therefore
soft interventions were
not approved.
Whether DSR validated by
the stakeholders
Yes.
Project Cost Project Cost : Rs. 19,59,000/-
GoI contribution : Rs. 17,35,500/-
Cluster beneficiaries: Rs. 2,21,500/-
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Indian Institute of Packaging, NID, DC
(Handicraft) etc.
Justification for undertaking
Soft Interventions
The cluster needs various supportive
activities like waste minimization, quality
control, creating awareness regarding
effective use of raw materials, new design
development and product diversification,
Marketing & Packing support etc.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
• 100 nos. of units are engaged
traditionally but after functioning of
cluster development programmes
more number of units adjoining the
villages of Baduria Dev. Block will
participated in the programme.
• It is expected that there will create
more employment facilities in the cluster as SPV will market directly as
well as there will be different section in CFC etc.
• Automatically some other people near by Baduria & adjoining places will
participate in the activities of CFC for
different types of jobs.
xc
Agenda No.30.33: Proposal for Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Industrial Area
Phase-I & II, Balotra, Distt. Barmer, Rajasthan
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
a. Proposals received from
Whether the Proposal recommended from
the State Govt.
Rajasthan State Industrial Development &
Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO), Jaipur.
No
b. Location of site Phase-I & II, Balotra, Distt. Barmer is located on
NH-112, Jodhpur-Barmer Road
c. Year of setting up of Indl Estate Year 1980-81 & 1984
d. Name of agency owning industrial estate RIICO, Jaipur
e. Present arrangements of maintenance of
the industrial estate
Services charges recovered from individual
industry
f. Main Problems related to Infrastructure Drainage, road & water supply scheme
g. Whether appraised DPR received or not Not received
h. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 290.97 acres
i. Area to be upgraded (acre) 290.97 acres
j. Number and sizes of plots 365
k. Units set up 363
l. Profile of units (micro / women owned / SC, ST)
Micro units
m. Implementing Period 24 months from the date of sanction
n. Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No
o. Performance of ID projects in state This office has so far sanctioned 11 projects for setting up of new Industrial Estates. Out of
which, 9 projects have been completed and remaining projects are at various stage of
implementation. 2 existing industrial estates towards upgradation project have also been
sanctioned under MSE-CDP, which are under implementation.
2 Details about Proposal:
Description As per proposal Comments, if
any
a. Implementing Agency (IA): Rajasthan State Industrial Development
& Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO),
Jaipur
b. Track Record of the IA RIICO has completed 9 new ID projects
for infrastructure development.
Track record is
satisfactory.
c. Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report.
Yes
The proposal is considered to be support
worthy.
d. Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state
Proposed ID centre is located on NH-
112, Jodhpur-Barmer road at distance of 105 Km from Jodhpur. The area is well
xci
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate power
supply, telecom facilities,
dwelling places of workers)
connected by road and railways. The
nearest station, Balotra is about 1 km
and bus stand is 2 km from the industrial
areas.
e. Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied with
The industrial conversion & allotment
done by Govt.
f. Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been
Constituted
Yes last meeting held on 12.12.2011 for
review the new ID project.
g. Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and any escalation in cost.
Yes, vide letter no. 1301 dated 12.08.11,
RIICO has confirmed that an expenditure of Rs. 828.32 lakh will be
borne by them.
h. Basis of elements of project Cost
Not given
3. Project Cost: (Rs.in lakh)
Particulars As per
Proposal
Eligible
under
MSE-CDP
a) Land development and other overhead
infrastructure
i) Cost of laying roads 406.00 200.00
ii) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
174.32 110.00
iii) Drainage (Internal) 470.00 60.00
Total 1050.32 370.00
4. Means of finance: -
(Rs.in lakh)
Particulars Amount
i GoI Grant under MSE-CDP (60% of eligible
amount of Rs 370 lakh)
222.00
ii Contribution from RIICO 828.32
Total 1050.32
5. Proposal for the Consideration of the Steering Committee: Cluster division
recommends the proposal for Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Industrial Area Phase-I
& II, Balotra, Distt. Barmer, Rajasthan at project cost of Rs. 1050.32 lakh with GoI assistance of
Rs. 222.00 lakh. Steering Committee may consider the proposal for approval.
xcii
Agenda No. 30.34 : Proposal for setting up of Infrastructure Development (ID) centre at 13
LNP, Industrial Area, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
a. Proposals received from
Whether the Proposal recommended from
the State Govt.
Rajasthan State Industrial Development &
Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO),
Jaipur
No
b. Location of site 13 LNP, Industrial Area, Sri Ganganagar.
c. Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan received or not
Yes
d. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
(p-6 of SIDBI)
81.11 acres
e. Area to be developed (acre) 81.11 acres
f. Number and sizes of plots to be developed
(p-29 of SIDBI)
82 plots of different size i.e. 700 sq. mtr-
10000 sq. mtrs.
g. Implementing Period (p-26 of SIDBI) 24 months from the date of sanction
h. Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots
allotted, units set up, etc.
No
i. Performance of ID projects in state. This office has so far sanctioned 11
projects for setting up of new Industrial Estates. Out of which, 9 projects have been
completed and remaining projects are at various stage of implementation. 2 existing
industrial estates towards up-gradation project have also been sanctioned under
MSE-CDP, which are under
implementation.
2 Details about Proposal:
Description Comments by
Cluster Division
a. Implementing Agency (IA): Rajasthan State Industrial
Development & Investment
Corporation Ltd. (RIICO), Jaipur
b. Track Record of the IA RIICO has completed 9 new ID
projects for infrastructure development.
Track record is
satisfactory.
c. Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and
recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. (p-29 of
SIDBI)
Yes, The proposal satisfies the norms and
parameters of the modified MSE-CDP scheme for setting up of MSE-
CDP (ID) centre and is considered support worthy.
d. Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity
to railway stations / state
� The area is well connected by road and railways.
� RIICO would manage water
xciii
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate
power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
(p-6, 10 & 11)
supply in the proposed ID centre
through its own bore well and
water reservoirs.
� Sri Ganganagar district is having
a lignite based thermal power
project. Due to this project, the
power position in the district is
quite good.
e. Whether land is in
possession in the name of IA
with Clear Title
No Land documents are
required.
f. Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied
with
No
g. Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been
Constituted
No Documents regarding
constitution of State Level Committee are
required.
h. Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will
meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and
any escalation in cost.
Specific confirmation not received Commitment letter is
required.
i. Basis of elements of project
Cost
Not given
j. Tangible Outcomes of the
project • Creation of 82 plots.
• Generation of direct
employment for about 500-600 persons initially and indirect
employment for about 900-1200 persons in 2-3 years.
k. Justification of the Proposal
(p-29 of SIDBI)
This project will improve socio economic condition of large number
of people and society in this district.
3. Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
Particulars Estimated by IA Recommended
by SIDBI and as per
guidelines
1 Land development and other overhead
infrastructure
i Compensation for land 1298.00 0.00
ii Cost of land filling/ leveling including
boundary wall/fencing
64.00 64.00
iii Cost of laying roads (Internal and
approach roads)
269.00 200.00
iv Road side greenery & social forestry 9.00 9.00
v Water supply including overhead tanks
and pump houses
142.00 110.00
vi Water harvesting 20.00 10.00
xciv
vii Drainage 135.00 60.00
viii Power (sub-station and distribution
network including street light etc),
Generation of non-conventional energy
73.00 73.00
ix Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
2 Administrative and other services
complex
0.00 0.00
i Admin. Office building 32.00 20.00
ii Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets
10.00 10.00
iii Provision for up-gradation of
infrastructure
132.00 0.00
3 Effluent Treatment facilities 105.00 80.00
4 Contingencies and pre operative
expenses
901.00 20.00
TOTAL 3200.00 666.00
4. Means of finance: -
Particulars Proposed by
IA
Proposed by SIDBI as
per MSE-CDP
iii GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 526.00 400.00
iv RIICO contribution 2674.00 2800.00
Total 3200.00 3200.00
5. Shortcomings:
i. Land is not in possession/ in name of the implementing agency
ii. Recommendation from State Govt, constitution of State Level Committee
6. Proposal for the Consideration of the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the
State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped.
xcvi
Agenda No.30.36 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Home Furnishing
Cluster, Panipat, Haryana
The proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Haryana.
Information about the cluster and proposed CFC is as follow:
1. Basic Information of Cluster:
b. Name of the Cluster
Home Furnishing Cluster
c. Location of Cluster
Panipat, Haryana
d. Products of the Cluster
Home furnishing products (Cushions, Curtains, Table Linen,
Floor Coverings, Shaggy, Rugs, Bathmats and Cushion Covers
ETC.)
e. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium)
3200 manufacturing units
(Page no. –10 of DPR)
f. Turnover (Rs in crore) Rs. 11000 crore. (Page no. – 4 of DPR)
g. Exports (Rs in crore) Rs. 3000 crore. (Page no. – 4 of DPR)
h. Employment in Cluster 75,000 persons (Page no. – 4 of DPR and page no. -1 of
Appraisal Report)
i. Technological Details The cluster has around 1000 traditional and 300 modern manufacturing units engaged in the manufacture of the above
products. Currently, hand tufted & 4 needle tufting machines are being used for production. There are limitations of space
and huge shortage of skilled manpower. The production level is
hampered and per person productivity is as low as 1 meter per
day. There is absence of facilities like automated secondary
backing line.
j. Whether DS R conducted The DSR conducting in the year 2011-12 (DPR was prepared
by Access Consultancy Service.)
k. Main findings of DSR
(Page no. – 1 of DSR)
Introduction of new improved manufacturing technologies,
without losing the traditional product values.
Strategic interventions for productivity enhancement and
Technological up gradation with the help of Technical
Consultants and support firms.
Research initiative for technological advancements.
l. Main Problems of cluster
(Page no. – 11 of DSR) • Low productivity.
• Limited range of products.
• Low risk taking ability.
• No branding of products.
• No consistency in the quality of raw-materials.
• Limited market study of current trends/color forecast.
• Lack of modern technology uptake.
• Labour intensive manufacturing.
xcvii
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Justification for CFC
(page no. 24 of Appraisal
report)
• The home furnishing cluster sector in India is presently going through a major
change. Traditional markets are saturated while new markets are offering
opportunities for growth.
• There is evidently great potential
for the home furnishing cluster of Panipat.
Presently, cluster firms experience some
critical constraints. Enterprises operate
with relatively low net profit margins with stagnant sales and the industry confronts a
scenario of rising raw material prices and faces tough competition in the global
market and is not able to match the world standards in terms of designs and quality of
output produced by them.
• In present globalised scenario,
MSME sector also need to be competitive
and face the global market to improve their
productivity and sales. To achieve the
objective, the interventions of Govt. of
India in terms of grant in order to set up
CFC would further give momentum to
industrialization.
• The envisaged project will
complement the rapid growth of the cluster in terms of manpower as well as upgrading
and testing needs.
• It is expected to increase net
earnings of home furnishing manufacturing
firms as a result of the common facility and
related interventions. This is because use of
advance and the complete range of value adding and expensive facilities like backing
machine, CAD centre, printing machine etc. could help lend better aesthetic look,
finish and quality and help increase sale value of the end product.
b. Location of CFC (page no. 3 of Appraisal
report)
Village Baroli , panipat, Haryana
c. Land for CFC
(Page – 15 of Appraisal
Report)
viii. Weather land acquired ix. Title is in name of
x. Valuation and its basis
xi. Land is sufficient
xii. Change of land use
6.78 acre (27439 sq.mtrs) of land has been
allotted by State Govt. on 33 year lease. Lease agreement shall be executed once
formal approval is received.
Title deed required.
xcviii
xiii. If on lease, duration of
lease
xiv. Whether lease is legally
tenable
d. Total Building area (sq ft)
(Page – 15 of Appraisal
Report)
40000 sq. ft.
e. Rate of construction of
building (Page – 15 of Appraisal
Report)
Total cost Rs. 171.50 lakh
(Rs 428.75- per sq. ft)
f. Main facilities proposed:
(Page – no. 10 of
Appraisal Report)
• Skill development
• CAD Design Centre with multi needle
machine,
• Automated backing line
• Carpet Printing machine
g. Production Capacity of
CFC
(page – 10 of appraisal
report)
Installed capacity - Rs. 1405.31 lakh pa at
100% capacity utilization. Revenue will be
generated from CAD Centre and value
adding facilities like backing plant and
printing machines. Capacity utilization
would be 60% during 1st year, 65% in the
2nd year, 75% in 3rd year onwards.
h. Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of production,
export/domestic sales and
direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Tangible outputs not mentioned. Required
i. Pollution clearance
required or not
SPV proposes to install an Effluent
Treatment Plant for the treatment of water
Consent to
Establish Required
j. Man power in CFC 61 nos.
k. Revenue generation mechanism for
sustainability of assets
(service/user charges to be
levied, any other-to be
specified)
Rs. 820.38 lakh.
(Page no. – 37 of appraisal report)
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address
(P-06 of DPR)
The Panipat Home Furnishing Cluster Pvt.
Ltd. (TPHFCPL), Panipat, Haryana.
b. Nature of SPV (company
or Society or Trust)
Private Limited Company.
C/o Diamond Exports, Babal Road,
Panipat, Haryana.
c. Name of the state Govt
and MSME officials in
The SPV shall have one nominee of the
State Government as member.
xcix
SPV
d. Date of formation of SPV 24 August, 2011
e. Number of members 25 members
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted Not available. Required.
g. Authorized share capital Rs 25 lakh divided into 2,50,000 equity
shares of Rs. 10 each.
h. Shareholding Pattern The SPV is a private limited company of
25 members. The authorized capital of the
SPV is Rs. 25 lakh divided into 2, 50,000
equity shares of Rs. 10 each. No
individual shareholder will have more
than 10% equity stake in the capital of the
company.
i. Commitment letter for
contribution Not available. Required.
j. SPV specific A/c Not available. Required.
k. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives
pursued by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support documentation
The members, promoters/stakeholders
have several years of successful
experience in manufacturing and
marketing related products, have established links with marketing channels
and are financially sound. (p-6 /appraisal
report)
l. Technical Institution MSME-DI, Karnal and District Industries
Centre, Panipat, Haryana.
m. CFC may be utilized by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member
ability to utilize at least
60 per cent of installed
capacity.
Yes. There are around 300 modern and
1000 traditional MSE engaged in the
manufacture of home furnishing products
in this cluster who are facing critical
constraints. The proposed CFC will
provide facilities like skill development,
high tech CAD Centre, automatic backing
plant etc. to the members and non-
members. Looking into the demand of the
facilities, it may be assumed that CFC will
utilized at least 60% of their capacity.
n. (b) Power requirement
for commercial/ domestic purpose
(Page – 13 of Appraisal Report)
(c) Water
(d) Gas/Oil/ Other
utilities
The SPV envisages power requirement of
300 KVA running the machines and for administrative facilities. They have
however proposed to apply for 400 KVA of connected load that can take care of
future requirement as well. The SPV envisages water requirement of
10 liters/sq. mtr. Water Charges are pegged at Rs. 0.50 sq. mtr. SPV has
earmarked Rs. 4500/annum for water
requirement.
c
4 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation
Agency
District Industry Centre, Government of
Haryana. Should be
Investment
Promotion Center,
Govt of Haryana
b. Implementation
Period
11 months from the date of obtaining
sanction of GOI.
Should be two
years after final
approval.
c. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
(Page – 25 of
Appraisal Report)
The project is technically feasible and financially viable. The proposed
performance indicators and financial position are satisfactory.
The proposed CFC will provide facilities
like skill development, high tech CAD Centre, automatic backing plant etc. to the
members and non-members.
The proposal is considered to be support
worthy.
Terms and
Conditions of
SIDBI appraisal
need to be followed
by the
Implementing
agency and SPV.
d. Comments of
Technical Division
(i) In the DPR, there are no projections
of production capacity of the project.
(ii) Specifications of the proposed
machines and details of production
capacity etc. are not mentioned in the
DPR.
(iii)There is no information in terms of
quantity of finished products and quantity of raw material in the
profitability statement. (iv) The project cost in DPR is not
matching with the value of project considered by SIDBI in its appraisal.
Technical Division
has not cleared the
proposal.
Observations of
Technical Division
sent to State Govt.
Reply awaited.
e. Approval of Technical Committee
Yet to be placed before the Technical
Committee
f. Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
(i) SIDBI appraisal report at para 3(i) mentions that State
Govt. contribution is Rs. 1.77 crore, whereas State Govt. commitment for contribution received is for Rs. 1.50 cr.
(ii) Citing number of units in Micro category, GoI grant of 90% has been sought, a certificate from State Govt. would
be required mentioning that there are more than 50% units of in micro category in the cluster.
(iii) ‘Consent to Establish from Pollution Control Board would
be required.
(iv) Papers related to title/lease deed are required.
(v) Confirmation for SPV contribution is required.
(vi) Annexure-II of SIDBI’s appraisal shows bank borrowing
for working capital (WC). In principle approval for WC
loan is required.
ci
(vii) Annexure-IV (profitability) of SIDBI’s appraisal shows
‘Nil’ interest on WC, whereas WC bank loan has been
shown.
(viii) undertaking of at least 60% utilization of installed
capacity of CFC by SPV members required
(ix) Details of the specific bank account of the SPV required
5 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameters As per DPR Recommendations by O/o
DC, MSME
i. Break Even Point (BEP)
BEP should be below 60% of the installed capacity.
48.55 %
suitable
j. Internal Rate of Return (IRR), payback period
(Should be above 10%)
IRR is positive at 20.68%.
suitable
k. Debt Service Coverage Ratio
(DSCR)
Not Applicable,
No debt component involved in the project.
There is no term loan.
l. Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
35.18 %
Highly viable (excess of 25% is desirable)
m. Net Present Value (NPV)
(need to be positive )
The NPV with 5% drop
in user charges out of Rs. 5.21 lakh.
suitable
n. DER N/A
o. Sensitivity Analysis Case IRR(
%)
(Post
tax)
NPV
(Post
tax)
ROCE
(%)
Base Case 14.95 175.83 37.26
5% reduction
usage of the
facilities
12.44 5.21 33.11
10% increase
in prod cost
12.78 15.14 30.16
Financia
l paramet
ers are satisfact
ory.
p. Working capital (In-principle
sanction of loan from a bank,
if applicable
arrangement made)
Not mentioned
q. Status of CFCs approved in the State
Currently, no CFC is working
No, CFC approved in the State.
6. Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S.N. Particulars Amount
1 Land and its development On Lease
2 Building & Other Civil Constructions 171.50
3 Plant & Machinery 1487.81
7 Misc. fixed assets 45.00
cii
10 Preoperative expenses 1.84
11 Contingencies 5.00
12 MMWC 58.00
Total Project Cost 1769.15
7. Means of Finance:
8. Plant and machinery- Annexure - I
9. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may approve the
proposal for setting up of the CFC in Home Furnishing Cluster, Panipat.
Particulars % age Amount (Rs. in lakh)
1. SPV contribution (equity share capital)
13.69% 242.24
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India (90% of the eligible project cost upto Rs. 15
crore)
76.31% 1350.00
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Haryana
(10% of the total project cost)
10.00% 176.91
Total 100% 1769.15
ciii
Agenda No. 30.37: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in four clusters
Proposal has been received for conducting Diagnostic Study in four clusters from Director
of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Haryana.
I AUTO COMPONENTS CLUSTER, FARIDABAD
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Auto Components Cluster
Location Faridabad, Haryana
Products Sheet metal, Rubber & Plastic components.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Not mentioned.
Age of cluster About 30 years old.
No. of Units 2500 units
Profiles of units/
Category
Not available.
Turnover (per annum) Year Rs.(Crore)
2006 -07 2133.00
2007-08 2370.00
2008-09 2633.00
2009-10 2925.00
2010-11 3250.00
Export Rs. 250 crore
Employment (direct /
indirect)
10,000- Direct Employment
20,000- Direct & Indirect Employment
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Faridabad Small Industries Association, Faridabad.
Name of the agency
for conducting DSR
Agency for DSR needs to be selected as per GFR provision.
Main Problems of
cluster • The typical micro-sized units in the cluster have poor linkages
with Nationalized and other commercial banks affecting their
performance potential.
• The fact that much of required raw material including CR and HR
sheets and NR is sourced through traders has been affecting the potential performance of cluster enterprises.
• There is need to however, employ advanced technology machine tools like CNC lathes machining centres, etc. despite the needs to
upgrade activities in terms of automatic pipe cutting equipment or
CNC machining /lathe facilities firms are yet to pursue serious
upgrading efforts. The reason may be ascribed to resource
constraints.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Investment Promotion Center, Chandigarh (an agency of
Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Haryana).
Project Cost Rs. 2.20 Lakh for DSR
civ
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
MSME-DI, Karnal;
DIC, Faridabad.
Justification for DSR Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further action
of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Outcomes Not mentioned.
II) PRINTING & PACKAGING CLUSTER, KARNAL, HARYANA.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Printing & Packaging Cluster
Location Karnal, Haryana
Products Visiting cards, Marriage cards, corrugated boxes, books, calendars,
diaries, magazines, paper cups, mono cartons etc.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Not mentioned.
Age of cluster About 60-70 years old.
No. of Units 300 units
Profiles of units/
Category
Not mentioned.
Turnover (per annum) Year Rs.
2006-07 226 crore.
2007-08 260 crore.
2008-09 300 crore.
2009-10 360 crore.
2010-11 452 crore.
Export The whole cluster is currently catering to the Domestic market only.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
3172- Directly Employed,
6000- Directly and Indirectly Employed
Presence of association/NGO,
contact details
Name of the agency
for conducting DSR
Agency for DSR needs to be selected as per GFR provision.
Main Problems of
cluster • Non-use of testing equipment and in case of some jobs testing in
labs in the NCR region with long lead times and logistical
constraints
• Power not available for several hours a day and natural gas
connectivity being some time away, the option of exploiting
alternate energy options including biomass based energy
generation is necessary.
• The typical micro-sized units in the cluster have poor linkages
with Nationalized and other commercial banks affecting their
cv
performance potential.
• The fact that much of required raw material is sourced through
traders and dealers has been affecting the potential performance
of the cluster enterprises.
• Despite the fact that competent technical institutions such as the
Kurukshetra University (Department of Printing Technology) are
present in nearby locations, cluster firms are yet to pursue serious
upgrading efforts. The reason may be ascribed to resource
constraints.
• There is Potential for exports subject to technology upgrading in
Publication, Pharma sector & Wedding cards.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Investment Promotion Center, Chandigarh (an agency of
Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Haryana).
Project Cost Rs. 2.20 Lakh for DSR
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
DIC, Karnal
MSME-DI, Karnal
Justification for DSR Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Outcomes Not mentioned.
III PRINTING & PACKAGING CLUSTER, RAI, SONEPAT
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Printing & Packaging Cluster
Location Rai, Sonepat, Haryana
Products Marriage cards, calendars, and printed stationeries to labels,
corrugated box manufacturing, pharmaceutical packaging, sweet and gift box manufacturing.
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Not mentioned.
Age of cluster About 20-30 years old.
No. of Units 110 units
Profiles of units/
Category
Not mentioned.
Turnover (per annum) Year Rs. Crore
2006 – 07 105.00
2007-08 115.00
2008-09 127.00
cvi
2009-10 140..00
2010-11 154.00
Export Presently Negligible.
Employment (direct /
indirect) 4400- Direct Employment
Name of the agency
for conducting DSR
Agency for DSR needs to be selected as per GFR provision.
Main Problems of
cluster • Non-use of testing equipment and in case of some jobs testing in
labs in the NCR region with long lead times and logistical
constraints
• Power not available for several hours a day and natural gas
connectivity being some time away, the option of exploiting
alternate energy options including biomass based energy
generation is necessary.
• The typical micro-sized units in the cluster have poor linkages
with Nationalized and other commercial banks affecting their
performance potential.
• The fact that much of required raw material is sourced through
traders and dealers has been affecting the potential performance
of the cluster enterprises.
• The market development initiatives will have to be coupled with
activities targeting technology upgrading- particularly by way of
pre-press, press and post-press and packaging operations. In the
absence of support from government, cluster enterprises may
experience sustainability concerns in the medium-to-long term
perspective.
• There is Potential for exports subject to technology upgrading in
Publication, Pharma sector & Wedding cards.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Investment Promotion Center, Chandigarh (an agency of
Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Haryana).
Project Cost Rs. 2.20 Lakh for DSR
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
DIC, Gurgaon;
MSME-DI, Karnal
Justification for DSR Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
cvii
IV STAINLESS STEEL UTENSILS CLUSTER, KUNDLI
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Stainless steel utensils Cluster
Location Kundli, Sonepat
Products Stainless steel utensils and cutlery
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Not mentioned.
Age of cluster About 10 years old.
No. of Units 72 nos. units
Profiles of units/
Category
(MSE firms – 72, Medium and Large firms – 0)
Turnover (per annum) Year Rs. in crore
2006-07 458.00
2007-08 427.00
2008-09 606.00
2009-10 695.00
2010-11 800.00
Export 50-60% of out-put being export oriented.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
4200 nos. (Directly)
8000 nos. (Directly and indirectly)
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Stainless Steel House ware Association.
Name of the agency
for conducting DSR
Agency for DSR needs to be selected as per GFR provision.
Main Problems of
cluster • Rising input costs in terms of coil and “patta” and relatively
stagnant market prices for finished products and services offered
by cluster firms has been affecting profitability of cluster firms.
Optimization of procurement costs as well as technology
upgrading is critical to retain competitive advantage.
• With power available only for a few hours a day and
establishment of the connectivity plans of the HSIIDC some time
away, the option of exploiting alternate energy options including
biomass based energy generation is critical without which
viability of firms may be affected in the longer term perspective.
• The typical small-sized units in the cluster have poor linkages
with Nationalised and other commercial banks affecting their
performance potential. Typically, the assistance secured from
banks has low limits.
• The fact that much of required raw material is sourced through
traders has been affecting the potential performance of cluster
enterprises They are yet to explore joint and bulk purchase of
units from firms like Jindal or Hissar Steel or direct import of
some grades of units as to further optimize procurement costs.
They are therefore often subject to speculative action by traders.
• Despite the needs to upgrade activities in terms of circle cutting
and polishing firms are yet to pursue serious upgrading efforts.
cviii
The reason may be ascribed to resource constraints.
• The enterprises are largely small in size and unable to
individually reap scale economies on some fronts (procurement,
and technology upgrading) as against larger manufactures in
other regions like China.
• There is an acute shortage of manpower in activities like
polishing, also implying need for greater capital intensive
automation in the segment.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
IA, its experience in cluster development
Investment Promotion Center, Chandigarh (an agency of Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Haryana).
Project Cost Rs. 2.20 Lakh for DSR
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
DIC, Sonepat;
MSME-DI, Karnal.
Justification for DSR Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further action
of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Outcomes Not mentioned.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal for coudcting diagnostic study in above mentioned four clusters. Steering Committee may approve the
proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in 4 Clusters at cost of Rs. 2.20 lakh each with 100% GoI grants.
cix
Agenda No. 30.38: Soft Interventions in Paint & Chemical Industry Cluster, Karnal.
Proposal has been received from MSME-DI, Karnal.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Paint & Chemical Industry Cluster
Location Karnal
Products Synthetic Enamel, Red Oxide Primer, Cement Primer, Water proof
cement paint, Oil Bound Distemper, Plastic Emulsion, Furniture Enamel, Paint Brush and all kind of industrial/decorative thinners.
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
In the present technology the plants and machineries used are - Ball mill, Edge runner, Pug mill and Pebble mill.
These machineries not only take lots of time to produce the finished materials but also have high power consumption. They also do
not furnish the products of good quality which can meet the current
consumers requirement. The production capacity is also low.
Age of cluster About 33 years.
No. of Units 62 nos. units
Profiles of units/ Category
Minority – 6, Woman – 1 and SC/ST –Nil.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 100 crore per annum.
Export No direct export from the cluster.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
700 nos. (Direct)
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
The Karnal Paints & Chemicals Manufacturer Association.
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes.
• The vision of Karnal Paint & Chemical Cluster is to continuously upgrade the manufacturing competence and quality of products,
introduce the manufacturing of new products and stimulate the growth in their manufacturing capacities to make it as an
economically progressive cluster.
Main Problems of
cluster • No adherence to global regulatory norms.
• Inadequate availability of raw materials.
• Non-availability of Skilled manpower.
• No training programme.
• Weak linkages with technical institutions.
• Lack of common testing and research laboratories.
• Limited product range of cluster.
• No joint marketing efforts.
• Rising cost of raw materials and other inputs.
Need for CFC, if any Establishment of CFC for testing and training, providing raw material
depot, effluent treatment facility, complementing production process etc.
2. Analysis of Proposal
cx
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments, if
any
IA, its experience in
cluster development
MSME-DI, Karnal
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality / Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
• Trust Building.
• Awareness Building on seminars on Cluster
Development Programme
• Capacity Building
• Exposure Visits to relevant cluster.
• Strengthening of Associations
Whether DSR validated
by the stakeholders
Yes.
Project Cost Project Cost: Rs. 22.80 lakh
GoI contribution: Rs.15.50 lakh. Cluster units/association: Rs. 7.30 lakh.
Technical Agency to be associated & its expertise
MSME-DI, Karnal, DIC, Karnal.
Justification for undertaking Soft
Interventions
Soft interventions will help like improvement of technology, facility up gradation, propagation of
quality control, sourcing of raw material, marketing, organizational building and
networking interventions as a result to increase the turnover, production, market, quality and
employment in the cluster.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales, Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
S.
No
Particulars Before
Interventions
After
Interventions
1. Turnover 100 crore. 170 crore.
2. Employment 700 nos. 1050 nos.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs.
22.80 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 15.50 lakh and the remaining
Rs. 7.30 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
cxi
Agenda No. 30.39: Soft Interventions in Pharmaceutical Cluster, Karnal.
Proposal has been received from MSME-DI, Karnal.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Pharmaceutical Cluster
Location Karnal
Products Tablets, Capsules, Liquid Orals, Ayurvedic Medicines, Herbal
Extracts, External Preparation, Ointments, Dry Powder & Syrups.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Process & quality up-gradation is essential through skill based training
programmes and propagation of advanced technologies. Strong linkage will be established with Drug Control Department besides marketing
assistance and technology up gradation scheme and technology/quality up gradation scheme of National Manufacturing Competitiveness
Programme.
Age of cluster More than 3 decades.
No. of Units 55 nos. (Allopathic – 29 and Ayurvedic – 23)
Profiles of units/
Category
Women – 6, Minority – 2
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 131 crore.
Export Rs. 30 crore.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
1600 nos. (Direct – 1000 and Indirect – 600)
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
M/s Karnal Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association.
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes. DSR recommends soft and hard interventions in the cluster.
Main Problems of
cluster • Absence of common testing facilities.
• Sourcing of raw materials from far away places leading to high
cost of production.
• Lower value addition and value realization.
• Limited product diversification.
• Limited market penetration.
• Poor efforts on export marketing.
• Lack of brand identity.
• High cost of packaging material with spurious/poor quality material.
Need for CFC, if any Establishment of Common Testing Laboratory Setting up of common pet packaging plant
Setting up of raw material depot.
2. Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As per proposal Comments, if
any
IA, its experience in
cluster development
MSME-DI, Karnal
Activities Proposed • Trust Building. �
cxii
Description As per proposal Comments, if
any
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
• Awareness Building on seminars on
Cluster Development Programme
• Capacity Building
• Exposure Visits to relevant cluster.
• Strengthening of Associations
Whether DSR validated
by the stakeholders
Yes.
Project Cost Project Cost: Rs. 15.60 lakh
GoI contribution: Rs.12.35 lakh. Stakeholders : Rs. 3.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
MSME-DI, Karnal
DIC, Karnal.
Justification for
undertaking Soft
Interventions
Soft interventions will help to upgrade the
manufacturing competence and quality of
products to introduce the new products and
stimulate the growth in their manufacturing
capacities to make it as an economically
progressive cluster.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment, ISO & other Certification,
others
S.
No
Particulars Before
Interventions
After
Interventions
1. Turnover 131 crore 200 crore.
2. Employment 1600 (Increase by
50%)
3. Profitability - (Increase by
20%)
4. Export 30 crore (Increase by
20%)
4. ISO 9001 Certification
(units)
5 (units) 15 (units)
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in cluster at a total cost of Rs. 15.60
lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 12.35 lakh and the remaining Rs. 3.25 lakh to be contributed by stakeholders.
cxiii
Agenda No.30.40 Soft Interventions in Furniture and Fabrication Cluster, Rampur
Bushahsr
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh.
1 Brief information of Cluster
Name of the Cluster Furniture and Fabrication Cluster.
Location Rampur Bushahsr, Shimla, HP
Products Furniture and Iron Fabrication
Technological
details, pollution
angle, etc.
Lack upgraded technology and training, due to unplanned or
unaligned production there is hugh wastage of raw materials, also
due to stringent use or demand. Lack of space also adds to the
wastage and also Sound and Air pollution.
Age of cluster 56 years
No. of Units 25
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro and small -25
Turnover (per
annum)
Approx Rs.586 Lacs
Export NIL
Employment (direct
/ indirect)
125-140 people
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
--
Whether DSR
conducted
DSR was conducted in July 2010.
Extent of
Competition for
cluster
At present the Cluster serves the needs of the Local market. The
basic competition is from the other adjoining clusters. These units will only be able to compete in the market if they are give technical
and design oriented training and also a session on quality assurance methods
Main Problems of
cluster
1. Lack of Space , Skilled Labour, Machinery and Knowledge of their use
2. Lack of Knowledge of Taxes, Transportation Facilities and New Design Knowledge and Design Development.
3. Lack of work Methods, Funds, easy access to Raw Material,
Safety Method and Electricity
4. Lack of Marketing of the Products
Need for CFC, if any Yes
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
As per proposal Comments, if any
IA, its experience in cluster
development
District Industries Centre, Shimla State govt will be
requested to
identify suitable
agency for
cxiv
implementation
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
1. Formation of an Association,
2. Actively participating in
Exhibitions and Fairs Nationally
and Internationally,
3. Workshop, Seminar and training
sessions to be conducted for the
Unit workers in order to equip
them with the knowledge on
design, technology, work methods,
quality, budgeting, marketing, etc.
4. Formation of website
5. Organizing Factory Visit and
Study tours at various companies, clusters, etc.
Whether DSR validated by
the stakeholders
Not validated
Project Cost Project Cost : 9.85 lakh
GoI contribution : 8.13 lakh
State Govt. Contribution:0.86 lakh
SPV contribution : 0 .86 lakh
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Some private tool and Equipment companies may be
associated with in order to give the workers training on
usage and designing aspects.
Justification for
undertaking Soft
Interventions
DSR was conducted in July 2010 in order to get the Pulse of
the Cluster standings in terms of technology, design, funds
and issues being faced by the existing units.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
Not given
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in Furniture and Fabrication Cluster,
Rampur Bushahsr at a total cost of Rs. 9.85 lakh for a period of 18 months, with GoI contribution of Rs. 8.13 lakh, Rs.0.86 Lakhs from HP and the remaining Rs. 0.86 lakh to be
contributed by SPV.
cxv
Agenda No.30.41: Proposal for conducting diagnostic study of Iron & Steel Product Cluster,
Damtal, District Kangra, HP
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh.
1. Details of the proposal are as under:
2. Analysis of Proposal
Parameters Proposed by Implementing
Agency
Comments by Cluster
Division
IA, its experience in cluster development
Himachal Consultancy Organization (HIMCON).
State govt will be requested
to identify suitable agency
for implementation
Project Cost Rs. 2.25 Lakh
Technical Agency to
be associated & its Himachal Consultancy Organization
(HIMCON).
HIMCON is a recognized
consultant of Govt. of HP
Name of the Cluster Iron & Steel Product Cluster
Location Damtal, District Kangra, HP.
Products Iron & Steel Product – Steel wires, GI wire, wire netting, standard
wire, annealed wire, HC wire, electrode wire, wire mesh, wire nails,
barbed wire, chain link, MS ingots, MS rod, MS channel/Angle etc.
Age of cluster 35 years.
No. of Units 48 nos.
Size of the Units Micro-11, Small-33
Profiles of units Micro-11, Small-33; women owned-02; SC owened-01;Minorites
owned -01
Employment Not available.
Turnover Rs. 200.00 crore.
Export Not available.
Problems of the
cluster
� Non-availability of raw material depot, non-availability of
testing facilities for the raw material as well as for the
finished product.
� Lack of technical resource centre for skill up-gradation of
work force.
� Non-availability of container depot and lack of physical
infrastructure like good roads, sewerage and common
effluent treatment plant.
� Lack of market information, feeble relation/poor linkage between industry and technical institutions.
Name of the agency
for conducting DSR
Himachal Consultancy Organization.
(Agency for DSR needs to be selected as per GFR provisions)
GoI assistance
proposed
Rs. 2.25 lakh
Technical consultant/
Professional Bodies to be associated
MSME-DI, Solan
DIC, Dharamsala Industrial Area Development Agency Dist. Kangra.
Govt. of Polytechnic College Kangra.
cxvi
expertise
Justification for DSR Need related to technology, quality
energy consumption pattern,
pollution, emission process
modification, marketing exports,
skill development etc. for activities
proposed under soft interventions
has clearly been worked out in
diagnostic study report.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Iron & Steel Product
Cluster, Damtal, District Kangra at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
cxvii
Agenda No.30.42: Proposal for conducting diagnostic study of Wooden Furniture
Cluster, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh
1. Details of the proposal are as under:
Name of the Cluster Wooden Furniture Cluster.
Location Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh.
Products Wooden furniture, doors, windows and frames.
Age of cluster NA
No. of Units Total -21 Units (All Micro Units)
Size of the Units Not available.
Profiles of units Not available.
Employment Not available.
Turnover Rs. 2.00 to 2.50 crore
Export 2.00 to 35 .00 lakh
Problems of the cluster � Non- availability of raw material, timber is not locally available.
� Most of the units are using the obsolete technology for production and using the
traditional ways as they are unable to invest to purchase modern machinery..
� Non- availability of container depot. � Skilled local labour is not easily available.
Name of the agency for
conducting DSR Himachal Consultancy Organization.
(agency for DSR needs to be selelcted as per GFR
provisions)
GoI assistance proposed Rs. 2.00 lakh
Technical consultant/ Professional Bodies to be
associated
MSME-DI, Solan; DIC, Hamirpur; IADA, District Hamirpur.
3. Analysis of Proposal
Parameters Proposed by Implementing
Agency
Comments by Cluster
Division
IA, its experience in
cluster development
Himachal Consultancy
Organization (HIMCON).
State govt will be
requested to identify
suitable agency for
implementation
Project Cost Rs. 2.00 Lakh
Technical Agency to be associated & its
expertise
Himachal Consultancy
Organization (HIMCON).
Justification for DSR Need related to technology,
quality energy consumption pattern, pollution, emission
process modification, marketing exports, skill development etc. for
cxviii
activities proposed under soft
interventions has clearly been
worked out in diagnostic study
report.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in the Cluster at total
cost of Rs. 2.00 lakh with 100% GoI grants.
cxix
Agenda No.30.43: Soft Interventions in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster,
Ludhiana.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster
Location Ludhiana, Punjab
Products Oil Expeller & Parts
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Most of the manufacturers are Micro & Small Enterprises and are
using very old & Conventional machines for making parts of machines. Casting being done is not graded & even testing is not done
for testing the properties of casted material.
Age of cluster 60 years.
No. of Units 177 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
All are Micro & Small units.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 145.00 crore
Export Rs. 40.00 crore
Employment (direct /
indirect)
2000 nos.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Society, Ludhiana.
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes
� Designing of Expellers and its parts is not being done presently in
a scientific manner, so training needs to be provided on structured
designing of components by using designing software, doing
FMEA (Failure Mode & Effect Analysis), stress calculation and
use of factor of safety etc.
Main Problems of
cluster • Fluctuation in price and high cost of raw materials, ,
inadequate skilled operators to run modern machines.
• Low productivity level of labour, high rejection rates.
• Absence of sufficient testing facilities
• Weak linkages between MSME’s and institutions technology
upgradation is slower.
• Higher electricity tariff, terrible shortage of power, high rate of
interest for loans.
• Lack of specialized skill training institutes, poor working
conditions, lack of working capital and high tax and duties
structure.
Need for CFC, if any � Tool Room needs to be created.
� A forging unit needs to be created.
� A training institute needs to be created
� A casting plant needs to be put to improve availability of graded
castings.
cxx
2. Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments, if any
IA, its experience in
cluster development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of
Punjab.
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality / Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
� Awareness creation & implementation of
5S, 3K, Kaizens, Pokayoke, TPM&TQM. � Trust Building
� Awareness on various Govt. schemes � Participation in Foreign Fair
� Capacity building
� Visit to a successful cluster
Whether DSR validated by the stakeholders
Yes
Project Cost Project Cost: Rs. 15.30 lakh
GoI contribution: Rs. 10.48 lakh.
Cluster units/association: 4.82 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Taaran Industries Ludhiana, MSME-DI,
Ludhiana
Justification for
undertaking Soft Interventions
Soft Interventions aims to identity & meet
the felt need of MSME’s in the cluster by channelizing the utilization of resources of
support service institute in a coordinated and integrated manner.
Main outcomes (before & after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
S.
No
Particulars Before
Interventions
After
Interventions
1. Total turnover Rs. 145.00 crore
Rs. 300.00 crore
2. Exports Rs. 40.00
crore
Rs. 110.00
crore
3. ISO 9001:2008 2 units 5 units
4. Awareness on latest
concepts of 5S,
KAIZENS,
POKAYOKE, PARETO
Analysis, 7-QC Tools,
SMED, kan ban,
inventory management,
TPM, TQM, OEE, 6-
Sigma and lean manufacturing
Very low
(around 10-15
%)
High
awareness in
all employees
of cluster
member units
(100%)
5. Rejection 5-6% 2-3%
6. Pollution Not within
permissible
limits
Within
permissible
limits
7. Cost of manufacturing Rs. 67 Kg. Rs. 60 Kg.
cxxi
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in cluster at a total cost of Rs. 15.30
lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 10.48 lakh and the remaining Rs. 4.82
lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
cxxii
Agenda No.30.44 Soft Interventions in Steel Re-rolling Cluster, Mandi Govindgarh
Proposal has been received from MSME-DI, Ludhiana.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Steel Re-rolling Cluster
Location Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab
Products Steel products are as follow: -
Rounds, Squares, Bar, TMT Bars, Press Patti, Flat, Channel, CTD Bars, Joists, Patra, Angles, Hexagons.
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Mandi Gobindgarh’s industries are mostly using traditional type of machines and processes. The Mandi Gobindgarh steel re-rolling
industries still survive on old conventional processes and technologies.
The industry is presently using conventional low speed, open train type
machineries and manual operations that is resulting into low
efficiency-productivity wise as well as energy wise.
Age of cluster 55 years old
No. of Units 273 Nos.
Profiles of units/ Category
Women – 2, Minority – 25%
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 1145.00 Cr.
Export NA
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Over 1 lakh (Direct & Indirect)
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
All India Steel Re-roller’s Association, Mandi Gobindgarh
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes
� Continuous supply, no inventory cost and reduced working capital
requirement.
� Higher energy efficiency and saving in cost.
� Improved process efficiency and productivity due to lesser scale
losses and resultant savings in cost.
� Provides advantage in rerolling of thicker and heavier material
which is otherwise difficult in coal furnaces.
� Provides different heating zones which is not possible in coal furnaces.
Problems of the cluster
• Hinterland location restricts the Export potential.
• Non-availability of international airport.
• BDS providers are not employed.
• Highly skilled manpower is not available.
• No formal skill up-gradation training for worker.
• Technological level is low leading to low productivity & value
addition and poor quality standards.
• Absence of technical analysis and professional design with
regard to many products.
• Low level of automation. The industry is highly labour
intensive. Informal and unorganized industrial sector.
Entrepreneurs are shy of new and upgraded technology.
• Migration of Entrepreneurship to other parts of the country due
to facilities and incentive there.
cxxiii
• Poor exploration of domestic market as well as export market.
• Inadequate information on markets. Price based competition.
Poor brand building efforts.
Need for CFC, if any � R & D support to the electric arc and induction furnaces, ladle
refining units, Rerolling mills and direct reduced iron units.
� Provide testing facility services to the industries.
� Provide trained technical manpower through short term and long
term courses.
2. Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by Cluster
Division
IA, its experience in
cluster development
MSME-DI, Ludhiana
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
� Capacity building & Trust building.
� For proper coordination of the cluster
actors regular meetings shall be
convened.
� Market Development.
� Technology Upgradation.
Whether DSR validated
by the stakeholders
-
Project Cost Project Cost: Rs. 24.60 lakh
GoI contribution: Rs. 17.90 lakh.
Cluster units/association contribution:
Rs. 6.70 lakh.
Technical Agency to be associated & its expertise
• National Institute for Secondary Steel Technology, Mandi Gobindgarh,
• PPDC, Agra,
• MSME-Tool Room, Ludhiana
• Mechanical Engineering Research &
Development Organization
(MERADO), Ludhiana
Justification for
undertaking Soft
Interventions
As per the DSR, cluster is unable to
develop because of the shortage of the
electricity, unskilled labour and ceiling in
production. All the investors are ready to
accept and follow the latest technology
subject to the availability at the reasonable and viable cost.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
(Page – 49 of DPR)
Employment Generation (Direct and
indirect ) – 1 lakh – 3 lakh.
No. of Beneficiaries – 273 nos.
Proposal for the consideration of Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the
proposal. Steering Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in cluster at a total
cost of Rs. 24.60 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 17.90 lakh and the
remaining Rs. 6.70 lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
cxxv
Agenda No.30.45: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Agriculture
Implements Cluster, Malout, Distt. Mukatsar, Punjab
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Agriculture Implements Cluster
Location Malout Industrial Club, Malout.
Products Agricultural Implements parts.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
There is a dire need for adoption of modern technology to enhance
efficiency & productivity.
Age of cluster About 45 years old.
No. of Units 75 units (SME – 56)
Profiles of units/
Category
Not available.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 62.00 crore.
Export Not available.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Not available.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Not given
Main Problems of
cluster
� Need for adoption of modern technology to enhance efficiency
and productivity.
� For reaping the benefits of global marketing, reducing inventory
costs and improving maintenance cost will meet the needs of the
market in the current business scenario.
� Globalization has resulted in standards that pervade products,
product performance, manufacturing, processing and services.
� Energy saving is another problem being faced by this cluster.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be associated & its expertise
Not available.
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Tractor Parts Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Agriculture
Implements Cluster, Malout, Distt. Mukatsar, Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
cxxvi
Agenda No.30.46 Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Agriculture
Implements Cluster, Talwanti Bhai, Dist – Ferozepur.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Agriculture Implements Cluster
Location Talwanti Bhai, Dist – Ferozepur.
Products Agriculture Implements parts.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
There is a dire need for adoption of modern technology to enhance
efficiency & productivity.
Age of cluster About 45 years ago.
No. of Units 75 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Not available.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 65.00 crore.
Export Not available.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Not available.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
Not given
Main Problems of
cluster
� Finding ways & means to develop low cost strategy is the need of
hour competitiveness is the buzz word today.
� There is need for adoption of stricter emission & safety norms.
� Energy saving is another problem being faced by this cluster
which required adoption of measures to reduce consumption and
to identify key opportunities for saving by focusing of energy
intensive system.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Not available.
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Tractor
Parts Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Agriculture Implements Cluster, Talwanti Bhai, Dist – Ferozepur at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI
grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
cxxvii
Agenda No.30.47: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Hand Tools
Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Hand Tools Manufacturers Cluster
Location Ludhiana, Punjab
Products Manufacturing of Hand Tools (spanners, screw, drivers, testers, wrenches, pliers etc.)
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Production process: blanking-forging-trimming-punching-broaching-grinding-autoshankharding-tempering-barreling-
shortblasting-Zn/Ni plating.
Age of cluster About 20 years old.
No. of Units 300 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro and Small- 25
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 200 crore.
Export Not mentioned.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Not available.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
M/s. Ludhiana Hand Tools Cluster (Regd.), Ludhiana.
Main Problems of
cluster
� Work force shortage.
� Efforts are required to cut the manufacturing costs.
� Efforts are required to build a modern business environment.
� Efforts are required to know lean and 5S scale.
� Need to improve product designs, tools and fixtures as to make
products globally competitive.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 3.00 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.50 lakh.
Technical Agency to be associated & its expertise
Not available.
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Hand Tools Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Hand Tools
Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 3.00 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.50 lakh.
cxxviii
Agenda No.30.48: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Tractors Parts
Manufacturers Cluster, Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Tractor Parts Manufacturer Cluster
Location Hoshiarpur, Punjab
Products Cluster members comprising of small & micro manufacturing
enterprises engaged in manufacturing of tractor parts for International Tractor Limited, manufacturers of “Sonalika” tractor.
Technological details Not mentioned.
Age of cluster About 15 years old.
No. of Units 55 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Not available.
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 250 crore.
Export Rs. 50 crore (export out of total turnover)
Employment (direct / indirect)
Not available.
Association/NGO, contact details
M/s P.K Khanna & Associates, Hoshiarpur.
Main Problems of cluster
� Need for adoption of modern technology to enhance efficiency and productivity.
� For reaping the benefits of global marketing, reducing inventory costs and improving maintenance cost will meet the needs of the
market in the current business scenario. � Globalization has resulted in standards that pervade products,
product performance, manufacturing, processing and services.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Not available.
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Tractor
Parts Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Tractors Parts
Manufacturers Cluster, Hoshiarpur, Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs.
2.25 lakh.
Agenda No.30.49 Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Tractor Parts
Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
cxxix
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Tractor Parts Manufacturers Cluster
Location Ludhiana, Punjab
Products All types of fasteners, nuts, hubs, brake drums, pins, top link ,shaft, gears, check nuts and specters etc.
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Not given
Age of cluster About 40 years
No. of Units Approx. 200 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro-180 and Small- 10 (Women enterprises-10)
Turnover (per annum) Approx. Rs. 150 crore.
Export Not mentioned.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Not available.
Presence of
association/NGO, contact details
M/s. Ludhiana Tractor Parts Manufacturers, Association, Ludhiana.
Main Problems of cluster
� There is a dire need for adoption of modern technology. � Efforts are required to cut the manufacturing costs.
� Efforts are required to build a modern business environment.
� Efforts are required to know lean and 5S scale.
� Need to improve product designs, tools and fixtures as to make
products globally competitive.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Not mentioned
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Tractor
Parts Manufacturers Clusters.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Tractor Parts
Manufacturers Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Agenda No.30.50 Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Wire Drawing
Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
cxxx
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Wire Drawing Cluster
Location Ludhiana, Punjab
Products Production of H. B. wire products. (Wire and Wire Products from Steel Wire Rods)
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Production process: Produces wire & wire products from steel wire rods.
(There is significant pollution due to acid being used in picking)
Age of cluster About 55 years old.
No. of Units Approx. 250 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro-228 and Small- 22 (Women enterprises-03)
Turnover (per annum) Approx. Rs. 1000 crore.
Export Not mentioned.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Not available.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
M/s. wire Drawing Development Society, Ludhiana.
Main Problems of
cluster
� There is a dire need for adoption of modern technology.
� Efforts are required to cut the manufacturing costs.
� Efforts are required to build a modern business environment.
� Efforts are required to know lean and 5S scale.
� Need to improve product designs, tools and fixtures as to make
products globally competitive.
� There is a need of software to support design material selection,
processing, testing and final validation
2 Analysis of Proposal
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Not available.
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Hand
Tools Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Wire Drawing
Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
cxxxi
Agenda No.30.51: Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Foundry & General
Engg. Cluster, Phagwara (Kapurthala), Punjab.
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Foundry & General Engg. Cluster
Location Phagwara (Kapurthala), Punjab
Products Diesel Engine Parts Motor parts, etc.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Not given
Age of cluster About 55 years old.
No. of Units Approx. 200 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro-186 and Small- 14 (Women owned-02, Owned by SC- 02)
Turnover (per annum) Approx. Rs. 150 crore.
Export Not mentioned.
Employment (direct / indirect)
Not available.
Presence of association/NGO,
contact details
Laghu Udyog Bharti, Phagwara.
Main Problems of
cluster
� There is a dire need for adoption of modern technology.
� Efforts are required to cut the manufacturing costs. � Efforts are required to build a modern business environment.
� Efforts are required to know lean and 5S scale.
� Need to improve product designs, tools and fixtures as to make
products globally competitive.
� There is a need of software to support design material selection,
processing, testing and final validation
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster
development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of Industry, Govt. of Punjab.
Project Cost Total project cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI is Rs. 2.25 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Regional Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (RCED),
Chandigarh- (a Non – Govt. organization registered under
Society Registration Act.)
Justification for DSR The DSR will be elaborating the new technology for Hand
Tools Manufacturers.
Outcomes Finding of DSR will help to take the decision for further
action of plan for the cluster’s needs.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Foundry & General
Engg. Cluster, Phagwara (Kapurthala), Punjab at a total cost of Rs. 2.50 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 2.25 lakh.
cxxxii
Agenda No. 30.52: Soft Interventions in Printing & Packaging Cluster, Ludhiana
Proposal has been received from Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Punjab.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Printing & Packaging Cluster
Location Ludhiana, Punjab
Products Printing boxes, folding carton corrugated boxes, text & religious
books, catalogues & price list, labels, price tags, stationery goods, posters, greeting & wedding cards and calendars etc.
Technological details, pollution angle, etc.
Computerization is rapidly taking place in the field of printing. Computer to plate (CtP) is an imaging technology used in modern
printing process. In this technology, an image created in a Desktop Publishing (DTP) application is output directly to a printing plate.
Age of cluster 100 years
No. of Units 600 units (450 Micro and 150 Small)
Profiles of units/
Category
SC/ST – 10, Woman – 05, Minority – 50
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 1000 crore.
Export Rs. 50 crore
Employment (direct /
indirect)
22000 nos. (Direct12000 –and Indirect –10000)
Presence of
association / NGO,
contact details
Offset Printer’s Association, Ludhiana
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes.
• Up-gradation of technology by adopting techniques like CtP, CtM,
waterless offset printing, automatic post press machines, packaging
and online quality control system will improve the quality of products.
• MDP on marketing, inventory control, production management and
latest manufacturing techniques will help to overcome deficiencies
in managerial and technological skills.
Main Problems of
cluster • Raw market is under development.
• Absence of sufficient testing facilities
• Organized marketing channel are not available
• Technological obsolescence resulting in underutilization of capacity
• No quality control techniques used
• Lack of trained technical/skilled persons
• Lack of market and product diversification.
• Stiff competition from other nearby clusters..
• Weak linkage between SMEs and institutions.
• Insufficient managerial skills. Generally they could not perform
better in the field of finance, marketing and quality control.
Need for CFC, if any Establishment of CFC consisting of Testing Laboratory, training,
Repair & maintenance and Research & Development will give a great boost towards technological development.
2. Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
cxxxiii
Proposed by IA Comments by Cluster Division
IA, its experience in
cluster development
Udyog Sahayak, Deptt. of
Industry, Govt. of Punjab
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality /
Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
• Trust Building.
• Awareness Building on
seminars on Cluster
Development Programme
• Capacity Building
• Exposure Visits to relevant cluster.
• Strengthening of Associations
Whether DSR validated
by the stakeholders
Yes
Project Cost Project Cost: Rs. 23.85 lakh
GoI contribution: Rs.16.01 lakh. Cluster units/association: Rs.
7.84 lakh.
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
MSME-DI, Ludhiana.
Justification for
undertaking Soft Interventions
Soft interventions will help to
build up the awareness among the cluster actors. Participants will be
benefited by improving their quality systems. The training
programme will give exposure to the cluster actors on better
technology, cost reduction and
quality improvement.
Main outcomes (before &
after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability, Employment,
ISO & other Certification,
others
S.
No
Particulars Before
Interventions
After
Interventions
1. No. of units 600 nos Not available.
2. Turnover Rs. 1000
crore. Not available.
3. Export Rs. 50 crore Not available.
4. Employment 22000 nos Not available.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may approve the proposal for Soft Interventions in cluster at a total cost of Rs. 23.85
lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI contribution of Rs. 16.01 lakh and the remaining Rs. 7.84
lakh to be contributed by cluster units / association.
cxxxiv
Agenda No.30.53: Proposals for In –Principle approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Focal Point, Ludhiana.
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
a. Proposals received from Industries and Commerce Department, Govt.
of Punjab.
b. Location of site Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana
c. Whether appraised DPR with
approved layout plan received or not
Not
(DPR is not as per the MSE-CDP guidelines)
d. Total Area of industrial estate/ area
(acre)
Area of Phase-V is not given.
(Total area of Focal Point Industrial Estate-1450 acres)
e. Area to be developed (acre) Area of Phase-V is not given.
f. Number and sizes of plots to be developed
Not given.
g. Implementing Period 24 months
h. Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
i. Performance of ID projects in state. 03 projects completed.
2 Details about Proposal:
Description Comments, if any
a. Implementing Agency (IA): Municipal Corporation,
Ludhiana.
b. Track Record of the IA Not given
c. Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach SIDBI
report.
Not received
d. Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to
railway stations / state highways,
availability of water supply,
adequate power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
yes
e. Whether land is in possession in
the name of IA with Clear Title
yes
f. Whether Zoning regulations and
non-agricultural conversion etc
complied with
Not Available
g. Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor
progress has been Constituted
Not Available
h. Whether confirmation received
form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost
Not Available
cxxxv
and any escalation in cost.
i. Basis of elements of project Cost Not given
j. Tangible Outcomes of the project Not given
k. Justification of the Proposal The ever-increasing number
of industries is causing
tremendous pressure on the
basic service and
infrastructure.
3. Project Cost: (Rs. Lakh)
Particulars Amount
proposed
As per MSE-CDP
guidelines
i. Laying roads 683.50 200.00
ii. Drainage 362.20 60.00
iii. Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc.
71.97 71.97
iv. Total 1117.67 331.97
4. Means of finance:
Particulars Amount (Rs in lakh)
i. GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 331.97
ii. State Government Not given
iii. IA (Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana.) Not given
Total
5. Shortcomings:
i. SIDBI Appraisal report
ii. Land documents.
iii. DPR of the project is not as per MSE-CDP guidelines. Information like area to be developed, tangible Outcomes of the project, plot developed, funding pattern, etc
iv. State Level Committee constitution. v. Confirmation of State Govt. contribution
6. Proposal for the Consideration of the Steering Committee: Cluster division
recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering
Committee may approve in principle approval for the up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities at Focal Point, Ludhiana.
cxxxvi
Agenda No. 30.54: Proposal to set up Common Facility Service Centre in Agricultural
Implements Cluster, Shornur
Industries & Commerce Department, Govt. of Kerala has submitted a proposal for setting up of
Common Facility Service Centre, Tool Room and Training Centre in Agricultural Implements
Cluster, Shornur. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Agricultural Implements Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster
Industrial area Shornur, Palakkad District.
c. Products of the cluster Agricultural Implements of various types, surgical
instruments, cutlery etc.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
130 nos.
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Rs. 43.20 crore
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Not available.
g. Employment in Cluster 3000 nos. (Direct – 2000 and Indirect – 1000)
h. Technological Details Products are manufactured by open forging using
pneumatic hammers or by age old smithy operations.
Quality of product depends upon skill of operator. This
technology is suitable for large objects or when the no. of parts produced is small and it is not suitable for
making products to close tolerance. Cutting operations of raw materials are done manually. Rail and Billets are
cut by a process of marking, heating and hammering. Heat treatment is also done for some products.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes.
j. Main findings of DSR • There is need for common branding and focus on international market. The cluster products reach to
at least 10,000 outlets especially rural areas across
the country.
• Testing facilities for raw material and finished goods are required.
• CAD/CAE software required.
• Project variation is required as per national and
international standards.
• Resolve the human attrition and skill shortage
through setting up common training centre.
k. Main Problems of cluster • Lack of training and skill upgradation.
• Un-scientific methods followed.
• Poor marketing linkages.
• Absence of critical machinery.
• Poor finishing, productivity and use of crude
technology.
• Lack of adequate supply of raw materials.
l. Other information, if any Nil
cxxxvii
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Location of CFC Vill – Shornur – I, Taluk – Ottapalam,
District – Palakkad.
b. Land for CFC
Weather land acquired (page - 64-65/cor.)
1 acre Land for proposed CFC has been allotted on hire purchase by DIC,
Palakkad to SPV on 18.5.09. Cost of land is Rs. 16.00 lakh and SPV has
paid Rs. 1.60 lakh. Remaining amount will be paid in 10 equal
annual installments along with interest.
Title is in name of Registry in name of SPV is not
available.
Required
Valuation and its basis Land on hire purchase basis from
State Govt.
Land is sufficient Yes.
Change of land use Land has been allotted by Industries
Department.
If on lease, duration of
lease
Information not available
Whether lease is legally
tenable
Not applicable.
c. Total Building area (sq ft)
Not available.
d. Rate of construction of building
Not available.
e. Major Outputs of CFC, Projected performance
of cluster after setting up of CFC
Before setting up of CFC
After … years of CFC
Production (Rs in cr) Not available. Not available.
Export (Rs in cr) Not available. Not available.
Employment (nos) 3000 Not available.
Others like no of
ISO, etc
Not available. Not available.
f. Pollution clearance
required or not
Required.
g. Main facilities
proposed • Heat Treatment Plant.
• Shearing machine.
• Dye forging hammer.
• Power Hammer.
• Trimming Press.
• Size Rolling machine.
• Oil Furnace.
• Plasma cutting machine.
• Rubber Moulding machine.
cxxxviii
• Plastic Injection machine.
• Powder Coating machine.
h. Prod capacity of CFC The CFC is meant to be used by the
cluster members as doing job work.
i. Man power in CFC 95 nos.
j. Revenue mechanism
for sustainability of
CFC (by user charges,
etc)
Revenue is estimated from job work and
training centre, as Rs. 604.04 lakh at
100% capacity utilization.
k. Estimated net profit for
1st & 2
nd year.
1st Year – Rs. 76.51 lakh
2nd
Year – Rs. 88.14 lakh
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address “Shornur Agricultural
Implements Consortium Pvt.
Ltd.”, Industrial Estate, Shoranur – 679122
b. Nature of SPV (company or Society or
Trust)
Private Limited Company
c. Name of the state Govt
and MSME officials in SPV
Not available.
d. Date of formation of SPV
16.09.2004
e. Number of MSE
Member Units
43 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Received.
g. Authorized share
capital
Rs. 10.00 lakh.
h. Shareholding Pattern Rs. 10,00,000/- contributed by
28 members and all are having
shares less than 10%.
i. Commitment letter for
contribution
Not received. Required
j. SPV specific A/c Not available. Required
k. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives
pursued by SPV
members with
documentation
Available.
l. Technical Institution Not available.
m. CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also
others in a cluster. Evidence FOR SPV
members’ ability to
Not available.
cxxxix
utilise at least 60% of
installed capacity
n. Utilities requirement
Power Not available.
Water Not available.
Gas/Oil/ Other Not available.
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Land 16.00
2 Building 80.00
3 Plant & Machinery (including installation and electrification) 365.03
4 Misc. fixed assets 7.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project
cost
9.00
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 3.00
7 Margin money for Working Capital 19.67
Total 499.70
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 10% 49.97
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 70% 349.80
3. Grant-in-aid from State Govt. 20% 99.93
Total 100% 499.70
6. Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 31.44% As per guidelines
b. IRR, payback period 27.72% As per guidelines
c. DSCR -
d. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
27.34% As per guidelines
e. NPV Rs. 554.18 lakh As per guidelines
f. DER -
g. Sensitivity Analysis Holds good As per guidelines
7. Plant and Machinery
(Rs in lakh)
Description No. Amount
Training Centre
1 Shaping Machine 1 3.00
2 Duty lathe 1 3.00
3 Power hammer 1 8.00
4 Power hammer (for cutlery forging) 1 3.00
cxl
5 Drop Forging Hammer 1 20.00
6 Trimming Press 1 5.00
7 Oil furnace 1 10.00
8 Flexible Grinder 1 0.08
9 Hand Grinder 1 0.08
10 Welding Machine 1 0.30
11 Grinding Machine 1 0.13
12 Generator Set 1 4.00
Tool Room
1 Milling Machine 1 3.00
2 Drilling Machine-Portable 1 0.10
3 Welding Machine 1 0.30
4 Grinding Machine 1 0.13
5 Power band saw 1 30.00
6 Flexible Grinder 1 0.08
7 Hand Grinder 1 0.08
8 Vertical Machinery Centre 1 65.00
9 Generator Set 0 0.0
Common Facility Centre
1 Heat Treatment Plant Oil Fired 1 30.00
2 Power Hammer 1 18.00
3 Shearing Machine (for rail & leaf cutting) 1 8.00
4 Power Hacksaw (for billet cutting) 1 5.00
5 Closed Dye forging Hammer 1 30.00
6 Trimming Press 1 10.00
7 Size Rolling Machine 1 20.00
8 Welding Machine 2 2.00
9 Rubber Moulding Machine 1 4.00
10 Plastic Injection Moulding 1 2.00
11 Powder Coating Plant 1 6.00
12 Grinding Machine 2 0.26
13 Knife Sharpening machine 1 2.00
14 Oil furnace 1 10.00
15 Plasma Cutting Machine with Compressor 1 2.00
16 Crane 1 5.00
17 Pick-Up 1 4.50
18 Generator Set 1 6.00
Total 320.04
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks,
if any
a. Implementation Agency Kerala Bureau of Industrial
Promotion (KBIP)
b. Commitment of SPV
contribution
Not available.
c. Commitment of State
Government contribution
Available.
d. Commitment of Loans
(Working capital and/ or term
Received.
cxli
loan)
e. Implementation Period 24 months
f. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
SIDBI appraisal has been
requested from State Govt.
vide letter dated 29.08.11 –
Appraisal awaited.
g. Comments of Technical
Division
h. Approval of Technical
Committee
9 Comments of Cluster Development Division: Since appraisal report from SIDBI, Project
Specific Account of SPV, Registry of land in the name of SPV and some other details are not
available, the proposal for setting of CFC in the cluster may be considered for in –principle
approval only.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
cxlii
Agenda No. 30.55 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Soft Toy Cluster, Kottayam under MSE-CDP.
Industries & Commerce Department, Govt. of Kerala has submitted a proposal for In-Principle
approval for setting up of CFC in Soft Toy Cluster, Kottayam. Salient features of the cluster and
the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Soft Toy Cluster
2. Location Kottayam
3. Products Soft Toys
4. Age of the cluster 10-15 years old.
5. No. of Units 343 nos. (300 artisans based units & 32 registered
units)
6. Type of units 32 SSI units.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Mother Toys Consortium Pvt. Ltd.,
8. Recommendation in the DSR The benchmark study conducted in the cluster
recommended for setting up of Skill Upgradation
Training Centre.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions has been taken up by Kerala
Bureau of Industrial Promotion (K-BIP)
10. Formation of SPV Mother Toys Consortium Pvt. Ltd.,
Palamattom Building, Gandhinagar P.O., Kottayam with 32 members.
11. Employment Not available.
12. Turnover Rs. 122.76 lakh
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Kerala.
14. Problems of the cluster • Low skills and workmanship
• Poor designs.
• Very high cost of raw material reducing
profitability.
• Absence of quality control for customer satisfaction.
• Lack of use of technology leading to poor quality of products and higher cost of labour.
• Low awareness of export procedures and documentation.
• No linkages with banks and other financial institutions like SIDBI, NSIC etc.
• Less number of units for mass production.
15. Need for CFC The CFC will provide facilities for Designs/patterns,
pattern cutting, fibre filling, fixing of eyes & nose,
testing of toys on commercial basis and a training
center.
cxliii
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land 20.80
2. Building 18.05
3. Plant & Machinery 38.03
4. Furniture & Fixtures 6.00
5. Vehicle for pick-up &
distribution
5.45
6. Preliminary & pre-
operative expenses
3.00
7. Provisions for
contingencies
2.22
8. Working Capital 5.68
Total 99.23
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs.
in lakh)
1.
SPV contribution
10 9.92
2
.
Grant-in-aid
from Govt.
of Kerala
20 19.85
3
.
Grant-in-aid
from Govt. of India
70 69.46
Total 100 99.23
Short comings in the proposal:
• List of SPV members along with their contribution is not available.
• Project Specific Account in Schedule A Bank is not available.
• As per provision of guidelines, DPR need to be appraised by SIDBI.
• Memorandum and Articles of SPV is not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- The Committee may consider the
proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Soft Toy Cluster, Kottayam, Kerala.
cxliv
Agenda No. 30.56: Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Printers Cluster,
Kannur
Industries & Commerce Department, Govt. of Kerala has submitted a proposal for setting up of
CFC in Printers Cluster Cluster, Kannur. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as
follows:
1 Basic information of cluster
a. Name of the cluster Printers Cluster, Kannur
b. Location of cluster/ spread
of cluster
Kannur - Kerala
c. Products of the cluster Offset printing & training
d. No. of enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
Total – 2645 ( Micro – 2635, small 10 medium –nil)
e. Turnover for the last five
years
Rs 35 cr.
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Nil
g. Employment in cluster 1200 (looks inappropriate vis-à-vis
number of units )
h. Technological details Four colour and web offset
i. Whether DS conducted Yes
j. Main findings of DSR • Offset printing industry is one of the growing
industries since last 20 years
• There is ample scope for development and importance of the cluster
• It is basically a contract/job based industry
• Low labour productivity
• Shortage of skilled labours and advanced
machinery
k. Main problems of cluster Low productivity
Price Competitiveness from Sivakasi Use of old and obsolete technology and machinery
Lack of professionalism
Shortage of skilled labours and advanced machineries
l. Other information, if any Nil
2 Information about proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Location of CFC Kannur district
b. Land for CFC
Weather land acquired Kannur municipality have already
sanctioned in their meeting to allot 20
cents of land for CFC on lease basis –
they will allot the same by end of April
2012
Documents
required.
Title is in name of Not available
Valuation and its basis 5 lakh
cxlv
Land is sufficient Yes
Change of land use No
If on lease, duration of
lease
15 years
Whether lease is
legally tenable
--
c. Total building area (sq
ft)
10,000 sq feet
d. Rate of construction of
building
Rs 90 lakh
e. Major outputs of CFC,
Projected performance
of cluster after setting
up of cfc
Before setting up
of CFC
After 10
years of CFC
Production (rs in cr) 35 53
Export (rs in cr) Nil 20
Employment (nos) 1200 3500
Others like no of
ISO, etc
Nil 50
f. Pollution clearance
required or not
Not required
g. Main facilities
proposed
Printing technology training,
international quality of printing for the
cluster members
h. Prod capacity of CFC Rs 10 cr
i. Man power in CFC 39
j. Revenue mechanism
for sustainability of
CFC (by user charges,
etc)
2.71 cr from training
1.18 cr. from user charges
k. Estimated net profit for
1st & 2
nd year.
1st year -(-17.5 lakh) and
2nd
year - 8.43 lakh
3 Information about spv
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Name and address North Malabar Offset Printers
Consortium Pvt. Ltd., k.m. complex,
near municipal bus stand, Kannur 1,
Kerala
b. Nature of SPV
(company or society or trust)
Private Ltd.
c. Name of the state govt. and MSME officials in
SPV
Mr. Kanakambaran – GM, DIC, Kannur from state govt. and Mr.
Nambeesan – asst director MSME-DI, Thrissur is from MSME.
d. Date of formation of SPV
16.11.2007
e. Number of MSE 33
cxlvi
member units
f. Bye laws or MoA and
AoA submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital Rs 10 lakh
h. Shareholding pattern Not available Required
i. Commitment letter for
contribution Not available Required
j. SPV specific a/c Not available Required
k. Trust building of SPV,
previous track record of co-operative initiatives
pursued by spv
members with
documentation
Members are working together last
15 years, already one raw material bank is running profitably since
1996. Apart from the above, CFC
members have already started one
designing centrre for cluster
members in Kannur. Most of
members are availing facility of
designing it is also running
profitably. SPV has conducted 3
different batches of training to
printing labours in small scale
jointly with Kannur university &
Calicut university for training.
l. Technical institution NTTF (Nettur Technical Training
Institute) leading training institute in
South have already agreed to work
together and syllabus for printing training is also ready. Approval
from Kannur university is expected.
m. CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others in a cluster.
Evidence for SPV members’ ability to
utilise at least 60% of installed capacity
Not Available
n. Utilities requirement
Power 316 kw
Water 1000 ltr
Gas/oil/ other 10 ltr oil
4 Project Cost:
Particulars Amount
1 Land and its development (lease) 5,00,000
2 Building & other civil constructions 90,00,000
3 Plant & machinery (including electrification) 8,18,50,000
4 Misc. Fixed assets 13,00,000
5 Preliminary & pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of
project cost
5,00,000
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 46,32,500
7 Margin money for working capital 20,00,000
cxlvii
Total 9,97,82,500
5. Means of finance:
(Rs. In lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 10 99,78,250
2. Grant-in-aid from govt. of India 70 6,98,47,750
3. Grant-in-aid from govt. of Kerala 20 1,99,56,500
4 Bank loan/ others Nil
Total 9,97,82,500
6 Financial analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 23.77
b. IRR, payback period 9.34
c. DSCR Nil
d. Return on capital employed
(ROCE)
Not Available
e. NPV Not Available
f. DER Not applicable
g. Sensitivity analysis Not available
7. Plant and machinery
Description No. Amount
1 4 colour d/dy. sheet fed offset 1 4,50,00,000.00
2 Multi colour web offset machine 20 pages 1 1,60,00,000.00
3 Single col.d.dy sheet fed offset 1 15,00,000.00
4. Computer to Plate Machine 1 75,00,000.00
5 Programmable cutting machine 43” 1 15,00,000.00
6 Semi automatic cutting machine 43” 1 3,00,000.00
7 Perfect binding machine 1 14,00,000.00
8 Folding machine d/ demy size 1 13,00,000.00
9 Lamination machine 1 3,00,000.00
10 Thread stitching machine 1 3,50,000.00
11 Wire stitching machine 1 1,00,000.00
12 Plate exposing machine 1 3,00,000.00
13 Card punching machine 1 5,00,000.00
14 DTP system - 10,00.000.00
15 Sticker cutting machine 1 3,00,000.00
16 Generator 1 15,00,000.00
17 Knife grinding 1 5,00,000.00
Electrification 25,00,000.00
Total 8,18,50,000.00
8 Implementation arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation agency KBIP, Trivandrum
cxlviii
b. Commitment of SPV
contribution
Not Available Required
c. Commitment of state
government contribution
20% of the project cost
already approved
d. Commitment of loans
(working capital and/ or term
loan)
Nil
e. Implementation period 2 year
f. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
Project already
submitted to SIDBI -
Appraisal report awaited
Appraisal
required
g. Comments of technical
division
Technical Division
suggested revising the
DPR by incorporating
generation of revenue from training activities
also. Modifications made in the revised DPR.
9 Shortcoming
i. Land documents ii. Project specific account
iii. Commitment about SPV contribution, iv. Details for 60% utilization of CFC by SPV members
v. Appraisal report from SIDBI
10. Proposal for the steering committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
cxlix
Agenda No. 30.57 : Proposal for extension of time limit for submission of setting up of 7
Infrastructure Development (ID) centres in Andhra Pradesh
Leather Industries Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. (LIDCAP),
Hyderabad has requested for extension of time limit for submission of setting up of 7
Infrastructure Development (ID) centres in (1) Jinkunta, Mahaboobnagar; (2) Ghanpur (Stn) ,
Warangal; (3) Mallemadugur , Khammam; (4) Armoor, Nizamabad; (5) Mandamarri, Adilabad;
(6) G.D. Nellore, Chitoor; (7) Rukmapur, Karimnagar. LIDCAP is the implementing agency for
the projects.
2 In-principle approval for these 7 centres with Rs 5 lakh each for preparation of DPRs was
accorded in the 23rd
SCM held on 23.08.2010.
3 Rs. 17.50 lakh (50% of sanction grant of Rs. 35.00 lakh) was released to LIDCAP on 30.06.11 with condition that DPRs of the ID centres would be completed within three months
from the receipt of sanction letter and DPRs should be prepared as per MSE-CDP guidelines, duly appraised by SIDBI. Appraised DPRs have not been received by this office. The time limit is
already over on 30.09.11.
4 LIDCAP has informed that title deed in favour of LIDCAP is expected to be completed by
July 2012 and requested for extension of time for a period of 6 months for submission of DPRs.
5. Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering
Committee may consider the proposal for extension of time limit upto 30th September 2012 for
submission of appraised DPRs by LIDCAP.
*****
cli
Agenda No.30.59 Proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study (DSR) in Agarbati
Manufacturing Cluster at District Gaya, Bihar
Proposal has been received from MSME-DI, Patna on 7-3-2012.
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of the Cluster Agarbati Manufacturing Cluster
Location Gaya, Bihar
Products Semi finished Agarbati without scent and finished agarbati.
Technological details,
pollution angle, etc.
Information not available.
Age of cluster About 40 years old.
No. of Units 150 units.
Profiles of units/
Category
Micro - 32
Turnover (per annum) Rs. 2 to 3 crore per annum.
Export Information not available.
Employment (direct /
indirect)
Information not available.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
M/s. Budha Agarbati Nirmata Sangh, Fatma Cottage Road No. 14B,
Aliganj, Gaya - 823001.
Main Problems of
cluster
� Unorganized, lack of knowledge of the latest technology and
market networking.
� The cluster actors are required to be trained with latest technology
in Agarbati manufacturing by organizing capacity building
training programmes under soft intervention of the cluster
development process.
� Introduction of information and communication technology by
developing web portal, e-catalogue, e-commerce and networking
the cluster portal at National level in order to outreach the cluster
into global market etc.
2 Analysis of Proposal
Description As Proposed
IA, its experience in cluster development
MSME-DI, Patna
Project Cost Rs. 1.00 lakh
Technical Agency to be
associated & its expertise
Information not available.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Steering Committee may approve the proposal for conducting Diagnostic Study in Agarbati
Manufacturing Cluster at District Gaya, Bihar at a total cost of Rs. 1.00 lakh and GoI grants of Rs. 1.00 lakh.
clii
AGENDA
for
30th STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
of
MICRO & SMALL ENTERPRISES -
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (MSE-CDP)
(Vol.-II)
DATE : 22 March 2012
TIME : 11:00 a.m.
VENUE : Room No. 701, Nirman Bhawan
New Delhi
MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES,
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (MSME)
NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI
cliii
INDEX
Agenda Description Page
Maharashtra
30.60 Setting up of CFC for Auto & Engineering Cluster, Ahmednagar 1
30.61 Setting up of CFC for General Engineering & Allied Cluster, Bhosari, Pune 7
30.62 Setting up of CFC for Mango Processing Cluster, Ratnagiri 13
Tamilnadu
30.63 Setting up of CFC for Rice Mill Cluster, Thanjavur 18
30.64 Setting up of CFC for Engineering Cluster, Dindigul 24
30.65 Setting up of CFC for Refractory Cluster, Vridhachalam 29
30.66 Setting up of CFC for Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kumbakonam,
Thanjavur
34
30.67 Setting up of CFC for Engineering Cluster, Ambattur 40
30.68 Setting up of CFC for Plastic Cluster, District Madurai, Tamilnadu 45
30.69 Setting up of CFC for Engineering Cluster, Paramakudi, Ramanathanpuram 50
30.70 Setting up of CFC for Plastic Cluster, Chennai, Kancheepuram 54
30.71 Setting up of CFC in Lorry Body Building Cluster, Namakkal, 59
30.72 Setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Perungudi, Tamilnadu 61
30.73 Setting up of CFC in Pharma (MICAL) Cluster, Chennai 63
30.74 Setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Kangayam, Tiruppur 65
30.75 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Mathur, Pudukkottai 67
30.76 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Virudhunagar (Urban), Virudhunagar 70
Karnataka
30.77 Setting up of CFC for Auto Cluster, Bidar 73
30.78 Setting up of CFC for Textile Cluster, Rabakavi, Banahatti, Bagalkot 80
30.79 Setting up of CFC for Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster, Hubli 82
30.80 Other proposals 84
Assam
30.81 Infrastructure Development (ID) at Pathshala, District – Barpeta 85
30.82 Soft Interventions in Bell Metal Cluster, Sarthebari Barpeta District 88
Odisha
30.83 Setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Neelachakra, Brahmagiri, Puri 90
30.84 Setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha 92
30.85 Proposals for development of six clusters in Odisha 94
Uttar Pradesh
30.86 Soft Interventions in Artificial Jewellery Cluster, Meerut 95
30.87 Setting up of CFC for Stainless Steel, Brass & German Silver Utensils Cluster,
Mirzapur
97
30.88 Setting up of CFC for Carpet & Durri Industry Cluster, Shahjahanpur 99
30.89 Setting up of CFC for Wollen Duree Cluster, Jaunpur 101
30.90 Setting up of CFC for Textile Printing Cluster, Pilakhua, Ghaziabad 103
30.91 Setting up of CFC for Brassware Cluster, Moradabad 105
30.92 Setting up of CFC for Brassware Cluster, Moradabad 107
30.93 Setting up of CFC for Brassware Cluster, Moradabad 109
30.94 Setting up of CFC for Chikankari Cluster, Barabanki 111
30.95 Setting up of CFC for Fan Cluster, Varanasi 113
1
Agenda No. 30.60: Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Auto &
Engineering Cluster, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra
Directorate of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra has submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in
Auto & Engineering Cluster, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
m. Name of the cluster Auto & Engineering Cluster
n. Location of Cluster
(P. 6 of the DPR) Ahmednagar, Maharashtra
o. Products of the cluster
(P. 7 of the DPR)
Jigs and fixtures manufacture (aluminum extrusion dies,
press tools), electrical components, motors, sugar mill
machinery and equipments, forgings and casting & auto components (gears, shafts, sheet metals components,
fasteners) etc.
p. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium)
(P. 7 of DPR)
421 units (MNC and Large – 7, Medium – 8, Small –
185 & Micro – 221)
q. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (P. 11 of DPR)
Rs. 700 Crore
r. Exports (Rs in crore) for the last five years
(P. 3 of DPR)
Rs. 150 Crore (directly and Indirectly).
s. Employment in Cluster
(P. 9 of DPR)
7952 Nos. (Direct employment by MSMEs)
3050 Nos. (Direct employment by large units) 10,000 Nos. (Indirect employment estimated)
t. Technological Details (P. 12 of DPR)
Technologies used by the cluster units are conventional and age old employed in the process of designing the
system particularly in casting, forging and fabrication units. The fabrication units are using conventional as
well as recent techniques. The machining units are
employing conventional machine tools but some have
installed CNC.
u. Whether DS conducted and
validated.
Diagnostic Study was validated on 18.5.2009.
v. Main findings of DSR Interventions towards innovation and technology up -
gradation, collective efforts to promote common brand,
a modern CFC.
w. Main Problems of cluster • Lack of trust among the cluster units.
• Slow technology up-gradation.
• Absence of product benchmarking & focus on R&D
facilities.
• Availability of raw materials from limited sources.
• High inventory cost.
• Lack of trained manpower for plant maintenance.
• No skill up-gradation training for workers.
x. Other information Technical support has been assured from Dr. Vithalrao
Vikhe Patil College of Engineering, MIDC,
Ahmednagar
2
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Justification for CFC The requirement of CFC has
been emphasized in the
Diagnostic Study Report.
b. Location of CFC Ahmednagar, Maharashtra As per SIDBI appraisal, site is well connected by road and is
about 120 KM from Pune on Pune – Aurangabad road.
c. Land for CFC Weather land
acquired Title is in name of
Valuation and its basis
Land is sufficient
Change of land use
If on lease, duration
of lease
Whether lease is
legally tenable
(P. 29 of the DPR)
2.00 acres Yes.
-
Yes
-
N/A
N/A
As per SIDBI appraisal, SPV has already acquired land
admeasuring 8067 sq. mtr. from MIDC on lease for 95
years.
d. Total Building area
(sq ft) (P. 29 of
DPR)
Area 44169.8 sq. ft. in 2 acre
land situated at Plot No. G 47/5
MIDC, Ahmednagar
e. Rate of construction
of building
(P. 29 of the DPR)
Estimated Cost Rs 397.53 lakh,
Rs 900 per sq ft
f. Main facilities
proposed (P-13-14
of DPR)
� Comprehensive Testing &
Quality Control lab.
� Training centre for new
labour/ staff.
� Research & Development
facility. � Advanced SPMs for automatic
integration. � Incubation centre.
� Tool Designing facility. � Common Raw Material Bank
& Common Marketing Centre � Display / Show room /
Visitors place. � Documentation and
information dissemination
centre.
g. Major Outputs of
CFC, Projected
performance of the
cluster after setting
up of CFC in terms
of production, export
Not given in terms of qualitative
and quantitative with time limit.
3
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
and employment, etc
h. Pollution clearance
required or not
NOC required.
i. Man power in CFC
(P. 35 of the DPR)
31 nos.
j. Estimated net profit
for 1st & 2
nd year. (P-
38 of DPR)
1st year – Rs. 49.88 lakh
2nd
year- Rs. 119.17 lakh
---
3. Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
p. Name and address M/s. Ahmednagar Auto &
Engineering Association, C/o
Anipra Chemicals, Plot No. B-
38, MIDC, Ahmednagar –
414111, Maharashtra
----
q. Nature of SPV
(company or Society or Trust)
Private Company Limited.
r. Name of the state
Govt. and MSME
officials in SPV
- One State Govt Official is
required to be included in SPV
s. Date of formation of
SPV
18th
March 2010. --
t. Number of members 78 nos.
u. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
v. Authorized share
capital ( as per AoA)
Rs. 95.00 lakh divided into 380
equity shares of Rs. 25000/-
each.
In SIDBI appraisal it is
mentioned that the authorized
capital is increase to Rs. 2.50
crore divided into thousand
equity share of Rs. 25000/-
each
w. Shareholding Pattern Given in SIDBI appraisal report
x. Commitment letter
for contribution
Not given State Govt. and SPV
commitment required.
y. SPV specific A/c Information not available. Details required.
z. Trust building of
SPV, Previous track
record of co-operative initiatives
pursued by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation
Soft interventions under taken
by Directorate of Industries,
Govt. of Maharashtra under MSE-CDP during 2009-10 with
GoI of Rs. 7.20 lakh.
aa. Technical Institution Support has been assured from
Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil College of Engineering, MIDC,
--
4
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
Ahmednagar.
bb. CFC may be utilized
by SPV members as
also others in a
cluster. However,
evidence should be furnished with regard
to SPV member ability to utilize at
least 60 per cent of
installed capacity. (P-
44 in the DPR)
The capacity utilization is at
25% first year, 50% during
second year, 65% third year and
75% fourth year 80% fifth year
85% year onwards
Consent to utilize atleast 60%
of installed capacity required.
cc. (b) Power
requirement for commercial/
domestic purpose (P-
43 of the DPR)
(c) Water
(d) Gas/Oil/ Other
utilities
200 KVA
--
--
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
e. Implementation
Agency
Industries Department, Govt of
Maharashtra
Should be MIDC,
Maharashtra
f. Implementation Period
(P- 45 of DPR)
15 months from the date of receive of
sanction of grant under MSE-CDP. The CFC should be
operationslised within
two years from the date
of final approval.
g. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SIDBI appraisal mentions that project
is technically feasible and financial
viable. SIDBI has approved the
project with some terms and
conditions given in the Annexure –
I.
h. Comments of
Technical Division
The proposal needs to be prepared as
per requirements of the units in the
cluster. The present activities of the
cluster, problems being faced by the cluster and the vision of the
CFC/Cluster needs to be properly described in the proposal. The criteria
for selection of machines for the CFC is not clearly given. More elaboration
is required on the aspect as to how the present requirements of cluster
are being met and how the CFC will
increase the efficiency, productivity,
State Govt has been
communicated vide
letter dtd 20.1.12. No
response received so far.
5
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
employment and export etc, after
setting up of CFC. The functions of
each m/c & equipment and the
present source of availing such
services have also not been described.
The identified machines indicate that
the CFC will run as a commercial
center as a competitor to the SME
units.
� SPV/IA to submit the
proposal with exact need of the cluster and justification.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC (P-42 of the DPR) :
Remarks,if any
r. IRR, payback period 32.95% Highly viable
s. DSCR 3.34
t. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
28.46%
u. NPV Net Present Value of the project
is positive.
v. DER N/A
w. Sensitivity Analysis (SIDBI appraisal P/25)
BEP 19.45% and ROCE 42.92%
x. Working capital (In-
principle sanction of loan
from a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
In-principle given by Bank of
Baroda, Pune for Term loan of
Rs 2.50 cr. No information on
working capital.
6. Project Cost: (P – 37 of DPR): (Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Land and site development 46.00
2 Building 397.53
3 CFC Equipments, Plant & Machineries 983.89
4 Furniture & Fixtures 50.00
5 Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost 17.56
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 7.95
7 Contingencies Plant & Machinery 49.19
Total 1552.12
7. Means of Finance:
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 9.80 152.00
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 67.65 1050.00
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 9.66 150.00
4 Bank Loan/ others 12.89 200.00
Total 100.00 1552.00
6
8. Plant and machinery Annexure - II
9 Shortcomings i. SPV Specific Account
ii. State Govt. and SPV commitment
iii. Major Outputs of CFC in quantitative terms iv. Consent to utilize atleast 60% of installed capacity by SPV members
10 Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC for Auto & Engineering Cluster,
Ahmednagar.
7
Agenda No.30.61 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for General
Engineering & Allied Cluster, Bhosari, Pune, Maharashtra
Directorate of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra has submitted a proposal for setting up of
CFC in General Engineering & Allied Cluster, Bhosari, Pune, Maharashtra. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster General Engineering & Allied Cluster
b. Location of Cluster Bhosari, Pune, Maharashtra
c. Products of the cluster
(page no. 21-22 of DPR)
Machine/Auto Components: Two wheelers Sprockets,
handles, foot rest, dikies, saree guard, power packs, machine
bed, machine columns, hoppers, gravity loaders, pneumatic circuit, hydraulic circuit etc. Press tools and parts: Body
parts for two wheeler and four wheelers, their press tools, press tools for defence purpose, press tools for shims,
templates, logos, etc. Die and Moulds: Plastic parts for two wheelers and four wheelers and their moulds etc. Jig and
fixtures: Jig and fixtures for CNC, VMC, HMC machines. Fixtures for SPMs, drilling jigs for various gang drilling
applications.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
(page 23 of DPR)
500 Units
(Micro – 300, Small – 150 and Medium – 50)
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
including exports (page 24 of DPR)
2005-06 428.21 crore
2006-07 466.14 crore
2007-08 513.29 crore
2008-09 578.79 crore
2009-10 634.05 crore.
f. Employment in Cluster
(page no. 4 of DPR) 8000 Nos.
g. Technological Details
(page no. 30 of DSR)
The technologies used by cluster units are conventional and
age old employed in the process of designing the system
particularly in casting, forging and fabrication units. Some
units have installed CNC machine tools. The testing
facilities are availed by the units from Pune region for the
finished products. The production tooling required by the
units is manufactured locally but advanced toolings are
procured from Pune region. However, the mature units
supplying component parts and sub-assemblies to lead firms
are equipped with the technologies as advised by their
principals.
h. Whether DS conducted and
validated. (page no. 7 of DPR)
Yes, the DSR is validated in District Level Cluster Co-
ordination Committee meeting held on 4.2.11 at Atharva academy, Bhosari Pune – 411026.
i. Main findings of DSR (page no. 60 of DSR)
DSR recommends following common facilities:- (i) Metallurgical Lab.
(ii) Inspection & Testing labs. (iii) Common processing house.
(iv) Industrial Waste Processing Center.
8
(v) Training Centre.
(vi) Raw Material Banks.
(vii) Design Centre.
j. Main Problems of cluster
(page no. 27 of DPR) • Lack of confidence & commitment to quality on part of
entrepreneur.
• Procurement of raw material from unapproved sources.
• High rejection rate /rework & defects.
• Lack of speed of innovation.
• Poor quality of production tooling.
• Lack of system of recognition & rewards.
• Lack of knowledge of lean manufacturing.
• Absence of the sense of ownership for cost quality and delivery.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Pune, Maharashtra As per SIDBI appraisal,
site is well connected by road and is about 4 km
from Chinchward railway station.
b. Land for CFC (page no. 86 of DPR)
i. Weather land
acquired
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its
basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration
of lease
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
Layout plan of CFC given on page no. 143 –
145 of DPR)
Land and building proposed on 15 years lease (total areas 14552 sq.
ft.) (two premises in Pavana and
Vishweshwar Industrial area,
measuring area 8000 sq. ft. and
6552 sq. ft. respectively).
SPV have signed leave and license
agreement for a period of 15 year.
SPV clarified that legally
registered agreement will be
made before disbursement of
grant.
Registered lease deed agreement for a minimum
period of 15 years
required.
c. Total Building area (sq
ft)
14552 sq. ft. Proposed land and
building on 15 years lease. d. Rate of construction of
building
Not applicable
e. Main facilities proposed • Common Processing House
• Industrial Waste Processing
Centre.
• Metrology, Metallurgy, Testing
and Analysis Lab.
• Training (HR) Centre.
9
f. Prod. capacity of CFC Waste oil recycling plant- 5000 ltr
per day, CNC laser operations and
other machining operations
g. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of production,
export/domestic sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.) (page no. 45-46 of DPR)
Production – Boost upto 20%
productivity within 1 year.
Employment- enhancement in
employment opportunities – 30 to
40% in a year time. Turnover – expected increase 15 to
20% in 1 year. Export - estimated boost from
existing Rs. 50 cr. to 150.0 cr in two years.
Training - Nearby 10000 MSMEs will benefit
h. Pollution clearance required or not
As per SIDBI appraisal, Para 5.5 that the manufacturing process
does not discharge toxic effluents
except metal scrap which would be
recycled. However, a suitable
condition to obtain ‘consent to
establish’ and to obtain ‘consent to
operate’ from MPCB within 3
months from the commencement of
commercial production has been
stipulated.
i. Man power in CFC(page
no. 82 of DPR)
56 nos.
j. Revenue generation
mechanism for
sustainability of assets
(service/user charges to
be levied, any other-to be
specified) (page no. 63 of DPR)
Revenue generation machanism
calculated at 100% capacity by Job
work in common processing house
per hour basis, by testing and
training and waste recycling -oil.
---
k. Estimated net profit for
1st & 2
nd year (after tax).
(page no. 100 of DPR)
1st year – Rs. 157.99 lakh
2nd
year- Rs. 202.69 lakh
---
3. Information about SPV
Description By IA Remarks, if any
a. Name and address (page no.
20 of DPR)
M/s. Sukhakarta General
Engineering Cluster Private
Limited (SPV), Gala No. F-
41, Vishweshwar Industrial
Co-op Soc Sector No. 7,
Plot no. 134/135,
Pradhikaran, Bhosari, Pune
b. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust)
Private Company SPV registered under
Companies Act 1956 as private
10
limited company.
c. Name of the state Govt. and
MSME officials in SPV
As per MoA, a
representative of the State
Govt. of Maharashtra shall
be accommodated in the
Board of Directors
Provision in the byelaws has
been made in article of
association (page 119 of the
DPR)
d. Date of formation of SPV (page no. 109 of DPR)
13th
April, 2011 --
e. Number of members (page no. 58 of DPR)
33 nos. (Details of individual member units
given)
f. Bye laws or MA and AoA
submitted (page no. 122-129 of DPR)
Yes
g. Authorized share capital (page no. 58 of DPR)
Rs. 10.00 lakh divided into 1.00 lakh equity shares of
Rs. 10/- each.
h. Paid up capital as on 13th
April, 2011 (page no. 129 of DPR)
The minimum paid up
share capital of the company shall be Rs. 1.00
lakh.
i. Shareholding Pattern (page
no. 59-61 of DPR)
Given None of member has more than
10% of in the equity capital of the SPV.
j. Commitment letter for contribution
Given
k. SPV specific A/c (page no. 135 of DPR)
A/c No. 2431201005312
l. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives
pursued by SPV members
need to be highlighted with
support documentation
Trust already developed,
SPV formed.
m. Technical Institution (State
Government
recommendation letter
dated 13.10.11)
Technical support has been
assured from College of
Engineering, Pune, Novel
Institute of business management and Research,
Pune, Kasegaon Education Society’s Polytechnic
Lohagaon, Pune
--
n. CFC may be utilized by
SPV members as also others in a cluster.
However, evidence should be furnished with regard to
SPV member ability to utilize at least 60 per cent
of installed capacity. (page
no. 181 of DPR)
It is mentioned in the DPR
that SPV member alone could able over the 100%
of installed capacity on single shift basis.
Consent to utilize atleast 60%
of installed capacity required.
o. (a) Power requirement for 245.44 KW Arrangement to be done.
11
commercial/ domestic
purpose (page no. 80 of
DPR)
(b) Water
(c) Gas/Oil/ Other utilities
20,000 ltrs
---
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
i. Implementation Agency
(page no. 56 of DPR)
Directorate of Industries, Govt. of
Maharashtra
Should be MIDC, Mumbai
j. Implementation Period
(page no. 56 of DPR)
12 months from the date of
receive of sanction of grant under MSE-CDP.
The CFC should be
operationslised within two years from the date of final
approval.
k. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SIDBI appraised the DPR. In its
recommendation mentioned that project is technically feasible and
financial viable, core members of
the SPV are experienced and
committed and recommended
with certain terms and conditions.
Conditions mentioned in
the appraisal should be fulfilled by the SPV at
different stages before
sanction and during the
project implementation.
l. Comments of Technical
Division
Mech Division mentioned in its
report dtd 20.12.11 that
specification, nomenclature,
suitability, costing of machinery
to be provided. Clarifications
submitted by Directorate of
Industries have been forwarded to
Mech. Div. on 28.02.12. Final
comments awaited.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC (page no. 103 of DPR):
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
y. BEP 25.60% Ok
z. IRR, payback period 16.00%
aa. DSCR Average – 3.35 DSCR is mentioned on p
24 of SIDBI report. Capacity utilization is
very in 1st year 40%
bb. Return on Capital employed
(ROCE)
38.75% Ok
cc. NPV Rs. 536.65 lakh Ok
dd. Sensitivity Analysis (page no. 105 of DPR)
BEP – 27.03% ROCE – Rs. 31.97 lakh
IRR – 14% NPV – Rs. 345.29 lakh
ee. Working capital (In-principle Details not given
12
sanction of loan from a bank, if
applicable arrangement made)
6. Project Cost: (page no. 90 of DPR):
* SIDBI report has recommended additional Rs. 32.30 lakh for transit insurance, octroi, transportation, electrification & commissioning.
7. Means of Finance: (page no. 91 of DPR):
8. Plant and machinery (page no. 77-78 of DPR) Annexure -III
9. Details of Fixed Assets (SIDBI Report page no. 21)
Sr.
No.
Furniture proposed Rs. in lakh Remarks
1 Material Handling accessories 0.85 Details of some of the
MFAs are not available.
SIDBI recommended disbursement on the basis
of actual expenditure.
2 Furniture, Library, fire fighting equipments, utility block etc.
15.23
3 Vehicle 7.00
Total 23.08
10. Shortcomings:
i. Land Documents ii. Consent to establish from Pollution Control Board
iii. Technical Division has not cleared the proposal
11 Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for in-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for General
Engineering & Allied Cluster, Bhosari, Pune, Maharashtra.
Particulars As per SIDBI
Recommendation
1 Land and building on lease 0.00
2 Plant & Machinery 1424.19*
3 Misc. fixed assets 23.08
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 9.00
5 Provision for Contingency 69.59
6 Margin money for Working Capital 10.30
Total Project Cost 1536.16
Particulars %age As per SIDBI
Recommendation
1. SPV contribution 186.16
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90% of eligible
project cost of
Rs 15 cr)
1350.00
Total 1536.16
13
Agenda No. 30.62 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Mango
Processing Cluster, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra
Development Commissioner (Industries), O/o Directorate of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra has
submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in Mango Processing Cluster, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra.
Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Mango Processing Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster
Ratnagiri
c. Products of the cluster Canned Mango Pulp, Amba Poli, Mango syrup, Mango
squash, Amba Mawa and other products from mango as well as kokam and jackfruit.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium) (p-14 of DPR)
37 registered micro & small units
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for the last five years
Present - Rs. 40.00 crores
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for the last five years
70% of the turnover
g. Employment in Cluster 1100 nos.
h. Technological Details Technology employed is not advanced and heavily
relies on traditional knowledge. Packaging technology is also required modernization.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes and validated on 29.9.2008.
j. Main findings of DSR (p-22 of DPR)
• Strengthening the existing processing units by providing access to information on modern
technology, packaging, markets, food laws and
hygiene requirements.
• Creating awareness on the scope for mango processing in terms of increasing value addition to
the products. Developing Ratnagiri brand of Mango products.
• Strengthening of local institutions and linking them with those connected to the mango
processing industry at the national level.
• Hard interventions for common processing,
packaging, testing and reforming unit, marketing centre.
k. Main Problems of cluster (p-29 of DPR)
• Traditional processing, non-uniform quality
hampers the market.
• The production capacity of the units is small.
• Lack of awareness among manufacturers about quality certification.
• Low branding of product & packaging.
• No branding of the product in the market.
14
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Located in the area of in &
around Ratnagiri and about
300 km from the State capital
Mumbai
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather land acquired (p-15 of SIDBI report)
Yes, SPV has acquired about 06 acres of land at village
Nakhare near pawas, Distt. Ratnagiri on 30 years long
lease, on a rent of Rs. 1.2 lakh per year.
Registered lease deed required.
ii. Title is in name of Notarized lease deed is in the name of the SPV
iii. Valuation and its basis Land is on rent of Rs. 1.2 lakh per year on lease basis
iv. Land is sufficient ----
v. Change of land use Information not available Required for
industrial purpose
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
30 years
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
Only notarized.
c. Total Building area (sq ft)
(p-15 of SIDBI report)
Approx. 71355.6 sq. ft.
d. Rate of construction of
building
Rs. 632.59 per sq. ft.
e. Major Outputs of CFC,
Projected performance of cluster after setting up of
CFC
Before setting
up of CFC
After … years
of CFC
Production (Rs in
cr)
Information not given Export (Rs in cr)
Employment (nos)
Others like no of ISO, etc
f. Pollution clearance required or not
Information not given Food processing project, consent
required
g. Main facilities proposed (P-
23 of DPR) • Common Aseptic Packaging
Unit
• Common Ambapoli
Processing Centre
• Common Testing Laboratory
• Common Reforming unit
• Common Marketing Centre
h. Prod capacity of CFC Information not given
i. Man power in CFC 159 nos.
15
j. Revenue mechanism for
sustainability of CFC (by
user charges, etc)
Revenue assumption is
calculated on the job charges
basis from Aseptic plant, Lab
services, Reforming centre,
Ambapoli centre.
k. Estimated net profit for 1st
& 2nd
year. (p-38 of the
DPR)
Net surplus in 1st year Rs.
13.53 lakh and 2nd
year Rs.
118.23 lakh
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address Konkan Mango Processing (Ratnagiri) Private Limited
At & Post-Nakhare, Distt. Ratnagiri.
b. Nature of SPV (company or Society or Trust)
A Private Limited Company (incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 (No. 1 of 1956)
c. Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not given Provision in the byelaws should be
made in article of association.
d. Date of formation of SPV 13.11.2009
e. Number of MSE Member
Units
41 members
f. Bye laws or MA and AoA
submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital Rs. 200000/-
h. Shareholding Pattern
(SIDBI appraisal annx.-I)
Given None of SPV
member have more
than 10%
shareholding in the
SPV.
i. Commitment letter for
contribution (encl. III of
DPR)
Given
j. SPV specific A/c Not given
k. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members with
documentation
Soft interventions were
undertaken by State govt.
under MSE-CDP during FY
2009-10. SPV formed,Trust
developed.
l. Technical Institution Agricultural Technology
Management Agency,
Ratnagiri
m. CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others
in a cluster. Evidence FOR
SPV members’ ability to
utilise at least 60% of
Not given Commitment
regarding utilization
of 60% of the
installed capacity by
SPV member
16
installed capacity required.
n. Utilities requirement
Power 200 units per hour
Water 80000 ltr. Per day
Gas/Oil/ Other ---
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Building / Civil construction 451.39
2 Plant & Machinery (Imported & Indigenous) 1302.26
3. Pre-operative expenses 78.64
4. Provision for contingencies 39.06
Total 1871.35
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. Share Capital 10% of PC 187.14
2. Govt. of India contribution 85.19% of the eligible PC 1277.96
3. Term loan from bank 21.70% of PC 406.25
Total 1871.35
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP (page – 35 of DPR) 49.82% O.K.
b. IRR, payback period (page – 34 of DPR)
17% 2 years one month
c. DSCR (page – 35 of DPR)
2.35 with grant 0.57 without grant
d. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
--
e. NP Ratio (page – 34 of
DPR)
2nd
year - 3.59
3rd year 40.66
f. DER (page – 34 of
DPR)
2.17
g. Sensitivity Analysis
(page – 34 of DPR)
Positive
7. Plant and Machinery Annexure-I
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
i. Implementation Agency Deptt. of Industries, GoM. Should be MIDC,
Mumbai
j. Commitment of SPV contribution (Encl – III of
DPR)
Received
17
k. Commitment of State
Government contribution
Not applicable.
l. Commitment of Loans)
(Working capital and/ or
term loan) (Encl – VIII of
DPR
In-principle approval of the
project from Bank of
Maharashtra, Ratnagiri
m. Implementation Period (page – 63 of DPR)
12 months The CFC should be operationslised
within two years from the date of
final approval,
n. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
SIDBI appraisal
recommends that proposal may be submit to Steering
Committee of MSE-CDP for its consideration for
sanction of GoI grant of
Rs. 1277.96 lakh to SPV.
(Annexure – II)
Conditions
mentioned in the appraisal should be
fulfilled by the SPV at different
stages before
sanction and
during the project
implementation.
o. Comments of Technical
Division
Technical Division of DC,
MSME has not supported
the proposal mentioning
that CFC will work as an
independent unit. It may be
beneficial to mango
growers but not cluster
units, as it is not
complementing /
supplementing the existing
processing activity of cluster unit.
Conveyed to DC
(Industries),
Directorate of
Industries, GoM
vide letter dated
10.10.2011. Reply
awaited.
9 Shortcomings:
i. Registered lease deed with land use permission
ii. Projected quantified outcomes with time limits
iii. Commitment regarding utilization of 60% of the installed capacity by SPV member, consent from pollution department,
iv. Inclusion of one State Govt. and one MSME officials each, provision in the byelaws
v. Technical Division of DC, MSME has not supported the proposal mentioning that CFC will
work as an independent unit. It may be beneficial to mango growers but not cluster units, as
it is not complementing / supplementing the existing processing activity of cluster unit. State
govt is considering submitting of revised DPR.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Mango Processing Cluster,
Ratnagiri, Maharashtra.
18
Agenda No. 30.63 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Rice Mill
Cluster, Thanjavur
Principal Secretary to Government, Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for
setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Thanjavur. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal
are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
2 Information about Proposed CFC
a. Description By Implementing Agency Remarks ,
if any
b. Justification for CFC 1. There is little modernization and
a. Name of the cluster Rice Mill Cluster
b. Location of Cluster Thanjavur, Tamilnadu.
c. Products of the cluster Rice, Rice Bran, Husk, Husk Ash.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
(p – II of DSR)
270 units (Small -140 and Micro – 130)
OBC – 75%, SC/ST – 1%, Minorities – 15% and others –
9%.
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (p – II of DSR)
Rs. 300-350 crore (estimated for one year)
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Nil.
g. Employment in Cluster
(p – II of DSR)
10000 (Direct – 4500 & Indirect – 5500)
h. Technological Details
(p- 16 of DSR)
Most of the units have installed indigenous & non-standard
local fabricated plants and follow traditional operations.
In general, the units lack modern technology and are not
competent in processing techniques in the following areas:
Storage techniques for Rice, Bran & Paddy, Drying
techniques, Parboiling techniques, Processing techniques,
Polishing methods, Effluent Treatment.
Appropriate De-husking, Value addition to waste material,
Energy Conservation, Colour sorting, Pollution control.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes
j. Main findings of DSR
(p – 22 of DSR)
Establishing Common Facility Centers with high quality &
efficient technology in the fields of processing, energy
sourcing, quality improvement, testing, storage, manpower
training, value addition packaging, wealth from waste etc.
k. Main Problems of cluster
(p – 20 of DSR)
Lack of scientific storage.
Lack of Poor quality of raw material.
Connection on local market only.
Low productivity of local machinery.
Reluctance to upgrade technology.
Inadequate linkage. Absence of alternative source of energy.
Lack of interest in workers training.
19
technology upgradation in the industry.
2. The larger units in the industry do not
venture into open market and face
competition but cater mainly to Public
Distribution System.
3. Rice milling is the traditional and major
industrial activity in the district.
c. Location of CFC Thanjavur
d. Land for CFC Weather land acquired
Title is in name of
Valuation and its basis
Land is sufficient
Change of land use
If on lease, duration of
lease Whether lease is legally
tenable
1.25 acres of land at a cost of Rs. 4.90 lakh
has been purchased and registered in the
name of M/s Thanjavur Paddy & Rice Millers
Consortium Pvt. Ltd. Land is located at R.S.
No. 118A/3, No. 7, Westulur village,
Orathanad Taluk, Thanjavur district,
Tamilnadu and situated at main state highway.
Land deed –
certified in the
Hindi/English
version required
along with land
use permission.
e. Total Building area
(sq. ft.)
Proposed to construct industrial shed,
Godown, Milling unit, Shed for boilder unit,
chimney, Ash room, Training centre, Testing
Laboratory building etc. at a cost of Rs.
60.50 lakh.
Proposed building
Area is not
mentioned.
f. Rate of construction of
building
Not given.
g. Main facilities proposed Par-boiling and Drier unit, raw paddy pre-
cleaning unit, Modern rice Milling unit,
Grader unit and Colour sorter unit. Testing
and training centre.
h. Prod capacity of CFC
(p – 30 of DPR)
Modern Rice Milling unit 2 MT / Hr.
i. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance
of the cluster after
proposed intervention
(in terms of production,
export/domestic sales
and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
(p – 50/c supplementary information)
Paramet
ers
Pre
interventio
ns
Post intervention
Immedia
te after
formatio
n of CFC
Anticip
ated
benefit
in
future
No. of units
Hulling-90 Mini
Modern-5 Modern-5
120 within 1
yr.
130 within
3 yr.
Employment
4000 4500 5000
Production
134400MT
138400MT
140000 MT
Sales turnove
r
43.5 cr. 47.85Cr. 50.0 Cr.
Quality(
hulling
- 20% 30%
20
units)
Product
diversifi
cation/v
alue
addition
Nil 10% 15%
Improv
ement
of Income
at unit level
30 lac 33 lac 36 lac
j. Pollution clearance
required or not
Information not available.
k. Man power in CFC 17 nos.
l. Revenue generation
mechanism for
sustainability of assets
(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to
be specified) (p – 32 – 33 of DPR)
Revenue has been calculated on the basis of
75% (during the 1st year) utilization of
installed capacity i.e. (16 Tonnes per shift)
(one shift of 8 hrs.) at a charge of Rs. 1.50 per k.g. It is mentioned that revenue will also be
generated from testing and training charges.
As major revenue
source is from
hulling i.e. Rs. 54
lakh out of total Rs 67.68 lakh,
after deleting Rice milling
component, financials will
change. Revised calculations are
required.
3 Information about SPV
Description By Implementing Agency Remarks, if
any
a. Name and address M/s. Thanjavur Paddy & Rice
Millers Consortium Pvt. Ltd.,
Street, M CHAVADY,
Thanjavur – 613001.
Tamil Nadu.
b. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust)
Private Company Limited –
registered under the Companies act
1956 (No. 1 of 1956)
c. Name of the state Govt and
MSME officials in SPV
Yet to be nominated. Provision in the
byelaws should
be made in article of
association.
d. Date of formation of SPV 17.06.2007
e. Number of members 25 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and AoA
submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital 1,00,000/-
h. Paid up capital as on 1st
January 2009
1,00,000/-
21
Description By Implementing Agency Remarks, if
any
i. Shareholding Pattern
(Attached with MoA in the
DPR)
None of SPV members have more
than 10% shares.
j. Commitment letter for
contribution
Undertaking regd. Rs. 21.4 lakh
equity capital toward share of contribution given on 15.2.12.
.
k. SPV specific A/c
(p – 2-3 Term Loan Letter)
It is mentioned in the Term Loan
sanction letter that the SPV is
banking with IOB since 21.03.2009
account no. is 12222.
l. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation
SPV formed. It is mentioned that
SPV has already taken various soft
interventions activities with the
support of MSME-DI, DIC and
PPRC.
m. Technical Institution M/s Paddy Processing Research
Centre, Govt. of India, Thanjavur.
n. CFC may be utilised by SPV
members as also others in a
cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member ability
to utilise at least 60 per cent of installed capacity.
(Enclosed in DPR as Annexure)
SPV has given an undertaken
mentioning that all our member able
to utilized services. Besides non
members are also permitted to use
the facility without any restriction.
o. (b) Power requirement for commercial/ domestic
purpose (c) Water
(d) Gas/Oil/ Other utilities
Not given.
p. Profit/ Surplus generated by
CFC to be ploughed back for future/expansion of CFC.
(p – 42 of DPR)
1st year - Rs. 10.46 lakh.
2nd
year – Rs. 17.70 lakh 3rd year – Rs. 26.23 lakh
4 Implementation Arrangements
Description By Implementing Agency Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai All projects in
Tamilnadu
implemented by
TANSIDCO.
b. Implementation Period
(p – 27 of DPR)
12 months The CFC should be
operationslised within
two years from the
date of final approval,
22
Description By Implementing Agency Remarks, if any
c. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SPV submitted Board Note by
Indian Overseas Bank, Thanjavur
to Chief Manager for sanctioning
term loan of Rs. 50.00 lakh for
building. It is also mentioned that
the Thanjavur being paddy growing
area is suitable for setting up of a
modern rice mill and proposal is
commercially viable and
technically feasible. Annexure -
Detailed SIDBI
appraisal is required.
d. Comments of Technical
Division
Food Division, office of DC
(MSME) recommended facilities
other than milling unit i.e.
parboiling and drier unit, raw paddy
pre-cleaning unit, grader unit, colour sorter unit, testing centre.
Total Cost of Machinery is Rs.146.99 lakh including modern
rice milling unit (worth Rs.32.6 Lakh).
In case milling unit is
removed, financials
need to be reworked.
e. Approval of Technical
Committee
Proposal was discussed in
Technical Committee meeting on
1.12.11. it was decided that
proposal may be submitted on file
after receiving all the information including SIDBI appraisal.
Deficit information
awaited from
Government of
Tamilnadu.
5 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Description By Implementing
Agency
Remarks, if any
a. BEP 59.04% Financial ratios
needs to rework
after deleting the
Rice milling
component
b. IRR, payback period 17.79%
c. DSCR 5.13
d. Return on Capital employed (ROCE) 27.37%
e. NPV -
f. DER -
g. Sensitivity Analysis IRR 15.68%
Average DSCR
4.42%
h. Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan
from a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
1st year -Rs.
27.47 lakh .
In-principle sanction
for working capital
from bank required.
6. Project Cost:
Particulars of cost Amount (Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land 4.90
(ii) Building 60.50
(iii) Plant and machinery * 146.99*
(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 14.27
23
(v) Preliminary expenses 5.00
(vi) Pre-operative expenses 7.00
(vii) Contingencies 6.00
Total 244.66
*Technical Division has recommended removal of machinery worth Rs.32.60 Lakh.
7. Means of Finance:
*In case milling unit is removed, financials need to be reworked.
8. Plant and machinery – Annexure
9. Shortcomings
i. SIDBI Appraisal of DPR
ii. Change in land use
iii. Revised financials need to be worked out in case milling unit is not installed
iv. Details of building area
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal for setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu to accord in principle
approval.
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 8.75 21.40
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 54.29 132.83
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of TN 16.52 40.43
4 Bank Loan (for building) 20.44 50.00
Total 100.00 244.66*
24
Agenda No. 30.64 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Engineering
Cluster, Dindigul, Tamilnadu
Director and Commissioner of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a
proposal for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Dindigul. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Engineering Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster (page – 1 of
DSR)
Dindigul District
c. Products of the cluster
(page – 8 of DPR)
Engineering activities i.e. fabrication work, automobile spares, components manufacturing,
textiles machinery spares, structural fabrication work, transformer manufacturing, EB overhead line
materials, locks and door fittings, furniture, gears, industrial valves, iron casting, agricultural equipment,
cycle parts etc.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium)
(page – 1 of DSR)
213 nos. units (Medium - 3, Small – 60, Micro – 150)
e. Turnover for the last five
years (P-9 DPR)
Rs. 475 crore (400 crore for 3 medium size industries
and Rs 75 crore for MSE sector)
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (P-9 DPR)
Rs. 150.00 crore. (from medium size units)
g. Employment in Cluster (P-9 DPR)
4000 (Direct – 1000 & Indirect – 3000)
h. Technological Details Transforming the engineering units at Dindigul to become more vibrant, efficient, and modernized by
2012 by infusing technology, quality standards and bring cultural changes among the micro and small
scale units under cluster mode.
i. Whether DS conducted Yes.
j. Main findings of DSR
(page – 10 of DPR) • The investment in plant and machinery by micro
units is relatively very low. Firms are not able to
get in to newer markets because of lack of firm level technology/modern machineries, testing,
training / capacity building facility for newer skills to other market segments.
• No facility available for R & D which is very essential for diversification.
• An inadequate testing facility for raw materials as well for finished products within the cluster is
another hindering factor.
• The productivity of the firms is relatively low due
to their limited infrastructure and technology level.
• Lack of good tool room facility and modernized higher capacity plant for handling bigger value
25
added services to BHEL and others.
• Frequent power interruption is another factor limiting the productivity of the firms.
k. Main Problems of cluster
(page – 32 of DSR) • Lack of good tool room facility for taking up
bigger order by micro units.
• Inadequate testing facilities and calibration
facilities.
• Low productivity due to insufficient
infrastructure and technology level.
• Individual procurement of raw materials
increases overall cost and reduces profit margin.
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Dindigul District Tamilnadu
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather
land acquired
Yes
ii. Title is in
name of (P-16 DPR)
M/s Dindigul Engineering Clusters Pvt.
Ltd, Dindigul, Tamilnadu. However, Sale
Deed is in local language
iii. Valuation and its basis (P-16
DPR)
Estimated cost of land and development is Rs. 60.00 lakh.
iv. Land is
sufficient (P-16 DPR)
SPV has already purchased about 10 acre
land in the suburbs of Dindigul for CFC.
v. Change of
land use Not mentioned
vi. If on lease,
duration of lease
N A
vii. Whether
lease is legally
tenable
N A
c. Total Building area
(sq ft)
Not mentioned
d. Rate of
construction of
building
Estimated at Rs. 120.00 lakhs
e. Major Outputs of
CFC,
Projected
performance of
cluster after setting
up of CFC (P-25
corr.)
Paramete
rs
Pre
Interventio
n
Immediate
after CFC
Anticipated
benefit in future
No. of
units
210 230 265
Employme
nt
4000 4500 5175
Turnover Rs. 75 crore Rs. 90 crore
(Increase 20%)
Rs. 117 crore
(Increase 30%)
26
Improvem
ent of
Income at
unit level
Micro-Rs.
20 lakh
Small-Rs.
75 lakh
Rs. 24 lakh
Rs. 90 lakh
(Average
20%)
Rs. 30 lakh
Rs. 112.5 lakh
(average 25%)
f. Pollution clearance
required or not
No details given.
g. Main facilities proposed
(Page – 2 of DPR)
1. Common Processing Center (heavy Engineering Fabrication & Machine shop)
2. Quality Control cum Testing Center. 3. Training Center.
h. Prod capacity of CFC
Information not available
i. Man power in CFC (Page – 12 of
Appraisal Report)
105 nos.
j. Revenue
mechanism for sustainability of
CFC (by user charges, etc)
Revenue generation calculated on job
work per machine, per hour basis.
k. Estimated net profit for 1st & 2nd
year. (Page – 41 of DPR)
1st Year – Rs. 174.04
2nd Year – Rs. 188.20
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Name and address M/s Dindigul Engineering Clusters Pvt.
Ltd, Dindigul, Tamilnadu. S-12, R.M. Colony, Dindigul – 624001
b. Nature of SPV
(company or Society
or Trust)
Private Limited Company.
c. Name of the state
Govt and MSME
officials in SPV
Nomination details not mentioned.
d. Date of formation of
SPV
11th
March 2009
e. Number of MSE
Member Units
24 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share
capital (P-8 of AOA)
Rs. 5 lakh divided into 5000 shares.
SPV has 46 share holders. Authorized
share capital will be suitably enhanced
to Rs. 132.82 lakh.
h. Shareholding Pattern Not given
i. Commitment letter
for contribution
Not received
j. SPV specific A/c In Axis Bank
27
k. Trust building of
SPV, Previous track
record of co-
operative initiatives
pursued by SPV
members with
documentation
SPV formed
l. Technical Institution Information not given
m. CFC may be utilised by SPV members as
also others in a
cluster. Evidence
FOR SPV members’
ability to utilise at
least 60% of installed
capacity
Letter received. The members of the SPV will be utilizing 60% of the
operating capacity of the CFC and the
other members will be utilizing the
balance 40% capacity.
n. Utilities requirement
Power 155.5 MW during 2011-12
Water No need for water for processing.
Company will be using ground water for other purpose.
Gas/Oil/ Other
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Land 60.00
2 Building 120.00
3 Plant & Machinery 708.47
4 Misc. fixed assets 20.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
20.00
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
37.82
7 Margin money for Working Capital 5.00
Total 971.29
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 13.67 132.82
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 67.06 651.34
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 10 97.13
4 Bank Loan/ others 9.24 90.00
Total 971.29
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 51.02 As per guidelines of
MSE CDP. b. IRR 11.14
28
c. DSCR 7.54
d. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
27.33
e. NPV 41.89
f. DER -
g. Sensitivity Analysis IRR – 8.77
DSCR – 6.18
7. Plant and Machinery (page no. 21 of DPR) Annexure I
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
b. Commitment of SPV contribution Not received
c. Commitment of State Government contribution
State govt has forwarded the proposal.
d. Commitment of Loans (Working capital and/ or term loan)
(Page – 47 of DPR)
Axis bank in its appraisal mentioned that SPV has
requested for Working capital loan and term loan.
e. Implementation Period (Page – 18 of DPR)
Within 8-12 months from the dated of approval of
the CFC.
CFC should be operationslised
within two years from the date of
final approval.
f. Appraisal of DPR and main
recommendations
DPR is appraised by Axis
Bank, SME Centre, Madurai – 625002
Annexure II
Detailed appraisal
required.
g. Comments of Technical Division Mech Division has taken
up issue of justification/
utilization of machinery
(reminder issued on
12.5.11, 1.8.11).
9. Shortcomings
i. Detailed appraisal in SIDBI format
ii. Provision of state & MSME official in MoA
iii. Building details
iv. Commitment of SPV for its contribution
v. Justification/ utilization of machines -- issue raised by Mech division
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC for Engineering Cluster, Dindigul.
29
Agenda No. 30.65 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Refractory
Cluster, Vridhachalam, Tamilnadu
Principal Secretary to Govt., Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for setting up of
CFC in Refractory Cluster, Vridhachalam, Tamilnadu. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Justification for CFC Old technology / machinery are
being used.
a. Name of the cluster Refractory Cluster
b. Location of Cluster Vriddhachalam, Distt. Cuddalore, Tamilnadu
c. Products of the cluster Bottam Pouring Set, Fire Bricks, Refractory Bed
Materials
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium) (page no. 7
of DPR)
102 units (Small- 1 & Micro- 101)
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (in
additional information)
2006-07- Rs. 34.00
2007-08- Rs. 35.00 2008-09- Rs. 38.00
2009-10- Rs. 40.00 2010-11- Rs. 45.00
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for the last five years (page no.
8 of DPR)
Nil
g. Employment in Cluster
(page no. 8 of DPR)
4500 persons (60% of women workers)
h. Technological Details
(page no. 10 of DPR)
Present- DD Kiln technology is being used.
Proposed- Tunnel and Rotary Kiln technology will be
used.
i. Whether DS conducted and
validated.
DPR is validated by Govt. of Tamilnadu.
j. Main findings of DSR NA
k. Main Problems of cluster • The cluster units are using only DD Kiln for firing
the refractories.
• Fire wood is used as the fuel for firing, which results in pollution.
• The wastage percentage is more since they use DD Kiln.
• The cost of manufacture only very limited products on account of lack of facilities.
• Their market segment is very limited.
• The units also face lack of finance for expansion.
• There is also lack of testing facilities for product
diversification.
30
b. Location of CFC Vridhachalam, Cuddalore Distt.,
Tamilnadu.
c. Land for CFC (page no.
19 of DPR)
i. Weather land
acquired
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
3 acres & 98 cent- SPV is in process
of purchasing of land (Agreement
papers submitted but in local
language)
English / Hindi
version of
registered sale deed
required.
d. Total Building area (sq ft)
(Building estimates)
48000 sq ft.
e. Rate of construction of
building
For construction of A.C. sheet roofed
shed @. 300/sq. ft.
f. Main facilities proposed
(page no. 14 of DPR)
Kiln section, Processing section,
Tool Room facility, Testing centre
and R&D section.
g. Prod. capacity of CFC Rotary – 40 tones per day.
Tunnel Kiln – 50 tones each per day.
h. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of
production,
export/domestic sales and
direct/indirect
employment, etc.) (page
no. 53 of DPR)
Present
Status
One Year from
setting up of
CFC
No of
units
102 122 (Increase by
15-20%)
Emplo
yment
4500 5175 (Increase by
15%)
Turno
ver
Rs. 45.00
crore
Rs. 51.75 crore
(Increase by 15%)
Export Nil Rs. 1.00 crore
Qualit
y
Rejections due to
firing will be very
less 1%)
Produc
t
diversi
ficatio
n
Mostly
bottom
pouring sets
& fire bricks
Diversification to
high alumina
Refractory
products.
Increa
se in
incom
e
15-20%
i. Pollution clearance
required or not
Not given Consent to
establish required.
j. Man power in CFC
(page no. 32 of DPR)
61
k. Revenue generation Income assumption made on the
31
mechanism for
sustainability of assets
(service/user charges to be
levied, any other-to be
specified) (page no. 39 of
DPR)
basis of user charges Ist year – Rs.
671.89 lakh proposed.
l. Estimated net profit for 1st
& 2nd year. (page no. 40 of
DPR)
Retained profit (after tax)
1st year– Rs. 68.73 lakh
2nd
year- Rs. 77.91 lakh
---
3. Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address (page no. 16
of DPR)
M/s Vriddhachalam Refractories Consortium
Private Ltd., 184, Aladi Road, Vriddhachalam- 606 001,
Cuddalore, Tamilnadu
----
b. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust) (Annexure of
DPR)
Private Ltd. Company
[(registered under Act 1956)
(No. 1 of 1956) with section 3
(1) (iii)]
Articles of association
should be as per
guidelines of MSE-
CDP.
c. Name of the state Govt. and
MSME officials in SPV
----- Provision in the
byelaws has been made
on 28.01.12.
d. Date of formation of SPV 5 April 2010 --
e. Number of members (in
additional information)
29 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and MoA
submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital (in
additional information) (raised on 28.1.12)
Rs. 45,00,000/- dividend into
Rs. 45,000/- equity share of
Rs. 10/- each
h. Paid up capital
(in additional information)
Rs. 40,16,500
i. Shareholding Pattern
(in additional information)
Given.
j. Commitment letter for
contribution (in additional
information)
Given.
k. SPV specific A/c
(in additional information)
State Bank of India,
Vriddhchalam Current A/c
No. 31137208391
l. Trust building of SPV, Previous
track record of co-operative
initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted
with support documentation
SPV formed, only
photographs of some training
and exposure visit attached with the DPR.
MSME-DI, Chennai
conducted MDP.
m. Technical Institution (page no. SPV has been utilizing the --
32
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
16 of DPR) expertise of Retired Professor
from Anna University.
n. CFC may be utilized by SPV
members as also others in a
cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize
at least 60 per cent of installed capacity. (in additional
information)
Given.
o. (a) Power requirement for
commercial/ domestic purpose (page no. 31 of DPR)
(b) Water (c) Gas/Oil/ Other utilities
250 HP
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency
(page no. 15 of DPR)
Industries Commissioner & Department of Industries and
Commerce (IC&DIC), Govt. of TN
All the projects in Tamilnadu implemented by
TANSIDCO.
b. Implementation Period
(in additional information)
12 months from approval by Purchase
Committee
Should be two years from
the date of final approval.
c. Appraisal of DPR and main recommendations
State Bank of India appraised the DPR. In its recommendation
mentioned that project to setup a CFC
for processing, production, testing
centre and training centre is
technically feasible and economically
viable. Appraisal is insufficient.
(Annexure-I)
Detailed appraisal from SIDBI or as per MSE-CDP
guidelines required.
d. Comments of Technical
Division
The project report for setting up CFC
for Refractory Cluster at
Vriddachalam, Cuddalore has been
found technically feasible.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC:
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP (page no. 51 of DPR) 51%
b. IRR, payback period (page no. 48 of DPR)
13.33%
c. DSCR (page no. 44 of DPR) 6.29
d. Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
(page no. 46 of DPR)
30.21%
e. NPV (page no. 48 of DPR) Rs. 109.70 lakh
f. DER
g. Sensitivity Analysis (page no. 49-51 of DPR)
DSCR – 5.28 IRR – 11.02%
33
NPV@10% - 33.46
h. Working capital (In-principle
sanction of loan from a bank, if
applicable
arrangement made)
In-principle given by State
Bank of India, Chennai.
6. Project Cost: (page no. 18 of DPR):
* should be restricted to 2% of project cost.
7. Means of Finance: (page no. 18 of DPR):
8. Plant and Machinery: Annexure - II
9 Shortcoming
i. Detailed appraisal (preferably in SIDBI format) ii. Validation of DSR/DPR from stake holders
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Refractory Cluster, Vridhachalam,
Tamilnadu to accord in-principle approval.
Particulars Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
1 Land 40.00
2 Building 150.00
3 Plant & Machinery 603.36
4 Misc. fixed assets 40.00
5 Preliminary exp. 5.00*
6 Pre-operative exp. 15.00*
7 EB Deposits 2.00
8 Contingencies 33.17
9 Margin for working capital 10.00
Total 898.53
Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 64% 573.51
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 10% 89.85
3. SPV contribution 15% 135.17
4. Bank Loan/ others 11% 100.00
Total 100% 898.53
34
Agenda No. 30.66 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Stainless Steel
Utensils Cluster, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu
Principal Secretary to Govt., Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (D1) Deptt., Govt. of
Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster,
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are
as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
a. Justification for CFC
(Page – v of DPR) • This CFC disseminates & promotes
adoption of advanced technology,
undertakes R&D in design centre, provides new form of training to
a. Name of the cluster Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster
b. Location of Cluster Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu
c. Products of the cluster
(page no. 5 - 7 of DPR)
Steel kettle, tea pots, coffee mugs, coffee maker, coffee pots, coffee cups, coffee warmer, tea sets, tea strainer,
fork, spoons, knives, fruit bowls, soup bowls, steel colanders, steel boilers etc.
d. No. of Enterprises including break up (micro,
small, medium) (page no.
15 of DPR)
114 units (micro enterprises) and around 46 units from part of the association.
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for the last three years (page
no. 16 of DPR)
2003-04 - 17.70 2004-05 - 18.46
2005-06 - 19.44
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (page no.
73 of DPR)
Nil
g. Employment in Cluster
(page no. 17 of DPR)
400 Nos.
h. Whether DS conducted and
validated.
DSR is not validated.
i. Main findings of DSR
(page 41 of DSR)
Need of CFC identify for buffing and polishing (internal
and external) of kitchen ware utensils. Need for
advance machines also identified.
j. Main Problems of cluster
(page no. ii of DPR) • Manual buffing process is handled by the cluster
members for both the internal & external surfaces of the kitchenware utensils.
• Deep draw press of lower capacity (<=100 Tons) exist in the cluster, which is insufficient to meet the
needs of the cluster.
• Weak linkages with the institution & association.
• Lack of exposure to advanced technology.
35
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
employees leading to employment
generation qualifies for Developmental
Scheme under MSE-CDP Scheme.
• Further this CFC is being adopted by a
group of micro enterprises which
qualifies for developmental
interventions.
b. Location of CFC Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu
c. Land for CFC (page
no. ii of DPR)
i. Weather land
acquired
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its
basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration
of lease
vii. Whether lease is legally tenable
Land is available on Rental Basis @ Rs.
1.44 lakh per annum in Kumbakonam.
Documents seem
to be in Tamil
language
d. Total Building area (sq
ft) (Building estimates)
Not given Details required
e. Rate of construction of
building
Premises on lease.
f. Main facilities proposed
(page no. 14 of DPR) • Special purpose machine for buffing
both external & internal surfaces of the kitchenware utensils.
• 300 Tons Hydraulic Deep Draw Press.
• Tools & Dies for Design Centre.
• Other machineries & accessories
required for the CFC.
g. Prod. capacity of CFC
(page iv of DPR)
3.6 lakh pieces per year.
h. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of
production,
export/domestic sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.) (page no. 78 of DPR)
Projected economies of scale and growth
potential, expected performance of the
cluster after proposed intervention
Increase of
turnover
Growth rate of
100%
Increase of
production
Growth rate of
40%
Increase of exports Growth rate of
40%
15-20% reduction in the annual cost of
production 40% increase in the employment.
i. Pollution clearance required or not (page no.
60 of DPR)
Information not given Consent of Pollution Control
Board is required.
36
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
j. Man power in CFC (page
no. 92 of DPR)
48
k. Revenue generation
mechanism for
sustainability of assets (service/user charges to
be levied, any other-to be specified) (page no. 91 of
DPR)
1st year on 60% capacity utilization – Rs.
53.10 lakh
2nd
year 65% capacity utilization – Rs. 57.53 lakh
l. Estimated net profit for
1st & 2
nd year.
(Annexure-II of DPR)
1st year– Rs. 10.06 lakh
2nd
year - Rs. 13.00 lakh
---
3. Information about SPV
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
a. Name and address (page
no. 54 of DPR)
Stainless Steel Utensil
Manufacturers Association, No. 10, Sarangapur, South Street,
Kumbakonam, Tanjore District, Tamilnadu
----
b. Nature of SPV (company or Society or Trust) (Society
registration)
Registered under section 10 of the Tamilnadu Act, 1975 (Tamilnadu
Act 27 of 1975)
c. Name of the State Govt.
and MSME officials in
SPV
Not given Provision in the
byelaws required.
d. Date of formation of
Society
10th
September 2008 --
e. Number of members (page
no. 106 -110 of DPR)
46 nos. Details of 46 nos.
SPV members given
in local language.
contribution details required.
f. Bye laws or MA and MoA submitted
Not received Bylaws and MoA required
g. Authorized share capital Not received
Required
h. Paid up capital
i. Shareholding Pattern
j. Commitment letter for
contribution
k. SPV specific A/c Union Bank of India
A/c. No. 392601010292979
37
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
l. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives
pursued by SPV members
need to be highlighted with
support documentation
SPV formed. It is mentioned that
SPV has already established
institution tie-up and identify the
site and made a lease agreement
for establishing CFC.
m. Technical Institution Institutional tie-up and linkages with Periyar Technology Business
Incubator of Pariyar Maniammai
University. Conducted skill
oriented training programmes and
undertaking various promotional
activities.
--
n. CFC may be utilized by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
However, evidence should
be furnished with regard to
SPV member ability to
utilize at least 60 per cent
of installed capacity. (page
no. 80 of DPR)
CFC mostly will be used by SPV
members and others, the
percentage of usage by SPV
members may exceed 60%.
Consent to utilize
atleast 60% of
installed capacity
required.
o. (a) Power requirement for
commercial/ domestic
purpose (page no. 92 of
DPR)
(b) Water
(c) Gas/Oil/ Other utilities
55 HP
----
----
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency
(page no. 15 of DPR)
Industries Commissioner &
Department of Industries and
Commerce (IC&DIC), Govt. of
Tamilnadu
All projects in Tamilnadu
implemented by
TANSIDCO.
b. Implementation Period
(page no. 54 of DPR)
3 years It should be 24 months
from date of final approval.
c. Appraisal of DPR and main recommendations
(Union Bank of India appraised of DPR)
Union Bank of India appraised the DPR. In its recommendation
mentioned that project may be technically and economically
feasible and financially viable.
Annexure I.
Term loan is not proposed for the project
hence, appraisal from SIDBI is required.
d. Comments of Technical Division
Technical Division has supported the proposal.
e. Approval of Technical
Committee
Observations:
• The appraisal report by Union
Observations of
Committee and Cluster
38
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
Remarks, if any
Bank of India is not as per
guidelines of MSE-CDP &
appraisal from the SIDBI may
be got done.
• The clarification regarding
‘MS tools worth Rs. 1.23
lakh, which are taken part of
the machinery and equipment
and not as consumable’ may be sought.
• Justification for MS tools Stock Pot Die, Stock Pot
Spinning Punch Die etc. may be obtained.
• Purpose of some of the equipments is not clear, the
committee observed that
cluster may be visited by the
MSME official to assess the
suitability of proposed
machinery and equipment vis-
à-vis the requirements of the
cluster.
Division were conveyed
to State Govt. on
09.02.12. Reply awaited.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC:
Description By Implementing/
recommending Agency
a. BEP (page no. 81 of DPR) 55.92% (Avg.)
b. IRR, payback period (page no. 81 of DPR) 12.12%.
c. DSCR (page no. 81 of DPR) Nil
d. Return on Capital employed (ROCE) (page no. 81 of
DPR)
27.46%.
e. NPV (page no. 81 of DPR) Rs. 5.19 lakhs.
f. DER NA
g. Sensitivity Analysis (page no. 81 of DPR) Sensitivity analysis has
been done for 5% drop in the user charges & 5%
increase in expenses.
h. Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a
bank, if applicable arrangement made) (page no. 80 of DPR)
The cluster not depends
for any debt finance from Bank,
39
6. Project Cost: (page no. 93 of DPR):
7. Means of Finance: (page no. 93 of DPR):
8.
Plan
t
and
mac
hinery Annexure - II
9. Shortcoming
i. SIDBI appraisal
ii. Validated DSR iii. Details of building
iv. Commitment regarding utilization of 60% of the installed capacity by SPV members v. By-laws of SPV and SPV commitment regarding their contribution
vi. Technical Committee desired clarification regarding ‘MS tools worth Rs. 1.23 lakh, which are
taken part of the machinery and equipment and not as consumable’, Justification for MS
tools Stock Pot Die, Stock Pot Spinning Punch Die etc. may be obtained. Committee desired a report from MSME officials. MSME-DI, Chennai has been requested to send the
report.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster,
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, Tamilnadu to accord in-principle approval.
Particulars Amount (Rs. in lakh)
1 Building 16.00
2 Machinery and equipments 104.95
3 Electrical installations 2.00
4 Pre-operative exp. 2.00
5 Margin for working capital 1.56
Total 126.51
Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 78.29 99.05
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 6.24 7.90
3. SPV contribution 15.47 19.57
Total 100% 126.52
40
Agenda No. 30.67 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Engineering
Cluster, Ambattur, Tamilnadu
Director and Commissioner of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Tamilnadu has
submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Ambattur, Tamilnadu. Salient
features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Engineering Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster \
Ambattur, Chennai District.
c. Products of the cluster
(page – 8 of DPR)
Air, Compressors, Fabrication of Boilers, Electrical
& Electrical M/c parts, Dies and moulds, pulleys, industrial values, iron casting, tools and pressed
components, power equipment, computer hardware accessories, structural fabrication, steel furniture,
Hand tools, Bicycle and parts etc.,
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro, small, medium)
(page – 10 of DPR)
5512 nos. units
Large – 37, Medium units – 125 nos, Small units – 1000 nos. & Micro units – 4350 nos.
e. Turnover (p7 of DSR) Rs 43875 cr (Rs 17550 cr for micro and small)
f. Exports (p7 of DSR) Engineering Products – Rs 10538 cr (Rs 5322 cr for
micro and small)
g. Employment in Cluster 41,000 nos. directly
h. Technological Details (p7 of DPR)
Mostly micro units have very limited capacity with old / obsolete machineries (lathe, frilling, grinding/
turning, shaping etc)
i. Whether DS conducted Yes
j. Main findings of DSR
(page – 11 of DPR) • Low technology level.
• Inability compete with medium players.
• High cost of utilities.
• Scarcity of raw materials.
• Inability to access research and development facilities.
• Inadequate infrastructure facilities in respect of micro industries.
k. Main Problems of cluster (p–10 of DSR)
• Shortage of skilled manpower.
• Absence of Product Engineering & system development facility (CAD/CAM/CAE).
• Absence of economies of scale in case of micro enterprises.
• More of low-value added services (job shops)
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
Location of CFC
(p-7/DPR)
Ambattur, Chennai.
41
Land for CFC (p-17/DPR)
Weather land
acquired
Rented Accommodation (monthly rent of
Rs 2 lakh)
Title is in name
of
N A
Valuation and its
basis
Not given
Land is sufficient Details not given
Change of land
use
Information not given.
If on lease,
duration of lease
Information not given.
Whether lease is
legally tenable
Information not given.
Total Building
area (sq ft)
Information not available
Rate of
construction of
building
Information not available
Major Outputs of
CFC,
Projected
performance of
cluster after
setting up of CFC
Paramete
rs
Pre
Interventio
n
Immedi
ate
after
formati
on of
CFC
Anticipated
visible
benefit in
future
Not given
Pollution clearance
required or not
Information not available
Main facilities
proposed
(Page – 2&7/
DPR)
• Common Processing Centre.
• Testing Centre.
• Tool Room cum Training Centre.
Prod capacity of
CFC
Information not available
Man power in
CFC (p 33 of
DPR)
128 nos.
Revenue
mechanism for sustainability of
CFC (by user charges, etc)
Revenue generation calculated on job
work per machine, per hour basis.
Estimated net profit for 1st &
2nd
year. (p35/c)
1st Year – Rs. 60.78lakh
2nd Year – Rs. 65.56 lakh
42
3 Information about SPV
a. Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
b. Name and address (P-3
of DPR)
M/s Ambattur Tapstia Engineering
Consortium Private Limited.,
No. 203, New Tiny Sector, Park
Road, Ambattur Industries Estate,
Chennai
c. Nature of SPV (company or Society or
Trust)
Private Limited Company.
d. Name of the state Govt
and MSME officials in SPV
Not given in the list of SPV. One Official
each from State Govt., MSME
should be accommodated.
e. Date of formation of SPV (P-MoA in DPR)
4th
September 2009
f. Number of MSE Member Units (P-1-5
of AoA)
45 nos.
g. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
h. Authorized share
capital (P-8 of MoA)
The Authorised share capital of the
Company is Rs.1000000 divided into 100000 equity shares of Rs.
10/- each.
i. Shareholding Pattern Information not available
j. Commitment letter for
contribution
Information not available
k. SPV specific A/c Information not available
l. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives
pursued by SPV
members with
documentation
Soft interventions undertaken by
MSME-DI Chennai under MSE-
CDP during 2008-2011.
m. Technical Institution Information not available
n. CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
Evidence FOR SPV
members’ ability to
utilise at least 60% of installed capacity
Letter received. The members of
the SPV will be utilizing 60% of
the operating capacity of the CFC
and the other members of the
cluster will be utilizing the balance
40% capacity.
o. Utilities requirement
Power (P-17 of corres.) 300 HP
11 KVA
Water
Gas/Oil/ Other
43
4 Project Cost (P-4/DPR):
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Rent Advance 20.00
2 Plant & Machinery 475.10
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 2.50
4 Preliminary Expenses 5.00*
5 Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost 10.00*
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 23.76
7 Margin money for Working Capital 15.00
Total 551.36
* should be restricted to 2% of project cost.
5. Means of Finance (P-4 of DPR):
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 10.66 58.76
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 79.48 438.16
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 9.86 54.44
Total 100 551.36
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP (P-47 of DPR) 51.64%
b. IRR (P-49 of DPR) 11.54%
c. DSCR NA
d. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE) (P-48
of DPR)
35.92%
e. NPV at 10% (P-49 of
DPR)
Rs. 32.22 lakh
f. DER NA
g. Sensitivity Analysis (P-
51 of DPR)
The sensitivity analysis,
indicate that even if there is
a fall of 5% in the income, the IRR will be still at
8.99% making the project viable.
7. Plant and Machinery Annexure I
(Rs in lakh)
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
p. Implementation Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai All the projects in
Tamilnadu implemented by TANSIDCO.
q. Commitment of SPV Not given Commitment letter
44
contribution required from SPV.
r. Commitment of State
Government contribution (p-28
of Corres.)
in-principle sanction
given by GoTN vide
letter No.
10029/D1/2009-4
dated 11.08.2008.
s. Commitment of Loans (Working capital and/ or term
loan) (Page – 4/c)
Indian Bank has given in principle sanction
of term loan of Rs 75 lakh & working
capital of Rs 25 lakh.
t. Implementation Period
(Page – 19 of DPR)
Within 6-8 months
from the date of approval of the CFC.
Should be 2 years from
final approval.
u. Appraisal of DPR and main recommendations
Appraisal not
received.
Required
v. Comments of Technical Division
Proposal is viable.
9 Shortcomings:
� No appraisal report received. � CFC proposed in rented accommodation, however no information about lease agreement.
� No information bank account details. � The information about export, turnover, employment etc is not clear.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
45
Agenda No. 30.68: Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Plastic Cluster,
District Madurai
Addl. Chief Secretary to Government, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (D1)
Department, Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in Plastic Cluster,
District Madurai, Tamilnadu. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Plastic Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread
of cluster \
Madurai
c. Products of the cluster
(page – 1 of DSR)
Household Plastic Items, Plastic Electrical Fittings, Food Packing Containers, Ploy bags, Plastic
hardware fittings, Toys & Cosmetics, Industrial products, Baby care products
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium)
(page – 1 of DSR)
500 Micro & 300 Small
(SC/ST entrepreneurs-100, Minority- 200, OBC &
Others-500, Women- 100)
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Presently Rs. 100.00 crore
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Information not given
g. Employment in Cluster Direct- 36000 & Indirect-42000
h. Technological Details Injection and blow moulding with Obsolete
technologies
i. Whether DS conducted Yes
j. Main findings of DSR
(page – 32 of DPR) • Largely unorganized and scattered.
• Getting the mould designed with the latest technology especially for the export market is
their major problem. At present they depend on
other states for latest designs.
• Inconsistent supply and control of raw materials by few big suppliers.
• Obsolete technologies are followed by most of
the cluster members.
• Machinery cost for bulk production is higher
on account of age old machines leading to
uncompetitive rates.
• No testing centre to ensure the quality of the products supplied.
k. Main Problems of cluster
(page – 31 of DSR) • Low per capita consumption of plastic.
• Lack of professional management.
• Monopoly control on raw material.
• Lack of Research & Development
• Obsolete technology
• Poor economics of scale.
• Poor linkages with BDS & Support service providers.
46
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Land for CFC (P-11 of corrs.)
i. Weather land
acquired
SPV informed vide letter dated
16.04.2010 that land has already procured within SIDCO
Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai, for Rs 32 lakh.
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its
basis
iv. Land is sufficient
v. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration
of lease
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
b. Total Building area (sq
ft)
Not given Details of building
along and
estimated cost
required. c. Rate of construction of
building
Estimated Cost Rs. 100.00 lakh
d. Major Outputs of CFC,
Projected performance
of cluster after setting up
of CFC
Para
mete
rs
Pre
Interventi
on
Immedi
ate after
formatio
n of
CFC
Anticipated
visible
benefit in
future
Information not given
e. Pollution clearance
required or not Information not given Consent to
establish required.
f. Main facilities proposed
(P – 2 of DPR) • Design Centre
• Processing Centre
• Quality Control & Testing Centre
• Training Centre
g. Prod capacity of CFC Not Given
h. Man power in CFC
(P – 30 & 31 of DPR)
23 nos.
i. Revenue mechanism for
sustainability of CFC
(by user charges, etc)
(p-37 of DPR)
Training- 12.96 lakh
Testing- 3.02 lakh
PM operations- 23.85 lakh Moulds making - 132.48 lakh
TOTAL - 172.31 lakh
j. Estimated net profit for
1st & 2
nd year.
(P-38 of DPR)
1st year – Rs 30.23 lakh
2nd
year- Rs 36.29 lakh
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address
(p-3 of DPR)
M/s Plasma Tool Room Cluster
Pvt. Ltd. 34/1, West Avani Moola Street, Madurai- 625 001
b. Nature of SPV Private Ltd. Co.
47
c. Name of the state Govt
and MSME officials in
SPV
-- Provision in Bye
laws required
d. Date of formation of
SPV
29.08.2008
e. Number of MSE
Member Units
30 nos.
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital Rs 5.00 lakh divided into 50,000
shares
h. Shareholding Pattern
(p49 of DPR)
Given
i. Commitment letter for
contribution (p48 of
DPR)
Given
j. SPV specific A/c
(p-11/c)
Punjab National Bank
A/c No. 4383002122509599
k. Trust building of SPV,
Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV
members with documentation
(p-11/c)
SPV in association with MSME-
DI, Chennai has conducted
awareness program, Technical seminars, like waste management
etc. for cluster. Also conducted training programmes on quality
management, production planning and new investment opportunities
in plastic industries. They are also encouraging aspiring
entrepreneurs to venture into plastic sector by giving all
technical inputs to them.
l. Technical Institution Information not given.
m. CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
Evidence FOR SPV
members’ ability to
utilise at least 60% of installed capacity (p-54
of DPR)
Given
n. Utilities requirement
Power 150 HP
Water
Gas/Oil/ Other Annual Fuel Cost: Rs. 4.61 lakh
48
4 Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars (p-19 of DPR) Amount
1 Land 35.00
2 Building 90.00
3 Plant & Machinery 331.07
4 Misc. fixed assets 20.00
5 Preliminary expenses 10.00*
6 Pre-operative expenses 15.00*
7 Provision for contingencies (Building 2% & Plant & Mach. 5%) 18.35
8 Margin for working capital 5.00
Total 524.42
*Both combined Should be restricted to 2% of project cost.
5. Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 13.99 73.35
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 65.40 342.96
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 6.31 33.11
4. Bank Term Loan 14.30 75.00
Total 100 524.42
6 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. BEP 48.60%
b. IRR (p-62 of DPR) 13.06%
c. DSCR 4.24
d. Return on Capital employed
(ROCE)
29.66%
e. NPV (p-59 of DPR) Rs 60.14 lakh
f. Sensitivity Analysis (p-62 of
DPR)
o.k
7. Plant and Machinery Annexure-I
8 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency TANSIDCO
b. Commitment of SPV contribution
Received (p49 DPR)
c. Commitment of State Government contribution
Specific letter not recd. DPR forwarded by state govt.
d. Commitment of Loans (Working capital and/ or
term loan)
Not given
e. Implementation Period 6 months Should be 2 years
49
(P – 18 of DPR) from date of final
approval.
f. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
Appraisal from PNB recd. Appraisal is not as
per SIDBI format.
g. Comments of Technical
Division
Chemical Div has partially
supported proposal. It has
suggested not allowing common plastic processing machines. Mech
Division has sought details of machines. State govt/ MSME-DI
have been requested to send
details/ comments on 5.4.11 and
12.5.11. Reply awaited.
9 Shortcomings
(i) Appraisal is not as per SIDBI format. (ii) Details of building
(iii) Chemical Div has partially supported proposal. It has suggested not allowing common
plastic processing machines. Mech Division has sought details of machines. State govt/
MSME-DI have been requested to send details/ comments on 5.4.11 and 12.5.11.
(iv) Major Outputs of CFC in quantitative terms
9 Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
50
Agenda No. 30.69 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Engineering
Cluster, Paramakudi, Ramanathanpuram, Tamilnadu
Industries & Commerce Department, Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for setting up
of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Paramakudi, Ramanathanpuram. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Engineering Cluster
b. Location of Cluster/ spread of
cluster (page – 1 of DSR)
Paramakudi, Ramanathanpuram
c. Products of the cluster
(page – 9of DPR)
single or double brake AB switches, Aluminum
knobs, Transformers bushing clamps, earthing rods, LT open type fuse sets, line material for distribution
of electricity, etc.
d. No. of Enterprises including break
up (micro, small, medium)
(page – 1 of DSR)
47 Micro
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for the last five years
45.78 (one year)
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for the last five years
No information
g. Employment in Cluster (p-8 of the DPR)
765
h. Technological Details Low level of technology using traditional machines for machining and fabrication.
i. Whether DS conducted (vide letter
dated 11.11.09 of SPV enclosed in
DPR)
Yes, DSR is validated on 3.11.2009
j. Main findings of DSR
(page – 14 of the DPR)
� CFC for structural fabrication center required
� Training center with R & D facilities
� The CFC in the second phase should have a hot
dip galvanizing plant
k. Main Problems of cluster
(page – 27 of DSR)
� Obsolete technology used in the cluster.
� Absence of sufficient testing facilities.
� Increase in cost due to transporting & loading
and unloading.
� Inability to expand market in private sector
with the existing infrastructure.
2 Information about Proposed CFC
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Location of CFC Paramakudi,
Ramanathanpuram District
b. Land for CFC
i. Weather land
acquired (P-41 of the
corres.)
Vide letter dt. 24.3.11, Govt. of
Tamilnadu has informed that the
land required for the CFC (1.21
acres) has been purchased and
registered. Sale Deed is yet to be
delivered by the Registrar. Vide
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its
basis
51
iv. Land is sufficient letter dt. 10.6.11, Govt. of
Tamilnadu has been requested for
Sale Deed. The same is still awaited. w. Change of land use
vi. If on lease, duration
of lease
vii. Whether lease is
legally tenable
c. Total Building area (sq
ft)
No information
d. Rate of construction of
building
No information
e. Major Outputs of CFC,
Projected performance
of cluster after setting
up of CFC
No information Before setting
up of CFC
After … years of CFC
Production (Rs in
cr)
Not mentioned.
Export (Rs in cr)
f. Pollution clearance
required or not
No information
g. Main facilities
proposed
(Page – 2of DPR)
Structural Fabrication Centre,
R&D Cum Testing and Training Centre
h. Man power in CFC (p-29-30 of DPR)
28 Nos.
i. Estimated net profit for 1st & 2nd year. (p-36 of
DPR)
1st year – Rs. 11.66 lakh
2nd year – Rs. 14.49 lakh
3 Information about SPV
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Name and address Paramakudi Engineering
Cluster Private Limited
b. Nature of SPV
(company or Society or
Trust)
Companies Act
c. Name of the state Govt
and MSME officials in
SPV
Not given in the list of SPV. One Official each
from State Govt. and
Ministry of MSME
should be
accommodated in
SPV.
d. Date of formation of
SPV
8.7.2008
e. Number of MSE
Member Units (P-3 of
DPR)
25 Nos. However,
shareholding detail for 16
members given. Clarification
awaited from State Govt.
f. Bye laws or MA and AoA submitted
Yes
g. Authorized share capital (P-45/c)
Rs 20.0 lakh
h. Shareholding Pattern Shareholding detail available Details required
52
(P-45/c) for 16 members out of 25.
i. Commitment letter for
contribution
Not available Required
j. SPV specific A/c (P-
46/c)
A/c No. 867831825 Indian
Bank, Madurai,
Ramanathanpuram
4 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Implementation Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
b. Commitment of SPV contribution Not given Commitment letter is
required.
c. Commitment of State Government
contribution (P-26 of the corres.)
In-principle approval
given.
d. Commitment of Loans (Working
capital and/ or term loan) (P-42 of
the corres.)
Indian Bank has also
approved sanction of
Rs. 39.0 lakh loan.
e. Implementation Period (P-19 of
the DPR)
6 months Should be 2 years
form date of final approval
f. Appraisal of DPR and main recommendations
Indian Bank has mentioned that project
may be termed as technically and
financially viable.
Annexure I
Appraisal by bank
does not confirm
about the viability
of the project.
Detailed appraisal
in SIDBI format is
required.
g. Comments of Technical Division
(p35/c)
Technical Division has
supported the proposal.
5 Project Cost: (page 4/DPR)
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1 Land and Site Development 15.00
2 Building 50.00
3 Plant & Machinery 144.81
4 Misc. fixed assets 5.00
5 Preliminary expenses 2.00*
6 Pre-operative expenses 5.00*
7 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 8.24
8 Margin money for Working Capital 3.34
Total 233.39
*Both combined should be restricted to 2% of project cost.
6. Means of Finance: (page 4/DPR)
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 37.58
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 133.47
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 23.34
53
4 Bank Loan/ others 39.0
Total 233.39
7 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Parameter As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP (p-42 of DPR) Rs. 44.81 lakh
b. IRR (P-44 of the DPR) 12.75%
c. DSCR (P-40 of the DPR) 4.07
d. Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
28.82%
e. NPV at 10% (P-44 of
the DPR)
23.63 lakh
f. DER Not given
g. Sensitivity Analysis (P-
45 of the DPR)
Sensitivity analysis, indicate
(with 5% fall in income,
IRR will be 9.98%) NPV is positive. Average DSCR –
3.55 making project viable.
7. Plant and Machinery Annexure I (p21 of DPR)
9 Shortcomings: (i) Detailed appraisal report required
(ii) Land documents required. (iii) No information about building construction.
(iv) No commitment letter from SPV for contribution.
(v) No information about clearance for pollution, inclusion of one Official each from
State Govt. in SPV.
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
54
Agenda No. 30.70 Proposal to set up Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Plastic Cluster,
Chennai, Kancheepuram District, Tamilnadu
Principal Secretary to Government, Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted a proposal for
setting up of CFC in Plastic Cluster, Chennai, Kancheepuram District, Tamilnadu on 27.2.12.
Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Plastic Cluster
b. Location of Cluster Chennai, Kancheepuram District, Tamilnadu
c. Products of the cluster (P-6
of DPR)
Plastic products like Flat film/ Tapes/ Woven fabric,
Carry bags, Rods tubes pipes, Roofing sheets,
Engineering Automobile parts, Furniture, Toys, Pet bottles, House hold containers.
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium) (P-7 of the
DPR)
106 (Micro- 80, Small-20 & Medium-6)
e. Turnover (Rs in crore) for
the last five years (P. 7 of
the DSR)
450.00
f. Exports (Rs in crore) for
the last five years
Not given.
g. Employment in Cluster (P.
7 of the DSR)
5800
h. Technological Details (P-
7 of the DSR)
Clusters units are using following technology / methods
- Injection moulding, compression moulding, blow
moulding, rotational moulding, blow film extrusion,
calendaring reprocessing units moulding.
i. Whether DS conducted and
validated. (P. 41 of the
DSR)
DSR prepared by MSME-DI, Chennai in the year 2007.
j. Main findings of DSR
(P – 32-34 of the DSR) • Formation of raw material bank.
• Common finishing centre.
• Internal corrective mechanism.
• Common production centre.
• Creation of skill development.
• Marketing linkages.
• Integrated production centre.
• Formation of tool room.
• Forward linkages.
• Backward linkages.
k. Main Problems of cluster
(P – 27 of the DSR) • Lack of professional management.
• Monopoly control on raw material.
• Lack of research & development.
• Obsolete technology.
• Poor economies of scale.
• Poor linkages with BDS & support service providers.
l. Other information Cluster units saturated within 30 Kms. Radius in
Pillaipakkam in Kancheepuram District.
55
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description By Implementing/recommending Agency Remarks,
if any
a. Justification for CFC (P. 3
of the DPR)
The proposed CFC will help the cluster
members to enhance their existing
productivity and employment and create
newer markets. It will also help the cluster
members for creating a common brand for
their product to cater to the core corporate
consumers.
b. Location of CFC Chennai, Kancheepuram District,
Tamilnadu
c. Land for CFC (P- 23 of
DPR) Weather land acquired
Title is in name of
Valuation and its basis
Land is sufficient
Change of land use
If on lease, duration of lease
Whether lease is legally
tenable
4.04 acres
Yes
SPV
Not mentioned
d. Total Building area (sq ft)
(P-25 of DPR)
63958 sq. ft.
e. Rate of construction of
building
Not given
f. Main facilities proposed
(P1- of DPR)
� Common processing centre for Plastic
Woven Fabric with or without
lamination.
� Testing facilities for raw materials,
woven fabric and lamination.
� A centre for training.
g. Major Outputs /
Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of
production, export/domestic sales and
direct/indirect employment, etc.) (P- 61
of DPR)
Para
meter
s
Pre
intervent
ion
Post intervention
Immedi
ate
after
formati
on of
CFC
Anticip
ated
visible
benefits
in
future
Units 100 115 130
Employme
nt
5000 6000 7000
Turn
over
Rs. 250
crore
Rs. 290
crore
Rs. 330
crore
Expo
rt
- Rs. 8
crore
Rs. 15
crore
Improvement of Net Income
(Profit) at the unit level
56
Description By Implementing/recommending Agency Remarks,
if any
Micr
o
units
Rs. 10
lakh
Rs. 13
lakh
Rs. 15
lakh
SSI
units
Rs. 25
lakh
Rs. 30
lakh
Rs.
32.5
lakh
h. Pollution clearance
required or not
Not given. Information
required.
i. Man power in CFC (P- 37-
38 of the DPR)
216 nos.
j. Revenue generation
mechanism for
sustainability of assets
(service/user charges to be
levied, any other-to be
specified) (P- 46 of the
DPR)
Revenue has been calculated on the basis on
conversion charges – extruder – I & II, user
charges lamination plant and income from
training etc.
k. Estimated net profit for 1st
& 2nd
year. (P. 47 of the
DPR)
1st year - Rs. 158.30 lakh
2nd
year – Rs. 169.61 lakh
3. Information about SPV
Description By IA Remarks, if any
i. Name and address M/s Chennai Plastic Sacks
Cluster Private Limited, No. 32,
Cathedral Road,
Gopalapuram, Chennai
ii. Nature of SPV (company or
Society or Trust)
Private Limited
iii. Name of the state Govt. and
MSME officials in SPV
As per MoU, a representative of
the State Govt. of Tamilnadu
shall be accommodated in SPV
State Govt. officials
yet to be nominated.
There is no provision
of MSME official in
SPV.
iv. Date of formation of SPV (P- 23
of DPR)
19.10.2010
v. Number of members (P- 23 of
DPR)
39
vi. Bye laws or MA and AoA
submitted
Yes
vii. Authorized share capital ( as per
AoA)
Rs. 70.00 lakh divided into
7,00,000 equity share of Rs. 10/- each
viii. Paid up capital as on 1st March
2011(P- 23 of the DPR) Rs. 70.00 lakh
ix. Shareholding Pattern Given in MOA
x. Commitment letter for
contribution
Commitment letter given
xi. SPV specific A/c Oriental Bank of Commerce
57
Description By IA Remarks, if any
A/c 05811131001690
xii. Trust building of SPV, Previous
track record of co-operative
initiatives pursued by SPV
members need to be highlighted
with support documentation
Soft interventions approved in
first SCM held on 25.6.08. Rs.
6.52 lakh released and various
activities organized by MSME-
DI, Chennai.
xiii. Technical Institution (P. 1 of the
DPR)
CIPET, Chennai
xiv. CFC may be utilized by SPV
members as also others in a
cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize
at least 60 per cent of installed capacity.
Received
xv. (b) Power requirement for commercial/ domestic purpose
(c) Water (P-39 of DPR)
(d) Gas/Oil/ Other utilities
1350 KVA
190 liters per day
4. Implementation Arrangements
Particular As per proposal Remarks if any
Implementation Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
Implementation Period (P- 59 of DPR)
12 months from the date of approval and sanction by GoI
Should be 2 years from date of final approval.
Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
Report appraised by OBC.
Main recommendation is
sanction of term loan of Rs.
100.00 lakh and WC Rs. 20.00
lakh. Annexure-
Appraisal report is not as
per the SIDBI format.
Comments of Technical
Division The proposal is for setting up
of complete production units
of very high capacity and not
the complementary process for the manufacture of woven
fabric/sacks for the cluster
members. This will affect the
existing woven fabric/sacks
manufacturing units in the cluster. Therefore, tech
division has not supported proposal. Annexure -
5. Financial Analysis of CFC (P. 52-55 of the DPR):
Particulars Implementing Agency Remarks, if any
ff. BEP 49.01%
gg. IRR, payback period 14.51%
hh. DSCR 12.13
58
Particulars Implementing Agency Remarks, if any
ii. Return on Capital employed
(ROCE)
26.53%
jj. NPV @ 10% Rs. 220.74 lakh
kk. DER N/A
ll. Sensitivity Analysis (P. 58
of the DPR)
The project is still viable.
mm. Working capital (In-principle
sanction of loan from a bank,
if applicable
arrangement made)
In-principle approval for given by
Oriental Bank of Commerce, Br.
Moulivakkam, Chennai
6. Total Cost: The total cost of the CFC is as follows:
Particulars Total Cost (Rs.
in lakh)
1 Land 58.00
2 Building 235.00
3 Plant & Machinery 1009.22
4 Misc. Fixed assets 97.74
5 EB Deposit 5.00
6 Preliminary expenses 7.00
7 Pre-operative expenses 13.00
8 Contingencies 55.16
9 Margin for working capital 5.00
TOTAL 1485.12
7. Means of Finance:
Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in lakh)
1. SPV contribution 17.38 258.16
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 69.15 1026.96
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamilnadu 6.73 100.00
4 Bank Loan/ others 6.73 100.00
Total 1485.12
8. Plant and machinery - Annexure
9. Shortcomings: i. Technical division has not supported CFC mentioning that proposal is for setting up of
complete production units of very high capacity and not the complementary process for the cluster units
ii. Pollution clearance, Details of building construction
10. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal of
CFC for Plastic Cluster, Chennai, Kancheepuram District, Tamilnadu may be rejected.
59
Agenda No.30.71 Proposal for setting up of CFC in Lorry Body Building Cluster,
Namakkal, Tamilnadu
Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Tamilnadu
has submitted the proposal for setting up of CFC in Lorry Body Building Cluster, Namakkal,
Tamilnadu. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Lorry Body Building Cluster
2. Location Namakkal, Tamilnadu
3. Products (page – 8/DPR) Truck body building.
4. Age of the cluster Since 1956
5. No. of Units (P- 8/DPR) 120 Nos.
6. Type of units Information not available.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Information not available.
8. Formation of SPV (p-3 of
DPR)
M/s. Namakkal District Lorry Body Builders Private
Limited
9. Employment (P-8/ DPR) 25000 Nos.
10. Turnover / Export Information not available
11. Implementing Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
12. Problems of the units � Non availability of skilled or suitable labour for bus
body enterprises. � High cost of raw material such as aluminum sheets,
toughened glass. � High cost of power.
� Non availability of designing centre and R&D institutions.
13. Recommendations in the
Diagnostic Study Report
(p-12 of DPR)
• Formation of a common raw material bank within the cluster for cost reduction.
• Creation of a common components manufacturing centre for manufacture of type approved cabin
components (kits) and other major components for body satisfying the norms of AIS 29 and AIS 93.
• Formation of an Integrated Production Centre for processes like MIG welding, planting etc, for quality
improvement, cost reduction.
• Creation of Research and Development and Testing
facilities.
14. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount
1 Land and Site Development 30.00
2 Building 100.00
3 Plant & Machinery 1175.82
4 Misc. fixed assets 5.00
5 ED Deposit 2.00
6 Preliminary expenses 10.00
7 Pre-operative expenses 15.00
8 Contingency (2% building and
5% on plant and machinery)
60.79
9 Margin money for Working
Capital
75.00
Total 1473.61
60
15. Means of finance (In
lakh) Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 15.79 232.79
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
75.14 1107.29
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of Tamilnadu
6.69 98.53
4 Bank Loan/ others 2.38 35.00
Total 100.00 1473.61
16. Facilities to be created in
the CFC • Common Components Manufacturing Centre.
• R&D Cum Testing Centre.
• Training Centre.
17. Plant and machinery Annexure-
18. Shortcomings • Land with clear title.
• Turnover of the cluster.
• Bank account details.
19. Comments of Cluster
Division
The proposal envisages purchase of raw material and sale
of products. There is no provision of user charges and hence proposal is not for common facility (not as per
scheme guidelines). Proposal may be accepted.
Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal of CFC in Lorry Body Building Cluster, Namakkal, Tamilnadu may be rejected.
61
Agenda No.30.72 Proposal for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Perungudi,
Tamilnadu
Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Tamilnadu has
submitted the proposal for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Perungudi, Tamilnadu.
Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
a. Name of the cluster Engineering Cluster
b. Location (P-5/DPR) Parungudi, Kancheepuram District
c. Products (P – 15\DPR) Automobile spares, tool room items, dies, jigs, fixtures,
punches, cutting tools, machine tools, industrial valves,
pump spares, gas cuts, panel boards, aluminum body
volves for automobiles and tapcet for automobile.
d. Age of the cluster Information not available.
e. No. of Units and its type
(P- 5/DPR)
Large – > 20 in Chennai Medium / Traders - > 20 in Chennai
Small/ Partially Mechanized - > 100 in Chennai Micro & Tiny Industries - Approx. 2000 in Perungudi and
surrounding.
f. Existence of Association /
NGO
Information not available.
g. Formation of SPV (P-
385/c)
Parungudi Engineering Cluster Private Limited
h. Employment (p-5/ DPR) 40000 (Direct-10000 & Indirect-30000)
i. Turnover / Export (p–5/DPR)
Rs. 12.00 crore / Information not available.
j. Implementing Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
k. Problems of the units (p–
10/DPR) � Problems in procurement of raw material and
consumables.
� No awareness of technology upgradation.
� Non-availability of modern and precision instruments
in micro units.
� Undercutting among the members.
l. Recommendation of the
DSR (P-8 of DSR) � No facility for research and development.
� Product design and engineering capabilities
constrained due to absence of economies of scale.
� Low volume of production.
� Conventional machines are not able to meet the
precision manufacturing.
� Sub standard industrial infrastructure.
m. Cost of the project (p-
23/DPR):
Particulars Amount
(Rs. in lakh
1 Land Existing
2 Building Exiting
3 Machinery and implements 60.00
4 CAD/CAM Software 2.50
5 CAD workstation 2.00
6 Generators 4.00
7 Office equipments and furniture
1.00
8 Deposits 1.00
62
9 Preliminary and pre-
operative exp.
1.00
10 Contingencies 3.00
11 Working capital margin 2.50
Total 77.00
n. Means of finance (p-
63/DPR)
Particulars Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India
59.60
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
Tamilnadu
7.45
3. Consortium 5.50
4. Bank Loan 4.45
Total 77.00
o. Facilities to be created in
the CFC (p-341/c) • Manufacturing of quality and value added engineering
products especially auto components.
• Training.
• Testing
• Product development
p. Plant and machinery Annexure -
q. Shortcomings SIDBI, Mumbai has informed vide letter dated 20.12.11 that viability of Proposal Is Doubtful and account of SPV
is already NPA in Central Bank of India. Proposed proposal of expansion of CFC is not viable and support
worthy. Annexure – SIBDI letter.
Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal of CFC in
Engineering Cluster, Perungudi, Tamilnadu may be rejected.
63
Agenda No.30.73 Proposal for setting up of CFC in Pharma (MICAL) Cluster, Chennai,
Tamilnadu
Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Tamilnadu has
submitted the proposal for setting up of CFC in Pharma (MICAL) Cluster, Chennai, Tamilnadu.
Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
a. Name of the cluster Pharma (MICAL) Cluster
b. Location (P-12/DPR) The pharma units are spread over the three regions viz
Chennai central, south and north.
c. Products (P – 23\DPR) Tablets, capsules, syrups, dry syrups, powders, injection,
ointments & lotions and raw drugs etc.
d. Age of the cluster (p-39 of
DPR)
50 years.
e. No. of Units (P- 8/DPR) 350 nos. units (Large – 19, Small and Medium – 136 & Micro – 195 nos.)
f. Type of units All are micro units
g. Existence of Association /
NGO
Information not available.
h. Formation of SPV (p-38
of DPR)
The Chennai Industrial Cooperative Analytical Laboratory
Ltd. (formally known as the MICAL) Guindy, Chennai – 600032
i. Employment (p-28/ DPR) 81000 nos.
j. Turnover / Export (p–
28/DPR) Rs. 2152. 0 Crore/ Rs. 500.0 Crore
k. Implementing Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
l. Problems of the units (p–
30/DPR) • Poor R&D infrastructure facilities.
• Insufficient facilities on quality control and testing laboratory.
• Over dependence on imported raw materials.
• Cumbersome legal formalities on Schedule M & Schedule T.
• Non protection of traditional medicine practitioners.
• Improper distribution system.
m. Cost of the project (p-
63/DPR):
Particulars Amount
1 Land Existing
2 Building and Civil works Existing
3 Equipments 332.64
4 Working capital 10.00
5 Preliminary and Pre-operative exp. 0.00
Total 342.64
n. Means of finance (In
lakh) (p-63/DPR)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 12.34 42.27
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
77.66 266.11
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of Tamilnadu
10.00 34.26
Total 100.00 342.64
o. Facilities to be created in
• Upgrading MICAL as Export Inspecting Agency
64
the CFC • Calibration and Validation of Instruments.
• Training Centre
p. Plant and machinery Annexure -
q. Shortcomings • Projected performance of the cluster after setting up of
CFC.
• SPV member details.
• Proposal as per Annexure-II of guidelines.
• Land document with clear title.
• Detailed appraisal report as per SIDBI format.
r. Comments of Technical
Division
There are nos. of NABL a credit laboratories for
pharmaceutical testing in the cluster are in Chennai.
FURTHER SETTING UP OF SUCH FACILITIES IS
NOT JUSTIFIED. Annexure -
Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal of CFC in
Pharma (MICAL) Cluster, Chennai, Tamilnadu may be rejected.
65
Agenda No.30.74 Proposal for setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Kangayam,
Tiruppur, Tamilnadu
Principal Secretary to Govt., Govt. of Tamilnadu has submitted the proposal for setting up of CFC
in Rice Mill Cluster, Kangayam, District – Tiruppur, Tamilnadu. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
a. Name of the cluster Rice Mill Cluster
b. Location Kangayam, District – Tiruppur, Tamilnadu
c. Products Boiled rice.
d. Age of the cluster (p-8 of
DPR)
After 1991 has cluster lead to growth.
e. No. of Units (P-7/DPR) 350 nos. (100 nos. rice mills are located in Kangayam Taluk alone).
f. Type of units Information not available.
g. Existence of Association /
NGO
Information not available.
h. Formation of SPV (p-3 of
DPR)
M/s. Kangayam Rice Mill Cluster Private Limited
i. Employment Information not available.
j. Turnover / Export Information not available.
k. Implementing Agency TANSIDCO, Chennai
l. Recommendations in the
Diagnostic Study Report
(p-10 of DPR)
• Storage techniques for paddy.
• Generation of steam for boiling, installation of
pressure boiler.
• Soaking & boiling techniques.
• Drying techniques.
• Thickness grader for removing broken.
• Colour sorters.
m. Cost of the project (p-25
of DPR)
Particulars Amount
1 Land and Site Development 20.00
2 Factory Building 30.00
3 Plant & Machinery 652.31
4 Misc. Fixed Assets 5.00
5 Preliminary Exp. 5.00
6 Pre-operative Exp. 5.00
7 Provision for contingencies (Building 2% and Plant &
Machinery 5%)
33.22
Total 750.53
n. Means of finance (In
lakh) (p-25 of DPR)
Particulars %age Amount
1. SPV contribution 12.67 95.11
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
70 525.37
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of Tamilnadu
10 75.05
4 Bank Loan/ others 7.33 55.00
Total 100.00 750.53
o. Facilities to be created in
the CFC (P-12 of DPR) • Common Processing cum Storage (SILO) Centre.
• Common Testing Centre cum Training Centre.
• Common Weigh Bridge.
66
p. Plant and machinery Annexure-
q. Comments of Technical
Division
Technical Division supported the CFC proposal.
Annexure -
r. Any other information SILO storage system is the major portion of the machinery
of CFC
Shortcomings
• Diagnostic Study Report.
• Commitment regarding contribution of SPV.
Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-
principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC for Rice Mill Cluster, Kangayam, District
– Tiruppur, Tamilnadu.
67
Agenda No. 30.75 Proposal for formation of New Industrial Estate at Mathur (New),
Pudukkottai District, Tamilnadu.
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
p. Proposals received from
Whether the Proposal recommended from
the State Govt.
Tamilnadu Small Industries Development
Corporation Ltd.
Yes
q. Location of site Mathur, Pudukottai District
r. Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan received or not
Yes
s. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 19.92 acres
t. Area to be developed (acre) 19.92 acres
u. Number and sizes of plots to be developed 40 plots
Micro (upto 15 cents)-13 Small (Below 1 acre)- 27
v. Implementing Period 15 months
w. Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No
x. Performance of ID projects in state. 12 projects sanctioned for new Industrial Estates. Out of which, 7 projects have been
completed and remaining projects are being implemented. 13 existing industrial estates for
infrastructure upgradation have also been sanctioned, out of which 7 projects have already
been implemented and 6 projects are under implementation.
2 Details about Proposal:
Description Comments by
Cluster Division
a. Implementing Agency (IA): Tamilnadu Small Industries
Development Corporation
Ltd.(TANSIDCO)
b. Track Record of the IA TANSIDCO has completed 13
proposals for infrastructure
development
Track record is
satisfactory.
c. Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report. (P-15/16 of
SIDBI report)
� About 40 Industrial units are
likely to come up in proposed
industrial estate which will
provide direct employment to
about 400 persons and indirect employment to 200.
� Pudukottai district is notified as industrially backward area.
Proposed industrial estate is 20 Kms away from BHEL.
Existing industrial estate at Mathur village is just opposite
to the proposed industrial
68
estate which was established
during 1980. All plots were
allotted and all the units are
functioning well.
� Proposal broadly conforms to
guidelines under MSE-CDP.
� Taking an overall view,
particularly in view of likely
benefits accruing to units
likely to be set up in industrial
estate, proposal is considered
to be support-worthy.
d. Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state
highways, availability of water supply, adequate power
supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Proposed industrial estate is
located at just 200 metres away from National Highway No. 210
which connects Trichy, Pudukottai and
Ramanathapuram and 15 kilometeres from Trichy.
Nearest railway station is Trichy (20 kms) and airport in Trichy
(15 kms). With regard to power,
the nearest sub-station is at
Kumaramangalam, which is 3
kms from proposed site.
e. Whether land is in possession
in the name of IA with Clear
Title
Yes (Land document in local
language)
f. Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied with
Information not available.
g. Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been
Constituted
State Level Committee is
already Constituted for infrastructure projects.
h. Whether confirmation received
form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved
project cost and any escalation in cost.
Specific confirmation not
received
DPR has been
forwarded by State Government and
TANSIDCO.
i. Basis of elements of project Cost (P-11 of SIDBI report)
As per SIDBI report, TANSIDCO has indicated that
detailed estimates have been prepared as per PWD and
Highways Department, GoTN
j. Tangible Outcomes of the
project
(Rs. in lakh)
Description Year ending 31st
March
2012 2013 2014
Sale of plots in % 15% 75% 10%
Area in acres 1.97 9.85 1.31
Developed plot cost per 30.43 33.47 36.51
69
acre
Sale value of developed
plot allotted
52.12 286.66 41.59
Administrative charges 7.82 43.00 6.24
Value of developed plot
allotted
59.94 329.66 47.83
Margin money receivable 13.03 71.67 10.40
Balance plot cost
receivable
46.91 295.42
Receipts for the year 13.03 118.58 305.82
3. Project Cost:
Rs. Lakh)
Particulars Estimated by IA Recommended
by SIDBIand as per
MSE-CDP
x Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall and fencing
55.00 55.00
xi Cost of Laying roads 117.00 117.00
xii Drainage 24.00 24.00
xiii Water supply arrangements including
overhead tanks & pump houses
20.00 20.00
xiv Street light arrangements including setting up of EB pillar box, EB service
connection charges & shifting of EB lines
13.00 13.00
xv Road side greenery 1.00 1.00
xvi Water harvesting 0.50 0.50
xvii Contingencies & pre-operative expenses 9.50 4.50
Total 240.00 235.00
4. Means of finance: -
Particulars Proposed by
IA
Proposed by SIDBI as
per MSE-CDP
v GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 144.00 141.00
vi TANSIDCO contribution 96.00 94.00
Total 240.00 235.00
5. Proposal for the Consideration of the Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Committee may consider the proposal for approval for setting up of
new Industrial Estate at Mathur District Pudukottai, Tamilnadu at project cost of Rs. 235.00 lakh
with GoI assistance of Rs. 141.00 lakh.
70
Agenda No. 30.76 Proposal for formation of new Industrial Estate at Virudhunagar
(Urban), District Virudhunagar, Tamilnadu
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
a. Proposals received from
Whether the Proposal
recommended from the State Govt.
Proposal received from TANSIDCO NO
b. Location of site Virudhunagar, District Virudhunagar, Tamilnadu
c. Whether appraised DPR with
approved layout plan received or
not
Yes
d. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
37.55 acres
e. Area to be developed (acre) 37.55 acres
f. Number and sizes of plots to be
developed (P-15 of SIDBI report)
117 plots
Micro Upto 15 cents 58
Small 0.15 acre to 0.25 acre 51
Medium 0.25 acre to 0.50 acre 5
Others Above 0.50 acre 3
TOTAL 117
g. Implementing Period 16 months
h. Other ID projects sanctioned in
same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set
up, etc.
This will be second ID centre in the same district. One
project (Virudhnagar) was sanctioned for upgradation in 2007. Project has been completed. As per the guidelines
of MSE-CDP, second/ subsequent project in a district will be considered only if the sites developed in the
earlier project(s) have been allotted. The upgradation work of this project already completed.
i. Performance of ID projects in state.
This office has so far sanctioned 12 projects for setting up of new Industrial Estates. Out of which, 7 projects
have been completed and remaining projects are at various stage of implementation. 13 existing industrial
estates towards upgradation project have also been sanctioned under MSE-CDP, out of which 7 existing
industrial estates towards upgradation project have
already been implemented and 6 upgradation projects are
under implementation.
2 Details about Proposal:
Description Comments by
Cluster Division
a. Implementing Agency (IA): Tamilnadu Small Industries
Development Corporation Ltd. (TANSIDCO), Chennai
b. Track Record of the IA TANSIDCO has completed 13 proposals (including 6 upgradation) for
infrastructure development
Track record is satisfactory.
c. Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and recommendations). Attach
� 117 Industrial units are likely to
come up in proposed industrial estate which will provide direct
71
SIDBI report. (P-16/17 of
SIDBI report)
employment to about 200 persons
and indirect employment to 600
persons.
� SIDCO Industrial Estate near the
proposed estate at Virudhunagar are
Madurai Industrial Estate and
Kappalur Industrial Estate. All the
plots and sheds of these industrial
estates are allotted and sale deed
executed. Proposed IE will fulfill
the need of upcoming
entrepreneurs. � Proposed industrial estate will
generate revenue of Rs. 251.47 lakh in next 3 years from the sale of plots
which include Admin charges.
d. Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state
highways, availability of water supply, adequate
power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
The proposed industrial estate lies
bordering State Highway No. 182 and is 20 kms away from Sivakasi. The
proposed site is also 0.5 kms from NH-7. Nearest Bus Terminus is
Virudhunagar (2 kms), Railway Station-
Virudhunagar (3 kms), Airport-
Madurai (42kms), Sea port- Tuticorin
(85 kms), Post office & Telephone
exchange – Virudhunagar (2 kms).
e. Whether land is in
possession in the name of IA
with Clear Title (P-10 of
SIDBI report)
Yes, the District collector has
transferred an extent of 37.55 acres of
dry land at Virudhunagar for proposed
ID centre.
f. Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied with
Information not available.
g. Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been
Constituted
State Level Committee is already
Constituted for infrastructure projects.
h. Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and any escalation in cost.
Specific confirmation not received
i. Basis of elements of project Cost (P-11 of SIDBI report)
As per SIDBI report, TANSIDCO has indicated that the detailed estimates for
the work have been prepared as per the
guidance rate of the PWD and
Highways Department, Govt. of
Tamilnadu.
j. Tangible Outcomes of the
project (Annex-I of SIDBI
report)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Description Financial Year
72
Developed plot sales 2012-13 2013-142014-15
1 Sale of plots in % 25% 65% 10%
2 Area in acres 5.62 14.61 2.25
3 Developed plot cost
per acre
10.31 11.34 12.37
4 Sale value of
developed plot
allotted
50.38 144.08 24.21
5 Administrative
charges
7.56 21.61 3.63
6 Value of developed
plot allotted
57.94 165.69 27.84
7 Margin Money
receivable
12.60 36.02 6.05
8 Balance plot cost
receivable
45.34 151.46
9 Receipt for the year 12.60 81.36 157.51
3. Project Cost:
(Rs. Lakh)
Particulars Estimated by IA Recommended by SIDBI
1. Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall and fencing
24.10 24.10
2. Cost of laying of roads 186.77 186.77
3. Road side greenery and social forestry
2.00 2.00
4. Water supply arrangements including overhead tanks & pump houses
23.57 23.57
5. Water harvesting 1.00 1.00
6. Drainage 44.70 44.70
7. Street light arrangements, including setting up of EB pillar box, EB
service connection charges & shifting of EB lines
30.53 30.53
8. Contingencies & Pre-operative expn. 17.33 6.33
Total 330.00 319.00
4. Means of finance: -
Particulars Proposed by
IA
Proposed by SIDBI
as per MSE-CDP
1. GoI Grant under MSE-CDP (60% of PC) 198.00 191.00
2. State Government 132.00 128.00
Total 330.00 319.00
5. Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster Division recommends the proposal. Committee may consider the proposal for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Virudhunagar,
District Virudhunagar, Tamilnadu at project cost of Rs. 319.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 191.00 lakh.
73
Agenda No. 30.77 Proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) for Auto
Cluster, Bidar, Karnataka
Commerce & Industries Department, Govt. of Karnataka has submitted a proposal for
setting up of CFC in Auto Cluster, Bidar, Karnataka. DPR has been prepared by M/s Brdigecomm
International Pvt. Ltd. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1 Basic Information of Cluster
a. Name of the cluster Auto Cluster, Bidar
b. Location of Cluster Bidar, Karnataka
c. Products of the cluster Heavy & Light vehicles repair work, Fabrication work,
Machine tools (conditioning of components) &
Agricultural Equipments manufacturing
d. No. of Enterprises
including break up (micro,
small, medium) (Appraisal
report P-6)
250 micro units are operational located in 32 acre land
known as Mohammadabad Auto Nagar. SIDBI appraisal
note stipulated a condition that SPV will submit
certified copy of EM/documentary proof that at least 50% units are micro to avail proposed 80% GoI grant.
How many units are involved in auto service sector alone is not clear.
e. Turnover for the last five years (p7 of DPR)
2006- Rs. 462 lakh 2007- Rs. 680 lakh
2008- Rs. 910 lakh 2009- Rs. 1278 lakh
2010- Rs. 1500 lakh
f. Exports for the last five
years
Nil
g. Employment in Cluster Direct- 5000 & Indirect- 40000
h. Technological Details Cluster is adopting conventional processing technology for repair work of heavy and light vehicles and
outsourcing precision work to Hyderabad auto units. CFC envisages setting up state of the art workshop for
undertaking repairs of automobiles and manufacturing of some critical components by using CNC machines.
i. Whether DS conducted and validated.
Yes, the State Govt. has completed the diagnostic study at its own and validated by the stakeholders. (Minutes of
validation are not available.)
j. Main findings of DSR The cluster members are using age old technology as a
result the productivity of the cluster is reducing day by
day and are unable to maintain the quality requirement.
The cluster members need machineries like major
engine repair, gearbox repair, differential / housing work and fuel injection pump repair.
k. Main Problems of cluster 1. Lack of advance training facilities. 2. Lack of advance machinery for repairs and job
work. 3. Lack of R&D and product development facilities.
4. Lack of advance technique of servicing.
2 Information about Proposed CFC
74
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. Justification
for CFC
(P16 of
Appraisal)
CFC will provide better facilities to all
member units in Auto Cluster to enable them
improve quality and margins. It is also
expected to enlarge employment
opportunities and upgrade the technological
base of the industry in the region. The
facilities would add to direct benefit of
further industrialization of the State and
would contribute to State exchequer.
b. Location of
CFC
Survey No. 45, Chowli Village, Bidar,
Karnataka.
c. Land for CFC Weather
land acquired
Valuation and
its basis
Land is
sufficient
Change of land
use
SPV has been allotted 2 acres land by Govt.
of Karanataka (Appraisal report P-2)
Free of cost (Stamp duty and registration
charges to the extent of 25% i.e. only Rs1.00
lakh have been borne by the Association. (p3
of appraisal)
Yes
The land is converted for Industrial use
mentioned in SIDBI appraisal report
Letter no
DIC/BDR/2011-12/374 dated,
However title deed
not available.
Document required
d. Total Building
area (sq ft)
34350 sq. ft. SIDBI mentioned
cost of construction
appears to be
reasonable e. Rate of
construction of
building
Rs. 500/- per sq. ft.
f. Main facilities
proposed
(Appraisal
report P-34)
• Dismantling, Testing and Calibration Section
• Fitting centre
• Gear box section
• Major Repair & Engine section
• Workshop section
• Final Fitment and testing section
• Emergency section
• Training Design & Research Section
DPR Page 33 (4.1.8)
mentions that Spring
Bush, Head Seats,
Valve Guide, Rubber
Bush and Hose pipe will
be manufactured under CFC. As per MSE-
CDP, Hard Interventions will
consist of creation of tangible “assets” like
Common Production/Processing
Centre (for balancing/
correcting/improving
production line that
cannot be undertaken by
individual units
g. Major Outputs
of CFC,
Projected
CFC is expected to provide additional
2000 new jobs by 2016.
Detailed outputs
required.
75
performance
of cluster
(Appraisal
report P-10)
h. Pollution
clearance
required or not
(Appraisal
report P-12)
It is mentioned in the appraisal report,
‘consent to establish’ before availing grant
from Central/ State Govt. and ‘consent to
operate’ from KPCB within 3 months
from the commencement of commercial
production will be obtained.
NOC is required.
i. Man power in
CFC
(Appraisal
report P-9)
CFC needs 253 men power in beginning.
j. Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability
of assets
At 70%
capacity
utilization
(Page- 37)
Revenue generation
from
Amount
Inspection, Testing and
Calibration unit
28,08,000
Fitting & Welding centre 54,49,600
Engine lathe work 1,51,58,000
Gear box centre 17,68,000
Differential centre 78,00,000
Bash Pump centre 82,16,000
Drum cutting centre 24,96,000
Parts manufacturing centre
1,37,80,800
Tyre Retreading centre 1,89,00,000
Painting centre 7,65,000
Washing centre 5,40,800
Training centre 19,50,000
TOTAL 7,96,32,000
3 Information about SPV
Description By IA Remarks, if any
a. Name and address (Appraisal report P-2)
Mohammadabad Special Purpose Vehicle (CFC)
Association Bidar Taluka, Bidar Distt., Karnataka.
b. Nature of SPV (company
or Society or Trust)
Society registered under
Karnataka Societies
(Registration) Act, 1960
c. Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in
SPV
Not available
d. Date of formation of SPV 16th
April, 2010
e. Number of members 250 members List of appraisal note
shows only 89 members.
f. Bye laws or MA and
AoA submitted
Yes
(Annexure 2)
g. Authorized share capital / Rs. 99.00 lakh Appraisal mentions that
76
SPV contribution SPV is a society which
presently has 250
members. Each member
shall contribute Rs. 40000.
However Rs. 15.30 lakh
has been raised from 89
members.
h. Shareholding Pattern Share divided into 89
members only instead of 250
members.
i. Commitment letter for
contribution (Resolution
at Annexure 2)
Received.
j. SPV specific A/c State Bank of India, Bidar,
A/c No. 31593073028
A/c is in name of BIDAR
Auto Cluster, CFC and
not in name of SPV
k. Trust building of SPV, Previous track record of
co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members
need to be highlighted
with support
documentation.
(Appraisal report P-12)
DSR has been validated by AD, MSME, Gulbarga and
that cluster members have completed major soft
intervention activities and are
ready to take up hard
interventions for setting up
the CFC.
Details of Soft interventions not
available.
l. Technical Institution
(P-27 of DPR)
a) Bridgecomm International
Pvt Ltd (BIPL)
b) Engineering College (REC-
Bhalki)
c) Karnataka College, Bidar
m. CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member
ability to utilise at least
60% of installed capacity.
SIDBI has stipulated a
condition to get details of
utilization (Appraisal report
P-5)
Details may be sought
n. (b) Power requirement
for commercial/ domestic purpose
(c) Water (d) Gas/Oil/ Other
utilities
250 KW
4 Implementation Arrangements
Description As per proposal Remarks, if
any
a. Implementation Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Up gradation (KCTU), Bangalore (P-27)
b. Implementation Period 18 months from the date of final
sanction.
77
c. Appraisal of DPR and
main recommendations
SIDBI has recommended that the
project is technically feasible and
financial viable and considered to be
support worthy
d. Comments of Technical
Division
Machineries of Rs. 257 lakh are of
production nature.
5 Financial Analysis of CFC:
Description As per proposal Remarks, if any
a. BEP 27.15%
b. IRR, payback period 24.27%
c. DSCR Not applicable
d. Return on Capital employed
(ROCE)
33.56%
e. NPV Not available
f. Sensitivity Analysis
g. Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if
applicable arrangement made) (Appraisal
report P-18)
SIDBI has stipulated a condition to make
arrangement for working capital (Rs.
154.00 lakh)
6 Total Cost: The total cost of the CFC is as follows:
7 Means of Finance:
8 Plant and machinery
(Rs in lakh)
Particulars of plant and machinery No. Cost
01 Hydraulic Press 01 5.51
02 Double track Overhead Rails 04 18.37
Particulars Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
1 Land and site development 13.00
2 Building and civil works 171.00
3 Plant & Machinery 670.00
4 Misc. fixed assets (furniture, fixtures, fire fighting equipment, first aid equipment, ETP, back up power)
(Appraisal report P-17)
46.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative exp. 15.00
6 Contingency 39.00
7 Margin money for Working Capital 35.00
Total Project Cost 989.00
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in lakh)
1. SPV contribution 10 99.00
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80 791.00
3. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10 99.00
4 Bank Loan/ others 0.00
Total 989.00
78
03 Semi Automatic degreasing machine 02 3.68
04 Physical Inspection & measurement of test 1 set 2.30
05 Internal crack detector 01 40.25
06 FIP calibration machine 01 74.75
07 Atomizer/Nozzle testing m/c 02 2.30
08 Element lapping machine 03 1.86
09 Alternator testing m/c 02 5.69
10 Stator testing machine 02 3.10
11 Armature Growler equipment 05 2.87
12 Arc welding 4 1.15
13 MIG –175 Gas welding m/c 1 1.15
14 Spot welding m/c 2 2.30
15 Longitudinal welder 01 4.65
16 Tig Mig welding m/c 01 1.72
17 Fully automatic circular sawing m/c 01 3.68
18 Metal cutting band saw m/c 01 3.10
19 Heavy duty auto copying m/c 01 3.45
20 5 axis milling m/c 01 28.75
21 Tools crib & hand tools 1 Set 23.00
22 CNC Gear hobbing m/c 01 8.63
23 Profile copying m/c 01 2.30
24 Heavy duty cylinder boring m/c 01 24.15
25 Bore honing m/c 02 20.70
26 Line boring m/c for block 01 12.65
27 Radial drilling m/c 01 4.60
28 Gang drilling m/c 01 11.50
29 Connecting rod bush cutting m/c 02 4.14
30 Slew pressing 50 MT cap 4.60
31 Crank shaft grinders, overhead rail/crane 40” 02 46.00
32 Cam shaft grinders, bush boring m/c 01 4.60
33 Valve grinding m/c 01 3.45
34 Valve seat cutting m/c 01 2.30
35 Surface Grinding m/c 01 4.60
36 Minor pillar drilling 01 1.73
37 CNC Milling machine 01 23.00
38 CNC Gear cutting machine 01 3.63
39 CNC Keyway cutting machine 01 5.75
40 Minor tools Sump 5 to 14 mm 1.15
41 Foundry equpt crucibles mouldings LS 34.50
42 Drum skimming m/c 1 set 23.00
43 Spray painting with compressor, etc. 1 set 28.75
44 Washing ramp with hyd. Hoist and washing eqpt 1 17.25
45 Engine tuning wheel alignment testing m/cs 1 set 27.02
46 M/cs for odd jobs like moving of material/vehicles 1 Set 46.00
47 Tyre resoling and buffing m/c 1 set 39.10
48 Computers 25 8.63
49 Automated software CAD/CAM 20.00
50 Training & teaching aids LS 5.33
51 Effluent treatment plant 21.43
52 Rain harvesting plant 5.16
TOTAL 699.00
79
9 Shortcomings: i. Technical Division raised the issue that machineries Rs. 1.10 crore is of production nature
and [there] seems no requirement [of these machines] for CFC. Apart from this machines
worth Rs.147 lakh need clarification about their utilities in such a cluster engaged in
servicing of automobile industry. As per the MSE-CDP guidelines Hard Intervention
under the programme will consist of creation of tangible “assets” as Common Facility
Centres (CFCs) like common production / processing centre (for balancing / correcting/
improving production line that cannot be undertaken by individual units.
ii. SIDBI appraisal report stipulated a condition that SPV will submit certified copy of EM/documentary proof that atleast 50% units are micro to avail proposed 80% GoI grant.
iii. Title deed of land iv. SIDBI appraisal has stipulated a condition for utilization of 60% capacity of the CFC by
SPV members. v. Working capital for CFC.
10 Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
80
Agenda No. 30.78. Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC for Textile
Cluster, Rabakavi – Banahatti, Bagalkot, Karnataka
Commerce & Industries Department, Govt. of Karnataka has sent a proposal seeking in-principle
approval and GoI assistance of Rs. 5.00 lakh for preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR).
The Nodal agency for the project is Karnataka State Powerloom Development Corporation
Limited (KSPDC).
1. Name of the cluster
Textile Cluster
2. Location Rabakavi – Banahatti, Bagalkot District (Karnataka)
3. Products Yarn dyed cotton Sarees of different varieties
4. Age of the cluster About 5 decades old
5. No. of Units 51 dyeing units and 12000 power looms consisting of 3626
registered units
6. Type of units Micro, Small and Medium units
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Information not available.
8. Recommendation in
the DSR
Diagnostic study has been prepared by IL& FS Limited.
Manufacturing units in cluster are facing constrains in
dyeing process of cotton yarn. The existing dyeing
techniques are highly health hazardous, stressful and time
consuming. Also there are no testing laboratory facilities
available for testing raw materials and colouring properties.
There is also no Effluent Treatment Plant in cluster.
9. Soft Interventions in
the cluster
State Govt. has informed that SPV in cluster would take
care of the soft interventions suggested in DSR.
10. Formation of SPV An SPV in the cluster has been formed by name ‘Sri
Kadasiddeshwara Textiles Private Limited’.
11. Employment Direct and indirect employment is about 40,000
12. Turnover / Export Rs 216 crore turnover
13. Implementing Agency Karnataka State Powerloom Development Corporation Ltd.
14. Problems of the cluster (i) The cluster is functioning in an un-organised manner
resulting in higher procurement costs. (ii) Manufacturing process of the yarn dyed cotton sarees
has remained mostly traditional. (iii) Dyeing process is very tedious & time consuming.
(iv) Manpower being the major problem in the cluster, the
output per day has reduced significantly.
(v) The existing yarn dyeing process is not capable to cater
the required standard quality product in the market.
(vi) There are not professional design and product
development centers and testing laboratories.
15. Need for CFC The existing technology used in the cluster for yarn dyeing
is traditional and outdated. The process starts with
bleaching, dyeing and drying which is done manually and
most of the units give it for job work to the dyers.
(ii) The existing dyeing process is not able to cater the
required standard quality product in the market. The shades
are not uniform and varies from batch to batch.
(iii) The existing techniques poses a big threat to the
environment as well as to the health of the workers as they
81
have continuously stand in front of the dyed liquor and dip
the hanks in the dye.
(iv) A laboratory is essential for testing of raw materials and
finished goods according to the industry standards.
(v) An Effluent Treatment Plant is required.
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount
Rs in lakh
1. Land and Building 201.42
2. Common Infrastructure: water
supply, Effluent Collection &
Treatment System
163.94
3. Plant and Machinery
1406.40
4. Unit Regd./Professional &
Advisory Fees
44.29
5. Preliminary Expenses 35.44
6. Working Capital for year 1 30.29
7. Pre-operative expenses for
year 1
35.44
8. Interest during construction 54.36
1971.58
17. Proposed Means of
Finance Govt. of India - Rs. 1050.00 lakh
SPV contribution - Rs. 350.00 lakh
(Including contribution from KSPDC of Rs.100.00 lakh)
Loan from Bank - Rs. 571.58 lakh
Total - Rs. 1971.58 lakh
18. Name of the agency
that will prepare the
DPR
IL & FS Ltd.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. The Committee may
consider the proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Textile Cluster, Rabakavi
– Banahatti, Bagalkot and approve GoI grant of Rs. 5.00 lakh to KSPDC for preparation of DPR,
including SIDBI appraisal for the CFC subject to the condition that selection of agency for
preparation of DPR will be as per GFR.
82
Agenda No. 30.79 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster, Hubli, Karnataka under MSE-CDP.
Commerce & Industries Department, Govt. of Karnataka has submitted a proposal for setting up
of CFC in Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster, Hubli, Karnataka. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster
2. Location Hubli-Dharwar District, Karnataka
3. Products Engineering Industrial products – Mainly
subcontracting- Machining, Fabrication, Fine
blanking, Plastic Injection moulded components,
Surface finishing parts & Components for Process
Industry Equipment, Auto components, Machine
tools, Agricultural implements, Components for
railways.
4. Age of the cluster Not available
5. No. of Units 100 micro units
6. Type of units Belongs to SC/ST
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Sir M. Vishweshwarayya Heat Treatment & Engineering Cluster
8. Recommendation in the DSR DSR has been validated by SPV, Director, MSME-
DI, Hubli & Joint Director, DIC. In the DSR, it has
been recommended that there is a need of Soft intervention and Hard intervention.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft intervention has not been undertaken in the cluster.
10. Formation of SPV Yes, Sir M. Vishweshwarayya Heat Treatment & Engineering Cluster
11. Employment 3000 labours (Directlry & Indirectly)
12. Turnover Rs. 5000 lakh
13. Implementing Agency It is mentioned in the DPR that KCTU will be fund
receiving agency and there is no specific name of IA has been given in the DPR.
14. Problems of the cluster • Lack of promotional & technology development institutional support.
• Lack of marketing knowledge & visibility.
• Outdated Plant & Machinery or non availability
of modern production technologies.
• Poor usage of information & Communication technology.
15. Need for CFC There is a need for maintaining a high degree of precision & quality, which can be achieved only with
precision Sheet Metal Formation & Fabrication machinery, machine tools, precision jigs & fixtures,
constant cal liberation of tools & equipment and a
good heat treatment. For this, there is need of
establishing a Common Facility Centre, which will
bridge the technological gap and create the
infrastructure to facilitate every SME into
manufacturing quality and high precision products.
83
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land 7.50
2. Building 30.00
3. Plant & Machinery (including
taxes, transportation & cost
escalation @ 15%)
397.877
4. Office Equipment 0.00
a) Telephone, Fax, Internet, Zerox 2.00
b) LCD projector, Lap top, Screen
etc.
1.50
c) PA and teaching aids 1.00
d) Computer systems with furniture 1.00
e) Office equp. & furniture 2.00
5. Others
a) Electrical from control panel to
MCC & other internals
5.00
b) Installation 3.00
c) Advances 2.00
d) Technical consultancy & DPR
fees
2.50
Total 455.377
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs.
in lakh)
1
.
SPV
contribution
10% 45.607
2
.
Grant-in-aid
from Govt. of
India
85% 387.00
3
.
Grant-in-aid
from Govt. of
Karnataka
5% 22.77
Total 455.377
Shortcomings:
• Return of Capital Employment (ROCE) is 9% against desirable of excess of 25% (page no.
28 of DPR).
• SIDBI appraisal has not been received.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle
approval.
85
Agenda No.30.81 Proposal for Infrastructure Development (ID) at Pathshala, Barpeta
1 Basic Information about Proposal:
j. Proposals received from Industries and Commerce Department,
Govt. of Assam
k. Location of site Bajali, Pathshala, District – Barpeta
l. Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not
Appraisal report received. DPR not received
m. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 100 Bighas- Non agricultural land. Area 1,33,780 Sqm. As per SIDBI’s report
possession certificate has been submitted by AIDC
n. Area to be developed (acre) 69,736 sqm.
o. Number and sizes of plots to be developed 76 plots of different sizes
p. Implementing Period 24 months
q. Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
r. Performance of ID projects in state. 6 ID projects in the state have been completed and 5 are ongoing
2 Details about Proposal:
Description As per proposal Comments, if
any
Implementing Agency
(IA):
Assam Industrial Development
Corporation Ltd. (AIDC)
Track Record of the IA Earlier 7 projects have been sanctioned to
AIDC and out of these 5 are complete
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations).
Attach SIDBI report.
The improved infrastructure facilities in
the form of road, drainage, power, water
supply, administrative and services
complex etc., will have an overall impact
in the functioning of the MSMEs operating
in the estate. Besides, as the operations
grow in the estate, many suppliers to these
MSMEs shall also be benefited to feed
their increased requirements. This will
result in improvement in the overall socio
economic condition of large number of
people and society at large.
Whether sufficient
facilities available at site.
(Proximity to railway
stations / state highways,
availability of water supply, adequate power
supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
National Highway 31 runs from the town,
Railway station is Pathshala is 1 km from
the town, Market is nearby.
86
Whether land is in
possession in the name of
IA with Clear Title
As per SIDBI’s appraisal report land has
been allotted by Govt. of Assam and
possession certificate has been submitted
by AIDC
Whether Zoning
regulations and non-
agricultural conversion
etc complied with
Not Available
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate
and monitor progress has
been Constituted
Not Available
Whether confirmation received form IA that it
will meet the cost in excess of approved
project cost and any escalation in cost.
Not Available
Basis of elements of
project Cost
As per PWD and Govt of Assam rates.
However SIDBI in its appraisal report has
mentioned that Building Plan need to be
approved by competent authority
Tangible Outcomes of the
project
Employment generation
Increase in revenue in state exchequer
Justification of the
Proposal
There are important places in the district
like Sarthebari, Barpeta road which are
linked to artisan industries. The Industrial
estate may serve as a place for expansion
of units of the existing entrepreneurs.
3. Project Cost:
(Rs. Lakh)
Particulars Recommended
by SIDBI, as per
guidelines
v. Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and
fencing
100.00
vi. Laying roads 199.98
vii. Road side greenery & social forestry 7.10
viii. Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump
houses
70.98
ix. Drainage 52.48
x. Rain water harvesting 0.00
xi. Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 208.01
xii. Others (sanitary conveniences) 0.00
xiii. Administrative and Other Services Complex 76.59
xiv. Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00
xv. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 14.30
xvi. Total 729.44
4. Means of finance: -
87
Particulars Amount (Rs in lakh)
iv. GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 584.00
v. State Government 145.44
vi. Others Nil
Total 729.44
5. Proposal for Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for setting
up of Infrastructure Development centre Pathshala, District – Barpeta. Steering Committee may
consider the proposal.
88
Agenda No. 30.82 Soft Interventions in Bell Metal Cluster, Sarthebari Barpeta District, Assam
Proposal received from MSME-DI, Guwahati
1 Brief information of Cluster:
Name of Cluster Bell Metal Cluster
Location Sarthebari, Barpeta, Assam
Products Artistic Bell Metal, Utensil, Decorative & Religious Items
Technological details, pollution
angle, etc.
The artisans use hand tools like Niyari (Anvil), Chalti, Sara (Tong), Kun (Hand operated lathe), Khonta (File), Hammer, etc for
manufacturing different articles from Bell Metal. No machine is used in manufacturing process.
Age of cluster Centuries old cluster.
No. of Units 200 nos. units
Profiles of units/ Category
All are micro
Turnover (p.a.) Rs. 7.00 crore
Export Nil
Employment
(direct / indirect)
1600 nos.
Presence of
association/NGO,
contact details
The Assam Cooperative Bell Metal Utensil Manufacturing Society
Ltd. Sarthebari Nagar Kohar Shilpi Sangstha
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
Yes.
The DSR has recommends for soft & hard interventions in the
cluster. It has enough growth potential provided strategic
interventions are made in key problem areas.
Extent of
Competition
The cluster members face competition with Brass & Bell Metal
Cluster, Hajo.
Main Problems of
cluster
� Consumables- Charcoal, the main fuel for the industry is very
costly,
� Machinery, Production & Technology Up gradation- In absence
of mechanization the cluster, the productivity and the quality of the items produced in the cluster is low.
� Networking - Due to poor networking the artisans are not aware of the different developmental schemes which can benefit the
cluster. � Marketing- Even though there is an established cooperative
society in the cluster which has 11 show rooms across the state of Assam, about 50% of the products are sold through
Mahajans or middlemen resulting in exploitation of the artisans.
� Need for Training- In order to make the cluster vibrant and
capable of withstanding the present day competition, there
is an urgent need to improve the quality of
entrepreneurship in the cluster.
� Strengthening of Association- Even though an association of
the artisans by the name Sarthebari Nagar Kahar Silpi Sanstha
is formed at Sarthebari with about 1,600 artisans as members,
the same needs to be strengthened.
� Business Development Services- The cluster is in urgent need
of BDS Provider in the field of technology/quality up
89
gradation, product/design development, product diversification
and newer marketing avenues.
2 Analysis of Proposal
(Rs in lakh)
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may kindly approve the Soft
Interventions in the cluster at a total cost of Rs. 16.55 lakh for duration of 18 months with GoI
contribution of Rs. 14.61 lakh and the remaining Rs. 1.94 lakh to be contributed by cluster units /
association.
Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments, if
any
IA, its experience in
cluster development MSME-DI, Guwahati It has taken up
soft interventions
in other clusters.
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality
/ Marketing / Export /
Quality/ Design, etc.)
Trust Building, awareness programme, Training
Programme, Exposure Visit to other Cluster,
Capacity Building, Participation in Sales cum-
Exhibition fare, Programme in Design, Marketing,
product diversification, packaging, Skill
Development, etc.
Whether DSR
validated by the
stakeholders
Yes on 13.12.11
Project Cost Project Cost : Rs. 16.55 lakh
GoI contribution : Rs. 14.61lakh Cluster beneficiaries: Rs. 1.94 lakh
Technical Agency to be associated & its
expertise
Department of Handicrafts O/o DC (Handicrafts), IIT, Guwahati, District Industries & Commerce
Center (DICC) Barpeta
Justification for
undertaking Soft Interventions
Units are poor artisans who manufacture utensils
with obsolete technology, face marketing problems due to quality of products, lack of
networking.
Main outcomes
(before & after) in terms of sales,
Exports, Investment, Profitability,
Employment, ISO & other Certification,
others
• Product and quality will be improved.
• Cluster products will have more acceptability
in the market
• Better networking among cluster actors and
tie up with Govt, department will result in easy flow of credit
• Increase in profit due to participation in trade fairs and exposure
90
Agenda No. 30.83 Setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Neelachakra, Brahmagiri, Puri
MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the proposal for setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster,
Neelachakra, Brahmagiri, Puri. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Cashew Cluster, Neelachakra, Brahmagiri
2. Location Brahmagiri, Puri
3. Products Cashew kernels Cashew Nut Shell liquid (CSNL)
4. Age of the cluster Information not available
5. No. of Units 26 (05 more are in pipeline)
6. Type of units Information not available
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Information not available
8. Formation of SPV Yes, M/s Neelachakra Cashew Nut Cooperative Ltd.,
Balisahi, Brahmagiri, Puri
9. Employment 2848 nos. (Direct & Indirect)
10. Turnover / Export Rs. 8.05 crore
11. Implementing
Agency
Information not available
12. Problems of the units Catering to domestic and nearby States market, poor
packaging, Low level of technology, unhygienic working conditions, low level of automation, No quality certification,
lack of standardization of processing methods, lack of infrastructure, lack of skilled manpower, lack of support from
financial institutions/banks, seasonal dependency and
pollution problems.
13. Recommendations in
the Diagnostic Study
Report
Diagnostic Study is not received alongwith proposal.
14. Need for CFC Need of CFC established in DPR prepared by BRN
Consultant Pvt. Limited, Bhubaneswar
15. Cost of the project Particulars Amount (In
lakh)
1. Land & Land Development 24.35
2. Civil construction 501.38
3. Plant & Machineries 208.56
4. Electrification & Sanitation 34.51
5. Furniture & Fixture 6.79
6. Laboratory Equipments 7.25
7. Preliminary Expenses 5.20
Total 788.04
16 Means of finance (In
lakh)
Govt. of India - Rs. 550.00 lakh
SPV - Rs. 238.04 lakh
Total - Rs. 788.04 lakh
17 Facilities to be
created in the CFC
Cashew nut godown, CSNL godown, CSNL machine
laboratory, peeling, shelling centre, automatic cutting centre, administrative building, conference hall etc.
91
2. Shortcomings:
i. Validated Diagnostic Study
ii. SIDBI appraisal
iii. Number of units and turnover of cluster are very less.
3. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for
‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the
proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
92
Agenda No. 30.84 Proposal for setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha
Commissioner cum Director of Industries, Govt. of Odisha has submitted the proposal for
setting up of CFC in Cashew Cluster, Ganjam, Odisha. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Cashew Cluster
2. Location Sabulia, Rambha, Ganjam, Orissa
3. Products Cashew nuts
4. Age of the cluster Information not available
5. No. of Units 75 units
6. Type of units All micro
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Information not available
8. Formation of SPV Yes, M/s Sri Jagannath Cashew Cluster Pvt. Ltd.
9. Employment 5 lakh persons
10. Turnover / Export Rs. 120.00 crore
11. Implementing Agency Information not available
12. Problems of the units (i) Lack of brand image. (ii) Prevalence of obsolete
technology. (iii) Lack of storage facilities. (iv) Lack of
value added products. (v) Price is highly volatile. (vi) In
adequate flow of market information. (vii) Only 8-10 grades against possibility of 32 grades. (viii) Processing
in un-hygienic condition. (ix) No by-product processing centre. (x) Following old packaging system. (xi) Lower
capacity utilization. (xii) Lack of skill in steam roasting technology. (xiii) Lack of organic certification of farm
land. (xiv) Weak linkages between SMEs & institution. (xv) Untrained entrepreneur and un-skilled labour force.
13. Recommendations in
DSR
DSR recommended the common facilities proposed.
14. Need for CFC DSR identified the need of Raw Material Bank with cold
storage facilities, packaging centre, by product processing
centre (CNSL & Husk), labour training cum production
centre and research and development centre.
15. Cost of the project (Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Amount
1. Land & Site Development 64.82
2. Building & other civil works 179.20
3. Plant & Machinery 429.00
4. Furniture & Fixture & other
equipments
6.79
5. Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses
10.75
6. Provision for contingencies 16.66
7. Margin for working capital 20.38
Total 727.60
16 Means of finance (In
lakh)
Govt. of India - Rs. 500.00 lakh
Govt. of Odisha - Rs. 145.52 lakh
SPV - Rs. 82.08 lakh
93
Total - Rs. 727.60 lakh
17 Facilities to be created
in the CFC
(i) Raw Material Bank.
(ii) Labour Training Centre cum production Centre.
(iii) Packaging Centre.
(iv) By product processing unit.
2. Shortcomings:
i. SIDBI appraisal
ii. Food Division of DC, MSME mentioned that activities like steam cooking and de shelling are proposed to be carried out at members individual units. In such a situation proposal of
installing facility of at par capacity of cluster units for steam cooking and de shelling (Raw
Cashew nut boiler and cooker of 600 kg per batch, 8 automatic deshelling machine line of
200 kg per hour, 2 cashew humidification unit of 1 MT per batch and cashew drying kiln
of 1.5 Mt capacity) in name of training centre may adversely affect business interest of
cluster units. Therefore, CFC should not install the above machine and may opt only
table modern machine for their training and research purpose etc. (Annexure – I).
4. Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6
months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) to accord in-principle approval.
94
Agenda No. 30.85 Proposals for development of six clusters in Odisha
Director of Industries, Government of Odisha has submitted on 15.12.09, proposal for soft
interventions in 6 clusters viz. (a) Groundnut processing Cluster, Jajpur, (b) Rice Milling Cluster,
Rayagada, (c) Rice Milling Cluster, Koraput, (d) Cashew Cluster, Koraput, (e) Rice Milling
Cluster, Ganjam, & (f) Readymade Garment Cluster, Gobindpur (Cuttack). Action plan for soft
interventions was received on 20.04.11.
As decided by AS&DC(MSME), letter dated 13.5.2011 was sent to State Government of Odisha
that the proposals for Hard Interventions for the above clusters may be submitted first. Soft interventions activities and related activities can be covered under training programme of MSME-
DI, Cuttack or can be considered later on if necessary. Alternatively, the proposals for both hard and soft interventions can be considered together. No response has been received either from State
Government or from cluster actors.
Proposal for the Steering Committee: Cluster division recommends that extension of time for
submission of complete proposal for setting up of CFC by 30 June 12, failing which the case will
be closed.
95
Agenda No. 30.86 Soft Interventions in Artificial Jewellery Cluster, Meerut
1. Brief information of Cluster:
Need for CFC, if any Common Design Development Centre, Training facility, Dye
Cutting facility, Product Display center etc.
Any other information
Name of the Cluster Artificial Jewellery Cluster, Meerut
Location In and around Meerut like Neel Ki Gali, Sadar Bazar, Kankar Khera,
Holi Mohalla, etc.
Products Artificial Jewellery items like Payal, Ring, Bangles, Set etc.
Technological
details, pollution
angle, etc.
Technological levels in the cluster is obsolete, based on traditionally developed technology. It causes pollution. Units in cluster use second
hand and locally available dye cutting, electroplating machine.
Age of cluster About 50 years old
No. of Units 4488 Units (Micro units)
Profiles of units/
Category
Minority – 50%, SC/ST- 6%, General – 44%)
Turnover Rs 200 crore (per annum)
Export Rs 50 crore
Employment (direct
/ indirect)
About 1 lakh
Presence of
association/NGO,
Artificial Jewellery Cluster Vikas Samity, Meerut
Whether DSR
conducted. Main
outcomes of DSR
� Introduction of modern machinery � Developing Training Facilities in cutting, designing and
manufacturing � To establish Meerut Cluster as world class Jewellery Cluster
� Brand Building for cluster products
� Quality control
Extent of competition
for cluster
Cluster units face competition from machine made products
manufactured in China and Italy flooding the markets and sidelining
genuine products in terms of price.
Main Problems of
cluster
• The basic problem is of procuring material and selling for which
they have to depend on the traders.
• In the absence of the designing and material testing labs the
artisan-based units are unable to ensure quality product.
• Due to obsolete technology & old machinery used in cluster, the
quality is deteriorating & production is also affected.
• Wastage is high due to absence of technical training to artisans.
• No R&D and testing labs available in the cluster hence products
is loosing its image.
• There should be a separate section to improve marketing and
export training for cluster.
• Lack of knowledge on export documentations and procedure as
well as assistance of the consultant.
96
2. Analysis of Proposal
Justification for
undertaking Soft
Interventions
The cluster is Artisan based belonging to poor
and Minorities. It also consists of 65% women
artisans. Soft interventions will create avenues to
develop quality and product specialization. The
interventions will help the member units to
establish linkages with marketing agencies in
national and international markets,
Institutes/designers for evolving value added
products with latest designs and texture.
Proposal for Steering Committee: Steering Committee may approve the proposal for soft interventions in Artificial Jewellery Cluster, Meerut at a total cost of Rs. 13.69 lakh with GoI
contribution of Rs. 11.95 lakh and remaining Rs. 1.74 lakh to be contributed by cluster units/association.
Particulars As Per Proposal Comments by
Cluster Division
IA, its experience in
cluster development
DIC, Meerut. DIC is engaged in the development
of Industrial units in the district.
It should be UP
Handicrafts
Corporation Ltd.
Activities Proposed
(Technology / Quality
/ Marketing / Export
/ Quality/ Design,
etc.)
Programme on packaging, design development,
technology improvement, export management,
dyeing, product diversification, computer training, capacity building etc.
Whether DSR
validated by the
stakeholders
Yes.
Project Cost Project Cost : Rs 13.69 lakh
GoI contribution : Rs.11.95 lakh
Cluster beneficiaries Rs. 1.74 lakh
Technical Agency to
be associated & its
expertise
DC (Handicraft), NIESBUD, Master School of
Management, NIIT, Meerut, IIFT, New Delhi,
MSME-DI etc.
Main outcomes
(before & after) in
terms of sales,
Exports, Investment,
Profitability,
Employment, ISO &
other Certification,
others
Particulars Pre-Intervention
(Present Status)
Post –
Intervention
(Projections) after
…….. years
Total Sales (Rs.) 200 crore 300 crore
Exports 50 crore 75 crore
Investment (Rs.) 30 crore 50 crore
ISO Certification of
Units
Nil 25%
Total Employment
(Direct- Indirect)
1,00,000 1,25,000
97
Agenda No. 30.87 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Stainless Steel, Brass & German Silver Utensils Cluster, Mirzapur
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department,. Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel, Brass & German Silver Utensils Cluster,
Mirzapur. Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Stainless Steel, Brass & German Silver Utensils
Cluster
2. Location Mirzapur (UP)
3. Products Domestic utensils and decorative items
4. Age of the cluster Age of the cluster
5. No. of Units 300 nos
6. Type of units Micro (20% belong to SC category, 5% belong to Minority , 20% belong to
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Mirzapur Metal Manufacturers Association, Mirzapur
8. Recommendation in the DSR The DSR recommends for setting of CFC in the cluster
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster were earlier approved under MSE-CDP and taken up by MSME-DI,
Allahabad
10. Formation of SPV Mirzapur Metallurgy Ltd incorporated on 27.12.2007
11. Employment 2500
12. Turnover Rs. 140 crore
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government
of UP
14. Problems of the cluster Use of old technology in melting of scrap, the
machining and finishing is done through manual
process, shortage of raw material, lack of training
facilities, lack of product diversification, poor quality
of finished products etc.
15. Need for CFC The Artisan in the cluster use scrap material for the
production which is untested and the same result in
more rejection during processing. The CFC proposed
includes facility for testing of raw materials,
induction melting furnace, Rolling machines power
press circle cutting facility etc. for improvement of
quality of products and acceptability with less
rejection.
98
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs.in lakh)
1. Land & site development 68.50
2. Building 258.50
3. Plant & Machinery 1167.00
4. Office Equipment 185.00
5 Preliminary & preoperative
expenses
15.00
6 Margin money for working capital 42.00
Total 1736.00
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 10% 136.00
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
1350.00
3 Term Loan Bank 250.00
Total 1736.00
What are the shortcomings:
(i) Land documents related to procurement of land by the SPV not available.
(ii) Appraisal report SIDBI/ concerned bank not available. (iii) Project Specific account of SPV not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee
may consider ‘In-principle’ approval for the CFC. in Stainless Steel, Brass & German Silver
Utensils Cluster, Mirzapur
99
Agenda No. 30.88 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Carpet & Durri Industry Cluster, Shahjahanpur under MSE-CDP.
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department, Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Carpet & Durri Industry Cluster, Shahjahanpur. Salient
features of the cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Carpet & Durri Industry Cluster
2. Location Shahjahanpur (UP)
3. Products Carpets and durri of different sizes and quality
4. Age of the cluster Age of the cluster
5. No. of Units 4,137 (Registered units are 137 nos)
6. Type of units Traditional Household Industry,
90% are from Minorities
7. Existence of
Association / NGO
Samajik Gramin Vikas Sansthan, Barujai
8. Recommendation
in the DSR
The DSR recommends for setting of CFC in the cluster
9. Soft Interventions
in the cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster were earlier approved under
MSE-CDP and taken up by DIC, Shajahanpur
10. Formation of SPV Samajik Gramin Vikas Sansthan, Barujai
11. Employment 25000 nos (Direct & Indirect)
12. Turnover Rs. 70 crore
13. Implementing AgencyDirectorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of UP
14. Problems of the clusterLack of training facilities Lack of modern Dyeing facilities
Lack of finishing facilities Lack of carpet backing for Tufted carpets
Lack of Brand Image and linkages with supporting institutions
15. Need for CFC • To establish
• Skill Upgradation & Training Centre
• Modern Dye House
• Modern Washing House
• Raw Material bank.
16. Cost of the project Particulars Total Cost (Rs.in
lakh)
1. Land & site development 13.80
2. Building 41.70
3. Plant & Machinery 329.50
4. Preoperative expenses 25.00
5. Margin money for working
capital
20.00
Total 430.00
100
17. Proposed Means of
Finance
Particulars Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 67.00
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 275.00
3 Term Loan Bank 88.00
Total 430.00
What are the shortcomings:
(i) Land documents related to procurement of land by the SPV not available.
(ii) Appraisal report SIDBI not available. (iii) Project Specific account of SPV not available.
(iv) Memorandum & Article of Association/By laws not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee
may consider ‘In-principle’ approval for the CFC in Carpet & Durri Industry Cluster,
Shahjahanpur.
101
Agenda No.30.89 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Wollen Duree Cluster, Jaunpur under MSE-CDP.
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department,. Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Wollen Duree Cluster Mariyahu, Jaunpur. Salient features of the
cluster and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Wollen Duree Cluster
2. Location Mariyahu, Jaunpur (UP)
3. Products Wollen duree, rugs, wall hanging, floor covering, etc
4. Age of the cluster 200 years old.
5. No. of Units 400 micro and 500 processing units
6. Type of units (Minorities – 300, SC – 40, Women – 40 and Others
– 20)
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Wooni Udhyog Sahkari Samity Ltd., Jaunpur
8. Recommendation in the DSR
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster were earlier approved under MSE-CDP and taken up by Govt. of UP
10. Formation of SPV Mariyahu Audyogik Avam Samajik Sewa Samitee
11. Employment 15,000 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 25.0 Crore
Export Rs. 10.0 Crore (2005-06)
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Industries, Govt. of UP
14. Problems of the cluster (as per
DSR)
Non availability of modern dyeing facilities, poor infrastructure, unhygienic working condition, poor
finishing and polishing of finished material, etc.
15. Need for CFC The CFC is required to over come the problems faced
by artisans /units which will improve:
• Brand image of Mariyahau Woolen Durees.
• Enhancing quality of durees.
• Updating the Duree industry with latest technical skills.
• Updating the Duree industry with modern management and quality tools.
• Encouraging industry to adopt international
quality and social.
102
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount in lakh
1. Land 45.00
2. Building 155.00
3. Plant & Machinery 337.03
4. Misc. Fixed Assets 10.00
5 Pre-operative Exp. 7.00
6 Working capital 29.30
Total 583.33
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 14.13 82.45
2 State Govt. 21.86 127.50
3 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India
64.01 373.38
Total 100 583.33
What are the shortcomings:
(i) Land documents related to procurement of land by the SPV not available. (ii) List of SPV members along with their contribution not available.
(iii) Appraisal report from SIDBI not available. (iii) Project Specific account of SPV not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- The Committee may consider the
proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Wollen Duree Cluster Mariyahu,
Jaunpur.
103
Agenda No. 30.90 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Textile Printing Cluster, Pilakhua, Ghaziabad, UP under MSE-CDP.
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department,. Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Textile Printing Cluster, Pilakhua. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Textile Printing Cluster
2. Location Pilakhua (Ghaziabad)
3. Products Traditional artesian or Traditional Industries or
Modern/high tech product.
4. Age of the cluster 100 years old.
5. No. of Units 400 units
6. Type of units Micro units.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Pilakhua Power loom Manufacturing & Weaving Association.
8. Recommendation in the DSR The DSR recommends for setting of CFC in the
cluster.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster were earlier approved
under MSE-CDP and taken up by NIESBUD, Noida.
10. Formation of SPV Textile Printing Cluster Vikas Samiti.
11. Employment 20,000 nos. (Direct & Indirect)
12. Turnover Rs. 200 crore in processing & printing job work and total fabric cost is Rs. 700 crore.
13. Implementing Agency Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of UP
14. Problems of the cluster • Designing capacity of artisans is very poor.
• The products are sold in local market due to lack of acceptability.
• Screen design exposing unit is obsolete.
• Obsolete method of bleaching and washing.
• Methods of value addition to the printed
fabric are missing in the cluster.
15. Need for CFC • The CFC will have finishing unit, designing
development centre, production centre,
testing centre and marketing assistance cell
which will help the artisans/cluster units to
get quality products and testing of raw
material as well as finished goods including
modern processing facilities.
104
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs.in lakh)
1. Land & site development 100.00
2. Building
3. Plant & Machinery 347.50
4. Misc. fixed assets 65.00
4. Preliminary & Preoperative
expenses
65.00
5 Contingency 20.00
6. Margin money for working capital 64.00
Total 661.50
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 17.86 115.50
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
52.14 347.50
3 Govt. of UP 30.00 198.50
Total 100 661.50
What are the shortcomings:
(i) Land documents related to procurement of land by the SPV not available.
(ii) Appraisal report SIDBI not available. (iii) Project Specific account of SPV not available.
(iv) Memorandum & Article of Association/By laws not available.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- The Committee may consider the
proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of CFC in Textile Printing Cluster, Pilakhua.
105
Agenda No.30.91: Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Brassware Cluster, Moradabad
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department, Government of UP has submitted proposal for
approval of CFC in Brassware Cluster, Moradabad, UP. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Brass & Aluminum Ingot Making Cluster
2. Location Moradabad
3. Products The products basket of Moradabad is mix of utility
products and decorative items. The major categories
include Candle Stand, Planters, Lamps, Tableware,
Kitchenware, Cutlery Sets, Bathroom accessories,
Wall fixture, trays, nautical items etc.
4. Age of the cluster About 350 years old.
5. No. of Units 25,000 nos.
6. Type of units (Small – 5,000 and Micro – 20,000)
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Moradabad Metal Recyclers Society
8. Recommendation in the DSR DSR recommends for setting up of CFC.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster have been taken up earlier by NIESBUD, Noida.
10. Formation of SPV Moradabad Metal Recyclers Society
11. Employment 3,50,000 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 3500 crore.
Export Rs. 2700 crore.
13. Implementing Agency UP Handicrafts Development Corporation
14. Problems of the cluster (as per
DSR) • Lack of appropriate technology in melting the
scraps to convert into ingot which is the raw
material for art ware castings activities.
• Inability to remove the impurities from the raw material.
• Inability to meet large quantity export orders due to poor and obsolete technology based
casting facilities.
• High cost production.
• Value addition in the products is not of global level from point of view of its export oriented
products.
15. Need for CFC Main objective of CFC will be augment the need
of cluster actors to enable them to reduce the cost
of production, reduce the consumption of fuel,
reduce the pollution, and increase the quality of
product to compete both in domestic and
international markets.
106
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount in
lakh
1. Land & Site Development 70.00
2. Factory building 200.00
3. Plant and machinery (including
installation, electrification &
commissioning)
675.00
4. Misc. Fixed Assets 40.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative
Exp.
40.00
6. Contingencies 32.50
6 Margin Money Working capital 7.50
Total 1065.00
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars % Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 10 107.00
2 State Govt. 20 213.00
3 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India
70 745.00
Total 100 1065.00
Shortcomings:
• Land documents
• List of SPV members along with their contribution
• Appraisal report from SIDBI
• Project Specific account of SPV
Other information: Government of UP has submitted another DPR also for same purpose and for same cluster but from different SPV with changes only in the project cost and financial ratios and
all other details remaining exactly the same. In addition, it has been informed by NIESBUD, Noida that SIDBI is questioning for setting of two identical CFCs in the same cluster. Cluster
Division has requested for geographical area of the proposed two CFCs to be used by cluster members from NIEBUD, Noida. Reply still not received.
Proposal for Steering Committee:- Steering Committee may like to deliberate on the issue for
taking final decision.
107
Agenda No. 30.92: Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
for Brassware Cluster, Moradabad
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department, Government of UP has submitted proposal for
approval of CFC in Brassware Cluster, Moradabad, UP. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Brassware Cluster
2. Location Moradabad
3. Products The products basket of Moradabad is mix of utility
products and decorative items. The major categories
include Candle Stand, Planters, Lamps, Tableware,
Kitchenware, Cutlery Sets, Bathroom accessories,
Wall fixture, trays, nautical items etc.
4. Age of the cluster About 350 years old.
5. No. of Units 25,000 nos.
6. Type of units (Small – 5,000 and Micro – 20,000)
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Moradabad Scrap Recycling Limited.
8. Recommendation in the DSR DSR recommends for setting up of CFC.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster have been taken up earlier by NIESBUD, Noida.
10. Formation of SPV Moradabad Scrap Recycling Limited.
11. Employment 3,50,000 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 3500 crore.
Export Rs. 2700 crore.
13. Implementing Agency UP Handicrafts Development Corporation
14. Problems of the cluster (as per
DSR) • Lack of appropriate technology in melting the
scraps to convert into ingot which is the raw
material for art ware castings activities.
• Inability to remove the impurities from the raw material.
• Inability to meet large quantity export orders due to poor and obsolete technology based casting
facilities.
• High cost production.
• Value addition in the products is not of global level from point of view of its export oriented
products.
15. Need for CFC Main objective of CFC will be augment the need of
cluster actors to enable them to reduce the cost of
production, reduce the consumption of fuel, reduce
the pollution, and increase the quality of product to
compete both in domestic and international markets.
108
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount in
lakh
1. Land & Site Development 25.00
2. Factory building 20.00
3. Plant and machinery (including
installation, electrification &
commissioning)
675.00
4. Misc. Fixed Assets 40.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative
Exp.
40.00
6. Contingencies 32.50
6 Margin Money Working capital 7.50
Total 840.00
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount (Rs. in
lakh)
1 SPV contribution 10 84.00
2 State Govt. 20 168.00
3 Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
70 588.00
Total 100 840.00
Shortcomings:
• Land documents
• List of SPV members along with their contribution
• Appraisal report from SIDBI
• Project Specific account of SPV
Other information: Government of UP has submitted another DPR also for same purpose and for
same cluster but from different SPV with changes only in the project cost and financial ratios and
all other details remaining exactly the same. In addition, it has been informed by NIESBUD,
Noida that SIDBI is questioning for setting of two identical CFCs in the same cluster. Cluster Division has requested for geographical area of the proposed two CFCs to be used by cluster
members from NIEBUD, Noida. Reply still not received.
Proposal for Steering Committee:- Steering Committee may like to deliberate on the issue for taking final decision.
109
Agenda No. 30.93 Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Brassware Cluster, Moradabad
Industries Department, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh has submitted a proposal for setting up of CFC in
Brassware Cluster, Moradabad (U. P). Salient features of the cluster and the proposal are as
follows:
1. Name of the cluster
Brassware Cluster
2. Location Moradabad (U. P)
3. Products Kitchenware, candle stand, planters, lamps,
tableware, cutlery sets etc.
4. Age of the cluster Age old.
5. No. of Units 25000 Micro & Small units
6. Type of units SC-250; Minorities-18750; Women-1000
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Moradabad Tools Training Centre, Moradabad
8. Recommendation in the DSR Lack of machineries and technology in drilling,
milling, molding and making brass products
technically. The cost of production is very high and
production is based on manual basis and it takes too
much time.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster have been taken up
earlier by NIESBUD, Noida.
10. Formation of SPV Moradabad Tools and Training Centre
11. Employment 350000 (Directly & Indirectly)
12. Turnover Rs. 2700 crore (export- Rs. 2200 crore)
13. Implementing Agency UP Handicrafts Development Corporation
14. Problems of the cluster • Lack of promotional & technology development institutional support.
• Indian artisans are not able to make products as per international standards
• Lack of marketing knowledge & visibility.
• Outdated Plant & Machinery or non availability of modern production technologies.
• Poor usage of information & Communication technology.
15. Need for CFC The CFC Machine tool centre shall serve as the main platform for up gradation the knowledge/technology
exploring of new ideas, development of production processes, product development etc.
3D scanners and CAD software is helpful in utilize
modern manufacturing on parts.
Grinding Machine is very useful for the quality
products in handicrafts industry and can be useful.
110
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs. in lakh)
1. Land & Site Development 190.00
2. Building 160.73
3. Plant & Machinery 803.89
4. Misc. fixed assets 89.48
5. Preliminary expenses 30.00
6 Pre-operative 30.00
7 Contingencies 43.41
8 Margin Money for WC 145.16
Total 1492.67
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount(Rs. in
lakh)
1. SPV contribution 17 250.00
2. Grant-in-aid from
Govt. of India
63 933.57
3. Grant-in-aid from
Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
10 163.95
4. Quasi loan (for WC)
10 145.15
Total 100 1492.67
Shortcomings:
• Land documents
• List of SPV members along with their contribution
• Appraisal report from SIDBI
• The SPV formed in the cluster is an Association of Person. In respect of all the cluster
proposals, the SPV formed is either Pvt Ltd. comapay, Society or Trust.
Proposal for consideration of the Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the
proposal for ‘In-principle’ approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State
Government within 6 months, failing which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee
may consider the proposal of in-principle approval for setting up of CFC in the cluster.
111
Agenda No. 30.94: Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
for Chikankari Cluster, Barabanki, UP
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department,. Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Chikankari Cluster, Barabanki,. Salient features of the cluster
and the proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Chikankari Cluster
2. Location Block Dewa, Dist Barabanki.
3. Products Ladies suits, Gents Kurta, Dress Material, Ladies
Tops, Furnishing Items.
4. Age of the cluster Age old cluster.
5. No. of Units Not available.
6. Type of units Not available.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Barabanki Chikankari Cluster Vikas Evam Kriyanvayan Samiti.
8. Recommendation in the DSR The main recommendations are that the artisans
should be organized, Design and product
development interventions should be initiated in the cluster and a Common Facility Center should be
established in the cluster.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Skill Upgradation of Artisans.
Design & Product Development Workshops.
10. Formation of SPV Barabanki Chikankari Cluster Vikas Evam
Kriyanvayan Samiti under Society Registration Act.
11. Employment 10,000 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 1000 crore.
13. Implementing Agency UP Handicrafts Development Corporation
14. Problems of the cluster • Highly unorganized Cluster.
• All artisans are job worker.
• Lack of backward & forward linkage.
15. Need for CFC The CFC will be having
• Cutting, Stitching, Interlock and Kaaj & Button machine.
• Washing & Dry Cleaning Machine.
• Design Center.
• Information Center.
• Raw Material Bank.
• Apparel Manufacturing and Training Center.
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Total Cost
(Rs.in lakh)
1. Land 7.16
2. Building 34.90
3. Equipment and machinery 35.92
4. Computerization 4.35
5. Managerial subsidy for 3 years 10.44
Total 92.77
112
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 14.99 22.42
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt.
of India
70.02 104.67
3 Govt. of UP 14.99 22.42
Total 100 149.51
Shortcomings:
• Land documents
• Appraisal report SIDBI
• Project Specific account of SPV
• Memorandum & Article of Association/By laws
• List of members along with their contribution
Proposal for Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’
approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing
which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal of in-
principle approval for setting up of CFC in the Cluster.
113
Agenda No. 30.95 : Proposal for In-Principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre for Fan Cluster, Varanasi
Special Secretary, Small Industries Department, Government of UP has submitted a proposal for
approval for setting up of CFC in Fan Cluster, Varanasi, UP. Salient features of the cluster and the
proposal are as follows:
1. Name of the cluster Fan Cluster
2. Location Varanasi
3. Products Ceiling fan, Table fan, Pedestal fan, Pumps, Spare
parts of fans and pumps.
4. Age of the cluster About 60 years old.
5. No. of Units 5000 units
6. Type of units Micro and Small units.
7. Existence of Association /
NGO
Vranasi Fan Cluster Private Limited, Varanasi
8. Recommendation in the DSR DSR recommends for setting up of CFC.
9. Soft Interventions in the
cluster
Soft interventions in the cluster have taken up by
DIC, Varanasi.
10. Formation of SPV Vranasi Fan Cluster Private Limited, Varanasi on 8.04.2010
11. Employment 3,00,000 nos.
12. Turnover Rs. 200 crore.
Export 10% (out of total turnover)
13. Implementing Agency UP Handicrafts Development Corporation
14. Problems of the cluster (as per
DSR) • Old technology for die casting.
• Old technology for painting.
• Manually making mesh guards.
• Non-availability of raw material.
• Lack of testing facilities.
15. Need for CFC • Facilities of Testing and certification of
products
• Technology up gradation.
• Skill up gradation.
• New technology for painting aluminum
rolling.
16. Cost of the project
Particulars Amount in
lakh
1. Land & Site Development 100.00
2. Building & Civil Works 120.00
3. Machinery & Equipments 335.00
4. Misc. Fixed Assets 105.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative
Exp.
5.00
6. Consultancy Fees 15.00
6 Margin Money Working capital
60.00
Total 740.00
114
17. Proposed Means of Finance
Particulars %age Amount
(Rs. in lakh)
1 SPV contribution 12.16 90.00
2 State Govt. 20.27 150.00
3 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India
67.57 500.00
Total 100 740.00
What are the shortcomings:
• Land documents
• List of SPV members along with their contribution
• Appraisal report from SIDBI
• Memorandum of Articles of association
• Financial analysis, project deliverables
Proposal for Steering Committee:- Cluster division recommends the proposal for ‘In-principle’
approval so that complete proposal is submitted by the State Government within 6 months, failing
which the proposal shall be dropped. Steering Committee may consider the proposal of in-
principle approval for setting up of CFC in the Cluster.