AGENDA 2:30 PM (Central)

AGENDA Education and Dissemination Committee

June 17, 2016 21 E Conference Room

2:30 PM (Central) Optimizing Outreach and Education 1:00 pm Combined Committee Session: Education and Dissemination/Advocacy and Outreach 1. Development of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Webinar

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Welcome and Committee Update – Colette Salm-Schmid, MD, FACS, Vice Chair 2:30 PM 2. Approval of August 25, 2015 Minutes - Exhibit 1 2:40 PM 3. NAPBC Accreditation Workshop: Pursuing Excellence through NAPBC Accreditation 2:45 PM

a. Workshop Agenda, Chicago, November 12, 2016 – Exhibit 2 b. Workshop Planning for 2017 – Group Discussion

4. 2017 Presentation Opportunities - Group Discussion – Exhibit 3 3:00 PM

a. NCRA – April 5 – 8, 2017 in Washington, DC b. CoC Annual Cancer Conference – June 2017 ACTION ITEM: Call for volunteers to form a Planning Committee

5. Best Practices Conference 3:20 PM

a. Recap of BP Conference – Exhibit 4 b. Planning for future Best Practices Conferences - Group Discussion – Exhibit 5

6. Online Education Planning - Group Discussion – Exhibit 6 3:40 PM

a. Standards Webinars b. Rural/Low Volume Center Education (Informational)

7. NAPBC Editorial Calendar – Exhibit 7 4:00 PM

8. New Business 4:15 PM

9. Committee Meeting Wrap-Up - Colette Salm-Schmid, MD, FACS, Vice Chair 4:20 PM 10. Adjourn 4:30 PM

National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers

Education and Dissemination Committee

Meeting Minutes

Conference Call

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Members Present: Randy Stevens, MD, Chair Colette Salm-Schmid, MD, Vice-Chair Ronda Henry-Tillman, MD, FACS Cheryl R. Herman, MD Colleen Johnson, RN, NP, CBPN-IC Judy Kneece, RN, OCN Amy Alderman, MD Donna-Marie Manasseh, MD James Connolly, MD, FCAP Scott H. Kurtzman, MD, FACS

Member Absent: Susan Brown, MS, RN Jessica Leung, MD Shannon MacDonald, MD Meena S. Moran, MD

Staff: Steffanye Hawbaker Mack Karen Pollitt

Agenda Item Discussion Action/Outcome

Welcome The committee meeting was called to order at 4:02 PM Central time. Randy Stevens (committee chair) announced that individual committee member attendance is under review and will be discussed during the NAPBC Board meeting in October. A letter will be sent to committee members with attendance records below 50%.

ACTION: Committee member attendance will be reviewed by the NAPBC Board.

Review and Approval of Minutes –

The Education and Dissemination Committee meeting minutes from the June 12, 2015 meeting were presented for review and approval.

MOTION: To approve Education and Dissemination meeting minutes of June 12, 2015 as written. ACTION: Carried

Online Education

a. NAPBC/ACS Webinar Update: Steffanye Hawbaker Mack of the NAPBC has been working with Stephanie Van Winkle of the American Cancer Society (ACS) to coordinate and plan the upcoming collaborative webinar series. The first webinar,

NAPBC Education and Dissemination Committee Conference Call Minutes August 25, 2015 Page 2

2

Genetic Testing 101, is scheduled for September 28, 2015. Scott Weissman, and NAPBC Board member, will give the genetics presentation and Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, also an NAPBC Board member, will give an introduction on behalf of the ACS. The committee was presented with the genetics webinar invitation and objectives. The second and third webinars have also been scheduled in October and November. The committee was asked to give input on the objectives/discussion topics for the upcoming webinars.

b. October/November Webinar Learning Objectives:

Risk Modification: The Importance of a Healthy Lifestyle, October 15, 2015, Speaker: Colette Salm-Schmid: The committee suggested the following objectives/topics for discussion on the breast cancer risk modification webinar:

i. Importance of exercise

ii. Weight: Effects of Low-Weight; What is mechanism of weight gain

for women going through treatment? (Steroids? Inactivity?); Pre-hab

where they work with patients to try to prevent the weight gain

iii. Limited Alcohol: A glass of wine with dinner? 2 a week? No more

than 2 within 24 hours? None?

iv. Use of baby aspirin

v. Nutrition: Is there a cancer diet? Soy? Eat Organic? Eat Meat or

plant and veggie diet? Supplements?

vi. Oral contraceptives, lubricants w/ estrogen

Imaging: Identifying Who to Screen, November 23, 2015, Speaker: Cheryl Herman: The committee suggested the following objectives/topics for discussion on the breast cancer screening webinar:

i. We should follow the guidelines of our member organizations

ii. Normal Populations Screening and High-Risk Screening

iii. 2 different types of screening and the timing – 20 – 30 min

iv. Internists are trying to figure out 3-D, when do you need an

ACTION: Steffanye Hawbaker Mack and Steffanye Van Winkle will coordinate a planning call between Colette and Colleen Doyle of the ACS to discuss the topics identified by the committee. ACTION: Steffanye Hawbaker Mack and Steffanye Van Winkle will coordinate a planning call between Cheryl and Robert Smith of the ACS to discuss the topics identified by the committee.


3

Ultrasound, MRI?

v. For diagnostic purposes and how to incorporate the other modalities

and when

vi. Frequency of screening for age groups

vii. What age should you stop screening? Is there a magical age to

stop? People are living longer.

viii. Timing: pre-menopausal operation with the MRI and Mammo

ix. Provider Perspective: If an institution only has the older type of units

should they refer patients to those centers

x. Ultrasound recommendations by state, Dense-breast only?

c. Future Webinars/E-learning Modules: The committee discussed the list of webinar/e-learning topics for 2016. The committee selected the following topics: Fertility, Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM), Pathology Standard 2.7, Risk Reduction

Fertility Webinar: The committee agreed that the NAPBC should definitely present a webinar on fertility, but did not determine the audience. It was suggested that this may be a webinar for patients. The NAPBC Board does not have an OB/GYN representative, so a speaker may have to come from outside of the NAPBC. Colette Salm-Schmid knows a fertility specialist who is a good speaker, but not involved with the NAPBC. The committee agreed that a medical oncologist should speak on this webinar as well, and will reach out to NAPBC Board members first, before reaching out to contacts outside of the NAPBC. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Webinar: Ronda Henry-Tillman suggested that CPM is a topic that the NAPBC could address, and the committee agreed as long as the intended audience is clear. The webinar should be about informed choice, not a decision statement on CPM, and should cover surgery, plastic surgery, and psychosocial topics. The committee agreed that there should be a panel of speakers from each area. Donna-Marie Manasseh volunteered to be a speaker on this panel. The committee would like to reach out to the NAPBC Board for the additional speakers, citing Barbara

ACTION: The Education and Dissemination Committee will reach out to NAPBC Board members to find speakers for the 2016 Fertility webinar. ACTION: NAPBC Staff will schedule a planning call between the chairs and vice-chairs of the Education committee and the Advocacy committee to discuss the CPM webinar.


4

Rabinowitz as a possible speaker representing the psychosocial aspect. This topic is one of the topics suggested by the Advocacy Committee, so staff will set up a planning call between the chairs and vice-chairs of each committee. Pathology Standard 2.7: This will be an e-learning module on the NAPBC website and will cover the “nuts and bolts” of meeting this standard. Discussion topics will be how to get the slides and implementing the process. Randy Stevens volunteered to give this talk.

Risk Reduction: This topic was not on the exhibit in the meeting packet. Randy Stevens suggested that the NAPBC do a webinar on Risk Reduction for patients or primary care providers or both. The topic would include hormone therapy, biopsy and should have a pathologist and medical oncologist included as speakers. Ronda Henry-Tillman has done several talks on risk reduction, so she volunteered to be a speaker on this webinar and suggested that it is too big a topic for just one hour. It was decided that this topic should be covered by a series of webinars and added to the list of future topics.

ACTION: NAPBC Staff will work with Randy Stevens to develop an e-learning module for Standard 2.7 ACTION: NAPBC Staff will add Risk Reduction webinar series to the future webinar topics

Schedule of Events

The committee reviewed the NAPBC schedule of events that includes workshops, meetings and exhibits. Karen Pollitt reported that NAPBC members attending the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress in October were asked to meet with fellows interested in the NAPBC. Scott Kurtzman and Colette Salm-Schmid volunteered. All but two NAPBC exhibits were cut from the American College of Surgeons Cancer Department budget this fiscal year. Scott Kurtzman suggested that the NAPBC present at national meetings instead of exhibit and asked if there was a cancer center executives meeting. Colette Salm-Schmid suggested that the NAPBC could present the value of accreditation during the January 27 – 30 ACE meeting in California. She suggested we should reach out to Bill Laffey (a CoC volunteer) to see if we can get on the agenda for the January meeting. Karen Pollitt suggested that we could also submit a poster on the value of accreditation at the 2016 AONN meeting.

ACTION: Scott Kurtzman and Colette Salm-Schmid volunteered to meet with Fellows interested in NAPBC during Clinical Congress in October. ACTION: Create a “value of accreditation” presentation and poster and submit for inclusion in the 2016 ACE and 2016 AONN meetings.


5

NAPBC Editorial Calendar

The NAPBC Editorial Calendar includes newsletters and email marketing campaigns. NAPBC staff will reach out to volunteers as needed for content.

NAPBC Education Committee Goals

The NAPBC Education Committee has met almost every goal except publish. Dr. Berger, the Clinical Scholar, is working on pulling the data together for the studies the committee wants to publish. Karen Pollitt informed the committee that there will be a data call in a couple of weeks that will progress this goal further. Randy Stevens suggested that the data collected by the NAPBC is more user-friendly in the future and Karen Pollitt reported that this is on the list of requirements for the team developing the new SAR. Karen Pollitt, Dr. Yao and the NCDB completed a data dictionary mapping project that will make it possible to bring over the data from current system into the new system. There could be data analysis access in the new system by Spring 2016. The Best Practices Conference may be moved to 2016. The planning committee is going to discuss the conference immediately following this committee call.

New Business

Colette Salm-Schmid asked if we could address the expectations of committee membership. Randy Stevens agreed and noted that we are starting with committee member attendance records. She will work with Dr. Kurtzman and Dr. Connolly regarding this issue.

ACTION: See Welcome

Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 Central time.

AGENDA

Pursuing Excellence through NAPBC Accreditation Workshop

Chicago, IL

Saturday, November 12, 2016 7:30 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am Welcome and Program Introduction

Karen Pollitt, Senior Manager, National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, Chicago, IL

Why Accreditation Matters

Colette Salm-Schmid, MD, FACS, Vice-Chair, NAPBC Education and Dissemination Committee, Green Bay, WI

9:00 am Understanding Key Components and Standards

Scott H. Kurtzman, MD, FACS, Vice-Chair, National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, NAPBC Surveyor, Waterbury, CT

10:00 am Break 10:15 am Understanding Key Components and Standards (continued) 11:15 am What to Expect on the Day of Survey

Randy Stevens, MD, Chair, NAPBC Education and Dissemination Committee, NAPBC Surveyor, White Plains, NY

12:00 pm Networking Lunch 1:00 pm An Administrator's View: What it takes to Achieve NAPBC

Accreditation Colleen Johnson, R.N., CBPN-IC, Regional Director of Breast

Health Services, Carondelet Health System, Kansas City, MO 1:45 pm The Importance of Quality Improvement: Is NAPBC Making a

Difference? Colette Salm-Schmid, MD, FACS, Vice-Chair, NAPBC Education

and Dissemination Committee, Green Bay, WI 2:30 pm Optimizing Resources for Your Dual NAPBC/CoC

Accreditation Karen Pollitt, Senior Manager, NAPBC Karen Stachon, Technical Specialist, CoC

Kathleen Thoburn, CTR, Manager, NCDB Information and Data Standards

3:30 pm Break 3:45 pm Q&A

All Faculty 4:30 pm Adjourn

2017 Presentation Opportunities

NCRA – April 5 – 8, 2017 in Washington, DC

Registrar audience

Revenue Share - $30/registrant

Possible Presentation Topics: o The value of accreditation o Quality Metrics o Prepare for Chart Review

CoC Annual Cancer Conference – June 2017

Administrator and Physician audience

Possible Presentations:

o Breast track

preparing for survey

standards

changes to Fords

8th editions staging

o NAPBC Preconference

Possible Speakers:

o NAPBC Board and Committee Members

o Speakers from 2013 and 2016 conferences

NAPBC Best Practices Conference Evaluation May 13 – 14, 2016 B Resort & Spa, Orlando, FL

Preconference Workshop: NAPBC Accreditation and Standards Review Friday, May 13, 2016

57 attendees

36 evaluation responses

33 CE certificates requested Preconference Workshop Evaluation Results:

Comments:

Clarified many of our questions

This workshop was very helpful.

So glad I went to the conference!

EXTREMELY informative, love the why accreditation matters portion!

I enjoyed the conference very much. It was very informative and helpful as we evaluate moving forward towards accreditation. Everyone was easy to approach and willing to share their knowledge and answer any questions. Great information

Presentations excellent! Wish we had had more time for discussion

A valuable review of the NAPBC program/standards.

more time spent on standards would be good

Comments:

Too short(half day is not enough) Workbook was presented for Friday, no workbook for Saturday presentations. I think it would have been great to have a book for both days with presentations I was disappointed that based on the price for the preconference and the start time that lunch was not available, or even a snack at break It was nice to have the workbook with the power points. This made it easy to take notes on each subject. the length was long. Well organized, great and comfortable location, well planned. The location of the conference was excellent. The support materials were extremely useful and provided a lot of information. Hotel too far from airport. would have been nice to have manual provided as well as a booklet for Saturday's conference

Comments:

I really liked and appreciated the open question and answer format that was offered during the standards review portion of the workshop. I think it would be nice if there was more time allotted in this segment for attendees to share their practices, if they would like. Nothing formal, just a quick “here is what we do.” This was such a helpful workshop. Reviewing each standard and being able to ask questions helped me tremendously. I gained a lot more info on the NAPBC standards. Very clear, the questions were valid and answered definitively by the speaker. I walked away from the conference feeling very excited about bringing back to my facility everything I had

learned and moving forward towards accreditation. Many questions clarified, thanks Absolutely!! Was able to get many questions answered.

Other Response (1):

I was just hired at the Breast Center at Grady and learned about this accreditation from my boss.

Other Responses (4):

CoC-trained Consultant/VP Physician Assistant Consultant and CTR Registered Nurse Navigator

Do you have any suggestions for future workshops?

I really enjoyed the preconference format & topics presented by the key leaders. Remind the speakers to be mindful of the language they use during their presentations. Dr. Kurtzman had a bit of a "potty mouth" at times. Skip the dinner and provide lunch for people coming for a half day conference We could have used a little more time on the standards. Expanded time on standards...a full day with plenty of time for questions I would suggest more opportunities to discuss the standards. I felt I learned more at the workshop than at the Breast Practices Presentation. If I could get reminder emails of events that NAPBC is hosting that would be great. thought this was well thought out and was great Providing templates to use for accreditation. I think it may be helpful to have a workshop dedicated to those who are CONSIDERING NAPBC accreditation only, more like an introduction. I think it is helpful for programs to understand the components and resources they need. Maintain the excellent quality provided at this conference. Both the Pre-conference workshop and Best Practices were excellent and very helpful as we seek our first accreditation. Mach interdisciplinary conference review recommendations follow up best practice for documenting recommendations More time for question and answer periods For such a short meeting, consider having the hotel at the airport or very close to the airport of the host city.

I think it was a wonderful workshop. The presenters were very willing to meet with individuals and answer all of our questions. They were very approachable and knowledgeable. It seems as though they really want every facility to do well. more time on standards - so questions can be asked

What other resources or services could the NAPBC provide that don't currently exist?

We have a program rich in Oncology Rehabilitation, we would love to see American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation listed as one of the professional organizations. It would have been nice to get an overview of SAR everything seemed to be covered Recommend use of consultants to programs going for initial accreditation or interested in accreditation, I find so many programs have spent a long time spinning their wheels.

NAPBC Best Practices Conference Saturday, May 14, 2016

93 attendees

59 evaluation responses

55 CE certificates requested Conference Evaluation Results:

Other Responses (6)

Physician Assistant

CoC-trained Consultant/VP Consultant and CTR RN Nurse Navigator Physical Therapist physician assistant

Other Responses (6):

Accredited and as a speaker presenter I was asked to present at the conference. I was invited to speak called about speaking napbc email

Overall Rating Chart #2:

Overall Rating Chart #3:

Comments about the ratings above (Optional)

Some of the presentations were too long. Needed more bathroom breaks in between speakers. Need two days and more time for individual speakers they all were very rushed to successfully cover their topics. Great conference, well planned and organized, terrific speakers, maybe less speakers on each topic and more time for each presentation, this could easily be a full two-day conference. Great job by NAPBC staff and educational planners. Not many exhibitors present. The set up for lunch outside should be re considered. It was very hot not enough shade and most of the food was in the sun. The comment was made during the conference that more time (which may necessitate another day to the conference) for both presenters as well as questions may be nice. Some of the presentations would benefit from being widdled down or given feedback to stay on the clear message to keep attendees engaged. While at times, there did not seem to be a lot of time for discussion after each presentation, all speakers and faculty were easy to approach afterwards and willing to share their knowledge.

Comments:

provide best practice examples, provide view of new SAR and new manual, updates to changes in manual and SAR. More in-depth discussion regarding standards and Q&A time related to standards that require clarification- business rules for generating performance measure data needed in manual.

C3PR and RQRS metrics to not seem to match what is being requested for review at survey (class of case 10-14 only). Overall great conference- an extra day of activities covering the above would have been helpful. More time for presentations, limit topic presenters to (2) different people or perspectives More time on practice specific settings i.e. academic v private v charity etc Would like to see a greater focus on the standards that are currently being implemented i.e. SCP and standard changing practices provide a copy of the manual and booklet for presenters' slides. As mentioned, securing the presentations far in advance (not easy!! But common and standard as compared with other conferences. I have a presentation in July for which my PP is due 5/31. That offers the opportunity to decipher the "extra" content that doesn't tell as strong of a story. If this was able to be achieved- then an electronic format of the presentations could be given at the beginning of the conference and attendees could take notes in the slides as the presenters are speaking. Some attendees were taking pictures of the screen and writing notes in thier IPads. Great conference!!! Such valuable information and content. Thank you for all the work you do to make this happen, it is of such huge benefit. The needs of the larger cancer center vs the smaller breast centers print out of slides would be helpful prior to take notes

Please Rate the Effectiveness of the Speakers and Presentations: Answered: 52 Skipped: 7

Do you have any suggestions for future topics to support and/or expand on what you have learned at this activity?

thought this was well planned out and topics were covered well 1.more details on metrics and data collection/reporting 2. more details on pathways of care Patient Satisfaction Strategies for Breast Centers. The partnership role with Cancer Registry - Extracting the Data. Quality Studies and Improvement An Exercise in Chart Review - Check and Balances. I feel it would have been beneficial to have a booklet for Saturday with slides like you provided for Friday's workshop For some of the topics, I was hoping for more of a "how to" rather than a highlight of a program. For the conference presenter evaluations- it is difficult to rate the presenters a few days later. "On the spot" would be more effective/ authentic.

*The one respondent whom answered “no” gave mostly low ratings throughout the evaluation; however they did not comment on any of the questions. The respondent identified themselves as a CTR and the Administrator at a currently accredited program.

Quote

This conference was very informative and helpful. I appreciate the speakers taking time to pass along their BEST practices. Thank you NAPBC for providing this wonderful opportunity and to the NAPBC staff for being so readily available for questions. Excellent conference, as a Breast Center Leader who has successfully accomplished two survey cycles - I found the information very helpful, for both evaluation of our accredited program mid cycle and to consider additional improvement strategies. Excellent conference especially for developing programs. One of the most informative conferences I have ever attended! Lisa Landvogt, BA, CTR - Accreditation Services Director for Registry Partners. The Best Practice Conference helped our team recognize where we were right on target in our planning process. Additionally it helped us identify what areas we needed to work to develop best practice and implement improvements prior to our survey. This conference provided many excellent best practices; it also made me realize we have ample best practices of our own. The NAPBC holds the breast cancer service line to a fantastic high standard- and the Best Practice conference is an opportunity to hear from those programs exceeding expectations. The best of the best: great information from experts". Megan Pfarr HSHS St. Vincent Hospital Regional Cancer Center Honestly, I came back from this conference inspired and filled with enthusiasm. I was impressed with the plethora of great ideas and innovation. I'm sure it was hard to pick out programs, but thanks so much for making the effort and arranging this program so we can all share and learn.

City State Best time of year for event Worst time of year for event

Location‐specific issues that may impact cost (i.e. Chicago Unions, Denver Airport far from Downtown/Hotel venues, etc.) City Attractions

Phoenix AZFeb‐April ‐ good weather but high rates

June/July/August ‐ good rates but hot weather

Resort fees at some hotels; some hotels far from airport

San Diego CA Summer

Rates higher in peak meeting months ‐ April and October; rates can also be high in February All hotels close to airport.

San Francisco CA Summer

Rates higher in peak meeting months ‐ April/May and Sept/October

San Francisco is one of the most expensive cities in which to hold a meeting. Hotel rates are typically $280‐$300+ and food/bev expenses are high. Some hotels are union properties.

Los Angeles CAValue months Jan, July, Aug, Nov Dec

Rates are highest March thru June; Sept‐Oct

Airport is 17 miles from city center; generally LA does not have strong appeal as destination unless in Beverly Hills, Santa Monica or water location

L.A. LIVE Entertainment District, Disney Concert Hall, California Science Center, USC Campus

Orlando FL

Value months summer ‐ although is busy all year round Lots of hotels to choose from

Theme Parks, Downtown Disney; Resorts Areas



Atlanta GAValue months July, August, Dec Peak Jan ‐ June, Sept ‐ Nov

airport 9 miles, $30 cab, good transit system; Popular areas are Buckhead north of downtown

College Football Hall of Fame, Georgia Aquarium, Centennial Park, World of Coke

Boston MA Value months Jan, Feb, Dec

Boston is another very popular destination right now.....rates in peak season are $280‐$320

airport is 5 miles to city center; easy transportation w/in city; many popular attractions in Boston; very walkable city

Freedom Trail, Faneuil Hall, Symphony Hall, Fenway Park, JFK Library, Boston Harbor, Museums

Kansas City MOValue months Spring, Fall and Winter Peak months June and July

Airport is 21 miles from city center; $40 cab fare

Country Club Plaza, National World War I Museum, Nelson Atkins Museum of Art, KCI Speedway, NASCAR track, Collegiate Basketball Museum and Hall of Fam. KC BBQ, Kansas City Fountains. Kansas City Chiefs Football, Royals Baseball, Sporting KC Soccer, KC Jazz District

St. Louis MOValue months Spring, Fall and Winter Peak months June and July

airport 12 miles; $35 cab fare; good hotel options

Gateway Arch, Anheuser‐Busch, Botonical Garden, Old Courthouse, City Gardens, Soulard Market, Saint Louis Zoo



Las Vegas NV Value months summer All other times peak

airport 5 miles from city; trying to book weekend meetings is impossible; limited in small hotels that are easy to work with....city is generally tough to place business meetings in

Shows, Red Rock Canyon, Hoover Dam

Portland OR Value Nov ‐ April Peak May ‐ Oct

9 miles; $35 to city center from airport; limited hotels; Portland is popular as a destination right now

Zoo, Museum of Science and Industry, Japanese Garden, Market, Pittock Museum; good restaurants; outdoor activities

Philadelphia PA

Nashville TN

Nashville is such a popular destination right now....there are no value months.

Airport is 8 miles to city center. Most hotels are within walking distance of restaurants, nightlife, etc.

Dallas TXValue months....summer, Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec Spring and Fall peak season

Airport is 21 miles from city center; $40 cab fare; Dallas is seeing a lot of growth in the downtown area

Bush Library, Botanical Gardens, Arboretum, Good Restaurants

Seattle WA Value months Dec/JanPeak months April‐June; Sept, Oct

airport 14 miles from city center; $18‐20 fare;

Pike Place Market, Space Needle, Chuhuly Garden, Museums, Monorail, Seattle Great Wheel; good hotel options



San Antonio TXValue months June thru Aug; Dec

Peak months Jan thru May, Sept thru Nov

8 miles airport to downtown; $25 Riverwalk, Southtown, Pearl

Future Webinar/E-learning Modules NAPBC Webinars: - Recorded Live - Use GoToWebinar - Attendees can submit questions via chat feature Topics:

1. “An Introduction to the NAPBC”/”NAPBC 101” Content: Condensed version of the NAPBC Workshop Speaker(s): TBD Length: 60min w/ Q&A Credit: CE TBD

2. Clinical Trials Speaker(s): Dr. Stevens, Dr. Goldstein (not confirmed) Length: TBD Credit: TBD

Whiteboard Videos/E-learning Modules: - Recorded, available on-demand - Slides, graphics, videos w/ and without voiceover Topics:

1. Standard 2.7, Pathology Content: How to implement the process and meet the standard Presenter: TBD Credit: TBD

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webinar Topics suggested by the Advocacy and Outreach Committee:

living with metastatic breast cancer

options for maintaining fertility

lymphedema

contralateral prophylactic mastectomy

Editorial Calendar TEMPLATE

Month Title/Description Author Status Due Date Type of ContentDate to Editor

Target Audience

Distribution Channel(s)

Publish Date Web Location

Message from the Chair Dr. Connolly Assigned 1/8/2016 Article 1/15/2016NAPBC Distribution List Newsletter 2/1/2016

https://www.facs.org/publications/newsletters/napbc‐news/feb‐2016

Best Practices Conference Promo SHM In Process 1/8/2016 Promotion 1/15/2016

NAPBC Distribution List Newsletter 2/1/2016


Accreditation Corner: Survey Update AL/KP On Hold 1/8/2016 Article 1/15/2016



National Cancer Survivors Day Poster Sue Rubin Complete 1/8/2016 Article; Social Media Post 1/15/2016

NAPBC Accredited Centers

Newsletter, Twitter, Facebook 2/1/2016


AugustBreast Cancer Awareness Month Event Survey SHM Complete 8/15/2016 Article 1/20/2016

NAPBC Accredited Centers

Newsletter, Twitter, Facebook 2/1/2016

ACR ‐ Breast Cancer Awareness Month Article

Member Organization Representative Assigned 9/15/2016 Article 1/20/2016


Breast Cancer Awareness Month Poster Sue Rubin In Process 9/15/2016 Article/Promo 1/20/2016


NAPBC Editorial/Content Calendar

January

September

Editorial Calendar 2016


Target Audience



November Workshop Save The Date Promo SHM Assigned 6/21/2016 Promo Article 6/21/2016

NAPBC Distribution List

Newsletter, CoC Source, Breif

NAPBC Newsletter Content Newsletter 6/27/2016NAPBC Distribution List Newsletter 6/30/2016

CoC Source Article Article 7/20/2016 CoC Source 8/1/2016


September NAPBC Newsletter Content Article


CoC Source Article Article 9/21/2016 CoC Source 10/1/2016Breast Cancer Awareness Newsletter Article


December NAPBC Newsletter Content Article 11/14/2016


CoC Source Article Article 12/2/2016 CoC Source 1/1/2017November

December


June

August

July

September

October

Editorial Calendar 2017


Target Audience



February


January

March

AGENDA 2:30 PM (Central)

Documents

Transcript of AGENDA 2:30 PM (Central)