A.G. MALLIARIS and MARY MALLIARIS Loyola University Chicago RISK MANAGEMENT SUMMER SCHOOL RISK AND...
-
Upload
steven-harrell -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of A.G. MALLIARIS and MARY MALLIARIS Loyola University Chicago RISK MANAGEMENT SUMMER SCHOOL RISK AND...
A.G. MALLIARIS and MARY MALLIARIS
Loyola University Chicago
RISK MANAGEMENT SUMMER SCHOOL
RISK AND RETURN OF INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS
June 19-28, 2006
Retirement Income
• Public Pension / Social Security
• Private Pension
• Personal Savings / Investments
• General Wealth
Key Questions
• How to Secure Adequate and Sustainable Public Pensions?
• What is the Role of Financial Markets?
Facts: Social Security in the U.S.
1935: Social Security Act
- Old Age Benefits
1939: Survivor’s Benefits
1954: Disability Benefits
1965: Medicare
In U.S.A. Major Federal Outlays – % of Total Expenditures, 2003
Source: Office of Management and Budget
U.S. Social Security System
• A Pay – As – You – Go Pension System
Versus
• A Fully Funded System
Prelude to a Crisis
1950: 16.5 workers for each retiree
2004: 3.31 workers for each retiree
2030: 2.17 workers for each retiree
Possible Solutions
• Raise Payroll tax rates– Now at 12.4%
• Cut Benefits
• Increase Retirement Age
• Allow for Private Retirement Accounts
Private Retirement Accounts
• Issues of Implementation• Issues of Risks/Returns• Strengthening Social Security and
Creating Personal Wealth for All Americans
• Detailed Report to be found at www.csss.gov
Contrast
• Extensive Research about long term investing and compounding
• Less is known about accumulations of monthly contributions
Wealth Indices of Investments in the U.S. Capital Markets
Graph 1. The Long Run Perspective (Dec 31, 1925 to Dec 31, 2002) of Wealth Indices of Investments in the U.S. Capital Markets: A $1 Invested in Large Company Stocks; Long-Term Bonds, T-Bills, and Inflation Rate. Logarithmic Scale.
Source: Ibbotson Associates SBBI 2003 Yearbook
Graph 1
$0
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
$1775.34
$59.70
$10.09
Large Company Stocks
Long-TermGovernment Bonds
Inflation
$17.48
T-Bills
The distribution of monthly nominal S&P 500 total returns vs. normal distribution: 1926 - 2002
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1 -0 -0 0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08 0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18 0.2
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28 0.3
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38 0.4
0.42
0.44
Distribution of Monthly Nominal S&P 500 Returns
Monthly: Annual:Geometric Mean: 0.81% 10.2%Arithmetic Mean: 0.97% 12.3%Standard Deviation: 5.65 19.56
The distribution of monthly nominal long-term government bonds total returns vs. normal distribution: 1926 - 2002
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1 -0 -0 0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08 0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18 0.2
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28 0.3
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38 0.4
0.42
0.44
Distribution of Monthly Long Term Gov. Bonds Returns
Monthly: Annual:Geometric Mean: 0.44% 5.4%Arithmetic Mean: 0.46% 5.7%Standard Deviation: 2.21 7.65
Evaluation
• Phenomenal results of a $1 investment due to compounding
• These results are not immediately relevant for private retirement accounts
• Two key reasons: Monthly contributions vs lump sum and uneven compounding
Our Goal
• Use Ibbotson monthly data
• Perform calculations with actual data instead of sample averages
• Evaluate the merit of individual retirement accounts
Methodology
• Consider a representative individual saving for his/her Retirement
• Choose an Investment Horizon of
20, 30, 40 years
• Choose Bonds and/or Stocks
• Use monthly data from 1926 to 2002
Purpose
• Compute accumulations for a representative retiree
• Judge the sufficiency of these accumulations
Average Annual Returns for 40-year Investment Horizon
S&P 500 Returns
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
1925 1927 1929 1931 1933 1935 1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961
Time Series of Average Annual Returns for a 40 year investment horizon beginning with Jan 1, 1926 to Dec 31, 1955; Feb 1, 1926 to Jan 31, 1956 and continuing to Jan 1, 1963 to Dec 31, 2002
Graph 3
Key Observation
• 40-year average returns are not very stable
• 30 or 20-year average returns are more volatile
• Contrast calculations based on 40-year average returns vs on the actual term structure of monthly returns
$1 monthly contributions over a 40-year investment horizon
S&P 500 Returns
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1925 1927 1929 1931 1933 1935 1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961
monthly contributions invested at the generation's geometric mean rate of growth and monthly contributions invested at the generation's specific term structure of returns
Accumulated wealth of $1 monthly contributions over a 40-year investment horizon per generation (a total of 444 generations) computed two ways
Graph 4
Partial Observation
• Accumulations based on generation averages often more volatile
• Use of actual term structure of monthly returns is more accurate
$1 monthly Contribution 40 years(3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted)
S&P 500 Returns
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1925 1927 1928 1930 1931 1933 1934 1935 1937 1938 1940 1941 1942 1944 1945 1947 1948 1950 1951 1952 1954 1955 1957 1958 1959 1961 1962
First generation begins Dec 31, 1925 and ends Dec 31, 1965; last generation begins Dec 31, 1962 and ends Dec 31, 2002 ( 37 years x 12 months = 444 generations )
Accumulation of $1 monthly Contribution (3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted) for 40 years earning S&P 500 nominal return
Graph 5
$1 monthly Contribution 30 years(3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted)
S&P 500 Returns
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1925 1927 1929 1931 1933 1935 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1969 1971
First generation begins Dec 31, 1925 and ends Dec 31, 1955; last generation begins Dec 31, 1972 and ends Dec 31, 2002 ( 47 years x 12 months = 564 generations )
Accumulation of $1 monthly Contribution (3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted) for 30 years earning S&P 500 nominal return
Graph 6
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
$8,0
00
$9,0
00
$10,
000
$11,
000
$12,
000
$13,
000
$14,
000
$15,
000
$16,
000
$17,
000
$18,
000
$19,
000
$20,
000
$21,
000
$22,
000
$23,
000
$24,
000
$25,
000
$26,
000
$27,
000
$28,
000
$29,
000
$30,
000
$31,
000
$32,
000
$33,
000
Distribution of $1 monthly Contribution (3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted) for 40 years earning S&P 500 nominal return
Accumulations of $1 monthly Contribution for 40 years
(3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted)Graph 7
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
$2,3
00
$2,9
00
$3,5
00
$4,1
00
$4,7
00
$5,3
00
$5,9
00
$6,5
00
$7,1
00
$7,7
00
$8,3
00
$8,9
00
$9,5
00
$10,
100
$10,
700
$11,
300
$11,
900
$12,
500
$13,
100
$13,
700
$14,
300
$14,
900
Graph 8
Distribution of $1 monthly Contribution (3% Inflation and 2% Productivity Adjusted) for 30 years earning S&P 500 nominal return
Distribution of $1 monthly Contribution (3% Inflation and 2% Productivity
Adjusted) for 30 years S&P 500 Returns
Remarks
• Accumulations are generation dependent
• Accumulations are not normally distributed
• If contributions increase, old compound but are small and recent are large but have little time to compound
• Term structure of returns is critical
Median Incomes
• Introduce median incomes
• Choose a 20-year retirement horizon
• Evaluate accumulations
Table 4. Assuming a 40-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period, this Table lists the probability that certain percentage of annual contribution will be sufficient to finance a percent of final pay
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% 24.8% 52.7% 67.3% 80.0% 93.0% 99.1% 99.8%55% 0.0% 0.0% 8.6% 16.7% 38.1% 60.1% 69.8% 85.1% 94.4% 99.3%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 14.9% 27.3% 52.7% 66.4% 75.0% 87.8% 96.2%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 12.4% 20.5% 40.3% 59.5% 67.6% 79.1% 91.0%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 10.1% 16.0% 29.7% 52.7% 64.6% 71.2% 82.9%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 14.9% 24.8% 41.9% 58.6% 67.3% 75.0%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 12.8% 17.8% 31.5% 52.7% 64.0% 68.7%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 11.5% 15.8% 26.1% 43.5% 57.7% 66.4%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 9.2% 14.9% 22.3% 34.0% 52.7% 62.2%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 7.7% 13.1% 17.3% 28.4% 44.4% 57.2%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 12.2% 15.5% 24.8% 36.0% 52.7%
40-year Investment Horizon and 20-year Retirement period (Invested 100% in S&P 500)
30-year Investment Horizon and 20-year Retirement period (Invested 100% in S&P 500)
Table 5. Assuming a 30-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period, this Table lists the probability that certain percentage of annual contribution will be sufficient to finance a percent of final pay
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 11.7% 23.4% 42.2% 56.7% 63.7% 68.3%55% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% 9.8% 13.3% 30.3% 45.9% 58.3% 64.5%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 7.8% 11.7% 19.9% 36.7% 49.5% 59.6%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 9.9% 13.1% 26.2% 40.2% 52.5%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 8.2% 11.7% 17.6% 31.9% 43.8%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 6.6% 10.1% 12.2% 23.4% 36.7%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 5.1% 8.9% 11.7% 15.8% 28.4%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.9% 7.1% 10.3% 12.2% 21.5%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 5.9% 9.4% 11.7% 14.7%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 4.8% 7.8% 10.3% 12.2%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 6.6% 9.6% 11.7%
40-year Investment horizon and a 20-year Retirement period (Invested
100% Long-Term Government Bonds)
Table 6. Assuming a 40-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period, this Table lists the probability that certain percentage of annual contribution will be sufficient to finance a percent of final pay
(Invested 100% Long-Term Government Bonds)
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 17.6% 24.1% 27.9%55% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 20.3% 24.5%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 7.4% 21.8%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 11.3%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Table 7. Assuming a 30-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period, this Table lists the probability that certain percentage of annual contribution will be sufficient to finance a percent of final pay
(Invested 100% Long-Term Government Bonds)
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 13.5%55% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
30-year Investment horizon and a 20-year Retirement period (Invested
100% Long-Term Government Bonds)
Table 9. Assuming a 30-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period(Invested 50% S&P500 and Long-Term Government Bonds)
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 12.8% 16.8% 21.6% 23.9%55% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 9.8% 14.7% 17.2% 22.0%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 11.2% 15.2% 17.6%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 8.5% 12.6% 15.6%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% 10.1% 13.8%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 7.4% 11.2%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 9.2%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Table 8. Assuming a 40-year investment horizon and a 20-year retirement period(Invested 50% S&P500 and Long-Term Government Bonds)
Percent of income contributed1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
50% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 15.8% 22.1% 29.5% 34.2% 40.3% 45.5%55% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.6% 19.4% 24.5% 30.4% 34.5% 41.4%
Percent 60% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 15.8% 21.4% 28.2% 31.1% 34.9%of final pay 65% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 13.3% 19.1% 23.0% 29.3% 32.0%
70% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.0% 15.8% 20.3% 25.7% 30.2%75% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 13.3% 18.0% 22.1% 28.2%80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.1% 15.8% 19.6% 23.9%85% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.5% 13.5% 17.8% 21.4%90% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 10.8% 15.8% 19.4%95% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.9% 14.0% 17.6%100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 11.9% 15.8%
Probability that certain percentage of annual contribution will be sufficient to finance a percent of final pay
CONCLUSIONS
• Results presented in investment books need to be modified for individual retirement accounts
• Accumulations are unstable
• Accumulations are dependent on the term structure of returns
• Cannot use generation averages
• Compounding is constrained
CONCLUSIONS (Contd.)
• Remains true that stocks outperform bonds
• High inflation and/or productivity affect the accumulation/contribution ratio
• Going beyond the S&P 500 returns
• Investment/retirement horizons
• Fees and account management
• Shifting Risks
Individual Retirement Accounts are an Important new innovation but we need to Moderate out expectations !
CONCLUSIONS (Contd.)