AECT comments on the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power’s views on electric prices in the...

7/27/2019 AECT comments on the Texas Coalition for Affordable Powers views on electric prices in the competitive electric

1/16


2/16

Legislativeadvertisingpaidforby:JohnW.Fainter,Jr.,PresidentandCEOAssociationofElectricCompaniesofTexas,Inc.1005Congress,Suite600Austin,TX78701phone512-474-6725fax512-474-9670www.aect.net

Pa e2of16

ERCOT Energy Use More Dependent onNatural Gas Than the U.S. Average

Residential Electricity Prices Tend to FollowChanges in Natural Gas Prices


3/16


Pa e3of16

1.2TCAPChoosesitsBaselineDatatoPre-EngineerItsFindingsTCAPprovidesnoreasonablejustificationforusing1999asthebaselinetomeasureelectricitypricesinseveralofitsanalyses.TCAPsuggests1999isanappropriatestartingpointformeasuringelectricityprices,basedonthetimingoflegislativepassageoftherestructuringlaw(SB7).

Thefactis,1999wasthetailendofaperiodofgreatstabilityinthenaturalgasmarketasshownbelow.

Wellhead Natural Gas Prices Have Been Volatile Since 2000

Source:EnergyInformationAdministration

Itisdifficulttochooseayearlessrepresentativeofthecostofgasoverthepastdecadethan1999.Toputitinstarkerterms,theaveragewellheadNYMEXgaspriceperyearisshownbelow(source:EIA).

Year NYMEXAverageGas

Price($/MMBtu)Increasefrom

19991999 2.19 ---2000 3.68 68%2001 4.00 83%2002 2.95 35%2003 4.88 123%2004 5.46 149%2005 7.33 235%2006 6.39 192%

2007 6.25 185%2008 7.97 264%2009 3.67 68%2010 4.48 105%2011 3.95 80%

2012(Sept.) 2.71 24%


4/16


Pa e4of16

TCAPselectivelychose1999asastartingpointbecausenaturalgasandelectricitypriceswereverylow.ThisallowsTCAPtopre-engineeritsfindingstosupportitsanti-competitiveagenda.ManycomparisonsthatTCAPprovidesarebasedonpriceincreasessince1999,thelast

yearofsustained,lownaturalgaspricesthathaslittlecorrelationwiththecommodityduringthe2000s.Infact,Texas'annualstatewideaveragepricein1999wasthelowestofanyofthepast20years.Moreover,TCAPsstartingpointforitssubsequentanalysisconspicuouslyavoidsthereality,orevenmentionof,thevolatileswingsinnaturalgaspricesbeginninginlate2000orthemassiveinfrastructureinvestmentrequiredtosupportTexaseconomicgrowth.Regardingthetimingofwhencompetitionbegan,therelevantdateisNOTwhentherestructuringlaw(SB7)waspassed.Instead,themorerelevantdateiswhenthelawwaseffectiveandimplementedforretailpricing.

Retailpowerpriceswerestillfullyregulatedin1999,2000,and2001.Atthetime,utilitieswereauthorizedtoadjustthefuelcomponentoftheirpricestwiceperyear.But,theywererequiredtofilespecialexceptionstoadjustpricesmorefrequentlytorecovertheincreasedcostfornaturalgas.TCAPsanalysisofthecompetitivemarketcapturesincreasedpricesresultingfromincreasedwholesalepowerprices,whichwerefueledbyrisingnaturalgascoststhatoccurredinastill-regulatedmarket.ThetransitiontocompetitionforresidentialcustomersstartedinJanuary2002.Any

comparisonofpricespriortothestartofcompetitionshoulduselate2001asastartingpoint.Thetransitiontocompetitionwascompletedin2007withtheexpirationofthemandatoryPricetoBeat,whichwasapricingmechanismapprovedbythePUCthateachREPformerlyaffiliatedwiththeregionstransmissionanddistributionutilitywasrequiredtooffer.Inessence,thePricetoBeatwasaregulatedpriceinthemarketplace.


5/16


Pa e5of16

1.3TCAPOftenReliesonEIAStatewideDataforItsComparisonsStatewideEIAdataisnotindicativeofpricinginthecompetitiveregionsofTexas,whichareasubsetofthestate.StatewideEIAdatasimplyandonlyreflectstheretailrevenueratesacrossthevariousmarketmodels,i.e.competitive,regulated,municipaland

cooperative,andwholesalepowermarketsincludedwithinourstatesborders.StatewideEIApricedataissimplyasumofrevenuesdividedbysalesvolumesacrosstheentirestate.Asshownbelow,thecompetitiveareasofTexasdonotcomprisetheentiretyofthestateinfact,competitiveretailelectricproviders(REPs)servejustover60percentoftheresidentialloadinTexas.

CompetitiveAreasofTexas

EIAsapproachisnotanunreasonablewaytostudyregulatedmarketswhereallcustomerspayessentiallythesamerate.But,itisneverrepresentativeofcurrentpricesintheERCOTcompetitivemarketorcurrentmarketconditions.TheEIAelectricpricedatareflectshistoricprices,nottheoffersavailableinadynamic,competitivemarketthatfrequentlychangeandwherecustomerscanchooseoffersandproductsthatsuittheirspecificneeds.

1.4TCAPDoesNotTakeIntoAccountOffersAvailableinCompetitiveAreasItsrelativelyeasytosurveypricesinregulatedareaswhereeveryonepaysthesamerate.Toassessacompetitivemarket,however,theanalysismustbebuiltontheobservableofferpricesavailabletocustomers.In,Texas,thoseoffersareeasilyfoundat

www.PowertoChoose.org,thePUCselectricchoicewebsite.Thepricethatcustomerspayforelectricityinacompetitivemarketistheresultofnumerousindividualdecisionsbasedonavarietyofindividualpreferences.Tryingtodistillthatdistributionofchoicesdowntoasingleaveragenumbertellsuslittle.Webelievetheoffersavailableinthecompetitivemarketandchangesinofferpricesprovidethemosteffectivesnapshotofitsperformance.


6/16


Pa e6of16

1.5TCAPDoesNotAccountFor,OrEvenEvaluate,StructuralDifferencesBetweenCompetitiveandNon-CompetitiveAreasofTexasTCAPusessomedataintheirreportwhichpurportstoreviewthepricesoftwogroupsareasofTexaswithderegulationandareasoutsidederegulation.Wepresumetheyare

tryingtodrawadistinctionbetweencompetitiveretailareasofTexasandotherareaswhichareservedbyamixofmunicipalutilities,co-ops,andintegratedutilitiesoutsidetheERCOTregion(i.e.,non-competitiveareas).However,therearesignificantissueswiththiskindofgeneralizedanalysis.Forinstance,thedataTCAPutilizesfromEIAisquitelaggedandtheseotherentitiesdonotallowtheircustomerstochoosetheoffersandprovidersthatbestmeettheir needs. Also, the approach does not make an apples-to-apples comparison due tostructuraldifferencesamongthevariousprovidersasdiscussedfurtherbelow.IntegratedutilitiesoutsideERCOTparticipateindifferentwholesalemarketswherethefuelmixforgenerationismoredependantuponcoal.ThesealsotendtobelowergrowthareasthantheERCOTregionsolowerinvestmentisrequiredtomaintainreliableelectricsupply.

Additionally, there is an inherent regulatory lag in these areas which results in sloweradjustmentstomarketconditionsvis--vistheERCOTregion.Whensummedtogether,theseareas are not a good comparison to competitive areas nor are they a proxy to whatcompetitiveareasofthestatewouldhavedoneoutsideindustryrestructuring.Themunicipalproviders(munis)andco-opswithinTexasareanothergroupthatcannotbeeasilycomparedtothecompetitivemarket.

Some munis and co-ops have a different generation mix with more emphasis oncoal.Similarly,someoftheseentitiessecuredlong-termsupplyarrangementswithbaseloadcoalandnuclearplantsatpricesbelowcurrentmarket

Co-ops can be eligible for federal USDA Rural Utility Service programs, such asgrantsandsubsidizedlowornointerestloanswithgenerousprincipalrepaymentdeferralterms.

Manymunisand co-ops are exempt from propertytaxes, sales taxes and severalregulatorycostslikeSystemBenefitFundandfranchisefees.Theyarealsonotforprofitentities.

Munishold a preferential city zoning approvalpositionand the abilitytobenefitfrom cross-subsidies by sharing facilities, services and personnel with other citydepartments.

Munis andco-ops maybenefit from generation contractsfromothergovernmentandnon-profitentities,whichalsobenefitfromthesamefinancialandregulatoryprivilegesasmunisandco-opsthatdistributepower.

Munis and co-ops have captive customer bases. This allows them to enter intolong-termhedgingcontractswhiletheircustomersholdassociatedrisks.Theycanalsoprovidesubsidiesamongthecustomerclassesif desiredandreduceservicingcostsastheydeemappropriate.


7/16


Pa e7of16

Intruth,therangeofpricesinareasofTexasthatnowhaveretailcompetitionandthosethatdonotwasverybroadpriortoelectricrestructuring.Today,andoverthepastseveralyears,surveysshowthatcompetitivepricesinTexascomparefavorablytonon-competitiveareas.

Simplyput,samplesofTexasnon-competitiveareasrevealthatseveralhavepricesconsistentwithorhigherthanthoseavailableinthecompetitivemarket.AreviewofthePUCsPowertoChoosewebsitehelpscustomersassesstheircompetitivepricingoptions.Today,someofthelowestpricesinTexasareavailableincompetitiveareasandtheaverageTexascompetitiveofferpriceisnearly2/kWhbelowthelatestTexasstateaveragepriceavailablefromTCAPsdatasource(EIA).ItmustberememberedthatEIAdataisneverrepresentativeofcurrentpricesintheERCOTcompetitivemarketorcurrentmarketconditions.TheEIAelectricpricedatareflectshistoricprices,nottheoffersavailableinadynamic,competitivemarketthatfrequentlychangeandwherecustomerscanchooseoffersandproductsthatsuittheirspecificneeds.

1.6TCAPMistakesStateBoundariesforPowerMarketBoundariesWhile85percentofTexasloadisservedbyERCOT,nearlyeveryotherelectricgridindependentsystemoperator(ISO)coversallorportionsofmultiplestates.Forexample,theWesternElectricityCoordinatingCouncil(WECC)gridrunsfromwestofElPasotoCaliforniaandnorthtoBritishColumbia.Somestates,likeLouisianaarepartofmorethanoneelectricgrid,whichincludesallorpartofoveradozenSoutheasternandMidwesternstates.Thiscomplexityamongmulti-stateISOsaffectshowyouassesselectricpricesandespeciallythefuelmix.WhileLouisianaprovidesalotofnaturalgasgeneration,coalisthepredominantfuelsourceinboththeSERCReliabilityCorporationandtheSouthwestPowerPool(SPP),whichcoverthestate.OklahomaisalsoamemberoftheSouthwestPowerPool(SPP)andsharesitsfuelmix.


8/16


Pa e8of16

Regions Outside Texas Part of Larger, Multi-State Grids

Regions That Include Adjacent StatesFar Less Dependent on Natural Gas

Sources: ERCOT, 2011 data; US Average, EIA, 2010 data

(ERCOT)


9/16


Pa e9of16

1.7TCAPIgnoresOtherBenefitsofChoiceintheCompetitiveMarketWithdozensofREPscompetingforresidentialbusiness,theERCOTmarkethasawiderangeofproductsincludingrenewablesourcesofenergy,varyinglengthsofagreements,andotherproductswhichallowacustomergreatercontroloftheirusage.

Inaddition,thecompetitivemarkethasencouragedtheadoptionofrenewablegenerationespeciallywindanditiswell-positionedforcustomerstobenefitfromREPsprovidingproductsthatusethesmartgrid.CustomersinERCOThavefullyembracedthegoalsofcompetitivemarket:thefreedomtochoosecompetitivelypricedproductsandservicesthatbestsuittheirneedsratherthanone-size-fits-allsolutionsofstrictlyregulatedmarkets.

1.8TCAPFailstoConsidertheImpactofNewInvestmenttoMeetPopulationandEconomicGrowthTexasisafast-growingstate.Itleadsthenationinnewresidentsandeconomicdevelopmentbothofwhichrequireelectricity.GeneratorsinTexashaveinvestedover$40billioninthestatesince1999tobuildnewelectricgeneratingfacilities.ManyofTexasoldergenerationplantshavebeenreplacedwithcleanergeneration,whileretrofittingothersensuretheyexceedstateandnationalclean-airrequirements.RetailelectricprovidershavealsoinvestedincustomersystemsandmarketingchannelstomeettheneedsofTexasconsumers.Privateinvestors,notratepayers,haveassumedtherisksofthesemassivegenerationandretailinvestments.Thatprotectscustomersfromrisksassociatedwiththeseprojects(e.g.costoverrunsoroutdatedtechnologies).Similarly,

utilitieshaveinvestedheavilytokeepupwithrisingelectricdemand.TCAPsanalysisdoesnottaketheseinvestmentsintoaccount.

SummaryTCAPsanalysisisdeeplyflawedinthewayitdepictspricesinthecompetitiveTexaselectricitymarket.Thefactis,inamarketwhereconsumershavechoiceandcontrol,aquickreviewofPowertoChoose.orgdemonstratesthattherearenumerouspricesavailabletodaythatarelowerthanthelastregulatedrates.Moreimportantly,consumerscanchoosetheprovider,theplanandthepricethatbestmeetstheirindividualneeds.

Therealpromiseofcompetitionprovidesconsumersachoiceofcompetitivelypricedelectricityandunlocksinnovationofproductsandservices.Thatpromisehasbeen,andcontinuestobe,kepteveryday.


10/16


Pa e10of16

Section2:NotesonTCAPSummaryStatementsinTheStoryofERCOT(page10)TCAP:TexansinderegulatedareasconsistentlyhavepaidmoreforpowerthanTexansoutsidederegulation.(Page2)AECTComments:

ThestatementbyTCAPdoesnotaccountfortheeffectofnaturalgasonelectricityprices.(see1.1)

TCAPhaschosenabaselineyearof1999thatisnotreflectiveofthemarket,andisusedtopre-engineerTCAPsfindings.(see1.2)

StatewideEIAdataisnotindicativeofpricinginthecompetitiveregions,failingtoreflectthedynamicchangesinthecompetitivemarket.(see1.3)

TCAPdoesnottakeintoaccounttheoffersavailableincompetitiveareas,which

provideamoreaccuratepictureofmarketperformance.(see1.4) Wholesalepowermarketsdontfollowstateboundaries.Anditsthegenerationfuel

mixthatcanbeaccessedviapowermarkets,notthegenerationfuelwithinastatesboundaries,thatisrelevanthere.(see1.6)

******

TCAP:Hadresidentialpriceskepttothenationalaverageafterderegulation,Texanswouldhavesavedmorethan$10billion.(Page3)AECTComments:

Giventhatthepredominantfuelforgeneratingelectricityintherestofthenationis

coal,itismisleadingtocalculatesavingsbasedontheassumptionthattherewasanypossiblewayTexascouldhavehadpricesequaltothenationalaverageduringthepast9yearsofvolatilegasprices.(see1.1)

TCAPreliesentirelyEIAstatewidedata,whichisnotindicativeofthecompetitivemarketandignorespricesavailableinthecompetitivemarketforitscomparisons.(see1.3and1.4)

TCAPignorestheotherbenefitsofchoiceinthecompetitivemarket,aswellthebenefitofinvestmentinnewinfrastructuretomeetgrowthneeds.(see1.7and1.8)


11/16


Pa e11of16

TCAP:Residentialelectricitypricesremainedconsistentlybelowthenationalaveragebeforetheretailelectricderegulationlaw,andconsistentlyabovethenationalaverageafterderegulation.(Page3)AECTComments:

TCAPdiscountstheeffectofnaturalgasonelectricityprices.(see1.1) StatewideEIAdataisnotindicativeofpricinginthecompetitiveregions,failingto

reflectthedynamicchangesinthecompetitivemarket.(see1.3)

******

TCAP:TexasLeadsMostDeregulatedStatesforPriceIncreasesforPriceIncreases,1999-2012.(Page6)AECTComments:

ThestatementbyTCAPdoesnotaccountfortheeffectofnaturalgasonelectricity

prices.(see1.1) TCAPhaschosenabaselineyearof1999thatisnotreflectiveofthemarket,andis

usedtopre-engineerTCAPsfindings.(see1.2) StatewideEIAdataisnotindicativeofpricinginthecompetitiveregions,failingto

reflectthedynamicchangesinthecompetitivemarket.(see1.3) TCAPdoesnottakeintoaccounttheoffersavailableincompetitiveareas,which

provideamoreaccuratepictureofmarketperformance.(see1.4)

Wholesalepowermarketsdontfollowstateboundaries.Anditsthegenerationfuelmixthatcanbeaccessedviapowermarkets,notthegenerationfuelwithinastates

boundaries,thatisrelevanthere.(see1.6) TCAPfailstoconsidertheimpactofnewinvestmentinTexastomeetpopulation

andeconomicgrowth,especiallycomparedtonearbystateswithlesspowerfuleconomies.(see1.8)


12/16


Pa e12of16

Section3:NotesonTCAPChartsinDeregulatedElectricityinTexas:AHistoryofRetailCompetition Note:TCAPincludesseveralotherchartsthatusethesamedatainsimilarways.

AECTComments:

ThestatementbyTCAPdiscountstheeffectofnaturalgasonelectricityprices.(see1.1)



TCAPdoesnottakeintoaccounttheoffersavailableincompetitiveareas,whichprovideamoreaccuratepictureofmarketperformance.(see1.4)

Wholesalepowermarketsdontfollowstateboundaries.Anditsthegenerationfuelmixwithinthosewholesalepowermarkets,notthegenerationfuelwithinastatesboundaries,thatisrelevanthere.(see1.6)

TCAPfailstoconsidertheimpactofnewgenerationinTexastomeetpopulationandeconomicgrowth,especiallycomparedtonearbystateswithlesspowerfuleconomies.(see1.8)

TCAPPa e6


13/16


Pa e13of16

AECTComments:

TCAPdiscountstheeffectofnaturalgasonelectricityprices.(see1.1)


StatewideEIAdataisnotindicativeofpricinginthecompetitiveregions,failingto

reflectthedynamicchangesinthecompetitivemarket.(see1.3)


TCAPsdataendsin2009whichisverymisleading;2010hasseenarapiddecreaseinelectricpricesofferedinthecompetitivemarket.Also,anddespitethelimitationsofTCAPsdatasource,eventhatclearlyshowsthatTexasaveragepricesarenowbelowtheUSaverage.

TCAPhasalsochosentousearangeof6/kWhto14/kWhtoexaggeratethesteepnessoftheslope.

TCAPPage14


14/16


Pa e14of16

AECTComments:





TCAPPa e26


15/16


Pa e15of16

AECTComments:


TCAPoftencitesLouisianabecauseitstheonlystateadjacenttoTexasthathasalargepercentageofnaturalgasgeneration.However,mostofLouisianaispartofSERCandSPP,multi-stateelectricgridsthataredependentoncoal.

Further,Louisianahasseenlittlepopulationgrowthandlittleinvestmentinnewindustry,whereasTXhasseenbillionsofdollarsinprivateinvestmentthathashelpedenableoureconomytogrow.(see1.8)

TCAPPa e42


16/16


Pa e16of16

AECTComments:



TCAPdoesnottakeintoaccountstructuraldifferencesbetweencompetitiveandnon-competitiveareassuchasgenerationfuelmix,supplyagreements,investmentrequirements,cross-subsidies,taxes,andcompetitivemarketdynamics.(see1.5)

TCAPignoresthebenefitsofcompetitioninthemarket,includingtheabilityofconsumerstochooseproductsthatmeetindividualneeds,aswellaspromotionof

renewablegeneration,smartmetersandotherinnovations.(see1.7) TCAPfailstoconsidertheimpactofnewgenerationinTexastomeetpopulationand

economicgrowth,especiallycomparedtonearbystateswithlesspowerfuleconomies.(see1.8)

TCAPPa e60

AECT comments on the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power’s views on electric prices in the...

Documents

Transcript of AECT comments on the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power’s views on electric prices in the...