Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS...

17
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05- 06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and A. Streun Paul Scherrer Institut

description

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Swiss Light Source Swiss Light Source: – 3 rd generation light source – 18(+2) beamlines – 2.4 GeV, 400 mA (top-up) – 12 TBA cells –  x = nm – C~288 m SLS

Transcript of Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS...

Page 1: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Recent optics measurements at SLS

M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and A. Streun

Paul Scherrer Institut

Page 2: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Contents

• SLS• “Local” LOCO• Emittance monitor status• Energy spread measurement using TBT data• Summary

Page 3: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Swiss Light Source

Swiss Light Source: – 3rd generation light source– 18(+2) beamlines– 2.4 GeV, 400 mA (top-up)– 12 TBA cells– ex= 5.5-7.5 nm– C~288 m

SLS

Page 4: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

“Local” LOCO (1)• Motivation

– LOCO* optics correction did not converge for bV-beat<~2% at SLS**

0 1 2 3 40.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Number of iterations

Ver. o

rbitr

espo

nse d

eviat

ion,rm

s (m/

rad)

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ver. beta-beat,rms (%)

0 1 2 3 40.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.160 1 2 3 4

Number of iterations

Hor. o

rbitr

espo

nse d

eviat

ion,rm

s (m/

rad)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Hor. beta-beat,rms (%)

|ORM_meas – ORM_fit|After partial LOCO fit (BPMs & Correctors)

|Meas. ORM – Model ORM|After full LOCO fit (BPMs, Correctors & Quads)

b-beat from fit model

ORM difference after BPM&corrector fit/calibration (black plots) - Should be comparable to the measurement noise level (0.01 m/rad) after iteration - Should fluctuate within the measurement noise level after a couple of iterations - Should be close to ORM difference with full LOCO fit (red plot) There is something wrong especially in the vertical plane…?

Method to probe the ring optics “locally” may give a better insight. * J. Safranek, NIM-A, 388, p.27 (1997)** M. Aiba et al., PRST-AB, 16, 012806 (2013)

Page 5: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

“Local” LOCO (2)• Local orbit response matrix

measurement– Keep orbit feedback running except for

the section under measurement – Measure orbit response as in LOCO for

the correctors in the measurement section

– Statistical measurement error ~0.02 m/rad in the vertical plane (cf. full ORM ~0.01 m/rad)

– Larger error in the horizontal (dispersive) plane, not fully understood

Local orbit response matrix example(V correctors #19-#31 out of #1-#73)

- Local response matrix measurement is established- Quadrupole errors outside the measurement section are transparent

Page 6: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

“Local” LOCO (3)• First results (using only vertical data):

Sect. 4-5, ORM meas. vs ORM fit model (unsuccessful case)

Sect.2-3 Sect.3-4 Sect.4-5 Sect.6-7RMS residual before/after LOCO fit|ORM_meas - ORM_fit| (m/rad) 0.0207/0.0099 0.0312/0.0267 0.0494/0.0439 0.0264/0.0145Average quad change, <|dK|> (m^-2) 0.0020 0.0066 0.0071 0.0044

Page 7: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

“Local” LOCO (4)

• Comparison – LOCO and Local LOCO

It seems that there is something wrong around Sector 4-5!

Quad corrections from fit

0 50 100 150 200 250-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0.00

0.01

0.02

Full LOCO Sect. 2-3 Sect. 3-4 Sect. 4-5 Sect. 6-7

dK (m

^-2)

s (m)

Page 8: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

“Local” LOCO (5)

Straight section 5 accommodates Femto beamline…– With wiggler, chicane, additional quads…– With additional p phase advance and irregular optics

SLS optics

Page 9: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Emittance monitor status (1)• Vertical emittance monitors at SLS

– Synchrotron radiation -> Vertical beam size -> ey

– Monitor #1* used for achieving ey =0.9 pm** (sy ~3.6 mm) reaching the resolution limit

* A. Andersson et al., NIM-A 591, p.437 (2008)** M. Aiba et al., NIM-A 694, p.133 (2012)

Hill-Valley ratio → Beam size

Page 10: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Emittance monitor status (2)– Monitor #2 development*

• Longer arm to improve the resolution (+ optical table accessible even during operation)• Plan A: Toroidal mirror optics → l independent Plan B: Lens optics (as in Monitor #1)• Interferometric method is also implemented

- Plan A: small image aberrations from toroid misalignment- Plan B: clean images, so far ey =1.3 pm** (sy ~4.3 mm) measured - Another vertical emittance tuning campaign is foreseen with Plan B

* Work supported by TIARA WP6 TIARA-REP-WP6-2012-015** Á. Saá Hernández et al., ICFA Newsletter 62 (2013)

Page 11: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Energy spread measurement (1)• Energy spread measurement using TBT data*

– Procedure• Merge TBT data from all BPMs• Fit (locally) sine function to data to find the envelope of the betatron oscillation• Fit theoretical formula** to the envelope

→ Energy spread corresponds to one of fitting parameters * D. Mayilyan, Master thesis, ETH Zurich (2014)** A. Sargsyan, NIM-A, 638, p.15 (2011)

Page 12: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Energy spread measurement (2)

Sine fit,single BPM

Sine fit,all BPMs

Envelop fit (a good example)

Fixed parameters(measured separately):- 1st order chromaticity, x1 Fitting parameters:- Energy spread- Amp. dependent tune shift(s) - 2nd order chromaticity- Synchrotron tune- Kick amplitude

Energy spread…?

x1 =3,5,7Pinger= 100, 300, 700 A

Page 13: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Summary• “Local” LOCO

– Method to probe the ring optics locally under development– First results indicate that Sector 4-5 could be a source that

prevents LOCO from converging • Vertical emittance monitor #2 R&D is on-going

– Difficulties with Toroidal mirror…– Another ey tuning campaign is foreseen with Monitor #2 (Plan

B)• Energy spread measurement attempted

– Using TBT data– Measured values depend on chromaticity and kick amplitude…

Page 14: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Back up slides

Page 15: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Local orbit response matrix analysis (1)

• Procedure– BPM calibrations from normal LOCO– Momentum deviation found from non-

measurement section BPMs (not important for vertical plane)

– Corrector calibrations found from Local response matrix

– Find best quadrupole setting (corrections) by fitting (SVD)

Page 16: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

• BPM and corrector calibration for Sector 2-3

Local orbit response matrix analysis (2)

Page 17: Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Bge, . Sa Hernndez, D. Mayilyan and.

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, 05-06.02.2015 Masamitsu Aiba, PSI

Local orbit response matrix analysis (3)

• Momentum deviation– Momentum is slightly

varied when the measurement corrector is in a dispersive section

– Momentum correction (1 Hz) is independent, and there can be residual momentum deviation at the time of measurement

– Local orbit response data is corrected by finding momentum deviation using the non-measurement BPMs

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

Horizontal LORM Dispersion term fit

LOR

M (m

/rad)

BPM ID

Momentum deviation fir forSector 2-3 (BPM 7-18)