Adjuvant therapies for RCC Dr. Camillo Porta S.C. di Oncologia Medica I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San...
-
Upload
willa-wheeler -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Adjuvant therapies for RCC Dr. Camillo Porta S.C. di Oncologia Medica I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San...
Adjuvant therapies for RCC
Dr. Camillo PortaS.C. di Oncologia MedicaI.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Back to the basics:terminology
• Adjuvant therapy:– additional cancer treatment given after the
primary treatment to lower the risk that the cancer will come back
NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms
The natural history of RCC
• Presentation at diagnosis1:– 45% with localized disease– 25% with locally advanced disease– 20–30% metastatic disease
• 33% of patients treated for localized disease will develop metastatic disease2
1. National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer statistics fact sheet: cancer of the kidney and renal pelvis. Accessed 2009;2. Flanigan RC et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2003;4:385–90.
Completed RCTs of adjuvant TxClosed adjuvant trials N Author (year) Outcome of the study
RT vs. observation 72 Kjaer (1987) negative
MPA vs. observation 136 Pizzocaro (1987) negative
Aut. tumor vaccine + BCG vs. observation 43 Adler (1987) negative
Aut. tumor vaccine ± BCG vs. observation 120 Galligioni (1996) negative
UFT vs. observation 71 Naito (1997) negative
IFN- vs. observation 247 Pizzocaro (2001) negative
IFN- NL vs. observation 283 Messing (2003) negative
HD IL-2 vs. observation 69 Clark (2003) negative
Autologous tumor vaccine vs. observation 553 Jocham (2004) positive in terms of PFS (p=0.02)
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- + 5-FU vs. observation 203 Atzpodien (2005) negative
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- vs. observation 310 Passalacqua (2007) negative
Aut. tumour-derived HSP-96-peptide complexvs. observation
918 Wood C (2008) negative
Thalidomide vs. observation 46* Margulis (2009) negative*trial stopped due to inefficacy
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- + 5-FU vs. observation 550 Aitchinson (2012) negative
Girentuximab (anti-CAIX MoAb) vs. observation
856 Belldegrun (2013) negative
Completed RCTs of adjuvant TxClosed adjuvant trials N Author (year) Outcome of the study
RT vs. observation 72 Kjaer (1987) negative
MPA vs. observation 136 Pizzocaro (1987) negative
Aut. tumor vaccine + BCG vs. observation 43 Adler (1987) negative
Aut. tumor vaccine ± BCG vs. observation 120 Galligioni (1996) negative
UFT vs. observation 71 Naito (1997) negative
IFN- vs. observation 247 Pizzocaro (2001) negative
IFN- NL vs. observation 283 Messing (2003) negative
HD IL-2 vs. observation 69 Clark (2003) negative
Autologous tumor vaccine vs. observation 553 Jocham (2004) positive in terms of PFS (p=0.02)
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- + 5-FU vs. observation 203 Atzpodien (2005) negative
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- vs. observation 310 Passalacqua (2007) negative
Aut. tumour-derived HSP-96-peptide complexvs. observation
918 Wood C (2008) negative
Thalidomide vs. observation 46* Margulis (2009) negative*trial stopped due to inefficacy
s.c. IL-2 + IFN- + 5-FU vs. observation 550 Aitchinson (2012) negative
Girentuximab (anti-CAIX MoAb) vs. observation
856 Belldegrun (2013) negative
Meta-analysis of RCTsof adjuvant Tx
Massari F, et al. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2013 (E-pub ahead of print)
Ongoing RCTs oftargeted agents as adjuvant Tx
Ongoing adjuvant trials
SORCE (MRC/EORTC)Sorafenib 1 year (+ 2 years placebo) vs. Sorafenib 3 years vs. placebo 3 years
1656 Leibovich score of 3 to 8.Primary end-point: DFS
Closed at enrolment;no data available yet
ASSURE (ECOG)Sunitinib 1 year vs. Sorafenib 1 year vs. placebo 1 year
1923 T3b-4 N0, T1-4 N+, or T1-4 with positive margins or
vascular invasion)Primary end-point: DFS
Closed at enrolment;no data available yet
S-TRAC (Pfizer)Sunitinib 1 year vs. placebo 1 year
856 High risk according to UISS.Primary end-point: DFS
Closed at enrolment;no data available yet
EVEREST (SWOG)Everolimus vs. placebo (days 1-42; treatment repeats every 6 weeks for 9 courses)
1218 Pathologically intermediate high-risk or very high-risk.
Primary end-point: DFS
Not yet enrolling(US only)
VEG113387 PROTECT study (GSK)Pazopanib 1 year vs. placebo 1 year
1500 Intermediate and high risk.Primary end-point: DFS
Closed at enrolment;no data available yet
NCT01599754 (SFJ Pharmaceuticals)Axitinib 3 yeas vs. placebo 3 years
592 pT2 or higher, pNx pN0 or pN1, M0, Fuhrman G3-4 and
ECOG PS 0-1Primary end-point: DFS
Enrolling(Japan only)
What theoretically hampersthe adjuvant use of antiangiogenics?
Adjuvant Tx for RCC:conclusions
• To date, no treatment emerged as a standard of care in this setting
• Presently, patients should be thus offered just obser-vation
• Enrollment into well-desigend and adequately con-ducted RCTs is mandatory
Thank You for Your kind attention!!!