Achieving Total Employee Engagement
-
Upload
thiago-h-dos-santos -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Achieving Total Employee Engagement
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
1/34
Raytheon Employee Engagementin Energy Conservation
Department of EnergyAugust 5, 2010
Steve FugarazzoRaytheon Company
Enterprise Energy Team
Copyright 2007 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved.
Customer Success Is Our Mission is a trademark of Raytheon Company.
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
2/34
Page 28/9/2010
Presentation Overview
Company Background
Communication & Outreach Initiatives Internal Partnerships
Energy Champions
Energy Citizens Energy Awareness Events & Contests
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
3/34
Page 38/9/2010
Raytheon What We Do
Raytheon is a global
technology company that
provides innovative solutions
to customers in 80 nations.
Through strategic vision, disciplined
management and world-class talent,Raytheon is delivering operational
advantages for customers every day
while helping them prepare for the
missions of tomorrow.
Supporting approximately 14,000 contracts
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
4/34
Page 48/9/2010
Raytheon Business Headquarters
Tucson, AZ
Missile Systems
Network CentricSystems
McKinney, TX
Raytheon Technical
Services Company LLC
Reston, VA
Tewksbury, MA
IntegratedDefense Systems
Global Headquarters
Waltham, MA
Space andAi rborne Systems
El Segundo, CA
75,000 employees worldwide, 2009 revenue $25B
Intelligence andInformation Systems
Garland, TX
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
5/34
Page 58/9/2010
Energy and Raytheon Sustainability
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
6/34Page 68/9/2010
What Energy Is To Us
~90% of our carbon footprint
Necessary to do business
Expensive! Estimated $120M in 2009 and rising
Finite resource Most energy from fossil fuels
A Corporate/Social responsibility to conserve it
Eliminate unnecessary waste
Reduce our environmental footprint
Energy Conservation for Sustainable Growth
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
7/34Page 78/9/2010
Why Focus on Employees?
Raytheon has a long history of energy efficiency efforts
Dating back to 1970s Recognized by U.S. Energy and Commerce Depts.
J UICE Poster Campaign
Main focus in 80s and 90s on infrastructure efficiency opportunities
More focus on untapped potential with employees in recent years Analysis of off-hour consumption showed room for improvement
Off-hour audits confirmed lots of waste happening
Employees were not motivated enough to save energy at work Employees much more apt to practice conservation at home
Use ENERGY STAR Work and Home theme to reach employees
Utilize ENERGY STAR recognition to engage top down support
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
8/34Page 88/9/2010
Whats The Best Approach?
One approach used in 1970s
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
9/34Page 98/9/2010
Softer Approach May Work Better
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
10/34Page 108/9/2010
Information Technology Green IT
Raytheon recognized with InfoWorld Green 15 award
Named one of Uptime Institutes 2009 "Global Green 100
Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS)
Earth Day events, employee contests
Human Resources
New Employee Orientations
Online Energy Training
Manufacturing
Engineering
Business Development
Partnerships with Internal Stakeholders
mailto:[email protected] -
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
11/34Page 118/9/2010
Critical Step: Develop a Network
Established network of Energy Champions
Anyone who sets a good example for others
Promotes energy conservation and efficiency
every day The responsibility of the Energy Champion is
to:
Instill a culture of energy conservation within their
respective workspaces with each occupant andwith every piece of equipment.
Develop conservation strategies specific to theirwork areas.
Identify and implement Energy Conservation
Measures (ECMs)
Assure there is no backsliding Savings must bemaintained.
Share progress, lessons learned, and innovative
energy practices with other team members.
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
12/34Page 128/9/2010
Recruit & Recognize Energy Champions
Your
PhotoHere
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
13/34Page 138/9/2010
Energy Citizen Background & History
2007 Energy Citizens program piloted at IDS 18 work & home questions 10% of IDS employees qualified from J uly-Dec 2007
2008 Energy Citizens Company Wide 18 questions developed through collaborative effort of Enterprise
Energy Team (EET) 29% of all Raytheon employees were qualified
2009 Energy Citizens Company Wide New and improved set of questions (14), including popups
w/hotlinks for employees to learn more 44% of all Raytheon employees were qualified
2010 Energy Citizens Company Wide Learning tool instead of quiz, fun and interactive Goal is 50% of Raytheon employees
At 33% through May
2011 and Future Plans: Considering other tools to engage employees
Raytheon Sustainability tool (Groom Energy/Proactively Green)
Include Energy Citizens as part of Sustainability Challenge
Ultimate vision is 100% or Total Employee Engagement
http://homenet.ray.com/rfac/energy/energyindex.html -
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
14/34Page 148/9/2010
Raytheon 2010 Energy Citizens (through May)
Expect to exceed 50% goal for 2010
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
15/34Page 158/9/2010
Earth Day Awareness Activities
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
16/34Page 168/9/2010
Energy Awareness Month
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
17/34Page 178/9/2010
Other Awareness Activities
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
18/34
Questions ????
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
19/34
AchievingTotalEmployee
EngagementinEnergyEfficiency BestPracticeProcessDevelopment
MaryAliceKurtzGeneral
Motors
WorldwideFacilitiesGroupAugust5,2010
ECEnergy&CarbonOptimizationTeam
https://gmweb.gm.com/manufacturing/wfg_ee_ECO/Team_Site/pics/GM%20Logo.png -
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
20/34
GlobalBestPracticeProcess
Common database system for capturing, sharing
and tracking implementation of Best Practices.
Global, Regional and Plant level implementation of
Best Practices are tracked across all GM Centers(i.e. Paint, GA, Body, Quality, Maintenance, Energy, Facilities, etc) .
Goal: Quick sharing &
implementation of Best Practices
with the intent to maximize Waste
Reduction Globally.
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
21/34
CriticalStepsinDevelopinga successfulBestPracticeprocess
Protocol that provides a framework for the
development, sharing and monitoring implementation
Leadership engagement within that structure is
imperative to drive performance and provide focus
Common database system for capturing, sharing
and tracking implementation of Best Practices
Automated notification to users of new best practices,
as they are approved, supports efficient and quickimplementation
Layered audit process to ensure implementation and
maximizing impact of identified opportunities
Training to ensure consistent implementation and
accommodate changes in personnel and within theorganization
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
22/34
GMGlobalBestPracticeProcess Process
andSystemDatabasefacilitatequickimplementation
Best Practice Ideas implemented prior to submittal
Proven implementation and operation
Meets financial criteria for necessary payback
Preliminary analysis / engineering developed
Database System is flexible, quickly manipulated for filtering
of data and reporting implementation status
Focus of Process is kept simple:
Best Practice Ideas submitted by Plant Championsthrough the Account Meeting Structure; approved in overall
Account Champion Meetings
Savings captured for ongoing prioritization of
implementation across Region BPs shared Globally to maximize reduction of waste
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
23/34
DrivingForoneConsolidatedProcess.
5
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
24/34
AccountCouncilReviewStructure
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
25/34
ConsolidatedMeetingStructure
7
Foreachfinancialaccount.AccountCouncil
SectorCouncils
PlantCouncils
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
26/34
BestPracticeProcessIntegrationintothe
Account
Reporting
Structure
Sector:
SharingamongPlantChampions&drivefull
developmentofBestPractices
DriveImprovedImplementationStatus
AccountChampion: AccountImplementationStatusReview
Buy
In
&
Approval
for
Implementation
of
newBestPractices
Plant:
Innovation&ImplementationofRegion&
Global
Best
Practices AccountRevieww/PlantManager
S bj M E i
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
27/34
SubjectMatterExpertise CriticalSupportinBestPracticeDevelopment
9
ProvidetechnicalexpertiseandanalysistosupportBestPractice
developmentas
requested
ProvidesupportindevelopmentofBestPracticesforGlobalSharing
SupportCostCouncilinassessmentofGloballySharedBestPracticesforpotentialRegionalimplementation
ProvidetechnicalexpertiseandanalysistosupportBestPractice
developmentas
requested
ProvidesupportindevelopmentofBestPracticesforGlobalSharing
SupportCostCouncilinassessmentofGloballySharedBestPracticesforpotentialRegionalimplementation
B t P ti I l t ti St t
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
28/34
BestPracticeImplementationStatusReportTemplates
10
Jul-09 Global BuGM Report for Energy & Utilities
9
AP
GMAP 9 Plants * BuGM Count 684
97% 97% 97% 87% 97% 93% 96% 97% 7% 86%
Total Not Applicable 12% 12% 11% 29% 13% 20% 30% 13% 1% 16%
Globally Approved BuGms 76 86% 86% 87% 58% 84% 74% 66% 84% 5% 70%
65 65 66 44 64 56 50 64 4 478
Shop Status BuGMnr. Description IN/AD/AI/NA2 Bupyeong1
SouthKorea(A)
Bupyeong2
SouthKorea(A)
Changwon
S.Korea(SuzukiSAICCC)(A/M)
ElizabethAustralia(A/M)
Gunsan
S.
Korea(SuzukiSAICCC)(A/M)
HalolIndia(A)
HanoiVietnam(
SuzukiSAICCC)(A)
RayongThailand(A)
TalegaonIndia
Energy and Util Globally Appr 19747 Energy Saving_Long Shutdow Adopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Not Applicable (NA)
19746 Reschedule_on_off_AirConditi Adopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Not Applicable (NA) 1 1 225288 energy saving by limited acce Adopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 4
Not Applicable (NA) 1 1 1 1 1 5
19514 Iiiumination layouts for all buildAdopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Not Applicable (NA) 1 1
29618 Operation of Roof Top Air Sup Adopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Not Applicable (NA)
28547 Summer Steam Shutdown Adopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 4
Not Applicable (NA) 1 1 1 1 4
29863 Installing Energy Efficient FluoAdopted (IN, AD, AI) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Plant Statistics
Total Reported
Total Adopte d (IN/AD/AI)
Count Adopted (IN/AD/AI)
Initiated
Adopted
Already Impleme nted
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
29/34
Best Practice
(BP) idea is
implemented
Subject Matter
Experts
Subject Matter
Experts
Acct Champion
Meeting
BP ideaReviewed
in Sector
Meeting
BP idea forward
to Plant Account
Champion
Reject
Accept
Originator
inputs BP into
the Database
Regions Accept or
Reject Globally
Shared BP
Best Practice is
RegionallyApproved and
Globally Shared
Regions share new
BPs with all Regions
Originating Region
BP Lead updates
Region status in
databaseAccept
Idea
Rejected
Reject
Best
Practice
process
complete
BestPractice
DevelopmentLifecycle
BestPractice
DevelopmentLifecycle
Reviewapproved
BP with
other
Sectors
BPFeedback
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
30/34
CostCouncilWebsite
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
31/34
BestPracticeWebsite
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
32/34
BestPracticeImplementationStatusbyPlantBest
Practice
implementation
statusistrackedbyCenterandbyAccount
Center
AccountorCostCouncil
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
33/34
SummaryReportsBestPracticeImplementationStatus
NA/Sector / Plant:
Month: May-10
Champion:
CYTD Spending ($000s) 222,491$
Assy CPU Evaluation 99.30$
Stamping CPU Evaluation 64.21$
CET CPU Evaluat ion 68.44$
Budget Performance ($000s) $ 2,614
57GMNA % Reported 75%
GMNA % Adopted 48%
55GMNA % Reported 81%
GMNA % Adopted 52%
55GMNA % Reported 1%
GMNA % Adopted 0%
Status At A GlanceUtilities
TOTAL COST COUNCIL FOCUS
Lou Pellat iro
Financial Stat us
Stamping Sector Report
CET Report
Approved BuGM's 4000 Account
Assembly Sector Report
410,2
42
488,0
74
505,6
47
222,4
91
43,783
48,053
47,869
45,447
37,339
38,425
39,486
38,586
40,892
39,379
42,307
44,080
87.44
68.10 68.44
73.65
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
Cost(000's) & CPU
Actual Forecast CET CPU Assy CPU Stamping CPU
$(2,143)
$7,287
$5,587
$2,614
($2,031)
($259)$147
$3,670
$4,434
$1,326$665
($2,054)
($310) ($195)
($858)
($1,920)
(4,000)
(2,000)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
BudgetPerformance
($000s)
Actual Forecast Cumulative
NA/Sector / Plant:
Month: May-10
Champion:
CYTD Spending ($000s) 119,400$
CPU Evaluation 99.30$
Budget Perf ormance ($000s) $ 174
Total # Of BuGM'sAssembly Adoption NA % Reported %
Arlington 54% 23% 77%
Bowling Green 61% 30% 91%CAMI n/a n/ a n/ a
Fairfax Assy & Contig 49% 21% 70%
Flint Assy 49% 19% 68%
Fort Wayne 58% 21% 79%
Hamtramck 63% 37% 100%
Lansing Delta Twp Assy & Contig 53% 46% 98%
Lansing Grand River 60% 39% 98%
Lordstown Assy & Contig 47% 35% 82%
Oshawa 49% 25% 74%
Ramos Arizpe Assy 0% 2% 2%
San Luis Assy 0% 0% 0%
Shreveport Assy & Cont ig 49% 47% 96%
Silao Assy & MFD 61% 26% 88%Wentzville Assy & Contig 61% 37% 61%
Status At A GlanceUtilities
Financial Status
ASSY & CONTIG SECTOR
0
Best Practice Adoption Status - Utilit ies
57
203,0
68
273,8
96
278,9
35
119,4
00
23,984
25,176
25,936
23,979
20,324
20,854
21,943
21,458
23,298
22,559
24,045
25,380
126
10299
105
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
Cost (000's) & CPU
Actual Forecast CPU Budget CPU
$(1,786)
$2,911
$1,850
$174
($1,874)
$222
($134)
$1,171
$2,818
$708
$110
($1,084)
($87) ($145)($404)
($1,128)
(3,000)
(2,000)
(1,000)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Budget
Performance($000s)
Actual Forecast Cumulative
SectorLevel
NAAccountChampion
-
7/28/2019 Achieving Total Employee Engagement
34/34
Questions..
16