Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

21
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology Ann E. Kovalchick Ph.D., Education/Instructional Design Chief Information Technology Officer 17 January 2013

description

Presentation to the Drake University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Teaching Symposium, January 2013

Transcript of Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Page 1: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Ann E. Kovalchick Ph.D., Education/Instructional DesignChief Information Technology Officer

17 January 2013

Page 2: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

• Describe your students• Describe your students’ primary learning challenge• Describe your instructional “problem”: What concept, idea, process, behavior do your students

continually fail to grasp• How many times have you taught the course? • Estimate what % of the course you revised & what % you redesign

Page 3: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

“Despite massive technology expenditures over the last decade or so, the widespread availability of substantial computing power at increasing reasonable prices, and a growing “comfort level” with this technology among college and university faculty, information technology is not being integrated into the teaching and learning processes nearly as much as people have regularly predicted since it arrived on the educational scene three or four decades ago. There are many isolated pockets of successful technology implementations. But it is an unfortunate fact that these individual successes, as important and encouraging as they may be, have been slow to propagate beyond their initiators; and they have by no means brought about the technologically inspired revolution in teaching and learning so long anticipated by instructional technology advocates.”Geoghegan, W.H. (1994). Whatever happened to instructional technology? Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Business Schools Computing Association, Baltimore, Maryland July 17-20, 1994.

Page 4: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

IMPACT

TASK

SELF

• Taking Charge of Change by Shirley M. Hord, William L. Rutherford, Leslie Huling-Austin, and Gene E. Hall, 1987

• From http://www.educationaltechnology.ca/couros/publication_files/unpublishedpapers/change_theory.pdf; adapted from Sweeny, B. (1997). The "Stages of Concern" from The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Retrieved November 25, 2003, from http://www.isdc.org/CBAM.html

Stages of Concern

Page 5: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

What Do I Want My Students To Learn?

A Model of Learning Objectives[http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/RevisedBlooms1.html]

students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the world works. If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test but revert to their preconceptions outside the classroom.

key finding #1

How People Learn. Bransford, J. D. [et al]. (2000). How people learn : brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Page 6: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

to develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application

key finding #2expert learners novice learners

• large knowledge base of domain specific patterns

• rapidly recognize when patters appear

• patterns not recognized

• focus on unknowns

Chase, W. G., and Simon, H. A. (1973)

How people learn, National Research Council (2000)

Recall improves when patterns are meaningful rather than random

Page 7: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Identify Best Teaching Approaches for the Learning You Want

Teaching Goals Inventoryhttp://fm.iowa.uiowa.edu/fmi/xsl/tgi/data_entry.xsl

Page 8: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Learner-centered Psychological Principles

• Cognitive and Metacognitive Factors• Motivational and Affective Factors

– Deep V Surface Learning• Developmental and Social Factor

– Perry, Belenky: Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development

• Individual Differences– Kolb’s Styles of Learning

Designing Significant Learning Experiences

Page 9: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

APPROACH MOTIVE STRATEGY

Surface Surface Motive is instrumental: Main purpose is to meet requirements minimally; a balance between working too hard and failing

Surface Strategy is reproductive; limit target to bare essentials and reproduce through rote learning

Deep Deep Motive is intrinsic: Study to actualize interest and competence in particular academic subject area

Deep Strategy is meaningful; read widely, interrelate with previous relevant knowledge

Achieving Achieving Motive is based on competition and ego-enhancement; obtain highest grade, whether or not materials interesting

Achieving Strategy is based on organizing one’s time and wotking space; behave as model student

Designing Significant Learning ExperiencesDeep learning v Surface learning

Page 10: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Deep learning v Surface learning

Designing Significant Learning Experiences

…a student’s ability to maintain materials in memory while taking notes end even to process and think about relationships between one idea and other ideas depends upon the knowledge or cognitive structures the student has available for organizing and relating the material.” McKeachie, 1994, Teaching Tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers.

Page 11: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Payne, CB and Bird, AD, Teaching clinical biomechanics in the context of uncertainty, JAPMA 89(10) 525-530, 1999

• Perry, William G. Jr. (1970), Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston).

• Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1997). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. Tenth anniversary edition. New York: Basic Books.

Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development

Page 12: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Kolb Styles: Characteristics of People

http://www.eduweb.com/practice_teach_full.html

Page 13: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Kolb’s Cycle of Learning

1. Create a concrete experience

2. Reflect on experience, analyze it

3. Integrate experience and reflections into concepts

4. Examine and develop concepts

5. Practice with givens and add something of oneself

6. Work on defined concepts and givens

7. Apply learning by doing it and share with others

8. Analyze application, judge results or experimentation for relevance & usefulness

Reflective Observation

Active Experimentation

Concrete Experience

Abstract Conceptualization

Imaginative Learners

WHY?

Analytic LearnersWHAT?

Common Sense LearnersHOW?

DynamicLearnersWHAT IF?

Page 14: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

BEHAVIORIST COGNITIVE SCIENCE CONSTRUCTIVIST

Learning is Change in overt behavior due to conditioning

Programming of a new rule for information processing

Personal discovery based on insight

Goals Predetermined, behavioral

Predetermined, Statements of purpose

Not pre-determined, negotiated, personal

Types of Learning Discrimination, Generalization, Association, Chaining

Short-term sensory storage, short-term memory, long-term-memory

Problem-solving

Instructional Strategies Present and provide for practice and feedback

Plan for cognitive learning strategies

Provide for active, self-regulating, reflective learner

Assessment Of product and process Diagnostic, mental representation and processing

Of process and product, personalized

Media Strategies Variety of traditional media

Computer-based (branching) instruction

Responsive environments

Key Concepts Reinforcement Elaboration Autotelic principles (Intrinsic motivation)

From “The Instructional Design Movement in Educational Technology.” by B. Seels, in Educational Technology, 44(3), p.13. 1995. Educational Technology Publications

Instructional Design Paradigms

Page 15: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Instructional Problem:

BEHAVIORISM COGNITIVE SCIENCE CONSTRUCTIVIST

Goals

? ? ?

Assessment

? ? ?

Strategies

? ? ?

Delivery Systems

Page 16: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Structuring the Learning and Choosing the Technology

Consider the Constraints: Time and Spaces

• Riser & Dick Model• Laurelled Model• Principle of First Exposure

Page 17: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Riser and Dick Instructional Design Model

From Instructional Planning: A Guide for Teachers (p. 5), by R.A. Reiser and W. Dick, 1996, Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. 1996.

Page 18: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

D. Laurrilard: A Conversational Framework

Page 19: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
Page 20: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

Structuring the Learning and Choosing the Technology

• Distributed intelligence (see handout)

• Types of Educational Technologies (see handout)

– Basic– Progressive

• 7 Things You Should Know[http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/7-things-you-should-know-about]

Page 21: Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology

What’s Changed?