ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

97
ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee MEETING MINUTES 11 June 2013 ________________________________________________________________________ Attendees: Location: MaineDOT Room 317A/B Wayne Frankhauser MaineDOT Laura Krusinski MaineDOT Leanne Timberlake MaineDOT Time: 1:00PM – 2:15PM Marie Malloy MaineDOT Chris Snow GZA Jason Gallant CMA Engineers Craig Weaver Kleinfelder Steve Hodgdon VHB Steve Percassi Erdman Anthony Notes Taken By: Steve Hodgdon ________________________________________________________________________ This is the second quarter ACEC/MaineDOT Bridge Design Subcommittee meeting. Information from MaineDOT o The 2-year (2014/2015) work plan is now posted on line. Many of the projects will be kicked-off this summer and fall. o The 2013 bridge load ratings have been assigned. Leanne Timberlake is assembling another batch of ratings for assignment in 2014. o The Department continues to see competitive construction bids. Nearly all projects are coming in at or below the PS&E estimate. o The Department is short-handed with contract specialists and looking to hire another. She also reiterated that consultant invoices need to be complete and include all the necessary backup including timecards, A-1 sheets (when there is a pay rate change or new person), and documentation of all receipts/expenses. Only approved wage rates may be billed. o The MaineDOT Chief Engineer is retiring the end of June. Finding a replacement is in progress. o The scheduled date for the new Standard Specifications Book is January 2014.

Transcript of ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

Page 1: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee

MEETING MINUTES

11 June 2013 ________________________________________________________________________ Attendees: Location: MaineDOT Room 317A/B Wayne Frankhauser MaineDOT Laura Krusinski MaineDOT Leanne Timberlake MaineDOT Time: 1:00PM – 2:15PM Marie Malloy MaineDOT Chris Snow GZA Jason Gallant CMA Engineers Craig Weaver Kleinfelder Steve Hodgdon VHB Steve Percassi Erdman Anthony Notes Taken By: Steve Hodgdon ________________________________________________________________________ This is the second quarter ACEC/MaineDOT Bridge Design Subcommittee meeting.

Information from MaineDOT

o The 2-year (2014/2015) work plan is now posted on line. Many of the

projects will be kicked-off this summer and fall.

o The 2013 bridge load ratings have been assigned. Leanne Timberlake is assembling another batch of ratings for assignment in 2014.

o The Department continues to see competitive construction bids. Nearly all

projects are coming in at or below the PS&E estimate. o The Department is short-handed with contract specialists and looking to hire

another. She also reiterated that consultant invoices need to be complete and include all the necessary backup including timecards, A-1 sheets (when there is a pay rate change or new person), and documentation of all receipts/expenses. Only approved wage rates may be billed.

o The MaineDOT Chief Engineer is retiring the end of June. Finding a

replacement is in progress. o The scheduled date for the new Standard Specifications Book is January 2014.

Page 2: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

ACEC/MaineDOT Bridge Design Subcommittee Page 2 of 3 Meeting Minutes 11 June 2013

o The Chief Engineer is working on the review of the Chapter 5 rewrite of the Bridge Design Guide (BDG). The Department hopes it will become part of the BDG once all comments are addressed and final revisions incorporated.

o Copies of the last three (3) Designer Meeting minutes (5/1, 5/15, and 5/29)

were distributed by the Department (see attached). Two of the meetings consisted of presentations. One by DS Brown on a spray applied deck membrane system (Deckguard) and the other by Lochner on their Route 1 Gateway bridges in New Brunswick, Canada.

The May 15 meeting included an assessment of elastomeric bearing

design inconsistencies in the Bridge Design Guide, Specifications, and AASHTO. The Department will work on drafting revisions to the BDG and Specifications for internal review.

The May 15 meeting also included “lessons learned” regarding a box culvert project on Mount Desert Island and splice locations for steel finger joint assemblies.

o MaineDOT is in final design of a NEXT beam bridge in Kittery that includes

carbon prestressing strands. The project includes techniques from the latest ABC Toolkit manual that was recently published and funds from a SHRP2 Grant. It is anticipated to be advertised in January 2014.

Strip Seal or Gland Seal Expansion Joints

o MaineDOT’s current gland seal detail is not performing well and the Department is considering revisions for improved durability. The consultant members presented the Department with an overview of expansion joint details and practices used in neighboring states including: New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire.

o Connecticut – Craig Weaver provided a packet (see attached) to the

committee with a summary of the Connecticut DOT Expansion Joint Systems including a 2/25/2011 memorandum that includes revisions to their strip seal expansion joint for new construction and rehabilitation projects.

o New York and Pennsylvania – Steve Percassi provided standard detail sheets used by each of these states (see attached). Also, Steve noted that NYSDOT prefers/uses the modular joint compared to the finger-type joint.

o Massachusetts and Vermont – Steve Hodgdon provided information and details by each of these states (see attached). VTrans does not use a gland-seal as a standard. They have been using their “Vermont Joint” for many years. Massachusetts does use a strip seal.

Page 3: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

ACEC/MaineDOT Bridge Design Subcommittee Page 3 of 3 Meeting Minutes 11 June 2013

o New Hampshire – Jason provided NHDOT details and guidelines from their Bridge Design Manual (see attached). The New Hampshire joint details are robust in comparison to the other state details presented.

Subcommittee Rotation

o Steve Percassi has his last meeting at the Q3 meeting this year. Keith Donnington is taking his place starting at the Q4 meeting this year.

Future Meeting Topics

o Steve Percassi will prepare and summarize their recent experience rehabilitating and strengthening a concrete through girder bridge using FRP wrap.

o Laura Krusinski noted that some research projects are expected to be complete at the University of Maine. The projects included a compilation of pile load test data and potential refinements in the Nordlund method for capacity in/on rock. Once the projects are finalized, the information can be discussed at a future meeting.

Next Meeting Date

o Tentatively August 20, 2013 at 1:00 PM, MaineDOT Conference Room 317A/B. Wayne will send a confirmation email.

Attachments: Designer Meeting Minutes from May 2013 Expansion Joint Information from NY, PA, CT, MA, VT, and NH I have attempted to summarize discussions held during this meeting as accurately as possible. If there are any items discussed herein that are misrepresented in any way, please contact me within ten working days. In the absence of any corrections or clarifications, it will be understood that these minutes accurately summarize the discussions at the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Steven Hodgdon

Page 4: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 5: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 6: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 7: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 8: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 9: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 10: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 11: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 12: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 13: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 14: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 15: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 16: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 17: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 18: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 19: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 20: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 21: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 22: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 23: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 24: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 25: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 26: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 27: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 28: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 29: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 30: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 31: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 32: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 33: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 34: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 35: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 36: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 37: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 38: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 39: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 40: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 41: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 42: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 43: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 44: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 45: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 46: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 47: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 48: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

REVISED

STATE OF NEW YORK

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER

(STRUCTURES)

APPROVED:

MODULAR JOINT SYSTEM

ONE CELL

SECTIONS A-A & C-C

BD-JM3E

NOTE:

DETAILS ARE SHOWN WITH STRIP SEAL. BOX SEAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED

AT THE CONTRACTOR’S OPTION.

DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS LABELED AS "NOT TO SCALE" ARE

INTENTIONALLY DRAWN NOT TO SCALE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. ALL

OTHER DETAILS, FOR WHICH NO SCALE IS SHOWN, ARE DRAWN

PROPORTIONAL AND ARE FULLY DIMENSIONED.

SECTION C-C (CONCRETE TRAFFIC BARRIER)

(ONLY THE STEEL SHOWN)

NOT TO SCALE

SLOTTED HOLE FOR

ANCHOR STUD

SUPPORT ANGLE

EDGE BEAM

HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUDS

1’-0"

(TYP.)

6" (TYP.)

3"

10

"

HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUD

3" MIN. (TYP.)

9"

10" CPGW

NOT TO SCALE

CPGW

HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUDS

SLOTTED HOLE FOR

ANCHOR STUD

SUPPORT ANGLE

EDGE BEAM

1’-0"

(TYP.)

6" (TYP.)

2’-0" (MAX.)

1’-0"

(MAX.)

3" MIN. (TYP.)

SLOTTED HOLE FOR

ANCHOR STUD

7"

1’-0"

(TYP.)

6" (TYP.)

2’-0" (TYP.)

EDGE BEAM

3" MIN. (TYP.)

SUPPORT ANGLE @

2’-0" CENTERS

HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUDS

6" (TYP.)

(TYP.)

1’-0"

SUPPORT ANGLE

HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUD

EDGE BEAM

3" MIN. (TYP.)

1’-4"CPGW

SLOTTED HOLE FOR

ANCHOR STUD

"J" + 4"

SEAL

2"

PRESTRESSED

BEAM

SLAB

5"

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A

(SEE NOTE "D") (TYP.)

SEE NOTE "C"

1’-3" 3"

PRESTRESSED

BEAM

SLAB

3"

6"

(MIN

.)

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

1’-0" (TYP.)

HEADED CONCRETE ANCHOR

STUD (TYP.)EDGE BEAMS

SUPPORT ANGLE

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION C-C (CURBLESS)

(ONLY THE STEEL SHOWN)

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION C-C (BRUSH CURB)

(ONLY THE STEEL SHOWN)

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ PIER

ADJACENT PRESTRESS BEAMS

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ PIER

MULTI-GIRDER SYSTEM

"J" + 4"

1"

(TYP.)

STEEL OR

PRESTRESS

GIRDER

9"

(TYP.)

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A

(SEE NOTE "D") (TYP.)

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

STEEL OR

PRESTRESS

GIRDER

SEAL

2"

5"

HEADED CONCRETE ANCHOR

STUD (TYP.)

1’-0" (TYP.)

EDGE BEAMS

SUPPORT ANGLE

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ ABUTMENT

MULTI-GIRDER SYSTEM

1" MIN.

9"

STEEL OR

PRESTRESS

GIRDER

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A

(SEE NOTE "D") (TYP.)

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

"J" + 4"

SEAL

REAR FACE

OF BACKWALL

REINFORCED CONCRETE

APPROACH SLAB

2"7"

5"

TYPE "D" WATERSTOP

HEADED CONCRETE ANCHOR

STUD (TYP.)

1’-0" (TYP.)

EDGE BEAMS

SUPPORT ANGLE

REAR FACE

OF BACKWALL

"J" + 4"

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ ABUTMENT

ADJACENT PRESTRESS BEAMS

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A

(SEE NOTE "D") (TYP.)

SEE NOTE "C"

1’-3" 3"

PRESTRESSED

BEAM

SLAB

3"

6"

(MIN

.)

SEAL

2"TYPE "D" WATERSTOP

REINFORCED CONCRETE

APPROACH SLAB

5"

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

1’-0" (TYP.)

HEADED CONCRETE ANCHOR

STUD (TYP.)EDGE BEAMS

SUPPORT ANGLE

**

**

SECTION C-C (SIDEWALK)

(ONLY THE STEEL SHOWN)

þÿ & p

þÿ & p

þÿ & p

þÿ & p

c OF BEARINGSc OF BEARINGS

@ 68 nF

þÿ & p (TYP.)

c OF JOINT

c OF BEARINGS

@ 68 nF

þÿ & p (TYP.)

c OF JOINT

@ 68 nF

þÿ & p (TYP.)

c OF JOINT

@ 68 nF

"J" AT 68 nF"J" AT 68 nF

"J" AT 68 nF

"J" AT 68 nF

c OF JOINT

þÿ & p (TYP.)

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� �B p

þÿ�1�

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� �B p

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� � p

þÿ�1�

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� �B p

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� � p

þÿ�2

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� �B p

þÿ�2

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� � p

þÿ�2

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� �B p

þÿ�2

INCREASE DIMENSION AS REQUIRED ON

SKEWED BRIDGES.

DIMENSION MUST BE CALCULATED FOR

EACH STRUCTURE AT EACH FASCIA.

FOR LOCATIONS OF SECTIONS A-A AND

C-C, SEE BD-JM1E AND BD-JM2E.

FOR NOTES B, C, AND D, SEE BD-JM5E.

FOR DIMENSION J, SEE BD-JM5E.

7"

**

9"*

9"**

** *

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

GEORGE A. CHRISTIAN, P.E.ISSUED UNDER EB 08-002

EFFECTIVE WITH THE

LETTING OF 1/08/09

ISSUED

5/01/08

PercassiSJ
Text Box
NYSDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/business-center/engineering/cadd-info/drawings/bridge-detail-sheets-usc/jm-modular-joints-usc
Page 49: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

REVISED

STATE OF NEW YORK

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER

(STRUCTURES)

APPROVED:

MODULAR JOINT SYSTEM

ONE CELL

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS

BD-JM5E

NOTE:

ALL CUTTING TO BE DONE WITH

A COPING SAW, SOAP AND WATER.

DETAIL FOR CUTTING

BOX SEAL

NOT TO SCALE

NOT TO SCALE

STRIP SEAL

NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE

EDGE BEAM

FOR BOX SEAL

EDGE BEAM FOR

STRIP SEAL

DETAIL OF SUPPORT ANGLE

(ASTM A36)

þÿ

3"

2"

7"

þÿ�

þÿ�

4"

3"

1"

1"þÿ

NOT TO SCALE

DETAIL OF HEADED CONCRETE

ANCHOR STUD

þÿ�

6"

þÿ

"J" + 4"

SEAL

2"

SIDEWALK SIDEWALK6"

MIN

.

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A

(SEE NOTE "D") (TYP.)

HEADED CONCRETE ANCHOR

STUD (TYP.)

EDGE BEAMS

SUPPORT ANGLE

SKEW

ANGLE

SUPERSTRUCTURE

TYPE

MAXIMUM

ALLOWABLE

SPAN

NO.

CELLS

STEEL

STEEL

CONCRETE

CONCRETE

155’-10"/COS SKEW

155’-10"/SIN SKEW

364’-6"/COS SKEW

364’-6"/SIN SKEW

1

1

1

1

2"

2"

2"

2"

NOTE "B"

THE CONCRETE FURNISHED AND PLACED IN THE RECESSES FOR

INSTALLING THE JOINT SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CURRENT SLAB ITEM, EXCEPT THAT MACHINE

FINISHING WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE COST FOR FURNISHING AND

PLACING THIS CONCRETE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE

OF THE SLAB ITEM.

NOTE "C"

PREPARE EXISTING SURFACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD

SPECIFICATION 566-3.03.

NOTE "D"

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �A�N�C�H�O�R� �S�T�U�D� �T�O� �B�E� �D�R

ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION 586-3.02.

GROUTING MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MATERIALS

SUBSECTION 701-07, ANCHORING MATERIALS-CHEMICALLY CURING. HOLES

TO BE DRILLED TO THE DIAMETER AND DEPTH RECOMMENDED BY THE

MANUFACTURER OF THE GROUTING MATERIAL (MIN. DEPTH OF 4").

THE COST OF THE ANCHORS, INCLUDING DRILLING AND GROUTING, SHALL

BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE JOINT SYSTEM ITEM.

HOLE DRILLED @ c OF SEAL

THIS ANGLE MUST BE GREATER

THAN 30 n BEFORE CUTTING OF

THE SEAL IS REQUIRED.

þÿ�1

þÿ�1

DIM. "J"

@ 68 nF.

LESS

THAN 45 n

LESS

THAN 45 n

@ 68 nF

"J" @ 68 nF

c OF JOINT

þÿ & p (TYP.)

þÿ�1

þÿ�1

þÿ�2

þÿ �"� �D�I�A�.� �T�H�R�E�

LONG @ 2’-0" CENTERS END WELD

þÿ�T�O� �E�D�G�E� � p

DETAILS PROVIDED ON THESE SHEETS ARE

DEVELOPED FOR CONVENTIONAL MONOLITHIC

AND ISOTROPIC DECKS. THE DESIGNER MUST

VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF THESE DETAILS

FOR OTHER DECK SYSTEMS AND MODIFY

THEM AS NECESSARY.

FOR LOCATION OF SECTION D-D, SEE BD-JM1E

AND BD-JM2E.

BRIDGES WITH A SKEW GREATER THAN 30 n

MUST USE COVER PLATES.

FOR COVER PLATE DETAILS, SEE BD-JM11E

AND BD-JM12E.

NOTES:

IT IS DESIRABLE TO HAVE THE MODULAR JOINT WITH ITS

SEAL ASSEMBLED IN THE SHOP AND DELIVERED TO THE JOB

SITE ALL SET FOR INSTALLATION IN ITS PREFORMED RECESS

IN THE STRUCTURAL SLAB. IN CASES WHERE THE JOINT

CANNOT BE ASSEMBLED IN THE SHOP, DUE TO ITS EXCESSIVE

LENGTH CAUSING SHIPPING PROBLEMS, THE JOINT SHALL HAVE

THE SEAL IN PLACE BEFORE THE STRUCTURE IS OPENED TO

TRAFFIC, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, AND BEFORE

DISCONTINUING OPERATION WHEN WORK IS SUSPENDED DURING

THE WINTER.

MODULAR JOINT SHOWN IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.

ACTUAL JOINT SUPPLIED MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE

ONE SHOWN HERE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO

ADJUST ALL REQUIRED DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD, BASED ON FIELD

VERIFIED DIMENSIONS, TO ACCOMMODATE THE ACTUAL MODULAR

JOINT SUPPLIED.

STRIP SEAL OR BOX SEAL MAY BE USED AT THE CONTRACTOR’S

OPTION.

THE ASSUMED DIMENSIONS OF THE BLOCKOUT (DEPTH AND WIDTH)

ARE PLACED ON THE PLANS. IF THE JOINT SYSTEM SUPPLIED BY THE

FABRICATOR/CONTRACTOR REQUIRES A CHANGE TO THE BLOCKOUT

SIZE OR SUPPORT SYSTEM (I.E. END DIAPHRAGM, ETC.) DETAILED

IN THE PLANS, THAT CHANGE TO THE BLOCKOUT OR SUPPORT SYSTEM

SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY. NO ADDITIONAL

PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THE CHANGES TO THE BLOCKOUT OR

SUPPORT SYSTEM AS A RESULT OF THE SUPPLIED JOINT SYSTEM.

ENDS OF BOX SEAL TO BE CAPPED WITH NEOPRENE SPONGE.

CAULKING COMPOUND FOR STRUCTURES CONFORMING TO N.Y.S.

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SUBSECTION 705-06 SHALL BE USED TO

þÿ�S�E�A�L� �B�E�T�W�E�E�N� �T�H�E� �C�U�R�B� �A�N�D

INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE FOR THE CURB ITEM.

DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS LABELED AS "NOT TO SCALE" ARE

INTENTIONALLY DRAWN NOT TO SCALE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. ALL

OTHER DETAILS, FOR WHICH NO SCALE IS SHOWN, ARE DRAWN

PROPORTIONAL AND ARE FULLY DIMENSIONED.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

GEORGE A. CHRISTIAN, P.E.ISSUED UNDER EB 08-002

EFFECTIVE WITH THE

LETTING OF 1/08/09

ISSUED

5/01/08

PercassiSJ
Text Box
NYSDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/business-center/engineering/cadd-info/drawings/bridge-detail-sheets-usc/jm-modular-joints-usc
Page 50: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

REVISED

STATE OF NEW YORK

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER

(STRUCTURES)

APPROVED:

MODULAR JOINT SYSTEM

MULTICELL

SECTIONS A-A, D-D & E-E

BD-JM8E

NOTE:

DETAILS ARE SHOWN WITH STRIP SEAL. BOX SEAL MAY BE

SUBSTITUTED AT THE CONTRACTOR’S OPTION.

DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS LABELED AS "NOT TO SCALE" ARE

INTENTIONALLY DRAWN NOT TO SCALE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. ALL

OTHER DETAILS, FOR WHICH NO SCALE IS SHOWN, ARE DRAWN

PROPORTIONAL AND ARE FULLY DIMENSIONED.

NOTE:

IN LIEU OF THE CORBEL TYPE BACKWALL

SHOWN, THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION

OF USING A FULL THICKNESS BACKWALL.

THE EXTRA CONCRETE SHALL BE PROVIDED

AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE STATE.

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ PIER

MULTIGIRDER SYSTEM

NOT TO SCALE

9"

(MIN.) (TYP.)

4" MIN. (TYP.)

AS

SU

ME

D

SEPARATION BEAM

SEAL (TYP.)

ANCHORAGE SYSTEM AND

SPACING TO BE DETERMINED

BY THE MANUFACTURER

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

SEE NOTE "C" (TYP.)

EDGE BEAMS

2’-0" (TYP.)

XX

X

(TY

P.)

6"

MIN

.

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION A-A

SECTION @ ABUTMENT

MULTIGIRDER SYSTEM

9"

(MIN.)

REAR FACE

OF BACKWALL

2’-0" (TYP.)

4" MIN. (TYP.)

REINFORCED CONCRETE

APPROACH SLAB

TYPE "D" WATERSTOP

(TRIMMED TO FIT)

AS

SU

ME

D

SEPARATION BEAM

SEAL (TYP.)

ANCHORAGE SYSTEM AND

SPACING TO BE DETERMINED

BY THE MANUFACTURER

SEE NOTE "B" (TYP.)

EDGE BEAMSSEE NOTE "C" (TYP.)

XX

X

6"

MIN

.

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION E-E

(HEADER ONLY SHOWN FOR CLARITY)

EDGE BEAM

SUPPORT BOX (TYP.)

SEPARATION BEAM

SEAL (TYP.)ANCHORAGE SYSTEM AND

SPACING TO BE DETERMINED

BY THE MANUFACTURER

NOT TO SCALE

SECTION D-D

ANCHORAGE SYSTEM AND

SPACING TO BE DETERMINED

BY THE MANUFACTURER

EDGE BEAM

SEPARATION BEAM

SEAL (TYP.)

NOTE:

REINFORCEMENT NOT SHOWN

þÿ�"�J�"�

@ 68 nF

þÿ & p (TYP.)

"J" + 68 nF

þÿ�"�J�"�

@ 68 nF

c BEARINGS c BEARINGS

@ 68 nF

þÿ�"�J�"�

45 n

þÿ & p (TYP.)

þÿ�1

"J" @ 68 nF

c BEARINGS

@ 68 nF

þÿ�"�J�"� 45 n

þÿ�1

þÿ & p (TYP.)

"J" + 68 nF

XXX THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE CALCULATED

BY THE DESIGNER. DIAPHRAGM DETAILS MUST

BE MODIFIED IF NECESSARY.

FOR LOCATIONS OF SECTIONS A-A, D-D, AND

C-C, SEE BD-JM6E AND BD-JM7E.

FOR NOTES B AND C AND DIMENSION J,

SEE BD-JM12E.

1" (MIN.)

1" (MIN.)

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

GEORGE A. CHRISTIAN, P.E.ISSUED UNDER EB 08-002

EFFECTIVE WITH THE

LETTING OF 1/08/09

ISSUED

5/01/08

PercassiSJ
Text Box
NYSDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/business-center/engineering/cadd-info/drawings/bridge-detail-sheets-usc/jm-modular-joints-usc
Page 51: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

A

DIAPHRAGM

STRINGER

CONTINUOUS NEOPRENE

STRIP SEAL

DIAPHRAGM

1

1

1

A

CONTINUOUS NEOPRENE

STRIP SEAL

DIAPHRAGM

1

1

STRINGER

TYPICAL SECTION AT ABUTMENT

FOR STEEL BEAMS

FIXED & EXPANSION

TYPICAL SECTION AT PIER

FIXED & EXPANSION

FOR STEEL BEAMS

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUTLIMITS OF BLOCKOUT

C

STRINGER

(TYP.)

CONSTR.

JOINT

CL TRANSVERSE

CONSTRUCTION

JOINT (TYP.)

L TRANSVERSE

CONSTRUCTION

JOINT

A

CONTINUOUS NEOPRENE

STRIP SEAL

P/S BEAM

PARTIAL DEPTH DIAPHRAGM,

EXPANSION, SEE SUPERSTRUCTURE

DETAILS FOR REINF. AND

1

1

1

1

SL

AB

BE

AM

NO

TC

H

TYPICAL SECTION AT PIER

FIXED & EXPANSIONLOCATION -23 -5 0 5 10 15 20

(INSTALLATION DIMENSION "A" @ VARIOUS TEMPERATURES)

25

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUT

JOINT (TYP.)

SEE SUPERSTRUCTURE DETAILS

C

MAX.

L TRANSVERSE

CONSTRUCTION

JOINT (TYP.)

MI

N.

MI

N.

MIN.

TWO PIECE MEMBER (EXTRUSION AND PLATE

COMBINATION) IN LIEU OF ONE PIECE

EXTRUSION IS PERMITTED. WELD IN

ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO/AWS

SPECIFICATIONS. (FULL PENETRATION

WELD AND N.D.T. REQUIRED)

(TYP.)

A

STRIP SEAL

SL

AB

BEAM

NOTCH

P/S BEAM

TYPICAL SECTION AT ABUTMENT

FIXED & EXPANSION

OPTIONAL BACKWALL

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUTC

NOTE:

FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS

SEE TYPICAL SECTION

AT ABUTMENT.

L TRANSVERSE

} MAX.

(TYP.)

OPTIONAL

FULL DEPTH DIAPHRAGM FOR FIXED AND PARTIAL DEPTH DIAPHRAGM

FOR EXPANSION, SEE SUPERSTRUCTURE DETAILS FOR REINF. AND DIMENSIONS.

PLATE WELDED TO

EXTRUSION IF TWO

PIECE OPTION IS

SELECTED

(SEE NOTE 2 )

C

BACKWALL REINF.

SEE ABUTMENT

BACKWALL REINF.

SPACING

-20 -15 -10 30 35

BC-767M

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STANDARD

NEOPRENE STRIP SEAL DAM

FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

& STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGES

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

TOP & BOT. STUDS (TYP.)

TO SKEW BETWEEN STRINGERS

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

TOP & BOT. STUDS (TYP.)

TO & CENTERED BETWEEN

BETWEEN BEAM FLANGES

TO SKEW BETWEEN STRINGERS

LONGIT. TOP REINFORCEMENT.

PLACED PARALLEL

TO & CENTERED

BETWEEN LONGIT.

TOP REINFORCEMENT

BETWEEN BEAM

TO & CENTERED

1

WELD LOCATION

(°C)

-10 25 32 40 50 60 68 80 85 95(°F)

TEMPERATURE

FULL DEPTH DIAPHRAGM, FIXED,

FOR REINF. AND DIMENSIONS.

-5 5 15

40 43

105 110

MIN.

PARALLEL TO & CENTERED BETWEEN

MAX.

BETWEEN LONGIT. TOP

REINFORCEMENT. (TYP.)

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

(TYP.)

MIN.

(TYP.)

LONGIT. TOP REINF.

(TYP.)

(ALT. WITH DIAG.)

MI

N.

LONG (HOR.)

C

WITH TOP HOR.)

(TYP.)

MIN.

MAX.

(SEE NOTE 2 )

SLAB

TOP OF

NEOPRENE

CONTINUOUS

FOR P/S SPREAD BEAMS

FOR P/S SPREAD BEAMS

**

1.

2.

**

BEAM

TOP OF

BEAM (TYP.)

TOP OF

BEAM (TYP.)

TOP OF

BEAM

TOP OF

EXTRUSION SCHEMATIC

(SEE NOTE 3)

(SEE NOTE 3)

I-BEAM (TYP.)

WEB OF THE

MEASURED TO THE

STEEL BEAM (TYP.)

THE WEB OF THE

MEASURED TO

3.

SEE DESIGN

DRAWINGS FOR

SIZE AND

REI

NF

OR

CE

ME

NT

NOTE: BOX BEAM SHOWN, I-BEAM SIMILAR.

STDS. DESIGN

DRAWINGS FOR

SIZE AND SPACING

NOTE: TABLE TO BE SHOWN AND COMPLETED ON FABRICATORS SHOP DRAWINGS.

TO SKEW BETWEEN BEAMS.

TO SKEW (TYP.)

CONSTR. JOINT

MAX.

(TYP.)

MEASURED TO THE WEB OF

THE STEEL BEAM (TYP.)

DIMENSIONS.

I-BEAM SIMILAR

NOTE: BOX BEAM SHOWN,

MIN. OF THE I-BEAM (TYP.)

MEASURED TO THE WEB

0 CL.

0 CL.

CONSTRUCTION

JOINT

MIN.

**

**

PA

VI

NG

NO

TC

H

DE

PT

H (

RE

FE

R

TO

CO

NT

RA

CT

DR

AWI

NG

S)

(TYP.)

MIN.

MIN.

(TYP.)

ROUGH CONSTRUCTION

CLR.

(TYP.)

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

TOP & BOT. STUDS

PLACED PARALLEL TO SKEW

TIED TO TOP & BOT. STUDS

ROUGH

MIN.

CLR.

PA

VI

NG

NO

TC

H

DE

PT

H (

RE

FE

R

TO

CO

NT

RA

CT

DR

AWI

NG

S)

ROUGH

JOINT

CONSTR.

ROUGH

PA

VI

NG

NO

TC

H

DE

PT

H (

RE

FE

R

TO

CO

NT

RA

CT

DR

AWI

NG

S)

TOP & BOT. STUDS

TIED TO TOP & BOT. STUDS

PLACED PARALLEL TO SKEW

FLANGES

MIN.

EXTRUSION NOTES:

CHIEF BRIDGE ENGINEER

RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED

* *

*

*

*

- SEE NOTE 20 ON SHEET 1

SHEET 2 OF 6

AS PER DIMENSION "A" TABLE

-"A", IS INSTALLATION WIDTH

DIMENSION "A" TABLE

BUREAU OF PROJECT DELIVERY

ACTING DIR, BUR. OF PROJECT DIRECTOR

SPACE AVAILABLE, REQUEST SPECIFIC LENGTH

APPROVAL FROM THE DISTRICT BRIDGE ENGINEER

AT THE SHOP DRAWINGS APPROVAL STAGE.

IF 10" STUDS CANNOT BE ACCOMMODATED IN THE

NOTE

2’-0"

9" 1’-3"

#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED

6"2-#6 TOP & BOT.

2" CLR.

2"

1’-0"

MI

N.

(T

YP.)

#4 @ 12" BENT

6"

2-#6 PLACED PARALLEL

6"2"

4"

#4 @ 12" BENT

PLACED PARALLEL

2-#6 PLACED PARALLEL

12"

4"

2" 6"(TYP.)

2" CLR.

1’-0"

MI

N.

(T

YP.)

2-#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED6"2"6"

2’-0"

9" 1’-3"

2’-0"

4"

4"

#4 REBAR

11" FOR

#5 REBAR

13" FOR

2’-0"

9" 1’-3"

#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED

6"2-#6 TOP & BOT.

2" CLR.

(T

YP.)

1’-0"

MI

N.

6"

1’-0" MIN.

LAP (TYP.)

#4 @ 12" BENT PLACED

2-#6 PLACED PARALLEL

1�"

2"

4"

0 CLR.

0 CLR.

2-#6 PLACED

PARALLEL

#4 @ 12" BENT

PLACED PARALLEL

6" 6"2-#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED

(T

YP.)

1’-0"

MI

N.

(TYP.)

2" CLR.

LAP (TYP.)

1’-0" MIN.

1�"

2"

4"

0 CLR.

SPECIFIED ON AN APPROVED DETAIL.

STUD SPACING IS 12" MAX. UNLESS

EXTRUSION THICKNESS �".

�" (TYP.)2�"

TO

CL

EA

R

2�

"

MI

N.

�"

�"

3"

� �"| STUDS

10" LONG (HOR.)

@ 12" C.C.

�"

8"

MI

N.

�"

4�"x�" MIN.

L �"| STUDS

10"

@ 24" C.C.

L �"| STUDS

10"

(ALT. @ 12" C.C.

LONG (DIAG.)

MAY 18, 2012 MAY 18, 2012

tshroyer
Highlight
tshroyer
Highlight
PercassiSJ
Text Box
PENNDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/design/bqad/2012/BC/bc767m.pdf
Page 52: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

BC-767M

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STANDARD

NEOPRENE STRIP SEAL DAM

FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

& STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGES

A

STRIP SEAL

FOR DETAILS, SEE

EXTRUSION DETAIL

SL

AB

BEAM

NOTCH

P/S BEAM

TYPICAL SECTION AT ABUTMENT

FIXED & EXPANSION

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUTCL TRANSVERSE

} MAX.

(TYP.)

BACKWALL REINF.

SEE ABUTMENT

SPACING

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

LONGIT. TOP REINFORCEMENT.

MIN.

PARALLEL TO & CENTERED BETWEEN

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

NEOPRENE

CONTINUOUS

FOR P/S ADJACENT BEAMS

TYPICAL SECTION AT PIER

FIXED & EXPANSION

FOR P/S ADJACENT BEAMS

A

STRIP SEAL

FOR DETAILS, SEE

EXTRUSION DETAIL

SL

AB

BEAM

NOTCH

P/S BEAM

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUTCL TRANSVERSE

MAX.

(TYP.)

MIN.

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

NEOPRENE

CONTINUOUS

SL

AB

BEAM

NOTCH

PARALLEL TO SKEW TIED TO

TOP & BOT. STUDS (TYP.)

PARALLEL TO & CENTERED BETWEEN

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

L TRANSVERSEC

BEAM (TYP.)

TOP OF

BEAM

TOP OF

STDS. DESIGN

DRAWINGS FOR

SIZE AND

ON SHEET 2.

ON SHEET 2.

TO SKEW

PARALLELLONGIT. TOP REINFORCEMENT. (TYP.)

MIN.

(TYP.)CLR.

(TYP.)(TYP.)

JOINT

CONSTR.

ROUGH

TOP & BOT. STUDS

PLACED PARALLEL TO SKEW

TIED TO TOP & BOT. STUDS

MIN.

DRAWINGS)

(REFER TO CONTRACT

PAVING NOTCH DEPTH

CHIEF BRIDGE ENGINEER

RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED

- SEE NOTE 20 ON SHEET 1

*

**

SHEET 3 OF 6

ON SHEET 2.

AS PER DIMENSION "A" TABLE

-"A", IS INSTALLATION WIDTH

BUREAU OF PROJECT DELIVERY

ACTING DIR, BUR. OF PROJECT DIRECTOR

0 CLR.

6"2-#6 TOP & BOT.

10" FOR

17" DEPTH BEAMS

ALL OTHER BEAMS

OR 11�" FOR

2" CLR.

6"2"

#4 @ 12" BENT PLACED

#6 PLACED

CLR.

2"

2"

4"

2’-0"

9" 1’-3"

�" (TYP.)

#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED

#4 @ 12" BENT PLACED

2-#6 TOP & BOT. PLACED

0 CLR.

6"

6" 2"2"

2"

4"

(TYP.)

2" CLR.

10" FOR

17" DEPTH BEAMS

OTHER BEAMS (TYP.)

OR 11�" FOR ALL

#6 PLACED PARALLEL TO SKEW (TYP.)

MAY 18, 2012 MAY 18, 2012

tshroyer
Highlight
tshroyer
Highlight
PercassiSJ
Text Box
PENNDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/design/bqad/2012/BC/bc767m.pdf
Page 53: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13

60°

BLOCKOUT

TO BE ADJUSTED FOR INSTALLATION TEMPERATURE

FOR SPECIFIC MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION.

TO PERMIT TEMPERATURE MOVEMENT IN THE

ASSEMBLY ON ONE SIDE OF JOINT.

DURING ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION TIGHTEN

BOLT AND BOTH NUTS ON STUD BOLTS1

2 3

3

IMMEDIATELY AFTER BLOCKOUT IS CAST,

LOOSEN BOTTOM NUT ON STUD BOLT

AND MAKING SURE DIMENSION A

REFLECTS THE INSTALLATION TEMPERATURE.

*

DO NOT TIGHTEN BOLT 4

PROVIDE LOW FRICTION INTERFACE BETWEEN

BOLT HEADS AND ANGLE AND TOP NUTS ON

3

4

2

2

1

*

DE

PT

H

OF

IN

SE

RT (

TY

P.)

OPEN

JOINT

P

SURFACE TO

BE SMOOTH

SECTION B-B

LOW SIDE

OF DAM

APPROVED

SEALER

C

STEEL

EXTRUSION

MIN.

(SLIDING)

(TYP.)

BC-767M

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STANDARD

NEOPRENE STRIP SEAL DAM

FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

& STEEL I-BEAM BRIDGES

L SCREW AND CONCRETE INSERT

CAST IN PLACE

(TYP.)

NOTE:

1. THE SURFACE OF THE BLOCKOUT MUST BE COMPLETELY

CLEAN WHEN THE JOINT IS INSTALLED.

2. THE EXPANSION JOINT DEVICE MUST BE SUSPENDED IN

THE BLOCKOUT TO THE PROPER LINE AND GRADE, WITH

THE DISTANCE BETWEEN EXTRUSIONS SET WITH RESPECT

TO THE TEMPERATURE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

3. AFTER THE CONCRETE OF THE BLOCKOUT ACHIEVES

SECTION 1001.3 (q) 1, REMOVE THE TEMPORARY SUPPORT

ASSEMBLY AND GRIND OFF TACK WELD UNTIL SMOOTH.

4. APPLY TOUCH-UP PAINT.

STUD BOLTS AND ANGLE.

ALTERNATE THIS PATTERN BETWEEN NEAR SIDE

AND FAR SIDE OF JOINT ON SUCCESSIVE

NUTS ON STUD BOLTS AND AFTER A IS

ASSEMBLIES, I.E. TIGHTEN BOLT AND BOTH

BOLT IMMEDIATELY AFTER BLOCKOUT IS CAST.

TIGHTEN BOLT . LOOSEN BOTTOM NUT ON STUD

SET FOR INSTALLATION TEMPERATURE. DO NOT

CONTRACTOR MAY USE ALTERNATE SCHEMES ONLY WITH

THE APPROVAL OF THE DISTRICT BRIDGE ENGINEER OR

DISTRICT STRUCTURE CONTROL ENGINEER.

2%

**

STEEL EXTRUSION

PRESCRIBED STRENGTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUB. 408

25° (TYP.)

(SLIDING) OVER MEDIAN.

SECTION AT SPLIT CONCRETE DIVISOR

SECTION AT BARRIER

THAN 90°.

EXTRUSION AS REQUIRED FOR SKEWS LESS

IS SHOWN FOR 90° SKEW. DETAIL STEEL

THE ALTERNATE BARRIER. STEEL EXTRUSION

SPACING OF THE SCREWS IS THE SAME FOR

STRIP SEAL INSTALLATION PROCEDURE

WIDTHLUGS

SEAL

STRIP

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

*

***

1 2 3 4

APPROVED EPOXY

BONDING AGENT

(TYP.)

TACK WELD

(TYP.)

SHIMS (TYP.)

(TYP. AT ALL BOLTS AND ANCHORS)

TOP OF

DECK

LIMITS OF BLOCKOUT

CONCEPTUAL SKETCH **

(SEE NOTES BELOW)

*

A

JOINT INSTALLATION SCHEME

REMOVABLE ANCHOR (TYP.)

HOLE WITH APPROVED

DO NOT USE PERCUSSION

DRILL TO INSTALL ANCHOR,

[AFTER REMOVAL FILL

BOLT (TYP.)

SPACED TO LIMIT DEFLECTION

OF DAM BETWEEN SUPPORTS

NONSHRINK MORTAR AS PER

�" MIN.

SEE DETAIL X

DETAIL X

PUB. 408, SEC.1001.2(e)]

**

*

SCREWS AND INSERTS

STRIP SEAL INSTALLATION NOTESJOINT INSTALLATION NOTES:

FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3

***

CHIEF BRIDGE ENGINEER

RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED

SEE NOTE 20 ON SHEET 1

SHEET 5 OF 6

BUREAU OF PROJECT DELIVERY

ACTING DIR, BUR. OF PROJECT DIRECTOR

FOR LOCATION OF SECTION B-B SEE SHEET 4.

(TYP.)

�" | STUD

�"x4" SLOTTED HOLE FOR

ADJUSTMENT OF DIMENSION A

6" MIN.

(TYP.)

4"2"4"

�" (

TY

P.)

L 6"x 4"x �" MIN.

TO �" MAX.

4"

4"

10"

RESISTANT SLIDING L

�" CHECKERED SKID

4"

JOINT WIDTH +�"

�" RECESS IN CONCRETE

JOINT WIDTH +�"

�" x �" CHAMFER

6"

�" BENT PLATE

SPACED @ 5" C.C.

4"

2�"

�"

15" MIN.

6"

6"

6" 6" 6"

�"| x 10" STUDS

PL �" BENT

4’-0"

SPA.@ 6" C.C. MAX.

SCREWS AND INSERTS

3"

(TYP.)

�" (

TY

P.)

STUDS (TYP.)

�"| x 10"

NOTE: FOR CONCRETE DIVISOR NOT SPLIT, USE ONE PIECE �" BENT SLIDING PLATE.

THE STRIP SEAL INTO THE RAIL CHANNEL.

AS THE WORK PROGRESSES DOWN THE LENGTH OF THE JOINT, WORK BOTH SIDES OF

RAIL TO INSURE PROPER SEATING. (SEE FIGURE 3)

AFTER THE SEAL LOCKS INTO PLACE, PUSH THE TOP OF THE LUG AGAINST THE FRAME

OF THE SEAL) (SEE FIGURE 2)

INTO THE CHANNEL (MAKE SURE THAT THE BAR IS DULL TO PREVENT PUNCTURING

PUSH THE LUG INTO THE CHANNEL AND THEN USE A BENT BAR TO FORCE THE LUG

ALIGNED WITH THE FRAME RAIL CHANNEL. (SEE FIGURE 1)

COLLAPSE THE STRIP SEAL INTO THE THE JOINT OPENING UNTIL THE LUG IS

3’-0" TO 4’-0" PRECEDING THE INSTALLATION.

LIBERALLY COAT THE STRIP SEAL LUGS WITH LUBRICANT ADHESIVE. COAT ONLY

SPLATTER AND/OR SHARP EDGES SHALL BE REMOVED.

CHANNEL SHALL ALSO BE INSPECTED AT ALL FIELD SPLICES, AND ALL WELD

BE INSPECTED TO ASCERTAIN THE ABSENCE OF CONCRETE AND DEBRIS. THE SEAL

THE FRAME RAILS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AND SEAL CHANNELS SHALL

MAY 18, 2012 MAY 18, 2012

tshroyer
Highlight
tshroyer
Highlight
PercassiSJ
Text Box
PENNDOT DETAILS Full set of details available at: ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/design/bqad/2012/BC/bc767m.pdf
Page 54: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 55: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 56: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 57: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 58: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 59: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 60: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 61: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 62: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 63: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 64: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 65: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 66: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 67: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 68: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 69: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 70: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 71: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 72: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 73: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 74: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 75: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 76: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 77: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 78: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 79: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 80: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 81: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 82: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 83: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 84: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 85: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 86: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 87: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 88: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 89: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 90: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 91: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 92: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 93: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 94: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 95: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 96: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13
Page 97: ACEC/Maine DOT Bridge Design Subcommittee - 6/11/13