ACADEMIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL - sdbor.edu€¦ · Academic and Student Affairs AGENDA ITEM: 8 – M...
Transcript of ACADEMIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL - sdbor.edu€¦ · Academic and Student Affairs AGENDA ITEM: 8 – M...
(Continued)
******************************************************************************
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS
Academic and Student Affairs
AGENDA ITEM: 8 – M
DATE: December 5-7, 2017
******************************************************************************
SUBJECT
Efficiency Infographics
CONTROLLING STATUTE, RULE, OR POLICY
None
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
During their August 2017 retreat the Board of Regents reviewed a report highlighting the
various efficiency initiatives completed in the Regental system over the past decade. The
report was developed in response for a presentation to the Joint Appropriations Committee
delivered at their July 2017 meeting. In response to a number of questions from the Board
during the retreat, a set of more detailed efficiency reports were presented during the
October 2017 meeting. This included reports on Section Size, Course & Program
Duplication, Instructor Rank Classifications, and the creation of a new taskforce to explore
Open Education Resources.
Following the presentation on these items, Board members inquired how to distill the
pertinent information down to key points that can be used during discussions with
stakeholders and legislators. In response, an initial set of Infographics have been developed
for six key efficiency areas. Additional infographics will be generated to address each of
the major points discussed with the Joint Appropriations Committee.
IMPACT AND RECOMMENDATION
Each of the six infographics seek to identify Board of Regents initiatives and policy
directives, and denote cost savings either to students or the institution. Infographics for
each of the six efficiency topics below have been developed and can be found in the
corresponding attachments.
Decreasing the Time to Completion
Campus advising staff have taken the challenge of encouraging students to
complete 15 or more credits every semester in order to keep them on pace for
graduation in four years or less. The Opportunity Scholarship program
requirements were modeled after this structure and has helped ensure that a higher
percentage of students are completing in a timely fashion. When considering costs
Efficiency Infographics
December 5-7, 2017
Page 2 of 3
associated with an additional year of enrollment and lost wages, students have the
opportunity to produce over $60,000 in earnings and tuition savings.
Instructor & Lecturer Ranks
During the 2013 round of negotiations with the Council of Higher Education
(COHE), the Board of Regents worked to develop a new Lecturer Rank structure
separate from the Professorial Ranks that would allow for the hiring of faculty that
could be focused solely on providing instruction to students. Since that time, the
Lecturer Ranks have grown at each campus (18.3% vs. 26.7%) and in comparison
are paid at 45% of full professors. A higher percentage of faculty are now dedicated
to teaching rather than research to balance student and institutional research needs.
It is estimated that $5.5 million is saved annually across the Regental system due
to this policy change.
Dual Credit Enrollment
State investment in the High School Dual Credit (HSDC) program has resulted in
a significant reduction in the cost of GE courses for students who participate in this
program during their Junior and Senior years. Students enroll at a reduced rate, and
save over $700 for each dual credit course they complete. Students who complete
up to four dual credit courses save $2,800 toward the total cost of their
postsecondary education and place themselves almost a semester ahead of
traditional freshman.
Managing Section Size
For almost two decades, the Board of Regents has maintained a 4/7/10 policy
(embedded in BOR Policy 5:17.4 Small Section Limitations) establishing that
selected courses must have enrollments of at least 4 Ph.D. students, 7 master’s
students, or 10 undergraduate students to be offered in the Regental system. Each
campus may have up to 3% or 4% of their sections that fall below these thresholds
without being in violation of the policy. The Board monitors these enrollments
each year and receives a report annually (currently depicted in the Section Size
Dashboard) to ensure compliance with these requirements. The goal of the policy
is to ensure appropriate curriculum management and appropriate class size for
students to engage with their peers in the subject matter. If under-enrolled sections
increased by 1% statewide it would result in an additional $619,000 in instructional
costs each year.
Dakota’s Promise
The Board of Regents have developed the framework for a new needs based
scholarship program which operates under the principles of shared responsibility.
Basic assumptions were established for the resources that students, families, the
federal government, and the state should contribute to the overall educational costs.
The Board prioritized the Dakota’s Promise scholarship program in their budget
request to Governor Daugaard, with the understanding that additional grant and aid
is necessary for the neediest students in South Dakota to have postsecondary
Efficiency Infographics
December 5-7, 2017
Page 3 of 3
opportunities after high school. This infographic depicts the average investments
from each of these critical partners to make the program a reality.
Course / Program Duplication
Currently, more than 40% of the undergraduate programs offered in the Regental
system are considered unique. In many instances where duplication does occur, the
overlap exists in common General Education, Teacher Education, STEM, or critical
need programs for the state. Additionally, when duplication of online courses does
occur, the average class size is traditionally three times the level required to meet
the 4/7/10 rule established by the Board.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I – Efficiencies Analysis – Graduating in Four Years Infographic
Attachment II – Efficiencies Analysis – Faculty Rank Classifications Infographic
Attachment III – Efficiencies Analysis – Dual Credit Enrollment Infographic
Attachment IV – Efficiencies Analysis – 4/7/10 Rule: Policy on Section Size Infographic
Attachment V – Efficiencies Analysis – Dakota’s Promise Infographic
Attachment VI – Efficiencies Analysis – Course/Program Duplication Infographic
Graduating in Four YearsGraduating college in four years should be a goal of many students. However, some don’t realize it takes at least 15 credit hours per semester to graduate from a 120-credit hour degree program. Regental institutions strongly encourage students to take 15 credit hours each semester because those who take more than four years to graduate miss out on an opportunity to enter the workforce early.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
The Cost of Year 5
$40,000 (Approx.)
$61,848$21,778
Lost Wages
Average Cost of Attendance (COA)
Total Cost
$5,250 is debt
Sources: SDBOR. (2016. [Graph illustration of college debt and cost, bar graph, [May 11, 2017]. Public university a�ordability dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.sdbor.edu/dashboards/
SDBOR. (2016). Graph illustration of average annual pay, bar graph, [May 11, 2017]. Occupational wages dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.sdbor.edu/dashboards/
Complete College America. (2014). Four-year MYTH: Make college more a�ordable. Retrieved from https://completecollege.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/4/4-Year-Myth.pdf
120 Credits in 5 Years
• Lost wages
• A year behind peers• More time paying on student loans/
increased interest
120 Credits in 4 Years + 1 Year Employment
• Average $40,000 professional income• A year closer to advancement opportunities• Less time paying on student loans/ less interest
Years to Graduation Based on Credits per Semester
10
15
12
6 Years
5 Years
4 YearsCOA includes tuition & fees, room and board, books, supplies, transportation, and other common living expenses.
• Higher potential for life events to interfere
ATTACHMENT I 4
Personnel costs remain the highest expense at a university
307 (20.4%)
440 (29.2%)
359 (23.8%)
402 (26.7%)
430 (30.5%)
407 (28.9%)
333 (23.6%)
240 (17.0%)
2017
5%
12%
Distribution of Faculty Rank Appointments During the Last Decade
2008Average Faculty Salaries 2017
Instructor
$53,754AssistantProfessor
$69,517AssociateProfessor
$76,677Full
Professor
$96,449
In fact, re-classi�cation of faculty rank saves the regental system approximately $5.5 million annually.
$13.8m $32.0m$23.7m $27.9m
$27.3m $42.1m$23.5m $34.6m $109.7m
$115.2m
Current Annual Instructional Expenditure
Instructional expenditure if ratios of faculty remained the same as 2008
E�ciencies Analysis - Faculty Rank Classi�cations
If faculty rank appointments remained unchanged, the instructional expenditures in SD would be much higher
This infographic provides an overview of how re-classi�cation of faculty ranks in the South Dakota Regental System has reduced instructional expenditure without hindering the delivery of content to students.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
56% Instructors & Asst. Professors are Untenured
ATTACHMENT II 5
Dual Credit EnrollmentHigh school juniors and seniors enrolled at participating public, private, and tribal high schools can simultaneously enroll in courses at a reduced cost that qualify for both college and high school credit. Courses o�ered meet the System General Education requirements at all six Regental institutions in the state.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
Tuition Cost of 3 Credit Hours
$145$707
$852Dual Credit Student
Undergraduate Resident*
Savings per class
Sources:SDBOR. (2016). [Graph illustration of college debt and cost, line graph, Nov. 6, 2017]. SDBOR Fall Enrollment Dashboard.
Retrieved from https://www.sdbor.edu/dashboards/SDBOR. (2017). Fact Book: Fiscal Year 2017. Retrieved from https://www.sdbor.edu/mediapubs/factbook/Documents/FY17Factbook.pdf
$284/ credit hour
$48.33/ credit hour $2,832Completing 4 Dual Credit Classes in High School saves
and can put you 1 Semester ahead of a traditional Freshman
$7,070Completing 10 Dual Credit Classes in high school saves
and can put you 1 Year ahead of a traditional Freshman
Dual Credit Saves Big
3,035 SD high school students bene�ted from HSDC in 2017
Eliminates Program DuplicationCollege general education courses count towards both college and high school graduation.
Potential Savings from Participation
10 Dual Credit Courses $7,070$3,3681 Year Room and Board
$10,438Savings to StudentsRoom and Board calculated using Double-Occupancy Room and Minimum Meal Plan rates, averaged across Regental System
The Big Picture Savings to Students
If all 3,035 students take an average of 4 dual credit courses,the total savings could be near $13.7m, or an average of $4,516 per student per year.
Savings includes 1 semester of room and board, half of $3,368 rate listed to the right
High School
College
Dual Credit
Undergraduate, resident tution averaged across Regental system
ATTACHMENT III 6
The 4-7-10 Rule: Policy on Section SizeUnderstanding the size of course sections in the state is critical to maintaining cost-e�ective, quality instruction, and services across the Regental system. This infographic discusses how the Board of Regents evaluates institutional performance based on managing section size.
Section Sizes Minimums, by Education Level
Undergraduate
10Entry-level
Graduate
7Upper-level
Graduate
4
202 Sections (2.9%)
6,794 Sections (97.1%)
Below MinimumAbove Minimum
2017 Enrollments Under Section Size Limits
189 Sections (2.7%)
8 Sections (0.1%)
5 Sections (0.07%)
Annually
$4,285
$857Avg. Cost of Undergraduate
3 Credit-Hour Course
(5 students)
Avg. Revenue for Half-enrollment
$8,570Avg. Revenue for
At-Limit Enrollment
$4,304
$1,076Avg. Cost of Entry-level Graduate,
3 Credit-Hour Course
Avg. Revenue for Half-enrollment
$7,532Avg. Revenue for
At-Limit Enrollment
(4 students)
Avg. Revenue for Half-enrollment
$2,152
$1,076Avg. Cost of Upper-level Graduate,
3 Credit-Hour Course
Avg. Revenue for At-Limit Enrollment
$4,304
(2 students)
$697k
-$591k$106k
$24k
-$19k$5k
138 46
-$21k
-$9k-$30k
$619,000 in lost funds
At-Limit EnrolledNet EarningsHalf-enrolledNet Earnings
Di�erence
Extra Entry-level Graduate Sections Under the Limit
Extra Undergraduate Sections Under the Limit
Extra Upper-level Graduate Sections Under the Limit
Resident, On-campus student, assuming an avg. $33 discipline fee/ course, Upper-level Graduate courses are assumed to be taught at a cost of $9,645. Other courses taught at a cost of $3,519.
Note: Undergraduate course revenue subsidizescritical mission areas of a university.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
If Percent of Under-Enrolled Courses Increase from 4 to 5% Systemwide
ATTACHMENT IV 7
State Partner Federal
Partner
Family Partner
Part-time work80% of earnings from 15 hrs/ week and 40 hours/ week while not in school at minimum wage.
Student Partner
Institutional Partner
Scholarships & LoansScholarships reward students for accepting responsibility for their own education. Loans cover the remainder of what wages and scholarships cannot.
Expected Family ContributionParents of dependent students or spouses of independent students should be expected to contribute.
SavingsSeveral incentives exist for parents and students to invest in the education of their child or partner.
Recognized Cost of Attendance
Institutional ResponsibilityAfter the Recognized Cost of Attendance, institutions are responsible for any remaining costs. This encourages restraint for increases to portions of costs they can control and will require institutions to �ll any �nancial gaps with institutional aid.
Filling the GapIf students and families have done what they can, then South Dakota should do what it can to manage a�ordability of postsecondary education in the state.
Federal SupportThe federal government o�ers students Pell awards and federal tax credits to encourage saving for college.
Dakota's Promise is a pathway to a more educated South Dakota, requiring several partners in order to be successful. Students, families, federal government, state government, and institutions all have essential roles in ensuring that any South Dakotan aspiring to attain a postsecondary credential can do so.
Recognized Cost of AttendanceAn average of tution, fees, and corresponding costs of living for the bottom three SDBOR instituions and the bottom two SD technical institutes.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
$19,767
$3,875$4,316$9,814+
$1,762 State PartnerFederal PartnerFamily PartnerStudent Partner
“Shannon’s” Example$3,875
$4,316
$9,814
$1,762
$5,814For Shannon
$4,000For Shannon
This is an example of what an average student, Shannon, would be expected to contribute, along with the other partners for one year of enrollment at a university.
ATTACHMENT V 8
Course Duplication in the Regental SystemIt can often be seen as an ine�cient to use resources to o�er courses that are currently shared by other institutions in the Regental system. However, due to South Dakota’s geography, having six campuses without overlap can challenge the educational quality of the state as a whole.
SDBOR EFFICIENCY SERIES
Program duplication bene�ts those students unable to relocate to a campus by giving them an option closer to home.
Provides Opportunity
Factors Associated with Managing Duplication
Teacher candidates receive the best guidance by residency instructors when the distance between school and college is closer.
The proximity of available STEM-relatedinstruction would impact the number ofstudents graduating with related degrees.
Quality STEM Education
Teacher Training
General Education Drives EnrollmentFor example, an under-enrolled biology program cannot be easily eliminated, especially since it is common for faculty to teach program-speci�c math courses, as well as biology courses that ful�ll general education requirements.
Every alternating year, a review of undergraduate degree programs is conducted to ensure programs maintain an average of �ve graduates per year. Programs failing to meet these conditions are �agged for review.
Regular Evaluation Program Duplication Stats
Distinct Associate’s or Bachelor’s degree programs263
40% Programs unique to the system*
*Based on CIP Code
2017 Regental Graduates in Biology
BHSU53 DSU4 NSU29 SDSMT15SDSU149USD94
Total 344
Avg. Section Size: 27
Online Sections, Systemwide
1,388 10 Most Common Duplicated Online
Total Sections130Fundamentals of Speech
Composition ICollege AlgebraGeneral PsychologyIntroduction to SociologyComposition IIHuman RelationsUnited States History IAmerican GovernmentBiology Survey I Lab
3119161311108877
In order to remain competetive with other online degree programs outside the Regental System, many schools must o�er their courses online, thus contributing to the total number of duplicate courses.
ATTACHMENT VI 9