Abut Design
-
Upload
subir-kunda -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Abut Design
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
1/32
BASIC DATA1.5m
Skew Angle 0 degrees
Overall Span L 10.000 m
Overall Span in skew direction Lskew 10.000 m
Clear Carriageway Bcw 7.550 m
Width of Solid Slab Wsolid 10.50 m
Width of Solid Slab in skew direction Wsolid skew 10.500 m
Depth of Solid Slab Dslab 0.8 m
Unit weight of concrete wcon 2.4 t/m3
Weight of Crash barrier wrail 1.0 t/m
DEAD LOAD CALCULATION
Dead LoadTotal wei (10.5*10*0.8*2.4) = 201.6 t
S.I.D.L.
Span = 10.000 m Width of the Carraige-way= 7.55 m
Superimposed dead load from Crash-Barrier= (1.0*10) = 10.00 t
Superimposed dead load from Crash-Barrier= (1.0*10) = 10.00 t
Superimposed dead load from Railing = (0.5*10) = 5.00 t
Superimposed dead load from Wearing Coat = (0.2*7.55*10) = 15.10 t
Total SIDL = (10+10.00+5.00+15.10) = 40.10 t
Total dead load+sidl reaction = (201.6+40.1) = 241.70 T
For design of substructure increasing by 5% = 1.05*241.7 = 253.79 T
Total Dead Load + SIDL on Abutment due to Superstructure = (253.79/2) = 126.895 T
Say= 127 T
DEAD LOAD CALCULATION
7.550m
Dslab
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
2/32
1) Total Length of the Bridge : 10.0 m, Exp jt to exp jt
2) Span Arrangement : 1*10 m
3) Overall Width of Superstructure : 10.5 m
4) Type of Superstructure : Solid Slab
5) Depth of Superstructure : 0.8 m
6) Type of Bearings : Tar paper
7) Type of Substructure
Abutment : cantilever type Abutment
8) Type of Foundations
Abutment : Open foundation
9) Design Data
* Formation Level : 105.791 m
* Safe Bearing Capacity
Abutment : 15 t/m2
10) Properties of earthfill behindabutments / returns
* Dry Density : 1.8 t/cu.m
* Submerged Density : 2.07 t/cu.m
* f : 31 degrees
* Cohesion 'C' : 0 t/sq.m
* m : 0.377
11) Founding Levels
*Abutments : 107.352 m
* return wall : 107.352 m
12) Return Walllength : 2.500 m
Abutment cap top Level : 104.991 m
SALIENT FEATURES
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
3/32
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
4/32
Front Ground Level : 109.352 m
High Flood Level : 113.976 m
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
5/32
Reaction has been calculated for the following cases
1. One lane of class 70-R(W)
2. One lane of class 70-R(T)
3. One lane of class - A
4. Two lane of class - A
(For Elastomeric Bearing) : 4
Horizontal force at each end including braking = Fh/2+Vr.Ltc
(As per Cl.214.5
Vr = Shear rating of the elastomeric bearings
Ltc = Movement of deck above beraing , other than that applied forces.
(As per IRC-83 Part-II)
Total Longitudinal Strain , d = 0.0005
Movement of the deck , Lrc = (0.5*0.0005*(9.6+0.2+0.2)) = 0.0025 m
GA (102.04*0.135)
h 0.048
G = 102.04 t/m2
A = 0.135 m2
[ Lo = 0.45 m Bo
h = nhi+2he = (3*0.012+2*0.006) = 0.04
hi = Thickness of individual internal layer of elastomer = 0.012
he = Thickness of top/bottom layer opf elastomer = 0.006
n = No. of internal elastomer layer = 3
= (286.99*0.0025)
= (no. of bearing*0
= (4*0.72)
= 2.87 t
Case 1 : One lane of class 70-R(W)
4.4 m Cg of 92t
0.2 m 9.60 m
Ra
Ra = 92*(9.6-4.4+0.2)/9.6 = 51.8
Rb = 92-51.8 = 40.3
Braking Force = 0.2*92/2+2.87 = 12.1
CL of 70-R CL of c/w
1.630
Transvers eccentricity = 3.120
Transvers moment = 3.12*51.8 = 161.5
CALCULATION OF LIVE LOAD REACTION FOR ABUTMENT
Horizontal force without any applied forces for one bearing, V.Lrc
Total horizontal force without any applied forces ,V.Lrc
28
No. of Bearing =
Vr = = =
9.5
3.120
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
6/32
Case 2 : One lane of class-A
2.99 m Cg of 36.4 t braking Force
0.2 m 9.60 m
Ra
Ra = 36.4*(9.6-2.99+0.2)/9.6 = 25.
Rb = 36.4-25.8 = 10.
Braking Force = 0.2*36.4/2+2.87 = 6.5
CL class A(1L) CL of c/w
1.30
9.5 m
Transvers eccentricity = 3.4
Transvers moment = 3.45*25.8 = 89.
Case 3 : Two lane of class-A
Ra = 2*25.8 = 51.
Rb = 2*10.6 = 21.
Braking Force(for 1 lane only) = 6.5
CL class A(2L) CL of c/w
3.05
9.5 m
Transvers eccentricity = 1.7
Transvers moment = 1.7*51.6 = 87.
Case 4 : One lane of 70R Tracked
cg of 70t Load
2.285m 2.285m
0.200m 9.600m 0.200m
Ra Rb
Ra = 70.00*7.315/9.6 = 54.80t
Rb= 70-54.80 = 15.20
CL of carriageway
2.60 2.2
9.500m
transverse moment = 118.09t-m
braking force = 9.870t = 115
Summary of Loads
1L class 70 - R
From the above 70R tracked case has been considered in the design of Abutment
mMax. vertical reaction (t)
12.1
6.5
6.5
Load case
51.8
25.8
51.6
1L class - A
3.45
Braking force (t)
1.7
2L class - A
70R-Tracked 54.8 9.9
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
7/32
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT STEM
Width of abutment 8.500 m
Thickness of abutment 1.000 m
Reinf. requred at base = 346.46 cm2
Reinf. Provided at base = 390.6 cm2
OK ( 42Nos 28 f ) @ 203.6585
= 0.46 % ( 42Nos 20 f ) @ 203.6585
Reinf. requred at the mid = 188.02 cm2
Reinf. Provided at the mid = 258.6 cm2
OK ( 42Nos 28 f ) @ 203.6585
= 0.30 % ( 0Nos 16 f ) @
Minimum Reinf. In Pier Column
Minimum Reinf. Reqd. ( 0.3% ) as per cl. 306.2.1 = 0.003*8.5*1* 10000
= 255.0 cm2
Transverse Reinforcement in Pier ColumnsAs per Cl. 306.3.2 of IRC:21
Min. Dia of trans. Reinf. = 1/4 * Largest bar dia. of main reinf.
= 1/4*28 = 7 mm
Bar Dia. Provided = 10 mm @ c/c 150 mm OK
As per Cl. 306.3.3 of IRC:21
Pitch = 12 * dia. of smallest bar of main reinf.
= 12*20
= 240 mm
The calculations for reinforcement requirement at various sections is presented here. A standard in house program has been
used for calculation of stresses in concrete and steel in a rectangular section subjected to combined axial and bending forces.
of IRC:21-2000
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
8/32
The abutment cap has been designed as per Clause 716.2.1 , IRC :78- 2000 .
The abutment cap shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both facesand in both directions assuming a cap thickness of 225 mm.
Length of abutment cap = 8.5 m
Width of abutment cap = 2.12 m
Depth of abutment cap assumed = 0.225 m
Reinforcement in the direction of length of abutment :-
Area of steel required (mm2) = 2385 mm
2
Providing steel by distributing equally at top & bottom = 16 nos. 12 f @ 131 mm
Area of steel provided (mm2) = 3619 mm
2 OK
Reinforcement in the direction of width of abutment :-
Area of steel required (mm2)/m = 1125 mm
2
Providing stirrups of 16 mm dia. 2 legged
Spacing if stirrups required = 357.4 mm
Therefore, providing 12 f , 2 legged stirrups @ 150 c/c .
Depth of abutment provided = 1000.00 mm
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
9/32
0.92
Design values :
0.300 m g = 1.80 t/m22.160
1 2 ka = 0.279
1.085 t/m2 0.603 t/m2
1)Earth Pressure due to surcharge equivalent to 1.2m of earthfil l = ka *g*1.2
= 0.603 t/m2
2)Earth Pressure due to backfill of earth = k a *g*h
= 1.085 t/m2
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*1.2*h2/2
= 1.406 t-m/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*h3*0.42/2
= 1.063 t-m/m
Total bending moment at the base of dirtwall = 2.469 t-m/m
due to earth pressure
Calculation of force and moment due to the effect of braking :(cosidering 40t bogie loading)
2.245 10t 8.5 10t
2.79m
2.160
1.750 2.79 2.160
Effective width = 6.700 m
Braking force, 0.2*20 = 4 t
braking force including impact of 50%= 6 t
Braking force per metre width = 0.90 t
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to effect of braking = 1.93 t-m/m
Therefore total bending moment at the base of the dirtwall = 4.40 t-m/m
height of
dirtwall,h = 2.160 m
DESIGN OF DIRTWALL
Earth Pressure diagram
width of
dirtwall =0.300 m
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
10/32
Basic Design Data:
Grade of conc. 35
Grade of steel 500
Dia of bar used 12Permissible stress in concrete 1190 t/m2
Permissible stress in steel 24000 t/m2m , Modulur ratio 10
K value for concrete 0.332
j value for concrete 0.889Q for concrete 175.55
Max. moment in dirtwall (t-m) 4.40
Effective depth required (mm) 158
Effective depth provided (mm) 244
Ast required (mm ) 845
Provide longitudinal reinforcement:
f16 @ 150 c/c
Ast provided (mm2) 1340 Thus OK
Therefore providing 12 f @ 250 c/c on the approach side and 10 f @ 200 c/c on the outer sidein the vertical direction . Also providing 10 f @ 150 c/c on both faces in the horizontal direction .
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
11/32
DESIGN OF FOOTING SLAB
L
3 10.836t/m^2
4.075t/m^2 2
10.500m
T T
6.219t/m^2 1
4 13.784t/m^2
L
From the design of abutment we obtain the maximum and minimum base pressures
considering LWL case as the governing case
Axial load = 768.837t
Net longitudinal moment = 445.0900t-m
transverse moment at base = 161.5000t-m
longitudinal section modulus at base = 117.670m^3
transverse section modulus = 150.675m^3
area of base = 86.10m^2
base pressure at point 1 = 13.784t/m^2
base pressure at point 2 = 10.836t/m^2
base pressure at point 3 = 4.075t/m^2base pressure at point 4 = 6.219t/m^2
Design of toe slab
D
a
1.3 C
0.5 B
3.5 0.9 3.8
5.15t/m^2 a 12.310t/m^2
8.200m
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
12/32
Average base pressure at point 1 = 12.310t/m^2
Average base pressure at point 4 = 5.147t/m^2
base pressure at junction-section a-a= 8.991t/m^2
Bending moment at face of stem
Depth of soil cover above footing = 2.000m
loadings Element Description Area factor Force (t) lever arm(m)
moment(t-
m)
B
rec portion of
conrete 1.000 4.56 1.9 8.664
C
triangular
porton of
concrete 0.500 3.648 1.27 4.63296
D
rectangular
portion of soil
cover 1.000 4.788 1.9 9.0972
E
triangular
porton of soilcover 0.500 2.736 2.53 6.9312
F
rectanguar
portion of
base
pressure -1.000 -46.78 1.9 -88.879413
G
triangular
portion of
base
pressure -0.500 6.31 1.27 7.98890989Total -24.74 -51.57
Bending moment at face stem = -51.57t-m
Grade of concrete = M30permissible stress in concrete = 1019 t/m^2
permissible stress in steel = 20400 t/m^2
m = 10
k = 0.333
j = 0.889
Q value for concrete = 150.963t/m^2
cover to substructure = 75.000mm
assuming a 16 dia bar,eff depth at junction= 1.217m
effective depth required at the junction = 0.584m
area of steel required = 23.36cm^2/m
minimum steel required 0.12% = 7.80cm^2/m
provide25 dia bar @190c/c = 25.8cm^2/m
safe
distribution steel for the tension face of toe slab,providing 0.25*(DL+LL) at the
junction = 5.84cm^2/m
minimum steel required = 7.80cm^2/m
provide16 dia bar @200c/c = 10.1cm^2/m
Downwardpressure
upwardpressure
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
13/32
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
14/32
check for shear
deff section
1.22m
1.30m
0.50m
3.50m 0.90m 3.80m
effective depth distance from stem junction = 1.217m
depth at 'd eff' distance from stem junction = 1.044m
effective depth at 'd eff' distance = 0.961mtan b = 0.229
base pressure at effective depth distance from
junction = 10.1t/m^2
Depth of soil cover above footing = 2.000m
Loadings Element Description Area factor Force Lever arm Moment
A
rectangular
part of
concrete 1.00 3.10 1.29 4.00
B
trianglar part
of concrete 0.50 1.69 0.86 1.45
C
rectangular
part of soil
cover 1.00 4.45 1.29 5.74
D
trianglar part
of soil cover 0.50 0.70 1.72 1.21
E
rectangular
part of base
pressure -1.00 -31.80 1.29 -41.07
F
trianglar partof base
pressure -0.50 2.91 0.86 2.51Total = -18.95 -26.15
downwardpressure
upward
pressur
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
15/32
shear force at critical section = 18.95t
bending moment at critical sction = 26.15t-m
net shear force at critical section = 12.73t
net shear stress at critical section = 13.25t/m^2
0.1325Mpa
percentage of reinforcement = 0.2689
permissible shear stress = 0.2424Mpa
safe in shear
summary of reinforcement in Toe slab
main steel 25 f @190c/c
dist. Steel 16 f @200c/c
main steel 16 f @200c/cdist. Steel 16 f @200c/c
Bottom
Top
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
16/32
HEEL SLAB DESIGN FML= 9.965
BRL = 8
3.164 CTRL = 7.7
STRL = 6.7
D
4.9
C
1.8 B
1.8 0.000
2.05
2.85t/m^2 41t/m^2
3 a 2
M-T
8.5
M-L
4 1
a
From the design of abutment we obtain the maximum and minimum base pressures
5.100m
1.000
1.000
5.100m
A
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
17/32
considering LWL case as the governing case
Axial Load = 961.00t
Net longitudinal mom = 712.00t-m
Transverse moment = 99.90t-m
Longitudinal section modulus at base = 36.8475 m^3Transverse section modulus at base = 61.4125 m^3
Area of the base = 43.35 m^2
summary of base pressures at points 1,2,3 & 4
Base pressure at point 1 = 43.12
Base pressure at point 2 = 39.86
Base pressure at point 3 = 1.22
Base pressure at point 4 = 4.47
Base pressure at junction a-a = 29.37 t/m^2
Summary of bending moment at the junction
due to soil and concrete
Element no Force Lever arm Moment
A 15.12 1.025 15.50
B 0.00 0.68 0.00
C 0.00 1.37 0.00
D 36.77 1.025 37.69
Total = 51.89 53.19
Summary of bending moment at the junction
due to base pressure
Element Force Lever arm moment
Description
rectangular portion of
concrete
triangular portion of
concretetriangular portion of
soilrectangular portion of
soil
Description
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
18/32
1 -60.20 1.025 -61.71
2 27.18 1.37 37.2366
-33.02 -24.4734
Bending moment at face of stem = 28.72 t-m
Shear force at face of stem = 18.87 t
Grade of concrete = M35
Grade of steel = 500
m = 10
permissible stress in steel = 24000 t/m^2
permissible stress in concrete = 1189.26 t/m^2
k = 0.33
j = 0.89
Q = 175.26 t/m^2
Effective depth required at junction= 0.40 massuming dia of steel = 16 mm
cover to the substructure = 75 mm
Effective depth provided at junction= 1.717 m
safe
area of steel required = 33.23 cm^2
provide 32 f bar @120 = 67.02 cm^2
safe
Design for shear
Heel has been checked for shear at the junction of heel portion
Effective depth = 1.717
shear force at the junction = 33.02 t
shear stress at the junction = 19.23 t/m^2
= 0.19 Mpa
triangular portion of
base pressure
diagram
Total =
rectangular portion of
base pressure
diagram
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
19/32
permissible shear stress
percentage of reinforcement = 0.39 %
permissible shear stress = 0.35 Mpa
safe
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
20/32
ka = 0.279
g = 1.80
Live load Surcharge = 1.20 m
(SHt)
Q1=ka*g*SHt Q2=ka*g*b
The end return wall has been designed as a plate fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of its vertical sides.
( Refer Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain by Roark & Young ).
1 8.165 2.05 0.251 0.603 0.183 0.190 0.573 0.265
0.251 3.729 0.134 0.090 0.423 0.151
500 248 740 800 -6.77
bar diaspacing
reqd
spacing
providedbar dia
spacin
g reqd
spacing
provided
20 f 619 c/c 150 c/c 12 f @ 125 c/c 12 f 300 c/c 125 c/c @
Ast provided (vertic Ast provided (horizontal) =
CHECK FOR SHEAR
0.251 0.603 0.183 0.190 0.573 0.265
DESIGN OF RETURN WALL
12 f
2999.17 mm2 1809.56 mm2
Earth face
Outer face
376
(at x=0 &
z=0.4b) Ma2
(t-m/m)
(at x=a & z=0) Mb1(t-m/m)
thk. of
end
return
wall at
top
Design of end return wall
a = 2.050
b
=8.1
65
Q1
(t/m2)
b1
(at x=0 &
z=0.8b) Ma1
(t-m/m)
-1.27
b2
Outer face
Horizontal reinforcement
Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate
Ast for vertical
reinforcement
(mm2)
507
Moment in
horizontal
direction(Mh)
-5.02
Ast for horizontal
reinforcement (mm2)
"a/b" (at x=a & z=0) Mb2(t-m/m)
-5.54
Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate
-3.75
(at x=a & z=0) R1
(t-m/m2)
2.819
(at x=0 &
z=0.8b) R2
(t-m/m2)
1.305
Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate
b1 g2
g1
For "a/b" Q1
(t/m2)
Earth face
Deff
provided
Deff
reqd.
g2
-1.23
b2
Moment in
vertical
direction(
Mv)
Vertical reinforcement
g2
S.NO.
Height
of
return
wall
(m) "b"
Length
of return
wall (m)
"a"
"a/b"
b2 g1
Q2
(t/m2)
b1
thk. of
end
return
wall at
bottom
g1
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
21/32
0.251 3.729 0.134 0.090 0.423 0.151
At x = a & z = 0
mm
mm
V (t-m/m2)
tv N/mm2
r
As per IRC 21-2000(Cl 304.7.1.3.3),
Permissible Shear Stress (0.5% steel)
N/mm2
Increase in permissible stress (d)
N/mm2
tv tc Thus OkAt x = 0 & z = 0.4*b
mm
z=0.4b 0.4 mm
V (t-m/m2)
tv N/mm2
r
As per IRC 21-2000(Cl 304.7.1.3.3),Permissible Shear Stress (0.5% steel)
N/mm2
Incease in permissible stress (d)
N/mm2
tv tc Thus Ok
0.214
1.00
0.214
10.80 o.k.
Check For One way Shear :
According to Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000. Pile Cap is not checked for shear if it is designed by truss analogy.
Pile Cap is checked for shear as per Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000.
The pile cap is checked for one way shear. The critical section for shear is considerred as thesection located deff distance from face of abutment.
Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutment(at deff distance) = 1625.0 mm
Distance of the Maximum Reaction Force from the Face of the abutment = 1300 mm
Distance of the critical section from the Maximum Reaction Force = (1,300-1,625) mm
= -325 mm < 600mm
Width of Pile Cap = 8.700 mShear at deff distance from face of abutment cap = 154.7 tShear at deff distance from face of abutment cap/m = 17.78 t/m
Pile Cap is checked for shear as per Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000.The pile cap is checked for one way shear. The critical section for shear is considerred as thesection located deff distance from face of abutment.
deff provided = 1.625 m
Shear Stress = 17.78/(1.625)= 10.94 t/m2
100*Ast/bd = 0.302
Permissible Shear Stress tc = 24.666 t/m2
Shear carried by concrete, Vc = 24.666*1.0*0.000= 40.1 t/m
Greater than Max. Design Shear,Thus no Shear Reinforcement is required,
(In One Layers at top in both directions)
one way shear check is required.
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
28/32
But minimum shear reinforcement will be provided as per Cl.304.7.1.5 of IRC-21,2000.
Asw 0.4bs 0.87fy
Where, s = Spacing of the Bars = 1000 mm
b = Width of the abutmen = 8700 mm
fy = Yield Strrength of steel = 500 MPa
Shear Reinforcement, Asw = (0.4*1000*8700)/(0.87*500) mm^2
= 8000.00 mm2
= 80.000 cm2
Provide 10 dia. 18L Stirrups @125 Spacing
Ast provided = 113.10 cm2
>80.00cm^2 , Thus O.K.
For construction convenience, required stirrups may be provided in alternate la ers as follows
10 dia. 18L Stirrups @250 c/c
+10 dia. 18L Stirrups @250 c/c
Check For Punching Shear around pile :
750 mm
1413 mm
2825 mm
750 mm
Permissible Punching Shear Stress around the pile = 0.16sqrt(f ck)
= 0.16*sqrt(35)
= 0.947 Mpa
Maximum Reaction on one pile = 233.0 t
Perimeter of area on which punching shear acts (taken as the minimum of two possible cases) = 3.719 m
Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutment = 0.813 m
Punching Shear Sress around the pile = 233.03/(3.72*1.625)
= 38.56 t/m2
= 0.39 Mpa
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
29/32
Check For Punching Shear around abutment column :
10125 mm
0 mm
2625 mm
Permissible Punching Shear Stress around the abutment = 0.16sqrt(f ck)
= 0.16*sqrt(35)
= 0.947 Mpa
Maximum Reaction on single abutment = 961 t
Self wt. of Pile Cap = 114.8 t
Total Load = 1076 t
Perimeter of area on which punching shear acts = 25.50 m
Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutme = 0.813 m
Punching Shear Sress around the abutment = 1,076/(25.50*1.625)
= 25.96 t/m2
= 0.260
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
30/32
Calculation of Top R/F for Sagging Moment :
Width of pile cap = 5.1 m
Net bending Moment = 0.0 t-m
Moment per unit width = 0.0 t-m
CALCULATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS
Grade of concrete = M35
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Unit. Wt of Concrete= 2.4 t/m3
Permissible stresses:
sst =
sbc =
Basic Design Parameters:
r= sst/sbc = 20.17
m= 10
k = m/(m+r) = 0.331
j = 1-k/3 = 0.890
q = 0.5*scbc*k*j = 175t/m^2
deff reqd. = sqrt(0.01/(175.44*1.0))
= 0.008 m = 7.5 mm
deff provd. = {(2.25*1000)-150-16-16/2} = 2076.0 mm
Main Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm
Distribution Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm Clear Cover Provided (including p = 150 mm
Ast reqd = (0.0*1000)/(24,000.0*0.890*2,076.0) = 0.000000 m2
= 0 mm2
= 0.00 cm2/m
Provide 16 f @ 125 c/c0 f @ 0 c/c
Rein.provided = 16.1 cm2/m > 0.00 o.k.
Calculation of Bottom R/F for Support Moment :
Width of pile cap = 5.1 m
Net bending Moment = 0.0 t-m
Moment per unit width = 0.0 t-m
CALCULATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS
Grade of concrete = M35
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Unit. Wt of Concrete= 2.4 t/m3
Permissible stresses:
sst =
sbc =
Basic Design Parameters:
r= sst/sbc = 20.57
m= 10
k = m/(m+r) = 0.327j = 1-k/3 = 0.891
q = 0.5*scbc*k*j = 170t/m^2
1167t/m^2
1190t/m^2
Thus O.K
(In One Layers at top)
24000t/m^2
DESIGN OF PILE CAP (TRANSVERSE DIRECTION)
24000t/m^2
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
31/32
deff reqd. = sqrt(0.00/(170.01*1.0))
= 0.000 m = 0.0 mm
deff provd. = {(2.25*1000)-150-25-16/2} = 2067.0 mm
Main Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm
Distribution Bar Dia. Provided = 25 f mm Clear Cover Provi = 150 mm
Ast reqd = (0.0*1000)/(24,000.0*0.891*2,067.0) = 0.000000 m2
= 0 mm2
= 0.00 cm2/m
Provide 16 f @ 125 c/c In One La ers at bottom in transverse dir.0 f @ 125 c/c
Minimum Ast reqd. (as per IS :456) = 0.06% of Cross-sectional area.
= (0.0006*2.25*1.0*1000000)
= 1350 mm2
= 13.50 cm2
Rein.provided = 16.08 cm2/m > 0.00 o.k.
Thus O.K
-
7/29/2019 Abut Design
32/32
So, we will follow here IS 2911 ,part 1/section 2
No. of Pile = 6
Pile diameter = 1.2 m
Pile length = 20.000 m
Normal Case :
Transverse Horizontal Force = 0 t
Longitudinal Horizontal Force = 284 t (from the output - 1 of ABUT2 fortran programme )
Resultant Horizontal Force = sqrt(0^2+284^2) = 284.00 t
Longitudinal Seismic Case :
Transverse Horizontal Force = 0 t
Longitudinal Horizontal Force = 358 t (from the output - 1-s of ABUT2 fortran programme )
(In house programme )
Resultant Horizontal Force = sqrt(0^2+358^2) = 358.00 t
Maximum Lateral load = 286.40 t
Q = Lateral Load in each Pile = (286.40/6 = 47.73 t
0.00
T = (E*I/K1)^(1/5) K 1 = 0.146 kg/cm3
(337,216.55*0.10*100000000/0.146)^0.2/100)
= 4.72 m
Q Q DRY Submerged
Loose sand 0.26 0.146
L1 L1 Medium sand 0.775 0.525
Dense sand 2.075 1.245Very loose sand under - 0.04
Le Lf repeated loading ornormally loading clays
L1 = 0.0
L1/T = 0.0
(From Fig 2 of IS:2911(Part 1, Sec-2)-AppendixB Lf/T = 2.2
Lf = (4.72*2.2) = 10.39 m
Grade of concrete = M35 Permissible Stress:
E = 57000*(fck)0.5
kg/cm2
Concrete scbc= 11.67 Mpa
= 57000*(35^0.5) 1167 t/sqm (In Normal Case)
= 337216.5 kg/cm2
= 3372165.5 t/m2
Steel sst= 240 Mpa
24000 t/s m (In Normal Case)
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Dia. of pile = 1.20 m
I of pile = (3.14*1.2^4/64) = 0.1018m^4
For fixed headpile, the fixed end moment of the equivalent cantilever is computed using the following equation :Mf =Q*(L1+Lf)/2
= 47.73*(0.00+10.39)/2
= 248.01 t-m
0.0
(m) = 0.82 (From Fig 3, IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)
m*Mf = 203.37 t-m
DESIGN OF PILEBored Cast in-Situ Piles
Final check OK
VALUES OF CONSTANT K1 ( kg/cm* )
Reduction Factor (m) , for L1/t or L1/R =
The Actual Maximum Moment (M) =