Abut Design

download Abut Design

of 32

Transcript of Abut Design

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    1/32

    BASIC DATA1.5m

    Skew Angle 0 degrees

    Overall Span L 10.000 m

    Overall Span in skew direction Lskew 10.000 m

    Clear Carriageway Bcw 7.550 m

    Width of Solid Slab Wsolid 10.50 m

    Width of Solid Slab in skew direction Wsolid skew 10.500 m

    Depth of Solid Slab Dslab 0.8 m

    Unit weight of concrete wcon 2.4 t/m3

    Weight of Crash barrier wrail 1.0 t/m

    DEAD LOAD CALCULATION

    Dead LoadTotal wei (10.5*10*0.8*2.4) = 201.6 t

    S.I.D.L.

    Span = 10.000 m Width of the Carraige-way= 7.55 m

    Superimposed dead load from Crash-Barrier= (1.0*10) = 10.00 t

    Superimposed dead load from Crash-Barrier= (1.0*10) = 10.00 t

    Superimposed dead load from Railing = (0.5*10) = 5.00 t

    Superimposed dead load from Wearing Coat = (0.2*7.55*10) = 15.10 t

    Total SIDL = (10+10.00+5.00+15.10) = 40.10 t

    Total dead load+sidl reaction = (201.6+40.1) = 241.70 T

    For design of substructure increasing by 5% = 1.05*241.7 = 253.79 T

    Total Dead Load + SIDL on Abutment due to Superstructure = (253.79/2) = 126.895 T

    Say= 127 T

    DEAD LOAD CALCULATION

    7.550m

    Dslab

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    2/32

    1) Total Length of the Bridge : 10.0 m, Exp jt to exp jt

    2) Span Arrangement : 1*10 m

    3) Overall Width of Superstructure : 10.5 m

    4) Type of Superstructure : Solid Slab

    5) Depth of Superstructure : 0.8 m

    6) Type of Bearings : Tar paper

    7) Type of Substructure

    Abutment : cantilever type Abutment

    8) Type of Foundations

    Abutment : Open foundation

    9) Design Data

    * Formation Level : 105.791 m

    * Safe Bearing Capacity

    Abutment : 15 t/m2

    10) Properties of earthfill behindabutments / returns

    * Dry Density : 1.8 t/cu.m

    * Submerged Density : 2.07 t/cu.m

    * f : 31 degrees

    * Cohesion 'C' : 0 t/sq.m

    * m : 0.377

    11) Founding Levels

    *Abutments : 107.352 m

    * return wall : 107.352 m

    12) Return Walllength : 2.500 m

    Abutment cap top Level : 104.991 m

    SALIENT FEATURES

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    3/32

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    4/32

    Front Ground Level : 109.352 m

    High Flood Level : 113.976 m

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    5/32

    Reaction has been calculated for the following cases

    1. One lane of class 70-R(W)

    2. One lane of class 70-R(T)

    3. One lane of class - A

    4. Two lane of class - A

    (For Elastomeric Bearing) : 4

    Horizontal force at each end including braking = Fh/2+Vr.Ltc

    (As per Cl.214.5

    Vr = Shear rating of the elastomeric bearings

    Ltc = Movement of deck above beraing , other than that applied forces.

    (As per IRC-83 Part-II)

    Total Longitudinal Strain , d = 0.0005

    Movement of the deck , Lrc = (0.5*0.0005*(9.6+0.2+0.2)) = 0.0025 m

    GA (102.04*0.135)

    h 0.048

    G = 102.04 t/m2

    A = 0.135 m2

    [ Lo = 0.45 m Bo

    h = nhi+2he = (3*0.012+2*0.006) = 0.04

    hi = Thickness of individual internal layer of elastomer = 0.012

    he = Thickness of top/bottom layer opf elastomer = 0.006

    n = No. of internal elastomer layer = 3

    = (286.99*0.0025)

    = (no. of bearing*0

    = (4*0.72)

    = 2.87 t

    Case 1 : One lane of class 70-R(W)

    4.4 m Cg of 92t

    0.2 m 9.60 m

    Ra

    Ra = 92*(9.6-4.4+0.2)/9.6 = 51.8

    Rb = 92-51.8 = 40.3

    Braking Force = 0.2*92/2+2.87 = 12.1

    CL of 70-R CL of c/w

    1.630

    Transvers eccentricity = 3.120

    Transvers moment = 3.12*51.8 = 161.5

    CALCULATION OF LIVE LOAD REACTION FOR ABUTMENT

    Horizontal force without any applied forces for one bearing, V.Lrc

    Total horizontal force without any applied forces ,V.Lrc

    28

    No. of Bearing =

    Vr = = =

    9.5

    3.120

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    6/32

    Case 2 : One lane of class-A

    2.99 m Cg of 36.4 t braking Force

    0.2 m 9.60 m

    Ra

    Ra = 36.4*(9.6-2.99+0.2)/9.6 = 25.

    Rb = 36.4-25.8 = 10.

    Braking Force = 0.2*36.4/2+2.87 = 6.5

    CL class A(1L) CL of c/w

    1.30

    9.5 m

    Transvers eccentricity = 3.4

    Transvers moment = 3.45*25.8 = 89.

    Case 3 : Two lane of class-A

    Ra = 2*25.8 = 51.

    Rb = 2*10.6 = 21.

    Braking Force(for 1 lane only) = 6.5

    CL class A(2L) CL of c/w

    3.05

    9.5 m

    Transvers eccentricity = 1.7

    Transvers moment = 1.7*51.6 = 87.

    Case 4 : One lane of 70R Tracked

    cg of 70t Load

    2.285m 2.285m

    0.200m 9.600m 0.200m

    Ra Rb

    Ra = 70.00*7.315/9.6 = 54.80t

    Rb= 70-54.80 = 15.20

    CL of carriageway

    2.60 2.2

    9.500m

    transverse moment = 118.09t-m

    braking force = 9.870t = 115

    Summary of Loads

    1L class 70 - R

    From the above 70R tracked case has been considered in the design of Abutment

    mMax. vertical reaction (t)

    12.1

    6.5

    6.5

    Load case

    51.8

    25.8

    51.6

    1L class - A

    3.45

    Braking force (t)

    1.7

    2L class - A

    70R-Tracked 54.8 9.9

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    7/32

    DESIGN OF ABUTMENT STEM

    Width of abutment 8.500 m

    Thickness of abutment 1.000 m

    Reinf. requred at base = 346.46 cm2

    Reinf. Provided at base = 390.6 cm2

    OK ( 42Nos 28 f ) @ 203.6585

    = 0.46 % ( 42Nos 20 f ) @ 203.6585

    Reinf. requred at the mid = 188.02 cm2

    Reinf. Provided at the mid = 258.6 cm2

    OK ( 42Nos 28 f ) @ 203.6585

    = 0.30 % ( 0Nos 16 f ) @

    Minimum Reinf. In Pier Column

    Minimum Reinf. Reqd. ( 0.3% ) as per cl. 306.2.1 = 0.003*8.5*1* 10000

    = 255.0 cm2

    Transverse Reinforcement in Pier ColumnsAs per Cl. 306.3.2 of IRC:21

    Min. Dia of trans. Reinf. = 1/4 * Largest bar dia. of main reinf.

    = 1/4*28 = 7 mm

    Bar Dia. Provided = 10 mm @ c/c 150 mm OK

    As per Cl. 306.3.3 of IRC:21

    Pitch = 12 * dia. of smallest bar of main reinf.

    = 12*20

    = 240 mm

    The calculations for reinforcement requirement at various sections is presented here. A standard in house program has been

    used for calculation of stresses in concrete and steel in a rectangular section subjected to combined axial and bending forces.

    of IRC:21-2000

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    8/32

    The abutment cap has been designed as per Clause 716.2.1 , IRC :78- 2000 .

    The abutment cap shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both facesand in both directions assuming a cap thickness of 225 mm.

    Length of abutment cap = 8.5 m

    Width of abutment cap = 2.12 m

    Depth of abutment cap assumed = 0.225 m

    Reinforcement in the direction of length of abutment :-

    Area of steel required (mm2) = 2385 mm

    2

    Providing steel by distributing equally at top & bottom = 16 nos. 12 f @ 131 mm

    Area of steel provided (mm2) = 3619 mm

    2 OK

    Reinforcement in the direction of width of abutment :-

    Area of steel required (mm2)/m = 1125 mm

    2

    Providing stirrups of 16 mm dia. 2 legged

    Spacing if stirrups required = 357.4 mm

    Therefore, providing 12 f , 2 legged stirrups @ 150 c/c .

    Depth of abutment provided = 1000.00 mm

    DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    9/32

    0.92

    Design values :

    0.300 m g = 1.80 t/m22.160

    1 2 ka = 0.279

    1.085 t/m2 0.603 t/m2

    1)Earth Pressure due to surcharge equivalent to 1.2m of earthfil l = ka *g*1.2

    = 0.603 t/m2

    2)Earth Pressure due to backfill of earth = k a *g*h

    = 1.085 t/m2

    Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*1.2*h2/2

    = 1.406 t-m/m

    Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*h3*0.42/2

    = 1.063 t-m/m

    Total bending moment at the base of dirtwall = 2.469 t-m/m

    due to earth pressure

    Calculation of force and moment due to the effect of braking :(cosidering 40t bogie loading)

    2.245 10t 8.5 10t

    2.79m

    2.160

    1.750 2.79 2.160

    Effective width = 6.700 m

    Braking force, 0.2*20 = 4 t

    braking force including impact of 50%= 6 t

    Braking force per metre width = 0.90 t

    Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to effect of braking = 1.93 t-m/m

    Therefore total bending moment at the base of the dirtwall = 4.40 t-m/m

    height of

    dirtwall,h = 2.160 m

    DESIGN OF DIRTWALL

    Earth Pressure diagram

    width of

    dirtwall =0.300 m

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    10/32

    Basic Design Data:

    Grade of conc. 35

    Grade of steel 500

    Dia of bar used 12Permissible stress in concrete 1190 t/m2

    Permissible stress in steel 24000 t/m2m , Modulur ratio 10

    K value for concrete 0.332

    j value for concrete 0.889Q for concrete 175.55

    Max. moment in dirtwall (t-m) 4.40

    Effective depth required (mm) 158

    Effective depth provided (mm) 244

    Ast required (mm ) 845

    Provide longitudinal reinforcement:

    f16 @ 150 c/c

    Ast provided (mm2) 1340 Thus OK

    Therefore providing 12 f @ 250 c/c on the approach side and 10 f @ 200 c/c on the outer sidein the vertical direction . Also providing 10 f @ 150 c/c on both faces in the horizontal direction .

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    11/32

    DESIGN OF FOOTING SLAB

    L

    3 10.836t/m^2

    4.075t/m^2 2

    10.500m

    T T

    6.219t/m^2 1

    4 13.784t/m^2

    L

    From the design of abutment we obtain the maximum and minimum base pressures

    considering LWL case as the governing case

    Axial load = 768.837t

    Net longitudinal moment = 445.0900t-m

    transverse moment at base = 161.5000t-m

    longitudinal section modulus at base = 117.670m^3

    transverse section modulus = 150.675m^3

    area of base = 86.10m^2

    base pressure at point 1 = 13.784t/m^2

    base pressure at point 2 = 10.836t/m^2

    base pressure at point 3 = 4.075t/m^2base pressure at point 4 = 6.219t/m^2

    Design of toe slab

    D

    a

    1.3 C

    0.5 B

    3.5 0.9 3.8

    5.15t/m^2 a 12.310t/m^2

    8.200m

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    12/32

    Average base pressure at point 1 = 12.310t/m^2

    Average base pressure at point 4 = 5.147t/m^2

    base pressure at junction-section a-a= 8.991t/m^2

    Bending moment at face of stem

    Depth of soil cover above footing = 2.000m

    loadings Element Description Area factor Force (t) lever arm(m)

    moment(t-

    m)

    B

    rec portion of

    conrete 1.000 4.56 1.9 8.664

    C

    triangular

    porton of

    concrete 0.500 3.648 1.27 4.63296

    D

    rectangular

    portion of soil

    cover 1.000 4.788 1.9 9.0972

    E

    triangular

    porton of soilcover 0.500 2.736 2.53 6.9312

    F

    rectanguar

    portion of

    base

    pressure -1.000 -46.78 1.9 -88.879413

    G

    triangular

    portion of

    base

    pressure -0.500 6.31 1.27 7.98890989Total -24.74 -51.57

    Bending moment at face stem = -51.57t-m

    Grade of concrete = M30permissible stress in concrete = 1019 t/m^2

    permissible stress in steel = 20400 t/m^2

    m = 10

    k = 0.333

    j = 0.889

    Q value for concrete = 150.963t/m^2

    cover to substructure = 75.000mm

    assuming a 16 dia bar,eff depth at junction= 1.217m

    effective depth required at the junction = 0.584m

    area of steel required = 23.36cm^2/m

    minimum steel required 0.12% = 7.80cm^2/m

    provide25 dia bar @190c/c = 25.8cm^2/m

    safe

    distribution steel for the tension face of toe slab,providing 0.25*(DL+LL) at the

    junction = 5.84cm^2/m

    minimum steel required = 7.80cm^2/m

    provide16 dia bar @200c/c = 10.1cm^2/m

    Downwardpressure

    upwardpressure

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    13/32

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    14/32

    check for shear

    deff section

    1.22m

    1.30m

    0.50m

    3.50m 0.90m 3.80m

    effective depth distance from stem junction = 1.217m

    depth at 'd eff' distance from stem junction = 1.044m

    effective depth at 'd eff' distance = 0.961mtan b = 0.229

    base pressure at effective depth distance from

    junction = 10.1t/m^2

    Depth of soil cover above footing = 2.000m

    Loadings Element Description Area factor Force Lever arm Moment

    A

    rectangular

    part of

    concrete 1.00 3.10 1.29 4.00

    B

    trianglar part

    of concrete 0.50 1.69 0.86 1.45

    C

    rectangular

    part of soil

    cover 1.00 4.45 1.29 5.74

    D

    trianglar part

    of soil cover 0.50 0.70 1.72 1.21

    E

    rectangular

    part of base

    pressure -1.00 -31.80 1.29 -41.07

    F

    trianglar partof base

    pressure -0.50 2.91 0.86 2.51Total = -18.95 -26.15

    downwardpressure

    upward

    pressur

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    15/32

    shear force at critical section = 18.95t

    bending moment at critical sction = 26.15t-m

    net shear force at critical section = 12.73t

    net shear stress at critical section = 13.25t/m^2

    0.1325Mpa

    percentage of reinforcement = 0.2689

    permissible shear stress = 0.2424Mpa

    safe in shear

    summary of reinforcement in Toe slab

    main steel 25 f @190c/c

    dist. Steel 16 f @200c/c

    main steel 16 f @200c/cdist. Steel 16 f @200c/c

    Bottom

    Top

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    16/32

    HEEL SLAB DESIGN FML= 9.965

    BRL = 8

    3.164 CTRL = 7.7

    STRL = 6.7

    D

    4.9

    C

    1.8 B

    1.8 0.000

    2.05

    2.85t/m^2 41t/m^2

    3 a 2

    M-T

    8.5

    M-L

    4 1

    a

    From the design of abutment we obtain the maximum and minimum base pressures

    5.100m

    1.000

    1.000

    5.100m

    A

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    17/32

    considering LWL case as the governing case

    Axial Load = 961.00t

    Net longitudinal mom = 712.00t-m

    Transverse moment = 99.90t-m

    Longitudinal section modulus at base = 36.8475 m^3Transverse section modulus at base = 61.4125 m^3

    Area of the base = 43.35 m^2

    summary of base pressures at points 1,2,3 & 4

    Base pressure at point 1 = 43.12

    Base pressure at point 2 = 39.86

    Base pressure at point 3 = 1.22

    Base pressure at point 4 = 4.47

    Base pressure at junction a-a = 29.37 t/m^2

    Summary of bending moment at the junction

    due to soil and concrete

    Element no Force Lever arm Moment

    A 15.12 1.025 15.50

    B 0.00 0.68 0.00

    C 0.00 1.37 0.00

    D 36.77 1.025 37.69

    Total = 51.89 53.19

    Summary of bending moment at the junction

    due to base pressure

    Element Force Lever arm moment

    Description

    rectangular portion of

    concrete

    triangular portion of

    concretetriangular portion of

    soilrectangular portion of

    soil

    Description

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    18/32

    1 -60.20 1.025 -61.71

    2 27.18 1.37 37.2366

    -33.02 -24.4734

    Bending moment at face of stem = 28.72 t-m

    Shear force at face of stem = 18.87 t

    Grade of concrete = M35

    Grade of steel = 500

    m = 10

    permissible stress in steel = 24000 t/m^2

    permissible stress in concrete = 1189.26 t/m^2

    k = 0.33

    j = 0.89

    Q = 175.26 t/m^2

    Effective depth required at junction= 0.40 massuming dia of steel = 16 mm

    cover to the substructure = 75 mm

    Effective depth provided at junction= 1.717 m

    safe

    area of steel required = 33.23 cm^2

    provide 32 f bar @120 = 67.02 cm^2

    safe

    Design for shear

    Heel has been checked for shear at the junction of heel portion

    Effective depth = 1.717

    shear force at the junction = 33.02 t

    shear stress at the junction = 19.23 t/m^2

    = 0.19 Mpa

    triangular portion of

    base pressure

    diagram

    Total =

    rectangular portion of

    base pressure

    diagram

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    19/32

    permissible shear stress

    percentage of reinforcement = 0.39 %

    permissible shear stress = 0.35 Mpa

    safe

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    20/32

    ka = 0.279

    g = 1.80

    Live load Surcharge = 1.20 m

    (SHt)

    Q1=ka*g*SHt Q2=ka*g*b

    The end return wall has been designed as a plate fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of its vertical sides.

    ( Refer Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain by Roark & Young ).

    1 8.165 2.05 0.251 0.603 0.183 0.190 0.573 0.265

    0.251 3.729 0.134 0.090 0.423 0.151

    500 248 740 800 -6.77

    bar diaspacing

    reqd

    spacing

    providedbar dia

    spacin

    g reqd

    spacing

    provided

    20 f 619 c/c 150 c/c 12 f @ 125 c/c 12 f 300 c/c 125 c/c @

    Ast provided (vertic Ast provided (horizontal) =

    CHECK FOR SHEAR

    0.251 0.603 0.183 0.190 0.573 0.265

    DESIGN OF RETURN WALL

    12 f

    2999.17 mm2 1809.56 mm2

    Earth face

    Outer face

    376

    (at x=0 &

    z=0.4b) Ma2

    (t-m/m)

    (at x=a & z=0) Mb1(t-m/m)

    thk. of

    end

    return

    wall at

    top

    Design of end return wall

    a = 2.050

    b

    =8.1

    65

    Q1

    (t/m2)

    b1

    (at x=0 &

    z=0.8b) Ma1

    (t-m/m)

    -1.27

    b2

    Outer face

    Horizontal reinforcement

    Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate

    Ast for vertical

    reinforcement

    (mm2)

    507

    Moment in

    horizontal

    direction(Mh)

    -5.02

    Ast for horizontal

    reinforcement (mm2)

    "a/b" (at x=a & z=0) Mb2(t-m/m)

    -5.54

    Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

    -3.75

    (at x=a & z=0) R1

    (t-m/m2)

    2.819

    (at x=0 &

    z=0.8b) R2

    (t-m/m2)

    1.305

    Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate

    b1 g2

    g1

    For "a/b" Q1

    (t/m2)

    Earth face

    Deff

    provided

    Deff

    reqd.

    g2

    -1.23

    b2

    Moment in

    vertical

    direction(

    Mv)

    Vertical reinforcement

    g2

    S.NO.

    Height

    of

    return

    wall

    (m) "b"

    Length

    of return

    wall (m)

    "a"

    "a/b"

    b2 g1

    Q2

    (t/m2)

    b1

    thk. of

    end

    return

    wall at

    bottom

    g1

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    21/32

    0.251 3.729 0.134 0.090 0.423 0.151

    At x = a & z = 0

    mm

    mm

    V (t-m/m2)

    tv N/mm2

    r

    As per IRC 21-2000(Cl 304.7.1.3.3),

    Permissible Shear Stress (0.5% steel)

    N/mm2

    Increase in permissible stress (d)

    N/mm2

    tv tc Thus OkAt x = 0 & z = 0.4*b

    mm

    z=0.4b 0.4 mm

    V (t-m/m2)

    tv N/mm2

    r

    As per IRC 21-2000(Cl 304.7.1.3.3),Permissible Shear Stress (0.5% steel)

    N/mm2

    Incease in permissible stress (d)

    N/mm2

    tv tc Thus Ok

    0.214

    1.00

    0.214

    10.80 o.k.

    Check For One way Shear :

    According to Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000. Pile Cap is not checked for shear if it is designed by truss analogy.

    Pile Cap is checked for shear as per Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000.

    The pile cap is checked for one way shear. The critical section for shear is considerred as thesection located deff distance from face of abutment.

    Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutment(at deff distance) = 1625.0 mm

    Distance of the Maximum Reaction Force from the Face of the abutment = 1300 mm

    Distance of the critical section from the Maximum Reaction Force = (1,300-1,625) mm

    = -325 mm < 600mm

    Width of Pile Cap = 8.700 mShear at deff distance from face of abutment cap = 154.7 tShear at deff distance from face of abutment cap/m = 17.78 t/m

    Pile Cap is checked for shear as per Cl. 307.2.5.4 of IRC-21,2000.The pile cap is checked for one way shear. The critical section for shear is considerred as thesection located deff distance from face of abutment.

    deff provided = 1.625 m

    Shear Stress = 17.78/(1.625)= 10.94 t/m2

    100*Ast/bd = 0.302

    Permissible Shear Stress tc = 24.666 t/m2

    Shear carried by concrete, Vc = 24.666*1.0*0.000= 40.1 t/m

    Greater than Max. Design Shear,Thus no Shear Reinforcement is required,

    (In One Layers at top in both directions)

    one way shear check is required.

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    28/32

    But minimum shear reinforcement will be provided as per Cl.304.7.1.5 of IRC-21,2000.

    Asw 0.4bs 0.87fy

    Where, s = Spacing of the Bars = 1000 mm

    b = Width of the abutmen = 8700 mm

    fy = Yield Strrength of steel = 500 MPa

    Shear Reinforcement, Asw = (0.4*1000*8700)/(0.87*500) mm^2

    = 8000.00 mm2

    = 80.000 cm2

    Provide 10 dia. 18L Stirrups @125 Spacing

    Ast provided = 113.10 cm2

    >80.00cm^2 , Thus O.K.

    For construction convenience, required stirrups may be provided in alternate la ers as follows

    10 dia. 18L Stirrups @250 c/c

    +10 dia. 18L Stirrups @250 c/c

    Check For Punching Shear around pile :

    750 mm

    1413 mm

    2825 mm

    750 mm

    Permissible Punching Shear Stress around the pile = 0.16sqrt(f ck)

    = 0.16*sqrt(35)

    = 0.947 Mpa

    Maximum Reaction on one pile = 233.0 t

    Perimeter of area on which punching shear acts (taken as the minimum of two possible cases) = 3.719 m

    Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutment = 0.813 m

    Punching Shear Sress around the pile = 233.03/(3.72*1.625)

    = 38.56 t/m2

    = 0.39 Mpa

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    29/32

    Check For Punching Shear around abutment column :

    10125 mm

    0 mm

    2625 mm

    Permissible Punching Shear Stress around the abutment = 0.16sqrt(f ck)

    = 0.16*sqrt(35)

    = 0.947 Mpa

    Maximum Reaction on single abutment = 961 t

    Self wt. of Pile Cap = 114.8 t

    Total Load = 1076 t

    Perimeter of area on which punching shear acts = 25.50 m

    Distance of the critical section from the face of the abutme = 0.813 m

    Punching Shear Sress around the abutment = 1,076/(25.50*1.625)

    = 25.96 t/m2

    = 0.260

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    30/32

    Calculation of Top R/F for Sagging Moment :

    Width of pile cap = 5.1 m

    Net bending Moment = 0.0 t-m

    Moment per unit width = 0.0 t-m

    CALCULATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS

    Grade of concrete = M35

    Grade of steel = Fe 500

    Unit. Wt of Concrete= 2.4 t/m3

    Permissible stresses:

    sst =

    sbc =

    Basic Design Parameters:

    r= sst/sbc = 20.17

    m= 10

    k = m/(m+r) = 0.331

    j = 1-k/3 = 0.890

    q = 0.5*scbc*k*j = 175t/m^2

    deff reqd. = sqrt(0.01/(175.44*1.0))

    = 0.008 m = 7.5 mm

    deff provd. = {(2.25*1000)-150-16-16/2} = 2076.0 mm

    Main Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm

    Distribution Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm Clear Cover Provided (including p = 150 mm

    Ast reqd = (0.0*1000)/(24,000.0*0.890*2,076.0) = 0.000000 m2

    = 0 mm2

    = 0.00 cm2/m

    Provide 16 f @ 125 c/c0 f @ 0 c/c

    Rein.provided = 16.1 cm2/m > 0.00 o.k.

    Calculation of Bottom R/F for Support Moment :

    Width of pile cap = 5.1 m

    Net bending Moment = 0.0 t-m

    Moment per unit width = 0.0 t-m

    CALCULATION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS

    Grade of concrete = M35

    Grade of steel = Fe 500

    Unit. Wt of Concrete= 2.4 t/m3

    Permissible stresses:

    sst =

    sbc =

    Basic Design Parameters:

    r= sst/sbc = 20.57

    m= 10

    k = m/(m+r) = 0.327j = 1-k/3 = 0.891

    q = 0.5*scbc*k*j = 170t/m^2

    1167t/m^2

    1190t/m^2

    Thus O.K

    (In One Layers at top)

    24000t/m^2

    DESIGN OF PILE CAP (TRANSVERSE DIRECTION)

    24000t/m^2

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    31/32

    deff reqd. = sqrt(0.00/(170.01*1.0))

    = 0.000 m = 0.0 mm

    deff provd. = {(2.25*1000)-150-25-16/2} = 2067.0 mm

    Main Bar Dia. Provided = 16 f mm

    Distribution Bar Dia. Provided = 25 f mm Clear Cover Provi = 150 mm

    Ast reqd = (0.0*1000)/(24,000.0*0.891*2,067.0) = 0.000000 m2

    = 0 mm2

    = 0.00 cm2/m

    Provide 16 f @ 125 c/c In One La ers at bottom in transverse dir.0 f @ 125 c/c

    Minimum Ast reqd. (as per IS :456) = 0.06% of Cross-sectional area.

    = (0.0006*2.25*1.0*1000000)

    = 1350 mm2

    = 13.50 cm2

    Rein.provided = 16.08 cm2/m > 0.00 o.k.

    Thus O.K

  • 7/29/2019 Abut Design

    32/32

    So, we will follow here IS 2911 ,part 1/section 2

    No. of Pile = 6

    Pile diameter = 1.2 m

    Pile length = 20.000 m

    Normal Case :

    Transverse Horizontal Force = 0 t

    Longitudinal Horizontal Force = 284 t (from the output - 1 of ABUT2 fortran programme )

    Resultant Horizontal Force = sqrt(0^2+284^2) = 284.00 t

    Longitudinal Seismic Case :

    Transverse Horizontal Force = 0 t

    Longitudinal Horizontal Force = 358 t (from the output - 1-s of ABUT2 fortran programme )

    (In house programme )

    Resultant Horizontal Force = sqrt(0^2+358^2) = 358.00 t

    Maximum Lateral load = 286.40 t

    Q = Lateral Load in each Pile = (286.40/6 = 47.73 t

    0.00

    T = (E*I/K1)^(1/5) K 1 = 0.146 kg/cm3

    (337,216.55*0.10*100000000/0.146)^0.2/100)

    = 4.72 m

    Q Q DRY Submerged

    Loose sand 0.26 0.146

    L1 L1 Medium sand 0.775 0.525

    Dense sand 2.075 1.245Very loose sand under - 0.04

    Le Lf repeated loading ornormally loading clays

    L1 = 0.0

    L1/T = 0.0

    (From Fig 2 of IS:2911(Part 1, Sec-2)-AppendixB Lf/T = 2.2

    Lf = (4.72*2.2) = 10.39 m

    Grade of concrete = M35 Permissible Stress:

    E = 57000*(fck)0.5

    kg/cm2

    Concrete scbc= 11.67 Mpa

    = 57000*(35^0.5) 1167 t/sqm (In Normal Case)

    = 337216.5 kg/cm2

    = 3372165.5 t/m2

    Steel sst= 240 Mpa

    24000 t/s m (In Normal Case)

    Grade of steel = Fe 500

    Dia. of pile = 1.20 m

    I of pile = (3.14*1.2^4/64) = 0.1018m^4

    For fixed headpile, the fixed end moment of the equivalent cantilever is computed using the following equation :Mf =Q*(L1+Lf)/2

    = 47.73*(0.00+10.39)/2

    = 248.01 t-m

    0.0

    (m) = 0.82 (From Fig 3, IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)

    m*Mf = 203.37 t-m

    DESIGN OF PILEBored Cast in-Situ Piles

    Final check OK

    VALUES OF CONSTANT K1 ( kg/cm* )

    Reduction Factor (m) , for L1/t or L1/R =

    The Actual Maximum Moment (M) =