ABRIDGED VERSION - JULY 5,...
173
Transcript of ABRIDGED VERSION - JULY 5,...
imoreno
Typewritten Text
imoreno
Typewritten Text
ABRIDGED VERSION - JULY 5, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
District Goals _______________________________________________________________ 1 Curriculum and Instruction Organizational Chart________________________________2
2011 State and Federal Standards ___________________________________________ 3-4
District Preliminary: State Assessment Data
State Assessment Results Student Enrollment ________________________________________________________________ 6 Assessment Results and Campus Rating Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) ______________________ 7 Multi-Year Preliminary District and Campus AEIS Ratings _________________________________ 8 District Assessment Results by Sub-Groups ______________________________________ 9 Campus Assesment Results by Sub-Groups UHS Feeder Campuses _____________________________________________________ 10 USHS Feeder Campuses ____________________________________________________ 11 AHS Feeder Campuses _____________________________________________________ 12 LBJ Feeder Campuses ______________________________________________________ 13 Targets/All Content Areas - Graph ______________________________________________ 14 Targets by Sub-groups/Reading / ELA Graph ___________________________________ 15 Targets by Sub-groups /Math – Graph __________________________________________ 16 Targets by Sub-groups /Writing - Graph ________________________________________ 17 Targets by Sub-groups / Social Studies - Graph __________________________________ 18 Targets by Sub-groups/ Science - Graph ________________________________________ 19 SSI 1st Admin. – Two Year Summary – Table (2010,2011) _________________________ 20 SSI 1st Admin. 5th Gr. Reading Longitudinal Results (2009, 2010, 2011) Table _______ 21 SSI 1st Admin. 8th Gr. Reading Longitudinal Results (2009, 2010, 2011) Table _______ 22 SSI 1st Admin. Reading Probable Middle Cohort Comparison - Table _____________ 23 SSI 1st Admin. 5th Gr. Math Longitudinal Results (2009, 2010, 2011) Table __________ 24 SSI 1st Admin. 8th Gr. Math Longitudinal Results (2009, 2010, 2011) Table __________ 25 SSI 1st Admin. Math Probable Middle Cohort Comparison - Table ________________ 26
CampusPreliminary: State Assessment Data
High School TAKS Results by Subject/Yr Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) _______________________ 28 TAKS ELA Composition Results _______________________________________________ 29 Primary EXIT Assessment Comparison (2010, 2011) ______________________________ 30 Class of 2011 Cohort #1 _______________________________________________________ 31 Class of 2011 Cohort #2 _______________________________________________________ 32
Class of 2011 Cohort #3 (pending) ______________________________________________ 33 TAKS Results by Grade, Subject/Yr Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) ________________ 34
Middle School TAKS Results by Subject/Yr Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) _______________________ 36 TAKS Writing Compostion Results _____________________________________________ 37 TAKS Results by Grade, Subject/Yr Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) _______________ 38
Elementary TAKS Results by Subject/Yr Comparison (2009, 2010, 2011) _______________________ 40 TAKS Writing Composition Results _________________________________________ 41-42 TAKS Results by Grade, Subject/Yr Comparsion (2009, 2010, 2011) ________________ 43 TPRI Kindergarten Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year __________ 44-47 TPRI First Grade Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year ___________ 48-50 TPRI Second Grade Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year _________ 51-53 Tejas Lee Kindergarten Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year _____ 54-56 Tejas Lee First Grade Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year _______ 57-59 Tejas Lee Second Grade Comparison of Beginning of Year to End of Year _____ 60-62 SRI Proficiency Summary Report 2nd Grade _____________________________________ 63
Bilingual/ESL Education
District Percent of English Language Learners (2009, 2010, 2011) ___________________ 65 District /Campus Bilingual/ESL LEP Enrollment ____________________________ 66-70 TELPAS Results (Pending) ____________________________________________________ 71 Developing Unity, Achievement, and Language Program (Kinder Teacher Program) ____ 72-74 Bilingual Academy for Second Grade Teachers _______________________________ 75-76
Middle School and High School ESL Plan Progress __________________________ 77-79 Dual Language Program Participation and Performance TAKS, TAKS-A, TAKS-M_____ 80-88
Gifted and Talented/Advanced Academics
District/Campus and Talented Enrollment _______________________________________ 90 District /Campus Advanced Placement Enrollment ______________________________ 91 District Advanced Placement Summary (2009, 2010, 2011) ______________________ 92 GT Assessment Data 2010-2011 ________________________________________________ 93 UISD Magnet Admittance Procedures __________________________________________ 94 Magnet 2007-2008 Cohort Class of 2011 ________________________________________ 95 2010 First Annual UISD Gifted and Talented Showcase _________________________ 96
Career and Technology (CTE)
District/Campus CTE Enrollment _______________________________________________ 98 CTE PBMAS – October 2010 __________________________________________________ 99 CTE UIL Academics Student Participation _____________________________________ 100 CTE Student Certification - LCC Dual Enrollment ______________________________ 101 CTE Curriculum-Based, Industry-Standard Certifications _______________________ 102 CTE LBJ/LCC Dual Enrollment (Hrs. Earned) _________________________________ 103 CTE Skills USA Vocational Industrial Clubs of America (VICA) Student Participation by Campus _ 104 CTE Health Occupations Students of America (HOSA) Participation by Campus _ 105 CTE Perkins Performance Measures ___________________________________________ 106
Guidance and Counseling
Credit by Exam Summary – Fall 2010 _________________________________________ 108 Credit by Exam Summary – Spring 2011 _______________________________________ 109 Credit by Exam Multi-year Summary – (2006-2011) ____________________________ 110 Graduates 2009 Enrolled in Texas Higher Education by Fall 2009 ___________ 111-112 District High School Graduates’ Longitudinal Analysis _________________________ 113 HB 1 – Dual Credit Eng 1302 and US History 1302 Grade Distribution–Fall 2010 ______ 114 HB 1 – Dual Credit Enrollment by Campus (Hist 1302 and Eng 1301) ___________ 115 United Partners for Scholars – Funds Distribution – Fall 2011 ___________________ 116
Fine Arts
Middle School and High School Art - Enrollment _______________________________ 118 Preformance Groups – HS and MS Enrollment _________________________________ 119 Performing Arts Groups – TMEA and UIL _____________________________________ 120 High School Theater Enrollment (2009, 2010, 2011) _______________________________ 121 Rhinoceros 3-D Software Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) _________ 122
2010 Extended Year Program
State and Federal Mandates and Requirements _________________________________ 124 Extended School Year Overveiw ______________________________________________ 125 Extended School Year Summer Sites __________________________________________ 126 Extended School Program Staffing (Elem, MS, HS) ____________________________ 127 Summary of Daily Attendance (Elem, MS, HS) ____________________________ 128-129 2010 High School Credits Earned - Odysseyware _______________________________ 130 SSI – Reading and Math 5th and 8th grade 3rd administration 2009-2010 __________ 131
Elementary Schools Extended School Year Program Survey ________________ 132-133 Middle Schools Extended School Year Program Survey_____________________ 134-135 High Schools Extended School Year Program Survey ___________________________ 136
Professional Development and Special Projects
Electronic Registrar Online (ERO) Summative _________________________________ 138 Building Leadership – New Principal’s Academy _______________________________ 139
Library Science
Curriculum and Instruction Department Profile ________________________________ 141
Department Highlights ______________________________________________ 142
Collection and Circulation _________________________________________ 143-144
Region 1 Databases _________________________________________________ 145
District Initiatives
Whatever it Takes to Succeed (WITTS) __________________________________ 147
Secondary Initiatives
Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA) ________________________ 149 Odyssey Ware – Courses Completed ___________________________________________ 150 Cambridge Educational Services __________________________________________ 151-157 Texas Higher Education Assessment Results (THEA) ___________________________ 158 READ 180 Results Summary Report___________________________________________ 159
Elementary Initiatives
Math and Science 3T’s Teaming Percentage Met Standard by Demographic ______ 161 Study Island Usage and Performance ______________________________________ 162-167
Appendix – Publications: Instructional Accountability Program / Department Publications _________________ 168
1. Provide consistent quality TEKS based instruction and/or an alternative curriculum for all students, resulting in improved student achievement.
2. Provide a safe and nurturing environment for all students and staff.
3. Increase the district's graduation rate through the implementation of effective drop-out and instructional interventions,
4. Increase participation in advanced academic courses and/or dual credit courses with successful completion, resulting in increased number of college credits earned.
5. Increase the participation at SAT/ACT preparation opportunities resulting in increased average SAT/ACT scores.
6. Promote community partnerships and parental involvement.
7. Ensure that the District is fiscally accountable and fiscally efficient, including efforts in the maximum possible reduction of the District's electricity consumption.
8. Implement initiatives to ensure employee recruitment, development, and retention.
United Independent School District
Mission statement: UNITED, we inspire alI students to become
responsible world citizens by pursuingexcellence through life-long learning.
2010-2011 District Goals
1
As o
f Mar
ch 2
011
Ann
Mac
dona
ld
Ele
men
tary
Ed.
E
xecu
tive
Dir
ecto
r
Roy
lin W
ilson
Se
cond
ary
Ed. E
xecu
tive
Dir
ecto
r
Gua
dalu
pe C
. Gor
ordo
, Ph.
D
Inst
. Acc
ount
abili
ty
Exe
cutiv
e D
irect
or
Pam
ela
R. J
uare
z A
ssoc
iate
Sup
erin
tend
ent f
or C
urri
culu
m &
Inst
ruct
ion
Sand
ra A
lvar
ez
Cam
pus I
nter
vent
ion
Exe
cutiv
e D
irec
tor
Mar
tha
Mok
e Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n E
xecu
tive
Dir
ecto
r
Dir.
Car
eer &
Tec
h. /U
IL
Alic
ia C
arril
lo
Dir.
–Bi
lingu
al/E
SL/D
ual L
ang/
Fo
reig
n La
ng.
Emm
a Le
za
D
ir. –
G-T
/Adv
ance
d A
cade
mic
s/Mag
net C
ampu
ses
Am
y A
lani
z
Dir.
– G
uida
nce
& C
ouns
elin
g C
hris
tina
Flor
es
D
ir.-P
rofe
ssio
nal S
taff
D
evel
opm
ent/S
peci
al
Proj
ects/
Libr
ary
Scie
nce/
New
Pr
inci
pals’
Aca
dem
y A
leid
a Pe
rez
Sanc
hez
Dir
. - F
ine
Art
s
Jav
ier V
era
Dir.
of B
udge
t/Itin
eran
t Se
rvic
es/C
ompl
ianc
e/
Cont
ract
ed S
ervi
ces
Cin
dy A
guila
r
Dir.
of In
stru
ctio
nal
Impr
ovem
ent &
Sta
te
Ass
essm
ents
G
uada
lupe
M. P
erez
Lice
nsed
Spe
cial
ist in
Sc
hool
Psy
chol
ogy
Thel
ma
Cav
azos
Coor
dina
tor-
Lang
. Arts
H
erlin
da N
ieto
/Olg
a G
utie
rrez
Co
ordi
nato
r- S
ocia
l Stu
dies
Th
elm
a So
lis, P
h.D
Co
ordi
nato
r-M
athe
mat
ics
Jacq
uelin
e Sa
las/
Thel
ma
Eliz
ondo
Co
ordi
nato
r-Sc
ienc
e M
onic
a M
ench
aca/
Ver
onic
a C
uella
r Co
ordi
nato
r-Re
adin
g/Rd
. Rec
over
y A
lma
Dim
as/ O
lga
Ibar
ra
Coor
dina
tor-
Early
Chi
ldho
od/L
it.
Car
men
Pom
pa
Coor
dina
tor-
Read
ing
Firs
t Sa
ra H
erna
ndez
Pr
ogra
m C
oord
inat
or
Ver
onic
a G
arci
a D
istri
ct-W
ide
Read
ing
1st C
oach
es
Otil
a B
usta
man
te
Ros
a C
anal
es
Coo
rdin
ator
-ELA
/Rdg
. Tw
ila G
arza
/Mar
y Lo
u Lo
pez
Coo
rdin
ator
-Rea
ding
El
izab
eth
Sala
zar/G
loria
Gut
ierr
ez
Coo
rdin
ator
-Soc
ial S
tudi
es
Erne
sto
Sand
oval
/Bla
nca
Ibar
ra
Coo
rdin
ator
-Mat
hem
atic
s Es
mer
alda
Gua
jard
o/La
ura
Den
ise
Col
lins
Coo
rdin
ator
-Sci
ence
C
laud
ia P
aliz
o/Lu
cille
Mal
dona
do-G
onza
lez
Coo
rdin
ator
-Ins
t. Te
ch/O
n-Li
ne C
urr.
Judi
th G
arci
a Pr
ogra
m C
oord
inat
or
Bel
inda
Man
ning
C
hris
ty R
oman
elli
Coor
dina
tor-
Bil/E
SL/D
ual L
ang.
/F
orei
gn L
ang.
V
eron
ica
Bro
wn
Mic
helle
Can
tu
Mar
issa
Gar
za
Coor
dina
tor-
GT/
AP
Lisa
Dun
n-Fl
ores
Co
ordi
nato
r-D
ysle
xia/
504
Bre
nda
Ben
avid
es
Coor
dina
tor-
Testi
ng
Chr
istin
a C
asan
ova
Isel
a C
obos
C
oord
inat
or-F
ine
Art
s Le
ticia
Lea
l Sy
stem
Ana
lyst
Ja
vier
Per
ez
Dat
a Ba
se P
rogr
amm
er
Mar
io M
artin
ez/A
leja
ndro
Gon
zale
z D
ata
Eva
luat
or-J
ose
Luis
Zam
ora
Coo
rdin
ator
-Ins
truc
tiona
l PE
IMS
Laur
a G
arci
a
Coor
dina
tor-
Sp. E
d.
Elis
a A
nger
s-C
astil
lo*
Jaim
e G
arza
* Sy
lvia
Lea
l*
Laur
a Sa
linas
*
*one
will
not
be
repl
aced
Coo
rdin
ator
-Car
eer &
Tec
hnol
ogy
Sam
San
chez
Itine
rant
Pro
fess
iona
l Sta
ff:
Lic
ense
d Sp
ecia
list i
n Sc
hool
Psy
chol
ogy
-3
Soci
al W
orke
rs –
4
Beh
avio
r In
terv
entio
n Sp
ecia
lists
4
Phys
ical
The
rapi
st –
Vac
ancy
O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
pist
s – 3
V
I Tea
cher
– 4
Sp
. Ed.
Hom
ebou
nd T
each
ers –
4
Ada
ptiv
e P.
E. T
each
ers –
6
Dia
gnos
ticia
ns –
25
Spee
ch L
angu
age.
Pat
holo
gist
s - 8
Itin
eran
t Cou
nsel
ors:
G
erar
do V
illar
real
C
ecili
a Sa
ntin
i El
vira
Sal
inas
A
lina
Solo
dkin
Eng
lish
Lang
. Lea
rner
C
oord
inat
ors:
M
aria
A. D
omin
guez
Y
adira
Mar
tinez
Spec
. Ed.
Coo
rdin
ator
s Ly
dia
Hin
ojos
a C
elia
Tab
oada
Sa
ndra
Gue
rra
Cyn
thia
Pal
izo
4
Gen
eral
H
omeb
ound
Tea
cher
s
Res
iden
tial F
acili
ties T
each
ers
2
Subg
roup
Ev
alua
ted
Exem
plar
yRe
cogn
ized
Aca
dem
ical
ly
Acc
epta
ble
TPM
A
llow
ed
≥90%
≥80%
≥70%
NO
YES
≥90%
≥80%
≥70%
NO
YES
≥90%
≥80%
≥70%
NO
YES
≥90%
≥80%
≥65%
NO
YES
≥90%
≥80%
≥60%
NO
YES
TELP
AS
Crit
eria
1st
Tim
e Te
ster
Prev
ious
Tes
ter
1st Y
ear
in U
.S. S
choo
lsN
ot E
valu
ated
Not
Eva
luat
ed
2nd
Year
in U
.S. S
choo
lsIn
term
edia
te o
r hi
gher
At l
east
one
leve
l hig
her
than
the
prev
ious
yea
r or
A
dvan
ced
or
high
er
3rd
Year
in U
.S. S
choo
lsA
dvan
ced
or
high
erA
dvan
ced
or
high
er
4th
or m
ore
year
s in
U.S
. Sc
hool
sA
dvan
ced
Hig
hA
dvan
ced
Hig
h
6.A
LL s
tude
nts,
gra
de
7-12
in p
revi
ous
year
≤150
stu
dent
s &
≤3%
≤1
50 s
tude
nts
& ≤
3%
N/A
N/A
Prop
osed
201
1 Fe
atur
e
Seco
ndar
y an
alys
is
that
redi
strib
utes
B+
W s
tude
nts
Revi
sed:
4/2
7/20
11 a
fter
fina
l Com
mis
sion
er's
Rec
omm
enda
tion
s re
leas
ed o
n 4/
22/2
011
Char
t pr
epar
ed b
y U
nite
d IS
D a
nd a
vaila
ble
to T
ASA
Acc
ount
abili
ty F
orum
sub
scri
bers
wit
h pe
rmis
sion
of U
nite
d IS
D.
*Afr
ican
-Am
eric
an, H
ispa
nic,
Whi
te, E
co. D
isad
vant
aged
- 30
-49
of th
ese
stud
ents
are
at l
east
10%
of A
LL s
tude
nts
OR
at le
ast 5
0 st
uden
ts in
the
grou
p.Su
bgro
up E
valu
ated
:**
ALL
stu
dent
s in
LEP
Mea
sure
- M
inim
um s
ize
of 3
0 st
uden
ts.
N/A
Requ
ired
Im
prov
emen
t (R
I) or
Ex
cept
ions
Allo
wed
NO
YES
YES
- RI
EXCE
PTIO
NS
DO
NO
T A
PPLY
*ALL
stu
dent
s - N
o M
inim
um R
equi
rem
ents
.
*ALL
stu
dent
s, H
, A
A, W
, & E
CO≥8
5%≥7
5%N
/A
Sour
ce: 2
010
Acc
ount
abili
ty M
anua
l; A
ccou
ntab
ility
Sys
tem
for
2010
& 2
011
- Sta
ndar
d Pr
oced
ures
, Com
mis
sion
er o
f Edu
cati
on F
inal
Dec
isio
ns, A
pril
2010
; & N
ovem
ber
2009
AEI
S G
loss
ary,
App
endi
x H
*ALL
stu
dent
s, H
, A
A, W
, & E
CO1.
6%1.
6%1.
6%
≥95%
YES
- RI
EXCE
PTIO
NS
DO
NO
T A
PPLY
N/A
≥25%
≥15%
N/A
Ann
ual D
ropo
ut R
ate
(7th
& 8
th G
rade
in 2
009-
2010
)
o
r
2) M
et T
ELPA
S cr
iteri
a (a
s sh
own
belo
wn)
N/A
NO
1) M
et S
tand
ard
on th
e TA
KS, T
AKS
-A, T
AKS
-M te
st
2010
-201
1 St
ate
Acc
ount
abili
ty S
tand
ards
(AEI
S)
*ALL
stu
dent
s &
EC
O
**AL
L st
uden
ts in
LE
P M
easu
re
EXCE
PT s
tude
nts
who
are
1st
Yea
r in
U
.S.
(Rea
ding
/ELA
AN
D M
ath)
Engl
ish
Lang
uage
Lea
rner
s (E
LL) P
rogr
ess
Indi
cato
rs
Indi
cato
rs E
valu
ated
*ALL
stu
dent
s,
His
pani
c, A
fric
an-
Am
eric
an, W
hite
, &
Eco
nom
ical
ly
Dis
adva
ntag
ed
Com
plet
ion
Rate
I [G
radu
ates
& C
onti
nuer
s] C
lass
of 2
010
5.
Und
erre
port
ed S
tude
nts
(Dis
tric
t O
nly)
NO
Mon
itore
d LE
P st
uden
ts
first
or
seco
nd y
ear
afte
r ex
it fr
om L
EP s
tatu
s
TAKS
Com
men
ded
Perf
orm
ance
N/A
(Onl
y TA
KS e
valu
ated
)N
/A (O
nly
TAKS
eva
luat
ed)
≥60%
≥60%
TAKS
Sta
ndar
ds (I
nclu
des
TAKS
-A, T
AKS
-M, &
TA
KS-A
lt)
Read
ing/
ELA
Wri
ting
Soci
al S
tudi
esM
athe
mat
ics
Scie
nce
1. 2. 3. 4.
3
Subg
roup
Ev
alua
ted
TPM
A
llow
ed
Perf
orm
ance
Im
prov
emen
t/Sa
fe
Har
bor/
Impr
ovem
ent
Targ
et
TAKS
-LA
T
TELP
AS
(Rea
ding
onl
y)
NO
NO
N/A
N/A
N/A
ALT
ERN
ATI
VES
AVA
ILA
BLE
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAFE
HA
RBO
R
IMPR
OVE
MEN
T TA
RGET
N/A
N/A
Gra
des
1-12
, pri
or y
ear,
(day
s pr
esen
t/da
ys in
mem
bers
hip)
X 1
00%
N/A
AN
Y IM
PRO
VEM
ENT
Oth
er In
dica
tor:
Gra
duat
ion
Rate
- H
igh
Scho
ols
& D
istr
ict
4 Ye
ar G
radu
atio
n Ra
te (S
tate
wid
e G
oal)
O
R
Mat
h75
%Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Stan
dard
s
2010
-201
1 Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
abili
ty S
tand
ards
(AYP
)
Indi
cato
rs E
valu
ated
Mee
ts A
YP S
tand
ard
Perf
orm
ance
Sta
ndar
ds
Read
ing
*ALL
stu
dent
s,
His
pani
c, A
fric
an-
Am
eric
an, W
hite
, Ec
onom
ical
ly
Dis
adva
ntag
ed,
Spec
ial-E
d, &
LEP
M
easu
re
80%
TAKS
-Alt
(Sub
ject
to 1
% F
eder
al C
ap)
TAKS
(Inc
lude
s TA
KS-A
)
TAKS
-M (S
ubje
ct to
2%
Fed
eral
Cap
)
95%
95%
**A
LL s
tude
nts,
H,
AA
, W, E
CO, S
P-ED
, &
LEP
Mea
sure
4 Ye
ar G
radu
atio
n Ra
te T
arge
t
OR
Safe
Har
bor
Targ
et
OR
90%
Read
ing
Mat
h
10%
dec
reas
e in
diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
the
prio
r ye
ar 4
-yea
r G
radu
atio
n Ra
te a
nd th
e 90
% S
tate
wid
e G
oal
*Sub
grou
p Ev
alua
ted
(Par
tici
pati
on)
1%
5 Ye
ar G
radu
atio
n Ra
te T
arge
t80
%
Alt
erna
tive
Tar
gets
for
Gra
duat
ion
Rate
75%
Impr
ovem
ent T
arge
t
OR
90%
***A
LL S
tude
nts
PERF
ORM
AN
CE
IMPR
OVE
MEN
T
Test
res
ults
for
50 o
r m
ore
stud
ents
in th
e st
uden
t gro
up (s
umm
ed a
cros
s G
rade
s 3-
8 an
d 10
) for
the
subj
ect,
and
the
stud
ent g
roup
mus
t com
prom
ise
at le
ast
10 p
erce
nt o
f all
test
take
rs in
the
subj
ect;
OR
200
or m
ore
stud
ents
in th
e gr
oup
enro
lled
on th
e te
st d
ate,
eve
n if
that
gro
up r
epre
sent
s le
ss th
an 1
0 pe
rcen
t of a
ll st
uden
ts e
nrol
led
on th
e te
st d
ate.
**Su
bgro
up E
valu
ated
(P
erfo
rman
ce)
50 o
r m
ore
stud
ents
in th
e gr
oup
enro
lled
on th
e te
st d
ate
(sum
med
acr
oss
Gra
des
3-8
and
10) f
or th
e su
bjec
t, a
nd th
e st
uden
t gro
up m
ust c
ompr
ise
at le
ast 1
0 pe
rcen
t of a
ll st
uden
ts e
nrol
led
on th
e te
st d
ate;
OR
Oth
er In
dica
tor:
Att
enda
nce
Rate
- M
iddl
e &
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ools
***A
LL S
tude
nts
Test
res
ults
for
200
or m
ore
stud
ents
in th
e st
uden
t gro
up, e
ven
if th
at g
roup
rep
rese
nts
less
than
10
perc
ent o
f all
test
take
rs in
the
subj
ect.
***S
ubgr
oup
Eval
uate
d (O
ther
Indi
cato
r)
2-YE
AR
AVE
RAG
ING
Char
t pr
epar
ed b
y U
nite
d IS
D a
nd a
vaila
ble
to T
ASA
Acc
ount
abili
ty F
orum
sub
scri
bers
wit
h pe
rmis
sion
of U
nite
d IS
D.
Sour
ce: 2
010
Ade
quat
e Ye
arly
Pro
gres
s (A
YP) G
uide
Revi
sed:
4/2
7/20
11 a
fter
fina
l Com
mis
sion
er's
Rec
omm
enda
tion
s re
leas
ed o
n 4/
22/2
011
ALL
stu
dent
s, G
RAD
UA
TIO
N: 5
0 or
mor
e st
uden
ts in
the
stud
ent g
roup
in th
e lo
ngitu
dina
l com
plet
ion
rate
cla
ss, a
nd th
e st
uden
t gro
up m
ust c
ompr
ise
at le
ast
10%
of a
ll st
uden
ts in
the
long
itudi
nal c
ompl
etio
n ra
te c
lass
; OR
200
or m
ore
stud
ents
in th
e st
uden
t gro
up in
the
long
itudi
nal c
ompl
etio
n ra
te c
lass
, eve
n if
that
gro
up r
epre
sent
s le
ss th
an 1
0% o
f all
stud
ents
in th
e lo
ngitu
dina
l com
plet
ion
rate
cla
ss.
ALL
stu
dent
s, A
TTEN
DA
NCE
: The
dis
tric
t or
cam
pus
mus
t hav
e at
leas
t 7,2
00 to
tal d
ays
in m
embe
rshi
p (4
0 st
uden
ts X
180
sch
ool d
ays)
. D
istr
icts
and
cam
puse
s w
ith fe
wer
than
7,2
00 to
tal d
ays
in m
embe
rshi
p ar
e no
t req
uire
d to
mee
t the
Att
enda
nce
Rate
sta
ndar
d.
NO
TE:
Subg
roup
s ar
e ev
alua
ted
for
impr
ovem
ent o
n th
e O
ther
Indi
cato
r as
a c
ompo
nent
of P
erfo
rman
ce Im
prov
emen
t ana
lysi
s on
test
per
form
ance
mea
sure
s.
4
Preliminary Results State Assessment Data
DISTRICT
5
SCH
OO
LEC
PKK
1ST
2ND
3RD
4TH
5TH
6TH
7TH
8TH
9TH
10TH
11TH
12TH
TOT.
P.10
/11
DIF
UN
ITED
HIG
H S
CH
OO
L 10
1194
589
574
735
9835
7127
WAS
HIN
GTO
N M
IDD
LE
427
395
425
12
4712
470
TRAU
TMAN
N M
IDD
LE
519
536
481
1536
1587
-51
BO
RC
HER
S EL
EM. S
CH
OO
L7
4997
7711
410
796
9263
958
356
DE
LLAN
O E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
651
6510
999
114
105
107
65
668
7-3
1FA
SKEN
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L15
8814
015
714
916
016
314
110
1310
35-2
2FI
NLE
Y EL
EM. S
CH
OO
L 5
4676
9881
8180
9556
254
220
KAZ
EN E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
448
7074
6693
9510
155
154
110
MAL
AKO
FF E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
571
147
149
136
148
152
135
94
394
12
MU
LLER
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L12
7710
913
713
212
710
911
7
820
804
16TR
AUTM
ANN
ELE
M.S
CH
.4
5510
810
812
513
515
114
0
826
811
15U
NIT
ED S
OU
TH H
IGH
SC
H.
746
661
616
569
2592
2697
-105
GO
NZA
LEZ
MID
DLE
SC
H.
345
345
339
10
2910
1910
UN
ITED
SO
UTH
MID
DLE
437
461
410
13
0813
78-7
0C
UEL
LAR
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L1
8486
124
9110
110
410
469
572
8-3
3B
.GAR
CIA
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L6
112
149
156
177
156
152
150
10
5810
64-6
KIL
LAM
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L5
8514
413
612
313
110
713
186
294
6-8
4R
UIZ
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L 9
7313
014
713
113
814
315
0
92
190
219
SALI
NAS
ELE
M. S
CH
OO
L 0
4512
714
412
112
613
314
7
84
390
3-6
0ZA
FFIR
INI E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
912
115
018
516
915
616
716
1
11
1810
9919
ALEX
AND
ER H
IGH
SC
HO
OL
738
682
661
438
2519
2718
-199
CLA
RK
MID
DLE
SC
HO
OL
275
294
285
854
849
5U
NIT
ED M
IDD
LE S
CH
OO
L35
636
832
910
5310
503
CO
L.SA
NTO
S B
ENAV
IDES
549
112
164
150
153
146
146
925
907
18C
LAR
K E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
436
7379
9010
378
6753
056
2-3
2G
UTI
ERR
EZ E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
1034
111
8311
497
128
109
686
655
31N
EWM
AN E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
740
9184
8785
7983
556
517
39N
YE E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
182
107
129
128
149
138
144
87
882
553
LBJ
HIG
H S
CH
OO
L71
061
149
646
722
8423
17-3
3L.
BR
UN
I VER
GAR
A M
IDD
LE28
825
326
5,
806
782
24SA
LVAD
OR
GAR
CIA
MID
.16
915
418
250
548
718
LOS
OB
ISPO
S M
IDD
LE
36
927
728
993
590
926
ARN
DT
ELEM
. SC
HO
OL
412
016
814
915
615
015
214
110
4010
46-6
CEN
TEN
O E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
511
413
814
112
914
212
312
691
890
99
JUAR
EZ L
INC
OLN
ELE
M.
934
5252
6240
5542
346
391
-45
KEN
NED
Y-ZA
PATA
ELE
M.
374
7279
8283
8265
540
574
-34
PER
EZ E
LEM
. SC
HO
OL
111
314
215
113
115
715
614
1
99
295
537
PRAD
A EL
EM. S
CH
OO
L28
8610
511
310
512
011
712
2
796
801
-5R
OO
SEVE
LT E
LEM
. SC
H.
597
121
121
119
111
129
121
82
483
0-6
DD
HAC
HAR
ELE
M. S
CH
.0
2959
6163
5558
58
38
340
9-2
6S.
T.E.
P.
1112
2555
2923
1216
750
117
JJAP
0
413
119
845
045
TOTA
LS17
019
1329
4932
0731
3032
1831
9831
3631
9630
9530
3432
7329
3927
0022
4141
399
4162
8-2
29
D
IFF.
-229
6
PRELIMINARY As of May 26, 2011 TEA official ratings are expected to be released July 29, 2011
Met TPM Met TPM Met Commended Performance
Reading/ELA 85% 93% 81% 91% 80% 22%Math 76% 85% 78% 86% 78% 22%
Writing 91% 96% 92% 96% 90% 25%Social Studies 89% 97% 93% 99% 92% 34%
Science 70% 76% 77% 89% 75% 19%
Academically Unacceptable
Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary
5 elem schools 16 elem schools 6 elem schools9 middle schools 2 high schools2 high schools
Academically Unacceptable
Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary
5 elem schools 17 elem schools 5 elem schools2 middle schools 7 middle schools
Assessment Results and Campus Rating Comparisons**
2010 Campus Ratings
0
0
2009 Campus Ratings
2009* 2010** 2011***
1 high school 3 high schools
Academically Unacceptable
Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary
9 elem schools 16 elem schools 2 elem schools
8 middle schools 1 middle schools 3 high school 1 high schools
STANDARDS: 2009 2010 2011Exemplary 90% 90% 90%
Recognized 75% 80% 80%Academically Acceptable
Rdg/ELA, Wtg, S.St. 70% 70% 70%Math 55% 60% 65%
Science 50% 55% 60%
*** Includes TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS ALT. SSI Grades include 1st administration.
2011 Anticipated Campus Ratings
1
*All SSI grades include 1st & 2nd administration.
**TAKS-A included as applicable.SSI Grades include 1st administration.
Source: AEISIT and DMAC ReportsAs of 5/26/2011
Compiled by UISD Testing and Accountability
7
PRELIMINARY TEA RATINGS** As of May 26, 2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 **2011
AA AA AA Recognized AA001 UHS AA AA Recognized Recognized Recognized
002 USHS AA AA AA Recognized AA
003 AHS AA AA Recognized Recognized AA009 LBJHS AA AA AA AA AA
041 UMS Recognized AA AA Recognized AA043 USMS AA AA AA Recognized AA044 SGMS AA AA AA AA AA045 WMS AA AA AA Recognized Recognized046 CMS AA AA AA Recognized AA047 LOMS AA AA AA Recognized AA048 TMS AA AA AA Recognized AA053 AGMS AA AA AA Recognized AA054 ^LBVMS AA AA AA AA AU
103 NYE AA Recognized Recognized Exemplary Recognized
105 CLARK EL Recognized AA Recognized Recognized AA
107 SALINAS AA AA AA Recognized AA
109 NEWMAN AA Recognized Recognized Recognized Recognized
110 TRAUTMANN Exemplary Exemplary Exemplary Exemplary Exemplary
111 PEREZ AA AA Recognized Recognized AA
112 FINLEY AA Recognized Recognized Recognized AA
113 UDDH Recognized Recognized Exemplary Recognized Recognized
114 GUTIERREZ AA Recognized Exemplary Exemplary Recognized
115 RUIZ AA AA AA Recognized Recognized
116 DE LLANO AA Recognized Recognized Recognized Recognized
117 KAZEN AA Recognized Recognized Recognized Recognized
118 JUAREZ‐LINCOLN AA Recognized Exemplary Exemplary Exemplary
119 PRADA AA Recognized AA AA AA
120 BORCHERS AA Recognized Recognized Recognized Recognized
121 KENNEDY‐ZAPATA Recognized AA Recognized Recognized Recognized
122 COL. SANTOS AA Exemplary Exemplary Recognized Recognized
123 ROOSEVELT AA AA AA AA AA
124 ZAFFIRINI AA Recognized AA AA AA
125 CUELLAR AA Recognized Recognized Recognized AA
126 MULLER AA AA Recognized Recognized Recognized
127 ARNDT Recognized AA Recognized Recognized Recognized
128 BONNIE GARCIA AA AA Recognized Recognized Recognized
129 CENTENO AA Recognized Recognized AA AA
130 MALAKOFF AA AA Exemplary Recognized Recognized
131 FASKEN Recognized Recognized Recognized Exemplary Recognized132 KILLAM NA NA Recognized AA Recognized
Campu
s No. UISD
LEGEND: AA = Academically Acceptable; AU = Academically Unacceptable
*NOTE: The labels for the various rating categories have changed slightly over time. Also, the system criteria and standards vary from year to year. See the Accountability Manual for the appropriate year.
** 2011 Rating is preliminary
^ Pending 2nd administration results for Reading (1% point away from meeting floor standard)
Source: AEIS IT and TEASE. 2011 Rating based on our DMAC internal State Assessment Database and Instructional Leadership Review
As of 5/26/2011Compiled by Instructional Accountability
8
Prel
imin
ary
TAK
S R
esul
ts b
y Ac
coun
tabl
e Su
b-gr
oups
As o
f May
25,
201
1
All
TPM
His
pW
htEc
on
Dis
dvAl
lTP
MH
isp
Wht
Econ
D
isdv
All
CM
DH
isp
Wht
Econ
D
isdv
CM
D
8593
8596
8283
8283
9480
8022
8090
7718
7685
7690
7380
8780
8977
7822
7884
7619
9196
9189
9092
9691
9590
9025
9093
8820
8997
8997
8693
9993
9592
9234
9294
9028
7076
6991
6677
8976
9073
7519
7588
7117
PEIM
S st
uden
ts e
xclu
ded
2011
**
E+
S
SOC
IAL
STU
DIE
S
SCIE
NC
E
2009
ˆ
E+S
2010
*
E+S
REA
DIN
G/ E
LA
MAT
H
WR
ITIN
G
2009
2010
2011
90%
90%
90%
75%
80%
80%
Stan
dard
s:Ex
empl
ary
Rec
ogni
zed
ˆ Includ
es SSI Rdg. +
Math 1st &
2nd
adm
inistration for grades 3, 5, 8.
* I
nclu
des
TAK
S A
whe
re a
pplic
able
. Inc
lude
s 1s
t for
SS
I Gra
des
Rea
ding
and
Mat
h. **
Inc
lude
s TA
KS
, TA
KS
A, T
AK
S M
, and
TA
KS
Alt.
Incl
udes
1st
adm
inis
tratio
n S
SI G
rade
s R
eadi
ng a
nd M
ath.
poss
ible
reco
gniz
ed c
ampu
s &/
or re
cogn
ized
st
anda
rdpo
ssib
le e
xem
plar
y ca
mpu
s &/
or e
xem
plar
y st
anda
rd
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
reco
gniz
ed (1
5%)
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
exem
plar
y (2
5%)
Sour
ce: A
EIS
and
DM
AC P
relim
inar
y R
esul
ts
As o
f 5/2
5/20
11C
ompi
led
by In
stru
ctio
nal A
ccou
ntab
ility
9
Eng
/Spa
resu
lts a
s ap
plic
able
. PE
IMS
stu
dent
s ex
clud
ed. a
t cam
pus
leve
l S
SI R
dg. a
nd M
ath
1st a
dm. O
NLY
UN
ITE
D I
SD
T
AK
S 2
011
SC
OR
ES
/ S
UB
-GR
OU
PS
Pre
limin
ary
as o
f May
25,
201
1
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o. D
is
DIS
TRIC
T80
8090
7778
7884
7690
9093
8892
9294
9075
7588
71C
omm
ende
d22
2230
1822
2232
1925
2532
2034
3452
2819
1936
1790
9091
8877
7776
7695
95na
9480
80na
7820
2020
1716
1520
1543
43na
3914
14na
1181
81na
7985
85na
8595
95na
9495
94na
9481
81na
7925
24na
2325
25na
2524
24na
2134
34na
3324
23na
2287
87na
8583
83na
8094
94na
9394
95na
9370
70na
6334
34na
2926
25na
2137
37na
3036
36na
3118
18na
1996
96na
9298
98na
9699
99na
9991
91na
8850
49na
4166
65na
5968
67na
5958
57na
5081
80na
7975
75na
7294
94na
9378
78na
7618
18na
1523
23na
1918
18na
1526
26na
2088
88na
8589
89na
8799
99na
100
9292
na92
3434
na24
3837
na32
4545
na33
5051
na43
Sum
of a
ll gr
ade
leve
ls te
sted
at e
ach
subj
ect.
REA
DIN
G/ E
LAM
ATH
WR
ITIN
GSO
CIA
L ST
UD
IES
SCIE
NC
E
UH
S
WM
S
TMS
TRAU
TMAN
N
FIN
LEY
MAT
IAS
70%/80%
65%/75%
70%
70%
60%
8484
na82
8686
na85
9797
na96
7979
na79
2121
na20
2525
na21
2020
na19
2827
na24
8382
na78
8584
na79
8584
na84
8079
na79
3030
na25
2726
na25
2421
na20
3434
na33
7979
na77
8685
na84
9393
na92
7979
na75
2727
na24
3535
na33
3028
na29
3837
na33
8282
na80
8484
na79
9191
na91
8888
na89
3131
na23
3433
na27
1918
na15
3939
na34
8585
na84
9090
na91
9797
na97
9191
na90
2727
na25
3332
na30
3534
na36
4646
na42
90%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
EXEM
PLA
RY
80%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
REC
OG
NIZ
ED
poss
ible
reco
gniz
ed c
ampu
s &
/or
reco
gniz
ed s
tand
ard
RI,
TPM
or E
xcep
tions
Pro
visi
on a
re
auto
mat
ical
ly a
pplie
d by
the
stat
e to
ach
ieve
a
high
er ra
ting.
poss
ible
exe
mpl
ary
cam
pus
&/o
r ex
empl
ary
stan
dard
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
reco
gniz
ed (1
5%)
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
exem
plar
y (2
5%)
MU
LLER
MAL
AKO
FF
FASK
EN
KAZ
EN
BO
RC
HER
S
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abilit
y
10
Eng
/Spa
resu
lts a
s ap
plic
able
. PE
IMS
stu
dent
s ex
clud
ed a
t cam
pus
leve
lS
SI R
dg. a
nd M
ath
1st a
dm. O
NLY
UN
ITE
D I
SD
T
AK
S 2
011
SC
OR
ES
/ S
UB
-GR
OU
PS
Pre
limin
ary
as o
f May
25,
201
1
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o. D
is
DIS
TRIC
T80
8090
7778
7884
7690
9093
8892
9294
9075
7588
71C
omm
ende
d22
2230
1822
2232
1925
2532
2034
3452
2819
1936
1785
85na
8375
75na
7492
92na
9172
72na
7113
13na
1315
15na
1431
31na
299
9na
974
74na
7272
72na
7189
89na
8892
92na
9164
65na
6321
21na
1918
18na
1624
24na
2120
20na
1918
18na
1867
67na
6668
67na
6784
84na
8494
94na
9468
67na
6615
15na
1513
12na
129
9na
828
28na
2812
12na
1273
73na
7177
77na
7682
82na
8277
77na
7618
18na
1527
27na
2514
14na
1231
31na
30
7777
na77
8383
na83
9191
na92
8080
na78
2930
na29
3030
na30
2828
na27
3838
na36
7272
na71
7575
na75
8787
na88
7474
na74
Sum
of a
ll gr
ade
leve
ls te
sted
at e
ach
subj
ect.
REA
DIN
G/ E
LAM
ATH
WR
ITIN
GSO
CIA
L ST
UD
IES
SCIE
NC
E
USH
S
USM
S
AGM
S
SALI
NAS
RU
IZ
ZAFF
IRIN
I
70%/80%
65%/75%
70%
70%
60%
2323
na23
2121
na20
1112
na12
3333
na33
7272
na71
8282
na82
9191
na90
7474
na72
2020
na20
2626
na24
2525
na25
2020
na18
8080
na79
8281
na81
8585
na83
8282
na80
2222
na20
2424
na22
1616
na13
2827
na25
7677
na75
8585
na84
8787
na86
8181
na80
2020
na17
2222
na22
1918
na18
2828
na26
90%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
EXEM
PLA
RY
80%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
REC
OG
NIZ
ED
CU
ELLA
R
B. G
ARC
IA
KIL
LAM
poss
ible
reco
gniz
ed c
ampu
s &
/or
reco
gniz
ed s
tand
ard
poss
ible
exe
mpl
ary
cam
pus
&/o
r ex
empl
ary
stan
dard
RI o
r Exc
eptio
ns P
rovi
sion
are
aut
omat
ical
ly
appl
ied
by th
e st
ate
to a
chie
ve a
hig
her r
atin
g.
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
reco
gniz
ed (1
5%)
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
exem
plar
y (2
5%)
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
11
Eng
/Spa
resu
lts a
s ap
plic
able
. PE
IMS
stu
dent
s ex
clud
ed a
t cam
pus
leve
lS
SI R
dg. a
nd M
ath
1st a
dm. O
NLY
UN
ITE
D I
SD
T
AK
S 2
011
SC
OR
ES
/ S
UB
-GR
OU
PS
Pre
limin
ary
as o
f May
25,
201
1
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o. D
is
DIS
TRIC
T80
8090
7778
7884
7690
9093
8892
9294
9075
7588
71
Com
men
ded
2222
3018
2222
3219
2525
3220
3434
5228
1919
3617
8989
9385
7978
8472
9494
9791
8080
9273
2020
2015
2020
3516
4645
6434
1615
2812
8787
na81
8383
na77
9393
na90
9797
na95
7776
na65
3635
na27
2524
na20
3534
na24
5453
na39
2221
na12
7676
na72
7271
na69
8383
na81
8383
na79
6261
na56
2524
na20
2121
na17
2424
na19
2525
na20
1818
na13
8888
na84
8686
na83
9190
na87
8887
na85
3332
na23
3535
na27
3030
na19
4142
na33
7777
na76
7878
na79
8181
na81
6363
na61
2323
na21
2121
na21
3029
na29
1717
na16
7979
na77
8383
na82
8585
na83
8181
na80
Sum
of a
ll gr
ade
leve
ls te
sted
at e
ach
subj
ect.
REA
DIN
G/ E
LAM
ATH
WR
ITIN
GSO
CIA
L ST
UD
IES
SCIE
NC
E
AHS
UM
S
CM
S
NYE
CES
NEW
MAN
70%/80%
65%/75%
70%
70%
60%
2323
na21
3434
na31
3030
na22
3333
na32
8989
na86
9393
na91
9393
na93
9191
na90
3030
na22
2929
na26
3131
na19
4747
na35
9393
na87
9696
na96
9999
na10
091
91na
82
4544
na35
4848
na41
4646
na39
5149
na33
90%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
EXEM
PLA
RY
80%
AT
EAC
H S
UB
GR
OU
P =
REC
OG
NIZ
ED
NEW
MAN
poss
ible
reco
gniz
ed c
ampu
s &
/or
reco
gniz
ed s
tand
ard
poss
ible
exe
mpl
ary
cam
pus
&/o
r ex
empl
ary
stan
dard
RI o
r Exc
eptio
ns P
rovi
sion
are
aut
omat
ical
ly
appl
ied
by th
e st
ate
to a
chie
ve a
hig
her r
atin
g.
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
reco
gniz
ed (1
5%)
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
exem
plar
y (2
5%)
GU
TIER
REZ
CSB
S
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
12
Eng
/Spa
resu
lts a
s ap
plic
able
. PE
IMS
stu
dent
s ex
clud
ed a
t cam
pus
leve
lS
SI R
dg. a
nd M
ath
1st a
dm. O
NLY
UN
ITE
D I
SD
T
AK
S 2
011
SC
OR
ES
/ S
UB
-GR
OU
PS
Pre
limin
ary
as o
f May
25,
201
1
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o.
Dis
All
His
pW
h.Ec
o. D
isD
ISTR
ICT
8080
9077
7878
8476
9090
9388
9292
9490
7575
8871
Com
men
ded
2222
3018
2222
3219
2525
3220
3434
5228
1919
3617
7575
na75
6666
na66
8585
na85
6564
na65
77
na7
1010
na10
2424
na23
55
na5
7474
na74
6464
na63
9191
na90
7979
na79
6060
na59
1515
na15
1010
na10
1515
na15
99
na9
1616
na16
6565
na65
7070
na69
8686
na85
9090
na90
6464
na63
1414
na13
1313
na12
1919
na19
2222
na20
1212
na12
6464
na64
6464
na64
8686
na85
8282
na81
5656
na54
1616
na15
1516
na14
1919
na18
1313
na13
1313
na11
7373
na72
8282
na82
7575
na75
7878
na78
2020
na19
2323
na22
88
na8
3030
na29
7777
na77
9696
na96
9191
na92
8989
na89
2020
na19
3434
na34
2222
na22
3232
na29
8181
na80
9595
na95
8383
na83
8080
na80
SGM
S
LOM
S
LAM
. BR
UN
I
PER
EZ
SCIE
NC
E
DD
HAC
HARLB
J
Sum
of a
ll gr
ade
leve
ls te
sted
at e
ach
subj
ect.
REA
DIN
G/ E
LAM
ATH
WR
ITIN
GSO
CIA
L ST
UD
IES
70%/80%
65%/75%
70%
70%
60%
8181
na80
9595
na95
8383
na83
8080
na80
2222
na22
3333
na33
1717
na15
3131
na31
9291
na92
9696
na96
100
100
na10
095
95na
9538
39na
3642
42na
4223
24na
2151
49na
5374
74na
7382
82na
8185
86na
8571
71na
7023
23na
2228
27na
2624
25na
2423
23na
2270
70na
6984
83na
8397
97na
9775
75na
7520
20na
1930
30na
2925
25na
2525
24na
2375
75na
7585
85na
8588
88na
8786
86na
8521
21na
2030
30na
3017
17na
1733
33na
3471
71na
7175
75na
7593
93na
9362
62na
6117
17na
1717
17na
175
5na
425
25na
2490
% A
T EA
CH
SU
BG
RO
UP
= EX
EMPL
AR
Y80
% A
T EA
CH
SU
BG
RO
UP
= R
ECO
GN
IZED
KZE
RO
OSE
VELT
ARN
DT
CEN
TEN
O
JLE
poss
ible
reco
gniz
ed c
ampu
s &
/or
reco
gniz
ed s
tand
ard
poss
ible
exe
mpl
ary
cam
pus
&/o
r ex
empl
ary
stan
dard
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
reco
gniz
ed (1
5%)
Mee
ts c
omm
ende
d pe
rform
ance
sta
ndar
d to
be
exem
plar
y (2
5%)
RI o
r Exc
eptio
ns P
rovi
sion
are
aut
omat
ical
ly
appl
ied
by th
e st
ate
to a
chie
ve a
hig
her r
atin
g.
PRAD
A
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
C
ompi
led
by In
stru
ctio
nal A
ccou
ntab
ility
13
9293
77
9192
75
9092
75
WR
ITIN
G
SO
CIA
L S
TUD
IES
SC
IEN
CE
ubjectsU
ISD
Tar
gets
2011
2011
P
revi
ew
2010
Pre
limin
ary
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As o
f 5/2
5/20
11C
ompi
led
by In
stru
ctio
nal A
ccou
ntab
ility
83
80
83
79
80
78
010
2030
4050
6070
8090
100
RE
AD
ING
/ ELA
MAT
H
Perc
enta
ges
Su
Rec
ogni
zed
80%
Exem
plar
y90
%
14
8383
94
8083
82
94
8080
80
90
77
405060708090100
ng PercentagesR
eadi
ng/E
LA P
relim
inar
y TA
KS
Res
ults
2010
to 2
011
Com
paris
on
2010
2011
Pre
view
Exem
plary
Recognized
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As o
f 5/2
5/20
11C
ompi
led
by In
stru
ctio
nal A
ccou
ntab
ility
0102030
All
His
pW
hite
Eco
n D
is.
Passin
Subg
roup
s
2011
15
100
Mat
h Pr
elim
inar
y TA
KS
Res
ults
2010
to 2
011
Com
paris
on
8080
89
7779
79
88
7778
78
84
768090100
Exem
plary
Recognized
7777
76
607080
entages
405060
g Perce
2010
2011
Pre
view
203040
Passin
2011
01020 0
All
His
pW
hite
Eco
n D
is.
Subg
roup
s
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abilit
y
16
9610
0
Writ
ing
Prel
imin
ary
TAK
S R
esul
ts20
10 to
201
1 C
ompa
rison
9291
9590
9191
96
8990
9093
88
8090100
Exem
plary
Recognized
607080
entages
405060
g Perce
2010
2011
Pre
view
203040
Passin
2011
01020 0
All
His
pW
hite
Eco
n D
is.
Subg
roup
s
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abilit
y
17
100
Soci
al S
tudi
es P
relim
inar
y TA
KS
Res
ults
2010
to 2
011
Com
paris
on
9393
9592
9292
9490
9292
9490
8090100
Exem
plary
Recognized
607080
entages
405060
g Perce
2010
2011
Pre
view
203040
Passin
2011
01020 0
All
His
pW
hite
Eco
n D
is.
Subg
roup
s
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abilit
y
18
100
Scie
nce
Prel
imin
ary
TAK
S R
esul
ts20
10 to
201
1 C
ompa
rison
7776
90
7575
90
7575
88
8090Exem
plary
Recognized
7673
7575
7275
7571
6070
entages
4050
ng Perce
2010
2011
Pre
view
2030
Passin
2011
010
All
His
pW
hite
Eco
n D
is.
Subg
roup
s
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Inst
ruct
iona
l Acc
ount
abilit
y
19
Stud
ent S
ucce
ss In
itiat
ive
(SSI
)1s
t Adm
inis
tratio
n Lo
ngitu
dina
l Sum
mar
yPr
elim
inar
y R
esul
ts
2010
*20
11ª
575
%78
%
882
%80
%
Subj
ect/
Gra
de
Leve
lR E A D I N G
579
%82
%
874
%76
%
* 201
0 In
clud
es T
AKS
and
TAK
S A
ª 201
1 In
clud
es T
AKS,
TAK
S A,
TAK
S M
, and
TAK
S Al
t.
M A T H
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 4
/20/
2011
Com
pile
d by
UIS
D T
estin
g an
d A
ccou
ntab
ility
20
1st Administration ONLY
English and Spanish TAKS and TAKS A TAKS and TAKS ATAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M,
and TAKS Alt.
TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS
Alt.
2009 2010 UISD Calculated 2011 Preview 2011
75%72%60%76%95%67%85%77%79%
"Preliminary" 5th Grade TAKS READING
65%91%
Trautmann
74%
68%77%81%
93% 94%65%79%
95%
CAMPUS
Newman 78%
77%NyeClark 81%Salinas 71%
UISD 75%
AA ≥ 70% Recognized ≥ 80 Exemplary ≥ 90
78%87%
75%78%
74%
81%
DD Hachar 89%
63%Perez
Gutierrez 86%
Finley 82%66%
71%78%
90%86%
71%93%66%60%67%75%67%71%
67%72%62%
91%72%84%82%90%
71%
85%Kazen 84%JLE 88%
Ruiz 66%De Llano 89%
64%84%79%72%
Prada
Killam 59%
Centeno 58%Malakoff 82%Fasken 87%
84%80%70%
58%Borchers 87%
65%83%
63%
86%69%93%
71%Muller
59%81%88%
86%
Roosevelt 54%Zaffirini 63%
Arndt 70% Garcia 73%
Cuellar
KZE 68%Col. Santos 93%
80%
79%
76%75%73%84%83%
92%67%90%
59%
53%61%71%85%70%73%
85%88%59%
Source: Pearson TAKS PDF FilesAs of 4/20/2011
Compiled by Inst. Account. and Campus Administrators
21
1st
Adm
inis
trat
ion
ON
LY
TAK
S an
d TA
KS
ATA
KS
and
TAK
S A
TAK
S, T
AKS
A, T
AKS
M, a
nd T
AKS
Alt.
TAK
S, T
AKS
A,
TAK
S M
, and
TAK
S Al
t.
CAM
PUS
2009
2010
UIS
D C
alcu
late
d 20
11 P
revi
ew20
11U
ISD
85%
82%
82%
80%
UM
S92
%89
%88
%89
%U
SMS
82%
83%
84%
81%
SGM
S65
%78
%77
%77
%W
MS
92%
83%
83%
82%
"Pre
lim
inar
y" 8
th G
rade
TA
KS
REA
DIN
G
AA ≥
70%
R
ecog
nize
d ≥
80
Exem
plar
y ≥
90
WM
SC
MS
87%
85%
85%
80%
LOM
S75
%73
%73
%71
%TM
S92
%89
%89
%89
%A
GM
S87
%77
%78
%80
%LB
VMS
73%
72%
73%
67%
Sou
rce:
Pea
rson
TA
KS
PD
F Fi
les
As
of 4
/20/
2011
C
ompi
led
by A
ccou
ntab
ility
and
verif
ied
by C
ampu
s A
dm.
22
2011A
8th Grade 2008*
5th Grade
79%93%
60%71%70%
67%
80%
72%
82%75%82%89%
81%
MIDDLE SCHOOL Middle School Clusters
UMS 89%NYE
COL. SANTOS BENAVIDES
USMS 81%RUIZ
SALINAS
BONNIE GARCIA
SGMS 77%KENNEDY ZAPATA
JUAREZ-LINCOLN
UNITED D.D. HACHAR
WMS 82%
FINLEY
KAZEN
MULLER
FASKEN
NEWMAN
Spring 2011 Probable Cohort - 1st Administration Comparison
SSI TAKS Reading
72%89%
68%67%51%
93%94%89%80%
83%65%N/A
67%69%
* 2008 data includes TAKS only.
MATIAS DE LLANO
BORCHERS
MALAKOFF
CMS 80% CLARK
AMPARO GUTIERREZ
LOMS 71%ROOSEVELT
PEREZ
CENTENO
A 2011 Data includes TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS Alt
LBVMS 67%PRADA
ARNDT
AGMS 80%CUELLAR
ZAFFIRINI
KILLAM
TMS 89%
TRAUTMANN
Source: District's current and previous result chartsAs of 4/20/2011
Compiled by Instructional Accountability
23
1st Administration ONLY
TAKS and TAKS A TAKS and TAKS ATAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and
TAKS Alt.
TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS
Alt.
2009 2010 UISD Calculated 2011 Preview 2011
UISD 81% 79% 78% 82%Nye 84% 84% 83% 85%
Clark 66% 77% 78% 67%Salinas 68% 75% 74% 78%
Newman 79% 79% 80% 80%Trautmann 98% 95% 95% 98%
Perez 68% 74% 72% 83%Finley 89% 88% 84% 72%
DD Hachar 93% 87% 87% 93%Gutierrez 82% 89% 88% 91%
Ruiz 71% 72% 70% 75%De Llano 91% 87% 87% 93%
"Preliminary" 5th Grade TAKS MATH
English and Spanish
CAMPUS
AA ≥ 65% Recognized ≥ 80% Exemplary ≥ 90
Kazen 84% 84% 84% 87%JLE 92% 96% 96% 95%
Prada 66% 63% 64% 73%Borchers 84% 82% 82% 85%
KZE 81% 67% 69% 92%Col. Santos 93% 91% 91% 94%
Roosevelt 73% 56% 53% 79%Zaffirini 66% 67% 66% 68%Cuellar 81% 80% 80% 80%Muller 73% 90% 90% 83%
Arndt 86% 77% 78% 81% Garcia 84% 78% 78% 75%
Centeno 70% 65% 67% 62%Malakoff 86% 83% 82% 79%
Fasken 83% 87% 87% 88%Killam 79% 64% 64% 83%
Source: Pearson TAKS PDF FilesAs of 4/20/2011
Compiled by Inst. Account. and Campus Administrators
24
1st
Adm
inis
trat
ion
ON
LY
TAK
S an
d
TA
KS
ATA
KS
and
TAK
S A
TAK
S, T
AK
S A
, TA
KS
M, a
nd T
AK
S A
lt.
TAK
S, T
AK
S A
, TA
KS
M, a
nd
TAK
S A
lt.
2009
2010
UIS
D C
alcu
late
d 20
11 P
revi
ew20
11
UIS
D72
%74
%74
%76
%U
MS
82%
84%
83%
82%
USM
S79
%74
%75
%82
%SG
MS
46%
53%
53%
53%
WM
S77
%81
%81
%82
%
CAM
PUS"P
reli
min
ary
" 8th
Gra
de T
AKS
MAT
H
AA
≥ 6
5%
Rec
ogni
zed ≥
80 E
xem
plar
y ≥
90
WM
S77
%81
%81
%82
%C
MS
75%
78%
77%
79%
LOM
S57
%61
%62
%76
%TM
S78
%80
%80
%79
%A
GM
S64
%70
%69
%73
%LB
VMS
69%
66%
67%
69%
Sour
ce: P
ears
on T
AKS
File
sAs
of 4
/20/
2011
Com
pile
d b
y In
stru
ctio
nal A
ccou
ntab
ility
and
ver
ified
by
Cam
pus
Adm
.
25
2011A
8th Grade 2008
5th Grade
84%92%
83%81%71%
91%
80%
84%
94%81%86%91%
92%
Spring 2011 Probable Cohort - 1st Administration Comparison
SSI TAKS Math
MIDDLE SCHOOL Middle School Clusters
UMS 82%NYE
COL. SANTOS BENAVIDES
USMS 82%RUIZ
SALINAS
BONNIE GARCIA
SGMS 53%KENNEDY ZAPATA
JUAREZ-LINCOLN
UNITED D.D. HACHAR
WMS 82%
FINLEY
KAZEN
MULLER
FASKEN
NEWMAN
78%85%
75%74%53%
97%95%91%84%
84%68%N/A
77%76%
CMS 79% CLARK
AMPARO GUTIERREZ
LOMS 76%ROOSEVELT
CENTENO
PEREZ
TMS 79%
TRAUTMANN
MATIAS DE LLANO
BORCHERS
MALAKOFF
AGMS 73%CUELLAR
ZAFFIRINI
KILLAM
A 2011 Data includes TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS Alt
LBVMS 69%PRADA
ARNDT2008 data includes TAKS only.
Source: District's current and previous result chartsAs of 4/20/2011
Compiled by Instructional Accountability
26
Campus Preliminary Results
State Assessment Data HIGH SCHOOLS
27
Sprin
g 20
11SU
BJE
CT/
YEA
R C
OM
PAR
ISO
NPR
ELIM
INA
RY
2009
ˆ20
10*
2011
A20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
ga in /l20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
2009
ˆ20
10*
2011
A
DIS
TR
ICT
81.8
%81
.4%
80.0
%66
.3%
77.9
%78
.0%
#67
.0%
76.7
%75
.0%
89.4
%93
.4%
92.0
%
UN
ITE
D H
S86
.4%
91.1
%90
.0%
70.3
%75
.4%
77.0
%#
73.2
%79
.9%
80.0
%91
.7%
95.6
%94
.0%
UN
ITE
D S
O H
S78
.5%
84.4
%85
.0%
59.0
%72
.1%
75.0
%#
58.6
%75
.6%
72.0
%85
.2%
93.9
%91
.0%
LB
J H
S68
.6%
78.3
%75
.0%
56.0
%66
.0%
66.0
%#
60.7
%68
.3%
65.0
%85
.4%
87.7
%85
.0%
AL
EX
AN
DE
R
HS
89.6
%91
.3%
89.0
%76
.0%
80.8
%79
.0%
#73
.3%
81.9
%80
.0%
95.1
%95
.7%
91.0
%
* 201
0 in
clud
es T
AK
S a
nd T
AK
S -
AA
201
1 in
clud
es T
AK
S, T
AK
S A
, TA
KS
M a
nd T
AK
S A
lt.
Dat
a ga
ther
ed
from
AEI
S - I
T an
d D
MA
C R
epor
ts
RE
AD
ING
/ EL
A
Gr
9, 1
0, E
XIT
* M
AT
H
G
r 9,
10,
EX
IT*
SC
IEN
CE
*
Gr
10/E
XIT
SOC
IAL
ST
UD
IES*
Gr
10/E
XIT
ˆ 2
009
incl
udes
TA
KS
and
TA
KS
- A
Sou
rce:
AE
IS IT
Rep
orts
D
MA
C R
epor
ts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
UIS
D T
estin
g an
d A
ccou
ntab
ility
28
2011 ELA Composition Report by Campus10th and 11th Grades
Score 4 Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3
Home
DistrictCampusName
374 2468 2189 473 50
164 967 574 99 10UNITED H S
97 557 487 126 9UNITED SOUTH H S
100 623 527 82 7JOHN B ALEXANDER H S
13 321 601 166 24LYNDON B JOHNSON
As ofCompiled by Instructional Accountability
5/26/2011Source: DMAC Database
29
jzamora
Text Box
Preliminary
LBJ
HS
466
314
67.4
%48
231
866
.0%
AH
S52
542
881
.5%
656
560
85.0
%
UH
S71
560
384
.3%
871
713
82.0
%
US
HS
529
402
76.0
%59
945
376
.0%
A 2
011
incl
udes
TA
KS
, TA
KS
A, T
AK
S M
and
TA
KS
Alt
* 201
0 in
clud
es T
AK
S a
nd T
AK
S A
SPR
ING
PR
IMA
RY
EXIT
ASS
ESSM
ENT
2011
Hig
h
Scho
ols
2009
-201
0*To
ok a
ll
4 ar
eas
Pas
sed
all
4 ar
eas
Pas
sing
P
erce
nt
2010
-201
1A
Took
all
4
area
sP
asse
d al
l 4
area
sP
assi
ng
Per
cent
PRELIM
INARY
Sou
rce
AE
IS IT
/ C
ampu
s S
umm
ary
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
Ins
truct
iona
l Acc
ount
abili
ty
30
MAY* GRADUATES
Needing Credits Only
Projected
Completion Rate
UISD 2,481 2 11 48 356 2,064 83.2%UHS 780 1 7 18 97 657 84.2%
USHS 580 0 0 2 100 478 82.4%AHS 597 0 1 6 52 538 90.1%LBJ 524 1 3 22 107 391 74.6%
"incomplete" 12th
2007-2008 Cohort
# needing 1 TAKS
# needing 2 TAKS
# needing 3 TAKS
# needing 4 TAKS TOTAL
UISD 356 189 75 31 61 356UHS 97 48 12 9 28 97
USHS 100 45 25 9 21 100AHS 52 30 14 4 4 52LBJ 107 66 24 9 8 107
CLASS OF 2011 As of October 14, 2010 Cohort check 1 of 3
TABLE 1. Summary of students SHOULD graduate May 2011.
CAMPUS
CLASS of '11 2007-2008
Cohort repe
ater
s 9t
h
repe
ater
s10t
h
CAMPUS
Students needing TAKS ONLY 2010 October Retesters
repe
ater
s 11
th
"inco
mpl
ete"
12t
h -T
AKS
*document ONLY students who belong to 07-08 Cohort
TABLE 2. CURRENT 12th graders lacking credits and/or NOT meeting TAKS requirements.
#1
11th grade REPEATERS
2007-2008 Cohort
# needing credits ONLY
# needing 1 TAKS
# needing 2 TAKS
# needing 3 TAKS
# needing 4 TAKS TOTAL
UISD 48 0 1 1 2 44 48UHS 18 0 0 0 0 18 18
USHS 2 0 0 0 1 1 2AHS 6 0 0 0 0 6 6LBJ 22 0 1 1 1 19 22
RETAINED2007-2008
Cohortrepeaters
9threpeaters
10th TOTALUISD 13 2 11 13UHS 8 1 7 8
USHS 0 0 0 0AHS 1 0 1 1LBJ 4 1 3 4
CAMPUS
Students needing TAKS & credit combination Possible 2010 October Retesters
TABLE 4. Number of students retained in grades 9 and 10
CAMPUS
INTENSE interventions
TABLE 3. • CURRENT 11th graders lacking credits and/or NOT meeting TAKS requirements.
#1
Source: Senior Counselors As of Oct. 14. 2010 Compiled by Instructional Accountability
31
MAY* GRADUATES
Needing Credits Only
Projected Graduation
RateUISD 2,269 0 8 37 188 2,036 89.7%UHS 731 0 5 15 39 672 91.9%
USHS 493 0 0 1 58 434 88.0%AHS 534 0 1 1 29 503 94.2%LBJ 511 0 2 20 62 427 83.6%
"incomplete" 12th
2007-2008 Cohort
# needing 1 TAKS
# needing 2 TAKS
# needing 3 TAKS
# needing 4 TAKS TOTAL
UISD 188 109 50 16 13 188UHS 39 19 10 6 4 39
USHS 58 34 15 4 5 58AHS 29 18 9 1 1 29LBJ 62 38 16 5 3 62
CLASS of 2011 As of January 25, 2011 Cohort check #2 of 3
TABLE 1. Summary of students SHOULD to graduate May 2011.
CAMPUS
CLASS of '11 2007-2008
Cohort repe
ater
s 9t
h
repe
ater
s10t
h
repe
ater
s 11
th
"inco
mpl
ete"
12t
h -T
AKS
*document ONLY students who belong to 07-08 Cohort
TABLE 2. CURRENT 12th graders lacking credits and/or NOT meeting TAKS requirements.
CAMPUS
Students needing TAKS ONLY Spring 2011 Retesters
#2
11th grade REPEATERS
2007-2008 Cohort
# needing credits ONLY
# needing 1 TAKS
# needing 2 TAKS
# needing 3 TAKS
# needing 4 TAKS TOTAL
UISD 37 0 1 2 2 32 37UHS 15 0 0 0 0 15 15
USHS 1 0 0 0 1 0 1AHS 1 0 0 0 0 1 1LBJ 20 0 1 2 1 16 20
RETAINED2007-2008
Cohortrepeaters
9threpeaters
10th TOTALUISD 8 0 8 8UHS 5 0 5 5
USHS 0 0 0 0AHS 1 0 1 1LBJ 2 0 2 2
TABLE 3. • CURRENT 11th graders lacking credits and/or NOT meeting TAKS requirements.
CAMPUS
Students needing TAKS & credit combination Spring 2011 Retesters
TABLE 4. Number of students retained in grades 9 and 10
CAMPUS
INTENSE interventions
#2
Source: Senior Counselors As of Jan. 25, 2011 Compiled by Instructional Accountability
32
33
Preliminary
Reading Math Reading Math
DISTRICT 88 71 83 69UHS 92 74 89 75
USHS 85 70 83 69LBJ 79 62 72 60
AHS 93 76 88 73
ELA Math SS* SCI* ELA Math SS* SCI*
DISTRICT 84 66 90 66 85 69 88 66
UHS 88 64 93 69 91 70 93 73
USHS 80 64 91 65 85 70 89 63
LBJ 90 80 79 52 75 64 78 56
AHS 74 54 94 75 88 72 91 70
ELA* Math* SS* SCI* ELA* Math* SS* SCI*
DISTRICT 90 88 98 90 88 87 96 85UHS 94 91 99 94 92 88 97 88
USHS 89 85 98 88 87 87 95 82LBJ 91 88 98 86 80 78 94 76
AHS 82 86 98 90 92 92 98 91
A2011 includes TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M, and TAKS Alt.
*2010 includes TAKS and TAKS A for all subjects
Grades 9 through 11The numbers indicated in the charts reflect the percentages of students who passed the TAKS test.
UNITED ISD TAKS comparison 2010 to 2011
High School Campuses
High School Campuses
10th GRADE/2011A
11th GRADE/2011A
10th GRADE/2010*
11th GRADE/2010*
9th GRADE/2011A9th GRADE/2010*High School Campuses
Source: AEIS IT and DMAC Reports
As of 5/25/2011Compiled by UISD Testing and Accountability
34
Campus Preliminary Results
State Assessment Data MIDDLE SCHOOLS
35
Sprin
g 20
11SU
BJE
CT/
YEA
R C
OM
PAR
ISO
NPR
EL
IMIN
AR
Y
2009
ˆ20
10*
2011
A20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
g a20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
g a20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
g a20
09ˆ
2010
*20
11A
g a iD
IST
RIC
T80
.4%
81.4
%80
.0%
73.0
%77
.9%
78.0
%90
.6%
91.6
%90
.0%
62.9
%76
.7%
75.0
%87
.7%
93.4
%92
.0%
UM
S87
.5%
87.2
%87
.0%
82.9
%86
.0%
83.0
%92
.7%
96.6
%93
.0%
72.8
%73
.9%
77.0
%97
.1%
97.7
%97
.0%
US
MS
79.0
%74
.7%
74.0
%73
.8%
74.7
%72
.0%
89.9
%92
.5%
89.0
%60
.4%
68.2
%64
.0%
85.2
%91
.7%
92.0
%
SG
MS
66.9
%67
.2%
74.0
%50
.3%
55.8
%64
.0%
88.7
%92
.1%
91.0
%45
.9%
72.6
%60
.0%
77.2
%89
.6%
79.0
%
WM
S82
.9%
80.3
%81
.0%
82.1
%85
.5%
85.0
%92
.2%
95.3
%95
.0%
69.8
%75
.5%
81.0
%93
.8%
95.1
%95
.0%
CM
S85
.0%
80.5
%76
.0%
72.6
%75
.4%
72.0
%94
.4%
92.1
%83
.0%
60.2
%66
.0%
62.0
%80
.9%
92.1
%83
.0%
LO
MS
66.3
%69
.2%
65.0
%60
.2%
70.0
%70
.0%
84.4
%90
.1%
86.0
%57
.9%
63.4
%64
.0%
83.5
%92
.1%
90.0
%
TM
S91
.2%
87.9
%87
.0%
84.2
%84
.6%
83.0
%93
.7%
97.7
%94
.0%
70.9
%68
.1%
70.0
%94
.7%
93.6
%94
.0%
AG
MS
78.8
%69
.1%
67.0
%63
.7%
70.0
%68
.0%
89.6
%90
.9%
84.0
%61
.4%
68.5
%68
.0%
86.4
%90
.6%
94.0
%
LB
VM
S70
.0%
66.3
%64
.0%
64.2
%68
.5%
64.0
%85
.2%
89.7
%86
.0%
52.0
%58
.1%
56.0
%79
.6%
90.6
%82
.0%
A 2
011
incl
udes
TA
KS
, TA
KS
A, T
AK
S M
, and
TA
KS
Alt.
(DM
AC
)
* 2
010
incl
udes
TA
KS
and
TA
KS
- A
ccom
mod
ated
for a
ll su
bjec
ts (A
EIS
-IT)
ˆ 2
009
incl
udes
TA
KS
(A
EIS
-IT)
Dat
a ga
ther
ed
from
AEI
S - I
T &
D
MA
C R
epor
ts
REA
DIN
G
6 - 8
MA
TH
6
- 8W
RIT
ING
G
r 7SC
IEN
CE
G
r 8
SOC
IAL
STU
DIE
S
Gr 8
Sou
rce:
AE
IS IT
and
DM
AC
Rep
orts
As
of 5
/25/
2011
Com
pile
d by
UIS
D T
estin
g an
d A
ccou
ntab
ility
36
2011 Writing Composition Report by Campus7th Grade
Score 4 Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3
Home
DistrictCampusName 62 1017 1652 227 15
8 169 166 12 2UNITED MIDDLE
12 163 239 34 0UNITED SOUTH MIDDLE
2 39 98 9 2SALVADOR GARCIA
5 130 216 19 0GEORGE WASHINGTON
12 90 150 34 1CLARK MIDDLE
4 78 146 34 2LOS OBISPOS MIDDLE
15 249 237 16 4TRAUTMANN MIDDLE
1 38 247 44 3ANTONIO GONZALEZ
3 61 153 25 1LAMAR BRUNI
As ofCompiled by Instructional Accountability
5/26/2011Source: DMAC Database
37
jzamora
Text Box
Preliminary
Middle School Campuses
Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Writing Reading Math Writing
DISTRICT 74 75 72 72 77 81 94 76 76 90
UNITED MS 88 86 88 82 85 87 97 85 84 93UNITED SO MS 68 69 72 70 73 81 93 70 67 89
SALVADOR GARCIA MS 57 59 70 68 66 55 92 73 71 91WASHINGTON MS 78 87 79 85 80 88 95 83 88 95
CLARK MS 78 65 76 68 78 82 92 73 70 83LOS OBISPOS MS 63 68 55 62 70 84 90 71 72 86
TRAUTMANN MS 86 86 84 83 88 88 98 88 86 94GONZALEZ MS 62 67 59 60 69 74 91 64 70 84
LAMAR BRUNI MS 63 69 58 60 64 70 90 68 63 86
Middle School Campuses
Reading^ Math^ SS^^ SCI*** Reading Math SS SCI
DISTRICT 82 75 93 68 80 76 90 67
UNITED MS 89 85 98 74 89 82 97 77UNITED SO MS 84 76 92 68 80 80 92 64
SALVADOR GARCIA MS 78 53 90 73 77 52 79 60WASHINGTON MS 83 82 95 76 82 82 95 81
CLARK MS 86 79 92 66 79 78 83 62LOS OBISPOS MS 73 62 92 63 71 77 90 64
TRAUTMANN MS 90 80 94 68 90 80 94 70GONZALEZ MS 78 70 91 69 80 73 94 68
LAMAR BRUNI MS 72 67 91 58 67 69 81 56
*2010 includes TAKS and TAKS A for all subjects. Includes 1st administration for SSI GradesA2011 includes TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS M and TAKS-Alt. Includes 1st administration only for SSI grades
UNITED ISD TAKS comparison 2010 to 2011 Grades 6 through 8
The numbers indicated in the charts reflect the percentages of students who passed the TAKS test.
8th GRADE/2010*
6th GRADE/2011A 7th GRADE/2011A7th GRADE/2010*6th GRADE/2010*
8th GRADE/2011A
Preliminary
Source: AEIS IT and DMAC ReportsAs of 5/25/2011
Compiled by UISD Testing and Accountability
38
Campus Preliminary Results
State Assessment Data ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
39
Spring 2011SUBJECT/YEAR COMPARISON PRELIMINARY
2009ˆ 2010* 2011ª 2009ˆ 2010* 2011ª 2009ˆ 2010* 2011ª 2009ˆ 2010* 2011ª
DISTRICT 80.3% 81.4% 80.0% 81.3% 77.9% 78.0% 87.0% 91.6% 90.0% 80.9% 76.7% 75.0%NYE 85.1% 84.7% 88.0% 87.0% 85.0% 86.0% 90.1% 96.6% 91.0% 81.4% 90.7% 88.0%
CLARK 85.3% 84.1% 77.0% 83.3% 83.3% 78.0% 90.9% 87.1% 81.0% 71.9% 76.2% 63.0%SALINAS 69.7% 74.2% 73.0% 68.3% 77.8% 77.0% 78.8% 80.5% 82.0% 66.9% 93.5% 77.0%
NEWMAN 77.0% 80.5% 79.0% 76.7% 80.6% 83.0% 81.7% 84.7% 85.0% 80.2% 87.3% 81.0%TRAUTMANN 98.4% 96.8% 96.0% 98.4% 98.4% 98.0% 99.1% 100.0% 99.0% 97.8% 98.2% 91.0%
PEREZ 66.7% 68.4% 73.0% 70.9% 78.1% 82.0% 70.1% 78.7% 75.0% 87.2% 81.2% 78.0%FINLEY 86.5% 84.6% 81.0% 82.7% 83.3% 75.0% 96.0% 95.0% 94.0% 85.2% 86.4% 78.0%
U.DD.HACHAR 79.8% 80.4% 77.0% 84.9% 81.3% 96.0% 95.3% 88.5% 91.0% 96.2% 95.1% 89.0%GUTIERREZ 85.8% 91.7% 89.0% 87.8% 91.2% 93.0% 92.4% 93.2% 93.0% 92.5% 95.0% 91.0%
RUIZ 76.5% 77.8% 77.0% 80.3% 80.8% 83.0% 88.9% 90.3% 91.0% 73.3% 79.7% 80.0%DE LLANO 91.1% 90.6% 85.0% 92.8% 88.7% 89.0% 98.0% 94.2% 99.0% 90.9% 85.3% 92.0%
KAZEN 83.8% 84.5% 84.0% 78.2% 82.3% 86.0% 91.6% 85.1% 97.0% 81.8% 88.1% 79.0%JUAREZ-LINCOLN 85.4% 89.0% 92.0% 96.3% 95.6% 96.0% 98.0% 90.2% 100.0% 93.9% 97.9% 95.0%
PRADA 61.1% 64.6% 74.0% 66.9% 70.9% 82.0% 66.0% 87.5% 85.0% 71.9% 73.7% 71.0%BORCHERS 86.3% 83.1% 83.0% 80.5% 80.1% 85.0% 90.8% 85.5% 85.0% 91.5% 89.9% 80.0%
KENNEDY-ZAPATA 77.8% 78.4% 81.0% 85.0% 86.3% 95.0% 90.4% 96.7% 83.0% 96.2% 84.6% 80.0%
COL. SANTOS 95.2% 93.8% 93.0% 94.3% 93.3% 96.0% 97.7% 97.0% 99.0% 95.5% 90.7% 91.0%ROOSEVELT 75.3% 66.3% 70.0% 71.7% 68.1% 84.0% 82.7% 92.3% 97.0% 66.0% 68.3% 75.0%
ZAFFIRNI 76.4% 71.1% 72.0% 72.2% 71.5% 75.0% 80.5% 82.3% 87.0% 66.1% 63.9% 74.0%CUELLAR 82.0% 74.9% 72.0% 90.6% 80.8% 82.0% 95.7% 93.3% 91.0% 75.3% 86.3% 74.0%MULLER 74.3% 84.9% 79.0% 75.5% 89.2% 86.0% 93.3% 88.4% 93.0% 79.5% 89.3% 79.0%
ARNDT 74.7% 77.3% 75.0% 81.7% 83.2% 85.0% 86.0% 86.8% 88.0% 82.2% 80.5% 86.0%B. GARCIA 75.8% 77.5% 80.0% 81.8% 81.8% 82.0% 78.4% 85.5% 85.0% 75.7% 80.5% 82.0%CENTENO 76.2% 70.0% 71.0% 77.5% 70.5% 75.0% 80.6% 93.0% 93.0% 73.8% 72.6% 62.0%
MALAKOFF 87.7% 82.6% 82.0% 86.3% 82.0% 84.0% 90.9% 92.9% 91.0% 92.3% 85.0% 88.0%FASKEN 87.5% 86.9% 85.0% 81.8% 86.9% 90.0% 90.3% 93.8% 97.0% 88.3% 95.3% 91.0%KILLAM 75.6% 72.7% 76.0% 77.5% 79.6% 85.0% 76.4% 89.4% 87.0% 66.0% 61.7% 81.0%
SCIENCE *** Gr 5
English and Spanish
READING* (3-5)
MATH** (3-5)
WRITING Gr 4
Source: AEIS IT and DMAC ReportsAs of 5/25/2011
Compiled by UISD Testing and Accountability
40
2011 Writing Composition Report by Campus4th GradeScore 4 Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3
Home
DistrictCampusName
90 948 1762 304 17
1 44 77 12 1NYE EL
2 26 35 12 1CLARK EL
1 26 85 22 0SALINAS EL
2 30 38 9 0NEWMAN EL
34 94 17 2 0TRAUTMANN EL
0 15 97 38 2PEREZ EL
1 21 48 6 0FINLEY EL
0 18 34 5 0UNITED D D HACHAR EL
3 46 65 11 0GUTIERREZ EL
4 54 74 10 0RUIZ EL
8 63 32 0 0MATIAS DE LLANO EL
1 24 55 5 0KAZEN EL
2 11 40 2 0JUAREZ/LINCOLN EL
2 30 62 18 0PRADA EL
0 28 55 13 0CHARLES BORCHERS EL
0 17 47 13 0KENNEDY ZAPATA EL
10 62 67 3 0COL SANTOS BENAVIDES
0 42 80 5 0FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT
2 29 100 23 5JUDITH ZAFFIRNI
2 28 59 12 2HENRY CUELLAR
2 40 61 6 0JULIA BIRD JONES MULLER
2 38 87 15 4JOHN W ARNDT
0 39 90 20 0BONNIE L GARCIA
As ofCompiled by Instructional Accountability
5/26/2011Source: DMAC Database
41
2011 Writing Composition Report by Campus4th GradeScore 4 Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3
Home
0 9 104 10 1RODOLFO C CENTENO
0 33 102 14 0DR MALAKOFF
9 55 87 7 0BARBARA FASKEN
2 26 64 11 1RADCLIFFE & SUE KILLAM
As ofCompiled by Instructional Accountability
5/26/2011Source: DMAC Database
42
Rea
ding
Mat
hR
eadi
ngM
ath
Rea
ding
Mat
hW
ritin
gR
eadi
ngM
ath
Writ
ing
Rea
ding
Mat
hSc
ienc
eR
eadi
ngM
ath
Scie
nce
DIS
TRIC
T87
8483
8578
8592
7786
9076
7977
7882
81N
YE92
8391
8686
8997
8585
9178
8491
8886
88C
LAR
K89
8985
8780
8087
7275
8183
8076
6968
63SA
LIN
AS
7575
7576
7782
8167
7782
7076
9478
7877
NEW
MA
N89
8278
8474
8085
7885
8580
8087
8081
81TR
AU
TMA
NN
100
9997
9895
9910
095
9799
9597
9895
9891
PER
EZ80
8182
8860
8079
6873
7562
7481
6884
78FI
NLE
Y86
8484
7087
7895
8385
9482
8886
7572
78U
DD
HA
CH
AR
7985
8598
7574
8983
9691
9086
9564
9389
GU
TIER
REZ
9588
9294
9598
9383
9493
8689
9592
9291
RU
IZ94
8785
8675
8490
7789
9165
7280
7175
80D
E LL
AN
O94
8687
8089
9294
8692
9989
8785
9296
92K
AZE
N94
8285
8277
8185
8088
9784
8488
8689
79JU
AR
EZ-L
INC
OLN
100
9892
9579
9390
9298
100
8896
9890
9595
PRA
DA
7573
7483
6378
8878
9085
5863
7472
7471
BO
RC
HER
S85
8489
9577
7586
7473
8587
8190
8484
80K
ENN
EDY-
ZAPA
TA89
9583
9974
9797
7692
8371
6885
8495
80C
OL.
SA
NTO
S96
9496
9693
9497
9398
9993
9291
9094
91R
OO
SEVE
LT75
7070
8569
7992
7187
9755
5668
6780
75ZA
FFIR
INI
8473
8081
6573
8264
7687
6367
6472
6974
CU
ELLA
R89
8080
8461
8093
7382
9174
8386
6380
74M
ULL
ER89
9179
8379
8688
7890
9388
9289
8185
79A
RN
DT
8384
7583
7988
8774
9088
7077
8177
8386
BO
NN
IE G
AR
CIA
9293
8886
6774
8676
8385
7378
8175
7582
CEN
TEN
O76
6079
7976
8693
5782
9360
6673
7564
62M
ALA
KO
FF82
8084
8084
8493
7990
9182
8385
8580
88FA
SKEN
8987
8691
8286
9487
9197
8988
9583
8891
KIL
LAM
8986
7885
7186
8971
8687
6066
6280
8481
* 2010
incl
udes
TAK
S an
d TA
KS A
for a
ll sub
ject
s. In
clud
es 1
st a
dmin
istra
tion
for S
SI G
rade
sA 20
11 in
clud
es T
AKS,
TAK
S A,
TAK
S M
and
TAK
S-Al
t. In
clud
es 1
st a
dmin
istra
tion
for S
SI g
rade
sUN
ITE
D I
SD
TA
KS C
om
pari
son
20
10
to 2
01
1
E +
S
Gra
des
3 th
roug
h 5
The
num
bers
indi
cate
d in
the
char
ts re
flect
the
perc
enta
ges
of s
tude
nts
who
pas
sed
the
TAK
S te
st.
5th
GR
ADE
2011
A3t
h G
RAD
E 20
10*
Elem
enta
ry C
ampu
ses
3th
GR
ADE
2011
A4t
h G
RAD
E 20
11A
4th
GR
ADE
2010
*5t
h G
RAD
E 20
10*
PREL
IMIN
AR
Y
Sour
ce: A
EIS
IT a
nd D
MAC
Rep
orts
As o
f 5/2
5/20
11C
ompi
led
by U
ISD
Tes
ting
and
Acco
unta
bilit
y
43
Texa
s P
rimar
y R
eadi
ng In
vent
ory
(TP
RI)
Kin
derg
arte
n C
ompa
rison
of
Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
GK
e
ds
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
ial
nal
ng
Tested
ord
s
g nsion
Period
No.
Letter Nam
Letter Sound
Deleting InitSounds
Deleting FinSounds
Screenin
# of Students
Rhyming
Blending WoParts
Blending Phonemes
ListeninComprehen
Assessment C
ampu
s
Campus N
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
BO
Y13
8764
346
718
5259
943
718
5286
662
918
6633
524
440
3278
657
EOY
1428
222
1615
311
554
906
208
1528
420
433
463
237
17D
ISTR
ICT
BO
Y73
3142
%56
77%
2230
%34
47%
5575
%58
79%
2027
%20
27%
2433
%EO
Y74
1014
%13
18%
23%
45%
1318
%10
14%
57%
45%
79%
BO
Y21
1152
%12
57%
943
%12
57%
1257
%12
57%
1048
%11
52%
1048
%EO
Y21
00%
314
%0
0%2
10%
210
%2
10%
15%
15%
210
%
103
NYE
CLA
RK
EL
105
BO
Y78
4153
%41
53%
3849
%44
56%
4254
%49
63%
2937
%49
63%
3747
%EO
Y78
1418
%15
19%
23%
56%
45%
68%
56%
34%
1924
%
BO
Y59
2949
%34
58%
2847
%38
64%
5390
%56
95%
1525
%17
29%
2746
%EO
Y62
813
%2
3%0
0%1
2%9
15%
813
%1
2%1
2%6
10%
SALI
NA
S
NEW
MA
N
107
109
BO
Y86
3237
%37
43%
3035
%33
38%
3743
%36
42%
1315
%17
20%
4451
%EO
Y87
45%
67%
00%
00%
78%
56%
00%
00%
89%
BO
Y61
3049
%42
69%
2948
%40
66%
5489
%59
97%
1321
%18
30%
3557
%EO
Y63
23%
12%
00%
00%
12%
914
%1
2%2
3%9
14%
TRA
UTM
AN
N
PER
EZ
110
111
BO
Y20
945
%13
65%
840
%11
55%
1785
%18
90%
420
%7
35%
1890
%EO
Y21
00%
00%
00%
00%
15%
210
%0
0%0
0%0
0%FI
NLE
Y11
2
As of M
ay 17, 2011
TPRI Kinde
rgarten Co
mparison Re
port
y,
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
44
Texa
s P
rimar
y R
eadi
ng In
vent
ory
(TP
RI)
Kin
derg
arte
n C
ompa
rison
of
Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
GK
e
ds
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
ial
nal
ng
Tested
ord
s
g nsion
Period
No.
Letter Nam
Letter Sound
Deleting InitSounds
Deleting FinSounds
Screenin
# of Students
Rhyming
Blending WoParts
Blending Phonemes
ListeninComprehen
Assessment C
ampu
s
Campus N
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
BO
Y13
431
%10
77%
538
%5
38%
1292
%12
92%
323
%3
23%
646
%EO
Y14
321
%1
7%1
7%3
21%
536
%6
43%
17%
17%
17%
UD
DH
113
BO
Y62
3252
%30
48%
2744
%30
48%
3048
%29
47%
2540
%24
39%
2744
%EO
Y62
1118
%17
27%
813
%9
15%
2032
%22
35%
46%
58%
1016
%
BO
Y55
2749
%21
38%
2647
%28
51%
3055
%30
55%
1425
%16
29%
2851
%EO
Y58
916
%6
10%
12%
12%
47%
35%
59%
59%
712
%
GU
TIER
REZ
115
RU
IZ
114
BO
Y50
2040
%12
24%
1530
%17
34%
2040
%20
40%
714
%8
16%
2448
%EO
Y51
48%
36%
12%
12%
24%
48%
00%
00%
48%
BO
Y33
927
%3
9%7
21%
721
%7
21%
721
%1
3%4
12%
2164
%EO
Y34
26%
13%
00%
13%
412
%0
0%0
0%0
0%2
6%
DE
LLA
NO
KA
ZEN
116
117
BO
Y7
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
229
%EO
Y8
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
BO
Y28
1243
%18
64%
1243
%19
68%
2589
%27
96%
725
%10
36%
1657
%EO
Y31
00%
26%
00%
00%
516
%10
32%
13%
13%
1445
%
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
PRA
DA
119
118
BO
Y57
3053
%23
40%
2340
%31
54%
3867
%38
67%
1221
%18
32%
4070
%EO
Y60
1220
%4
7%3
5%4
7%14
23%
2135
%2
3%1
2%11
18%
120
BO
RC
HER
S
As of M
ay 17, 2011
TPRI Kinde
rgarten Co
mparison Re
port
y,
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
45
Texa
s P
rimar
y R
eadi
ng In
vent
ory
(TP
RI)
Kin
derg
arte
n C
ompa
rison
of
Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
GK
e
ds
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
ial
nal
ng
Tested
ord
s
g nsion
Period
No.
Letter Nam
Letter Sound
Deleting InitSounds
Deleting FinSounds
Screenin
# of Students
Rhyming
Blending WoParts
Blending Phonemes
ListeninComprehen
Assessment C
ampu
s
Campus N
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
BO
Y18
211
%7
39%
317
%2
11%
528
%5
28%
211
%1
6%4
22%
EOY
200
0%0
0%0
0%0
0%0
0%1
5%0
0%0
0%0
0%K
ENN
EDY-
ZAPA
TA12
1
BO
Y82
4656
%59
72%
4757
%55
67%
6579
%70
85%
1215
%19
23%
4757
%EO
Y87
78%
67%
11%
22%
910
%9
10%
00%
11%
78%
BO
Y23
730
%8
35%
730
%8
35%
1461
%20
87%
522
%5
22%
417
%EO
Y26
28%
14%
14%
14%
28%
28%
00%
14%
312
%
122
CO
L. S
AN
TOS
123
RO
OSE
VELT
BO
Y45
1329
%8
18%
1329
%15
33%
3578
%41
91%
1022
%14
31%
1942
%EO
Y48
510
%0
0%0
0%0
0%1
2%11
23%
36%
36%
919
%
BO
Y35
1646
%11
31%
1337
%16
46%
1749
%17
49%
411
%9
26%
2674
%EO
Y37
1130
%1
3%4
11%
514
%7
19%
1232
%0
0%1
3%6
16%
125
CU
ELLA
R
124
ZAFF
IRIN
I
BO
Y49
2449
%20
41%
2041
%23
47%
2347
%23
47%
1837
%20
41%
2551
%EO
Y51
2141
%10
20%
510
%6
12%
1325
%16
31%
36%
48%
714
%
BO
Y56
1832
%18
32%
1934
%21
38%
3970
%48
86%
1425
%11
20%
3970
%EO
Y61
58%
23%
23%
23%
915
%11
18%
12%
00%
1118
%12
7
126
AR
ND
T
MU
LLER
BO
Y85
3642
%54
64%
3845
%42
49%
3541
%38
45%
1720
%28
33%
7386
%EO
Y73
2129
%12
16%
57%
811
%1
1%1
1%3
4%2
3%39
53%
128
BO
NN
IE
GA
RC
IA
As of M
ay 17, 2011
TPRI Kinde
rgarten Co
mparison Re
port
y,
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
46
Texa
s P
rimar
y R
eadi
ng In
vent
ory
(TP
RI)
Kin
derg
arte
n C
ompa
rison
of
Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
GK
e
ds
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
ial
nal
ng
Tested
ord
s
g nsion
Period
No.
Letter Nam
Letter Sound
Deleting InitSounds
Deleting FinSounds
Screenin
# of Students
Rhyming
Blending WoParts
Blending Phonemes
ListeninComprehen
Assessment C
ampu
s
Campus N
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
BO
Y32
1753
%24
75%
2475
%24
75%
2475
%24
75%
2166
%22
69%
1753
%EO
Y32
412
%4
12%
13%
39%
516
%17
53%
13%
39%
39%
129
CEN
TEN
O
BO
Y10
455
53%
7774
%54
52%
7067
%92
88%
9288
%21
20%
3534
%69
66%
EOY
108
2422
%22
20%
55%
87%
3734
%38
35%
00%
33%
2523
%
BO
Y73
4764
%41
56%
4359
%48
66%
3649
%37
51%
1926
%27
37%
4156
%EO
Y77
1114
%3
4%5
6%5
6%1
1%9
12%
23%
11%
1013
%13
1
130
FASK
EN
MA
LAK
OFF
BO
Y82
4555
%39
48%
3948
%45
55%
4960
%52
63%
1923
%27
33%
6377
%EO
Y84
3238
%18
21%
810
%19
23%
3238
%44
52%
45%
34%
1720
%13
2K
ILLA
M
As of M
ay 17, 2011
TPRI Kinde
rgarten Co
mparison Re
port
y,
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
47
TPR
I Firs
t Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
inal
s Tested
ng
ing
s. on
ing
wel on
s. on
nal
ing
ing
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
g
nd on
Gra
phop
hone
mic
Kno
wle
dge
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ng nsion ries
+ WPM
d Parts
No.
UIS
D
nemes
tial
Period
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SD%
Blends in FiPosition
# of Students
Screeni
Word ReadiSet 2
Initial ConSubstitutio
Word ReadiSet 1
Middle VowSubstitutio
Final ConsSubstitutio
Deleting FinSounds
Word ReadiSet 3
Word ReadiSet 4
Initial BlenSubstitutio
ReadinComprehen
Both Sto
Fluency 60+
Blending Word
Cam
pus
Campus
Blending Phon
Deleting IniSounds
Assessment
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD
%#
St%
60
+
BO
Y17
7482
146
472
2755
031
693
3985
648
331
1942
524
470
2675
042
815
4693
553
1359
7714
7683
1448
8214
5282
127
7
EOY
2005
540
2748
260
316
08
267
1338
249
274
413
77
206
1015
68
558
2845
623
464
2367
033
916
47
BO
Y90
3539
2326
2224
2730
3134
1314
1921
1719
2831
3236
4348
6572
7280
7179
7078
56
EOY
100
2626
22
33
66
1010
11
22
22
33
55
44
1010
1717
1919
2727
5151
103
NYE
DIS
TRIC
T
EOY
100
2626
22
33
66
1010
11
22
22
33
55
44
1010
1717
1919
2727
5151
BO
Y30
1447
1033
1033
1240
1343
310
517
620
1137
1447
1653
2687
2893
2790
2893
00
EOY
3115
482
61
35
168
261
31
31
35
166
193
108
2611
3512
3922
7114
45
BO
Y85
5362
2024
2732
4654
5160
1922
2833
3136
4351
4856
6071
7487
7892
7892
7386
22
EOY
9552
554
45
513
1415
165
55
58
89
915
1614
1532
3436
3837
3946
4819
2010
7SA
LIN
AS
CLA
RK
EL
105
BO
Y64
4062
3047
3859
3961
4266
2641
2945
3047
4062
4164
4367
5586
5484
5688
5891
46
EOY
6827
406
95
711
1615
225
76
97
1014
2122
328
1224
3524
3521
3129
4324
35
BO
Y10
212
127
73
34
410
101
12
23
310
107
721
2151
5064
6363
6256
5516
16
EOY
105
1110
00
11
22
44
11
00
22
00
33
22
55
66
55
1312
7773
NEW
MA
N10
9
110
TRA
UTM
AN
N
BO
Y10
339
3824
2327
2633
3249
488
810
1015
1540
3945
4470
6890
8794
9193
9096
932
2
EOY
108
2321
33
33
44
76
11
33
33
55
76
76
1413
1918
2119
3431
4138
BO
Y43
2047
1126
1228
1637
2047
12
37
512
1433
1637
2149
3479
3888
4093
3274
37
EOY
6010
170
00
03
57
120
00
02
32
34
73
59
1512
209
1512
2037
6211
2FI
NLE
Y
111
PER
EZ
BO
Y4
00
375
375
375
375
250
250
250
250
250
125
250
250
250
250
00
EOY
155
330
00
00
01
71
71
73
203
203
202
135
337
474
273
208
5311
3U
DD
H
TPRI 1st Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
48
TPR
I Firs
t Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
inal
s Tested
ng
ing
s. on
ing
wel on
s. on
nal
ing
ing
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
g
nd on
Gra
phop
hone
mic
Kno
wle
dge
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ng nsion ries
+ WPM
d Parts
No.
UIS
D
nemes
tial
Period
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SD%
Blends in FiPosition
# of Students
Screeni
Word ReadiSet 2
Initial ConSubstitutio
Word ReadiSet 1
Middle VowSubstitutio
Final ConsSubstitutio
Deleting FinSounds
Word ReadiSet 3
Word ReadiSet 4
Initial BlenSubstitutio
ReadinComprehen
Both Sto
Fluency 60+
Blending Word
Cam
pus
Campus
Blending Phon
Deleting IniSounds
Assessment
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD
%#
St%
60
+
BO
Y54
3056
1528
1731
2444
2750
1528
1833
1833
2546
3056
2648
3463
4583
4278
4380
47
EOY
6012
202
31
27
128
130
01
22
33
56
104
79
1513
2212
2021
3527
45
BO
Y86
4755
3743
4350
5362
6879
4047
3945
4047
5766
6171
5969
7688
7486
7587
6576
33
EOY
9619
201
12
29
98
82
22
22
28
88
85
58
816
1710
1018
1957
5911
5R
UIZ
114
GU
TIER
REZ
BO
Y82
2834
1417
2024
2429
3037
1012
1316
1417
2429
2429
3037
4555
6377
5466
5972
1316
EOY
8621
241
12
27
810
123
31
12
27
811
139
1020
2323
2719
2226
3049
57
BO
Y30
1860
1343
1653
1757
1757
827
1033
1137
1860
1860
2067
2480
2790
2687
2997
27
EOY
3610
280
00
02
64
110
00
00
01
33
82
66
179
257
199
2517
47
116
DE
LLA
NO
117
KA
ZEN
BO
Y10
00
110
550
660
560
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
110
110
880
220
EOY
384
110
01
32
52
50
00
01
31
32
51
32
54
113
815
3921
55
BO
Y27
519
27
311
519
622
27
311
415
519
622
1452
2074
2074
1970
2489
311
EOY
459
200
01
22
46
130
00
04
95
117
162
47
168
184
917
3828
62
118
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
119
PRA
DA
BO
Y56
2748
1527
1934
2138
2545
1629
1832
1934
2646
2748
2545
4377
4580
4275
4682
712
EOY
5611
203
54
78
1412
211
22
43
56
117
125
98
148
147
1216
2931
55
BO
Y19
947
316
316
632
632
526
526
526
737
737
1263
1895
1789
1910
019
100
00
EOY
225
232
92
92
94
182
92
92
92
91
54
184
187
325
234
1810
4512
1K
ENN
EDY-
ZAPA
TA
120
BO
RC
HER
S
BO
Y11
539
3424
2120
1728
2434
304
37
612
1032
2834
3039
3485
7488
7782
7189
7718
16
EOY
119
1714
11
43
76
108
00
00
11
33
65
43
1311
1513
1815
4034
7361
122
CO
L.
SAN
TOS
TPRI 1st Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
49
TPR
I Firs
t Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
Phon
emic
Aw
aren
ess
inal
s Tested
ng
ing
s. on
ing
wel on
s. on
nal
ing
ing
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
g
nd on
Gra
phop
hone
mic
Kno
wle
dge
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ng nsion ries
+ WPM
d Parts
No.
UIS
D
nemes
tial
Period
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SDSD
SD%
Blends in FiPosition
# of Students
Screeni
Word ReadiSet 2
Initial ConSubstitutio
Word ReadiSet 1
Middle VowSubstitutio
Final ConsSubstitutio
Deleting FinSounds
Word ReadiSet 3
Word ReadiSet 4
Initial BlenSubstitutio
ReadinComprehen
Both Sto
Fluency 60+
Blending Word
Cam
pus
Campus
Blending Phon
Deleting IniSounds
Assessment
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD %
SD #
SD %SD
#SD
%#
St%
60
+
BO
Y56
2443
1120
1730
1934
2443
1221
1629
1730
2239
2545
2443
4275
4580
4377
5089
47
EOY
5919
324
74
73
54
72
32
32
34
75
84
79
1510
1713
2211
1931
53
BO
Y69
1725
710
812
2029
4058
1014
1522
1826
3246
3855
3246
5478
6087
6087
6087
23
EOY
7935
442
33
44
512
151
11
12
35
68
105
620
2523
2924
3030
3819
24ZA
FFIR
INI
124
123
RO
OSE
VELT
BO
Y79
5266
3139
3747
4253
5873
2835
3544
3443
4962
5468
5671
7392
7291
7089
6886
45
EOY
8143
532
24
56
721
261
11
14
56
713
1613
1626
3231
3840
4938
4717
21
BO
Y85
5261
3541
3946
4452
4654
2529
3136
3541
4047
4452
5767
7386
7791
7588
7791
45
EOY
8824
272
23
37
811
122
23
33
33
35
65
621
2425
2832
3631
3527
3112
6M
ULL
ER
125
CU
ELLA
R
BO
Y44
1739
716
818
1125
1330
37
716
818
1125
1227
1943
3682
3886
3886
3989
37
EOY
647
111
21
24
65
80
01
22
32
35
83
514
2215
2313
2024
3823
36
BO
Y92
6267
3740
4246
5054
5964
2123
2729
3336
5863
6065
6267
8087
8289
8289
8693
33
EOY
100
5050
77
88
2424
3636
33
77
88
1818
2222
1717
3333
4343
5151
6868
2525
127
AR
ND
T
128
BO
NN
IE
GA
RC
IA
BO
Y33
1648
927
1030
1648
2988
1030
1648
1752
2988
3091
2267
2988
3091
2988
2988
00
EOY
496
121
21
22
43
62
42
42
45
105
104
89
1811
2211
228
1634
69
BO
Y13
463
4735
2641
3149
3755
4111
818
1324
1842
3147
3574
5510
075
110
8210
780
9269
1310
EOY
141
2719
11
11
96
1410
00
00
11
54
64
64
1410
1913
2216
3928
5942
130
MA
LAK
OFF
129
CEN
TEN
O
BO
Y83
3643
1619
2125
2834
3441
2024
2429
2530
3036
3340
3036
5263
6275
6781
6173
45
EOY
101
1616
11
00
44
1010
00
11
11
44
55
55
1212
1212
1616
2121
6665
BO
Y99
6667
3232
3939
5051
6162
1818
2525
2727
5556
6061
5960
7879
9091
8788
9394
66
EOY
103
3635
00
00
77
2019
44
55
44
88
1616
1515
1616
3231
2928
4847
3130
131
FASK
EN
132
KIL
LAM
TPRI 1st Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
50
TPR
I Sec
ond
Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
+ WPM
ng ension
stories)
ding
GK
Spe
lling
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ding
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
ding
ding
s Tested
ment d
s No.
ingSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
%60
+
Fluency 90
ReadinComprehe
(SD on both
Word ReadSet 4
Set 1
Set 3
Set 4
Word ReadSet 1
Set 2
Word ReadSet 2
Word ReadSet 3
# of Students
AssessmPerio
Cam
pus
Campus
ScreenSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
% 6
0+
BO
Y26
2813
6452
1665
4423
6890
2194
8322
9787
1073
4115
3058
1637
6218
7371
1319
5035
413
EOY
2829
00
448
1612
8545
1349
4811
7942
203
738
814
407
1472
626
574
2011
9842
BO
Y12
152
4361
5010
788
9679
111
9233
2757
4769
5777
6451
4219
16EO
Y12
30
017
1441
3336
2952
4213
1116
1322
1837
3026
2161
5010
3N
YE
DIS
TRIC
T
EOY
123
00
1714
4133
3629
5242
1311
1613
2218
3730
2621
6150
BO
Y60
2948
3863
5592
5287
5795
1830
3253
4270
4372
2745
610
EOY
630
08
1323
3718
2925
402
38
1311
1713
2111
1732
51
BO
Y90
5561
7179
7887
7988
8594
4449
6370
6572
6471
4651
1011
EOY
102
00
3938
7473
6564
6766
1212
2928
2726
4645
2323
2827
105
CLA
RK
EL
107
SALI
NA
SEO
Y10
20
039
3874
7365
6467
6612
1229
2827
2646
4523
2328
27
BO
Y78
3747
5064
7090
7191
6988
2026
3849
4254
5064
2532
912
EOY
830
014
1734
4129
3538
462
212
1414
1727
3310
1244
53
BO
Y11
927
2341
3410
084
9076
9782
1412
3832
4336
5647
2824
3429
109
NEW
MA
N
110
TRA
UTM
AN
NEO
Y12
30
014
1145
3737
3042
343
27
613
1116
1310
879
64
BO
Y12
563
5082
6611
491
105
8411
390
4838
7661
7963
9677
8165
1411
EOY
127
2217
4132
3528
3024
129
2016
1814
2520
4939
4233
BO
Y58
3153
3662
5595
5086
5391
1119
3764
3459
4374
3153
1119
110
TRA
UTM
AN
N
111
PER
EZ
112
FIN
LEY
EOY
650
04
625
3819
2920
310
03
52
34
64
635
54
BO
Y46
2452
2963
4291
3985
4189
1226
2759
3065
3474
1635
49
EOY
590
06
1013
2211
199
155
812
205
817
2923
3911
19
112
FIN
LEY
113
UD
DH
TPRI 2nd
Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by Elemen
tary Instruction
51
TPR
I Sec
ond
Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
+ WPM
ng ension
stories)
ding
GK
Spe
lling
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ding
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
ding
ding
s Tested
ment d
s No.
ingSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
%60
+
Fluency 90
ReadinComprehe
(SD on both
Word ReadSet 4
Set 1
Set 3
Set 4
Word ReadSet 1
Set 2
Word ReadSet 2
Word ReadSet 3
# of Students
AssessmPerio
Cam
pus
Campus
ScreenSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
% 6
0+
BO
Y10
049
4963
6384
8482
8288
8825
2556
5658
5863
6330
3020
20EO
Y11
10
011
1035
3228
2533
303
38
713
1221
1916
1457
51B
OY
100
4949
6464
9090
8484
9595
2626
5151
6262
7878
5656
88
EOY
107
00
2221
4946
4340
5249
98
1413
1211
2422
1312
4542
115
RU
IZ
114
GU
TIER
REZ
EOY
107
00
2221
4946
4340
5249
98
1413
1211
2422
1312
4542
BO
Y90
4044
5359
8089
6572
8089
2528
4044
4651
5359
3741
1517
EOY
960
015
1648
5037
3934
353
38
810
1018
199
960
62
BO
Y32
1341
1753
2991
2578
2888
619
1547
1341
2269
1444
722
116
DE
LLA
NO
117
KA
ZEN
EOY
430
06
1425
5819
4420
472
59
215
1211
269
2119
44
BO
Y55
1935
2851
5091
3665
4684
1425
2444
2647
2953
2545
815
EOY
460
04
912
268
1713
282
41
24
95
115
1134
74
BO
Y98
6465
7073
9496
8385
9294
5253
6768
7273
7779
7577
1212
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
118
PRA
DA
119
117
EOY
102
00
1111
4443
3332
3130
88
1515
1616
2726
3029
3433
BO
Y86
3541
4148
7486
6070
7385
2226
4552
4148
5260
2327
1517
EOY
980
021
2146
4731
3247
486
618
1813
1323
2315
1554
55
BO
Y75
5168
5675
6789
6891
7296
3952
5371
5472
5877
5067
34
PRA
DA
119
KEN
NED
Y-12
1
BO
RC
HER
S12
0
OEO
Y82
00
810
2024
1417
2126
1113
1113
1417
2024
1822
2733
BO
Y10
831
2936
3380
7469
6484
7815
1437
3438
3550
4629
2734
31EO
Y12
90
023
1849
3833
2648
372
212
99
725
1912
979
61
KEN
NED
YZA
PATA
121
122
CO
L.
SAN
TOS
TPRI 2nd
Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by Elemen
tary Instruction
52
TPR
I Sec
ond
Gra
de C
ompa
rison
of B
OY
to E
OY
+ WPM
ng ension
stories)
ding
GK
Spe
lling
Wor
d R
eadi
ng
ding
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
ding
ding
s Tested
ment d
s No.
ingSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
%60
+
Fluency 90
ReadinComprehe
(SD on both
Word ReadSet 4
Set 1
Set 3
Set 4
Word ReadSet 1
Set 2
Word ReadSet 2
Word ReadSet 3
# of Students
AssessmPerio
Cam
pus
Campus
ScreenSD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%SD
#SD
%#S
tud
% 6
0+
BO
Y82
4656
4757
7895
7288
7996
2935
5972
5668
6174
5972
1215
EOY
980
012
1256
5749
5050
5110
1018
1812
1234
3541
4238
39B
OY
155
104
6711
775
147
9514
090
145
9488
5711
373
113
7313
084
9763
85
EOY
164
00
1710
7445
5735
7345
1710
2616
2515
4829
5433
4125
124
ZAFF
IRIN
I
RO
OSE
VELT
123
BO
Y80
5265
5670
7898
6986
7695
3038
5670
6075
7290
4050
45
EOY
850
08
942
4926
3141
486
710
1213
1528
3320
2421
25
BO
Y12
159
4987
7210
990
107
8811
494
4134
6453
7360
8772
6957
2420
EOY
122
00
1613
3831
3630
4436
1311
1613
1714
2520
1411
6452
CU
ELLA
R12
5
MU
LLER
126
EOY
122
00
1613
3831
3630
4436
1311
1613
1714
2520
1411
6452
BO
Y14
594
6510
673
130
9012
989
137
9472
5098
6811
277
120
8390
6212
8EO
Y15
50
026
1771
4653
3466
4315
1014
924
1542
2728
1853
34
BO
Y15
210
066
112
7414
696
145
9514
897
8053
105
6911
777
130
8685
567
5EO
Y16
00
045
2811
069
9660
100
6216
1025
1632
2068
4240
2543
27
127
AR
ND
T
128
BO
NN
IE
GA
RC
IAEO
Y16
00
045
2811
069
9660
100
6216
1025
1632
2068
4240
2543
27
BO
Y85
5666
6779
7892
7993
8195
4452
6678
6678
7082
6576
45
EOY
102
00
1616
5150
3433
4544
1414
2222
2323
3231
3635
2424
BO
Y12
947
3674
5711
287
9674
110
8537
2964
5067
5280
6256
4326
20EO
Y13
50
018
1370
5259
4453
393
212
917
1325
1920
1574
55
129
GA
RC
IA
CEN
TEN
O
MA
LAK
OFF
130
EOY
135
00
1813
7052
5944
5339
32
129
1713
2519
2015
7455
BO
Y13
073
5692
7112
092
107
8212
092
4535
8062
8162
9573
6046
1915
EOY
148
00
2618
7551
5839
5839
75
2517
1711
3725
2416
6041
BO
Y10
864
5971
6610
194
9689
103
9543
4069
6478
7283
7754
509
8K
ILLA
M13
2
FASK
EN13
1
EOY
101
00
1919
7473
5554
6766
77
1717
1919
2828
1414
3939
KIL
LAM
132
TPRI 2nd
Grade
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by Elemen
tary Instruction
53
Teja
s LE
E K
inde
rgar
ten
Com
paris
on o
f Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
iento mpresa
n
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
n
s
n s
o os
sión de ra
t Period
s Tested
s No.
o
nto de las ras
n auditiva
onológica: as
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
Con
ocim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
asC
onci
enci
a fo
noló
gica
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
Conocimde la letra i
Identificacióndel sonido
inicial
Identificacióndel sonido
final
Unión de lossonidos
Identificaciónde las letras
Conocimientode los sonido
Comprenslectur
Assessmen
# of Students
Cam
pus
Campus
Conocimientode rimas
Reconocimienpalabr
Comprensión
Conciencia foSílaba
BO
Y13
7329
321
394
2940
630
121
998
672
EOY
1403
735
176
1314
010
318
2336
394
720
815
341
2441
630
472
3431
723
BO
Y30
413
1343
1550
27
1653
EOY
291
33
103
108
280
02
75
176
2110
346
217
24
DIS
TRIC
T
103
NYE
BO
Y43
716
1228
716
921
2251
EOY
477
157
153
615
322
44
99
1912
2614
309
1913
28
BO
Y46
1226
3576
2963
49
3474
EOY
490
020
4116
3319
391
24
816
3325
5130
6124
4928
57
BO
Y
SALI
NA
S10
7
105
CLA
RK
EL
BO
Y25
1040
1352
1664
624
1768
EOY
261
47
279
356
235
197
277
278
3119
7316
6210
38
BO
Y17
1165
1165
1271
00
1271
EOY
162
123
193
193
190
00
03
193
196
385
315
31
BO
Y77
1114
2431
2836
11
6078
109
NEW
MA
N
110
TRA
UTM
AN
N
BO
Y77
1114
2431
2836
11
6078
EOY
782
36
82
39
121
15
615
194
519
249
1213
17
BO
Y48
1327
1838
1531
48
3267
EOY
432
56
145
1225
582
56
147
1615
359
2113
307
16
BO
Y36
1233
2261
1233
38
2775
FIN
LEY
111
PER
EZ
112
BO
Y36
1233
2261
1233
38
2775
EOY
424
109
215
1214
330
05
1211
2617
4015
3618
4311
2611
3U
DD
H
Tejas LEE Kind
er Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
54
Teja
s LE
E K
inde
rgar
ten
Com
paris
on o
f Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
iento mpresa
n
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
n
s
n s
o os
sión de ra
t Period
s Tested
s No.
o
nto de las ras
n auditiva
onológica: as
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
Con
ocim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
asC
onci
enci
a fo
noló
gica
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
Conocimde la letra i
Identificacióndel sonido
inicial
Identificacióndel sonido
final
Unión de lossonidos
Identificaciónde las letras
Conocimientode los sonido
Comprenslectur
Assessmen
# of Students
Cam
pus
Campus
Conocimientode rimas
Reconocimienpalabr
Comprensión
Conciencia foSílaba
BO
Y45
1840
2453
2760
920
3271
EOY
454
96
136
1311
243
73
74
94
97
1615
3312
27
BO
Y67
2131
2030
2334
46
5582
EOY
694
65
77
1020
290
02
36
915
2214
2029
4213
19
114
GU
TIER
REZ
RU
IZ11
5
BO
Y13
538
538
538
215
1077
EOY
134
313
233
235
382
152
153
233
236
465
384
31
BO
Y34
1235
721
1132
721
2059
EOY
351
32
61
33
91
31
31
32
65
143
92
6
BO
Y41
00
12
12
00
820
116
DE
LLA
NO
117
KA
ZEN
JUA
REZ
BO
Y41
00
12
12
00
820
EOY
430
01
21
21
21
20
00
01
22
52
50
0
BO
Y68
1522
69
913
913
5479
EOY
681
15
72
317
250
05
712
1828
4128
4129
4317
25
BO
Y28
1657
1139
1243
27
2796
PRA
DA
118
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
119
BO
Y28
1657
1139
1243
27
2796
EOY
284
142
73
117
250
00
03
119
3211
3917
613
11
BO
Y51
24
714
714
12
2039
EOY
521
22
42
44
82
42
42
43
66
128
157
13
BO
Y23
1670
626
626
626
1923
122
CO
LSA
NTO
S
121
KEN
NED
Y-ZA
PATA
120
BO
RC
HER
S
EOY
240
01
41
44
170
00
01
43
122
83
120
012
2C
OL.
SA
NTO
S
Tejas LEE Kind
er Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
55
Teja
s LE
E K
inde
rgar
ten
Com
paris
on o
f Beg
inni
ng o
f Yea
r (B
OY
) to
End
of Y
ear (
EO
Y)
iento mpresa
n
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
n
s
n s
o os
sión de ra
t Period
s Tested
s No.
o
nto de las ras
n auditiva
onológica: as
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
Con
ocim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
asC
onci
enci
a fo
noló
gica
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
Conocimde la letra i
Identificacióndel sonido
inicial
Identificacióndel sonido
final
Unión de lossonidos
Identificaciónde las letras
Conocimientode los sonido
Comprenslectur
Assessmen
# of Students
Cam
pus
Campus
Conocimientode rimas
Reconocimienpalabr
Comprensión
Conciencia foSílaba
BO
Y85
78
1416
2428
22
6576
EOY
882
23
34
55
61
13
33
313
158
929
338
9
BO
Y97
22
1819
2323
22
7375
EOY
953
310
118
89
91
13
34
418
1925
2629
3118
19
123
RO
OSE
VELT
124
ZAFF
IRIN
I
BO
Y45
613
1124
1636
49
4293
EOY
497
1413
2712
2417
351
26
1216
3325
5135
7128
5727
55
BO
Y54
1426
1120
917
1324
4278
EOY
572
45
94
713
231
25
96
1114
2514
2514
2510
18M
ULL
ER
125
CU
ELLA
R
126
BO
Y98
66
1919
1515
55
6364
EOY
993
37
78
88
81
13
313
1320
2021
2126
2621
21
BO
Y59
1017
2441
1729
58
4068
EOY
535
917
3213
258
154
810
1910
198
1523
4325
479
17
127
AR
ND
T
128
BO
NN
IE
GA
RC
IA
BO
Y98
1818
2222
2728
89
8486
EOY
101
55
1313
1010
2828
55
1010
1717
4545
3131
4848
2727
BO
Y37
1027
514
411
38
3286
EOY
391
32
52
513
331
31
39
239
2310
2614
365
13
129
CEN
TEN
O
130
MA
LAK
OFF
BO
Y61
2134
2134
2643
47
3964
EOY
615
88
132
322
361
21
26
1013
2113
2120
3315
25
BO
Y47
1430
1430
1021
613
4187
EOY
542
410
195
924
440
04
719
3518
3333
6128
5225
46
131
FASK
EN
132
KIL
LAM
Tejas LEE Kind
er Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
56
Teja
s LE
E F
irst G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
d
WPM
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
e
Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
Period
Tested
No.
Exactitud
Fluidez 60+ W
Identificación del sonido
inicial y final
Union y egmentación de
los sonidos
Omisión del sonido inicial y
final
Reconocimiento de palabras
omprensión de
Dic
tado
Cam
pus
Assessment P
# of Students T
Campus N
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
# St
ud.
%60
+N
I#N
I%N
I#N
I%
BO
Y12
0775
062
601
5053
044
785
6544
333
795
179
EOY
1139
948
736
225
2019
917
229
2075
867
670
5967
059
BO
Y33
2061
1752
2164
2164
1030
2370
DIS
TRIC
T
se
s
R
C
BO
Y33
2061
1752
2164
2164
1030
2370
EOY
272
72
76
227
266
2218
6715
5615
56
BO
Y39
2462
2462
1538
2359
1744
2769
EOY
437
165
1212
289
2111
2623
5329
6729
67
BO
Y45
3271
2351
2249
3476
1533
3987
SS
103
NYE
105
CLA
RK
EL
107
BO
Y45
3271
2351
2249
3476
1533
3987
EOY
425
123
79
2110
249
2167
6730
7130
71
BO
Y18
1161
1478
1161
1583
317
1794
EOY
154
274
275
336
407
4747
4711
7311
73
BO
Y2
00
00
00
00
150
150
SALI
NA
S
109
NEW
MA
N
107
BO
Y2
00
00
00
00
150
150
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y44
2455
2148
2455
3477
1534
4091
EOY
433
73
710
239
216
1427
6338
8838
88
BO
Y47
2655
2451
1736
2757
2043
3166
110
TRA
UTM
AN
N
111
PER
EZ
BO
Y47
2655
2451
1736
2757
2043
3166
EOY
342
62
63
93
93
925
7411
3211
32
BO
Y39
2769
1641
1641
2667
1436
3282
EOY
434
93
715
3513
3010
2332
7425
5825
58
112
FIN
LEY
113
UD
DH
First G
rade
Tejas LEE
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
57
Teja
s LE
E F
irst G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
d
WPM
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
e
Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
Period
Tested
No.
Exactitud
Fluidez 60+ W
Identificación del sonido
inicial y final
Union y egmentación de
los sonidos
Omisión del sonido inicial y
final
Reconocimiento de palabras
omprensión de
Dic
tado
Cam
pus
Assessment P
# of Students T
Campus N
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
# St
ud.
%60
+N
I#N
I%N
I#N
I%
se
s
R
C
BO
Y27
2074
415
1141
1867
933
2489
EOY
210
00
02
102
102
1010
4813
6213
62B
OY
5221
4024
4620
3829
5619
3739
75
114
GU
TIER
REZ
BO
Y52
2140
2446
2038
2956
1937
3975
EOY
503
64
810
207
147
1429
5817
3417
34
BO
Y19
947
842
526
1053
1158
1263
EOY
192
111
56
323
167
3715
7916
8416
84
BO
Y38
1950
1232
1129
2053
1539
2361
116
115
RU
IZ
DE
LLA
NO
117
KA
ZEN
EOY
370
00
02
52
53
822
5911
3011
30
BO
Y41
2151
2254
1024
2356
1946
3176
EOY
121
80
00
03
254
339
7512
100
1210
0
BO
Y79
4051
3038
3949
5468
2329
6380
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
117
KA
ZEN
118
BO
Y79
4051
3038
3949
5468
2329
6380
EOY
583
53
57
127
129
1635
6036
6236
62
BO
Y19
1368
947
842
1368
842
1684
EOY
190
00
01
51
50
013
684
214
21
BO
Y54
3463
1935
1324
3157
2852
4074
120
BO
RC
HER
S
KEN
NED
Y
119
PRA
DA
BO
Y54
3463
1935
1324
3157
2852
4074
EOY
571
21
25
95
97
1228
4920
3520
35
BO
Y35
720
720
823
720
2160
1954
EOY
410
00
05
122
51
215
3711
2711
27
BO
Y58
5086
3764
2238
3662
2543
4578
121
KEN
NED
Y-ZA
PATA
122
CO
L. S
AN
TOS
BO
Y58
5086
3764
2238
3662
2543
4578
EOY
629
157
1112
1912
1915
2432
5232
5232
52R
OO
SEVE
LT12
3
First G
rade
Tejas LEE
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
58
Teja
s LE
E F
irst G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
Con
cien
cia
fono
lógi
ca:
Soni
dos
d
WPM
UIS
DPe
rcen
tage
of S
tude
nts
Still
Dev
elop
ing
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
e
Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
Period
Tested
No.
Exactitud
Fluidez 60+ W
Identificación del sonido
inicial y final
Union y egmentación de
los sonidos
Omisión del sonido inicial y
final
Reconocimiento de palabras
omprensión de
Dic
tado
Cam
pus
Assessment P
# of Students T
Campus N
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
NI#
NI%
# St
ud.
%60
+N
I#N
I%N
I#N
I%
se
s
R
C
BO
Y78
4558
2836
2937
4456
3849
5571
EOY
104
55
66
1615
2120
2019
6260
6361
6361
BO
Y40
2870
2768
3178
3895
512
3998
124
ZAFF
IRIN
I
BO
Y40
2870
2768
3178
3895
512
3998
EOY
4211
266
1415
3612
2926
6217
4037
8837
88
BO
Y46
3167
3065
2861
3474
1124
3883
EOY
492
42
48
168
1610
2029
5926
5326
53
BO
Y96
7174
5254
4648
7477
2728
9094
126
MU
LLER
125
CU
ELLA
R
BO
Y96
7174
5254
4648
7477
2728
9094
EOY
806
84
516
2011
1414
1865
8163
7963
79
BO
Y56
4682
3664
3970
4886
814
5395
EOY
569
164
717
3018
3218
3221
3841
7341
73
BO
Y98
6263
5758
4041
5657
4546
7476
128
BO
NN
IE
GA
RC
IA
127
AR
ND
T
BO
Y98
6263
5758
4041
5657
4546
7476
EOY
949
106
618
1913
1416
1749
5240
4340
43
BO
Y10
660
550
550
550
440
550
EOY
73
432
293
433
434
574
576
866
86
BO
Y0
419
384
192
4361
3043
36
129
CEN
TEN
O
130
MA
LAK
OFF
BO
Y70
4159
3854
1927
4361
3043
5376
EOY
534
83
611
218
1510
1939
7444
8344
83
BO
Y24
2292
1771
2083
2292
28
2292
EOY
311
32
611
354
134
1325
8119
6119
61
FASK
EN
132
KIL
LAM
131
First G
rade
Tejas LEE
Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
59
Teja
s LE
E S
econ
d G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
e Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
WPM
o
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
Tested
Period
No.
d
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
Comprensión de
Fluidez 90+ W
Reconocimientode las palabras
Dictado
# of Students T
Assessment P
Cam
pus
Campus N
Exactitud
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
# St
ud%
60+
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
BO
Y40
078
2017
744
275
6936
491
233
58EO
Y28
341
1440
1420
673
177
6319
970
BO
Y4
00
125
375
375
250
103
NYE
DIS
TRIC
T
C
R
EOY
30
00
03
100
310
03
100
BO
Y25
416
1040
1976
2496
1560
EOY
275
193
1122
8116
5916
59
BO
Y25
28
728
2184
2510
017
68EO
Y25
00
728
2184
2510
017
68
103
NYE
105
CLA
RK
EL
107
SALI
NA
SEO
Y25
00
728
2184
2510
017
68
BO
Y6
117
233
467
610
04
67EO
Y4
125
00
410
04
100
410
0
BO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
109
NEW
MA
N
110
TRA
UTM
AN
NEO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
BO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y15
320
747
1067
1510
08
5311
2FI
NLE
Y
PER
EZ11
1
EOY
114
363
277
647
6411
100
BO
Y9
556
778
333
910
06
67EO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
112
FIN
LEY
113
UD
DH
Second
Grade
Tejas LEE Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
60
Teja
s LE
E S
econ
d G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
e Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
WPM
o
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
Tested
Period
No.
d
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
Comprensión de
Fluidez 90+ W
Reconocimientode las palabras
Dictado
# of Students T
Assessment P
Cam
pus
Campus N
Exactitud
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
# St
ud%
60+
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
C
R
BO
Y8
225
675
450
788
810
0EO
Y3
267
267
133
267
310
0
BO
Y23
313
835
1565
2296
1148
GU
TIER
REZ
114
BO
Y23
313
835
1565
2296
1148
EOY
206
301
58
4010
5014
70
BO
Y3
133
133
267
267
133
EOY
11
100
110
00
01
100
110
0
BO
Y28
00
725
2071
2279
1036
116
DE
LLA
NO
115
RU
IZ
11B
OY
280
07
2520
7122
7910
36EO
Y21
210
15
1362
1362
1781
BO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
JUA
REZ
-LI
NC
OLN
117
KA
ZEN
118
BO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y24
28
729
1979
1250
521
EOY
150
00
09
601
75
33
BO
Y2
00
150
150
210
01
50
PRA
DA
120
119
BO
RC
HER
S
KEN
NED
Y-B
OY
20
01
501
502
100
150
EOY
30
01
333
100
267
310
0
BO
Y34
00
618
3397
2779
1132
EOY
362
60
023
6412
3319
5312
2C
OL.
SA
NTO
S
121
KEN
NED
Y-ZA
PATA
Second
Grade
Tejas LEE Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
61
Teja
s LE
E S
econ
d G
rade
Com
paris
on o
f BO
Y to
EO
Y
e Lectura
Con
ocim
ient
o de
los
graf
ofon
emas
WPM
o
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s St
ill D
evel
opin
gU
ISD
Tested
Period
No.
d
Con
cim
ient
o de
lo
s gr
afof
onem
as
Comprensión de
Fluidez 90+ W
Reconocimientode las palabras
Dictado
# of Students T
Assessment P
Cam
pus
Campus N
Exactitud
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
# St
ud%
60+
SD #
SD%
SD #
SD%
C
R
BO
Y30
723
1860
1757
3010
021
70EO
Y32
00
619
3094
2166
1547
BO
Y3
267
267
133
310
00
0
123
RO
OSE
VELT
124
ZAFF
IRIN
IEO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
BO
Y7
343
686
229
710
05
71EO
Y6
350
350
233
583
610
0
BO
Y10
220
220
880
1010
06
60
124
126
MU
LLER
125
CU
ELLA
R
ZAFF
IRIN
I
EOY
101
102
208
806
609
90
BO
Y39
1513
1128
3282
3897
1744
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y19
316
737
1474
1895
947
127
AR
ND
T
126
MU
LLER
BO
NN
IE
128
EOY
156
403
2013
8715
100
1387
BO
Y37
924
2978
1849
3697
3389
EOY
241
41
422
9223
9616
67
BO
Y2
150
150
00
150
150
130
MA
LAK
OFF
CEN
TEN
O12
9
GA
RC
IA12
8
EOY
00
00
00
00
00
0
BO
Y12
18
975
867
1210
09
75EO
Y0
00
00
00
00
00
BO
Y35
1234
2263
2160
3394
3394
130
MA
LAK
OFF
131
FASK
EN
132
KIL
LAM
EOY
277
266
2217
6311
4127
100
132
KIL
LAM
Second
Grade
Tejas LEE Com
parison Re
port
As of M
ay 17, 2011
Compiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
62
SRI Proficiency Summary Reprort2nd Grade
# Stu % # Stu % # Stu % # Stu %United ISD 2923 219 7% 996 34% 721 25% 987 34%
NYE 131 15 11% 47 36% 28 21% 41 31%
Campus# of
Students Tested
Advanced Lexile Level 601-1700+
Proficient Lexile Level 300-600
Basic Lexile Level
100-299
Below Basic Lexile Level
BR-99
NYE 131 15 11% 47 36% 28 21% 41 31%
CLARK EL 89 4 4% 20 22% 25 28% 40 45%
SALINAS 121 3 2% 42 35% 26 21% 50 41%
NEWMAN 86 8 9% 33 38% 24 28% 21 24%
TRAUTMANN 119 11 9% 77 65% 20 17% 11 9%
PEREZ 130 4 3% 29 22% 36 28% 61 47%
FINLEY 65 7 11% 33 51% 19 29% 6 9%
UDDH 68 4 6% 19 28% 16 24% 29 43%
GUTIERREZ 111 15 14% 37 33% 24 22% 35 32%
RUIZ 114 4 4% 49 43% 36 32% 25 22%
DE LLANO 98 19 19% 41 42% 24 24% 14 14%
KAZEN 52 2 4% 18 35% 20 38% 12 23%
JUAREZ-LINCOLN 61 5 8% 14 23% 23 38% 19 31%
PRADA 106 3 3% 26 25% 27 25% 50 47%
BORCHERS 90 13 14% 43 48% 13 14% 21 23%
KENNEDY-ZAPATA 83 3 4% 20 24% 19 25% 41 49%
COL. SANTOS 146 31 21% 58 40% 30 21% 27 18%COL. SANTOS 146 31 21% 58 40% 30 21% 27 18%
ROOSEVELT 90 4 4% 40 44% 24 27% 22 24%
ZAFFIRINI 167 9 5% 32 19% 31 19% 95 57%
CUELLAR 89 3 3% 35 39% 21 24% 30 34%
MULLER 129 10 8% 42 33% 32 25% 45 35%
ARNDT 144 3 3% 35 39% 21 24% 30 34%
BONNIE GARCIA 162 1 1% 40 25% 39 24% 82 51%
CENTENO 96 1 1% 15 16% 38 40% 42 44%
MALAKOFF 132 18 14% 51 39% 31 23% 32 24%
FASKEN 146 5 3% 77 53% 34 23% 30 21%
KILLAM 98 9 9% 25 26% 28 29% 36 37%
Year-End Proficiency Lexile Range
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
100-400 300-600 500-800 600-900 700-1000 800-1050
Scholastic Reading Inventory SRI
SRI Proficiency Summary ReportAs of May 20, 2011
Compiled by Elementary Instruction
63
BILINGUAL/ ESL
64
District P
ercent of E
nglish Language Learners
19 TA
C Ch
apter 89
, Sub
chapter BB
, TEC
Sub
chapter B 29
.051
‐29.06
4
TOTA
L E
NR
OLL
ME
NT
ELL
P
OP
ULA
TIO
N%
TOTA
L E
NR
OLL
ME
NT
ELL
P
OP
ULA
TIO
N%
TOTA
L E
NR
OLL
ME
NT
ELL
P
OP
ULA
TIO
N%
20,5
5013
,949
67.9
%20
,593
13,7
1166
.6%
20,3
2313
,697
67.4
%
8,74
82,
277
26.0
%9,
062
2,13
323
.5%
9,86
42,
334
23.7
%
10,1
891,
913
18.8
%10
,656
1,63
515
.3%
11,0
361,
493
13.5
%
39,4
8718
,139
45.9
%40
,311
17,4
7943
.4%
41,2
2317
,524
42.5
%18
,389
ELL
1451
8%17
,479
ELL
1,22
37%
17,5
24 E
LL1,
401
8%TO
TALS
Rec
ent I
mm
igra
nt/
Rec
ent A
rriv
al
2009
2010
2011
INS
TRU
CTI
ON
AL
SE
TTIN
G
(27)
Ele
men
tary
(9) M
IDD
LE
SC
HO
OLS
4 H
IGH
SC
HO
OLS
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt IR
ISAs of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt IR
ISAs of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
65
Bili
ngua
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge L
imite
d E
nglis
h P
rofic
ient
Enr
ollm
ent
19
TAC
Cha
pter
89,
Sub
chap
ter B
B, T
EC
Sub
chap
ter B
29.
051-
29.0
64
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
UH
S36
0932
89%
31%
10%
325
99%
6319
%1
0%12
438
%14
14%
154
4%TM
S15
4417
411
%6
3%16
494
%21
12%
32%
4828
%33
2%12
58%
WM
S12
4830
424
%1
0%5
2%29
898
%66
22%
21%
6020
%64
5%18
615
%TR
AU
TMA
NN
826
322
39%
10%
315
98%
62%
175%
3110
%23
7%10
613
%47
6%FI
NLE
Y55
936
665
%3
1%36
399
%0
0%34
9%13
4%31
8%36
6%26
5%D
ELL
AN
O65
130
947
%16
5%27
489
%19
6%18
6%8
3%27
9%36
6%27
4%K
AZE
N54
735
765
%5
1%35
299
%0
0%35
10%
93%
319%
407%
255%
BO
RC
HE
RS
636
310
49%
72%
279
90%
237%
3511
%13
4%20
6%38
6%37
6%M
ULL
ER
819
452
55%
41%
429
95%
194%
327%
82%
368%
304%
344%
MA
LAK
OFF
943
458
49%
286%
423
92%
61%
327%
102%
429%
616%
424%
FAS
KE
N10
1063
763
%6
1%60
395
%28
4%33
5%15
2%45
7%99
10%
384%
FEED
ER P
ATT
ERN
12,3
924,
017
32%
802%
3,04
376
%88
822
%38
610
%11
33%
487
12%
684
6%74
16%
LEP
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
LYr
1Yr
2Yr
3TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%U
HS
3609
328
5731
3612
438
%14
14%
1410
%12
790
%15
44%
149%
140
91%
TMS
1544
174
2710
1148
28%
332%
721
%26
79%
125
8%7
6%11
894
%W
MS
1248
304
1822
2060
20%
645%
69%
5891
%18
615
%6
3%18
097
%TR
AU
TMA
NN
826
322
135
523
7%10
613
%8
8%98
92%
476%
817
%39
83%
FIN
LEY
559
366
714
1031
8%36
6%1
3%35
97%
265%
14%
2596
%D
ELL
AN
O65
130
916
92
279%
366%
00%
3610
0%27
4%0
0%27
100%
KA
ZEN
547
357
1317
131
9%40
7%4
10%
3690
%25
5%4
16%
2184
%B
OR
CH
ER
S63
631
06
59
206%
386%
00%
3810
0%37
6%0
0%37
100%
MU
LLE
R81
945
212
618
368%
304%
00%
3010
0%34
4%0
0%34
100%
MA
LAK
OFF
943
458
1812
1242
9%61
6%5
8%56
92%
424%
512
%37
88%
FAS
KE
N10
1063
718
1314
457%
9910
%5
5%94
95%
384%
513
%33
87%
FEED
ER P
ATT
ERN
12,3
924,
017
103
8171
487
12%
684
6%50
7%63
493
%74
16%
507%
691
93%
M1
M2
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 1
/ Non
-LEP
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 2
/ Non
-LEP
ENR
OLL
MEN
TR
ECEN
T IM
MIG
RA
NT/
REC
ENT
AR
RIV
AL
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ENR
OLL
MEN
TLE
P C
OU
NT
PAR
ENT
DEN
IAL
LEP
PAR
TIC
IPA
TIO
NEX
ITED
/ Non
-LEP
BIL
ING
UA
LES
L
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
SPEC
IAL
ED.
GT
RI/R
A
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt and
IRIS
As of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
66
Bili
ngua
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge L
imite
d E
nglis
h P
rofic
ient
Enr
ollm
ent
19
TAC
Cha
pter
89,
Sub
chap
ter B
B, T
EC
Sub
chap
ter B
29.
051-
29.0
64
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
USH
S25
9331
812
%0
0%3
1%31
599
%34
11%
10%
5818
%12
75%
173
7%A
GM
S10
3634
733
%0
0%14
4%33
396
%40
12%
10%
329%
848%
131
13%
US
MS
1309
367
28%
92%
357
97%
3710
%5
1%29
8%87
7%15
612
%S
ALI
NA
S85
160
071
%17
3%58
397
%0
0%34
6%12
2%14
2%25
3%34
4%R
UIZ
916
585
64%
214%
564
96%
00%
325%
173%
122%
102
11%
455%
ZAFF
IRIN
I11
3388
778
%13
1%84
695
%15
2%53
6%21
2%43
5%44
4%27
2%C
UE
LLA
R70
152
074
%1
0%49
094
%29
6%38
7%6
1%32
6%40
6%35
5%G
AR
CIA
1053
796
76%
30%
793
100%
10%
516%
192%
192%
798%
394%
KIL
LAM
862
594
69%
132%
581
98%
20%
275%
203%
244%
556%
303%
FEED
ER P
ATT
ERN
10,4
545,
014
48%
772%
3,87
177
%1,
052
21%
346
7%10
22%
263
5%64
36%
670
6%
LEP
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
LYr
1Yr
2Yr
3TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%U
SHS
2593
318
1518
2558
18%
127
5%32
25%
9575
%17
37%
3218
%14
182
%A
GM
S10
3634
711
1011
329%
848%
1113
%73
87%
131
13%
118%
120
92%
US
MS
1309
367
177
529
8%87
7%13
15%
7485
%15
612
%13
8%14
392
%S
ALI
NA
S85
160
010
22
142%
253%
00%
2510
0%34
4%0
0%34
100%
RU
IZ91
658
54
62
122%
102
11%
00%
102
100%
455%
00%
4510
0%ZA
FFIR
INI
1133
887
1512
1643
5%44
4%1
2%43
98%
272%
14%
2696
%C
UE
LLA
R70
152
012
119
326%
406%
00%
4010
0%35
5%0
0%35
100%
GA
RC
IA10
5379
69
73
192%
798%
00%
7910
0%39
4%0
0%39
100%
KIL
LAM
862
594
910
524
4%55
6%0
0%55
100%
303%
00%
3010
0%FE
EDER
PA
TTER
N10
,454
5,01
410
283
7826
35%
643
6%57
9%58
691
%67
06%
579%
613
91%
ENR
OLL
MEN
TLE
P C
OU
NT
PAR
ENT
DEN
IAL
LEP
PAR
TIC
IPA
TIO
NEX
ITED
/ Non
-LEP
BIL
ING
UA
LES
LSP
ECIA
L ED
.G
TR
I/RA
M1
M2
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 1
/ Non
-LEP
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 2
/ Non
-LEP
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ENR
OLL
MEN
TR
ECEN
T IM
MIG
RA
NT/
REC
ENT
AR
RIV
AL
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ALL
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt and
IRIS
As of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
67
Bili
ngua
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge L
imite
d E
nglis
h P
rofic
ient
Enr
ollm
ent
19
TAC
Cha
pter
89,
Sub
chap
ter B
B, T
EC
Sub
chap
ter B
29.
051-
29.0
64
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
AH
S25
2622
59%
21%
42%
219
97%
94%
00%
9643
%93
4%92
4%U
MS
1050
134
13%
11%
64%
127
95%
107%
00%
4231
%29
3%97
9%C
MS
852
170
20%
74%
163
96%
2414
%1
1%34
20%
658%
100
12%
NY
E88
152
860
%19
4%50
395
%7
1%24
5%25
5%50
9%34
4%39
4%C
LAR
K52
535
668
%2
1%35
510
0%0
0%31
9%2
1%58
16%
265%
224%
NE
WM
AN
555
318
57%
124%
304
96%
00%
217%
31%
175%
214%
193%
GU
TIE
RR
EZ
684
316
46%
41%
309
98%
31%
217%
258%
113%
436%
406%
CO
L. S
AN
TOS
923
379
41%
82%
364
96%
92%
174%
277%
6116
%56
6%64
7%FE
EDER
PA
TTER
N7,
996
2,42
630
%55
2%1,
835
76%
528
22%
157
6%83
3%36
915
%36
75%
473
6%
LEP
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
LYr
1Yr
2Yr
3TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%A
HS
2526
225
3532
2996
43%
934%
1112
%82
88%
924%
1112
%81
88%
UM
S10
5013
416
1412
4231
%29
3%3
10%
2690
%97
9%3
3%94
97%
CM
S85
217
010
1212
3420
%65
8%13
20%
5280
%10
012
%13
13%
8787
%N
YE
881
528
2514
1150
9%34
4%0
0%34
100%
394%
00%
3910
0%C
LAR
K52
535
620
2117
5816
%26
5%0
0%26
100%
224%
00%
2210
0%N
EW
MA
N55
531
85
93
175%
214%
00%
2110
0%19
3%0
0%19
100%
GU
TIE
RR
EZ
684
316
56
011
3%43
6%1
2%42
98%
406%
13%
3998
%C
OL.
SA
NTO
S92
337
932
209
6116
%56
6%0
0%56
100%
647%
00%
6410
0%FE
EDER
PA
TTER
N7,
996
2,42
614
812
893
369
15%
367
5%28
8%33
992
%47
36%
286%
445
94%
SPEC
IAL
ED.
GT
RI/R
AM
1M
2
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 1
/ Non
-LEP
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 2
/ Non
-LEP
ENR
OLL
MEN
TLE
P C
OU
NT
PAR
ENT
DEN
IAL
LEP
PAR
TIC
IPA
TIO
NEX
ITED
/ Non
-LEP
BIL
ING
UA
LES
L
ENR
OLL
MEN
TR
ECEN
T IM
MIG
RA
NT/
REC
ENT
AR
RIV
AL
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt and
IRIS
As of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
68
Bili
ngua
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge L
imite
d E
nglis
h P
rofic
ient
Enr
ollm
ent
19
TAC
Cha
pter
89,
Sub
chap
ter B
B, T
EC
Sub
chap
ter B
29.
051-
29.0
64
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
TOTA
L%
LBJH
S23
0862
227
%1
0%61
699
%11
118
%1
0%57
9%14
06%
157
7%S
GM
S50
216
232
%1
1%16
199
%42
26%
00%
149%
143%
7816
%LO
MS
932
391
42%
00%
387
99%
5514
%1
0%43
11%
829%
119
13%
LBV
MS
814
285
35%
41%
281
99%
228%
00%
259%
496%
123
15%
PE
RE
Z99
272
673
%11
2%71
799
%0
0%52
7%15
2%25
3%64
6%42
4%U
DD
HA
CH
AR
395
328
83%
10%
321
98%
00%
237%
62%
72%
277%
72%
JUA
RE
Z35
029
283
%1
0%28
598
%6
2%34
12%
72%
62%
185%
113%
PR
AD
A79
362
479
%16
3%60
897
%0
0%31
5%10
2%43
7%40
5%23
3%K
EN
NE
DY
532
419
79%
41%
415
99%
00%
348%
00%
82%
509%
285%
RO
OS
EV
ELT
823
700
85%
51%
684
98%
122%
335%
61%
112%
506%
223%
AR
ND
T10
3176
774
%9
1%75
999
%0
0%34
4%9
1%14
2%66
6%42
4%C
EN
TEN
O90
975
183
%10
1%74
299
%0
0%51
7%5
1%13
2%39
4%31
3%FE
EDER
PA
TTER
N10
,381
6,06
758
%63
1%4,
531
75%
1,46
324
%52
29%
601%
266
4%63
96%
683
7%
LEP
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
LYr
1Yr
2Yr
3TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%LB
JHS
2308
622
1025
2257
9%14
06%
1410
%12
690
%15
77%
149%
143
91%
SG
MS
502
162
74
314
9%14
3%3
21%
1179
%78
16%
34%
7596
%LO
MS
932
391
1411
1843
11%
829%
56%
7794
%11
913
%5
4%11
496
%LB
VM
S81
428
59
88
259%
496%
00%
4910
0%12
315
%0
0%12
310
0%P
ER
EZ
992
726
910
625
3%64
6%0
0%64
100%
424%
00%
4210
0%U
DD
HA
CH
AR
395
328
11
57
2%27
7%0
0%27
100%
72%
00%
710
0%JU
AR
EZ
350
292
12
36
2%18
5%0
0%18
100%
113%
00%
1110
0%P
RA
DA
793
624
259
943
7%40
5%0
0%40
100%
233%
00%
2310
0%K
EN
NE
DY
532
419
22
48
2%50
9%0
0%50
100%
285%
00%
2810
0%R
OO
SE
VE
LT82
370
03
44
112%
506%
24%
4896
%22
3%2
9%20
91%
AR
ND
T10
3176
74
55
142%
666%
23%
6497
%42
4%2
5%40
95%
CE
NTE
NO
909
751
55
313
2%39
4%2
5%37
95%
313%
26%
2994
%FE
EDER
PA
TTER
N10
,381
6,06
790
8690
266
4%63
96%
284%
611
96%
683
7%28
4%65
596
%
LEP
PAR
TIC
IPA
TIO
NEX
ITED
/ Non
-LEP
BIL
ING
UA
LES
LSP
ECIA
L ED
.G
TR
I/RA
M1
M2
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 1
/ Non
-LEP
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 2
/ Non
-LEP
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ENR
OLL
MEN
TR
ECEN
T IM
MIG
RA
NT/
REC
ENT
AR
RIV
AL
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ALL
ENR
OLL
MEN
TLE
P C
OU
NT
PAR
ENT
DEN
IAL
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt and
IRIS
As of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
69
Bili
ngua
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge L
imite
d E
nglis
h P
rofic
ient
Enr
ollm
ent
19
TAC
Cha
pter
89,
Sub
chap
ter B
B, T
EC
Sub
chap
ter B
29.
051-
29.0
64
TOTA
LTO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%Se
cond
ary
20,3
233,
827
19%
351%
330.
9%37
4698
%53
414
%16
0.4%
662
17%
1,00
85%
1691
8%El
emen
tary
20,9
0013
,697
66%
240
2%13
,247
97%
185
1%87
76%
342
2%72
35%
1,32
56%
876
4%D
ISTR
ICT
41,2
2317
,524
43%
275
2%13
,280
76%
3,93
122
%1,
411
8%35
82%
1,38
58%
2,33
36%
2,56
76%
LEP
CA
MPU
STO
TAL
TOTA
LYr
1Yr
2Yr
3TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%TO
TAL
%Se
cond
ary
20,3
233,
827
246
204
212
662
17%
1,00
85%
132
13%
876
87%
1691
8%13
28%
1559
92%
Elem
enta
ry20
,900
13,6
9729
923
718
772
35%
1,32
56%
312%
1294
98%
876
4%31
4%84
596
%D
ISTR
ICT
41,2
2317
,524
545
441
399
1,38
58%
2,33
36%
163
7%21
7093
%2,
567
6%16
36%
2404
94%
DIS
TRIC
T TO
TALS
ENR
OLL
MEN
TLE
P C
OU
NT
PAR
ENT
DEN
IAL
LEP
PAR
TIC
IPA
TIO
NEX
ITED
/ Non
-LEP
BIL
ING
UA
LES
L
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ENR
OLL
MEN
TR
ECEN
T IM
MIG
RA
NT/
REC
ENT
AR
RIV
AL
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
REG
ED
ALL
SPEC
IAL
ED.
GT
RI/R
AM
1M
2
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 1
/ Non
-LEP
Mon
itore
d Ye
ar 2
/ Non
-LEP
Source: C
ampu
s Mon
thly ELL Cou
nt and
IRIS
As of April 7, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
70
Pendin
gTA
C Ch
apter 10
1.10
01, Sub
chapter AA
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessm
ent S
ystem (T
ELPA
S) RESULTS
TELP
AS
beg
an to
be
impl
emen
ted
by th
e st
ate
of T
exas
in o
rder
to c
ompl
y w
ith fe
dera
l req
uire
men
ts fo
r Eng
lish
Lang
uage
Lea
rner
(E
LL) a
ccou
ntab
ility
thro
ugh
the
No
Chi
ld L
eft B
ehin
d (N
CLB
) Act
of 2
001.
Und
er N
CLB
, sta
tes
mus
t sho
w a
nnua
l inc
reas
es in
PR
OG
RE
SS
ELL
s m
ake
in le
arni
ng E
nglis
h an
d in
A
TTA
ININ
G E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge p
rofic
ienc
y. P
opul
atio
n cr
iteria
to b
e m
onito
red
chan
ged
in F
ebru
ary
2011
.
2010
‐201
1
2010
‐ 20
11 Rep
ort Pe
nding Fina
l Ann
ual M
easuremen
t Achievemen
t Objectives (AMAOs) I & 2 Calculation
s
Source: Texas Edu
catio
n Agency NCLB Dep
artm
ent
As of M
ay 201
1Co
mpiled by Bilingual/ESL Dep
t.
71
Develop
ing Unity, A
chievemen
t, and
Language Acade
my
fo
r Kind
ergarten
Teachers Im
plem
entin
g 20
10 – 201
1 District E
xpansion
19 TA
C Ch
apter 89, Sub
chapter BB
, 1245.(a)‐(g)
Source: A
gend
a, ERO
Evaluations, A
necdotal Notes
As of M
ay 2011
Com
piled by Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
D.U
.A.L
. Kin
der A
cade
my
5/3/
2010
5/
21/2
010
9/6/
2010
TOP
ICS
A
ttend
ance
A
ttend
ance
A
ttend
ance
1.
San
tilla
na C
omie
nzos
Pre
sent
atio
n 6.
Firs
t and
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
Acq
uisi
tion
49
50
49
2.C
onte
nt a
nd L
angu
age
Obj
ectiv
es
7.Th
eory
and
Res
earc
h th
at S
uppo
rt D
L
3.E
very
day
Lang
uage
Act
ivity
8.
Cha
ract
eris
tics
of E
ffect
ive
DL
Cla
ssro
oms
Num
ber o
f Kin
der S
tude
nts
in D
UA
L P
rogr
am
4.D
ual L
angu
age
Pro
ficie
ncy
9.La
ngua
ge A
cqui
sitio
n S
trate
gies
in th
e C
onte
nt A
reas
1,
024
5.D
ual L
angu
age
Pro
gram
Ove
rvie
w
ERO
Eva
luat
ions
4
4. A
s a
resu
lt of
this
pro
fess
iona
l dev
elop
men
t ses
sion
, how
do
you
plan
to in
tegr
ate
the
lear
ning
in o
rder
to e
nhan
ce y
our
stud
ents
’ suc
cess
?
I ha
d m
any
ques
tions
that
wer
e m
ade
clea
r by
the
pres
ente
rs to
hel
p as
sist
my
stud
ents
in th
e du
al p
rogr
am.
It
will
hel
p m
e m
anag
e m
y in
stru
ctio
nal t
ime.
I
am p
lann
ing
to in
tegr
ate
ever
ythi
ng th
at I
lear
ned
in th
is tr
aini
ng b
ecau
se th
is is
my
first
yea
r as
a du
al la
ngua
ge te
ache
r
I w
ill in
tegr
ate
the
lear
ning
in o
rder
to e
nhan
ce m
y st
uden
ts’ s
ucce
ss o
n m
y da
ily s
ched
ule,
rout
ines
, pro
cedu
res,
pla
nnin
g an
d te
achi
ng
As
a D
ual L
angu
age
Teac
her I
will
inte
grat
e th
e le
arni
ng th
roug
hout
cen
ters
I
got t
he o
ppor
tuni
ty to
cre
ate
a le
sson
pla
n us
ing
the
new
TE
from
San
tilla
na a
nd in
corp
orat
e th
e S
LPS
. S
antil
lana
inte
grat
ed w
ith S
ci. a
nd S
ocia
l Stu
dies
wor
ks w
onde
rfully
W
ill c
orre
late
less
ons
betw
een
Sci
ence
/Soc
ial S
tudi
es a
nd S
SL
to te
ach
them
atic
uni
ts.
I
plan
on
inte
grat
ing
the
Dua
l Pro
gram
100
%. E
SL
is o
ne o
f my
top
goal
s to
dev
elop
and
impr
ove
my
stud
ents
’ Eng
lish
Lang
uage
. D
iffer
ent t
echn
ique
s an
d w
ays
to im
plem
ent t
he p
rogr
am h
elps
me
unde
rsta
nd b
ette
r wha
t nee
ds to
be
done
.
I ha
ve a
bet
ter u
nder
stan
ding
of h
ow I
can
impl
emen
t and
inte
grat
e S
ci/ S
. St.
with
the
Lang
uage
Arts
cur
ricul
um
I pl
an to
inte
grat
e it
as e
ffect
ivel
y as
pos
sibl
e fo
r suc
cess
in th
e cl
assr
oom
.
Loo
king
forw
ard
to th
e ne
w p
rogr
am fo
r thi
s co
min
g ne
w s
choo
l yea
r
72
Develop
ing Unity, A
chievemen
t, and
Language Acade
my
fo
r Kind
ergarten
Teachers Im
plem
entin
g 20
10 – 201
1 District E
xpansion
19 TA
C Ch
apter 89, Sub
chapter BB
, 1245.(a)‐(g)
Source: A
gend
a, ERO
Evaluations, A
necdotal Notes
As of M
ay 2011
Com
piled by Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
4 4.
As
a re
sult
of th
is p
rofe
ssio
nal d
evel
opm
ent s
essi
on, h
ow d
o yo
u pl
an to
inte
grat
e th
e le
arni
ng in
ord
er to
enh
ance
you
r st
uden
ts’ s
ucce
ss?
(con
tinue
d)
I w
ill im
plem
ent m
any
mor
e gr
aphi
c or
gani
zers
into
my
less
ons.
I
saw
lots
of g
reat
idea
s th
at I
can
inco
rpor
ate
in m
y cl
assr
oom
.
I am
goi
ng to
impl
emen
t eve
ryth
ing
that
they
cov
ered
bec
ause
it is
my
first
yea
r as
a D
ual L
angu
age
Teac
her
I
will
inte
grat
e th
e tip
s on
read
ing
and
scie
nce
and
soci
al s
tudi
es in
to a
dai
ly ro
utin
e. M
aint
ain
stru
ctur
e se
emed
to b
e a
big
poin
t
in th
e sw
itchi
ng o
f cla
sses
.
As
a re
sult
of th
is tr
aini
ng, I
kno
w h
ow to
man
age
a du
al la
ngua
ge c
lass
room
.
The
trai
ning
hel
ped
me
to b
ette
r und
erst
andi
ng th
e pr
ogra
m. T
his
new
kno
wle
dge
will
be
appl
ied
to m
y cl
assr
oom
stru
ctur
e.
I w
ant s
tude
nts
to b
e ac
tive
and
oral
par
ticip
ants
eve
ry d
ay.
I
plan
to re
ally
dev
ote
to th
is p
rogr
am to
mak
e it
as s
ucce
ssfu
l as
it ca
n be
.
5 5.
Ple
ase
iden
tify
one
targ
eted
pro
fess
iona
l dev
elop
men
t top
ic/a
rea
that
will
faci
litat
e yo
ur p
rofe
ssio
nal g
row
th.
T
he u
se o
f res
ourc
es fo
r the
ES
L bl
ock
in th
e du
al la
ngua
ge.
T
he u
se o
f Soc
ial S
tudi
es/S
cien
ce S
pani
sh la
ngua
ge p
rofic
ienc
y st
anda
rds
M
ore
Tech
nolo
gy T
rain
ing
A
ssis
tanc
e in
cen
ter d
evel
opm
ent,
tech
nolo
gy, T
PR
I and
LA
S
Dua
l Lan
guag
e cl
assr
oom
env
ironm
ent a
nd o
rgan
izat
ion
S
cien
ce h
ands
-on
train
ing.
M
ore
tips
and
idea
s fro
m m
aste
r tea
cher
s th
at a
re o
r hav
e be
en w
ith th
e pr
ogra
m
Inte
grat
ing
ES
L th
roug
hout
my
day
in M
ath,
Lan
guag
e A
rts a
nd m
y da
ily o
ral l
angu
age.
I
wou
ld li
ke to
be
able
to o
bser
ve d
iffer
ent D
L cl
assr
oom
s to
get
a b
ette
r im
age
of h
ow th
ings
sho
uld
be d
one
in a
DL
clas
sroo
m.
N
ew a
ctiv
ities
for m
ath
and
mat
h ce
nter
s.
How
to u
se th
e m
ater
ials
sha
red
with
the
who
le g
roup
for E
.S.L
.
The
use
of t
he T
ejas
lee
ques
tioni
ng s
trate
gies
M
ore
DL
Trai
ning
s in
whi
ch I
can
lear
n m
ore
abou
t the
pro
gram
and
its
best
impl
emen
tatio
n to
ben
efit
stud
ents
com
plet
ely.
6 C
omm
ents
:
Som
e ex
pect
atio
ns fo
r thi
s pr
ogra
m a
re ti
me
cons
umin
g.
Tra
inin
g w
as v
ery
inte
rest
ing.
V
ery
info
rmat
ive
and
clea
red
som
e co
nfus
ion.
T
hank
you
for m
akin
g ou
r Dua
l Pro
gram
tran
sitio
n so
ooo
muc
h sm
ooth
er
73
Develop
ing Unity, A
chievemen
t, and
Language Acade
my
fo
r Kind
ergarten
Teachers Im
plem
entin
g 20
10 – 201
1 District E
xpansion
19 TA
C Ch
apter 89, Sub
chapter BB
, 1245.(a)‐(g)
Source: A
gend
a, ERO
Evaluations, A
necdotal Notes
As of M
ay 2011
Com
piled by Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
6 C
omm
ents
: (co
ntin
ued)
T
hank
you
for y
our c
onst
ant s
uppo
rt~!!!
!!
Pre
sent
ers
wer
e gr
eat,
you
mak
e m
e fe
el p
art o
f som
ethi
ng g
rand
and
saf
e to
dis
cuss
any
rela
ted
topi
cs o
r con
cern
s.
I am
100
% p
rom
otin
g th
e D
ual P
rogr
am!
A
ll co
ncer
ns b
roug
ht u
p du
ring
the
sess
ion
wer
e im
med
iate
ly a
ddre
ssed
in a
ver
y pr
ofes
sion
al w
ay. W
e le
ft w
ith th
e co
nfid
ence
th
at a
ny o
bsta
cle
we
enco
unte
red;
we
wou
ld h
ave
the
supp
ort a
nd e
ncou
rage
men
t. W
e on
ly w
ishe
d w
e co
uld
mee
t mor
e of
ten.
L
ooki
ng fo
rwar
d fo
r nex
t yea
r.
I ac
quire
d ne
w s
kills
and
info
rmat
ion
in th
is tr
aini
ng. T
he p
rese
nter
s ar
e aw
esom
e an
d kn
owle
dgab
le. W
e ne
ed m
ore
sess
ions
like
this
on
e.
Atte
ndan
ce c
lerk
and
any
oth
er p
erso
nnel
regi
ster
ing
kind
er s
tude
nts
need
to b
e in
form
ed a
bout
the
dual
lang
uage
pro
gram
so
that
they
m
ay p
rom
ote/
offe
r it t
o th
e pa
rent
s.
It w
as a
ver
y re
leva
nt in
form
ativ
e tra
inin
g.
Thi
s pr
ogra
m is
new
to m
e bu
t with
the
help
and
trai
ning
s of
all
dual
lang
uage
coo
rdin
ator
s I f
eel p
repa
red
to ta
ke o
n th
is n
ew c
halle
nge.
A
necd
otal
Res
pons
es R
egar
ding
Pos
t 1st
Yea
r Im
plem
enta
tion:
“A
ttach
ed, y
ou w
ill fi
nd th
e R
eadi
ng L
evel
s fo
r my
clas
s. T
his
is a
big
impr
ovem
ent f
rom
last
yea
r for
me.
I lo
ve th
e D
ual L
angu
age
Pro
gram
. Lik
e yo
u sa
id, i
t is
a lo
t of w
ork
but w
orth
it.”
– M
atia
s D
e Ll
ano
Ele
men
tary
“A
fter t
each
ing
so m
any
year
s, I
have
nev
er s
een
the
text
leve
ls s
oar a
s hi
gh a
s th
ey d
id th
is y
ear.
I ha
ve s
tude
nts
read
ing
at le
vel 1
0,
that
’s a
firs
t gra
de le
vel.”
- C
ente
no E
lem
enta
ry
“Our
par
enta
l sup
port
and
com
mitm
ent i
s at
100
% th
is y
ear.
We
alw
ays
have
par
ents
wai
ting
to ta
lk to
us
befo
re o
r afte
r sch
ool.
We
had
an
amaz
ing
turn
out
for O
pen
Hou
se a
nd p
aren
ts w
ant t
o vi
sit b
oth
the
Eng
lish
and
Spa
nish
teac
hers
. Th
ey lo
ve th
at th
eir c
hild
ren
are
lear
ning
bot
h E
nglis
h an
d S
pani
sh.”
- A
rndt
Ele
men
tary
“W
e w
ould
like
to re
crui
t Kin
derg
arte
ners
goi
ng in
to 1
st g
rade
to fi
ll up
the
1st g
rade
Dua
l Lan
guag
e cl
asse
s. W
e w
ant m
ore
stud
ents
to ta
ke
adva
ntag
e of
the
prog
ram
.” -
Arn
dt E
lem
enta
ry
“I ha
d ne
ver s
een
such
hig
h re
adin
g te
xt le
vels
as
I did
this
yea
r. T
he D
ual L
angu
age
stud
ents
are
mor
e th
an re
ady
for 1
st g
rade
. I w
ant
mor
e te
ache
rs fo
llow
ing
the
prog
ram
.” -
Arn
dt E
lem
enta
ry
“It’s
won
derfu
l to
see
how
the
Bili
ngua
l Bud
dies
stra
tegi
es w
ork!
The
chi
ldre
n le
arn
from
eac
h ot
her i
n so
man
y w
ays,
not
onl
y ac
adem
ic b
ut
they
pra
ctic
e th
eir s
ocia
l lan
guag
e. I
t’s a
del
ight
to s
ee th
em in
thei
r pai
rs a
nd b
oth
lang
uage
s ar
e va
lued
.” -
Hen
ry C
uella
r Ele
men
tary
“H
ola,
aqu
í est
á m
i rep
orte
de
los
nive
les
de le
ctur
a. In
cluy
e el
resu
ltado
de
esta
últi
ma
sem
ana
que
corr
espo
nde
a la
6ta
sem
ana.
Est
oy
enca
ntad
a co
n el
pro
gram
a, y
los
resu
ltado
s so
n ex
cele
ntes
, así
com
o la
con
exió
n em
ocio
nal q
ue tu
ve e
ste
año
con
los
alum
nos.
Fa
sken
Ele
men
tary
74
Bilingual Acade
mies for Second
Grade
Teachers
2010
‐201
119
TAC Ch
apter 89
, Sub
chapter BB
, 124
5.(a)‐(g)
6. E
LL L
angu
age
Acq
uisi
tion
Pro
file
7. B
iling
ual P
lan
Ove
rvie
w &
Gra
des
8. S
kills
that
Tra
nsfe
r & S
kills
that
Don
't
9.E
ffect
ive
Wor
d W
alls
vs.
Inef
fect
ive
10. K
rash
en's
2nd
Lan
guag
e Th
eorie
s
ERO
Eva
luat
ions
4 4.
As
a re
sult
of th
is p
rofe
ssio
nal d
evel
opm
ent s
essi
on, h
ow d
o yo
u pl
an to
inte
grat
e th
e le
arni
ng in
ord
er to
enh
ance
you
r stu
dent
s’
succ
ess?
I c
an n
ow a
ddre
ss h
ow s
tude
nts
are
havi
ng p
robl
ems
and
can
use
the
prop
er te
chni
ques
in th
e st
uden
ts' f
irst l
angu
age.
I l
ove
the
way
the
Bili
ngua
l dep
artm
ent i
s w
orki
ng w
ith th
e w
hole
dis
trict
to b
e un
iform
ed.
Act
iviti
es a
nd re
sour
ces
will
hel
p dr
ive
inst
ruct
ion.
I w
ill e
nhan
ce th
eir a
bilit
y to
inst
ill th
eir p
rior k
now
ledg
e to
acq
uire
the
skill
s th
ey n
eed
to b
ecom
e lif
e-lo
ng le
arne
rs
We
will
regr
oup
the
stud
ents
acc
ordi
ng to
the
AB
CD
leve
ls ju
st li
ke w
e gr
oupe
d th
em a
t thi
s se
ssio
n
Now
I ha
ve a
bet
ter u
nder
stan
ding
abo
ut B
IL s
tude
nts
and
how
they
are
sup
pose
d to
be
lear
ning
. I p
lan
to u
se th
e da
ta in
LA
P b
inde
r and
the
Bili
ngua
l Pro
gram
ove
rvie
w to
gui
de m
y le
sson
s.
I will
def
inite
ly tr
y to
follo
w th
e pl
an, I
kno
w it
will
be
a lo
t of w
ork
the
first
roun
d bu
t it s
eem
s w
ell w
orth
it.
It is
now
mor
e cl
ear o
n ho
w to
del
iver
inst
ruct
ion
and
mee
t my
stud
ents
nee
ds.
LAP
For
ms
will
hel
p m
e de
term
ine
the
stud
ent's
lang
uage
of i
nstru
ctio
n.
By
usin
g th
e co
mpo
nent
s ac
cord
ingl
y I w
ill b
e ab
le to
org
aniz
e an
d co
mpl
ete
lap
form
s to
hav
e qu
ick
acce
ss to
bili
ngua
l inf
o. o
n al
l ELL
sU
sing
the
reso
urce
mor
e of
ten
now
that
I re
ally
und
erst
and
how
the
prod
uct w
orks
G
ood
idea
s th
at a
re e
asy
to im
plem
ent
I sho
uld
be a
ble
to c
alcu
late
the
stud
ent's
gra
des
corr
ectly
.
Due
to th
is tr
aini
ng, I
will
be
able
to g
roup
my
stud
ents
and
inst
ruct
them
in th
e la
ngua
ge n
eces
sary
for t
hem
to s
ucce
ed. F
ollo
win
g al
l bili
ngua
l gu
idel
ines
. I w
ill in
tegr
ate
the
idea
s fo
r act
iviti
es fo
r cen
ters
I le
arne
d at
the
train
ing;
I le
arne
d ne
w id
eas
that
will
hel
p m
e de
liver
the
know
ledg
e m
y st
uden
ts n
eed
to s
ucce
ed.
I hav
e a
bette
r und
erst
andi
ng o
f whi
ch s
tude
nts
shou
ld c
ontin
ue w
ith E
SL
to e
nsur
e su
cces
s....
even
thou
gh I
don'
t tea
ch th
at p
artic
ular
pop
ulat
ion
at
this
tim
e.
The
sugg
estio
ns a
nd in
form
atio
n he
lps
give
me
insi
ght i
nto
the
type
of s
tude
nts
that
I am
wor
king
with
and
how
I ca
n be
tter u
nder
stan
d th
em in
ord
er to
m
eet t
heir
need
s.
7183
2. B
iling
ual E
duca
tion
Pro
gram
Mod
els
3. U
ISD
Ear
ly T
rans
ition
Pla
n
4. P
re-L
as D
ata
Ana
lysi
s
5. In
stru
ctio
nal G
roup
ings
for L
angu
age
Acq
uisi
tion
Seco
nd G
rade
Day
Tw
o Tr
ansi
tion
Aca
dem
y
9/15
/201
09/
22/2
010
TOP
ICS
Atte
ndan
ceA
ttend
ance
1. §
Cha
pter
89
on S
tate
Law
on
Bili
ngua
l Edu
catio
n
Source: Presentation Agend
a ER
O Data
As of Sep
tembe
r 20
10Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
75
Bilingual Acade
mies for Second
Grade
Teachers
2010
‐201
119
TAC Ch
apter 89
, Sub
chapter BB
, 124
5.(a)‐(g)
5 5.
Ple
ase
iden
tify
one
targ
eted
pro
fess
iona
l dev
elop
men
t top
ic/a
rea
that
will
faci
litat
e yo
ur p
rofe
ssio
nal g
row
th.
Kno
win
g ab
out t
he S
TAR
R te
st
Kno
win
g ex
actly
whi
ch s
tude
nts
to p
rovi
de in
terv
entio
ns to
. D
evel
opin
g vo
cabu
lary
and
tec
hnol
ogy
Teac
hing
my
stud
ents
in th
eir d
omin
ant l
angu
age.
Id
entif
y si
gns
of d
ysle
xia.
Bes
t met
hods
for r
each
ing
trans
ition
al s
tude
nts.
How
to w
ork
with
an
autis
tic s
tude
nt b
eing
inco
rpor
ated
in
a re
gula
r cla
ssro
om e
nviro
nmen
t. H
ow to
teac
h an
aut
istic
stu
dent
to th
e be
st o
f the
ir ca
paci
ty.
Com
pute
r tec
hnol
ogy
and
usag
e.
Rea
ding
with
Spa
nish
and
Eng
lish
grou
ps
Use
of c
ompu
ter t
o de
velo
p st
uden
t's a
ctiv
ities
.
Rea
ding
stra
tegi
es th
at a
re p
art o
f our
new
read
ing
serie
s...t
oo m
any
mat
eria
ls .G
reat
one
s!
Dis
cipl
ine
man
agem
ent o
f def
iant
stu
dent
s an
d A
DH
D s
tude
nts
not o
n m
edic
atio
n
How
to g
et s
tude
nts
inte
rest
ed to
read
at h
ome.
6 C
omm
ents
: I w
ould
like
to s
ee B
IL s
tude
nts
bein
g ta
ught
the
corr
ect w
ay.
Trul
y le
arne
d fro
m th
e se
ssio
n.
Goo
d in
form
atio
n be
caus
e it
give
s us
a b
ette
r pic
ture
of w
ho a
re T
IER
II s
tude
nts
are.
We
shou
ld h
ave
this
refre
sher
cou
rse
ever
y yr
. I l
ove
thei
r ses
sion
s. T
hey
are
very
cre
ativ
e an
d th
ey a
lway
s gi
ve u
s gr
eat i
deas
. It
was
a lo
t to
soak
in a
t onc
e, a
nd n
ot h
avin
g al
l of t
he in
fo. i
nput
ted
mad
e it
diffi
cult,
but
now
we
know
and
we
can
mov
e on
...th
anks
Th
is w
as v
ery
inte
rest
ing
train
ing
just
wis
hed
we
coul
d ha
ve m
ore
time
to g
o ov
er a
ll th
e in
form
atio
n.
A fe
llow
teac
her b
roug
ht u
p th
e fa
ct th
at m
any
teac
hers
that
do
inst
ruct
ion
in S
pani
sh a
re la
ckin
g th
e re
sour
ces
to fa
cilit
ate
them
in th
eir t
each
ing.
I fe
lt th
at s
ever
al te
ache
rs, i
nclu
ding
the
pres
ente
rs, w
ere
quic
k to
ass
ume
that
this
teac
her w
as n
ot a
gre
at te
ache
r bec
ause
she
men
tione
d th
at it
take
s a
long
tim
e to
tran
slat
e m
ater
ials
into
Eng
lish.
The
pre
sent
ers
wer
e in
cons
ider
ate
and
unsu
ppor
tive
to th
ose
teac
hers
that
spo
ke u
p ab
out t
he la
ck o
f re
sour
ces.
It c
reat
ed a
ver
y un
com
forta
ble
envi
ronm
ent f
or s
ever
al te
ache
rs.
Kno
win
g th
e la
ngua
ge o
f ins
truct
ion
and
havi
ng th
e in
form
atio
n fro
m p
revi
ous
year
s w
ill fa
cilit
ate
to fi
nd o
ut w
hen
the
stud
ents
sta
rted
stru
gglin
g.
How
to s
et u
p th
e di
ffere
nt re
adin
g sk
ills
will
hel
p m
e or
gani
ze m
y id
eas
for d
iffer
ent t
opic
s. It
will
go
in a
n or
derly
man
ner s
o I c
an g
o ov
er th
e sk
ills
smoo
thly
.
Source: Presentation Agend
a ER
O Data
As of Sep
tembe
r 20
10Co
mpiled by
Bilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
76
UISD M
iddle Scho
ol and
High Scho
ol ESL Plan Progress
TAC Ch
apter 10
1.10
01, Sub
chapter AA
CA
MP
US
Tota
l #
LEP
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
HC
AM
PU
S
Tota
l LE
P
RI/R
A
# P
artic
ipa
ting
Yea
r 1
RI/R
A
Yea
r 2
RI/R
A
Yea
r 3
RI/R
AB
IA
DV
AH
TMS
5426
27
107
TMS
5027
728
154
411
8W
MS
6743
1214
114
WM
S62
4720
2121
1222
85
AG
MS
3639
1219
53
AG
MS
4243
1714
1112
168
1U
SM
S38
289
97
2U
SM
S34
309
1114
68
96
UM
S47
405
1512
8U
MS
3637
1614
64
1011
12C
MS
5940
1114
123
CM
S44
3313
1516
915
54
SG
MS
2524
99
23
SG
MS
2125
712
28
104
3LB
VM
S34
309
133
3LB
VM
S40
276
1420
86
74
LOM
S38
3516
123
2LO
MS
4443
1418
1212
218
2TO
TAL
398
305
8511
265
35TO
TAL
373
312
109
147
117
7511
271
45P
erce
nts
100%
77%
28%
37%
21%
11%
Per
cent
100%
84%
29%
39%
31%
24%
36%
23%
14%
CA
MP
US
Tota
l LE
P
RI/R
A
# P
artic
ipa
nts
Yea
r 1
RI/R
A
Yea
r 2
RI/R
A
Yea
r 3
RI/R
AB
IA
DV
AH
TMS
5025
1712
212
811
4W
MS
5347
1720
164
2712
4A
GM
S27
205
1210
88
31
US
MS
2218
79
65
83
2U
MS
3723
1711
92
59
7C
MS
3529
1210
134
1310
2S
GM
S13
142
47
53
33
LBV
MS
2317
56
126
43
4LO
MS
4134
914
187
1311
3TO
TAL
301
227
9198
112
4389
6530
Per
cent
100%
75%
30%
33%
37%
19%
39%
29%
13%
TELP
AS
2010
2007
-200
8: Y
ear 1
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
n20
08-2
009:
Yea
r 2 o
f Im
plem
enta
tion
TELP
AS
2008
TELP
AS
2009
2009
-201
0: Y
ear 3
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Source: D
MAC
As of M
ay 201
1Co
mpiled by: B
ilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
77
UISD M
iddle Scho
ol and
High Scho
ol ESL Plan Progress
TAC Ch
apter 10
1.10
01, Sub
chapter AA
Yea
r 1
RI/R
A
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
HY
ear 2
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H
Yea
r 3
RI/R
A
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H23
212
54
1010
73
10
310
30
12
018
162
94
120
191
69
320
110
36
210
116
32
08
63
30
09
71
51
018
156
72
18
85
30
07
53
11
015
152
53
519
130
65
211
30
03
010
103
21
412
120
38
110
30
03
07
93
33
03
31
11
02
21
01
09
92
32
28
71
50
18
60
21
316
131
74
08
61
13
114
101
63
012
611
927
4425
2396
8115
2926
1191
506
1821
510
0%94
%23
%37
%21
%19
%10
0%84
%19
%36
%32
%14
%10
0%55
%12
%36
%42
%10
%TO
TAL
Per
cent
s
LOM
S
2010
-201
1: Y
ear 4
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
nTE
LPA
S 20
11
CA
MPU
STM
SW
MS
AG
MS
US
MS
UM
SC
MS
SG
MS
LBV
MS
Source: D
MAC
As of M
ay 201
1Co
mpiled by: B
ilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
78
UISD M
iddle Scho
ol and
High Scho
ol ESL Plan Progress
TAC Ch
apter 10
1.10
01, Sub
chapter AA
Tota
l Y
ear 1
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H28
298
911
119
298
126
323
294
99
715
82
42
085
9522
3428
1110
0%23
%36
%29
%12
%
Tota
l Y
ear 1
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
HTo
tal Y
ear
2 R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H
Tota
l Y
ear 3
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H31
245
512
231
92
14
246
40
20
219
185
45
419
123
06
328
40
21
129
255
89
323
111
34
351
100
13
68
71
50
114
113
41
317
51
12
187
7416
2226
1087
439
815
1114
223
16
610
100%
85%
22%
30%
35%
14%
100%
49%
21%
19%
35%
26%
100%
16%
4%26
%26
%43
%
Tota
l Y
ear 1
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
HY
ear 2
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
HY
ear 3
R
I/RA
# P
artic
ipa
ting
BI
AD
VA
H35
303
158
429
101
23
435
20
00
214
163
85
018
172
37
523
102
42
231
291
511
1233
170
410
323
30
12
011
113
43
126
223
87
422
71
11
491
8610
3227
1710
666
617
2716
103
223
65
810
0%95
%11
%35
%30
%19
%10
0%62
%6%
16%
25%
15%
100%
21%
3%6%
5%8%
US
HS
AH
SLB
JHS
TOTA
LP
erce
nts
UH
S
TELP
AS
2010
CA
MPU
SU
HS
US
HS
AH
SLB
JHS
TOTA
LP
erce
nts
2010
-201
1: Y
ear 3
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
nTE
LPA
S 20
11
CA
MPU
S
2009
-201
0: Y
ear 2
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
n
2008
-200
9: Y
ear 1
of I
mpl
emen
tatio
nTE
LPA
S 20
09
CA
MPU
SU
HS
US
HS
AH
SLB
JHS
TOTA
LP
erce
nts
Source: D
MAC
As of M
ay 201
1Co
mpiled by: B
ilingual/ESL Dep
artm
ent
79
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
CSB
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
4410
0%23
6044
95%
2402
5997
%66
264
95%
644
4th
4784
%22
7143
98%
2340
4489
%68
061
93%
677
5th
4098
%23
9549
94%
2328
4898
%77
657
91%
740
UM
S6t
h28
94%
2321
3795
%24
0638
95%
760
3897
%79
17t
h21
81%
2228
3010
0%82
339
82%
776
8th
1984
%81
132
97%
868
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
CSB
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
4410
0%23
9244
100%
2371
5996
%62
464
98%
629
4th
4710
0%23
7043
100%
2425
4496
%68
760
100%
697
5th
4098
%24
3249
96%
2414
4898
%77
957
96%
749
UM
S6t
h28
94%
2376
3789
%23
6938
95%
761
3895
%74
57t
h21
95%
2282
3010
0%82
139
95%
780
8th
1995
%79
432
91%
825
2010
2010
2008
2009R
eadi
ng
Mat
hem
atic
s20
11
2008
2009
2011
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
80
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
CSB
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
4th
4798
%24
2444
98%
2516
4496
%24
0860
93%
2486
UM
S7t
h21
86%
2303
3010
0%25
0839
97%
2409
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
CSB
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
5th
4098
%23
7149
90%
2234
4896
%24
0957
93%
2344
UM
S8t
h19
68%
2265
3291
%25
04
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.
UM
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
8th
1995
%23
6732
97%
2481
Writ
ing
2011
2011
2008
2009
2010
2010
2011
Soci
al S
tudi
es
2008
2009
2010
Scie
nce
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
81
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
KES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
2893
%22
8530
100%
639
3097
%61
04t
h22
95%
2278
2492
%65
829
93%
655
5th
2379
%21
6622
81%
2266
2110
0%74
7G
WM
S6t
h20
92%
2299
1672
%22
0319
90%
752
7th
1785
%22
4714
86%
728
2190
%78
68t
h14
86%
775
1479
%78
0
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
KES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
2889
%22
5730
97%
609
3087
%55
24t
h22
90%
2314
2410
0%67
729
100%
674
5th
2386
%22
1422
91%
2461
2110
0%76
9G
WM
S6t
h20
77%
2256
1679
%22
8819
95%
788
7th
1771
%22
5014
93%
750
2190
%81
58t
h14
86%
778
1486
%75
7
2008
2009
2010
2011
Rea
ding
no d
ata
no d
ata
no d
ata
no d
ata
2008
2009
2010
no d
ata
Mat
hem
atic
s20
11
no d
ata
no d
ata
no d
ata
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
82
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
KES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
422
100%
2384
2488
%23
2929
100%
2391
GW
MS
7th
1792
%21
7014
100%
2324
2010
0%24
06
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
KES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
5th
2360
%20
6522
77%
2248
2190
%24
45G
WM
S8t
h14
86%
2259
1471
%21
93
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.
GW
MS
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
8th
1410
0%23
5814
86%
2293
2008
2009
2010
no d
ata
2010
Scie
nce
2008
2009
2010
Writ
ing
Soci
al S
tudi
es20
11
2011
no d
ata
2011
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
83
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
RSK
EP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
1788
%23
3813
92%
565
1872
%55
84t
h13
92%
2317
1776
%64
117
71%
582
5th
810
0%22
5911
80%
700
1771
%67
0
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
RSK
EP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
1788
%22
6313
100%
540
1867
%50
74t
h13
92%
2309
1794
%66
017
82%
584
5th
810
0%23
7511
73%
677
1794
%72
6
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
RSK
EP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
4th
1385
%23
7017
88%
2348
1771
%22
48
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
RSK
EP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
5th
888
%22
4411
73%
2261
1694
%23
24
2011
2011
Rea
ding
Mat
h
Writ
ing
Scie
nce
2009
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2011
2011
2010
2010
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
84
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
ZES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
4283
%21
9437
95%
2319
1910
0%60
528
82%
578
4th
4077
%20
1941
78%
2244
2789
%66
620
85%
619
5th
2885
%21
7838
76%
2181
2580
%71
628
96%
730
AG
MS
6th
2691
%23
1928
86%
2254
1593
%71
030
70%
688
7th
2475
%22
1913
92%
746
1587
%72
48t
h21
95%
820
1587
%80
6
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
ZES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
4278
%21
7837
86%
2265
1974
%53
828
89%
595
4th
4082
%21
9041
80%
2285
2793
%68
720
90%
654
5th
2885
%23
7738
79%
2222
2584
%67
128
93%
727
AG
MS
6th
2683
%22
2628
80%
2268
1573
%69
830
57%
662
7th
2480
%21
9013
100%
771
1580
%72
98t
h21
100%
768
1580
%78
4
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2011
Rea
ding
Mat
hem
atic
s20
11
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
85
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
ZES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
4th
4287
%22
8137
93%
2280
2796
%23
9020
90%
2305
AG
MS
7th
2488
%22
2813
100%
2367
1593
%23
04
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.#
of
st.
# of
st
.
ZES
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
5th
3871
%21
1625
76%
2252
2810
0%24
99A
GM
S8t
h21
86%
2238
1593
%22
45
Gra
de#
of
st.
# of
st
.
AG
MS
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Pas
sing
R
ate
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
8th
2195
%23
4215
100%
2372
2008
2009
2010
2011Sc
ienc
e20
0820
0920
10
Writ
ing
2011
2011
2010
Soci
al S
tudi
es
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
86
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -T
AK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of
st.
Gra
de#
of
st.
Rui
zP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
Rui
zP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
3rd
3789
%60
13r
d37
89%
588
2011
2011
Rea
ding
Mat
h
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of: M
ay 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: B
iling
ual/
ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
87
UIS
D D
ual L
angu
age
Prog
ram
Par
ticip
atio
n an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce -
TAK
S/TA
KS-
A/T
AK
S-M
TAC
Cha
pter
101
.100
1, S
ubch
apte
r AA
Gra
de#
of s
t.G
rade
# of
st.
AH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
AH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
9th
2095
%22
869t
h20
95%
2285
Gra
de#
of s
t.G
rade
# of
st.
UH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
UH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
9th
1191
%22
479t
h11
73%
2192
Gra
de#
of s
t.G
rade
# of
st.
USH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
USH
SP
assi
ng
Rat
e
Avg
. S
cale
S
core
9th
2281
%22
759t
h22
82%
2275
Rea
ding
2011
Mat
h20
11
Rea
ding
Mat
h
Rea
ding
2011
Mat
h20
11
2011
2011
Sou
rce:
DM
AC
As
of:
May
201
1C
ompi
led
by:
Bili
ngua
l/ES
L D
epar
tmen
t
88
Gifted and Talented/ Advanced Placement
89
Gifted and Talented/LEP Enrollment 29 TEC Subchapter D. Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students
CAMPUS2010
TOTAL2011
TOTAL2010
TOTAL %2011 Total %
2010TOTAL %
2011TOTAL %
UHS 3367 3623 551 16% 643 18% 0 0% 1 0%WMS 1168 1256 143 12% 164 13% 3 2% 2 1%TMS 1528 1536 354 23% 339 22% 3 1% 3 1%FINL 572 557 29 5% 37 7% 10 34% 13 35%KZN 549 549 39 7% 36 7% 9 23% 9 25%
JMES 797 815 52 7% 46 6% 8 15% 8 17%BFES 999 1018 78 8% 86 8% 25 32% 15 17%
TES 826 830 149 18% 163 20% 33 22% 31 19%MDL 674 654 90 13% 73 11% 12 13% 8 11%
CBES 588 641 64 11% 66 10% 9 14% 13 20%MMES 917 930 86 9% 94 10% 9 10% 10 11%
TOTAL 11,985 12,409 1,635 14% 1,747 14% 121 7% 113 6%AHS 2504 2536 578 23% 551 22% 1 0% 0 0%UMS 1016 1041 286 28% 294 28% 0 0% 0 0%CMS 875 852 190 22% 170 20% 2 1% 1 1%NYE 847 872 64 8% 79 9% 18 28% 25 32%
CSBS 908 929 162 18% 174 19% 23 14% 27 16%NEW 528 555 28 5% 26 5% 3 11% 3 12%CES 541 537 15 3% 16 3% 1 7% 2 13%
GUTE 679 679 149 22% 143 21% 20 13% 25 17%TOTAL 7,898 8,001 1,472 19% 1,453 18% 68 5% 83 6%
USHS 2552 2626 383 15% 349 13% 1 0% 1 0%AGMS 984 1039 84 9% 84 8% 2 2% 1 1%USMS 1282 1319 255 20% 251 19% 4 2% 5 2%HCES 689 704 27 4% 25 4% 5 19% 6 24%JZES 1061 1124 51 5% 60 5% 16 31% 21 35%RSKE 858 866 49 6% 48 6% 18 37% 20 42%RUIZ 900 900 91 10% 102 11% 21 23% 17 17%SES 843 854 50 6% 51 6% 13 26% 12 24%
BLGE 1045 1045 65 6% 67 6% 21 32% 19 28%TOTAL 10,214 10,477 1,055 10% 1,037 10% 101 10% 102 10%
LBJ 2145 2342 89 4% 102 4% 0 0% 1 1%LBVMS 757 810 44 6% 56 7% 1 2% 0 0%LOMS 897 931 50 6% 43 5% 0 0% 1 2%SGMS 507 503 31 6% 40 8% 0 0% 0 0%
PER 953 1010 34 4% 36 4% 13 38% 15 42%PES 795 794 15 2% 16 2% 6 40% 10 63%RES 831 837 14 2% 14 2% 4 29% 6 43%
JAES 1022 1035 43 4% 54 5% 12 28% 9 17%RCCE 892 910 9 1% 14 2% 1 11% 5 36%KZES 575 529 0 0% 0 0% 0 NA 0 0%
JLE 389 356 24 6% 22 6% 6 25% 7 32%UDDH 409 403 10 2% 10 2% 6 60% 6 60%
TOTAL 10,172 10,460 363 4% 407 4% 49 13% 60 15%STEP/JJAP 182 175 8 4% 9 5% 1 13% 0 0%
GRAND TOTAL 40,451 41,522 4,533 11% 4,653 11% 340 8% 358 8%
GT COUNT GT/LEPENROLLMENT
Sources: IRIS and MIS Enrollment ReportAs of: April 13, 2011
Compiled By: GT/AA Department
90
UIS
D N
umbe
r of S
tude
nts
Enro
lled
in A
P C
ours
es20
08-2
009,
200
9-20
10, a
nd 2
010-
2011
TEC
28.
009
U
ISD
To
tals
UIS
D
Tota
lsU
ISD
To
tals
Subj
ect
2008
-200
920
09-2
010
2010
-201
120
08-2
009
2009
-201
020
10-2
011
2008
-200
920
09-2
010
2010
-201
120
08-2
009
2009
-201
020
10-2
011
2008
-200
920
09-2
010
2010
-201
1
Cal
culu
s A
B64
7911
010
09
7610
664
3415
2518
420
020
8
Cal
culu
s B
C0
1186
00
013
2320
00
1813
3412
4
AP
C
ompu
ter
Sci
ence
00
00
00
00
202
00
00
020
2
U.S
. His
tory
203
141
148
6889
5815
518
723
212
413
318
355
055
062
1
Eng
lish
Lang
uage
303
233
300
8812
110
033
229
537
321
325
430
193
690
310
74
Eng
lish
Lite
ratu
re15
013
875
4449
6215
915
716
418
413
612
253
748
042
3
US
Gov
't an
d P
oliti
cs18
618
820
176
101
136
109
185
173
186
173
202
557
647
712
Spa
nish
La
ngua
ge49
5255
247
379
355
401
310
397
209
194
237
906
935
1,04
4
Spa
nish
Li
tera
ture
00
00
00
010
120
017
010
29
Bio
logy
4935
460
036
3158
730
2411
880
117
273
Che
mis
try23
4931
00
011
1525
00
034
6456
Phy
sics
B71
8611
00
00
2816
200
00
9910
213
0
Phy
sics
C:
Mec
hani
cs0
019
00
013
1519
00
013
1538
Mac
ro-
econ
omic
s16
218
920
474
9913
694
195
192
126
189
227
456
672
759
Sta
tistic
s50
6485
00
00
100
00
1350
7498
Stu
dio
Art
1112
100
00
00
00
00
1112
10
TOTA
LS1,
321
1,27
71,
480
607
838
892
1,42
21,
582
1,96
61,
076
1,11
81,
463
4,42
64,
815
5,80
1
Ale
xand
er H
igh
Scho
olLB
J H
igh
Scho
olU
nite
d H
igh
Scho
olU
nite
d So
uth
Hig
h Sc
hool
2010
-201
1 G
oal:
5% In
crea
se in
stu
dent
enr
ollm
ent;
Atta
inm
ent:
986
Add
ition
al s
tude
nts
enro
lled
Adv
ance
d Pl
acem
ent c
ours
es; 2
0% In
crea
se in
stu
dent
enr
ollm
ent
Sou
rces
: IR
IS, C
ampu
s R
egis
trars
, Mas
ter S
ched
ules
, MIS
As
of: A
pril
15, 2
011
Com
pile
d by
: G
T/A
dvan
ced
Aca
dem
ics
Dep
artm
ent
91
UISD Advanced Placement Summary 2008, 2009, 2010TEC 28.009
2008
2009
2010
211 208 246
169 226 249
152 235 182
796 982 1100
Number of Exams with a Score of 4
Number of Exams with a Score of 5
1613
677
42%
532
1093
49%
Attainment: 1% Increase in the Number of Assessments Meeting Criterion
2009-2010 Goal: 10% Increase in the Number of Students Assessed with AP Exams;Attainment: 12% Increase in the Number of Students Assessed with AP Exams2009-2010 Goal: 10% Increase in the Number of Assessments Meeting Criterion;
1365
669
49%UISD Percent of Qualifying Scores on AP Exams
UISD Number of Qualifying Scores on AP Exams
UISD Total Number of AP Exam Grades Reported
UISD Number of Students Assessed with AP Exams
Number of Exams with a Score of 3
Source: College Board AP School District SummaryAs of August 17, 2010
Compiled by: GT/Advanced Academics Department
92
2010-2011 GT Assessment Data 29TEC Subchapter D. Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students
EHBB Local/Legal-Special Programs: Gifted and Talented Students
2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011NYE 15 8 11 3 9 6 48 52 33 30 32 62% 31 25 29 94%CES 7 2 8 0 0 7 14 24 16 9 16 67% 13 6 8 62%SES 6 14 9 7 8 0 55 44 26 35 23 52% 21 26 14 67%
NEW 3 12 2 8 5 14 26 44 30 14 30 68% 26 11 17 65%TES 24 11 10 0 1 9 61 55 41 44 41 75% 41 35 38 93%PER 16 0 9 6 5 0 33 36 24 23 23 64% 22 12 15 68%FINL 19 15 4 16 5 6 30 65 32 15 31 48% 31 10 22 71%
UDDH 4 0 1 2 3 0 18 10 5 12 4 40% 4 7 2 50%GUTE 20 20 18 6 3 9 86 76 39 53 39 51% 38 34 36 95%RUIZ 21 56 24 24 33 34 102 192 89 54 75 39% 63 39 42 67%MDL 6 21 4 3 14 2 42 50 33 29 30 60% 30 21 19 63%KZN 11 3 6 0 0 2 19 22 14 7 13 59% 11 6 9 82%JLE 10 13 8 5 10 11 40 57 31 15 20 35% 18 11 14 78%PES 15 2 13 8 1 2 23 41 20 15 16 39% 12 10 8 67%
CBES 12 0 4 7 4 8 32 35 22 20 22 63% 21 14 16 76%KZES 0 7 6 4 5 6 12 28 14 6 14 50% 14 4 11 79%CSBS 21 19 27 11 16 4 129 98 62 74 62 63% 59 64 54 92%
RES 8 7 2 2 2 2 11 23 15 4 15 65% 14 1 11 79%JZES 9 15 4 15 2 2 32 47 31 16 29 62% 29 10 22 76%
HCES 6 9 4 10 2 5 24 36 20 15 17 47% 17 13 15 88%JMES 20 8 13 9 17 9 49 76 38 33 37 49% 30 23 13 43%JAES 10 3 4 17 15 7 79 56 33 46 31 55% 29 27 25 86%BLGE 18 17 13 9 25 6 72 88 43 35 38 43% 34 20 26 76%RCCE 6 4 1 0 0 4 13 15 7 5 6 40% 5 5 4 80%MMES 17 11 12 9 4 6 93 59 40 57 39 66% 38 39 28 74%BFES 15 9 0 7 11 10 71 52 34 45 31 60% 31 39 21 68%RSKE 25 31 17 22 27 23 55 145 73 27 58 40% 54 19 28 52%UMS 5 2 0 16 7 3 9 3 43% 3 3 3 100%
USMS 13 17 0 31 30 19 17 19 63% 15 7 14 93%SGMS 9 0 0 16 9 7 11 7 78% 4 3 1 25%WMS 11 37 13 88 61 40 74 39 64% 38 40 27 71%CMS 11 0 0 7 11 6 4 6 55% 6 3 5 83%
LOMS 5 2 0 10 7 3 5 3 43% 3 1 1 33%TMS 12 3 0 14 15 11 13 10 67% 9 6 3 33%
AGMS 6 4 3 32 13 8 23 7 54% 6 7 2 33%LBVMS 12 5 1 36 18 9 22 7 39% 6 10 4 67%
TOTALS 344 317 234 210 227 194 84 70 17 1519 1697 971 916 893 53% 826 611 607 73%
8th
Tota
l Tes
ted
for G
T Pr
ogra
m
Qua
lifie
d (Q
) fo
r Por
tfolio
Subm
issi
on
Q F
ollo
win
g Po
rtfo
lio S
ubm
issi
on
Perc
ent Q
Fol
low
ing
Port
folio
Eva
luat
ion
Perc
ent Q
for
Port
folio
Sub
mis
sion
Port
folio
s Su
bmitt
ed
Scor
ed 5
5.0
to 9
9.0
on N
NA
T
1st
Kin
der
Cam
pus
7th
6th
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
Sources: GT Accountability Reports;NNAT Score Reports
As of: May 04, 2011Compiled by: GT/AA Department
93
2010-2011 2011-2012
871862
9
370124123123
99-8598-8396-76
363
129 113
April 8, 9, 124/19-4/23
11-May-201019-May-2010
UISD Magnet Admittance ProceduresDistrict Summary for the 2010-2011 School Year and for the
2011-2012 School Year
968845
123
Total Number of Applicants Who Qualified to Test with an Overall Grade Average of a B (80%) in Math, Science, Language Arts, Reading, and Social StudiesTotal Number of Students TestedTotal Number of Students Who did not Show Up to Test
11-May-201118-May-2011
Range of Magnet Composite Scores by Campus:
Total Number of Students Sent a Non-Acceptance Letter
Notification Procedures:
All Standard Notification Letters Sent OutAcceptance DeadlineParent Meeting Date
99.2-86.598.4-82.297.2-75.5
351
April 6, 7, 8
Phone Calls to Parents of Qualifying Students (Confirmation of student's choice & parental support of choice)
UHSUSHS
4/18-4/20
381130125126
Total Number of Students Sent an Acceptance LetterAHSUHSUSHS
AHS
Total Number of Students Who Declined An Offer to One of the Three Magnets
Source: CogAT score reports, 7th grade report cards, 8th grade mid-semester report cards
As of 4/29/2011Compiled by GT/AA Department
94
UISD 363 358 33 1 325UHS 124 124 14 0 110
USHS 120 115 3 0 112AHS 119 119 16 1 103
UISD 325 325 19 1 306UHS 110 110 6 0 104
USHS 112 112 1 0 111
# of 9th grade
students who
qualified
# of UISD &/or
program withdrawls
# of entries from
outside Laredo, TX
Total Program
Continuers
# of UISD &/or
program withdrawls
# of entries from
outside Laredo, TX
Total Program
Continuers
# of 10th grade
students who
qualified
# of students
enrolled @ beginning of school
year
Magnet 2007-2008 Cohort
As of April 15, 2011TABLE 1. Summary of qualifying students enrolled - 9th graders/ 2007-2008 School Year
CAMPUS
# of students
enrolled @ beginning of school
year
CLASS of 2011
TABLE 2. Summary of qualifying students enrolled - 10th graders/ 2008-2009 School Year
CAMPUS
YEAR 1
2007-08
YEAR 2
2008-09
USHS 112 112 1 0 111AHS 103 103 12 1 91
UISD 306 306 7 1 299
UHS 104 104 3 0 101USHS 111 111 3 0 108
AHS 91 91 1 1 90
UISD 299 299 17 0 282UHS 101 101 3 0 98
USHS 108 108 9 0 99AHS 90 90 5 0 85
# of UISD &/or
program withdrawls
# of entries from
outside Laredo, TX
Total Program
Graduates
TABLE 4. Summary of qualifying students enrolled - 12th graders/ 2010-2011School Year
CAMPUS
TABLE 3. Summary of qualifying students enrolled - 11th graders/ 2009-2010School Year
CAMPUS
# of 12th grade
students who
qualified
# of students
enrolled @ beginning of school
year
# of 11th grade
students who
qualified
# of students
enrolled @ beginning of school
year
# of UISD &/or
program withdrawls
# of entries from
outside Laredo, TX
Total Program
Continuers
YEAR 3
2009-10
YEAR 4
2010-11
Source: Magnet DeansAs of April 15, 2011
Compiled by GT/AA Department
95
201
0 Fi
rst A
nnua
l UIS
D G
ifted
/Tal
ente
d Sh
owca
se
Elem
enta
ry C
ampu
sN
umbe
r of 1
st-5
th G
rade
Pr
ojec
ts P
rese
nted
Nye
6C
lark
2S
alin
as5
New
man
3Tr
autm
ann
15P
erez
3Fi
nley
2U
nite
d D
D H
acha
r1
Gut
ierr
ez15
Rui
z9
Mat
ias
de L
lano
9K
azen
4Ju
arez
-Lin
coln
2P
rada
1B
orch
ers
6K
enne
dy-Z
apat
a1
The
Texa
s E
duca
tion
Age
ncy
defin
es “t
he T
exas
Per
form
ance
S
tand
ards
Pro
ject
” as
“a s
tate
wid
e st
anda
rds
and
asse
ssm
ent
syst
em” u
tiliz
ed “t
o ca
ptur
e th
e hi
gh le
vels
of a
chie
vem
ent o
f gi
fted/
tale
nted
stu
dent
s. T
he g
oal o
f the
TP
SP
is fo
r stu
dent
s to
cr
eate
wor
k th
at re
flect
s th
e pr
ofes
sion
al q
ualit
y th
at th
e Te
xas
Sta
te P
lan
for t
he E
duca
tion
of G
ifted
/Tal
ente
d S
tude
nts
requ
ires.
S
tude
nt p
roje
cts
are
TEK
S-b
ased
and
focu
s on
the
core
con
tent
ar
eas
of E
nglis
h la
ngua
ge a
rts, m
athe
mat
ics,
sci
ence
, and
soc
ial
stud
ies
with
inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y co
nnec
tions
.”U
nite
d In
depe
nden
t Sch
ool D
istri
ct h
as im
plem
ente
d re
sear
ch-
base
d pr
ojec
ts th
roug
h th
e TP
SP
at th
e el
emen
tary
, mid
dle,
and
hi
gh s
choo
l lev
els.
Beg
inni
ng w
ith th
e 20
09-2
010
scho
ol y
ear,
elem
enta
ry s
choo
l GT
stud
ents
hav
e m
et w
ith th
eir i
ntel
lect
ual
peer
s on
a w
eekl
y ba
sis
to c
reat
e or
igin
al p
rodu
cts
and
perfo
rman
ces
base
d on
inve
stig
atio
n.
Beg
inni
ng th
is 2
010-
2011
sch
ool y
ear,
mid
dle
and
high
sch
ool
GT
stud
ents
hav
e m
et w
ith th
eir i
ntel
lect
ual p
eers
thro
ugh
a va
riety
of
del
iver
y op
tions
incl
udin
g el
ectiv
e co
urse
s, c
ore
cour
ses,
or
othe
r allo
tted
time
to c
reat
e or
igin
al p
rodu
cts
and
perfo
rman
ces
base
d on
sci
entif
ic in
vest
igat
ion.
Mid
dle
scho
ol s
tude
nts
have
als
o ha
dth
eop
tion
toco
nduc
tres
earc
han
dcr
eate
proj
ects
rela
ted
to
As of: May 10, 201
0Co
mpiled by: GT/AA Dep
artm
ent
Col
onel
San
tos
Ben
avid
es14
Roo
seve
lt1
Zaffi
rini
5C
uella
r3
Mul
ler
5A
rndt
4G
arci
a7
Cen
teno
1M
alak
off
9Fa
sken
10K
illam
5TO
TAL
148
othe
r allo
tted
time
to c
reat
e or
igin
al p
rodu
cts
and
perfo
rman
ces
base
d on
sci
entif
ic in
vest
igat
ion.
Mid
dle
scho
ol s
tude
nts
have
als
o ha
d th
e op
tion
to c
ondu
ct re
sear
ch a
nd c
reat
e pr
ojec
ts re
late
d to
so
cial
stu
dies
.
Hig
h sc
hool
stu
dent
s pa
rtici
pate
in a
sci
entif
ic re
sear
ch d
esig
n co
urse
at t
he s
opho
mor
e le
vel t
o co
nduc
t res
earc
h an
d in
vest
igat
ion
for p
roje
ct c
ompl
etio
n. A
t the
juni
or le
vel,
stud
ents
ta
ke a
two-
cour
se s
eque
nce
cons
istin
g of
a s
econ
d le
vel o
f sc
ient
ific
rese
arch
des
ign
and
a pr
oble
ms/
solu
tions
cou
rse
durin
g w
hich
they
col
labo
rate
with
men
tors
in th
e co
mm
unity
. S
tude
nt
proj
ects
hav
e be
en s
how
case
d fo
r par
ents
, com
mun
ity m
embe
rs,
and
othe
r sta
keho
lder
s at
the
cam
pus
and
dist
rict l
evel
s as
wel
l as
at th
e23
rd A
nnua
lUIS
D R
egio
nal S
cien
ce F
air.
As of: May 10, 201
0Co
mpiled by: GT/AA Dep
artm
ent
96
Career and Technology
97
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
n St
uden
t Enr
ollm
ent
2010
-201
1
Part
icip
ant
in C
TE
Prog
ram
Coh
eren
t Se
quen
ceTe
ch
Prep
Part
icip
ant
in C
TE
Prog
ram
Coh
eren
t Se
quen
ceTe
ch
Prep
Scho
ols
1's
2's
3's
Tota
l Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
1's
2's
3's
Tota
l Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Ale
xand
er H
S41
295
1,92
02,
256
279
1,92
42,
005
Cla
rk M
S38
138
138
938
9
Uni
ted
MS
507
507
644
644
LBJ
HS
6019
21,
405
1,65
76
751,
712
1,79
3
Lam
ar B
runi
-Ver
gara
MS
482
482
533
533
Los
Obi
spos
MS
492
492
489
489
Sal
vado
r Gar
cia
MS
223
223
210
210
Uni
ted
HS
5584
2,72
52,
864
911
2,75
32,
773
Trau
tman
n M
S81
581
585
085
0
Was
hing
ton
MS
727
727
796
796
Uni
ted
Sout
h H
S11
816
01,
698
1,97
66
112
2,03
22,
150
Ant
onio
Gon
zale
z M
S49
049
052
652
6
Uni
ted
Sou
th M
S49
849
859
259
2
Tota
l CTE
Stu
dent
Enr
ollm
ent
4,88
973
17,
748
13,3
685,
052
277
8,42
113
,750
2009
‐201
020
10‐201
1
Source: 20
10 CTE PEIMS Fall Subm
ission
Carl D. Perkins Pub
lic Law
109
‐270
19 TAC 12
9.10
23, 102
5
As of Octob
er 29, 201
0Co
mpiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
98
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
nPe
rfor
man
ce B
ased
Mon
itorin
g A
naly
sis
Syst
em
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rsD
istr
ict R
ate
PBM
AS
Stan
dard
or
Sta
te R
ate
Dis
tric
t Rat
ePB
MA
S St
anda
rd
or S
tate
Rat
e
CTE
Ove
rall
TAK
S Pa
ssin
g R
ate
Mat
hem
atic
s71
.855
.077
.860
.0R
eadi
ng/E
LA87
.470
.088
.570
.0S
cien
ce69
.350
.078
.655
.0S
ocia
l Stu
dies
90.7
70.0
94.5
70.0
CTE
Tec
h Pr
ep T
AK
S Pa
ssin
g R
ate
Mat
hem
atic
s74
.655
.078
.860
.0R
eadi
ng/E
LA89
.570
.089
.370
.0S
cien
ce72
.450
.079
.455
.0S
ocia
l Stu
dies
92.5
70.0
95.0
70.0
CTE
Ann
ual D
ropo
ut R
ate
<1%
3%<1
%3%
CTE
RH
SP/D
AP
Dip
lom
a R
ate
93.3
070
.00
92.7
070
.00
CTE
Gra
duat
ion
Rat
e94
.40
70.0
095
.20
75.0
0
CTE
Non
-Tra
ditio
nal C
ours
es-M
ale
41.3
040
.00
41.9
040
.00
CTE
Non
-Tra
ditio
nal C
ours
es-F
emal
e41
.00
35.0
040
.10
35.0
0
2008
‐200
920
09‐201
0
Source: h
ttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/
Performance Based
Analysis System
2009
‐201
0 PB
MAS Re
port
Compiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
99
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
nU
IL A
cade
mic
s St
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n
Scho
ols
Dis
tric
tA
dvan
ced
to
Reg
iona
lsA
dvan
ced
to S
tate
Dis
tric
tA
dvan
ced
to
Reg
iona
lsA
dvan
ced
to S
tate
Ale
xand
er H
S66
281
5918
6C
lark
MS
108
109
Uni
ted
MS
114
116
LBJ
HS
344
060
41
Lam
ar B
runi
-Ver
gara
MS
3594
Los
Obi
spos
MS
5368
Sal
vado
r Gar
cia
MS
4748
Uni
ted
HS
8018
472
100
Trau
tman
n M
S10
111
7W
ashi
ngto
n M
S11
611
6
Uni
ted
Sout
h H
S60
71
5214
4A
nton
io G
onza
lez
MS
7981
Uni
ted
Sou
th M
S11
011
7
Tota
l UIL
Stu
dent
Par
ticip
atio
n1,
003
576
1,10
946
11
2009
‐201
020
10‐201
1
Source: C
ampu
s repo
rts,
http://utdirect.utexas.edu
/uil/mlc2_pu
b_meet_list.WBX
As of M
ay 4, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
100
Career and Technical EducationLyndon B. Johnson High School Student Certifications Laredo Community College Dual Enrollment Program
CertificateCollege Hours
Required for Certificate
State Certified Nursing Assistant 15Computer Information Basic Skills 16LCC Nurse Aide Certificate 15Total Student Certifications
Number of Students Certified
2009-2010
1291536
Number of Students Certified
2008-2009
10151439
Source: LCC/LBJ CTE Technical Student Enrollment 2009‐2010Carl D. Perkins Public Law 109‐270TEC 29.181
As of March 22, 2011Compiled by Curriculum and Instruction
Secondary Ed./Career and Technical Education
101
Career and Technical EducationCurriculum-Based, Industry-Standard Student Certifications
Certification 2008-2009 2009-2010
CPR/First Aid 334 267Dental Assistant 86 90Medical Administrative Assistant 18 17Microsoft Office User Specialist 123 826CareerSafe 393 118General Occupational Safety Hazards Adm./EPA 18 13General Occupational Safety Hazards Adm. 153 172Food Handlers 18 13Pharmacy Tech 13 12ServSafe 0 16Internal Revenue Service Certified Tax Preparers 0 49Total Industry-Standard Certifications 1156 1593
Source: TEA 2S1‐Technical Skills Attainment 2009‐2010Carl D. Perkins Public Law 109‐270TEC 29.181
As of March 22, 2011Compiled by Curriculum and Instruction
Secondary Ed./Career and Technical Education
102
Career and Technical EducationLBJ/Laredo Community College Dual Credit Enrollment
Dual Credit Program
Technical College Hours
Earned 2008-2009
Technical College Hours
Earned 2009-2010
Diesel Mechanics 49 78Computer Office Systems 180 108Nursing Assistant 168 180Total College Hours Earned 397 366
Number of Students 36 36Average Hours per Student 11.03 10.17
Source: UISD LCC/LBJ CTE Technical Credit Student ReportsCarl D. Perkins Public Law 109‐270TEC 29.181
As of March 22, 2011Compiled by Curriculum and Instruction
Secondary Ed./Career and Technical Education
103
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
n S
kills
USA
Voc
atio
nal I
ndus
tria
l Clu
bs o
f Am
eric
a St
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n
Scho
ols
Are
aA
dvan
ced
to S
tate
Adv
ance
d to
Nat
iona
lsA
rea
Adv
ance
d to
Sta
teA
dvan
ced
to N
atio
nals
Ale
xand
er H
S12
3-
8-
-
LBJ
HS
7413
-15
7-
Uni
ted
HS
6320
125
24-
Uni
ted
Sout
h H
S41
29-
21-
-
Tota
l Ski
lls U
SA S
tude
nt P
artic
ipat
ion
190
651
6931
-
2009
‐201
020
10‐201
1
Source: C
ampu
s repo
rts
As of M
ay 4, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
104
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
nH
ealth
Occ
upat
ions
Stu
dent
s of
Am
eric
a St
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n
Scho
ols
Are
aA
dvan
ced
to S
tate
Adv
ance
d to
Nat
iona
lsA
rea
Adv
ance
d to
Sta
teA
dvan
ced
to N
atio
nals
Ale
xand
er H
S92
4410
8521
6
LBJ
HS
113
16
21
Uni
ted
HS
166
-5
00
Uni
ted
Sout
h H
S-
--
200
0
Tota
l HO
SA S
tude
nt P
artic
ipat
ion
119
5311
116
237
2010
‐201
120
09‐201
0
Source: C
ampu
s repo
rts
As of M
ay 4, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
105
Car
eer a
nd T
echn
ical
Edu
catio
nPe
rkin
s Pe
rfor
man
ce M
easu
res
2010
-201
1
Perf
orm
ance
Mea
sure
s
Stat
ewid
e Pe
rfor
man
ce
Targ
et %
200
6-20
07
UIS
D A
ctua
l %
200
6-20
07
Stat
ewid
e Pe
rfor
man
ce
Targ
et %
200
7 -20
08
UIS
D A
ctua
l %
200
7-20
08
Aca
dem
ic A
ttain
men
t-Rea
ding
/Lan
guag
e A
rts
95.0
099
.06
95.0
099
.47
Aca
dem
ic A
ttain
men
t-Mat
hem
atic
s95
.00
98.4
395
.00
98.7
5
Seco
ndar
y Sc
hool
Com
plet
ion
90.0
099
.17
90.5
698
.27
Stud
ent G
radu
atio
n R
ates
89.0
098
.90
89.0
097
.93
Seco
ndar
y Pl
acem
ent
74.1
082
.07
76.7
579
.04
Non
trad
ition
al P
artic
ipat
ion
38.7
446
.41
38.7
445
.64
Non
trad
ition
al C
ompl
etio
n38
.30
46.0
338
.30
45.0
2
Source: 201
0‐20
11 Title 1, Part C
Carl D Perkins App
lication
As of M
arch 22, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Curriculum and
Instruction
Secon
dary Ed./Career and Technical Edu
catio
n
106
Guidance & Counseling
107
Texas Tech University
Cred
it By
Exam Scores
Fall 20
10
Campu
sSpan. II A
Span. II B
Span. III A
Span. III B
ELA 8th A
ELA 8th B
Eng.III A
Eng III B
Tests Avg
90 or
better
Cred
it Earned
Total
Tests
Ordered
Potential
Cred
its
Earned
AH
S
33
2424
21.0
5427
UH
S-M
11
21.0
21
UH
S
33
33
11
1.5
147
LBJ
22
21.0
42
US
HS
11
11
42
TMS
11
21.0
21
SG
MS
11
11
21.0
42
Tota
ls12
1228
281
11
111
5.5
8442
Campu
sSpan
. II A
Span
. II B
Span
. III A
Span
. III B
ELA 8th B
Eng. III A
Eng. III B
Cred
it
Earned
AH
S
1.0
1.0
UH
S-M
.5.5
1.0
UH
S
.5.5
LBJ
.5.5
1.0
US
HS
TMS
.5.5
1.0
SG
MS
.5.5
1.0
Tota
ls2.
02.
01.
55.5
Tests Taken
Tests Ordered
and
Credits Earne
d
Cred
its Earne
d By
Cam
pus and Subject
Source: Texas Tech University
Compiled by
Guidance and Co
unseling Dep
t.As of Feb
ruary 20
11
108
Texas Tech University
Cred
it By
Exam Scores
Spring
201
1
Campu
sSpan. I A
Span. I B
Span. II A
Span. II B
Span. III A
Span. III B
Lang. A
rts
4th
Tests Avg
90 or
better
Cred
it Earned
Total
Tests
Ordered
Potential
Cred
its
Earned
AH
S
11
44
42.0
105.0
UH
SA
22
66
84.0
168.0
UH
S
55
1.5
105.0
US
HS
11
21.0
UM
S2
21
12
1.0
63.0
Salinas
11
n/a
1n/a
Tota
ls2
29
911
111
167.5
4522
Campu
sSpan. I A
Span. II B
Span. II A
Span. II B
Span. III A
Span. III B
Lang. A
rts 4th
Cred
it Earned
AH
S
1.0
1.0
2.0
UH
SA
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
UH
S
0.5
.5U
SH
SU
MS
0.5
0.5
1.0
Salinas
pass
edpassed
Tota
ls1.
01.
01.
51.
51.
51.
0pa
ssed
7.5
Tests Taken
Tests Ordered
and
Credits Earne
d
Cred
its Earne
d By
Cam
pus and Subject
Source: Texas Tech University
Compiled by: G
uidance and Co
unseling Dep
t.As of : 4/27
/201
1
109
Cre
dit B
y E
xam
Com
paris
on o
f Sch
ool Y
ears
EE
JB (L
egal
/Loc
al P
olic
ies)
all 2006
pring 2007
all 2007
pring 2008
all 2008
pring 2009
all 2009
pring 2010
all 2010
pring 2011
Fall
Spr
Fall
Spr
Fall
Spr
Fall
Spr
Fall
Spr
Num
ber o
f exa
ms
orde
red
5058
217
269
245
216
288
120
8445
Cos
t per
exa
m$1
4.00
$14.
00$1
4.00
$14.
00$1
4.00
$15.
00$1
5.00
$15.
00$1
7.00
$17.
00*T
otal
cos
t$7
40.0
0$8
52.0
0$3
,138
.00
$3,7
66.0
0$3
,430
.00
$3,2
40.0
0$4
,320
.00
$1,8
75.0
0$1
,537
.00
$815
.00
Exam
s re
turn
ed (u
ntak
en)
20
25
40
10
04
Num
ber o
f cre
dits
ear
ned
15.5
1867
.565
.565
7074
21.5
5.5
7.5
% s
corin
g 90
or b
ette
r64
%62
%62
%49
%53
%63
%51
%36
%13
%36
%#
of te
st s
corin
g 90
or b
ette
r32
3613
513
113
013
614
843
1116
% s
corin
g 89
or b
elow
30%
38%
37%
49%
45%
37%
49%
64%
87%
56%
# of
test
sco
ring
89 o
r bel
ow15
2280
133
111
8014
077
7325
*T
tl
til
dhi
id
hdl
i
Eve
ry h
igh
scho
ol te
st o
rder
ed is
a p
ossi
ble
.50
cred
it if
the
stud
ent p
asse
s w
ith a
gra
de o
f 90
or b
ette
r.
* To
tal c
ost i
nclu
des
ship
ping
and
han
dlin
g
Sou
rce:
Tex
as T
ech
Uni
vers
ityC
ompi
led
by th
e G
uida
nce
& C
ouns
elijn
g D
ept.
As
of D
ate
Apr
il 27
, 201
1
110
12 May 2010 -- \HS2HE\2BasicB\QWK03591\HS2HEcampus.sas - MainProc.sasSource: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and Texas Education Agency
"Not found" graduates have standard ID numbers that were not found in the specified Fall term at Texas higher education institutions."Not trackable" graduates have non-standard ID numbers that will not find a match at Texas higher education institutions.
"Other" records combine records where Total Students for one institution < 5.High schools with more than 25 graduates
Texas High School Graduates From FY 2009Enrolled in Texas Public or Independent Higher Education Fall 2009
County=WEBB
District High School HS Code Institution Students
TEXAS A&MINTERNATIONAL UNIV
74
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 8
U. OF TEXAS AT SANANTONIO
7
TEXAS STATE UNIV - SANMARCOS
6
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (5) 10
Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (1) 2
Not trackable 26
Not found 127
Total high school graduates 399
UNITED ISD JOHN B ALEXANDER H S 240903003 LAREDO COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
230
TEXAS A&MINTERNATIONAL UNIV
112
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 15
U. OF TEXAS AT SANANTONIO
11
AUSTIN COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
9
UNIV OF THE INCARNATEWORD
7
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 6
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY 5
TEXAS STATE UNIV - SANMARCOS
5
U. OF TEXAS-PANAMERICAN
5
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHTEXAS
5
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (7) 11
Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (7) 11
Not trackable 9
Not found 119
Total high school graduates 560
UNITED ISD LYNDON B JOHNSON 240903009 LAREDO COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
138
111
12 May 2010 -- \HS2HE\2BasicB\QWK03591\HS2HEcampus.sas - MainProc.sasSource: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and Texas Education Agency
"Not found" graduates have standard ID numbers that were not found in the specified Fall term at Texas higher education institutions."Not trackable" graduates have non-standard ID numbers that will not find a match at Texas higher education institutions.
"Other" records combine records where Total Students for one institution < 5.High schools with more than 25 graduates
Texas High School Graduates From FY 2009Enrolled in Texas Public or Independent Higher Education Fall 2009
County=WEBB
District High School HS Code Institution Students
TEXAS A&MINTERNATIONAL UNIV
61
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (5) 11
Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (3) 3
Not trackable 18
Not found 136
Total high school graduates 367
UNITED ISD UNITED H S 240903001 LAREDO COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
289
TEXAS A&MINTERNATIONAL UNIV
156
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 17
U. OF TEXAS AT SANANTONIO
11
U. OF TEXAS-PANAMERICAN
7
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 6
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (10) 21
Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (6) 9
Not trackable 12
Not found 162
Total high school graduates 690
UNITED ISD UNITED SOUTH H S 240903002 LAREDO COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
212
TEXAS A&MINTERNATIONAL UNIV
89
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 10
U. OF TEXAS AT SANANTONIO
8
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (8) 15
Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (6) 8
Not trackable 18
Not found 162
Total high school graduates 522
WEBB CISD BRUNI H S 240904001 LAREDO COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
6
Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (8) 12
112
Hig
h S
chool G
raduate
s' L
ongitudin
al A
naly
sis
- b
y D
istr
ict
Texas P
K-1
6 P
ublic
Education I
nfo
rmation R
esourc
eP
DL-G
R10
24
0903
UN
ITE
D I
SD
: L
AR
ED
OS
ch
oo
l D
istr
ict:
9
:00:5
9A
M3/2
/2011
20
08
-20
09
2007-2
008
2006-2
007
2005-2
006
2004-2
005
2003-2
004
2002-2
003
2001-2
002
2000-2
001
1999-2
000
Gra
duate
s R
ecom
mended a
nd
Advanced H
igh S
chool P
rogra
m
548
25.6
1%
599
31.3
1%
605
34.3
6%
647
39.3
6%
674
43.8
2%
603
35.9
1%
577
40.9
8%
589
43.3
1%
653
49.0
6%
582
47.9
4%
Gra
duate
s D
istinguis
hed
Achie
vem
ent
and A
dvanced H
onors
Pro
gra
m
1,3
85
64.7
2%
1,1
49
60.0
6%
928
52.7
0%
772
46.9
6%
670
43.5
6%
822
48.9
6%
597
42.4
0%
518
38.0
9%
358
26.9
0%
272
22.4
1%
Gra
duate
s M
inim
um
Hig
h S
chool
Pro
gra
m a
nd I
ndiv
idual E
ducation
Pla
n
207
9.6
7%
165
8.6
3%
228
12.9
5%
225
13.6
9%
194
12.6
1%
254
15.1
3%
234
16.6
2%
253
18.6
0%
320
24.0
4%
360
29.6
5%
To
tal N
um
ber
of
Gra
du
ate
s2
,14
01,9
13
1,7
61
1,6
44
1,5
38
1,6
79
1,4
08
1,3
60
1,3
31
1,2
14
Me
tric
sS
ch
oo
l Y
ea
r
19
98
-19
99
1997-1
998
1996-1
997
1995-1
996
1994-1
995
1993-1
994
1992-1
993
1991-1
992
1990-1
991
Gra
duate
s R
ecom
mended a
nd
Advanced H
igh S
chool P
rogra
m
474
42.6
6%
417
37.5
0%
268
27.4
3%
261
30.5
6%
219
28.0
8%
306
43.5
9%
302
39.2
7%
200
38.2
4%
163
35.1
3%
Gra
duate
s D
istinguis
hed
Achie
vem
ent
and A
dvanced H
onors
Pro
gra
m
11
0.9
9%
66
5.9
4%
85
8.7
0%
76
8.9
0%
104
13.3
3%
1
0.1
4%
63
8.1
9%
45
8.6
0%
44
9.4
8%
Gra
duate
s M
inim
um
Hig
h S
chool
Pro
gra
m a
nd I
ndiv
idual E
ducation
Pla
n
626
56.3
5%
629
56.5
6%
624
63.8
7%
517
60.5
4%
457
58.5
9%
395
56.2
7%
404
52.5
4%
278
53.1
5%
257
55.3
9%
To
tal N
um
ber
of
Gra
du
ate
s1
,11
11,1
12
977
854
780
702
769
523
464
Sc
ho
ol Y
ea
rM
etr
ics
Page 1
of
1T
exas E
ducation A
gency
•
Texas H
igher
Education C
oord
inating B
oard
•
tp
eir@
tea.s
tate
.tx.u
s
113
Sou
rce:
LC
C &
TA
MIU
Com
pile
d by
: Gui
danc
e D
ept.
Dat
e: M
arch
28,
201
1
Dua
l Cre
dit E
nglis
h 13
02 a
nd H
isto
ry 1
302
Fall
2010
Sco
res
Bel
ow is
the
brea
kdow
n of
gra
des
for a
ll fo
ur U
ISD
hig
h sc
hool
s co
mbi
ned
for E
nglis
h 13
02.
The
perc
enta
ge o
f stu
dent
s w
ho p
asse
d th
e co
urse
is 9
6%.
Bel
ow is
the
brea
kdow
n of
gra
des
for a
ll fo
ur U
ISD
hig
h sc
hool
s co
mbi
ned
for H
isto
ry 1
302.
The
per
cent
age
of s
tude
nts
who
pas
sed
the
cour
se is
97%
.
Num
ber o
f Stu
dent
s H
isto
ry 1
302
Fall
2010
G
rade
Rec
eive
d Pe
rcen
tage
122
A 23
%
260
B
48%
90
C
17
%
48
D
9%
17
F 3%
53
7 To
tal S
tude
nts
Num
ber o
f Stu
dent
s En
glis
h 13
02 F
all 2
010
Gra
de R
ecei
ved
Perc
enta
ge
159
A 44
%
143
B
39%
43
C
12
%
11
D
3%
9 F
2%
365
Tota
l Stu
dent
s
114
His
tory
130
2En
glis
h 13
01
129
98
216
180
110
123
8260
537
461
Sou
rce:
Hig
h S
choo
l Reg
istra
rsC
ompi
led
by: G
uida
nce
& C
ouns
elin
g D
ept.
HO
US
E B
ILL
I IN
ITIA
TIV
E -
DU
AL
CR
ED
IT E
NR
OLL
ME
NT
2010
/201
1 Col
lege
Alg
ebra
13
14Sc
hool
Engl
ish
1302
Fall
Sem
este
r Enr
ollm
ent
Spr
ing
Sem
este
r Enr
ollm
ent
29
Uni
ted
H.S
.
Uni
ted
Sou
th
Lynd
on B
. Joh
nson
Tota
l Stu
dent
s
Dat
e: M
arch
28,
201
1
Ale
xand
er H
.S.
80 365
72 34 47 182
102
120
63
115
United Partners for Scholars2010-2011
School Name
Number of Recipients
Partners for Scholars Funds
Awarded*UHS 20 20,000.00$
USHS 19 19,000.00$ AHS 18 18,000.00$
LBJHS 31 31,000.00$ District 88 88,000.00$
School Name
Number of Recipients
Partners for Scholars Funds
Awarded*
Number of Students who
have not collected Funds as of
4/14/11UHS 22 22,000.00$ 0
USHS 22 22,000.00$ 1AHS 21 21,000.00$ 1
LBJHS 26 31,000.00$ 4District 96 96,000.00$ 6
United Partners for Scholars2009-2010
School Name
Number of Recipients
Partners for Scholars Funds
Awarded*
Number of Students who
have not collected Funds as of
4/20/10UHS 19 19,000.00$ 0
USHS 22 22,000.00$ 0AHS 13 13,000.00$ 0
LBJHS 26 26,000.00$ 0District 80 80,000.00$ 0
*Amount awarded per student is $1,000.00
United Partners for Scholars2008-2009
Source: UISD Accounting DepartmentAs of April 26, 2011
Compiled by Guidance and Counseling
116
FINE ARTS
117
UIS
D M
S/H
S A
rt E
nrol
lmen
t 2
008-
2009
/ 20
09-2
010
/ 201
0-20
11
6th
Art
08
-09
6th
Art
09
-10
6th
Art
10
-11
7th
Art
08
-09
7th
Art
09
-10
7th
Art
10
-11
8th
Art
08
-09
8th
Art
09
-10
8th
Art
10
-11
UM
S3
228
301
296
184
126
142
101
130
144
USM
S3
195
238
181
186
177
206
166
151
170
SGM
S1
4950
8250
4027
101
7373
GW
MS
333
824
420
70
00
199
262
214
CM
S2
206
188
131
026
7019
021
215
8LO
MS
319
520
925
913
413
711
619
622
017
6TM
S4
363
486
518
00
029
032
726
8G
MS
222
521
519
90
00
189
203
164
LBVM
S1
00
011
710
210
170
103
106
Dis
tric
t22
1799
1931
1873
671
608
662
1502
1681
1473
Art
I 08
-09
Art
1
09-1
0A
rt 1
10
-11
Art
II
08-0
9A
rt II
09
-10
Art
II
10-1
1 A
rt II
I 08
-09
Art
III
09-1
0A
rt II
I 10
-11
AP
Art
08
-09
AP
Art
09
-10
AP
Art
10
-11
UH
S4
360
363
276
213
219
285
2736
440
00
USH
S2
269
252
240
5010
613
10
00
00
0A
HS
338
520
620
783
163
175
160
012
1210
LBJ
225
730
124
064
7650
00
00
00
Dis
tric
t11
1271
1122
963
410
564
641
4336
4412
1210
Cam
pus
Num
ber o
f Te
ache
rs
Mid
dle
Scho
olC
ampu
sN
umbe
r of
Teac
hers
Hig
h Sc
hool
Sou
rce:
Tea
cher
repo
rts to
Fin
e A
rts D
ept.
and
IRIS
As
of: M
arch
22
, 201
1C
ompi
led
by: F
ine
Arts
Dep
artm
en
118
UIS
D M
S/H
S Pe
rfor
man
ce G
roup
s 2
008-
2009
/ 20
09-2
010
/ 201
0-20
11
Cam
pus
Che
er
08-0
9C
heer
09
-10
Che
er
10
-11
Dan
ce D
rill
08-0
9D
ance
Dril
l
09
-10
Dan
ce D
rill
10
-11
Folk
loric
o/Fl
amen
co
08-0
9Fo
lklo
rico/
Flam
enco
09
-10
Folk
loric
o/Fl
amen
co
10-1
1
UH
S34
3532
3945
510
0U
SHS
3028
3040
4034
00
AH
S21
2025
3335
380
0LB
J26
2530
2023
280
0U
MS
2532
2833
3025
00
USM
S18
1925
1321
350
0SG
MS
716
1517
1616
00
GW
MS
3232
2523
2327
00
CM
S16
1716
1218
250
0LO
MS
914
150
00
00
TMS
2624
1829
2535
00
GM
S13
1919
00
254
0B
VMS
2425
190
00
00
Nye
130
2116
1515
00
12C
lark
140
00
00
00
Salin
as22
1818
00
00
0N
ewm
an0
00
00
00
0Tr
autm
ann
200
00
00
00
Pere
z0
00
00
00
0Fi
nle y
00
00
021
00
Hac
har
1410
70
00
00
Gut
ierr
ez21
00
00
00
0R
uiz
00
00
00
00
20D
e Ll
ano
00
00
00
00
140
011
00
00
90
Juar
ez/L
in.
00
00
00
00
Prad
a0
00
00
00
0B
orch
ers
160
160
00
00
Ken
./Za p
.0
00
00
00
030
1716
1619
198
126
2618
21R
oose
vel t
00
00
170
00
Zaffi
rini
340
00
00
1818
23C
uella
r13
1211
00
00
06
Mul
ler
1618
200
00
011
12A
rnd t
00
00
026
00
Gar
cia
190
00
00
00
Cen
teno
00
00
00
00
Mal
akof
f18
200
00
023
028
2224
2017
150
020
22
Kaz
en
CSB
S
Fask
en
Sou
rce:
Tea
cher
repo
rts to
Fin
e A
rts D
ept.
and
IRIS
As
of: M
arch
3, 2
011
Com
pile
d by
Fin
e A
rts D
epar
tmen
t
119
Per
form
ing
Arts
Gro
ups
Texa
s M
usic
Edu
cato
rs A
ssoc
iatio
n (T
ME
A)a
nd U
nive
rsity
Inte
rsch
olas
tic L
eagu
e (U
IL) P
artic
ipat
ion/
Com
petit
ions
Cho
irB
and
Orc
h.C
hoir
Ban
dM
aria
chi
Cho
irB
and
Cho
irB
and
Uni
ted
HS
114
254
4632
1822
212
11
8123
5W
ashi
ngto
n M
S
340
42
258
Trau
tman
n M
S21
141
63
1841
11
3421
0 U
nite
d S
outh
HS
94
1214
71
111
7G
onza
lez
MS
34
29
11
51U
nite
d S
outh
MS
14
745
73
81
19
65A
lexa
nder
HS
18
940
3123
11
89C
lark
MS
33
836
11
115
Uni
ted
MS
22
827
116
71
110
81LB
J H
S86
72
11
275
L. B
runi
Ver
gara
MS
298
71
292
Sal
vado
r Gar
cia
MS
264
0D
NA
DN
A11
Los
Obi
spos
MS
253
21
136
TOTA
LS22
847
236
0246
8716
3918
82
440
110
124
1235
Cho
irB
and
Orc
h.C
hoir
Ban
dM
aria
chi
Cho
irB
and
Cho
irB
and
Uni
ted
HS
9219
349
3449
353
416
11
112
125
6W
ashi
ngto
n M
S
344
22
460
Trau
tman
n M
S23
240
47
1343
11
124
200
Uni
ted
Sou
th H
S
9321
1310
111
11
115
Gon
zale
z M
S
332
131
241
Uni
ted
Sou
th M
S
155
444
71
23
68A
lexa
nder
HS
39
234
438
150
192
11
210
5C
lark
MS
40
01
381
111
6U
nite
d M
S
185
284
2010
52
227
81LB
J H
S10
07
21
22
90L.
Bru
ni V
erga
ra M
S34
27
22
102
Sal
vado
r Gar
cia
MS
283
35
19Lo
s O
bisp
os M
S27
74
22
75TO
TALS
185
518
3730
5310
820
6322
419
447
13
2715
013
28
2009
-201
0
2010
-201
1
Are
a Le
vel
Sta
te L
evel
Vars
ity
Ban
d U
IL
Con
cert
Vars
ity
Ban
d U
IL
Sigh
t R
eadi
ng
Orches-tra
Choir
Cam
pus
Enr
ollm
ent
TME
AU
IL R
atin
gsU
IL 1
st D
iv.
Med
als
Ear
ned
Orches-rta
Choir
Band
Dis
trict
Lev
elR
egio
n Le
vel
Band
Cam
pus
Dis
trict
Lev
elR
egio
n Le
vel
Vars
ity
Ban
d U
IL
Con
cert
Vars
ity
Ban
d U
IL
Sigh
t R
eadi
ng
UIL
Rat
ings
Are
a Le
vel
TME
A
Sta
te L
evel
UIL
1st
Div
. M
edal
s E
arne
d
Orches-tra
Choir
Band
Enr
ollm
ent
Orches-rta
Choir
Band
Sou
rce:
UIL
Form
s.co
m /
TME
A C
onte
st R
esul
ts /
IRIS
Rep
orts
*DN
A =
Did
Not
Atte
ndA
s of
: 5/1
2/11
Com
pile
d by
: Fin
e A
rts D
epar
tmen
t / C
I
120
UIS
D H
S Th
eate
r Enr
ollm
ent
200
8-20
09 /
2009
-201
0 / 2
010-
2011
08
-09
09
-10
10-
11 0
8-09
09-
10
10-1
1 0
8-09
09-
10 1
0-11
UH
S11
275
112
1230
180
00
USH
S11
315
615
00
00
00
0A
HS
6865
700
00
1515
17LB
J0
00
00
00
00
Dis
tric
t29
329
633
212
3018
1515
17
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-
11
UH
S19
2220
USH
S13
1515
AH
S19
1919
LBJ
1615
11U
MS
1314
15U
SMS
1210
15SG
MS
1113
9G
WM
S16
1322
CM
S15
129
LOM
S0
169
TMS
1819
19G
MS
1017
11LB
VMS
010
22D
istr
ict
162
195
196
Part
icip
atio
n M
S / H
S U
IL O
AP
Cam
pus
MS
/ HS
Uni
vers
ity In
ters
chol
astic
Lea
gue
(UIL
) One
Act
Pla
y (O
AP)
20
08-2
009
/ 200
9-20
10 /
2010
-201
1
Cam
pus
The
ater
I T
heat
er II
Thea
tre
Prod
uctio
n I
Sou
rce:
Tea
cher
repo
rts to
Fin
e A
rts D
ept.
and
IRIS
As
of: M
arch
22,
201
0C
ompi
led
b y: F
ine
Arts
Dep
artm
ent
121
Compiled by: Fine Arts Department As of May 13, 2011
United Independent School District
Rhinoceros 3-D Software Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funded
15 Rhinoceros 4.0 (classroom Lab Pack) for the following UISD campuses:
HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUSES (5) MIDDLE SCHOOL CAMPUSES (10)
Population using Rhinoceros 4.0 (classroom Lab Pack)
Middle School art students = 4,008 High School art students = 1,658
Software Description This course is concerned with the visualization and creation of 3-D computer-generated models and their applications in today’s manufacturing, communication, and publishing industries. software. In addition to developing a working knowledge of 3-D terminology and concepts, each student will learn how to create a variety of 3-D geometric models from technical drawings, sketches, real models, and written descriptions. Implementation of Rhinoceros 4.0 in the UISD middle and high school art classes This program is intended to be used as supplemental learning material for art classes. The elements of this software will help students meet mathematics and science requirements. This program does not substitute for an Art I, II, II, IV or AP Art class as it is not a standalone course.
Timeline - January 21, 2011 to February 7, 2011 – Distribution of Rhinoceros Software to the targeted campuses - 1st teacher training to introduce software on February 21, 2011 - 2- day workshop for further training summer 2011 - Full implementation as art class supplemental teaching program for fall of 2011
122
2010 EXTENDED YEAR
PROGRAM
123
Compiled by Program Evaluation Department
State & Federal Mandates & Requirements
• PK-K LEP Mandate
• TAKS Mandate - SSI
• Extended School Year (ESY)
• Migrant Project Matemática
District Initiatives
• Promotion
• TAKS Acceleration
• Credit Recovery (only for students who need credits to graduate in 4 years with cohort)
• Language Academy
• Science Academy
• Put Reading First
• Literacy Ambassadors
• STAR Program
124
Source: 2010 Summer Binder As of August 6, 2010 Compiled by: Program Evaluation Department
2010 EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR OVERVIEW
Elementary Students: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 7:45 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. Elementary Teachers: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 7:45 a.m. – 2:15 p.m. • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT – SATURDAY, MAY 22, 2010 • WORKDAY - SATURDAY, MAY 29, 2010 ************************************************************************************************** Middle School Students: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 8:15 a.m. – 2:30 p.m. Middle School Teachers: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 8:15 a.m. – 2:45 p.m. • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT – SATURDAY, MAY 22, 2010 • WORKDAY - SATURDAY, MAY 29, 2010 ************************************************************************************************** High School Students: June 7th - July 15th/July 16th Monday – Thursday 8:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. High School Teachers: June 7th - July 15th/July 16th Monday – Thursday 8:45 a.m. - 1:15 p.m. • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT – WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2, 2010 • WORKDAY – THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2010
125
Compiled by Program Evaluation Department
UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010
EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR SUMMER PROGRAM
Elementary Students: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 7:45 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Elementary School Sites Finley Elementary housed at *Kazen Elementary
Cuellar Elementary housed at *Killam Elementary
Clark, Newman Elementary housed at *Gutierrez Elementary
Borchers Elementary housed at *Malakoff Elementary
C.S.B.S. Elementary housed at *Nye Elementary
Fasken Elementary housed at *Muller Elementary
Arndt Elementary housed at *Prada Elementary
Centeno Elementary housed at *Roosevelt Elementary
Ruiz Elementary housed at *Salinas Elementary
Trautmann Elementary housed at *Matias De Llano Elementary Juarez-Lincoln, United D. D. Hachar Elementary housed at *Kennedy-Zapata Elementary
B. Garcia Elementary housed at *Zaffirini Elementary
*Perez Elementary
Middle School Students: May 31st – July 1st Monday – Thursday 8:15 a.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Middle School Summer Sites Clark Middle School housed at *United Middle School
Gonzalez Middle School housed at *United South Middle School Los Obispos Middle School housed at *Vergara Middle School
Trautmann Middle School housed at *Washington Middle School *Salvador Garcia Middle
High School Students: June 7th – July 15 or 16th Monday – Thursday 8:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
High School Summer Sites LBJ High School housed at *United South High School
Alexander High School housed at *United High School
S.T.E.P. Academy
*Underlined Campus – Hosting Campus
126
Source: Campus Rosters As of August 6, 2010 Compiled by: Program Evaluation Department
United Independent School District Extended School Year Summer Program
2010 Total Staffing
Elementary: Regular Program Teachers - 363 Resource Teachers - 26 Self-Contained Unit Teachers - 42 Total - 379 Middle School: Regular Program Teachers - 141 Resource Teachers - 20 Self-Contained Unit Teachers - 12 Total - 173 High School: Regular Program Teachers - 46 PLATO Teachers - 4 Self-Contained Unit Teachers - 13 S.T.E.P. Academy - 3 Total - 66 Total Teachers District-Wide- 618
127
201
0 EX
TEN
DED
SC
HO
OL
YEA
R
SUM
MA
RY
OF
DA
ILY
ATT
END
AN
CE
C
AM
PUS
5/31
6/1
6/2
6/3
6/7
6/8
6/9
6/10
6/14
6/15
6/16
6/17
6/21
6/22
6/23
6/24
6/28
6/29
6/30
7/1
AD
A*P
RA
DA
15
620
120
320
419
120
119
219
317
717
917
717
716
918
217
916
914
014
313
213
317
4.9
AR
ND
T14
017
018
217
916
618
216
816
716
716
917
617
215
416
016
316
412
112
112
211
315
7.8
*MA
LAK
OFF
119
145
150
145
128
139
137
134
123
133
135
135
115
128
125
120
110
122
109
8312
6.75
BO
RC
HER
S13
614
513
414
111
312
512
612
811
311
711
711
811
311
511
811
410
810
910
283
118.
75*R
OO
SEVE
LT
198
222
233
220
198
209
215
212
198
209
212
192
194
197
202
208
185
186
176
148
200.
7C
ENTE
NO
206
255
259
230
209
232
237
231
220
227
226
219
209
218
213
218
193
213
214
197
221.
3*G
UTI
ERR
EZ79
104
107
108
9010
397
9589
9396
9781
9893
9286
8491
8293
.25
CLA
RK
86
128
129
132
118
113
116
111
112
107
117
112
111
112
107
106
9097
100
7710
9.05
NEW
MA
N10
212
112
513
011
812
612
011
611
612
112
011
111
210
710
810
691
9091
8511
0.8
*NYE
122
158
159
150
144
143
145
150
134
141
146
140
140
141
144
145
124
133
119
122
140
C.S
.B.S
.10
813
513
813
412
013
413
912
812
412
712
912
512
513
012
513
011
110
910
590
123.
3*K
ILLA
M17
621
420
919
717
719
319
119
019
019
017
218
517
218
118
317
816
116
316
515
218
1.95
CU
ELLA
R10
913
313
513
313
212
913
313
312
512
812
912
112
012
012
312
011
211
510
593
122.
4*M
ULL
ER15
016
916
716
316
016
616
116
915
616
616
416
115
115
916
316
014
815
415
315
315
9.65
FASK
EN16
518
818
417
716
616
917
717
816
417
417
417
315
516
516
316
116
115
915
814
616
7.85
*KA
ZEN
119
142
135
142
121
131
132
133
114
122
119
116
119
116
124
122
110
107
109
103
121.
8FI
NLE
Y13
315
115
715
613
414
315
015
114
414
814
113
412
913
613
813
511
912
411
693
136.
6G
AR
CIA
207
246
245
243
239
239
237
225
228
233
239
235
211
229
230
220
202
209
202
184
225.
15*Z
AFF
IRIN
I21
325
324
523
123
523
823
623
122
522
923
422
421
623
022
822
719
722
020
618
622
5.2
*KEN
NED
Y-ZA
PATA
127
141
158
155
131
143
150
143
130
135
135
131
129
135
137
131
110
121
114
114
133.
5JU
AR
EZ-L
INC
OLN
7010
610
893
8910
495
8989
9493
8585
9189
8978
5379
7787
.8U
NIT
ED D
.D. H
AC
HA
R65
7379
7971
7468
6765
6870
6261
6065
6754
7550
4565
.9*M
ATI
AS
DE
LLA
NO
136
149
152
147
132
143
142
138
129
140
135
132
131
136
137
131
110
118
112
107
132.
85TR
AU
TMA
NN
125
154
156
146
145
150
146
140
136
142
141
142
127
142
136
131
114
114
113
106
135.
3*P
EREZ
262
327
336
313
300
312
302
284
263
287
276
282
252
273
274
280
237
265
266
217
280.
4*S
ALI
NA
S16
718
819
517
816
217
817
616
717
016
917
417
015
016
516
116
815
514
414
813
916
6.2
RU
IZ14
520
020
518
517
918
218
218
617
718
218
717
916
517
517
618
015
515
616
814
817
5.6
TOTA
LS38
2146
1846
8545
1141
6844
0143
7042
8940
7842
3042
3441
3038
9641
0141
0440
7235
8237
0436
2532
76
*Sou
rce
Cam
pus
Rep
orts
128
201
0 EX
TEN
DED
SC
HO
OL
YEA
R
SUM
MA
RY
OF
DA
ILY
ATT
END
AN
CE
C
AM
PUS
5/31
6/1
6/2
6/3
6/7
6/8
6/9
6/10
6/14
6/15
6/16
6/17
6/21
6/22
6/23
6/24
6/28
6/29
6/30
7/1
AD
A*U
NIT
ED M
S12
714
715
212
812
713
013
512
812
013
113
613
312
312
513
212
811
411
496
8412
5.5
CLA
RK
MS
136
151
146
108
9910
294
9910
010
499
9794
9593
9488
9078
6310
1.5
*UN
ITED
SO
UTH
MS
186
194
192
137
139
138
132
145
125
133
134
132
125
120
126
131
119
144
143
150
142.
25G
ON
ZALE
Z M
S13
816
916
712
812
213
813
012
512
213
113
813
612
312
812
912
210
512
112
412
613
1.1
*VER
GA
RA
MS
113
141
144
122
108
119
122
118
110
115
108
104
9791
111
107
102
106
109
130
113.
85LO
S O
BIS
POS
MS
161
179
176
139
127
144
151
145
145
152
145
144
136
137
148
142
138
143
145
159
147.
8*S
.GA
RC
IA M
S12
415
916
312
712
912
712
713
412
013
012
611
811
411
911
712
211
611
290
7512
2.45
*WA
SHIN
GTO
N M
S20
021
520
718
218
318
319
018
217
717
217
216
915
616
516
316
416
017
018
218
217
8.7
TRA
UTM
AN
N M
S17
119
220
514
914
415
414
214
514
614
514
814
312
714
114
314
212
212
914
914
914
9.3
TOTA
LS13
5615
4715
5212
2011
7812
3512
2312
2111
6512
1312
0611
7610
9511
2111
6211
5210
6411
2911
1611
18
CA
MPU
S 5/
316/
16/
26/
36/
76/
86/
96/
106/
146/
156/
166/
176/
216/
226/
236/
246/
286/
296/
307/
1*U
NIT
ED H
IGH
XX
XX
126
166
163
165
173
166
192
189
200
202
206
214
216
191
193
163
*ALE
XAN
DER
HIG
HX
XX
X80
108
107
113
107
108
118
118
124
125
128
131
127
116
107
89*U
NIT
ED S
OU
TH H
IGH
XX
XX
161
169
175
173
165
176
174
167
163
165
161
166
135
155
138
132
LBJ
HIG
HX
XX
X13
514
314
414
212
914
514
613
511
511
111
612
211
011
596
90S.
T.E.
P.1
1011
1114
1712
1412
149
1111
710
109
98
12TO
TALS
110
1111
516
603
601
607
586
609
639
620
613
610
621
643
597
586
542
486
CA
MPU
S 7/
57/
67/
77/
87/
127/
137/
147/
15*U
NIT
ED H
IGH
177
172
148
x14
566
88A
LEXA
ND
ER H
IGH
114
111
102
x10
349
78*U
NIT
ED S
OU
TH H
IGH
115
115
130
x10
730
4660
LBJ
HIG
H82
8995
x69
4228
61TO
TALS
488
487
475
042
418
724
012
1
*Sou
rce
Cam
pus
Rep
orts
129
2010 HIGH SCHOOL CREDITS EARNED
AHS LBJ UHS USHSENGLISH I 2 3ENGLISH II 2 2ENGLISH III 5 1ENGLISH IV 2 4 5 2SPEECH 1 0.5 3.5BIOLOGY 4CHEMISTRY 1 2 6PHYSICS 6 2 1 1HEALTH 0.5 0.5 1IPC 1PSYCHOLOGY 0.5 1.5 1.5W. GEOGRAPHYW. HISTORY 1 1.5 2US HISTORY 1 2 2.5 1GOVERNEMENT 1 0.5 1.5 1.5ECONOMICS 1.5 0.5 1 1PERSONAL FAMILY LIVING 0.5 1 1.5PERSONAL FINANCIAL LITERACY 0.5P.E. 0.5ALGEBRA 1 1.5 1ALGEBRA II 1 4 4GEOMETRY 1 3 3.5PRE-CAL 1BCIS 2.5 3SPANISH I 1 1SPANISH II 1 0.5 5NUTRITIONTOTAL ODYSSEYWARE CREDITS 16.5 31 34 38.5
ODYSSEYWARE
Source: Campus ReportsAs of August 6, 2010
Compiled by: Program Evaluation Department
130
TAKS Results 3rd Administration5th and 8th Grade
2009-2010
5th Grade Reading 445 103 23%8th Grade Reading 276 63 23%
#DIV/0!5th Grade Math 313 96 31%8th Grade Math 409 119 29%
Tested Met Standard Percent Met Standard
Source: District TAKS ResultsAs of August 6, 2010
Compiled by: Program Evaluation Department
131
ELEMENTARY EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAM SURVEY The Staff Development for the summer program in which I participated was helpful 1 2 3 4 5 1 3 41 69 172 0.35% 1.05% 14.34% 24.13% 60.14% Support from your summer school principal was adequate. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 23 42 218 0.35% 0.70% 8.04% 14.69% 76.22% Walkthroughs by your summer school administrator contributed to the improved quality of instruction. 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 32 63 185 1.05% 1.39% 11.15% 21.95% 64.46% The scope & sequence for summer curriculum was adequate. 1 2 3 4 5 5 18 58 54 152 1.74% 6.27% 20.21% 18.82% 52.96% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Put Reading First 1 2 3 4 5 12 8 44 77 134 4.36% 2.91% 16.00% 28.00% 48.73% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Math Activities 1 2 3 4 5 10 4 37 80 145 3.62% 1.45% 13.41% 28.99% 52.54% Your campus learning environment was motivating and conducive to learning. 1 2 3 4 5 0 5 20 63 197 0.00% 1.75% 7.02% 22.11% 69.12% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Reading Activities 1 2 3 4 5 13 4 49 62 145 4.76% 1.47% 17.95% 22.71% 53.11% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your programs: Pre-Kinder Activities 1 2 3 4 5 69 1 12 19 68 40.83% 0.59% 7.10% 11.24% 40.24% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Kinder Activities 1 2 3 4 5 69 3 20 27 56 39.43% 1.71% 11.43% 15.43% 32.00%
132
Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Special Ed. STAR 1 2 3 4 5 74 1 14 22 60 43.27% 0.58% 8.19% 12.87% 35.09% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: SSI TAKS Activities 1 2 3 4 5 59 0 18 33 79 31.22% 0.00% 9.52% 17.46% 41.80% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Science Academy Activities 1 2 3 4 5 8 6 20 43 175 3.17% 2.38% 7.94% 17.06% 69.44% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Language Academy Activities 1 2 3 4 5 77 1 15 23 53 45.56% 0.59% 8.88% 13.61% 31.36% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Literacy Ambassadors Initiative 1 2 3 4 5 39 1 21 42 112 18.14% 0.47% 9.77% 19.53% 52.09% Parents were informed about the summer program through a parent meeting 1 2 3 4 5 20 7 41 52 162 7.09% 2.48% 14.54% 18.44% 57.45% Notification of your summer employment was made in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 34 37 209 0.35% 1.75% 11.89% 12.94% 73.08% Electronic Registrar Online
133
MIDDLE SCHOOL EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAM SURVEY The Staff Development for the summer program in which I participated was helpful 1 2 3 4 5 3 7 28 43 75 Support from your summer school principal was adequate. 1 2 3 4 5 3 7 16 37 93 1.92% 4.49% 10.26% 23.72% 59.62% Walkthroughs by your summer school principal contributed to the improved quality of instruction. 1 2 3 4 5 10 3 27 47 68 6.45% 1.94% 17.42% 30.32% 43.87% The scope & sequence for summer curriculum was adequate. 1 2 3 4 5 2 0 24 52 77 1.29% 0.00% 15.48% 33.55% 49.68% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Put Reading First 1 2 3 4 5 9 4 29 52 51 6.21% 2.76% 20.00% 35.86% 35.17% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Math Activities 1 2 3 4 5 21 2 20 32 52 16.54% 1.57% 15.75% 25.20% 40.94% Your campus learning environment was motivating and conducive to learning. 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 24 39 78 3.27% 4.58% 15.69% 25.49% 50.98% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Reading Activities 1 2 3 4 5 13 2 18 41 49 10.57% 1.63% 14.63% 33.33% 39.84% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Special Ed. STAR 1 2 3 4 5 38 2 12 16 30 38.78% 2.04% 12.24% 16.33% 30.61% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: SSI TAKS Activities 1 2 3 4 5 26 2 18 30 44 21.67% 1.67% 15.00% 25.00% 36.67%
134
Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Language Academy Activities 1 2 3 4 5 41 1 10 17 25 43.62% 1.06% 10.64% 18.09% 26.60% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Science Academy Activities 1 2 3 4 5 21 1 9 23 50 20.19% 0.96% 8.65% 22.12% 48.08% Rate the following student centered activities that are applicable to your program: Literacy Ambassadors Initiative 1 2 3 4 5 29 0 19 18 26 31.52% 0.00% 20.65% 19.57% 28.26% Parents were informed about the summer program through a parent/orientation meeting. 1 2 3 4 5 12 6 35 27 71 7.95% 3.97% 23.18% 17.88% 47.02% Notification of your summer employment was made in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 21 32 97 0.64% 3.21% 13.46% 20.51% 62.18%
135
HIGH SCHOOL EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAM SURVEY Staff Development contributed to my ability to meet my student’s instructional needs. 1 2 3 4 5 1 0 3 6 16 3.85% 0.00% 11.54% 23.08% 61.54% Walkthroughs by your summer school administrator contributed to the improved quality of instruction. 1 2 3 4 5 1 4 2 6 13 3.85% 15.38% 7.69% 23.08% 50.00% Support from your summer school principal was adequate. 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 6 17 0.00% 3.85% 7.69% 23.08% 65.38% Resources were provided in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 0 2 4 5 15 0.00% 7.69% 15.38% 19.23% 57.69% Parents were informed about the summer program through an orientation meeting. 1 2 3 4 5 0 2 5 6 13 0.00% 7.69% 19.23% 23.08% 50.00% Notification of your summer employment was made in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 0 3 3 6 14 0.00% 11.54% 11.54% 23.08% 53.85%
136
Professional Development
137
Professional Development Electronic Registrar Online Summative
State Board for Educator Certification 19 TAC Chapter 32, Subchapters A and B; TAC 153, BB
TEC 21.033, Subchapter H; TEC Sec. 21.451U.I.S.D. Policy DMA Legal
Trainings
2010-2011 2009-2010 2010-2011 2009-2010
1,416 1,610 27,260 38,007
Extended School Year 50 36 940 528
Summer Learning Opportunities 104 77 1,219 816
Special Education Academy 3 3 100 116
New Teacher Orientation 30 36 610 647
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (A.R.R.A.) 274 102 3,549 1,649
Designated Campus-based
Professional Development Days
249 205 12,560 12,805
DesignatedDistrict Level Professional
Development Days 706 1,233 8,282 26,834
Number of Sessions Number of Participants
District Totals
Source: ERO SystemAs of April 8, 2011
Compiled by Professional Development
138
Bui
ldin
g Le
ader
ship
Cap
acity
New
Prin
cipa
l's A
cade
my
NC
LB: P
.L. 1
07-1
10, S
ectio
n 91
01(3
4)
2010
-201
120
09-2
010
2008
-200
920
07-2
008
2006
-200
7 M
ucia
M. F
lore
sC
aryn
Fox
Li
nda
Cas
tillo
M
aria
Elv
a C
ampo
sC
lare
Flo
res
Bor
cher
s E
lem
enta
ryR
uiz
Ele
men
tary
Cla
rk E
lem
enta
ryM
atia
s D
e Ll
ano
Ele
men
tar y
Bon
nie
Gar
cia
Ele
men
tary
Mel
issa
Shi
nnLe
ticia
Gar
cia
Abr
aham
Rod
rigue
zD
inor
ah W
icks
trom
Cue
llar E
lem
enta
ryN
ewm
an E
lem
enta
ryS
alin
as E
lem
enta
ryB
orch
ers
Ele
men
tary
Gilb
erto
Cas
troP
rada
Ele
men
tary
Rau
l Nuñ
oR
ober
ta R
amire
z D
avid
Can
ales
R
ene
Rod
rigue
zS
alva
dor G
arci
a M
iddl
eU
nite
d M
iddl
e U
nite
d M
iddl
eC
lark
Mid
dle
Arm
ando
Sal
azar
Lo
s O
bisp
os M
iddl
eE
duar
do G
arza
S
TEP
Aca
dem
y
Elv
a M
. Mar
tinez
L.
B.J
. Hig
h
Subt
otal
s4
33
34
T
otal
for 2
006-
2011
yea
rs17
Elem
enta
ry
Mid
dle
Hig
h
Sou
rce:
Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Rec
ords
As
of A
pril
08, 2
011
Com
pile
d by
Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t
139
Library Science
140
Curriculum & InstructionDepartment Profile – _Library Science_
Staff Programs & Responsibilities
Students Supported
Staff Supported
I Lead Librarian and 41 librarians
Student Instruction:To promote the integration of curriculum, resources, and teaching strategies to ensure the success of all students as content creators.
41,509 All UISD Students (Grades PreK-12)
Targeted AudienceIncludes: Students (Pre-K-12)
Faculty/Staff Instruction:To provide continual instruction on latest technologies, print/non-print resources, implementation of scope & sequence, and use of equipment
6,177 full-time employees
Targeted Audience:Teaching and support personnel at all 42 campuses
Parent & Community Involvement:Provide information equity by connecting school faculty, staff, and students to community resources and services as appropriate.
Arenas of collaboration include Book/Science Fairs, AR Fairs, etc., e.g. 2 family members per student attending various events equal to 83,018 UISD participants
Targeted Audience:All UISD Community
Accountability System(s): Instructional Resources on Materials, Selection, and Adoption:EFA Legal and LocalInstructional Resources on Library Media Programs:EFBInstructional Resources on Copyrighted Materials:EFE Legal and LocalTexas Education Code 33.021:Texas Library State StandardsLibrary Media Specialists Online HandbookLibrary Media Specialists Online Framework K-12
2010-2011 Budget(s): Each campus appropriates monies according to SBDMLocal, General Operating (199) Each campus varies according to SBDMFederal, ARRA, Title I, (book replacement plan) NOTE: This funding will expire September 2011. Monies spent district-wide on Year 3 Allocation: $535,675.77
141
As of April 8, 2011 Compiled by Library Science Department
United ISD Library Science Department
2010-2011 Highlights
Goal:
As per the School Library Program: Standards and Guidelines for Texas, Standard I, Principle 2.T
The goal is to promote the integration of curriculum, resources, and teaching strategies to ensure the success of all students as the effective creators and users of ideas and information, enabling them to become lifelong learners.
Timeline:
August 2010-May 2011
Elementary Highlights:
Literacy Ambassadors: Students are celebrated for their summer reading achievements Library Family Nights: Friends and family read with their child Author Video Chat: Dan Gutman, Author visit via Web conferencing Book Clubs: Students and library media specialists meet to discuss newest titles Accelerated Reading Celebrations: Students are honored periodically for reading achievements
Middle School Highlights:
Online Book Clubs: Students “meet” via EChalk discussion boards and in real time Podcasting Projects: Students create their own audio reviews of their favorite books VOKIS: Student create avatars on their research projects Book Trailers: Students create their own movie trailer of their favorite books Booky Awards: Students compete in movie trailers competition Teen Read Week: Students participate in various activities highlighting their favorite books
High School Highlights:
Author Web Conferencing: All district high schools participated in an author book discussion via web conferencing
Library Virtual Tours: Students utilize online library virtual tours highlighting library services and resources Author Visit: All district high schools hosted Texas poet laureate Karla Morton to participate in a poetry festival Nationally renowned author Elizabeth Partridge participated in a book discussion with all district high schools Reading Promotions: Library Bucks were given to students for every hour read Online Book Clubs: Students participate by discussing their favorite book via discussion boards with each other
and also with other classes VOKI Projects: Students create their avatars for English classes
142
Library Science Data Collection and Circulation
District Libraries
8/3/10-4/1/11
8/3/09-4/09/10 4/1/2011 4/9/2010
8/3/10-4/1/11 4/9/2010
United High 38,375 35,748 172 162 3,611 3,373Washington Middle 15,790 14,479 178 88 1,250 1,178Trautmann Middle 19,481 18,227 176 142 1,540 1,524Trautmann Elementary 14,024 15,144 21 19 829 826Finley Elementary 12,767 12,508 13 11 561 571Dellano Elementary 11,678 11,704 20 10 654 671Kazen Elementary 11,716 10,546 38 19 550 549Borchers Elementary 9,609 9,178 19 18 638 586Muller Elementary 11,443 10,365 42 40 819 791Malakoff Elementary 13,811 11,661 30 28 940 917Fasken Elementary 13,639 13,574 100 24 1,018 998United South High 22,485 19,735 938 104 2,606 2,575United South Middle 13,261 13,753 154 109 1,311 1,281Gonzalez Middle 15,692 11,632 84 71 1,044 976Salinas Elementary 14,024 10,787 124 41 853 839Ruiz Elementary 14,546 14,978 17 16 907 896Zaffirini Elementary 13,173 11,710 23 19 1,125 1,060Cuellar Elementary 11,959 11,340 32 10 698 687Garcia Elementary 15,026 13,494 42 40 1,047 1,029Killam Elementary 9,901 8,608 39 38 860 869J.B. Alexander High 29,449 27,438 156 109 2,522 2,522United Middle 11,720 10,446 203 150 1,050 1,017Clark Middle 11,815 12,067 208 142 846 883Nye Elementary 11,903 11,729 21 20 875 840Clark Elementary 9,341 9,376 16 15 535 543Newman Elementary 10,059 9,668 34 26 556 528Gutierrez Elementary 13,860 13,438 86 83 676 681Col. Santos Benavides 12,010 11,056 23 20 926 903L. B. Johnson High 18,179 19,054 520 472 2,328 2,179Salvador Garcia Middle 12,764 12,510 87 87 505 506Los Obispos Middle 12,348 12,248 115 104 903 903L.Bruni Middle 11,745 10,364 43 37 750 750Perez Elementary 14,495 13,737 52 83 960 960United DD Elementary 11,380 11,210 27 26 414 414Juarez-Lincoln Elementary 12,260 12,598 106 104 388 388Prada Elementary 13,858 13,720 20 19 802 802Kennedy-Zapata Elementary 13,594 13,491 96 54 579 579Roosevelt Elementary 14,547 14,290 50 18 839 839Arndt Elementary 14,668 12,881 75 73 1,016 1,016Centeno Elementary 16,829 12,810 41 39 879 879
Totals 579,224 543,302 4241 2,690 41,210 40,328
Collection Holdings Electronic Books Current
Enrollment
Source: Destiny Resource Management Solution SystemMIS Current EnrollmentLibrary Media Specialists Campus Records
As of April 08, 2011Compiled by Library Science Department
143
Library Science Data Collection and Circulation
District Libraries
United HighWashington MiddleTrautmann MiddleTrautmann ElementaryFinley ElementaryDellano ElementaryKazen ElementaryBorchers ElementaryMuller ElementaryMalakoff ElementaryFasken ElementaryUnited South HighUnited South MiddleGonzalez MiddleSalinas ElementaryRuiz ElementaryZaffirini ElementaryCuellar ElementaryGarcia ElementaryKillam ElementaryJ.B. Alexander HighUnited MiddleClark MiddleNye ElementaryClark ElementaryNewman ElementaryGutierrez ElementaryCol. Santos BenavidesL. B. Johnson HighSalvador Garcia MiddleLos Obispos MiddleL.Bruni MiddlePerez ElementaryUnited DD ElementaryJuarez-Lincoln ElementaryPrada ElementaryKennedy-Zapata ElementaryRoosevelt ElementaryArndt ElementaryCenteno Elementary
Totals
8/3/10-4/1/11
8/2009-4/9/10
8/3/10-4/1/11 9/09-3/31/10
19,537 17,476 38,001 34,25125,446 24,684 23,936 21,12011,276 11,157 13,776 17,31442,018 52,742 7,344 7,82430,376 30,700 7,405 7,44345,345 54,178 8,841 6,56921,321 27,633 2,132 2,29038,857 45,000 9,000 17,38836,358 30,822 3,579 2,13625,613 29,661 10,455 5,67534,782 38,618 4,175 6,36722,537 14,163 25,847 14,51310,515 11,162 13,444 14,12811,435 11,775 6,220 5,56322,039 27,956 4.899 3,95424,710 28,376 11,693 3,51316,300 13,915 6,802 9,38311,357 17,571 1,548 4,63727,365 28,402 5,540 5,54818,846 17,736 3,705 72914,610 10,200 21,896 13,4299,438 10,554 6,572 11,7086,563 5,023 7,967 8,50179,591 75,384 6,460 11,81022,502 31,263 3,773 3,03833,594 30,126 9,802 1,05031,110 36,674 2,219 3,85739,871 37,947 8,074 17,18814,575 14,414 30,314 13,5039,647 8,584 11,671 3,56514,108 6,264 12,106 6,26114,184 9,820 12,761 9,27520,909 28,263 10,604 5,36818,566 28,586 2,748 3,74744,616 34,568 9,290 5,86412,774 14,743 1,079 2,17811,026 9,749 3,442 1,58026,785 26,884 3,809 3,90811,460 17,313 2,590 4,57618,101 21,098 3,972 6,670950,063 991,184 374,597 327,421
Number of Student Walk-insCirculation
Source: Destiny Resource Management Solution SystemMIS Current EnrollmentLibrary Media Specialists Campus Records
As of April 08, 2011Compiled by Library Science Department
144
Library Science DataRegion I Databases
District Libraries
08/3/10-4/1/11 08/3/09-4/1/10 08/08-03/09 08/3/10-4/1/11 8/3/09-4/1/10 08/08-03/09
United High 52,279 55,270 118,064 3,115 1,124 2,116Washington Middle 115,761 91,553 162,813 1,993 907 3,239Trautmann Middle 65,392 41,504 142,758 3,030 1,492 2,613Trautmann Elementary 187 3,159 4,187 3,801 1,917 3,773Finley Elementary 11,296 8,013 17,134 2,119 991 1,631Dellano Elementary 449 4,843 2,721 1,318 823 1,303Kazen Elementary 4,168 1,720 7,122 2,755 1,167 2,430Borchers Elementary 2,151 4,384 1,471 2,888 1,207 2,349Muller Elementary 587 8,892 7,246 4,099 1,591 2,787Malakoff Elementary 302 242 2,594 3,775 1,826 2,193Fasken Elementary 444 484 2,314 2,801 1,282 2,635United South High 107,622 93,568 236,228 3,719 2,236 3,662United South Middle 11,816 27,261 33,004 4,473 4,673 5,056Gonzalez Middle 22,866 66,869 120,134 2,541 2,246 2,617Salinas Elementary 8,002 890 7,878 3,716 1,757 3,422Ruiz Elementary 791 57 576 3,546 2,148 4,191Zaffirini Elementary 82 23 3,302 7,225 3,637 4,861Cuellar Elementary 35 288 891 3,804 1,804 2,830Garcia Elementary 153 442 1,823 5,476 2,651 3,137Killam Elementary 148 29 98 2,680 1,857 1,959J.B. Alexander High 59,774 64,813 202,677 3,818 1,710 1,634United Middle 5,153 45,344 58,650 3,254 1,615 1,757Clark Middle 6,591 12,059 16,699 2,085 936 1,347Nye Elementary 14,967 294 7,766 3,665 1,866 2,508Clark Elementary 25 211 170 3,160 1,401 2,382Newman Elementary 2,521 12,259 34,534 2,345 883 1,842Gutierrez Elementary 911 1,233 127,589 1,528 675 2,058Col. Santos Benavides 17,251 32,228 31,398 2,837 1,678 2,232L. B. Johnson High 12,924 74,293 154,206 7,489 1,993 3,773Salvador Garcia Middle 38,384 60,657 71,566 2,193 1,761 2,230Los Obispos Middle 844 2,419 13,808 1,525 1,310 1,399L.Bruni Middle 2,429 18,357 5,257 5,500 4,209 3,236Perez Elementary 22,122 20,741 1,900 6,339 2,675 3,504United DD Elementary 1,617 449 4,562 2,161 1,046 1,781Juarez-Lincoln Elementary 888 8,351 12,379 1,938 1,027 1,385Prada Elementary 0 451 4,733 3,188 1,848 2,369Kennedy-Zapata Elem 173 6,237 2,123 3,338 1,439 3,163Roosevelt Elementary 199 1,223 7,879 3,756 2,190 2,622Arndt Elementary 322 164 399 2,017 1,045 2.206Centeno Elementary 199 625 1,523 5,263 1,882 2,144
Totals 591,825 771,899 1,656,176 136,273 70,525 114,376
NetTrekker Searches United Streaming Searches
Source: Region I DatabasesAs of April 08, 2011
Compiled by Library Science Department
145
District Initiative
146
WITTS(Whatever It Takes to Succeed)
District Initiative
Schools 2009‐2010 2010‐2011Bonnie Garcia
Killam Perez Prada Prada
Roosevelt Salinas Zaffirini Clark
Salvador Garcia Salvador Garcia Lamar Bruni Vergara Lamar Bruni Vergara
Los ObisposAntonio Gonzalez United South L.B. Johnson L.B. Johnson United South United South
Best Practice What Works Clearinghouse
Turning Around Chronically Low Performing Schools
Using Student Achievement Data to Support Instructional Decision Making
Professional Classroom Instruction that Works‐ Reading/Resource Research‐Based Strategies for Meeting the Needs of
Tool Strategies for Increasing Student Diverse Learners
Elementary
Middle
High
Source: Campus Intervention Compiled by Campus Intervention
Tool Strategies for Increasing Student Diverse LearnersAchievement Paula Rutherford
Robert Marzano Jane Polluck
Source: Campus Intervention Compiled by Campus Intervention
147
SECONDARY INITIATIVES
148
Teac
her E
xpec
tatio
ns a
nd S
tude
nt A
chie
vem
ent (
TES
A)
10/1
4/10
11/1
8/10
12/9
/10
1/13
/11
2/10
/11
3/24
/11
4/14
/11
Uni
ted
Hig
h Sc
hool
1914
1414
1313
1314
Was
hing
ton
Mid
dle
Scho
ol6
00
00
00
0Tr
autm
an M
iddl
e Sc
hool
109
77
57
88
Uni
ted
Sout
h H
igh
Scho
ol9
97
59
86
9U
nite
d So
uth
Mid
dle
Scho
ol7
66
66
6A
nton
io G
onza
lez
Mid
dle
Scho
ol11
119
89
87
8
Ale
xand
er H
igh
Scho
ol14
99
7U
nite
d M
iddl
e Sc
hool
88
88
88
88
Cla
rk M
iddl
e Sc
hool
90
00
00
00
Lynd
on B
. Joh
nson
Hig
h Sc
hool
810
109
910
810
Salv
ador
Gar
cia
Mid
dle
Scho
ol8
00
00
00
0Lo
s O
bisp
os M
iddl
e Sc
hool
1010
1010
1010
1010
Lam
ar B
runi
Ver
gara
Mid
dle
Scho
ol10
88
58
88
7To
tals
129
9488
7977
7868
74
2010
-201
1 A
ttend
ance
Scho
ol N
umbe
r of
part
icip
ants
20
09-2
010
Source: TESA Trainers Data Sheet
As of 4‐22‐20
11
Compiled by
Secon
dary Edu
catio
n
149
CAMPUS TOTALS
Alexander HS # Students # Credits # Students Started
# Students Completed
# Credits Completed
1/2 Credit Courses 39 54 17 2 11 Credit Courses 21 23 6 1 1
# of Students In Progress AHS - 20 # of Credits In Progress AHS - 15
Total # of Students (non-duplicative) 54 23Total # Credits 50 2
L B Johnson HS # Students # Credits # Students Started
# StudentsCompleted
# Credits Completed
1/2 Credit Courses 145 144 71 70 611 Credit Courses 150 219 107 49 169
# of Students In Progress LBJ - 75 # of Credits In Progress LBJ - 60.5
Total # of Students (non-duplicative) 199 168Total # Credits 291 230
United HS # Students # Credits # Students Started
# StudentsCompleted
# Credits Completed
1/2 Credit Courses 74 98 74 19 111 Credit Courses 119 150 115 52 62
# of Students In Progress UHS - 50 # of Credits In Progress UHS - 58
Total # of Students (non-duplicative) 168 117Total # Credits 199 73
Courses Requested
2010 - 2011OdysseyWare Year in Review Report
Courses Completed
United South HS # Students # Credits # Students Started
# StudentsCompleted
# Credits Completed
1/2 Credit Courses 72 95 58 32 22.51 Credit Courses 85 143 65 30 44
# of Students In Progress USHS - 36 # of Credits In Progress USHS - 28
Total # of Students (non-duplicative) 136 126Total # Credits 191 66.5
STEP Academy # Students # Credits # Students Started
# StudentsCompleted
Credits Completed
1/2 Credit Courses 79 25.51 Credit Courses 19 9
Total # of Students (non-duplicative) 85 85Total # Credits 59 34.5
United ISD OdysseyWare Data for: AHS, LBJHS, UHS, USHS
TOTAL # Students
# Students # Credits # Students # Credits
Total # 1/2 Credit Courses Requested 330 391 220 123 96Total # 1 Credit Courses Requested 375 535 293 132 276
Total # Students Requesting Courses (Non-Dup ) 557 731 434 372
Total # Students IN PROGRESS 181 Total # Credits IN PROGRESS 146.5
TOTAL # Credits Requested 731TOTAL # Credits Completed 372
Data complied as of April 26, 2011
# Courses Requested
TOTAL # Credits Completed
3585 85
Source:OdysseyWare Program, Data Compiled by:Instruction Department Campus Reports
Secondary Instruction DepartmentApril 2011
150
United ISD PSAT Report, 2010‐2011
PSAT Summary:
In the fall of 2010, Cambridge Educational Services partnered with the United School District to provide students with a five‐week PSAT prep program. Students enrolled in the four schools involved in this program (Alexander High School, Lyndon B. Johnson High School, United High School and United South High School) utilized the official PSAT test in October. In the first session of the Cambridge PSAT prep program, students took an official released PSAT pre‐test in order to identify skill gaps and those test sections which were in need of the most review. Cambridge provided both teachers as well as materials to instruct students in learning effective strategies and reviewing the basic skills necessary to improve their performance on the official PSAT. The results of this program, measured using the scores from the Cambridge pre‐test and the official October PSAT test, are extremely positive, especially regarding increases in PSAT scores for those students who attended all five preparation sessions. Even though Cambridge can see areas which need to be improved upon, such as making sure all proper procedures are followed regarding pre and post‐testing, these preliminary results are encouraging. The information detailed in the rest of this report reconciles data from a number of different resources in an easily readable and usable format. Cambridge believes that it is essential to understand the impact of 100% attendance on student score gains. When attendance factors are combined with the test scores, the results correspond to research which has already been conducted concerning successful test prep programs. Those students from the four schools combined who attended all five test preparation sessions had an average score increase which was 3.6 times higher than those of students who attended four or less classes. When taking into account the pre‐test confusion, those schools who followed Cambridge procedures correctly (Lyndon B. Johnson and United South High School), students who attended 100% of the test sessions increased their scores on average 6.6 times more than students who did not attend all of the sessions. Clearly attendance is a significant factor in program success.
151
Official PSAT Scores: (2009‐2010)
Campus Actual PSAT 2009 Scores (Avg) Actual PSAT 2010 Scores (Avg) Percent Increase Alexander HS 140 162 16% LBJ HS 113 120 6% United HS 137 143 4% United South 129 134 5% District 128 143 12%
Official PSAT Scores: (2009‐2010)
Each of the four schools involved in the Cambridge PSAT prep program showed significant gains in their students’ average scores from the 2009 actual PSAT to the 2010 actual PSAT. Students from the entire district that were enrolled in the Cambridge program scored on average 12% higher on the 2010 actual PSAT than those involved in the previous year’s program scored on the 2009 actual PSAT. These gains demonstrate an increase in student motivation and also effective targeting of skill gaps within the student population enrolled in the program.
140
113
137
129 128
162
120
143
134
142
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
Alexander HS LBJ HS United HS United South District
Actual PSAT 2009 Scores Actual PSAT 2010 Scores
152
Average Gains from Pre to Actual PSAT Test: (Based on Attendance, 2010)
Campus Gain with 100% attendance Gain with 0‐80% attendance Attendance Impact Multiplier
Alexander HS 2.9 0.5 5.8x LBJ HS 1.2 0.9 1.3x United HS 4.5 1.0 4.5x United South 7.6 2.1 3.6x District 4.0 1.1 3.6x
Average Gains from Pre to Actual PSAT Test: (Based on Attendance)
Once attendance factors are taken into account, the data demonstrates a clear increase in scores on the part of those who committed to attending all class sessions compared to those who attended four or fewer classes. In the district as a whole, 100% attendees exhibited a four point average increase in their scores compared to a 1.1 point average increase for students who attended 0‐80% of the sessions. Without exception, students in each school who attended all of the test preparation classes increased their scores on average 3.6 times more than students who missed one or more sessions.
0.5 0.9 1
2.1
1.1
2.9
1.2
4.5
7.6
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Alexander HS LBJ HS United HS United South District Average
Gain with 0‐80% attendance Gain with 100% attendance
153
Program Implementation Success According to Cambridge Recommendations
Campus Gain with 100% attendance
Gain with 0‐80% attendance
Average Gains (All)
Attendance Impact Multiplier
AHS & UHS 3.4 1.5 1.4 2.3x LBJ & USHS* 4.6 0.7 2.4 6.6x District 4.0 1.1 1.9 3.6x
*Indicates those schools whose students did not have to retake the pre‐test
Program Implementation Success According to Cambridge Recommendations
After grouping schools together according to whether they implemented proper Cambridge testing procedures or not, the data shows that those schools (Lyndon B. Johnson and United South High School) whose students did not have to retake the pre‐test as a result of confusion of test booklets scored on average one point higher than students who had to retake the pre‐test (Alexander High School and United High School). Furthermore, when the data is divided out based on attendance, it shows that from those schools who followed Cambridge’s recommended procedures, students who attended 100% of the classes showed an average 4.6 point increase in their scores. This increase is 6.6 times higher than those students at the same schools who attended four or fewer sessions.
1.5
0.71.1
3.4
4.6
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AHS & UHS LBJ & USHS District
Gain with 0‐80% attendance Gain with 100% attendance
154
Percent of Students Increasing Their Score from Pre to Actual PSAT Test:
Campus Students with 100% attendance N Students with 0‐80% attendance N Alexander HS 57% 21 45% 49 LBJ HS 56% 16 52% 25 United HS 80% 10 55% 40 United South 79% 19 60% 58 District 72% 66 54% 172 Of the 66 students enrolled in the Cambridge program which attended all class sessions, 72% saw an increase in their scores from the Cambridge pre‐test to the actual 2010 PSAT compared to 54% of students which attended 0‐80% of the classes. Among those students who attended all of the test prep sessions, all four schools individually saw over 50% of their students increase their scores.
Enrollment and Testing:
(2010) Campus Number of Students
Enrolled (2010) Number of Matched Pre and Post
Tested (2010) Percent of Students Pre and
Post Tested (2010) Alexander HS* 129 67 52% LBJ HS 75 43 57% United HS* 143 50 35% United South 96 77 80% District 443 237 54% *Based on Alexander and United High School’s re‐test of the pre‐test
Matched Pre and Post Tested Students: (2009‐2010)
Campus Number of Matched Pre and Post Tested
(2009) Number of Matched Pre and Post Tested
(2010 Cambridge Program) Alexander HS 28 67 LBJ HS 50 43 United HS 52 50 United South 73 77 District 203 237
Over 50% of the students district‐wide who enrolled in the Cambridge program completed both the pre and post‐tests, a total of 237 students. This total is a 17% increase in student completion in comparison to the 2009 program. This data again reinforces the success of Cambridge’s program in increasing student dedication to academic success and college readiness.
155
Future Program Improvement and Considerations: In an effort to ensure greater results in 2011, we would like to make the following suggestions based on our discussions and 20+ years of experience implementing similar programs nationwide: 1) Pre‐test students on Saturday. The 2010 Cambridge and United School District program pre‐tested
students and conducted the first test preparation session on the same day. However, dedicating one day to pre‐testing students and then beginning classes the following Saturday may improve program efficiency. The benefit of this is that Cambridge’s team has ample time to gather and review the data and implement an appropriate course of action based on where the students exhibited strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, student focus and motivation decreases following such a lengthy testing session, making it difficult for students to grasp the concepts and strategies taught in the subsequent lesson.
a. To safeguard the efficiency of the pre‐testing session, Cambridge can provide a pre‐assessment proctor checklist which the program coordinator can utilize to inform the proctors of the appropriate off‐record PSAT form code to use for pre‐testing, preventing future confusion.
b. Proctors will be responsible for ensuring that test booklets with the proper form code are distributed.
c. Cambridge will communicate this information by conference call so that proctors at all four locations can report to the program coordinator that they have received the correct test booklets and are aware of accurate testing procedures before the students arrive for the pre‐assessment.
2) Instructors are a key component to program success. Cambridge appreciates your candid appraisal
of the instructors and test preparation procedures that you observed. a. It is essential to program success that Cambridge provides high quality instructors, and
therefore it is important that any concerns regarding instructors are communicated to the program coordinator and your Cambridge representative immediately. Cambridge is committed to promptly taking into account all evaluations when determining which proctors are appropriate for each program.
b. Programs are additionally encouraged to consider hiring some of their own teachers. In Cambridge’s experience, training teachers to provide their own students with rigorous and efficient test preparation can be an extremely effective method of increasing test scores. There are a few reasons why this method is efficient.
i. Your instructors see their students daily and can consistently provide reminders to students to attend each Saturday session.
ii. Your instructors are familiar with their students and know how to best motivate them to follow instructions and learn the skills and strategies that will help them improve academically and elevate their scores.
Cambridge is committed to promoting communication no matter which instructors are proctoring the program and quality control mechanisms are always in place. Any teacher participating in the program will be evaluated and trained to effectively administer the test preparation sessions.
156
3) Attendance has an impact on higher achievement. As indicated by the data presented as well as
numerous other Cambridge programs, committed attendance is essential for program success. In an effort to further improve attendance so that the program can see greater results next year, Cambridge proposes the following suggestions:
a. Instituting a call system that contacts students’ homes (in English and Spanish) weekly to remind parents and students of an upcoming Saturday session.
b. Rewarding students for attendance and participation, including both presence in class and active involvement, with McDonald gift certificates ($1 to $2 per day attended). These can be distributed each day or following the last class session.
c. Asking students to pay a nominal fee for the program which would be refunded in full if the student exhibited 100% attendance.
d. Celebrating achievement by giving students a pizza party following the final class session. e. Working with students to develop individualized study plans to maximize the benefit of the
program.
Ideas for improving student motivation are limitless and you are not restricted to selecting only one idea. Cambridge desires to partner with the United School District to use these strategies to motivate your students and ensure that they are suitably prepared for the PSAT.
Typically, students who enroll in five Saturday test prep sessions must be committed and have a good understanding of the benefits of such a program. Within the United School District you have identified the top 20% of your students for this program. However, it is often these high achieving students who have a tendency to over commit themselves and it is likely that this contributes to a drop in attendance. It may be helpful to ensure that these high achieving students are not only committed but also physically able to dedicate such a significant amount of time to the program.
Cambridge is committed to supporting the efforts of the United Independent School District to aid your students in improving their academic performance and raising their PSAT/SAT scores. The data confirms that this initial program year was a success; however, Cambridge is confident that even greater gains can be demonstrated next year. Cambridge thanks you again for the opportunity to provide PSAT test preparation programs to your schools in 2010 and hopes that you will consider the suggestions indicated in this summary as ways of enhancing your program and continuing to increase scores. We look forward to our continued partnership with the United Independent School District as we work to continually improve academic performance.
157
Texas Highe
r Ed
ucation Assessm
ent R
esults (T
HEA
)
Scho
ol
20
10-2
011
Num
ber
of
Stud
ents
Te
sted
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Rea
ding
Sco
re
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Rea
ding
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Mat
h Sc
ore
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Mat
h
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Writ
ing
Sco
re
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Writ
ing
Uni
ted
Hig
h S
choo
l61
237
261
%37
361
%44
272
%U
nite
d S
outh
Hig
h S
choo
l28
314
451
%17
160
%18
264
%A
lexa
nder
Hig
h S
choo
l41
927
064
%27
265
%30
473
%Jo
hnso
n H
igh
Sch
ool
301
104
35%
117
39%
149
50%
Uni
ted
Sou
th H
igh
Sch
ool
283
144
51%
171
60%
182
64%
John
son
Hig
h S
choo
l30
110
435
%11
739
%14
950
%
Uni
ted
Hig
h S
choo
l61
237
261
%26
543
%40
366
%A
lexa
nder
Hig
h S
choo
l41
927
064
%20
348
%27
165
%
Scho
ol
20
09-2
010
Num
ber
of
Stud
ents
Te
sted
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Rea
ding
Sco
re
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Rea
ding
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Mat
h Sc
ore
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Mat
h
Num
ber o
f st
uden
ts th
at
met
requ
ired
Writ
ing
Sco
re
Perc
enta
ge
of s
tude
nts
pass
ing
Writ
ing
Uni
ted
Hig
h S
choo
l47
930
463
119
2522
547
Uni
ted
Sou
th H
igh
Sch
ool
316
160
5111
035
185
84
Ale
xand
er H
igh
Sch
ool
408
267
6516
741
250
61
John
son
Hig
h S
choo
l23
286
3769
2995
41
Uni
ted
Sou
th H
igh
Sch
ool
316
160
5111
035
185
84
John
son
Hig
h S
choo
l23
286
3769
2995
41
Uni
ted
Hig
h S
choo
l47
930
463
119
2522
547
Ale
xand
er H
igh
Sch
ool
408
267
6516
741
250
61
Req
uire
d TH
EA
Sta
ndar
d 20
09-2
010
Rea
ding
Mat
hW
ritin
gR
eadi
ngM
ath
Writ
ing
Sta
te23
023
022
0S
tate
230
230
220
LCC
230
230
220
LCC
230
230
220
TAM
IU23
025
024
0TA
MIU
230
250
240
Req
uire
d TH
EA
Sta
ndar
d 20
10-2
011
LCC Re
quirem
ent
TAMIU Req
uiremen
t
State Re
quirem
ent
LCC Re
quirem
ent
TAMIU Req
uiremen
t
State Re
quirem
ent
Source: Evaluation System
s Group
s of Pearson
As of M
ay 20, 201
1 Co
mpiled by: Secon
dary Edu
catio
n
158
United Independent School District
ENROLLMENT MEAN USAGE PER STUDENT MEAN PERFORMANCE
SCHOOL
STUDENTSIN READ
180
STUDENTSWITH A
MINIMUMOF TWO
SRITESTS
DAILY(MINUTES)
SESSIONSPER
WEEK
NUMBEROF
SESSIONS
TOTALTIME
(MINUTES)
NO. OFWEEKS
BETWEENFIRST
AND LASTSRI
NO. OFSRI
ADMINIS-TRATIONS
FIRST SRITEST
LAST SRITEST
SRIGROWTH(LEXILE)
AGMS 145 143 15 1 30 423 41 4 358 409 51
AHS 14 12 15 2 35 528 34 2 602 765 162
CMS 69 66 16 1 39 635 54 4 358 489 130
LBJ 26 23 10 1 14 155 48 3 395 347 (-48)
LBVMS 142 128 15 1 24 346 45 4 310 365 55
LOMS 107 104 13 1 27 367 49 4 349 514 166
SGMS 83 79 15 1 12 191 45 3 327 356 29
STEP 9 3 16 2 14 253 12 1 662 613 (-48)
TMS 55 52 16 1 30 495 49 4 402 553 151
UHSA 31 30 19 2 59 1136 45 3 522 653 131
UMS 49 48 21 1 31 731 44 4 392 490 98
USHS 33 33 20 1 20 398 29 3 417 464 46
USMS 141 133 14 1 23 332 49 4 363 497 134
WMS 89 87 13 1 42 543 48 4 363 426 62
TOTAL 993 941 15 1 28 435 46 4 366 455 90
MANAGEMENT
Results Summary ReportDISTRICT: UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Time Period: 08/24/09 – 05/02/12
Total READ 180 Licenses: 1500
Using This ReportPurpose: Use this report to compare READ 180 usage data with SRI growthresults for schools or classes.
Follow-Up: Run this report at the end of each SRI test window to trackprogress and usage within a school or district.
Printed by: Gloria Gutierrez Printed on: 05/24/11Copyright © Scholastic Inc. All rights reserved. v 1.5
159
ELEMENTARY
INITIATIVES
160
Ele
men
tary
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e 3T
s Te
amin
gPe
rcen
tage
Met
Sta
ndar
d by
Dem
ogra
phic
#%
#%
#%
#%
10/1
8/20
10TE
KS
Tar
gete
d Te
st30
0314
6749
%17
115
9%10
4929
328
%22
2699
245
%11
/29/
2010
Ben
chm
ark
2945
1617
55%
112
2220
%*
**
2301
1162
50%
2/7/
2011
TEK
S T
arge
ted
Test
2937
1414
48%
156
1711
%10
2830
630
%23
1510
4045
%
#%
#%
#%
#%
10/1
8/20
10TE
KS
Tar
gete
d Te
st29
8919
8967
%16
950
30%
1044
476
46%
2228
1426
64%
11/2
9/20
10TE
KS
Tar
gete
d Te
st29
9615
9653
%16
738
23%
**
*23
3511
7750
%1/
4/20
11B
ench
mar
k29
0414
7251
%76
2026
%99
225
626
%22
7310
5246
%
*DM
AC
una
ble
to g
ener
ate
data
.
5th
Gra
de M
ath
5th
Gra
de S
cien
ce
Dat
eM
et S
tand
ard
Met
Sta
ndar
dA
sses
smen
tSt
uden
t C
ount
Met
Sta
ndar
d
Dur
ing
the
2010
-201
1 ac
adem
ic s
choo
l yea
r, th
e 5t
h G
rade
Mat
h an
d Sc
ienc
e te
ache
rs, i
nclu
ding
Spe
cial
Edu
catio
n te
ache
rs a
nd
cam
pus
adm
inis
trat
ors,
met
thro
ugho
ut th
e ye
ar to
revi
ew d
ata
rega
rdin
g st
uden
ts’ a
cade
mic
pro
gres
s on
Dis
tric
t Ben
chm
arks
and
TE
KS
Targ
eted
Tes
ts. C
ampu
s an
d D
istr
ict r
epor
ts in
clud
ed R
esul
ts b
y D
emog
raph
ics,
Item
Ana
lysi
s, a
nd T
AK
S O
bjec
tive
or T
EKS
Mas
tery
Rep
orts
. Dat
a w
as g
ener
ated
thro
ugh
D-M
AC
or b
y C
AS-
GA
S fo
rms
subm
itted
by
cam
pus
adm
inis
trat
ors.
The
se m
eetin
gs
prov
ided
teac
hers
and
adm
inis
trat
ors
the
oppo
rtun
ity to
revi
ew a
nd c
ompa
re c
ampu
s an
d di
stric
t res
ults
and
to c
olla
bora
te w
ith
teac
hers
thro
ugho
ut th
e di
stric
t. Te
stin
g ite
ms
whe
re s
tude
nts
evid
ently
str
uggl
ed a
cros
s th
e di
stric
t wer
e re
view
ed in
det
ail t
o di
scus
s po
ssib
le s
tude
nt m
isco
ncep
tions
and
to s
hare
str
ateg
ies
to in
crea
se s
tude
nts’
com
preh
ensi
on a
nd m
aste
ry in
stu
dent
s ex
pect
atio
ns a
sses
sed.
Econ
omic
ally
D
isad
vant
aged
All
Stud
ents
Stud
ent
Cou
ntSt
uden
t C
ount
Stud
ent
Cou
nt
Dat
e
Spec
ial
Educ
atio
nLE
P
Stud
ent
Cou
nt
Ass
essm
ent
Met
Sta
ndar
d
All
Stud
ents
Spec
ial
Educ
atio
nLE
P
Econ
omic
ally
D
isad
vant
aged
Stud
ent
Cou
ntM
et S
tand
ard
Stud
ent
Cou
ntM
et S
tand
ard
Met
Sta
ndar
d
Met
Sta
ndar
dSt
uden
t C
ount
Source: D
MAC Database
As of April 6, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction Dep
t.
161
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
NYE
25,3
5110
2,61
915
4,94
666
.22
Kin
der
290
2,61
42,
890
90.4
517
11,
561
1,69
492
.14
119
1,05
31,
196
88.0
41s
t Gra
de1,
501
5,61
47,
931
70.7
989
03,
340
4,61
172
.43
611
2,27
43,
320
68.4
92n
d G
rade
2,76
57,
935
13,6
6558
.07
1,76
14,
879
7,26
067
.281
12,
588
5,60
146
.219
346
880
458
.23r
d G
rade
3,79
114
,593
22,4
1265
.11
2,42
410
,141
13,6
0174
.56
1,18
34,
023
7,98
950
.35
128
309
572
54.0
24t
h G
rade
2,55
68,
888
13,9
0963
.91,
961
6,95
810
,446
66.6
424
1,41
12,
505
56.3
215
747
886
655
.19
5th
Gra
de14
,448
62,9
7594
,139
66.9
8,22
839
,107
55,1
4570
.91
3,45
913
,900
22,7
1061
.22,
710
9,84
516
,027
61.4
2C
LAR
K7,
021
29,1
3145
,386
64.1
8K
inde
r1s
t Gra
de25
101
139
72.6
625
101
139
72.6
62n
d G
rade
424
2,38
44,
386
54.3
536
42,
120
3,90
054
.35
6026
448
654
.32
3rd
Gra
de85
03,
305
4,81
068
.71
712
2,77
03,
823
72.4
597
418
771
54.2
137
111
196
56.6
34t
h G
rade
652
3,67
55,
761
63.7
948
02,
947
4,37
567
.36
168
717
1,36
452
.56
411
2250
5th
Gra
de5,
070
19,6
6630
,290
64.9
33,
743
13,6
6020
,747
65.8
457
42,
796
4,13
267
.66
744
3,20
25,
383
59.4
8SA
LIN
AS
57,3
6524
4,74
934
3,17
371
.31
Kin
der
296
1,37
51,
802
76.3
235
944
1,30
872
.17
6143
149
487
.24
1st G
rade
3,07
416
,919
26,2
1164
.55
1,72
58,
468
13,0
8764
.71,
349
8,45
113
,124
64.3
92n
d G
rade
18,7
5064
,022
91,1
0470
.27
14,2
9950
,518
68,8
1873
.43,
689
10,9
4318
,827
58.1
274
72,
414
3,25
174
.25
3rd
Gra
de17
,271
87,0
5011
8,44
173
.514
,264
73,0
5497
,223
75.1
41,
790
7,42
811
,945
62.1
81,
125
6,32
18,
800
71.8
24t
h G
rade
7,56
128
,445
39,8
9871
.29
6,05
723
,912
31,3
5976
.25
1,43
94,
404
8,27
353
.23
6112
224
749
.39
5th
Gra
de10
,413
46,9
3865
,717
71.4
25,
032
24,9
3133
,066
75.3
92,
335
8,10
413
,501
60.0
22,
967
13,6
6718
,705
73.0
6N
EWM
AN
49,8
3731
8,83
546
4,87
068
.58
Kin
der
4136
441
887
.08
330
3196
.77
3833
438
786
.31s
t Gra
de3,
063
23,2
0835
,304
65.7
486
46,
271
9,79
064
.05
2,19
916
,937
25,5
1466
.38
2nd
Gra
de9,
351
44,2
4569
,700
63.4
85,
944
28,2
0041
,588
67.8
3,31
615
,602
27,4
3956
.86
9144
367
365
.82
3rd
Gra
de13
,616
91,2
7813
4,08
668
.07
9,45
763
,423
89,2
0671
.09
3,80
924
,372
39,6
9561
.39
271
2,82
14,
156
67.8
74t
h G
rade
9,61
572
,599
101,
036
71.8
56,
359
44,8
0358
,678
76.3
52,
481
21,8
1932
,844
66.4
369
75,
079
8,11
262
.61
5th
Gra
de14
,151
87,1
4112
4,32
670
.09
5,55
328
,077
39,1
4971
.71
2,26
812
,961
19,5
1766
.46,
310
45,9
4065
,415
70.2
2TR
AU
TMA
NN
12,5
1432
,664
50,1
0365
.19
Kin
der
3778
139
56.1
137
7813
956
.11
1st G
rade
1,14
73,
346
5,37
662
.24
908
2,36
23,
781
62.4
723
998
41,
595
61.6
92n
d G
rade
3,57
37,
923
13,0
3560
.78
2,73
45,
696
9,15
862
.19
699
1,80
73,
191
56.6
214
042
068
661
.22
3rd
Gra
de2,
323
7,93
611
,303
70.2
11,
958
6,60
69,
188
71.8
936
51,
330
2,11
562
.88
4th
Gra
de1,
100
3,90
45,
941
65.7
166
92,
737
4,17
465
.57
427
1,16
51,
763
66.0
84
24
50
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
162
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
5th
Gra
de4,
334
9,47
714
,309
66.2
32,
018
4,58
06,
646
68.9
152
71,
414
2,18
764
.65
1,78
93,
483
5,47
663
.6PE
REZ
112,
283
362,
765
516,
663
70.2
1K
inde
r4,
022
12,0
5117
,843
67.5
41,
958
5,25
78,
160
64.4
22,
064
6,79
49,
683
70.1
61s
t Gra
de15
,739
40,6
7458
,264
69.8
112
,917
33,4
5646
,567
71.8
42,
822
7,21
811
,697
61.7
2nd
Gra
de15
,568
42,3
8963
,088
67.1
912
,412
36,9
8851
,694
71.5
52,
759
4,54
19,
871
4639
285
31,
507
56.6
3rd
Gra
de30
,085
117,
404
164,
757
71.2
623
,795
97,7
5013
1,34
574
.42
6,06
819
,068
32,2
7359
.08
161
403
765
52.6
74t
h G
rade
29,6
5396
,899
136,
770
70.8
519
,163
64,0
1584
,856
75.4
39,
686
30,2
0547
,587
63.4
764
82,
066
3,33
861
.89
5th
Gra
de17
,216
53,3
4875
,941
70.2
510
,716
36,1
1748
,681
74.1
92,
344
5,72
59,
576
59.7
84,
134
11,4
6517
,596
65.1
5FI
NLE
Y35
,051
133,
278
188,
157
70.8
3K
inde
r1,
428
6,44
49,
875
65.2
61,
167
5,30
28,
121
65.2
826
11,
142
1,75
465
.11s
t Gra
de5,
077
17,5
9225
,644
68.6
3,57
111
,909
17,2
5769
1,50
25,
674
8,37
167
.78
49
1656
.25
2nd
Gra
de7,
158
25,5
9935
,545
72.0
25,
796
21,1
3627
,730
76.2
21,
312
4,39
67,
668
57.3
223
5285
61.1
73r
d G
rade
5,51
223
,356
33,9
2668
.84
3,58
415
,770
20,7
0676
.16
1,66
26,
514
11,5
1256
.58
226
938
1,42
565
.82
4th
Gra
de8,
795
33,3
1845
,830
72.7
6,46
725
,537
32,8
2977
.78
2,19
47,
261
12,2
0159
.51
120
462
722
63.9
85t
h G
rade
7,08
126
,969
37,3
3772
.23
4,08
815
,752
20,0
9678
.38
1,48
26,
021
9,44
263
.76
1,50
35,
188
7,77
166
.76
U.D
.D.H
AC
HA
R45
,592
183,
766
245,
735
74.7
8K
inde
r13
7112
656
.35
747
7067
.14
624
5642
.85
1st G
rade
283
1,84
62,
439
75.6
922
21,
486
1,85
180
.28
6136
058
861
.22
2nd
Gra
de8,
715
17,8
3324
,510
72.7
67,
798
16,1
4321
,494
75.1
416
784
1,65
347
.42
501
906
1,36
366
.47
3rd
Gra
de10
,738
29,5
4341
,815
70.6
58,
820
23,0
6331
,455
73.3
21,
803
6,15
29,
772
62.9
511
132
657
756
.49
4th
Gra
de2,
629
12,6
3817
,373
72.7
51,
369
6,40
28,
398
76.2
319
31,
011
1,75
757
.54
1,06
75,
225
7,21
872
.38
5th
Gra
de23
,214
121,
835
159,
472
76.4
11,4
4960
,314
78,7
0276
.63
248
1,15
81,
943
59.5
911
,495
60,3
0678
,722
76.6
GU
TIER
REZ
26,6
8413
1,69
716
7,30
578
.71
Kin
der
1963
9963
.64
1859
9363
.44
14
666
.66
1st G
rade
310
1,93
42,
599
74.4
196
548
622
88.1
214
1,38
61,
977
70.1
2nd
Gra
de13
,133
66,7
3076
,949
86.7
211
,151
61,1
6268
,225
89.6
41,
617
4,41
17,
130
61.8
636
51,
157
1,59
472
.58
3rd
Gra
de1,
270
5,07
17,
727
65.6
31,
118
4,81
17,
131
67.4
612
721
650
143
.11
2341
8846
.59
4th
Gra
de3,
616
17,6
6625
,537
69.1
82,
959
15,3
3521
,141
72.5
364
62,
305
4,33
753
.14
919
4245
.23
5th
Gra
de8,
336
40,2
3354
,394
73.9
77,
418
36,5
3148
,643
75.1
666
2,76
64,
480
61.7
424
891
01,
234
73.7
4R
UIZ
37,2
9619
9,18
627
6,50
872
.03
Kin
der
4116
819
486
.639
155
181
85.6
32
1313
100
1st G
rade
596
4,32
65,
217
82.9
244
23,
194
3,82
383
.54
153
1,13
11,
390
81.3
61
14
252n
d G
rade
606
2,61
14,
601
56.7
530
31,
657
2,14
677
.21
282
908
2,39
637
.89
2146
5977
.96
3rd
Gra
de12
,710
65,5
1293
,576
70.0
110
,620
53,3
7773
,588
72.5
31,
781
10,8
2517
,662
61.2
829
71,
236
2,19
756
.25
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
163
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
4th
Gra
de9,
118
50,7
9270
,166
72.3
96,
752
37,6
7250
,195
75.0
52,
219
12,4
8118
,903
66.0
214
063
21,
039
60.8
25t
h G
rade
14,2
2575
,777
102,
754
73.7
57,
871
43,5
5657
,751
75.4
22,
390
12,9
8118
,564
69.9
23,
890
18,9
6025
,935
73.1
DE
LLA
NO
12,3
6382
,111
112,
396
73.0
5K
inde
r19
116
171
67.8
414
102
153
66.6
65
1418
77.7
71s
t Gra
de38
11,
660
2,15
577
.03
266
1,06
11,
380
76.8
811
559
977
577
.29
2nd
Gra
de1,
231
3,48
05,
190
67.0
584
02,
429
3,33
472
.85
387
1,03
91,
841
56.4
33
1012
83.3
33r
d G
rade
2,68
217
,504
24,1
7172
.42
2,26
015
,439
20,8
6174
369
1,89
53,
040
62.3
350
148
240
61.6
64t
h G
rade
3,34
419
,919
26,6
0374
.88
3,23
819
,266
25,6
9274
.98
100
600
827
72.5
53
3350
665t
h G
rade
4,70
639
,432
54,1
0672
.88
2,87
023
,975
31,5
5675
.97
545
5,10
77,
231
70.6
21,
225
9,82
514
,609
67.2
5K
AZE
N43
,684
189,
494
266,
742
71.0
4K
inde
r40
105
163
64.4
26
1226
46.1
534
9313
767
.88
1st G
rade
1,28
23,
212
5,09
463
.05
843
2,08
83,
122
66.8
843
91,
124
1,97
256
.99
2nd
Gra
de6,
440
17,5
5024
,345
72.0
95,
090
14,5
7019
,162
76.0
31,
080
2,46
74,
224
58.4
270
513
959
53.4
93r
d G
rade
14,5
7669
,080
98,3
1870
.26
10,7
8152
,263
71,2
2073
.38
2,66
911
,953
19,0
1262
.87
769
3,15
15,
284
59.6
34t
h G
rade
10,7
6644
,700
66,2
3667
.49
9,38
037
,935
55,0
4368
.91
1,21
66,
156
10,0
1461
.47
161
595
1,13
652
.37
5th
Gra
de10
,580
54,8
4772
,586
75.5
68,
703
44,5
8558
,923
75.6
632
61,
555
2,26
168
.77
1,55
08,
706
11,3
9776
.38
JUA
REZ
-LIN
CO
LN5,
891
61,7
9889
,175
69.2
9K
inde
r1s
t Gra
de2,
293
25,4
4435
,435
71.8
2nd
Gra
de1,
017
9,03
415
,562
58.0
570
159
252
63.0
994
78,
875
15,3
1057
.96
3rd
Gra
de46
46,
705
8,72
576
.85
47
2231
.81
460
6,69
88,
703
76.9
64t
h G
rade
931
10,4
4014
,945
69.8
628
210
283
74.2
836
9,49
213
,770
68.9
367
738
892
82.7
35t
h G
rade
1,18
610
,175
14,5
0870
.13
9265
91,
047
62.9
496
99,
113
12,8
2971
.03
125
403
632
63.7
6PR
AD
A25
,014
102,
732
143,
567
71.5
5K
inde
r3
2122
95.4
53
2122
95.4
51s
t Gra
de47
261
330
79.0
918
101
120
84.1
629
160
210
76.1
92n
d G
rade
185
1,01
91,
372
74.2
711
864
981
779
.43
6134
851
467
.76
2241
53.6
53r
d G
rade
8,83
837
,370
51,3
8872
.72
6,93
131
,767
41,9
8575
.66
1,81
25,
398
8,98
260
.09
8820
240
450
4th
Gra
de6,
457
23,4
2031
,428
74.5
25,
233
19,9
4625
,795
77.3
21,
156
3,26
55,
305
61.5
467
208
326
63.8
5th
Gra
de9,
484
40,6
4159
,027
68.8
54,
450
20,9
3428
,425
73.6
41,
918
6,80
811
,309
60.1
93,
115
12,8
9719
,287
66.8
6B
OR
CH
ERS
23,3
2510
0,97
613
8,85
072
.72
Kin
der
378
2,24
34,
105
54.6
425
71,
653
2,99
455
.21
121
590
1,11
153
.11s
t Gra
de13
2844
63.6
41
59
55.5
512
2335
65.7
12n
d G
rade
1,21
25,
497
7,48
573
.44
905
4,61
45,
969
77.2
928
581
81,
397
58.5
522
6511
954
.62
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
164
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
3rd
Gra
de6,
057
27,2
8036
,175
75.4
14,
753
22,1
5328
,301
78.2
71,
115
4,36
86,
702
65.1
718
975
91,
172
64.7
64t
h G
rade
2,87
39,
338
14,6
5163
.74
1,66
76,
098
8,71
269
.99
1,19
03,
180
5,83
054
.54
1452
9455
.31
5th
Gra
de12
,792
56,5
9076
,390
74.0
87,
160
29,7
4238
,899
76.4
51,
708
7,77
811
,300
68.8
33,
776
18,6
7725
,322
73.7
5K
ENN
EDY-
ZAPA
TA33
,061
87,9
9113
4,17
765
.57
Kin
der
294
3,52
05,
314
66.2
428
83,
500
5,28
966
.17
620
2580
1st G
rade
1,85
39,
852
13,9
5270
.61
1,59
28,
946
12,6
1470
.92
248
885
1,29
868
.18
1321
4052
.52n
d G
rade
5,17
611
,319
19,7
3657
.35
1,67
64,
554
6,35
871
.62
3,19
56,
126
12,1
4550
.44
305
639
1,23
351
.82
3rd
Gra
de5,
507
14,1
7322
,375
63.3
41,
581
5,28
37,
002
75.4
43,
799
8,64
214
,876
58.0
912
022
445
549
.23
4th
Gra
de7,
197
16,2
9525
,332
64.3
34,
409
11,5
9716
,298
71.1
52,
440
3,95
57,
792
50.7
532
272
61,
169
62.1
5th
Gra
de13
,034
32,8
3247
,468
69.1
73,
012
8,58
611
,467
74.8
795
02,
069
3,75
655
.08
9,06
622
,174
32,2
3668
.78
CO
L.SA
NTO
S40
,285
240,
351
315,
273
76.2
3K
inde
r56
386
431
89.5
645
289
332
87.0
411
9799
97.9
71s
t Gra
de58
52,
805
3,97
970
.542
01,
788
2,47
972
.12
165
1,01
71,
500
67.8
2nd
Gra
de5,
005
20,9
3527
,223
76.9
3,81
616
,169
20,2
7679
.74
845
3,44
25,
018
68.5
934
41,
324
1,92
968
.63
3rd
Gra
de7,
709
39,5
5052
,424
75.4
46,
454
34,4
0144
,334
77.5
973
52,
979
5,01
659
.38
469
1,96
22,
763
714t
h G
rade
21,9
5514
3,97
018
6,05
977
.38
15,1
1810
0,76
712
5,58
980
.23
6,82
043
,167
60,3
9771
.47
1426
5547
.27
5th
Gra
de4,
975
32,7
0545
,157
72.4
31,
141
5,80
57,
718
75.2
12,
100
13,8
2318
,688
73.9
676
96,
521
9,04
772
.07
RO
OSE
VELT
53,0
2017
8,44
425
7,11
269
.4K
inde
r64
358
441
81.1
849
280
338
82.8
415
7810
375
.72
1st G
rade
7,34
231
,309
44,5
2970
.31
3,85
414
,367
20,9
9368
.43
3,48
816
,942
23,5
3671
.98
2nd
Gra
de12
,533
28,3
4349
,796
56.9
27,
679
19,2
6229
,790
64.6
53,
721
7,65
316
,292
46.9
71,
125
1,42
83,
698
38.6
13r
d G
rade
17,0
1165
,007
86,7
3174
.95
14,9
4558
,370
76,2
6376
.53
1,83
06,
095
9,53
963
.89
209
491
785
62.5
44t
h G
rade
8,15
126
,873
37,8
8770
.93
6,93
923
,247
31,1
8974
.53
1,17
73,
522
6,49
854
.224
6211
454
.38
5th
Gra
de7,
919
26,5
5437
,728
70.3
85,
531
19,1
3926
,035
73.5
152
11,
971
2,99
765
.76
1,85
85,
407
8,62
462
.69
ZAFF
IRIN
I34
,036
159,
247
213,
919
74.4
4K
inde
r1
11
100
11
110
01s
t Gra
de56
425
499
85.1
755
421
489
86.0
91
410
402n
d G
rade
6238
052
672
.24
3924
434
271
.34
1050
6675
.75
1386
118
72.8
83r
d G
rade
6,74
129
,278
38,0
1877
.01
6,19
026
,631
33,8
0878
.77
502
2,22
23,
660
60.7
148
424
548
77.3
74t
h G
rade
15,4
7470
,737
93,2
2175
.88
11,8
9255
,744
70,7
3278
.81
3,49
914
,864
22,2
1766
.935
6914
846
.62
5th
Gra
de11
,702
58,4
2681
,654
71.5
54,
941
22,9
9630
,524
75.3
31,
413
5,92
19,
602
61.6
65,
343
29,5
0541
,512
71.0
7C
UEL
LAR
32,4
7713
3,98
719
8,83
167
.39
Kin
der
211
1110
01
11
100
110
1010
01s
t Gra
de73
32,
704
4,22
963
.94
6328
736
778
.267
02,
417
3,86
262
.58
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
165
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
2nd
Gra
de5,
253
23,2
7736
,792
63.2
74,
058
18,3
4727
,784
66.0
384
83,
328
6,35
052
.434
71,
602
2,65
860
.27
3rd
Gra
de9,
263
42,3
0660
,930
69.4
37,
350
32,5
4145
,748
71.1
31,
662
8,79
713
,663
64.3
820
584
31,
275
66.1
14t
h G
rade
9,84
735
,068
48,5
6672
.21
8,45
830
,603
41,3
1474
.07
1,10
73,
554
5,67
262
.65
279
911
1,57
557
.84
5th
Gra
de7,
379
30,6
2148
,303
63.3
93,
900
15,1
1322
,856
66.1
257
12,
589
4,47
157
.92,
907
12,9
1720
,971
61.5
9M
ULL
ER31
,495
134,
981
193,
408
69.7
9K
inde
r12
8310
083
965
7784
.41
318
2378
.26
1st G
rade
433
2,64
14,
111
64.2
431
22,
084
3,29
363
.28
121
557
818
68.0
92n
d G
rade
11,2
9446
,060
68,0
6867
.67
8,64
137
,527
52,1
2871
.99
2,58
58,
255
15,5
0053
.25
6625
139
164
.19
3rd
Gra
de11
,930
47,4
9567
,444
70.4
29,
433
38,6
2652
,447
73.6
42,
372
8,36
414
,387
58.1
311
648
557
284
.79
4th
Gra
de5,
937
23,5
9033
,731
69.9
44,
223
17,0
8923
,397
73.0
31,
702
6,45
710
,262
62.9
212
4472
61.1
15t
h G
rade
1,88
915
,112
19,9
5475
.73
923
6,48
18,
645
74.9
684
18,
024
10,2
0278
.65
100
509
916
55.5
6A
RN
DT
2,39
19,
467
14,9
0063
.53
Kin
der
137
379
562
67.4
313
737
956
267
.43
1st G
rade
2398
171
57.3
120
9515
660
.89
33
1520
2nd
Gra
de20
662
61,
129
55.4
516
451
486
859
.21
4111
226
043
.07
10
10
3rd
Gra
de1,
538
6,07
49,
054
67.0
989
33,
969
5,22
475
.97
633
2,06
13,
750
54.9
69
3969
56.5
24t
h G
rade
7327
438
371
.54
3714
219
273
.95
3613
219
169
.15t
h G
rade
414
2,01
63,
601
55.9
827
71,
316
2,39
654
.92
1790
189
47.6
112
061
01,
016
60.0
3B
ON
NIE
GA
RC
IA37
,233
176,
545
237,
692
74.2
7K
inde
r6
3647
76.6
427
3479
.41
29
1369
.23
1st G
rade
355
1,58
82,
625
60.5
302
1,27
72,
064
61.8
753
311
561
55.4
32n
d G
rade
6,97
532
,433
50,8
7263
.75
6,35
130
,230
46,3
8965
.16
457
1,73
13,
404
50.8
516
647
21,
078
43.7
83r
d G
rade
8,07
041
,489
56,8
2473
.01
7,51
839
,478
52,9
0574
.62
295
1,15
02,
129
54.0
119
568
31,
384
49.3
44t
h G
rade
7,62
136
,366
45,4
4880
.02
7,28
934
,839
42,8
5881
.28
258
1,23
52,
060
59.9
564
274
482
56.8
45t
h G
rade
14,2
0664
,633
81,8
7678
.94
12,7
0957
,624
70,7
8281
.41
768
3,73
35,
892
63.3
568
43,
060
4,79
863
.77
CEN
TEN
O21
,492
50,0
2776
,535
65.3
6K
inde
r7
2635
74.2
87
2635
74.2
81s
t Gra
de1
11
100
11
110
02n
d G
rade
741
5377
.36
741
5377
.35
3rd
Gra
de10
,364
24,7
6736
,957
67.0
27,
487
20,1
6227
,988
72.0
32,
729
4,29
48,
340
51.4
813
729
259
349
.24
4th
Gra
de8,
799
19,8
5630
,104
65.9
65,
330
14,0
2119
,961
70.2
43,
416
5,76
59,
961
57.8
751
6717
737
.85
5th
Gra
de2,
314
5,33
69,
385
56.8
665
91,
569
2,58
260
.76
319
790
1,40
156
.38
1,33
62,
977
5,40
255
.1M
ALA
KO
FF16
,206
72,6
9510
9,72
266
.25
Kin
der
4522
628
778
.75
1614
017
878
.65
2986
109
78.8
9
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
166
Stu
dy Is
land
Usa
ge a
nd P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
t20
10-2
011
CA
MPU
SSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
% C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Sess
ions
Cor
rect
Tota
l%
C
orre
ctSe
ssio
nsC
orre
ctTo
tal
%
Cor
rect
Ove
rall
Mat
hR
eadi
ngSc
ienc
e
1st G
rade
199
932
1,18
078
.98
6260
565
692
.22
137
327
524
62.4
2nd
Gra
de1,
237
4,15
66,
056
68.6
395
13,
176
4,47
670
.95
173
707
1,15
561
.21
113
273
425
64.2
33r
d G
rade
3,90
017
,369
26,2
6966
.12
3,79
116
,937
25,6
5266
.02
9134
448
171
.51
1777
118
65.2
54t
h G
rade
4,74
422
,968
34,1
8267
.19
4,44
621
,771
31,8
7368
.323
493
91,
876
50.0
560
257
425
60.4
75t
h G
rade
6,08
127
,044
41,7
4864
.78
4,40
619
,003
28,8
1265
.95
706
3,54
85,
356
66.2
495
94,
460
7,51
159
.37
FASK
EN19
,013
64,7
6889
,042
72.7
3K
inde
r9
4160
68.3
37
3043
69.7
62
1117
64.7
1st G
rade
112
531
703
75.5
399
449
607
73.9
713
8296
85.4
12n
d G
rade
4,76
517
,826
26,1
4368
.19
2,45
99,
826
13,2
5874
.11
2,01
26,
647
10,8
5661
.22
294
1,35
32,
029
66.6
83r
d G
rade
8,71
925
,276
33,1
2976
.37,
653
22,0
2028
,696
76.7
371
22,
138
2,93
172
.94
325
948
1,29
173
.43
4th
Gra
de4,
647
17,2
9723
,692
73.0
13,
834
13,9
2418
,432
75.5
473
33,
151
4,90
164
.29
5217
626
965
.42
5th
Gra
de76
13,
797
5,31
571
.44
583
2,99
74,
121
72.7
254
227
370
61.3
512
457
382
469
.53
KIL
LAM
29,8
9514
8,31
721
6,95
868
.36
Kin
der
508
2,45
63,
982
61.6
828
81,
504
2,33
164
.52
220
952
1,65
157
.66
1st G
rade
1,22
78,
384
12,7
1465
.94
3519
527
471
.16
1,19
28,
189
12,4
4065
.82
2nd
Gra
de2,
287
13,6
1619
,701
69.1
153
23,
077
4,09
275
.19
1,72
210
,367
15,3
7067
.44
3317
223
971
.96
3rd
Gra
de9,
293
38,1
8457
,909
65.9
45,
874
27,4
5738
,531
71.2
53,
278
10,3
4118
,598
55.6
131
362
734
49.3
14t
h G
rade
3,01
617
,476
25,8
9767
.48
1,85
810
,788
15,2
4070
.78
1,13
96,
631
10,5
6262
.78
1757
9361
.29
5th
Gra
de13
,564
68,2
0196
,755
70.4
95,
259
26,2
6237
,284
70.4
33,
212
17,9
4927
,496
65.2
75,
083
23,9
7531
,915
75.1
2
Source: Study
Island
As of M
ay 10, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Elemen
tary Instruction
167
Instructional A
ccou
ntability Program
/Dep
artm
ent P
ublications
Guida
nce an
d Co
unselin
g
•Suicide
/Hom
icideInterven
tionPlan
Section 504
•UISDDyslexiaPo
liciesandProced
ures
Manual
Bilin
gual
Source: Instructio
nal A
ccou
ntability Dep
artm
ents
As of M
ay 23, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Instructional A
ccou
ntability
•Suicide
/Hom
icide Interven
tion Plan
•High Scho
ol Cou
rse Catalog
•Dual Credit G
uide
•Distin
guishe
d Achievemen
t Program
Guide
•Gradu
ation Re
quirem
ents
•UISD Dyslexia Po
licies and Proced
ures M
anual
•UISD Sectio
n 504 Po
licies and Proced
ures M
anual
•Brochures.‐Section 50
4/Dyslexia Program
Awaren
ess for E
ducators and
Paren
ts
(Available in English and Spanish).
•Informational O
verview on UISD
Bilingual/ESL Program
•UISD Bilingual/ESL Handb
ook
•UISD DUAL Program Guide
•ESL
InstructionalPlanfortheMiddleScho
ol•H
igh Scho
ol Registrar’s Handb
ook
•Middle Scho
ol Registrar’s Handb
ook
•Implem
entin
g the Pe
rson
al Gradu
ation Plan
(PGP) DMAC
•UISD Local Cou
rse Alignm
ent P
lan
•Guidance and Co
unseling Program
•ESL Instructional Plan for the Middle Scho
ol•ESL Instructional Plan for the High Scho
ol•LPA
C‐Process for Ide
ntifying Limite
d English
Proficient Stude
nts
•EDP Training
on Ch
anges
•IRIS Training: Excel and
Creating Labe
lsg
g•D
ating Violen
ce Safety Plan
Guide
•Suicide
Source: Instructio
nal A
ccou
ntability Dep
artm
ents
As of M
ay 23, 201
1Co
mpiled by
Instructional A
ccou
ntability
168
