Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

31
Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University

Transcript of Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Page 1: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Abnormal Mammogram

Marion C.W. Henry, MD

Yale University

Page 2: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Ms. Young

Ms. Young is a 43 yr-old woman who presents to your clinic with an abnormal mammogram noted on routine screening examination.

Page 3: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

History

What other aspects of the history of present illness do you want to know?

Make a list of at least three pertinent questions.

Page 4: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

History, Ms. Young

Characterization of symptoms

Temporal sequence Alleviating /

Exacerbating factors:

Pertinent PMH, ROS, MEDS.

Relevant family hx. Associated signs and

symptoms

Consider the Following

Page 5: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

History, Ms. Young Consider the following:

Characterization of Symptoms: Does she have any symptoms at

all?

Temporal sequence: Has she ever had a mammogram

before?

Alleviating / Exacerbating factors: Are there any?

Associated signs/symptoms: Any hx of mass, pain, nipple discharge

or skin changes?

Pertinent PMH: age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, any previous breast biopsies and results? Hx of hormone therapy?

Relevant Family Hx: does cancer run in her family? Any 1st degree relatives with breast cancer? Ovarian cancer?

Page 6: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Physical Examination

What specific aspects of the physical exam would you look for?

Page 7: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Physical Examination, Ms. Young

Vital Signs: BP=136/80, HR=79, RR=14, T=98.3 Appearance: Slightly overweight, well-appearing Relevant problem-focused exam findings

HEENT: anicteric sclera, no lymphadenopathy

Genital-rectal: no masses, normal tone

Chest: clear bilaterally, good air movement

Neuromuscular: grossly normal

CV: Rhythm regular, no murmur Skin/Soft Tissue:

Breasts: symmetrical ,no masses, no nipple discharge, no skin changes, no axillary adenopathy,

Abd: soft, non-tender, no hepatosplenomegaly,

Remaining Examination findings non-contributory

Page 8: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Studies

Screening Mammogram• Standard 2 view- CC and MLO

Diagnostic Mammogram• Spot compression views • Oblique or extra views based on location of

abnormality

Page 9: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Mammography

Can you describe 3 mammographic findings that raise concern?

Page 10: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Mammographic Abnormalities

1. Mass

2. Microcalcifications

3. Asymmetric Density

Page 11: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Breast Mass MLO views

Page 12: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Breast Mass CC views

Page 13: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Asymmetric Density

Page 14: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Microcalcifications Mag View

Page 15: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Spiculated Mass Mag View

Page 16: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Mass with Microcalcifications

Page 17: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Pleomorphic Calcifications

Page 18: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Mammogram Review:BIRAD classification

BIRAD 0: cannot be classified at present time without additional views

BIRAD I: Absolutely normal BIRAD II: Radiologic abnormality but definitely benign (eg.

Vascular calcification, calcified fibroadenoma) BIRAD III: Abnormality with low chance for malignancy (eg.

New solid lesion without marked abnormality in margin or small cluster calcification without pleomorphism)

BIRAD IV: abnormal mammogram with about 40% malignancy rate (eg. Clustered microcalcifications with pleomorphism or mass with irregular margin)

BIRAD V: markedly abnormal mammogram with expected rate of malignancy about 80% (eg. Abnormal lesion with irregular spiculated margin and microcalcifications within lesion)

Page 19: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Studies – Results

How will you manage a patient with an abnormal mammogram and a nonpalpable lesion based on each BIRAD Classification ?

Page 20: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Studies – Results

• BIRAD II: yearly surveillance mammogram

• BIRAD III: stereotactic biopsy or mammogram at 6 months

• BIRAD IV: stereotactic or needle-localized biopsy

• BIRAD V: needle-localized lumpectomy

Page 21: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Ms. Young – BIRAD III abnormality. Repeat mammogram in 6 months has minor changes.

What now?

Stereotactic core needle biopsy with marker clip placement

Mammogram specimen to see areas of microcalcification and match to original mammogram

Page 22: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Pathology

Your final pathology report shows presence of atypical ductal hyperplasia. What do you tell your patient?

Next steps?

Page 23: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia ADH

Her relative risk of breast cancer has increased by 3 times

If she does not develop breast cancer in the next 8 to 10 years, then her risk returns to normal

Page 24: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Pathology, Scenario 2

Her breast biopsy shows DCIS, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

What next?

Page 25: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Scenario 2, cont

Needle – localized excisional biopsy also shows ductal carcinoma in situ with tumor-free margins – now what do you advise your patient?

Page 26: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ

2 factors determine your management: size and pathologic type (commedeo or papillary/cribiform type)

If papillary/cribiform and less than 1 cm – only excision with free margin is adequate

If commedeo type, or greater than 1 cm, or palpable – lumpectomy and radiation or total mastectomy

Page 27: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

What is the expected outcome?

Following total mastectomy for in situ carcinoma, 99% of patients are cured, less than 1% have axillary node mets

Following lumpectomy and radiation, there will be 12% recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. 6% will be in situ recurrence and will be cured with total mastectomy. 6% will be invasive.

Page 28: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Pathology, Scenario 3

The pathology from the biopsy comes back as lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) – how do you manage the patient?

Page 29: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Lobular Carcinoma In Situ

Lobular carcinoma in situ is not a pre-malignant disease

Observe patient closely, ↑↑ risk for invasive CA

Anti-estrogen therapy may be beneficial

Recommend prophylactic bilateral mastectomy ONLY is patient is carrier for mutated BRCA I or BRCA II gene or has extremely strong family history of breast cancer among multiple first degree relatives

Page 30: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

QUESTIONS ??????

Page 31: Abnormal Mammogram Marion C.W. Henry, MD Yale University.

Acknowledgment The preceding educational materials were made available through the

ASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATIONASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATION

In order to improve our educational materials wewelcome your comments/ suggestions at:

[email protected]