A1TACHMENTA [Attachment A consists of 6 pages] Director Mobile: 0457542462 E-mail:...
Transcript of A1TACHMENTA [Attachment A consists of 6 pages] Director Mobile: 0457542462 E-mail:...
John Tarasiuk
From: Scott Donoghue <[email protected] >
Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2014 12:19 PM
To: John Tarasiuk
Subject: FW: privacy screens - Google Search
Attachments: 66.13_SEAVIEW RD CANOPY_PA01A.PDF; ShopDrawings.pdf
John, Please find attached the amended fenceplans in answer to the questions raised by the development panel.
You will see that:
• The cut —out section reflects exactly what exists today on the old fence.
• The new fence measures 3 metres high (as per the prior submission)
• The fence height is taken from the lowest point i.e. the flats side.
• The ratio between the aluminium screening and masonry has changed to reflect the change from the measurement point (the masonry is meant to reflect the height of the existing brush fence as seen from my side of the properties. The screening is meant to reflect the additional height to the existing fence
• The shop drawing attachment reflects the spec of the aluminium screen. This can be viewed in conjunction with the sample pictures previously supplied.
I trust that this satisfactorily answers ALL of the questions raised by the Development Panel?
Please advise the process from here i.e. when will this be presented to the Panel and what is the process of approval
from there.
Thanks for your assistance.
Kind regards
Scott Donoghue Operations Director
Mobile: 0457542462
E-mail: [email protected]
GRUNDFOS Pumps Pty. Ltd. 515 South Road, Regency Park AU-SOlO South Aus(ralia Australia Phone: (+61)8 8461 4611 www.grundfos.com.au
From: Donnie Terminello [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2014 8:58 AM To: Scott Donoghue Subject: RE: privacy screens - Google Search
Hi Scott,
Please find attached amended plans to submit to council.
Regards, Donnie Terminello DIRECTOR
Urban Glass & Aluminium Pty Ltd Domel Constructions Pty Ltd Unit 8, 65 Stephens Avenue, TORRENSVILLE, 5031 T. 08 8443 8849 I F. 08 8443 8411 donnieurbanqIass.com .au www.urbanglass.com.au
urbaN T V ci ( domel This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this transmission in
error, please notify the sender at the e-mail address above.
CS.1
Qu1Certf,.d
Aufl44.00
From: Scott Donoghue [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Friday, 12 September 2014 10:34 AM To: Donnie Terminello Subject: FW: privacy screens - Google Search
From: John Tarasiuk [mailto :[email protected] .ciov.au] Sent: Friday, 12 September 2014 10:27 AM To: Scott Donoghue. Subject: RE: privacy screens - Google Search
Thanks Mate
John Tarasiuk Development Officer - Planning Planning & Development
72 Woodville Rd, Woodville 5011
1: (08) 8408 1293 F: (08) 8408 1122 www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au
From: Scott Donoghue [mailto :sdonoghue©grundfos.com ] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 10:27 AM To: John Tarasiuk Cc: Donnie TermineHo Subject: RE: privacy screens - Google Search
Hi John,
Scott Donoghue GRUNDFOS Pumps Pty. Ltd. Operations Director 515 South Road, Regency Park
AU-5010 South Australia
Mobile: 0457542462 Australia Phone: (+61)8 8461 4611 www.grundfos.com.au
E-mail: sdonoghueQrundfos.com
Go Green - Think before you print.
This initiative forms part of our environmental plan - Towards One Planet Living: Greening the Western Suburbs.
Warning - This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, subject to
legal or other professional privilege, or protected by copyright. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender by
reply email and delete this email from your system. You are not permitted to use, reproduce or disclose the contents of this
email. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the sole responsibility
of the recipient. Thank you.
Go Green - Think before you print.
This initiative forms part of our environmental plan - Towards One Planet Living: Greening the Western Suburbs.
Warning - This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, subject to
legal or other professional privilege, or protected by copyright. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender by
reply email and delete this email from your system. You are not permitted to use, reproduce or disclose the contents of this
email. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the sole responsibility
of the recipient. Thank you.
)
1200H Rendered block wall
Llt4 ' CNA ON
Uj -
(I)
FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY
SITE PLAN SCALE 1:200
SITEWORKS, DRAINAGE AND LEVELS ARE TO BE AS PER ENGINEERING DESIGN AND DOCUMENTATION.
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: BESSER BLOCK WALL ON BOUNDARY
ALUMINIUM PRIVACY SCREEN
PAINTED ACRYLIC RENDER WHERE SHOWN
800H Aluminium Sun Shade above
800H Aluminium Sun Shade above
2200H Rendered reinforced Besser block wall
FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1:100
2200H Rendered reinforced Besser block wall
SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1:100
PROJECT
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
413c SEAVIEW ROAD, HENLEY BEACH
CLIENT
DOMEL HOMES
D,aw,o Oat.
A.A 19/06/13
S.W. Copytlgflt
AS SPECIFIED NO Sb.00 So
66.2013 PAUl OF 01
© Plans, specifications, other technical drawings or content provided as part of this report may be protected by Copyright laws and should not be reproduced other
than for the purpose of consideration of the Development Application.
90mm
DETAIL / McArthur 101.6mm Centre Pocket Frame ELEVATION
Centre Pocket Frame
U r 6 aN glass and aluminium
Quots lids:
Quote Munt: - - Ver 1
QaWmer:
Drevdn: Dute: 18/09/2014
L
© Plans, specifications, other technical drawings or content provided as part of this report may be protected by Copyright laws and should not be reproduced other
than for the purpose of consideration of the Development Application.
Development Plan Provisions - Consolidated 16 May 2013 Land Use
Desired Character Statement - Western Edge Policy Area 17
This policy area will be characterised by a wide range of housing types at medium densities. The seaside Complies character will be enhanced by new development in the area, through appropriate design, including interesting roof forms and parapets, building articulation, use of light colours and coloured materials, appropriate
landscaping and location of vehicle garaging. Buildings that exceed two storeys in height and present plain box- like built forms and limited detailing are generally inappropriate, although 3 storey buildings may be acceptable in very limited circumstances.
Development of a quality built form and landscaping will enhance the appearance of the Seaview Road frontage of sites that face the coast. It is important that the area is not dominated by buildings and other
structures that are built with no setback from the Seaview Road frontage.
Building setbacks along Military Road shall allow sufficient space to provide attractive garden landscaping that can enhance the existing streetscape character.
Vehicle access to sites will not interfere with the growth and retention of existing Norfolk Island Pines within the adjacent verge of the public road reserve.
Western Edge Policy Area 17
01 Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area. Complies PDC 1 Development should not be undertaken unless it is consistent with the desired character for the policy area. Complies Residential Zone
PDC 1 The following forms of development are envisaged in the zone: Complies • Domestic outbuilding in association with a dwelling
• Domestic structure
• Dwelling
• Dwelling addition
• Small scale non-residential uses that serve the local community, for example: a Child care facilities
PDC - Principle Development Control 0 - Objective
o Health and welfare services o Open space o Primary and secondary schools o Recreation areas
o Shops, offices or consulting rooms
Supported accommodation
Visual Appearance/Built Form
General Section - Design and Appearance 01 Development of a high architectural standard that responds to and reinforces positive aspects of the local Complies
environment and built form PDC 3 Development should have regard to the following design elements in the context of the desired character of Complies
the locality:
setbacks from boundaries
height
bulk and scale
external materials, patterns, textures and colours
ground-floor height above natural ground level roof form and pitch
verandas, eaves and signage
driveway crossovers, fence style and alignment streetscape.
Overshadowing
General Section - Residential Development PDC 7 The design and location of buildings should ensure that direct winter sunlight is available to adjacent dwellings, Complies
with particular consideration given to:
windows of habitable rooms, particularly living areas ground-level private open space
upper-level private balconies that provide the primary open space area for any dwelling
PDC - Principle Development Control 0 - Objective
(d) access to solar energy. PDC 9 Development should ensure that ground-level open space of existing buildings receives direct sunlight for a Complies
minimum of two hours between 9.00am and 3.00pm on 21 June to at least the smaller of the following: half of this space
35 square metres of this space (with at least one of the area's dimensions measuring 2.5 metres).
In cases where overshadowing already exceeds these requirements, development must not increase the overshadowed area by more than 20 per cent.
Visual Privacy
General Section - Residential Development PDC 32 Direct overlooking into habitable room windows and onto the useable private open spaces of other dwellings Complies - Refer to body of
from windows, especially from upper-level habitable rooms and external balconies, terraces and decks, should report for further discussion be minimised through the adoption of one or more of the following:
building layout
location and design of windows and balconies screening devices
landscaping
adequate separation.
Landscaping, Fences and Walls General Section - Landscaping, Fences and Walls PDC 4 Fences and walls, including retaining walls, should: Complies
not result in damage to neighbouring trees
be compatible with the associated development and with existing predominant, attractive fences and walls in the locality
enable some visibility of buildings from and to the street to enhance safety and allow casual surveillance
incorporate articulation or other detailing where there is a large expanse of wall facing the street; assist in highlighting building entrances
be sited and limited in height, to ensure adequate sight lines for motorists and pedestrians especially on corner sites
PDC - Principle Development Control 0 - Objective
in the case of side and rear boundaries, be of sufficient height to maintain privacy and/or security
without adversely affecting the visual amenity or access to sunlight of adjoining land be constructed of non-flammable materials
be incorporated as part of the development where the established character of the locality involves front fences.
4 PDC - Principle Development Control 0 - Objective
Site Photos - 413C Esplanade, Henley Beach
Photo taken in front of entry of 10/415 Esplanade
Photo taken in front of entn of IO/ i 5 5anade
I
Photo taken in front of 1/ 15 Lsp•Lnade on left hand side of balcony
Photo taken front in front of 413C Esplanade
TO: Development Assessment Panel
FROM: Manager Planning and Development
DATE: 3 September 2014
HENLEY WARD
ITEM 3.49 413C ESPLANADE HENLEY BEACH SA 5022
Applicant Mr D Terminello
Development Application No 252/1393/13
Proposal Masonry and aluminium slatted fence with a combined
height of up to 3m located on the northern boundary
Owner of land M r S L Donoghue, Mrs K L Donoghue
Zone Residential Zone
(Western Edge Policy Area 17)
Form of assessment Merit
Public notification category Consent Category 3 Public Notice
Representations 5 representation received, 2 to be heard
Representors to be Heard
Ms Lorraine J Harker - 10/415 Seaview Road, HENLEY BEACH
Mr David Sea rles - 1/415 Henley Beach Road,
HENLEY BEACH
The owners, MrS L Donoghue, Mrs K L Donoghue, will
speak in support of the proposal.
Agency consultations Nil
Author John Tarasiuk - Development Officer - Senior Planner
Attachments Development Plan provisions table
Application documents
C. Representations/Applicants response
d. Notification map
Development Plan 16 May 2013
Recommendation Approval with Condition
Report
Background
An existing timber slatted screen measuring approximately 3m in height was located
forward of the building structure (see image below). The screen has since been removed by
the current owner. Whilst the structure was erected by the previous owner, there is no
record of the structure having been approved by Council. As details of this structure are
unclear, it cannot be determined if the previous structure required Development Approval
under the Act.
i4
41
S
Proposal
The application seeks approval to construct a fence of 5.3m in length located on the
northern boundary between the dwelling and Esplanade beach frontage. The fence
measures 1.2m in height for a length of 1.6m and 3m for a length of 3.68m. It is to be
constructed of rendered besser block up to 1.8m in height with a 1.2m high aluminium sun
shade above.
The fence is proposed by the owner to act as a screen to minimise the impact of overlooking
from the adjoining three storey residential units to the north.
Site/Locality
The site has an area of approximately 350m 2 with 7.6m frontage to Seaview Road. The site
slopes down from the Seaview Road to the Esplanade by approximately 2.5m and contains
one half of an existing two storey semi-detached dwellings.
The locality is predominantly residential and comprises a mix of dwelling types and
densities. The adjoining site to the north contains a three storey apartment building
comprising 15 units. The adjoining site to the south is the other half of the two storey semi-
detached dwellings.
The beach is located directly to the west of the site and abuts a public reserve and shared
use pathway.
3
Site and Locality Plan
I
AP
ley
Subject Site shown in blue and Locality in red
Further photos of the subject site and adjoining site can be found throughout the body of
this report.
4
Summary of Representations and Applicants Response
Representations
The proposal underwent the Category 3 Public Notification process from which the following
representations were received:
Representors to be heard
Ms Lorraine J Harker - 10/415 Seaview Road, HENLEY BEACH SA 5022
Mr David Sea ries - 1/415 Henley Beach Road, HENLEY BEACH SA 5022
Representors Not to be Heard
Mr Barry M Carmichael - 6/415 Seaview Road, HENLEY BEACH SA 5022 Mr Ezio Bordon - 8/415 Seaview Road, HENLEY BEACH SA 5022
Mr Philip W Hayes - 36 East Terrace, HENLEY BEACH SA 5022
Category 3 public notification provides representors with a right of appeal to the
Environment Resources and Development Court should they be aggrieved by the decision of
Council.
Copies of the representations and the applicant's response are attached (Attachment Q.
The following is a summary of the representations and the applicant's response.
Representors issue Applicant's response
Current fence is attractive and does not No Response received by the applicant need replacing
Proposed fence is of a lesser quality and No Response received by the applicant unsightly
Fence will block views of the sea and beach No Response received by the applicant
Fence is too high and will dominate the No Response received by the applicant
common property.
Will block sea breezes leading to increase in No Response received by the applicant
temperatures around the building
Officer's response
Whilst the representors have raised several issues, the assessment predominantly focuses
on the visual impact and loss of amenity as a result of the height of the fence. Whilst the
notion of the fence blocking sea breezes has been raised, this cannot be considered in the
body of the report as this is does not relate to Development Plan Policy.
The structural condition of the existing fence is an issue to be discussed between the
neighbours and is a civil issue.
5
Development Assessment
The proposal is neither a complying nor non-complying form of development and must be
considered on its merits against the relevant provisions of the Development Plan. The
Development Act 1993 provides that a Planning Authority is to have regard to the relevant
provisions of the Development Plan in assessing development proposals.
Attachment A contains a comprehensive list of all Development Plan provisions considered
relevant to the proposal. A comprehensive assessment against the relevant provisions of
the Development Plan has been undertaken within Attachment A. Where compliance with
a particular Development Plan provision requires further discussion, it has been outlined in further detail below.
Desired Character & Land Use
The proposed fence does not seek to change the nature of the proposed residential land use
and will preserve the seaside character of the locality.
It is considered that the proposed fence is consistent with the desired character of the
locality and does not change the land use on the site.
Visual ApDearance/Built Form
The proposed fence measures 5.3m in length and is located on the northern boundary
between the dwelling and Esplanade beach frontage. The fence measuring between 1.2m to
3m in height is to be constructed of rendered besser block up to 1.8m in height with a 1.2m
high aluminium slats above.
Landscaping, Fences and Walls Principle of Development Control 4 requires fences to be
compatible with the associated development and with existing attractive fences in the
locality. Whilst the rendered besser block and slatted aluminium structure is of a different
material to that of the remaining brush boundary fence, it will be consistent with the
materials of the associated dwelling. The fence is considered to be designed with materials
that will be attractive and will not significantly reduce the visual appearance of the existing
fence. Furthermore, due to their combustible nature, brush fences are no longer considered
to be an acceptable fencing material within 3m of a residential dwelling.
Landscaping, Fences and Walls Principle of Development Control 4 requires side boundary
fences to be of a sufficient height to maintain privacy and/or security, without adversely
affecting the visual amenity or access to sunlight of adjoining land. The height of the fence is
significantly higher than that of a standard 1.8m - 2.1m high boundary fence, however it is
required to minimise the impact of overlooking from the adjoining residential units.
The primary concerns raised by the representors are with the loss of the sea and beach
views as a result of the height of the structure. Whilst, it is acknowledged that partial views
of the beach and sea may be lost from some of the ground floor units, these views are
enjoyed as a result of a current low boundary fence. The Development Regulations 1993
allow for fences to a height of 2.1m without requiring the approval of Council, which would
significantly minimise the current views enjoyed by the adjoining residents. Whilst a portion
of the fence will to be increased in height to 3m, the front section of the fence will remain at
the current approximate height of 1.2m. The proposed fence will still allow for substantial
beach and ocean views to be enjoyed from the adjoining owner's property. The minor
reduction of beach and sea views are not considered to have an adverse impact on the
amenity of the adjoining occupants as reasonable views will still be maintained. It should be
noted that the current Development Plan has no reference to the protection of ocean views
over private land.
The visual impact of the structure is minimised through the use of high quality building
materials which comprising rendered masonry and aluminium slatted screen above. The
aluminium slats will minimise overlooking on the subject site whilst still allowing for partial
views through the screen.
The height of the fence is not considered excessive to its staggered height and is not
considered to have an unreasonable bulk and scale impact given the reasonable separation
distance to the adjoining units due to the location of their driveway adjacent to the shared
boundary. It should be also recognised that the current Development Plan would enable a
structure of up to 3m in height to be built along the boundary for a distance of 8m in length
starting from the setback of adjoining structures. Therefore this assessment in affect is
focusing on the impact of the height forward of the adjoining building line.
Given the generous spatial separation between the fence and the adjoining building with the
location abutting the common driveway and parking area, the built form is considered
acceptable.
Site Photo. Mock-up indicatHg approxrnate heght and impact of proposed fence
iFA
Overshadowing
The proposed fence is located on the northern side of the subject site which is south of the
adjoining property and will therefore only have minimum overshadowing impacts to the
subject land.
Overlooking
The owner is proposing the fence to minimise the overlooking from the residents of the
adjoining unit development.
Residential Development Principle of Development Control 32 requires direct overlooking
into habitable room windows and onto the useable private open spaces of other dwellings
from windows, especially from upper-level habitable rooms and external balconies, terraces
and decks, to be minimised.
Whilst the Development Plan seeks to minimise overlooking from upper level windows, the
adjoining multi-storey apartment building was constructed prior to the proposed dwelling
having been constructed. Furthermore, the yard located fronting the Esplanade is not
necessarily considered to be 'private'. Whilst the minimising of overlooking is not a
requirement of the Development Plan in this instance, the owners desire to reduce
overlooking from the adjoining units is considered acceptable.
Site Photo: Looking north from the subject site
.LI
Site Photo: Taken from the second level of the adjoining units
Conclusion
This application has been assessed against the Charles Sturt Development Plan dated 13
May 2013.
The height of the fence is not considered excessive and is not considered to have an
unreasonable bulk and scale impact given the reasonable separation distance to the
adjoining units. Whilst partial views of the beach and sea will be obscured, the design and
location of the fence will still allow for substantial views to be enjoyed by the joining
residential units.
It is therefore considered that the proposed fence is acceptable and has sufficient merit to
warrant support.
Recommendation
Reason for Decision
The Panel has read and considered the report prepared by the Development Officer -
Senior Planner dated 3 September 2014 and agrees with the assessment outlined in
that report.
That pursuant to Section 35 (2) of the Development Act, 1993, the proposal is not
seriously at variance with the relevant provisions of the Charles Sturt (City)
Development Plan consolidated 13 May 2013.
C. That pursuant to Section 33 of the Development Act, 1993, Development Application
Number 252/1393/14 be GRANTED Development Plan Consent subject to the
following conditions:
Develop in accordance with the approved plans
That the proposal shall be developed in accordance with the details and approved
plans stamped by Council except where varied by the conditions herein and shall be
completed prior to occupation of the proposed development.
Reason: To ensure the development proceeds in an orderly manner.
Finish of Fence
The northern side of the fence shall be rendered to the satisfaction of Council.
Reason: To ensure the development proceeds in an orderly manner.
Notes
This consent does not give you authorisation to commence the abovementioned work
until your plans which are currently with Council have been assessed for Building
Rules consent. Once these plans have been assessed you will be issued with a final
Development Approval.
Before proceeding with this proposal, you are required to seek Building Rules Consent
pursuant to the provisions of the Development Act, 1993.
You are advised that under the Fences Act you are legally required to give notice for
the removal of a fence on the common boundary. Please refer to the Fences Act for
the correct procedural requirements.
To ensure your development can now proceed without unnecessary delays please ensure the matters outlined below are properly managed.
The following information outlines your obligations in relation to appropriately managing
noise, dust and works effecting adjoining land (both private and public).
Driveway Crossovers . If you are relocating an existing driveway crossover you must remove and reinstate the
old crossover to match the existing kerb profile, footpath and verge. You will require a
permit to work on Council land to construct your new driveway crossover which must
be constructed to Council specification. Please contact Council on 8408 1111 or refer
to our website http://www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=7&c=4118 for
relevant specifications.
Council Verges
10
. Please take every precaution necessary to avoid damage to the landscaping and
infrastructure present on Council verges, as you will be required to make good
damage to Council property.
Common boundary
When removing fences that are on the common boundary with your neighbour you
must give your neighbour 28 days notice in writing that you intend to remove the
dividing fence. Where the neighbour has a pool, particular care must be taken to
ensure the pool is not left exposed, if temporary fencing is installed the temporary
fence must comply with AS 1926.1 - Swimming pool safety. We recommend that you
consider the Fences and the Law booklet available on line and follow the processes
outlined in the booklet.
Where it is intended to erect external walls on the boundary the face of the external
wall must be on the boundary. Further, barge boards, capping tiles or other fixtures
on the boundary wall must not encroach upon the land of the adjoining owner.
Existing fence lines may not be the true legal boundary. To avoid violation of
neighbour's rights, the onus of proof of the boundary line rests with the owner of the
land where the work is undertaken. This will necessitate a survey being carried out by
a licensed surveyor to identify the true location of the boundary and proposed footing
on the ground. You will need the neighbour's written approval to enter their land to
carry out any construction.
Neighbours • Construction within an established neighbourhood can be a stressful time for existing
residents. You are urged to take all necessary precautions to ensure adjoining
properties are not damaged or residents unreasonably impacted. In the interests of
good neighbourliness you may wish to consider providing your contact details to all
adjoining property owners inviting them to contact you should there be any concerns
during the construction process.
Dust • Airborne dust and sand emissions potentially generated on site must be managed and
this can be achieved by wetting down the soil and site during the demolition and
construction process. If you have any concerns or questions in relation to dust you
can contact the EPA on 8204 2004.
Asbestos
• If there is asbestos material in or on the building or fencing to be demolished there
are specific requirements for the method of removal and disposal of asbestos. The
removal of asbestos over 10 square metres in area must be carried out by a licensed
asbestos removal contractor in accordance with Safe Work SA requirements. For
further information in relation to this please contact Safe Work SA on 1300 365 255.
Use of Public Space
• Should any part of the development process require use of public land (ie, the
footpath, nature strip, road or other reserve), additional permits will be required.
11
• Examples of such activities include storage of materials, delivery of materials from
public land, placing of temporary fences on public land, blocking of the road, footpath
or nature strip for any period of time.
• Where works from public space impact vehicular or pedestrian traffic, you will be
requested to lodge a Traffic Management Plan that adheres to the requirements of
the relevant Australian Standards.
• Additional fees and charges may apply, please contact the Council's Compliance Team
on 8408 1380 to discuss your projects needs.
Environment Protection Note
The Environment Protection (Water Quality) Policy 2003 requires any person who is
undertaking an activity, or is an occupier of land to take all reasonable and practicable
measures to avoid the discharge or deposit of waste from that activity or land into any
waters or onto land in a place from which it is likely to enter any waters (including the
stormwater system).
The policy also creates offences that can result in on-the-spot fines or legal proceedings. The
following information is provided to assist you to comply with this legislation:
Building and construction should follow sediment control principles outlined in the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention - Code of Practice for the Building and Construction
Industry (EPA 1999). Specifically, the applicant should ensure:
• During construction no sediment should leave the building and construction
site. Appropriate exclusion devices must be installed at entry points to
stormwater systems and waterways.
• A stabilised entry/exit point should be constructed to minimise the tracking of
sand, soil and clay off site. However, should tracking occur, regular clean-ups
are advised.
Litter from construction sites is an environmental concern. All efforts should be made
to keep all litter on site. The applicant should ensure that bins with securely fitted lids,
capable of receiving all waste from building and construction activities, are placed on
site.
All building and construction wastewaters are listed pollutants under the Environment Protection (Water Quality) Policy 2003 and as such must be contained on site.
It is important that you familiarise yourself with the terms of the Policy and ensure that all
contractors engaged by you are aware of the obligations arising under it.
For further information please contact the Environment Protection Authority on telephone
(08) 8204 2004.
12
0 ' 0 0 Q 00 0o0 0 00 00 OoOO 00O
00 .0 00 0 00 000*00 0
F_~ Develomnt Application Fc*m
00 - 0
00
Development Act 1993 To submit an application, sections 1-15 of this application must be completed. Please use block letters and black or blue pen. The completed form must be accompanied by all required documents as specified in the planning requirements checklists and the applicable fees.
Applications submitted that do not include the prerequisite information listed in the "Planning Requirements Checklist" will be returned for resubmission by the applicant once they are complete.
1 Application Type:
Office Use Only
252/ Property Number:
Date Lodged:
p.7. (3, Received By:
LI Complying Development Building Rules Consent (Building Only)
II3' Development Plan Consent (Planning Only) J Development Approval (Both
includes approval to prune or remove a significant tree Planning and Building)
2 Location of Proposed Development
No:qt,C Street: P-') Subur0iC.A1 7c6* Postcode:b-
Lot No: DP: Section No: (Full/Part) Hd:
Certificate of Title: Volume: Folio:
3 Detailed Description of Proposed Development Li.eL-c-c.c( i-c(i_, f_•c.r
i-.Ari _hf.._kC_- 4 Cost of the Proposed Development (excluding fit-out costs such as furniture)
$ ,cc> Please note: Council may require written justification to verify costs.
5 Details of Parties Sections marked * must be completed.
(Please note that all correspondence will be addressed to the Applicant. in the event of multiple applicants the addressee will be the first named)
*Appljcant
Name (Mr/Mrs/Ms/Company): Drr 1c-wii-c-kk
Email: ci 'J kric.s . c..
Postal Address: iA, j\ 1' 4 LJ h'J'U e. So
one: £4 - Mobile: Fax: 5 *Builder: ts '6 "' ''1 Licence No:
Email:
Postal Address:
Phone: Mobile: Fax:
*Owner(s) of Subject Land: (Mr/Mrs/Ms)
Email:
Postal Address:
Phone: Mobile:
Fax:
City of Charles Sturt 72 Woodville Road, Woodville, south Australia 5011 108 8408 1111 F 08 8408 1122 www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au
13
6 Has The Construction Industry Training Fund Act 1993 Levy Been Yes Nof' Paid?
7 Does a regulated tree exist on the site or on adjoining land which Yes fl No
might be affected (including damage to tree roots) by the proposed
development?
New Dwellings and Dwelling Additions (Sections 8 and 9 only)
8 Site Declarations - New Dwellings Only:
Yes J No E( 8.1 Was the allotment created on or after 1 September 2009?
8.2 Does the site have connection to or is capable of being connected to Yes dNo
a sewage system or waste control system which complies with the
Public and Environmental Health Act, 1987?
8.3 Was the site, to the best of your knowledge and belief, subject to Yes No El' site contamination as a result of a previous use of the land or a previous activity on the land?
9 Site Declarations - New Dwellings, Dwelling Additions and Carports/Garages:
9.1 If the proposed building includes a garage/carport, does it gain
driveway access from: D (if not applicable)
9.1.1 an existing driveway or authorised access point; or Yes
0
9.1.2 a mountable or rollover kerb; or
Vo Yes o 0
9.1.3 a driveway access point illustrated as part of an approved Yes 0 No
land division; or
9.1.4 a driveway access point that is not located within 6 m of an Yes 0 No 0 intersection or a pedestrian actuated crossing and will not
interfere with a tree, street furniture, or other
infrastructure?
10 *Contact Person for Further Information (if other than the applicant)
Name: *c,4 -i A5 Email:
Phone: .z 11 Mobile: __ Fax: I -aa Z. 7 '8
27/05/2013
14
3
ii Current Land and Property Use (e.g. dwelling, shop, industry, warehouse)
JC
Historic Use of Land
Are there any easements on the land? jI1 Yes LjIIio Are there any significant trees on the land or adjacent land? El Yes No
Is there a brush fence within 3 metres of the
proposed building work? El Yes L3' No
12 Building classification details
Building classification sought
Present classification(s):
Commercial/Industrial applications:
Number of employees:
Male: Female:
Institutional buildings:
Number of persons accommodated:
Assembly buildings:
Number of occupants:
13 Decision Notification Distribution
Decision Notices and associated documentation will be distributed by email if less than 5mb and the applicants email address is included in the Applicant Details section on page 1 of this
form. When greater than 5mb in size or where an email address is not provided the decision documentation will be distributed on a CD unless a paper copy is specifically requested.
IiiPlease send a paper copy of the decision documentation by post.
14 Privacy policy
/ acknowledge that copies of this application and supporting documentation may be provided to interested persons in accordance with the Development Regulations 2008 and Development Act 1993 and where public notification is required may be made available on Council's website. Information included within this application will be publicly available on Council's website within the Development Application Register and On Line Development Application Tracking system.
Details provided by the applicant, written representations and other technical reports form part of the
reports attached to Council agendas. The agenda, minutes and accompanying report is made available on Council's website. Information,. including names and addresses recorded in these documents can therefore be searched by the various website search engines.
15 *signed: *Date: 2b ( '/!3
El Applicant El Owner Authorised Person
16 Office Use Only:
Date:
Receipt No:
15
Application Fees - Current at July 2012
Nature of Fee As at 1 July 2012 Lodgement
If the development cost is <$5,000 $55.50 If the development cost is >$5,001 $118.50 If the development is Non-complying add $89.00 If this is a secondary lodgement (i.e. building approval separate to planning approval), $55.50 add:
Schedule la Application Fee (Building Rules Only) $46.25
Certificate of Title Search (if Certificate not supplied) $30.00
Planning Consent
Complying
Consent Dev cost <$10,000 $34.50 Dev cost <$100,000 $95.00 0ev cost >$100,000 Cost x 0.125%
Non Complying Dev cost <$10,000 $47.50 0ev cost <$100,000 $113.00 0ev cost >$100,000 cost x 0.12 5%
Notification Category 2/3 public notification $95.00 *Advertising fee (GST Inc.) $530.00
Non Complying $113.00 Referral to Government Agencies ( <$1000 000) $197.00 Referral to Government Agencies ( >$ 1000 000) $330.00 - Transport SA
- DEH (Heritage SA)
- Coast protection
- EPA
- DAC
Referral EPA (22 1(b) 2(3) 2(7) 2(8) 2(10) 3(3)) $330.00
Other
Total Planning Building Consent (GST inc.)
Class 1, 2 & 4 (Detached dwelling/additions, apartment building, habitable outbuilding, m2 x $2.68 multiple dwelling/additions) Class 3, 5 & 6 (boarding house/additions, offices/additions, hotels and shops/additions) m2 x $3.56 Class 7 & 8 (Warehouse/additions, factories/additions) m2 x $2.36 Class 9a & 9c (Institutional buildings) m2 x $4.04 Class 9b (Assembly buildings/additions) m
2 x $3.55
Class lOa & lOb (Garages, verandahs, swimming pools, signs, air-conditioning special m 2 x $0.80 structures, freestanding walls)
Minimum $60.50 If the application is for a Demolition 0.2 x class fees If the application is for a Change of Classification 0.8 x class fees If a Certificate of Occupancy is required $39.75 The Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) Levy applies if the development cost is
>$15,000. If payment has been made to the board, proM of payment must be supplied 0ev cost x 0.25% with the development application.
Application to extend the application approval $89.00
Total Building
Total Combined
27105/2013
16
.. ...• .... . .. . ...•...... .. .. .. . .QN
• •••• •• ••••• • .. ,
• Powerline Clearance Declaration of Applicant Pursuant to Clause 2A(1) of ScheduleS of the Development Regulations 2008 To: City Of Charles Sturt
1. From: (Applicant details)
Name
Postal Address: A c. iic Email: NZA (
Phone: O _ 'ar- MobilP Fax:______________
2. Development Details
Development Application Number
Date of Application
Location of Proposed Development_________________________________________________________
Description of Proposed Development
3. Declaration
being the applicant for the development described above declare that the proposed development will Involve the construction of a building which would, if constructed in accordance with the plans submitted, not be contrary to the regulations prescribed for the purposes of section 86 of the Electricity Act 1996.1 make this declaration under Clause 2A(1) of Schedule 5 of the Development Regulations 2008.
Signed:
Date:
"Please refer to notes on next page"
City of charles Sturt 72 Woodville Road, Woodville, South Australia 5011 T 08 8408 1111 F 08 8408 1122 www.charlessturt.sagov.au
17
Title -Register .Search LANDS TITLES OFFICE, ADELAIDE
For a Certificate of litle issued pursuant to the Real Property Act 1866
REGISTER SEARCH OF CERTIFICATE OF TITLE * VOLUME 6051 FOLIO 406 *
COST : $25.75 (GST exempt ) PARENT TITLE : CT 5707/714 REGION : EMAIL AUTHORITY PS 11315731 AGENT LGY6P BOX NO : 000 DATE OF ISSUE : 13/01/2010 SEARCHED ON : 02/07/2013 AT : 15:59:16 EDITION : 1 CLIENT REF 252/1393/13
REGISTERED PROPRIETORS IN FEE SIMPLE
SCOTT LEWIS DONOGHUE AND KATHRYN LORRAINE DONOGHUE BOTH OF 413C ESPLANADE HENLEY BEACH SA 5022 AS JOINT TENANTS
DESCRIPTION OF LAND
ALLOTMENT 1 DEPOSITED PLAN 53363 IN THE AREA NMdED HENLEY BEACH HUNDRED OF YATALA
EASEMENTS
SUBJECT TO PARTY WALL RIGHTS OVER THE LAND HARKED A (RTC 8773555)
SUBJECT TO A FREE AND UNRESTRICTED RIGHT OF WAY OVER THE LAND MARKED E
TOGETHER WITH PARTY WALL RIGHTS OVER THE LAND MARKED B (RTC 8773555)
TOGETHER WITH A FREE AND UNRESTRICTED RIGHT OF WAY OVER THE LAND MARKED F
SCHEDULE OF ENDORSEMENTS
NIL
NOTATIONS
DOCUMENTS AFFECTING THIS TITLE
NIL
REGISTRAR—GENERAL' S NOTES
NIL
END OF TEXT.
Page 1 of 2
The Registrar-General certifies that this Title Register Search displays the records maintained in the Register Book and other notations at the time of searching. <D
LANDS TITLES OFFICE ADELAIDE SOUTH AUSTRALIA
DIAGRAM FOR CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 6051 FOLIO 406
SEARCH DATE : 02/07/2013 TIME: 15:59:16
GRAM6E ROAD
SP 904
-__-_----------------------- 61•16
0
PARTY WAU- - E
(.L42 flDt 1 A 130-211
47-11 F - 2B
66 -
SEC E.L.P ARTY WALL G 940 0.18
(282)- - - -
47.61
73
H 4
is 6.S9
FP 13
0 4 8 12 16Metres I I I I I
Page 2 of 2 19
FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY lOflCIL_i
1200H Rendered block wall
)
w
Uj
0
ci)
SITE PLAN SCALE 1:200
SITEWORKS, DRAINAGE AND LEVELS ARE TO BE AS PER ENGINEERING DESIGN AND DOCUMENTATION.
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: BESS ER BLOCK WALL ON BOUNDARY
ALUMINIUM PRIVACY SCREEN
PAINTED ACRYLIC RENDER WHERE SHOWN
1200H Aluminium Sun Shade above
00
04
FROK'T I 1 ELEV/ATIOKI '1 L 1800H Rendered
I reinforced Besser block wall
SCALE 1:100
1200H Aluminium Sun Shade above
J 1800H Rendered reinforced Besser block wall
SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1:100
NINOWSH CA 7
To,.el Bflht RRa21 M
PROJECT
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
413C SEAVIEW ROAD, HENLEY BEACH
CUE NT
DOMEL HOMES
00w,, 000
A.A 19/06/13 00010 Copy000t
AS SPECIFIED Pro$cl NO. 80001 N.
66.2013 PA01 OF01
Co00 ..m000R,. 00..00o.,01 1.00000 e,.Io0 WIN op .011,000010010 1.00 dowN,g.. F1gw,00 d1000Won. OwO
0000d0N 0110 Ofly 00wp01,oy.hoI 00 ,,RO00d00
20 © Plans, specifications, other technical drawings or content provided as part of this report may be protected by Copyright laws and should not be reproduced other
than for the purpose of consideration of the Development Application.