A Standardized Approach to Safe, Effective Prone Positioning in the SICU
1
A Standardized Approach to Safe, Effective Prone Positioning in the SICU Sharon Dickinson, Craig Meldrum, Connie Rickelmann and the SICU staff University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Purpose Background Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References To evaluate if a standardized approach to prone positioning for the treatment of Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Acute Lung Injury (ALI) prevents the following complications: • Self extubations • Line and tube pulls • Employee injuries •A retrospective data analysis was completed from May 2010 to April 2011 to evaluate for complications of prone positioning utilizing the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) data system • All patients proned during the study period were included in the analysis • A comparison group of patients who were not proned were also analyzed. This group consisted of all patients admitted to the SICU during the study period • Data was analyzed to evaluate for complications of prone positioning Prone positioning occurred for 118 days during the study period. One patient self-extubated during the study period but no lines or trachs were pulled. Our overall incidence of notable complications is 1/118 (0.85%). No employee injuries were noted secondary to proning a patient. Non-prone positioning occurred for 6997 days. In this comparison group, we experienced 13 self extubations, 75 line pulls and 3 trach pulls for an overall incidence of 91/6997 (1.3%). In our experience, the use of the prone position is an effective strategy for the treatment of severe hypoxemia in patient with ARDS. To institute the prone position, we favor a simple 5 step technique that uses four staff members and a regular ICU bed. More recent studies document the benefit of extended prone position therapy (> 20 hours per day) in ARDS. A recent review of all published meta- analyses on the efficacy of prone position for ALI and ARDS concluded that prone positioning was associated with reduced mortality in the cohort of patients with severe hypoxemia, defined as PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio < 100 mm Hg. Additionally, prone positioning can be used as a rescue therapy for patients with ARDS and refractory life-threatening hypoxemia. Based on the evaluation of this intervention, the following conclusions and recommendations are made: 1) Prone positioning of patient’s with ARDS using a standardized protocol can prevent complications 2) Prone positioning of patient’s does not result in increased injuries to healthcare workers. 3) Prone positioning is a safe and effective treatment option for severe hypoxemia 1. Piehl MA, Brown RS. Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care med 1976;4:13-4. 2. Dickinson S, Park PK, Napolitano LM. Prone-Positioning Therapy in ARDS Crit Care Clin. 2011 Jul;27(3):511-23 3. Pelosi P, Tubiolo D, Mascheroni D, Vicardi P, Crotti S, Valenza F, Gattononi L: Effects of the prone position on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during acute lung injury. 1997 Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Vol. 157. Pp 387- 393, 1998 4. Dirkes S, Dickinson S: Common questions about prone positioning, June 1998. AJN. Vol. 98 No 6 5. Lamm WJE, Graham MM, Albert RK: 1994. Mechanism by which the prone position improves oxygenation in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Vol. 150. Pp 184-193. The prone position has been used to improve oxygenation in patients with severe hypoxemia and acute respiratory failure since 1974. The prone position has been shown to increase end- expiratory lung volume and alveolar recruitment. All studies with the prone position document an improvement in systemic oxygenation in 70% to 80% of patients with ARDS, and the maximal improvements are seen in the most hypoxemic patients. 1-3 Prone positioning has associated risks to both the patient and the healthcare worker. 2 One challenge to use of the prone position in ARDS patients has been the difficulty of safely moving a patient with severe hypoxemia due to ARDS. 2 Complications can occur in the process and include unplanned extubation, lines being pulled, and tubes becoming kinked. Additionally, proning obese and fluid overloaded Tuck flat sheet around pt arm In order to protect it and move pt With flat sheet, pull pt to one side of the bed. Tilt the patient over and position with pillows Patient fully proned, head to side. Position pt arm up on one side, arm straight on the other and knee up if desired. SICU criteria to initiate prone positioning: 1) Effective compliance (normalized) < 0.5 mL/cmH 2 0/Kg 2) P/F ratio < 200 on Fi0 2 > 0.5 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Proning Non-proning Line/tube pulls Days during study Self-extubation Trachs pulled 6997 0 13 0 75 0 3 Proning Data for period 5/1/10 - 4/30/11 % Incidence per non-proning day 1.21% % Incidence per proning day 0.85%
description
A Standardized Approach to Safe, Effective Prone Positioning in the SICU Sharon Dickinson, Craig Meldrum, Connie Rickelmann and the SICU staff University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Purpose. Methods. Discussion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of A Standardized Approach to Safe, Effective Prone Positioning in the SICU
A Standardized Approach to Safe, Effective Prone Positioning in the SICU
Sharon Dickinson, Craig Meldrum, Connie Rickelmann and the SICU staff University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Purpose
Background
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
To evaluate if a standardized approach to prone positioning for the treatment of Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Acute Lung Injury (ALI) prevents the following complications:• Self extubations• Line and tube pulls• Employee injuries
• A retrospective data analysis was completed from May 2010 to April 2011 to evaluate for complications of prone positioning utilizing the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) data system
• All patients proned during the study period were included in the analysis
• A comparison group of patients who were not proned were also analyzed. This group consisted of all patients admitted to the SICU during the study period
• Data was analyzed to evaluate for complications of prone positioning
Prone positioning occurred for 118 days during the study period. One patient self-extubated during the study period but no lines or trachs were pulled. Our overall incidence of notable complications is 1/118 (0.85%). No employee injuries were noted secondary to proning a patient. Non-prone positioning occurred for 6997 days. In this comparison group, we experienced 13 self extubations, 75 line pulls and 3 trach pulls for an overall incidence of 91/6997 (1.3%).
In our experience, the use of the prone position is an effective strategy for the treatment of severe hypoxemia in patient with ARDS. To institute the prone position, we favor a simple 5 step technique that uses four staff members and a regular ICU bed. More recent studies document the benefit of extended prone position therapy (> 20 hours per day) in ARDS. A recent review of all published meta-analyses on the efficacy of prone position for ALI and ARDS concluded that prone positioning was associated with reduced mortality in the cohort of patients with severe hypoxemia, defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 100 mm Hg. Additionally, prone positioning can be used as a rescue therapy for patients with ARDS and refractory life-threatening hypoxemia.
Based on the evaluation of this intervention, the following conclusions and recommendations are made: 1) Prone positioning of patient’s with ARDS
using a standardized protocol can prevent complications
2) Prone positioning of patient’s does not result in increased injuries to healthcare workers.
3) Prone positioning is a safe and effective treatment option for severe hypoxemia
1. Piehl MA, Brown RS. Use of extreme position changes in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care med 1976;4:13-4.
2. Dickinson S, Park PK, Napolitano LM. Prone-Positioning Therapy in ARDS Crit Care Clin. 2011 Jul;27(3):511-233. Pelosi P, Tubiolo D, Mascheroni D, Vicardi P, Crotti S, Valenza F, Gattononi L: Effects of the prone position on
respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during acute lung injury. 1997 Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Vol. 157. Pp 387-393, 1998
4. Dirkes S, Dickinson S: Common questions about prone positioning, June 1998. AJN. Vol. 98 No 65. Lamm WJE, Graham MM, Albert RK: 1994. Mechanism by which the prone position improves oxygenation in
acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Vol. 150. Pp 184-193.
The prone position has been used to improve oxygenation in patients with severe hypoxemia and acute respiratory failure since 1974. The prone position has been shown to increase end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar recruitment. All studies with the prone position document an improvement in systemic oxygenation in 70% to 80% of patients with ARDS, and the maximal improvements are seen in the most hypoxemic patients.1-3 Prone positioning has associated risks to both the patient and the healthcare worker. 2 One challenge to use of the prone position in ARDS patients has been the difficulty of safely moving a patient with severe hypoxemia due to ARDS. 2 Complications can occur in the process and include unplanned extubation, lines being pulled, and tubes becoming kinked. Additionally, proning obese and fluid overloaded patients can be labor intensive and can result in staff injuries.2 However, the technique can be performed safely by trained and dedicated critical care staff aware of its potential benefits in critically ill patients with ARDS and severe hypoxemia.2-4
Tuck flat sheet around pt armIn order to protect it and move pt
With flat sheet, pull pt to one side of the bed.
Tilt the patient over and position with pillows
Patient fully proned, head toside.
Position pt arm up on one side, armstraight on the other and knee up if desired.
SICU criteria to initiate prone positioning:1) Effective compliance (normalized) < 0.5 mL/cmH20/Kg2) P/F ratio < 200 on Fi02 > 0.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
ProningNon-proning
Line/tube pulls
Days during study
Self-extubation Trachs pulled
6997
0 13 075
03
Proning Data for period 5/1/10 - 4/30/11
% Incidence per non-proning day 1.21% % Incidence per proning day 0.85%
