A MORE PERFECT UNION Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.
-
Upload
flora-kennedy -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of A MORE PERFECT UNION Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.
War is over – Now what – Continental Congress debates……
Tried to draft one constitution for the states as a whole
Articles of Confederation – a document adopted by the second continental congress in 1777 and finally approved by the states in 1781, that outlined the form of government of the new United States
State Governments were supreme in some matters
National government was supreme in some matters
Delegates called this new form of gov’t a confederation or alliance
Articles of Confederation
IN 1777 THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION WERE WRITTEN BY THE SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS AS THE FIRST INDEPENDENT GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. IT WAS OFFICIALLY ADOPTED IN 1781.
Articles of Confederation
Gave the new national gov’t the power to declare war
Make peace & sign treaties Borrow money Set standards for coins
and for weights & measures
Establish a postal service Deal with Native American
peoples
Congress could not enact and collect taxes
Congress could not regulate interstate/foreign trade
Regardless of population, each state had ONE vote in Congress
2/3 majority – 9 out of 13 states needed to agree to pass any law
Articles could be amended only if all states approved
There was no executive branch to enforce the laws of Congress
There was no national court system to settle legal disputes
There were 13 separate states that lacked national unity
Accomplishments Weaknesses
Westward Expansion - - THE NW TERRIOTORY
Ordinance of 1785 – dealt more with selling the property than governing it - Government needed money to pay off nation’s debts)- Called for the land to be surveyed and sold to the highest bidder
HOW TO BECOME A STATE…. Northwest Ordinance – dealt with governing the
territory - Congress would choose a Governor and 3 judges to rule the territory- Over time the territory would be divided into no fewer than 3 and no more than 5 states- Citizens had freedom of religion and speech, right to trial by jury, and protection from unfair punishments- Settlers had to treat Indians fairly- Slavery was banned in the territory
Northwest Ordinance became a model used for the settlement of other territories
SHAY’S rebellion – showed the weaknesses in the Articles…
DANIEL SHAY LEFT HIS FARM IN WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS TO SERVE AS A CAPTAIN IN THE REVOLUTIONARY ARMY. UPON HIS
RETURN IN 1787 HE WAS FORCED TO IMMEDIATELY PAY BACK DEBTS. HE AND OTHERS PETITIONED THE GOVERNMENT FOR AN EXTENSION WHICH WAS DENIED. IN RESPONSE HUNDREDS OF FARMERS, WITH
SHAY AS THEIR LEADER, MARCHED TO THE COURTHOUSE TO DISRUPT THE PROCESS OF SEIZING FARMS FROM PEOPLE UNABLE TO
PAY BACK DEBTS. ABOUT 1200 MARCHED TO SPRINGFIELD WHERE THE STATE ARSENAL WAS LOCATED. MILITIA WAS PRIVATELY HIRED
AS THE GOVERNMENT WAS UNABLE TO ACT DIRECTLY UPON CITIZENS. FIGHTING BROKE OUT BETWEEN SHAY’S FOLLOWERS AND
THE MILITIA, RESULTING IN THE DEATHS OF FOUR FARMERS. SHAY WAS SENTENCED TO DEATH FOR HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE
REBELLION. THIS EVENT INDICATED THAT THE NEW GOVERNMENT WAS
POWERLESS TO ACT IN A TIME OF CRISIS. IT LED TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION HELD THE NEXT YEAR.
Constitutional convention
1st time, held in Annapolis, Maryland
Because of poor turnout, Delegates called another meeting. It was held in Philadelphia
Key Players : James Madison, Roger Sherman, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington
Because of the disturbing Shays’s Rebellion, 12 states sent delegates to Philly
55 DELEGATES MET IN PHILADELPHIA IN SEPTEMBER 1787 AND DECIDED TO DRAFT A NEW CONSTITUTION RATHER THAN REVISE THE ARTICLES
George Washington… President of the Convention…
THOMAS JEFFERSON…..
Summer 1787 – Independence Hall in Philadelphia12 states sent delegates (Rhode Island didn’t send delegates)Original; purpose was to discuss way to fix the Article of Confederation The 55 delegates were among the most educated in America
- Called the “Founding Fathers”
Different Ideas….
DIFFERENT FACTIONS AT
THE CONVENTIO
N
FACTIONS ARE GROUPS OF PEOPLE UNITED BY A COMMON BELIEF, LIKE AN INTEREST GROUP
SMALL STATES VERSUS LARGE STATES
SLAVE HOLDERS VERSUS ANTISLAVERY ADVOCATES
STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT VERSUS WEAK
Constitutional Convention…
Delegates decided to keep all of their discussions secret (nailed the windows shut)
Most of our records come from James Madison’s notes
James Madison – known as the “Father of the Constitution” - Many of its principles are based on his ideas
Delegates had to develop a strong government without infringing on people’s liberties
Round 1…… How to set up the Government…
Virginia PlanEdmund RandolphBicameral
Legislature.State representation
was based upon population.
Power to taxPower to regulate
trade.Define: VETOProposed executive
and judicial branches
New Jersey PlanWilliam PatersonUnicameral
Legislature.One state – one vote
concept. (Like Articles)
Power to taxPower to regulate
trade.National executive &
judicial branches
19
THE GREAT COMPROMISE
THE DELEGATES AGREED ON TWO HOUSES IN CONGRESS, THE SENATE
AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
THE SENATE WOULD HAVE EQUAL REPRESENTATION, MEANING EVERY STATE WAS ALLOTTED 2 SENATORS.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WOULD BE BASED ON POPULATION
AND THEREFORE THE NUMBER WOULD VARY FROM STATE TO
STATE.
The Great Compromise
Developed by Roger Sherman from Connecticut Legislature would have 2 houses People would be represented in the lower house
(House of Representatives)- Based on population (larger states have more representatives)- 2 year terms
States would be represented in the upper house - every state would have the same number of representatives (2 per state) 6 year terms
22
SLAVERY:
REPRESENTATION AND THE SLAVE TRADE
SOUTHERN DELEGATES INSISTED THAT SLAVES SHOULD COUNT AS PART OF A STATE’S POPULATION
THIS WOULD HAVE GIVEN THEM THE ADVANTAGE IN CONGRESS AS THEIR POPULATION WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER AS A REGION
NORTHERN DELEGATES DISAGREED AND REFUSED TO COUNT SLAVES AS PART OF THE STATE’S POPULATION FOR PURPOSES OF REPRESENTATION
MOST STATES WANTED TO END THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE HOWEVER SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA LOBBIED HARD TO KEEP THE SLAVE TRADE INDUSTRY ACTIVE
23
THREE-FIFTHS COMPROMISE, SLAVE TRADE, AND FUGITIVE SLAVES
THE SOUTHERN STATES WERE ALLOWED TO COUNT SLAVES AS 3/5
OF A PERSON FOR REPRESENTATION PURPOSES IN THE
HOUSE. SLAVES WERE ALSO COUNTED TO DETERMINE THE
AMOUNT OF FEDERAL TAXES OWED BY EACH OF THE SOUTHERN
STATES.
THE SLAVE TRADE WAS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE UNTIL 1808,
HOWEVER ALL OF THE NEW STATE CONSTITUTIONS EXCEPT
GEORGIA’S BANNED OVERSEAS SLAVE TRADE.
ARTICLE I Section 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the
States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to
the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on
such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
ARTICLE IV SECTION 2 No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the
Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation
therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of
the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.
ARTICLE I SECTION 2 Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within
this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by
adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three
fifths of all other Persons.
CLAUSE ON ESCAPED SLAVES
24
A FORM OF GOVERNMENT WHERE POWER IS SHARED BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT.
IN THE UNITED STATES THIS TRANSLATES TO A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON D.C., STATE GOVERNMENTS, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN THE
U.S. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE STATE GOVERNMENTS, ALSO KNOWN AS
NATIONAL SUPREMACY.
THE DELEGATES AGREED THE BEST FORM OF GOVERNMENT WOULD BE FEDERALISM
G overnm ent Structure
DELEGATED POW ERSP o w e rs d e le ga ted to then a tion a l g o ve rnm e nt by
th e C o ns titu t io n .
RESERVED POW ERSP o w e rs n o t g ran ted to the
n a tion a l g o ve rnm e nt o rd e n ie d to the sta te s.
CONCURRENT POW ERSP o w ers h e ld a nd e xe rc ise d by
b o th th e n a tion a l an d thes ta te g ove rn m en ts.
Controlled power….
National Government powers- Coin money- Make treaties- Declare war
State Powers- Set punishment for crimes- Make education laws - Regulate trade within the state
Concurrent Powers (Both have these powers)- Power to tax- Build roads- Set up courts
In case of conflicts between Federal and State laws – States must follow national laws
Separation of PowersStates limited the
authority of the national gov’t
3 branches for gov’t were created:
Legislative – makes laws
Executive – to carry out laws
Judicial – to interpret the law
Delegates established a system of checks and balances – prevents one branch of gov’t from dominating the others.
System of Checks and Balances
EXECUTIVEBRANCH
LEGISLATIVEBRANCH
JUDICIAL BRANCH
*President
*Carries out laws.
*Congress
*Makes the laws.
*Supreme Court
*Interprets the laws.
Can veto acts of Congress.
Can remove the President from office.
Can declare acts of the President “unconstitutional”.
Can appoint judges to the Supreme Court.
Can refuse to appoint judges.
Can declare acts of Congress “unconstitutional”.
Regulation of trade…
Delegates debated how much control the national government should have on trade
Delegates agreed that national government should control trade between states
North also wanted National Gov. to control foreign trade- Gov. allowed to tax imports (tariff)
Congress could end slave trade in 20 years
Power of the president…
Decided that the Executive branch would be headed by one person
Congress had power to impeach President if needed
President would be chosen by the Electoral College- Many delegates didn’t trust the judgment of the people to elect the President
States Electoral votes = number of Senators + Number of representatives in the House
Creating the Constitution4 months of debate
and compromise, delegates succeeded in creating a flexible constitution.
Constitution sent to congress, which submitted it to states for approval
Procedure for electing the President
Each state chooses a # of electors equal to the # of senators and representatives the state had in Congress. Electors are chosen by the states.
Electoral College – casts ballots for presidential candidates
DEBATE OVER RATIFICATION
FEDERALISTSADVOCATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
NATIONAL SUPREMACY
IN FAVOR OF RATIFICATION
BILL OF RIGHTS UNNECESSARY SINCE
GOVERNMENT HAD LIMITED POWERS
MADISON, HAMILTON, JAY
ANTIFEDERALISTSIN FAVOR OF STRONG STATE GOVERNMENTS
STATE SUPREMACY
AGAINST RATIFICATION
BILL OF RIGHTS ESSENTIAL TO GUARANTEE CITIZEN’S
RIGHTS
MASON, CLINTON, HENRY
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
Anti-Federalists Concern: Constitution will give
national govt. too much power.
President will be just like a king.
Individual liberties will be threatened by a powerful govt.
Federal govt. could come under control of one powerful faction.
Federalist Response: Constitution will give
national govt. enough power to solve the country’s problems.
System of checks and balances will limit President’s power.
Bill of Rights will protect citizens’ freedom.
Country is too big to be dominated by any one faction.
38
THE FEDERALIST PAPERS
A SERIES OF 85 ESSAYS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN NEW YORK NEWSPAPERS FROM OCTOBER 1787 TO
AUGUST 1788 AUTHORED BY PUBLIUS, THE PEN-NAME FOR JAMES MADISON, ALEXANDER HAMILTON, AND JOHN JAY. THE ESSAYS EXPLAINED THE NEW CONSTITUTION AND ARGUED
FOR RATIFICATION CITING SUCH THEMES AS THE NEED
FOR SEPARATION OF POWERS, STRONG CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT, AND GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER
FACTIONS.
JAY
HAMILTON
MADISON
States decide for themselves!! Delaware – 1st state to ratify the
constitution New Hampshire was the 9th state (made
it law) Virginia and New York were 10th and 11th Government couldn’t succeed without
these two states Rhode Island – last state to ratify the
constitution Federalist had to promise to add a Bill of
Rights to convince states to ratify Constitution
40
IN ORDER TO RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION TWO-THIRDS OF THE STATES, NINE, HAD TO APPROVE IT. THE PROCESS BEGAN IN
DECEMBER OF 1787 WITH STATE CONVENTIONS SOME OF WHICH WERE HEATED DEBATES AND OTHERS WERE UNANIMOUSLY IN
FAVOR.
STATE DATE VOTE IN CONVENTION
DELAWARE DECEMBER 7, 1787 UNANIMOUS
PENNSYLVANIA DECEMBER 12, 1787 46 TO 23
NEW JERSEY DECEMBER 18, 1787 UNANIMOUS
GEORGIA JANUARY 2, 1788 UNANIMOUS
CONNECTICUT JANUARY 9, 1788 128 TO 40
MASSACHUSETTS FEBRUARY 7, 1788 187 TO 168
MARYLAND APRIL 28, 1788 63 TO 11
SOUTH CAROLINA MAY 23, 1788 149 TO 73
NEW HAMPSHIRE JUNE 21, 1788 57 TO 46
VIRGINIA JUNE 26, 1788 89 TO 79
NEW YORK JULY 26, 1788 30 TO 27
NORTH CAROLINA NOVEMBER 21, 1789 195 TO 77
RHODE ISLAND MAY 29, 1790 34 TO 32
42
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
THERE WAS MUCH SKEPTICISM ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION. ANTI-
FEDERALISTS LOBBIED HARD AT THE CONVENTION TO
REQUIRE A BILL OF RIGHTS BE ADDED IN ORDER TO
GUARANTEE RATIFICATION. THIS STARTED A MOMENTUM
WHICH LED TO THE EVENTUAL ADDITION OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS, WRITTEN IN
1789 BY MADISON AND RATIFIED BY THE STATES
OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS.