SACSCOC 2012 -Protecting Academic Integrity in Online Exam Environments
A LEAP Success - SACSCOC
Transcript of A LEAP Success - SACSCOC
10/28/2019
1
MARS:AGiantLEAPforStudent
Success
SACSCOC2019AnnualConventionDecember8,2019Houston,Texas
BobbiParrino Cook,EdD – IRSCQEPDirector,ProfessorMathDepartment,[email protected]
LynneO’Dell,MEd– IRSCQEPManager/Math&[email protected]
OVERVIEW• Describe IRSC’s QEP:
MARS (Math At the Root of Success) • Discuss the process• Explain the cycle of action research• Define the different course pedagogies• Identify additional aspects of MARS• Share DATA• Discuss the possibilities for action research
for YOUR institution• Questions
10/28/2019
2
SACSCOCQualityEnhancementPlan
IdentifytheProblemStudents’ failure to progress through introductory math coursesDevelopPlanofActionImprove student learning and success through redesign of introductory math coursesImplementPlan&AssessResults
College‐wideinvolvementinIRSC’sQEP
• The college and community provided input to select a topic for the QEP
• Developmentteam (with members from throughout the college) did the research to narrow down the topic
• Once the topic was identified – needed fouractionteams• A total of over60people involved
• Research & Implementation• Marketing & Design• Assessment & Evaluation• Curriculum & Leadership
10/28/2019
3
Drivingbeliefsgoingforward
• IRSC’s #1 priority – authentic student learning & success
• It’s all about our students
• Focus on IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING
• Potential impact – thousands of students expected to profoundly influence completion agenda
CurriculumTeamConsistedofmathdepartmentfaculty
Played a crucial role in implementation: • Revise and standardize courses• Maintain course integrity throughout
redesign• Respond to quantitative and qualitative
data to make ongoing improvements
10/28/2019
4
Research
Data Collection
Evaluate Change
Research
Action
Evaluate Change
IdentifyProblem
ACTIONRESEARCH
Action
Data Collection
10/28/2019
5
TYPESofDATACOLLECTED
QUANTITATIVE – 3DATAPOINTS
1. Diagnostic Exam 2. Departmental Final Exam 3. Final Grade In Course
QUALITATIVE – FOCUSGROUPS1. Students 2. Tutors 3. Instructors
InitialActionsSTANDARDIZED curriculum &content schedule
Built one MARS (MathAttheRootofSuccess)LAB (computer lab) on each of 2 campuses (now 16 labs on 5 campuses)
Added new deliveries (EMPORIUMS)
10/28/2019
6
COURSES&DELIVERYMETHODS
2012‐2013 (baseline year)One course & Two delivery methods
2018‐2019Two courses & Eight delivery methods
2INTRODUCTORYMATHCOURSES
MAT1033IntermediateAlgebra
&MAT1100
QuantitativeReasoning
10/28/2019
7
…TheResults…
Tremendous collaboration and teamworkin the math department; evidence‐baseddecision making is the norm
Dramatic improvement in introductory math courses
BASELINE SUCCESS (2012–2013) 56%COURSE SUCCESS (2018–2019) 74%
ALLMAT1033&1100SECTIONS
Take a DIAGNOSTIC at the start of the term (1033 - MML) (1100 – ALEKS)
Have STANDARDIZED CURRICULUMSame online HW (inthesameorder) (1033 - MML) (1100 – ALEKS & EXCEL)
Take a COMMON departmentalfinalexam
10/28/2019
8
DIFFERENTDELIVERIES
MAT1033(IntermediateAlgebra)
• SE – SupplementalEmporium(SE2&SE4)• HY– HybridEmporium• FE– FlippedEmporium• VM – Virtual Mastery• TR– TraditionalFace‐to‐Face
MAT1100(QuantitativeReasoning)• CL – CollaborativeLearninginface‐to‐faceclasses• QRO– QuantitativeReasoningOnline
COLLABORATIVELEARNINGMAT1100–QuantitativeReasoning
10/28/2019
9
MAT1100Developed for the LIBERALARTSPATHWAYas
a pre-requisite for the liberal arts math courses
Course Delivery for face-to-face sections Collaborativelearning
Curriculum includes employabilityskills: critical thinking, data analysis, employability skills (EXCEL - portfolios); increase math self-efficacy
Nopre‐requisite– notfordualenrollment
IRSCMATHEMPORIUMSMAT1033– IntermediateAlgebra
10/28/2019
10
ALL IRSCEMPORIUMS…Take place in the MARS(computer) LAB
Have both active learning & computer time
Have an instructorandatutorpresent during class time – “justintime” assistance
Have testing on the computer with mandatory exam booklets to showwork
SUPPLEMENTAL EMPORIUMMeets 4hoursa week – EXTRA CONTACTTIME
Half of the time in active learning; other half in computer assignments
Have two different schedules: SE2&SE4
SE2 – two hours twice a week
SE4 – 1 hour four times a week
SEisthedeliverywiththehighest successratesforcertainethnic/socioeconomicgroups
10/28/2019
11
HYBRIDEMPORIUM(HY)Meets 2.5hoursa week
Hybrid - a combination of traditionaland emporium pedagogies
Most of the time in active learning with“some” time set aside for computer workwith the instructor & tutor present
Night and day classes – keepingnight
FLIPPEDEMPORIUM(FE)Meets 2.5 hours a weekTypical FLIP pedagogyStudent watches video before classStudent are required to perform a task for each
lesson known as WSQ (Watch, Summary, andQuestion).Instructor answers questions about assignmentStudents progress through computer assignment
with instructor and tutor available
Subsequent coursesuccessrate
(2017– 2018) 82%
10/28/2019
12
VIRTUALMASTERY(VM)
Online version of MAT1033Baseline success rate (2012–2013) 32%Success rate for (2018 – 2019)59%Mastery based progression throughthe software using pre-requisitesSubsequent course success rate: 80%
IMPORTANTCONTRIBUTINGFACTORSTOTHEPROJECT:
TutorsProfessionaldevelopmentMathematicsdepartmentenvironment&communication
10/28/2019
13
TUTORS– ASC&PEER There is a tutor in EVERY EMPORIUMCLASS
Tutors are a familiar face in the ASC tutoring lab
Tutors conduct review sessions
Peer tutors “look like” the students
Tutors are making a difference
There are tutor training sessions
Majority of tutors are peer tutors
SCALEOUT– Plans to develop a
PeerTutoringProgram& expand to other
departments
FACULTYPROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT
External:Study skillsSoftware trainingCollaborative learningConferences
Internal:Professional Learning Communities (PLC)Equity and inclusionActive learning strategies (clickers & Echo360)Engaging the Under-resourced College Student
10/28/2019
14
MathDepartmentProfessionalDevelopment
MathDepartmentEnvironment&CommunicationGenuine commitment to student learning
and successConsistent sharing of what works & doesn’tFree-ranging discussion for possible
solutionsExamining data before making decisionsEncouragement of new ideas and strategiesFailures chalked up to experience and
lessons learned
10/28/2019
16
QUALITATIVEDATA‐ FOCUSGROUPSStudents–Tutors‐ Instructors
Action takenevery termForexample:
Open MARS labTest reviews in the softwareTest review daysAlternative Emporium scheduleInformation flyers about courses and
delivery methodsLength of the assignments
SCALEOUT‐ FOCUSGROUPWORKGROUP
QUANTITATIVEDATA
10/28/2019
17
Enrollment&StudentServices’Efforts(in response to SB1720)
“NOTREADY”for gateway (introductory) math
Students had 13‐18%LOWERsuccess than students identified as
READY
SUBSEQUENTMATHCOURSES
2012– 2013(baseline)72%success rate
2017– 2018(todate)72% success rate
10/28/2019
18
MAT1033(2018‐ 2019)
TotalWeeklyMeetingTime CourseSuccess
2.5HRS(Traditional;FE;HY)
64%TR
63%FE‐HY
4HRS(SE2;SE4)
69%
DISCUSSIONActionResearch
FocusGroups
PeerTutoring
Whatsubjectareas/coursescouldeachoranyofthesethingshelpimprovestudentsuccessinYOUR QEPoratyourinstitutioningeneral?
10/28/2019
19
THEMARSDATAREINFORCESWHATWORKSFORSUCCESS
Action‐ResearchGuidedPathwaysSTANDARDIZATION across the department(curriculum, diagnostic testing, departmental finals)EXTRAstudent/teachercontacttimeEmporiumdeliveriesTutors & peertutorsCollaborativelearningFocusgroupsfor meaningful changeOpportunities to share through PROFESSIONALDEV.Scalingout to other courses & disciplines
QUESTIONS?