A Genetic Network for Systemic RNA Silencing in …...A Genetic Network for Systemic RNA Silencing...
Transcript of A Genetic Network for Systemic RNA Silencing in …...A Genetic Network for Systemic RNA Silencing...
1
Short Title: A Network for Systemic RNA Silencing in plants 1
Corresponding Author: Yiguo Hong 2
Research Centre for Plant RNA Signaling, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, 3
Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China; Warwick-Hangzhou RNA Signaling 4
Joint Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 5
and Worcester-Hangzhou Joint Molecular Plant Health Laboratory, Institute of Science and 6
the Environment, University of Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK. 7
Telephone: +86-571-28866065 8
Fax: +86-571-28866065 9
E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 10
Primary Research Area: Systemic Transportation/Cell Biology 11
2nd
Research Area: Small RNAs in Systemic PTGS/Signaling and Response 12
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on February 8, 2018, as DOI:10.1104/pp.17.01828
Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
A Genetic Network for Systemic RNA Silencing in Plants1 13
Weiwei Chen2, Xian Zhang
2, Yaya Fan
2, Bin Li
2, Eugene Ryabov
2, Nongnong Shi, Mei Zhao, 14
Zhiming Yu, Cheng Qin, Qianqian Zheng, Pengcheng Zhang, Huizhong Wang, Stephen 15
Jackson, Qi Cheng, Yule Liu, Philippe Gallusci, Yiguo Hong
16
Research Centre for Plant RNA Signaling, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, 17
Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China (W.C., X.Z., Y.F., B.L., E.R., N.S., 18
M.Z., Y.Z., C.Q., Q.Z., P.Z., H.W., Y.H.); Warwick-Hangzhou RNA Signaling Joint 19
Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick CV4 7AL, UK (E.R., 20
S.J., Y.H.); Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 21
Beijing 100081, China (Q.C.); Centre for Plant Biology and MOE Key Laboratory of 22
Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China (Y.L.); 23
UMR EGFV, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRA, Université de Bordeaux, 210 Chemin de 24
Leysotte, CS 50008, 33882 Villenave d’Ornon, France (P.G.); Worcester-Hangzhou Joint 25
Molecular Plant Health Laboratory, Institute of Science and the Environment, University of 26
Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK (Y.H.) 27
1Funding: This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of 28
China (NSFC 31370180 to Y.H.); Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China 29
(the National Transgenic Program of China 2016ZX08009001-004 to Y.H.); Hangzhou 30
Normal University (Pandeng Program 201108 to Y.H.); the Hangzhou City Government 31
(Innovative Program for Science Excellence 20131028 to Y.H.); NSFC (31601765 to W.C., 32
31201490 to X.Z., 31500251 to C.Q.); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation 33
(LY15C140006 to X.Z., LY14C010005 to N.S.) and the UK Biotechnology and Biological 34
Sciences Research Council (UK-China Partnering Award BB/K021079/1 to S.J. and Y.H.). 35
2These authors contributed equally to this work. 36
Author Contributions: W.C., X.Z., Y.F., B.L. and E.R. designed, performed experiments 37
and analysed data; N.S., M.Z., Y.Z., C.Q., Q.Z. and P.Z. performed experiments; H.W., S.J., 38
Q.C., Y.L. and P.G. were involved in the analysis of data and helped writing the paper. Y.H. 39
initiated the project, designed experiments, analysed data and wrote the paper. 40
One-sentence Summary: A DCL2-dependent DCL genetic pathway is crucial for systemic 41
PTGS in plants. 42
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
*Address correspondence to [email protected], [email protected] or 43
[email protected]. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the 44
findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the instructions 45
for Authors (www.plantphysioll.org) is: Yiguo Hong ([email protected], 46
[email protected] and [email protected]).47
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
ABSTRACT 48
Non-cell autonomous RNA silencing can spread from cell to cell and over long-distances in 49
animals and plants. However, the genetic requirements and signals involved in plant mobile 50
gene silencing are poorly understood. Here, we identified a DICER-LIKE2 (DCL2)-51
dependent mechanism for systemic spread of post-transcriptional RNA silencing, also known 52
as post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS), in Nicotiana benthamiana. Using a suite of 53
transgenic DCL RNAi lines coupled with a GFP reporter, we demonstrated that N. 54
benthamiana DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 are required to produce microRNAs and 22, 55
24, and 21nt small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), respectively. All investigated siRNAs 56
produced in local incipient cells were present at low levels in distal tissues. Inhibition of 57
DCL2 expression reduced the spread of gene silencing, while suppression of DCL3 or DCL4 58
expression enhanced systemic PTGS. In contrast to DCL4 RNAi lines, DCL2-DCL4 double-59
RNAi lines developed systemic PTGS similar to that observed in DCL2 RNAi. We further 60
showed that the 21 or 24 nt local siRNAs produced by DCL4 or DCL3 were not involved in 61
long-distance gene silencing. Grafting experiments demonstrated that DCL2 was required in 62
the scion to respond to the signal, but not in the rootstock to produce/send the signal. These 63
results suggest a coordinated DCL genetic pathway in which DCL2 plays an essential role in 64
systemic PTGS in N. benthamiana, while both DCL4 and DCL3 attenuate systemic PTGS. 65
We discuss the potential role of 21, 22 and 24 nt siRNAs in systemic PTGS. 66
Keywords: DICER-LIKEs; mobile silencing signal; Nicotiana benthamiana; siRNAs; 67
systemic PTGS 68
INTRODUCTION 69
RNA silencing is a cellular gene regulatory mechanism that is conserved across fungal, plant, 70
and animal kingdoms (Baulcombe, 2004; Sarkies and Miska, 2014). Through sequence-71
specific targeting, RNA silencing can degrade mRNA for post-transcriptional gene silencing 72
(PTGS) or modify related DNA for transcriptional gene silencing (TGS). In plants, primary 73
silencing is triggered by dsRNA molecules, which are processed into 21–24 nucleotide (nt) 74
small-interfering (si) RNA duplexes, known as primary siRNAs, by DICER-LIKE (DCL) 75
ribonuclease III-like enzymes (Baulcombe, 2004; Sarkies and Miska, 2014). For instance, 76
dsRNA can be directly produced from a hairpin transgene in primary silencing (Mlotshwa et 77
al., 2008). Primary silencing differs from transitive silencing, in which the trigger is initially 78
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
not itself dsRNA. In contrast to primary silencing, the dsRNA in transitive silencing is 79
produced from a single-stranded (ss) RNA template, and requires the coordinated activity of a 80
set of genes. These genes include DICER-LIKE 2 (DCL2), RNA dependent RNA polymerase 81
6 (RDR6), and SGS3, the latter of which encodes a coiled-coiled domain protein (Mlotshwa et 82
al., 2008; Parent et al., 2015). Transitive silencing cascades and amplifies cell and non-cell 83
autonomous silencing to other parts of the target RNA, leading to generation of secondary 84
siRNAs. It is well known that DCL2 plays an essential role in cell-autonomous silencing 85
transitivity and accumulation of secondary siRNAs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) 86
(Mlotshwa et al., 2008; Parent et al., 2015). 87
In animals and plants, TGS and PTGS can spread from cell to cell, systemically, or 88
even between different organisms (Weiberg et al., 2013). Intercellular and long-distance 89
movement of non-cell autonomous RNA silencing involves mobile signals and various 90
genetic components (Melnyk et al., 2011b; Molnar et al., 2010). For example, SNF2, a JmjC 91
domain protein JMJ14, the THO/TREX mRNA export complex, and RDR6 are all associated 92
with intercellular RNA silencing (Qin et al., 2012; Searle et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2007; 93
Yelina et al., 2010). Moreover, RDR6 also contributes to initial signal perception for 94
systemic PTGS (Melnyk et al., 2011b). Intriguingly, NRPD1a, encoding RNA polymerase 95
IVa, RDR2, and DCL3, which all function- in a chromatin silencing pathway, are required for 96
the reception of long-distance mRNA PTGS, and Argonaute4 is also partially involved in the 97
reception of such long-distance silencing. DCL4 and DCL2 then act hierarchically, as they do 98
in antiviral resistance, to produce 21 and 22 nt siRNAs, respectively, which guide mRNA 99
degradation in systemic tissues (Brosana et al., 2007). 100
Arabidopsis, and most likely other plant species, possess four DCL RNase III family 101
enzymes for small RNA (sRNA) biogenesis. DCL1 is involved in microRNA (miRNA) 102
production and DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 are involved in 22, 24, and 21 nt small interfering 103
RNA (siRNA) production, respectively (Henderson et al., 2006; Mukherjee et al., 2013; Xie 104
et al., 2004). DCL1-generated miRNAs can move and act as local and distal signals that play 105
essential roles in plant growth and development, although direct evidence for mobile miRNA 106
signalling is lacking (Carlsbecker et al., 2010; Pant et al., 2008; Skopelitis et al., 2017). The 107
DCL3-processed 24 nt siRNA has been shown to direct systemic TGS that controls genome-108
wide DNA methylation in recipient cells through RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) 109
of homologous genomic DNA sequences (Henderson et al., 2006; Lewsey et al., 2016; 110
Melnyk et al., 2011a; Molnar et al., 2010; Sarkies and Miska, 2014). However, systemic 111
silencing has also been reported to occur in the absence of sRNAs (Mallory et al., 2001) and 112
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
no specific siRNAs produced by any of the four DCLs were found to be associated with 113
systemic silencing (Brosnan et al., 2007). Moreover, even in Arabidopsis, different genetic 114
factors required for mobile PTGS have been discovered from mutant screens in very similar 115
experimental systems (Melnyk et al., 2011b). Thus, the precise nature of long-distance 116
mobile signal remains to be elucidated, as this signal is not exclusively produced by any of 117
the four DCLs. Crucial molecular events during systemic RNA silencing reception were 118
elegantly investigated in Arabidopsis (Brosnan et al., 2007). Nevertheless, these findings 119
contrast with systemic silencing, known as RNA interference (RNAi) in animals, where the 120
mobile signal is dsRNA (Jose et al., 2011). In Caenorhabditis elegans, systemic RNAi 121
involves inter-tissue transfer and entry of gene-specific dsRNAs into the cytosol by the 122
dsRNA-selective importer SID-1 (Winston et al., 2002; Feinberg and Hunter, 2003; Shih and 123
Hunter, 2011). Consequently, mobile dsRNAs expressed in a variety of somatic tissues can 124
lead to SID-1-dependent homologous RNAi of target mRNA in other somatic tissues, or even 125
transgenerational silencing (Jose et al., 2009; Devanapally et al., 2015). 126
The intricate functions of DCL2 and DCL4 are partially redundant in trans-acting 127
siRNA biogenesis and in plant antiviral defence. However, DCL2 is responsible for 22 nt 128
siRNA biosynthesis and has different roles to DCL4 in the production of primary and 129
secondary siRNAs (Chen et al., 2010; Henderson et al., 2006; Qu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 130
2011; Xie et al., 2005). DCL4-processed 21nt siRNA is mainly involved in intracellular 131
PTGS as well as represents the signalling molecule that moves from leaf companion cells to 132
adjacent cells to induce limited intercellular PTGS in Arabidopsis (Dunoyer et al., 2005). 133
Interestingly, DCL2 expression in leaf vascular tissues enhances PTGS in surrounding cells 134
in Arabidopsis. DCL2 is thought to promote the production of 22 nt siRNAs that then 135
stimulate 21 nt siRNA biogenesis via RDR6 and DCL4, resulting in increased cell-to-cell 136
spread of PTGS (Parent et al., 2015). By contrast, DCL4 inhibits the cell-to-cell spread of 137
virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), a form of PTGS, while DCL2, likely along with a 138
DCL2-dependent RNA signal, is required for efficient trafficking of VIGS from epidermal to 139
adjacent cells (Qin et al., 2017). However, the roles of 21 and 24 nt siRNAs and other types 140
of RNA molecules in mobile PTGS and TGS are under debate (Mallory et al., 2001; Brosnan 141
et al., 2007; Melnyk et al., 2011b; Sarkies and Miska, 2014) and remain highly controversial 142
(Berg, 2016). 143
On the other hand, impairment of DCL2 or DCL4 can reduce or promote cell-144
autonomous PTGS, and DCL2 promotes intracellular transitive silencing in Arabidopsis 145
(Mlotshwa et al., 2008; Parent et al., 2015). Moreover, two different strong viral suppressors 146
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
of silencing (Turnip crinkle virus P38 and Turnip mosaic virus HC-Pro) block the 147
accumulation of secondary siRNAs produced by transitive silencing (Mlotshwa et al., 2008). 148
Thus, DCL2 may have in a role in viral defense that can be coupled to intercellular and 149
systemic PTGS. This view is indeed supported by the requirement of DCL2 and DCL2-150
dependent mobile signals for intercellular antiviral silencing in N. benthamiana (Qin et al., 151
2017). A genetic screen for impaired systemic RNAi revealed that DCL2 is crucial for RDR6-152
dependent systemic PTGS (Taochy et al., 2017). Nevertheless, it is not known whether, and 153
to what extent, DCL2 and other DCLs regulate systemic silencing. However, DCL2 and its 154
cognate 22 nt siRNA are clearly able to affect secondary siRNA biogenesis, antiviral defence, 155
and plant development (Bouche et al., 2006; Chen 2010; Garcia-Ruiz et al., 2010; Qin et al., 156
2017; Wang et al., 2011). 157
In this article, we report the genetic requirement of a DCL network and the 158
involvement of mobile siRNAs in the systemic spread of PTGS in N. benthamiana. 159
RESULTS 160
Genetic Resources for Examining Mobile RNA Silencing in N. benthamiana 161
To investigate systemic RNA silencing in N. benthamiana, we used gene-specific RNAi to 162
inhibit the four DCLs orthologous to Arabidopsis DCL1, DCL2, DCL3 and DCL4 163
(Supplemental Data Set S1). Specific genes or gene fragments were PCR-amplified and 164
cloned into the overexpression vector pCAMBIA1300 to produce p35S-GFP714 (the GFP 165
coding sequence of this variant is 714 nt long; Ryabov et al., 2004) or the hairpin RNAi 166
vector pRNAi-LIC (Xu et al., 2010) to generate pRNAi-GFP714 and pRNAi-DCLs 167
(Supplemental Fig. S1). These cloned DCL gene fragments shared no detectable nucleotide 168
sequence similarity (Supplemental Table S1). Plants were then transformed with each of the 169
pRNAi-DCL constructs. We selected two single-copy homozygous RNAi lines DCL2Ai and 170
DCL2Bi for DCL2; DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi for DCL3; DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi for DCL4, and 171
produced a double RNAi line DCL24i through crossing DCL2Ai with DCL4Bi (Table 1). We 172
crossed all of the individual DCL RNAi lines with the 16cGFP plants bearing a single copy 173
of a GFP transgene (referred to as GFP792, as the coding region of this gene variant is 792 nt 174
long) under the control of the 35S promoter (Haseloff et al., 1997; Ruiz et al., 1998) to create 175
the hybrid lines Gfp, GfpDCL2Ai, GfpDCL2Bi, GfpDCL3Ai, GfpDCL3Bi, GfpDCL4Ai, 176
GfpDCL4Bi, GfpDCL24Ai, and GfpDCL24Bi (Table 1). Through selfing, we generated 177
homozygous lines homGfpDCL2Ai, homGfpDCL3Bi, and homGfpDCL4Ai. An additional 178
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
double DCL2-DCL4 RNAi line GfpDCL24Ci was obtained through crossing homGfpDCL2Ai 179
and homGfpDCL4Ai (Table 1). However, we only obtained one hemizygous DCL1i or 180
GfpDCL1i line by transforming N. benthamiana or 16cGFP with pRNAi-DCL1, as 181
homozygous DCL1 RNAi was lethal (Table 1). Lines RDR6i and GfpRDR6i were included in 182
this work (Schwach et al., 2005). To confirm the inhibition caused by RNAi, we performed 183
RT-qPCR and analyzed DCL mRNA levels in the RNAi lines. Gene-specific RNAi 184
repression of DCL2, DCL3 and DCL4 was between 70–90%; and approximately 45% 185
suppression was achieved for DCL1 (Supplemental Fig. S2), consistent with our previous 186
analyses (Qin et al., 2017). 187
DCLs Function Differentially to Generate Small RNAs in N. benthamiana 188
To determine whether individual DCLs function differently to generate 21, 22, and 24 nt 189
siRNAs in N. benthamiana (Fig. 1), we used a GFP reporter system and performed a local 190
PTGS assay (Ruiz et al., 1998; Ryabov et al., 2004). Leaves of the DCL RNAi plants at the 191
six-leaf stage were co-infiltrated with Agrobacterium harbouring p35-GFP714 and 192
Agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714 or an empty pRNAi-LIC vector (Supplemental Fig. 193
S1; Supplemental Fig. S3A). Compared to the non-RNAi wild-type plant (Fig. 1A), RNAi of 194
DCL1 (DCL1i; Fig. 1B), DCL2 (DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi; Fig. 1C and D), and DCL3 (DCL3Ai 195
and DCL3Bi; Fig. 1E and F) did not affect local RNA silencing, but RNAi of DCL4 196
(DCL4Ai, DCL4Bi and DCL24i; Fig. 1G-I) weakened local PTGS. This is evident by almost 197
complete (Fig. 1A-F, left panel) or partial reduction (Fig. 1G-I, left panel) in GFP 198
fluorescence intensity in the co-agroinfiltrated lamina (Supplemental Fig. S4). Consistent 199
with the level of RNAi achieved, only a low level of GFP714 mRNA was detected in wild-200
type, DCL2Ai, DCL2Bi, DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi plants, whereas a relatively high level of 201
GFP714 mRNA was found in DCL4Ai, DCL4Bi and DCL24i plants (Fig. 1J). We also noticed 202
that the GFP714 mRNA levels were slightly higher in DCL1i plants (Fig. 1J). 203
We then used northern hybridizations to characterize siRNAs present in the infiltrated 204
leaf tissues of different DCL RNAi lines (Fig. 1K). These local siRNAs are hereafter 205
designated L-siRNAs. L-siRNAs include primary siRNAs that are directly generated from the 206
hairpin GFP714 dsRNA, and secondary siRNAs that are generated from the p35S-GFP714 207
expressed GFP714 mRNA. There is some variation in the levels of siRNAs detected in the two 208
independent RNAi lines with respect to a given DCL gene. Nevertheless 21, 22, and 24 nt L-209
siRNAs were readily detectable in the control and DCL1i plants. This contrasted with the 210
specific loss of 22 nt L-siRNAs in DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi, 24 nt L-siRNAs in DCL3Ai and 211
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
DCL3Bi, and 21 nt L-siRNAs in DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi (Fig. 1K). We also noticed a large 212
amount of 22 and 24 nt L-siRNAs in DCL4Ai and DCL4Ai, and a high level of 24 nt L-213
siRNAs in DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi. However, 21 and 22 nt L-siRNAs were undetectable in the 214
DCL24i plants (Fig. 1K). These data reveal that in N. benthamiana, as in Arabidopsis, DCL4, 215
DCL2, and DCL3 are required to produce 21, 22, and 24 nt siRNAs, respectively. 216
RNAseq analysis confirms DCLs for Biosynthesis of Small RNAs in N. benthamiana 217
To further investigate how DCL RNAi affects sRNA synthesis, we collected agro-infiltrated 218
leaf tissues from N. benthamiana (Nb), DCL1i, DCL2Ai, DCL2Bi, DCL3Ai, DCL3Bi, 219
DCL4Ai, DCL4Bi, and RDR6i plants at 7 days post agro-infiltration (dpa). The leaves were 220
co-infiltrated with agrobacterium harboring p35S-GFP714 and agrobacterium harboring 221
pRNAi-GFP714 (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. S3A). We then constructed 9 individual local 222
sRNA libraries for NGS and generated approximately 11 million sRNA reads for each library 223
(Supplemental Table S2). We found that (i) gene-specific RNAi of DCLs or RDR6 had no 224
off-target effect on other silencing-related genes (Supplemental Fig. S5); (ii) correlation 225
analyses of total miRNAs among these sRNA libraries validated the authenticity and direct 226
comparability of the detected sRNA profiles (Supplemental Table S3 and S4); and (iii) DCL1 227
RNAi resulted in a clear reduction of miRNAs (Supplemental Fig. S6; Supplemental Table 228
S2). Compared to Nb, DCL1i and RDR6i (Fig. 2A, B and I, left panel), decreased levels in 21, 229
22, and 24 nt GFP714 L-siRNAs and total sRNAs correlated with RNAi of DCL4, DCL2, and 230
DCL3 (Fig. 2C-H, left panel; Supplemental Fig. S3B-J). These data are consistent with the 231
sRNA northern detection (Fig. 1K) and further show that as in Arabidopsis, DCL1 is also 232
required for miRNA biosynthesis in N. benthamiana. 233
Detection of L-siRNAs in Distal Systemic Leaves 234
To investigate whether GFP714 L-siRNAs generated in local leaves are able to move 235
systemically to distant tissues (Fig. 3), we collected a pool of young systemic leaves from the 236
agro-infiltrated DCL RNAi or control plants at 14 dpa and constructed 9 systemic leaf sRNA 237
libraries for NGS (Supplemental Fig. S3A). Similar to the local sRNA libraries made from 238
the infiltrated leaf tissues, we generated approximately 11 million sRNA reads for each of the 239
systemic libraries and DCL-specific RNAi was again found to have little off-target effect on 240
other silencing-related genes in the systemic leaves (Supplemental Table S2; Supplemental 241
Fig. S5). We then scrutinized the systemic leaf sRNA datasets for reads matching the GFP714 242
mRNA. Different levels of both sense and antisense 21, 22, and 24nt GFP714 L-siRNAs were 243
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
detected in systemic leaves of Nb, RDR6i, and DCL RNAi plants (Fig. 2A-I, right panel), 244
although the total number of GFP714 L-siRNA (and total sRNA) reads in the infiltrated leaves 245
was similar among all samples (Fig. 2A-I, left panel; Supplemental Table S2). We detected 246
high levels of 22 nt L-siRNAs, some 21 nt L-siRNAs, and a low level of 24 nt L-siRNAs in 247
systemic Nb leaves (Fig. 2A, right panel). However, in the young leaves of DCL1i, DCL2Ai, 248
DCL2Bi, and RDR6i plants (Fig. 2B-D and I, right panel), the number of 22 or 21 nt L-249
siRNA reads was 5-8 times lower than that in Nb. In systemic leaves of DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi 250
as well as those of DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi, only very low levels of 22 or 21 nt L-siRNAs were 251
identified (Fig. 2E-H, right panel), 45-68 fold lower than in Nb. The distribution across the 252
GFP714 mRNA of both sense and antisense 21-24 nt L-siRNAs detected in local or systemic 253
leaf tissues was almost identical among all samples (Fig. 3, left vs right panels A-I). However, 254
we failed to detect any full-length or partial GFP714 RNA in systemic young leaves in any of 255
the agro-infiltrated plants by RT-PCR using GFP714-specific primers (Supplemental Fig. S7; 256
Supplemental Table S5). 257
DCL2 Facilitates, while DCL4 and DCL3 Attenuate, Systemic PTGS 258
To analyze the impact of DCL RNAi on systemic PTGS (Fig. 4), we infiltrated leaves of Gfp 259
(resulting from a cross between Nb and 16cGFP), GfpDCL1i, GfpDCL2Ai, GfpDCL2Bi, 260
GfpDCL3Ai, GfpDCL3Bi, GfpDCL4Ai or GfpDCL4Bi plants at the six-leaf stage with 261
Agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714. It is important to note that local PTGS is induced 262
by the hairpin GFP714 that directly produces long dsRNA in the agro-infiltrated leaves. 263
However, sense transgene GFP792 silencing in local and systemic young leaves requires the 264
activity of multiple genes, including RDR6, to produce dsRNA from GFP792 ssRNA 265
(Mlotshwa et al., 2008). Under long-wavelength UV light, we observed red fluorescence in 266
halos around the infiltrated areas on Gfp and RNAi line leaves at 7 dpa (Fig. 4A; 267
Supplemental Table S6), indicating local silencing. 268
DCL1 RNAi had no obvious effect on systemic silencing in GfpDCL1i; however, 269
DCL2 RNAi resulted in no PTGS in systemic young leaves of GfpDCL2Ai and GfpDCL2Bi 270
(Fig. 4B; Supplemental Fig. S8; Supplemental Table S6). This contrasts with enhancement of 271
systemic PTGS in GfpDCL4Ai and GfpDCL4Bi or GfpDCL3Ai and GfpDCL3Bi (Fig. 4B; 272
Supplemental Fig. S8; Supplemental Table S6). Systemic silencing was further illustrated in 273
single young leaves (Fig. 4C-G). In contrast to the positive control (Fig. 4D), systemic PTGS 274
was completely absent in the young leaves of GfpDCL2Ai and GfpDCL2Bi, as in Gfp (Fig. 275
4C). Only limited silencing was observed in one leaf located immediately above the 276
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
infiltrated leaves at 18 dpa or later and such limited systemic PTGS was restricted to minor 277
veins of DCL2 RNAi plants (Fig. 4E). However, strong systemic silencing appeared in young 278
leaves of DCL3 and DCL4 RNAi lines (Fig. 4F and G). Similar results of DCL RNAi on local 279
or systemic silencing were observed in 16cGFP, homGfpDCL2Ai, homGfpDCL3Bi and 280
homGfpDCL4Ai plants as in Gfp and GfpDCL RNAi lines (Supplemental Table S6). 281
We then used northern hybridizations to detect systemic siRNA (dubbed Sy-siRNAs; 282
Fig. 4H). Sy-siRNAs are siRNAs resulting from transitive silencing of the sense transgene 283
GFP792 mRNA in non-agroinfiltrated leaves. Such systemic transitive silencing was triggered 284
by mobile signals that were generated in agro-infiltrated local leaves. Sy-siRNAs also include 285
two types of secondary siRNAs generated either from the GFP792 mRNA sequences that were 286
directly targeted by the mobile signals or from the other parts of the GFP792 mRNA 287
sequences that were not directly targeted by the mobile signals. No 21, 22, and 24 nt Sy-288
siRNAs were detected in the young leaves of GfpDCL2Ai and GfpDCL2Bi by northern blot 289
(Fig. 4H). We were also unable to detect 24 nt Sy-siRNA in GfpDCL3Ai and GfpDCL3Bi, in 290
which systemic silencing was apparently enhanced (Fig. 4B, F and H; Supplemental Fig. S8). 291
However, 21, 22, and 24 nt Sy-siRNAs accumulated to a higher level in systemic leaves of 292
GfpDCL4Ai and GfpDCL4Bi plants compared to Gfp (Fig. 4H). Considering the differential 293
functions of DCL4 and DCL2 in primary and secondary siRNA biosynthesis (Chen et al., 294
2010; Cuperus et al., 2010), and the up-regulated DCL2 expression in the DCL4 or DCL3 295
RNAi lines (Qin et al., 2017), we suspect that these Sy-siRNAs are secondary siRNAs 296
generated from the sense-transgene GFP792 mRNA. Taken together, our data demonstrate that 297
DCL2 facilitates, whilst DCL4 and DCL3 attenuate, systemic PTGS, at least for the 298
transgene-induced PTGS in N. benthamiana. 299
Genetic Interplay between DCL4 and DCL2 to Influence Systemic PTGS 300
To investigate a potential genetic link between DCL2 and DCL4 in systemic PTGS (Fig. 4I 301
and L), we infiltrated leaves of the triple-cross GfpDCL24Ai and GfpDCL24Bi (Table 1) with 302
Agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714 at the six-leaf stage. Local RNA silencing was 303
sufficiently induced, as evidenced by the appearance of red halos around the agro-infiltrated 304
lamina (Fig. 4J, i). No long-distance spread of PTGS occurred to reach systemic leaves, 305
which showed uniform green fluorescence under long-wavelength UV light (Fig. 4J, ii and iii; 306
Supplemental Table S6), although some minor vein-restricted silencing was observed in one 307
leaf immediately above the agro-infiltrated leaves (Fig. 4I). Similar systemic PTGS patterns 308
were also found in an additional DCL2-DCL4 double RNAi line GfpDCL24Ci (Table 1; 309
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
Supplemental Table S6). These findings show that 16cGFP plants with simultaneous RNAi 310
against DCL2 and DCL4 develop systemic PTGS in a manner similar to GfpDCL2Ai and 311
GfpDCL2Bi lines, but in contrast to GfpDCL4Ai and GfpDCL4Bi lines. 312
Comparison of Hairpin GFP714 and Transgene GFP792 Sequences 313
As indicated in Fig. 5, sequences of transgene 792nt-GFP792 (Haseloff et al., 1997; Ruiz et al., 314
1998) in all transgenic Gfp and GfpDCL RNAi lines and hairpin 714nt-GFP714 (Ryabov et al., 315
2004) in the pRNAi-GFP714 vector share three identical and two less-similar regions, the 316
latter named Region 1 and Region 2, respectively. GFP792 also possesses nucleotides 1-66 317
and 778-792 at both 5’- and 3’-ends that are completely absent from the GFP714 sequence. 318
Within Region 1 or Region 2, the maximum interval between any two consecutive 319
mismatched bases is 14 nt. This information is essential and relevant to our subsequent 320
siRNA profiling and bioinformatic analyses of siRNAs that may or may not be associated 321
with transitive silencing. We only counted 20-25 nt siRNAs that were perfectly (100%) 322
matched to target gene mRNAs. This means that the 20-25 nt siRNAs mapped to Region 323
1/Region 2 of the GFP792 mRNA will not be mapped to the equivalent Region 1/Region 2 of 324
the GFP714 mRNA, or vice versa. Thus, these siRNAs are exclusive to either GFP792 or 325
GFP714, and most importantly, any Sy-siRNA unique to the transgene GFP792 Region 326
1/Region 2 mRNA should be generated by transitive silencing in systemic tissues. 327
Mapping L-siRNAs and Sy-siRNAs to Transgene GFP792 mRNAs and to Hairpin 328
GFP714 dsRNA 329
To investigate whether L-siRNAs are associated with Sy-siRNA biosynthesis and systemic 330
PTGS in distal recipient tissues, we performed systemic transgene GFP792 silencing assays 331
(Supplemental Fig. S9A) and sequenced sRNA libraries generated from the infiltrated or 332
systemic leaves of Gfp, GfpDCL1i, GfpDCL2Ai, GfpDCL3Bi, GfpDCL4Ai, and GfpDCL24Ai 333
plants. Systemic transgene GFP792 silencing was triggered by mobile signals originating from 334
local PTGS that was initiated by the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA (Fig. 4; Supplemental Fig. S9B). 335
Similar to the sRNA results obtained from the non-GFP transformed RNAi lines, we 336
generated approximately 12-million sRNA reads for each library (Supplemental Table S7). 337
Interrogation of these sRNA datasets further confirmed DCL-specific RNAi and their roles in 338
siRNA biogenesis (Supplemental Fig. S9B-P; Supplemental Fig. S10). Moreover, RNAi of 339
DCL1 resulted in a clear reduction of miRNAs, although the total number of miRNAs was 340
generally higher in systemic leaves than in local infiltrated leaves (Supplemental Fig. S11). 341
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
We mapped L- and Sy-siRNAs onto the transgene GFP792 mRNA. The distribution of 342
antisense L- and Sy-siRNAs mapped to nucleotides 217-282 and 625-742 (Fig. 5, ©-labelled) 343
were essentially the same and sense L- and Sy-siRNAs mapped to nucleotides 363-402 and 344
730-773 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA (Fig. 5, ℗-labelled) in both local and systemic 345
leaves of Gfp (Fig. 6A and B), GfpDCL1Ai (Fig. 6C and D), GfpDCL2Ai (Fig. 6E-G), 346
GfpDCL3Bi (Fig. 6H and I), GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 6J and K), and GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 6L-N). The 347
L-siRNAs in these four clusters (Fig. 6A, C, E, H, J and L; asterisked) corresponded to the 348
occurrence of systemic GFP792 PTGS (Fig. 4; Supplemental Fig. S9B). We also found 349
relatively high numbers of Sy-siRNA reads in young leaves where strong systemic GFP792 350
PTGS occurred in Gfp, GfpDCL1i, GfpDCL3Bi, and GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 6B, D, I and K). 351
However, between the Gfp control and each of GfpDCL RNAi lines, we observed distinct 352
profiles of L- and Sy-siRNAs across Region 1/Region 2 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA. Sy-353
siRNAs in young leaves specifically mapped to Region 1/Region 2 (Fig. 6B, D, F, G, I, K, M 354
and N) were absent in the agro-infiltrated leaves where local silencing occurred efficiently in 355
Gfp, GfpDCL1i, GfpDCL2Ai, GfpDCL3Bi, GfpDCL4Ai, and GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 6A, C, E, H, 356
J and L). 357
We also mapped the L- and Sy-siRNAs across the GFP714 mRNA, which was only 358
expressed from pRNAi-GFP714 and formed hairpin dsRNA in the agro-infiltrated leaf lamina 359
of Gfp (Fig. 7A and B), GfpDCL1i (Fig. 7C and D), GfpDCL2Ai (Fig. 7E-G), GfpDCL3Bi 360
(Fig. 7H and I), GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 7J and K), and GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 7L-N). All four clusters 361
of siRNAs mapped to the transgene GFP792 mRNA nucleotides 217-282, 363-402, 625-742 362
and 730-773, which also mapped to the equivalent identical sequences of the GFP714 RNA. 363
However, L-siRNAs originating from the hairpin GFP714 dsRNAs were more abundant than 364
the Sy-siRNAs derived from the transgene GFP792 mRNA. Moreover, we were able to map 365
some L-siRNAs to Region 1 (nucleotide 237-306) and Region 2 (nucleotide 354-540) of the 366
hairpin GFP714 RNA (Fig. 7A, C, E, H, J and L). These two regions differ from equivalent 367
nucleotides 300-369 and 409-603 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA (Fig. 5). Intriguingly, only 368
extremely low reads of such L-siRNAs were found in systemic leaves (Fig. 7B, D, F, G, I, K, 369
M and N). 370
Taken together, these data (Figs. 5-7) suggest that (i) the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA is the 371
main sources for biogenesis of L-siRNA in local PTGS; (ii) GFP714-specific L-siRNAs 372
mapped to Regions 1/2 are present in systemic leaf tissues; (iii) L-siRNAs are associated with 373
the Sy-siRNA biogenesis and the induction of systemic GFP792 silencing; and (iv) Sy-374
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
siRNAs unique to the two specific regions i.e. Regions 1/2 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA, 375
are generated by transitive silencing in systemic young leaves. 376
Influence of DCLs on Biogenesis of 21, 22, and 24 nt L-siRNAs for Systemic Transgene 377
GFP792 Silencing 378
To further examine the association of L-siRNAs with systemic GFP792 PTGS in Gfp (Fig. 8A 379
and B), GfpDCL1i (Fig. 8C and D), GfpDCL2Ai (Fig. 8E-G), GfpDCL3Bi (Fig. 8H and I), 380
GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 8J and K), and GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 8L-N), we analyzed the size distribution 381
of sense and antisense L- and Sy-siRNAs (Fig. 8). In local silencing induced by the hairpin 382
GFP714 dsRNA, there were generally more antisense than sense L-siRNAs (Fig. 8A, C, E, H, 383
J and L). However, in systemic GFP792 PTGS, sense- and antisense Sy-siRNAs were 384
approximately equal (Fig. 8B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N). Furthermore, the distribution of 21, 385
22, and 24 nt L-siRNAs differed from that of Sy-siRNAs in infiltrated and systemic leaves 386
for Gfp (Fig. 8A and B), GfpDCL1i (Fig. 8C and D), GfpDCL2Ai (Fig. 8E-G), GfpDCL3Bi 387
(Fig. 8H and I), GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 8J and K), and GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 8L-N). 388
In Gfp and GfpDCL1Ai, the siRNA profile was almost identical, but shifted from 22, 389
21 and 24 nt L-siRNAs (approximately “2.5:2:1” ratio for sense L-siRNA and about 1.4:1.2:1 390
for antisense L-siRNA) for local silencing to predominantly 21 nt along with some 22 nt 391
(approximately 6 fold less than 21 nt) and low level of 24 nt (around 300 times less than 21 nt) 392
Sy-siRNAs for systemic PTGS (Fig. 8A-D). However, RNAi of DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 had 393
different impacts on the accumulation of 21, 22, and 24 nt L- and Sy-siRNAs. In local 394
silencing, high levels of 24 and/or 21nt L-siRNAs were generated in GfpDCL2Ai and 395
GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 8E and L). Only a very low level of Sy-siRNAs (103-10
5 fold less than L-396
siRNAs) was found in young leaves which showed no systemic silencing (Fig. 8G and N), 397
although 100-200 or less of 21, 22, and 24 nt Sy-siRNAs were detected in leaves with minor 398
vein-restricted systemic PTGS (Fig. 8F and M). The decrease in the 22 nt L-siRNAs was 399
closely correlated with the decrease in the levels of Sy-siRNAs, as well as with the abolition 400
and/or reduction of systemic GFP792 silencing in young leaves of GfpDCL2Ai and 401
GfpDCL24Ai (Fig. 4; Supplemental Fig. S8; Supplemental Fig. S9B). 402
By contrast, the enhanced systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS and the increased Sy-403
siRNA reads in young leaves were positively linked with the elevated levels of 22 nt L-404
siRNAs in local tissues of GfpDCL3Ai (Fig. 8H) and GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 8J). However, we 405
observed a reduction in the level of 24 nt L-siRNAs (nearly none) in GfpDCL3Bi (Fig. 8H) as 406
well as a decrease in 21 nt L-siRNAs (3-4 fold less than 22 nt L-siRNAs) in GfpDCL4Ai (Fig. 407
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
8J), consistent with sRNA northern detection (Fig. 4H). Further siRNA size profiling 408
confirmed that the levels of 22 nt L-siRNA were linked with efficient systemic transgene 409
GFP792 PTGS, whereas variations in 21 and 24 nt L-siRNAs did not affect Sy-siRNA 410
production and the occurrence of systemic GFP792 silencing (Supplemental Fig. S12). 411
Requirement of DCL2 to Respond to Mobile Systemic PTGS 412
To further investigate the genetic mechanism involved in the control of systemic PTGS, we 413
used 16cGFP, homGfpDCL4Ai, and homGfpDCL2Ai (Table 1) as either rootstocks or scions 414
in reciprocal grafting experiments (Fig. 9). When grafted onto the sense transgene GFP792-415
silenced homGfpDCL4Ai stocks, homGfpDCL2Ai scions developed no PTGS and showed 416
strong GFP green fluorescence (Fig. 9A and B). However, in the reciprocal grafting, strong 417
sense transgene-mediated PTGS occurred in homGfpDCL4Ai scions three weeks after 418
grafting (wag), even if homGfpDCL2Ai stocks had very limited transgene GFP792 silencing 419
(Fig. 9C, inlet). In controls, efficient PTGS took place at 3 wag in homGfpDCL4Ai scions 420
that were grafted onto GFP792-silenced homGfpDCL4Ai stocks (Fig. 9D). In a different 421
experimental setting, homGfpDCL2Ai scions grafted onto pre-silenced 16cGFP stocks 422
remained un-silenced throughout the experiments, whilst homGfpDCL4Ai scions developed 423
systemic PTGS at 3 wag (Fig. 9E and F). These results demonstrate that (i) DCL4 is unlikely 424
required to produce and respond to mobile silencing signals for systemic PTGS, and (ii) 425
DCL2 is required in the scion to respond to the signal, but not in the rootstock to 426
produce/send the signal. 427
DISCUSSION 428
Genetic insights into mobile RNA silencing and involvement of mobile signal(s) in systemic 429
silencing remain two of the least understood, but yet most debated and divisive topics in the 430
field of plant RNA silencing. Using a suite of DCL RNAi lines together with a GFP reporter, 431
grafting, sRNA hybridization and NGS approaches, we have found that gene-specific 432
suppression of DCL2 expression reduces systemic PTGS. DCLs play central roles in the 433
biogenesis of 21, 22, and 24 nt antisense and sense L-siRNAs in incipient cells. DCL2 is 434
required to respond to mobile signals in recipient cells, but to produce such signals in 435
incipient cells. DCL4 or DCL3 inhibit non-cell autonomous PTGS in systemic tissues. We 436
also extensively profiled L- and Sy-siRNAs associated with both local hairpin dsRNA-437
mediated silencing and systemic transitive sense-transgene PTGS, and examined how L-438
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
siRNAs generated by DCLs affect long-distance spread of PTGS. We propose that DCL2 is 439
the key player along with DCL4 and DCL3, as well as mobile siRNAs in systemic PTGS (Fig. 440
10). Thus, we report several novel findings that shed light on how systemic PTGS is 441
genetically and molecularly regulated in N. benthamiana. 442
1) We have generated transgenic DCL RNAi lines for dissecting intra-/intercellular and 443
systemic PTGS (Table 1). DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 are responsible for the biogenesis 444
of miRNAs and 22, 24, and 21 nt siRNAs, respectively, in N. benthamiana. DCL4 and the 445
DCL4-processed 21 nt siRNAs are essential for local hairpin dsRNA-mediated PTGS, whilst 446
DCL2 or DCL3 and their cognate 22 or 24 nt L-siRNAs are not critical for such intracellular 447
silencing (Fig. 1). 448
2) Local PTGS induced by the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA can lead to efficient biogenesis of 449
mobile L-siRNAs in incipient cells and local leaf tissues (Figs. 1-3). Our experimental system 450
(Supplemental Fig. 3A) avoids the amplification and cascading production of siRNAs in 451
remote recipient cells and enables unambiguous detection of different sized L-siRNAs in 452
systemic leaves. However, neither long (full-length or partial) GFP714 RNA (Supplemental 453
Fig. S7) nor agrobacterium-originated siRNA (Supplemental Table S2) was detectable in 454
young leaves, although these results do not rule out the possibility that long RNAs are present 455
and serve as the mobile signal. Moreover, the total number of GFP714 L-siRNA (and total 456
sRNA) reads in local leaf tissues and their distributions across the GFP714 RNA are almost 457
identical among Nb, RDR6i and all DCL RNAi lines (Figs. 2 and 3). The L-siRNAs detected 458
in systemic leaves are mainly 22 and 21 nt, but some are 24 nt (Fig. 2). These mobile L-459
siRNAs were not particularly abundant in systemic young leaf tissues, but consistent with the 460
levels of mobile siRNAs reported in Arabidopsis (Molnar et al., 2010). These data indicate 461
that all sized sense and antisense L-siRNAs are capable of trafficking over long distances 462
(Fig. 10A). Compared to Nb, the reduced levels of L-siRNAs in distal tissues of all RNAi 463
lines suggest that RDR6 and DCLs, particularly DCL3 and DCL4, contribute to the systemic 464
spread of L-siRNAs (Fig. 2). Indeed, genetic analyses have demonstrated that RDR6 is 465
required for perception of long-distance silencing signals (Schwach et al., 2005; Melnyk et al., 466
2011b) and DCL2 responds to mobile silencing for efficient systemic PTGS in plants (Fig. 4; 467
Taochy et al., 2017). However, even if locally produced siRNAs are mobile, this does not 468
prove that siRNAs are the signal. 469
3) Genetic analysis indicates that DCL1 is unlikely to be involved in local hairpin 470
dsRNA-mediated PTGS, although a slightly elevated level of target mRNA was detected in 471
DCL1i plants (Fig. 1) and sense-transgene induced systemic PTGS (Figs. 4). This conclusion 472
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
is supported by the identical profiles of L-siRNAs or Sy-siRNAs in both Gfp and GfpDCL1i 473
plants (Figs. 6-8). Further, the altered size profiles between L- and Sy-siRNAs in Gfp and 474
GfpDCL1i (Fig. 8) implies that the local and systemic PTGS are likely two linked processes 475
with distinct molecular and genetic requirements. Indeed, local PTGS is induced by a hairpin 476
GFP714 RNA that directly produces long dsRNA, which differs from the sense transgene 477
GFP792-mediated PTGS in systemic leaf tissues. In the latter case, dsRNA is not produced 478
directly, but its production from ssRNA requires the activity of several genes, including 479
RDR6 and DCL2 (Mlotshwa et al., 2008). 480
4) DCL2 RNAi reduces systemic PTGS and blocks the exit of the mobile silencing 481
signal from vascular tissues to the surrounding mesophyll cells, indicating that DCL2 is 482
required for long-distance spread of PTGS (Fig. 4), consistent with that DCL2 promotes, 483
whilst DCL4 inhibits, cell-to-cell spread of VIGS (Qin et al., 2017). Moreover, DCL2 is 484
required to respond to mobile signals for systemic PTGS (Fig. 9), supported by a recent 485
report of a critical role of DCL2 in systemic PTGS in Arabidopsis (Taochy et al., 2017). 486
DCL2 is thus involved in promoting the long-distance (leaf-to-leaf) and short-distance 487
movement (vascular cells to neighboring cells) of PTGS in addition to its role in generating 488
the 22 nt siRNAs. On the other hand, our grafting experiments showed that DCL2 is not 489
required in the rootstock for producing/sending the signal (Fig. 9). However, in contrast to 490
complete loss-of-function mutants, RNAi lines are partial loss-of-function. It thus remains 491
possible that in the DCL2i rootstock, residual DCL2 could still produce some transportable 492
molecules and such signals could then be perceived by DCL2 in recipient cells where DCL4 493
is knocked-down by RNAi to trigger systemic transitive PTGS (Fig. 9). Taochy et al. (2017) 494
have elegantly shown that Arabidopsis DCL2 is required in both the source rootstock and 495
recipient shoot tissue for RDR6-dependent systemic PTGS, although this latest discovery is 496
in contrast to their previous finding (Brosnan et al., 2007). 497
5) Contrary to DCL2, DCL4 and DCL3 inhibit sense transgene-mediated systemic PTGS, 498
as RNAi of DCL4 or DCL3 enhances systemic PTGS in distant young leaves (Fig. 4). Our 499
data also reveal that DCL4 has an epistatic effect on DCL2, thereby influencing systemic 500
PTGS in N. benthamiana (Fig. 4I and J). Only DCL2 is required to respond to mobile signals 501
for systemic PTGS in the reciprocal DCL2i-DCL4i grafting experiments (Fig. 9) and RNAi of 502
DCL4 or DCL3 has been found to up-regulate DCL2 expression (Qin et al., 2017). Taken 503
together, our findings suggest that a DCL2-dependent DCL genetic network regulates non-504
cell autonomous systemic silencing (Fig. 10B). A hierarchical interaction between DCL4 and 505
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
DCL2 to affect cell autonomous PTGS was also reported in Arabidopsis (Bouche et al., 2006; 506
Henderson et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2005). 507
6) Our work implicates or excludes the involvement of certain types of RNAs in mobile 508
systemic PTGS (Fig. 10A). First, combined with earlier elegant work showing that DCL2 is 509
required for transitive silencing (Mlotshwa et al., 2008; Parent et al., 2015), our results 510
suggest that the plant’s response to the signal requires a set of genes that are unique to 511
transitive silencing (i.e., genes that play a role in the production of dsRNA). Thus, these 512
results suggest that the signal for systemic silencing in plants is not itself dsRNA, in contrast 513
to dsRNA being required for the systemic spread of RNAi in animals (Jose et al., 2011). 514
Second, detection of L-siRNAs in systemic tissues implies that mobile L-siRNAs 515
might contribute to systemic PTGS. This notion is supported by the L- and Sy-siRNA 516
profiles associated with the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA-mediated local silencing and systemic 517
transgene GFP792 silencing. The identical distributions of the four clusters of L- and Sy-518
siRNAs across nucleotides 625-742 and 217-282, 730-773 and 363-402 of the transgene 519
GFP792 mRNA and the equivalent sequences of the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA (Fig. 5, labelled 520
© or ℗) suggest that L-siRNAs originated from these parts of the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA 521
might represent a component of mobile signals for the biosynthesis of Sy-siRNA and for 522
systemic induction of GFP792 silencing in distal recipient cells (Figs. 6 and 7, asterisk). 523
Consistent with this, the abundance of the four clusters of Sy-siRNAs associated with 524
systemic GFP792 PTGS are much less than the corresponding L-siRNAs associated with local 525
silencing induced by the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA in control and all RNAi lines (Figs. 6 and 7, 526
asterisk). Furthermore, L-siRNAs specific to Regions 1/2 of the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA were 527
found in systemic leaf tissues (Fig. 7). By contrast, Sy-siRNAs unique to Regions 1/2 of the 528
transgene GFP792 mRNA (these two regions have different sequences between GFP714 and 529
GFP792; Fig. 5), were not found in local leaves where primary silencing efficiently occurred 530
(Fig. 6). These results suggest that Sy-siRNAs distinct to Regions 1/2 of the GFP792 mRNA 531
must have been generated from transitive sense-transgene silencing in systemic leaf cells and 532
tissues. Such transitive PTGS was likely induced by secondary siRNAs that were produced 533
from primary silencing of the GFP792 mRNA sequences, directly targeted by the four clusters 534
of mobile L-siRNAs that were generated from the identical GFP714 sequences in local PTGS 535
(Figs. 6-8; Fig. 10A). However, these results do not exclude the possible involvement of 536
other types of RNAs in systemic RNA silencing in plants. 537
Third, the 21 or 24 nt L-siRNAs processed by DCL4 or DCL3 and their precursor 538
RNAs are unlikely to be a major component of the mobile signal for systemic PTGS (Fig. 8), 539
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
in line with our genetic and functional analysis of DCLs in systemic silencing (Fig. 4). That 540
suppression of DCL4 or DCL3 enhanced systemic silencing and the levels of 21 or 24 nt L-541
siRNAs were not correlated with the biogenesis of GFP792 Sy-siRNAs (Fig. 8) and the 542
intensity of systemic PTGS in all GfpDCL RNAi lines (Fig. 4) provides evidence to support 543
such a conclusion. This is also consistent with fact that DCL4 and DCL3 proteins are not 544
required for the production of the sRNA signals in Arabidopsis (Brosnan et al., 2007; Taochy 545
et al., 2017). 546
Fourth, the levels of DCL2-processed 22 nt L-siRNAs were weakly correlated with 547
the induction of systemic PTGS. Mapping L- and Sy-siRNAs onto the transgene GFP792 548
mRNA and hairpin GFP714 dsRNA identified sense and antisense 22 nt L-siRNAs that might 549
be required for systemic GFP792 PTGS in distal recipient cells. It is evident that the varied 550
levels of the 22 nt L and Sy-siRNAs mapped to the transgene GFP792 antisense sequences 551
625-742 and 217-282, and sense strand 730-773 and 363-402 (Supplemental Fig. S12) were 552
linked to the induction of systemic GFP792 silencing in each RNAi lines (Fig. 4). This is also 553
consistent with the high levels of 21, 22, and 24 nt Sy-siRNAs in GfpDCL4Ai, likely 554
resulting from DCL2 and DCL2-processed 22 nt siRNAs that may trigger efficient 555
biosynthesis of secondary Sy-siRNAs in the systemic leaf tissues (Chen et al., 2010; Cuperus 556
et al., 2010; Mlotshwa et al., 2008). However, these findings per se are not direct evidence 557
that DCL2-processed 22 nt L-siRNAs and/or their precursors are the bona fide signals for 558
induction of Sy-siRNA biogenesis and systemic transitive PTGS. 559
Nonetheless, the molecular nature of systemic PTGS signals needs further 560
characterisation. DCL4-processed 21 nt siRNA or DCL3-processed 24 nt siRNA and their 561
precursors may not be involved in long-distance PTGS signalling, even though 21 and 24 nt 562
siRNAs act primarily as intra- and intercellular triggers for RNA-directed degradation of 563
target mRNA or RdDM (Lewsey et al., 2016; Melnyk et al., 2011a; 2011b; Sarkies and 564
Miska, 2014). In Arabidopsis, the DCL3-processed 24 nt siRNAs are thought to be the main 565
signals for systemic TGS (Lewsey et al., 2016; Melnyk et al., 2011a; Molnar et al., 2010). 566
However, we have not examined the roles of DCLs and mobile siRNAs in systemic TGS in N. 567
benthamiana. Furthermore, whether the DCL2-processed/dependent 22 nt siRNAs and/or 568
their precursors could serve as signals for systemic PTGS requires further investigation, even 569
though 22 nt sRNAs can effectively trigger biogenesis of secondary siRNAs of various sizes 570
in plants (Chen et al., 2010; Cuperus et al., 2010; Mlotshwa et al., 2008) and DCL2 and 571
DCL2-processed 22 nt siRNAs are involved in the cell-to-cell spread of VIGS in N. 572
benthamiana (Qin et al., 2017). 573
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
Our findings also differ from early works showing that long-distance movement of 574
transitive silencing occurs in the absence of sRNAs in the rootstock (Mallory et al., 2001), 575
and that no specific sRNAs are associated with systemic silencing in Arabidopsis (Brosnan et 576
al., 2007; Taochy et al., 2017). Considering the transitivity and sequence-specificity of RNA 577
silencing along with the fact that various types of RNA molecules can trigger cell-578
autonomous silencing, we concede that various forms of transportable RNAs, if they can be 579
perceived and processed by DCL2 or a DCL2-dependent pathway in recipient cells, could 580
function as systemic silencing signals (Fig. 10A). On the other hand, DCL4 and DCL3 could 581
affect DCL2-mediated systemic PTGS through their negative regulation of DCL2 expression 582
(Qin et al., 2017), which would indirectly influence DCL2 activity in systemic PTGS. 583
Additionally, DCLs may compete with each other for dsRNA substrates. The loss of DCL4 or 584
DCL3 could enhance the DCL2 output, because the level of dsRNA substrate for DCL2 is 585
increased in both incipient and recipient cells. Cross-regulation among DCLs could also 586
occur at transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and/or translational levels. These mechanisms 587
may act synergistically for DCLs to maximize production of the mobile signals for systemic 588
PTGS (Fig. 10B), in contrast to what has been described in Arabidopsis (Melnyk et al., 2011b; 589
Sarkies and Miska, 2014). Nevertheless, findings from different non-cell autonomous 590
silencing systems may not necessarily be exclusive of each other. There may be various 591
routes to mobile silencing in different plants. N. benthamiana is a natural rdr1 mutant and 592
might behave differently compared to Arabidopsis (Nakasugi et al., 2013). The occurrence of 593
cell-type or tissue dependent functions and specificities of different DCL proteins or different 594
domain arrangements of the DCL proteins has also been reported in N. benthamiana (Andika 595
et al., 2015; Nakasugi et al., 2013). 596
In conclusion, along with our recent work (Qin et al., 2017), we demonstrate that a 597
complex genetic and regulatory network involving DCL2, DCL4, and DCL3 may govern the 598
rate and characteristics of the mobile PTGS (Fig. 10). DCL2 plays a centre role in response to 599
mobile signals for systemic PTGS in distal recipient cells. We have also highlighted the 600
potential (non)-involvement of RNAs, including different sized siRNAs, in systemic PTGS. 601
Arabidopsis DCLs have distinct functions in mobile silencing, but in N. benthamiana their 602
counterparts appear to behave similarly in intracellular silencing to generate miRNAs and 21, 603
22, or 24 nt siRNAs (this study; Katsarou et al., 2016; Qin et al., 2017), but act coordinately 604
to fulfil different roles in systemic PTGS. Thus, our work provides a new framework to test 605
whether the DCL2-centered DCL genetic pathway for systemic PTGS is the representative 606
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
model for the majority of plant species and to unravel mobile signals for systemic PTGS in 607
plants, as well as in (and across) organisms of different kingdoms. 608
MATERIALS AND METHODS 609
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions 610
Non-transformed N. benthamiana and transgenic N. benthamiana plants (Table 1) were 611
grown and maintained in insect-free glasshouses and growth-rooms at 25°C with 612
supplementary light (13,000 Lux intensity/Visible 40W LED Light Bulbs) to give a 16-hour 613
photoperiod. 614
Plasmid Constructs and Plant Transformation 615
The GFP714 coding sequence (Ryabov et al., 2004) was PCR-amplified and cloned between 616
the duplicated 35S CaMV promoter and the NOS terminator of pJG045, a pCAMBIA1300-617
based vector, to produce p35S-GFP714 (Supplemental Fig. S1A). To generate gene-specific 618
hairpin DCL- and GFP714-RNAi constructs (Supplemental Fig. S1B), cDNA fragments 619
corresponding to nucleotides 4835-5075 of DCL1 (Genbank number FM986780), nucleotides 620
3382-3582 of DCL2 (Genbank number FM986781), nucleotides 4167-4347 of DCL3 621
(Genbank number FM986782), nucleotides 3283-3482 of DCL4 (Genbank number 622
FM986783), or the full-length GFP714 (nucleotides 1-714) sequence were cloned into the 623
RNAi vector pRNAi-LIC as described (Xu et al., 2010). There is no sequence similarity 624
among the DCL fragments (Supplemental Table S1; Supplemental Data Set S1). The full-625
length GFP714 sequence (Ryabov et al., 2004) was also cloned into pMD18-T (Takara) to 626
produce pT7.GFP from which GFP714 RNA transcripts were produced by in vitro 627
transcription using the T7 RNA polymerase. Primers used for these constructs are listed in 628
Supplemental Table S5. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. 629
pRNAi-DCL1, pRNAi-DCL2, pRNAi-DCL3, and pRNAi-DCL4 were transformed 630
into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404, and pRNAi-GFP714 and p35S-GFP714 were 631
introduced into A. tumefaciens EHA105. Transgenic N. benthamiana plants were generated 632
by Agrobacterium-mediated leaf disc transformation as described (Hong et al., 1996). Two 633
independent homozygous lines (DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi, DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi, DCL4Ai and 634
DCL4Bi) with a single-copy of each RNAi construct were obtained. Line DCL4Bi was 635
crossed with DCL2Ai to produce DCL24i. DCLi lines were crossed with the GFP transgenic 636
line 16cGFP that constitutively expresses GFP792 (Haseloff et al., 1997; Ruiz et al., 1998) to 637
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
produce GfpDCL2Ai, GfpDCL2Bi, GfpDCL3Ai, GfpDCL3B, GfpDCL4Ai, GfpDCL4Bi, 638
GfpDCL24Ai, and GfpDCL24Bi, respectively. At the later stage of this project, we also 639
generated homozygous homGfpDCL2Ai, homGfpDCL3Bi, homGfpDCL4Ai, and 640
GfpDCL24Ci through selfing. Only one hemizygous DCL1i or GfpDCL1i line was generated 641
through direct transformation of N. benthamiana or 16cGFP with pRNAi-DCL1 642
(Supplemental Fig. S1B). All transgenic lines used in this study are summarized in Table 1. It 643
should be noted that DCL RNAi is gene-specific and has no obvious off-target effect on other 644
DCL and RNA silencing-associated genes (Supplemental Data Set S1; Supplemental Fig. S5 645
and S10). 646
Local RNA Silencing and Small RNA Mobility Assay (SRMA) 647
The experimental design for local RNA silencing and SRMA to detect long-distance 648
movement of siRNAs from local to systemic young leaves is outlined in Supplemental Fig. 649
S3A. Two young leaves per N. benthamiana or DCLi plant (six plants at the six-leaf stage in 650
each experiment) were co-infiltrated with 1 OD600 agrobacterium harbouring p35S-GFP714 651
and agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714 in repeated experiments. In co-infiltrated leaf 652
cells, pRNAi-GFP714 is expected to generate hairpin GFP714 dsRNA that are diced into 653
siRNAs. These siRNAs targeted and degraded GFP714 mRNA transcribed from the p35S-654
GFP714 expression cassette, leading to disappearance of GFP fluorescence. Green 655
fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ software following the software provider’s 656
guidance (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Infiltrated leaf tissues from 3-4 different plants at 7 days 657
post agro-infiltration (dpa), and four newly developed young leaves of each of 3-4 different 658
plants at 14 dpa were collected and pooled for sRNA extraction and construction of sRNA 659
libraries. 660
Systemic RNA Silencing and Grafting Experiments 661
Systemic RNA silencing was performed for each line as outlined in Supplemental Fig. S9A. 662
Briefly, leaves from six seedlings at the six-leaf stage of transgenic GFP792 line Gfp and 663
GfpDCL RNAi lines were agroinfiltrated with freshly cultured agrobacterium (1 OD600) 664
carrying pRNAi-GFP714 as previously described (Hong et al., 2003). Plant grafting was 665
performed as described by Schwach et al. (2005). Induction and spread of GFP silencing was 666
routinely examined under long-wavelength UV light and recorded photographically using a 667
Nikon Digital Camera D7000. Red halos on the infiltrated leaves and regions of leaf lamina 668
where GFP silencing occurred show red chlorophyll fluorescence, whilst tissues expressing 669
GFP show green fluorescence under long-wavelength UV light. Local and systemic RNA 670
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
silencing assays were performed for each line in at least two separate experiments. N. 671
benthamiana is an allotetraploid (Nakasugi et al., 2014); however, the specific RNAi 672
constructs described above only knock down specific DCL expression in spite of the 673
homeologous and duplicated gene copies in the genome. This should not interfere with the 674
analysis of the impact of DCL RNAi on cell and non-cell autonomous RNA silencing. 675
Agroinfiltrated leaf tissues were collected from 3-4 plants at 7 dpa and pooled for sRNA 676
extraction and construction of local sRNA libraries. Young leaves with systemic GFP792 677
PTGS from 3-4 plants of each of the Gfp, GfpDCL1i, GfpDCL3Bi and GfpDCL4Ai lines, 678
leaves with weak vein-restricted systemic PTGS from 3-4 plants of each of the GfpDCL2Ai 679
and GfpDCL24Ai lines, or young leaves without systemic PTGS from 3-4 plants of each of 680
the GfpDCL2Ai and GfpDCL24Ai lines were collected at 14 dpa and pooled for sRNA 681
extraction and construction of systemic sRNA libraries. 682
RNA Extraction and Northern Detection of mRNA and siRNA 683
For RT-PCR and quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), total RNAs were extracted from 684
leaf tissues using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit as recommended by the manufacturer 685
(Tiangen). For Northern blot, total RNAs were extracted from leaf tissues with Trizol reagent 686
as recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNAs (5 μg) extracted 687
from infiltrated tissues were separated on a 1% formaldehyde agarose gel, transferred to 688
Hybond-N+ membranes (Amersham Biosciences) by upward capillary transfer in 20xSSC 689
buffer, then cross-linked to the membrane with an UVP CX 2000 UV crosslinker four times 690
(upside, downside, upside, downside) at 120 millijoules/cm2, 1 minute each. Membranes 691
were hybridized with digoxigenin (Dig)-labelled GFP DNA probes prepared using the DIG 692
High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Roche). RNAs were detected using a DIG Nucleic Acid 693
Detection Kit (Roche) as recommended by the manufacturer. Chemilluminescent signals 694
were detected with a ChemiDocTM
XRS+ imaging System (Bio Rad). 695
To analyze siRNAs, low-molecular-mass sRNAs were enriched from total RNA as 696
described (Hamilton and Baulcombe, 1999). The enriched sRNAs (2.5 μg) were fractionated 697
on an 18% denaturing polyacrylamide/7 M urea gel in 1 x Tris–borate–EDTA (TBE) buffer. 698
Small RNAs were transferred to Hybond-N+ membranes (Amersham Biosciences) by 699
upward capillary transfer in 20xSSC buffer, then cross-linked to the membranes with an UVP 700
CX 2000 UV Crosslinker four times (upside, underside, upside, underside) at 120 701
millijoules/cm2, for 1 minute each time. The membranes were hybridized with digoxigenin 702
(Dig)-labelled GFP RNA probes using a DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche) as recommended by 703
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
the manufacturer. The hybridization chemiluminescence signals were detected with a 704
ChemiDocTM
XRS+ imaging System (Bio Rad). 705
RT-PCR and RT-qPCR 706
First-strand cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg total RNAs that were pre-treated with 1 unit 707
RNase-free DNase I as templates by the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). RT-PCR 708
analyses of GFP714 RNA were performed using various sets of primers listed in Supplemental 709
Table S5. The RT–qPCR analyses of DCL mRNA levels were performed using DCL-specific 710
primers (Supplemental Table S5) and the SYBR Green Mix. The amplification program for 711
SYBR Green I was performed at 95C for 10 seconds, 58C for 30 seconds and 72C for 20 712
seconds on a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad), following the 713
manufacturer’s instructions. Quadruplicate quantitative assays were performed on cDNA of 714
each of the four biological duplicates (leaf tissues from four different treated plants). The 715
relative quantification of DCL mRNA was calculated using the formula 2–ΔΔCt
and normalized 716
to the amount of GAPDH transcripts (GenBank accession number TC17509) as described 717
(Qin et al., 2012). RT-qPCR data between control and various treatments were analysed by 718
Student’s t-test (http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html). The statistical significance 719
threshold was P ≤ 0.05. 720
Construction of sRNA Library and sRNA Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) 721
Fragments of 18-30 bases long RNA were isolated from total RNA extracted from pooled 722
samples of 3-4 different plants for each of the biological and technical duplicates after being 723
separated through 15% denaturing PAGE. The pooled samples contained leaf tissues from 3-6 724
leaves per plant. Then sRNAs were excised from the gel and sequentially ligated to a 3’ 725
adapter and a 5’ adapter. After each ligation step, sRNAs were purified after 15% denaturing 726
PAGE. The final purified ligation products were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using reverse 727
transcriptase (Finnzymes Oy). The first strand cDNA was PCR amplified using Phusion* 728
DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes Oy). The purified DNA fragments were used for clustering and 729
sequencing by Illumina Hiseq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at the Beijing Genomics 730
Institute, Shenzhen. 731
Bioinformatics Analysis of sRNA Sequences 732
Illumina HighSeq 2000 sequencing produced a similar number of 11-12 million reads per 733
sRNA library. The reads were cropped to remove adapter sequences and were aligned to the 734
reference sequences using Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). Reference sequences 735
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
include hairpin GFP714 (Rabyov et al., 2004), GFP792 transgene (Haseloff et al., 1997), 736
DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 gene sequences (Nakasugi et al., 2013) and a set of 737
50 tobacco miRNAs identified in Nicotiana plants (Pandey et al., 2008; Fig. 5; Supplemental 738
Data Set S1). SAMtools pileup was used to produce the siRNA and miRNA coverage profiles 739
(Li et al., 2009). For correlation analyses for sRNA libraries, the number of miRNA hits 740
corresponding to the previously identified set of 50 Nicotiana miRNAs was determined. All 741
analyzed sRNA libraries for local and systemic leaf samples contained similar proportions of 742
host-encoded miRNA reads (Nakasugi et al., 2013; Ryabov et al., 2014), indicating 743
equivalence and direct comparability of the datasets and no variation due to the efficiency of 744
library preparation and sequencing (Supplemental Tables S2 and S7; Supplemental Figs. S5, 745
S6, S10 and S11). Outcomes of comparisons between normalized siRNAs against the total 746
sRNA reads (per 10 million sRNA reads) are consistent with the numbers of siRNA reads 747
directly compared. 748
Accession Numbers 749
DCL1: Genbank number FM986780; DCL2: Genbank number FM986781; DCL3: Genbank 750
number FM986782; DCL4: Genbank number FM986783; and GAPDH: GenBank accession 751
number TC17509. 752
Supplemental Material 753
754
Supplemental Tables 755
Supplemental Table S1. Nucleotide Sequence Similarity (%) between DCL Fragments in the 756
pRNAi-DCLs Constructs. 757
Supplemental Table S2. Summary of sRNAseq datasets of 18 GFP714 sRNA Libraries for 758
Long-distance Spread of siRNAs. 759
Supplemental Table S3. Correlation analyses of miRNA profiles among agro-infiltrated leaf 760
sRNA libraries (Nb background). 761
Supplemental Table S4. Correlation analyses of miRNA profiles among systemic leaf sRNA 762
libraries (Nb background). 763
Supplemental Table S5. Primers Used in This Study. 764
Supplemental Table S6. Impact of DCL RNAi on Systemic PTGS. 765
Supplemental Table S7. Summary of sRNAseq Datasets of 14 sRNA Libraries for Local 766
and Systemic PTGS. 767
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
Supplemental Table S8. Correlation analyses of miRNA profiles among agro-infiltrated leaf 768
sRNA libraries (16cGFP Transgenic Background). 769
Supplemental Table S9. Correlation analyses of miRNA profiles among systemic leaf sRNA 770
libraries (16cGFP Transgenic Background). 771
Supplemental Figures 772
Supplemental Figure S1. Construction of Gene Expression and RNAi Vectors. 773
Supplemental Figure S2. RNAi Effects on DCL Gene Expression. 774
Supplemental Figure S3. NGS detection of total small RNAs in local and systemic leaves. 775
Supplemental Figure S4. Effect of DCL RNAi on Local GFP714 RNA Silencing. 776
Supplemental Figure S5. DCL RNAi Does Not Cause Off-target Silencing of Genes 777
Associated with RNAi Pathways in Nb Backgound Plants –sRNA Reads in 18 sRNA 778
Libraries. 779
Supplemental Figure S6. miRNA Reads in 18 sRNA Libraries (Nb Background). 780
Supplemental Figure S7. No Long-distance Movement of Large GFP714 RNA. 781
Supplemental Figure S8. Impact of DCL RNAi on Systemic PTGS. 782
Supplemental Figure S9. Size Profiles for Total sRNAs in Local and Systemic Leaves. 783
Supplemental Figure S10. DCL RNAi Does Not Cause Off-target Silencing of Genes 784
Associated with RNAi Pathways in 16cGFP Transgenic Background Plants – sRNA Reads 785
in 14 sRNA Libraries. 786
Supplemental Figure S11. miRNA Reads in 14 sRNA Libraries (16cGFP Transgenic 787
Background). 788
Supplemental Figure S12. Specific 21-24nt siRNA Distributions across the Transgene 789
GFP792 mRNA. 790
Supplemental Data 791
Supplemental Data Set S1. Reference Sequences Used in This Study. 792
Supplemental Data Set S2. DCL RNAi Does Not Cause Off-target Silencing of Genes 793
Associated with RNAi Pathways in Nb Backgound Plants – sRNA Reads in 18 sRNA 794
Libraries. 795
Supplemental Data Set S3. miRNA Reads in 18 sRNA Libraries (Nb Background). 796
Supplemental Data Set S4. DCL RNAi Does Not Cause Off-target Silencing of Genes 797
Associated with RNAi Pathways in 16cGFP Transgenic Background Plants – sRNA Reads 798
in 14 sRNA Libraries. 799
Supplemental Data Set S5. miRNA Reads in 14 sRNA Libraries (16cGFP Transgenic 800
Background). 801
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 802
We are indebted to David Baulcombe for his kind gift of 16cGFP, RDR6i and GfpRDR6i 803
seeds and for his constructive and critical comments on the manuscript. The corresponding 804
author thanks Mahmut Tör for reading the manuscript. No conflict of interest is declared. 805
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
FIGURE LEGENDS 806
Figure 1. Impact of DCL RNAi on Local Hairpin dsRNA-mediated PTGS. (A-I) Local PTGS 807
assay. The left half of leaves of N. benthamiana (A), DCL1i (B), DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi (C, D), 808
DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi (E, F), DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi (G, H) and DCL24i (I) plants were co-809
infiltrated with agrobacterium harbouring p35S-GFP714 and pRNAi-GFP714 and the right half with 810
p35S-GFP714 and the pRNAi-empty vector. Without PTGS, GFP714 expression from p35S-GFP714 811
shows strong green fluorescence. Induction of PTGS by the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA generated 812
from pRNAi-GFP eliminates GFP714 expression and the infiltrated lamina show red auto-813
fluorescence. DCL4 RNAi attenuated intracellular silencing and the level of PTGS decreased in 814
DCL4Ai, DCL4Bi and DCL24i plants. Some green fluorescence is still be visible in the infiltrated 815
lamina of these plants (G-I). Photographs were taken under long-wavelength UV light (upper 816
panel) or through a stereo-fluorescent microscope (lower panel) at 4 days post-agroinfiltration 817
(dpa). Bar=100 μm. The ratio in the bottom right corner of each panel indicates the number of 818
plants out of the number of agro-infiltrated plants that developed local PTGS in two experiments. 819
The green fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ software (Supplemental Fig. S4). 820
(J) Analysis of GFP714 mRNA in DCL RNAi lines. Northern detection was performed using 821
GFP714-specific probes (upper panel). Equal loading of total RNAs extracted from leaf tissues at 822
4 dpa is indicated by the equal amount of 18S and 28S rRNAs shown on the gel (lower panel). 823
The position and size of GFP714 mRNA and 18S and 28S rRNA are indicated. (K) Detection of 824
local L-siRNAs. L-siRNAs were analysed by small RNA Northern blots (upper panel). Equal 825
loading of sRNAs extracted from leaf tissues at 4 dpa is indicated by the equal amount of 5S 826
rRNA/tRNAs shown on gel (lower panel). The position of 21, 22 and 24 nt siRNA as well as 5S 827
rRNA/tRNAs are indicated. 828
Figure 2. Detection of L-siRNAs in local and systemic leaves. (A-I) GFP714 L-siRNAs 829
generated from hairpin dsRNA-mediated local PTGS can be detected in distal systemic young 830
leaves. Sense (blue) and antisense (red) 21, 22 and 24 nt L-siRNAs were present in local (left 831
panel) and systemic (right panel) tissues of N. benthamiana (Nb, A) and RNAi lines DCL1i (B), 832
DCL2Ai (C), DCL2Bi (D), DCL3Ai (E), DCL3Bi (F), DCL4Ai (G), DCL4Bi (H) and RDR6i (I). 833
Outline of mobile siRNA assay is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S3A. 834
835 Figure 3. Distribution of 20-25nt L-siRNAs across the GFP714 mRNA. (A-I) Distribution of 836
20-25nt GFP714 L-siRNAs for N. benthamiana (Nb; A); DCL1i (B); DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi (C, D); 837
DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi (E, F); DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi (G, H); and RDR6i (I). Total GFP714 L-838
siRNA reads are from sRNA libraries of agro-infiltrated leaves (7 days post agroinfiltration (dpa); 839
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
left panel) and systemic young leaves (14 dpa; right panel). Outline of mobile siRNA assay is 840
indicated in Supplemental Fig. S3A. 841
Figure 4. Antagonistic Roles of DCL2 Against DCL3 and DCL4 in Systemic PTGS. (A, B) 842
Impact of DCL RNAi on local and systemic PTGS. Local GFP silencing was induced by the 843
hairpin GFP714 dsRNA in all plants by infiltration of leaves with agrobacterium harbouring 844
pRNAi-GFP714, evident by the red halos around the infiltrated lamina. A close-up of the red halo 845
(red arrow) below each image shows clearer silencing effects (A). Sense transgene GFP792-846
mediated systemic PTGS was assessed on young leaves (B). At 14 days post agroinfiltration 847
(dpa), all infiltrated plants of GfpDCL4Ai and GfpDCL4Bi lines developed very strong systemic 848
GFP792 PTGS in young leaves. GfpDCL3Ai and GfpDCL3Ai plants also developed strong 849
systemic PTGS in young leaves, although some relatively weak GFP792 silencing was observed in 850
some of Gfp and GfpDCL1i plants and no systemic silencing appeared on any GfpDCL2Ai and 851
GfpDCL2Bi plants. An enlarged snapshot (lower) of each photograph in its panel shows a clearer 852
image of the silencing phenotypes (B). The ratio in the bottom right corner of each photo in panel 853
B indicates the number of plants out of the number of agro-infiltrated plants that developed 854
systemic PTGS in two separate experiments. Photographs were taken at 7 (A) and 14 dpa (B). (C-855
G) Systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in young leaves. Transgene GFP792 expression was not 856
silenced in the mock-infiltrated Gfp plant and uniform green fluorescence occurred in the whole 857
lamina of the non-infiltrated young leaf (C). Systemic GFP792 silencing in young leaf of Gfp 858
plants infiltrated with agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714 was evident by the red 859
fluorescence of chlorophyll across the leaf lamina of a newly-grown young leaf (D). Only very 860
weak GFP792 silencing was observed in the minor veins of a leaf immediately above the 861
infiltrated leaves of GfpDCL2Ai (E), but extremely strong systemic GFP792 silencing appeared in 862
GfpDCL3Bi (F) and GfpDCL4Ai (G). (I) Weak minor vein-restricted systemic silencing in 863
GfpDCL24Ai. Photographs were taken at 18 dpa. (H) Northern blot detection of Sy-siRNAs in 864
the systemic young leaves at 14 dpa. Total sRNA extracted from systemic leaves of GfpRDR6i 865
plants that were agro-infiltrated with pRNAi-GFP714 was included as a negative control. Upper: 866
siRNA blot, lower: 5S rRNA/tRNA control showing equal loading of sRNA samples. The sizes 867
and positions of siRNAs and 5S rRNA/tRNA are indicated. (J) Local (i) and systemic (ii, iii) 868
GFP792 silencing in GfpDCL24Ai. A section of panel J(ii) is enlarged to show a clearer young 869
leaf image [J(iii)]. Photographs were taken at 7 dpa [J(i)] or 14 dpa [J(ii) and (iii)]. Influence of 870
DCL RNAi on the development of local and systemic transgene GFP792 silencing is also 871
summarized in Supplemental Table S6. 872
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
Figure 5. Comparisons of the transgene GFP792 and the hairpin GFP714 sequences. 873
Completely distinct sequences between the GFP792 transgene (16cGFP) present in the Gfp and 874
GfpDCL RNAi lines and the hairpin GFP714 (GFPi) in the pRNAi-GFP vector are outlined in red-875
boxes, identical sequences are in green boxes, and similar sequences are in dotted boxes 876
(highlighted yellow for the actual sequences). Sequence coordinates are indicated. The four 877
clusters of the sense (s) and antisense (as) siRNAs corresponding to the positive (℗) and 878
complementary (©) stands (underlined) of the GFP714 and GFP792 mRNA are also indicated. 879
Figure 6. Distribution of L- and Sy-siRNA across the transgene GFP792 mRNA. (A) and (B) 880
Gfp. (C) and (D) GfpDCL1i. (E-G) GfpDCL2Ai. (H) and (I) GfpDCL3Bi. (J) and (K) 881
GfpDCL4Ai. (L-N) GfpDCL24Ai. Total L- and Sy-siRNAs are from local agro-infiltrated leaves 882
(A, C, E, H, J and L) and systemic young leaves (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N). Sense- (blue) and 883
antisense (red) siRNAs were mapped to the transgene GFP792 mRNA sequence. The profiles of 884
L-siRNAs generated largely from the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA differ from that of Sy-siRNAs that 885
were derived from the GFP792 mRNA, particularly in the two less similar Region 1/Region 2 (Fig. 886
5). These differences indicate that elevated levels of L-siRNAs (*) together with their long RNA 887
precursor RNAs, despite the latter being unlikely (Supplemental Fig. S7), moved from local to 888
systemic leaves and contributed to silencing signal. Such mobile signals might act as the primary 889
trigger for production of Sy-siRNAs and for systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in distal young 890
leaves. Sense and antisense Sy-siRNAs associated with Region 2 and Region 1 (highlighted) in 891
systemic recipient cells are likely secondary and resulted from transitive silencing. Experimental 892
design for systemic silencing assays is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene 893
GFP792 PTGS are shown in Fig. 4, Supplemental Fig. S8 and Supplemental Fig. S9B. Compared 894
to Gfp (B) and GfpDCL1i (D), strong systemic PTGS occurred in GfpDCL3Bi (I) and GfpDCL4i 895
(K); no systemic PTGS was observed in young leaves of GfpDCL2Ai (F) and GfpDCL24Ai (M), 896
and only very weak vein-restricted silencing in the leaf located immediately about the agro-897
infiltrated leaves of GfpDCL2Ai (G) and GfpDCL24Ai (N). 898
Figure 7. Distribution of L- and Sy-siRNAs across the hairpin GFP714 RNA. (A) and (B) Gfp. 899
(C) and (D) GfpDCL1i. (E-G) GfpDCL2Ai. (H) and (I) GfpDCL3Bi. (J) and (K) GfpDCL4Ai. (L-900
N) GfpDCL24Ai. Total L- or Sy-siRNAs are from local agro-infiltrated leaves (A, C, E, H, J and 901
L) or systemic young leaves (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N). Sense (blue) and antisense (red) 902
siRNAs were mapped to the hairpin GFP714 RNA. The L-siRNA profiles differ from Sy-siRNAs 903
in the two less similar Region 1/Region 2 (Fig. 5). Experimental design for systemic silencing 904
assays is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS are shown in Fig. 905
4, Supplemental Fig. S8 and Supplemental Fig. S9B. 906
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
Figure 8. Size profiles for L- and Sy-siRNAs. (A-N) Fourteen sRNA libraries were generated 907
from sRNA samples extracted from agroinfiltrated leaves at 7 days post agroinfiltration (dpa; A, 908
C, E, H, J and L) and systemic young leaves at 14 dpa (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N) of Gfp (A, B), 909
GfpDCL1i (C, D), GfpDCL2Ai (E-G), GfpDCL3Bi (H, I), GfpDCL4Ai (J, K) and GfpDCL24Ai 910
(L-N). Plants were infiltrated with agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714. Blue and red bars 911
represent L- and Sy-siRNAs aligned to the sense and antisense strand of GFP792 mRNA, 912
respectively. The abundance of the 22-nt L-siRNA is closely correlated with the induction and 913
reduction of systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in systemic young leaves. Experimental design 914
for systemic silencing assays is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene GFP792 915
PTGS are shown in Fig. 4, Supplemental Fig. S8 and Supplemental Fig. S9B. 916
Figure 9. Systemic Silencing in Grafted homGfpDCL2Ai and homGfpDCL4Ai Plants. (A, B) 917
16cGFP, homGfpDCL2Ai and homGfpDCL4Ai plants were used as silenced stocks to produce or 918
as scions to receive systemic silencing signals in three experiments. No systemic transgene 919
GFP792 silencing was observed in homGfpDCL2Ai scions grafted onto GFP792-silenced 920
homGfpDCL4Ai stocks 3 weeks after grafting (wag, A) and 6-wag (B). (C) Systemic GFP792 921
silencing at 3 wag in a homGfpDCL4Ai scion grafted onto a homGfpDCL2Ai stock. An enlarged 922
section (boxed) of the stock plant showed very limited GFP792 silencing with red fluorescence 923
marked with an asterisk in the inset leaf. (D) Systemic GFP792 silencing in a homGfpDCL4Ai 924
scion grafted onto a GFP792-silenced homGfpDCL4Ai stock at 3 wag as a control. (E) A 925
homGfpDCL2Ai scion grafted onto GFP792-silenced 16c stocks remained unsilenced at 3 wag and 926
afterwards. (F) Systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in a homGfpDCL4Ai scion grafted onto a 927
GFP792-silenced 16cGFP stock at 3 wag. All plants are photographed under long-wavelength UV 928
illumination. Red fluorescence shows transgene GFP792 silencing whilst green fluorescence 929
indicates no silencing. Scions and stocks are indicated by arrows in each panel. 930
Figure 10. Systemic PTGS in N. benthamiana. (A) A regulatory complex among DCL2, DCL3, 931
and DCL4 contributes to biogenesis of mobile silencing signals for systemic PTGS. Regulation of 932
DCL2 expression by DCL4 or DCL3 is demonstrated in our recent work (Qin et al., 2017). DCL1 933
is not included because it seems to have no obvious effect on systemic PTGS. In this model, 934
mobile 21, 22, and 24 nt L-siRNAs are generated from the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA by DCL2, 935
DCL3, or DCL4 in the incipient cells of local leaf tissues. However, only the levels of the DCL2-936
processed 22 nt L-siRNAs, particularly those L-siRNAs matching to the four identical regions 937
indicated by ℗ (positive strand) or © (complementary strand) of the hairpin GFP714 and the 938
transgene GFP792 mRNA (Fig. 5), are somewhat correlated with the DCL2-dependent induction 939
of systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS and Sy-siRNA biogenesis in the recipient cells of systemic 940
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
leaf tissues. Sy-siRNAs unique to Region 1/Region 2 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA are 941
generated by transitive PTGS in recipient cells. Different color “=” signs represent siRNAs 942
matching to each of the four identical sequences between GFP714 and GFP792 (Fig. 5). (B) DCL2-943
dependent DCL genetic network in systemic silencing. Reduction of DCL2 reduces systemic 944
PTGS, suggesting that DCL2 acts an important activator of the long-distance spread of PTGS. 945
DCL2 is also required to perceive incoming signals, likely in the form of sense and antisense 946
siRNAs and their long RNA precursor (although the latter is unlikely to contribute to systemic 947
silencing), for induction of systemic siRNA biogenesis and execution of systemic PTGS in distal 948
recipient cells. DCL4 or DCL3 may contribute to systemic silencing through their positive 949
influences on long-distance movement of siRNAs; however, both are negative regulators (T sign) 950
that down-regulate DCL2 expression (Qin et al., 2017). Thus, DCL2 is a key player in the 951
systemic silencing network. Suppression of either DCL4 or DCL3 alleviates the negative control 952
of DCL2 expression and the elevated DCL2 could then respond more effectively to mobile 953
signals for more efficient systemic PTGS in N. benthamiana. 954
TABLES 955
Table 1. Summary of Transgenic Lines Generated and Used in This Study. Wild-type and
transgenic lines Genetic background and cross Transgene information
Nb N. benthamiana Wild-type, no transgene DCL1i RNAi of DCL1 in Nb pRNAi-DCL1, single copy, hemizygous
DCL2Ai RNAi of DCL2 in Nb pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, homozygous DCL2Bi
DCL3Ai RNAi of DCL3 in Nb pRNAi-DCL3, single copy, homozygous DCL3Bi
DCL4Ai RNAi of DCL4 in Nb pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, homozygous DCL4Bi
RDR6i (Gift from David Baulcombe) RNAi of NbRDR6 in Nb RDR6 hairpin, single copy, homozygous
DCL24i Cross between DCL2Ai and DCL4Bi pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, hemizygous pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, hemizygous
16cGFP GFP transgenic line in Nb 35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous GfpRDR6i (Gift from David Baulcombe) RNAi of RDR6 in 16cGFP
35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous RDR6 hairpin, single copy, homozygous
GfpDCL1i RNAi of DCL1 in 16cGFP 35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous
pRNAi-DCL1, single copy, hemizygous GfpDCL2Ai Cross between 16cGFP and DCL2Ai 35S-GFP, single copy, hemizygous
pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, hemizygous GfpDCL2Bi Cross between 16cGFP and DCL2Bi GfpDCL3Ai Cross between 16cGFP and DCL3Ai 35S-GFP, single copy, hemizygous
pRNAi-DCL3, single copy, hemizygous GfpDCL3Bi Cross between 16cGFP and DCL3Bi
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
GfpDCL4Ai Cross between 16cGFP and DCL4Ai 35S-GFP, single copy, hemizygous pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, hemizygous GfpDCL4Bi Cross between 16cGFP and DCL4Bi
GfpDCL24Ai Triple cross among 16c, DCL2Ai and
DCL4Ai 35S-GFP, single copy, hemizygous
pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, hemizygous pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, hemizygous GfpDCL24Bi
Triple cross among 16c, DCL2Ai and
DCL4Bi homGfpDCL2Ai Self from GfpDCL2Ai
35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, homozygous
homGfpDCL3Ai Self from GfpDCL3Ai 35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous
pRNAi-DCL3, single copy, homozygous homGfpDCL4Ai Self from GfpDCL4Ai
35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, homozygous
GfpDCL24Ci Cross between homGfpDCL2Ai and homGfpDCL4Ai
35S-GFP, single copy, homozygous pRNAi-DCL2, single copy, hemizygous pRNAi-DCL4, single copy, hemizygous
Gfp Cross between Nb and 16cGFP 35S-GFP, single copy, hemizygous 956
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
957
LITERATURE CITED 958
Andika IB, Maruyama K, Sun L, Kondo H, Tamada T, Suzuki N (2015) Differential 959
contributions of plant Dicer-like proteins to antiviral defences against potato virus X in leaves 960
and roots. Plant J 81: 781-793. 961
Baulcombe D (2004) RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431: 356-363. 962
Berg JM (2016) Retraction. Science 354: 190. 963
Bouche N, Lauressergues D, Gasciolli V, Vaucheret H (2006) An antagonistic function for 964
Arabidopsis DCL2 in development and a new function for DCL4 in generating viral siRNAs. 965
EMBO J 25: 3347-3356. 966
Brosnan CA, Mitter N, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM, Carroll BJ (2007) Nuclear gene silencing 967
directs reception of long-distance mRNA silencing in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 968
14741-14746. 969
Carlsbecker A, Lee JY, Roberts CJ, Dettmer J, Lehesranta S, Zhou J, Lindgren O, Moreno-970
Risueno MA, Vatén A, Thitamadee S, Campilho A, Sebastian J, Bowman JL, Helariutta Y, 971
Benfey PN (2010) Cell signalling by microRNA 165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. 972
Nature 465: 316-321. 973
Chen HM, Chen LT, Patel K, Li YH, Baulcombe DC, Wu SH (2010) 22-nucleotide RNAs trigger 974
secondary siRNA biogenesis in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 15269-15274. 975
Cuperus JT, Carbonell A, Fahlgren N, Garcia-Ruiz H, Burke RT, Takeda A, Sullivan CM, 976
Gilbert SD, Montgomery TA, Carrington JC (2010) Unique functionality of 22-nt miRNAs in 977
triggering RDR6-dependent siRNA biogenesis from target transcripts in Arabidopsis. Nat Struct 978
Mol Biol 17: 997-1003. 979
Devanapally S, Ravikumar S, Jose AM (2015) Double-stranded RNA made in C. elegans neurons 980
can enter the germline and cause transgenerational gene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 981
2133-2138. 982
Dunoyer P, Himber C, Voinnet O (2005) DICER-LIKE 4 is required for RNA interference and 983
produces the 21-nucleotide small interfering RNA component of the plant cell-to-cell silencing 984
signal. Nat Genet 37: 1356-1360. 985
Feinberg EH, Hunter CP (2003) Transport of dsRNA into cells by the transmembrane protein SID-1. 986
Science 301: 1545–1547. 987
Garcia-Ruiz H, Takeda A, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Fahlgren N, Brempelis KJ, Carrington 988
JC (2010) Arabidopsis RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and Dicer-like proteins in antiviral 989
defense and small interfering RNA biogenesis during Turnip mosaic virus infection. Plant Cell 27: 990
944-945. 991
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
Hamilton AJ, Baulcombe DC (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional 992
gene silencing in plants. Science 286: 950-952. 993
Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge S (1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and 994
subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis 995
plants brightly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2122-2127. 996
Henderson IR, Zhang X, Lu C, Johnson L, Meyers BC, Green PJ, Jacobsen SE (2006) 997
Dissecting Arabidopsis thaliana DICER function in small RNA processing, gene silencing and 998
DNA methylation patterning. Nat Genet 38: 721-725. 999
Hong Y, Saunders K, Hartley MR, Stanley J (1996) Resistance to geminivirus infection by 1000
virus-induced expression of dianthin in transgenic plants. Virology 220: 119-127. 1001
Hong Y, Stanley J, van Wezel R (2003) Novel system for the simultaneous analysis of 1002
geminivirus replication and plant interactions in Nicotiana benthamiana. J Virol 77: 13315-1003
13322. 1004
Jose AM, Garcia GA, Hunter CP (2011) Two classes of silencing RNAs move between 1005
Caenorhabditis elegans tissues. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 1184–1188. 1006
Jose AM, Smith JJ, Hunter CP (2009) Export of RNA silencing from C. elegans tissues does not 1007
require the RNA channel SID-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2283–2288. 1008
Katsarou K, Mavrothalassiti E, Dermauw W, Van Leeuwen T, Kalantidis K (2016) 1009
Combined Activity of DCL2 and DCL3 Is Crucial in the Defense against Potato Spindle Tuber 1010
Viroid. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005936. 1011
Langmead B, Salzberg S (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9: 357-1012
359. 1013
Lewsey MG, Hardcastle TJ, Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Valli A, Urich MA, Nery JR, Baulcombe 1014
DC, Ecker JR (2016) Mobile small RNAs regulate genome-wide DNA methylation. Proc Natl 1015
Acad Sci USA 113: E801-810. 1016
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1017
1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) The sequence alignment/map format 1018
and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079. 1019
Mallory AC, Ely L, Smith TH, Marathe R, Anandalakshmi R, Fagard M, Vaucheret H, Pruss 1020
G, Bowman L, Vance VB (2001) HC-Pro suppression of transgene silencing eliminates the small 1021
RNAs but not transgene methylation or the mobile signal. Plant Cell 13: 571-583. 1022
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Bassett A, Baulcombe DC (2011a) Mobile 24 nt small RNAs direct 1023
transcriptional gene silencing in the root meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 21: 1678-1024
1683. 1025
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Baulcombe DC (2011b) Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA 1026
silencing. EMBO J 30: 3553-3563. 1027
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
36
Mlotshwa S, Pruss GJ, Peragine A, Endres MW, Li J, Chen X, Poethig RS, Bowman LH, Vance 1028
V (2008) DICER-LIKE2 plays a primary role in transitive silencing of transgenes in Arabidopsis. 1029
PLoS One 3: e1755. 1030
Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, Baulcombe DC (2010) Small 1031
silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 1032
328: 872-875. 1033
Mukherjee K, Campos H, Kolaczkowski B (2013) Evolution of animal and plant dicers: early 1034
parallel duplications and recurrent adaptation of antiviral RNA binding in plants. Mol Biol Evol 1035
30: 627-641. 1036
Nakasugi K, Crowhurst R, Bally J, Waterhouse P (2014) Combining transcriptome assembly 1037
from multiple De novo assemblers in the allo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS 1038
One 9: e91776. 1039
Nakasugi K, Crowhurst RN, Bally J, Wood CC, Hellens RP, Waterhouse PM (2013) De novo 1040
transcriptome sequence assembly and analysis of RNA silencing genes of Nicotiana benthamiana. 1041
PLoS One 8: e59534. 1042
Pandey SP, Shahi P, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2008). Herbivory-induced changes in the small-RNA 1043
transcriptome and phytohormone signaling in Nicotiana attenuate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1044
4559-4564. 1045
Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible W-R (2008) MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the 1046
regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J 53: 731-738. 1047
Parent J-S, Bouteiller N, Elmayan T, Vaucheret H (2015) Respective contribution of Arabidopsis 1048
DCL2 and DCL4 to RNA silencing. Plant J 81: 223-232. 1049
Qin C, Shi N, Gu M, Zhang H, Li B, Shen J, Mohammed A, Ryabov E, Li C, Wang H, Liu Y, 1050
Osman T, Vatish M, Hong Y (2012) Involvement of RDR6 in short-range intercellular RNA 1051
silencing in Nicotiana benthimiana. Sci Rep 2: 467. 1052
Qin C, Li B, Fan Y, Zhang X, Yu Z, Ryabov E, Zhao M, Wang H, Shi N, Zhang P, Jackson S, 1053
Tör M, Cheng Q, Liu Y, Gallusci P, Hong Y (2017) Roles of DCL2 and DCL4 in Intra- and 1054
Intercellular Antiviral Silencing in Nicotiana benthmiana. Plant Physiol 174: 1067-1081. 1055
Qu F, Ye X, Morris TJ (2008) Arabidopsis DRB4, AGO1, AGO7, and RDR6 participate in a DCL4-1056
initiated antiviral RNA silencing pathway negatively regulated by DCL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1057
105: 14732-14737. 1058
Ruiz MT, Voinnet O, Baulcombe DC (1998) Initiation and maintenance of virus-induced gene 1059
silencing. Plant Cell 10: 937-946. 1060
Ryabov EV, van Wezel R, Walsh J, Hong Y (2004) Cell-to-Cell, but not long-distance, spread of 1061
RNA silencing that is induced in individual epidermal cells. J Virol 78: 3149-3154. 1062
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
37
Ryabov EV, Wood GR, Fannon JM, Moore JD, Bull JC, Chandler D, Mead A, Burroughs N, 1063
Evans DJ (2014) A virulent strain of Deformed Wing Virus (DWV) of Honeybees (Apis mellifera) 1064
prevails after Varroa destructor-mediated, or in vitro, transmission. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004230. 1065
Sarkies P, Miska EA (2014) Small RNAs break out: the molecular cell biology of mobile small 1066
RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15: 525-535. 1067
Searle IR, Pontes O, Melnyk CW, Smith LM, Baulcombe DC (2010) JMJ14, a JmjC domain 1068
protein, is requried for RNA silencing and cell-to-cell movement of an RNA silencing signal in 1069
Arabidopsis. Genes & Dev 24: 986-991. 1070
Schwach F, Vaistij FE, Jones L, Baulcombe DC (2005) An RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1071
prevents meristem invasion by potato virus X and is required for the activity but not the production 1072
of a systemic silencing signal. Plant Physiol 138: 1842-1852. 1073
Shih JD, Hunter CP (2011) SID-1 is a dsRNA-selective dsRNA-gated channel. RNA 17: 1057–1065. 1074
Skopelitis DS, Benkovics AH, Husbands AY, Timmermans MCP (2017) Boundary formation 1075
through a direct threshold-based readout of mobile small RNA gradients. Dev Cell 43: 265-273. 1076
Smith LM, Pontes O, Searle I, Yelina N, Yousafzai FK, Herr AJ, Pikaard CS, Baulcombe DC 1077
(2007) An SNF2 protein assoicated with nuclear RNA silencing and the spread of a silencing 1078
signal between cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 1507-1521. 1079
Taochy C, Gursanscky NR, Cao J, Fletcher SJ, Dressel U, Mitter N, Tucker MR, Koltunow 1080
AMG, Bowman JL, Vaucheret H, Carroll BJ (2017) A Genetic Screen for Impaired Systemic 1081
RNAi Highlights the Crucial Role of DICER-LIKE 2. Plant Physiol 175: 1424-1437. 1082
Wang XB, Jovel J, Udomporn P, Wang Y, Wu Q, Li WX, Gasciolli V, Vaucheret H, Ding SW 1083
(2011) The 21-nucleotide, but not 22-nucleotide, viral secondary small interfering RNAs direct 1084
potent antiviral defence by two cooperative argonautes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 23: 1085
1625-1638. 1086
Weiberg A, Wang M, Lin FM, Zhao H, Zhang Z, Kaloshian I, Huang HD, Jin H (2013). Fungal 1087
small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways. Science 342: 1088
118-123. 1089
Winston WM, Molodowitch C, Hunter CP (2002) Systemic RNAi in C. elegans requires the 1090
putative transmembrane protein SID-1. Science 295: 2456–2459. 1091
Xie Z, Allen E, Wilken A, Carrington JC (2005) DICER-LIKE 4 functions in trans-acting small 1092
interfering RNA biogenesis and vegative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1093
USA 102: 12984-12989. 1094
Xie Z, Johansen LK, Gustafson AM, Kasschau KD, Lellis AD, Zilberman D, Jacobsen SE, 1095
Carrington JC (2004) Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. 1096
PLoS Biol 2: E104. 1097
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
38
Xu G, Sui N, Tang Y, Xie K, Lai Y, Liu Y (2010) One-step, zero-background ligation-1098
independent cloning intron-containing hairpin RNA constructs for RNAi in plants. New Phytol 1099
187: 240-250. 1100
Yelina NE, Smith LM, Jones AM, Patel K, Kelly KA, Baulcombe DC (2010) Putative Arabidopsis 1101
THO/TREX mRNA export complex is involved in transgene and endogenous siRNA biosynthesis. 1102
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 13948-13953. 1103
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 1. Impact of DCL RNAi on Local Hairpin dsRNA-mediated PTGS. (A-I) Local PTGS
assay. The left half leaves of N. benthamiana (A), DCL1i (B), DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi (C, D), DCL3Ai
and DCL3Bi (E, F), DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi (G, H) and DCL24i (I) plants were co-infiltrated with
agrobacterium harbouring p35S-GFP714 and pRNAi-GFP714; and the right half with p35S-GFP714 and
the pRNAi-empty vector. Without PTGS, GFP714 expression from p35S-GFP714 shows strong green
fluorescence. Induction of PTGS by the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA generated from pRNAi-GFP
eliminates GFP714 expression and the infiltrated lamina show red auto-fluorescence. DCL4 RNAi
attenuated intracellular silencing and the level of PTGS decreased in DCL4Ai, DCL4Bi and DCL24i
plants. Some green fluorescence can still be visible in the infiltrated lamina of these plants (G-I).
Photographs were taken under long-wavelength UV light (upper panel) or through a stereo-
fluorescent microscope (lower panel) at 4 days post-agroinfiltration (dpa). Bar=100μm. The ratio in
the bottom right corner of each panel indicates the number of plants out of the number of agro-
infiltrated plants that developed local PTGS in two experiments. The green fluorescence intensity was
measured using the ImageJ software (Supplemental Fig. S4). (J) Analysis of GFP714 mRNA in DCL
RNAi lines. Northern detection was performed using GFP714-specific probes (upper panel). Equal
loading of total RNAs extracted from leaf tissues at 4-dpa is indicated by the equal amount of 18S and
28S rRNAs shown on gel (lower panel). The position and size of GFP714 mRNA and 18S and 28S
rRNA are indicated. (K) Detection of local L-siRNAs. L-siRNAs were analysed by small RNA
Northern blots (upper panel). Equal loading of sRNAs extracted from leaf tissues at 4-dpa is indicated
by the equal amount of 5S rRNA/tRNAs shown on gel (lower panel). The position of 21-, 22- and
24nt siRNA as well as 5S rRNA/tRNAs are indicated.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2. Detection of L-siRNAs in local and systemic leaves. (A-I) GFP714 L-siRNAs generated
from hairpin dsRNA-mediated local PTGS can be detected in distal systemic young leaves. Sense
(blue) and antisense (red) 21, 22 and 24nt L-siRNAs were present in local (left panel) and systemic
(right panel) tissues of N. benthamiana (Nb, A) and RNAi lines DCL1i (B), DCL2Ai (C), DCL2Bi (D),
DCL3Ai (E), DCL3Bi (F), DCL4Ai (G), DCL4Bi (H) and RDR6i (I). Outline of mobile siRNA assay
is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S3A.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 3. Distribution of 20-25nt L-siRNAs across the GFP714 mRNA. (A-I) Distribution of 20-
25nt GFP714 L-siRNAs for N. benthamiana (Nb; A); DCL1i (B); DCL2Ai and DCL2Bi (C, D);
DCL3Ai and DCL3Bi (E, F); DCL4Ai and DCL4Bi (G, H); and RDR6i (I). Total GFP714 L-siRNA
reads are from sRNA libraries of agro-infiltrated leaves (7 days post agro-infiltration (dpa); left panel)
and systemic young leaves (14dpa; right panel). Outline of mobile siRNA assay is indicated in
Supplemental Fig. S3A.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4. Antagonistic Roles of DCL2 Against DCL3 or DCL4 in Systemic PTGS. (A, B) Impact
of DCL RNAi on local and systemic PTGS. Local GFP silencing was induced by the hairpin GFP714
dsRNA in all plants by infiltration of leaves with agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714,
evidenced by the red halos around the infiltrated lamina. A close-up of the red halo (red arrow) below
each image shows clearer silencing effects (A). Sense transgene GFP792-mediated systemic PTGS was
assessed on young leaves (B). At 14 days post agro-infiltration (dpa), all infiltrated plants of
GfpDCL4Ai and GfpDCL4Bi lines developed very strong systemic GFP792 PTGS on young leaves.
GfpDCL3Ai and GfpDCL3Ai plants also developed strong systemic PTGS in young leaves, although
some relatively weak GFP792 silencing was observed in some of Gfp and GfpDCL1i plants and no
systemic silencing appeared on any GfpDCL2Ai and GfpDCL2Bi plants. An enlarged snapshot (lower)
of each photograph in panel shows a clearer image of the silencing phenotypes (B). The ratio in the
bottom right corner of each photo in panel B indicates the number of plants out of the number of agro-
infiltrated plants that developed systemic PTGS in two separate experiments. Photographs were taken
at 7 (A) and 14dpa (B). (C-G) Systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in young leaves. Transgene
GFP792 expression was not silenced in the mock-infiltrated Gfp plant and uniform green fluorescence
occurred in the whole lamina of the non-infiltrated young leaf (C). Systemic GFP792 silencing in
young leaf of Gfp plants infiltrated with agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714 was evidenced by
the red fluorescence of chlorophyll across the leaf lamina of a newly-grown young leaf (D). Only very
weak GFP792 silencing was observed in minor veins of a leaf immediately above the infiltrated leaves
of GfpDCL2Ai (E), but extremely strong systemic GFP792 silencing appeared in GfpDCL3Bi (F) and
GfpDCL4Ai (G). (I) Weak minor vein-restricted systemic silencing in GfpDCL24Ai. Photographs
were taken at 18dpa. (H) Northern blot detection of Sy-siRNAs in the systemic young leaves at 14dpa.
Total sRNA extracted from systemic leaves of GfpRDR6i plants that were agro-infiltrated with
pRNAi-GFP714 was included as a negative control. Upper: siRNA blot, lower: 5S rRNA/tRNAs
control showing equal loading of sRNA samples. The sizes and positions of siRNAs and 5S
rRNA/tRNAs are indicated. (J) Local (i) and systemic (ii, iii) GFP792 silencing in GfpDCL24Ai. A
section of panel J(ii) is enlarged to show a clearer young leaf image [J(iii)]. Photographs were taken
at 7dpa [J(i)], or 14dpa [J(ii) and (iii)]. Influence of DCL RNAi on development of local and systemic
transgene GFP792 silencing was also summarised in Supplemental Table S6.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5. Comparisons between the transgene GFP792 and the hairpin GFP714 sequences.
Completely distinct sequences between the GFP792 transgene (16cGFP) presented in Gfp and
GfpDCL RNAi lines and the hairpin GFP714 (GFPi) in the pRNAi-GFP vector are outlined in red-
boxes, identical sequences in green boxes, similar sequences in dotted boxes (highlighted yellow for
the actual sequences). Sequence coordinates are indicated. The four clusters of the sense (s) and
antisense (as) siRNAs corresponding to the positive (℗) and complementary (©) stands (underlined)
of the GFP714 and GFP792 mRNA are also indicated.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 6. Distribution of L- and Sy-siRNA across the transgene GFP792 mRNA. (A) and (B) Gfp. (C)
and (D) GfpDCL1i. (E-G) GfpDCL2Ai. (H) and (I) GfpDCL3Bi. (J) and (K) GfpDCL4Ai. (L-N)
GfpDCL24Ai. Total L- and Sy-siRNAs are from local agro-infiltrated leaves (A, C, E, H, J and L) and
systemic young leaves (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N). Sense- (blue) and antisense (red) siRNAs were
mapped to the transgene GFP792 mRNA sequence. The profiles of L-siRNAs generated largely from the
hairpin GFP714 dsRNA differ from that of Sy-siRNAs that were derived from the GFP792 mRNA,
particularly in the two less similar Region 1/Region 2 (Fig. 5). These differences indicate that the high
abundance of L-siRNAs (asterisked) together with their long RNA precursor RNAs, despite the latter is
unlikely (Supplemental Fig. S7) moved from local to systemic leaves. Such mobile signals might act as the
primary trigger for production of Sy-siRNAs and for systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in distal young
leaves. Sense and antisense Sy-siRNAs associated with Region 2 and Region 1 (highlighted) in systemic
recipient cells are likely secondary and resulted from transitive silencing. Experimental design for systemic
silencing assays is indicated in Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS are shown in Fig.
4, Supplemental Fig. S8 and Supplemental Fig. S9B. Compared to Gfp (B) and GfpDCL1i (D), strong
systemic PTGS occurred in GfpDCL3Bi (I) and GfpDCL4i (K); no systemic PTGS was observed in young
leaves of GfpDCL2Ai (F) and GfpDCL24Ai (M), and only very weak vein-restricted silencing in the leaf
located immediately about the agroinfiltrated leaves of GfpDCL2Ai (G) and GfpDCL24Ai (N).
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 7. Distribution of L- and Sy-siRNAs across the hairpin GFP714 RNA. (A) and (B) Gfp. (C)
and (D) GfpDCL1i. (E-G) GfpDCL2Ai. (H) and (I) GfpDCL3Bi. (J) and (K) GfpDCL4Ai. (L-N)
GfpDCL24Ai. Total L- or Sy-siRNAs are from local agro-infiltrated leaves (A, C, E, H, J and L) or
systemic young leaves (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N). Sense (blue) and antisense (red) siRNAs were
mapped to the hairpin GFP714 RNA. The L-siRNA profiles differ from Sy-siRNAs, in the two less
similar Region 1/Region 2 (Fig. 5). Experimental design for systemic silencing assays is indicated in
Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS are shown in Fig. 4, Supplemental Fig. S8
and Supplemental Fig. S9B.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 8. Size profiles for L- and Sy-siRNAs. (A-N) Fourteen sRNA libraries were generated from
sRNA samples extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 7 days post agro-infiltration (dpa; A, C, E, H,
J and L) and systemic young leaves at 14dpa (B, D, F, G, I, K, M and N) of Gfp (A, B), GfpDCL1i
(C, D), GfpDCL2Ai (E-G), GfpDCL3Bi (H, I), GfpDCL4Ai (J, K) and GfpDCL24Ai (L-N). Plants
were infiltrated with agrobacterium harbouring pRNAi-GFP714. Blue and red bars represent L- and
Sy-siRNAs aligned to the sense and antisense strand of GFP792 mRNA, respectively. The abundance
of the 22-nt L-siRNA is closely correlated with the induction and reduction of systemic transgene
GFP792 silencing in systemic young leaves. Experimental design for systemic silencing assays is
indicated in Supplemental Fig. S9A. Systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS are shown in Fig. 4,
Supplemental Fig. S8 and Supplemental Fig. S9B.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 9. Systemic Silencing in Grafted homGfpDCL2Ai and homGfpDCL4Ai Plants. (A, B)
16cGFP, homGfpDCL2Ai and homGfpDCL4Ai plants were used as silenced stocks to produce or as
scions to receive systemic silencing signals in three experiments. No systemic transgene GFP792
silencing was observed in homGfpDCL2Ai scions grafted onto GFP792-silenced homGfpDCL4Ai
stocks 3 weeks after grafting (wag, A) and 6-wag (B). (C) Systemic GFP792 silencing at 3-wag in a
homGfpDCL4Ai scion grafted onto a homGfpDCL2Ai stock. An enlarged section of the stock plant
showed very limited GFP792 silencing with red fluorescence asterisked in the inset leaf. (D) Systemic
GFP792 silencing in a homGfpDCL4Ai scion grafted onto a GFP792-silenced homGfpDCL4Ai stock at
3-wag as a control. (E) A homGfpDCL2Ai scion grafted onto GFP792-silenced 16c stocks remained
unsilenced at 3-wag and afterwards. (F) Systemic transgene GFP792 silencing in a homGfpDCL4Ai
scion grafted onto a GFP792-silenced 16cGFP stock at 3-wag. All plants are photographed under long-
wavelength UV illumination. Red fluorescence shows transgene GFP792 silencing whilst green
fluorescence indicates no silencing. Scions and stocks are indicated by arrows in each panel.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 10. Systemic PTGS in N. benethamiana. (A) A regulatory complex among DCL2, DCL3 and
DCL4 contributes to biogenesis of mobile silencing signals for systemic PTGS. Regulation of DCL2
expression by DCL4 or DCL3 is demonstrated in our recent work (Qin et al., 2017). DCL1 is not
included because it seems to have no obvious effect on systemic PTGS. In this model, mobile 21, 22
and 24nt L-siRNAs are generated from the hairpin GFP714 dsRNA by DCL2, DCL3 or DCL4 in the
incipient cells of local leaf tissues. However, only the levels of the DCL2-processed 22nt L-siRNAs,
particularly these L-siRNAs matching to the four identical regions indicated by ℗ (positive strand) or
© (complementary strand) of the hairpin GFP714 and the transgene GFP792 mRNA (Fig. 5), are
somewhat correlated with the DCL2-dependent induction of systemic transgene GFP792 PTGS and
Sy-siRNA biogenesis in the recipient cells of systemic leaf tissues. Sy-siRNAs unique to Region
1/Region 2 of the transgene GFP792 mRNA are generated by transitive PTGS in recipient cells.
Different colour “=” signs represent siRNAs matching to each of the four identical sequences between
GFP714 and GFP792 (Fig. 5). (B) DCL2-dependent DCL genetic network in systemic silencing.
Reduction of DCL2 reduces systemic PTGS, suggesting DCL2 acts an important activator for long-
distance spread of PTGS. DCL2 is also required to perceive incoming signals, likely in the form of
sense and antisense siRNAs and their long RNA precursor (although the latter is unlikely to contribute
systemic silencing), for induction of systemic siRNA biogenesis and execution of systemic PTGS in
distal recipient cells. DCL4 or DCL3 may contribute to systemic silencing through their positive
influences on long-distance movement of siRNAs, however both are negative regulators (T sign) that
down-regulate DCL2 expression (Qin et al., 2017). Thus, DCL2 is a key player in the systemic
silencing network. Suppression of either DCL4 or DCL3 alleviates the negative control of DCL2
expression and the elevated DCL2 could then respond more effectively to mobile signals for more
efficient systemic PTGS in N. benthamiana.
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAndika IB, Maruyama K, Sun L, Kondo H, Tamada T, Suzuki N (2015) Differential contributions of plant Dicer-like proteins to antiviraldefences against potato virus X in leaves and roots. Plant J 81: 781-793.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Baulcombe D (2004) RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431: 356-363.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Berg JM (2016) Retraction. Science 354: 190.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bouche N, Lauressergues D, Gasciolli V, Vaucheret H (2006) An antagonistic function for Arabidopsis DCL2 in development and a newfunction for DCL4 in generating viral siRNAs. EMBO J 25: 3347-3356.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brosnan CA, Mitter N, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM, Carroll BJ (2007) Nuclear gene silencing directs reception of long-distance mRNAsilencing in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 14741-14746.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Carlsbecker A, Lee JY, Roberts CJ, Dettmer J, Lehesranta S, Zhou J, Lindgren O, Moreno-Risueno MA, Vatén A, Thitamadee S,Campilho A, Sebastian J, Bowman JL, Helariutta Y, Benfey PN (2010) Cell signalling by microRNA 165/6 directs gene dose-dependentroot cell fate. Nature 465: 316-321.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chen HM, Chen LT, Patel K, Li YH, Baulcombe DC, Wu SH (2010) 22-nucleotide RNAs trigger secondary siRNA biogenesis in plants.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 15269-15274.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cuperus JT, Carbonell A, Fahlgren N, Garcia-Ruiz H, Burke RT, Takeda A, Sullivan CM, Gilbert SD, Montgomery TA, Carrington JC(2010) Unique functionality of 22-nt miRNAs in triggering RDR6-dependent siRNA biogenesis from target transcripts in Arabidopsis. NatStruct Mol Biol 17: 997-1003.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Devanapally S, Ravikumar S, Jose AM (2015) Double-stranded RNA made in C. elegans neurons can enter the germline and causetransgenerational gene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 2133-2138.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Dunoyer P, Himber C, Voinnet O (2005) DICER-LIKE 4 is required for RNA interference and produces the 21-nucleotide smallinterfering RNA component of the plant cell-to-cell silencing signal. Nat Genet 37: 1356-1360.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feinberg EH, Hunter CP (2003) Transport of dsRNA into cells by the transmembrane protein SID-1. Science 301: 1545–1547.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Garcia-Ruiz H, Takeda A, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Fahlgren N, Brempelis KJ, Carrington JC (2010) Arabidopsis RNA-dependent RNApolymerases and Dicer-like proteins in antiviral defense and small interfering RNA biogenesis during Turnip mosaic virus infection.Plant Cell 27: 944-945.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Hamilton AJ, Baulcombe DC (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286: 950-952.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge S (1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescentprotein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2122-2127.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Henderson IR, Zhang X, Lu C, Johnson L, Meyers BC, Green PJ, Jacobsen SE (2006) Dissecting Arabidopsis thaliana DICER function insmall RNA processing, gene silencing and DNA methylation patterning. Nat Genet 38: 721-725.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hong Y, Saunders K, Hartley MR, Stanley J (1996) Resistance to geminivirus infection by virus-induced expression of dianthin intransgenic plants. Virology 220: 119-127.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hong Y, Stanley J, van Wezel R (2003) Novel system for the simultaneous analysis of geminivirus replication and plant interactions inNicotiana benthamiana. J Virol 77: 13315-13322.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jose AM, Garcia GA, Hunter CP (2011) Two classes of silencing RNAs move between Caenorhabditis elegans tissues. Nat Struct MolBiol 18: 1184–1188.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jose AM, Smith JJ, Hunter CP (2009) Export of RNA silencing from C. elegans tissues does not require the RNA channel SID-1. ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 106: 2283–2288.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Katsarou K, Mavrothalassiti E, Dermauw W, Van Leeuwen T, Kalantidis K (2016) Combined Activity of DCL2 and DCL3 Is Crucial in theDefense against Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005936.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Langmead B, Salzberg S (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9: 357-359.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lewsey MG, Hardcastle TJ, Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Valli A, Urich MA, Nery JR, Baulcombe DC, Ecker JR (2016) Mobile small RNAsregulate genome-wide DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E801-810.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1000 Genome Project Data ProcessingSubgroup (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mallory AC, Ely L, Smith TH, Marathe R, Anandalakshmi R, Fagard M, Vaucheret H, Pruss G, Bowman L, Vance VB (2001) HC-Prosuppression of transgene silencing eliminates the small RNAs but not transgene methylation or the mobile signal. Plant Cell 13: 571-583.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Bassett A, Baulcombe DC (2011a) Mobile 24 nt small RNAs direct transcriptional gene silencing in the rootmeristems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 21: 1678-1683.
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Melnyk CW, Molnar A, Baulcombe DC (2011b) Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing. EMBO J 30: 3553-3563.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mlotshwa S, Pruss GJ, Peragine A, Endres MW, Li J, Chen X, Poethig RS, Bowman LH, Vance V (2008) DICER-LIKE2 plays a primaryrole in transitive silencing of transgenes in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 3: e1755.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, Baulcombe DC (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and directepigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328: 872-875.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mukherjee K, Campos H, Kolaczkowski B (2013) Evolution of animal and plant dicers: early parallel duplications and recurrentadaptation of antiviral RNA binding in plants. Mol Biol Evol 30: 627-641.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nakasugi K, Crowhurst R, Bally J, Waterhouse P (2014) Combining transcriptome assembly from multiple De novo assemblers in theallo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 9: e91776.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nakasugi K, Crowhurst RN, Bally J, Wood CC, Hellens RP, Waterhouse PM (2013) De novo transcriptome sequence assembly andanalysis of RNA silencing genes of Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 8: e59534.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pandey SP, Shahi P, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2008). Herbivory-induced changes in the small-RNA transcriptome and phytohormonesignaling in Nicotiana attenuate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 4559-4564.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible W-R (2008) MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphatehomeostasis. Plant J 53: 731-738.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Parent J-S, Bouteiller N, Elmayan T, Vaucheret H (2015) Respective contribution of Arabidopsis DCL2 and DCL4 to RNA silencing.Plant J 81: 223-232.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qin C, Shi N, Gu M, Zhang H, Li B, Shen J, Mohammed A, Ryabov E, Li C, Wang H, Liu Y, Osman T, Vatish M, Hong Y (2012) Involvementof RDR6 in short-range intercellular RNA silencing in Nicotiana benthimiana. Sci Rep 2: 467.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qin C, Li B, Fan Y, Zhang X, Yu Z, Ryabov E, Zhao M, Wang H, Shi N, Zhang P, Jackson S, Tör M, Cheng Q, Liu Y, Gallusci P, Hong Y(2017) Roles of DCL2 and DCL4 in Intra- and Intercellular Antiviral Silencing in Nicotiana benthmiana. Plant Physiol 174: 1067-1081.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qu F, Ye X, Morris TJ (2008) Arabidopsis DRB4, AGO1, AGO7, and RDR6 participate in a DCL4-initiated antiviral RNA silencing pathwaynegatively regulated by DCL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 14732-14737.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ruiz MT, Voinnet O, Baulcombe DC (1998) Initiation and maintenance of virus-induced gene silencing. Plant Cell 10: 937-946.Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ryabov EV, van Wezel R, Walsh J, Hong Y (2004) Cell-to-Cell, but not long-distance, spread of RNA silencing that is induced inindividual epidermal cells. J Virol 78: 3149-3154.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ryabov EV, Wood GR, Fannon JM, Moore JD, Bull JC, Chandler D, Mead A, Burroughs N, Evans DJ (2014) A virulent strain ofDeformed Wing Virus (DWV) of Honeybees (Apis mellifera) prevails after Varroa destructor-mediated, or in vitro, transmission. PLoSPathog 10: e1004230.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sarkies P, Miska EA (2014) Small RNAs break out: the molecular cell biology of mobile small RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15: 525-535.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Searle IR, Pontes O, Melnyk CW, Smith LM, Baulcombe DC (2010) JMJ14, a JmjC domain protein, is requried for RNA silencing and cell-to-cell movement of an RNA silencing signal in Arabidopsis. Genes & Dev 24: 986-991.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schwach F, Vaistij FE, Jones L, Baulcombe DC (2005) An RNA-dependent RNA polymerase prevents meristem invasion by potato virusX and is required for the activity but not the production of a systemic silencing signal. Plant Physiol 138: 1842-1852.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shih JD, Hunter CP (2011) SID-1 is a dsRNA-selective dsRNA-gated channel. RNA 17: 1057–1065.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Skopelitis DS, Benkovics AH, Husbands AY, Timmermans MCP (2017) Boundary formation through a direct threshold-based readout ofmobile small RNA gradients. Dev Cell 43: 265-273.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith LM, Pontes O, Searle I, Yelina N, Yousafzai FK, Herr AJ, Pikaard CS, Baulcombe DC (2007) An SNF2 protein assoicated withnuclear RNA silencing and the spread of a silencing signal between cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 1507-1521.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Taochy C, Gursanscky NR, Cao J, Fletcher SJ, Dressel U, Mitter N, Tucker MR, Koltunow AMG, Bowman JL, Vaucheret H, Carroll BJ(2017) A Genetic Screen for Impaired Systemic RNAi Highlights the Crucial Role of DICER-LIKE 2. Plant Physiol 175: 1424-1437.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang XB, Jovel J, Udomporn P, Wang Y, Wu Q, Li WX, Gasciolli V, Vaucheret H, Ding SW (2011) The 21-nucleotide, but not 22-nucleotide, viral secondary small interfering RNAs direct potent antiviral defence by two cooperative argonautes in Arabidopsisthaliana. Plant Cell 23: 1625-1638.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weiberg A, Wang M, Lin FM, Zhao H, Zhang Z, Kaloshian I, Huang HD, Jin H (2013). Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity byhijacking host RNA interference pathways. Science 342: 118-123.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Winston WM, Molodowitch C, Hunter CP (2002) Systemic RNAi in C. elegans requires the putative transmembrane protein SID-1.Science 295: 2456–2459.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xie Z, Allen E, Wilken A, Carrington JC (2005) DICER-LIKE 4 functions in trans-acting small interfering RNA biogenesis and vegative www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 12984-12989.Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xie Z, Johansen LK, Gustafson AM, Kasschau KD, Lellis AD, Zilberman D, Jacobsen SE, Carrington JC (2004) Genetic and functionaldiversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PLoS Biol 2: E104.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xu G, Sui N, Tang Y, Xie K, Lai Y, Liu Y (2010) One-step, zero-background ligation-independent cloning intron-containing hairpin RNAconstructs for RNAi in plants. New Phytol 187: 240-250.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yelina NE, Smith LM, Jones AM, Patel K, Kelly KA, Baulcombe DC (2010) Putative Arabidopsis THO/TREX mRNA export complex isinvolved in transgene and endogenous siRNA biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 13948-13953.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon April 11, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.