9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 1 What is Measure Q? Measure...
Transcript of 9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 1 What is Measure Q? Measure...
1 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises9/8/2004
What is Measure Q?
Measure Q is a vote on whether to change current zoning to create a Planned Community District that:
Increases building heights from the current maximum of 75 feet to 240 feet - triple the height Increases density from the current maximum of 43 units per acre to 61 units per acre - 47% increase in density Allows over 10 acres of navigable water and wetland bay to be filled. Enables construction of up to 17 towers between 20-23 stories tall.
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 2
Big and Isolated
Extreme height on a small land footprintTriples General Plan height limitsTaller than the tallest Oracle buildingMore skyscrapers of this height than Sacramento or San Jose
Limited accessCurrently only one small access roadNo relief
Proposed Blomquist extension expected to be overburdened when it opens
Inaccessible to transit
Dense1,930 luxury condosMore than 4,000 people
More than 14,000 new car trips PER DAY on already burdened roadsWithin 100 yards of Bair Island Wildlife Refuge
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 3
Inappropriate Development
Contrary to City’s strategic plan for housing
General Plan: Encourage housing downtown
Emphasize proximity to transitEmphasize proximity to services
Downtown PlanInvest in an active and vital city centerCourthouse SquareLibraryTheater district
Redwood City’s General Plan
Residential development should be located only where services and facilities can be provided. (Land Use Policy L-1, page 6-5)
Higher residential densities should be promoted at locations near or within commercial and financial centers, and transportation terminals. (Land Use Policy L-3, page 6-5)
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 4
Views From Bair Island
Future view? Irrevocably changed skyline
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 5
Effects of Measure Q
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) list 88 negative impacts.
Traffic
Water
Environment
Privatize Marinas
27 are Significant and Unmitigatable
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 6
Traffic Impacts
Limited accessWhipple is only freeway on/off rampCongestion on 101, Whipple, Woodside, Veterans, Broadway Difficult transit accessRequired shuttle and buses will be inadequate; half cost paid by SamTrans, not expected to work.
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 7
Water Impact
Redwood City is currently using approx. 1000 a.f. of water more than its SFPUC allocation (12,000 a.f.).
RC cannot guarantee the water supply for this project
Marina Shores Village would use an additional 482 a.f. of water (4% of allocation)
458 a.f for residential use (95% of usage, 3.8% of allocation)
24 a.f. for landscape irrigation (5% of usage, 0.2% of allocation)
Marina Shores $10M is standard ‘tap fee’ for connecting to City services for a development of this size. This is a required payment, not an “investment.”
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 8
Water Supply
Nothing will increase the City’s drinking water.
All water is from Hetch Hetchy through the SF PUC
RC has attempted to purchase additional supply, to no avail.
We are under pressure to get back within the allocation.
Drought or shortage would require immediate 12% cutback without Marina Shores, 15% with Marina Shores. The pro-rata share of cutback would be in addition to this.
EIR Section 10
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 9
Emergency Water Supply
The height of the towers, density of the development and distance from other emergency supplies result in the requirement for on-site emergency water supplies to meet minimum fire safety standards.Emergency supplies would be dedicated for use of Marina Shores and the 2 small existing developments. There would be no excess capacity for other Redwood City residents. (EIR Section 10)
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 10
Recycled Water
Recycled water facility Being built to address existing overuseGoal to recycle 1,600 AF/Yr, slightly more than our current over-use of Hetch Hetchy water.Cost will be greater than $50MPrimary users are industrial sites east of Hwy 101All new construction east of 101 required to include recycled componentIs not planned to serve RC west of 101
Only 5% of Marina Shores water usage is applicable for recycled water
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 11
Parks and Open Space?
City Requirements for parklandGeneral Plan: 1.75 acres per thousand residents
General Plan: expected to be increased to 2.25 a/1000
Precise Plan: 6.8 acres of parks and open space (1.7 a/1000)
Parks and Open Space Inclusions at MSV (p27-29 of Precise Plan)
3.5 acres that is UNDERWATER - the marinas
1.3 acres under the existing power transmission towers
1.5 acres for required hardscape walkways at edges of development
0.5 acres at Point Park
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 12
Parks and Open Space?
EIR: this open space “would not provide any of the typical neighborhood or community park amenities provided at other parks in the city.”
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 13
Redwood City/Marina Shores
Redwood City median income:City-wide annual: $66,748
City-wide Monthly: $5,562
Redwood Shores annual: $100,683
Redwood Shores monthly: $8,390
Requirements at Marina Shores:Low income
Annual income: $56,550
Monthly payment: $1,550
Moderate IncomeAnnual income: $109,800
Monthly payment: $2,768
Redwood City Planning Dept., Sept 2003
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 14
Housing Affordability
Starting Salary RangesFirefighter: $65,016
Librarian: $40,104
Police: $71,184
Nurse (County General): $69,216
Teacher: $37,762
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 15
Intentional Deception
None of developers images show the skyscrapers: the primary characteristic of the developmentThere is no description of the size of the projectLiterature, web site talk about the
“creation of parks and open space” “increased water supply” “traffic improvements will reduce traffic” “affordable housing”
None of it is true.
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 16
Conclusion: Measure Q is a Bad Deal.
It is not a village. The height, density and cumulative impact are inappropriate and intolerable.
It creates traffic congestion, environmental degradation and visual degradation for all area residents.
It will significantly strain the City’s already over-taxed water supply.
It does not provide amenities to Redwood City residents.
It does not offer appropriately priced low and affordable housing.
9/8/2004 Committee Against Measure Q/ People for Housing Not High-rises 17
NO on Measure Q
Developer is asking Redwood City residents to accept a completely out-of-scale development with horrific environmental, traffic and other impacts
Majority of residents recoil from height and density
Vote NO on Measure Q