950150_634379258142497500 (1)

download 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

of 24

Transcript of 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    1/24

    Job EvaluationPrepared by

    Narendra Singh Chaudhary

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    2/24

    Job Evaluation Job evaluation is a systematic process of

    analyzing and evaluation jobs to determine the

    relative worth of each job in an organization. It forms the basis for designing the

    compensation management system in an

    organization. since the compensation

    management and the perceived fairness ofcompensation administration have a big

    influence on employee morale and satisfaction.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    3/24

    According to the Bureau of LaborStatistics (USA), Job evaluation is the

    evaluation or rating of jobs to determinetheir positions in the job hierarchy. theevaluation may be achieved throughassignment of points or use of some

    other systematic method for essential jobrequirements such as skill, experienceand responsibility.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    4/24

    Objectives To determine relative worth of different jobs in

    an organisation and providing the basis for thecompensation management system.

    To determine the position and place of a job inthe organizational hierarchy.

    To clarify the responsibility and authorityassociated with each job.

    To manage internal and external consistency inthe compensation.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    5/24

    To maintain complete and accurate datarelating to job description and job specificationof various jobs.

    To ensure employee satisfaction with respectto the compensation.

    To avoid discrimination of any kind in wageadministration.

    To provide the basis for classification of new orchanged jobs.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    6/24

    Principles of JobEvaluation The job dimensions have to be properly

    selected and should be rated in accordancewith the demands of the job.

    The dimensions selected for the purpose ofrating should be clearly defined to ensure clearunderstanding by the employees.

    The evaluation program should be explained

    and illustrated to the employees at alllevels.The employees as well as thesupervisors should have confidence in thesystem of evaluation.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    7/24

    The employees must be actively involved in the

    evaluation program. This helps develop a

    sense of trust in the whole exercise. Market factors should be taken into

    consideration while evaluating jobs. For

    example, if there is a scarcity of statisticians in

    the job market, this fact has to be given dueimportance while evaluating the job of a

    statisticians.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    8/24

    Process of Job Evaluation Preparation of a Job Evaluation Plan

    Job Analysis

    Job Description & Job Specification

    Selection of job dimensions

    Classification of jobs

    Implementation of the evaluation

    Maintenance

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    9/24

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    10/24

    Techniques of JobEvaluationQuantitative

    Point Rating MethodFactor

    comparison Method

    Decision

    Band Method

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    11/24

    Non-Quantitative

    Ranking MethodJob Classification/

    Job Grading Method

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    12/24

    Ranking Method Ranking is the method in which the jobs

    in an organisation are assessed based

    on the knowledge,skills,effort and otherjob dimensions associated with each job.

    Ranking involves preparation of brief job

    descriptions and assigning ranks to thejobs in accordance with their worth in the

    organization.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    13/24

    Techniques Of Ranking Relative Ranking

    Paired Comparison Ranking

    Single Factor Ranking

    Once the ranking of the jobs is complete,

    a monetary value is attached to each job.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    14/24

    Job Grading In this method of job evaluation, the jobs are

    classified and graded based on theirsignificance and their worth to the organization,

    the jobs at various levels in an organization areplaced under different grades, which areclearly defined. Grades are formulated on thebasis of the nature of the tasks and

    responsibilities of the jobs. For e.g.:-a grademay comprise jobs like Financial Accountants,Management Accountants, Cost Accountants

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    15/24

    Point rating method The point method or the point rating

    method is one of the most widely used

    methods of job evaluation. In thismethod, a quantitative point scale isdeveloped to evaluate the jobs. Thenumber of scales to be used and other

    aspects of implementation aredetermined by the job evaluation analystor the human resource function.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    16/24

    Steps in Point method Determine the job factors or compensable

    Determine the sub factors

    Define the degree statements or profilestatements

    Assign points to factors,subfactors anddegrees ( For e.g. if experience is critical to a

    job, degree I might be 20 points, degree IImight be 60 points, degree III-60 points,degree IV -80 points).

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    17/24

    Preparation of chart

    Applying point system

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    18/24

    Factor comparisonmethod It is based on the principles of point rating and

    ranking.

    Steps involved-

    Determining & defining specific factors(4 to 7)

    Identify key or bench mark jobs

    Comparison and ranking of various factors

    upon their importance Assigning monetary values and adding up to

    pay of the bench mark job and evaluation.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    19/24

    Decision Band Method It is more popular in both public & private firms

    for more than 25 years. It was developed byProf.Emeritus Thomas T.Paterson in 1970s

    and further developed & refined by Ernst &Youngs compensation specialist in clientorganisation.

    The basic premise of DBM is that the value of ajob depends on its decision-making

    requirements. Decision-making is logical andequitable basis for comparing jobs because all

    jobs involved decision-making on all levels.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    20/24

    The DBM distinguishes six levels of

    decision making or decision-bands",

    ranging from the most far reachingdecisions on organizational goals to the

    simplest decisions, such as how fast to

    key-enter data. The DBM job evaluation produces a

    decisionbased structure.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    21/24

    Merits of Job Evaluation It is logical and objective method of ranking

    and grading jobs for the purpose of

    compensation management.

    It helps in preventing & removing discrepancies

    in the wage structure of an organization.

    It helps in maintaining higher worker

    satisfaction level by logical explanation ofissues related to job differentials

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    22/24

    It facilitates the entry of new jobs into the

    organizational wage structure and help in

    appropriate evaluation and pay structure

    fixation accordingly.

    It helps in comparison of organizations wage

    structure with that of competitors and market

    rates. It helps in decisions related to selection,

    transfer and promotion of employees

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    23/24

    Demerits Changes in jobs and its factors can render job

    evaluation techniques outdated and irrelevant.

    It can give rise to employee grievance if not

    properly formulated or implemented. It introduces rigidity into the pay system and

    reduces opportunities for mangers top exercisediscretion.

    It takes long time to implement and mayinvolve formalization of rules leading mismatchb/w financial condition of firm and establishedwage structure.

  • 7/29/2019 950150_634379258142497500 (1)

    24/24