71 Unit Report[1]

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

1/31

SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITSDOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26 X 75) AT PHASE 1B, ON

LOT PT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIMSENTUL,DAERAH SEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL

KHUSUS, FOR MESSRS SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTYSDN. BHD.

CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016

DECLARATION

This Tender Report is prepared by the undersigned for the above project and allreviews made are based on the Tender Documents received only.

MITG GROUP SDN. BHD.

MOHD ADNAN SUHOT

1

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

2/31

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 TITLE OF PROJECT

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS

DOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26 X 75) AT PHASE 1B, ON LOTPT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIM SENTUL,DAERAHSEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL KHUSUS, FOR MESSRSSIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.

CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016

1.2 BRIEF INFORMATION OF TENDER

a) Consultant Pre-Tender Estimate : RM 19,980,108.82

b) Date of Closing of Tender : 24th March 2011

b) Fixed Completion Period of Contract : 52 weeks

c) Tender Validity Period : 120 days

d) Expiry Date of Tender Validity Period: 22nd July 2011

e) Type of Tender : Tender by Invitation/Selective Tenderingfrom Employersapproved list

f) Type of Contract : Bill of Quantities FormPart of the Contract

g) Tender bond : RM 10,000.00

h) Performance Bond : 5% of Contract Sum

i) L.A.D (Mock-up Unit) : RM 500.00/Unit/Day(Whole Works) : RM 10,300.00/Day

2

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

3/31

1.3 CONSULTANTS FOR THE PROJECT:

a)Architect : Visage Architect Sdn. Bhd.

b) Civil Engineer : Ranhill Bersekutu Sdn. Bhd.

c) Structural Engineer : JPI Sdn. Bhd

d) Mechanical and Electrical Engineer : PE Associates Sdn. Bhd

e) Quantity Surveyor : MITG Group Sdn. Bhd.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS

The Works let on this contract are as follows:

a) Preliminaries and General Conditions

b) Anti-termite Chemical Treatment

c) Building Works

d) Infrastructure Works (Provisional Quantities)

e) Mock-up Units

f) Mechanical & Electrical Works

3.0 THE TENDER

The tender is based on Bills of Quantities which form part of the contract inaccordance with the Agreement and Conditions of PAM Contract 2006

Private Edition with Quantities. No adjustment in the tendered sum will beallowed. However, if there are changes in the scope of works ordered by theEmployer, these will be treated as variations and adjustments to the tenderedsum. The tendered rates will be used as a basis for valuation of suchvariations.

3

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

4/31

4.0 CALLING OF TENDER

The tender was based on selective tendering. Fifteen (15) pre-qualifiedtenderers (selection done by the Employer) were invited by the Employer tosubmit tenders for this project.

The documents were made available to tenderers commencing 24 th February2011. Ten (10) tenderers responded to the tender invitation.

All tenderers were required to submit their tenders on the stipulated time viz.,not later than 12 noon on 24th March 2011 at the office of:

Contract Management DepartmentSime Darby Property Berhad

Operation Office,20, Jalan Astaka U8/82,Seksyen U8, Bukit Jelutong,40150 Shah Alam,Selangor Darul Ehsan.

5.0 TENDERS RECEIVED

The tenders were opened at the office of Messrs. Sime Darby Property Berhad(Contract Management Department). All the Ten (10) tenderers that

responded to the invitation, submitted their tenders on or before the stipulateddate and time.

All the tender documents were then reverted to the office of the ConsultingQuantity Surveyor on 24th March 2011. The detailed analysis and tenderevaluation focused on five (5) lowest tenders only as other five (5) tenderersoffer were higher. It is unlikely that the offer will be neither considered foracceptance nor beneficial to the Employer. The tabulation of the tendersreceived arranged in ascending order is depicted in Table 1 of Page 5. (Referalso Schedule of Tender Opening)

There was one (1) no. Addendum issued and all the ten tenderers haveincluded it in their tender.

4

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

5/31

5

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

6/31

Table 1 - Tenders Received in Ascending Order

Fixed CompletionPeriod

Open Completion Period

Code Tenderer Position

TenderSum (RM)

24 MonthDefect

LiabilityPeriod

TenderSum (RM)

with 60MonthDefect

LiabilityPeriod

TenderSum (RM)

24 MonthDefect

LiabilityPeriod

Completion Period(Weeks)

TenderSum (RM)

with 60MonthDefect

LiabilityPeriod

Completion Period(Weeks)

Remarks

6/10PA BUILDERS

SDN BHD1 21,788,000.00 25,668,000.00 23,993,311.21 48 27,873,311.21 48

2/10AL AMBIA SDNBHD

2 22,210,895.91 - --

--

7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE

SDN BHD

3 22,602,103.95 - --

--

8/10 SRI MANSANGSDN BHD

4 23,820,000.00 25,820,000.00 --

--

4/10 IDAMAN IKHLASSDN BHD

5 23,863,048.94 24,113,048.94 --

--

6

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

7/31

Fixed CompletionPeriod

Open Completion Period

Code Tenderer PositionTender

Sum (RM)24 Month

Defect

LiabilityPeriod

TenderSum (RM)

with 60Month

DefectLiabilityPeriod

TenderSum (RM)24 Month

Defect

LiabilityPeriod

Completion Period

(Weeks)

TenderSum (RM)

with 60Month

DefectLiabilityPeriod

Completion Period

(Weeks)

Remarks

10/10JALLCON SDNBHD

6 23,980,000.00 25,880.000.00

3/10 MAKASSAR SDNBHD

7 25,500,000.00 25,800,000.00 25,500,000.00 52 25,800,000.00 52

5/10 TIMUR KAYASDN BHD

8 26,419,690.35 27,619,690.35 - - - -

1/10 AIMACONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD

9 27,574,685.30 28,677,672.7029,523,911.35 65 30,704,867.80 65

9/10 BUMIMETROCONSTRUCTION SDN BHD

10 29,190,073.80 -- - - -

7

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

8/31

Arithmetical checks were carried out on all tenders. Errors were found in all thetenders. The errors were due to mistakes in multiplying, addition and transfer. Theerrors subsequently change the tenderers position. The tenders, the corrected tendersum and their revised position are depicted below.

Table 3 - Corrected Tender Sum due to Arithmetical Error:

8

Code Tenderer Original Tender

Sum( RM )

OriginalPosition

CorrectedTender Sum

( RM )

Arithmetical Check

RevisedPosition

Remarks

Error (RM) %

6/10PA BUILDERSSDN BHD

21,788,000.00 1 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 -0.0049 1

2/10AL AMBIA SDNBHD

22,210,895.91 2 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97 +3.6750 2 Wrong M&Etransfer

7/10 GLOBAL GLOBESDN BHD

22,602,103.95 3 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00 +3.4199 4Wrong M&E

transfer

8/10 SRI MANSANGSDN BHD

23,820,000.00 4 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80 +0.0049 5

4/10 IDAMAN IKHLASSDN BHD

23,863,048.94 5 23,862,985.04 -63.90 -0.0003 6

10/10JALLCON SDNBHD

23,980,000.00 6 23,159,983.00 -820,017.00 -3.4196 3Wrong M&E

transfer

3/10 MAKASSAR SDNBHD

25,500,000.00 7 25,508,996.40 +8,996.40 +0.0353 7

5/10 TIMUR KAYASDN BHD

26,419,690.35 8 26,442,173.35 +22,483.00 +0.0851 8

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

9/31

The Tendered Sum shall be the basis of acceptance of tender and not the CorrectedTotal. Any error found, shall be rationalized prior to signing of Contract.

9

Code Tenderer Original Tender

Sum( RM )

OriginalPosition

CorrectedTender Sum

( RM )

Arithmetical CheckRevisedPosition

Remark

Error (RM) %

1/10AIMACONSTRUCTIONSDN. BHD

27,574,685.30 9 27,577,301.02 +2,615.72 +0.0095 9

9/10BUMIMETROCONSTRUCTIONSDN BHD

29,190,073.80 10 30,314,446.63 +1,124,372.83 +3.8519 10Arithmet

Error Genera

Summa

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

10/31

6.0 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF TENDERS

The tenders were evaluated based on the financial or commercial proposalonly. Since the tender was based on selective tendering, tenderers selectedwere deemed to be capable in carrying out the proposed work to warrantinvitation. Hence, we did not analyse the tenderers capabilities in terms ofexperience and resources.

The criteria of the evaluation in descending order of importance are as follows:

6.1 Tender documents duly filled in and a formal offer made (Sufficiency ofTenders submitted).

6.2 Competitiveness and reasonableness of tender.

6.3 Pricing all sections of the tender documents and Bills of Quantities.

All tender documents are checked to ensure that tenderers had made validand proper offers. A full checklist/analysis is given in the following appendices:

Appendix A - Breakdown of Tender by SectionAppendix B - Breakdown of Building Works per UnitAppendix C (i) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works

(Type A)Appendix C (ii) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works

(Type B)Appendix D - Comparison of Major Rates

Our evaluation was based on comparative analysis between our Pre-Tenderestimate and the Tenderers submission.

7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION

10

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

11/31

7.1 Tenderer 6/10 PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD.

The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements. The tenderer submitted a complete tender.

The Tenderer submitted the lowest offer and the arithmetical error are foundbut the error does not affect the contractors ranking. The tenderers overalloffer is within the acceptable margin of +/- 10%, i.e. 9.05% higher than the

QS estimate.

11

Tender Sum(RM)

CorrectedTender Sum

(RM)

Error OriginalPosition

RevisedPosition

21,788,000.00 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40(-0.0049%)

1 1

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

12/31

12

DescriptionTenderer

(RM)Qs Estimate

Differencewith estimate

PercentageDifference %

Preliminaries 1,109,305.11 920,000.00 +189,305.11 +20.57

BuildingWorks

Type A

Type B

6,954,576.65

7,168,724.24

5,862,369.52

6,050,856.88

+1,092,207.13

+1,117,867.36

+18.63

+18.47

External

Works WithinLot Boundary 131,267.00 135,996.40 -4,699.40 -3.46

Anti TermiteTreatment

49,230.00 61,076.00 -11,846.00 -19.40

Mock Up Unit 20,000.00 10,000.00 +10,000.00 +100.00

Mechanical &ElectricalWorks

1,000,469.00 2,272,000.00 -1,271,531.00 -55.97

ExternalInfrastructure

3,808,062.00 2,964,652.00 +843,410.00 +28.45

Lighting andTelephone

Infrastructure

340,820.00 360,650.02 -19,830.02 -5.50

Prime CostSum &

ProvisionalSum

818,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25

Tender Sum 21,788,000.00 19,980,106.82 +1,807,893.18 +9.05

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

13/31

7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)

7.1 Tenderer 6/10 PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

The pricing for Preliminaries is higher i.e. 20.57% higher than the QSestimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,109,305.11 or 5.60% of the tendersum is considered acceptable.

The overall cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+18.63%) and TypeB (+18.47%) higher than the QS estimate.

The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM80.67 is higherthan the QS estimate which is RM67.95.

The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-

The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works is higher, i.e. 28.45% higher thanthe QS estimate.

The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service- 5.50% lower than the Engineer estimate.

The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is higher, i.e -55.97% lowerthan the Engineer estimate.

Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.

13

Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)

UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc

with QS (Rwith QS (R

QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer

HalfSlab

80 75.00/m 265.00/m265.00/m 6,000.00 21,200.00 71 426,000.00 1,505,200.00 1,079,200.0

AcotecWall

190 55.00/m 74.20/m74.20/m 10,450.00 14,098.00 71 741,950.00 1,000,958.00 259,008.0

TOTAL 1,167,950.00 2,506,158.00 1,338,208.0

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

14/31

7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD.

The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements.

The tenderer submitted the second lowest offer with the arithmetical error of+RM816, 248.97, mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. Their corrected tenderamount is actually higher at RM 23,027,144.88 but the error does not changethe tenderers ranking. The tenderers overall offer i.e. 11.17% higher thanthe QS estimate.

14

Tender Sum(RM)

CorrectedTender Sum

(RM)Error

OriginalPosition

RevisedPosition

22,210,895.91 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97(+3.6750%) 2 2

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

15/31

15

DescriptionTenderer

(RM)Qs Estimate



Preliminaries 1,013,644.00 920,000.00 +93,644.00 +10.18

BuildingWorks

Type A

Type B

6,748,207.50

6,962,028.08

5,862,369.52

6,050,856.88

+885,837.98

+911,171.20

+15.11

+15.06

ExternalWorks WithinLot Boundary

153,909.30 135,996.40 +17,912.90 +13.17


64,981.40 61,076.00 +3,905.40 +6.39

Mock Up Unit 67,288.00 10,000.00 +57,288.00 +572.88

Mechanical &Electrical

Works626,362.00 2,272,000.00 -1,645,638.00 -72.43


4,901,376.83 2,964,652.00 +1,936,724.83 +65.33


Infrastructure

432,475.80 360,650.02 +71,825.78 +19.92

Prime CostSum &

ProvisionalSum

824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00

Tender Sum 22,210,895.91 19,980,106.82 +2,230,789.09 +11.17

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

16/31


7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. 10.18% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,013,644.00 or 4.98% of thetender sum is considered acceptable.

The total cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+15.11%) and Type B(+15.06%)higher than the QS estimate.


16

Item QtyQty

Rate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)

UnitUnit

Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM)DifferenceDifference

with QSwith QS(RM)(RM)


Fwk tosides of

slab188 8.00/m 17.00/m17.00/m 1,504.00 3,196.00 71 106,784.00 226,916.00 120,132.00

Half slab 80 75.00/m 88.80/m88.80/m 6,000.00 7,105.00 71 426,000.00 504,384.00 78,384.00

100mmskirting

16 5.00/m 16.90/m16.90/m 80.00 270.40 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40

175mmriser

23 9.00/m 28.80/m28.80/m 32.80 276.00 71 14,697.00 47,030.40 32,333.40

Nosing 23 5.00/m 26.10/m26.10/m 115.00 600.30 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30

Half bwl 102 28.00/m 41.20/m41.20/m 2,856.00 4,202.20 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40

Acotec wall 190 55.00/m 70.10/m70.10/m 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00

Plaster 98 10.00/m 18.70/m18.70/m 980.00 1,832.60 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60

`TOTAL C/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.50

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

17/31


7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM78.03 is higherthan the QS estimate which is RM67.95.

The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 65.33% higher thanthe QS estimate.

The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service19.92% higher than the Engineer estimate.

The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is very high, i.e -72.43% lowerthan the Engineer Estimate some arithmeticalarithmetical error during transfer to generalsummary.

Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.

17


UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference



Total B/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.5

400mm x400mm

tiles78 47.00/m 80.10/m80.10/m 3,666.00 6,247.80 71 260,286.00 443,593.80 183,307.8

Pegola 4 120.00/no 1,062.60/no1,062.60/no 480.00 4,250.40 71 34,080.00 301,778.40 267,698.4

Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,744.80/no1,744.80/no 800.00 1,744.80 71 56,800.00 123,880.80 67,080.80

TNB 1 800.00/no 1,058.20/no1,058.20/no 800.00 1,058.20 71 56,800.00 75,132.20 18,332.20

Surface

water

drain

900mmwide

83 350.00/m 1,210.00/m1,210.00/m 29,050.00 100,430.00 - - - 71,380.00

750mmwide

23 290.00/m 1.155.00/m1.155.00/m 6,670.00 26,565.00 - - - 19,895.00

600mmwide

195 230.00/m 1,078.00/m1,078.00/m 44,620.00 209,132.00 - - - 164,512.0

450mmwide

53 175.00/m 1,023.00/m1,023.00/m 9,275.00 54,219.00 - - - 44,944.00

Ditto, avgdpth

222 140.00/m 880.00/m880.00/m 31,080.00 195,360.00 - - - 164,280.0

Precastblock drain

1,344 120.00/m 517.00/m517.00/m 161,280.00 694,848.00 - - - 533,568.0

TOTAL 2,285,169.00 4,492,785.70 2,207,616.7

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

18/31

7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD.


The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 13.12% higher than the QS estimate which

is 3

rd

lowest tenderer. There is an error of +RM772,968.00 or +3.4199%mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. The error when corrected changed thecontractors ranking from 3rd to 4th.

18

Tender Sum(RM)

CorrectedTender Sum

(RM)

ErrorOriginalPosition

RevisedPosition

22,602,103.95 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00(+3.4199%)

3 4

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

19/31


7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

19

DescriptionTenderer

(RM) Qs EstimateDifference

with estimatePercentage

Difference %

Preliminaries 630,000.00 920,000.00 -290,000.00 -31.52

BuildingWorks

Type A

Type B

7,190,373.05

7,426,721.40

5,862,369.52

6,050,856.88

+1,328,003.53

+1,375,864.52

+22.65

+22.74


270,990.50 135,996.40 +134,994.10 +99.26


26,615.00 61,076.00 -34,461.00 -56.42

Mock Up Unit 223,000.00 10,000.00 +213,000.00 +2,130.00


Works560,190.00 2,272,000.00 -1,711,810.00 -75.34

External

Infrastructure

4,557,382.00 2,964,652.00 +1,592,730.00 +53.72


Infrastructure393,061.00 360,650.02 +32,410.98 +8.99

Prime CostSum &

ProvisionalSum

806,000.00 800,000.00 +6,000.00 +0.75

Tender Sum 22,602,103.95 19,980,106.82 +2,621,997.13 +13.12

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

20/31



The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. -31.52% lower than the QSestimate. The preliminaries price at RM 630,000.00 or 2.98% of the tendersum is considered low.

The total building works is i.e. Type A (22.65%) and Type B (22.74%) higherthan the QS estimate


20

ItemQtyQty


UnitUnit

Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference

with QS (RMwith QS (RMQS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer

100mmskirting

16 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 80.00 560.00 71 5,680.00 39,760.00 34,080.00

175mmriser

23 9.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 207.00 805.00 71 14,697.00 57,155.00 78,384.00

225mmtread

23 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 276.00 805.00 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40

Nosing 23 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 115.00 805.00 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30

Half bwl 102 28.00/m 36.00/m36.00/m 2,856.00 3,672.00 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40

Acotec wall 190 55.00/m 70.10/m70.10/m 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00

Plaster 98 10.00/m 16.00/m16.00/m 980.00 1,568.00 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60

400mm x400mm tile

78 47.00/m 86.00/m86.00/m 3,666.00 6,708.00 71 260,286.00 476,268.00 215,982.00

Skirting 73 5.00/m 40.00/m40.00/m 365.00 2,920.00 71 25,915.00 207,320.00 181,405.00

UAC 47 32.00/m 70.00/m70.00/m 1,504.00 3.290.00 71 106,784.00 233,590.00 126,806.00

Plasterboard

121 45.00/m 70.00/m70.00/m 5,445.00 8,470.00 71 386,595.00 601,370.00 214,775.00

TOTAL C/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189.00

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

21/31



21

Item QtyQty


UnitUnit

Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc



Total B/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189

Broomfinish

34 5.00/m 45.00/m45.00/m 170.00 1,540.00 71 12.070.00 108,630.00 96,560.0

Pebblewash

8 40.00/m 150.00/m150.00/m 320.00 1,200.00 71 22,720.00 85,200.00 62,480.0

Gate 1 1,000.00/no 2,000.00/no2,000.00/no 1,000.00 2,000.00 71 71,000.00 142,000.00 71,000.0

Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no1,800.00/no 800.00 1800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.0

TNB 1 800.00/no 1,200.00/no1,200.00/no 800.00 1,200.00 71 56,800.00 85,200.00 28,400.0

Pegola 4 120.00/no 500.00/no500.00/no 480.00 2,000.00 71 34,080.00 142,000.00 107,920.

900mmwide drain

83 350.00/m 1,500.00/m1,500.00/m 29,050.00 124,500.00 - - - 95,450.0

750mmwide ditto

23 290.00/m 900.00/m900.00/m 6,670.00 20,700.00 - - - 14,030.0

600mmwide ditto

195 230.00/m 750.00/m750.00/m 44,620.00 145,500.00 - - - 100,880.

450mmwide ditto

53 175.00/m 450.00/m450.00/m 9,275.00 23,850.00 - - - 14,575.0

Ditto, avgdpth exc

1.5222 140.00/m 350.00/m350.00/m 31,080.00 77,700.00 - - - 46,620.0

Precastblock drain

1,344 120.00/m 350.00/m350.00/m 161,280.00 470,400.00 - - - 309,120.

Crusher run 4,306 13.50/m 23.00/m23.00/m 58,131.00 99,038.00 - - - 40,907.0

Conc.Wearing

4,306 15.20/m 24.00/m24.00/m 65,451.20 103,344.00 - - - 37,892.8

Kerb 3.107 30.00/m 78.00/no78.00/no 93,210.00 242,346.00 - - - 149,136.

TOTAL 2,594,261.20 4,909,421.00 2,315,159

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

22/31



The cost per m2 GFA GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM83.73 ishigher than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.



The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -75.34% lowerthan Engineer Estimate and some arithmeticalarithmetical error during transfer to generalsummary.

7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD.


The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 19.22% higher than the QS estimate.There is an error of +RM1,155.80 or +0.0049% mainly due to amount transferto summary. The error when corrected changed the contractors ranking from4th to 5th.

22

Tender Sum(RM)

CorrectedTender Sum

(RM)Error

OriginalPosition

RevisedPosition

23,820,000.00 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80(+0.0049)

4 5

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

23/31

23

DescriptionTenderer

(RM)Qs Estimate



Preliminaries 2,320,502.10 920,000.00 +1,400,502.10 +152.23

BuildingWorks

Type A

Type B

6,904,454.21

7,121,870.60

5,862,369.52

6,050,856.88

+1,042,084.69

+1,071,013.72

+17.78

+17.70


185,862.90 135,996.40 +49,866.50 +36.67


67,076.00 61,076.00 +6,000.00 +9.82

Mock Up Unit 145,110.00 10,000.00 +135,110.00 +1,351.00


Works1,205,221.00 2,272,000.00 -1,066,779.00 -46.95


4,241,352.00 2,964,652.00 +1,276,700.00 +43..06


Infrastructure

442,854.00 360,650.02 +82,203.98 +22.79

Prime CostSum &

ProvisionalSum

824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00

Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,839,891.18 +19.22

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

24/31


7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 152.23% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 2,320,502.10 or 11.22% of thetender sum is considered high.

The total building works is i.e. Type A (17.78%) and Type B (17.70%)higherthan the QS estimate



24



with QS (RMwith QS (RM


Half slab 80 75.00/m 122.00/m122.00/m 6,000.00 9,150.00 71 426,000.00 649,650.00 223,650.00

Half bwl 102 28.00/m 43.00/m43.00/m 2,856.00 4,386.00 71 202,776.00 311,406.00 108,630.00

Plaster 98 10.00/m 16.92/m16.92/m 980.00 1,658.16 71 69,580.00 117,729.36 48,149.36

Broomfinish

34 5.00/m 28.00/m28.00/m 170.00 952.00 71 12,070.00 67,592.00 55,552.00

Pebblewash

8 40.00/m 98.00/m98.00/m 320.00 784.00 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00

Gate 1 1,000.00/no 3,400.00/no3,400.00/no 1,000.00 3,400.00 71 71,000.00 241,400.00 170,400.00


TNB 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no1,800.00/no 800.00 1,800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.00

Pegola 4 120.00/no 990.00/no990.00/no 480.00 3.960.00 71 34,080.00 281,160.00 247,080.00

TOTAL C/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955.36

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

25/31

7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONTD)




The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -46.95% lowerthan Engineer Estimate.


25


UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc



Total B/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955

900mmwide drain

83 350.00/m 695.00/m695.00/m 29,050.00 57,685.00 - - - 28,635.0

750mmwide ditto

23 290.00/m 650.00/m650.00/m 6,670.00 14,950.00 - - - 8,280.0

600mmwide ditto

195 230.00/m 570.00/m570.00/m 44,620.00 110,580.00 - - - 65,960.0

450mmwide ditto

53 175.00/m 583.00/m583.00/m 9,275.00 30,899.00 - - - 21,624.0

Ditto, exc1.5m

222 140.00/m 514.00/m514.00/m 31,080.00 114,108.00 - - - 83,028.0

Precastblock drain

1,344 120.00/m 448.00/m448.00/m 161,280.00 602,112.00 - - - 440,832.

DIsposal 11,961 5.00/m 20.00/m20.00/m 58,131.00 239,220.00 - - - 179,415.

TOTAL 1,293,606.00 3,2193,35.36 1,925,729

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

26/31

7.3 Tenderer 4 /10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD.


The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 19.43% higher than the QS estimate.

26

Tender Sum(RM)

CorrectedTender Sum

(RM)

ErrorOriginalPosition

RevisedPosition

23,863,048.94 23,862,985.04 -63.90(-0.0003)

5 6

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

27/31

27

DescriptionTenderer

(RM)Qs Estimate



Preliminaries 1,300,000.00 920,000.00 +380,000.00 +41.30

BuildingWorks

Type A

Type B

7,271,238.55

7,493,441.32

5,862,369.52

6,050,856.88

+1,408,869.03

+1,442,584.44

+24.03

+23.84


173,514.46 135,996.40 +37,518.06 +27.59


61,340.58 61,076.00 +264.58 +0.43

Mock Up Unit 43,805.53 10,000.00 +33,805.53 +338.06


Works1,243,540.11 2,272,000.00 -1,028,459.89 -45.27


4,629,804.79 2,964,652.00 +1,665,152.79 +56.17

Lighting and

TelephoneInfrastructure

400,204.49 360,650.02 +39,554.47 +10.97

Prime CostSum &

ProvisionalSum

824,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25

Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,882,940.12 +19.43

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

28/31


7.3 Tenderer 4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)

The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 41.30% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,300,000.00 or 5.99% of thetender sum is considered acceptable.

The total building works is i.e. Type A (24.30%) and Type B (23.84%)higherthan the QS estimate



28



with QS (RMwith QS (RM


Half slab 80 75.00/m 154.18/m154.18/m 6,000.00 11,563.50 71 426,000.00 821,008.50 395,008.50

Roof 117 58.93/m 98.55/m98.55/m 7,000.11 11,530.35 71 497,007.81 818,654.85 321,647.04

Half bwl 102 28.00/m 40.73/m40.73/m 2,856.00 4,154.46 71 202,776.00 294,966.66 92,190.66

Plaster 98 10.00/m 29.04/m29.04/m 980.00 2,845.92 71 69,580.00 202,060.32 132,480.32

Pebblewash

8 40.00/m 101.48/m101.48/m 320.00 811.84 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00


TNB 1 800.00/no 1,252.65/no1,252.65/no 800.00 1,252.65 71 56,800.00 88,938.15 32,138.15

Pegola 4 120.00/no 618.37/no618.37/no 480.00 2,473.48 71 34,080.00 175,617.08 141,537.08

TOTAL C/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488.9

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

29/31


29


UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenDifferen

with QS (with QS (


Total B/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488

Precastblock drain

1,344 120.00/m 511.00/m511.00/m 161,280.00 686,784.00 - - - 525,504

2100mm x2100mm

bricksump1 2,600.00/no 3,741.40/no3,741.40/no 2,600.00 3,741.40 - - - 1,141.4

1950mm x1950mm

ditto6 2,300.00/no 3,482.20/no3,482.20/no 13,800.00 20,893.20 - - - 7,093.2

1650mm x1650mm

ditto2 1,600.00/no 2,975.78/no2,975.78/no 3,200.00 5,951.56 - - - 2,751.5

1500mm x1500mm

ditto3 1,100/no 1,880.29/no1,880.29/no 3,300.00 5,640.87 - - - 2,340.8

Ditto exc1.5m but n.e

3.0m29 1,300.00/no 2,734.86/no2,734.86/no 37,700.00 79,310.94 - - - 41,610.

1200mm x1200mm

7 900.00/no 1,540.46/no1,540.46/no 6,300.00 10,783.74 - - - 4,483.2

750mm x750mm

cover slab47 75.00/no 230.43/no230.43/no 3,525,00 10,829.74 - - - 7,304.7

600mm x600mm ditto

170 48.00/no 211.33/no211.33/no 8.160.00 35,926.10 - - - 27,766.

450mm x450mm ditto

170 27.00/no 200.10/no200.10/no 4,590.00 34,017.00 - - - 29,427.

TOTAL 1,610,218.81 3,521,130.79 1,910,911

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

30/31






The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -445.275.27% lower% lowerthan Engineer Estimate.than Engineer Estimate.

8.0 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

30

8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]

31/31

The following are our observation and recommendation:-

1) If time is and essence and the project need to be launched immediately,we recommend the following:-

a) Tender interview to be held to inform the tenderers about theirrates.

b) We proposed tenderer PA Builders to be inform about the ratesfor half slab and Acotec wall and they have to review their ratessince these items caused major difference from our estimate.

c) Tenderer Al-Ambia need to review the infrastructure works to ouracceptable range.

If both above tenderers price can be reduced to an acceptable range,their overall pricing would definitely be within an acceptable price for

award.

2) If time is not critical we recommend to re-tender this phase to get widerprice range because from our observation, the contractor pricing for theworks were not based on market price which we believe due of thefollowing reasons:-

a) The contractors speculate that the price of basic material wouldincrease again in the next 5 or 6 months which will coincide withwork being done on site.

b) Speculative buying of major item such as concrete andreinforcement bar. We strongly believe that the contractor hasmade forward order at a premium price in anticipation of the pricegoing higher whereas in actual fact the price is lower at thecurrent point of time.

71 Unit Report[1]

Documents

Transcript of 71 Unit Report[1]