4.2 Sonic Measurements

download 4.2 Sonic Measurements

of 59

Transcript of 4.2 Sonic Measurements

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    1/59

    Advanced Formation Evaluation

    October 2012

    by Alain Brie

    Sonic Measurements

    Acquisition and Evaluation

    4.2

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    2/59

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    3/59

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    4/59

    3 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Borehole Compensated Measurement

    Making a measurement with two transmitters on top andbottom of the receivers achieves borehole compensation.

    The BHC measurement is the average of the upper andlower transmitter measurements,

    BHC corrects the effect of sonde tilt and boreholeenlargement,

    The T-R spacings of the BHC tool are 3 ft- 5 ft

    2

    LTxUTxBHC

    ttt

    +=

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    5/59

    4 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Long Spacing Sonic

    Short spacing measurements such as the 3 5 ft BHC limitthe depth of investigation and can cause adverse effects onthe measurement.

    In very large boreholes the tool can read the mudtinsteadof the formation,

    In case of alteration (shale swelling) the log can read thealtered zone instead of the virgin formation,

    Increasing the TR Spacing increases the depth ofinvestigation and provides a reliable measurement of theformation,

    The Long Spaced Sonic sonde with TR spacings of 8 10 ft

    and 10 12 ft was designed for this purpose.

    Sh

    allowSection

    IntermediateSection

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    6/59

    5 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Legacy Sonic Tools

    Digital Cartridge

    Array SonicBHC LSS

    Legacy Sonic Tools can be operated with acommon digital cartridge that digitizes sonicwaveforms downhole.

    The BHC sonde has 3 - 5 ft spacing

    The Long Spacing Sonde has 8-10 ft and 10-12ft

    Spacings, The Array Sonic has 3-5 ft, 8-10 ft spacings and an

    array of 8 receivers every 6 in located at 8 ft fromthe upper transmitter.

    All these measurements are monopole.

    LTx

    UTx

    LTx

    UTx

    LTx

    UTx

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    7/59

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    8/59

    7 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Slowness-Time Coherence Computation

    The Slowness Time Coherence techniquescans the waveforms for all possible timesand move-out to find coherent arrivals inthe waveform.

    Coherence is the ratio of coherent energyalong a move-out over the total energy,

    Coherence of 1 is perfect correlation, Low coherence means no correlation.

    The calculated coherence for each timeand slowness value is plotted on the STPlane.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    9/59

    8 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    ST Plane

    TRline

    Each point on the ST plane represents theresult of a coherence computation at a certaintime and move-out.

    Contours a drawn around zones of equalcoherence,

    Low coherences are shown in blue and high

    coherences in red, High coherence peaks indicate a highly

    correlated event propagating at this time andslowness,

    The arrival time of events propagating alongthe borehole should be close to their slownesstimes the TR spacing.

    0 Coherence 1

    Time s

    Slowness

    s/ft

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    10/59

    9 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Field STC Processing Results

    Field STC processing for monopole P&S (DSI SAM-4).

    This display is used to control the quality of theSTC computation.

    Track 3 shows the Slowness coherence projectionoverlaid with the resulting DT logs,

    Low coherences are shown in blue and highcoherences in red,

    Continuous red bands indicate good quality data(good coherence),

    DT logs should follow track red bands,

    Result logs are shown in Track 2,

    Other information is shown in Track 1.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    11/59

    10 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Monopole Borehole Propagation

    Monopole sonic tools measure head waves,

    Not body waves

    The transmitter sends a pressure pulse thatpropagate as compressional and shear body wavesin the formation,

    Body waves induce head waves in the formationwhen they are faster than the mud compressional,

    Sonic receivers record the head waves,

    The shear headwaveonly exists in fast formations

    Other waves propagate in the borehole

    ? The pseudo-Rayleigh wave,

    ? The Stoneley wave,

    ? Normal and leaky modes (borehole arrivals).

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    12/59

    11 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Compressional and Shear Waves

    Consider a pile of disks. If we excite a vibration by knocking

    vertically on the top it propagates down as acompressional wave,

    With a compressional wave particle motionis parallel to the propagation direction,

    If we excite a vibration by knocking the pilelaterally it propagates down as a shearwave,

    With a shear wave particle motion isperpendicular to the propagation direction,

    Compressional

    (extensional)

    Shear

    (flexural)

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    13/59

    12 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Monopole-Dipole Excitation

    In monopole excitation one point source sends a

    pressure pulse in all directions.

    With dipole excitation two point sources side-by-side pulse in opposite phase creating a lateral

    push-pull effect.

    Quadrupole excitation uses four point sources;

    one diagonal pulses in phase opposition with the

    other diagonal.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    14/59

    13 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Dipole Shear Sonic Imager

    DSI Tool String

    The DSI, dipole shear imager tool acquiresboth monopole and dipole measurements.

    Its main features are:

    Two dipole transmitters in perpendiculardirections,

    One monopole transmitter with high and low

    frequency drives, Array of 8 receivers stations with dipole and

    monopole capability,

    Long spacing for reading past altered zones,

    Isolation joint to prevent direct wavetransmission through the tool body.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    15/59

    14 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Electrodynamic Dipole Transmitter

    There are various ways to generate dipole excitation in the borehole.

    The electrodynamic transmitterworks as a loudspeaker, pushing

    the mud laterally,

    The push excites

    the borehole in

    flexion,

    Flexural wave propagates verticallyalong the borehole, while particle

    motion is transverse; it is therefore

    close to a shear wave.

    Propagation

    DisplacementElectrodynamic Transmitter Flexural Wave

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    16/59

    15 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    DSI Upper Dipole (SAM-2)

    Dipole DSI Waveforms

    Flexural

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    17/59

    16 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Flexural Wave Dispersion

    Flexural Dispersion Curves in 8 in. Borehole

    Inflection Point

    The flexural wave is linked to the wellboreand varies with frequency. This is calledfrequency dispersion.

    At low frequency the flexural slownessreaches the formation shear slowness,

    At higher frequencies the flexural slowness

    increases, The maximum amplitude of the flexural is

    at the inflection point,

    Dispersive STC processing accounts fordispersion and outputs formation sheardirectly.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    18/59

    17 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Dipole Processing Quality Control Display

    Quality control plot for dipole shearprocessing..

    ST Projection with log tracking results ispresented in Track 3,

    Coherence in Track 1,

    Arrival frequency and filter band in Track 2,

    Filtered waveform and reconstructed sheararrival time in Track 4.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    19/59

    18 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Sonic Scanner Tool

    TheSonic Scannertool is the latest development in Schlumberger sonic technology. The

    SScan benefits from the experience acquired with the DSI-1 and DSI-2 tools and offers

    superior dipole as well as monopole measurement capabilities.

    The Sonic Scanner is modular, in the basic configuration it replaces all prior monopole

    tools: BHC, LSS and AS.

    In the full configuration it replaces the DSI and adds new capabilities for anisotropic and

    inhomogeneous formation analysis.

    The Sonic Scanner tool was designed by computer modeling, it has predictable acoustics

    allowing full characterization of its response and frequency behavior for high fidelity answers.

    S i S B i C fi i

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    20/59

    19 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Sonic Scanner Basic Configuration

    Minimum Service Sonde

    Basic Configuration

    Monopole only tool to replace old technology sondes.

    True BHC with upper and lower monopole transmitters.

    Large 13 receivers array provide robust measurement and

    multiple spacings from 1 to 7 ft.

    Cement bond log (CBL) and variable density log (VDL)

    measurement Improved behind casing monopole measurement with

    CBL/VDL simultaneous acquisition

    Measurements

    Monopole P&S

    Cement Evaluation Altered zone evaluation

    S i S F ll C fi ti

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    21/59

    20 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Sonic Scanner Full Configuration

    Full Service

    Configuration

    Basic configuration measurements plus:

    Long-spacing 10.8 to 16.8 ft monopole with MF transmitter.

    Low frequency monopole Stoneley measurement.

    Wideband dipole measurements from X and Y transmitters.

    All modes including BCR acquired all the time.

    Improved behind casing dipole measurement with CBL/VDL

    simultaneous acquisition.

    Measurements

    Dipole X&Y and anisotropy

    Monopole P&S and Stoneley

    Cement Evaluation

    Stress Eval

    Altered zone

    S i S W f

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    22/59

    21 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Monopole Far (MF)

    Sonic Scanner Waveforms

    High quality, high consistency waveforms; Very wideband dipole waveforms for high quality answers, especially in cased hole and new

    applications (formation alteration and stress evaluation).

    Dipole (XD)

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    23/59

    Alt ti E l ti F Di l Di i

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    24/59

    23 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Alteration Evaluation From Dipole Dispersion

    Chemical or mechanical alteration of the formationnear the wellbore increases the dispersion of thedipole flexural wave.

    Evaluation of dispersion provides:

    More accurate formation shear,

    Information on formation weaknesses and potentialfailure,

    Formation stress information.

    Dipole Anisotropy Radial Profiling

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    25/59

    24 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Dipole Anisotropy Radial Profiling

    Systematic acquisition of XD and YDdipole waveforms provides shear slownessin the fast and slow directions in case ofanisotropy.

    More accurate shear determination forformation evaluation,

    Dispersion analysis further provides stress

    information,

    This is essential information for rockmechanics evaluation.

    Elastic Waves Velocities

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    26/59

    25 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Elastic Waves Velocities

    GKVp

    += 34

    Compressional Shear

    GVs=

    GKV

    t

    p +

    ==3

    4

    8.3048.304

    GV

    t

    s

    s

    8.3048.304==

    Units: KandG in GPa in g/cc Vp ansVs in km/s t andts ins/ft

    Sound waves are elastic waves that propagate in the ground as vibrations.

    In an isotropic, homogeneous (HI) medium only two moduli and thedensity are necessaryto determine the velocity of the compressional and shear body waves.

    K is the bulk modulus, G is the shear modulus and r is the density

    ElasticWavesAnalogywithSpring Mass Systems

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    27/59

    26 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Elastic Waves Analogy with Spring-Mass Systems

    Propagation of a vibration in asystem of spring and masses.

    Displacement of masses.

    Density

    Moduli

    Elastic MediumSpring-Mass System

    Spring Stiffness

    Mass

    Velocity

    Slowness

    Elastic Moduli

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    28/59

    27 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Elastic moduli represent the resistance of amaterial to deformation.

    Bulk modulus is the resistance to compression

    Shear modulus is the resistance to distortion

    Elastic Moduli

    cK=

    sG=

    Compression

    Shear

    Elastic Moduli

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    29/59

    28 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Young Modulus and Poissons ratio are oftenused in rock lab and rock mechanics.

    Young Modulus is the resistance to uniaxialcompression (as in a press)

    Poissons ratio characterizes lateral expansion asthe sample is compressed

    1

    3

    1

    2

    ==

    1

    uE=

    Uniaxial Compression

    Elastic Moduli

    PoissonsRatio is linked toVp/Vs

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    30/59

    29 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Poissons ratio is linked to the Vp/Vs ratio.

    The physical limits of Poissons Ratio are:

    Poissons Ratio and Vp/Vs are linked as:

    From which the physical limits for Vp/Vs(isotropic material) are:

    Poissons Ratio is linked to Vp/Vs

    5.00

    VsVp/2

    1/

    2/

    2

    12

    2

    =VsVp

    VsVp

    soft

    Elastic Moduli Equivalence

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    31/59

    30 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Elastic Moduli Equivalence

    -Poissons Ratio

    -Lame Constant

    -

    -

    E

    G

    K

    -Youngs Modulus

    Shear Modulus

    Bulk Modulus

    K, G E, ,

    K

    K

    3

    9

    +

    )3(2

    23

    +

    K

    K

    ++ )23(

    )(2

    +

    3

    23 K)21)(1(

    +E

    )21(3 E

    )1(2 +E

    32+

    Two elastic constants are sufficient to describe elastic properties of a HI medium

    (Homogeneous Isotropic),

    Young modulus and Poissons ratio are used in rock mechanics,

    The Lame constants and are used in theoretical physics.

    DynamicElasticModuli

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    32/59

    31 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Dynamic Elastic Moduli

    Factorsof InfluenceonSonicSlowness

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    33/59

    32 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Porosity

    Lithology (mineralogy) including clay content

    Pore fluid

    Pore shapes

    Micro structure Stress (pressure) and compaction

    Factors of Influence on Sonic Slowness

    Sizes of pores and grains have no influence (Sonic wavelength is much larger)

    Equations that do not account for all effects are approximate and limited,

    Most equations only account for Porosity and Lithology effects,

    Elastic Moduli are needed to account for fluid effect (GassmannEquation).

    WyllieSonicPorosity

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    34/59

    33 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Wyllie Sonic Porosity

    In 1950 MrWyllie proposed a simple time-average response equationbased on a

    correlation of laboratory measurements to linktand porosity:

    mf

    m

    S tt

    tt

    =

    mf

    m

    S tt

    tt

    Cp

    =

    1

    In unconsolidated sands the Wyllie Porosity is larger than true porosity. A

    compaction factor (multiplier) is added:

    Cp: compaction factor is 1 in well consolidated sands

    up to 2 in loose sands.

    mf ttt += ).1(.

    TheWyllie sonic porosity is this obtained as:

    ( ) mf

    tCptCpt

    += ..1..

    SonicPorosityEquations

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    35/59

    34 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Sonic Porosity Equations

    Raymer-Hunt-Gardner Equation - RHG

    mf ttt

    +

    =

    2)1(1

    )1(11

    =

    sttm

    )(1

    t

    tt

    s

    m

    =

    s = 1.45 in sandstones1.60 in carbonates.

    Velocity Equation - VelC

    and

    with

    Sonic Porosity Chart Por-3

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    36/59

    35 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Sonic Porosity Chart Por 3

    Porosity Evaluation from Sonic (Por-3)

    V, ft/s t, s/ftWater 5300189

    26000 38.5

    Dolomite 23000 43.5

    Limestone 21000 47.6

    Hard Sands19500 51.3Soft Sands 18000 55.5

    HardSa

    ndston

    es

    SoftS

    andsto

    nes

    Lim

    esto

    ne

    Do

    lomite

    UncompactedSandstones

    Mineral End Points

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    37/59

    36 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    e a d o s

    1.5378.255.52.65Soft sand

    1.8492502.98Anhydr ite

    1.73116.5672.16Salt1.878.543.52.87Dolomite

    1.8688.547.52.71Limestone

    1.598851.52.65Hard sand

    Vp/VsmtsmtmmEnd points

    End points for Wyllie Equation

    These are slightly different from mineral values.

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    38/59

    Sonic Porosity Equations In Sandstones

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    39/59

    38 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    y q

    Slowness in Unconsolidated Sandstones

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    40/59

    39 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Compressional slowness in shallow unconsolidated sands

    Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

    Sonic Porosity Equations In Carbonates

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    41/59

    40 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Crossplot compressional t-porosity in a water-bearing limestone

    y q

    SSPI =

    62 s/ft

    15 PU

    10.5 PU

    t= 62 s/ft, Sonic = 10.5 PUND = 15 PU

    Secondary Porosity Index

    SPI = 15 10.5 = 4.5 PU

    Porosity Evaluation from Slowness

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    42/59

    41 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Porosity Evaluation Recommendations

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    43/59

    42 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Well compacted sands

    Unconsolidated sands

    Carbonates

    Metamorphic and igneous rocks

    Both Wyllie and VelCare adequate

    Moderate unconsolidation: VelC

    Substantial unconsolidation: calibrated Wyllie with Cp

    VelCis a good average

    Can use a dual porosity model : intergranular / isolated pores

    Wyllie often gives good results for unfracturedblock

    Vp/Vs Crossplot in Shaly Sands -Effect of Gas

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    44/59

    43 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Original Crossplot for Gas Sands.

    Brie et al. -SPE 1995

    Vp/Vs vst crossplot

    Updated Vp/Vs Crossplot for Sands and Carbonates

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    45/59

    44 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    p p p

    Vp/Vs vst crossplot

    UpdatedVp/Vs Crossplot

    Includes:

    - Effect of water salinity in sands,

    - Water and gas trends in carbonates

    Brie, SPWLA-2001

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    46/59

    Live Oil Slowness

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    47/59

    46 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Effect of Live Oil on Vp/Vs

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    48/59

    47 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Live oil has an effect ont andVp/Vs.Although intuitively oil is liquid like water, it ismore compressible.

    At high GOR the effect of live oil on sonictandVp/Vs is comparable to that of gas.

    Sands with live oil, gravity 35 API, at 200Fand 5000 psi

    For different GOR

    Evaluation of Gas Effect on Sonic Slowness

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    49/59

    48 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Elastic physics govern sound propagation in materials and rocks.To understand the

    effect of the pore fluid, especially that of gas, on sound velocity and slowness we haveto go back to the elastic properties of the rock. We have seen that sound velocity are

    linked to elastic moduli and density with the relations:

    23

    42 sbpb VVK = 2

    sbVG =

    Where K is the bulk modulus,G the shear modulus andb is the rock density.

    and

    and

    GKVp

    += 3

    4

    GVs=

    Starting from the logs K and G can be obtained with the expressions:

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    50/59

    Partially Saturated Rocks

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    51/59

    50 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    In partially saturated rocks the effective fluid bulk modulus,

    Kfe, must be entered in the Gassmannequation.Geophysicist useWoods Law , a compliance law to evaluate

    Kfe.

    However Woods Law is too abrupt at sonic frequency where

    a more gradual change is observed.

    A realistic approximation is provided by thepower mixing

    law:

    The exponente is usually around 5.Note that when saturation is less than 50% the fluid bulk

    modulus is practically that of gas.Fluid Mixing Laws (low pressure)

    Kfe

    = Kmf

    Kg( )Sxo e + Kg

    0 100Liquid Saturation %

    0

    2.5

    PoreFlu

    idModulus

    GPa

    Woods

    Law

    Powe

    rMix

    ingLaw

    g

    xo

    mf

    xo

    fe K

    S

    K

    S

    K

    += 11

    Effect of Gas on Vp/Vs

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    52/59

    51 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    ( ) ( ) 3

    422

    +== G

    K

    mVs

    Vp

    dryVs

    Vp dry

    In shaly sands theVp/Vs of the dry rock is constant andequal to theVp/Vs of the minerals; 1.5 to 1.58(depending on additional minerals).

    This expression provides a link between dry bulk

    modulusKdry and the shear modulusG, obtained fromtshear.

    Kdry can then be used to estimate the hydrocarbon

    volume fromt, ort at different saturation conditions(fluid substitution).

    Effect of Gas ont Slowness

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    53/59

    52 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Light hydrocarbon effect is large in

    porous, unconsolidated formations.

    The effect of gas on compressionalt issmall to negligible in low porosity, compact

    formations.

    Vp/Vs Crossplot in Tight Gas Sands -Algeria

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    54/59

    53 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Although the porosity is very low, the

    effect of gas on Vp/Vs is visible in tight

    sands with porosities of 10 PU or less.

    Vp/Vs Crossplot in Low Porosity Oil Sand

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    55/59

    54 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Although the effect is small, the effect of live oil on

    Vp/Vs is visible in tight sands with porosities of 6 to11 PU.

    A quicklookmethod can be used to detect oil

    bearing intervals in the field.

    A polynomial correlation is adjusted to fit the Wet

    Sand line on theVp/Vs crossplot

    The wett can then be calculated fromtshear.

    Live Oil properties:

    41 deg API1301 cuft/bbl260F

    4500 psi

    Chardacet al. SPE-2003

    432.... sssswet tetdtctbat ++++=

    In the example shown: a = -0.8482

    b = 0.7665

    c = -1.450 10-3

    d = 1.391 10-6

    e = -5.364 10-10

    t Overlay for HC Detection in Low Porosity Sands

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    56/59

    55 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    The wett calculated fromtshear. with the polynomial

    calculation is drawn with the measuredtlog

    A separation betweentlog andtwet indicate the

    presence of light hydrocarbon in the formation.

    There is good agreement with the subsequent ELAN

    evaluation.

    Chardacet al. SPE-2003

    Vp/Vs Crossplot in Limestone

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    57/59

    56 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Comparison of model curves with data

    from a clean limestone with some gasintervals.

    Wet Vp/Vs varies little and does not

    depend on spherical porosity fraction,

    Dry (gas bearing) Vp/Vs decreases with

    porosity and with decreasing spherical

    porosity fraction.

    Generalized DryVp/Vs for Complex Lithology

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    58/59

    57 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    In shaly sandsVp/Vsdry is constant around 1.53, but in carbonates it changes with porosity and

    spherical pores fraction. A generalized equation forVp/Vsdry is given by the expression:

    )9.01()53.1/(1.3/)/( spfVsVpVsVpVsVp mmdry =

    Vp/Vsm :Vp/Vs of the minerals

    (solids),

    spf: Fraction of spherical

    pores (molds or vugs) inthe porosity

    Vp/Vsm The generalizedVp/Vsdry allows us to

    evaluate the hydrocarbon effect and

    do fluid substitution on the sonic logs

    in all lithologies.

    Sonic Applications

  • 8/12/2019 4.2 Sonic Measurements

    59/59

    58 Advanced Formation EvaluationAlain Brie 2012

    Seismic

    Time Depth curveSynthetic seismogram

    AVO/AVA calibration

    Anisotropy

    Cased Hole

    Cement Bond Evaluation

    Rock Mechanics

    Pore pressure

    Stress orientation and magnitude

    Hydro-FracdesignWell bore stability evaluation

    Sanding prediction

    Petrophysics

    Porosity-Lithology (especially in CH)Gas detection

    Fractured reservoir evaluation

    Permeability

    Sonic Imaging